ReportWire

Tag: Marjorie Taylor Greene

  • Republicans Explain Why They Support An Election Denier As House Speaker

    Republicans Explain Why They Support An Election Denier As House Speaker

    [ad_1]

    Newly elected House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana was a vocal supporter of Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. The Onion asked House Republicans why they unanimously selected an election denier as their leader, and this is what they said.

    Rep. ​Ron Estes (R-KS)

    Image for article titled Republicans Explain Why They Support An Election Denier As House Speaker

    “Our two-party system of government works best when one party accepts election results and the other doesn’t.”

    Rep. George Santos (R-NY)

    Rep. George Santos (R-NY)

    Image for article titled Republicans Explain Why They Support An Election Denier As House Speaker

    “Lord knows I’ve been asking my colleagues to overlook some shit.”

    Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA)

    Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA)

    Image for article titled Republicans Explain Why They Support An Election Denier As House Speaker

    “Why would I abandon the strategy that got me this far?”

    Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX)

    Image for article titled Republicans Explain Why They Support An Election Denier As House Speaker

    “As the representative of a grossly gerrymandered district, I kind of forgot elections were a thing.”

    Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX)

    Image for article titled Republicans Explain Why They Support An Election Denier As House Speaker

    “It seems like he never recovered from his parents’ divorce, so I thought the speakership might cheer him up.”

    Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA)

    Image for article titled Republicans Explain Why They Support An Election Denier As House Speaker

    “That’s not fair. A lot of my colleagues voted for me because of how much I hate gays.”

    Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY)

    Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY)

    Image for article titled Republicans Explain Why They Support An Election Denier As House Speaker

    “If America didn’t want us empowering election deniers they would have voted the right way and not forced our hand.”

    Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA)

    Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA)

    Image for article titled Republicans Explain Why They Support An Election Denier As House Speaker

    “Because I’m going to be raking in seven figures lobbying for Wal-Mart by next year so who gives a fuck.”

    Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ)

    Image for article titled Republicans Explain Why They Support An Election Denier As House Speaker

    “Anything’s better than that cuck Paul Gosar taking charge.”

    Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH)

    Image for article titled Republicans Explain Why They Support An Election Denier As House Speaker

    “He said I could use the speaker’s office when he goes home for the night.”

    Rep. Greg Pence (R-IN)

    Image for article titled Republicans Explain Why They Support An Election Denier As House Speaker

    “He had the little ‘R’ next to his name.”

    Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO)

    Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO)

    Image for article titled Republicans Explain Why They Support An Election Denier As House Speaker

    “How are we supposed to deny the results of the next election if we don’t have a speaker?”

    Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA)

    Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA)

    Image for article titled Republicans Explain Why They Support An Election Denier As House Speaker

    “My entire existence is centered around not making Donald Trump mad.”

    Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC)

    Image for article titled Republicans Explain Why They Support An Election Denier As House Speaker

    “We need to make Mr. Trump feel good. I mean, look at him: He’s mad all the time. Like, all the time! Don’t you just want to do something nice for a big ol’ grinch like that?”

    Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-NC)

    Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-NC)

    Image for article titled Republicans Explain Why They Support An Election Denier As House Speaker

    “The beautiful thing about elections is that they’re subjective, like a work of art. They’re not determined by who had the most votes, but by which candidate spoke most eloquently to your heart.”

    Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA)

    Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA)

    Image for article titled Republicans Explain Why They Support An Election Denier As House Speaker

    “At the end of the day, we all just want what’s best for our wealthiest constituents.”

    Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL)

    Image for article titled Republicans Explain Why They Support An Election Denier As House Speaker

    “Because we’re laying groundwork to steal the next election. Was that not clear?”

    You’ve Made It This Far…

    You’ve Made It This Far…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Speakership: Gym Jordan’s Major Fail – Bill Tope, Humor Times

    Speakership: Gym Jordan’s Major Fail – Bill Tope, Humor Times

    [ad_1]

    Rep. Jim Jordan fails to gain House Speakership, as the Republican sh*t show rambles on. Rep. Jim Jordan (R. OH) failed in his benighted quest for Speakership of … Read more

    Thanks for reading. Subscribe to our monthly Humor Times magazine here, available worldwide, in print or digital format. Read a Free Sample of the magazine online here, and order a Free Trial (3 issues) here!

    [ad_2]

    Bill Tope

    Source link

  • Kevin McCarthy Got What He Wanted

    Kevin McCarthy Got What He Wanted

    [ad_1]

    “I made history, didn’t I?” Kevin McCarthy was saying Tuesday night, a few hours after he in fact did, by becoming the first speaker of the House to ever be ousted from the job. History comes at you fast—and then it hurtles on. By yesterday morning, the race to replace him was fully in motion, even as the wooden Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy sign still hung outside his old office.

    Washington loves a death watch, which is what McCarthy’s speakership provided from its first wee hours. He always had a strong short-timer aura about him. The gavel looked like a toy hammer in McCarthy’s hands, the way he held it up to show all of his friends when he was elected. He essentially gave his tormentors the weapon of his own demise: the ability of a single member of his conference to execute a “motion to vacate” at any time. Tuesday, as it turned out, is when the hammer fell: day 269 of Kevin held hostage.

    McCarthy tried to put on a brave face during Tuesday’s roll call. But he mostly looked dazed as the bad votes came in, sitting cross-legged and staring at the ground through the back-and-forth of floor speeches, some in support, some in derision.

    “This Republican majority has exceeded all expectations,” asserted Elise Stefanik of New York, cueing up an easy rejoinder from McCarthy’s chief scourge, Matt Gaetz of Florida: “If this House of Representatives has exceeded all expectations, then we definitely need higher expectations!”

    Garret Graves of Louisiana hailed McCarthy as “the greatest speaker in modern history,” which brought an immediate hail of laughter from the minority side. Otherwise, Democrats were content to say little and follow the James Carville credo of “When your opponent is drowning, throw the son of a bitch an anvil.”

    Mike Garcia of California urged his fellow Republicans to be “the no-drama option for America,” which did not seem to be going well. Andy Biggs of Arizona concluded, “This body is entrenched in a suboptimal path.”

    By 5 p.m., that path had led to a 216–210 vote against McCarthy—and the shortest tenure of a House speaker since Michael C. Kerr of Indiana died of tuberculosis, in 1876.

    How should history remember McCarthy’s speakership? Besides briefly? McCarthy was never much of an ideological warrior, a firebrand, or a big-ideas or verdict-of-history guy. He tended to scoff at suggestions of higher powers or lofty purposes.

    Insomuch as McCarthy had any animating principle at all, it was always fully consistent with the prevailing local religion: self-perpetuation. Doing whatever was necessary to hang on for another day. Making whatever alliances he needed to. Could McCarthy be transactional at times? Well, yes, and welcome to Washington.

    The tricky part is, if you’re constantly trying to placate an unruly coalition, it’s hard to know who your allies are, or when new enemies might reveal themselves. That became more apparent with every “yea” vote to oust McCarthy—Ken Buck of Colorado, Nancy Mace of South Carolina. At various points, McCarthy had considered those Republicans to be “friends.” And “you can never have too many friends,” McCarthy was always telling people. In the end, he could have used more.

    “Kevin is a friend,” Marjorie Taylor Greene was saying outside the Capitol before Tuesday’s vote. She turned out to be steadfast. Reporters surrounded Greene like she was an old sage. “Matt is my friend,” Greene also said, referring to Gaetz. George Santos walked by behind the MTG press scrum, and three of the Greene reporters trailed after him. Lauren Boebert—whom Greene had once called a “little bitch” on the House floor (not a friend!)—followed Santos. Boebert wound up supporting McCarthy, sort of. “No, for now,” she said when her name came up in the voice vote.

    McCarthy always tried to convey the impression that he was having fun in his job, and was aggressively unbothered by critics who dismissed him as a lightweight backslapper, in contrast to his predecessors, Paul Ryan the “policy” guy and John Boehner the “institutionalist.” Back in April 2021, I was sitting with McCarthy, then the House minority leader, at an ice-cream parlor in his hometown of Bakersfield, California. He used to come in here—a place called Dewar’s—for Monday-night milkshakes after his high-school football practices. He kept saying hello to people he recognized and posing for photos with old friends who stopped by our table. At one point that night, McCarthy turned to me and indicated that being someone people wanted to meet was one of the main rewards of his job.

    He was always something of a political fanboy at heart, hitting Super Bowls and Hollywood awards parties. He liked meeting celebrities. He showed me pictures on his phone of himself with Kobe Bryant, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Donald Trump. We had just eaten dinner at an Italian restaurant, Frugatti’s, which featured a signature dish named in his honor—Kevin’s Chicken Parmesan Pizza. (He had ordered a pasta bolognese.)

    “I know the day I leave this job, the day I am not the leader anymore, people are not going to laugh at my jokes,” McCarthy told me then. “They’re not going to be excited to see me, and I know that.” This was something to savor, for as long as it lasted. And that basically became the game: take as many pictures and gather as many keepsakes as he could to prove the trip was real.

    “Keep dancing” became a favorite McCarthy mantra during his abbreviated time with the speaker’s gavel—as in, keep dancing out of the way of whatever “existential threat” to his authority came along next. McCarthy would contort himself in whatever direction was called for: promise this to get through the debt-ceiling fight, finesse that to keep the government open, zig with the zealots, zag with the moderates. Renege on deals, if need be; throw some bones; do an impeachment; order more pizza.

    “Tonight, I want to talk directly to the American people,” McCarthy said on the morning of January 7. After being debased through 15 rounds of votes, he could finally deliver his “victory” speech as the newly (barely) elected speaker of the House. As a practical matter, it was after 1:15 a.m., and the American people were asleep. Everything about McCarthy’s big moment felt like an overgrown kid playacting. There he was with a souvenir hammer, after near-fisticuffs broke out between two of the crankier kids at the sleepover.

    McCarthy would grab whatever sliver of a bully pulpit he could manage. “I never thought we’d get up here,” he said as he began his late-night acceptance speech. Immediately, everyone wondered how long he could possibly stay. And how it would end. This seemed to include McCarthy himself. “It just reminds me of what my father always told me,” he said. “It’s not how you start. It’s how you finish.”

    McCarthy had moved into the speaker’s chambers a few days earlier, before it was officially his to move into. Why wait? He took a picture with his freshly engraved nameplate on the door. He invited his lieutenants over to check out his new office. Not bad for a kid from Bakersfield! He ordered more pizza. And Five Guys. Dancing requires fuel.

    But throughout his tenure, McCarthy carried himself with a kind of desperate edge, which his critics sensed and held against him. “We need a speaker who will fight for something, anything, besides just staying or becoming speaker,” Bob Good of Virginia said in a floor speech on Tuesday.

    This was late in the afternoon, when everyone still expected McCarthy to keep fighting. His supporters viewed his defeat as temporary. Gaetz stepped out onto the Capitol steps and was quickly engulfed by a scrum of boom mics, light poles, and onrushing reporters. Back inside, McCarthy grabbed the last word on the crazy spectacle.

    “Judge me by my enemies,” the now–former speaker said, maybe trying to sound defiant.

    [ad_2]

    Mark Leibovich

    Source link

  • House Dem Spots 1 Very Awkward Problem In GOP Plan To Make Trump Next Speaker

    House Dem Spots 1 Very Awkward Problem In GOP Plan To Make Trump Next Speaker

    [ad_1]

    Some far-right Republican members of the House say they want Donald Trump to become the next speaker after Kevin McCarthy’s stunning ouster on Tuesday threw the body into chaos.

    GOP Reps. Troy Nehls (Tex.), Greg Steube (Fla.) and Marjorie Taylor-Greene (Ga.) all tweeted in support of Trump becoming speaker, while Jim Jordan (Ohio) told Fox News that if Trump wants to be speaker “that’s fine, too.”

    Fox News host Sean Hannity claimed Trump “might be open” to the idea.

    There is no rule saying the speaker must be a member of the House, although every speaker so far has been.

    But there’s a big problem with the GOP plan to make Trump the first non-member to wield the gavel: Their own rules.

    Rep. Sean Casten (D-Il.) gave his Republican colleagues a reminder of Rule 26, which was adopted in January and states that any GOP leader indicted of a felony with a potential prison sentence of 2 years or more needs to step aside:

    Trump has been indicted on 91 felony charges, many of which carry potential sentences far above 2 years.

    By late Wednesday, “Rule 26” was trending on X, formerly known as Twitter.

    That’s not the only kink in the plan.

    House speaker is a labor-intensive job. Trump, on the other hand, is better known for spending as much time as he can playing golf. During his four-year presidency, Trump spent nearly 300 days on the golf course, as the former president’s critics noted on X:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Twitter Users Raise A Stink After Marjorie Taylor Greene Calls Biden An ‘Old Fart’

    Twitter Users Raise A Stink After Marjorie Taylor Greene Calls Biden An ‘Old Fart’

    [ad_1]

    Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) called Joe Biden an “old fart” on Friday, but the insult whiffed with many social media users.

    On Friday, the president announced the creation of the Office of Gun Violence Prevention within the White House and later tweeted that “it’s time to again ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.”

    He added, “If members of Congress refuse to act, then we need to elect new members of Congress who will act.”

    That post apparently had Greene seeing red and she responded by tweeting back, “Whatever you old fart. We are electing a new President. Turning 45 into 47.”

    Greene may have thought the “old fart” comment was a truth bomb, but many users of X, formerly known as Twitter, raised a stink, especially since she’s been griping recently about the lack of “society’s standards that set etiquette and respect for our institutions.”

    As a result, she was thoroughly mocked.

    Greene has been harping on civility for everyone else but her for a while now.

    On Monday, after she criticized Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman for wearing a hoodie on the Senate floor, he pointed out that there are other forms of decorum. He reminded her of when she displayed nude images of Hunter Biden during a House hearing.

    Back in May, Greene found out how much her Democratic colleagues respect her desire for decorum when they raucously laughed at her after she told them, “Members are reminded to abide by decorum of the House,” she said, only to spark raucous laughter.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • John Fetterman Dings Marjorie Taylor Greene Over Dick Pic Stunt

    John Fetterman Dings Marjorie Taylor Greene Over Dick Pic Stunt

    [ad_1]

    Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) gave Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) a blunt reminder of her own recent past after she attacked his fashion.

    Greene, a conspiracy theorist and close ally of House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), said it was “disgraceful” that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) had tweaked the chamber’s informal dress code to allow senators to dress as they choose.

    Fetterman, known for his hoodies and other informal attire, is the most prominent beneficiary of the change.

    But Republicans are up in arms over the move, especially Greene, who said “dress code is one of society’s standards that set etiquette and respect for our institutions.”

    Given Greene’s own etiquette-defying history ― including a speech at a white nationalist event last year ― her critics were quick to point out her hypocrisy.

    And on Monday, Fetterman fired back on Twitter, reminding Greene of the time she displayed nude images of Hunter Biden during a House hearing.

    “Thankfully, the nation’s lower chamber lives by a higher code of conduct: displaying ding-a-ling pics in public hearings,” he wrote on X (formerly Twitter):

    Fetterman’s fashion has been a common target for Republican lawmakers.

    Just last week, Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) took a dig at his clothing, calling his shirt a muumuu and taunting him for wearing pants that were “not exclusively elastic.”

    Fetterman fired back with a reminder that the House had failed to pass any spending bills, sending the country on the path to a government shutdown.

    “Instead of crying about how I dress, how about you get your shit together and do your job, bud?” he wrote on X.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Demanded ‘Etiquette And Respect’ And You Know What Happened

    Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Demanded ‘Etiquette And Respect’ And You Know What Happened

    [ad_1]

    Far-right Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) drew criticism on Sunday with her pearl-clutching response to a report that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) had changed the chamber’s informal dress code.

    The move would allow Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) to wear his casual-style clothes on the Senate floor.

    “The Senate no longer encoding a dress code for Senators to appease Fetterman is disgraceful,” wrote Greene.

    “Dress code is one of society’s standards that set etiquette and respect for our institutions,” she ranted. “Stop lowering the bar.”

    The comment about “etiquette and respect” from the conspiracy theory-promoting, climate change-denying, insult-hurling, far-right congresswoman who screamed at President Joe Biden during his State of the Union address and showed nude images of the president’s son during a hearing was too much for people on X, formerly Twitter.

    “Among many many other things, you showed hunter biden’s penis in a house hearing so please spare us the self-righteous bullshit,” replied Adam Jentleson, Fetterman’s chief of staff.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘A Clue!’ Exclaims Kevin McCarthy After Finding Footprints That Match Biden’s Shoes

    ‘A Clue!’ Exclaims Kevin McCarthy After Finding Footprints That Match Biden’s Shoes

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON—Crouching down with a large magnifying glass to his eye, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy reportedly exclaimed, “A clue!” Friday after finding footprints on the House floor matching President Joe Biden’s shoes. “I say, this footprint appears to be identical to the ones found in the Oval Office, leading me to deduce they can only belong to one man,” said McCarthy, donning a houndstooth deerstalker hat and motioning to his sidekick to follow closely behind as he traced the footprints into the shadows of the U.S. Capitol. “Look there, my good man, the interloper has led us to the statuary but then appears to have disappeared into the gardens. We may need to fetch the bloodhound lest the trail turn cold. I say, Gaetz, I have a hunch that pursuing this lead will have us wrapping up this impeachment inquiry in no time at all.” At press time, a candle-holding McCarthy let out a scream after he and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene bumped into one another while both inching backwards through a dark and mysterious Capitol hallway.

     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz Have an Embarrassing Fight Over Whose Idea It Was to Impeach Joe Biden

    Marjorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz Have an Embarrassing Fight Over Whose Idea It Was to Impeach Joe Biden

    [ad_1]

    Earlier today, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy announced that Republicans will move forward with an official impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden, despite the embarrassing fact that, as House Freedom Caucus member Ken Buck told MSNBC on Sunday, they haven’t uncovered a single piece of evidence “linking President Biden to a high crime or misdemeanor.” Also deeply embarrassing? The tantrum Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene is now having over not getting the credit she thinks she deserves for calling to impeach Biden first.

    Greene—who commemorated 9/11 one day earlier by calling the president’s policies “traitorous” and suggesting states should secede—was apparently triggered by a post from Congressman Matt Gaetz, who wrote, “When @SpeakerMcCarthy makes his announcement in moments, remember that as I pushed him for weeks, [Fox News host Brian Kilmeade] said I was: ‘Speaking into the wind’ on impeachment. Turns out, the wind may be listening!”

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    That didn’t sit right with Greene, who has been absurdly calling for Biden’s impeachment since he took office in 2021—and she needed to make sure everyone knew that. Taking to the platform formerly known as Twitter, she responded: “Correction my friend. I introduced articles of impeachment against Joe Biden for his corrupt business dealings in Ukraine & China while he was Vice President on his very first day in office. You wouldn’t cosponsor those and I had to drag you kicking and screaming to get you to cosponsor my articles on the border. Who’s really been making the push?”

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Earlier in the day, Greene claimed that “launching an Impeachment Inquiry into Joe Biden isn’t a tall order” and that the GOP Oversight Committee has supposedly “uncovered mountains of evidence of crimes and corruption committed by the Biden family.” (To date, the committee has not shared said evidence with the public, which may be because, in the words of Greene’s colleague Buck, it “doesn’t exist right now.”) Shortly before McCarthy’s announcement, Ian Sams, the White House spokesman for oversight and investigations, wrote on X: “McCarthy is being told by Marjorie Taylor Greene to do impeachment, or else she’ll shut down the government. Opening impeachment despite zero evidence of wrongdoing by POTUS is simply red meat for the extreme rightwing so they can keep baselessly attacking him. They admit it.”

    In other impeachment news, Politico reports that, unsurprisingly, Donald Trump is working behind the scenes with Republicans to impeach his likely 2024 competition. According to the outlet, the ex-president “has been speaking weekly with House GOP conference chair Elise Stefanik, who was the first member of Republican leadership to come out in support of impeachment,” and the two reportedly chatted shortly after McCarthy announced the inquiry today. The former guy also had dinner with Greene on Sunday night at his Bedminster golf club, where “the topic of impeachment was discussed,” per the outlet. Last month on Truth Social, in a post all but admitting the impeachment push was solely about retribution, Trump wrote: “Either IMPEACH the BUM, or fade into OBLIVION. THEY DID IT TO US.”

    If you would like to receive the Levin Report in your inbox daily, click here to subscribe.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • In Nightmare Fuel No One Asked for, Marjorie Taylor Greene and Kari Lake Are Reportedly Duking It Out to Become Trump’s VP

    In Nightmare Fuel No One Asked for, Marjorie Taylor Greene and Kari Lake Are Reportedly Duking It Out to Become Trump’s VP

    [ad_1]

    At some point in the near future, Donald Trump is going to have to pick a 2024 running mate and would-be VP, and while we now know that this specific job includes responsibilities like “being okay with the boss calling you a pussy,” “rolling with the punches when the boss’s supporters threaten to hang you,” and “understanding that, from time to time, the boss will blame you for his insurrections,” there are, somehow, still people who actually want it. Badly!

    Rolling Stone reports that conservative nightmares Marjorie Taylor Greene and Kari Lake are currently in a “death race” to be named Trump‘s 2024 VP, a job that we again must emphasize involves working for a guy who thinks nothing of siccing his blood-thirsty followers on individuals he’s mad at. (That is, of course, if he’s the GOP nominee, which very much looks like will be the case). While the women have kept it civil in public, the outlet reports, “behind the scenes, the two view one another with intense distrust and disdain, each seeing the other as direct competition for Trump’s political affections,” according to several people familiar with the matter. Viewing Lake as a direct threat for the gig, Greene has reportedly “gone beyond simple attempts to raise her own profile in the ongoing Trump veepstakes,” and has recently taken to “trash-talking” the failed Arizona gubernatorial candidate to “to others in the MAGA elite, political circles, and conservative media, multiple.” (Last spring, People revealed that in an effort to win the VP nod, Lake had practically moved into Mar-Lago, and was spending more time there than Melania Trump, a.k.a. the ex-president’s wife.)

    Hilariously—if the notion of an accused criminal returning to power with a VP whose grasp on reality is nonexistent is funny—Greene’s biggest complaint about Lake is said to be that she is not “serious” enough to be a heartbeat away from the presidency. (Obviously, that’s one hundred percent true, but it’s also true that an individual best known for promoting QAnon, harassing a school shooting survivor, and the whole Jewish space lasers business should also not be allowed anywhere near the halls of power.) “MTG thinks [Lake] is a scammer and not even a conservative,” a source told Rolling Stone, adding that the Georgia congresswoman has said that “Lake is a grifter and [is] trying to keep riding Trump’s coattails because she lost [in Arizona], so she’s cozying up on the election-integrity messaging.” Said another person familiar with Greene’s point of view, Greene “thinks it’s complete nonsense that anyone would think it’s a good idea for Donald Trump to consider [Kari] for VP.”

    As for whether or not either woman has any chance whatsoever of being named Trump’s running mate, that is unclear as this time. According to Rolling Stone, the ex-president has “made a point of repeatedly commending each of them for their frequent efforts—both publicly and behind the scenes with lawmakers and grassroots activists—to aid his 2024 campaign.” On the other hand, numerous people close to Trump have put the odds of either Greene or Lake being added to the ticket at slim to none, with several boldly declaring that even Trump is not “stupid enough” to make one of them his running mate. (In July, the Daily Beast reported that Lake’s strategy of being in Trump’s face as much as possible had backfired, and that the he’d become “less enthusiastic” about her, having decided she was too much of a “spotlight hound.”)

    But don’t go thinking that a second Trump administration would be a Greene-free affair, because even if Rep. Gazpacho Police (R-Crazy Town) doesn’t make it to the ticket, it seems there’ll still be a place for her somewhere:

    >Trump has suggested to close associates that Greene would be “great” in some position of seniority in his potential second administration, whether in the cabinet, at an agency, or in the West Wing at his side. The ex-president even floated the idea of installing her at the Justice Department; this confused some in Trump’s orbit because, as a source bluntly put it: “I don’t think she’s a lawyer.”

    As for Lake, it’s possible she might take herself out of the running, having suggested she may run for Senate.

    If you would like to receive the Levin Report in your inbox daily, click here to subscribe.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene: Impeach Biden Now or I’ll Shut Down the Government

    Marjorie Taylor Greene: Impeach Biden Now or I’ll Shut Down the Government

    [ad_1]

    Marjorie Taylor Greene says she’s drawing a line in the sand. Though her ally, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, is trying to rally the conference around a short-term funding measure to avoid a government shutdown this fall, the far-right Georgia Republican told constituents Thursday that she wouldn’t sign on to any such measure—unless he formally moves to impeach President Joe Biden.

    “I will not vote to fund the government unless we have passed an impeachment inquiry” on Biden,” Greene told a town hall audience, adding that she would not support a continuing resolution that includes funding for the “Biden regime’s weaponized government,” COVID vaccines, or Ukraine’s defense against the Russian invasion. “I will be happy to work with all of my colleagues, I will work with the speaker of the House, I will work with everyone,” she said. “But I will not fund those things.”

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    The ultimatum—which builds on a list of absurd demands other House Republican extremists have made ahead of the funding fight—could make the prospect of a shutdown more likely. For all their cable news innuendo, Republicans have not appeared to find any actual evidence of wrongdoing by the president, and it’s not clear there’s enough support in the full conference for a formal impeachment push. “I don’t think it’s there at the moment,” as New York Republican Mike Lawler told reporters recently. On the other hand, McCarthy appears to be increasingly open to the idea, telling Fox News last week that impeachment seems a “natural step forward” for House Republicans—and even using the promise of an inquiry to try to dampen opposition to his government funding plan.

    “If we shut down,” he said, “all the government shuts it down—investigation and everything else.”

    In other words, if Greene’s protest picks up steam, the funding of the government may very well depend on an explicitly political impeachment—one rooted in lies, conjecture, and of course a desire to protect and avenge Donald Trump. “Comparing this to past impeachments isn’t apples to apples or even apples to oranges; it’s apples to elephants,” as a White House aide told NBC News Friday of the administration’s preparations to respond to the expected inquiry. “Never in modern history has an impeachment been based on no evidence whatsoever.”

    That obviously isn’t an issue for Greene, who first filed articles of impeachment against Biden the day after he took office: The point of all this isn’t to hold the president accountable for actual wrongdoing, after all; it’s about cheapening the impeachment process that twice ensnared Trump—first over his attempt to extort Ukraine, then over the insurrection he incited in a last-ditch effort to remain in power. McCarthy has spent most of his speakership trying to delay this exercise in political nihilism. But now, he is coming to a fork in the road. “The House Republicans responsible for keeping the government open already made a promise to the American public about government funding,” White House spokesman Andrew Bates said in a statement Thursday, following Greene’s remarks. “It would be a shame for them to break their word and fail the country because they caved to the hardcore fringe of their party in prioritizing a baseless impeachment stunt over high stakes needs Americans care about deeply.”

    [ad_2]

    Eric Lutz

    Source link

  • Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Says Mitch McConnell Is Not ‘Fit For Office’

    Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Says Mitch McConnell Is Not ‘Fit For Office’

    [ad_1]

    Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) said that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) is not “fit for office” after McConnell on Wednesday appeared to freeze in front of reporters when asked if he would run for reelection in 2026.

    “Severe aging health issues and/or mental health incompetence in our nation’s leaders MUST be addressed,” Greene wrote Wednesday on X, formerly Twitter.

    This is the second time in recent months that McConnell’s health has worried the public and fellow lawmakers. In July, the 81-year-old froze mid-sentence while speaking to reporters, prompting his team to escort him away. McConnell later said he was “fine” and an aide said that he felt lightheaded and needed to step away.

    The two incidents come after he suffered a concussion and rib fracture in March after falling at a dinner event.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene Cries ‘Racist’ Over Not-Racist Debate Exchange

    Marjorie Taylor Greene Cries ‘Racist’ Over Not-Racist Debate Exchange

    [ad_1]

    Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the Georgia Republican who once spoke at a white nationalist conference, took issue with what she deemed to be a “racist” incident at Wednesday’s GOP primary debate.

    “I was pretty disgusted at Chris Christie and his racist comment towards Vivek Ramaswamy,” Greene said during a discussion on Right Side Broadcasting Network at the event, hosted by Fox News, in Milwaukee. “He compared him with Obama. I honestly thought that was pretty racist.”

    Christie, the former governor of New Jersey, called out his rival on stage after the entrepreneur basically recycled a line used by former President Barack Obama.

    “Who the heck is this skinny guy with a funny last name and what the heck is he doing in the middle of this debate stage?” Ramaswamy had said.

    Obama famously called himself a “a skinny kid with a funny name who believes that America has a place for him, too,” during the 2004 Democratic National Convention keynote speech when he was running for the U.S. Senate.

    Christie pointed that out, saying: “I’ve had enough already tonight of a guy who sounds like ChatGPT.”

    “The last person in one of these debates … who stood in the middle of the stage and said, ‘What’s a skinny guy with an odd last name doing up here?’ was Barack Obama,” Christie said. “And I’m afraid we’re dealing with the same type of amateur.”

    Greene attended the debate as a surrogate for Donald Trump, who was absent.

    Ramaswamy has been loudly pro-Trump on the campaign trail and repeatedly defended him at Wednesday’s event. Christie, on the other hand, was the former president’s most vocal critic on the stage.

    Greene apparently wasn’t fazed about actual racism and bigotry when she spoke last year at the America First Political Action Conference in Orlando, Florida, organized by prominent white nationalist Nick Fuentes; when she told two Muslim colleagues in Congress to “go back to the Middle East”; when she falsely claimed Obama is a Muslim and “opened up our borders to an invasion by Muslims,”; and when she told supporters that undocumented immigrants are “replacing your jobs and replacing your kids in school and, coming from all over the world, they’re also replacing your culture.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Conservatives Explain Why They Love ‘Rich Men North Of Richmond’ Singer Oliver Anthony

    Conservatives Explain Why They Love ‘Rich Men North Of Richmond’ Singer Oliver Anthony

    [ad_1]

    Country singer Oliver Anthony made waves across the music industry when his song “Rich Men North Of Richmond,” which contains lyrics that appear to be veiled allusions to QAnon conspiracy theories, recently went viral. The Onion asked right-wingers why they love Anthony’s controversial song so much, and this is what they said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene Says Trump Prosecutor Should Be Going After Rapists. Ahem.

    Marjorie Taylor Greene Says Trump Prosecutor Should Be Going After Rapists. Ahem.

    [ad_1]

    But to many observers on social media, that’s exactly what the Fulton County district attorney was doing.

    Writer E. Jean Carroll accused Trump of raping her in a Manhattan department store in a lawsuit, and a jury found him liable for sexual abuse. A judge this month rejected Trump’s defamation counterclaim, saying Carroll’s insistence in a post-verdict TV interview that Trump raped her was “substantially true.”

    “Mr. Trump did in fact ’rape’ Ms. Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contacts outside of the New York Penal Law,” Judge Lewis Kaplan wrote in tossing Trump’s suit.

    All of this seemed to have escaped Trump diehard Greene as she blathered on about the fourth indictment against Trump ― the second for plotting to overturn President Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election.

    Greene criticized the crime rate of Atlanta (which is in Fulton County) and said the state of Georgia was rife with predators and traffickers.

    “Fani Willis should be going after murderers, rapists, car theft,” she said on Newsmax.

    MSNBC’s Mehdi Hasan led the charge to rebut Greene, joking: “Who wants to tell her?”

    “She is,” media personality and former prosecutor Ron Filipkowski wrote of Willis.

    Check out other responses:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • House Judiciary Committee expected to launch inquiry into Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis | CNN Politics

    House Judiciary Committee expected to launch inquiry into Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    The Republican-led House Judiciary Committee is expected to open a congressional investigation into Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis as soon as Thursday, a source tells CNN – the same day former President Donald Trump is slated to surrender at the county jail after being charged for participating in schemes to meddle with Georgia’s 2020 election results.

    The committee is expected to ask Willis whether she was coordinating with the Justice Department, which has indicted Trump twice in two separate cases, or used federal dollars to complete her investigation that culminated in the fourth indictment of Trump, the source added. The anticipated questions from Republicans about whether Willis used federal funding in her state-level investigation mirrors the same line of inquiry that Republicans used to probe Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who indicted Trump in New York for falsifying business records to cover up an alleged hush money scheme.

    Meanwhile, Georgia Republicans could launch their own state-level investigation into Willis’ probe, according to GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, who has spoken to top officials in the state about a potential probe. She has also been pushing for a congressional-led inquiry into Willis, who has previously dismissed GOP accusations accusing her of being partisan and consistently defended her investigation.

    “I’m going to be talking to (House Judiciary Chair) Jim Jordan, (House Oversight Chair) Jamie Comer, and I’d like to also ask (Speaker) Kevin McCarthy his thoughts on looking at doing an investigation if there is a collaboration or conspiracy of any kind between the Department of Justice and Jack Smith’s special counsel’s office with the state DA’s,” Greene told CNN. “So, I think that could be a place of oversight.”

    It all amounts to a familiar playbook for House Republicans, who have been quick to try to use their congressional majority – which includes the ability to launch investigations, issue subpoenas and restrict funding – to defend the former president and offer up some counter programming amid his mounting legal battles. But they’ve also run into some resistance in their extraordinary efforts to intervene in ongoing criminal matters, while there are questions about what jurisdiction they have over state-level investigations.

    As their target list on behalf of Trump grows, House Republicans are also cranking up the heat on their own investigations into the Biden family.

    Just this week, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy vowed to move ahead with an impeachment inquiry of President Joe Biden after the House returns from August recess if the Biden administration does not turn over more documents and information related to the Republican led investigations related to Hunter Biden – the strongest sign yet that House Republicans are poised to launch an impeachment inquiry of the president.

    A McCarthy spokesperson did not respond to CNN’s request for comment to elaborate on the speaker’s remark that opening an impeachment inquiry hinged on whether committees received the “bank statements, the credit card statements and other” documents they were asking for.

    House Oversight chair James Comer has subpoenaed six banks for information regarding specific Biden family business associates, received testimony from Hunter Biden’s associates and reviewed hundreds of suspicious activity reports related to the Biden family at the Treasury Department. The Kentucky Republican has not yet subpoenaed bank records from Biden family members themselves. He boasted in June on Fox Business that “every subpoena that I have signed as chairman of the House Oversight Committee over the last five months, we’ve gotten 100% of what we’ve requested, whether it’s with the FBI, or with banks, or with Treasury.”

    The House Judiciary chair, GOP Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, just subpoenaed four individuals involved in the Hunter Biden criminal probe and has requested a number of documents and interviews pertaining to special counsel David Weiss’ ongoing criminal investigation.

    There is still some skepticism among more moderate Republicans, however, about whether they should be trying to intervene in ongoing investigations and whether an impeachment inquiry is warranted.

    Behind the scenes, members of the House Judiciary panel, who would help oversee an impeachment inquiry, have recently been discussing how all signs are pointing towards the House launching one in short order.

    “We had even some of our more moderate members saying that the oversight wasn’t serious if the next step wasn’t an impeachment inquiry,” Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida, a top Trump surrogate and Judiciary panel member, told CNN about a recent committee call. “There was great interest among my Judiciary colleagues to really include and involve everyone in the conference. There’s a real desire to get everyone on board and go through the evidence with those who might remain skeptical.”

    Trump’s allies have called for Congress to expunge Trump’s two previous impeachments, a move that has sparked pushback by many even among House Republicans.

    Greene, who spoke with McCarthy on Tuesday, said she doesn’t think the votes are there yet for expunging Trump’s previous two impeachments, even as the former president continues to promote the idea on Truth Social. But she said, “I think the impeachment inquiry looks very, very good.”

    “He is spending the recess talking about it constantly,” Greene added of McCarthy. “I really feel strongly that that’s something that’s going to happen.”

    Even before Trump’s indictment in Fulton County his congressional allies were laying the groundwork to take aim at Willis and broader election laws.

    GOP Rep. Russell Fry of South Carolina introduced a longshot bill earlier this year to give current and former presidents and vice presidents the ability to move their civil or criminal cases from a state court to a federal court as the investigation in Fulton County was ongoing. Fry introduced the bill shortly after Trump was indicted by Bragg on more than 30 counts related to business fraud.

    The Judiciary Committee, which has jurisdiction over Fry’s bill, is examining ways to move this bill forward and schedule a markup, two sources familiar with the process told CNN.

    Fry, who tweeted shortly after the Fulton County indictment that the outcome underscores the need for his bill, said in a statement to CNN, “these rogue prosecutors shouldn’t be able to wield unwarranted power and target our nation’s top leaders for their political agendas.”

    Separately, the House Committee on Administration has been working on a conservative election integrity package that Republicans are calling “transformative,” but Democrats frame as “designed to appease extremist election deniers.”

    Republicans argue the bill gives states the tools to strengthen voter integrity, implement selection reforms in Washington, DC, and protects conservatives’ political speech. Democrats, meanwhile, contest the legislation attacks the freedom to vote, burdens election workers and creates less transparency in elections.

    One of the nine hearings that Republicans held on the bill, which recently passed out of committee and is ready for a floor vote in the House, was held last month in Atlanta.

    The top Democrat on the panel, Rep. Joe Morelle of New York, accused Republicans of playing defense for Trump through the field hearing, which Republicans have said was not the case.

    “One might ask, why are we here in Georgia? The answer is simple. We’re here because in 2020, Joe Biden won and Donald Trump lost. There was no widespread voter fraud in Georgia, there were no suitcases full of fake ballots, no voting machines changed any votes. In fact, we know of only one possible crime that took place, because it was recorded on tape,” Morelle said.

    Democrats on the House Oversight Committee have also accused their Republican counterparts of coinciding the release of key interview transcripts with days consumed by Trump’s legal woes, according to a recent memo released by Democratic committee staff.

    An Oversight Committee spokesperson said in a statement to CNN, “to be clear, there was absolutely no connection between the transcript releases and anything else covered in the news.”

    The types of moves Republicans made on behalf of Trump in the wake of the Fulton County indictment are not necessarily new. After Trump was indicted by the Department of Justice in two separate cases, Greene called for Congress to defund Smith’s office, who is overseeing the two federal indictment cases, and House Freedom Caucus members issued a statement Monday that they would not support even a short-term government spending bill that does not address what they see as the weaponization of the Department of Justice.

    Gaetz recently introduced a resolution to censure and condemn the judge presiding over Trump’s federal indictment in the 2020 election subversion case.

    Despite the partisan back and forth, Trump’s Capitol Hill allies remain unfazed. But, not all Republicans have bought into the Trump defensive strategy.

    “Nobody is paying attention other than the people who are obsessed with Trump,” a senior Republican lawmaker told CNN.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Biden Shares New Campaign Ad With Marjorie Taylor Greene As Star Endorser

    Biden Shares New Campaign Ad With Marjorie Taylor Greene As Star Endorser

    [ad_1]

    President Joe Biden released a new campaign ad on Tuesday featuring the words of one of his harshest critics in Congress: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.).

    The short video highlights Greene’s comments last weekend at the conservative Turning Point Action student activist conference in Florida. The lawmaker used her address to blast the White House for trying to “finish what FDR started,” referring to Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s policies to address rural poverty, education and medical care.

    The video was accompanied by a simple missive from the president: “I approve this message.”

    “Joe Biden had the largest public investment in social infrastructure and environmental programs that is actually finishing what FDR started, that LBJ expanded on, and Joe Biden is attempting to complete,” Greene said during her speech. “Programs to address education, medical care, urban problems, rural poverty, transportation, Medicare, Medicaid, labor unions, and he still is working on it.”

    The White House took aim at Greene earlier this week, saying the lawmaker had caught the Biden administration trying to “make life easier for hardworking families.”

    “We agree with Marjorie Taylor Greene, which is not something that we say very often,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters on Monday. “We agree with her all around, all around on this. We are opposed to rural poverty, and the president is committed to protect Medicare and committed to protect Social Security.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough Mocks Marjorie Taylor Greene With Iconic Sitcom Moment

    MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough Mocks Marjorie Taylor Greene With Iconic Sitcom Moment

    [ad_1]

    MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough on Monday asked if extremist Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s (R-Ga.) silence over her reported ouster from the far-right House Freedom Caucus was “like a scene out of ‘Seinfeld.’”

    Scarborough referred to the second-season moment, in an episode titled “The Revenge,” in which George Costanza (played by Jason Alexander) rage-quits his job with a rant at his boss. He later realizes he’s messed up and has no new role to go to, returns to work and just pretends it didn’t happen.

    “Is she Costanza-ing the House Freedom Caucus? I don’t know,” MSNBC politics reporter Ali Vitali admitted to Scarborough in a video shared online by Mediaite.

    Greene’s removal from the group reportedly followed an argument with Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) on the House floor. But the Georgia congresswoman has not acknowledged her reported departure.

    It has been “one of the most vexing stories over the last two weeks of recess,” said Vitali. “It’s like taking advantage of the fact that not everyone is in the same Capitol complex to stop something from happening that eventually is still going to happen, which is being kicked out of the House Freedom Caucus.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene Sh-t-Talking Lauren Boebert Apparently a Bridge Too Far for Freedom Caucus

    Marjorie Taylor Greene Sh-t-Talking Lauren Boebert Apparently a Bridge Too Far for Freedom Caucus

    [ad_1]

    You can spread conspiracy theories and lies in the Freedom Caucus. You can pal around with white nationalists. You can even foment political violence. But call Lauren Boebert a “little bitch,” as Marjorie Taylor Greene did last month, and you’ve gone a step too far, apparently.

    Greene was booted from the hard-right group in a vote ahead of the Independence Day holiday, Representative Andy Harris confirmed to Politico Thursday—“an appropriate action,” Harris told the outlet, given her comments about Boebert. “I think the way she referred to a fellow member was probably not the way we expect our members to refer to other fellow, especially female, members,” Harris said, noting that the Georgia firebrand became the first member to ever be expelled from the group because of “some of the things she’s done.”

    Those “things” likely go beyond her confrontation last month with Boebert, whom she accused of having “copied” her articles of impeachment against President Joe Biden. Greene, a staunch Donald Trump ally, came into Congress as the face of an extremist insurgency, but has since worked her way through the bloodstream of the GOP to the heart of Kevin McCarthy’s inner circle. Her ascent should, in theory, be a feather in the cap of the MAGA right—a symbol of its influence over the party establishment. Instead, her proximity to McCarthy—the subject of their scorn and distrust—has seemed to create some distance between her and her own faction, which has staged several high-profile rebellions to assert their power over leaders in the narrow House majority.

    Greene, for her part, has rejected the Freedom Caucus’s mutinous approach, even as she continues to share in their depraved brand of politics: “I’m just as conservative as they are,” she said in June. But “there’s conservative fantasies,” she continued, “and there’s reality.”

    The congresswoman—who has suggested that the Parkland and Sandy Hook school shootings were staged; supported the QAnon conspiracy theory; and floated the idea that California wildfires in 2018 might have been started by space lasers owned by the Rothschilds—is hardly a spokesperson for “reality,” of course. But her distant flirtation with the concept appears to be straining her relationship with some of her fellow travelers on the far-right, who have taken their litmus test to a new extreme. Not only do their members have to embrace the MAGA madness; they have to embrace their hardline approach, as well.

    “I think all of that mattered,” Harris said, referring to Greene’s alliance with McCarthy and her vote for the debt ceiling deal he carved out with Biden, which has provided no shortage of grist for the far-right outrage mill. But “I think the straw that broke the camel’s back,” Harris added, “was publicly saying things about another member in terms that no one should.”

    Harris’s comments aside, there remains some uncertainty over Greene’s current standing in the Freedom Caucus. As NBC News reports, Freedom Caucus Chair Scott Perry has not yet spoken to her about it, and one member suggested to the outlet that she has “not responded to” several attempts at outreach, perhaps because “she knew she was being dismissed from the Freedom Caucus, and a little bit like someone refusing service from a legal standpoint…if I’m not served, then maybe it doesn’t take effect.” The group expects to deal with the situation when lawmakers return from recess next week, sources told NBC News. Until then, they told the outlet, the whole thing remains a “mess.”

    [ad_2]

    Eric Lutz

    Source link

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene Ripped For ‘Encouraging’ Violence In ‘Outrageous’ New Image

    Marjorie Taylor Greene Ripped For ‘Encouraging’ Violence In ‘Outrageous’ New Image

    [ad_1]

    A former sergeant with the U.S. Capitol Police tore into Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) for posting a new image of herself arriving at the building with a massive gun.

    “Finding this outrageous and dangerous is an understatement,” wrote former U.S. Capitol Police Sgt. Aquilino Gonell, who left the force as a result of injuries and trauma sustained during the Jan. 6 attack.

    He called out her “delusional obsession with political violence.”

    Greene, a close ally of House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), is a conspiracy theorist who last year spoke at a white nationalist event. The new image ― a promo shot for her “MTG Battleground” podcast ― was shared by Patriot Takes, which monitors right-wing media.

    “She is no longer flirting with violence,” Gonell wrote as he retweeted the image. “She is encouraging it…again.”

    Greene has not only downplayed the violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6, but insisted that the assault would’ve been successful if she had been in charge.

    “I want to tell you something. If Steve Bannon and I had organized that, we would have won,” she said at a far-right event in December, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center. “Not to mention, we would’ve been armed.”

    The new image ― showing her arriving at the Capitol armed ― was roundly condemned on Twitter:

    [ad_2]

    Source link