ReportWire

Tag: leonardo da vinci

  • The Best Holiday Gifts for the Art Lovers and Artists On Your List

    [ad_1]

    When it comes to gifts for art lovers, wrapping original art is the ultimate power move. But here’s the catch: collectors pour their hearts—and usually their bank accounts—into curating deeply personal collections. If you know your giftee very, very well, a piece of art can be a very, very good gift. You could also treat the collector in your life to a gallery outing or surprise them with a session with an art advisor. But if adding to their collection feels too ambitious, there are plenty of artsy presents for everyone on your list, from the absolute obsessive to the casually cultured. Whether you’re working with a shoestring budget or aiming for extravagance, there’s no shortage of options that are thoughtful, stylish and primed to impress. Enjoy our guide to the gifts guaranteed to thrill any art enthusiast.

    [ad_2]

    Christa Terry

    Source link

  • Louvre heist leaves a cultural wound — and may turn French crown jewels into legend

    [ad_1]

    PARIS (AP) — The robbery at the Louvre has done what no marketing campaign ever could: It has catapulted France’s dusty crown jewels — long admired at home, little known abroad — to global fame.

    One week on, the country is still wounded by the breach to its national heritage even as authorities Sunday announced arrests tied to the haul.

    Yet the crime is also a paradox. Some say it will make celebrities of the very jewels it sought to erase — much as the Mona Lisa’s turn-of-the-20th-century theft transformed the then little-known Renaissance portrait into the world’s most famous artwork.

    In 1911, a museum handyman lifted the Leonardo da Vinci masterpiece off its hook. The loss went unnoticed for more than a day; newspapers turned it into a global mystery, and crowds came to stare at the empty space. When the painting resurfaced two years later, its fame eclipsed everything else in the museum, and that remains so today.

    That’s the uneasy question shadowing Sunday’s robbery: whether a crime that cut deep will glorify what’s left behind.

    “Because of the drama, the scandal, the heist, the Apollo Gallery itself and the jewels that remain will likely receive a new spotlight and become celebrities, just like the Mona Lisa after 1911,” said Anya Firestone, a Paris art historian and Culture Ministry licensed heritage expert. She toured the gallery the day before the robbery and did not think it looked sufficiently guarded.

    Bringing celebrity through theft

    The heist has electrified global media. Nightly newscasts from the U.S. to Europe and across Latin America and Asia have beamed the Louvre, its Apollo Gallery and the missing jewels to hundreds of millions — a surge of attention some say rivals, or even surpasses, the frenzy after Beyoncé and Jay-Z’s 2018 “Apeshit” video filmed inside the museum. The Louvre is once again a global set.

    For generations, the British monarchy’s regalia has captured the popular imagination through centuries of coronations and drawing millions every year to their display in the Tower of London. Meanwhile, France’s jewels lived in the shadow. This week’s heist tilts the balance.

    One early emblem of that celebrity effect could be the survivor piece itself — Empress Eugénie’s emerald-set crown, dropped in the getaway and studded with more than 1,300 diamonds — which may now become the gallery’s most talked-about relic.

    “I’d never even heard of Eugénie’s crown until this,” said Mateo Ruiz, a 27-year-old visitor from Seville. “Now it’s the first thing I want to see when the gallery reopens.”

    Among the treasures that escaped the thieves’ grasp are storied gems still gleaming under glass — the Regent Diamond, the Sancy and the Hortensia. Authorities say one other stolen bejeweled piece, besides Empress Eugénie’s damaged crown, has since been quietly recovered, though they have declined to identify it.

    The heist has not dented the Louvre’s pull. The palace-museum reopened to maximum crowds Wednesday, even as the jewels remain missing. Long before the robbery, the museum was straining under mass tourism — roughly 33,000 visitors a day — and staff warn it cannot easily absorb another surge, especially with the Apollo Gallery sealed and security resources stretched.

    Jewels represent French history itself

    For France, the loss is more than precious stones and metal totaling over $100 million; it is pages torn from the national record. The Apollo Gallery reads as a timeline in gold and light, carrying the country from Bourbon ceremony to Napoleon’s self-fashioned empire and into modern France.

    Firestone puts it this way: The jewels are “the Louvre’s final word in the language of monarchy — a glittering echo of kings and queens as France crossed into a new era.” They are not ornaments, she argues, but chapters of French history, marking the end of the royal order and the beginning of the country France is today.

    Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez called the theft an “immeasurable” heritage loss, and the museum says the pieces carry “inestimable” historic weight — a reminder that what vanished is not just monetary.

    Many also see a stunning security lapse.

    “It’s staggering that a handful of people couldn’t be stopped in broad daylight,” said Nadia Benyamina, 52, a Paris shopkeeper who visits the gallery monthly. “There were failures — avoidable ones. That’s the wound.”

    Investigators say the thieves rode a basket lift up the building’s Seine-facing façade, forced open a window, smashed two display cases and fled on motorbikes — all in minutes. Alarms sounded, drawing security to the gallery and forcing the intruders to bolt, officials say. The haul spanned royal and imperial suites in sapphire, emerald and diamond — including pieces tied to Marie-Amélie, Hortense, Marie-Louise and Empress Eugénie.

    In Senate testimony, Louvre director Laurence des Cars acknowledged “a terrible failure,” citing gaps in exterior camera coverage and proposing vehicle barriers and a police post inside the museum. She offered to resign; the culture minister refused. The heist followed months of warnings about chronic understaffing and crowd pressure points.

    Drawing crowds to see what isn’t there

    Outside the blocked doors, visitors now come to see what cannot be seen.

    “I came to see where it happened,” said Tobias Klein, 24, an architecture student. “That barricade is chilling. People are looking with shock and curiosity.”

    Others feel a flicker of hope. “They’re ghosts now — but there’s still hope they’ll be found,” said Rose Nguyen, 33, an artist from Reims. “It’s the same strange magnetism the Mona Lisa had after 1911. The story becomes part of the object.”

    Curators warn that recutting or melting the jewels would be a second violence. In museums, authenticity lives in the original: the mount, the design, the work of the goldsmith’s hand — and the unbroken story of who made, wore, treasured, exhibited and, yes, stole the object.

    Whether loss now brings legend is the Louvre’s uneasy future.

    “In the strange economy of fame, even bad news becomes attention — and attention makes icons,” Firestone said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Portrait of a genius: Ken Burns on Leonardo da Vinci

    Portrait of a genius: Ken Burns on Leonardo da Vinci

    [ad_1]

    Ever since he got a movie camera for his 17th birthday, Ken Burns has been making documentaries. Over the years, he’s created 36 documentary series for PBS, all of them about American history, from “The Civil War,” “Baseball” and “Jazz,” to “Prohibition,” “The Vietnam War” and “Muhammad Ali.”

    Now, he’s just made his first project ever that’s not about an American subject: “Leonardo da Vinci.” “It was just getting to know one of the most incredibly interesting human beings who has ever walked the Earth,” Burns said. “And the fact that he turns out to be arguably the greatest painter and certainly the greatest scientist of his age is, you know, extra added.”

    Burns co-directed the show with his daughter, Sarah Burns, and her husband, David McMahon.

    To watch a trailer for the documentary “Leonardo da Vinci” click on the video player below:


    Preview – Ken Burns’ DAVINCI by
    WPBS-TV on
    YouTube

    The four-hour series makes use of the approximately 6,000 notebook pages Leonardo left behind, from studies in such disciplines as geology and physics, to his preparatory studies for his paintings. And then there are his to-do lists. What emerges is a portrait of a genius, who’s not just a painter, not just a scientist, not just an inventor.

    “He wants to know everything about everything,” said Sarah Burns. “So, he’s dissecting a cadaver because he wants to understand how the heart works and how the body works, all towards creating a painting that is more life-like, more believable, more alive.”

    Ken Burns said the “gigantic” volume of source material asks fundamental basic questions: “Where did I come from? Where am I going? How does the universe work? I mean, these are things that occupied him every single moment of every single day.”

    What also emerges is a man who rarely finished anything. “There’s fewer than 20 paintings that exist today, probably less than half of those are actually finished, we think,” said Sarah Burns.

    Ken Burns says he doesn’t believe it’s a mark of procrastination: “I think things are left unfinished, or undelivered to patrons, because the questions that he was asking of this work for himself had been satisfied.”

    Sarah added, “Being interested in so many different things as he was, there’s always the next thing, a new question, something else that comes along that takes away his attention.”

    Two things DaVinci did finish, though, are among the most famous paintings ever made: “The Last Supper” and “Mona Lisa.”

    “‘The Last Supper’ was a very commonly painted subject for Leonardo’s time,” said McMahon. “Leonardo discovers a completely different thing happening than most other painters had. This is Christ telling his disciples that one of them is going to betray him. And he puts them in groups. And so, one is putting his hand over his eyes, another is reaching for a knife. And so, it becomes a painting that feels like seconds unfolding. And it makes me feel like he would have been a filmmaker, today, had he lived in our time.”

    Scenes from “The Last Supper,” by Leonardo da Vinci.

    CBS News


    “I think he invents film,” said Ken Burns. “There’s a kind of inherent dynamism and movement to it that’s just exquisite.”

    Of “Mona Lisa,” Burns said, “In order for him to be a great painter, he has to understand the circulatory system. He has to understand about hair. He has to understand about geography and rock formations and mist and how atmosphere works. And so, my wish is that nobody ever makes a joke about her smile ever again! Because she is embodying the entire human project in that thing.”

    If you’ve ever edited photos or videos on an iPhone or a Mac, you may already know one of Burns’ favorite editing techniques: Zooming or panning across a still image, a process, he says, meant to “shake alive something that is two-dimensional.”

    But the new documentary, narrated by Keith David, introduces techniques that will be very new to Burns aficionados: split screens that juxtapose old and modern footage.

    According to Sarah Burns, Leonardo da Vinci was a lateral thinker: “He made connections across all of these disciplines. Showing multiple things on screen at the same time was a way of, in some ways, visually illustrating Leonardo’s thought process.”

    leonardo-da-vinci-split-screen-bats.jpg
    A split-screen dramatizes Leonardo da Vinci’s fascination with the physiology of bats.  

    PBS


    Asked about the balance of labor for the project, Saran Burns said, “Dave and I are the writers of this. And then once we have our script, we begin our editing process. And that’s when we get in there all together and work on making it better, together. Occasionally, we disagree about what that should be.”

    But Ken Burns doesn’t automatically get the final word: “No! That doesn’t work,” he said. “That doesn’t wash with collaboration.”

    “Leonardo da Vinci” airs on PBS in mid-November. It’s the story of a fascinating man and an astonishing life. “He could feel, I think, quite rightfully, that he had lived a fuller life than practically anybody I’d ever come across, in any study, in any period. Period,” said Burns.

    WEB EXTRA: Ken Burns on the “incredibly modern” Leonardo da Vinci:


    Ken Burns on the “incredibly modern” Leonardo da Vinci

    02:30

         
    For more info:

          
    Story produced by Jay Kernis. Editor: Emanuele Secci. 

         
    See also: 

           
    More from Ken Burns:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Scientists Winkle New Secret From ‘Mona Lisa’

    Scientists Winkle New Secret From ‘Mona Lisa’

    [ad_1]

    PARIS (AP) — The “Mona Lisa” has given up another secret.

    Using X-rays to peer into the chemical structure of a tiny speck of the celebrated work of art, scientists have gained new insight into the techniques that Leonardo da Vinci used to paint his groundbreaking portrait of the woman with the exquisitely enigmatic smile.

    The research, published Wednesday in the Journal of the American Chemical Society, suggests that the famously curious, learned and inventive Italian Renaissance master may have been in a particularly experimental mood when he set to work on the “Mona Lisa” early in the 16th century.

    The oil-paint recipe that Leonardo used as his base layer to prepare the panel of poplar wood appears to have been different for the “Mona Lisa,” with its own distinctive chemical signature, the team of scientists and art historians in France and Britain discovered.

    “He was someone who loved to experiment, and each of his paintings is completely different technically,” said Victor Gonzalez, the study’s lead author and a chemist at France’s top research body, the CNRS. Gonzalez has studied the chemical compositions of dozens of works by Leonardo, Rembrandt and other artists.

    The “Mona Lisa” has given up another secret.

    “In this case, it’s interesting to see that indeed there is a specific technique for the ground layer of ‘Mona Lisa,’” he said in an interview with The Associated Press.

    Specifically, the researchers found a rare compound, plumbonacrite, in Leonardo’s first layer of paint. The discovery, Gonzalez said, confirmed for the first time what art historians had previously only hypothesized: that Leonardo most likely used lead oxide powder to thicken and help dry his paint as he began working on the portrait that now stares out from behind protective glass in the Louvre Museum in Paris.

    Carmen Bambach, a specialist in Italian art and curator at New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art, who was not involved in the study, called the research “very exciting” and said any scientifically proven new insights into Leonardo’s painting techniques are “extremely important news for the art world and our larger global society.”

    Finding plumbonacrite in the “Mona Lisa” attests “to Leonardo’s spirit of passionate and constant experimentation as a painter – it is what renders him timeless and modern,” Bambach said by email.

    The paint fragment from the base layer of the “Mona Lisa” that was analyzed was barely visible to the naked eye, no larger than the diameter of a human hair, and came from the top right-hand edge of the painting.

    The scientists peered into its atomic structure using X-rays in a synchrotron, a large machine that accelerates particles to almost the speed of light. That allowed them to unravel the speck’s chemical make-up. Plumbonacrite is a byproduct of lead oxide, allowing the researchers to say with more certainty that Leonardo likely used the powder in his paint recipe.

    “Plumbonacrite is really a fingerprint of his recipe,” Gonzalez said. “It’s the first time we can actually chemically confirm it.”

    After Leonardo, Dutch master Rembrandt may have used a similar recipe when he was painting in the 17th century; Gonzalez and other researchers have previously found plumbonacrite in his work, too.

    “It tells us also that those recipes were passed on for centuries,” Gonzalez said. “It was a very good recipe.”

    Leonardo is thought to have dissolved lead oxide powder, which has an orange color, in linseed or walnut oil by heating the mixture to make a thicker, faster-drying paste.

    “What you will obtain is an oil that has a very nice golden color,” Gonzalez said. “It flows more like honey.”

    But the “Mona Lisa” — said by the Louvre to be a portrait of Lisa Gherardini, the wife of a Florentine silk merchant — and other works by Leonardo still have other secrets to tell.

    “There are plenty, plenty more things to discover, for sure. We are barely scratching the surface,” Gonzalez said. “What we are saying is just a little brick more in the knowledge.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link