ReportWire

Tag: Marco Rubio

  • Rubio urges closer U.S.-Caribbean ties, cites gangs, energy among shared interests

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio delivered a message of closer cooperation as he met with Caribbean leaders on Wednesday, identifying gang violence and energy security as areas of shared concern.

    Rubio, who spent the day in the Federation of Saint Kitts and Nevis in talks with regional heads of government, said he intended to make relations with the Caribbean a “personal priority.” It was his second official visit to the region in less than a year.

    “It will be one that I will be personally engaged in,” he said, “and it’s one that I hope to leave for my successor, whoever that may be.”

    Rubio was among the special guests at the 50th regular meeting of the Conference of Heads of Government of the Caribbean Community, known as CARICOM. Other guests included the secretary general of the Commonwealth and the foreign ministers of the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia.

    In remarks described as “brisk” and “encouraging,” Rubio addressed the administration’s pressure campaign toward Venezuela, the capture of Nicolás Maduro last month, the threat of transnational criminal organizations and the region’s energy challenges.

    Speaking behind closed doors to leaders of CARICOM’s 15 member states and associate members, Rubio warned that transnational criminal organizations pose perhaps the greatest threat to both the Caribbean and the United States.

    “We have a long history of working together on responding” to challenges, Rubio said, according to a State Department transcript of his address.

    He acknowledged a frequent complaint from Caribbean leaders: many of the guns fueling high murder rates in parts of the region originate in the United States.

    “We are committed and continue to work very hard with our law enforcement agencies to shut that down,” he said. “These are terroristic organizations.”

    Rubio pointed to Haiti, where the United States led efforts at the United Nations Security Council to authorize a new Gang Suppression Force, as proof of the administration’s commitment.. The mission, expected to begin deploying in April, would be larger and more robust than the previous Kenyan-led effort.

    He also cited sanctions against gang leaders and their financiers, including the designation of a powerful coalition as a foreign terrorist organization.

    “I think our cooperation will have to grow even deeper and our commitment to it will have to grow even stronger because these groups grow stronger,” he said.

    Energy, he said, is also an area where the U.S. and Caribbean relationship can be of benefit.

    “There are extraordinary opportunities for economic advancement, to work together,” he said. “ Energy is critical for the future; it’s critical for every economy in order to prosper.”

    Many of the countries in the region are seeking to develop oil and gas resources, he noted. Previous administrations have promoted energy cooperation in the region, often with an emphasis on renewables. But oil-producing countries such as Guyana, Trinidad and Tobago and Suriname have underscored their role as hydrocarbon exporters.

    Financing remains a major constraint in a region that pays some of the highest electricity costs in the hemisphere.

    Rubio suggested that Venezuela could help supply the energy needs. The country’s oil wealth once funded development programs through the discounted PetroCaribe oil program until U.S. sanctions restricted countries’ ability to pay.

    On Wednesday, he once again raised the prospect of Caribbean governments doing business with Venezuela to fund their energy needs. Referring to the interim government led by Delcy Rodríguez, he said the South American nation has “done things that eight or nine weeks ago would have been unimaginable.

    “Ultimately we do believe that a prosperous, free Venezuela who’s governed by a legitimate government who has the interests of their people in mind could also be an extraordinary partner and asset to many of the countries represented here today in terms of energy needs and the like, and also one less source of instability in the region,” he said. “So we expect to work very closely with all of you on that topic as well to the extent possible, and I think it’s related to the topic of security that I highlighted.”

    Rubio also defended the U.S. policy on Venezuela: “Irrespective of how some of you may have individually felt about our operations and our policy towards Venezuela, I will tell you this, and I will tell you this without any apology or without any apprehension: Venezuela is better off today than it was eight weeks ago.”

    Rodríguez‘s interim administration, he added, has “for the first time in a long time, generating oil revenue that’s going to the benefit of their people,” including public services and medical supplies.

    One sensitive issue Rubio did not publicly address was U.S. travel restrictions affecting several Caribbean countries. Haiti remains under a full travel ban, while Dominica and Antigua and Barbuda face partial restrictions. Officials from other Eastern Caribbean states have raised concerns about heightened visa scrutiny.

    He also did not address the issue of Cuba, which remains of major concerns for Caribbean leaders. Rubio cast his appearance at the summit — the first in a decade attended by every regional leader — as a demonstration of the Trump administration’s commitment to the Western Hemisphere.

    “The stronger, the safer, the more prosperous, and the more secure that all of your counties are, the stronger, safer, more secure, and prosperous the United States is going to be. We view our security, our prosperity, our stability to be intricately tied to yours, and we are going to evidence that in the actions we’re prepared to take,” he said.

    Rubio also added that he hoped his presence served as “a real-world demonstration of our commitment to being your partner,” he said.

    “I don’t even want to call it resetting relations because it’s really not about a reset. I mean, we have longstanding ties to each of you bilaterally and all of you collectively, but reinvigorating our relationships because we have a lot in common to work on, both opportunities and challenges, and the United States is committed to doing that.”

    Jacqueline Charles

    Miami Herald

    Jacqueline Charles has reported on Haiti and the English-speaking Caribbean for the Miami Herald for over a decade. A Pulitzer Prize finalist for her coverage of the 2010 Haiti earthquake, she was awarded a 2018 Maria Moors Cabot Prize — the most prestigious award for coverage of the Americas.

    [ad_2]

    Jacqueline Charles

    Source link

  • Rubio plans to update Netanyahu on US-Iran talks in Israel next week, officials say

    [ad_1]

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio plans to travel to Israel next week to update Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the U.S.-Iran nuclear talks, two Trump administration officials said.Rubio is expected to meet with Netanyahu on Feb. 28, according to the officials, who spoke Wednesday on condition of anonymity to detail travel plans that have not yet been announced.The U.S. and Iran have recently held two rounds of indirect talks over the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program. Officials from both sides publicly offered some muted optimism about progress this week, with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi even saying that “a new window has opened” for reaching an agreement.”In some ways, it went well,” U.S. Vice President JD Vance said about the talks in an interview Tuesday with Fox News Channel. “But in other ways, it was very clear that the president has set some red lines that the Iranians are not yet willing to actually acknowledge and work through.”Netanyahu visited the White House last week to urge President Donald Trump to ensure that any deal about Iran’s nuclear program also includes steps to neutralize Iran’s ballistic missile program and end its funding for proxy groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah.Trump is weighing whether to take military action against Tehran as the administration surges military resources to the region, raising concerns that any attack could spiral into a larger conflict in the Middle East.On Friday, Trump told reporters that a change in power in Iran “seems like that would be the best thing that could happen.” He added, “For 47 years, they’ve been talking and talking and talking.”The Trump administration has dispatched the USS Gerald R. Ford, the world’s largest aircraft carrier, from the Caribbean Sea to the Mideast to join a second carrier as well as other warships and military assets that the U.S. has built up in the region.Dozens of U.S. fighter jets, including F-35s, F-22s and F-16s, have left bases in the U.S. and Europe in recent days to head to the Middle East, according to the Military Air Tracking Alliance, a team of about 30 open-source analysts that routinely analyzes military and government flight activity.The team says it’s also tracked more than 85 fuel tankers and over 170 cargo planes heading into the region.Steffan Watkins, a researcher based in Canada and a member of the MATA, said he also has spotted support aircraft, like six of the military’s early-warning E-3 aircraft head to a base in Saudi Arabia.Those aircraft are key for coordinating operations with a large number of aircraft. He says they were pulled from bases in Japan, Germany and Hawaii.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio plans to travel to Israel next week to update Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the U.S.-Iran nuclear talks, two Trump administration officials said.

    Rubio is expected to meet with Netanyahu on Feb. 28, according to the officials, who spoke Wednesday on condition of anonymity to detail travel plans that have not yet been announced.

    The U.S. and Iran have recently held two rounds of indirect talks over the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program. Officials from both sides publicly offered some muted optimism about progress this week, with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi even saying that “a new window has opened” for reaching an agreement.

    “In some ways, it went well,” U.S. Vice President JD Vance said about the talks in an interview Tuesday with Fox News Channel. “But in other ways, it was very clear that the president has set some red lines that the Iranians are not yet willing to actually acknowledge and work through.”

    Netanyahu visited the White House last week to urge President Donald Trump to ensure that any deal about Iran’s nuclear program also includes steps to neutralize Iran’s ballistic missile program and end its funding for proxy groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah.

    Trump is weighing whether to take military action against Tehran as the administration surges military resources to the region, raising concerns that any attack could spiral into a larger conflict in the Middle East.

    On Friday, Trump told reporters that a change in power in Iran “seems like that would be the best thing that could happen.” He added, “For 47 years, they’ve been talking and talking and talking.”

    The Trump administration has dispatched the USS Gerald R. Ford, the world’s largest aircraft carrier, from the Caribbean Sea to the Mideast to join a second carrier as well as other warships and military assets that the U.S. has built up in the region.

    Dozens of U.S. fighter jets, including F-35s, F-22s and F-16s, have left bases in the U.S. and Europe in recent days to head to the Middle East, according to the Military Air Tracking Alliance, a team of about 30 open-source analysts that routinely analyzes military and government flight activity.

    The team says it’s also tracked more than 85 fuel tankers and over 170 cargo planes heading into the region.

    Steffan Watkins, a researcher based in Canada and a member of the MATA, said he also has spotted support aircraft, like six of the military’s early-warning E-3 aircraft head to a base in Saudi Arabia.

    Those aircraft are key for coordinating operations with a large number of aircraft. He says they were pulled from bases in Japan, Germany and Hawaii.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Judge blocks deportation of Palestinian activist who led protests at Columbia

    [ad_1]

    An immigration judge has blocked the Trump administration from deporting Mohsen Mahdawi, a Palestinian graduate student who led protests at Columbia University against Israel and the war in Gaza.

    In a ruling made public by Mahdawi’s attorneys on Tuesday, the judge, Nina Froes, said she had terminated the case because of a procedural misstep by government attorneys, who failed to properly certify an official document they intended to use as evidence.

    The Trump administration may appeal the decision. But the ruling marked the latest setback for the federal government’s sweeping effort to expel pro-Palestinian campus activists and others who expressed criticism of Israel. 

    Mahdawi, a legal permanent resident of the U.S. for the last decade, was arrested by immigration agents last April during what he thought was a citizenship interview. He was released two weeks later after an order from a federal judge.

    In the months since, the government has continued its effort to deport him, citing a memo from Secretary of State Marco Rubio arguing noncitizens can be expelled from the country if their presence may undermine U.S. foreign policy interests.

    Government attorneys submitted a photocopy of the document to the immigration judge, but they failed to certify it as required under federal law, the judge wrote.

    “I am grateful to the court for honoring the rule of law and holding the line against the government’s attempts to trample on due process,” Mahdawi said in a statement released by his attorneys. “This decision is an important step towards upholding what fear tried to destroy: the right to speak for peace and justice.”

    Mahdawi has also mounted a separate case in federal district court arguing that he was unlawfully detained. That case remains ongoing, his lawyers said.

    Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security who is leaving her post next week, cast Mahdawi as a leader of “pro-terrorist riots” whose visa should be revoked in a statement to The Associated Press.

    “No activist judge, not this one or any other, is going to stop us from doing that,” she added.

    The Trump administration has arrested and sought to deport several international students who participated in pro-Palestinian campus protests, accusing them of antisemitism and citing a federal law that lets the secretary of state block visas for people who could pose “adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.” The students have sued the government over their detention, arguing they are being punished for First Amendment-protected speech.

    The government has accused Mahdawi of “threatening rhetoric and intimidation of pro-Israeli bystanders” during protests on Columbia’s campus, which he has denied.

    Another Columbia activist and green card-holder, Mahmoud Khalil, was arrested in March 2025 and is currently fighting a bid to deport him. An immigration judge ordered him to be deported in September, which he is appealing. On a separate track, a U.S. district court judge freed him from immigration detention last summer, a ruling that was overturned by a panel of appellate judges last month, though Khalil is expected to challenge that move.

    And last month, a separate immigration judge blocked the government’s attempt to deport a Tufts University graduate student, Rümeysa Öztürk, over an op-ed criticizing the school’s response to the war in Gaza.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Watch: Rubio says Trump administration

    [ad_1]

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the Trump administration “made multiple attempts” to get former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro to leave the country before the U.S. military operation to capture him. “You couldn’t make a deal with this guy,” Rubio told GOP Sen. James Risch of Idaho.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why Venezuelans support Trump’s capture of Maduro

    [ad_1]

    This week, guest host Zach Weissmueller is joined by Freddy Guevara, a Venezuelan opposition leader who was imprisoned by the regime of Nicolás Maduro and now lives in exile.

    Guevara first entered politics as a student activist opposing Hugo Chávez, later becoming the youngest elected city council member in Venezuelan history before winning a seat in the National Assembly. After the government stripped the assembly of power and escalated repression, Guevara spent three years as a political refugee in the Chilean Embassy in Caracas and was later imprisoned by the Maduro regime. He has lived in exile since 2021 and is now a visiting fellow at Harvard’s Kennedy School, where he studies democratic transitions and political repression.

    Weissmueller and Guevara discuss how authoritarianism operated under Nicolás Maduro, including political imprisonment, surveillance, and the foreign alliances that helped sustain his oppressive regime. They examine Maduro’s capture, why many Venezuelans support U.S. intervention, and what a democratic transition would require after decades of dictatorship. Guevara challenges common assumptions in the West about sovereignty and regime change and makes the case that Venezuelans themselves have driven the push to remove Maduro – while explaining how Venezuela’s collapse was not simply the result of corruption but a predictable consequence of socialism in practice.

    The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie goes deep with the artists, entrepreneurs, and scholars who are making the world a more libertarian—or at least a more interesting—place by championing “free minds and free markets.”

     

    0:00—Introduction

    1:09—Guevara’s arrest in Venezuela

    8:34—The mechanics of oppression

    12:27—The capture of Maduro

    15:31—Delcy Rodríguez

    20:38—Venezuelan oil and national sovereignty

    27:19—The Trump administration’s transition strategy

    29:47—U.S. media coverage of Venezuelan politics

    32:22—María Corina Machado

    36:45—Marco Rubio’s three-phase strategy

    41:12—Maduro indictment

    47:20—The consequences of socialism

    50:45—What will progress look like for Venezuela?

     

    Upcoming Reason Events

    [ad_2]

    Zach Weissmueller

    Source link

  • Tony Blair, Rubio, Kushner, Witkoff to help oversee Gaza reconstruction, White House says

    [ad_1]

    The White House released the names of some of the leaders who will play a role in overseeing the next steps in Gaza after the Palestinian committee set to govern the territory under U.S. supervision met for the first time Friday in Cairo. 

    The committee’s leader, Ali Shaath, an engineer and former Palestinian Authority official from Gaza, pledged to get to work quickly to improve conditions. He expects reconstruction and recovery to take about three years and plans to focus first on immediate needs, including shelter.

    “The Palestinian people were looking forward to this committee, its establishment and its work to rescue them,” Shaath said after the meeting, in a television interview with Egypt’s state-owned Al-Qahera News.

    Under President Trump’s plan, Shaath’s technocratic committee will run day-to-day affairs in Gaza under the oversight of a Trump-led “Board of Peace,” whose members have not yet been named.

    The White House said an executive board will work to carry out the vision of the Board of Peace.

    The executive board’s members, announced Friday, include Secretary of State Marco Rubio, White House special envoy Steve Witkoff, Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Apollo Global Management CEO Marc Rowan, World Bank President Ajay Banga, and Mr. Trump’s deputy national security adviser Robert Gabriel.

    Nickolay Mladenov, a former Bulgarian politician and U.N. Middle East envoy, is to serve as the executive board’s representative overseeing day-to-day matters.

    Mr. Trump supports the group’s efforts to govern Gaza after the two-year war between Israel and Hamas. Israeli troops withdrew from parts of Gaza after the ceasefire took effect on Oct. 10, while thousands of displaced Palestinians have returned to what is left of their homes. 

    Kushner and Witkoff were key negotiators in helping Israel and the terrorist organization Hamas reach a ceasefire deal, the premise of which was based on a 20-point blueprint from the White House. In an interview with “60 Minutes” in October, Kushner said the success or failure of the peace plan would depend on whether Israel and the international partners involved can create “a viable alternative” to Hamas’ violent tactics.

    “If they are successful, Hamas will fail, and Gaza will not be a threat to Israel in the future,” Kushner told “60 Minutes.”

    Earlier this week, Witkoff announced the U.S. was moving into what the White House has called the second phase of the Gaza peace plan. In a post to X, Witkoff said this involved Hamas returning the remains of the final deceased hostage still in Gaza. 

    “Failure to do so will bring serious consequences,” Witkoff wrote.  

    Now, there will be a number of huge challenges going forward, including the deployment of an international security force to supervise the ceasefire deal and the difficult process of disarming Hamas.

    The White House also announced the members of another board, the “Gaza Executive Board,” which will work with Mladenov, the technocratic committee and the international stabilization force.

    Witkoff, Kushner, Blair, Rowan and Mladenov will also sit on that board. Additional members include Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan; Qatari diplomat Ali Al-Thawadi; Hassan Rashad, director of Egypt’s General Intelligence Agency; Emirati minister Reem Al-Hashimy; Israeli businessman Yakir Gabay and Sigrid Kaag, the Netherlands’ former deputy prime minister and a Middle East expert. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Vance, Rubio meet with Greenland and Denmark’s foreign ministers

    [ad_1]

    Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other White House officials met Wednesday with Danish and Greenlandic foreign ministers amid the Trump administration’s ongoing threats to take over Greenland

    The meeting came one day after Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen said at a news conference, “If we have to choose between the United States and Denmark here and now, we choose Denmark.”

    President Trump has repeatedly said he wants to acquire Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark, citing national security reasons. He repeated that again on Wednesday morning, saying “it is vital for the Golden Dome that we are building” and that “NATO should be leading the way for us to get it.”

    “IF WE DON’T, RUSSIA OR CHINA WILL, AND THAT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!” Mr. Trump said in a post on Truth Social. 

    “NATO becomes far more formidable and effective with Greenland in the hands of the UNITED STATES,” he said. “Anything less than that is unacceptable.”

    On Tuesday, Mr. Trump told reporters that if Greenland’s premier said the territory wanted to stay part of Denmark, “that’s their problem.”

    “I disagree with him,” Mr. Trump said. “I don’t know who he is, don’t know anything about him, but that’s going to be a big problem for him.” 

    Leaders of both Denmark and Greenland have stated Greenland is “not for sale,” which has led Trump officials to say that the administration is considering all options, including military force. 

    “I’d love to make a deal with them. It’s easier,” Mr. Trump said Sunday. “But one way or the other, we’re going to have Greenland.” Rubio has downplayed the possibility of military force to acquire Greenland.

    Vance visited Greenland last year. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said Tuesday that the Trump administration is applying “completely unacceptable pressure from our closest ally.” 

    Frederiksen said earlier this month that an American military move to seize control of Greenland would amount to the end of the NATO military alliance. Denmark is a NATO member, and NATO’s Article 5 states that if a NATO ally suffers an armed attack, all members will consider it an attack on them as well and do what they need to aid the attacked nation.

    Tensions were high ahead of the meeting, as was concern about a further fracturing of the relationship with the U.S. NATO ally, sources familiar with the situation told CBS News. The Danish government expected to present an offer for enhanced cooperation with the U.S. and access in Greenland in terms of military presence and NATO presence, the sources said.

    The Danes wanted clarity on what the U.S. is pressing for beyond that offer, and whether a financial plus-up is being demanded, the sources said. They wanted to know if Mr. Trump’s intent is to have control or political ownership, which concerns them, given the clear objection of the Greenlandic government to either. Greenlandic officials have been clear that they want the island to belong to Denmark.

    A European official from a nearby country said there is some concern that Denmark may be miscalculating by demanding this meeting with the U.S. because it could formalize and potentially harden positions around what could otherwise be rhetorical pressure by Mr. Trump.

    On Wednesday, Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky took to the Senate floor to voice his disapproval of intervening in Greenland’s affairs and to emphasize the importance of maintaining a united NATO alliance. 

    “Unless and until the President can demonstrate otherwise, then the proposition at hand today is very straightforward: incinerating the hard-won trust of loyal allies in exchange for no meaningful change in U.S. access to the Arctic,” McConnell said. “That’s allies – plural. Because this is about more than Greenland. It’s about more than America’s relationship with its highly capable Nordic allies. It’s about whether the United States intends to face a constellation of strategic adversaries with capable friends … or commit an unprecedented act of strategic self-harm and go it alone.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Marco Rubio: From Trump Foe To Foreign Policy Enabler | RealClearPolitics

    [ad_1]

    As Secretary of State, the President’s onetime foe now offers him lavish displays of public praise-and will execute his agenda in Venezuela and around the globe.

    [ad_2]

    Dexter Filkins, New Yorker

    Source link

  • Trump responds to post suggesting Rubio as president of Cuba: ‘Sounds good to me’

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    President Donald Trump reacted to a social media post joking about Secretary of State Marco Rubio becoming the president of Cuba, replying, “Sounds good to me.”

    Trump posted the response Sunday on his Truth Social account after a user wrote, “Marco Rubio will be president of Cuba.”

    Rubio’s broad portfolio in the Trump administration has fueled online jokes portraying him as being placed in charge of an ever-expanding list of roles.

    MADURO’S ARREST IS GOOD NEWS FOR ALL AMERICANS AND LEAVES DEMOCRATS LOOKING FOOLISH

    U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio looks on during a meeting with oil and gas executives in the East Room of the White House on Jan. 9, 2026. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

    Officially, he serves as secretary of state, national security advisor, and acting archivist of the United States.

    He also previously served as acting administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development, before the agency’s remaining functions were discontinued or absorbed into the State Department as part of a reorganization finalized in July.

    RUBIO SPEARHEADS MASSIVE STATE DEPT REORGANIZATION SET TO ELIMINATE, MERGE MORE THAN 300 OFFICES

    A USAID flag flies outside headquarters in Washington, D.C.

    An American flag and USAID flag fly outside the USAID building in Washington, D.C., Feb. 1, 2025. (REUTERS/Annabelle Gordon)

    Social media users on X have turned a photo of Rubio from a White House meeting into a viral “realizing” meme, joking that his growing responsibilities make him the administration’s go-to official for a widening range of positions.

    Users have posted AI-generated photos of Rubio that depict him in a range of imagined roles, from the Shah of Iran and the president of Venezuela to the manager of Manchester United.

    Marco Rubio walks into the East Room of the White House ahead of a meeting with energy industry leaders.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio arrives for a meeting with President Donald Trump and oil and gas executives in the East Room of the White House on Jan. 9, 2026, in Washington, D.C. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Rubio has leaned into the humor himself, writing on X last week that he wouldn’t be a candidate for the vacant head coach or general manager positions with the Miami Dolphins.

    “While you never know what the future may bring right now my focus must remain on global events and also the precious archives of the United States of America,” he wrote.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What Susie Wiles, Marco Rubio, and Stephen Miller Told Me About Trump’s “Donroe Doctrine”

    [ad_1]

    After US forces whisked Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro and his wife out of the country, Secretary of State Marco Rubio struggled to explain why Donald Trump’s administration hadn’t obtained congressional approval for the operation. After all, during a series of extraordinarily unguarded interviews with me for Vanity Fair, Susie Wiles said that Trump would need congressional consent before striking targets on Venezuela’s mainland. “If he were to, you know, authorize some activity on land,” Trump’s chief of staff told me on November 4, “then you’d have to—then it’s war, then Congress.”

    Last Sunday, on national television, Rubio disagreed. Not only was congressional approval not required, he insisted, but consulting lawmakers would have jeopardized the security of the mission.

    When it comes to Venezuela, those on Trump’s team can’t get their stories straight. At first, they said, toppling Maduro was about stemming the flow of dangerous drugs into the US. Then it was about punishing the Venezuelan dictator for sending criminal gangs across the US border. Rubio has said it’s about denying American adversaries like China and Hezbollah a haven in the western hemisphere. And most recently, Trump has said it’s about seizing Venezuela’s oil.

    On November 4, over lunch in her White House office, I asked Wiles what the president was up to in Venezuela.

    “He wants to keep on blowing boats up until Maduro cries uncle,” she told me. “And people way smarter than me on that say that he will.”

    Of course, those people were wrong; despite bellicose threats from Trump, lethal strikes on boats piloted by alleged drug smugglers, and a suffocating US naval armada, Maduro refused to cry uncle and clung to power. So Trump ordered US Special Operations forces to remove him.

    But what was the justification for Trump’s Venezuela campaign? In an earlier conversation, Wiles told me it was a war on drugs. Each alleged drug boat, she said, represented a potentially staggering loss of American lives. “The president says 25,000. I don’t know what the number is, and we don’t either. But he views those as lives saved, not people killed.”

    I later asked Wiles: “So his theory is that these boats are part of Maduro’s drug-smuggling network?”

    “The narcotics rings, unlike Mexico, are actually state-sponsored in Venezuela,” she replied. “And that’s how Maduro stays in power. You know, he pays the people from the drug profits. And the only way to stop that is to just…we’re very sure—I’m not always sure of everything, but we’re very sure we know who we’re blowing up.”

    On October 1, toward the height of the US military campaign against alleged drug boats, I asked Rubio, “What’s the authority for the use of military force here?”

    “Well, I refer you to White House counsel because I know they’ve written up on that extensively,” the secretary of state told me. “I’m not in any way disavowing it. I agree with it 100%. I think we’re on very strong, firm footing, but I don’t want to be giving legal answers on behalf of the White House or the Department of War.”

    I pointed out that the US had traditionally used lethal force against terrorists, not drug dealers: “The only way this has been done in the past was on targets that were considered hostile combatants or terrorists.”

    “Well, the president [believes], and I agree with his view, [that] these are anyone who is involved in the business of smuggling not just drugs, but crime into the United States…They empower and fuel an entire network of criminality that leads to violence, that leads to murders, that leads to all sorts of things that happen in the United States that are drug-related. This is an act of war against the United States.”

    [ad_2]

    Chris Whipple

    Source link

  • Moulton hits Markey over prior support for war authorization

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — An expected vote by the U.S. Senate on a war powers resolution to restrict U.S. military action in Venezuela has become a campaign issue in the Democratic primary race between incumbent U.S. Sen. Ed Markey and challenger U.S Rep. Seth Moulton.

    The Senate on Thursday is poised to vote on a war powers resolution, filed by Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia, to halt President Donald Trump’s use of military force against Venezuela. The move comes after Trump ordered the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, who were brought to New York to face drug trafficking and weapons charges.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAms6>@4C2ED D2J %CF>A’D 2EE24< @? ‘6?6KF6=2 H2D :==682= 2?5 F?2FE9@C:K65] %CF>A 2C8F6D E96 >@G6 H2D ;FDE:7:65 E@ DE@A E96 7=@H @7 :==682= 5CF8D :?E@ E96 &?:E65 $E2E6D 7C@> ‘6?6KF6=2 2?5 6I6CE &]$] 9686>@?J @G6C E96 C68:@?]k^Am

    kAm|@F=E@?[ 2 7:G6E6C> s6>@4C2E D66<:?8 E@ F?D62E |2C<6J 😕 E96 $6AE6>36C AC:>2CJ[ 😀 2>@?8 E96 s6>@4C2ED 2?5 >:=:E2CJ G6E6C2?D 😕 r@?8C6DD FC8:?8 E96 #6AF3=:42?4@?EC@==65 $6?2E6 E@ 2AAC@G6 C6DEC:4E:@?D @? E96 FD6 @7 >:=:E2CJ 7@C46 😕 E96 $@FE9 p>6C:42? 4@F?ECJ H96? :E 4@>6D FA 7@C 2 G@E6]k^Am

    kAmqFE |@F=E@? 2=D@ D66D E96 FA4@>:?8 G@E6 2D 2? @AA@CEF?:EJ E@ 9:89=:89E 9:D A@=:E:42= C:G2=’D DFAA@CE 7@C E96 H2C 2FE9@C:K2E:@? 3J r@?8C6DD >@C6 E92? EH@ 564256D 28@[ H9:49 =625 E@ 9:D 56A=@J>6?E E@ xC2B 2D 2 J@F?8 |2C:?6 42AE2:?]k^Am

    kAmx? 2 G:56@ A@DE65 @? D@4:2= >65:2[ |@F=E@? A@:?ED @FE E92E |2C<6J — 2D 2 >6>36C @7 E96 w@FD6 @7 #6AC6D6?E2E:G6D — G@E65 😕 a__a E@ DFAA@CE C6D@=FE:@?D 2FE9@C:K:?8 E96 FD6 @7 7@C46 xC2B] |@F=E@? D6CG65 7@FC 4@>32E E@FCD @7 5FEJ 😕 xC2B]k^Am

    kAmw6 2=D@ 4C:E:4:K65 |2C<6J 7@C G@E:?8 E@ 4@?7:C> 7@C>6C u=@C:52 $6?] |2C4@ #F3:@ 7@C $64C6E2CJ @7 $E2E6] %CF>A 92D C6A@CE65=J AFE #F3:@[ 2 =@?8E:>6 |25FC@ 4C:E:4[ 😕 492C86 @7 @G6CD66:?8 E96 &]$] >:=:E2CJ @A6C2E:@?D 😕 ‘6?6KF6=2]k^Am

    kAm“t5 |2C<6J G@E65 7@C E96 xC2B H2C 32D65 @? 2 =:6[” |@F=E@? D2:5 😕 E96 G:56@] “%96? 96 2AA2C6?E=J =62C?65 ?@E9:?8 2?5 G@E65 E@ CF336C DE2>A |2C4@ #F3:@[ H9@ 😀 D6?5:?8 EC@@AD :?E@ ‘6?6KF6=2 32D65 @? 2 =:6]”k^Am

    kAm|@F=E@? 92D 42==65 %CF>A’D F?:=2E6C2= :?4FCD:@? 😕 ‘6?6KF6=2 “xC2B a]_” 2?5 😀 2>@?8 s6>@4C2ED H9@ 2C8F6 E92E E96 4@?7=:4E 😀 23@FE D6:K:?8 E96 4@F?ECJ’D @:= C6D6CG6D[ ?@E 5CF8 EC277:4<:?8 @C E6CC@C:D>]k^Am

    kAm“(6’G6 8@EE2 DE@A DFAA@CE:?8 E9:D #6AF3=:42? H2C >@?86C:?8] xE’D ?@E E96 <:?5 @7 =6256CD9:A E92E H6 ?665[” |@F=E@? D2:5 😕 E96 G:56@] “p?5 x 5@?’E E9:?< $6?2E@C |2C<6J F?56CDE2?5D E96 DE2<6D 7@C J@F?8 A6@A=6 =:<6 >JD6=7 H9@ 2C6 D6?E E@ 7:89E 2?5 5:6 😕 E96D6 H2C E92E H6 5@?’E ?665]”k^Am

    kAmx? C6DA@?D6[ |2C<6J’D @77:46 :DDF65 2 DE2E6>6?E A@:?E:?8 @FE E92E E96 G6E6C2? =2H>2<6C 324<65 2 D:>:=2C H2C A@H6CD C6D@=FE:@? E92E 42>6 FA 7@C 2 G@E6 😕 E96 $6?2E6 😕 }@G6>36C[ H9:49 “H@F=5 92G6 3=@4<65 s@?2=5 %CF>A 7C@> 2FE9@C:K:?8 >:=:E2CJ DEC:<6D @? ‘6?6KF6=2]” %96 C6D@=FE:@? 72:=65 E@ A2DD 2>:5 #6AF3=:42? @AA@D:E:@?]k^Am

    kAm“(96? $6?2E@C z2:?6 3C:?8D 9:D C6D@=FE:@? E@ E96 $6?2E6 7=@@C 7@C 2 G@E6 E9:D H66<[ $6?2E@C |2C<6J H:== DFAA@CE :E 282:?[” E96 DE2E6>6?E D2:5] “#6AF3=:42?D H:== 92G6 2 492?46 E@ 8@ @? C64@C5i 5@ E96J DE2?5 7@C s@?2=5 %CF>A’D H2C 7@C @:= @C 5@ E96J DE2?5 7@C A6246 7@C E96 p>6C:42? A6@A=6n $6?2E@C |2C<6J 49@@D6D E96 p>6C:42? A6@A=6 6G6CJ E:>6]”k^Am

    kAm%96 DE2E6>6?E 5:5?’E 255C6DD |@F=E@?’D 4C:E:4:D> @7 E96 D6?2E@C 7@C 9:D AC6G:@FD G@E6D @? E96 xC2B H2C C6D@=FE:@?D]k^Am

    kAm|@F=E@? 2?5 @E96C 4C:E:4D D2J E96 4=2:> 3J !C6D:56?E v6@C86 (] qFD9’D 25>:?:DEC2E:@?E92E xC2B 925 H62A@?D @7 >2DD 56DECF4E:@? 29625 @7 E96 ~4E@36C a__a G@E6D E@ 2FE9@C:K6 7@C46 😕 E96 4@F?ECJ H2D 32D6=6DD] }62C=J d[___ &]$] EC@@AD H6C6 <:==65 😕 E96 H2C] xC2B: 562E9D H6C6 6DE:>2E65 😕 E96 9F?5C65D @7 E9@FD2?5D]k^Am

    kAmx? a_ab[ E96 E96?s6>@4C2E:4=65 $6?2E6 A2DD65 2 3:A2CE:D2? 3:== E@ C6A62= E96 `hh` 2?5 a__a H2C A@H6CD 2FE9@C:K2E:@? 7@C xC2B 😕 2 DJ>3@=:4 >@G6 2:>65 2E 6?5:?8 5632E6 @G6C E96 =682= ;FDE:7:42E:@? 7@C E96 H2CD] qFE E96 3:== DE2==65 😕 E96 v~!4@?EC@==65 w@FD6 2?5 72:=65 E@ C6249 E96?!C6D:56?E y@6 q:56?’D 56D<]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Rubio and Hegseth brief congressional leaders as questions mount over next steps in Venezuela

    [ad_1]

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other top officials briefed leaders in Congress late Monday on the striking military operation in Venezuela amid mounting concerns that President Donald Trump is embarking on a new era of U.S. expansionism without consultation of lawmakers or a clear vision for running the South American country.Republican leaders entered the closed-door session at the Capitol largely supportive of Trump’s decision to forcibly remove Venezuela’s president Nicolás Maduro from power, but many Democrats emerged with more questions as Trump maintains a fleet of naval vessels off the Venezuelan coast and urges U.S. companies to reinvest in the country’s underperforming oil industry.A war powers resolution that would prohibit U.S. military action in Venezuela without approval from Congress is heading for a vote this week in the Senate.“We don’t expect troops on the ground,” said House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., afterward.He said Venezuela’s new leadership cannot be allowed to engage in narcoterrorism or the trafficking of drugs into the U.S., which sparked Trump’s initial campaign of deadly boat strikes that have killed more than 115 people.“This is not a regime change. This is demand for a change in behavior,” Johnson said. “We don’t expect direct involvement in any other way beyond just coercing the new, the interim government, to get that going.”Johnson added, “We have a way of persuasion — because their oil exports, as you know, have been seized, and I think that will bring the country to a new governance in very short order,” he said.But Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, emerged saying, “There are still many more questions that need to be answered.”“What is the cost? How much is this going to cost the United States of America?” Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said afterward.Lawmakers were kept in the darkThe briefing, which stretched for two hours, came days after the surprise military action that few, if any, of the congressional leaders knew about until after it was underway — a remarkable delay in informing Congress, which has ultimate say over matters of war.Administration officials fielded a range of questions — from further involvement of U.S. troops on the ground to the role of the Venezuelan opposition leadership that appeared to have been sidelined by the Trump administration as the country’s vice president, Maduro ally Delcy Rodriguez, swiftly became the country’s interim president.Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Air Force Gen. Dan Caine, and Attorney General Pam Bondi, who brought drug trafficking charges against Maduro, all joined the classified session. It was intended for the called “gang of eight” leaders, which includes Intelligence committee leadership as well as the chairmen and ranking lawmakers on the national security committees.Asked afterward if he had any more clarity about who is actually running Venezuela, Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, said, “I wish I could tell you yes, but I can’t.”Leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee — Republican chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and ranking Democrat Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois — said they should have been included in the classified briefing, arguing they have oversight of the Justice Department under Bondi.Earlier in the day, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer warned that Trump’s action in Venezuela is only the beginning of a dangerous approach to foreign policy as the president publicly signals his interests in Colombia, Cuba and Greenland.“The American people did not sign up for another round of endless wars,” Schumer said.Afterward, Schumer said the briefing, “while extensive and long, posed far more questions than it answered.”Republicans hold mixed views reflective of the deepening schism within Trump’s “Make America Great Again” movement as the president, who vowed to put America first, ventures toward overseas entanglements many lawmakers in both parties want to avoid — particularly after the long wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.No clarity on what comes nextNext steps in the country, and calls for elections in Venezuela, are uncertain.The Trump administration had been in talks with Rodríguez, who took the place of her ally Maduro and offered “to collaborate” with the Trump administration. Meanwhile, Trump has been dismissive of Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado, who last month won the Nobel Peace Prize for her struggle to achieve a democratic transition in her nation. Trump has said Machado lacks the “support” or “respect” to run the country.But Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., a staunch Trump ally, said he plans to speak soon with Machado, and called her “very popular if you look at what happened in the last election.”“She eventually, I think, will be the president of Venezuela,” Scott said. “You know, this is going to be a process to get to a democracy. It’s not easy. There’s a lot of bad people still there, so it’s going to take time. They are going to have an election, and I think she will get elected.”Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who has been a leading critic of the Trump campaign of boat strikes against suspected drug smugglers, said there are probably a dozen leaders around the world who the U.S. could say are in violation of an international law or human rights law.“And we have never gone in and plucked them out the country. So it sets a very bad precedent for doing this, and it’s unconstitutional,” Paul told reporters. “There’s no way you can say bombing a capital and removing the president of a foreign country is not an initiation of war.”__Associated Press writer Kevin Freking contributed to this story.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other top officials briefed leaders in Congress late Monday on the striking military operation in Venezuela amid mounting concerns that President Donald Trump is embarking on a new era of U.S. expansionism without consultation of lawmakers or a clear vision for running the South American country.

    Republican leaders entered the closed-door session at the Capitol largely supportive of Trump’s decision to forcibly remove Venezuela’s president Nicolás Maduro from power, but many Democrats emerged with more questions as Trump maintains a fleet of naval vessels off the Venezuelan coast and urges U.S. companies to reinvest in the country’s underperforming oil industry.

    A war powers resolution that would prohibit U.S. military action in Venezuela without approval from Congress is heading for a vote this week in the Senate.

    “We don’t expect troops on the ground,” said House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., afterward.

    He said Venezuela’s new leadership cannot be allowed to engage in narcoterrorism or the trafficking of drugs into the U.S., which sparked Trump’s initial campaign of deadly boat strikes that have killed more than 115 people.

    “This is not a regime change. This is demand for a change in behavior,” Johnson said. “We don’t expect direct involvement in any other way beyond just coercing the new, the interim government, to get that going.”

    Johnson added, “We have a way of persuasion — because their oil exports, as you know, have been seized, and I think that will bring the country to a new governance in very short order,” he said.

    But Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, emerged saying, “There are still many more questions that need to be answered.”

    “What is the cost? How much is this going to cost the United States of America?” Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said afterward.

    Lawmakers were kept in the dark

    The briefing, which stretched for two hours, came days after the surprise military action that few, if any, of the congressional leaders knew about until after it was underway — a remarkable delay in informing Congress, which has ultimate say over matters of war.

    Administration officials fielded a range of questions — from further involvement of U.S. troops on the ground to the role of the Venezuelan opposition leadership that appeared to have been sidelined by the Trump administration as the country’s vice president, Maduro ally Delcy Rodriguez, swiftly became the country’s interim president.

    Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Air Force Gen. Dan Caine, and Attorney General Pam Bondi, who brought drug trafficking charges against Maduro, all joined the classified session. It was intended for the called “gang of eight” leaders, which includes Intelligence committee leadership as well as the chairmen and ranking lawmakers on the national security committees.

    Asked afterward if he had any more clarity about who is actually running Venezuela, Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, said, “I wish I could tell you yes, but I can’t.”

    Leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee — Republican chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and ranking Democrat Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois — said they should have been included in the classified briefing, arguing they have oversight of the Justice Department under Bondi.

    Earlier in the day, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer warned that Trump’s action in Venezuela is only the beginning of a dangerous approach to foreign policy as the president publicly signals his interests in Colombia, Cuba and Greenland.

    “The American people did not sign up for another round of endless wars,” Schumer said.

    Afterward, Schumer said the briefing, “while extensive and long, posed far more questions than it answered.”

    Republicans hold mixed views reflective of the deepening schism within Trump’s “Make America Great Again” movement as the president, who vowed to put America first, ventures toward overseas entanglements many lawmakers in both parties want to avoid — particularly after the long wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    No clarity on what comes next

    Next steps in the country, and calls for elections in Venezuela, are uncertain.

    The Trump administration had been in talks with Rodríguez, who took the place of her ally Maduro and offered “to collaborate” with the Trump administration. Meanwhile, Trump has been dismissive of Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado, who last month won the Nobel Peace Prize for her struggle to achieve a democratic transition in her nation. Trump has said Machado lacks the “support” or “respect” to run the country.

    But Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., a staunch Trump ally, said he plans to speak soon with Machado, and called her “very popular if you look at what happened in the last election.”

    “She eventually, I think, will be the president of Venezuela,” Scott said. “You know, this is going to be a process to get to a democracy. It’s not easy. There’s a lot of bad people still there, so it’s going to take time. They are going to have an election, and I think she will get elected.”

    Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who has been a leading critic of the Trump campaign of boat strikes against suspected drug smugglers, said there are probably a dozen leaders around the world who the U.S. could say are in violation of an international law or human rights law.

    “And we have never gone in and plucked them out the country. So it sets a very bad precedent for doing this, and it’s unconstitutional,” Paul told reporters. “There’s no way you can say bombing a capital and removing the president of a foreign country is not an initiation of war.”

    __

    Associated Press writer Kevin Freking contributed to this story.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Who is Delcy Rodríguez? The woman who’s Venezuela’s interim president

    [ad_1]

    As uncertainty simmers in Venezuela, interim President Delcy Rodríguez has taken the place of her ally deposed President Nicolás Maduro, captured by the United States in a nighttime military operation, and offered “to collaborate” with the Trump administration in what could be a seismic shift in relations between the adversary governments.Rodríguez served as Maduro’s vice president since 2018, overseeing much of Venezuela’s oil-dependent economy and its feared intelligence service, and was next in the presidential line of succession.She’s part of a band of senior officials in Maduro’s administration that now appears to control Venezuela, even as U.S. President Donald Trump and other officials say they will pressure the government to fall in line with its vision for the oil-rich nation.On Saturday, Venezuela’s high court ordered her to assume the role of interim president, and the leader was backed by Venezuela’s military.Ally or adversaryRodríguez, a 56-year-old lawyer and politician has had a lengthy career representing the revolution started by the late Hugo Chávez on the world stage. It’s been unclear if the leader would warm up to the Trump administration or follow the same adversarial line as her predecessor.Her rise to become interim leader of the South American country came as a surprise on Saturday morning, when Trump announced that Secretary of State Marco Rubio had been in communication with Rodríguez and that the Venezuelan leader was “gracious” and would work with the American government. Rubio said Rodríguez was someone the administration could work with, unlike Maduro.But in a televised address, Rodríguez gave no indication that she would cooperate with Trump, referring to his government as “extremists” and maintaining that Maduro was Venezuela’s rightful leader.“What is being done to Venezuela is an atrocity that violates international law,” Rodríguez said, surrounded by high-ranking civilian officials and military leaders.Trump warned on Sunday, if Rodríguez didn’t fall in line, “she is going to pay a very big price, probably bigger than Maduro.” He added that he wanted her to provide “total access,” from oil facilities to basic infrastructure like roads, so they can be rebuilt.Trump’s comments also followed Rubio having asserted in TV interviews on Sunday that he didn’t see Rodríguez and her government as “legitimate” because he said the country never held free and fair elections.On Sunday, in statements posted to her Instagram, she took a major shift in tone in a conciliatory message where she said she hoped to build “respectful relations” with Trump.“We invite the US government to collaborate with us on an agenda of cooperation oriented towards shared development within the framework of international law to strengthen lasting community coexistence,” she wrote.Rise to interim presidentA lawyer educated in Britain and France, the interim president and her brother, Jorge Rodríguez, head of the Maduro-controlled National Assembly, have sterling leftist credentials born from tragedy. Their father was a socialist leader who was arrested for his involvement in the kidnapping of American business owner William Niehous in 1976, and later died in police custody.Unlike many in Maduro’s inner circle, the Rodríguez siblings have avoided criminal indictment in the U.S., though the interim president did face U.S. sanctions during Trump’s first term for her role in undermining Venezuelan democracy.Rodríguez held a number of lower-level positions under Chávez’s government, but gained prominence working under Maduro to the point of being seen as his successor. She served the economic minister, foreign affairs minister, petroleum minister and others help stabilize Venezuela’s endemically crisis-stricken economy after years of rampant inflation and turmoil.Rodríguez developed strong ties with Republicans in the oil industry and on Wall Street who balked at the notion of U.S.-led regime change. The interim president also presided over an assembly promoted by Maduro in response to street protests in 2017 meant to neutralize the opposition-majority legislature.She enjoys a close relationship with the military, which has long acted as the arbiter of political disputes in Venezuela, said Ronal Rodríguez, a spokesperson for the Venezuela Observatory of Rosario University in Bogota, Colombia.“She has a very particular relationship with power,” he said. “She has developed very strong ties with elements of the armed forces and has managed to establish lines of dialogue with them, largely on a transactional basis.”Future in powerIt’s unclear how long Rodríguez will hold power, or how closely she will work with the Trump administration.Geoff Ramsey, a senior nonresident fellow at the Atlantic Council, a Washington research institute, said Rodríguez’s initially firm tone with the Trump administration may have been an attempt to “save face.” Others have noted that Maduro’s capture required some level of collaboration within the Venezuelan government.“She can’t exactly expect to score points with her revolutionary peers if she presents herself as a patsy for U.S. interests,” Ramsey said.Venezuela’s constitution requires an election within 30 days whenever the president becomes “permanently unavailable” to serve. Reasons listed include death, resignation, removal from office or “abandonment” of duties as declared by the National Assembly.That electoral timeline was rigorously followed when Maduro’s predecessor, Chavez, died of cancer in 2013. However, the loyalist Supreme Court, in its decision Saturday, cited another provision of the charter in declaring Maduro’s absence a “temporary” one.In such a scenario, there is no election requirement. Instead, the vice president, an unelected position, takes over for up to 90 days — a period that can be extended to six months with a vote of the National Assembly.In handing temporary power to Rodríguez, the Supreme Court made no mention of the 180-day time limit, leading some to speculate she could try to remain in power even longer as she seeks to unite the disparate factions of the ruling socialist party while shielding it from what would certainly be a stiff electoral challenge.—Janetsky reported from Mexico City and Debre reported from Buenos Aires, Argentina. Associated Press writers Joshua Goodman in Miami, Darlene Superville aboard Air Force One and Jorge Rueda in Caracas, Venezuela, contributed to this report.

    As uncertainty simmers in Venezuela, interim President Delcy Rodríguez has taken the place of her ally deposed President Nicolás Maduro, captured by the United States in a nighttime military operation, and offered “to collaborate” with the Trump administration in what could be a seismic shift in relations between the adversary governments.

    Rodríguez served as Maduro’s vice president since 2018, overseeing much of Venezuela’s oil-dependent economy and its feared intelligence service, and was next in the presidential line of succession.

    She’s part of a band of senior officials in Maduro’s administration that now appears to control Venezuela, even as U.S. President Donald Trump and other officials say they will pressure the government to fall in line with its vision for the oil-rich nation.

    On Saturday, Venezuela’s high court ordered her to assume the role of interim president, and the leader was backed by Venezuela’s military.

    Ally or adversary

    Rodríguez, a 56-year-old lawyer and politician has had a lengthy career representing the revolution started by the late Hugo Chávez on the world stage. It’s been unclear if the leader would warm up to the Trump administration or follow the same adversarial line as her predecessor.

    Her rise to become interim leader of the South American country came as a surprise on Saturday morning, when Trump announced that Secretary of State Marco Rubio had been in communication with Rodríguez and that the Venezuelan leader was “gracious” and would work with the American government. Rubio said Rodríguez was someone the administration could work with, unlike Maduro.

    But in a televised address, Rodríguez gave no indication that she would cooperate with Trump, referring to his government as “extremists” and maintaining that Maduro was Venezuela’s rightful leader.

    “What is being done to Venezuela is an atrocity that violates international law,” Rodríguez said, surrounded by high-ranking civilian officials and military leaders.

    Trump warned on Sunday, if Rodríguez didn’t fall in line, “she is going to pay a very big price, probably bigger than Maduro.” He added that he wanted her to provide “total access,” from oil facilities to basic infrastructure like roads, so they can be rebuilt.

    Trump’s comments also followed Rubio having asserted in TV interviews on Sunday that he didn’t see Rodríguez and her government as “legitimate” because he said the country never held free and fair elections.

    On Sunday, in statements posted to her Instagram, she took a major shift in tone in a conciliatory message where she said she hoped to build “respectful relations” with Trump.

    “We invite the US government to collaborate with us on an agenda of cooperation oriented towards shared development within the framework of international law to strengthen lasting community coexistence,” she wrote.

    Rise to interim president

    A lawyer educated in Britain and France, the interim president and her brother, Jorge Rodríguez, head of the Maduro-controlled National Assembly, have sterling leftist credentials born from tragedy. Their father was a socialist leader who was arrested for his involvement in the kidnapping of American business owner William Niehous in 1976, and later died in police custody.

    Unlike many in Maduro’s inner circle, the Rodríguez siblings have avoided criminal indictment in the U.S., though the interim president did face U.S. sanctions during Trump’s first term for her role in undermining Venezuelan democracy.

    Rodríguez held a number of lower-level positions under Chávez’s government, but gained prominence working under Maduro to the point of being seen as his successor. She served the economic minister, foreign affairs minister, petroleum minister and others help stabilize Venezuela’s endemically crisis-stricken economy after years of rampant inflation and turmoil.

    Rodríguez developed strong ties with Republicans in the oil industry and on Wall Street who balked at the notion of U.S.-led regime change. The interim president also presided over an assembly promoted by Maduro in response to street protests in 2017 meant to neutralize the opposition-majority legislature.

    She enjoys a close relationship with the military, which has long acted as the arbiter of political disputes in Venezuela, said Ronal Rodríguez, a spokesperson for the Venezuela Observatory of Rosario University in Bogota, Colombia.

    “She has a very particular relationship with power,” he said. “She has developed very strong ties with elements of the armed forces and has managed to establish lines of dialogue with them, largely on a transactional basis.”

    Future in power

    It’s unclear how long Rodríguez will hold power, or how closely she will work with the Trump administration.

    Geoff Ramsey, a senior nonresident fellow at the Atlantic Council, a Washington research institute, said Rodríguez’s initially firm tone with the Trump administration may have been an attempt to “save face.” Others have noted that Maduro’s capture required some level of collaboration within the Venezuelan government.

    “She can’t exactly expect to score points with her revolutionary peers if she presents herself as a patsy for U.S. interests,” Ramsey said.

    Venezuela’s constitution requires an election within 30 days whenever the president becomes “permanently unavailable” to serve. Reasons listed include death, resignation, removal from office or “abandonment” of duties as declared by the National Assembly.

    That electoral timeline was rigorously followed when Maduro’s predecessor, Chavez, died of cancer in 2013. However, the loyalist Supreme Court, in its decision Saturday, cited another provision of the charter in declaring Maduro’s absence a “temporary” one.

    In such a scenario, there is no election requirement. Instead, the vice president, an unelected position, takes over for up to 90 days — a period that can be extended to six months with a vote of the National Assembly.

    In handing temporary power to Rodríguez, the Supreme Court made no mention of the 180-day time limit, leading some to speculate she could try to remain in power even longer as she seeks to unite the disparate factions of the ruling socialist party while shielding it from what would certainly be a stiff electoral challenge.

    Janetsky reported from Mexico City and Debre reported from Buenos Aires, Argentina. Associated Press writers Joshua Goodman in Miami, Darlene Superville aboard Air Force One and Jorge Rueda in Caracas, Venezuela, contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Commentary: In Trump’s invasion of Venezuela, Marco Rubio is the biggest sellout of all

    [ad_1]

    By invading Venezuela, President Trump just lit America’s eternal exploding cigar.

    For over 175 years — ever since the United States conquered half of Mexico — nearly every president has messed with Latin America while telling the rest of the world to stay the hell out.

    We have helped depose democratically elected leaders and propped up murderous strongmen. Trained death squads and offered bailouts to favored allies. Ran economic blockades and encouraged American companies to treat the region’s riches, and its workers, like a cookie jar.

    From the Mexican American War to the Bay of Pigs invasion, the Panama Canal to NAFTA, we’ve only looked out for ourselves in Latin America even while wrapping our actions in the banner of benevolence.

    It’s rarely ended well for anyone involved — especially us. Many of the leaders we put into power became despots we tolerated until they ran their course, like Panama’s Manuel Noriega. The political upheaval we helped create has led generations of Latin Americans to migrate to el Norte, fundamentally changing our country even as too many Americans think people like my family should have stayed in their ancestral homes.

    So there Trump was at Mar-a-Lago on Saturday, insisting that the capture of Venezuela dictator Nicolás Maduro and his wife by American troops was a military action as brilliant and consequential as D-day. He also announced that the U.S. would “run the country” and practically jiggled out his weird “YMCA” dance at the idea of making money from Venezuelan oil.

    His message to the world: Venezuela is ours until we say so, just like the rest of Latin America. And if allies and enemies alike still didn’t get the hint, Trump announced an updated Monroe Doctrine — the idea that the U.S. can do whatever it wants in the Western Hemisphere — called the “Donroe Doctrine.”

    Because of course he did.

    No one in Washington should be more versed in this terrible history than Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the child of Cubans who fled the island when it was ruled by the U.S.-backed caudillo Fulgencio Batista.

    Rubio grew up in an exile community that saw Batista’s replacement, Fidel Castro, remain in power for decades, despite a U.S. embargo. As one of Florida’s U.S. senators, Rubio represented millions of Latin American immigrants who had fled civil wars sparked by the U.S. in one way or another.

    Yet he’s Trumpworld’s biggest cheerleader for Latin American regime change, helping torpedo the president’s anti-interventionist campaign promise as if it were a narco boat off the South American coast.

    On Saturday, Rubio looked on silently as Trump threatened Colombian President Gustavo Petro to “watch his ass.” When it was Rubio’s turn to take questions from reporters, he said Cuban leaders “should be concerned” and offered a warning to the rest of the world: “Don’t play games with this president in office, because it’s not going to turn out well.”

    In Latin America, few are more reviled than the vendido — the sellout. Betraying one’s country for personal or political gain is an original sin dating back to the tribes who aligned with Spanish conquistadors to take down repressive empires, only to suffer the same sad end themselves. Vendidos have dominated the region’s history and stilted its development, with leaders — Mexico’s Porfirio Diaz, the Somozas of Nicaragua, Rafael Trujillo in the Dominican Republic — more than happy to side with the yanquis at the expense of their own countrymen.

    Rubio belongs to this long, sordid lineup — and in many ways, he’s the worst vendido of them all.

    Then-Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), left, listens during a 2016 president debate with candidate Donald Trump.

    (Wilfredo Lee / Associated Press)

    I still remember the fresh-faced, idealistic guy trying to pass a bipartisan amnesty bill in 2013. Though too right-wing for my taste, he seemed like a Latino politician who could thread the needle between liberals and conservatives, gringos and us.

    It was wonderful to see him call out Trump’s boorishness when the two ran against each other in the 2016 Republican presidential primary. He told CNN’s Jake Tapper, in words that sound more prophetic than ever, “For years to come, there are many people … that are going to be having to explain and justify how they fell into this trap of supporting Donald Trump because this is not going to end well, one way or the other.”

    The thirst for power has a way of corrupting even the most idealistic hearts, alas. Rubio ended up endorsing Trump in 2016, supporting Trump’s claims that the 2020 election was rigged and proclaiming at the 2024 Republican National Convention that Trump “has not just transformed our party, he has inspired a movement.”

    Rubio’s reward for his boot-licking? He sets our foreign policy agenda, which is like putting an arsonist in charge of a fireworks stall.

    I’m sure all of this comes off as leftist babble to the Venezuelan diaspora, many of whom cheered Maduro’s fate from Spain to Mexico, Miami to Los Angeles. Only a deluded pendejo could support what Maduro wrought on Venezuela, which was a prosperous country and a relatively stable U.S. ally for decades as the rest of South America teetered from one crisis to another.

    But for Trump, toppling Maduro was never about the well-being of Venezuelans or bringing democracy to their country; it was about securing a foothold to flex American power and enrich the U.S.

    Meanwhile, his deportation Leviathan has gobbled up tens of thousands of undocumented Venezuelans and canceled the temporary protected status of hundreds of thousands more.

    Back in 2022, when Rubio was still a senator, he advocated for Venezuelans to be eligible for temporary protected status, which is granted to citizens of countries considered too dangerous to return to. At the time, Rubio argued that “failure to do so would result in a very real death sentence for countless Venezuelans who have fled their country.”

    Now? At a May news conference, he maintained that the 240 Venezuelans deported to El Salvador earlier in 2025 “were not migrants, these were criminals,” even though the Deportation Data Project found that only 16% of them had criminal convictions.

    Rubio has long fashioned himself as a modern-day Simón Bolívar, the Venezuelan who led the liberation of South America from Spain and who has been a hero to many Latinos ever since.

    But even Bolívar knew to be skeptical of American hegemony, writing in an 1829 letter that the U.S. “seems destined by Providence to plague [Latin] America with miseries in the name of Freedom.”

    Plague, thy name is Marco Rubio. By pushing Trump to run rampant over Latin America, you’re setting in motion the same old song of U.S. meddling that ties your family and mine. By letting Maduro’s cronies remain in power if they play along with you and Trump, even though they stole an election in 2024, proves you’re as much for the Venezuelan people as, well, Maduro.

    Vendido.

    [ad_2]

    Gustavo Arellano

    Source link

  • Face the Nation: Cotton, Himes, Van Hollen

    [ad_1]

    Missed the second half of the show? Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Sen. Tom Cotton, Rep. Jim Himes and Sen. Chris Van Hollen join.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rubio vows to eliminate Hezbollah, Iran operations from Venezuela after Maduro capture

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    The day after elite U.S. forces captured wanted narco-terrorist and former Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro in Caracas, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the Iran-backed Lebanese terrorist movement Hezbollah will no longer have operations in the South American state.

    The Iranian regime-backed Hezbollah terrorist organization is responsible for both the bombing of the U.S. embassy, which killed 63 people, and the Marine barracks bombing in Beirut in 1983, when 241 U.S. military personnel were killed.

    Speaking on CBS’ Face the Nation, Rubio said, “It’s very simple, okay? In the 21st century, under the Trump administration, we are not going to have a country like Venezuela in our own hemisphere, in the sphere of control and the crossroads for Hezbollah, for Iran and for every other malign influence in the world. That’s just not gonna exist.” He also told NBC’s Meet the Press that, in regard to Venezuela, that meant, “No more Iran/Hezbollah presence there.”

    GOP SENATOR PREDICTS TRUMP’S NEXT MOVE IN VENEZUELA AMID HEZBOLLAH’S INFLUENCE: ‘LONG PAST DUE’

    Hezbollah members salute and raise the group’s yellow flags during the funeral of their fallen comrades Ismail Baz and Mohamad Hussein Shohury, who were killed in an Israeli strike on their vehicles, in Shehabiya in south Lebanon on April 17, 2024.  (AFP via Getty Images)

    Walid Phares, who has advised U.S. presidential candidates and is a leading expert on Hezbollah, told Fox News Digital that “Hezbollah has a long history in Venezuela and has emerged as a significant security concern in Latin America, particularly after the September 11, 2001 attacks. The origins of Hezbollah’s presence in Venezuela date back to the mid-1980s, when the organization began recruiting members from segments of the local Lebanese diaspora.”

    He noted that Hezbollah gained greater traction following the late Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez’s consolidation of power in 2002. “During this period, Hezbollah’s presence became more visible, with reports indicating that some of its members gained access to Venezuelan state institutions, including security agencies, often through the acquisition of Venezuelan passports and legal documentation. These developments facilitated the expansion of Hezbollah-linked networks throughout Latin America, extending into Brazil, Argentina and Chile, and reportedly reaching as far as the U.S.–Mexico border.”

    Phares said, “Hezbollah is believed to maintain a substantial presence across Venezuela, including command-and-control elements in Caracas. Margarita Island has been frequently cited in open-source reporting as a logistical hub used for activities ranging from financial operations to intelligence gathering and alleged narcotics trafficking. Additional public reporting has suggested Venezuelan cooperation with Iranian and Hezbollah-linked operations targeting Iranian dissidents abroad, including attempted kidnappings and intimidation campaigns in the Western Hemisphere.”

    ON MADURO’S ‘TERROR ISLAND,’ HEZBOLLAH OPERATIVES MOVE IN AS TOURISTS DRIFT OUT

    The U.S.-designated terrorist organization Hezbollah lashed out at the U.S. after it captured Maduro. Hezbollah said it “condemns the terrorist aggression and American thuggery against the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela” and “further affirms its full solidarity with Venezuela — its people, presidency and government — in confronting this American aggression and arrogance.”

    The thorny challenge of how to purge the Venezuelan state and society of embedded Hezbollah operatives was addressed by Phares. He said, “One option would be to rely on a post-Maduro transitional authority that has pledged to dismantle terrorist networks. In practice, however, it is likely that U.S. intelligence and counterterrorism agencies would play a leading role in identifying and disrupting pro-Iranian networks operating within Venezuelan territory.”

    Matthew Levitt, a scholar on Hezbollah from the Washington Institute, told Fox News Digital that “It will all come down to what kind of regime comes next. Trump’s statements leave that wide open. There is, however, an opportunity to address the longstanding Hezbollah presence in Venezuela, and the strategic relationship between Venezuela and Iran more broadly.”

    Carrie Filipetti, executive director of the Vandenberg Coalition, and a former deputy assistant Secretary of State during Trump’s first administration, told Fox News Digital, “Among the many ways in which the Iranian regime and Maduro regime coordinated until Maduro’s arrest was providing a safe haven for Hezbollah fighters. Hezbollah took advantage of the lack of rule of law in Venezuela and parts of Latin America more generally to engage in money laundering connected to the drug trade. They are also believed to have used connections within the Maduro regime to secure Venezuelan passports for members of Hezbollah.”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    She noted that “It isn’t a surprise that the plot to kidnap Iranian American journalist Masih Alinejad involved taking her by speedboat to Caracas. Hezbollah and Iran knew under Maduro, they could operate with impunity there, spread anti-American propaganda, and plan anti-American attacks. Whether there are any implications for the Maduro- Hezbollah relationship now that Maduro is gone will depend on whether regime insiders are allowed to remain in power or not.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Marco Rubio says

    [ad_1]


    Marco Rubio says “the president always retains the optionality” to occupy Venezuela – CBS News









































    Watch CBS News



    After the U.S. carried out a military operation in Venezuela and captured President Nicolás Maduro, Secretary of State Marco Rubio says “the president always retains the optionality” to occupy the country.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • GOP coalescing behind Vance as Trump privately dismisses third-term run

    [ad_1]

    When Charlie Kirk was killed by an assassin this fall, Republican leaders credited the organization he founded for enabling President Trump’s return to power.

    Now that organization is mobilizing behind Vice President JD Vance.

    Uninterested in a competitive Republican primary in 2028, Turning Point USA plans to deploy representatives across Iowa’s 99 counties in the coming months to build the campaign infrastructure it believes could deliver Vance, a Midwesterner from nearby Ohio, a decisive victory, potentially short-circuiting a fractious GOP race, insiders said.

    It is the latest move in a quiet effort by some in Trump’s orbit to clear the field of viable competitors. Earlier this month, Marco Rubio, the secretary of State previously floated by Trump as a possible contender, appeared to take himself out of the running.

    “If Vance runs for president, he’s going to be our nominee, and I’ll be one of the first people to support him,” Rubio told Vanity Fair.

    After Kirk’s widow, Erika, endorsed Vance on stage at Turning Point USA’s annual conference in Arizona last week, a straw poll of attendees found that 84% would support Vance in the coming primaries. Yet, wider public polling offers a different picture.

    A CNN poll conducted in early December found that Vance held a plurality of Republican support for 2028, at 22%, with all other potential candidates, such as Rubio and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, registering in single digits.

    The remaining 64% told pollsters they had “no one specific in mind,” reflecting an open field with plenty of room for other figures to gain ground.

    While a recent Gallup poll found that 91% of Republicans approve of Vance’s job performance as vice president — an encouraging number entering a partisan primary — only 39% of Americans across party lines view him positively in the role, setting Vance up for potential challenges should he win the nomination.

    Potential presidential candidates on both sides of the political aisle are expected to assess their chances over the next year, before primary season officially kicks off, after the midterm elections in November.

    Closing out the Turning Point USA conference, Vance called for party unity amid escalating conflicts among right-wing influencers over the acceptability of racism and antisemitism within Republican politics.

    “President Trump did not build the greatest coalition in politics by running his supporters through endless, self-defeating purity tests,” Vance said. “Every American is invited. We don’t care if you’re white or Black, rich or poor, young or old, rural or urban, controversial or a little bit boring, or somewhere in between.”

    Charlie Kirk, he added, “trusted all of you to make your own judgment. And we have far more important work to do than canceling each other.”

    Vance’s remarks drew criticism from some on the right for appearing to tolerate bigotry within the party. The vice president himself has been subjected to racist rhetoric, with Nick Fuentes — a far-right podcaster who has praised Adolf Hitler — repeatedly directing attacks at Vance’s wife and children over their Indian ancestry.

    “Let me be clear — anyone who attacks my wife, whether their name is Jen Psaki or Nick Fuentes, can eat s—,” Vance said in an interview last week, referring to President Biden’s former press secretary. “That’s my official policy as vice president of the United States.”

    In the same interview, Vance praised Tucker Carlson, another far-right podcaster who has defended Fuentes on free speech grounds, as a “friend of mine,” noting that he supported Vance as Trump’s vice presidential pick in 2024.

    Trump has floated Vance as his potential successor multiple times without ever explicitly endorsing his nomination, calling him “very capable” and the “most likely” choice for the party.

    “He’s the vice president,” Trump said in August. “Certainly he’s doing a great job, and he would be probably favored at this point.”

    Several of Trump’s most ardent supporters have pushed the president to seek a third term in 2028, despite a provision of the Constitution, in the 22nd Amendment, barring him from doing so.

    Trump himself has said the Constitution appears clear on the matter. But Steve Bannon, an architect of Trump’s historic 2016 campaign and one of his first White House strategists, continues to advocate a path forward for another run, reportedly disparaging Vance as “not tough enough” to lead the party to victory.

    “He knows he can’t run again,” Susie Wiles, the president’s White House chief of staff, told Vanity Fair in a recent profile of her. “It’s pretty unequivocal.”

    Trump, who will be 82 when he is slated to leave office, has told Wiles he understands a third term isn’t possible “a couple times,” she added.

    Alan Dershowitz, a prominent constitutional law professor and a lawyer to Trump during his Senate impeachment trial, recently presented Trump with a road map to a third term in an Oval Office meeting, which he will publish in a new book slated for release next year.

    Even he came away from their meeting believing Trump would pass on another bid.

    “That is my conclusion based on what he has said in public,” Dershowitz told The Times.

    “He has said in the past,” he added, “that it’s too cute.”

    [ad_2]

    Michael Wilner

    Source link

  • Trump’s Inner Circle, On the Record (Part 2 of 2)

    [ad_1]

    Trump’s team was divided on whether Putin’s goal was anything less than a complete Russian takeover of Ukraine. “The experts think that if he could get the rest of Donetsk, then he would be happy,” Wiles told me in August. But privately, Trump wasn’t buying it—he didn’t believe Putin wanted peace. “Donald Trump thinks he wants the whole country,” Wiles told me.

    In October I asked Rubio if that was true. “There are offers on the table right now to basically stop this war at its current lines of contact, okay?” he said. “Which include substantial parts of Ukrainian territory, including Crimea, which they’ve controlled since 2014. And the Russians continue to turn it down. And so…you do start to wonder, well, maybe what this guy wants is the entire country.” (In Wiles’s office is a photograph of Trump and Putin standing together, signed by Trump: “TO SUSIE YOU ARE THE GREATEST! DONALD.”)

    I asked Wiles about the remarkable 180-degree conversion of the secretary of state and the vice president from fierce Trump critics to high-ranking acolytes—and heirs apparent. Trump has floated a Vance-Rubio GOP presidential ticket in 2028. Rubio’s transformation was ideological and principled, she said: “Marco was not the sort of person that would violate his principles. He just won’t. And so he had to get there.” By contrast, she suggested, Vance had other motivations. “His conversion came when he was running for the Senate. And I think his conversion was a little bit more, sort of political.” During another visit to the White House on November 13, when I asked Vance about his conversion to Trump loyalist, he said: “I realized that I actually liked him, I thought he was doing a lot of good things. And I thought that he was fundamentally the right person to save the country.”

    Will Rubio challenge Vance for the top spot on the 2028 GOP presidential ticket? His answer: “If JD Vance runs for president, he’s going to be our nominee, and I’ll be one of the first people to support him.”

    Wiles is known for having an open-door policy. Trump sometimes comes in unannounced (“he apparently never did in the first administration”). During lunch, no one interrupted us, and Wiles checked her phone only once. She was enjoying a rare moment of downtime. “They don’t know what I’m doing,” she said, motioning toward the Oval, and laughed out loud. After an hour, as I got up to go, I told her about how President Barack Obama’s chief Rahm Emanuel used to complain to visitors about how thankless his job was: “This is nice,” he said, pointing to the wood-burning fireplace, “and this is nice,” gesturing toward the outdoor patio. “And everything in between sucks.” Wiles replied: “I don’t feel that way at all.”

    To the left of the fireplace was a freestanding video monitor: a live feed of Trump’s Truth Social posts.

    The average tenure for a modern White House chief of staff is a year and a half. George W. Bush’s Andrew Card holds the record at five years and three months. Wiles may yet eclipse Trump’s so-far longest-lasting chief, John Kelly, at 17 months. If she chose to quit, Wiles could make a fortune running the campaign of any number of would-be GOP nominees; though Wiles says she earned around $350,000 for her role managing Trump’s 2024 campaign, she was reported to have made millions more through her consulting firm (Wiles had not replied when asked about this by the time this article went to print). When reports emerged that Biden aide Mike Donilon stood to make $8 million if his boss had stayed in the race and won, Wiles said her co–campaign chair Chris LaCivita sent her a note that said, “Boy, am I stupid. Why was [I] so cheap?

    Wiles says she’d originally planned to serve as chief for six months. “I have not had a day I would describe as overwhelming, though there’s plenty of frustration here. But you go to bed at night, you say your prayers, and you get up and do it again.” I asked her about her health and the president’s. “Mine is good,” she said. “His is great. My kids are grown. I’m divorced. This is what I do if I stay four years.”

    [ad_2]

    Chris Whipple

    Source link

  • Now the Trump Administration Is Coming After Our Fonts

    [ad_1]

    He’s the narrow type.
    Photo: Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

    If I had to pick a word to describe Calibri, the sans-serif typeface that was the default font for Microsoft apps from 2007 to 2024, it would probably be “inoffensive.”

    Sure, Microsoft’s “extremely readable” font has had its critics over the years, but they’ve mostly just complained that it’s too plain, that it lacks personality. I’d bet that for most people, Calibri became a ubiquitous, thoughtless part of their normal life, from office memos to book reports, and few probably realized it was designed and implemented to be a more readable typeface on digital screens — which it has been. Even Microsoft has said that customers didn’t really have strong feelings about it, unlike with other fonts. Everybody thought it was … fine. But it turns out we were all wrong: According to the Trump administration, this 21-year-old boring font is weak and woke.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday barred the use of Calibri at the State Department and brought back the serif Times New Roman, which was the agency’s official font from 2004 to 2023. This was necessary, he said, to reverse the “wasteful” and distasteful shift to Calibri ordered by his Biden administration predecessor, Antony Blinken. Rubio alleged that change — which provoked little meaningful controversy at the time — was yet another example of woke radicalism run amok, since the change was recommended by the State Department’s now-disbanded DEI office because Calibri is considered to be easier to read for people with disabilities like dyslexia or vision problems. Per the New York Times report:

    While mostly framed as a matter of clarity and formality in presentation, Mr. Rubio’s directive to all diplomatic posts around the world blamed “radical” diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility programs for what he said was a misguided and ineffective switch from the serif typeface Times New Roman to sans serif Calibri in official department paperwork.

    In an “Action Request” memo obtained by The New York Times, Mr. Rubio said that switching back to the use of Times New Roman would “restore decorum and professionalism to the department’s written work.” Calibri is “informal” when compared to serif typefaces like Times New Roman, the order said, and “clashes” with the department’s official letterhead. …

    Mr. Rubio’s directive, under the subject line “Return to Tradition: Times New Roman 14-Point Font Required for All Department Paper,” served as the latest attempt by the Trump administration to stamp out remnants of diversity initiatives across the federal government. …

    Echoing President Trump’s call for classical style in federal architecture, Mr. Rubio’s order cited the origins of serif typefaces in Roman antiquity. 

    Julius Caesar would never have used Calibri, so neither should Donald Trump’s federal government, where addressing the needs of the disabled is nowhere near as important as demonizing diversity and fetishizing trad aesthetics.

    [ad_2]

    Chas Danner

    Source link