ReportWire

Tag: Liverpool FC

  • Diaz’ family demand proof of life as guerrillas STILL refusing to hand over dad

    Diaz’ family demand proof of life as guerrillas STILL refusing to hand over dad

    [ad_1]

    THE distressed family of Luis Diaz have demanded the kidnappers holding his father hostage offer proof he is alive as the group has still not released him.

    The ELN rebel group promised to release the Liverpool star’s dad, Luis Manuel Diaz and vowed to “keep its word” but has so far failed to free the 58-year-old.

    7

    The National Liberation Army has promised to “keep its word” and release the 58-year-oldCredit: AFP
    The Liverpool player lifted his shirt revealing a message to free his dad after scoring a goal

    7

    The Liverpool player lifted his shirt revealing a message to free his dad after scoring a goalCredit: Reuters
    Even though the Colombian military withdrew troops, the ELN has still not handed over the star's dad

    7

    Even though the Colombian military withdrew troops, the ELN has still not handed over the star’s dadCredit: AFP
    Luis Manuel Diaz was kidnapped from his hometown 11 days ago

    7

    Luis Manuel Diaz was kidnapped from his hometown 11 days agoCredit: Colombia Police

    On Tuesday, the government’s head negotiator with the guerilla group, Otty Patiño, confirmed the man should be released soon after the Colombian military met the ELN’s demands.

    The military withdrew troops from the area surrounding the guerillas’ jungle lair near the border with Venezuela, where the star’s dad is thought to be held.

    But Luis Manuel’s ordeal has entered its 11th day after being abducted from his home town of Barrancas, with his family growing concerned about his release.

    The missing man’s brother Gabi admitted they are worried and has begged the ELN, to offer proof the 58-year-old is still alive.

    He said: “What we would most like is to have that proof by seeing him and knowing what situation our brother, our relative, our papa, our son is in because my father is here and wants to see his son.”

    Luis Alfonso Diaz, the footballer’s cousin, told Colombian state broadcaster RNC: “We are asking the ELN to send us proof of how Luis Manuel is now so we can have some peace of mind.”

    The demands are being echoed by government officials and Colombian media which has accused the captors of playing games and speculated that army and police activity was complicating the freedom process as an attempt to buy time while it negotiates a ransom demand.

    No information has been made public about the possibility of a cash payment for Luis Manuel’s release.

    After the rebel group was identified as the kidnappers last week, Colombian journalist Salud Hernandez-Mora, warned: “The modus operandi of the kidnap of the parents of Lucho Diaz is identical to other kidnaps this criminal gang has carried out.

    “And they only free people in exchange for millions.”

    While Colombian media outlet Semana slammed the group today and accused it of lying in an article that read: “It’s vital the ELN hands over proof Luis Manuel Diaz is alive, so his family and the country can see he is good conditions and is indeed in the hands of the Northern War Front.”

    Patino, who’s been the government’s chief negotiator in ongoing peace talks with the ELN which started before the October 28 kidnap, said yesterday “The ELN are taking too long to hand their hostage over.

    “They should free Mr Diaz today, there’s no reason for them not to do it.”

    Colombian military chiefs insisted on Monday they had laid the ground for the release “in the next few hours” after confirming the withdrawal of troops and police.

    Around 200 men were told to return to the town of Barrancas to facilitate Operation Freedom after the ELN expressed its concerns.

    Colombia’s Army said of the military manoeuvre: “All the guarantees and conditions are being offered so Mr Diaz can recover his freedom in the next few hours.”

    It comes after the Liverpool star score a last-gasp equaliser for his team before lifting his shirt to reveal the words “Libertad Para Papa” – meaning “Freedom for my father”.

    The footballer on Sunday broke his silence with an emotional social media appeal.

    The 26-year-old, referring to his father by his nickname “Mane” wrote on Instagram: “This is not Luis Diaz the player speaking.

    “Today it is the son of Luis Manuel Diaz speaking.

    “Mane, my dad, is a hard-working family man, the pillar of our family and he’s been kidnapped.

    “I ask the ELN for the prompt release of my father, and I ask international organisations to work together for his freedom.

    “Every second, every minute, our anguish grows.

    “My mother, my brothers and I are desperate, distressed and without words to describe what we are feeling.

    “This suffering will only end when we have him back home.

    “I beg you to release him immediately, respecting his integrity and ending this painful wait as soon as possible.

    “In the name of love and compassion, we ask you to reconsider your actions and allow us to have him back.

    “I thank Colombians and the international community for the support received, thank you for so many demonstrations of affection and solidarity in this difficult time that many families in my country find themselves experiencing.”

    The ELN responded on Monday with a statement signed by the unit’s leader Commander Jose Manuel Martinez Quiroz.

    It said: “On November 2, we informed the country of the decision to release Mr. Luis Manuel Díaz, father of the player Luis Díaz.

    “From that date, we began the process to accomplish this as soon as possible. We are making efforts to avoid incidents with government forces.

    “The area is still militarised, they are carrying out flyovers, disembarking troops, broadcasting and offering rewards as part of an intense search operation.

    “This situation is not allowing for the execution of the release plan quickly and safely, where Mr. Luis Manuel Díaz is not at risk. If operations continue in the area, they will delay the release and increase the risks.

    “We understand the anguish of the Díaz Marulanda family, to whom we say that we will keep our word to release him unilaterally, as soon as we have security guarantees for the development of the liberation operation.”

    Luis Diaz’s mum Cilenis Marulanda was also abducted near the couple’s home alongside her husband but freed as the police and army hunt for their captors kicked in.

    On Sunday morning she fought back tears as she urged the kidnappers to release her partner.

    Cilenis made her impassioned plea as she took part in a second march to demand Luis Manuel Diaz’s freedom.

    She said, with her eyes closed before breaking down and being hugged by a relative beside her: “I want them to release him now, that the people who are keeping him free him now back to me, because we want to have him back home.”

    Cilenis wore a T-shirt with her husband’s face printed on it under the message: “Your family is waiting for you.”

    Protesters took to the streets of Barrancas calling for Luis Manuel Diaz's release

    7

    Protesters took to the streets of Barrancas calling for Luis Manuel Diaz’s releaseCredit: EPA
    Authorities offered a reward of 200million pesos for the return of Liverpool star's dad

    7

    Authorities offered a reward of 200million pesos for the return of Liverpool star’s dadCredit: AFP
    The Liverpool star begged the kidnappers for the return of his dad in a social media post

    7

    The Liverpool star begged the kidnappers for the return of his dad in a social media postCredit: instagram/@luisdiaz19_

    [ad_2]

    Aliki Kraterou

    Source link

  • MATCHDAY: Wolves-Liverpool in replay; Napoli face new coach

    MATCHDAY: Wolves-Liverpool in replay; Napoli face new coach

    [ad_1]

    January 16, 2023 GMT

    A look at what’s happening in European soccer on Tuesday:

    ENGLAND

    There are six third-round replays in the FA Cup, with Liverpool looking to stay in realistic contention for a domestic trophy by beating Wolverhampton in an all-Premier League matchup. An entertaining game ended 2-2 at Anfield on Jan. 7 and was tinged with controversy with Wolves having a late goal disallowed because of an offside not picked up by VAR cameras. Liverpool’s only game since then was a 3-0 loss at Brighton in the league on Saturday, a low point in the team’s season. Liverpool is in ninth place in the league, 19 points off first place, and already out of the League Cup. Among the other replays, non-league teams Chesterfield and Boreham Wood from the fifth tier of English soccer are in action against second-tier West Bromwich Albion and third-tier Accrington Stanley, respectively.

    ITALY

    New Cremonese coach Davide Ballardini faces a difficult first match in charge as his side visits Serie A leader Napoli in the Italian Cup. Ballardini was appointed on Sunday to replace Massimiliano Alvini, who was fired after Cremonese’s 11th defeat in 18 league matches left it bottom of the table. Cremonese is without a league win although it has beaten second-division sides Ternana and Modena in previous rounds of the cup. Napoli is nine points clear at the top of Serie A and will be even more full of confidence after humiliating Juventus 5-1 on Friday. The winner will face Roma in the quarterfinals.

    ___

    More AP soccer: https://apnews.com/hub/soccer and https://twitter.com/AP_Sports

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fenway Sports Group’s Potential Liverpool FC Exit A Sign Soccer Has Peaked

    Fenway Sports Group’s Potential Liverpool FC Exit A Sign Soccer Has Peaked

    [ad_1]

    As reports emerged claiming Liverpool FC owner Fenway Sports Group was considering selling the club, it was not manager Jurgen Klopp who faced the media.

    Just a few weeks back the German went out of his way to highlight the ‘ceiling’ the Merseyside giants faced in comparison to clubs like Newcastle United and Manchester City.

    So it would have been interesting to know whether he viewed the statement that FSG “under the right terms and conditions would consider new shareholders” as a validation of this stance.

    Instead, Klopp’s assistant, Pep Lijnders, was tasked with staring down the mass of cameras ahead of the Red’s Carabao Cup game versus Derby. The coach made an interesting concession; the managerial team was aware of the club’s position before the news broke.

    “We knew before, of course,” he added, “one and a half weeks ago or something.”

    This season, more than any other, soccer players and coaches have faced questions that go way beyond their regular remit.

    Whether discussing financial disparity, as Klopp was ahead of the Manchester City game, or the ethics of hosting the World Cup in Qatar, which Liverpool’s manager also got hot under the collar about, the news agenda has often been far from the soccer field.

    Even then you had to feel for Lijnders who took the brunt of the initial media attention and towed the regular party line well.

    “First of all, everybody who saw us in the last years realized who we are as a club [and that] we have a strong relationship with the owners,” he said, adding later “what I would like to say is that I always know the owners act in the best interests of the club and they always did. I believe they always tried at least. This relationship was very important for us.”

    Why now?

    Soccer is a sport where the thinking is often frustratingly short-term. As news of the potential sale of Liverpool broke, discussions inevitably turned to this season’s patchy form and suggestions of a major playing staff rebuild.

    Also present was the theory that facing the financial might of rival owners FSG felt it had reached its limit.

    “FSG perhaps acknowledge they have taken Liverpool as far as they can in their current state. Indeed, their ownership came with an accepted exit strategy,” leading writer Ian Doyle of the Liverpool Echo told readers.

    “Like almost every other European club, simply cannot compete with that level of backing, as has been exposed by their unwillingness to spend beyond their means in the transfer market. It has prompted frustration among certain supporters, with boss Jurgen Klopp indicating he would prefer a little more risk being taken in hope of greater reward,” he added.

    Former Reds defender Jamie Carragher, went even further, speculating about an even shorter timeframe of events.

    “Maybe they woke up on Monday morning and read about how much Manchester City have made commercially and thought, ‘you can’t stop it, can you,” he said referring to the continued rise in revenues at the Citizens.

    The truth is organizations like Fenway Sports Group aren’t responding to a recent set of financial results or a drop-off in form. These businesses make decisions based on projections over decades.

    The connotations of a potential exit therefore should be viewed as a serious statement about the future of the game.

    FSG’s stake in soccer’s most successful league would not be relinquished if it thought there were substantial riches to be unearthed.

    The decision to explore a potential sale could be a sign they think the value of the club has peaked.

    The Super League project failure

    The greatest indication soccer is set for something of a downturn or at least a plateau can be found in the words of the leader of the game’s most famous club.

    Speaking just a couple of weeks ago, Real Madrid president Florentino Perez said “our beloved sport is sick, especially in Europe, and, of course, in Spain.

    “[Soccer] is losing its position as the world’s leading global sport. The most worrying fact is that young people are becoming less and less interested in [soccer]. The current competitions, as they are designed today, do not attract spectators’ interest, except in the final stages,” he added.

    Perez’s remedy to this predicament is of course a plan FSG was very much backing, the creation of a European Super League [ESL], the ill-fated breakaway competition which fell apart after fan anger prompted a flurry of English clubs to drop out.

    The debacle prompted an extensive apology from owner John W Henry to Reds fans. “I’m sorry and I alone am responsible for the unnecessary negativity brought forward over the past couple of days,” he said in a video posted online, “it’s something I won’t forget. And shows the power the fans have today and will rightly continue to have.”

    But were the ESL to have been created you have to wonder; would Henry and FSG be weighing up a sale now?

    According to The Athletic, one of the titles which broke the story originally, the answer is no. “It is fair to say that had the European Super League got off the ground, FSG probably wouldn’t be looking to sell now,” the title wrote.

    Predictions that the soccer bubble was ready to burst have been frequent since revenues in the sport began skyrocketing in the late 1990s.

    However, history has shown the game to be economic recession-proof and now global pandemic-resistant.

    It may be that FSG has called the market wrong and the next owners will oversee another equally lucrative period of growth.

    But if Florentino Perez is to be believed, the sport may be approaching a high watermark where Liverpool’s owners should cash out their chips.

    [ad_2]

    Zak Garner-Purkis, Contributor

    Source link

  • Liverpool-Man City has become England’s ugliest rivalry

    Liverpool-Man City has become England’s ugliest rivalry

    [ad_1]

    LONDON — As the Manchester City team bus made its way out of Anfield, there came a parting shot.

    An object, supposedly thrown by home fans after the bad-tempered 1-0 loss to Liverpool on Sunday, caused a small crack in the windshield.

    It’s a rivalry that has turned ugly, the bitterest in the Premier League.

    City manager Pep Guardiola had already successfully avoided coins being hurled in his direction during the match. Liverpool, meanwhile, condemned the behaviour of the away fans after offensive chants relating to Hillsborough — the tragedy in 1989 that resulted in the deaths of 97 of its fans.

    As fierce as the competition has been on the field during a four-year period when the teams have dominated English soccer, so has the feud been off it. A person with knowledge of the bus incident said City will make an official complaint to the English Football Association.

    The person spoke on condition of anonymity because City has yet to publicly comment on the events surrounding the match. The coin-throwing and Liverpool manager Jurgen Klopp’s pre-match comments will also be included in the complaint, the person said.

    “There are three clubs in world football who can do what they want financially,” Klopp said on Friday, an apparent reference to City, Paris Saint-Germain and Newcastle, who are backed by Abu Dhabi, Qatar and Saudi Arabia, respectively.

    Tensions between the clubs have been building for some time — dating back to before their recent battle for supremacy at the top of the Premier League.

    Raheem Sterling’s transfer to City in 2015 pointed to a shift in the balance of power from one of European soccer’s traditional giants to its newly-enriched rival, which was bought by the Abu Dhabi royal family in 2008. As a result, the England forward was heavily-criticized for what was perceived as a financially motivated move.

    “Trophies don’t get handed out, you’ve got to earn them,” former Liverpool defender Jamie Carragher said at the time. “You’ve got to deliver in big games and he hasn’t done that yet.”

    Sterling went on to win four titles at the Etihad Stadium and 10 major trophies.

    But the rivalry really intensified when Klopp emerged as the greatest threat to Guardiola’s dominance.

    Liverpool beat City in three-straight games in the second half of the 2017-18 campaign, which saw Guardiola’s team crowned champion with a record 100 points.

    It was a notice of intent from Klopp, while Liverpool fans appeared determined to intimidate City, not only with the famously daunting atmosphere inside Anfield, but also by attacking the visiting team bus ahead of a Champions League quarterfinal match.

    The damage caused was so severe that a replacement bus was required to get the team back to Manchester.

    The small crack left on the windscreen on Sunday was not as dramatic, but it was the latest incident involving two teams that have set standards on the field that have not been matched by their fans off it.

    Liverpool said it wants to work with City to eradicate “vile chants.”

    “The concourse in the away section was also vandalized with graffiti of a similar nature,” Liverpool added in a statement after Sunday’s match.

    Meanwhile, Klopp, who was sent off for angrily charging out of his technical area to remonstrate with the referee’s assistant, apologized for the coin-throwing.

    “Horrible,” he said. “I am sorry. It never should happen.”

    How the FA unpicks a game that was overshadowed by flash points off the field is not straight-forward. It has limited jurisdiction over isolated incidents of objects being thrown from the crowd from individuals. And while it has condemned the chants from City fans, it would only normally act when discrimination is involved.

    Klopp’s fate is also uncertain.

    The Liverpool manager won’t face an automatic suspension for his red card, the FA said. The governing body will review the incident before deciding whether to offer him a ban and/or a fine. If his behaviour is deemed to be serious enough, he could face a hearing and potentially more severe punishment.

    If the fall-out from this latest engrossing clash between City and Liverpool has shown anything, it’s that this rivalry isn’t going away any time soon.

    ———

    AP World Cup coverage: https://apnews.com/hub/world-cup and https://twitter.com/AP—Sports

    ———

    James Robson is at https://twitter.com/jamesalanrobson

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jurgen Klopp Is Wrong: Liverpool FC Has No ‘Ceiling,’ But Newcastle United Did

    Jurgen Klopp Is Wrong: Liverpool FC Has No ‘Ceiling,’ But Newcastle United Did

    [ad_1]

    Liverpool FC manager Jurgen Klopp is no stranger to the passive-aggressive jibe about an opponent.

    Through trademark gritted teeth and sarcastic tone, he’s fond of the barbed comment dressed up as fact.

    But in the pre-match press conference for the game against Manchester City, the German was almost theatrical in trotting out a well-worn complaint about rivals’ spending power.

    To a relatively innocuous question about whether Liverpool could “compete” with the Mancunians Klopp replied: “City won’t like it, nobody will like it, but you know the answer. What does Liverpool do? We cannot act like them. It’s not possible, not possible.”

    “Nobody can compete with City. You have the best team in the world and you put in the best striker on the market. No matter what it costs, you just do it.”

    Clearly wanting to press home his point about finances, Klopp roped in the other two clubs known for their vast resources, Paris Saint-Germain and Newcastle United.

    “It’s just clear: there are three clubs in world football who can do what they want financially. It’s legal, everything is fine, but they can do whatever they want. Competing with them? It’s not possible to deal with that,” he added.

    Most curiously he then preceded to reference a comment by Newcastle United sporting director Dan Ashworth that there was “no ceiling for the club.”

    “He’s absolutely right. There’s no ceiling for Newcastle,” Klopp said, adding sarcastically “congratulations – some clubs have ceilings.”

    It’s not the first time Klopp has taken aim at the club, who finished 43 points behind the Reds last season, in somewhat strange circumstances.

    As Liverpool FC was still recovering reputationally from being one of the driving forces behind the ill-fated European Super League, the German bizarrely compared the debacle to Newcastle United being taken over by the Saudi Arabian Public Investment Fund [PIF].

    “With the Super League, the whole world was justifiably upset about it. It’s basically like the Super League now – just for one club. Newcastle is guaranteed to play a dominant role in world football for the next 20 or 30 years,” he said.

    Klopp appears to be more preoccupied with commenting on finances than any other Premier League manager, the question is why?

    Where’s Liverpool’s ‘ceiling?’

    The strangest part of Klopp’s ‘ceiling’ comment seemed to be the suggestion that Liverpool somehow had limits that were restricting its ambition.

    Reaching the Champions League Final last season and challenging for an unprecedented quadruple until the last minutes of the campaign is pretty much the opposite of having a barrier to what a club can achieve.

    Subsequently strengthening that squad with a record-breaking $95 million striker and making your 30-year-old star player the highest-paid employee in the club’s history, with a $60 million contract, are also not the actions of a club with a ceiling.

    Liverpool did let Sadio Mane depart this summer, but the economic case for any club, regardless of resources, spending more than $100 million on contract renewals for stars in their thirties is hardly a strong one.

    Five years ago it might have been possible to argue Liverpool had a ceiling when Phillip Coutinho left to join Barcelona feeling he couldn’t do what he wanted at Anfield.

    But today it’s simply not true and history shows us wealthy new challengers can be a good thing for elite sides like Liverpool.

    A ‘Big Two’ to a ‘Big Six’

    While it would be wrong to argue that heavy investment or the presence of a wealthy benefactor is bad for a club, it is totally incorrect to suggest it guarantees lofty ambitions.

    For example, since Chelsea was taken over by billionaire Roman Abramovich in 2003, it has been the Premier League’s biggest spender in seven of the subsequent 19 seasons.

    The noticeable thing about this investment is that it hasn’t resulted in Chelsea dominating the division. Five titles have been achieved, but sporadically, nothing like Manchester United’s sustained success of the 90s or Liverpool’s in the 80s.

    With well over a billion dollars spent, Manchester United has also matched rivals Manchester City’s outlay over the past decade. But as is often highlighted the club has no title in that time and has rarely mounted a sustained challenge.

    On the other hand, Manchester City, who’ve topped the spending charts six times, since its 2008 takeover by the Abu Dhabi Group, has earned six titles four of which came in the last five years.

    But if investment capability or money spent always resulted in success then Chelsea and City would have monopolized the division.

    In fact, the emergence of these two new powers did not lower the ceilings of any of the traditional giants, if anything the greater depth of competition has benefited the league overall.

    Before the investment in Chelsea, the Premier League had a ‘Big Two’ Arsenal and Manchester United.

    When the West Londoners began splashing the cash in the early 2000s Arsene Wenger, who’d just led his side on an unprecedented unbeaten run expressed concern: “It is very difficult for any club to cope with that kind of competition when there is financially no logic between what comes in and what goes out,” he feared.

    Ultimately, however, Chelsea’s cash-boosted rise to the top table of the Premier League did not destroy the competition.

    What happened was the number of teams challenging at the top expanded, largely thanks to increases in Champions League revenue, Chelsea and Liverpool made it a ‘Big Four.’

    Fears were raised once again when Manchester City was purchased in 2008 and supercharged its spending to join the elite as soon as possible.

    The result, again, was an expansion of the most powerful teams, Tottenham Hotspur and Manchester City made it a ‘Big Six.’

    Newcastle United and the real ceiling

    At the top of the league, competition has not suffered from the investment, arguably it’s improved.

    No side has held the title for three consecutive years since Manchester United did between 2007 and 2010. While the two back-to-back titles achieved by Manchester City in the past five years have both been earned by single points.

    Spurs and Liverpool, neither of whom have been bought by billionaires, emerged as challengers for the title during that time and famously Leicester City lifted the crown.

    The ‘ceiling’ that emerged in this period was not for clubs like Liverpool, whose revenues had been raised by the Champions League in the noughties, it was for teams like Newcastle United.

    Until it was bought by PIF, Newcastle could not really have any hope of joining the elite, the gap in revenue and on-pitch investment was too big.

    If they produced a talented player, like Andy Carroll or Yohan Cabaye, wealthier clubs with bigger ambitions hoovered them up.

    Fans of sides like Newcastle may have held wild dreams that they could replicate the Leicester miracle of 2016-17 and win the title but the brutal truth is the ‘Big Six’ has held a monopoly on the Champions League places for the past decade.

    So when it comes to ‘ceilings’ Jurgen Klopp should welcome Newcastle United’s burgeoning ambition, history shows the disruption caused by investment in a club outside the established elite has been beneficial.

    [ad_2]

    Zak Garner-Purkis, Contributor

    Source link

  • Trent Alexander-Arnold’s Defending Is A Problem Liverpool FC Has Solved Before

    Trent Alexander-Arnold’s Defending Is A Problem Liverpool FC Has Solved Before

    [ad_1]

    Liverpool FC boss Jurgen Klopp had enough.

    The criticism of Trent Alexander-Arnold’s defending, which was background noise before last season’s Champions League Final, had become a regular part of the mainstream agenda.

    So Klopp did what good managers do, he went on the offensive.

    “The first thing you do if you judge a player, you think about his overall package – and the skillset he has for being influential in possession is mad for a right-back,” he told the media before Liverpool faced Brighton & Hove Albion.

    “I don’t know if you ever saw a right-back like this where you think, ‘OK, passing here, passing there, switching side, crossing there, free-kicks, corners, all these kind of things, smart decisions, quick decisions.’ He’s an outstanding football player.”

    But Klopp didn’t just want to highlight the positives, the Liverpool manager confronted attacks on Alexander-Arnolds defensive capabilities too.

    “First part of the season, we, as a team, didn’t defend well. That’s the truth, we know that, we saw it,” he continued.

    “As a defender, Trent is involved in that – but […] we, as a unit, didn’t defend well. That’s why defending is an art, if you want, because everything has to work together.

    “Offensively, one skill, one guy makes a difference, goal. Defensively, one guy defends the whole pitch, not possible. So we need everybody involved and we were not good at that, that’s the truth – my responsibility.”

    Unfortunately for Klopp, his efforts to deflect the individual criticism of the right back fell on deaf ears.

    When Brighton raced to an early two-goal lead and left Anfield with a 3-3 draw it was Alexander-Arnold who was in the firing line once again.

    Memes of the young Liverpudlian slumped on the floor flooded social media along with clips that supposedly highlighted his frailties.

    But Klopp is right. The truth is Alexander-Arnold is being treated unfairly and making him a scapegoat for a team not quite at its best is a major mistake.

    The other side of the coin

    In many regards, the continued attacks on the 23-year-olds abilities are part of a long-established pattern with young talented English soccer players.

    When an exciting homegrown prospect emerges, the British media hype machine whirs into gear praising the youngster to the heavens.

    Alexander-Arnold’s emergence was greeted with the usual salivation from media pundits and online commentators quick to label him the ‘best right back in the world.’

    But everyone knows plaudits become punishment if standards slip or a rough patch is encountered. The same voices who lauded the talent will eviscerate without a second thought.

    An insight into the merciless calculation that goes into this was provided by media personality Piers Morgan in a documentary about the life of one of England’s most revered and then abused talents, Paul Gascoigne.

    “I always love the mythical notion that there’s nothing newspapers like more than to build them up and knock ’em down,” says in a clip archive clip used in the series, “we build them up, they knock themselves down. And if they make the wrong choices then they pay the price of their fame.”

    For Gascoigne, it was problems off the field that meant he never fulfilled his full potential.

    Alexander-Arnold’s frailties are firmly on the pitch, but that’s why context and nuance are even more important when assessing his current shortcomings.

    Becoming a right back at 17

    The response to Jurgen Klopp’s statement that Alexander-Arnold’s skillset “is mad for a right-back” is simple; that’s because he isn’t one.

    Unlike many other players who spend their formative years honing their skills for a specialized position on the pitch, the Liverpool star made the switch to fullback as a seventeen-year-old.

    Before then, the youngster used his ample creativity to pull the strings in central midfield or ping in crosses from the right wing, he even dabbled as a ball-playing center-half.

    But such areas are amongst the hardest for an untried youth prospect to break into, they are where clubs like Liverpool make their biggest investments.

    Full-back, however, was not an area where the club was particularly blessed with talent, so the precocious youngster decided to adapt his game to where the opportunity lay.

    The process wasn’t easy, former Liverpool youth team coach Neil Critchley has revealed how he used to put the youngster under severe pressure in training to see if he could handle playing in his new role.

    “If the winger was getting success against him in training, we just used to keep giving him the ball,’ the trainer said, “some days I’d think, ‘I’ve got Trent here; he’s going to quit.’ And the next day he’d come back and it was as if he was like, ‘Right, I’ll show you.’”

    This determination eventually led him to the first team where he went from strength to strength.

    ‘Obscene numbers’

    Alexander-Arnold’s rise has been meteoric, as one of the Premier League’s greatest ever right back’s Gary Neville pointed out his numbers are incredible.

    “If you look at Trent’s stats in the last four seasons since 2018 [44 assists, 315 chances created] – that is absolutely obscene,” Neville said on Sky Sports Monday Night Football.

    “Just to put that into perspective, I played 400 games in the Premier League and had 35 assists, he’s got 44 in his last four seasons at the age of 23. It is absolutely ridiculous. I cannot believe those numbers.”

    The point the former Manchester United man went on to make was that when it came to defending he was still not completely there.

    While Liverpool was dominant these flaws were less exposed, but the rough start to this season and the patchy form of his colleagues have meant his weaknesses have come to the fore more regularly.

    His advice? Work at it, bite the bullet and put the hard yards on the training pitch as he did with Critchley years ago and if he does, even diehard Manchester United fan Neville admitted, he could be the greatest of all time.

    [ad_2]

    Zak Garner-Purkis, Contributor

    Source link