ReportWire

Tag: Marilyn Monroe

  • Lana Del Rey’s “Candy Necklace” Video Deliberately Blurs the Line Between Fantasy and Reality With Its Meta Framework

    Lana Del Rey’s “Candy Necklace” Video Deliberately Blurs the Line Between Fantasy and Reality With Its Meta Framework

    [ad_1]

    When an artist reaches a certain point in their career, self-reference can’t be avoided. In Lana Del Rey’s case, that tends to become quite a quagmire in terms of how most of her music and aesthetics were already referencing other people to begin with. This includes not only “paying homage” visually to the “classics” of Americana and 50s-era icons like Marilyn Monroe, James Dean and Elvis Presley, but also more esoteric fare, including instrumentation and intonation from Eleni Vitali’s “Dromoi Pou Agapisa” for “Video Games” (though some have tried to push back on that theory). Then, of course, there’s her signature of randomly throwing in the lyrics of musical heroes like David Bowie (“Ground control to Major Tom” in “Terrence Loves You”), Patsy Cline (“I fall to pieces” in “Cherry”), Bob Dylan (“Like a rolling stone” in “Off to the Races” and “Lay-lady-lay” in “Tomorrow Never Came”), Beach Boys (“Don’t worry baby” in “Lust for Life” and “California dreamin’” on “Fuck It I Love You”) and Leonard Cohen (“That’s how the light gets in” in “Kintsugi”), to name a few. And let’s not forget her tendency toward weaving literary quotes into much of her work, to boot (which is much easier to sneak in and have people assume is one’s own because nobody’s all that well-read anymore, are they?). Many of which take from Nabokov’s evermore problematic tome, Lolita. Hence, the Del Rey songs “Lolita,” “Carmen” and “Off to the Races.” There’s also Walt Whitman in “Body Electric,” T. S. Eliot in “Burnt Norton” and Oscar Wilde in “Gods and Monsters.” With so many people to “inspire” (read: take from), it’s no wonder Del Rey is so prolific.

    But it all makes sense because of how much Del Rey has always represented the millennial gift for pastiche. Themselves having experienced it on overload from the day of conception, thanks to being “cultivated” in a postmodern world. Where society is at now leaves potential for many more “posts” to be placed in front of that “modern” (just how many might depend on who you ask). And maybe that’s why the love of all things meta has taken root so deeply in pop culture ever since Scream came to theaters. Del Rey herself has never much favored playing with the concept too overtly, perhaps deciding it was time to do so after all this talk of her various “personas” throughout album cycles—though mainly the “Daddy”-loving one that sucks on lollipops, sips “cherry cola” and still insists, “He hit me and it felt like a kiss” (another lyric borrowed from someone else: The Crystals). So it’s only right for director Rich Lee (who previously teamed with Del Rey on videos for “Doin’ Time” and “Fuck It I Love You/The Greatest”) to commence “Candy Necklace,” the first single from Did You Know That There’s A Tunnel Under Ocean Blvd to receive a video accompaniment, by opening on a klieg light. Everything about such an emblem signifying the grandeur of Del Rey’s music, as well as her ongoing commitment to presenting Old Hollywood glamor as a lifestyle choice people can still choose to make.

    Lee zooms into the shot of the klieg light and then cuts to the man wielding it behind the back of the truck Lana is “driving” on set. One with a screen backdrop that plays footage of trees on a loop to make it seem like she’s actually driving though some woodsy area (“You can find me where no one will be/In the woods somewhere,” as she says on “Sweet”) when, obviously, she’s not. But it’s all part of the “put-on,” innit? That razzle-dazzle that only Hollywood—de facto, Del Rey—still knows how to achieve better than anyone. And where is she driving to but L.A.? Some small-town girl bound for the big city to do “big things.” Much like the woman Del Rey visually emulates in the video, Elizabeth Short. Better known as the Black Dahlia. Like Del Rey, Short shares a name with Elizabeth “Lizzy” Grant and also spent much of her youth on the East Coast (with some stints in Florida, also like “Lizzy”) before ending up in L.A. after various boppings around between her father and some Army and Navy men.

    Rumors of whether or not Short was a prostitute began to crop up in the wake of her murder, tying right in with another favorite topic of Del Rey’s, as explored on “A&W.” Indeed, after so much rejection in her life, it would be easy to imagine Short callously thinking to herself as she prowled the streets of L.A., “It’s not about having someone to love me anymore/This is the experience of being an American whore.” Regardless of whether or not she did prostitute herself at one time or another, there was an innocent aura about her. Which then, of course, brings us to the flowers—dahlias—Short wore in her hair. As Del Rey used to adorn her own hair with a “sweet” flower crown despite talking of subjects like cocaine, older men and being born bad.

    The dichotomy of a woman when viewed through the myopic lens of men—particularly men controlling Hollywood and the narratives that were churned out of it—is embodied by Del Rey as the vixen, the vamp and the lost little lamb throughout the video. Cutting from her in the truck as “Lana” to her as the Black Dahlia sometime in the 40s as she’s guided out of a car by a John Waters lookalike (maybe the real deal wasn’t available), Lee sets the stage for something sinister to build—only to keep taking us out of the moment with constant behind-the-scenes “asides” from Del Rey herself who, as usual, helmed the concept. As she walks into the stately mansion she’s led to by this older gentleman (Johnny Robish), she reminds one of Lana (quelle coincidence) Clarkson being led to the slaughter by Phil Spector. Eerily (and perhaps intentionally) enough, Robish actually did portray Spector in a TV series called Silenced. And yes, one could imagine Del Rey moonlighting as a hostess at the House of Blues and ending up in such a man’s abode had things gone in an alternate direction for her. In fact, one of her chief defenses against those calling her portrayal of the Black Dahlia insensitive (since, by now, everyone is desensitized to Marilyn’s image being habitually plundered) is that, “It’s not insensitive when you started the same way and you could’ve ended up that way, but that hasn’t been how the story played out and no one knows how it will. So, leave if you don’t like the idea.” But obviously, plenty will like it, for Del Rey is not without her devoted legions, even if they aren’t able to move mountains in quite the same way as Swifties or Beyhive members.

    But Taylor and Beyoncé don’t tend to go quite so niche (at least not in ways deemed as polarizing) with their visual brainchilds. In this video’s instance, a key part of the concept is highlighting “what it’s like for those in front of the camera, behind the smokescreen of fame.” Almost like what Britney Spears was doing in the video for “Lucky” as a matter of fact. But, as usual, Brit doesn’t get much credit for her profundity. Del Rey also follows the tradition of movies that serve as a “film within a film” designed to debunk the supposed perfection of it all—totally manufactured by those behind the camera as much as those in front of it. For someone mired in the debate about “persona,” it couldn’t be a more on-the-nose notion. Almost as on the nose as the various “rundowns” of the video that have come out, offering only such reductive “commentary” as, “Lana Del Rey Transforms Into Marilyn Monroe in New Video.” No shit. But, as with most Del Rey videos, there’s much more to it than the surface.

    Considering her collaboration with Lee on the merged videos for “Fuck It I Love You” and “The Greatest” (clocking in at nine minutes and nineteen seconds to make it a length contender with the videos for “Ride,” “Venice Bitch,” “Norman Fucking Rockwell”/“Bartender”/“Happiness Is A Butterfly” and, now, “Candy Necklace”), he actually alludes to it when making mention of her skateboarding down an alleyway in Long Beach for that shoot. An alleyway will factor in during this video as well, but not with such a “fun-loving” tinge. What’s more, it’s worth noting that the lyrics to “Fuck It I Love You” encapsulate the “everygirl”—like Elizabeth Short—who moves to L.A. with “big dreams” (“said you had to leave to start your life over”). Only to fall into the trap of “fast living” (yet again). This apparent in lyrics such as, “Maybe the way that I’m living is killing me/I like to light up the stage with a song/Do shit to keep me turned on/But one day I woke up like, ‘Maybe I’ll do it differently’/So I moved to California but it’s just a state of mind.” And that state of mind can often lead to a dark destiny, hidden behind the oft-repeated phrase: “the myth of California.”

    Del Rey as Black Dahlia starts to slowly uncover it as we see her atop a grandiose staircase, in the home of the creepy older man who takes her there. Another camera cut shows Del Rey overlooking the scene with Jon Batiste, her trusty piano player on the song and also, of course, a Grammy-winning dynamo in his own right. But in this context, the two both appear as outsiders looking in, heightening the meta concept of us as the outsider audience watching them look like outsiders, too. When Del Rey then descends the staircase while “acting the part,” it feels like a callback to Norma Desmond in Sunset Boulevard doing the same thing after retreating entirely into her delusions.

    Whatever is happening throughout the video, Lee is always sure to keep our eyes on the varying necklaces Del Rey is wearing, with the term “candy necklace” being symbolic of a lure itself. Something women use to “ensnare” by drawing the male gaze to her vulnerable neck and then up to the mouth as she sucks on the candy. It’s also a metaphor for something sweet and disposable—the way most young women are viewed, particularly by men in “the industry” who see such women as mere “perks” of being in it. Ergo, Del Rey’s dissection of yet another disappointing man who she thought she was madly in love with echoes a sentiment expressed in “Shades of Cool”: “I can’t fix him/Can’t make him better.” But by the time she—or rather, the Black Dahlia version of herself—realizes it, it’s too late.

    At the two-minute, forty-eight-second mark of the video, Del Rey is up to her old “National Anthem” tricks again by portraying Marilyn Monroe, but this time with the full-on re-creation of her blonde coif (as opposed to just wearing a replica of the Jean Louis gown that Kim Kardashian felt obliged to destroy for the sake of her vanity). Shot from a movie-within-a-movie perspective again, we hear the “real” Del Rey tell Lee, “I just don’t know, like, how to not be, like, a robot. I just need to shoot, shoot, shoot, shoot.” And shoot she does…in the persona of Marilyn holding a book in her hand (there’s also a book in the background appropriately titled Handbook of General Psychology). While some would write Del Rey’s portrayal of Marilyn off as yet another tired trick in her usual playbook, it bears remarking that her putting on this particular “character” has more significance at this moment in time, with Del Rey currently being thirty-seven—a year older than Marilyn was when she died (or committed suicide, if that’s the theory you’re going with). This meaning she survived past a “scary age” for those who pay attention to the women slain by the Hollywood machine. Which harkens back to Del Rey’s mention of how when she started out as Lizzy Grant taking on the big city and finding herself in precarious situations with men-wolves, her fate might have gone down just as dark a path as Short’s or Monroe’s.

    After talking about being like a robot, Del Rey adds, “I’m not, like, it’s not, like, working anymore for me.” There are two interpretations of this line: 1) the concept isn’t working for her anymore or 2) doing the shoot no longer feels like work to her because she’s so “in it.” In this manner, as well, there is a layer of duality to everything. Transitioning back to Black Dahlia mode, Del Rey offers another behind-the-scenes soundbite in the form of, “‘Cause the whole thing about the video is, like…why it was all supposed to be behind-the-scenes is because all these women who, like, changed their name, changed their hair, like me and stuff [correction: her like them], it’s like they all fell into these different, different, like, snake holes, so the whole point is like how do you learn from that and not fall into your own thing?” Del Rey grapples with that question as she puts on another wig—this one more Veronica Lake-esque. Along with a Red Riding Hood-style cape in white. The Red Riding Hood vibe being undeniably pointed, per the mention of the men-wolves above—the ones that still run most industries. And still make them all a rather scary place to be a woman. Especially a “fragile” one (as Del Rey so often likes to remind people that she is—something Jewel was doing quite some time ago).

    Walking down a darkened alleyway in this glam-ified Red Riding Hood getup, Del Rey finds herself singing—performing—yet again in a club (as she has also done so many times before in videos such as “Blue Velvet,” “Ride” and “Fuck It I Love You”). One where the seedy Phil Spector-reminiscent character waits and watches. A wolf in no sheep’s clothing. As Batiste plays the piano next to her, Del Rey locks eyes with this foreboding male presence…yet another “Daddy” figure in her music video canon (see also: “Ride,” “Shades of Cool” and “The Greatest”). The one to lead her into the proverbial woods, rather than out of them, as she would like to believe.

    Back in the alleyway with this man who will serve as her “date” for the rest of the “evening,” Del Rey rips off the wig she’s wearing to reveal Black Dahlia curls again…or are they Del Rey’s own? As usual, she toys with viewers’ perception on the matter, with wig-snatching as yet another bid to break down the wall of artifice created by Hollywood glamor. Subverting the “real” goings-on “behind the scenes” again by flashing a middle finger at the camera in her dressing room and demanding, “Get out. Seriously.” But is she being serious, or is this a sendup of the difficult diva persona? Once more, the decision is at the discretion of the beholder.

    Close-ups on Del Rey’s necklace become more pronounced after this scene, though it’s been accented the entire time that each “character” she plays wears some kind of ornate necklace. The one lured (whether aware of the lure or ultimately uncaring that it is a lure) into the backseat of “Daddy’s” car keeps caressing the “candy” necklace she’s wearing as Lee cuts to Batiste repeating the phrase like a narrator who can only communicate her fate through this ominous pair of words. All at once, there’s a moment when it seems as though the necklace feels to her like a choking hold that she tries to remove before looking around frantically out the window. Is it too late to escape what she herself walked into? As necklaces both candy and jeweled fall against a black backdrop and into blood, we find out what the answer is…and what we knew it to be all along: she can’t escape the gruesome outcome that awaits. This shown dramatically by a shot of the car door open and her white cape strewn from the seat to the floor, covered in blood. The camera pans to the back of the car, where a trunk is attached. The perfect size for fitting a mutilated body. Partially open, the camera closes in on its blood-spattered exterior, zooming into the blackness of the trunk only to then reflect back the POV from within: a bevy of reporters letting their flashbulbs go off in a frenzy, ready to splash the horrid tale all over newspapers across the country. The girl is just a story now. Another cautionary tale. One that tells women: don’t be “loose,” don’t “ask for it.” And suddenly, among the fray of “paparazzi” (a word not yet coined in the Black Dahlia’s time), there’s Jon Batiste, who presently comes across as the A$AP Rocky of the narrative, for Del Rey does so enjoy to portray herself as the romantic fetish of Black men. And the fetish of bad men.

    Another cut made through the flashbulb and into the reality where Del Rey is just a star who was playing a tragic dead girl concludes the video. Or was this the alternate reality Del Rey wants to offer up for all the girls who didn’t survive the wolves of Hollywood? Whatever the case, she poses with her star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame (one that doesn’t actually yet exist, but maybe it will soon) with that shit-eating grin of triumph. The black-and-white scene then segues into color, indicating the falseness of it. A few close-ups on some more neck shots of Del Rey wearing her various necklaces are followed by the final frame being Del Rey’s smiling face as seen through the camera monitor. This concluding the meta blending of fiction and reality, with Del Rey happier than ever (to use an Eilish phrase) about confusing the two. For to live in the twentieth century and beyond is to never really know the difference anymore. Just ask Gloria Swanson/Norma Desmond. Or Norma Jeane/Marilyn. Or Elizabeth Short/the Black Dahlia. Or Lizzy/Lana.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Celluloid Immortality Doesn’t Make A Slow Career Death Any Less Painful: Babylon

    Celluloid Immortality Doesn’t Make A Slow Career Death Any Less Painful: Babylon

    [ad_1]

    There is Old Hollywood and then there is Germinal Hollywood (“Silent Era” Hollywood, if you prefer). The latter has been less a fascination in the public eye because it appears, on the surface, not to have as much “glamor” attached to it. But oh, how the silent film stars of the day were shellacked. Coated in a veneer of glitz that belied what was going on behind the scenes. Such debauchery and excess that could only occur at the beginning of the “film colony.” Before the rest of the world infiltrated it with its opinions and judgments, all so infused with “morality.” Before the Hays Code and sound in pictures came along to decimate the germinal era.

    Writer-director Damien Chazelle’s preoccupation with “the Hollywood machine” was made evident with his sixth film, La La Land. A movie that, lest anyone forget, initially received all the much-deserved praise it got before a backlash suddenly arose about it exemplifying the #OscarsSoWhite phenomenon—and then came the controversial false announcement that it had won Best Picture at the 2017 Academy Awards (it was actually Moonlight, so way to fuck shit up for a Black triumph again). But despite all that, La La Land remains a timeless story about the “clawing your way to fame in Hollywood” narrative. However, it appears Chazelle might have thought Emma Stone too precious in that role (as Mia Dolan) and wanted to show an even more realistic, darker side of Hollywood. As Kenneth Anger wanted to with his notorious book, Hollywood Babylon, which, yes, speaks of the same scandalous lifestyles Chazelle is acknowledging in his latest underrated work, Babylon (what else would it be called?).

    With this particular film (coming in at a sprawling three hours), Chazelle is adamant about immediately acquainting the viewer with just how debauched Hollywood in its infancy really was. We’re talking shit that makes the story of Harvey Weinstein look totally innocent. This is why Chazelle is certain to make reference to the 1921 Fatty Arbuckle scandal in the initial twentyish minutes of the movie, with a fat man being “entertained” (read: pissed on) by a naked actress who has just secured her first part in a movie. When the Fatty Arbuckle-esque actor, named Wilbur (E.E. Bell), has to inform Bob Levine (Flea—yes, Flea) of Jane Thornton’s (Phoebe Tonkin) passed-out, brutalized state (Virginia Rappe didn’t end up quite so fortunate, dying instead), Bob calls on Don Wallach’s (Jeff Garlin) all-around servant/jack-of-all-trades, Manuel Torres (Diego Calva). Having crossed the border with his family at twelve, it’s immediately made clear that Manuel is enamored of the movies, of what they “mean.” Never mind the sordid lives of the people who make them. The people who are deified by the masses, therefore can only disappoint in the end when the reality of their personal lives comes to light. As it always does, even back then… Thanks to gossip columnists like Elinor St. John (Jean Smart), a Louella Parsons type who skulks around every party and event stoically in search of some morsel to print.

    And no one would love to be written about more than the as-of-yet unknown Nellie LaRoy (Margot Robbie), who crashes the Don Wallach industry party the viewer is invited to observe as Babylon launches us into a world of depravity and devil-may-care antics. After all, this was a time when no threat of being filmed or photographed by some interloper was even a thought on anyone’s radar. That would come much, much later—with the full-tilt castration of any members of the “film colony.” But in 1926, where Chazelle sets the stage at the end of the silent film era, it was all free-wheeling and rabble-rousing. Which is why Nellie has no qualms about literally crashing the party as the car she’s likely stolen hits a statue when she rolls up to Wallach’s. While the gatekeeper of the house tells her she’s not on the list, Manuel plays along with her charade (which includes telling the guard she’s real-life silent film star Billie Dove) by calling out, “Nellie LaRoy? They’re waiting for you.” With that, Manuel effectively gives her the keys to the Hollywood kingdom, for it turns out she’ll be given the small part that was reserved for Jane Thornton in Maid’s Off now that she’s been decimated by Wilbur. Before this moment, however, she and Manuel will bond over a few piles of cocaine (mostly consumed by Nellie) as he opens up to her about “wanting to be part of something bigger.” Part of “something that lasts, that means something.”

    Indeed, Babylon is all about the chase for immortality that only the medium of film (and its various offshoots at this point) can provide. Unlike the once revered medium of literature, someone is actually brought “to life” every time one of their movies is played decades or (now) centuries later. That’s what someone like Nellie, channeling her Pearl-esque obsession with getting famous (and Pearl, too, existed around the same timeframe Babylon touts), wants more than anything. The same is true for an already-established star like Jack Conrad (Brad Pitt), whose personal life is modeled after Douglas Fairbanks (married three times), while his aesthetic and career are modeled more after John Gilbert’s (married four times). For it was the latter who adhered to the advice of the day re: transitioning from silents to “talkies”: use proper stage diction. This pronounced “eloquence” on Gilbert’s part is what often led audiences to laugh openly at his movies with sound. A scene recreated in Babylon when Conrad sneaks into a theater to see the audience’s reaction to his new feature. In 1929’s Redemption, Gilbert has a line that goes: “I’m going to kill myself to let the whole world know what it has lost.” It seems Conrad is ultimately of this belief by the conclusion of Babylon.

    But before that, we witness the last days of Babylon (the OG way to phrase “the last days of disco”) as the elephant we’re very bluntly introduced to in the first few minutes comes out to distract the partygoers from Jane’s body being carried out. Not that they would really need an elephant to distract them, for it all looks like the stuff of Eyes Wide Shut: everyone fucking everyone in any given square inch of the room. Manuel is instructed to take Jack home, enduring his various ramblings about the movie industry and how, “We’ve got to dream beyond these pesky shells of flesh and bone. Map those dreams onto celluloid and print them into history.” After he falls off his balcony during this urging to innovate the medium into something better, something more than “costume dramas,” he invites Manuel to accompany him to work, asking, “Have you ever been to a movie set before?” He admits, “No.” Jack assures, “You’ll see. It’s the most magical place in the world.”

    It is in this moment, “only” thirty-one minutes into the movie, that the title card finally flashes: BABYLON. And with that title mind, let us not forget how Anger commenced his own Hollywood Babylon, with the Don Blanding poem called “Hollywood” from Star Night at the Cocoanut Grove. It goes:

    “Hollywood, Hollywood
    Fabulous Hollywood
    Celluloid Babylon
    Glorious, glamorous
    City delirious
    Frivolous, serious…
    Bold and ambitious,
    And vicious and glamorous.
    Drama—a city-full,
    Tragic and pitiful…
    Bunk, junk and genius
    Amazingly blended…
    Tawdry, tremendous,
    Absurd, stupendous;
    Shoddy and cheap,
    And astonishingly splendid…
    HOLLYWOOD!!”

    Yes, Hollywood is all of these dichotomies. And, to the point of being “amazingly blended,” Chazelle focuses on the trials and tribulations of people of color in early Hollywood, including Manuel, who will later Americanize his name to Manny (which is what Nellie calls him from the beginning). There’s also Lady Fay Zhu (Li Jun Li), who appears to offer some nod to the “Dragon Lady” trope of Anna May Wong, though Wong was never reduced to writing title cards for silent movies, which we’re given an up close and personal look at as Zhu writes dialogue for “The Girl” that starts out, “Sweet sixteen and never—well, maybe once or twice.” There’s also Black trumpeter Sidney Palmer (Jovan Adepo), reduced to eventually putting on blackface makeup to make himself look “blacker” for the purposes of lighting issues within a certain film.

    A meta element in terms of how much Babylon pays homage to Sunset Boulevard with regard to subject matter (“the dark side of Hollywood” and the putting out to pasture of silent film stars—complete with cameos by the likes of Buster Keaton) occurs during a moment where Jack Conrad is speaking to Gloria Swanson on the phone, using reverse psychology to get her to play a small part for cheap in his movie. Swanson would famously star as Norma Desmond in Billy Wilder’s 1950 masterpiece. With failed screenwriter (a newly-made profession after the “title writers” of the silent movie epoch) Joe Gillis (William Holden) standing by to watch Norma’s madness, her delusions of still being relevant as he narrates, “I didn’t argue with her. You don’t yell at a sleepwalker. He may fall and break his neck. That’s it. She was still sleepwalking along the giddy heights of a lost career—plain crazy when it came to that one subject: her celluloid self. The great Norma Desmond! How could she breathe in that house so crowded with Norma Desmonds? More Norma Desmonds and still more Norma Desmonds.”

    Watching old movies of her celluloid self projected onto a screen every night, she is made youthful and immortal any time she desires, contributing to the delusion. Nellie, whose character is inspired by Clara Bow, has fewer delusions, especially after hearing two men talk shit about her at another party. One of them says of the silent film stars, “It’s the end, I’m telling you. It’s the end for all of ‘em. All the frogs.”

    For although Chazelle started us in 1926, he then takes us to 1927, with the advent of sound in movies changing everything. A proverbial “Video Killed the Radio Star” effect for the silent movie titans. This is the innovation Jack has been crying out for, unaware that it will be the cause of his own undoing. “You think people want that though? Sound in their movies?” Jack inquires in a public restroom before the sound of someone taking a fat shit in one of the stalls ensues. The studio executive, Billy (Sean O’Bryan), who Jack asks this of replies, “Yeah, why wouldn’t they?” In the next instant, Jack is declaring to Manny and George Munn (Lukas Haas), “This is what we’ve been looking for! Sound is how we redefine the form!” Munn insists, “People go to the movies not to listen to the noise.” This as Olga (Karolina Szymczak), his latest wife, is having a major tantrum involving the bombastic smashing of dishes.

    In a moment of “passion,” she shoots him, but this doesn’t stop Manny from carrying out his instructions from Jack to go check out a screening of The Jazz Singer in New York. Seeing the audience reaction there, Manny informs Jack that everything is about to change (running out of the theater while the picture is still playing to do so). Chazelle then cuts to 1928. Specifically, to a sound stage in 1928, where, in contrast to the noisy, chaotic vibe of the “sets” we saw in 1926, the signage everywhere calls for silence as we note just that in the various shots of the sound stage in question.

    With this new era in cinema birthed, Chazelle gets to the heart of the many challenges to navigate during the infancy of sound in film, complete with one of the sound guys forced into a hot box of an operation that eventually causes him to die for some non-masterpiece, a total throwaway movie. Death is, indeed, everywhere in Babylon, reinforcing the notion that it’s not so serious so long as one knows they’ve been a part of that something “greater” that Manny was talking about. That they’ve secured a small piece of immortality even if they were “only” part of the production crew (after all, their name will still be in the credits). On a fitting side note, Babylon has only been able to enter the race for an Oscar because of the work done on the film by those “behind the scenes.”

    But back to the silent movie era. Another point of this phase in cinema history seemed to be to reiterate that everything in life is just scenes. “Vignettes.” And in the time of the silent movie era, that’s all that could be captured. The advent of cinema—therefore the ability to “document” as never before—changed everything. The way people were suddenly motivated by the performance of life rather than actual life.

    The chaos of onset life before the “talkies” is told in bursts and fits, with abrupt pauses to heighten the sense of calm that comes only when filming stops. An extra’s death after being impaled by one of the props prompts George to note nonchalantly, “He’s dead.” Another man says, “He did have a drinking problem.” George shrugs, “That’s true, probably ran into himself, huh?” Thus, yet another person has sacrificed themselves very literally to the art of filmmaking. And, to that end, there is an iconic scene of Nellie at the party during the opening of Babylon where she lies on the floor, her arms splayed out in “Christ position” as though offering herself to the celluloid gods. That’s what all of these actors and actresses were willing to do. Whatever it took to “get themselves up there.” To become gods to all “those wonderful people out there in the dark,” as Norma Desmond calls them.

    Not only is Nellie able to secure that place thanks to the dumb luck of Jane being subjected to Wilbur, but also because of her unique ability to cry on cue without any aid whatsoever from glycerin. In awe, the director asks, “How do you do it, just tear up over and over again?” Nellie replies, “I just think of home.” For she’s the quintessential type of person who comes to Hollywood determined never to go back to the bowel from whence they came. Appropriately, we find out that the place that makes Nellie cry on cue is New York as she tells Manny, “Why would Conrad send you here? God. I got out of this place first chance I got.” And yes, most of Hollywood’s early film community had “immigrated” from NYC. Proof that the East Coast has always known that the West holds more promise despite their cries of “inferior!” While back in her hometown, we find out that Nellie has a mother in a sanatorium—how very Marilyn. Though Clara Bow would have a mother in one of those long before Norma Jeane did.

    As Manny continues to climb up the Hollywood ladder behind the scenes (more in love with Nellie than ever), Nellie, in turn, proceeds to tumble down it. Not just because her voice and persona aren’t “translating,” but because she’s also started up an affair with Zhu (who has been eyeing Nellie from the beginning of her career, only able to entice her once she sucks snake poison out of her neck in the desert). Manny, determined to keep protecting Nellie any way he can, warns Zhu, “There’s a new sensibility now. People care about morals,” presaging what’s to come with the Hays Code.

    Chazelle then gives us another time jump to 1930 as Jack watches the dailies for his first sound feature. Something he can’t seem to enjoy without George’s presence. For he’s since killed himself in the wake of another female jilting. The film turns out to be a huge flop and, by 1932, Jack admits to Elinor, “Well, my last two movies didn’t work, but I learned a lot from ‘em.” That doesn’t stop Elinor from printing what she really thinks about the washed-up actor, giving him a cover story with the headline, “Is Jack Conrad Through?” When he goes to her office to confront her directly about it after it causes Irving Thalberg (Max Minghella) to dodge all his calls to the studio, she explains simply, “Your time has run out. There is no ‘why.’” The conversation that ensues is one that applies eerily to Brad Pitt’s own career, as he begins to willingly declare a state of semi-retirement now that he’s approaching his sixties. A thought unthinkable: a movie star getting old. But it happens. The only difference now is, the public has an easier time tracking and critiquing the aging process. For, as Elinor says, “It’s those of us in the dark, the ones who just watch, who survive.” And those in the spotlight are left to watch it cruelly dim.

    As Nellie’s certainly has while Manny continues to stick his neck out for her, causing him to be taken to L.A.’s underworld by a seedy character named James McKay (Tobey Maguire). It’s in this den of far bleaker iniquity than what we saw in the true halcyon days of Babylon that Manny is shown a Nightmare Alley-like geek that eats rats. While Babylon might “revamp” history (unlike Ryan Murphy’s Hollywood all out revising it—and yes, Babylon is something Murphy might be able to create if he was capable of more seriousness and less camp), it is entirely accurate in wielding this metaphorical image as McKay delights in saying to Manny, “He’ll do anything for money!”

    In the end, that’s what cinema is about, despite MGM’s logo declaring, “Ars gratia artis” (“Art for art’s sake”). It has never been fully about art, which is partially how a 1915 Supreme Court case ruled that the right of the First Amendment shouldn’t extend to film, with Justice Joseph McKenna insisting film was a “business, pure and simple, originated and conducted for profit.” But as, Jack Conrad tries to explain to his snobby theater actress wife, film is an art above all else. Even if it caters to “low culture” for the sake of a studio’s profits. And, speaking of studios, as it did in Sunset Boulevard, Paramount Pictures is happy to play the part of the soul-crushing studio that chews up youth and spits it out when the audience is done with the actor in question. In Babylon, it’s “disguised” as Kinoscope (Sunset Boulevard didn’t bother changing the name at all). Where Manny eventually returns with his wife and child in 1952 to see how it has changed. And oh, how the whole town has changed since he was chased out of it thanks to Nellie (the foolish things one does for love, etc.). Marilyn Monroe is clearly all the rage now—along with Technicolor and Cinemascope, tools designed to emphasize that television remains no comparison for the big screen. And it seems in this instant, we’re meant to understand the disappointment of each original generation seeing what comes with the new, and the increasing bastardization of film. At the same time, progress is what all the forebears wanted. To see the industry grow and change and flourish—even if it meant they could no longer be part of it. That is the unsung selflessness of moviemaking.

    As Manny enters a movie theater near Paramount to take his seat, we experience, with him, a “wonderful people out there in the dark” moment as he watches Singin’ in the Rain, stunned into tears as he recognizes the story of Nellie’s own botched transition to the talkies in Lina Lamont (Jean Hagen), whose voice is too “unpolished” for dialogue. Chazelle then makes the daring move to break away from this movie and reveal a montage of other scenes from films that have proven themselves to be benchmarks in the incremental progress of the medium. So it is that Elinor’s consolation to Jack is proven, the one in which she asserts, “When you and I are both long gone, any time someone threads a frame of yours through a sprocket, you’ll be alive again. You see what that means? One day every person on every film shot this year will be dead, and one day all those films will be pulled from the vaults and all their ghosts will dine together… Your time today is through, but you’ll spend eternity with angels and ghosts.” And yet, somehow, that unique form of immortality doesn’t take away from the sadness of watching oneself atrophy in real time. It was Chloë Sevigny who once said she disliked the idea of watching herself age onscreen with each passing film. And yet, is that not a small price to pay for the “privilege” of immortality? Even if Hollywood is no longer “the crowd of cocaine-crazed, sexual lunatics” it once was in the days of Babylon. Even if, as Anger put it, “…the fans could be fickle, and if their deities proved to have feet of clay, they could be cut down without compassion. Off screen a new Star was always waiting to make an entrance.”

    Babylon reiterates that point (and so much more) about Hollywood, the greatest dream ever sold. The greatest (and only) means by which to remain truly immortal.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • 12 Great Actors Who’ve Never Won An Oscar

    12 Great Actors Who’ve Never Won An Oscar

    [ad_1]

    Every year, the Academy Awards come along to grace a handful of nominated actors with a golden statue. But let’s face it. Hollywood is teeming with talent, and just because you’ve risen to A-lister status doesn’t mean you’re automatically guaranteed an Oscar. In fact, over the years, there have been plenty of seasoned actors who have experienced tremendous success in the movie and television industry — but they’ve never won an Academy Award. While it may be hard to believe based on their impressive careers, these celebrities have never gone home with that coveted award.

    Why is that, exactly? Well, it’s pretty obvious that there are several different factors that go into selecting a winner for Best Actor or Best Actress. Like pretty much every other art form, reception to a performance is subjective. What might be one person’s idea of “best” is another person’s “very good.” And, even if everyone’s performances were all considered equal in terms of quality, there still has to be one winner.

    Some actors — such as Leonardo DiCaprio, for instance — spend years delivering memorable performance after memorable performance, only to be passed over continuously by the Academy. DiCaprio finally broke this cycle with his ambitious performance as frontiersman Hugh Glass in the 2015 film The Revenant, which won him the Oscar for Best Actor. While some famous actors go their whole careers without ever achieving that milestone, it doesn’t mean they aren’t deserving. Sometimes, the timing just isn’t right. Here are 12 actors who have surprisingly never won an Oscar.

    12 Actors Who Have Surprisingly Never Won An Oscar

    These great actors have given unforgettable performances in classic films. None of them have won an Academy Award.

    Actors Who Won Oscars For Their First Movie Roles

    [ad_2]

    Claire Epting

    Source link

  • Not This Again, Kim.

    Not This Again, Kim.

    [ad_1]

    Cue the “can she stop wearing famous icon’s artifacts?” commentary. It was just announced that Kim won Princess Di’s prized, diamond-encrusted, amethyst Attallah cross pendant. Ever the deal-maker, Kardashian nabbed it in the final 5-minutes of the Royal & Noble Sotheby’s auction at the bargain price of only $197,453. That’s double the pre-auction estimated price.


    What could go wrong?

    Most famously, Princess Diana wore the cross pendant paired with a complementary Victorian-style Catherine Walker gown to Birthright’s London charity gala in 1987. The pendant comes from the Naim Attallah CBE, of Asprey & Garrard, who had a close relationship with Diana. Previously, it had been loaned only to the Princess of Wales, and has never been worn by anyone else.

    Again, yet another memento – and piece of history – from dead female celebrities falls into Kim Kardashian’s greedy clutches. It comes just mere months after Kim provocatively wore Marilyn Monroe’s “Happy Birthday, Mr. President” dress to the Met Gala. This decision sparked outrage amongst the general public, who declared that no one should wear the dress but Marilyn herself.

    Sotheby’s

    While Kim’s acquisition of Princess Di’s cross will certainly light a fire under some, both Sotheby’s and Kim – who has a collection of jewels previously owned by women who inspire her – are simply thrilled. Sotheby’s is overjoyed that the legacy of the necklace can continue.

    I, for one, am super thrilled to devour the comments about the first time Kim wears that thing in public. I’m certain we’ll see an explanation on Season 4 of The Kardashians.

    [ad_2]

    Jai Phillips

    Source link

  • The 16 Biggest Fashion News Stories of 2022

    The 16 Biggest Fashion News Stories of 2022

    [ad_1]

    In fashion, the top headlines of 2022 were brimming with excitement and chaos.

    Scandals swept Balenciaga and any brand associated with the artist formerly known as Kanye West. Legislation offered a new pathway for sustainability in fashion. A new guard of creatives took the helm at some of the world’s most stories houses, while a recession loomed over the whole industry.

    [ad_2]

    Andrea Bossi

    Source link

  • How Michelle Williams found the music of Mitzi Fabelman

    How Michelle Williams found the music of Mitzi Fabelman

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — In both Steven Spielberg’s “The Fabelmans” and Kelly Reichardt’s upcoming “Showing Up,” Michelle Williams plays women where life — societal hurdles and daily nuisances — gets in the way of self-expression.

    Mitzi Fabelman, the early-1960s matriarch based on Spielberg’s own mother, has given up her career as a talented concert pianist to raise a family. It’s a sacrifice that haunts her. It’s also a gift that radiates from her.

    “I think of her as the piano that she loved so much,” Williams says. “That range was inside of her. That musicality. That emotional dexterity. That was her art. That music flowed through her, and it affected how deeply she could feel. She was the tornado that she drove into.”

    As an actor, Williams has, herself, steered straight into some indelibly tempestuous characters: the romantic of “Blue Valentine,” Marilyn Monroe in “My Week with Marilyn,” the anguished ex-wife of “Manchester by the Sea.” But if there was ever a role that showed the extent of Williams’ remarkable range – her every-note-on-the-piano “emotional dexterity” – it’s Mitzi.

    The fictionalized but autobiographical film, currently playing in theaters, centers on Spielberg’s coming of age as a filmmaker. But Mitzi is the film’s aching soul. At turns despondent, playful and ebullient, Mitzi’s moods swing with a quicksilver melancholy, caught between undying devotion to her children and a stifling of her dreams. In many ways, she gives them to her son. It’s Mitzi who gifts young Sammy/Spielberg his first movie camera. “Movies are dreams that you never forget,” she tells him at his first trip to the cinema.

    How life filters into work is deeply embedded in Williams’ emotional life as an actor, one drawn from wellsprings of personal memory and illuminated by the kind of metamorphosis Mitzi was denied. How the two relate was on her mind as she spoke in a recent interview by Zoom from her home in Brooklyn. Occasionally, Williams’ newborn, her third child and second with her husband, the theater director Thomas Kail, stirred in the next room. Balancing a baby and a big new movie can be head-spinning. At the recent Gotham Awards where she received a tribute award, Williams stood stunned at the podium: “What is happening? I shouldn’t even be out of the house. I just had a baby.”

    But it may be just the start. Williams’ performance in “The Fabelmans” – luminous, enthrallingly theatrical, delicately heartbreaking — is widely expected to land Williams her fifth Academy Award nomination. It’s an honor the 42-year-old is yet to win, a shutout that looks increasingly like some mistake.

    But what pushes an actor like Williams — one of such interior intensity that she hasn’t watched her work in more than a decade — is closer to her character in “Showing Up.” In it, Williams plays a sculptor of modest human figures, with little hope of attracting a wide audience. The role is almost antithetical to Mitzi; Williams’ character, Lizzy, is solitary and less expressive. Her handmade artwork, crafted in between endless interruptions, is about the opposite of something as big and glitzy as a Spielberg production. But she’s compelled, regardless.

    “I think it’s that way for everybody,” says Williams. “You never know if what you’re doing is going to be of any interest to anybody but yourself.”

    Is it true for Williams, too?

    “Ab-so-lutely,” she answers.

    MINING SPIELBERG’S MEMORIES

    Spielberg’s mother, Leah Adler, died at the age of 97 in 2017. His father, Arnold Spielberg, passed away in 2020 at 103. Making “The Fabelmans,” which Tony Kushner and Spielberg wrote through the pandemic, became a way to memorialize the two most influential figures of his life.

    In preparation, Spielberg — who had Williams cast in his mind a decade earlier after seeing “Blue Valentine” — gave her copious amounts of home movies and photographs of his mother to comb through. Williams’ impressions thoroughly informed her interpretation of Mitzi.

    “The resonant information that this woman transmitted through a photograph was enough for me to work with, to embody her,” she says. “That’s how strong her spirit was. You could catch it in a frozen image taken 60 years ago.”

    But there was also something that Spielberg, who grew up with three sisters, told Williams about his mom that struck her. He said: “We were more like playmates.”

    “They got into mischief together. They got into fun,” Williams says. “And I’ll tell you this: None of her children seem to resent her for it. I think they thought they had a pretty great childhood. They had fun together. How often do we let ourselves really play with our children? What do our children want to do with us? Play! She was Peter Pan.”

    It’s an aspect of Mitzi that may not be terribly far from Williams, herself. It’s how she hopes she raised her first daughter, from her relationship with Heath Ledger.

    “I love, in that small window of time, to invest as much magic as possible. I do think that childhood is a place where we can generate creative work from for the rest of our lives,” says Williams. “I’ve always felt very protective of my daughter’s childhood. Now as I embark on two more childhoods, I can see that because I know what it meant for me.

    “I grew up in Montana. I grew up riding horses bareback. I grew up adventuring. I grew up unsupervised. I grew up wandering through natural environments. That wilderness is maybe the best part of me,” says Williams. “The desire to feel free and exploratory and like a natural being, like a human animal, is something that I seek out over and over again in my life.”

    MITZI’S CHOICE

    The pivotal event of “The Fabelmans” comes when Mitzi reluctantly leaves her husband (played by Paul Dano) for his best friend (Seth Rogen). It’s a defining moment for Sammy, wrapped up in his own dawning realization of the power of cinema to capture, shape and distort reality. For Mitzi, it’s a desperate stab at self-preservation.

    “I thought she already suffered a near-death experience. When she gave up her dream of being a concert pianist, she experienced what it’s like for part of you to die,” says Williams. “So when she’s faced with another near-death experience — Do I stay in this marriage or do I allow myself to go where my heart is leading? — she knows that she can’t die again. There will be nothing left of her.”

    For Kushner, whose plays fuse domestic life with political currents, Mitzi is a mid-century woman only fitfully experiencing more modern freedoms. He and Williams spoke about the uncertainty and pain of her choice.

    “What is this thing in her that allows her to make this decision? Is it her artistry? Is it bravery? Is it how big her emotions are? What allowed this woman to stake a claim on her life like this?” says Williams. “I don’t know but I do think it’s what’s allowed her children to do the same thing, to stake a claim on their own lives. That, I think, is one of the greatest gifts that you give to your kids, showing them how they can be a full person.”

    LETTING GO

    Williams’ favorite thing to hear on the set was Spielberg behind the monitor saying, “I have an idea.” In one especially vivid scene during a campout, Mitzi dances in the headlights of a parked car, swaying to a melody seemingly just out of reach. Spielberg had many impromptu ideas shooting that scene. Williams, coming off Gwen Verdon in the miniseries “Fosse/Verdon,” channeled a dancer’s composure to give Spielberg as many options as possible. “Mitzi wasn’t a dancer per se, but she carried herself like one,” she says.

    Such moments making “The Fabelmans,” Williams says, were so intoxicating that she wanted to “eat the air” on set. When Williams was 12, she decided she wanted to be an actress after seeing not just a play on stage but “the whole beehive behind.” “I wanted to be inside of a family,” she says. After finding that on “The Fabelmans,” letting go of Mitzi wasn’t easy.

    “It’s hard to let them go. It’s sad to let them go. You’ve spent so much time, to exclusion of other things and people in your life, with them,” Williams says. “I can allow it to be a slow process of letting go of them. And I can try to cling to the couple or maybe many things that they have taught me. You can’t help but be affected by their spirit as it’s been residing with you. She certainly was a huge loss for me. I hit the floor when this movie was over. I cried in a way that caught me by surprise.”

    But there are parts of Mitzi living, still, with Williams.

    “Coming up on the holidays, isn’t a camera the perfect gift for every child this year?” she says, smiling. “That’s what my kids are getting.”

    ———

    Follow AP Film Writer Jake Coyle on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/jakecoyleAP

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • For $3.05 Million You Can Buy the Love Nest Marilyn Monroe Shared With Arthur Miller

    For $3.05 Million You Can Buy the Love Nest Marilyn Monroe Shared With Arthur Miller

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    If you’re looking for some high-end real estate with historical connections, Marilyn Monroe’s and Arthur Miller’s former home near Sutton Place is on the market for $3.05 million — a notable drop from its original $3.75 million asking price.


    Fox Photos | Getty Images

    Monroe was married three times; her final and longest marriage (five years) was to Miller.

    During that time, the pair lived in a 1927 14-story building at 444 E 57th St. in a 2,190 square foot prewar home with a formal dining room, fireplaces, and coveted views of the East River.

    It’s a prestigious address. The New York Post notes that designer Bill Blass once lived there in the building’s penthouse and other notable residents have included royalty such as Sweden’s Princess Madeleine.

    The apartment itself is one of two on the floor. It’s listed by Brown Harris Stevens, whose listing has more detail on the residence’s many amenities:

    It features a large entry foyer leading to a grand living room with wood burning fireplace, 9ft ceilings, and picture windows. Off the entry foyer is a powder room with tasteful built-ins. The spacious, contemporary dining room easily accommodates 10 people and is perfect for entertaining. A third bedroom, currently a library, has a wood burning fireplace, custom cabinetry, and pocket doors. The large, exceptional, renovated chef’s kitchen with a center island is adorned with marble counters, lots of custom white cabinetry, top-of-the line appliances including a Wolf stove top, stainless steel hood plus two Dacor ovens and two Miele dishwashers.

    When Monroe and Miller lived at the address, the now-iconic actor decorated in her own inimitable style. According to OtSoNY.com, Monroe “made the walls a simple white and set mirrors from the floor to the ceiling in the living-room, after having joined the two rooms. The sofa, the armchairs and the furniture were white, as was the piano.”

    For his part, “Miller hung a picture of Marilyn taken by Jack Cardiff in England,” in his workroom. Though he said “it was his favorite picture of Marilyn, he gave it up when he left the apartment.”

    The Post reports that the building’s amenities “include a doorman, an elevator operator, a resident manager and bike storage.” That, and some fascinating 20th-century history.

    [ad_2]

    Steve Huff

    Source link