ReportWire

Tag: Life Insurance

  • Term vs. permanent life insurance: How to choose what’s right for you – MoneySense

    Your insurance choice depends on your long-term financial goals

    Brooke Dean, founder of BMD Financial Ltd. at Raymond James, likens the two options to renting versus owning. “Term life insurance is like renting an apartment,” she said. Similar to renting, people pay for coverage for a set period of time. When the time is up—similar to a lease ending—the consumer walks away without any ownership or equity in the policy. 

    Permanent life insurance is like buying a house, Dean said. This type of policy has a higher upfront premium, but with time, the policy can accumulate equity, and people can borrow against it, similar to a home.

    Each serves a different purpose in financial planning, and deciding which one would be more suitable depends on individual needs.

    Jeffrey Talor, director of sales at CanWise Life Insurance Services, says a permanent life insurance policy could be one of the cleanest ways to transfer wealth. For example, when adult children inherit their parents’ assets—such as a home, cottage or business—the assets will be assessed at fair market value and any capital gains would be subject to taxes. A permanent policy could provide the cash to settle tax bills without the need to sell any of those assets. “If you don’t have the cash flow, this is one of the items of strategy that we’re noticing is a great way to mitigate taxes,” Talor said.

    Compare life insurance quotes and save

    Request a personalized quote and consult with an expert about your coverage needs. Get the protection you need at the right price.

    When permanent life insurance makes sense—and when it doesn’t

    A permanent policy can also offer dividends. Dean said a portion of the premiums are typically invested on behalf of the policyholder with a goal to maximize dividends. But it may not work as an investment strategy for everyone—especially younger people.

    Dean said her clients under the age of 50 often ask about permanent life insurance and how they heard it could be an investment strategy. “If you’re looking at it as just an investment strategy and you don’t have a lot of investments already saved up, then no, that’s probably not the best way to do it,”  she said. Instead, she recommends using it as an investment only after you have topped up your registered savings accounts and might be looking at other ways to put disposable cash to use.

    Talor said some people also buy permanent policies to leave a legacy. For example, Talor said he has seen grandparents buy permanent policies as gifts to their grandchildren—establishing a nest egg for them to leverage or borrow against when the grandkids enter adulthood. He said the younger the policyholder is, the more time the policy gets to accumulate its cash value.

    Term insurance has the appeal of being more affordable and accessible—offering large-enough coverage for a set period of time for young families who may have a mortgage and kids. Talor said term life insurance can be 10 to 15 times cheaper than a permanent policy. “The average Canadian cannot afford to buy the amount of permanent insurance they need,” he added.

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    When it makes sense to combine policies

    Talor said he often sees his clients go for a blend of both term and permanent life insurance policies, which protect them in the short run but also builds equity in the long term. 

    Dean said there are some insurance companies that allow rolling or converting a term life insurance policy into permanent life insurance, without having to lose the premiums that were already paid into it earlier. But she said it’s important for people to ask why they need both at the same time.

    “Is there still a mortgage outstanding? If you were to pass away, do you still have kids you have to provide for?” she asked. “But you also are making a good income and say your RRSPs and TFSAs are topped up.” “You want that term because it’s cheap, you have the coverage, but you also want to start investing in this other product and diversifying a bit more.”

    Get free MoneySense financial tips, news & advice in your inbox.

    Read more about insurance:



    About The Canadian Press


    About The Canadian Press

    The Canadian Press is Canada’s trusted news source and leader in providing real-time stories. We give Canadians an authentic, unbiased source, driven by truth, accuracy and timeliness.

    The Canadian Press

    Source link

  • Taxes halved their inheritance. Could anything be done? – MoneySense

    It is a story about two young adults outraged by the amount of wealth lost to taxes—$659,000—when their parents, in their early 60s, both passed away within a year of each other. 

    I can sympathize with the children, thinking they were going to get this much money only to find they were getting substantially less. Without understanding why, I’m sure it was confusing and hurtful. Let’s walk through why the tax was so high and what if anything could have been done.

    Their father died, after their mother, in December, so he had a full year of income, which I’m assuming was $175,000. There was an RRSP worth $715,000, and I will assume capital gains on the cottage of $850,000. This combination resulted in taxes of about $659,000.  

    Hard to fix after the fact

    What could they have done to lower the amount of tax? In this case, when death is sudden, there is not much you can do. The father’s salary is taxable and there is no getting around that.  

    The same goes for the RRSPs; there is no getting around the tax. The children were named as beneficiaries of the RRSPs, which saved probate fees, but you can’t transfer an RRSP to an adult child like you can a spouse. The funds are withdrawn and the full value goes to the children, but the estate must pay the tax on the value of the RRSP. Regardless, the children end up paying the tax. 

    It is possible to reduce the amount of capital gains paid by designating either the house or cottage as the primary residence and naming the property that has appreciated the least as the secondary property. If there is a bright side to capital gains tax, it is that 50% of your gain is tax-free, so on a $850,000 gain you only pay tax on $425,000.

    When you add it all up—salary $175,000, plus $715,000, plus $425,000 taxable capital gain—that is taxable income of $1,315,000 and tax of $659,000 or 50% of the total income.

    This is why it looks like the government took all their parents’ money. The children inherited the house and cottage and the only cash money they had to pay the taxes was the money from the RRSP. Out of $715,000, they were only left with about $56,000 between the two of them to cover the funeral, accounting, and legal fees, and to maintain the properties until one or both could be sold. 

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    Have a personal finance question? Submit it here.

    The takeaway: plan for many outcomes

    I’m sure when their parents did their planning, if they did, they assumed they might live to age 90, drawing down on their RRSP/RRIF over time to minimize the tax. They may have sold their principal residence and moved to the cottage, designating it as the principal residence. This would have deferred—and, with inflation, shrunk—the capital gain. They may never have considered what the situation would look like if the unexpected happened.

    If they had, they may have considered purchasing life insurance. Life insurance is for “just in case” the unexpected happens. They could have purchased some term insurance with an option to convert to permanent insurance if taxes continued to be an estate issue. The insurance doesn’t minimize the tax, but it provides the children with tax-free money right away—money that gives them time to pause and think rather than feel under pressure to sell properties at a time that may not be opportune.

    This story serves as a good reminder that when doing your planning, consider what the picture may look like if the unexpected happens and then decide if you want to do anything about it. In this case the parents may have been aware, and understood the tax implications, if they both passed away early. Maybe they felt the children would just sell one or both properties and everything would be good. For the adult children this was unfamiliar territory with a big learning curve.  

    Get free MoneySense financial tips, news & advice in your inbox.

    Read more Ask a Planner columns:



    About Allan Norman, MSc, CFP, CIM


    About Allan Norman, MSc, CFP, CIM

    With over 30 years as a financial planner, Allan is an associate portfolio manager at Aligned Capital Partners Inc., where he helps Canadians maintain their lifestyles, without fear of running out of money.

    Allan Norman, MSc, CFP, CIM

    Source link

  • 42% of Canadians don’t have life insurance—are you one of them? – MoneySense

    The report sheds light on just how many Canadians are leaving their families financially at risk—and why so many are putting off getting coverage.

    How wide is the coverage gap?

    PolicyMe’s study found that a staggering 42% of Canadians either don’t have life insurance or aren’t sure if they have it, with almost two-thirds of those who are uninsured saying they aren’t likely to get coverage in the next five years. Families with kids are the hardest hit: almost half (49%) of parents saying they probably won’t purchase life insurance in that same period. 

    Yet one in four Canadians without coverage aren’t confident that their families would be financially secure if they passed away unexpectedly.

    Life insurance changes that. Among those with coverage, 80% say they’re confident that their loved ones would be financially protected.

    It’s clear that life insurance provides peace of mind—so why are so many Canadians still putting it off?

    Read more: Do I really need life insurance?

    Why Canadians are skipping life insurance

    Among those surveyed, more than a third say they don’t have life insurance coverage because it’s simply too expensive—and 42% of those people have kids at home. About 10% say that the high cost of living has delayed their plans, non-essential expenses typically the first to go when budgets get tight.

    Medical requirements are another barrier. Just over a quarter (26%) hesitate to buy life insurance due to the medical questions that many policies require.

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    Perhaps most striking, though, is that 27% of Canadians—more than one in four—believe they don’t need life insurance.

    Consider a family of four living on a single income. If the primary earner were to pass away unexpectedly, the loss of income could put a major strain on day-to-day living—expenses like rent or a mortgage, groceries, and childcare add up quickly. A life insurance payout could replace lost income, cover debts, and give the surviving parent breathing room to focus on family instead of finances during a difficult time.

    Compare life insurance quotes and save

    Request a personalized quote and consult with an expert about your coverage needs. Get the protection you need at the right price.

    The benefits of getting covered sooner

    When it comes to life insurance, starting early is key. Life insurance costs rise an average of about 8% each year you delay, so securing a term policy when you’re younger means you’ll enjoy the lowest rates for longer. 

    But getting coverage late is better than never—and it’s probably more affordable than you think. According to PolicyMe, the average cost of a 20-year term life insurance policy is around $20–30 per month for $500,000 in coverage if you start in your 30s.

    And gone are the days of having to visit an agent and endure seemingly endless sales pitches. Many providers offer online quotes, while some let you complete the entire process online—from getting quotes to completing the medical questionnaire to finalizing your coverage. 

    Life insurance doesn’t have to be complicated or costly; it’s about making sure your loved ones are protected and giving yourself peace of mind, no matter when you start.

    Get free MoneySense financial tips, news & advice in your inbox.

    Read more about insurance:



    About Jessica Barrett


    About Jessica Barrett

    Jessica Barrett is the editor-in-chief of MoneySense. She has extensive experience in the fintech industry and personal finance journalism.

    Jessica Barrett

    Source link

  • AmeriLife’s Scott Perry Named 2025 Honoree by the Chinese American Insurance Association

    Recognition celebrates the company’s expanding support of communities and agents that reflect America’s evolving demographics

    AmeriLife Group, LLC (“AmeriLife”), a national organization that develops, markets, and distributes life and health insurance, annuities, and retirement planning solutions, proudly announced today that its Chairman and CEO, Scott R. Perry, was honored by the Chinese American Insurance Association (CAIA) during its annual Lunar New Year Banquet on April 3 in New York City. The event celebrates the achievements and contributions of individuals and organizations that have significantly impacted the insurance industry and its ability to serve the fast-growing Asian American community.

    “On behalf of AmeriLife and our incredible team across the country, I’m honored to be recognized by the CAIA for our efforts to advance the very best that the insurance industry has to offer and better serve consumers and the agents that support them,” said Perry. “We are committed to providing innovative solutions and education that empower consumers to make informed decisions about their health and financial futures. This recognition is a testament to our team’s continued hard work and dedication.”

    “We are thrilled to honor Scott and AmeriLife for their significant contributions to the insurance industry and their dedication to serving the Asian American community,” said CAIA President Vince Vitiello. “Their industry leadership and innovation have set a high standard for excellence, and we look forward to continuing our partnership to advance the goals of our organization.”

    The CAIA was founded to educate Asian American consumers on the importance of insurance and promote professionalism within the agent communities through continuing education credit opportunities while also acting as a bridge between China and the U.S. on best practices in the insurance space.

    AmeriLife is similarly dedicated to serving increasingly diverse agent and client communities nationwide through its robust distribution network. Since 2020, AmeriLife has expanded its network with more than 90 new partners in cities and regions that reflect America’s evolving demographics, such as Philadelphia-based CAIA member Happy Insurance, which works alongside AmeriLife’s The Senior Resource Group (SRG).

    “It’s a privilege to join our colleagues from Happy at this year’s CAIA event to celebrate the important work this industry group is doing to empower the next generation of agents and agencies,” said Shane Sounders, co-founder and principal of The Senior Resource Group. “We believe that it is critically important to continue reaching out to the Chinese American communities, and we take pride in how our partnership with AmeriLife – under Scott’s leadership – has enabled us to stay ahead of the game and deliver on the growing needs of demographic change.”

    ###

    About AmeriLife

    AmeriLife’s strength is its mission: to provide insurance and retirement solutions to help people live longer, healthier lives. In doing so, AmeriLife has become recognized as a leader in developing, marketing, and distributing life and health insurance, annuities, and retirement planning solutions to enhance the lives of pre-retirees and retirees across the United States. For over 50 years, AmeriLife has partnered with top insurance carriers to provide value and quality to customers through a distribution network of over 300,000 insurance agents, financial professionals, and over 160 marketing organizations and insurance agency locations nationwide. For more information, visit AmeriLife.com and follow AmeriLife on Facebook and LinkedIn.

    Source: AmeriLife

    Related Media

    Source link

  • AmeriLife’s “Empowering Voices” Campaign Celebrates National Women’s History Month

    Campaign honors women leaders, their achievements, and forward-thinking attributes for the next generation of insurance and financial services industry leaders

    AmeriLife Group, LLC (“AmeriLife”), a national organization that develops, markets, and distributes life and health insurance, annuities, and retirement planning solutions, is celebrating National Women’s History Month through the theme of “Empowering Voices” as it recognizes the remarkable women leaders driving innovation and excellence within its industry. This month-long celebration underscores AmeriLife’s unwavering commitment to fostering a unified workforce that values diverse perspectives, contributions, and leadership.

    One of the key initiatives supporting this mission is the Distribution Women’s Leadership Council (DWLC). Now in its third year, the Council is committed to recruiting, retaining, empowering, and advancing women within AmeriLife’s Distribution business. The DWLC maintains a forum for sharing best practices, fostering mentorship, and providing networking opportunities. These efforts are crucial in leveraging market opportunities and achieving its business objectives.

    “We are thrilled to celebrate the incredible women making a significant impact at AmeriLife,” said Mike Vietri, Chief Distribution Officer for Wealth at AmeriLife and executive champion of the DWLC. “Their leadership and dedication are instrumental in shaping our company’s future. The Distribution Women’s Leadership Council plays a vital role in ensuring that we continue to support and empower women at every level of our organization.”

    The DWLC has been instrumental in developing programs that provide Distribution with the skills and resources they need to succeed.

    • From leadership training to networking events such as its monthly “Sips & Strategies” gatherings and annual conference, the Council is dedicated to creating an environment where individuals can thrive and reach their full potential.

    • Sponsoring attendance at community events such as the Valspar Executive Women’s Day, the ANNIKA Women’s Leadership Summit, and the SharpHeels Career & Leadership Summit is a key extension of its mission, providing invaluable networking opportunities and connections with other professionals beyond the office.

    “We are committed to building a workforce that reflects the diverse communities we serve,” said Kelly Atkinson, AmeriLife’s Senior Vice President, Distribution Operations & Chief of Staff, Wealth Distribution, and founding member of the DWLC. “By empowering women and recognizing their contributions, we are strengthening our company and positively impacting the industry.”

    The Power of Mentorship

    Mentorship is not just a pillar but a driving force at the DWLC, essential for fostering growth, development, and success. Each member is committed to embracing this vital role within their respective positions.

    “As women in finance, we can use our experiences and influence to inspire the next generation and ensure they have access to clear, easy-to-understand education,” said Rayna Reyes, Principal of American Federal.

    “Women leaders today can make a significant impact by mentoring young women and, more importantly, shaping policies to create inclusive work environments,” said Angela Palo, Chief Operating Officer of Pinnacle Financial Services, Inc.

    Ana Hernandez, Managing Director of Grupo Latinamericano de Seguras, agrees, saying,Women leaders can leverage their influence and experiences to inspire the next generation and ensure equitable and empowering education for young women by actively mentoring and sponsoring young females, ultimately creating a visible pathway for future female leaders.” 

    Stephanie Kirk, Chief Executive Officer of Secure Benefits, Inc., added, “Young women need mentors. Someone willing to teach them by inclusion, not just instruction. My philosophy is the best education is to learn by doing.  Being a woman of influence gives me an excellent opportunity to roll up my sleeves and work hard alongside someone trying to get to where I am.   The next generation of women coming behind me will reach even greater heights because I’m giving them a shoulder to stand on!”  

    Learn more about the Distribution Women’s Leadership Council and its lead-by-example philosophy.

    About AmeriLife

    AmeriLife’s strength is its mission: to provide insurance and retirement solutions to help people live longer, healthier lives. AmeriLife develops, markets, and distributes life and health insurance, annuities, and retirement planning solutions to enhance the lives of pre-retirees and retirees across the United States. For over 50 years, AmeriLife has partnered with top insurance carriers to provide value and quality to customers through a national distribution network of over 300,000 agents, financial professionals, and more than 160 marketing organizations and insurance agencies. For more information, visit AmeriLife.com, and follow AmeriLife on Facebook and LinkedIn.

    Contact Information

    Jeff Maldonado
    Media Contact
    media@amerilife.com

    Alex Hyer
    Corporate Development
    corporatedevelopment@amerilife.com

    Source: AmeriLife

    Related Media

    Source link

  • Third suspect arrested and charged in the 2017 stabbing death of hairdressing mogul

    Third suspect arrested and charged in the 2017 stabbing death of hairdressing mogul

    Authorities say they have arrested the mystery man who allegedly teamed up with an accomplice to fatally stab famed hairstylist Fabio Sementilli seven years ago at a Woodland Hills mansion.

    Prosecutors allege Christopher Austin was the second man involved in the killing, along with the lover of Sementilli’s wife.

    Austin was recently arrested in connection with the killing and extradited from Washington state. On Oct. 18, after being sent back to Los Angeles, Austin pleaded not guilty to a charge of murder with the special allegations of the use of a deadly weapon, and pleaded not guilty Wednesday to an additional charge of conspiracy to commit murder.

    The 38-year-old Austin, prosecutors allege, conspired with Monica Sementilli, the hairstylist’s wife, and her lover Robert Louis Baker in January 2017 to kill her husband as part of a scheme to pocket his $1.6 million in life insurance. Austin’s alleged conspirators have been behind bars for more than five years, but until recently Austin’s identity and whereabouts had been unknown.

    Sementilli was the father of three and an executive at the hair-care giant Wella.

    Baker, 62, last year admitted that he killed the celebrity hairdresser on Jan. 23, 2017, leaving him in a pool of blood on a back patio in what was initially thought to be a home-invasion robbery gone wrong. Baker is serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole.

    Six months after the killing, Los Angeles police detectives arrested Baker and Monica Sementilli, revealing that they had been in a relationship for 18 months. Baker, a convicted sex offender, met her at LA Fitness, where he was a racquetball instructor.

    Baker, after admitting to the crime, has said that Monica Sementilli did not know about the murder plot. Prosecutors and LAPD investigators contend that extensive evidence shows she was tied to the killing.

    Monica Sementilli’s trial is pending, and she and Baker have been held in the Los Angeles County jail system for more than five years. She had pleaded not guilty, and her attorney, Leonard Levine, said that she was falsely accused and that Baker will testify to that.

    Her trial has been postponed a few times, and the arrest of Austin could change the dynamics. Prosecutors allege that Baker stabbed the hairstylist several times with a knife and that Austin stabbed the victim in the neck with a knife.

    Baker is alleged to have told Austin that the victim’s wife wanted to get her husband’s life insurance money. As part of the conspiracy alleged by prosecutors, Baker gave Austin money to buy a ticket to fly from Anchorage to Los Angeles and a roll of gold coins after the slaying, according to the complaint.

    Austin was arrested in Washington state and extradited to L.A. County, where he is being held on more than $2 million bail pending a Dec. 2 court appearance.

    Initially, when LAPD responded to the home and found Sementilli stabbed to death, investigators considered it to be the work of knock-knock burglars who plagued parts of San Fernando Valley.

    But though the home’s master bedroom was ransacked, the assailants never took the hair mogul’s valuable watch on his wrist, piquing the interest of detectives, said then-Robbery Homicide Division Capt. Billy Hayes. Security surveillance video showed two hooded men jogging up to the home before the slaying. Afterward, the men drove away in Sementilli’s Porsche and were recorded on another surveillance camera as they abandoned the vehicle five miles away.

    In an apparent attempt to cover up their actions, the two men took a video recording system hidden in the garage of Sementilli’s home that captured video from six cameras around the house, prosecutors said.

    Detectives closed in on Baker after discovering blood in the abandoned Porsche. His DNA had previously been captured after he was convicted of a lewd and lascivious conduct with a minor in 1993 and forced to register as a sex offender, Hayes said at the time.

    Prosecutors alleged Monica Sementilli told Baker how to remove the home’s video recording system. They presented evidence that she watched a live feed of the area shortly before the killing to ensure Baker had a clear path to her husband. Prosecutors alleged that she also let her 16-year-old daughter come home first and discover the crime scene.

    “Monica fully intended for Fabio to be murdered,” Los Angeles County Deputy Dist. Atty. Beth Silverman told a grand jury in 2017. “She wanted him out of the way because she wants to be with Robert Baker. She’s unhappy in her marriage, even though at the same time she’s acting like the loving, adoring wife.”

    Baker pleaded no contest in July 2023 to one count each of first-degree murder and conspiracy to commit murder. He also admitted the special circumstance allegations of murder for financial gain and murder while lying in wait.

    One of Monica Sementilli’s attorneys, Leonard Levine, told reporters after Baker’s plea that the defense was confident that his plea and his “truthful testimony will finally establish once and for all that Monica Sementilli had nothing to do with the planning or the murder of Fabio Sementilli, her husband. And we’re looking forward to the trial, which we believe will establish that fact.’’

    Richard Winton

    Source link

  • Nurse’s union blasts changes by new hospital owners

    Nurse’s union blasts changes by new hospital owners

    Unionized nurses at Holy Family Hospital’s campuses in Haverhill and Methuen are accusing the new owners of violating the terms of their contracts by making “unilateral” changes to their health care coverage and other benefits.

    Lawrence General Hospital formally took over ownership of the hospitals last week as part of the sale of bankrupt Steward Health Care System’s Massachusetts hospitals in a $28 million deal signed off on by a federal judge in Texas.

    The sale was heralded by Gov. Maura Healey, health care leaders and local elected officials as a way to preserve jobs, improve working conditions and prevent the closure of the hospitals.

    But the Massachusetts Nurses Association alleges that Lawrence General is violating the terms of the court-approved sale and collective bargaining agreements for registered nurses who work at Holy Family’s two campuses.

    In an emergency motion, filed in U.S. Bankruptcy Court on Wednesday, the union alleges that LGH unilaterally imposed changes to the nurses’ health plans that will increase premiums, out-of-pocket costs and deductibles, and removed credits for uninsured members.

    The hospital also required nurses at Holy Family to switch to a different, more costly type of retirement plan, and reduced coverage through its life insurance plans, according to the union, which estimates the changes will cost nurses thousands of dollars in lost wages.

    “Unless immediately addressed, Lawrence’s improper actions will cause significant economic injury to MNA and its members by reducing benefits while imposing significantly higher costs, including increased deductibles and copays,” lawyers for the union wrote in the 91-page complaint.

    The complaint asks the bankruptcy judge to declare the hospital in violation of the terms of the sale and require it to honor existing collective bargaining agreements with unionized nurses.

    “We remain an active and engaged participant in discussions with the Massachusetts Nurses Association, just as we have from the outset,” a spokesperson from Lawrence General Hospital said in a statement. “The court filings will not impact or interrupt our ability to deliver high-quality, compassionate, and culturally competent care. We continue to work together with the MNA and all of our staff to meet the health care needs of our patients, their families, and the communities we serve.”

    In the court filing, the union said shortly after the sale of Holy Family hospitals was announced in September nurses entered into negotiations with Lawrence General for new employment terms.

    But the union said hospital officials rejected several offers and then “threatened” to impose the changes on nurses if they didn’t agree to the new terms. After the sale of the hospitals closed on Oct. 1, Lawrence General imposed the new employment terms by “fiat,” according to the complaint.

    “Lawrence’s actions cannot be excused as inadvertent mistakes or transitional hiccups,” the union’s lawyers wrote. “Rather, they are its most recent attempt to impose significant economic changes on MNA-represented nurses.”

    The Dallas-based Steward operated about 30 hospitals nationwide before it filed for bankruptcy protection earlier this year to pay down $9 billion in debt to its creditors.

    In September, a federal judge approved plans to transfer ownership of several of Steward’s Massachusetts hospitals, including Holy Family, Morton Hospital in Taunton and St. Anne’s Hospital in Fall River. Morton and St. Anne’s were purchased by Lifespan, a Rhode Island-based company, a deal valued at more than $175 million.

    The state took over a fifth Steward hospital — St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in Brighton — by eminent domain until Boston Medical Center takes it over as its new owner.

    Steward closed its hospitals in Dorchester and Ayer at the end of August after failing to reach adequate terms with prospective buyers.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Should you buy life insurance to pay for tax owed upon death? – MoneySense

    Should you buy life insurance to pay for tax owed upon death? – MoneySense

    Capital gains tax, Nazim, might apply to some of your assets. If you own non-registered stocks or a rental property, for example, they might be subject to a capital gain on your death. Your home would likely be sheltered by the principal residence exemption. A tax-free savings account (TFSA) is tax free, whereas a registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) is not subject to capital gains tax, but is subject to regular income tax. Your RRSP, unless left to a spouse, is generally fully taxable on top of your other income in the year of your death.

    The tax is payable by your estate, so although it reduces the inheritance left to your beneficiaries, it’s not payable directly by them. It can be paid with the assets that make up your estate.

    Hard versus soft assets

    You mention that your estate is made up of hard and soft assets, Nazim. I assume by hard assets you mean real estate. And by soft assets you mean cash, stocks, bonds, mutual funds and/or exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

    Your soft assets can be very liquid and used to pay the tax that your estate owes. That tax is not due until April 30 of the year following when your executor files your final tax return. If you die between November 1 and December 31, there is an extension to six months after your death for your executor to file your tax return and pay the tax owing. So, there’s always at least six months to come up with the funds required to pay income tax on death, and there’s more than six months when a death occurs between January 1 and October 31.

    Since soft assets are considered sold upon death, there is generally no advantage for your beneficiaries to keep those assets rather than turn them into cash or into other investments of their choosing.

    Your hard assets, Nazim, are obviously less liquid. If there is a special property, like a family cottage or a rental property, they choose to keep, I can appreciate how you might want to make sure they can do that without being forced to sell.

    Should you buy insurance to cover tax owed upon death?

    Your cash and investments may provide sufficient funds to pay taxes owed upon death. Or your beneficiaries may choose to sell one or more of your real estate properties. You could buy life insurance to pay the tax, but I find this strategy is oversold or misunderstood. I will explain with an example.

    Let’s say you are 62 years old, and your life expectancy is another 25 years, based on your current health. If you buy a life insurance policy that requires a level premium of $5,000 per year for life, and you pay that premium for 25 years, you will have paid $125,000 to the insurance company. If you instead invested the same amount each year at a 4% after-tax rate of return, you would have accumulated $216,559 after 25 years.

    Jason Heath, CFP

    Source link

  • Divorce and life insurance: How to make sure your family stays protected – MoneySense

    Divorce and life insurance: How to make sure your family stays protected – MoneySense


    When it comes to life insurance, specifically, reviewing and potentially updating policy and beneficiary information should be the first step post-divorce. Most people who are married name their spouse as their primary beneficiary. Whether or not the divorce is contentious, they will likely want to update this to a new beneficiary. However, depending on the divorce agreement, there may be circumstances where the former spouse remains a beneficiary, as a way to provide financial support on the expenses they agreed to contribute towards.

    Canadians can also name their children or other dependents as the primary beneficiary or beneficiaries. If the beneficiary is a minor, you will need to appoint a trustee, who would manage the funds of the trust until the child is old enough to do so.

    You might also need to make further adjustments to the policy. It’s helpful to consult the professionals who are supporting you through your divorce, whether that’s your licensed life insurance advisor, estate planning specialist, accountant or lawyer. Some things to consider include:

    1. Who will pay for the policy going forward?

    To ensure your family’s insurance coverage stays intact, set clear expectations on who will pay for the policy. It’s worth noting that the owner of the life insurance policy does not need to be the same individual as the payor.

    2. Is your insurance coverage sufficient?

    After reviewing your financial obligations and identifying expenses that your former spouse is covering (partially or completely), does your life insurance policy provide enough coverage for your family? You may need to discuss purchasing additional temporary coverage if your debt load has increased. This applies to your critical illness and disability insurance policies, as well.

    3. Is there cash value in the policy?

    Some permanent policies accumulate cash value over time. The owner of the life insurance policy may decide to leverage the policy’s cash value as a loan for emergency cash-flow purposes or to fund a planned expense. The caveat is that the death benefit of the policy is generally reduced by that policy loan until the money is paid back. Whole life insurance policies typically have consistent premiums and generally guaranteed cash value accumulation, while universal life insurance offers flexible premiums and death benefits but with fewer guarantees. Universal life policies allocate a portion of your premiums towards the life insurance itself, while the remainder is divided between savings and investment components, which must be regularly monitored to ensure they are performing. Depending on the policy and its duration, the cash value of a life insurance policy may need to be considered as an asset in the divorce agreement.

    In addition, reviewing your policy is important to keep track of payment cycles or any other conditions that may prevent your policy from coming into effect when needed.

    Get personalized quotes from Canada’s top life insurance providers.All for free with ratehub.ca. Let’s get started.*This will open a new tab. Just close the tab to return to MoneySense.

    Step 3: Turn your focus to your future

    Once you’ve sorted out your financial obligations and reviewed your insurance policies, it’s time to look forward. Here are a few steps that can help protect your future as well as the future of your beneficiaries in the case of a divorce:

    • A policy that insures your ex-spouse can be kept in force voluntarily, or you can get new policies to help provide financial protection for your dependents. This is especially important if you’re counting on your ex-spouse’s support payments for living expenses.
    • Recent divorcé(e)s may also want to consider disability and critical illness insurance. Life takes lots of unexpected turns, and these types of insurance can help ease your mind so you can focus on your family and/or recovery.
    • If a court orders it or if it’s integrated into your divorce agreement, a policy can be required to remain in effect as part of a divorce settlement or as part of a spousal or child support agreement.
    • A new policy may be issued to replace an existing policy because it better meets the needs of both parties.
    • Secure your own separate life insurance policy to ensure your children or other dependents are financially protected, especially if your ex-spouse’s financial situation isn’t stable. Life insurance coverage generally lapses when payments are missed.

    Don’t be afraid to ask for help

    You don’t have to do all of this alone. If you need help to organize your finances, divide up assets (including intangible ones like a life insurance policy) or explore new options, don’t hesitate to consult a professional. They can provide guidance and ensure you have proper protection for your family.



    Michael Aziz, CFA, CFP

    Source link

  • ESAF Small Finance Bank joins with Edelweiss Tokio Life to offer life insurance products

    ESAF Small Finance Bank joins with Edelweiss Tokio Life to offer life insurance products


    Taking a substantial step to enrich the array of financial solutions for customers, ESAF Small Finance Bank has officially declared a bancassurance collaboration with Edelweiss Tokio Life Insurance.

    The partnership plays a crucial role in ESAF Small Finance Bank’s strategy to broaden its range of offerings, demonstrating its commitment to providing financial security to a more extensive segment of the unbanked and under-banked population.

    K. Paul Thomas, MD and CEO, ESAF Small Finance Bank said, “This partnership aligns with our goal of providing our customers with a broad range of financial solutions. We look forward to making a meaningful impact in the lives of our customers. By extending the reach of life insurance to underserved communities, we are taking a significant step towards inclusive financial security.”

    Sumit Rai, MD & CEO, Edelweiss Tokio Life Insurance said, “We have a strong presence in South India, and our partnership with ESAF Small Finance Bank will enable us to cement our leadership in this region. We will collaborate with the bank to bring innovative and relevant insurance solutions.”

    The aim of this partnership is to widen the accessibility of innovative life insurance products, capitalizing on ESAF Small Finance Bank’s strong presence across rural markets in India. The alliance plays a pivotal role in Edelweiss Tokio Life’s comprehensive multi-channel distribution strategy, setting the stage for establishing new standards in customer-focused insurance services, a press release said.





    Source link

  • Should seniors cancel their life insurance policies? – MoneySense

    Should seniors cancel their life insurance policies? – MoneySense

    It’s got to be your decision. To help you decide, I will give a quick review of why purchasing insurance makes sense and the two types of insurance available. You can then relate the reason for purchasing insurance to your current need for insurance. 

    Why do Canadians need life insurance

    Ultimately, Canadians buy life insurance because they want to take care of others should something happen to them. They want to protect their survivor’s lifestyle or maximize the inheritance with insurance when they pass away unexpectedly, or naturally after a long, healthy and happy life.

    There are two financial needs to consider when determining the amount of insurance needed: How much income would be needed, as well as current and future debts. Current debt may be a mortgage, and future debt may be children’s university expenses or future taxes.

    Find the best life insurance coverage for you

    Get a free quote and consultation to find the right coverage at the best price. It takes less than 2 minutes to start saving.

    You will be leaving MoneySense. Just close the tab to return.

    How much life insurance would you need?

    A simple method in determining the how much insurance you need to replace your income is to divide the income needed by a safe investment return.

    If you need to replace an annual income of $50,000, and you think you can safely earn 5% on the invested insurance proceeds a year, then divide $50,000 by 5%. This gives you a need for $1 million of insurance, or $1 million minus your existing investments. That is earning 5% a year on a $1 million gives $50,000 a year.  

    You could argue that you don’t need the $50,000 annual income replacement for life because, your expenses will be lower as you age, you will have other income such as the Canadian Pension Plan (CPP), Old Age Security (OAS), and so on. That’s all true— but this calculation does not take into consideration inflation. Over time inflation will whittle down the value of that $1 million.

    Does life insurance cover debt?

    Yes, and once you know how much insurance you need to replace income, then just add on the debt.

    Maybe when you purchased the insurance your situation looked a bit like this: A $750,000 mortgage and anticipated post-secondary expenses of $250,000 for children, if any, means upping the insurance from $1 million to $2 million.

    Allan Norman, MSc, CFP, CIM

    Source link

  • Infinite banking in Canada: Should you borrow from your life insurance policy? – MoneySense

    Infinite banking in Canada: Should you borrow from your life insurance policy? – MoneySense

    Now, after a fair bit of research and a few interviews with experts on infinite banking, I feel I know enough to pass on the basics—plus what you should think about before signing up. 

    What is infinite banking?

    According to a useful primer from independent insurance firm PolicyAdvisor, “Infinite banking is a concept that suggests you can use your whole life insurance policy to ‘be your own bank.’” It was created in the 1980s by American economist R. Nelson Nash, who introduced the idea in his book Becoming Your Own Banker. He launched the “Infinite Banking Concept” (IBC) in the U.S. in 2000, and eventually it migrated to Canada.

    An article on infinite banking that appeared both on Money.ca and in the Financial Post early in 2022 bore a simplistic headline that said, in part, “how to keep your money and spend it too.” The writer—Clayton Jarvis, then a MoneyWise mortgage reporter—framed the concept by declaring that the problem with the average Canadian’s capital is that it’s usually doing just one job at a time: it’s spent, lent or invested. 

    “But what if you were able to put your money to a specific purpose and continue using it to generate income? That’s the idea behind infinite banking (IB),” Jarvis wrote. He compared IB to a reverse mortgage: “In both cases, you still possess the appreciating asset being borrowed against—your policy or your home—and you have the freedom to pay back the loan at your leisure[.]” But Jarvis also evinced some skepticism when he added: “those who have sipped rather than chugged the IB Kool-Aid say it’s a strategy that may be too complex to be marketed on a mass scale.”

    Borrowing from your life insurance policy

    If you’re not familiar with the finer details of insurance, infinite banking does seem a bit arcane. Rather than put your money in a traditional bank—which until the last year or so paid next to nothing in interest on accounts—you would invest in a whole life or universal life insurance product, both of which provide some “cash value” from the investment portion of their policies. Then, if you want to borrow money, instead of making hefty interest payments to a bank, you would borrow against your life insurance policy. 

    As PolicyAdvisor explains, “Because you’re only borrowing from your policy, the insurance company is still investing your entire cash value component. So, your cash value still grows even though you’ve borrowed a portion of it.” 

    Those new to infinite banking should watch a YouTube primer made by Philip Setter, CEO of Calgary-based insurance broker Affinity Life. In it, he readily concedes that much of the marketing hype portrays infinite banking as some kind of “massive secret of the wealthy,” which essentially amounts to buying a whole life insurance policy and borrowing against it. Setter has sold many leveraged insurance products himself, but to his credit, in the video he calls out some of the conspiracy-mongering that seems to be attached to infinite banking, including the primary message from some promoters that traditional banks and governments are out to rip off the average consumer. 

    Infinite banking seems to be geared to wealthy people who are prepared to commit to the long term with the leveraged strategy, and who can also benefit from the resulting tax breaks (more on this below). It’s not for the average person who is squeamish about leverage (borrowing to invest) and/or is not prepared to wait for years or decades for the strategy to bear fruit. As Setter warns in his video: “Once you commit to this, there’s no going back.” If you collapse a policy too soon, it’s 100% taxable: “It only is tax-free if you wait until you die … you commit to it until the very end.” 

    Get personalized quotes from Canada’s top life insurance providers.All for free with ratehub.ca. Let’s get started.*This will open a new tab. Just close the tab to return to MoneySense.

    How are insurance advisors paid for selling infinite banking products?

    Asked how advisors are paid, Setter said they receive a lump-sum commission based on the premium amount of the policy. I also asked this of Asher Tward, financial head of estate planning at TriDelta Private Wealth. In an email, Tward said it’s “the same as with any insurance policy—mostly upfront commission based on premiums paid (higher if there is more initial funding). Fundamentally, this is a life insurance sale. If one undertakes an external or collateralized loan versus a policy loan, they may be compensated on the loan as well.”

    Jonathan Chevreau

    Source link

  • You just won the Powerball jackpot — what should you do next?

    You just won the Powerball jackpot — what should you do next?

    One lucky person picked the winning $1.73 billion Powerball number in California. It is a life-changing amount of money for the lucky winner or winners — but not necessarily in a good way. 

    Robert Pagliarini, author of “The Sudden Wealth Solution,” has been guiding lottery winners for decades. And he has seen plenty of people run through their winnings faster than you can say “jackpot!” Or, friends and family (and certainly office lottery pool players) can see their winnings tied up in legal battles for years, as the parties argue over who gets how much. About 70% of lottery winners lose or spend all the money in five years or less, after all. 

    “Money — especially when you’re talking about this level of money — absolutely upends people’s lives,” Pagliarini, the president of Pacifica Wealth Advisors, told MarketWatch. “You should be excited, but you should also be prepared, for sure.” 

    These are his five tips for what to do if you win the lottery or get another windfall.

    Document that the winning ticket is YOURS

    Sign your name on the winning ticket, take a picture of yourself holding the winning ticket — in fact, take a video of yourself holding the signed, winning ticket, for good measure. 

    “The first step is really all about securing the ticket … because whoever has it is the owner,” says Pagliarini. “There’s no record of you having purchased that ticket with those numbers. So having that ticket is everything.” 

    Related: Hoping to win Mega Millions? This woman hit a $112 million Mega Millions jackpot.

    You have to document that this ticket is yours, which is why Pagliarini says legal experts recommend signing it. “I would absolutely sign it myself,” he adds. 

    And then put that ticket in a safe place, like a home safe or lockbox.

    Don’t tell anyone yet!

    You may want to sing the good news from the rooftops that your financial troubles are over. Problem is, everyone else’s troubles aren’t — and Pagliarini warns that, for your own personal safety and peace of mind, it’s better not to let the world know you’ve just become a billionaire overnight — if you can help it. Unfortunately, most states make you disclose that you’ve won.

    “We’re used to seeing people with the big check on TV, which looks pretty cool — but now everybody in the entire world knows that you’re worth $1 billion. And that’s not really the kind of publicity that you want,” says Pagliarini. “You’re going to be hit up for lots of money requests as people come out of the woodwork. And that adds such a huge amount of stress when you’re in a situation that is already stressful.” 

    You generally have 180 days to collect the winnings, and you’re going to have to make some big, life-changing decisions during that time. Staying anonymous, if you can, will give you the space to make those decisions with a clear head. 

    Unfortunately, as noted, most states compel lottery winners to come forward publicly. If you have to reveal yourself and do press interviews, protect your personal information. Some past Powerball winners didn’t answer questions about any meaningful or personal significance associated with the winning numbers that they played, for example, or they refused to share details about their children. One couple simply moved out of their house and refused to speak with the media at all while they settled their affairs.

    “My rule is basically, you tell one family member, and then you immediately try to get professional help,” Pagliarini adds. Which leads us to…. 

    Get a lawyer and a financial adviser

    Bring in the professional help as soon as you can. An attorney can help you decide the best time to claim your lottery prize, and offer more advice on keeping your ticket safe. They can also help navigate your rights and protect your best interests with regards to how much you need to present yourself publicly. And they can also help you manage your safety. 

    Meanwhile, a financial adviser can assess your financial situation and help you decide whether it makes sense to take a lump sum of cash, or to collect your winnings over annual payments. A financial adviser can also help you manage your money so that you can check things off your bucket list without overspending.

    “You know you’ve won, and then typically you have about 180 days to collect the winnings,” says Pagliarini. “So you’ve got to do some serious planning.” You need all the help you can get.  

    Do you take the lump-sum payment or the annuity payment?

    Pagliarini considers staying anonymous as the first big decision a lottery winner makes. The second most important question, however, is how they collect their winnings. Do you want to take a lump sum, or do you want to take the annuity (aka, a payout over time)?

    “This is really the biggest financial decision you’ll ever make in your entire life,” he says. (Granted, it’s one that most of us will never have to make, since the odds of winning the lottery, let alone a jackpot of this size, are infinitesimal.)  

    He notes that most people take the lump-sum payment, and in some circumstances this can be a better decision. But keep in mind that if you win a $1 billion Powerball jackpot, for example, you are not getting $1 billion.

    “They send you about 60-ish percent of whatever the lump sum is,” Pagliarini notes. So for a $1 billion prize, for example, “you would get around $600 million instead of $1 billion,” he said. And after state taxes, depending on where you live, and federal taxes, that jackpot may be closer to $300 million in the end. Whereas, the annuity is given as 30 payments over 29 years, which will come closer to hitting the advertised $1 billion jackpot than lump-sum takers would get. So being patient can pay off in the long run, especially with a bigger prize like this.

    As far as taxes are concerned, Pagliarini still leans toward annuity — especially for a smaller jackpot, like if it was $1 million. That’s because you would get a lump-sum payment of about $600,000, which would put you in the highest federal and state income tax bracket (for single filers anyway) that year — versus taking an extra $30,000 a year for 30 years. “That annuity payment is probably not going to catapult you into the highest tax bracket,” he says. But for a $1 billion-plus jackpot like this, you’re going to be in the highest tax bracket whichever payout you choose, he says.

    But there’s another reason to consider going the annuity route, Pagliarini says — it can save you from yourself. 

    “The biggest advantage of the lump-sum payout is that you get most of the money up front, and then you can do whatever you want with it,” he says, such as pay off debt, invest it, buy a house, etc. “But that actually happens to be the biggest disadvantage of the lump sum,” he continues. And that’s because, if you overspend your winnings and run out of cash with your lump sum, then you are out of luck. But the annuity payments are almost like a do-over each year, he says, because you can learn from your mistakes and spend the next annual windfall more wisely. “I’ve advised most people honestly to take the annuity,” he says. “It just allows you to really make mistakes, but have them not be a total derailment.” 

    If you still can’t make up your mind, he also has a free online quiz to help you decide whether you should take a lump sum or an annuity payment

    Keep it simple when deciding where to put your new money.

    So you’ve secured your ticket, tried to keep it quiet, hired some professional help, and decided how you are going to collect your winnings. Then what do you do with all of this cash? 

    Every financial situation is different, of course, which is where a financial adviser can help you sort out the nuances to make this lottery win a real dream come true for you. But in general, Pagliarini recommends keeping things simple — even considering that this $1 billion jackpot (even whittled down after taxes) would allow you to do basically whatever you wanted to do. 

    “If I were meeting with you, we would sit down and make some serious decisions, and prioritize what you want to do,” he says, “such as paying off debt, and discussing what is on your wish list. Do you want to buy a new house or a second house, or buy your family houses?” He suggests pricing out your wish list together with your adviser to see whether you could afford to do everything you want.

    But you still want money left over to live on. “We want to make sure the money left over is generating enough income so that they could survive on that for as long as they wanted — and particularly in this case, I’m sure generations would be able to survive on this amount of money,” he says. “I would invest in index funds. I wouldn’t get esoteric with limited partnerships and venture capital. Just go for a diversified portfolio, because as soon as you start deviating from ‘simple’ you can really increase your chances of just losing it all.” 

    He notes that because lottery winnings don’t feel “earned,” the prize may not feel like “real” money — which is one of the reasons so many lottery winners don’t manage their newfound wealth well. Again, about 70% of lottery winners lose or spend all that money in five years or less. “If the money doesn’t feel earned or real, you’re going to make decisions with that money that are probably not going to be in your best interest,” he adds. “You’re giving it away more freely, spending more freely, or freely investing in things a lot riskier than you would have done if you had to sweat and earn that money.” 

    So keep it simple. “Don’t think just because you have x-millions of dollars now that you really have to get ‘sophisticated,’” he adds.

    And some bonus advice for office pools

    This is more of an extra, hindsight tip for before you and your co-workers start throwing in a buck apiece for a long-shot bid at a jackpot like this. Pagliarini warns that office pools can get “tricky,” so it’s good to sign a contract setting some ground rules before you all pool together. 

    “There’s been a lot of litigation around office pools, because maybe somebody forgets to play one week, and that’s the week everyone wins. Or someone thought they played this week, but on this particular week they didn’t,” he says. “So loosey-goosey situations can end up in court to battle it out.”

    A much simpler solution to avoid this is to have an office pool contract that spells out who is in this pool, how much they are contributing, and it also determines in advance whether the group will take the lump-sum payment or the annuity payment. 

    “Because the last thing that you want is to win $1 billion or $100 million dollars, and then to be tied up in court for four years,” says Pagliarini. “That’s no fun.”

    Source link

  • 8 Questions To Ask Before Buying Life Insurance | Entrepreneur

    8 Questions To Ask Before Buying Life Insurance | Entrepreneur

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    This story originally appeared on Under30CEO.com

    What would happen if you were to pass away? If you’re a parent or spouse, it’s likely crossed your mind at some point. After all, it’s only natural to worry about the future and well-being of your loved ones. There are several ways to protect your family, but life insurance is usually one of the easiest. This way, your loved ones will receive financial security if the worst should happen. But before you begin the process of buying life insurance, you need to do your homework. Here are 8 questions to ask yourself before making a purchase:

    1. Why do you need life insurance?

    Life is an unexpected journey. With so many twists and turns, there’s no telling what might occur. Having life insurance can give you peace of mind that your family will be cared for if the worst should happen. Here are some reasons you need life insurance:

    Financial Protection: Life insurance provides financial support to your loved ones in the event of your death. It can help cover funeral expenses, pay off debts, or replace lost income.

    Related: 4 Personal Finance Tips Every Entrepreneur Should Know

    Income Replacement: If you’re the primary breadwinner a policy can provide a source of income for your loved ones after you’re gone. It can help replace your income, ensuring that your family can maintain living costs.

    Debt Repayment: Life insurance can be used to pay off any outstanding debts, such as a mortgage or credit card debt. This can prevent your loved ones from being burdened with these financial obligations after your death.

    Education Expenses: If you have kids, you can help cover expenses like tuition fees, books, and other needs.

    Business protection: life insurance can help ensure your business’s survival after your death. It can provide funds to cover any business debts, pay off partners, or provide a financial cushion during the transition period.

    2. How much cover do you need?

    No amount of cover is enough to replace a life. However, the amount of coverage a family needs can vary. What might suit one family may not be enough for another,

    Generally speaking, the amount of coverage you need should be enough to replace your income and cover any outstanding debts. It should also provide a financial cushion for your family to maintain their living standards.

    Another thing worth protecting is your home. If you have a mortgage, you’ll want to ensure it’s covered in full. Your family can avoid extra burdens or be forced to sell their home.

    3. What type of life insurance is best for you?

    There are several types of life insurance to choose from, depending on your specific needs.

    Term life insurance covers you for a specified amount of time, such as 30 years. There are three different levels of cover: decreasing term, level term, and increasing term. While it’s usually more affordable, the policy only pays out if you die within the agreed term.

    Whole life insurance provides cover for your entire life. It also has a cash value component, which means you can use the funds to cover unexpected expenses or retirement planning. This type of policy can be expensive, but you have a guarantee of payout.

    Suppose you’re entering old age and want to set aside something for your children or grandchildren. Then, an Over 50s policy may be more appealing. It’s also important to assess your circumstances and consider what you want your payout to cover.

    Related: 5 tips that will help you improve your personal finances

    Choosing the right policy depends on your specific needs, the amount of coverage required, and the desired duration. For example, if you have a mortgage with 20 years remaining, a decreasing term policy may be suitable.

    4. How much will life insurance cost?

    Before you get into any commitment it’s wise to keep an eye on the cost. Once you take out a policy you’re expected to make regular payments. So it’s vital to ensure you can afford the premium.

    The cost of life insurance varies on a range of factors:

    • The type of policy you select – For example, term policies may be cheaper than whole life policies as they only cover you for a specific period.
    • Your age, health, and lifestyle – Older individuals and those with pre-existing health conditions usually have more expensive premiums.
    • The amount of coverage – If you’re looking for higher levels of coverage, the premium is likely to be more expensive.
    • Your insurer’s rates – Different insurers offer different rates, so shop around to find the most competitive one.

    5. How long do you need life insurance for?

    How long you need life insurance depends on your specific situation and the reason for getting it. The duration of your policy could be shorter or longer depending on your needs.

    If you plan on covering a mortgage, it’s suggested to have cover for the remaining length of your mortgage term. This helps to ensure your loved ones can pay off the mortgage if needed.

    For those who have family members, the policy should provide cover until they are no longer financially dependent. This is usually until the youngest child turns 18, or before retirement.

    6. How can you lower your premiums?

    If you’re worried about high premiums, there are a few ways to keep the costs down:

    • Take out cover early – The younger and healthier you are, the lower your premiums may be. So if you decide to take out a policy, it’s best to do so as soon as possible.
    • Shop around – Don’t be afraid to compare different policies and insurers. This allows you to assess what’s available and find the most competitive deal for your situation.
    • Opt for a lower level of cover – You may not need to opt for the highest level of cover. Choose one that’s appropriate for your needs.
    • Quit smoking – Smokers typically pay higher premiums than non-smokers. Quitting could make the policy more affordable.
    • Take out joint cover – Ideal for couples as it offers protection for both parties. So if one partner were to pass away, the other would benefit from the same cover.

    7. What is the claim process for life insurance?

    The claim process varies depending on the insurer and type of policy you have. Generally, it involves providing evidence that the insured has passed away, such as a death certificate. You may also be required to provide other documentation, such as the original policy documents or proof of identity.

    Once you’ve submitted the necessary documents and information, your insurer will assess your claim and decide whether to approve it. If your claim is accepted, the payout will be paid to your beneficiaries within a few weeks or months.

    8. Do I need to take a medical exam to get life insurance?

    Medical exams are often required for applicants looking for high levels of coverage or who have pre-existing health conditions.

    The exam usually involves a doctor taking your vitals and asking questions about your medical history and current well-being. Depending on the insurer, the results may be used to determine your premiums or eligibility.

    Kimberly Zhang

    Source link

  • These 20 growth stocks are worth considering on a pullback, says Citi

    These 20 growth stocks are worth considering on a pullback, says Citi

    Citi has released a list of 20 large-cap growth stocks that it says present opportunities in the event of a pullback.

    “Our call since early summer has been to hold Growth and look to buy on pullbacks,” Citi analyst Scott Chronert said in a note released Monday, adding that Citi has had a tactical preference for cyclicals. “However, on the heels of the strong Cyclicals surge during June and July, and our upwardly revised S&P 500 target of 4600, the messaging has been to buy on pullbacks more broadly,” he wrote.

    Citi also notes that the Russell 1000 Growth Index
    RLG
    has sold off more than 6% from its mid-July high, although two-thirds of the stocks in the index are down 10% or more, with one-third down more than 20%. “This sets up for interesting intermediate to long-term stock selection opportunities,” Chronert said.

    Related: Preorders for the iPhone 15 have begun, and here’s a sign they’ve been ‘solid’

    The analyst acknowledged that there is still a risk of economic softening ahead, if not a recession. “Yet, the argument that Growth stocks can show fundamental resilience during periods of broader economic weakening is a theme that we have considered for several years now,” he said.

    Set against this backdrop, the analyst firm has compiled a tech-heavy list of 20 stocks that have a buy rating from Citi, have at least 75% of market cap assigned to growth, according to Russell, and have experienced a decline of 10% or more from year-to-date highs since March 31. Other common characteristics of the stocks include consensus estimates of free cash flow per share above March 31 levels and free cash flow per share within or above market-implied five-year-forward estimates.

    Tech heavyweights Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    +0.74%

    and NVIDIA Corp.
    NVDA,
    +1.47%

    are on the list, along with Pinterest Inc.
    PINS,
    -2.47%
    ,
    Lam Research Corp.
    LRCX,
    +0.24%
    ,
    Teradata Corp.
    TDC,
    +0.36%
    ,
    Datadog Inc.
    DDOG,
    +0.09%
    ,
    MongoDB Inc.
    MDB,
    -0.73%
    ,
    HubSpot Inc.
    HUBS,
    +0.18%

    and KLA Corp.
    KLAC,
    +0.79%
    .
    The other stocks cited by Citi are Lockheed Martin Corp.
    LMT,
    -0.18%
    ,
    DraftKings Inc.
    DKNG,
    -1.44%
    ,
    Las Vegas Sands Corp.
    LVS,
    -0.98%
    ,
    Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.
    CMG,
    -0.85%
    ,
    Netflix Inc.
    NFLX,
    +1.31%
    ,
    TKO Group Holdings Inc.
    TKO,
    -1.93%
    ,
    Rockwell Automation Inc.
    ROK,
    +1.09%

    and Paycom Software Inc.
    PAYC,
    +0.45%
    ,
    and healthcare stocks Bruker Corp.
    BRKR,
    +1.04%
    ,
    Insulet Corp.
    PODD,
    -0.66%

    and Intuitive Surgical Inc.
    ISRG,
    +1.75%
    .

    Related: Will Nvidia stock be like Apple or Cisco in the AI era?

    Shares of Apple, which recently launched its iPhone 15, are down 5.5% in the last three months. Shares of chip maker NVIDIA are up 2.8% over the same period, while Lockheed Martin is down 8.9% and DraftKings is up 8.6%. Las Vegas Sands is down 21.8% and Chipotle is down 8.8%, while Netflix is down 7.8%.

    Source link

  • RIL announces insurance entry; JIo Financial to offer life, general, health products

    RIL announces insurance entry; JIo Financial to offer life, general, health products

    Reliance Industries on Monday announced its plans to foray into the insurance sector through Jio Financial Services (JFS), which will provide “simple, yet smart” life, general, and health insurance products through a digital interface.

    Jio Financial is looking to potentially partnering with global players, and will use predictive data analytics to co-create contextual products with partners to cater to customer requirements, RIL Chairman Mukesh Ambani said at the AGM.

    Ambani attributed Jio Financial’s growth potential to a digital-first architecture, healthy capitalisation, net worth of Rs 1.2 lakh crore and strong board of management led by K.V. Kamath.

    “Just like Jio and Retail, JFS too will prove to be an invaluable addition to the Reliance ecosystem of customer-facing businesses,” he said adding that the recent de-merger to set up Jio Financial has been like a “mini bonus” for RIL’s long-term investors.

    Each shareholder received one share of Jio Financial for every share of RIL held by them.

    Lending, payments

    “JFS is born to accelerate the replication of India’s dazzling growth story in Bharat,” Ambani said adding that the focus will be on the informal and underserved sectors in rural, semi-urban, and urban areas, with the aim of accelerating inclusive growth.

    This the NBFC plans to achieve by transforming and modernising financial services, with a digital-first approach which will help simplify products, reduce cost of service, and expands reach, he said, adding that for SMEs, merchants, and self-employed entrepreneurs, ease of doing business must mean ease in borrowing, investments, and payment solutions.

    In payments, Jio Financial will consolidate its payments infrastructure with an offering for both consumers and merchants, Ambani said, adding that the company will not just compete with current industry benchmarks but also “explore path-breaking features such as blockchain-based platforms and CBDC”.

    BlackRock JV

    Ambani also touched upon Jio Financial’s recent asset management JV with US-based BlackRock. The the world’s largest asset manager, BlackRock manages worth over $ 11 trillion.

    “Jio Financial Services brings digital infrastructure capabilities and local market knowledge, and BlackRock brings global investment and risk management expertise. Together, we will aim to transform India’s asset management industry through a digital-first offering and democratise access to affordable, innovative investment solutions,” said Larry Fink, Chairman and CEO of BlackRock.

    Source link

  • $1.8 million to retire? Are you kidding?

    $1.8 million to retire? Are you kidding?

    This time it’s in the latest Charles Schwab Retirement Survey. Among 1,000 people surveyed, the average respondent figured he or she needed to save $1.8 million to retire. (That figure is up from $1.7 million in the same survey a year earlier.)

    Touchingly, 86% also told Schwab they were either “somewhat” or “very” likely to achieve their goals.

    Er, no.

    If the numbers show anything, it’s that most people don’t understand math, don’t understand finance and are wildly out of touch with reality.

    Some simple calculations will show that these figures are all wrong.

    First, let’s start with the bad news. There is no way 86% of people should be “very” or “somewhat” confident that they are going to hit that $1.8 million target, or anything like it. Let alone that 37% think they are “very” likely to hit it.

    Median retirement-account balance at the moment? Try $27,000 and change, says 401(k) giant Vanguard.

    Even that’s overstating the picture. The Federal Reserve’s most recent triennial Survey of Consumer Finances says the median American household has $26,000 in total financial assets, including savings accounts, life insurance, 401(k) plan and the like. Among those aged 45 to 54, the figure is $37,000, and among those 55 to 64 it’s $47,000. How anyone thinks they are getting from there to $1.8 million by retirement age is a mystery. Magic carpets? Magic beans?

    Granted, the survey is from 2019, but the intervening pandemic period won’t have changed the picture that much — in either direction.

    It’s not clear from the survey whether those polled included the value of the equity in their homes. Throw that in, and the median household’s total net worth rises to $122,000. Among those aged 45 to 54 it rises to $169,000, and among those 55 to 64 to $213,000. COVID policies helped drive up average U.S. home prices by about 30%, so those figures will have risen since 2019.

    But again we are not nearing $1.8 million.

    Not even close.

    The good news, though, is that you don’t actually need this amount or anything like it to retire.

    Naturally if someone hasn’t figured life out by the time they retire, and they still think that buying yet more stuff is the route to happiness, no amount is going to be enough.

    How much we’d like and how much we need are very different things.

    A $1.8 million balance would buy a 65-year-old couple an immediate annuity paying a guaranteed lifetime income of $9,500 a month, or just over $110,000 a year.

    The average Social Security benefit on top of that for a retired couple is just under $3,000 a month, or $36,000 a year. So in total you’d be on about $146,000 a year. What are these people planning to do in retirement?

    Even with a 3% annual rise, to account for inflation risk, that annuity will pay out $83,000 a year, and that’s for a couple, not just for one person. The money continues until both of you have gone.

    How much do we really need? Well, while acknowledging that each person and each person’s situation is going to be different, let’s do some simple math.

    Actual seniors are living on median annual incomes of around $45,000 to $50,000, says the Federal Reserve. And most of them say they are either reasonably satisfied with retirement or actually happy. So, at least, they tell Gallup and the Employee Benefit Research Institute.

    Meanwhile, a new survey from Schroders finds that the average person thinks a comfortable retirement can be had on around $5,000 a month, or $60,000 a year.

    The average Social Security benefit for a retired couple is $36,000 a year. To bring that income up to $50,000 you’d need an annuity paying $14,000 a year.

    Current cost in the annuities market: $225,000.

    To bring that up to $60,000 the annuity would cost $385,000.

    For $350,000 you can get an income of $18,000 with a 3% annual increase to deal with inflation.

    For $800,000 you can double your Social Security income, bringing in another $36,000 a year — with a 3% annual increase to deal with inflation.

    The cost of housing is a major component for retirees. No, someone doesn’t have to move to Iowa to be able to retire in comfort. But they can move the dial by cashing in their home in an expensive neighborhood — especially the kind of location they may have moved to for a high-paying job or the best schools — and moving somewhere cheaper. Away from coastal California or the “Acela” corridor in the Northeast, a lot of U.S. homes are really cheap.

    Retirement savings generally are grossly inadequate, and many people face genuine hardship in their senior years. And, of course, pretty much everyone could use more money. On the other hand, you can retire in comfort with a lot less than $1.8 million.

    Source link

  • You just won the Mega Millions jackpot — what should you do next?

    You just won the Mega Millions jackpot — what should you do next?

    Robert Pagliarini, author of “The Sudden Wealth Solution,” has been guiding lottery winners for decades. And he has seen plenty of people run through their winnings faster than you can say “jackpot!” Or, friends and family (and certainly office lottery pool players) can see their winnings tied up in legal battles for years, as the parties argue over who gets how much. About 70% of lottery winners lose or spend all the money in five years or less, after all. 

    “Money — especially when you’re talking about this level of money — absolutely upends people’s lives,” Pagliarini, the president of Pacifica Wealth Advisors, told MarketWatch. “You should be excited, but you should also be prepared, for sure.” 

    These are his five tips for what to do if you win the lottery or get another windfall.

    Document that the winning ticket is YOURS

    Sign your name on the winning ticket, take a picture of yourself holding the winning ticket — in fact, take a video of yourself holding the signed, winning ticket, for good measure. 

    “The first step is really all about securing the ticket … because whoever has it is the owner,” says Pagliarini. “There’s no record of you having purchased that ticket with those numbers. So having that ticket is everything.” 

    Related: Hoping to win Mega Millions? This woman hit a $112 million Mega Millions jackpot.

    You have to document that this ticket is yours, which is why Pagliarini says legal experts recommend signing it. “I would absolutely sign it myself,” he adds. 

    And then put that ticket in a safe place, like a home safe or lockbox.

    Don’t tell anyone yet!

    You may want to sing the good news from the rooftops that your financial troubles are over. Problem is, everyone else’s troubles aren’t — and Pagliarini warns that, for your own personal safety and peace of mind, it’s better not to let the world know you’ve just become a billionaire overnight — if you can help it. Unfortunately, most states make you disclose that you’ve won.

    “We’re used to seeing people with the big check on TV, which looks pretty cool — but now everybody in the entire world knows that you’re worth $1 billion. And that’s not really the kind of publicity that you want,” says Pagliarini. “You’re going to be hit up for lots of money requests as people come out of the woodwork. And that adds such a huge amount of stress when you’re in a situation that is already stressful.” 

    You generally have 180 days to collect the winnings, and you’re going to have to make some big, life-changing decisions during that time. Staying anonymous, if you can, will give you the space to make those decisions with a clear head. 

    Unfortunately, as noted, most states compel lottery winners to come forward publicly. If you have to reveal yourself and do press interviews, protect your personal information. Some past Powerball winners didn’t answer questions about any meaningful or personal significance associated with the winning numbers that they played, for example, or they refused to share details about their children. One couple simply moved out of their house and refused to speak with the media at all while they settled their affairs.

    “My rule is basically, you tell one family member, and then you immediately try to get professional help,” Pagliarini adds. Which leads us to…. 

    Get a lawyer and a financial adviser

    Bring in the professional help as soon as you can. An attorney can help you decide the best time to claim your lottery prize, and offer more advice on keeping your ticket safe. They can also help navigate your rights and protect your best interests with regards to how much you need to present yourself publicly. And they can also help you manage your safety. 

    Meanwhile, a financial adviser can assess your financial situation and help you decide whether it makes sense to take a lump sum of cash, or to collect your winnings over annual payments. A financial adviser can also help you manage your money so that you can check things off your bucket list without overspending.

    “You know you’ve won, and then typically you have about 180 days to collect the winnings,” says Pagliarini. “So you’ve got to do some serious planning.” You need all the help you can get.  

    Do you take the lump-sum payment or the annuity payment?

    Pagliarini considers staying anonymous as the first big decision a lottery winner makes. The second most important question, however, is how they collect their winnings. Do you want to take a lump sum, or do you want to take the annuity (aka, a payout over time)?

    “This is really the biggest financial decision you’ll ever make in your entire life,” he says. (Granted, it’s one that most of us will never have to make, since the odds of winning the lottery, let alone a jackpot of this size, are infinitesimal.)  

    He notes that most people take the lump-sum payment, and in some circumstances this can be a better decision. But keep in mind that if you win a $1 billion Powerball jackpot, for example, you are not getting $1 billion.

    “They send you about 60-ish percent of whatever the lump sum is,” Pagliarini notes. So for a $1 billion prize, for example, “you would get around $600 million instead of $1 billion,” he said. And after state taxes, depending on where you live, and federal taxes, that jackpot may be closer to $300 million in the end. Whereas, the annuity is given as 30 payments over 29 years, which will come closer to hitting the advertised $1 billion jackpot than lump-sum takers would get. So being patient can pay off in the long run, especially with a bigger prize like this.

    As far as taxes are concerned, Pagliarini still leans toward annuity — especially for a smaller jackpot, like if it was $1 million. That’s because you would get a lump-sum payment of about $600,000, which would put you in the highest federal and state income tax bracket (for single filers anyway) that year — versus taking an extra $30,000 a year for 30 years. “That annuity payment is probably not going to catapult you into the highest tax bracket,” he says. But for a $1 billion-plus jackpot like this, you’re going to be in the highest tax bracket whichever payout you choose, he says.

    But there’s another reason to consider going the annuity route, Pagliarini says — it can save you from yourself. 

    “The biggest advantage of the lump-sum payout is that you get most of the money up front, and then you can do whatever you want with it,” he says, such as pay off debt, invest it, buy a house, etc. “But that actually happens to be the biggest disadvantage of the lump sum,” he continues. And that’s because, if you overspend your winnings and run out of cash with your lump sum, then you are out of luck. But the annuity payments are almost like a do-over each year, he says, because you can learn from your mistakes and spend the next annual windfall more wisely. “I’ve advised most people honestly to take the annuity,” he says. “It just allows you to really make mistakes, but have them not be a total derailment.” 

    If you still can’t make up your mind, he also has a free online quiz to help you decide whether you should take a lump sum or an annuity payment

    Keep it simple when deciding where to put your new money.

    So you’ve secured your ticket, tried to keep it quiet, hired some professional help, and decided how you are going to collect your winnings. Then what do you do with all of this cash? 

    Every financial situation is different, of course, which is where a financial adviser can help you sort out the nuances to make this lottery win a real dream come true for you. But in general, Pagliarini recommends keeping things simple — even considering that this $1 billion jackpot (even whittled down after taxes) would allow you to do basically whatever you wanted to do. 

    “If I were meeting with you, we would sit down and make some serious decisions, and prioritize what you want to do,” he says, “such as paying off debt, and discussing what is on your wish list. Do you want to buy a new house or a second house, or buy your family houses?” He suggests pricing out your wish list together with your adviser to see whether you could afford to do everything you want.

    But you still want money left over to live on. “We want to make sure the money left over is generating enough income so that they could survive on that for as long as they wanted — and particularly in this case, I’m sure generations would be able to survive on this amount of money,” he says. “I would invest in index funds. I wouldn’t get esoteric with limited partnerships and venture capital. Just go for a diversified portfolio, because as soon as you start deviating from ‘simple’ you can really increase your chances of just losing it all.” 

    He notes that because lottery winnings don’t feel “earned,” the prize may not feel like “real” money — which is one of the reasons so many lottery winners don’t manage their newfound wealth well. Again, about 70% of lottery winners lose or spend all that money in five years or less. “If the money doesn’t feel earned or real, you’re going to make decisions with that money that are probably not going to be in your best interest,” he adds. “You’re giving it away more freely, spending more freely, or freely investing in things a lot riskier than you would have done if you had to sweat and earn that money.” 

    So keep it simple. “Don’t think just because you have x-millions of dollars now that you really have to get ‘sophisticated,’” he adds.

    And some bonus advice for office pools

    This is more of an extra, hindsight tip for before you and your co-workers start throwing in a buck apiece for a long-shot bid at a jackpot like this. Pagliarini warns that office pools can get “tricky,” so it’s good to sign a contract setting some ground rules before you all pool together. 

    “There’s been a lot of litigation around office pools, because maybe somebody forgets to play one week, and that’s the week everyone wins. Or someone thought they played this week, but on this particular week they didn’t,” he says. “So loosey-goosey situations can end up in court to battle it out.”

    A much simpler solution to avoid this is to have an office pool contract that spells out who is in this pool, how much they are contributing, and it also determines in advance whether the group will take the lump-sum payment or the annuity payment. 

    “Because the last thing that you want is to win $1 billion or $100 million dollars, and then to be tied up in court for four years,” says Pagliarini. “That’s no fun.”

    Source link

  • With Microsoft, Meta and Alphabet earnings hanging on AI, more investors are asking: ‘How are you going to pay for that?’

    With Microsoft, Meta and Alphabet earnings hanging on AI, more investors are asking: ‘How are you going to pay for that?’

    Shares of big tech companies have coasted through this year on AI euphoria, but as Microsoft Corp., Alphabet Inc. and Meta Platforms Inc. prepare to report results this week, some investors are starting to ask how much those AI advancements might actually cost.

    Those questions have surfaced after several months during simply saying “AI” on earnings calls appeared to be enough for investors. If the economy sours though — as some expect in the second half of this year or next year — big tech’s AI ambitions could go with it.

    “Given the exorbitant costs associated with the development, hosting and serving of AI products, many investors are concerned about the potential for [fiscal 2024] commentary regarding a material increase,” Jefferies analyst Brent Thill wrote, according to a MarketWatch earnings preview for Microsoft’s
    MSFT,
    -0.89%

    results.

    Microsoft and Alphabet Inc.
    GOOGL,
    +0.69%

    GOOG,
    +0.65%
    ,
    which both report on Tuesday, have been in heated competition in the world of online search and digital advertisements, as Microsoft leans more on its massive investments in research lab OpenAI to muscle up its own search capabilities. But a Deutsche Bank analyst said that so far, Google appears to have the upper hand in that battle.

    Still, for Microsoft, after a broader pullback in IT spending earlier this year, analysts have found more to like about its cloud-computing business — namely market-share gains, generally-sturdy demand, and whatever ways AI can fit into the equation. Wolfe Research analyst Alex Zukin, in a recent note, said he believed “the focus will turn from what is good enough, to how good can it be,” as Microsoft moves deeper into AI.

    “How good can it be?” might also be a question for Meta
    META,
    -2.73%
    ,
    which reports second-quarter results on Wednesday.

    Shares of the social-media company have more than doubled in value so far this year. JMP analyst Andrew Boone, in a recent note, cited likely improvements in Meta’s digital ad segment, better engagement, and a broader advertising backdrop that “appears to be stable” after a slowdown in spending, Still, there are signs that the initial user attraction to Threads, Meta’s answer to Twitter, has fizzled.

    This week in earnings

    For the week ahead, 166 companies in the S&P 500 index report results, including 12 from the Dow, according to FactSet. Among them are Domino’s Pizza Inc.
    DPZ,
    -0.62%
    ,
    which now plans to deliver pizza via Uber Eats after years of chafing at third-party delivery apps. Industrials General Electric Co.
    GE,
    -0.82%

    and 3M Co.
    MMM,
    +0.04%

    also report, after 3M agreed to pay $10.3 billion to settle accusations it was responsible for so-called “forever chemicals” in drinking water.

    Quick-service restaurant chains Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.
    CMG,
    +0.20%

    and McDonald’s Corp.
    MCD,
    -0.51%

    also report, with BofA analysts expecting an “almost normal” quarter for the industry, after spending at chain restaurants grew last month and costs for some ingredients started to ease following two years of supply disruptions. Auto makers General Motors Co.
    GM,
    -1.81%

    and Ford Motor Co.
    F,
    -0.71%

    also report, and while parts shortages that have constrained vehicle production have shown signs of fading, so has electric-vehicle “euphoria.”

    The calls to put on your calendar

    Visa, Mastercard: Earlier this month executives from the big banks said U.S. consumers are generally doing OK despite still-rampant inflation, although perhaps less OK than in prior months. This week credit-card giants Visa Inc. and Mastercard Inc. report results on Tuesday and Thursday, respectively. The profit, sales and credit-card volume figures from Visa
    V,
    -0.15%

    and Mastercard
    MA,
    -0.14%

    will offer more specifics on consumer spending, as vacations and concerts compete with more expensive and more pressing needs, like groceries and other bills.

    Shares of Visa and Mastercard are up so far this year, but some analysts said there could be more room investors to step in. SVB MoffettNathanson analyst Lisa Ellis recently said shares of both companies were hovering at “unusually attractive” levels.

    The number to watch

    Mattel outlook, and anything ‘Barbie’-related: The “Barbie” movie hit theaters nationwide on Friday. And after an epic marketing campaign, Mattel Inc.’s investors, banking on the film to drive a rebound for the toy maker during the second half of this year, will be zeroed in on the box-office results following the film’s debut on Friday.

    Expectations for the film are huge. And when Mattel
    MAT,
    -0.42%

    reports second-quarter results on Wednesday, executives could offer the first answers to some big questions: Has the film helped revive toy sales? Sales for anything else? Will the “Barbenheimer” effect help or hurt financials?

    The film — directed by Greta Gerwig, written Gerwig and Noah Baumbach, and starring Margot Robbie and Ryan Gosling — brings together two writers with indie bona fides and two actors with mainstream starpower. Reviews so far have been favorable, and Barbie is already Mattel’s most profitable franchise. But the movie isn’t directly geared toward children, movie theaters have struggled to get back on track after pandemic lockdowns, and toy demand through this year has been weak after ballooning during the pandemic. And some analysts don’t expect “Barbie” to do much for Mattel’s stock.

    Emily Bary and Jon Swartz contributed reporting to this story.

    Source link

  • A Retirement Tax Break That Ends the Fear of Outliving Your 401(k)

    A Retirement Tax Break That Ends the Fear of Outliving Your 401(k)

    A Retirement Tax Break That Ends the Fear of Outliving Your 401(k)

    Source link