ReportWire

Tag: LIHTC

  • Exploring Which Stakeholders Stand To Benefit Most From NHIA

    Exploring Which Stakeholders Stand To Benefit Most From NHIA

    [ad_1]

    It’s a painful reality: The cost of homes is putting homeownership beyond the reach of a growing share of Americans.

    A new bill called The Neighborhood Homes Investment Act (NHIA) strives to address this problem, encouraging affordable home building and spurring renewal of distressed neighborhoods through the creation of a new tax credit.

    By supporting affordable housing initiatives through tax credits, The American Bankers Association (ABA)-backed NHIA would work much like the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC). Developers or investors would receive the tax credits, which would lessen their federal tax liability, in return for building or renovating housing properties.

    “On the surface, the ABA’s endorsement paints a picture of community-focused growth,” says Brian Pillmore, founder and CEO of Oklahoma City, Okla.-based Visbanking, which offers banking tools and services.

    “A deeper dive reveals that many of its members could significantly benefit. The banking world, especially those involved as lenders or sponsors in housing transactions, have an undeniable vested interest in such tax credits being ratified. A successful implementation of the NHIA could amplify their transaction volumes, opening up avenues for heightened interest and fee income. It’s essential to juxtapose this backing with the broader implications and beneficiaries of the act.”

    Rich potential

    The NHIA offers the attractive promise of revitalized development and revived enclaves. But transforming this rich potential into on-the-ground reality is more complicated, Pillmore believes. There’s little question the tax credit could attract development to the distressed areas where it is needed the most, and where the credits would be focused.

    However, according to Pillmore, “There’s a looming shadow: The interests of financial behemoths. Banks and developers with their expansive reach and financial clout, are poised to leverage these credits optimally. Thus, while we might witness a cosmetic revival of neighborhoods, the deep-rooted challenges of housing affordability might remain largely unaddressed.”

    The NHIA is touted as advancing the cause of housing affordability and galvanizing community investment, both of which augur a more hopeful future for housing in distressed areas. But Pillmore believes the “true value and direction of these investments” remains in doubt. A report by the CBO, he adds, suggests the supply of affordable housing may not be increased as a result of the act. He believes that while neighborhoods could see cosmetic improvements from the NHIA, the lasting impact of the act on housing affordability remains debatable. With banks and developers poised to garner a larger share of the advantages, the community-centered goals of the act could take a back seat to the financial interests of these stakeholders.

    Dual role

    Pillmore envisions a conflict of interests emerging as a result of passage of the NHIA.

    “Banks undeniably have a critical role in shaping community futures and are pivotal in the housing development ecosystem,” he says. “Tax credits, like those proposed in the NHIA, offer them an avenue to both support housing initiatives and realize financial gains. But this dual role can sometimes lead to conflicting interests.

    “While banks can significantly impact community development and make homeownership a reality for many, their inherent business model, centered around profitability, can sometimes overshadow community-centric goals. With the NHIA, while banks might play a significant role, the larger question of balance between financial interests and genuine community development remains at the forefront.”

    Should the NHIA become reality, a surge in housing activities in earmarked zones seems inevitable. But a core issue remains, Pillmore says. Will neighborhoods benefit from real and lasting improvement? Or will the enhancement turn out to be little more than window dressing? Will the primary beneficiaries be homeowners, or will they be banks, developers and mortgage companies?

    “The NHIA, while promising on paper, reignites a pressing debate,” Pillmore concludes. That debate centers, he says, “On the real essence of affordable housing in America, and the actors that shape its destiny.”

    [ad_2]

    Jeffrey Steele, Contributor

    Source link

  • Macroeconomic Trends Stalling Affordable Housing Development

    Macroeconomic Trends Stalling Affordable Housing Development

    [ad_1]

    Affordable housing development has never been without hurdles. The 3.8 million affordable homes deficit currently confronting the U.S. is ample proof.

    But some affordable housing sector veterans are labeling this current environment one of the toughest they have ever witnessed.

    It’s not hard to understand why. Ongoing inflation and the highest interest rates in decades, combined with lingering supply chain problems left over from the pandemic years, are fueling what some term a crisis gripping affordable housing development. That’s made it more daunting to provide the kind of new supply needed to even modestly begin to address the supply shortfall.

    “This crisis and its far-reaching complexities are unlike anything I have experienced in my career,” says Aaron Pechota, executive vice president of development at The NRP Group, one of the three largest affordable housing developers in the nation.

    “The challenges hindering affordable housing development across America need to be addressed immediately to avoid prolonging the situation. When affordable housing projects are put on hold and remain suspended, the shortage worsens substantially, as these developments typically take two to three years to complete.”

    Financing gaps

    The NRP Group has faced problems related to macroeconomic trends across its portfolio, in markets like New York, New Jersey, Washington, D.C., North Carolina, Texas and Ohio. Soaring prices of steel, concrete, electrical, cabinetry and labor, among others, have added several million dollars to the costs of each development.

    Moreover, aggressive interest rate increases have dramatically hiked the cost of construction loans.

    The typical financing gaps with which affordable housing developers are all too familiar have been widened into chasms by the high cost of loans and the soaring costs of everything else. The NRP Group has witnessed project financing gaps leap from $2 to $3 million to $5 to $10 million on average, and far more in some markets. In affordable housing, extra costs of this kind can’t be offset by raising rents.

    Federal funding provided by the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) has been highly valuable in spurring affordable housing development benefitting those earning far below Area Median Incomes (AMI).

    There have been calls by dozens of members of Congress to expand the LIHTC program. But since the onset of Covid, there have been no substantive changes made to the program to offset the new development challenges.

    Scaling back

    Although the need for more affordable housing continues to grow, developers nationwide have been compelled to cut back or even entirely halt projects.

    At the start of last year, The NRP Group planned to launch development of almost 1,900 affordable housing units. But the need to line up additional financing forced the company to delay the start of at least 200 of those residences. The delays came in one of the regions where hard-pressed renters could least afford them, Upstate New York. There, the company had to put in a holding pattern two planned affordable communities, the 135-unit Overlook Terrace in Cortlandt, and the 72-unit Selkirk Reserve community in Albany County.

    Those who will suffer the brunt of the crisis will of course be the homeless. In 2020, almost 580,500 Americans were unhoused, and of those more than 110,500 were counted among the chronically homeless, according to the National Alliance to End Homelessness. The assortment of post-pandemic macroeconomic pressures on development of new affordable housing can’t help but make the problem worse.

    “The states and cities embracing public-private partnerships and successfully implementing processes for affordable housing developers to access gap funds will keep these much-needed units in production,” Pechota says. “The localities that do not are going to see a significant drop in new units produced going forward, creating a domino effect that will impact underserved communities for years to come.”

    [ad_2]

    Jeffrey Steele, Contributor

    Source link