ReportWire

Tag: Local Government

  • Housing advocate Rae Huang announces candidacy for mayor of Los Angeles

    LOS ANGELES — Community organizer and minister Rae Huang formally announced her candidacy for mayor of Los Angeles on Sunday, offering voters an option to the left of Mayor Karen Bass and potentially complicating prospects for Bass avoiding a runoff.

    “This campaign is not about me,” the 43-year-old Huang said Sunday afternoon at Arts District Brewing Co. in downtown Los Angeles. “It is about us, all of us, all Angelenos, it is about the future that we will and must build together this new season for our city.

    “In this new season, we are going to make housing affordable for all. We are going to make transit free, safe and fast. We are going to make sure that wages and work are dignified.”

    Huang is deputy director of Housing Now California, a coalition of over 150 organizations that fights tenant displacement. She is also a member of the Los Angeles chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America, and if elected would be Los Angeles’ first Asian-American mayor.

    Huang is a long shot to win with little name recognition or political experience, but if her campaign gains traction she could siphon enough votes from Bass to keep the mayor from a majority in the June 2 primary. If no candidate receives over 50%, the top two finishers will meet in a runoff in November.

    Bass has drawn criticism for her handling of the devastating Palisades fire in January. When the fire broke out Bass was in Ghana as part of the four-member presidential delegation attending the inauguration of John Dramani Mahama as president.

    Bass has also drawn criticism for not doing enough to address high housing costs.

    Doug Herman, a spokesperson for the Bass campaign, told City News Service in an email that “Under Mayor Bass’ leadership, there has been unprecedented progress on the issues that matter most to Angelenos.”

    “Homelessness has declined for the first time in two consecutive years, neighborhoods are safer with significant drops in crime, and the Palisades fire recovery continues far ahead of pace with the fastest recovery and rebuilding in California history,” Herman said.

    “In addition, there was no better defender of Los Angeles than Mayor Karen Bass when Trump’s ICE raids started and we won a court ruling to help stop the illegal raids and unconstitutional arrests. That’s what we need to move Los Angeles forward.”

    Former LAUSD Superintendent Austin Beutner declared his candidacy on Oct. 13.

    “Rev. Huang and I share many concerns about the direction of Los Angeles, including our city’s lack of affordable housing. I look forward to getting to know her during the campaign ahead,” Beutner told City News Service on Sunday.

    The 72-year-old Bass, a former congresswoman and Assembly speaker and a onetime community organizer herself, defeated businessman Rick Caruso in 2022 to become mayor.

    Caruso has not announced whether he will run for mayor again in 2026.

    City News Service

    Source link

  • How Lina Khan is busy striving to maximize Mamdani’s power

    Lina Khan has quickly thrown water on any hopes that she might be a benign force on New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani’s transition team. The former Federal Trade Commission (FTC) chair suggested in a recent interview that she’s looking to make sure Mamdani can “unilaterally deploy” ample power as mayor.

    Khan is “exploring ways to maximize…Mamdani’s executive authority through little-used laws already in place,” as Bloomberg put it.

    “Exploring ways to maximize executive authority” is a scary enough phrase no matter who the executive in question is. But it’s got a particularly chilling ring when applied to Mandami, a Democratic Socialist who has said there’s no problem too minor for the government to get involved in, and Khan, who spearheaded some of the Biden administration’s worst efforts to disrupt free markets with heavy-handed government intervention, repeatedly tested the limits of FTC power, and attempted to do through an executive agency things that should have been left to Congress.

    In a recent interview with Pod Save America host Tommy Vietor, Khan made it clear that she envisions Mamdani’s New York City as a place where the mayor can wield ample unchecked power.

    “I’m gonna be especially focused on things like ‘how do we make sure that we have a full accounting of all of the laws and authorities that the mayor can unilaterally deploy?’” Khan said in the interview, which was taped last week but won’t air in full until November 23. She went on to talk about how her time at the FTC taught her there were “unused and underused” powers that she could wield, and she wanted to find out the full extent of authority that would be possible for Mandami as mayor.

    With Khan’s influence, we can expect the future Mamdani mayoral administration to get creative—and, perhaps, unconstitutional—in its application of existing laws and authorities to enact Mamdani’s agenda, which includes things like city-run grocery stores, free child care and bus rides, nearly doubling the minimum wage, and a freeze on raising rents.

    Much of Mamdani’s agenda would require acquiescence from state government authorities, which may make enacting it a stretch.

    Khan apparently isn’t phased. “A lot of what he is going to be looking to deliver is going to be requiring working closely with other institutional actors, be it the governor, be it the legislature, but he should also have a lot of ability to do things unilaterally,” she told Vietor.

    She also seems intent on taking elements of the Biden administration’s failed agenda to the Big Apple. “Khan is planning to look at recently-enacted and proposed legislation and regulations affecting algorithmic price discrimination, surveillance pricing and junk fees,” Bloomberg reports.

    And, of course, no Khan operation would be complete without a little bit of absolutely overreaching antitrust policy.

    At the FTC, Khan went after tech platforms and other companies “under novel theories of harm,” notes Liz Hoffman at Semafor. “In her new role, Khan has identified an early avenue in a 56-year-old NYC prohibition on business practices deemed ‘unconscionable’—a designation expansive enough to delight any regulator.”

    This could include targeting stadiums for selling high-price concessions, Hoffman reports. (No problem too small for government action, indeed.)

    If Khan’s influence takes hold, we can expect from the future Mamdani administration not just big meddling in significant aspects of city life but also the sort of low-grade authoritarianism we saw attempted under Biden, who rallied against the way cable bills were formatted and airline ticket fees were displayed.

    Using the might power of the state to make stadium hot dogs cheaper is a perfect distillation of the sort of petty populism that Khan has come to be known for—and Mamdani may, alas, be angling to adopt as NYC mayor.

    Elizabeth Nolan Brown

    Source link

  • New Jersey town tentatively agrees to not seize 175-year-old family farm

    The township of Cranbury, New Jersey, will not take Andy Henry’s 175-year-old family farm for an affordable housing development after all.

    According to a tentative agreement made public yesterday, the township has agreed to halt its eminent domain proceedings against Henry’s farm while it awaits a state regulatory change that will open up an alternative site for affordable housing development.

    While no formal agreement to stop the seizure has been reached yet, Cranbury Mayor Lisa Knierim said in a statement yesterday that the state’s impending rule change (expected to be formalized by the end of the year) “creates a meaningful opportunity” to find another location for affordable housing that will let Henry keep his farm.

    “This is something that we hope will work out favorably for all the parties involved. It’s been a long way of getting here, and we’re not done yet, but this is very encouraging,” Henry tells Reason. “[I’m] definitely optimistic. More than if I’d talked to you a week ago.”

    The eminent domain saga surrounding Henry’s farm began back in April, when the town informed Henry that it planned to seize his farm, which he co-owns with is brother, and convert it into a 130-unit affordable housing site.

    Cranbury has insisted since the beginning that the seizure was a necessary means of meeting its obligations under New Jersey’s fair share housing law. That law gives localities affordable housing quotas and then requires them to update their planning laws to meet those quotas.

    From the get-go, Cranbury’s attempted seizure was hotly controversial.

    Henry’s property is the only operative farm in what is now Cranbury’s booming warehouse district. For years, he’d been turning down multiple, multi-million dollar offers from warehouse developers looking to redevelop his land into a logistics center as well.

    His deep sentimental attachment to the property, which has been in his family since before the Civil War, made him unwilling to forfeit it to the township either.

    “They saw this little patch of green out there and said, ‘oh, we’ll just snatch that up.’ It’s very disappointing to me,” Henry says.

    While New Jersey state law requires towns to plan for affordable housing, it does not require them to actually build that housing themselves, nor to seize property to facilitate affordable housing development.

    Instead, they must show that they’ve amended their laws to create a “realistic opportunity” for enough affordable housing development.

    Tim Duggan, Henry’s attorney, told Reason back in June that the town could have satisfied that requirement through a number of other means, including upzoning other locations in town to allow for denser housing.

    Fair housing advocates also weighed in against the seizure of Henry’s farm. The purpose of New Jersey’s fair share housing laws is not only to encourage affordable housing but to ensure that housing isn’t all dumped in unsuitable locations.

    The Fair Share Housing Center, a non-profit that works to enforce New Jersey housing law, argued in an administrative complaint that even if Cranbury could voluntarily purchase Henry’s farm, they would still be proposing to place affordable housing in a warehouse district far from jobs, amenities, and services.

    Despite these objections, the town insisted that the seizure of the farm was the only way it could comply with state law. In June, it submitted a housing element to the state that called for using eminent domain to take Henry’s property.

    Henry promptly countersued to block the seizure. A number of other groups, including the Fair Share Housing Center, also asked the state regulators to reject Cranbury’s housing element.

    While this legal process was unfolding, Cranbury’s seizure efforts also attracted wide-ranging political opposition. New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy weighed in against the seizure, as did Republicans in the state Legislature.

    U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins publicly opposed the taking of Henry’s farm as well, and even appears to have donated to a GoFundMe in support of Henry’s case.

    This pressure eventually proved enough to get Knierim to back down. In September, she authored a letter to town residents saying that an alternative site to Henry’s farm had been identified.

    In order to make the site viable for affordable housing development, said the mayor, the state’s housing finance agency needed to amend a rule forbidding affordable housing tax credits from being used to finance projects within 250 feet of existing warehouses.

    Absent that rule change, Henry’s farm was still at risk.

    According to statements from both the mayor and Murphy issued yesterday, the state has started the process of amending its 250-foot warehouse rule. The rule making is anticipated to be finished by the end of the year, said Murphy.

    Once that’s complete, and the town’s housing element is amended to reflect the change, Henry’s farm will finally be safe from eminent domain.

    Christian Britschgi

    Source link

  • Outreach pro Victoria Ryan appointed to Islip Planning Board | Long Island Business News

    With a career focused on representing development projects before municipal planning officials, Victoria Ryan now finds herself on the other side of the table. 

    The development advocate and community outreach specialist is now a member of the Town of Islip Planning Board, appointed earlier this week to fill the unexpired term of former member Brad Wilson through the end of 2031. 

    Through her public relations firm VR/PR, Ryan has worked with applicants who have appeared before planners in Islip and other towns to obtain land-use approvals, though her process has always begun with knocking on doors, acting as a liaison between the community and her clients to try and build consensus. 

    Ryan says talking to people in their homes has enabled her to get their unique perspectives and humanize the impact of each application, while working with developers to revise their proposals to smooth the long and arduous approvals process that Long Island is infamous for. Whether the project is multifamily development, a public works project, or a quick-service restaurant, Ryan stresses that communication is key to bridging the gap between concerns of residents and the goals of developers and her experience in the trenches brings a unique perspective to her new role. 

    “My goal is to find the sweet spot between what can turn into two polarities, particularly with controversial projects: the property owner’s right to develop their property, and the concerns of nearby residents,” Ryan told LIBN. “My experience in this business has shown that some concerns are valid, others less so. Some applications make sense, others less so. But everyone has a right to be heard.” 

    Ryan cut her teeth in the political arena, serving as the assistant to the mayor of Saratoga Springs, where she shared in oversight of the city’s planning and engineering departments. She later served as policy analyst for the Albany County executive. Ryan later served as vice president for a Melville-based advertising agency, producing award-winning television and radio advertisements for political candidates throughout New York. 

    In 2007, Ryan was tapped as executive director of lslip’s Foreign Trade Zone, where she ran day-to-day operations, uncovering and addressing non-compliance issues that saved the agency over $500,000 in pending fines. 

    Ryan, who is married to Phil Boyle, a former state senator and current president and CEO of Suffolk Regional Off-Track Betting Corporation, has served as a trade mission delegate to Ireland for the Ireland Chamber of Commerce-USA and currently serves on the board of the Long Island YMCA and on the gala committee for United Veterans Beacon House. In 2023, she was honored by LIBN as one of Long Island’s Top 50 Women in Business. 


    David Winzelberg

    Source link

  • Some red states are trying to take control of their blue cities

    After 30 days, President Donald Trump’s federal takeover of Washington, D.C., has ended. But the use of federal troops in policing American cities could just be starting

    On Tuesday, the president said he was finalizing negotiations with a Republican-run state for a potential deployment. “We’re working it out with the governor of a certain state that would love us to be there, and the mayor of a certain city in that same state,” Trump told reporters. “We’ll announce it probably tomorrow.” While no location has been announced, the president’s next destination could be New Orleans, Louisiana, given that he floated the idea of deploying the National Guard to the city last week. 

    If this is the course of action that Trump decides to take, the National Guard will join ranks with Troop NOLA, a specialized police force established in 2024 by Republican Gov. Jeff Landry. Since its creation, the initiative has played a central role in Landry’s wider crime crackdown, making roughly 500 arrests, confiscating nearly 200 illegal firearms, and recovering over 50 stolen cars, according to Fox 8. The governor also used his emergency powers to deploy Troop NOLA officers to the French Quarter following a deadly attack on January 1, framing the move as necessary for law and order.

    This dynamic isn’t unique to Louisiana; several Republican-led states have similarly moved to expand state control into Democratic-run cities, often citing concerns over crime and public safety. In Mississippi, a similar pattern has taken shape. In recent years, the Capitol Police force in Jackson has undergone major expansion, growing to 148 officers—the Jackson Police Department has 258—and patrolling roughly 24 of the city’s 114 square miles. While The Washington Post reports that some city residents have welcomed this police presence, critics have maintained that heightened law enforcement has led to a spike in police abuses—including several high-profile cases in which Capitol Police officers have been charged with manslaughter and civil rights violations.

    In addition to boosting law enforcement presence, Mississippi’s state government has also taken steps to bypass local control over the judiciary by establishing a separate state-run court in Jackson. The court, which opened in January with over $730,000 in taxpayer dollars for FY 2025, will “adjudicate misdemeanor offenses and traffic citations investigated by the State Capitol Police,” reports the Clarion Ledger. It will also oversee initial felony offenses introduced by the Capitol Police. The prosecutor and judges of this court are appointed by state-level officials rather than through local elections. 

    Those who support the court have argued the move was necessary, in order “to address a spike in crime and Jackson’s court backlogs,” according to The Washington Post. Republican Gov. Tate Reeves called it “another major addition to ensuring law and order in our capital city.”

    But Mississippi and Louisiana aren’t alone. In Missouri, Georgia, and Indiana, Republican-led legislatures have moved to seize control of local policing and prosecutors—often targeting Democratic jurisdictions under the banner of crime control. Critics say it marks a broader shift from limiting government to consolidating it. And in many cases, they argue, this decision isn’t about improving governance but about maintaining political control.

    Whether Trump will enact a federal intervention in another U.S. city remains uncertain. Such a move would deepen a trend already underway in many Republican-led states—curbing local autonomy under the banner of public safety.

    Jacob R. Swartz

    Source link

  • VIDEO: New Jersey man dances at town hall meeting to protest property tax hike

    Mhm Mr. Tilly, I started your time. Um, How was everyone’s weekend?

    VIDEO: New Jersey man dances at town hall meeting to protest property tax hike

    Updated: 6:01 AM PDT Sep 6, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    Americans are famous for our creative dissents against taxes — just take the Boston Tea Party. Last week, a New Jersey man carried on the tradition at a town meeting by dancing to express his response to a property tax hike.In a video livestreamed on Cranford TV-35, Will Thilly, a candidate for the Cranford township committee, gets out of his seat and dances his way up to the podium. An official tells him, “I started your time,” and Thilly holds up his finger as he continues dancing.He pauses to grab a bottle of water and pieces of paper before asking the audience about their weekends. “Did you know I could do the backspin? Anybody?” he says. “Wanna see me do the backspin? No? I’m gonna do the backspin.”After proceeding to do so and unsuccessfully motioning for the audience to applaud, Thilly jumps into his remarks.”Well, why did our taxes go up so much? We were told the referendum was going to bring it up for an average household about $400,” he says. “And mine went up, like, 900 bucks. I think we were told, like, that was from the schools or something? But the school referendum said it would only go up, like I said, 400 bucks on an average assessed home.””So I wanted to know why it went up, if it did much more than that,” he goes on. “And what extra expenses were incurred by the schools that weren’t told to the public when we voted on that referendum?”Thilly then moonwalks back to his seat.”Thank you, Mr. Thilly,” Cranford Mayor Terrence Curran then says, according to NBC. “I like the interpretative dance.”Cranford is a town of less than 25,000 people as of the 2020 census, located 18 miles southwest of Manhattan. Thilly’s campaign website says he is running to “tell you the truth, to fight for what you need, and to defend our Town and schools,” explaining that he opposes “$150 million in 30-year tax exemptions to billionaire developers” for a development in his town.

    Americans are famous for our creative dissents against taxes — just take the Boston Tea Party. Last week, a New Jersey man carried on the tradition at a town meeting by dancing to express his response to a property tax hike.

    In a video livestreamed on Cranford TV-35, Will Thilly, a candidate for the Cranford township committee, gets out of his seat and dances his way up to the podium. An official tells him, “I started your time,” and Thilly holds up his finger as he continues dancing.

    He pauses to grab a bottle of water and pieces of paper before asking the audience about their weekends.

    “Did you know I could do the backspin? Anybody?” he says. “Wanna see me do the backspin? No? I’m gonna do the backspin.”

    After proceeding to do so and unsuccessfully motioning for the audience to applaud, Thilly jumps into his remarks.

    “Well, why did our taxes go up so much? We were told the referendum was going to bring it up for an average household about $400,” he says. “And mine went up, like, 900 bucks. I think we were told, like, that was from the schools or something? But the school referendum said it would only go up, like I said, 400 bucks on an average assessed home.”

    “So I wanted to know why it went up, if it did much more than that,” he goes on. “And what extra expenses were incurred by the schools that weren’t told to the public when we voted on that referendum?”

    Thilly then moonwalks back to his seat.

    “Thank you, Mr. Thilly,” Cranford Mayor Terrence Curran then says, according to NBC. “I like the interpretative dance.”

    Cranford is a town of less than 25,000 people as of the 2020 census, located 18 miles southwest of Manhattan. Thilly’s campaign website says he is running to “tell you the truth, to fight for what you need, and to defend our Town and schools,” explaining that he opposes “$150 million in 30-year tax exemptions to billionaire developers” for a development in his town.

    Source link

  • City’s ‘bold’ new plan for rough sleepers after Wiggles blunder

    WA’s biggest regional city has unveiled a “bold” plan to transform its city centre and relocate a local music shell used by rough sleepers as an unofficial homeless shelter.

    The City of Bunbury’s masterplan focuses on the area around the Graham Bricknell Music shell — a venue that gained notoriety after the council’s “brazen” approach of playing the Wiggles on repeat to deter antisocial behaviour.

    The plan, which the city expects to cost “hundreds of millions of dollars” would also result in the bus station being moved, the city’s heritage buildings revived and the surrounding area — known as Bicentennial Square — made into a “go-to” destination for tourists.

    The proposed transformation has been met with mixed reactions.

    The City of Bunbury says the plan is expected to cost hundreds of millions of dollars. (Supplied: City of Bunbury)

    Andy Mcwhirter, who lives in Australind, north of Bunbury, said it was “about time” more was done to attract visitors.

    “Anything that [the city] can do for tourists is good,” he said.

    When I was a kid everyone used to come to Bunbury for holiday, now they don’t. They bypass Bunbury.

    A man stands in a dark street

    Andy Mcwhirter says anything that can be done to bring tourists to Bunbury is a good thing. (ABC South West WA: Jacqueline Lynch)

    The Bunbury Outer Ring Road was opened last year to take traffic around the city.

    Calls have recently ramped up to make Bunbury CBD “cool again” after many retailers shut up shop.

    The council has described the redevelopment as a “bold” plan, which Mayor Jaysen Miguel said would shape the next generation of Bunbury’s history.

    “[This is] the direct link between that waterfront and our city,” he said.

    “How can we make it more accessible to bring people and potentially beautify it in some ways?”

    He said the project would take some time and would need millions of dollars of government and private investment.

    ‘Where are they going to go?’

    Rough sleepers have slept at the sound shell for years — even setting up what CBD worker Kylie Collins said was a “camp”.

    Ms Collins said while the plan to revitalise parts of Bunbury sounded “great”, she worried for the homeless people sleeping at the shell.

    “Where are they going to go?” she said.

    We want our town to be thriving and successful and we want shops full and businesses full, but lives need to matter more.

    A woman stands talking in front of a bus station

    Kylie Collins wants more to done to help the homeless people living at the shell. (ABC South West WA: Jacqueline Lynch)

    “I have friends that are camped down there and they’re really struggling … maybe we can look at building something for them?

    I think that should really be the priority rather than nice, big, green lawns.

    April Hill, who has been sleeping in the area with up to a dozen others, said the planned changes had come as a shock.

    “It actually feels home to those who actually stay here,” she said.

    “A big change is going to make it all awkward, certain people are going to feel out of place, ” she said.

    “[And] You’re taking away people’s old memories, you’re destroying what they had here.”

    Graham Bricknell shell homeless camp

    The Graham Bricknell Music Shell will be moved. (ABC South West ABC: Jacqueline Lynch)

    Cr Miguel said he understood the significance of the music shell as the grandson of former deputy mayor Graham Bricknell — who the venue was named after.

    Mr Miguel said he was committed to relocating it.

    “It’s sort of strapped for room right now when we have big events,” he said.

    “It’s obviously very much important to maintain it, absolutely, and maintain it in my grandfather’s memory, but what’s the best use out of it going forward as well?

    “And how can we fully utilise that and the area?”

    Bunbury bus station with the sound shell in the background

    The bus station will be moved to another location in the city centre. (ABC South West WA: Jacqueline Lynch)

    He said he would work with rough sleepers and agencies on a way forward for the people living there.

    Investment into helping homeless

    The state government has since promised to expand homelessness services in the regional city.

    A day after the city’s plan was released, a further $3 million was promised to expand Anglicare’s Housing First Service in Bunbury, which links homeless people with health, financial, social and employment services.

    WA Homeless Minister Matthew Swinbourn said the services would be crucial in helping people into homes.

    “We know that these types of services transform lives and provide serious, long-term solutions for people who are experiencing homelessness,” he said.

    The Bicentennial Square plan is open for public comment.

    Source link

  • Photo: A tiny monument to eminent domain resistance in New York City

    This is part of Reason‘s 2025 summer travel issue. Click here to read the rest of the issue.

    The Hess Triangle is the result of an eminent domain fight that began in 1910, when New York City seized and demolished a Greenwich Village apartment building owned by the Hess family. The city had forgotten this roughly 25-inch plot on the edge of the property—until 1921, when officials demanded that the Hess estate pay back taxes on the land. The Hess family refused to give the plot to the city, and in 1922 it instead installed a sidewalk mosaic reading “Property of the Hess estate which has never been dedicated for public purposes.”

    This article originally appeared in print under the headline “The Hess Triangle.”

    Emma Camp

    Source link

  • Georgia woman could lose $30,000 after local government denies her permit to open hair salon

    When Khalilah Few opened her salon, Creative Crowns Collective, in 2023, she didn’t think her business savvy would put her at odds with the local government. But two years later, she now finds herself in a legal battle with Clayton County, Georgia. 

    After outgrowing her original studio space, Few signed a two-year lease for a new salon housed in an old barbershop in Jonesboro, a city in Clayton County, in March. She invested over $30,000 into the property and applied for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in April to open her salon. Despite meeting the legal requirements for a permit, the Clayton County Zoning Advisory Board and the Board of Commissioners denied Few’s application in July. 

    Instead of the law, county officials cited a “saturation” of similar businesses in a 5-mile radius, arguing the salon would not “grow Clayton County smartly.” Commissioner DeMont Davis, whose fourth district includes the new location of the salon, even noted that Few’s plan “does align” with the county’s economic development plan but still voted against it, saying Few’s business was “just in the wrong area.”

    Few has filed a lawsuit against Clayton County, alleging violations of the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the Georgia Constitution. Jessica Bigbie, an attorney at the Institute for Justice (I.J.), which is representing Few, tells Reason that “nothing in the ordinance or the law says anything about smart growth being a basis to deny a permit.”

    Throughout the process, Few says county staff gave “vague” responses when asked about requirements and reasons for denial. She tells Reason the first time she heard about “oversaturation” was when she attended her meeting with the zoning advisory board. “What’s frustrating and infuriating about this process is I asked questions, I directly asked, ‘What are some reasons that this application can be denied?’” She says, she “wanted to be prepared.” 

    Clayton County officials did not respond to Reason‘s request for comment.

    Few’s hurdles can be traced back to 2024, when Clayton County amended its municipal code and designated District 4, where the proposed salon is located, as a General Business Zoning District with a Business Corridor Overlay District. This overlay permits some businesses to open without a CUP while requiring one for others. Personal service establishments, such as dry cleaners or watch repair shops, typically do not require a CUP, whereas hair salons do.

    The county’s CUP criteria for District 4 appear arbitrary, as they treat similar businesses unevenly. Day cares and dance/music schools are permitted, but gyms and places of worship are conditional. Counterintuitively, even potentially hazardous companies, such as research labs, are permitted.

    To get a CUP, applicants must meet with the Technical Review Committee, community residents, and the Zoning Advisory Group, then attend a final hearing before the County Board of Commissioners. The board considers the application’s proper filing, the Zoning Advisory Group’s recommendation, compliance with permit conditions, and consistency with the ordinance’s purpose and intent. They also weigh the benefits against potential harm to properties or the county and can impose reasonable conditions to ensure public health, safety, and welfare.

    Few’s salon met the permit conditions, and she provided county staff and the commissioners with not only her application but a presentation detailing her alignment with the county’s 2039 comprehensive development plan as well as Davis’ stated economic priorities. She also had “over 50 letters of support,” yet none of that mattered. “I think you have a fabulous business,” said Davis. “You have a fabulous personality, and I love what you bring, and you actually hurt my heart right now, but we’ve got to deny,” he added. 

    “The Board of Commissioners concedes that the salon fits the plan; it’s a good business, she’s doing the right thing, she is just not doing it where they want her to do it,” says Bigbie. “The government shouldn’t be stopping legitimate businesses from opening to stop them from competing with others.”

    Clayton County officials have denied several other potential salon owners a CUP since the passage of the 2024 ordinance. Lea Bakam, who owned LeNa Braiding, tells Reason she was denied a CUP on June 17 after spending “more than $35,000” fixing up a salon in Clayton County. Like Few, Bakam presented the board of commissioners with her business plan and letters of support. Yet, in denying the permit, Davis again noted that the area was “extremely saturated with salons.” 

    The Georgia Supreme Court has already ruled, in Raffesnber v. Jackson (2023), that it is a violation of due process rights when governments restrict the pursuit of “lawful occupation of their choosing free from unreasonable government interference.” I.J. prevailed in a similar case in Fulton County, Georgia—Diagne v. City of South Fulton (2024)—in which the Fulton County Superior Court struck down the town’s attempt to block Awa Diagne from opening a salon. The court found that the county’s denial of a permit ran “contrary to Georgia’s long history of constitutional jurisprudence.”

    Few has filed for an interlocutory injunction to continue working while her court case is pending. Clayton County must respond to her lawsuit by September 18.

    Tosin Akintola

    Source link

  • At V.P debate, J.D. Vance and Tim Walz scapegoat immigrants, ‘corporate speculators’ for high housing costs

    At V.P debate, J.D. Vance and Tim Walz scapegoat immigrants, ‘corporate speculators’ for high housing costs

    Both candidates at tonight’s vice-presidential debate agreed that housing costs are too high. And both Sen. J.D. Vance (R–Ohio) and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz had their favorite scapegoats to blame the problem on.

    For Vance, it was immigrants.

    “You’ve got housing that is totally unaffordable because we brought in millions of illegal immigrants to compete with Americans for scarce homes,” said the Republican vice-presidential nominee.

    Instead of “blaming migrants for everything on housing, we could talk a little bit about Wall Street speculators buying up housing and making them less affordable,” responded the Democrat.

    Neither candidate’s answer is particularly surprising. Vance has blamed immigrants for raising housing costs throughout the campaign. The GOP party platform claims that deportations will help bring housing costs down.

    Meanwhile, the Democratic presidential nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, has repeatedly blamed “corporate landlords” and “Wall Street” for rising rents and home prices. As a solution, she has endorsed capping rents at properties owned by larger corporate investors and using antitrust law to stop landlords from using rent-recommendation software. Walz was merely aping his running mate’s rhetoric.

    Vance, to be sure, has also repeatedly blamed institutional investors for raising Americans’ housing costs.

    There’s a straightforward logic to both candidate’s claims. Increased demand for housing, whether from immigrants or corporate investors, would be expected to increase prices.

    But increased demand should also be expected to increase supply, bringing prices back down.

    Corporate investors and immigrants also play an important, direct role in increasing housing supply. Investors supply capital to build new homes. Immigrants supply labor for the same.

    At least one study has found that the labor shortages caused by immigration restrictions do more to raise the cost of housing than they do to lower it through reduced demand.

    Higher demand fails to translate into supply when the government restricts homebuilding through regulations that limit where and how much housing developers can build.

    California and New Jersey have the same percentage of foreign-born residents. California also has a lot more regulatory restrictions on home building than New Jersey. The median home price in New Jersey is 30 percent cheaper as a result.

    Vance cited a Federal Reserve study showing that immigration increased housing costs, promising to share the paper later on social media. (The campaign has thus far shared remarks, not studies, from Fed officials, to the effect that immigration has increased demand for housing, which duh.)

    Contra Walz, one study has found that restrictions on investor-owned rental housing raised rents and raised the incomes of residents in select neighborhoods by excluding lower-income renters. Studies on the effects of rent-recommendation software have found mixed effects on housing costs. In tight markets, such software raises rents. When supply is loose, it lowers them.

    As always, the ability of builders to add new supply is what sets the price in the long term. Both candidates gestured at this in their own way, although Walz was more explicit about the relationship.

    “We cut some of the red tape,” he said, referencing Minneapolis’ experience of liberalizing zoning laws and seeing housing costs fall. Walz’s pro-supply remarks were nevertheless sandwiched between calls for spending more on affordable housing and down-payment assistance.

    On the supply side of the equation, Vance referenced Trump’s plan to open up federal lands for more development, saying the feds own lands “that aren’t being used for anything. They’re not being used for national parks. They’re not being used and it could be places where we build a lot of housing. And I do think that we should be opening up building in this country.”

    In some Western states, the federal government is the largest landowner and its undeveloped lands act as a de facto urban growth boundary. Vance is right that opening up those lands for development would add supply and lower prices.

    Unfortunately, his support for residential development on currently federal-owned land was immediately succeeded by a call to kick out the illegal immigrants who are competing for homes.

    So there you have it. Both candidates recognized the role that home building and home supply plays in reducing housing costs. But both were also keen to single out scapegoats—immigrants for Vance, Wall Street for Walz—for increasing demand and prices.

    Walz acknowledged tonight that there’s not a lot the federal government can do to reduce locally set land use regulations. He’s right. But the federal government does have a lot of other levers they can pull to make housing costs worse, from immigration restrictions to nationwide rent control.

    And both candidates indicated that they’d pull those levers.

    Christian Britschgi

    Source link

  • Gov. Newsom signs bills to make it easier to provide shelter beds, build more ADUs

    Gov. Newsom signs bills to make it easier to provide shelter beds, build more ADUs

    Gov. Gavin Newsom on Tuesday signed two bills that tweak existing shelter and ADU laws in an attempt to boost supply and make a dent in the state’s housing and homelessness crisis.

    One of the bills, Assembly Bill 3057, focuses on something called junior ADUs — units created within existing houses that can be up to 500 square feet and don’t need their own bathroom.

    Under the new law, junior ADUs — like larger ADUs — will be exempt from requirements under the California Environmental Quality Act that can add time and cost to projects.

    The bill’s author, Assemblymember Lori D. Wilson (D-Suisun City), called the exemption a “a small but significant technical change that offers Californians more accessible and efficient options to build affordable housing solutions.”

    The second bill, Assembly Bill 2835, was authored by Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel (D-Encino). It makes permanent a set of temporary rules that have made it easier to house homeless individuals in privately owned hotels and motels for longer than 30 days.

    Local governments, including Los Angeles, have increasingly turned to that strategy to get people off the streets, at times relying on state funding.

    “The homelessness crisis demands immediate and innovative action, not the status quo,” Newsom said in a statement. “With these new laws, local governments have even more tools to provide housing. I urge them to fully utilize the state’s unprecedented resources to address homelessness.”

    Andrew Khouri

    Source link

  • Driscoll appointed trustee of Cape Ann Savings Bank

    Driscoll appointed trustee of Cape Ann Savings Bank

    A former Manchester-by-the-Sea selectwoman with banking experience is Cape Ann Savings Bank’s newest trustee.

    Margaret “Muffin” Noonan Driscoll was appointed as a trustee by unanimous vote at the the Cape Ann Savings Bank Board of Trustees’ quarterly meeting on July 24.

     “Margaret ‘Muffin’ Driscoll has many of the characteristics that we look for in a trustee,” bank President Marianne Smith said in a prepared statement. “She is deeply dedicated to the Manchester community as exhibited by amongst other things, her years of service on the Manchester Affordable Trust and the Manchester Board of Selectman. She is a lifelong resident and worked in the community for many years, and as an added bonus, she has past banking experience. Muffin grew up with long standing roots in Manchester-by-the-Sea and holds true to the cornerstones set forth by her family of hard work, public service, and generosity.”

    Driscoll worked for the Warren Five Cents Savings Bank for more than 10 years, then spent two decades working in the Manchester Essex Regional School District before accepting a position working with the dean of students at Bishop Fenwick High School in Peabody.

    She sits on and is secretary of the Action Inc. Board of Directors, is a founding member of the Hooper Fund’s Board of Directors and has volunteered with several local non-profit organizations. Driscoll is a corporator of Cape Ann Savings Bank, a position she has held since 2019.

    In Manchester-by-the-Sea municipal government, Driscoll volunteered on a committee to explore affordable housing development, has served as a member of the Manchester Affordable Housing Trust since 2016, chairs the Parks & Recreation Committee, and is the former vice chair of the Board of Selectmen, having served from 2011-2020.

    A graduate of Manchester High School, she received a certificate in paralegal studies through Salem State College. She and her husband reside in Manchester-by-the-Sea and are the parents of two adult children and grandparents to a 1-year-old granddaughter.

    Cape Ann Savings Bank, founded in 1846, offers accounts, products and services to support customers’ financial goals and help grow businesses. The bank’s main office is at 109 Main St., with branches at 38 Rogers St. and 4 School House Road in Gloucester, 247 Main St. in Rockport, and 17 Beach St. in Manchester-by-the-Sea. More information may be found online at capeannsavings.bank.

    Source link

  • New Study Finds Paths to More Effective Short-Term Rental Regulations

    New Study Finds Paths to More Effective Short-Term Rental Regulations

    Dual surveys of STR operators and government officials support reveal opportunities to support local businesses and sustainably manage tourism amongst other community needs

    Today, Rent Responsibly released the 2024 State of the Short-Term Rental (STR) Industry Report, the largest study of its kind exploring the STR industry and the local STR regulatory landscape across the US. 

    Researchers surveyed more than 4,000 STR owners and property managers and more than 2,000 local government staff and elected officials to glean new insights that support strategic decision-making, from how to collaborate on effective community management programs to how to operate more responsible private accommodations.

    The combined surveys yielded more than 130,000 new data points. The full report can be downloaded here.

    Key findings:

    • 94.6% of STR operators supported local businesses through purchases and referrals.
    • Most STR operators (75%) catered primarily to families, followed by wellness travelers, public event attendees, and corporate travelers.
    • 83% of government respondents reported their jurisdiction is facing an affordable housing shortage, citing the cost of building new housing, real estate values, and lack of space to build new housing as the top three factors having the biggest negative impact on their affordable housing supply. Solutions that were deemed most effective in addressing this focused on increasing the new housing supply: opening new space to build new housing (55.3%), supplementing the cost of, or otherwise incentivizing, building new housing (50.5%), and creating more favorable zoning policies (45.9%).
    • A majority of government officials rank tourism as important to their local economies and rank guest spending as highly important to their jurisdictions, second only to property values.

    “Over one million STR owners and managers and more than 30,000 municipalities in the US stand to benefit from the insights uncovered in this study,” said David Krauss, co-founder and CEO of Rent Responsibly, a community and education platform for STR operators. “This report shows there is ample opportunity for short-term rental owners and policymakers to engage on priorities that support local businesses, boost tourism, and respect community needs.”    

    Rent Responsibly partnered with the College of Charleston Office of Tourism Analysis on this research. 

    “This study allowed us to learn about a broad spectrum of local government communities and capture a diverse perspective of approaches,” said Brumby McLeod, Associate Professor and Riley Research Fellow at the College of Charleston. “Particularly interesting to me were the views of staff, their work with short-term rentals, and the perceived effectiveness of their local ordinances. Rent Responsibly continues to get it right by listening to all stakeholders.”

    On Thursday, June 20, Rent Responsibly will host a webinar exploring top results. Registration is free here.

    Support for the research was provided by Vrbo, part of Expedia Group, as well as HostawaySuperhogTouch StayAvalaraHostfullyBreezewayNoiseAwareProper InsuranceDtravelGovOS, and Topkey.

    Source: Rent Responsibly

    Source link

  • San Diego is cracking down on groups for exercising outside without a permit

    San Diego is cracking down on groups for exercising outside without a permit

    They come in packs. They’re often crunchy. They’re chameleons: a downward-facing dog one moment, a cobra or child the next. (What versatility!) They do handstands and breathe peacefully. And we can’t have any of that. 

    At least, not on public land. By “they,” I’m referring to the world of yogis. And by “we,” I mean the city of San Diego, which revised its municipal code in March to prevent groups of four or more people engaged in commercial recreational activities—yoga, fitness classes, dog training, etc.—from convening in public spaces without a permit.

    Law enforcement officers are zeroing in on rogue gatherings, breaking up beachside classes before they begin and issuing tickets to the teachers. And despite the city’s emphasis on “commercial” activities, park rangers are also busting those groups who meet with no cost of admission. “It’s really tragic that the city would take away the opportunity to come to a class for free, to be outside in a public park, and to enjoy nature,” Amy Baack, a yoga instructor, told San Diego’s KGTV station. And despite what might be the gut reaction here—”Just get a permit!”—it appears the city isn’t making that easy: “We are perfectly willing and ready to get a permit,” Baack added, “if the city would allow it.”

    The law was originally tailored to target permitless food vendors. Reasonable people can and should debate the necessity or utility of preventing people from buying hot dogs from someone without a stamp of approval from government bureaucrats. But it would seem even more questionable to apply that concept to people who voluntarily meet by the water to do some stretching. Conjuring safety concerns there requires an active imagination.

    Indeed, San Diego says the core issue at stake is safety. Officials expanded the code, which went into effect March 29, “to ensure these public spaces remain safe and accessible,” a city spokesperson said in a statement. What danger these groups pose while transitioning from, say, bridge pose to wheel pose remains unclear.

    The idea that the code provision ensures accessibility, meanwhile, is richly ironic, as it explicitly excludes from access those taxpaying San Diegans who have the audacity to work out with other people sans a permit. That they have gathered together as opposed to separately, or to do a specific activity as opposed to something nebulous, should not suddenly necessitate approval from the government.

    Whether or not the rule will survive is up in the air: An attorney for a group of yoga instructors on Friday served a cease-and-desist letter to city officials. Whatever the case, it’s an example of the government implementing a solution in search of a problem, which didn’t actually exist until city leaders created it.

    Billy Binion

    Source link

  • Review: Exposing a broken juvenile court system

    Review: Exposing a broken juvenile court system

    In Rutherford County, Tennessee, kids as young as 7 years old were getting thrown in jail for incredibly minor offenses—stealing a football or pulling someone’s hair. Some kids were even jailed for acts that weren’t crimes at all, such as failing to stop an after-school fight. Worse still, the kids were frequently put in solitary confinement, even though that’s explicitly prohibited for children under Tennessee law.

    Not only were these jailings illegal, but pretty much everyone working in the Rutherford County Juvenile Court knew it—including the county’s sole juvenile court judge, Donna Scott Davenport.

    In The Kids of Rutherford County, a four-part podcast series from Serial Productions and The New York Times, Meribah Knight examines how so many kids could be unlawfully detained and why it took so long to stop the practice.

    The podcast follows two public defenders, Wes Clark and Mark Downton, who eventually launched a successful lawsuit against the county after years of maddening attempts to convince Davenport that her practices were illegal.

    Thanks to Clark and Downton’s suit, Rutherford County is no longer illegally detaining its children on minor offenses and Davenport is no longer on the bench. But the pair didn’t end up with an unalloyed victory. The $11 million payout that Clark and Downton won in court? Only 23 percent of the eligible recipients could be contacted to make claims, so just $2.2 million was distributed to the jailed kids.

    The Kids of Rutherford County showcases just how difficult it is to force broken government systems to change, and how difficult it is to make the victims of injustice whole.

    Emma Camp

    Source link

  • Suits Filed for Municipal Clients Across the Country in PFAS National Litigation

    Suits Filed for Municipal Clients Across the Country in PFAS National Litigation


    Press Release


    Jan 10, 2024

    Last month, multiple cities in 5 states across the country including the states of Kentucky, Louisiana, New York, New Jersey, and Maryland filed suits in the PFAS national litigation. The suits allege significant damages including to the water systems, airports, and other critical areas of these cities and towns from PFAS chemicals, also known as ‘forever chemicals.’ Mike Stag of the national environmental firm Stag Liuzza represents the cities and towns and has stated that “These PFAS and PFOS chemicals are one of the greatest threats to our environment. Our clients need significant money to remediate their water systems and other public areas from these chemicals. We will continue to file suits on behalf of additional municipalities we represent across the country. This issue is too important for our clients not to have aggressive, experienced counsel helping them obtain all money possible.” Stag and his firm also represent municipalities in California, Alabama, Colorado, Massachusetts, West Virginia, and Ohio, and Stag sits on the Executive Committee of the national suit filed in Federal Court in South Carolina.

    In June, national class action settlements totaling over $12 Billion were proposed. These settlements only deal with public water systems and do not include payments for airports, fire training centers or other likely PFAS contaminated public areas. It is expected that public water systems and municipalities which file a proper and valid claim could receive payments as early Summer 2024. “We want our clients to be in the front of the line to receive any payments possible from the national settlement the minute it is approved,” said Stag. The amount a municipality may receive is based on complex formulas and include what is known as ‘baseline’ testing. “During data collection, we are finding that this is a process that takes multiple steps to gather the proper and best evidence for the claims process.”

    More information about the national PFAS Public water system settlement, or filing suit to recover money for PFAS contamination, can be obtained by contacting Mike Stag or Ashley Liuzza at Stag Liuzza or by visiting https://www.cleangroundwater.com

    For images or other information, please visit https://www.cleangroundwater.com/presskit

    Source: Stag Liuzza



    Source link

  • Wellington CBD street parking switches to Pay by Plate next week (Wednesday 3 January) – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    Wellington CBD street parking switches to Pay by Plate next week (Wednesday 3 January) – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    Central Wellington’s ageing parking meter system is
    being updated with new technology, with the new meters
    installed and going live next week.

    There are 400 new
    Pay by Plate machines in central Wellington, Kelburn and by
    the Botanic Gardens ki Paekākā; 260 are card-only and 140
    are cash and card machines. The new parking system will be
    live from Wednesday 3 January.

    Pay by Plate is a
    paperless system that uses the vehicle plate number, rather
    than a numbered car park, to record the parking time and
    payment.

    Parking prices will stay the same, from $3 –
    $5 per hour on weekdays depending on the location, and $3
    per hour on weekends.

    So what do you need to know to
    be ready for the switch?

    Tips for smooth parking with
    Pay by Plate:

    · There are two types of new meter –
    all meters accept PayWave and a third of them also take
    coins.

    · Coin/card meters are the black and yellow
    rectangular meters that sit on the ground, the card-only
    meters are on a pole.

    · Take a note of your Parking
    Area, which is on the side of the meter, eg W01. You can
    ignore the old kerbside numbers – these will be removed in
    the new year.

    · Your active parking session can be
    used in any parking space until it expires, so long as the
    vehicle plate number and parking area are the same. If you
    park in another parking area which has a different ‘W’
    (Wellington) number, you’ll need…

    MMP News Author

    Source link

  • Long live the Conch Republic

    Long live the Conch Republic

    The United States acquired the island of Key West through neither military conquest nor diplomatic treaty. In good American fashion, it was purchased with private funds.

    The island was uninhabited except by foliage and flamingos when John Whitehead spotted it while sailing from Nassau in 1819. It had little to recommend it—not even a source of fresh water—except a deep harbor, fortuitously placed between America’s Eastern Seaboard and the busy gulf port of Mobile, Alabama.

    Sensing the potential in that location, Whitehead and a business partner, John Simonton, tracked down the island’s owner, a Spanish citizen named Juan Pablo Salas, and made him a $2,000 offer. “Salas accepted, no doubt believing he’d gotten the better part of the deal,” writes Maureen Ogle in Key West: History of an Island of Dreams.

    The island began to fill with settlers and just as soon acquired a reputation as a “deadly nest” of pirates and disease. “In another time and place, such a reputation may have killed the settlement,” Ogle explains. “But in early-nineteenth-century America—alive with the pioneering spirit—that reputation only added to Key West’s allure.” As Simonton himself put it, “Capital and capitalists will always go where profit is to be found.”

    Wrecking, or salvaging the cargo of distressed sea vessels, was the town’s chief industry. Wreckers provided an invaluable service, venturing out during violent storms at grave risk to themselves to prevent the loss of both life and goods when ships foundered on the hazardous coral reefs. “It was a vocation regulated by few laws,” writes Victoria Shearer in It Happened in the Florida Keys, “but governed by firm rules of honor: The first wrecking vessel to arrive at a distressed ship became the wrecking master of record, directing the salvage and earning a larger share of the proceeds. Other wreckers received shares in proportion to the amount of tonnage they saved.”

    On shore, commission agents waited to receive the cargo and arranged to have it auctioned off—for a cut of the reward, of course.

    The construction of public lighthouses (and the introduction of steam-powered ships, less likely to be blown aground) eventually put the wreckers out of business. Sea-sponge harvesting, cigar manufacturing, and tourism took over as engines of the local economy. The second of those was a product of government intervention: In the 1850s, Congress imposed stiff tariffs on Cuban cigars but failed to apply the duty to raw tobacco leaf. Predictably, entrepreneurs took to making bulk ingredient purchases in Havana and then set up factories in Key West, a mere 90 miles away. The workers were largely imported from Cuba as well.

    During the 19th century, “a decidedly cosmopolitan city slowly emerged from the mangrove thickets,” Ogle writes. “Because Key West sat at the crossroads of the Caribbean, everyone crossed paths with throngs of what one islander called ‘world wanderers,’” from Bahamians to Irishmen to “Hindoos” to Swedes.

    Key West naturally selected for a certain anti-authoritarian disposition. When state health officials responded to an 1896 smallpox outbreak by establishing a quarantine camp and closing the harbor, residents “balked,” Ogle recounts. “At a town meeting, seven hundred people listened as one speaker after another denounced government interference. Key Westers paid taxes and got nothing but grief” from the state capital, they said. Eventually, “the crowd voted to inform the state legislature of their desire to secede.”

    It wouldn’t be the last time.

    ***

    By the early 20th century, Key West was gaining fame as a haven of vice. Saloons lined Duval Street. Gambling and prostitution were major attractions.

    The situation intensified with the passage of the 18th Amendment, which banned the manufacture, sale, and transportation of alcohol. Suddenly, rumrunning became the biggest business of all. “Liquor washed over Key West during Prohibition like high tide under a full moon,” Shearer writes. “Given its proximity to Cuba and the Bahamas, both of which were swimming in booze, the Florida Keys became a wide-open distribution point….Locals considered smuggling liquor a public service.”

    In Key West, even the Prohibition agents often left the islanders well enough alone—and for good reason. One story, recounted in both books, involves a 1926 speakeasy raid by a group of federal “revenooers” down from Miami. For whatever reason, this time the townspeople weren’t having it. “Proprietors of the raided properties swore out warrants against the agents,” Ogle writes, “charging them with assault and battery, destruction of private property, and larceny.”

    The justice of the peace for the Keys, Rogelio Gomez, “sided with the locals and granted the warrants,” Shearer explains, making him “the only county magistrate in the United States ever to issue an arrest warrant against a Prohibition agent.” The Miami agents, apparently seeing the writing on the wall, snuck out through the back door of the courthouse and escaped aboard a Navy ship. “The mess was finally cleaned up when the two sides—locals and feds—reached a compromise and dropped both cases,” Shearer writes.

    Around this time, Key Westers (also known as “Conchs”) rejoiced when the U.S. Coast Guard relocated its headquarters away from the island. “And why shouldn’t they have?” asks Ogle. “From the point of view of Key West rumrunners, the Coast Guard represented unfair competition. As soon as the Guard’s servicemen seized a cargo of contraband booze, they turned right around and sold it….Who wouldn’t be resentful?”

    The onset of the Great Depression a few years later hit the island city hard. It’s an exaggeration to say Ernest Hemingway’s personal expenditures single-handedly kept the economy going, but only just. The celebrity writer ate and drank at the city’s taverns; took out-of-town friends on deep-sea fishing expeditions; bought and renovated his now-famous residence on Whitehead Street; and lured in other literary types with disposable income, including the poet Robert Frost, the philosopher John Dewey, and the playwright Tennessee Williams.

    But even Hemingway’s largesse wasn’t enough for the struggling town. In 1934, Julius Stone Jr., head of the Florida division at the Federal Emergency Relief Administration, arrived with an ambitious plan: to “turn Key West into a first-class tourist destination” by rehabilitating the historic downtown with a combination of federal dollars and local volunteer labor. Hoping to cultivate the arts scene, Stone also tasked a cadre of writers, painters, thespians, and musicians employed by the Works Progress Administration and the Federal Writers’ Project with beautifying the island.

    Perhaps the least libertarian aspect of Key West history, then, is that its fame as a hub of arts and culture was purchased in sizable part with tax money. But that story’s epilogue is worth bearing in mind: After the New Deal programs dried up, locals created an arts league in an effort to maintain their new reputation. Stone himself, “back in town as a practicing attorney and mover-and-shaker, served as one of the organization’s first presidents,” Ogle writes. “Later, he would flee the island when one of his many shady deals turned sour.”

    Leading lights such as Hemingway and Frost, lamenting the touristification of the island, decamped. But those who remained bet on the allure of “bohemianism,” producing glossy brochures that, in Ogle’s words, “played up the island’s live-and-let-live attitude and portrayed the community as a hotbed of eccentricity.” Later, the same spirit would make Key West into a gay enclave famous for its drag shows.

    There does seem to be something to the notion that Conchs are just different from other folks. In 1962, Americans held their collective breath as the country tottered on the edge of war. News broke that the Soviets had installed nuclear missiles in communist Cuba, putting attack capabilities in the United States’ backyard. But despite being on the literal frontlines of that showdown, Shearer reports, “Life in Key West remained curiously, quintessentially laid back. After all, October in the Florida Keys, the height of hurricane season, had always been fraught with a degree of danger.”

    In the 1970s, the Keys emerged as a way station in the international drug trade. The same personal and geographic characteristics that had allowed Key West denizens to flourish during Prohibition (including a high tolerance for risk and hundreds of miles of marshy coastline) made it tough for federal law enforcement officials to keep up with traffickers half a century later—especially when local law enforcement officials were sometimes in on the game.

    ***

    By 1982, the feds had come up with a new tactic for catching drug runners and illegal immigrants entering the country through the Keys. Their move sparked an uprising that, in a sense, continues to this day.

    On April 18, without warning, the U.S. Border Patrol set up a checkpoint on U.S. Highway 1 at the top of the Keys—the only road out of town—and began searching all vehicles attempting to pass north onto the mainland. By some reports, the roadblock caused traffic to back up for 19 miles. Motorists, most of whom were vacationers headed home at the end of the weekend, sat for hours in the heat waiting for their chance to pass.

    The tourism industry felt an immediate impact in the form of canceled reservations. Proprietors didn’t take that lightly.

    Mayor Dennis Wardlow and the island’s Chamber of Commerce initially tried the legal route: They flew to Miami and filed for an injunction in federal court. It was to no avail. So the outraged Key Westers opted for a more dramatic response.

    On April 23, Wardlow announced that Key West was seceding from the Union. “They’re treating us like a foreign country,” he said, “so we might as well become one.” Assuming the title of prime minister, he lowered the stars and stripes and raised the light blue flag of the fledgling Conch Republic. “We serve notice on the government in Washington,” he declared, “to remove the roadblock or get ready to put up a permanent border to a new foreign land. We as a people may have suffered in the past, but we have no intention of suffering in the future at the hands of fools and bureaucrats….We’re Conchs and we’ve had enough.”

    Wardlow’s cheeky intention was to declare war on America, fire one shot, surrender, and then ask for $1 billion in aid for rebuilding. His countrymen carried out the plan of attack as only Key Westers would. “Using the Conch Republic’s weapon of choice—hard, stale Cuban bread,” Shearer writes, a member of Wardlow’s war cabinet “hit a cooperative young uniformed naval officer over the head, then immediately handed over the loaf.”

    The rebellion was part publicity stunt, part genuine protest. (“We’re happy to secede today with some humor,” Wardlow said. “But there’s some anger, too.”) It was effective on both counts: The roadblock was speedily removed, and the gag became a tourism bonanza.

    Today, Conch Republic apparel is available at pretty much all of Key West’s many, many T-shirt shops. A 10-day “independence” celebration happens every April, drawing thousands to the island. (The festivities include a mock battle in which combatants pelt naval vessels with water balloons and conch fritters.) Community leaders boast that Conchs are a people with a “sovereign state of mind.” The micronation even sells novelty passports—and there are documented cases of holders successfully using them to travel abroad and reenter the United States. Sovereign, indeed!

    In 1994, the Conchs sent an “official” delegation to the Summit of the Americas in Miami. In 1995, when a government shutdown in Washington caused the closure of Dry Tortugas National Park, just off the Florida coast, the Republic “threatened to use three antique biplanes loaded with stale Cuban bread to bomb the park’s Fort Jefferson” unless the popular tourist destination was reopened, Shearer writes.

    More recently, in 2006, the fake country “annexed” a stretch of an abandoned overseas bridge after the Coast Guard told a group of Cuban refugees that landing there did not trigger “wet foot, dry foot”—the policy at the time of granting legal status to any Cuban who landed on American soil.

    Peter Anderson, who held the title of Conch Republic ​​secretary general, “led a landing party of Conchs who staked miniature flags along the bridge,” wrote Darien Cavanaugh in a 2015 article for the War Is Boring website. “Since the federal government decided in its infinite wisdom that the old Seven Mile Bridge is not territory of the United States, the Conch Republic is very interested,” Anderson told reporters; Washington “chose not to defend” the bridge against the invasion.

    And there you have the colorful history behind the Key West motto, emblazoned on everything from sweatshirts to souvenir passports: “We seceded where others failed.”

    Stephanie Slade

    Source link

  • Infographic: Florida’s special districts

    Infographic: Florida’s special districts

    There are currently 1,967 special districts across Florida, according to the Florida Department of Commerce. Most aren’t like the big, quasi-autonomous districts that cover The Villages and Disney World, though. Some just cover local or county libraries, utilities, parks, or airports, among other typical government functions. Others cover the whole state under a variety of functions, like Space Florida’s function as “the single point of contact for all space-related functions of the State of Florida.” Most districts are focused on community and commercial development, though some remain undeveloped years after creation.

    Altogether, they combine in a patchwork of governmental districts that blanket the state—sometimes complicating government functions, sometimes simplifying them.
    — Jason Russell

    (Infographic by Erin Davis)

    Erin Davis

    Source link

  • Northbridge curfew trial extended after 800 kids removed from Perth CBD streets – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    Northbridge curfew trial extended after 800 kids removed from Perth CBD streets – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    More than 800 kids — two a day — were taken off the streets as part of the Northbridge curfew trial, prompting an extension of the highly successful program.

    Community Services Minister Sabine Winton told The Sunday Times the Home Safe trial, started in October 2022, would be extended until June 2025. The Government has credited the program with a massive drop in youth crime this year.

    Original Author Link click here to read complete story..

    MMP News Author

    Source link