ReportWire

Tag: Madonna

  • Santa Clause Gets Lap Dance Onstage With Madonna – Falls On Dancer

    Santa Clause Gets Lap Dance Onstage With Madonna – Falls On Dancer

    [ad_1]

    Opinion

    Source: MLVC: The Madonna Podcast YouTube

    Things got weird at a Madonna concert on Tuesday night when a man dressed as Santa Clause got a lap dance while onstage with the “Like A Virgin” singer. The Santa figure then fell off his chair and onto the backup dancer who had been performing the lap dance.

    Madonna’s Santa Debacle

    Daily Mail reported that video that has since gone viral shows Madonna performing onstage with a person dressed as Santa on Tuesday night during her Celebration tour stop in Washington D.C. Santa sat in a chair in the middle of the stage while the 65 year-old “Vogue” singer performed nearby.

    Santa was eventually approached by a female backup dance who claimed onto his lap and proceeded to give him a lap dance. Both Santa and the dancer soon fell out of the chair, with him ending up on top of her as Madonna looked on in shock. The dancer immediately returned to dancing while Santa tried to compose himself and get up.

    Madonna Reveals She Was In A Coma

    This came days after Madonna revealed that she was in a medically induced coma for 48 hours back in June when she was hospitalized with a bacterial infection. She dropped this bomb during another tour stop in Brooklyn, New York on Saturday night, giving a personal shoutout to her friend Shavawn.

    “There are some very important people in the room tonight that were with me at the hospital,” Madonna said. “There’s one very important woman who dragged me to the hospital.”

    “I don’t even remember; I passed out on my bathroom floor and woke up in the ICU,” she added. “I was in an induced coma for 48 hours. She saved my life. Thank you Shavawn.”

    People Magazine went on to reveal the first things she thought about when she finally came out of the coma.

    “There were a couple of things I thought about when I first became conscious and I saw my six incredible children sitting around me — by the way, I had to almost die to get all my kids in one room,” she said, referring to Lourdes, 27, Rocco, 23, David Banda, 18, Mercy James, 17, and 11-year-old twins Estere and Stella.

    Related: Madonna, 64, Found Unresponsive And Rushed To Hospital – Family ‘Feared They May Lose Her’

    Madonna Thanks Fans – Continues Tour

    Two weeks after her hospitalization, Madonna took to social media to thank her fans for their support.

    “I have felt your love. I’m on the road to recovery and incredibly grateful for all the blessings in my life,” she wrote on Instagram.

    “My first thought when I woke up in the hospital was my children,” she continued. “My second thought was that I did not want to disappointment anyone who bought tickets for my tour. I also didn’t want to let down the people who worked tirelessly with me over the last few months to create my show. I hate to disappoint anyone.”

    Related: Franklin Graham Blasts Madonna for Saying Jesus Would be OK with Abortion

    Madonna was able to resume her tour in October with a stop in London, and she’s now traveling the U.S. making stops in various city. Given the latest viral footage, it’s clear that her tour is wilder than ever. What do you think of Madonna’s Santa escapades? Let us know in the comments section.

    Now is the time to support and share the sources you trust.
    The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites.”

    An Ivy leaguer, proud conservative millennial, history lover, writer, and lifelong New Englander, James specializes in the intersection of culture and politics.

    FREE NEWS ALERTS

    Subscribe to receive the most important stories delivered straight to your inbox. Your subscription helps protect independent media.



    By subscribing, you agree to receive emails from ThePoliticalInsider.com and that you’ve read and agree to our Privacy policy and to our terms and conditions.

    FREE NEWS ALERTS

    [ad_2]

    James Conrad

    Source link

  • Taylor Gets “Imma Let You Finish’d” Again With Accusation of Her Being Unworthy for Time Person of the Year

    Taylor Gets “Imma Let You Finish’d” Again With Accusation of Her Being Unworthy for Time Person of the Year

    [ad_1]

    Once again, Taylor Swift has dominated the conversation and, once again, a large part of that conversation is whether or not she “deserves” something. In this instance, being Time’s Person of the Year, a still respected and aspired to cover in a world where print journalism (and most other forms of print) has effectively gone the way of the dodo. The ones calling out the tone deafness of her appearance on the 2023 cover (for perspective, fellow “influencers” shortlisted for the latest edition included Barbie and Vladimir Putin—yes, you read that right) are not just her usual detractors, though. They also happen to be Swifties themselves…arguing that, instead, the masses should be seeing Palestinian journalists on the cover. 

    This was highlighted recently by the hit-or-miss stylings of Saint Hoax, who extracted a number of comments from fans that included such sentiments as, “Big Taylor Swift fan and she’s absolutely had one of the biggest years of her entire career but hey actually maybe there are ongoing world events that could’ve been highlighted with this piece” and “As a Swiftie I’m incredibly proud of her but the real heroes are the journalists documenting the genocide happening in Palestine.” To get slightly meta, the comments about the comments themselves were more divided, with one user agreeing, “Taylor and Beyoncé: nothing more than money machines this year. The world is falling apart and they haven’t said a single thing,” while another said, “Oooomggg stop trying to take this away from her. A young woman makes it to ‘Person of the Year’ on Time magazine and what about these other people who are more deserving?? I’m not even a Swiftie but this is perverse.” Then there was the glib assessment, “Sounds about White.” 

    While the hype and praise around Swift has often made this listener repeat the Heath Ledger as Patrick Verona phrase, “What is it with this chick? She have beer-flavored nipples or something?” it does seem telling that, for the second most obvious time, her proverbial “trophy” is being denigrated/taken away. In fact, in the article itself she alludes to the years-long beef with Ye that started back at the 2009 VMAs when he was still Kanye West. And yes, it also involved fellow 2023 touring powerhouse (complete with theatrical release of said tour) Beyoncé. On that front, one supposes it’s comforting that the cast of characters in the mainstream hasn’t changed too much (mainly because Gen Z has produced a paucity of “stars”). And Swift wants to remind people of that by rehashing some well-marinated beef that started in 2016 (years after everyone thought it had all “calmed down” between Swift and West). With a little song called “Famous,” wherein the erstwhile West asserts, “I made that bitch famous.” The implication being that, thanks to his hijacking of her acceptance speech for Best Female Video of the Year at the VMAs, Swift’s star began to shine a lot brighter afterward. Barring the fact that this is one of the key examples that speaks to West’s narcissism, it’s a flat-out fallacy. No one got Swift to her position except for Swift (and, to reiterate, winning the birth lottery by being born to affluent parents willing to support what many other progenitors would balk at as a pipe dream). 

    Being that Swift is something of the queen of dredging up old material these days (what with rerecording all her previously released albums from Big Machine), it makes sense that she has an innate ability to catalog and recall every “era” of her life. And this was the era that spawned her Reputation phase, one that embraced being the “bad guy” à la Billie Eilish before the latter even really entered the collective consciousness (but insisted before Taylor on “Anti-Hero,” “I’m the problem“). Of course, there was nothing all that “bad” in what Kim Kardashian (then known, foolishly, as Kim Kardashian West) manipulated the media and the masses into thinking: that Swift had consented to Ye rapping, “I feel like me and Taylor might still have sex/Why?/I made that bitch famous.” When the song came out, however, Swift reacted negatively, rightfully condemning the reference to her as misogynistic and unsanctioned. This prompted Kim K to release select portions of the phone conversation Ye had with Swift about the song that made it seem like she whole-heartedly approved. Never mind that no one bothered to ask her how she felt about the accompanying video, which was even more crass as it paraded naked wax figures (that look just like “the real thing”) of Kanye West, Taylor Swift, Kim Kardashian, George W. Bush (of all people), Donald Trump, Anna Wintour, Rihanna, Chris Brown, Ray J, Amber Rose, Caitlyn Jenner and Bill Cosby (again, weird choice) lying in bed together. 

    With Kardashian’s damning “evidence,” Swift was fed to the media and internet dogs, branded with that damning word again: “calculated.” And, newly, “snake.” This betrayal and backlash is a moment in her life that is called out again and again in the Time article as a reason for why she is where she is now after the heartache of that treachery. For, despite the “pain” of being painted as the villain, Lansky notes, “Getting to this place of harmony with her past took work; there’s a dramatic irony, she explains, to the success of the tour. ‘It’s not lost on me that the two great catalysts for this happening were two horrendous things that happened to me,’ Swift says, and this is where the story takes a turn. ‘The first was getting canceled within an inch of my life and sanity,’ she says plainly. ‘The second was having my life’s work taken away from me by someone who hates me.’” Cue the lyric from Reputation’s “End Game” that goes, “I swear I don’t love the drama, it loves me.”

    That drama came first when Kardashian initially released the edited conversation Swift had with West and, second, when the complete recording was leaked in 2020 (a year when people had plenty of extra time to analyze such things). So it is that Swift can look back now and candidly say, “​​You have a fully manufactured frame job, in an illegally recorded phone call, which Kim Kardashian edited and then put out to say to everyone that I was a liar. That took me down psychologically to a place I’ve never been before. I moved to a foreign country. I didn’t leave a rental house for a year. I was afraid to get on phone calls. I pushed away most people in my life because I didn’t trust anyone anymore. I went down really, really hard.” Yet they say what makes a successful person—a hero, even—is someone who doesn’t stay knocked down (though, this is the sort of cheeseball line that, as usual, totally overlooks the many benefits of privilege). Having been part of the fame game for so long at this point, and weathering the many so-called controversies of it (though never anything even remotely as interesting as dancing in front of burning crosses or getting pleasured amid gender-fluid patrons in a The Night Porter-inspired hotel), Swift has learned to take the bad with the good. What choice does she have, after all, if she wants to remain in the spotlight? Which she very patently does.

    As she tells Time, “Nothing is permanent. So I’m very careful to be grateful every second that I get to be doing this at this level, because I’ve had it taken away from me before.” This, to be clear, is her subjective response to being discredited, and has little bearing on the actual album sales that occurred after Kardashian and West attempted to disparage her reputation. Lansky remarks on this as well, coming to the conclusion that if Swift felt canceled, then it’s valid. Life being so much more about feelings than objectivity these days. 

    And what Swift feels now is that her “response to anything that happens, good or bad, is to keep making things. Keep making art.” She then adds, in a moment of pettiness that can’t help but overtake her, “But I’ve also learned there’s no point in actively trying to quote unquote defeat your enemies. Trash takes itself out every single time.” More direct shade against not just West and Kardashian (still somehow raking in her millions as “a girl with no talent”), but also Scooter Braun. 

    As for those who call Swift’s decision to talk trash about that trash in what is theoretically a “classy article,” well, it’s obvious why she would more than “casually” “hint” at the feud that ignited the material on Reputation: she’s about to rerelease that album next, and it’s always good to prime the masses for the narrative that was going on during the period in Swift’s life when an album was initially unleashed. And she’s, needless to say, very much ready to take back that narrative (you know, the “one that [she] never asked to be a part of, since 2009”). It being one of the only examples of a time when she wasn’t totally in control of it. Of rerecording this album, Swift muses, “The upcoming vault tracks for Reputation will be ‘fire.’ The rerecordings project feels like a mythical quest to her. ‘I’m collecting horcruxes. I’m collecting infinity stones. Gandalf’s voice is in my head every time I put out a new one. For me, it is a movie now.” As it has been for everyone else watching the drama unfold all along. Just as they’re watching a repeat of what West did to Swift at the VMAs by witnessing the internet insist that someone else (multiple someone elses) is more deserving of what she was honored with. Clearly, in this context, the “competitor” is literally in another playing field. Nay, battlefield. Making it difficult for anyone who doesn’t want to offend to argue that Swift being attacked for accepting her place on the cover has nothing to do with Palestine.

    To be even more direct, in America, no one gives as much of a fuck about Palestinian journalists as they do about Taylor Swift. And that’s just the cruel, pure honesty that has ruffled so many feathers. In this regard, the editors of Time actually did do their part to assess “the individual who most shaped the headlines over the previous twelve months, for better or for worse.” Considering the latest Israel-Palestine conflict didn’t even pop off until October, that alone gives Swift a more competitive edge for the cover, as she’s been making headlines from day one of 2023, most notably when the world was “shocked” to learn of her breakup with Joe Alwyn and then appalled by her decision to go for Matty Healy as a rebound. Is it bleak and unfortunate that celebrity culture is more influential and headline-shaping than the everyperson risking their lives to report on unspeakable atrocities? Of course. Is it new? No. Is it worth diminishing Swift’s record-breaking accomplishments in 2023? Not really. Unless one is fond of the symmetry that brings us back to the very moment that Swift says sparked it all for her to work harder, better, faster, stronger (a song Kanye has sampled, yes): being publicly shamed and told that someone else should have gotten her recognition. Recognition that, at this juncture, is almost comical in its absurd reverence. Case in point, at another moment in the article, Lansky pronounces, “As a pop star, she sits in rarefied company, alongside Elvis Presley, Michael Jackson, and Madonna; as a songwriter, she has been compared to Bob Dylan, Paul McCartney, and Joni Mitchell.”

    All of these are extremely grandiose, over-the-top comparisons that give Swift a lot more credit than she’s due (ironically, the crux of the argument for why Palestinian journalists should be on the cover instead). Not because she hasn’t “earned her stripes” (even if it’s not as challenging to do so when, again, you have emotionally and financially supportive parents), but because, well, she’s just so vanilla compared to the aforementioned legends she’s being compared to. Even so, maybe it’s time that some people should just “let Taylor finish.” Like she said (despite being fined multiple times for not taking trash out), “Trash takes itself out every time.” Or, in this case, hyper-overrated pop stars doomed to “age out” of popularity do (at least when they’re a woman). Something Swift herself has openly admitted to waiting for, thus taking advantage of the spotlight while the world is fully committed to letting her bask in it. Genocide be damned.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Madonna’s Most Non Sequitur Ad Is Also Her Most Superfluously Sellout-y

    Madonna’s Most Non Sequitur Ad Is Also Her Most Superfluously Sellout-y

    [ad_1]

    Of course, it’s hard to be a “sellout” when you were never really “indie” to begin with. But, in Madonna’s case, there has usually been at least some modicum of “street cred” to all that she’s done thanks to her pre-fame years spent in New York as a ruffian determined to “make the scene.” In short, determined to sell out. After reaching a new stratosphere of fame with her sophomore album, 1984’s Like A Virgin, Madonna did just that, literally selling out venues across America with her inaugural tour, appropriately called The Virgin Tour

    As the decades went by, Madonna maintained her reign over pop music, accordingly garnering the nickname “the Queen of Pop.” Yet, despite being the most famous woman in the world (sorry Taylor Nobody), Madonna has done relatively few major endorsements (although more unofficial endorsements, ranging from Mike and Ikes to Vita Coco, also produced “the Madonna effect” in terms of drawing attention to an otherwise underlooked brand). In fact, her most famous endorsement deal—the one with Pepsi—didn’t last more than two airings before the company pulled the plug over her controversial “Like A Prayer” video. Before that, Madonna made her first advertising debut with a heavy-hitting company in 1986, starring in a series of Mitsubishi ads…that only aired in Japan. That way, it seemed, Madonna could still maintain her aura of what she would call “artistic integrity.” It also made her very “Regina George-esque” before that Mean Girl’s time (“I hear she does car commercials…in Japan”). A 1987 ad for Mitsubishi’s hi-fi VHS player also finds Madonna playing with one of her favorite taglines, additionally wielded during her 1985 The Virgin Tour: “Dreams come true.” Except rather than being about the blood, sweat and tears she gave to become a star, in this context, it’s all about the ultimate post-neoliberal dream: owning a bunch of expensive shit meant to prove your worth and importance. 

    This, among other ads Madonna would lend her name to, were what Prince would call a sign o’ the times. Specifically, the 80s times. For it seems no coincidence that the confluence of events that would allow Madonna and the Decade of Excess to collide in such a way that she became the most recognized pop star in the world would serve to further buttress the “glamor” of capitalism. Like many, Madonna has flirted shamelessly with the system, while also insisting that money is hollow and meaningless (see: the “irony” of the “Material Girl” video and her endless espousal of the tenets of Kabbalah after 1996). This latter sentiment, however, is not exactly in line with becoming the face of a bank. Which, of all the entities Madonna has promoted, has to be the least punk rock thing she’s ever done. A far cry from the defiant, anti-establishment girl she claimed to be upon first arriving in New York in 1978. And yet, is she really so different now from the girl who once said in a pre-fame “art movie” called In Artificial Light, “I’ll do anything for money. ‘Cause money is my love.” She came up with the dialogue herself, and it seems to still hold true now, based on her reaching the apex of showing that money really is her love by endorsing a bank. And, randomly enough, a Brazilian one. At least go for an Argentinian bank for a vague Evita correlation. That would have a bit more relevance to it than Madonna promoting Itaú

    Madonna’s gradual advertising evolution leading up to this moment was perhaps indicative that it would come down to this eventually. Her multimillion dollar endorsement deal with a juggernaut like Pepsi in 1989 signaling not only that she had come a long way since 1984 and being “just about the music” by lending her face to an advert for MTV (during its “I want my MTV” era), but also that she was now willing to freely admit to being a shill by doing such ad work in the U.S. No longer was it all hush-hush “commercials in Japan” fare. Granted, the Japan work would reanimate again in 1995, when she exhibited early signs of her “Nothing Really Matters” era by appearing in samurai attire (with a couture-y twist) to hawk a sake called Jun Legend for Takara. Likely interested in Madonna because the name had “legend” in it.

    Directed by one of Madonna’s 90s mainstays, Alek Keshishian, the surreal ad features Madonna slaying a gold dragon to gain access to her precious glass of sake, so committed to its goodness that she even wrote lyrics about it that go: “How can I be pure, when all the strength I have is breaking me?/How can I be sure, where is this road I’ve chosen taking me?” She then insists while looking straight into the camera, “I’m pure. Jun Legend.” It’s nothing short of pure irony to make such a declaration and name-check a brand in the same sentence, but Madonna manages to do it with a perfectly straight face. Such is the motivation of money. 

    Though it wasn’t always motivational enough to “muzzle” what she really wanted to say in her art. Which brings us back to the Pepsi commercial (wherein she used similar “Dreams come true” language by urging the viewer/younger version of herself, “Make a wish”). Not only because the video for “Like A Prayer” was in direct defiance of the brand’s “wholesomeness,” but because, in addition to being busy promoting some big corporate names in the 80s, she still found time to do no-frills PSAs. Usually ones endorsing safe sex (“Use a condom, it may be the most important thing you ever do”). Namely, a 1988 PSA that was part of the Musicians For Life campaign. As usual, Madonna was among the few famous people willing to not only advocate for AIDS research, but to discuss the disease at all. In fact, it’s a wonder Pepsi or Mitsubishi would want to work with her at all based on her outspoken advocacy for gay men and the AIDS crisis. For it can’t be emphasized enough just how much no one wanted to be associated with such a “thing.” 

    In the mid-90s, as resources for AIDS victims improved, so, too, did Madonna’s sense of “quality control” with regard to advertising ventures. Case in point, her Spring 1995 Versace ad campaign, photographed by Steven Meisel. It was in this instance that she shifted more toward a “strictly haute couture” path. Opting for “class” advertising as opposed to “trash” advertising. Perhaps because the boon of her finances allowed her to be more selective with such projects. Madonna’s renown for being ahead of the curve on sensing the next wave of the future also manifested in 2001, when she allowed Microsoft to use “Ray of Light” in a commercial for Windows XP. Apparently, allowing three years to lapse since the song was on the charts was sufficient for Madonna to translate the track into something more directly commodifiable. Indeed, at the dawning of the next century, it seemed as though Madonna was “activated” anew into more incessant advertising action. There was also the 1999 Max Factor commercial just before the Microsoft one, with the former allowing her to play up her persona as a diva and a flirt. Starting with a makeup artist telling her about how “luscious” Max Factor Gold is, Madonna “jokes” after the lipstick is applied, “If I weren’t me, I’d kiss me. But I am me…and that’s a tragedy.” Cutting to her on set doing a scene that “requires” her to kiss a hot guy, “Ray of Light” plays in the background here as well. When the director yells, “Cut!” Madonna and the man in question keep kissing anyway, with Madonna finally turning toward the camera to protest, “Hey, I wasn’t finished!” before then going back to kissing him. Of all her ads, it’s arguably the most…on-brand. With her natural persona shining through in ways that it was usually only able to in the voting PSAs she did for MTV in the early 90s. 

    The 00s, however, appeared to mark a brief period when she was okay with the simple use of her song in a commercial in lieu of actually full-on endorsing a product with her appearance. Like the Windows XP one or, two years later, the Estée Lauder commercial for a perfume called Beyond Paradise. During which not only did her song, “Love Profusion,” play throughout, but the exact same backdrop and aesthetics from the Luc Besson-directed video appeared. Which makes sense as he also directed the Carolyn Murphy-starring commercial the same day as Madonna’s video shoot. Clearly, Madonna didn’t want to “overly” endorse the fragrance by actually lending her own likeness to the ad. The same year, however, she found Gap “worthy” enough of her direct involvement by not only showing up in the commercial with Missy Elliott, but also reworking one of her then new songs from American Life, “Hollywood,” to incorporate her 1985 hit, “Into the Groove.” Ergo, “Into the Hollywood Groove” marking the still germinal trend of mashups in music. What’s more, with Gap, Madonna returned with a vengeance to her ultra-corporate, appeal-to-the-everyman campaigning. Indeed, that return was met with more than a hint of cynicism at the time, with one reporter for The Guardian remarking of the partnership, “The singer, who turned fashion designer Jean-Paul Gaultier into a household name when she wore one of his cleavage-enhancing corsets, will be shown extolling the virtues of a comfortable pair of cords in the new advert.” To boot, Madonna showed the first signs of no longer being “ahead of the curve,” so much as lagging behind it, what with Gap reaching its “edgy” zenith in the mid-90s. 

    Nonetheless, there were still moments when Madonna could bring her distinctive brand of sardonic humor to a commercial. As she did when she teamed up with her husband (once upon a time), Guy Ritchie, for a 2001 short film called Star, from BMW’s The Hire series. It marked a more unconventional approach to advertising by tapping respected auteurs to direct ten-minute segments (each starring Clive Owen) highlighting the performance capabilities of various BMW models. In Madonna’s “vignette,” that was the M5, showcased in all of its glory to the tune of Blur’s “Song 2” before Madonna was embarrassingly ejected from it in front of a slew of eagerly anticipating vultures (a.k.a. paparazzi). 

    As for what was next on Madonna’s list of major mainstream brands to work with after Gap, it turned out to be Motorola. But this time, her motives were far more than just financial: she wanted to debut the lead single from 2005’s Confessions on a Dance Floor, “Hung Up.” With the premise being to show a slew of famous musicians cramming into a phone booth together (including Madonna, her Maverick protégée, Alanis Morissette, Little Richard, Questlove and Iggy Pop, among others), it was meant to play up how the ROKR model was the first to incorporate the iTunes media player. Making it easy to keep all your favorite music “in one place.” At the end, a Notorious B.I.G. lookalike approaches the already packed booth so that Madonna can deliver the line, “Biggie! No!” Probably too “fatphobic” for the present, but it delivered in ‘05. 

    Madonna ramped up her corporate cheerleading in 2007 when she designed an exclusive line of clothing for H&M called, what else, M by Madonna. The ad campaign included not only an onslaught of print media, but also another offbeat premise that placed Madonna in the role of “girlboss” before that became such a vexing term. A woman in charge who demands that other women dress for the same “obey everything I say” part accordingly (making it something of a riff on the Madonna wannabe concept when the girl in the commercial emerges wearing the same outfit as M). 

    In 2008, a Sunsilk commercial with the tagline, “Change up your look. Make your hair happen” aired while soundtracked by Madonna’s lead single from Hard Candy, “4 Minutes.” It was a fitting catchphrase that played into the numerous images of Madonna in her various guises and hairstyles that flashed across the screen throughout the ad. Except, of course, her ass would never use something as pedestrian as Sunsilk to achieve these looks. In point of fact, Madonna would be more inclined, these days, to use a product of her own making. 

    So it was that, eventually, Madonna decided it was time to endorse her very own brand: MDNA Skin. While Madonna had named brands after herself or moments in her career before, including Material Girl and Truth or Dare, both instances involved shilling the products exclusively at Macy’s, which meant all the limitations that went with that. Whereas with MDNA, Madonna started her own truly standalone brand, which could be sold in different stores across the globe, in addition to online at MDNASkin.com. Launched in 2014, the skincare line would offer a number of opportunities for M to create tailored ad content for the products. And, eerily enough, it’s the 2017 “Express Yourself” campaign that echoes the same shtick presented in this Brazilian banking commercial. For just as she says, “I’ve had the opportunity to embody many personas. To express myself. But always remain myself,” so, too, does she say something similar in the ad for Itaú: “I’m always reinventing myself. So that I can keep being myself.” And, one supposes, to keep being herself, she needs to keep advertising something. It’s simply all part of the Madonna and capitalism “synergy.” 

    When the singer casually mentioned to concertgoers at her November 19th date of The Celebration Tour in Paris that she had filmed something “the other day” at Opéra, fans were briefly hopeful that it might signal new music because, surely that must mean a music video. Alas, it turned out to be this odd, extremely non sequitur commercial for Itaú. As if Madonna places her own money in such a bank. Moreover, why film her segment in Paris if it’s meant to promote something Brazilian? Everything about it makes absolutely no sense, including talk of her constant reinvention in relation to this. Unless, of course, she wants to advocate for the kind of illicit banking that requires reconstructive face surgery to hide one’s original identity. The only way in which it could make sense, if one really wanted to reach, is that Madonna saw something resonant in the ad Sylverster Stallone did for Itaú’s Uniclass option. A name that, yes, suggests some kind of utopian ideal—as though we can all live in the same financial class. With Uniclass designed for “medium-income clients,” the campaign’s tagline went: “Make it to the top.” So it is that Madonna could likely get on board with a “pull yourself up by your bootstraps” sentiment such as that. Except that her campaign is for Itaú full-stop, not its Uniclass sector.

    Regardless, Madonna finds something to tap into about the “product” by announcing at the end, “I am made of the future.” More telling declarations about how she has no plans to go anywhere, even despite the reaper trying to take her life prematurely over the summer. It’s an assertion that speaks to her 2019 song, “Future,” from Madame X, during which she warns, “Not everyone is comin’ to the future/Not everyone is learning from the past.” And what the pop star has learned from her own past, evidently, is that advertising still pays. Even if the money and the ad itself are utterly superfluous for Madonna.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Gondola Antics Were So Much Better/Less Vexing When They Were Relegated to the “Like A Virgin” Video

    Gondola Antics Were So Much Better/Less Vexing When They Were Relegated to the “Like A Virgin” Video

    [ad_1]

    Easily characterizable as yet another example in an endless series of bad tourist behavior (see also: etching your and your girlfriend’s name into a wall of the Colosseum), something about a particular modern abuse in tourism—selfie taking—truly does make one yearn for simpler times in “traveling antics.” Or, in this case, “gondola antics.” This being part of the latest selfie taking snafu captured on camera and shared ad nauseam via various platforms. While the video doesn’t show the moment of the fall, it does reveal the aftermath of a boat capsizing, leaving in its wake a group of very “surprised,” very wet Chinese tourists (for once, the “Dumbfuck Award” didn’t go to American tourists instead). Yet how could they really be surprised when they were told repeatedly to sit the fuck down by their gondolier? Namely, during the “portion of the program” where the gondolier specifically warned them that he was about to make a maneuver whose success was entirely contingent upon the distribution of the weight inside the boat. An artful maneuver that most gondoliers are required to execute when they ferry the gondola under a bridge. You know, Madonna in the “Like A Virgin” video-style. 

    A video that, for years, inspired many a tourist in Venice to attempt recreating some of M’s iconic writhing and gyrating on a gondola as it went under bridges and wound around canals. All while Madonna made it look so effortless in her blue Spandex pants and sleeveless black dress with cutouts at the sides, her layers of crucifix necklaces bouncing in the wind. Jumping and bopping as tourists on a bridge above her look down in what one might imagine to be awe. After all, back in 1984, such varietals of outrageous behavior in Venice were the exception, not the rule. With the advent of smartphones, not only was existence never the same, but neither was Venice. Already constantly teeming with tourists (to the point where a cap on the number of visitors will take effect), outfitting every single one of them with a pocket-size, easily accessible camera (made all the more appealing because it could also connect to the internet, where they could post the picture they had just taken) undeniably caused a change for the worse in that particular city. 

    Madonna’s playful jumping intermixed with sensual dancing seems positively tame in retrospect compared to some of the other things tourists will get up to nowadays (on a gondola or elsewhere) in the name of “living for the Insta/TikTok.” And, lest one forget, we never really see Madonna “rocking the boat,” so to speak—thanks to artful camerawork by director Mary Lambert, who shoots Madonna from a low-angle or waist-level position during most of these instances to merely give the illusion that she’s actually engaging in all of this “capsizing behavior” for real. 

    In the non-cinematic version of this narrative, however, the gondolier would have surely told Madonna the same thing that the Chinese tourists were told: bitch, sit down. Be humble. Granted, the Queen of Pop did appear to have far more reverence for the Queen of the Adriatic than your average tourist of the moment. So it was that during her 1998 episode of VH1’s Behind the Music, Madonna described Venice as a “very, very romantic place.” But of course it would seem that way to her. For one thing, it was “pre-social-media-ruining-every-tourist-destination.” For another, she stayed at Hotel Cipriani, a staple of Venice’s luxury hotel scene since the very year Madonna was born: 1958. It was one of the only options in town with a pool and, per Lambert, Madonna wanted to make sure she had access to one for her workout regimen. She also wanted to make sure she could avoid the video’s producer, Simon Fields, of whom Lambert said, “[He] ​​still wanted to sleep with her—so did everybody else, for that matter.” That kind of “aura” about Madonna is at least part of why the streets and canals were ostensibly cleared for the video shoot…Lambert didn’t want to have a Love Potion No. 9 situation on her hands with one mere cough out of M’s mouth. By the same token, Madonna, being a Leo and still new to fame, relished the crowds that would start to gather behind the scenes and call her, according to her, a “puta”—the Spanish word for whore, though Madonna was looking for the Italian one: “puttana.” 

    As for reasons why Madonna and Lambert homed in on Venice for the bulk of the video shoot, the former remarked, “​​We felt Venice symbolized so many things, like virginity. And I’m Madonna, and I’m Italian.” Except for when she can’t find the correct word for whore in said language. Nonetheless, there’s no denying that Madonna had far more legitimate reasons for “making Venice her playground” than the artless tourists in the vein of the capsized Chinese ones mentioned above. Which brings us to how the real puttani of the moment are those who can’t resist the temptation of vanity that comes with “peddling themselves” online. And not even for the sake of “influencing,” but rather, the sake of the errant likes that might validate their existence. Including, of course, a selfie taken while crossing under a Venetian bridge in a gondola. The very same thing Madonna did back in 1984…without the selfie part. For, you see, there was a benefit to a lack of democratization in “art” (selfies being deemed as such by “influencers” such as Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian): it meant that not just any old asshole could try to bill what they were doing as precisely that. 

    This extends, to be sure, to “social media curation.” What historians, should there be any trace of humanity left in the future, will look back on as the “preeminent” “art form” of the twenty-first century. Perhaps forgetting altogether there was a time when tourist “hot spots” like Venice weren’t so drenched in stupidity in service of social media, as opposed to in service of more reined-in postmodern art à la the “Like A Virgin” video. Now that was an instance of (semi-)controlled antics one could actually get behind. For there remains in its wake a true piece of art that stands the test of time…as opposed to an embarrassing viral TikTok video that will be lost to a black hole once the next short clip captivates the millions who use the app. 

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Madonna Sr., Martin Burgoyne and World AIDS Day

    Madonna Sr., Martin Burgoyne and World AIDS Day

    [ad_1]

    Anyone who has even the most cursory knowledge of Madonna ought to know by now that her mother, Madonna Fortin Ciccone Sr., died when she was just a child (five, to be exact). It’s been mentioned often over the years as the driving force for why she would seek to become the most famous woman in the world, yearning to fill the emotional void her mother left behind through the adoration of millions of people. It’s textbook psychology. Alas, before Madonna could attempt to secure the love of the masses (in addition to a lot of its hate), she had to do the grunt work first—and that meant an overwhelming loneliness during her first years in New York. That is, until she cultivated a circle of “Downtown friends.” At the center of that circle was Martin Burgoyne, who everyone described, essentially, as a delight. Being that Madonna was less prone to that description because of her “crass,” “rough-hewn” ways, Martin was almost like a social greasing agent for those who would otherwise be intimidated by Madonna. 

    That the two remained close even after she shot to superstardom was a testament to how much the street urchin-turned-pop star really did love him. While others had been cast aside along the way, Martin was an angel-faced charmer Madonna couldn’t possibly ditch. The “meanest” thing she ever did to him was have her A&R man, Michael Rosenblatt, be the one to say that his proposed album artwork for Madonna’s debut wasn’t going to cut it when, in fact, it was Madonna who felt that way because (per Seymour Stein’s account) she believed “it just wasn’t iconic enough.” Which meant Madonna was using “iconic” long before Gen Z started to toss it around to refer to the most mundane of shit. As Madonna went “deeper and deeper” into Hollywoodland after becoming famous, complete with marrying A-list actor Sean Penn, she never strayed too far from Martin or her “New York roots” (by way of Michigan). And yes, Martin and the “Downtown crew” were also invited to her star-studded wedding on August 16, 1985 (also Madonna’s twenty-seventh birthday). Soon after, three of the four key gay male guests—Burgoyne, Keith Haring and Steve Rubell—from the NYC scene would die of AIDS. The fourth guest in question, Andy Warhol, was spared from it by his inherent “asexuality.” Alas, his gallbladder was not.

    Although the affair was fraught with drama due to the paparazzi’s infiltration (prompting Penn to famously write in the sand of the private beach near the house where they were to be wed, “FUCK OFF” in large letters so the message to the “chopperazzi” looming overhead would be crystal clear…in case there was somehow any confusion), Warhol of course called it “the most exciting weekend of my life.” What with his tendency to get hard over the presence of top-notch celebrities. He would also note in his diary, “Martin went down to the hairdresser earlier in the day to have his hair done. We rode in a limo out to Malibu and when we saw helicopters in the distance we knew we were at the wedding. Somebody had tipped the reporters off about where the wedding was and about ten helicopters were hovering, it was like Apocalypse Now.” And yes, that phrase could be used to describe the bulk of the 80s for gay men, who were summarily “picked off” by a disease that no one wanted to investigate because of the community it was adversely affecting. The religious right rhetoric that dominated under Ronald Reagan’s reign gave scandalized heteros further license to treat the novel virus as though it was “according punishment” for the gay men “going against God” with their “lifestyle.” 

    Just a year after Madonna’s wedding to Sean, Burgoyne would die of AIDS on November 30, 1986. It was a particularly somber day, as December 1st was also to mark the twenty-third anniversary of Madonna Sr.’s death. Martin, eerily enough, was twenty-three himself. Nothing more than a baby. His immortalization as a “child” due to dying so young would also crop up in the video for “Open Your Heart,” released in the World AIDS Day month of December, back in 1986. Of course, World AIDS Day wouldn’t officially exist until 1988, after WHO public information officers James W. Bunn and Thomas Netter, working for the Global Programme on AIDS, proposed it. It was a wonder that the day of acknowledgement and awareness actually got the green light “so soon.” But the only reason it did was because of the WHO’s decision to market the focus more on children in “disadvantaged countries” (a euphemism for Africa). Still, at least it was “something” from an official, respected organization. That was more than gay men had gotten out of their governments, especially the U.S. and U.K. ones. It was Bunn who settled on December 1st as a day of observance, because it was after U.S. elections and before the Christmas holiday, which meant the spotlight could briefly be put on something else. 

    A year before the first World AIDS Day, Madonna held a benefit concert at Madison Square Garden while on her Who’s That Girl Tour outing. It was the first time she would unofficially make “Live To Tell” her AIDS tribute song by dedicating it to the memory of Martin (the show was also a benefit for amFAR [American Foundation for AIDS Research]). And, uncannily enough, Madonna would choose to open the performance with the “Open Your Heart” boy (not the same one from the video itself, but meant to be “the same”) gliding past her on a chair, reaching out to her from the shadows as though to say, “Please help me.” It was an obvious nod to how haunted Madonna felt by being unable to save one of her best friends. The “little boy” that was Martin. The placement of the song after “Where’s The Party” also seemed to be symbolic of how the party quite literally stopped once so many gay men started “disappearing” from the dance floor. 

    The dark, one-two punch reminder of losing Martin on November 30th and her mother on December 1st was perhaps only slightly mitigated by the “invention” of World AIDS Day. Something that finally addressed an “issue” (to use understatement) that had been ignored and brushed aside by the mainstream for far too long. In what marks both the sixtieth anniversary and the thirty-seventh anniversary of Madonna Sr. and Martin’s deaths, respectively, World AIDS Day undoubtedly holds a continued poignancy in Madonna’s life. And yes, she’s certain to remark upon it in some way or another every December 1st.

    With her current tour, The Celebration Tour, landing in Amsterdam during this year’s World AIDS Day, it’s undeniable that her performance of “Live To Tell” (which features numerous hanging screen images of some of the men Madonna knew personally [and many she didn’t] and lost to the disease, Burgoyne included) will take on an especial profundity. It, too, is arranged in the setlist to come after one of Madonna’s signature dance bops, “Holiday,” to drive home the point that a truly somber pall was cast over dance floors across the world when AIDS came to roost and the question, “Where’s The Party” took on a far more existential meaning.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Cry For Argentina (Among Other Countries)

    Cry For Argentina (Among Other Countries)

    [ad_1]

    As the world continues to turn evermore in an extreme right-leaning direction, it can be no real surprise (especially not to the highly jaded ones) that Argentina’s latest president is none other than Javier Milei a.k.a. “El Loco.” And yes, he seems to be someone who acts the way Donald Trump truly wanted to while still kind of “holding back” (believe it or not). Because, at the bare minimum, at least Trump never dressed up in a superhero costume reminiscent of Nacho Libre while calling this alter ego “General Ancap.” Though he probably wanted to do something similar (with his rightful alter ego name being something like General Shithead or General Cheeto). Indeed, Trump’s “congratulations” for Milei appear as much a sign of his own hope for more dystopia during the 2024 election as they do “genuine happiness” over the fact that unhinged men keep fortifying patriarchy’s hold over the political arena, ergo what goes on in the world. 

    With his own demagoguery, Milei rose to political prominence in much the same way that Trump did: through a lot of publicly-displayed buffoonery. Specifically, he was an economic (therefore, political) pundit that made numerous TV appearances, sometimes in the guise of the aforementioned alter ego. Usually, so that he might sing about Argentina’s economic crisis in that getup. His career as an “economist” for various privately-funded companies, including Corporación América, as well as a think tank called Fundación Acordar, only added to the insulated reverence he kept building over the years. Having his own radio show, Demoliendo mitos (a.k.a. Demolishing Myths—ha! As if!) didn’t hurt his steady building of a following either. One that, like the Americans who gravitated toward Trump, simply wanted to see a radical change—any radical change—in their government. One that, in Argentina, has been dominated by Peronism since the time of Perón.

    In fact, Milei’s victory over erstwhile current president Sergio Massa marks the first time since the country returned to a “democracy” (back in 1983) that such a dominant far-right presence has managed to take hold of the government. Because, as is often the case, the right tends to triumph in elections when the left is blamed for economic crises and the correlative rising poverty and crime rates. Both of which Argentina is suffering from big time, what with the poverty rate hovering at over forty percent. Milei, a self-declared libertarian, clearly saw this as an opportunity to swoop in and act as that “superhero” he mimicked on TV. The kind who wields chainsaws in public while on the campaign trail to indicate his “seriousness” about wanting to make “dramatic cuts” in order to “stabilize” the economy and curb the out-of-control inflation problem that has been plaguing the country. 

    As Milei put it, “There is no room for gradualism. There is no room for half measures.” The Netherlands’ latest far-right leader, Geert Wilders, would likely agree. Wilders even wears a red tie, a signature of Donald Trump (apart from the red, shudder-inducing “Make America Great Again” hat). As leader of the ironically-titled Party For Freedom, much of Wilders hardline politics is rooted in “nativist,” anti-immigration views—with an especial emphasis on being distinctly anti-Islam (his vocal sentiments have, indeed, made him a target for many Islamic extremist death threats). While his economic policies are less in the spotlight than Milei’s, Dutch philosopher Rob Riemen might as well be talking about both men when, in 2010, he cited Wilders and his party as “the prototype of contemporary fascism” in that he has finagled “the politicization of the resentment of the man in the crowd” (this description also easily applying to Trump’s political rise as a demagogue). 

    Throughout the globe, this alarming turn of phrase has continued to gain traction in terms of the far-right gradually “collecting” power and entering increasingly into mainstream government after lying in wait to pounce on the “right moment” (no pun intended) via taking advantage of public dissatisfaction with things that ultimately have nothing to do with conservative “soapbox solutions.” In Europe especially, the far-right continues to gain control of governments at the highest level. This includes Giorgia Meloni in Italy, Petteri Orpo in Finland and Viktor Orbán in Hungary. Another alarming “tidbit” of late is that if French presidential elections were held today, polling wisdom suggests far-right extremist Marine Le Pen (who has already run for the role of French president three times) would finally win. 

    All across the world, not just in Europe and South America (see also: ​​the recent power held by Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro and Chile’s José Antonio Kast), a fascist, far-right darkness is taking hold. One spurred by the age-old idea that conservative parties are somehow “miracle workers” at resuscitating the economy (of course, the Tories in Britain are the most glaring present evidence to the contrary). Milei simply happens to be among the freshest, most overt examples of how, when people turn to the right for “fiscal salvation” (which, by the way, never actually comes), they, without fail, seem to forget, every time, about the even higher price one must pay in the sacrifice of human rights so as to achieve that so-called salvation. 

    In Argentina’s case, toppling the Peronism that has dominated the country’s politics since the time after Juan Perón’s first “presidency” (read: a presidency that employed many dictatorial tactics) is yet another sign of how extreme things have become. With voters turning to “shock politics” in a bid to seek a change that can never truly come unless the system of capitalism is dismantled entirely. And no, that does not automatically mean turning to socialism (that age-old conservative fear), but rather, a reassessment entirely of humanity’s priorities. 

    Naturally, the likelihood of that happening is nil, with Žižek’s adage, “It’s easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism” automatically coming to mind amid increasingly absurd voter “preferences” relating, in the end, to how they can better secure their financial well-being instead of their emotional and spiritual one. In short, putting a more colorful Band-Aid (represented by the superhero costume-wearing politician) on a fatal wound that needs a different cure entirely. 

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • The Celebration Tour: Madonna’s Shelved Biopic Reanimates in the Form of a Pop-Theater Concert

    The Celebration Tour: Madonna’s Shelved Biopic Reanimates in the Form of a Pop-Theater Concert

    [ad_1]

    Among the many memorable statements Madonna made throughout 1991’s Truth or Dare, the one that stuck out most, in terms of characterizing the Blond Ambition Tour, was this: “It’s a journey that you go on… You take a journey. It’s cathartic. You can’t get to one place without going to another place.” Madonna has obviously borne that same statement in mind with regard to the conception of her twelfth—that’s right, twelfth—tour. For we, the audience, are all taken on the journey of her life. So yes, more than a “greatest hits” tour (with that term being used more loosely in Madonna’s interpretation), this is a “pop” odyssey. Except that Madonna doesn’t like the word “pop” to describe her show. As she told the crowd, “I really hate that word, ‘pop,’ ‘cause it sounds disposable, and I am not.” This much she’s been determined to make the masses—however hating and skeptical they are—consistently aware of. Even though some of her more adamant detractors (Morrissey especially) have billed her as precisely that. Designed for disposable, assembly-line consumption with each new era. Ergo, a nickname like McDonna (an insult hurtled at Madonna by, who else, Morrissey) referring to her McDonald’s-like nature, capitalism-wise. And sure, Madonna has never made any attempt to hide her zeal for money, but if that were the only thing motivating her, she would have stopped (to many people’s delight) a long time ago.

    In truth, she had a number of opportunities to simply “take the money and shut up” in her early days, as she was forging an artistic path for herself. One that quite a few others tried to help shape along the way—apparently not aware of the iron will they had come up against until it was too late, and they had already sunk a lot of money into molding their “coquette.” This included Belgian producers Jean-Claude Pellerin et Jean Vanloo, who hired Madonna to be a backup dancer for Patrick Hernandez in 1979, but also wanted to make her into their next Big Thing. They flew her to Paris and put her up in a nice place near Parc Monceau so they could work on that “shaping” with vocal coaches, the works. Then there was Camille Barbone, who managed Madonna under Gotham Management from 1981 to 1982, when Madonna broke out of her contract to pursue her own artistic route. One that was not in line with the Pat Benatar-inspired sound and aesthetic Barbone was cultivating. Of course, these are not the people or occasions M references in The Celebration Tour. Though she says, “I think of it as a retrospective. I’m gonna tell you the story of my life—the last forty years of my life,” that story can’t feature any of the people who might not have gotten a “return on their investment” in supporting Madonna Ciccone before she was: MADONNA. Although perhaps it could if Madonna ever did release the biopic she was working on for three years (starting in 2020). And obviously, this tour is meant to be a “substitute” for that biopic (as opposed to a substitute for love). The one that she publicized at length via her various writing sessions with both Diablo Cody and Erin Cressida Wilson. The production also involved intense auditions (described as “Madonna boot camp”) for the lead role, with Julia Garner finally winning out over competitors like Florence Pugh, Sydney Sweeney, Alexa Demie, Odessa Young, Emma Laird, Bebe Rexha and Sky Ferreira. But maybe Madonna, in the end, got “creeped out” by someone trying to fulfill an impossible role, preferring to just do it herself by going on tour. Thus, the announcement at the beginning of 2023 that, while the movie was shelved, there would be a tour to soothe wounded fans instead. Indeed, many fans likely breathed a sigh of relief, knowing that the delicacy of telling such a story could go wrong in manifold ways. Even with (or perhaps precisely because of) Madonna directing the project herself.

    A world tour, on the other hand, that was something she could guarantee to conquer (or so she thought before that major “health scare” a.k.a. near-death experience over the summer). And she could also tell her life story that way instead, as The Celebration Tour is so clearly “runoff” from the Little Sparrow (the main working title) script she had been working on for years. Mining through so much material to ensure the accuracy of her story’s telling. Maybe even snippets of the dialogue were repurposed in some of the “vignettes” of The Celebration Tour…like Madonna trying to get into a club (presumably Paradise Garage) and being rebuffed. A slight she wouldn’t forget about, she admits, informing the audience, “Nobody let me into any clubs dressed like this. Can you imagine? Assholes! I’ve been getting revenge for the last forty years.” For who would deny Madonna entry into any club now? Having all but assured every DJ has a dance hit of hers that will undoubtedly get the crowd going. This fear of rejection she has stemming from being “bounced” so often in her pre-fame days manifested most overtly in a 2000 MTV promo for the Madonna V.I.P. Contest, wherein M appears at the front of a line outside of a club, only to be met with the jarring question, “Are you on the list?” She looks at the bouncer skeptically and replies, “People don’t usually ask me that question.” Unmoved, the bouncer says, “Well I can’t let you in here if you’re not on the list.” Out of patience, she reminds, “Excuse me but I’m…Madonna.” The bouncer then points to the slew of other people dressed like Madonna (a running theme throughout her career) waiting in line (or “on line” as  New Yorkers annoyingly like to say) to get inside. As Madonna realizes that the bouncer sees her as another “wannabe”/nobody, it seems to take her back to those days when she couldn’t get into a club just for being herself. Awakening from the nightmare in the comfort of her palatial abode, she remarks, “Thank god, it was just a dream.” She then looks into the camera as cliché cheeseball music plays and adds, “But for millions of people not getting into a nightclub, it’s a reality they have to face every day… Won’t you please help put an end to club-going nightmares? Enter today.” So yes, to say that club culture was, is and remains a heavy influence on Madonna’s psyche would be an understatement. And it’s a culture that infected her upon encountering “the scene” in New York City. The “stage,” naturally, where she begins The Celebration Tour’s story. For it was this moment that she attributed to the birth of her “Real” Self: in 1978, when she moved to New York.

    Thus, it can be no surprise that the “journey” of the tour commences with mentioning the “transfer” to her beloved adopted city, centered around “early days” tracks like “Everybody,” “Burning Up” and “Holiday.” “Can you imagine moving to New York in 1978?” she asks the crowd at one point. Because, sure, 70s and 80s NYC is plenty glamorized now, but back then, it was truly the last place a girl on her own should move. Even a girl as “tough as nails” as Madonna. But it was perhaps New York itself that transformed her into the level of “tough” we know today, having endured all manner of horrors upon arrival, including being raped at knifepoint. But Madonna’s the type of person who can take all of these traumas “in stride”—that is to say, she believes that every struggle is what makes you into the person you are (ergo, “You can’t get to one place without going to another place”). So who would she be, indeed, without all those emotional scars (or “Beautiful Scars,” as one of her Rebel Heart-era songs is titled)? Especially the one that stemmed from her mother dying of breast cancer when Madonna was five years old. Had that not happened, there’s no denying Madonna’s drive for fame wouldn’t have been as intense. Not to say that it was a “good thing” her mother died so she would be compelled to seek love from the entire world so as to fill the void where maternal love was supposed to be. Indeed, during a video portion of the show, Madonna features a soundbite of herself from a 1995 interview wherein she says that she would have gladly traded her fame and fortune for one thing: a mother. The concept of motherhood is, in fact, very much omnipresent throughout the tour. And yes, of course, lots of sexuality and writhing. After all, how do you think women become mothers? (Answer: by fucking).

    But before Madonna became a literal mother to six children and a metaphorical “Mother” to all the gays, as well as every pop star that came after her (Britney included), she was a loudmouthed “street kid” aspiring to be a club kid. And that’s the version of herself we see sitting next to her after her performance of “Into the Groove.” Dressed in what look like “rags” by today’s standards. And Madonna is the first to admit her 1981-era sartorial choices were slightly “tragic.” Nonetheless, she turns to the dancer mimicking her early 80s style while wearing a flesh-colored mask that obfuscates their real face (for an eerie effect) and asks the audience, “Anyways, have you met Me? Have you met Myself?” By some accounts, none of us ever really will (#nobodyknowsme).

    With this reflection on the past, it’s ironic that Madonna should begin the tour with “Nothing Really Matters.” Not because, for most non-fans, it wouldn’t be considered a “greatest hit,” per se, but because one of the defining lyrics of the song is: “Nothing takes the past away like the future.” She then proceeds to bring the past back after that song, as though to further prove she can defy time however she wants to. Of that rag-wearing club aspirant, Madonna notes, “I like to keep her by my side. I never forget where I come from—the struggle, the humility, the hard work. And I just want to give you a hug right now, thank you.” Yes, Madonna symbolically hugging and thanking her early twenties self for all the bravado and determination she brought to New York so that the Madonna of forty years later could relish the fruits of those labors is a combination of being ultra-meta, a psychologist’s wet dream and, to the more cynical, yet another sign of Madonna’s enduring narcissism. Something her former University of Michigan roommate, Whitley Setrakian, once commented on by shrugging, “Her passion was…herself. The Project of Madonna.”

    That passion for the Project of Madonna is alive and well for The Celebration Tour, with those “past selves” and incarnations being constantly present onstage. And yes, she might owe a debt to the 9.9.99 VMAs for that idea. It was during that year’s awards show that a slew of drag performers dressed in some of her most iconic looks gave her a nonverbal introduction before she took the stage to then introduce Paul McCartney and present the award for Video of the Year. With the endless barrage of options in terms of “Madonna looks,” the pop star has long been a favorite of drag queens, and so it’s only right that the tour should be emceed by one. Specifically, Bob the Drag Queen, who introduces the show in Madonna’s famed Marie Antoinette ensemble from the 1990 VMAs (and yes, one of the drag queens at the 1999 VMAs wore that look, too). He’s also sure to call out that legendary tidbit about how Madonna arrived in NY with a mere thirty-five dollars in her pocket, adding to that reminder a touch of goading about how he’d like to see you try to become the Queen of Pop with just thirty-five dollars and a dream in New York City. Of course, one of the unacknowledged things about Madonna is that she did benefit, like the rest of her baby boomer cohort, from the time and place she found herself in. For, while it was difficult to do what she did in many regards, it was also much easier to become famous in the early 80s without any…polish. Particularly as she got in on the ground floor of the postmodern/MTV pop star period that would dominate until the 00s. There wasn’t much competition in her field—not the way there is now in terms of everyone vying for the same piece of “virality pie.” One wonders if Madonna would have been able to thrive in such a climate, or if she was truly built for the more “blood, sweat and tears” form of fame that did not rely on smartphones and the internet for some kind of “democratizing” advantage. She herself has said she’s glad she came up during a time before social media, for it allowed her to experiment and become the artist she wanted to without risk of it somehow backfiring on her later with the video and photos “receipts.” Many of which we have access to, but a great many that we don’t.

    Even some of those very earliest performances of “Holiday.” A song that stands out more particularly than previous performances of it on her tours in that she uses it to show the drastic “comedown” effect that AIDS had on the club and party circuit. Lending new meaning to phrase, “Keep dancing till we die.” Incorporating Chic’s 1978 single, “I Want Your Love,” at one point, the song starts to slow as ominous musical undertones begin to creep in. Soon, Madonna is repeating the word “holiday” with a melancholic tone as the music has stopped altogether and the gay man she was dancing with (“played” here by Daniele Sibilli) proceeds to fall to the ground—his light-hearted dance now transformed into a danse macabre. Resigning herself to this loss, she places her coat (lined with Keith Haring’s signature graffiti) and kneels over him as the stage’s trap door opens to take them both down into the depths. The opening to Madonna’s least appreciated song (and definitely not a greatest hit), “In This Life,” then plays before transitioning into “Live To Tell.” This precursor to how AIDS put a stop to the party and cast a dark pall over the 80s for anyone outside of a conservative yuppie bubble is what helps to lend such a powerful effect to the performance. Serving as a contrast and visual manifestation of how everything changed once AIDS arrived and gay men—gay men that Madonna knew—started dropping like flies.

    “Live To Tell” not only makes excellent use of the many hanging retractable screens that appear during the show, but it also marks the first appearance of the “portal frame.” A sort of life-size picture frame Madonna can stand in while suspended in midair, “going back in time,” as it were. And seeing the faces of those she lost to AIDS, including her first gay friend and mentor, Christopher Flynn. Then, of course, her “twin flame,” Martin Burgoyne. Both of these men being who she refers to in “In This Life.”

    Being that no greatest hits tour of Madonna’s would be complete without “Like A Prayer,” she uses it once more to draw on her go-to theme of Catholicism’s intertwinement with sexuality. That, by repressing it, the religion ends up rendering sex “taboo,” therefore even hotter because of its “forbiddenness.” Choosing to incorporate Sam Smith and Kim Petras’ “Unholy” before and after, the audience is treated to dancers in gimp masks gyrating before neon crosses. Because without Catholicism and its subversion, there is no Madonna. What’s more, the themes and visuals presented by this back-to-back pairing of “Live To Tell” and “Like A Prayer” ultimately serve as a better representation of what Ryan Murphy was trying to convey in the atrocious AHS: NYC.

    Unfortunately, Madonna may have grown too accustomed to death already after her mother’s premature one. And, after her performance of “Don’t Tell Me” (which expectedly features a bevy of glam cowboy costumes), she informs the audience, “When I was a child, of course, I associated being a mother with death because my mother had many children and then she died. And then I thought, ‘Why would I want to be a mother? It just ends up in death.’ So my whole life I just kept saying, ‘I’m gonna live the life my mother never had. And I did. Oh boy, did I.” Eventually, though, she “surrendered to the pleasure” of motherhood. Being among the first of her kind to show others that you can be a mom and still be a badass. You don’t have to give up all of yourself to do it (though, some mothers are wont to point out that Madonna has had an army of paid staff to help her raise her children, therefore remain “herself”). In fact, you can even impart some of yourself onto the children. Which Madonna would like to think she’s done in that all of them have artistic inclinations. She’s taught them, in effect, that art is the best and healthiest way to cope with trauma and loss. To put it another way, “Everything in this show is bits and pieces of my life. People I’ve loved, people I’ve lost, friends I’ve lost, peers I’ve lost, children I’ve gained, family, art, life—all of it. That’s what saves me, and that is how I survive.” Naturally, this leads into “I Will Survive” (a gay anthem, bien sûr), Madonna’s chosen cover track for the tour (whereas the Rebel Heart Tour favored “La Vie En Rose”). It’s a pointed selection, of course, for the crux of this tour seems to be about Madonna dealing with her survivor’s guilt over the years, particularly with regard to so many of her contemporaries dying before her. Most overtly, this pertains to Michael Jackson and Prince (both of whom Madonna “dated,” as much as one can date men like that). When combined with Madonna, they formed the Holy Boomer Trinity of pop culture icons, all born in 1958. Both men are acknowledged during the tour, though Prince to a much less cringeworthy degree. His “cameo” arrives, fittingly, at the end of “Like A Prayer.” For the album of the same name is heavy with Prince contributions, from “Love Song” to the closing track, “Act of Contrition”—wielded at the end of “Like A Prayer” here so that the Prince lookalike can do his guitar-scorching thing.

    Regrettably, Madonna remains among the many to act as though 1) pedophilic allegations against Michael Jackson never happened and 2) Leaving Neverland doesn’t exist. Strangely, Madonna’s Jackson obsession has only increased over the years in spite of how vocal he was about his contempt for her. At one point calling her, in his taped recordings with his “spiritual advisor,” Shmuley Boteach, a “nasty witch.” He also listed Madonna as one of the people who was “jealous” of his talent by saying, “They admire you and know you’re wonderful and great, but they’re jealous. ‘Cause they wish they were in your place, wish they were in your shoes. And ‘M’ is one of them. Madonna. She’s not a nice… she hasn’t been kind. She’s a woman, and I think that’s what bothers her. Women don’t scream for other women. And men are too cool to scream for women.” Needless to say, Jackson doesn’t seem to be factoring in the many screaming gay men at Madonna’s shows. The Celebration Tour being no exception to the rule. But it seems the segment that features her and Jackson’s 80s-era silhouettes dancing (to the tune of “Billie Jean” and “Like A Virgin,” in a nod to what Madonna did on The Virgin Tour) against one of the screens is more for the people who really were seeking a greatest hits tour in buying a ticket. Digging deep among the few images of them actually together, Madonna displays the three “photo sessions” of the two of them (the first when she went backstage to see the Jacksons after their 1984 Victory Tour, the second when they went to The Ivy together in 1993 and the third, of course, from their 1991 “date” at the Academy Awards). It’s no longer totally obvious why Madonna is so dead-set on solidifying her association with a child molester (and master manipulator of those children and their parents) except the usual excuse about how there’s no one else on the same level to compare herself to anymore. Least of all in the present climate of TikTok and YouTube nobodies coasting off millions of views rather than actual star quality and charisma.

    Oddly, the main criticism about the Michael portion of the program, which, alas, sticks out in one’s mind because it’s toward the end of the show, has little to do with Madonna continuing to elevate and idolize a sexual assaulter and more to do with being “hokey” or “corny.” Um, no, the real problem is Madonna remains hellbent on aligning her affections with someone who was blatantly inappropriate with children, whether one believes the “allegations” or not. Her blind spot about Jackson also negates Madonna’s feminist persona. One that would surely adhere to the adage about believing victims. Women or men. Like the men in Leaving Neverland (James Safechuck and Wade Robson, of Britney-kissing fame). Considering Madonna herself was the victim of sexual assault, it also seems bizarre that she would be so willing to gloss over this “complicated” aspect of Jackson’s legacy. Yet, in some sense, it mirrors the glossing over of her own complicated one. From the cultural appropriation arguments (ostensibly “amended” by featuring the Queens Remix of Beyoncé’s “Break My Soul” during the “Vogue” segment) to ignoring the fact that she and Sinead O’Connor weren’t exactly “best mates.” Or even in possession of the kind of acquaintanceship that would warrant Madonna flashing her image on one of the screens during, of all things, “Don’t Cry For Me Argentina.” To add insult to injury, O’Connor’s image is displayed right after Marlon Brando’s—not exactly a known advocate of women’s rights.

    In fact, one of the key clashes between Madonna and O’Connor stemmed from their divergent views on feminism. With O’Connor saying of Madonna, in a 1991 Spin interview, “Madonna is probably the hugest role model for women in America. There’s a woman who people look up to as being a woman who campaigns for women’s rights. A woman who, in an abusive way toward me, said that I look like I had a run-in with a lawnmower and that I was about as sexy as a Venetian blind.” To be fair, Madonna was no kinder in her assessment of appearance when it came to her “beloved” Michael Jackson either, publicly declaring she wanted to give him a makeover, starting with his hair and also, “I wanna get him out of those buckly boots.” For someone as prone to and reliant upon image overhauls, there was no chance things could have worked out between them, “romantically” or platonically.

    Additionally, Madonna’s affection for Jackson makes little sense when taking into account that he echoed what many detractors have said over the years: “Let’s face it, she can’t sing and she’s just an okay dancer. What does she do best? She knows how to market herself. That’s it.” And yet, one apparently can’t put a price on effective “marketing.” Madonna was even able to market herself as a “better” Catholic than Sinead by commenting of her ripping up an image of Pope John Paul II on Saturday Night Live, “I think there’s a better way to present her ideas rather than ripping up an image that means a lot to other people.” Evoking a sort of, “Hey, that’s only okay when I do it” philosophy on Madonna’s part when it comes to controversy-starting. Once more highlighting the palpable tinge of hypocrisy in featuring Sinead’s image during the tour.

    After her performance of “Don’t Tell Me,” Madonna is due for her second speech of the night. And, after talking about motherhood, she took the opportunity to address the shitty state of the world by inquiring of her audience, “How can we change this? What can we do? Do you ask yourself that question? You know how you can change it?” “Give you more money,” someone in the audience jadedly quips. Because, sure, it’s no lie that Madonna has cadged her fair share of dough from fans as she assures them it’s all for a good cause. But, ultimately, isn’t it? If one woman can still bring so much joy and entertainment to people in a world that is increasingly bleak as fuck in general and utterly flaccid on the showmanship front in particular, there can be no denying she’s earned those millions. And yes, Madonna does make someone like Taylor Swift, with her “precious” Eras Tour, look positively banal. The Celebration Tour, accordingly, is a reminder to those who have been foolish enough to forget that there is only one true master in the art of pop stardom, and it’s the very woman who helmed it.

    While some have said that Madonna “conceding” to a greatest hits tour is a sign of desperation, this is not a conventional “greatest hits” tour by any means (and certainly, few would cite “Mother and Father” or “The Beast Within” as being among her hits). Unless one counts the fact that these are the greatest hits to the gay men who have enjoyed dancing to these tracks in the club the most. How else does one explain the presence of “Fever,” “Justify My Love,” (cover or not) “I Will Survive,” “Bedtime Story” and “Rain”? What’s more, her overt preference for the Erotica album on this tour not only reveals that she thinks the record has finally been vindicated enough to be truly appreciated, but that this, like so much of what she’s done, is a tour for the gays. Correction: the older gays. In other words, the proverbial last of the Mohicans in terms of having any fucking taste.

    *note: this review references the November 19, 2023 performance

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Less Phallic, More Spiritual: Megan Thee Stallion’s “Cobra”

    Less Phallic, More Spiritual: Megan Thee Stallion’s “Cobra”

    [ad_1]

    While one might automatically assume that a song called “Cobra,” coming from Megan Thee Stallion, would be inherently innuendo-laden (it was, after all, in “WAP” that Cardi B declared, “I need a king cobra”), in the end, the rapper’s latest single is more spiritual than sexual. Because, lest anyone forget, the cobra is known just as much for being able to shed its skin as it is for its phallic nature. 

    So it is that the Douglas Bernardt-directed video begins with a circular close-up on Megan Thee Stallion’s mouth (with the entire rest of the screen in black) as she informs us, “Just as a snake sheds its skin, we must shed our past over and over again.” Amen. Soon after, the camera zooms out to show Thee Stallion with snake eyes. Bernardt then cuts to a very birth-like scene (you know, think: emerging from ya ma’s vaginal canal) of Megan, practically in her birthday suit, crawling out of the snake’s mouth. After making her way out into the wilderness-y milieu, another snake awaits as the rock-oriented (by rap standards) beat drops and Thee Stallion commences her tale of woe and overcoming it with the lyrics, “Breakin’ down and I had the whole world watchin’/But the worst part is really who watched me/Every night I cried, I almost died/And nobody close tried to stop it/Long as everybody gettin’ paid, right?/Everything’ll be okay, right?”

    Surely, these are lines that Britney Spears can relate to. In addition to, “I’m winnin’, so nobody trippin’/Bet if I ever fall off, everybody go missin’.” Indeed, part of Spears’ big “fuck you” to the many who wronged her, particularly her family, is to shirk the music industry altogether at this point (with rumors still swirling that she’s due to “return” any day now). So if Megan ever wants to take the same approach, she knows who to look to for inspiration. At the same time, Spears has shown her cobra-like strength by shedding the trauma of her own past and still “daring” to interface with the public at all (mostly on Instagram). And, besides, this is the same girl who iconically draped a snake around her shoulders while shimmying to “I’m A Slave 4 U” at the 2001 VMAs. The snake metaphor has long been in her wheelhouse (much to Taylor Swift’s dismay).

    As for the moody guitar rhythm of “Cobra,” brought to listeners by Bankroll Got It, Shawn “Source” Jarrett and Derrick Milano, it reminds one of ANTI-era Rihanna—namely the sixth track on the album, “Woo” (co-produced by Hit-Boy, Kuk Harrell and, yes, Travis Scott). But the visuals themselves are pure Nicki Minaj (complete with a similar state of undress) in the video for 2018’s “Ganja Burn,” off the Queen album. And, like “Cobra,” “Ganja Burn” also offers a prologue, this one written (instead of spoken) as follows:

    Once upon a time, in a world unknown… there lived a queen. The generous queen. One day, her enemies all came together to hold a secret meeting and concocted a plan to take the generous queen down. They conspired with someone who was once very close to her & struck like a thief in the night. Though the queen could hear & see them in her mind, she decided to allow them an easy victory. She advised her army to do & say nothing. They slaughtered her village. What they perceived as death was a deep sleep. Once the generous queen had enough of her rest, she began to arise as she blew life back into her army. They all assembled, stronger & better than ever. They became more protective of the queen than ever before. She made a command. One command. ‘Kill everything in sight.’ With those words, her enemies were all put to death. The queen’s empire celebrated. They asked her, ‘Why did you allow us to be defeated?’ She responded, ‘So that generations for years & years to come would know, that even in the grave, he is lord.

    Megan Thee Stallion wants to convey a similar message to her own enemies, with especial focus on the man who caused so much of her suicide ideation for the past few years, Tory Lanez. It is he that The Stallion refers to when she provides the aforementioned rap, “Breakin’ down and I had the whole world watchin’/But the worst part is really who watched me/Every night I cried, I almost died.” And yet, despite understanding the preciousness of life after her near-death experience, Megan still can’t help feeling “very depressed.” We’re talking wrist-slittingly depressed.

    Addressing the conundrum of being rich and successful, yet still feeling empty inside (to bring up Britney again, she already explored that pain with 2000’s “Lucky”), Megan sings, “How can somebody so blessed wanna slit they wrist?/Shit, I’d probably bleed out some Pinot/When they find me, I’m in Valentino, ayy.” Needless to say, the expensive wines and the designer labels aren’t enough to fill an emotional and spiritual void. Which means, like Britney in 2003, maybe it’s time for Megan to seek Kabbalah counsel from Madonna, who once told her dancers that after their tour (2004’s Reinvention Tour, to be exact), she hoped they had become “more compassionate to other human beings and more responsible for your actions and your words, because without those two things your gifts and your talents mean nothing.”

    Perhaps Thee Stallion is starting to pick up on that message, even if still allowing herself to wallow in her melancholia just a little bit longer. During the chorus, she speaks to that sadness on a new level, channeling Charlotte York (Kristin Davis) in the vulvodynia episode of Sex and the City (“The Real Me”) when she says, “This pussy deprеssed, hmm/I’m about to stress him, yeah.” This is said while Megan is in a human-sized tank meant to mirror the kind that “pet” cobras and other snakes are usually kept in, all while strangers watch her and take her picture. Thus, she takes Taylor Swift’s “fishbowl” metaphor from the “Lover” video and remakes it with a snake tank. For that’s what it is to be famous: trapped inside a glass prison with everyone on the outside examining and dissecting your every move. Inside the tank, Megan peels off another layer of skin from her face. 

    Intercut scenes in black and white then start to show up, featuring Megan in her most Nicki-looking aesthetic yet. A smattering of heads contained inside a sea of snakes also serves to highlight Thee Stallion’s overarching message that she will always triumph over her enemies, hitting back when they least expect it with her own set of venomous fangs. Dancing in the middle of a spiral jetty during the mercurial guitar solo (at its most “80s rock” yet), Thee Stallion again gives off major “Ganja Burn” video vibes. Soon, a montage of images that we’ve seen throughout the video play at a rapid-fire pace before the camera finally pauses on Thee Stallion’s face looking back at us, her back arched and her breathing visible. It is in this moment that the viewer can understand the full weight of her focus on the cobra as a spirit animal. For it is she who posted an image relating to the cobra’s symbolic meaning that stated, “Cobras exemplify courage and self-reliance. They stand tall and fierce in the face of challenges, teaching one to tap into their inner strength and rely on oneself to conquer their threats. Emulating the cobra helps one be more confident in the person they are within.”

    How fitting, then, that “Cobra” should serve as the first single from Megan’s Hot Girl label. Part of a larger company called Hot Girl Productions LLC—and secured after years of legal battles with 1501 Certified Entertainment—it’s no coincidence that her first release since 2022’s Traumazine is a marked departure from the sound of previous music. Not just the melding of rap and rock (of the variety perhaps not seen since Run DMC and Aerosmith joined forces), but with the amplification of her deeply personal lyrics. The kind of lyrics that are generally not associated with being “rap topics” (because that can only extend to repetitive mentions of bands and booties, n’est-ce pas?).

    This includes exposing further vulnerability by alluding to her breakup with Pardison Fontaine, as she refers to his infidelity via the lines, “Pulled up, caught him cheatin’/Gettin’ his dick sucked in the same spot I’m sleepin’.” Here, again, it’s worth remarking that Minaj was the mainstream’s progenitor of these kinds of deeply personal lyrics in her rap music, with notable examples including The Pinkprint’s “I Lied,” “The Crying Game” and “Pills n Potions.” With “Cobra,” Megan Thee Stallion is amplifying the “vulnerability in rap” trend that Minaj started a decade ago and making it all her own.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • No Smoke, Just Mirrors: Dua Lipa Offers Up Some Madonna-Inspired Magic on “Houdini”

    No Smoke, Just Mirrors: Dua Lipa Offers Up Some Madonna-Inspired Magic on “Houdini”

    [ad_1]

    By now, it’s not exactly “undercover” (despite any “spy movies” a certain pop star is about to be in [*cough cough* Argylle]) that Dua Lipa is heavily inspired by Madonna. Just as most pop stars are, and will likely continue to be whether they’re aware of it or not (such is the power of being a progenitor). For, as listeners already witnessed on her sophomore album, Future Nostalgia, Lipa went all in on emulating the disco-fied but modern sound that Madonna cultivated for 2005’s Confessions on a Dance Floor. She even went so far as to tap Madonna for a collaboration on a remix of “Levitating” for Club Future Nostalgia (the twenty-first century’s answer to You Can Dance…apart from Finally Enough Love). But now that Lipa has mastered the sound of Madonna’s mid-00s era, she appears determined to do the same for its aesthetic. 

    Enter the video for “Houdini,” the lead single from her forthcoming third album (the title of which has yet to be revealed). While Gen Z might not be aware of Harry Houdini’s renown as a master of “magic” (or even Madonna’s)—or, more to the point, escape artistry—they could be forced to look into it now thanks to Lipa’s analogy. One that she chooses to carry out within the confines of an empty dance studio à la, that’s right, Madonna in the “Hung Up” video. Directed by Emmanuel Cossu, Lipa’s visual accompaniment to “Houdini” starts out, as “Hung Up” does, with Lipa working out some moves in an empty dance studio, complete with a full-length mirror that serves as an entire wall. The opening notes to the song then immediately confirm that, yes, it’s produced by Tame Impala (a.k.a. Kevin Parker). Along with Danny L Harle of PC Music repute. So it is that Lipa wants us to know that, although she’s “veering away” from the 70s disco sound in favor of a 70s psychedelia one (which makes Tame Impala the perfect collaborator), she’s still very much in full Madonna Confessions on a Dance Floor mode. Even if it’s minus the hot pink leotard with coordinating sparkly purple belt. 

    Indeed, Lipa opts for more “sexy-comfortable chic” (think: a riff on what Sporty Spice was already doing) in dark blue track pants and a black mesh tank with a flesh-colored top underneath. The latter deliberately giving off the “is she topless?” vibe (Madonna, in contrast, never left that as a question mark during her Erotica era…or any era, for that matter). As she walks with sultry panache along the length of the mirror, Lipa’s reflection proceeds to do its own thing on the choreo front (and yes, the video’s choreography, Charm La’Donna [how coincidental that her last name rhymes with Madonna] is a key part of what makes it so captivating). Thus begins the “magic” (i.e., optical illusion) portion of the program that one would expect of a song with such a title. A brief “blackout” of the lights in the studio then allows for the “magic” of materialization, for that’s when a bevy of shirtless dancers subsequently appear all around Lipa in an orgiastic mise-en-scène. One that also mimics certain portions of the “Hung Up” video—specifically, when all of Madonna’s dancers are writhing around on and near each other in a club (one that also apparently has arcade game options, including the then-pervasive Dancing Stage Fusion…just an upgraded version of Dance Dance Revolution, really). 

    While Lipa never leaves the dance studio for any “slice of life” purposes, the undeniable visual connection between “Houdini” and “Hung Up” (oh, look at that—both songs start with an “H”) is further heightened by the lyrics themselves. For a start, that comes in the form of Lipa declaring, “Time is passin’ like a solar eclipse…/It’s your moment, baby/Don’t let it slip.” This is like her version of Madonna saying, “Time goes by so slowly for those who wait/No time to hesitate.”

    Additional similarities in the lyrical motifs also occur via Lipa’s own warning that she won’t stick around very long for someone who isn’t worthwhile. As manifest in the lines, “Tell me all the ways you need me/I’m not here for long/Catch me or I go Houdini/I come and I go/Prove you got the right to please me.” This not only mimics Madonna’s sentiments when she says, “I can’t keep on waiting for you/You’ll wake up one day/But it’ll be too late,” but also mirrors who she was as a person during her early days of trying to make it/“be somebody” in New York. A journey that was slightly more circuitous than Lipa’s, who had the “London advantage” of attending schools targeted specifically toward singing and acting. And clearly, all that education has paid off…as one can see by watching Lipa own the rehearsal studio. Whether or not the dancers she’s only seeing in the mirror are “actually there” or mere phantasms (how Black Swan) of a magical nature depends largely if one believes in magic in general, and hauntings in particular. 

    Appearing multiple times and in multiple ways throughout the video, the dancers (all sporting the same shade of red-hued hair as Lipa), at the zenith of the song’s musical breakdown, multiply in such a way as to give an “in da club” effect before Lipa is shown once again entirely alone in the studio. After all, half the work of being a creative person is having the imagination to envision how the final product will turn out once the necessary collaborators become involved. 

    The indelible images from both “Houdini” and “Hung Up” are the ones of each pop star watching themselves in the mirror as they perform (and, at one point, Lipa’s barrage of mirrored images become quite funhouse-y). As though that reflection they see is the performer self, while the one watching is the “mere mortal” self who yearns to be seen the same way (/live up to impossible expectations) the performer is by her fans.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Perhaps Lana Del Rey Needs A Reminder of What Having “Absolutely No Money” Means

    Perhaps Lana Del Rey Needs A Reminder of What Having “Absolutely No Money” Means

    [ad_1]

    Lana Del Rey has long been “accused” of being the daughter of a rich man. From the outset of her success, there were speculations that Robert Grant had “bought” her career, including her initial bum deal with 5 Points Records (which eventually cost Del Rey plenty of money to buy back the rights to the songs that were released on Lana Del Ray a.k.a. Lizzy Grant, ergo eschewing an eventual need to release Lana Del Ray a.k.a. Lizzy Grant [Lana’s Version]). In the first year after “Video Games” was released, there was no shortage of venom directed at her vis-à-vis her “authenticity,” or lack thereof. And part of that stemmed from a vehement belief that Del Rey was yet another case of privilege being the key to success. For whatever reason, Del Rey has sought to set the record straight after over a decade of letting “the narrative” perpetuate. And yet, what she had to say about being “poor, or whatever” (as Madonna would call it) doesn’t exactly scream, “Struggle!” 

    Citing growing up in Lake Placid as the height of her “poor girl legitimacy,” Del Rey does little to assuage the contempt of those who would seek to remind her that poverty—real poverty—is not what she endured. At worst, she endured the white girl version of poverty that Andie Walsh in Pretty in Pink had to by being called white trash and having to work a part-time job. In fact, she says the real rich kids at her boarding school used to call her “WT from LP” (white trash from Lake Placid). An “epithet” that actually sounds like an on-brand song title for Del Rey. 

    Somebody trolling in the comments section (via the sarcastic, “It’s so depressing to grow up rich. And then get even richer. Omg what will she ever do?”) was what finally set Del Rey off enough to post a video (and then delete it) about having “absolutely no money” as a child. She started by saying, “I wanna make this video really short and sweet [at over five minutes], just ‘cause the conversation that keeps coming up about coming from, me coming from money and my family having money and this whole thing. I just wanna say, like, coming from the most rural spot inarguably, one of the most rural spots in America, that was not a wealthy town, um, and having gone to a boarding school where I didn’t even know I was going or didn’t have any concept of and got financial aid for because my uncle worked in the administrative building and also being completely alienated from all the kids who already knew each other from New York City. I had such a tough time there because everyone knew how much money everyone had.” Apart from the incomplete sentences, there are many holes to poke in all of those statements. For a start, there are far more rural places in America than Lake Placid, and it is certainly not known for being a poor town. Indeed, it was co-opted by the wealthy after the founding of the Lake Placid Club in 1895 led to the “discovery” of the upstate milieu as a place where the affluent could “retreat” (as though their already cushy day-to-day existence was something that needed to be “escaped”).

    Dewey Decimal System creator Melvil Dewey was at the helm of the aforementioned social club known for its racist and exclusionary practices. Complete with a membership policy that stipulated, “No one will be received as a member or guest against whom there is physical, moral, social or race objection, or who would be unwelcome to even a small minority… This invariable rule is rigidly enforced. It is found impracticable to make exceptions for Jews or others excluded, even though of unusual personal qualifications.” So fearful of a Jewish “infection” near his precious Lake Placid Club was Dewey that he even bought the plot of land adjacent to the club so that no Jewish person would. 

    So yes, Lake Placid, one could argue, was a haven for the white and racist (often synonymous with wealth) early on in its history, and perhaps that’s where Del Rey has gotten some of her propensities for tone deafness (e.g., the “question for the culture,” posting videos of people without their faces obscured during the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests, saying she’s not racist because she’s fucked some “rappers” [though which ones besides the white G-Eazy remains unclear]). Del Rey also freely admits to the perks of nepotism, which most non-privileged people have no access to whatsoever, by stating her uncle’s administrative position at the Kent School helped give her a leg up. And yet, she clearly doesn’t see it that way. All she sees, essentially, is being the Dan/Jenny Humphrey of her boarding school, looked upon as “less than” in such a way as to make her eventually sing, “Money is the reason we exist/Everybody knows it, it’s a fact/Kiss, kiss.” For those without “real” money to spend in here (as Vivian Ward announced at the Beverly Hills store where she was previously rejected) genuinely don’t “exist” to those with the proverbial big bucks. This, as Del Rey admits, further compelled her toward the path of fame and fortune so that no one could ever call her trash again. Though, of course, no one outside an uber-wealthy circle probably ever would have. 

    Elsewhere, Del Rey remarks, “My parents were arguing about money every single day, and my dad working as a woodworker and in real estate and my mom working in special education. Like, although he bought domain names later on, it doesn’t mean that they were worth anything until more recently.” What she fails to mention is that both worked at renowned ad agency the Grey Group in NYC before moving to Lake Placid once Del Rey was born (to die). Grant was a copywriter, while Hill was an account executive. Neither of those salaries would be anything to turn one’s nose up at. And obviously, they had enough money for the move upstate and to buy a house where they would raise the rest of the Grant family. Nonetheless, Del Rey claims to have felt scarcity during her youth. And yet, how scarce could it have all really been once Robert and Patricia got Lana and her sister Chuck’s modeling career for Ford Models going (hence, the constantly resurfacing photos of Lana from random-ass photoshoots like the one with Lindsay Lohan for Abercrombie & Fitch)? Pimping them out like the Spearses with Britney, as it were. Maybe some of that money even helped with LDR’s tuition for the notoriously expensive private university that is Fordham in the Bronx. Del Rey, conveniently, didn’t mention how that was afforded. 

    Though she was sure to add that, while in New York, “I really didn’t know what to do, and depended on the boyfriends that I had to let me stay with them all that while.” Steven Mertens and Josh Kemp are then name-checked, the way Madonna might be forced to give Dan Gilroy or Camille Barbone some credit for furnishing her with the basics in life while she focused on her music. As a matter of fact, while performing in London for The Celebration Tour, Madonna made a similar, blunter comment about needing to rely on boyfriends upon moving to New York City, and away from her own middle-class family in Michigan: “I had no way to take a bath or shower… So I would actually, um, date men who had showers and bathtubs. Yep, that’s what I did… Blow jobs for showers.” Del Rey could say the same, but that wouldn’t suit her vision of herself. 

    Nor would it to admit that taking any kind of vacation is a privilege, no matter how “ghettoly” executed. So it is that she also declared, “Even on our monthly [a word she didn’t seem to mean within the context], like, spring break vacation every year, we drove to Daytona. Not flew ‘cause it was too expensive.” This is where she comes across like that model in the season one episode of Sex and the City (or Kristen Wiig in Bridesmaids saying, “Help me, I’m poor”) who says, “I’m really very literary. I read. I’ll sit down and read a whole magazine from cover to cover.” Del Rey’s version of that is, “I’m really very poor. I had to go to boarding school and Fordham on financial aid” and “Oh my gawww, we had to drive to Daytona instead of flying.” Bitch, do you know how many actual poor people can’t go goddamn nowhere?

    Still, she concludes her woe-is-me speech with, “It’s so sad that I can’t own coming from this, like, beautiful rural mountain town.” No one ever said she couldn’t own that. But to call herself poor (while her parents’ huge wedding announcement in the New York Times circa 1982 also suggests otherwise as poor people simply don’t do that kind of shit) is, let’s just say it, a bit extreme and absurd. Granted, in the present, being middle class (even upper) is little better than being outright poor (in terms of how far a dollar will stretch), and certainly entails far fewer (if any) governmental benefits…replaced instead by greater tax burdens. But Del Rey ought to at least somewhat remember, in her life before fame, that poverty is not something she ever actually experienced, nor was she at risk of it. Especially after her father did cash in on those domain names in the 2000s. Even so, it better suits the “lore of Lana,” particularly with her small-town predilections of late, to announce that not only was she not a rich kid, she was a poor kid. But with poverty like hers, who needs food stamps?

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Charli XCX Creates Her Own Version of CSS’ “City Grrrl” With “In The City”

    Charli XCX Creates Her Own Version of CSS’ “City Grrrl” With “In The City”

    [ad_1]

    In 2011, CSS released their third album, La Liberación. Still finding it difficult to recreate the “virality” of 2005’s “Music Is My Hot Hot Sex,” CSS didn’t make it easier for themselves to do it again with this record. After all, they chose to release just one official single from: “Hits Me Like A Rock” featuring Bobby Gillespie. And yet, after the video—filled with what would now be called “TikTok dancing”—came out, CSS released another visual accompaniment for a song from La Liberación called “City Grrrl” featuring SSION. In the same way that Charli XCX’s new single, “In The City,” pays homage to how a sprawling metropolis lends the kind of anonymity necessary to feel totally free, CSS’ “City Grrrl” took it one step further by speaking to how a city (specifically, a city like New York), after enough time spent there, can make you so numb that “nothing hurts.” 

    Many see this as an advantage, while others posit that the idea of eventually losing all sense of humanity as a result of living in a city (again, mainly New York) simply isn’t worth it. However, for the oppressed and repressed collection of misfits that tends to (or once tended to) gravitate toward those “bright lights,” pain has been the norm in some way for their entire lives, so feeling nothing sounds pretty good in contrast. The thing is, New York is so chock full of normies now thanks to how much money it takes to live there. It’s hardly a place where “being different” is easier to conceal anymore. Not among the Rag & Bone-wearing ilk. Or even the Uniqlo types. For homogeneity has become so unavoidable in society that it’s seeped into the city landscape. A milieu that people were (and still are) so convinced stood out as a bastion of uniqueness. Though, from the get-go, cities were designed to have their own “inverse” homogeneity to the suburban alternatives that are often mocked and ridiculed by city dwellers who presume their lifestyle is inherently better. Particularly those, like Charli XCX, who grew up in such environments, frequenting the clubs and raves of London and its outer reaches as she made a name for herself (beyond just making the user name of Charli XCX on MSN Messenger). 

    In the early days of her recording career, Charli’s lyrics and tone possessed echoes of fellow Brits Lily Allen and Kate Nash, particularly on a song titled “Art Bitch” (side note: CSS also has a song called the same on their debut album). A nod to the sort of girl who would inevitably flee to the city to turn her art into financial gold (because that’s what art is all about now, right?). So it is that Charli sings, “You use a needle and a thread to sew up your dreams/Of going to France or New York or wherever it is/You’re gonna get there one day.” This is the same archetype CSS’ lead singer, Lovefoxxx, embodies in the video for “City Grrrl.” In fact, the premise for it comes off like a combination of Madonna blowing into New York for the first time meets her eponymous character in Desperately Seeking Susan riding back into town from Atlantic City. Lovefoxxx starts the video in a similar fashion, opening on a Coach USA bus with the destination “NEW YORK” emblazoned on the sign above the windshield. From there, Lovefoxxx pulls another Susan maneuver by proceeding to conduct her hygiene affairs in the public bathroom of the bus station, dyeing her hair pink with Manic Panic and changing her ensemble to reflect her inner “punk rock” edge on the outside. Now that she feels liberated enough in the city to do so. 

    The idea that you can be whoever you want to be, finally see yourself as you always dreamed you could be, is also the crux of Charli’s “In The City.” Which additionally offers a requisite gay feature (like “City Grrl” with SSION) via Sam Smith. Because what would any song showing love for the big city be without mentioning or alluding to the gays that populate it? In “City Grrrl,” Lovefoxxx calls it out directly by singing, “When I was a little girl/I wanted to be a citizen of the world/Being busy with my job and my gay friends/Laughing and drinking with my one-night stands.” For Charli, having Smith on the song to lend his vocals to a verse about meeting an accepting lover seems to be sufficient, with Smith declaring, “I knew the night that I met you/Underneath the New York City lights/Baby, no matter what I do/There’s an angel standin’ by my side.” Though one is surely likelier to find a devil at their side “in the city” instead. Especially during the less sanitized times of 2011, when “City Grrrl” came out. 

    In fact, it doesn’t feel like a coincidence that Charli’s city ode has a sound very similar to another 2011 track: Rihanna’s “We Found Love.” It’s got that same EDM infusion—one that also harkens back to Charli’s earlier musical sound before it veered more sharply into pop. This is thanks to co-production by Charli herself, A. G. Cook, George Daniel (a.k.a. the drummer for The 1975 and Charli’s boyfriend), ILYA and Omer Fedi. And, just as “We Found Love” was described, “In The City” is also “the rare song that manages to be sad and joyous all at once.” To that end, “In The City” transports the listener back to the early 2010s of Rihanna’s pre-Fenty heyday. Charli even invokes use of the word “diamonds” by saying, “All the lights are diamonds in the sky,” as though to deliberately remind us of Rihanna belting out, “We’re like diamonds in the sky.” And why not conjure up this not-so-distant period by mimicking its distinct sonic trends? After all, it was a simpler time not just in the twenty-first century, but in New York as well. Arguably the last blip in its history before every corner was taken over by a corporate entity. 

    With “In The City,” Charli appears to be part of the massive cabal that keeps perpetuating the myth that this is how New York still is. Even if its generic title can also be applied to other megalopolises like London, Istanbul, Tokyo and Los Angeles. But, of course, with Smith directly name-checking New York, it’s clear that’s the town they want people to associate the song with. Regardless of it no longer being the place where one can assure, “I found what I was lookin’ for.” Unless what you’re looking for happens to be a ramped-up obsession with money, status and a whole slew of other things that have nothing to do with being the kind of “art bitch” Charli once talked about or that Lovefoxxx once portrayed as a “City Grrrl” of yore. Where saying, “Don’t live your life, girl/Unless it’s just like a movie” has now become, “Live your life like any little banality set against a basic urban backdrop could go viral on TikTok.”

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Fans telling Madonna to ‘grow up’ and ‘act her age’ on her Celebration tour is not OK

    Fans telling Madonna to ‘grow up’ and ‘act her age’ on her Celebration tour is not OK

    [ad_1]

    This isn’t even the first time that Madonna has faced scrutiny over her performance in the context of her age. After her appearance at the 2023 Grammys, many critics flocked to the Internet to air their unsolicited opinions. “Madonna looks good for her age … if her age is a 2,700-year-old vampire who eats babies and small animals alive,” one posted.

    A Madonna fan did admittedly hit back at the time with a perfect response: “The negative comments here are so predictable. Most of them come from people who are scared of getting older and insignificant themselves.”

    The singer has been fielding these comments about her age for too long, just like many women in (and out) of the public eye, aged over the age of 40 or so. Back in 2016, she hit out at an unknown critic about “acting her age”.

    “How do I know I’m still acting my age?” she wrote. “Because it’s MY age and it’s MY life and all of you women hating bigots need to sit down and try to understand why you feel the need to limit me with you down fear of what you aren’t familiar with.

    “The fact that people actually believe a woman is not allowed to express her sexuality and be adventurous past a certain age is proof that we still live in an ageist and sexist society,” she posted on Instagram.

    In a 2021 interview, Madonna spoke out about not thinking about age when she performs. “I don’t even think about my age, to tell you the truth. I just keep going,” she said. “Even when I performed almost my entire tour in agony, I had no cartilage left in my right hip, and everyone kept saying, ‘You gotta stop, you gotta stop.’ I said, ‘I will not stop. I will go until the wheels fall off.’”

    To infantalise Madonna in this way by telling her to act more like other women her age just feels like misogynstic.

    Kevin Mazur

    So if she’s not thinking about her age, why is everyone else?

    There are multiple issues at play here – one is the disturbing link many draw between age and sexuality. When a woman gets older, she is shamed for her sexuality. She’s told to “act her age” and curb that side of herself, particularly in public. Secondly, fans seem to be claiming some kind of ownership over Madonna’s body and behaviour, wanting her to act the way they think is “age appropriate” to them. Both of these issues stink of misogyny over a woman’s choices and a misplaced assumption that we own Madonna’s body, actions or performances.

    Perhaps the star’s “fans” and critics would do well to concentrate on respecting her energy, commitment and talent – instead of focusing on her age and how she should be acting in response to it.

    [ad_2]

    Charley Ross

    Source link

  • For the Broke Asses in the Ultra Cheap Seats: The Eras Tour in Movie Format Makes It Clear That Taylor Swift Is Still the Apolitical “Good Girl”

    For the Broke Asses in the Ultra Cheap Seats: The Eras Tour in Movie Format Makes It Clear That Taylor Swift Is Still the Apolitical “Good Girl”

    [ad_1]

    Billed instantly as a “three-hour career-spanning victory lap,” Taylor Swift’s sixth tour is, needless to say, her most ambitious yet. Part of that ambitiousness has extended to releasing it as a concert film while still touring the world with the production. Obviously, she’s not worried about losing any profits by making it available to the “broke asses” who couldn’t manage to get themselves to the real thing. And even to those who already did, but simply want to see it in an even more “larger than life” format (IMAX being designed to accommodate such a desire). As Swift says, “Too big to hang out/Slowly lurching toward your favorite city.” That she is, as movie theaters across the globe roll out the reel and proceed to endure what can best be described, rather unoriginally, as Swiftmania. Indeed, one wishes Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr would weigh in on the matter, but instead non-Beatle Billy Joel already decided of Swiftie fanaticism and the Eras Tour, “The only thing I can compare it to is the phenomenon of Beatlemania.”

    Rob Sheffield of Rolling Stone tapped into part of why people are so, ugh, enchanted with the tour when he wrote, “​​Taylor Swift keeps building the legend of her Eras Tour, week after week, city by city, making every night so much longer, wilder, louder, more jubilant than it has to be. There’s nothing in history to compare. This is her best tour ever, by an absurd margin. It’s a journey through her past, starring all the different Taylors she’s ever been, which means all the Taylors that you’ve ever been.” The thing about that, of course, is, well, Swift hasn’t exactly been all that multi-dimensional over the years. Sure, she’s changed her sound from country to pop and dabbled with some musical styles in between, but, in the end, she’s still the Aryan wet dream wearing red lipstick. Steadfastly committed to delivering a good time without much of any true substance to say in her position of power. Not through the music itself anyway (unless one counts the forced feeling of “allyship” in “You Need To Calm Down”). Over every so-called era, that has remained the most constant of all—Swift’s singular focus on one non-political topic and one non-political topic only: bad boyfriends. And, sometimes, when she’s cresting on the high of being in love, “good” boyfriends…before they inevitably turn bad. 

    This is one of the key aspects of Swift’s “relatability quotient.” With the “everywoman” seeing themselves in her despite the fact that few “average” women are giraffe tall, thin, blonde and blue-eyed. The Barbie ideal, as it were. Once upon a time, this was embodied by Britney Spears, who experienced a similar level of fervor at her so-called peak (that word always suggesting, somewhat rudely, that a person will never be as good as they were at a certain moment in time). The fundamental difference between the two is that Swift has remained America’s sweetheart throughout her career, while Britney defiantly ripped off the shackles of that role when she shaved her head and, months later, gave a somnambulant performance of “Gimme More” at the MTV VMAs. Up until that instance, Spears had always been a consummate performer. Dancing, (mostly) singing and sexing it up for the crowd. She chose one year in her life to have a rightly deserved breakdown, and things never really went back to being the same for her. 

    In 2007, Swift (a Sagittarius like Britney) was eighteen, and had just released her self-titled debut one year prior. This reality seemed to reinforce that, when it comes to the music industry, there is always another young(er) blonde pop star in the making, waiting to take over for the current “hot thing.” And Swift would embody the same “I’m a good girl who does as I’m told” aura (that Britney initially did) for the vast majority of her career. Herself admitting, “My entire moral code as a kid and now is a need to be thought of as good” and “The main thing I always tried to be was, like, a good girl.” Even now, after “going political” (a.k.a. making one public statement against a Republican Congresswoman), it’s clear that what lacks most from Swift’s work, ergo her stage shows, is a message worth imparting. Of course, her fans and casual listeners alike will say that there can be no more important message than simply “making people feel good.” To a certain extent, that’s true. However, after a while, one wonders if Swift’s failure to say anything on the same level as a Madonna stage show is an exemplification of how the public no longer really wants to be challenged. “Preached to,” as it were. This, in some respects, is emblematic of the “algorithm effect” that has taken hold of society, with everyone seeing only what they want to see, and no “unpleasant” (read: contrary) viewpoints thrown into the mix. Including the one that would dare call out Swift for being anything other than perfection. 

    In this regard, too, she differs from Spears, who was far more derided for being a talented blonde girl, but with “nothing to say.” This being most clearly immortalized in an 00s interview during which she said of George W. Bush, “We should just trust our president in every decision that he makes and we should just support that, you know. And, um, be faithful in what happens.” Alas, Spears’ faith in a few patriarchal institutions has been shaken to its core in the decades since and, similar to Swift, she’s had a reckoning with the “good girl” she once thought she wanted to be in order to receive endless accolades and praise. For someone like Madonna, who provided the blueprint of the modern theatrical stage show with 1990’s Blond Ambition Tour, that was never a reckoning that needed to occur. She was always a “bad girl” from the start. In other words, a woman who spoke her mind without fear or inhibition. This is why one of her earliest stage shows, the Who’s That Girl Tour, addressed political topics ranging from AIDS to essentially directing the missive of “Papa Don’t Preach” at Ronald Reagan and the pope. No other woman, least of all in the hyper-conservative 1980s, would have ever dared to do that, and certainly not at the very beginning of her career. 

    And yes, it is Madonna, who was once marveled at for staying in the business for a paltry fifteen years, that has allowed for someone like Swift to exist in it for almost two decades without anyone questioning it. Because, as Madonna established, the idea of a pop star, particularly a woman, having many eras is merely a reflection of an inherently misogynistic public that expects to see something new in order to be kept interested in the same woman. Especially when there are more youthful options cropping up all the time. As Swift noted, “The female artists have reinvented themselves twenty times more than the male artists. They have to or else you’re out of a job. Constantly having to reinvent, constantly finding new facets of yourself that people find to be shiny.” This speaks to something Madonna said about the Who’s That Girl Tour: “That’s why I call the tour Who’s That Girl?; because I play a lot of characters, and every time I do a video or a song, people go, ‘Oh, that’s what she’s like.’ And I’m not like any of them. I’m all of them. I’m none of them.” In actuality, the real reason to highlight that title was the fact that she had a movie of the same name playing in theaters (briefly) the summer the tour was happening. A movie that was originally going to be called Slammer before then-husband Sean Penn ended up being thrown in the slammer himself and it seemed like it would be in poor taste. 

    Swift’s luck with movie roles hasn’t been much better than Madonna’s, but people seem to talk about the clunkers that are Valentine’s Day and Cats far less than, say, Body of Evidence or Swept Away. Both Swift and Madonna are, of late, focusing on what they do best, with the latter kicking off her own world tour the same weekend the Eras Tour film debuted in theaters. Perhaps an unwitting “flex” on Madonna’s part, as she still seems keenly aware that, of all the pop stars, she’s the only one willing to make a truly political statement during her shows. What’s more, no matter how “old” she’s gotten, she has always been an active participant in the choreography expected of a pop star/musical extravaganza. And so, while the Eras Tour film is deft in creating the kind of spectacle that allows the viewer to feel like they’re actually at the show (complete with annoying audience members singing along in the theater), perhaps what stands out more in the movie than it would in person is the lack of choreography that Swift herself engages in. Instead, she’s a master at the art of the illusion of movement as she struts frequently up and down the ample stage. Here, too, Swift can be differentiated from a “real” pop star in that she has always merely dipped her toe into what that means as someone who more strongly identifies with the singer-songwriter qualities that theoretically mean chilling at home and writing poignant lyrics without having to worry about executing a dance move correctly onstage. But this is where Swift makes it clear that, in the twenty-first century, a musician has no choice but to become the multimedia art project that Madonna always was from the get-go. A walking, talking embodiment of synergy. Even if an embodiment that has never truly “ate” (despite Swift’s recent comparisons to the likes of Madonna and Michael Jackson…stage presence-wise, among other ways). 

    The uninformed accusations that Madonna is jumping on the Taylor and Beyoncé bandwagon of doing marathon, theatrical shows is rather absurd considering this is what Madonna has been doing from the beginning, long before anyone else thought to put in the effort it requires. Particularly the effort it takes to endure the personal risk to one’s life and reputation by speaking out against the injustices of the world. This has not been received warmly by quite a few institutions, not least of which was the Vatican, who urged Italians to boycott Madonna’s Blond Ambition Tour for being blasphemous. In response, Madonna made a public statement in Rome during which she declared, “My show is not a conventional rock show, but a theatrical presentation of my music. And like theater, it asks questions, provokes thought and takes you on an emotional journey. Portraying good and bad, light and dark, joy and sorrow, redemption and salvation.” 

    As the Eras Tour film underscores, that’s not really what’s happening at a Taylor Swift show. And that’s fine, one supposes—it just serves as a reminder that what people go apeshit over often isn’t very thought-provoking. With Swift preferring to, instead, take a page from the name of an LCD Soundsystem documentary by just “shutting up and playing the hits.”

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Troye Sivan Subverts the 90s Calvin Klein Ad in “One of Your Girls” Video

    Troye Sivan Subverts the 90s Calvin Klein Ad in “One of Your Girls” Video

    [ad_1]

    With the release of Troye Sivan’s third album, Something to Give Each Other, he’s in full-blown promotion mode. Which means, rightly, the release of another single to coincide with the album’s unveiling on October 13th. That single happens to be “One of Your Girls”—not to be confused with Kate Winslet as Rose urging Leonardo DiCaprio as Jack to draw her like “one of your French girls.” Though it seems Sivan would be down for that based on his self-confidence in the Gordon von Steiner-directed video for “One of Your Girls.”

    Evoking a similar feel to the “provocative” Calvin Klein ads of the 90s (and not just because most of the video is shot in black and white, and set against a stark white backdrop), Sivan offers the same seductive promise of “freedom” (or “permission,” if you prefer) to be oneself, no matter what gender they are. And, just as the 1994 ad for CK One “boldly” suggested that a fragrance could be “for a man or a woman,” Sivan opts to take that gender-bending tagline one step further by sliding into the titular role of “One of Your Girls.” Yes, that’s right, Sivan becomes the girl so that he can prove to the straight man he’s lusting after that he’s just as viable a candidate for a situationship. His lust for the hot straight man in question is evoked in lyrics that include, “Everybody loves you, baby/You should trademark your face/Linin’ down the block to be around you/But, baby, I’m first in place.” While the sentiments come across as “sweet like Marabou” (in case you were unsure that Sivan is Australian) in sonic form, the accompanying visual lends a more melancholic tinge to the song as we see that Sivan is bending over backwards to become desirable to a straight man by choosing to put on the drag of a “quintessentially hot” woman.

    Serving Willam from Drag Race realness, Sivan relishes his femme persona, working a chair prop with almost as much gusto as Britney Spears in the “Stronger” video. Almost. The Calvin Klein aesthetic stays consistent throughout, with the camera’s focus on muscular shirtless men (whether filmed in color or B&W) being ever-constant. One such shirtless and muscular man including Ross Lynch, who Chilling Adventures of Sabrina fans will recognize immediately as Harvey. While others will be quick to call out that another Disney star has gone “wild” (with Lynch formerly starring on a Disney Channel show called Austin & Ally). 

    Although Sivan recently gushed about Janet Jackson being “the blueprint, literally. As far as pop stars go, she’s it to me,” the look he adopts for his drag persona is decidedly Madonna-esque, right down to the white dress (“Like A Virgin” anyone?) that winks naughtily at the idea of “purity.” Then there is the aforementioned chair that could just as easily double as being from the “Open Your Heart” video. Not to mention the lap dance Sivan gives Lynch channeling Madonna’s own same-sex tease during The Girlie Show performance of “Bye Bye Baby,” in which she, too, switches guises into that of a man (or really, Marlene Dietrich) dressed in coattails to grind against three other women. And yes, there are similar “Open Your Heart” “lock and key” lyrics delivered by Sivan as he declares, “You get the key to my heart, and I need it.” 

    Meanwhile, it seems that what pop music needs is someone who is as much of a sexual chameleon as Sivan. Hence, that moment when he stares into the camera to tell us, “Pop the culture iconography, standin’ right in front of me.” The only problem is, he still can’t quite offer anything truly different apart from mimicking the female pop star “blueprints” that have come before him. And, by the end of the video, he’s transitioned to full-tilt Britney Spears circa “I’m A Slave 4 U,” delivering similar choreography and wearing an ensemble that a Britney wannabe might have once plucked from the racks of Charlotte Russe. 

    While some will interpret the pouty looks Sivan gives as being an affectation of his “sexy” persona, others might recognize the sadness shining through after being rejected by a straight man who is only “curious” about dabbling in homo encounters. Ergo, Sivan adopting this female persona to appeal to what the straight male ideal is supposed to be. As Sivan put it, “It was really just reflective of how I felt I was bending and changing my values or my self-worth for someone else. It’s like, slay, there’s this performance from a pop star girl version of me. But towards the end of the video, I think you really can see the vulnerability and the cracks that this isn’t going to work.”

    Even if it might have been fun to pretend for a while. With Sivan’s realizations about overly catering to straight men who were merely queer-curious, he started thinking about how that might be a reflection of his own enduring homophobia, noting, “A lot of the boys that song is about, I feel like they probably would’ve bullied me in high school, and now here they are paying me attention. So, at the sacrifice of my own self-worth, I’m throwing myself at them, and then you’re really just at their beck and call, and that can sometimes not feel so great.”

    But, at the very least, it must have felt great to dress up in Madonna and Britney-coded drag against the same all-white backdrop of a 90s CK One commercial in the name of subverting straight expectations.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Lolahol Finally Surrenders Full-Stop to Emulating Her Mother, “Spelling” Us With An Updated Take on the “Frozen” Video

    Lolahol Finally Surrenders Full-Stop to Emulating Her Mother, “Spelling” Us With An Updated Take on the “Frozen” Video

    [ad_1]

    The first introduction to Lourdes Leon a.k.a. Lolahol as a singer was 2022’s “Lock&Key.” More to the point, that introduction revealed Lolahol’s unexpected preference for one, Lady Gaga (via incorporating a very specific Gaga quote into the lyrics). The other pop star often cited as being rebellious, unafraid to push boundaries and a constant LGBTQIA+ ally. Needless to say, Madonna was all of these things decades before Lady Gaga came ‘round to continue the “trend.” And yes, it could be said that Madonna did make all of those things “trendy,” during a time when everything she stood for was branded as terminally taboo or, quite simply, uncool. Even her children took a while to come around to her music, with Madonna citing on more than one occasion that they didn’t really like it. Or would simply tell her when a song she was making rubbed them the wrong way. 

    However, one song that only the most heartless of fools would try to deride as anything less than extraordinary is Madonna’s 1998 track, “Frozen.” And, boldly enough, it served as the first single from Ray of Light. For not every pop star would be so willing to set the tone for a record with something as “moody” (a.k.a. not Top 40 radio-friendly) as this. But then, Madonna had never done anything by the book before that point, either. In choosing to “update” this video for her new song, “Spelling” (a witchy reference, not a language arts one), Lourdes Leon invites further automatic comparisons to her mother (so much for wanting to stand apart as one’s own artist). And, in that spirit, the “Frozen” video, directed by Chris Cunningham, must be mentioned before even bothering to unpack the visuals of “Spelling.” 

    Opening on the cracked ground of the Mojave Desert (“Can’t take the heat in a desert dream,” Lolahol sings at one point), “Frozen” is quick to show us a witchy, Elvira-like Madonna suspended in mid-air as she tells us, “You only see what your eyes want to see/How can life be what you want it to be?/You’re frozen.” These lyrics, of course, are leaps and bounds above Lolahol’s patchier offerings on “Spelling,” including, “You stay in the water/Remind you/Followin’ in black, whatever/Cyclical, bicycle, oh, yeah.” In a way, it comes off trying to sound like a “classier” version of Nicki Minaj rapping, “Wrist icicle, ride dick bicycle/Come true yo, get you this type of blow/If you wanna menage I got a tricycle.” Apart from that, it’s obviously just Lolahol grasping at straws for a word that pairs well with “cyclical.” And yes, that’s what “Spelling” is, one supposes. Proof that, as Madonna says on “Extreme Occident,” “Life is a circle.” 

    That seems to be why, just three days before her twenty-seventh birthday (with “Spelling” released on October 11th), Leon says goodbye to twenty-six (the age Madonna was when she rose to meteoric fame with “Like A Virgin,” complete with that iconic MTV VMAs performance) by saying hello to her inner Madonna. Something she appeared to have been fighting for a while in her bid to become “her own person.” Yet perhaps the wisest thing she could have done is realize that trying to run away from a juggernaut like Madonna is impossible. Especially when she’s your mother. Plus, Leon is no stranger to “Frozen,” aware of its every sonic nuances after making a dramatic choreographed video to accompany Madonna’s live performance of the song during the Madame X Tour. Shot in black and white, the video’s presentation makes it so that Lourdes is larger than life behind Madonna, holding her literally in the palms of her hands at the beginning. Superimposed over one another throughout, this moment on the tour was consistently singled out as a highlight by many critics. And when Madonna sings, “Give yourself to me,” it has an eerie effect, as though she’s asking Lourdes to be “hers” for all of eternity. 

    In effect, that’s what a child is (read: property) to a parent in general. Unless, like Madonna, you suffer the blow of losing your mother too soon. As many know by now, Madonna was just five when her mother, Madonna Sr., died of breast cancer, creating an emotional void in the singer’s life that she would seek to fulfill until the birth of Lourdes in 1996. And yes, her name does refer to being something of a miracle to Madonna, who perhaps never thought she would find a love so fulfilling. Enter the cheesy headline that some magazine (in this case, Vanity Fair) was bound to use right after Lourdes’ birth: “Madonna and Child.” This was a far cry from a 1991 Vanity Fair cover story on Madonna called “The Misfit.” In it, Madonna mentions a palm reader who came to a New Year’s Eve party at her house on that last day of 1990. According to M, “She looked at my palm and she said I’m never going to have any children.” So much for being prophetic. And yet, knowing Madonna, she probably set out to have as many children as possible after hearing a fortune teller insist that she wouldn’t. For Madonna’s entire drive in life has been to prove people wrong when they tell her she “can’t” do something. 

    This can be attributed to her oppressive patriarch, Tony Ciccone, who gave his eldest daughter a strict Catholic upbringing. One that, without the gentleness of a mother, likely seemed particularly stifling. As Madonna said, “When you grow up without a mother… you are on a mad search for love. Unconditional love.” Madonna’s comments on mothering (long before the overused “mother is mothering” phrase came along) also stood out in Truth or Dare, during which she discusses her maternal feelings toward her dancers, noting, “I think I have unconsciously chosen people that are emotionally crippled in some way. Or who need mothering in some way. Because I think it comes real natural to me. It fulfills a need in me to be mothered.” That more than slight tinge of non-altrusim in Madonna’s motives for wanting to “nurture” would come across in later interviews after she had Lourdes. 

    For instance, in a 2003 interview with Megan Mullally called “Madonna Speaks,” she once again mentions how the birth of her daughter was the beginning of her losing her sense of narcissism (timed to coincide with her study of Kabbalah). She adds antithetically to that declaration, “My children help me see myself… I see my daughter being, you know, reacting to things and I get kind of anxiety-ridden watching her do it and I go, ‘My god, that’s me.’ It’s kind of like a mirror thing that happens… ‘cause your children really are mirrors of you, they’re sparks of your soul. And when you learn to embrace your children for all of their shortcomings, in a way, you’re doing that to yourself.”

    Phrased like that, Madonna comes across as one of those parents who definitely relishes having children for the benefit of making a “carbon copy” of oneself. This only adding to Madonna’s legacy—one that assures she will live on long after she’s left this Earth. Not just through her work, but through her children. After all, Madonna has called them her greatest work of art (more property allusions), not any of the music or other media she’s put out into the world. And Lolahol’s tribute to Madonna and “Frozen” builds on that secured legacy. 

    In the post that accompanied Lolahol’s announcement of the video’s release, she wrote, “This piece is very special. It’s an homage to my mother’s timeless piece of art ‘Frozen’ [obviously]. That piece has come up countless times in my life, connecting the two of us. I would be nothing without the woman who brought me into the world. I revere her, and hope that this translates.” This feels like a far cry from previous, less than reverent statements Lourdes has made about Mama Madonna. But maybe with age comes wisdom. Or a “softening.” That’s what happened to Madonna much later in life, circa forty, with Ray of Light marking her complete transition into “Ethereal Girl” in lieu of “Material Girl.”

    Claire Farin, the director of “Spelling,” seeks to bring the same hard edge to that softening that reveals itself in the “Frozen” video (swapping out the desert in favor of a quintessentially creepy woods setting). Which is why her interpretation of the latter echoes something more tantamount to Chilling Adventures of Sabrina meets the witchy scenes in Lana Del Rey’s “Chemtrails Over the Country Club” video. After all, this is still a Gen Z project. Or “piece,” as Leon kept repeating. Such deliberate use of that word also calls attention to her “weird art kid” status. That same phrase being used by a Madonna fan after seeing the Madame X Tour. Madonna then promptly reposted the comment in her story. And yes, of late, Madonna is being re-evaluated as someone who has always been more “pure artist” than pop star. At least, this is the approach Mary Gabriel takes in the latest biography about the star, called Madonna: A Rebel Life. And maybe Leon finally saw some of that rebellion as being worthy of deference. 

    Even if her single cover smacks more of Evanescence’s Fallen than it does Madonna’s “Frozen.” The point is, Leon is trying. To “do homage,” that is. She even nods more subtly to another video of Madonna’s, “Die Another Day,” by wrapping black bands around her arms, tefillin-style. Another American Life-era track that seems to have an influence is “I’m So Stupid,” with Lolahol singing, “Everybody’s looking for something” in the same tone as Madonna when she declares, “Everybody’s lookin’ for somethin’/Everybody’s stupid, stupid.” Lolahol instead accuses herself of stupidity by remarking, “I was stupid and it doesn’t work like that.” Whether she meant to reference “I’m So Stupid” or not, it’s clear Leon has been paying more attention to her mother’s work (even if only through osmosis) than she might have previously let on. 

    Though she’s vague about the “it” in “doesn’t work like that,” maybe what Lolahol is referring to pertains to the presumed ease with which she could kick start her own career by sheer virtue of being Madonna’s daughter. To that point, Madonna said of Lourdes in 2019, “She doesn’t have the same drive [as me]—and again, I feel social media plagues her and makes her feel like: ‘People are going to give me things because I’m [Madonna’s] daughter.’ I try to give her examples of other children of celebrities who have to work through that ‘Oh yeah, you’re the daughter of…’ and then eventually you are taken seriously for what you do.”

    This seems to be gradually happening to Lourdes. But it might actually be a detriment to call further attention to her nepo baby status by emulating such an iconic visual of her mother’s (as we also saw in the video for Go’s “Cuntradiction”). At the same time, if anyone “deserves” to emulate, who else but Lourdes ought to? (But don’t try telling that to a drag queen.) It’s something she’s been doing since at least 2009 (or 2003, if you count her cameo during the Britney/Xtina performance of “Like A Virgin”), when she appeared in Madonna’s “Celebration” video dressed in M’s “Like A Virgin” regalia, complete with wedding dress and “Boy Toy” belt. At the time, she was just shy of turning thirteen. In the years since, Leon has proven to be a quick study in the ways of her mother, even going to the same university Madonna dropped out of (University of Michigan) before herself “dropping out” to transfer to SUNY Purchase. Pursuing the same love of dance that Madonna possessed when she went to college (indeed, there are moments during the aforementioned Madame X Tour performance of “Frozen” where Lourdes becomes U of M-era Madonna), Leon has been quoted as saying of dance: “You’re using your body to define the space around you—to change it. That’s a very naked form of expression.”

    Nakedness becomes more literal in “Spelling,” with Leon opting to differentiate her version of “Frozen” from Madonna’s by entering into a body of water wearing only her birthday suit. As though baptizing herself a fully-formed star. Something Madonna also did by choosing to move to New York and reinvent herself for the very first time. Having schooled both Lourdes and several generations of women on not being ashamed of nudity (see: Madonna declaring, “I’m not ashamed” when her pre-fame nude photos were leaked to Playboy and Penthouse), Lourdes pointedly chooses to “sex up” this “Frozen” homage with one of her mother’s tried-and-true shock value staples. Except that, as a direct result of Madonna, women who are comfortable with their sexuality are no longer even half as shocking. 

    In 2019, Madonna gave an interview to iHeartRadio, during which she was asked if she thought any of her children would follow in her footsteps. She replied, “Following in my footsteps? I wouldn’t wish that on anyone.” Yet it seems as though, suddenly, Lourdes wants to do something like that, or as close to it as someone from Gen Z (bordering dangerously on millennial) can get to imitating Madonna. With imitation still being, so they insist, the sincerest form of flattery. Not, instead, the greatest sign that there is nothing original left to do or say.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • The Unspoken “Trick” of Madonna’s Longest-Charting R&B/Hip Hop Single Since “Take A Bow” Is One She’s Been Using for Decades

    The Unspoken “Trick” of Madonna’s Longest-Charting R&B/Hip Hop Single Since “Take A Bow” Is One She’s Been Using for Decades

    [ad_1]

    For a long time, Madonna has been aware of the benefits of a certain “gimmick”: the musical collaboration. Where once she would have shied away entirely from the very concept of a “duet,” the world’s most famous pop star began to come around to the notion more readily in the late 90s, easing into things with an oft-forgotten feature on Ricky Martin’s “Be Careful (Cuidado Con Mi Corazón).” Produced by Madonna’s then-favorite producer of the time, William Orbit, it certainly stands apart from the rest of the general vibe on Martin’s breakout self-titled album, released in 1999 on the heels of “Livin’ La Vida Loca” fever. 

    It didn’t take long for Madonna to go even bigger for her next collab, 2003’s “Me Against the Music.” Added as a feature after Madonna locked lips with Britney at the 2003 MTV VMAs, it was apparent she wanted to keep the heat from the moment going by continuing to cash in on the so-called controversy of kissing another woman/pop star (side note: naturally, there was no interest in a duet with Christina Aguilera, the other pop star she kissed). 

    Long before Madonna opted to offer up her talents to more recognizable (and much younger) musicians, she would surprise listeners with “blink and you’ll miss it” collaborations in the 80s and 90s. This included Nick Kamen’s 1986 single, “Each Time You Break My Heart,” as well as getting Prince to jump on the vocals for 1989’s “Love Song,” which he also co-produced. And then there was the unexpected appearance of Warren Beatty on “Now I’m Following You (Part I)” for 1990’s I’m Breathless: Music from and Inspired by the Film Dick Tracy. Sure, he might have played the eponymous “Dick,” but no one was expecting him to sing at any point for the project. 

    To many, Madonna’s erstwhile hesitancy to lend her vocals or add the vocals of others to songs might come across as par for the course vis-à-vis her “diva” ways. But, in truth, Madonna’s artistic spirit and according search to belong to a tribe makes her a willing proponent of working with other people (even if, as she once said, “To me, the whole process of being a brush stroke in someone else’s painting is a little difficult”). It’s just a matter of whether or not she deems the project 1) worthy of her attention and 2) if she thinks it will have chart success. Because, although Madonna has proven herself enough times not to need to worry about “making hits” anymore, the perfectionist in her will likely never stop thinking about it on some level. This is precisely why her most overt bid for what the cynics call “relevancy” transpired on 2008’s Hard Candy, on which she not only tapped the by then tired production stylings of Timbaland and Justin Timberlake, but also featured the latter on its lead single, “4 Minutes.”

    While “4 Minutes” was a perfectly passable “bop,” something about it lacked the avant-garde vigor of previous Madonna songs in general and her collaborations in particular. Hard Candy also wielded the presence of Kanye West on “Beat Goes On” (surprisingly never released as a single), giving him most of the verse time while Madonna stuck primarily to the chorus. For good measure, she added Timberlake to another song on the record, the highly innocuous “Dance 2night.” If the spelling of “tonight” wasn’t enough indication, it was obvious Madonna wanted to appeal to a more au courant audience. Even if Timberlake was at his most au courant in 2002. 

    Her collaborative zeal would only ramp up in the years that followed. And yes, it was for the same reason that drove her to work with Spears and Timberlake: she wanted to stay fresh in the minds of a generation of new listeners. And yet, the “trick” rarely proved to be fruitful in terms of chart measurement. For instance, 2018’s “Champagne Rosé,” a Quavo track from Quavo Huncho that also features Cardi B, didn’t gain much attention. Arguably, The Weeknd’s “Popular” (featuring Playboi Carti in addition to Madonna) should have gone the same route (as “Vulgar” with Sam Smith, released at the same time, did). Especially considering how quickly the project it’s associated with, The Idol, flopped. And yet, for whatever reason, something about the song just “clicked,” in large part thanks to TikTok and its alchemizing ability to convert virality into a hit. 

    Long before “Popular,” however, MDNA and Rebel Heart established the clear trend of post-2000s Madonna records relying on other musicians to assure her chart placement (this included, however critically panned it was, 2012’s “Give Me All Your Luvin’” featuring Nicki Minaj and M.I.A.). Because, needless to say, the taste of the current youth is somewhat lacking. In need of constant bells and whistles. Or, in direct contrast, something completely uninspired and derivative (this technically calls out a singer such as Olivia Rodrigo). Madonna is willing to provide either so long as it means that her lyrics remain on the lips of a fresh batch of listeners. Although some would argue that Madonna “doesn’t care” about mainstream success anymore because just look at her last album, Madame X, it bears noting that said record was awash in more collaborations than any Madonna album thus far. There was “Future” featuring Quavo, “Crave” featuring Swae Lee, “Faz Gostoso” featuring Anitta and “Bitch I’m Loca” featuring Maluma (plus Maluma on the lead single, “Medellín”). One glance at that roster and it should come across that M is ever-aware of what the current “trend” is in music, and long ago picked up on the fact that collabs with fellow white artists wouldn’t forge the path to chart glory. This recently extended to “allowing” her own co-opting of “Vogue” to be co-opted by Beyoncé for the Queens Remix of “Break My Soul.” Knowing that, in 2022, it was simply “good business” to redirect the movement toward Beyoncé’s stewardship. 

    But the “trick” here, as well as in “Popular,” is that she has forced herself to be more backgrounded than usual, which, in effect, means she’s coasting off both Beyoncé and The Weeknd’s ability to generate a hit in the current climate. The same went for 1994’s “Take A Bow.” This being, incidentally, the last Madonna single that was able to chart for so many weeks (sixteen, to be exact) on Billboard’s Hot R&B/Hip Hop Songs chart. And that, too, featured the strong presence of a Black man: Babyface. Madonna had already hinted at going in a more R&B/house direction with 1992’s Erotica, but Bedtime Stories was a mainstream culmination of that pivot. Something more palatable for the masses after being scared off by Erotica and the imagery surrounding it. Babyface (and Dallas Austin) was a key “ingredient” in helping Madonna to secure her “softer” (but still relevant) side for the next album cycle. In addition to co-producing the signature hit with Madonna, he provided the prominent complementing vocals that repeated just about everything she says in the song (call it Cypress Hill’s “Insane in the Brain” approach). For whatever reason, though, “Take A Bow” is not listed as “featuring Babyface.”

    What it all adds up to is that Madonna’s “secret (no Bedtime Stories allusion intended) sauce” for the decades since the 1980s has been as much reliant on “reinvention” as it has been incorporating the next generation of musicians into her work. Or, more recently, allowing herself to be incorporated into it. Which means she’s not quite the egomaniac everyone makes her out to be… For she’s willing to admit when another musician as the “lead” on the track will result in higher, more enduring chart potential. 

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Madonna, Pepsi, “Like a Prayer,” and the Music Video That Rewired Pop Capitalism

    Madonna, Pepsi, “Like a Prayer,” and the Music Video That Rewired Pop Capitalism

    [ad_1]

    Madonna’s divorce from Sean Penn was finalized on January 25, 1989, the same day Pepsi announced an unprecedented agreement with her. She would release her new single, “Like a Prayer,” during a Pepsi commercial in exchange for $5 million and Pepsi’s sponsorship of her next tour. The ad marked the first time a record would premiere in a commercial and the first time a TV commercial would be given a global launch. Pepsi said it would be seen in forty countries — or “just about every TV set on the planet Earth”— with an estimated viewership of 250 million people. Madonna’s manager Freddy DeMann called the marketing campaign around the record and the commercial the “pop-world equivalent” of a new Star Wars film.

    By 1989, commercials and advertisements featuring celebrities and their work had become cultural events. Andy Warhol and Keith Haring illustrated ads for Absolut Vodka. Spike Lee created an ad starring Michael Jordan for Nike. Miles Davis and Lou Reed appeared separately in Honda scooter commercials. But no industry relied more on famous boosters than the one peddling soft drinks. In a country where, per capita, people drank more soda pop than they did water, celebrities were needed to build brand loyalty, especially in the teenage market, which grew in value by billions of dollars each year. Pepsi and Coca-Cola were engaged in a hot and high-profile “cola war” that pitted their beverages and their ad budgets against each other. And that necessitated attracting more and bigger stars.

    Since 1984, Pepsi had featured entertainers in its ads — Michael Jackson, Tina Turner, David Bowie, Lionel Richie, and the Miami Sound Machine. It had even considered Madonna in 1985, but a scandal erupted after Playboy and Penthouse published nude photos of a young Madonna, and she was deemed too controversial. By late 1988, controversy (apparently) be damned, Pepsi considered her a must-have. Rival Coca-Cola had signed George Michael for a Diet Coke commercial directed by Stephen Frears. Pepsi’s retort was the Madonna deal.

    Releasing her new song during a commercial was risky on many levels, not least because it bypassed the crucial radio market. “At first I thought, is it really Madonna doing this?” Warner’s Tom Ruffino told Q magazine. “But I’ve never met an artist who was so in tune with her own career; she plots it out very carefully. I realized that this would be an enormous way to achieve immediate recognition for the record from millions of people.”

    In an interview with Rolling Stone, Madonna defended the decision, saying, “As far as I’m concerned, making a video is also a commercial . . . [and] record companies just don’t have the money to finance that kind of publicity.” Besides, she said, she liked the idea of fusing art and commerce, which made the former more “accessible” and elevated the latter.

    The Pepsi spot would be directed by Joe Pytka. He was perhaps best known in the late ’80s for an unforgettable public service ad he created for a campaign called This Is Your Brain on Drugs. It involved an egg, a frying pan, and a terrifying sizzle. The Madonna job came his way after he shot Michael Jackson’s video for “The Way You Make Me Feel” and a Jackson commercial for Pepsi. But Madonna wasn’t sure she wanted to work with Pytka, at least not until he brought choreographer Vincent Paterson onto the project.

    In a documentary called, “Vincent Paterson—The Man Behind the Throne,” Pytka said that Madonna told him she would not sing or dance in the Pepsi ad.

    The contract didn’t call for that, but I wanted Vince to work with the other performers in the piece just to give it some energy. And she walked onto the set while he was rehearsing the other dancers. And she came over to me and asked me to introduce her to Vincent and the next thing I know, she’s in there dancing.

    That introduction was, for Madonna’s career, the most important part of the commercial. Paterson would go on to choreograph some of her iconic performances, from her “Vogue” and “Express Yourself” videos to her Blond Ambition tour to parts of the film Evita.

    Madonna and Vincent Paterson were compatible in part because of their backgrounds. Paterson, too, was raised in a conservative household steeped in Catholicism, which he credited with introducing him to the notion of theatricality. Though white, he grew up in Philadelphia in a mixed-race neighborhood where he learned to dance on the street. And, like Madonna, he became a little parent after his father left Vincent’s mother and eight children.

    They were also sympathetic artistically. Paterson’s first love was theater. As a result, his dancers performed as characters who expressed themselves through movement. And finally, Paterson drew inspiration from the same well as Madonna — old films, fashion, photography — and he thrived on collaboration. “She is the first person I’ve ever synthesized so completely with as an artist,” he told writer Matthew Rettenmund.

    The story recounted in the Pepsi commercial is a clever mix of past and present: a woman haunted by her past and a child dreaming of her future. The segment begins with black-and-white home-movie-style footage of Madonna as a child (played by eight-year-old Heidi Marshall) over which Madonna’s voice sings the opening phrases of  “Like a Prayer.”

    [ad_2]

    Mary Gabriel

    Source link

  • Kylie Minogue Eases the Tension in Fraught Times—Or Proves What Britney Said: “Keep On Dancin’ Till The World Ends”

    Kylie Minogue Eases the Tension in Fraught Times—Or Proves What Britney Said: “Keep On Dancin’ Till The World Ends”

    [ad_1]

    Bathed in the glow of a green light on the cover of her sixteenth album, Tension, as she holds a diamond (“Chasing my diamond on the horizon,” she sings on “Vegas High”) over her right eye, it’s only expected that Kylie Minogue should have a song on the record called “Green Light.” Yes, she dares to title a song as such after what Lorde did with 2017’s “Green Light.” But Minogue can carry it off, earnest with her audience as she opens with the chorus, “Just give me the green light/And I can make you feel better/Spinnin’ ’round in circles I could do it forever.” Functioning as the first verse and a portion of the full chorus, Minogue later adds to the latter, “Let me be your highlight/Dancin’ all night together/Just give mе the green light/And I could be yours forevеr.”

    That exact setup has been what’s happening between Minogue and her fans for decades as she serves dance bop consistency no matter what’s going on in the world. With Tension, Minogue proves that being on the dance floor provides the ultimate tunnel vision to tune out whatever “bad time” is occurring outside of it. To open her audience up to that sentiment, Minogue begins Tension with her global smash hit, “Padam Padam” (what she’s referred to as being her second “Can’t Get You Out of My Head”). More than just a track that solidifies how Madonna paved the way for female pop stars to sing about “frivolous twenties shit” at any age, it is an invitation into the escapist world of Tension. Granted, all of Minogue’s albums provide that kind of escapism, it’s just that it seems as though it’s never been more needed as a numbing agent than now. Indeed, as Minogue reminds her listeners, “now” is all we have. So why waste it intensifying anxieties about the latest environment-related catastrophe or dictatorial derangement? At least, that’s what it sounds like on the second track, “Hold On To Now.”

    With its 00s-era dance floor sound, Minogue transports us back to a time and place when things felt more carefree (even when people didn’t think it could possibly get worse than George W. Bush). But just because the sound is carefree doesn’t mean Minogue avoids getting “way existential” as she sings, “Baby, what are we holdin’ on to?/Baby, where do we wanna run to?/Oh, we’ll figure it out somehow-ow-ow/Keep holdin’ on to now, now/Dreamin’ we’ll be dancin’ forever/Floatin’ on this feeling together.” As though addressing the time prior to when the pandemic forced everyone to stop in their tracks and “reassess” (before getting right back to capitalism and the “tenets” of it that will inevitably furnish yet another pandemic in the near future), she says, “We’re all just goin’, goin’ ’round/So where we goin’, goin’ now? (hold on to now)/The world could all be fallin’ down (hold on to now)/But we’ll be holdin’ on to now.” Spoken like the Britney Spears of 2012 when she urged, “Keep on dancin’ ’til the world ends/If you feel it, let it happen/Keep on dancin’ ’til the world ends.” Because, really, what else can you do? Certainly not make a concerted effort to change the behavior that will lead to the world’s end (or rather, the end of humans). Which is why, when Minogue assures, “We’ll figure it out somehow,” what she really means is: people will be forced to learn to live with the discomfort that they assisted in creating. 

    Like “Hold On To Now,” “Things We Do For Love” also has an accompanying visualizer video. One in which she returns to the 70s aesthetic of her Disco album (far more tired and less listenable than Tension) by way of a sequined jumpsuit. And yet, the sound of the song is pure 80s (as Minogue put it, “It’s got a bit of a Footloose feel”), filled with the kind of hopeful synths and blithe notes that betrayed how dark the decade actually was. Which just goes to show that, in the darkest times, people still want to believe in the possibility of a light at the end of the tunnel. With its Springsteen-y intonation (sonically speaking), Minogue chants, “Should I stay?/Should I go?/Maybe you could be my unconditional/Oh, there’s nothin’ that I wouldn’t do/For love, for love, the things we do for love/Tell me, how far would you go?/When you hear our song come on the radio.” The latter line reminding us that Minogue’s music still exists in a realm where people listen to the radio (and not some kind of streaming platform). And one where toxic relationships are still romanticized. For she alludes to such toxicity in the first verse with, “Every time (every time)/That you come close, I can’t shake it/Oh, the feelings that I have/Oh, we’re never done.” How Katy Perry in “Never Really Over.”

    But one thing she’s truly never done with is bringing the masses dance-pop perfection. To that end, “Tension” (arguably more of an earworm than “Padam Padam”) is among the most standout songs of the album…and not just because Minogue wields sorbet and chili as similes in her verses. Opening with “piano stabs” that reek of 90s club culture, the hyper-sexualized lyrics of the single also serve to transport us through time. Specifically, to an era when people were actually more sexual and less repressed (apparently, only on the dance floors of 90s nightclubs). This being why Minogue seems determined for the musical tone to mimic the lyrical reference to orgasming, describing how “with the piano stabs, it takes you up and up, closer and closer to the climax, it gets so edgy…then it drops.” The effect is one that will definitely have listeners playing the song on repeat. 

    What follows is another upbeat, uptempo track that does, not so coincidentally, bear similarities to something out of the Daft Punk canon. For Minogue takes another risk on naming a song the same way as an iconic track that already came before: “One More Time.” Although she can’t one-up what Daft Punk did with that title, the track is a solid enough dance ditty. And, like most of the songs on Tension, it’s co-produced by Biff Stannard, Duck Blackwell and Jon Green, lending a dance floor cohesion to the record that wasn’t present on Disco. She even gives a nod to her album title and cover in the lyrics of this song, urging, “Release the pressure, ah, you know it’s special when we/Slow down, shake it all out.” For, as she remarked of featuring a diamond on the cover, “The diamond is a subliminal image: that of the creation of beautiful things under pressure. I think people could feel it through the cover, especially if they know how diamonds are made, that is to say, under the constraint.”

    And humanity, it would seem, loves to operate under the constraint of pressure-filled capitalism. A system that hardly leaves much time for romance, though it does sell the concept oh so well (simply look at the Jay-Z and Beyoncé campaign for Tiffany & Co.)—just as Minogue does when she insists, “You know there’s somethin’ ‘bout you and me/One more time, one more time, one more time/Rewind it back, we got history/One more time, one more time, one more time.” Her frequent mentions of returning to the same person are present here, too (as it was on “Things We Do For Love”). As is the insistence on slowing down…a running theme in Minogue’s career (hear also: “Skip a beat and move with my body/Yeah/Slow”), despite the fact that her songs are created with a fast tempo. Even when they might start out, let’s say, “gently” enough. This is the case for “You Still Get Me High,” during which the mood of the record slows down briefly at the beginning of the track (while continuing to drip in the 80s musical tones that Minogue knows like the back of her hand). With an Arcade Fire-y/stadium performance vibe, it then picks up the tempo at the forty-eight second mark as Minogue belts the chorus, “Baby, baby, goodbye/Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh/Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh/Maybe it’s the moonlight/You still get me high (high)/Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh/Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh/Shine on me all night/You still get me high.” This, to be sure, is how her devoted listeners still feel about Minogue after all these years. Until she shows her penchant for releasing an occasional clunker onto the record. That assignation certainly applies to “Hands.”

    That’s right, here she goes again, naming a song after something another singer already made famous: Jewel with her own “Hands.” To boot, this is definitely the most cringeworthy song on the record. The reason why really boils down to one fatal flaw in the track: its pre-chorus. Resembling something that wants to emulate “white girl rap” but can’t quite achieve the delicate balance required to successfully execute it, Minogue faux raps, “Right, yeah/Everything I do is so right [not in this case, though], yeah/Barbie, I’m that cherry on top of the cake/All up in your face/I’m about to give you a taste.” Apart from the mention of Barbie, everything about these lyrics are completely irrelevant. Not to mention utterly cliche in the worst possible manner. At least Madonna went all-out in her daringness on the rap of “American Life.” Here, Minogue plays it safe while still flopping. Which is the worst possible way to flop. 

    But at least there is the consolation of the song that follows, the aforementioned “Green Light.” Having been given the green light for decades now, Minogue feels particularly in her element on this track, branding it as “a cousin to ‘Spinning Around’ [from 2000’s Light Years]—it’s not as overt, it’s quite breezy and chill.” That much is corroborated by the dazzling saxophone solo throughout. Because, again, Minogue is an unapologetic 80s girl. 

    Nonetheless, “Vegas High” finds Minogue going more “90s dance” again as she offers a pulsing beat to describe, “Losin’ track of time/We’re rollin’ on the night/And fallin’ to the sky/Make my eyes roll back when I feel that Vegas high.” Incidentally, Minogue had initially planned to call the album Vegas High to align with her More Than Just A Residency show at the Venetian in Las Vegas. Minogue eventually settled on Tension instead, choosing to ignore her fear that, with the world already being such a tense place as it is, people might not respond well to the title. Obviously, however, the masses are far more open to Kylie’s kind of tension than the tension wrought by political clashes.

    Swapping out a Vegas high for a regular one on “10 Out of 10” featuring Oliver Heldens, Minogue not only reminds us that she does constantly give us ten out of ten (save for the intermittent “mehs” here and there), but also returns to the sexually-charged lyrical tone of “Tension.” This much shines through when she teases, “Wanna kiss me where the sun don’t shine/Wow, wanna devour/Me boy, I might get wеt, bring a towel/After we’rе done, let’s hop in the shower.” And yet, since we already know how well Kylie can “do sex,” she seems to want to remind listeners of her more vulnerable side on “Story,” the song that closes the standard edition of the album. Coming across like an unwitting love letter to her fandom, Minogue announces, “You’re part of my story,” in addition to, “You said/Turn another page/Baby, take the stage/You know the stars are comin’ out for ya/Ebb and then they flow/Baby, feel the glow.” Which Minogue so clearly does throughout this levity-filled record.

    What’s more, as though wanting to reiterate that, no matter how 80s she is, her heart will always belong to the 70s, Minogue kicks off the deluxe edition with “Love Train” (yes, The O’Jays have a more well-known 70s single titled that). Another “catchy little ditty,” Minogue nearly ruins it by vaguely pronouncing Mario like “Mare-ee-oh” as she commences, “Ninety-nine lives, Super Mario/Wanna be with you and spend ’em all/I got a ticket to ride.” As we all do for this thing called the slow apocalypse. So it is that her post-chorus mimics the sound of a “choo-choo” as she croons, “Ooh, ooh, la-la-la-la-la” and later makes things innuendo-laden once more with the declaration, “All aboard my love train/I can take you to the moon in the fast lane/I need a passenger, baby, don’t wait/Yeah, you better buckle up, it’s a beautiful view.”

    As it is on “Just Imagine,” a song that was given to Minogue all the way back in 2006 for consideration on X. And, like The Weeknd saying, “I feel it coming,” so, too, does Kylie pronounce, “I can feel it comin’/Oh, my heartbeat’s out of my hands/Don’t what it is, but, oh/Just imagine/All these words I’m thinkin’/And I know that you understand/What if we could say ’em all?/Just imagine.” Being a song about “imagining,” the sonic landscape is accordingly suffused with a dreamy, lush tone that, to repeat, smacks of something straight out of the 80s. Just as the final track on the deluxe edition does. And, though Jefferson Airplane claimed it before, using already iconic song titles doesn’t faze Minogue if you couldn’t tell by now. Hence, concluding the album with “Somebody To Love.” On it, Minogue cautions of that bastard, Cupid, “One day, the arrow’s gonna get through/Nothing you can do, it’s automatic/You won’t know what you’re gettin’ into/But when it happens, it’s cinematic.” Until it just becomes full-stop dramatic amid the inevitable unraveling of the relationship. Nonetheless, Minogue warns that, like Dawson and Joey, you can’t control it when you end up going from “strangers to friends and to lovers/Open your heart [#MadonnaSaid] and let solo go/We could be good for each other/Don’t have to do it alone.” The irony of that statement being that it embodies both capitalist and anti-capitalist philosophies. For, on the one hand, Minogue reinforces the narrow-mindedness of monogamous yearnings and, on the other, alludes to how no man is an island a.k.a. Rand-ian objectivist.

    And yet, when the end comes (whether individually or collectively through a cataclysm), perhaps we’ll all find that it’s true what’s been said: you’re born alone and you die alone. So why not keep on dancin’ till the (or your) world ends to try to forget, as much as possible, that that’s the reality? Minogue being the great creator of an alternate one through her dance-ready distractions on Tension.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • 32 Legendary Musicians You Should Dress as For Halloween This Year

    32 Legendary Musicians You Should Dress as For Halloween This Year

    [ad_1]

    Choosing a Halloween costume is pretty much like choosing a new identity: it’s one night to be whoever you want, and what’s more fun than pretending you’re a famous musician? Of course you could go more current and channel Beyoncé’s “Renaissance” World Tour costumes, Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour, or Justin Bieber, but going back in time can be really exciting too — especially when it comes to paying homage to an iconic musician.

    As far as musician Halloween costumes go, you’ll be in good company. In 2017, Kim Kardashian and her sister Kourtney channeled Madonna and Michael Jackson with spot-on looks, while both Demi Lovato and Kim went as Selena Quintanilla in 2017. Beyoncé herself has often favored famous musician costumes for Halloween, dressing up with Blue Ivy and Tina Knowles as Salt-N-Pepa in 2016 and going as Toni Braxton in 2018. Other stars have paid homage to legends like Amy Winehouse, Cher, or Prince. But you don’t have to be a celebrity in real life to choose to embody one on Halloween – that’s the beauty of the holiday, which allows you to become whoever you want, whether that’s a member of Kiss, Freddie Mercury, Aretha Franklin, or whatever musician you grew up loving.

    If you’re thinking about taking a trip down memory lane, keep reading for our iconic musician costume inspiration!

    [ad_2]

    Britt Stephens

    Source link

  • Pepsi and Madonna share never-before-seen commercial that was canceled 34 years go

    Pepsi and Madonna share never-before-seen commercial that was canceled 34 years go

    [ad_1]

    In 1989, Madonna starred in a Pepsi commercial that never saw the light of day – until now. The star shared the commercial on Instagram, saying that 34 years after it was canceled, Pepsi was finally revealing the spot.

    Madonna said that before the commercial could premiere, her “Like a Prayer” music video came out – and proved controversial. 

    “The commercial was immediately canceled when I refused to change any scenes in the video where I was kissing a black saint or burning crosses,” she wrote on Instagram. “So began my illustrious career as an artist refusing to compromise my artistic integrity.”

    “Thank you [Pepsi] for finally realizing the genius of our collaboration,” she wrote. “Artists are here to disturb the peace.”

    “Like A Prayer” was Madonna’s fourth album, featuring hits like “Express Yourself” and “Cherish.” The music video for the titular single featured actor Leon Robinson, who is Black, playing a saint-like figure in a church. 

    In the video, Madonna witnesses a White woman get killed by White men, but the Black man she is in a relationship with is arrested for the murder. Madonna hides in a church, where she meets the saint and kisses him.

    Many condemned the video, which also employed several religious symbols, such as a crucifix. 

    The Vatican even urged a boycott of her tour. “I am aware that the Vatican and certain communities are accusing my show of being sinful and blasphemous, that they are trying to keep people from seeing it,” Madonna said at the time, according to Entertainment Tonight. “I think I’m offending certain groups, but I think that people who really understand what I’m doing aren’t offended by it.”

    Pepsi famously nixed its ad featuring the song before it premiered. “It may go down as one the most expensive advertising blunders ever,” Entertainment Tonight host John Tesh reported at the time. 

    Despite the backlash, Madonna continued to push the envelope. And Pepsi continued to feature stars in its ads. The brand, celebrating its 125th anniversary, has been sharing those star-studded commercials on social media, including spots with Tina Turner, Ray Charles, Robert Palmer and Britney Spears. And of course, Madonna.

    The never-before-seen ad was also shared by Pepsi on Instagram. It shows Madonna singing “Like A Prayer,” in front of a neon Pepsi sign, and holding a can of the soda.

    Both Madonna’s and Pepsi’s sharing of the ad was praised and questioned by commenters. “AMAZING!!!!!!!!!!” Andy Cohen commented.

    “This song changed my life,” wrote Diplo.

    On Pepsi’s post, several commenters said the brand should apologize to the singer. “Alright, are they going to make up for the global boycott they had against her?” one person wrote. “Nearly 10 years of injustice in awards and advertising deals? What makes me feel at ease is knowing she’s always been right and, in fact, ‘ahead of her time and a thousand years ahead of yours.”

    “After such a long time??? Don’t you think you should apologise for the way you treated her?!?” another wrote.

    “The Queen deserves this and an apology,” another commented.

    CBS News has reached out to a representative for Pepsi and is awaiting response.

    [ad_2]

    Source link