ReportWire

Tag: leisure

  • Airbnb, Blackstone to join S&P 500, while Deere will replace Walgreens in S&P 100

    Airbnb, Blackstone to join S&P 500, while Deere will replace Walgreens in S&P 100

    [ad_1]

    Shares of investment giant Blackstone Inc. and vacation-home rental platform Airbnb Inc. rallied after hours on Friday after both won the nod to join the S&P 500 index
    SPX
    later this month.

    The announcement, from S&P Dow Jones Indices, said that the change would take hold before the start of trading on Monday, Sept. 18. The move, among others announced Friday, will “ensure each index is more representative of its market-capitalization range,” according to a release.

    Airbnb
    ABNB,
    +0.87%

    currently has a market value of $83.98 billion, and its shares are up 64.7% so far this year. Blackstone
    BX,
    -1.77%
    ,
    currently worth $129.29 billion, has seen its stock rise 43.6% year-to-date.

    Shares of Airbnb and Blackstone were up 5.7% and 4.8%, respectively, after hours on Friday.

    Blackstone and Airbnb will replace Lincoln National Corp.
    LNC,
    +2.14%

    and Newell Brands Inc.
    NWL,
    +1.23%

    in the index, S&P Dow Jones Indices said on Friday. In the process, Lincoln and Newell will join the S&P SmallCap 600.

    Blackstone in July said it had reached $1 trillion in assets under management, aided by a growth trajectory that it said had outpaced its private equity rivals.

    “We’ve established an unparalleled global platform of leading business lines, offering over 70 distinct investment strategies,” Chief Executive Stephen Schwarzman told analysts. “We believe our clients view us as the gold standard in alternative asset management.”

    Meanwhile, Airbnb last month said that travelers were seeking longer stays and bigger properties in pricier areas, as the rebound in travel endures despite a tidal wave of inflation last year. The company’s second-quarter results and third-quarter sales forecast topped Wall Street’s estimates.

    Meanwhile, S&P 500 member Deere & Co.
    DE,
    +1.94%

    will replace Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc.
    WBA,
    -7.43%

    in the S&P 100, S&P Dow Jones Indices said on Friday. That change also takes hold on Sept. 18. S&P Dow Jones Indices said Walgreens “is no longer representative of the megacap market space” but will stay in the S&P 500.

    Shares of Deere fell 0.2% after hours. Walgreens stock was up 0.4%.

    Don’t miss: Walgreens CEO Roz Brewer steps down with stock at decade-and-a-half low

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Microsoft proposes Ubisoft license to win U.K. approval for Activision Blizzard buyout

    Microsoft proposes Ubisoft license to win U.K. approval for Activision Blizzard buyout

    [ad_1]

    Microsoft will change the terms of its Activision Blizzard buyout offer in a new effort to win approval from the U.K. competition regulator.

    The regulator, the Competition and Markets Authority, said Microsoft
    MSFT,
    +1.71%

    will now license Activision’s global cloud streaming to Ubisoft Entertainment, for any game available now or in the next 15 years. Ubisoft, in its own release, highlighted the ability to stream the popular Call of Duty franchise.

    Financial terms were not released, but the regulator said Ubisoft will make a one-off payment and also agree a market-based wholesale pricing mechanism.

    The license will be exclusive except in the European economic area. Ubisoft would have the ability to require Microsoft to provide versions of games on operating systems other than Windows, such as Linux.

    Ubisoft shares
    UBI,
    +5.80%

    jumped nearly 5% in opening Paris trade.

    The regulator now says it’s inviting comments on the structure of the new offer. “This is not a green light. We will carefully and objectively assess the details of the restructured deal and its impact on competition, including in light of third-party comments,” said the regulator’s CEO, Sarah Cardell.

    Microsoft last year agreed to buy Activision Blizzard for $68.7 billion, or $95 per share. Activision stock
    ATVI,
    +0.28%

    closed Monday at $90.72.

    In a blog post, Microsoft Vice Chair Brad Smith said it anticipates the CMA review processes can be completed before the 90-day extension in its acquisition agreement with Activision Blizzard expires on Oct.18. He also said the deal with Ubisoft was carefully structured not to interfere with an existing deal struck with European regulators.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. head coach Vlatko Andonovski resigns after Women’s World Cup disappointment: reports

    U.S. head coach Vlatko Andonovski resigns after Women’s World Cup disappointment: reports

    [ad_1]

    Vlatko Andonovski has resigned as head coach of the U.S. women’s national soccer team, according to multiple reports Wednesday, following a disappointing early exit from the Women’s World Cup.

    The soccer blog 90min first reported Andonovski’s departure, and the news was confirmed by ESPN and The Athletic late Wednesday. ESPN reported the U.S. Soccer Federation is expected to make an official announcement Thursday.

    Assistant…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Phil Mickelson responds to sports betting allegations: ‘I never bet on the Ryder Cup’

    Phil Mickelson responds to sports betting allegations: ‘I never bet on the Ryder Cup’

    [ad_1]

    ‘I never bet on the Ryder Cup. While it is well known that I always enjoy a friendly wager on the course, I would never undermine the integrity of the game.’

    That was golf star Phil Mickelson responding to allegations he wagered more than $1 billion on football, basketball and baseball over the past three decades, and attempted to bet on the Ryder Cup, too.

    The claims were made by professional gambler and Las Vegas businessman Billy Walters in a book due out on Aug. 22, “Gambler: Secrets from a Life of Risk.” Walters said Mickelson placed hundreds of bets with him for exactly $220,000 and 1,115 bets for precisely $110,000 over the span of three decades. Walters claims that Mickelson also asked him to place a $400,000 bet on the U.S. team to win the 2012 Ryder Cup, a request that Walters said he declined, according to excerpts of the book reported by The FirePit Collective. 

    PGA Tour players are prohibited from wagering on events under the organization’s Integrity Program.

    “​​I have also been very open about my gambling addiction,” Mickelson continued in his statement shared on social media. “I have previously conveyed my remorse, took responsibility, have gotten help, have been fully committed to therapy that has positively impacted me and I feel good about where I am now.”

    Mickelson did not specifically address Walters’s claims that he wagered over $1 billion on sports, or that he lost more than $100 million on his bets during the multi-decade span.

    Walters is viewed as one of the more successful professional gamblers in recent memory, with sportsbooks limiting the amount he could wager at their establishments. He was convicted of insider trading in 2017 and served five years in federal prison. Mickelson was named in that insider-trading case; he was not accused of wrongdoing but agreed to pay back close to $1 million earned on a stock tip he received from Walters.

    Representatives for Mickelson did not respond to MarketWatch’s request for comment for this story.

    Mickelson was one of the first professional golfers to leave the PGA Tour for LIV Golf last year. He was offered roughly $200 million to join the Saudi-backed league, according to the Golf Channel’s Brentley Romine. The PGA Tour, the DP World Tour and the Saudi-backed LIV Golf circuit reached a landmark merger agreement in June that aims to create a single operation that would “unify” golf.

    See also: PGA Tour head: it will be ‘difficult’ to earn players trust after LIV merger

    And: Tiger Woods turned down LIV Golf offer in the ‘neighborhood’ of $700 million, says Greg Norman

    Some fellow professional golfers reacted to the alleged gambling issues by taking a few swings at Mickelson.

    “At least he can bet on the Ryder Cup this year because he won’t be a part of it,” golfer Rory McIlroy said on Thursday. McIlroy, one of the PGA Tour’s staunchest defenders in its battle against LIV Golf, has been critical of Mickelson and LIV on multiple occasions.

    Golfers including Mickelson and Dustin Johnson have been criticized for joining LIV Golf and turning a blind eye to Saudi Arabia’s human-rights record. According to the U.S. State Department, Saudi Arabia has in recent years been linked to multiple human-rights violations, including unlawful killings; executions for nonviolent offenses; forced disappearances; torture and cases of cruel and inhuman or degrading treatment of prisoners and detainees by government agents, among other offenses.

    Golfer Jordan Speith, a three-time major championship winner, said people in the golf world were “surprised” by the recent headlines about Mickelson.

    Mickelson’s alleged gambling predates the summer of 2018, when the Supreme Court lifted a U.S. ban on sports betting, allowing states to create legislation to legalize gambling. Since then, 34 states allow some form of legal sports betting, according to the latest tally by the American Gaming Association.

    It’s estimated that between 1% and 3% of the American adult population has some sort of gambling issue, although some groups believe the actual number could be even higher.

    “We didn’t have a good problem-gambling infrastructure in place prior to the expansion of sports betting, and we still don’t,” Keith Whyte, executive director of the National Council on Problem Gambling, was quoted as having told the Charlotte Observer in February.

    U.S. sportsbooks accepted $93 billion in sports bets in 2022, according to the American Gaming Association’s Tracker, a massive jump from the $57.22 billion wagered in 2021.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The long-simmering rumor of Apple buying Disney is resurfacing as Bob Iger looks to sell assets

    The long-simmering rumor of Apple buying Disney is resurfacing as Bob Iger looks to sell assets

    [ad_1]

    Analysts got to the point early and often during a conference call late Wednesday: What are Disney Chief Executive Robert Iger’s M&A plans, particularly following reports that former Disney executives Kevin Mayer and Tom Staggs, now co-CEOs of Blackstone-backed Candle Media, have been retained in a “consulting capacity” to decide ESPN’s fate?

    There is even the unthinkable, unsinkable decades-old rumor floating about again: Could Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    -0.90%

    acquire Disney
    DIS,
    -0.73%
    ,
    as one Hollywood executive floated to the Hollywood Reporter?

    The prospect of an Apple-Disney combo seems far-fetched in a heated regulatory climate, where the Federal Trade Commission is attempting to crack down on Big Tech acquisitions, but it could happen should Disney sell off assets and Apple gobbles up Disney’s direct-to-consumer business that includes streaming service Disney+, some media analysts speculate. Apple could conceivably even buy ABC, which reportedly is on the block. But the path is long and circuitous.

    Yet the rumors persist, dating back to Apple co-founder Steve Jobs’ reverence for the Disney brand, and the increasingly overlapping businesses of both companies over the years.

    When pressed by analysts during a conference call late Wednesday, Iger declined to discuss the future of Disney’s structure or possible asset sales. When asked if Disney might “plausibly” be snapped up by one company — read Apple — an exasperated Iger said he would not “speculate” on the sale of Disney to a technology company or anyone else, given the current global stance of regulators. The FTC has aggressively challenged mergers from the likes of Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    -1.17%

    and Facebook parent Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    -2.38%
    ,
    with limited success.

    Since Iger hinted at the potential sale of Disney’s assets in an interview with CNBC last month, rumors have swirled around ESPN.

    ESPN and related properties likely could command at least one-third of Disney’s current depressed market cap of about $150 billion, say some media watchers, though Iger has denied ESPN is for sale. He has acknowledged “the sports leader” is seeking “strategic partners” — possibly with the NFL, MLB, NBA and NHL — to generate revenue. Late Tuesday, ESPN stuck up a deal with Penn Entertainment Inc.
    PENN,
    +9.10%

    to create ESPN Bet, a digital sportsbook to launch in the fall in 16 states.

    Read more: Penn dumps Barstool for ESPN-branded sports-gambling service

    Another possible property being dangled is ABC. But with rights to the NBA Finals and two Super Bowls in the next eight years, it is unclear who would acquire the network and how Disney would replace lucrative sports revenue.

    Other properties on the block include cable channels Freeform and Disney Channel, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal.

    “If an asset sale happens, will the proceeds be deployed into fortifying its balance sheet or beefing up its remaining operations?” Rick Munarriz, senior media analyst at The Motley Fool, said in an email.

    Disney, which is in the midst of a $5.5 billion cost-cutting campaign, is exploring several avenues to prop up sales as linear TV ads shrink, Disney+ subscriptions decline and attendance at Walt Disney World wanes.

    Read more: Disney posts smaller streaming loss amid cost-cutting moves, stock slips

    Shares of Disney are trading at half their highs from a few years ago, in large part because of dwindling sales and profits at ESPN and Disney’s other cable networks.

    Enter Mayer, who previously ran Disney’s strategic planning group for years and engineered a trifecta of mega deals: The acquisition of the aforementioned Pixar Animation Studios from Steve Jobs for $7.4 billion in 2006, the purchase of Marvel Entertainment for $4 billion in 2009, and the acquisition of Lucasfilm for $4.05 billion in 2012. Mayer also led the $71.3 billion acquisition of 20th Century Fox’s entertainment assets in 2019, which has drawn mixed reviews.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Disney posts smaller streaming loss, will hike prices for Disney+ and Hulu

    Disney posts smaller streaming loss, will hike prices for Disney+ and Hulu

    [ad_1]

    Walt Disney Co.’s stock dipped in after-hours trading Wednesday after the company posted mixed quarterly results roughly in line with analysts’ expectations amid a cost-cutting frenzy.

    Separately, Disney said it is hiking prices on almost all of its streaming packages in an aggressive push to boost its bottom line. Commercial-free Disney+ will cost $13.99 per month, a 27% increase, beginning Oct. 12. Ad-free Hulu will increase 20% to $17.99 per month. A new Disney+ and Hulu Bundle ad-free plan launches Sept. 6 for $19.99.

    Read more: Disney is raising prices on Hulu and Disney+ again. Here’s how much you’ll soon pay.

    The media giant
    DIS,
    -0.73%

    reported a fiscal third-quarter loss of $460 million, or 25 cents a share, mostly because of restructuring and impairment charges. After adjusting for restructuring costs and other effects, Disney reported earnings of $1.03 a share. Revenue grew 4% to $22.3 billion from $21.5 billion a year ago.

    Analysts surveyed by FactSet had on average expected adjusted earnings of 96 cents a share on revenue of $22.5 billion. Disney shares declined about 3% in after-hours trading immediately following the release of the report, after dropping 0.7% to $87.52 in the regular session.

    “Our results this quarter are reflective of what we’ve accomplished through the unprecedented transformation we’re undertaking at Disney to restructure the company, improve efficiencies and restore creativity to the center of our business,” Disney Chief Executive Robert Iger said in a statement announcing the results. Disney is in the midst of a $5.5 billion cost-cutting plan overseen by Iger, who returned to the CEO position to right the ship in late 2022.

    Direct-to-consumer (DTC) sales, which includes streaming services and some international products, hauled in $5.5 billion, compared with analysts’ forecast of $5.7 billion on average and last year’s total of $5.05 billion. The division did reduce its quarterly losses to $512 million, compared with $1.06 billion a year ago. Analysts were expecting a loss of $758 million.

    Still, the company has lost more than $10 billion in its DTC segment since launching Disney+ in late 2019. Disney had told investors for three years it expects Disney+ to be profitable by September 2024. During a conference call with analysts late Thursday, Iger said Disney is “actively exploring” options to crack down on account sharing when the company updates subscriber agreements later this year and will “roll out tactics to drive monetization” in 2024.

    The company’s iconic theme parks around the world and product-sales business increased to $8.3 billion in revenue from $7.4 billion a year ago. The average analyst estimate was $8.1 billion.

    Disney’s largest business segment, media and entertainment distribution, raked in $14 billion during the quarter, down from $14.1 billion a year ago. Analysts on average predicted $14.3 billion, according to FactSet.

    Disney’s television networks generated sales of $6.7 billion, while analysts’ average estimates called for $6.74 billion. Content sales and licensing, a category that includes Disney’s film business, reported revenue of $2.1 billion, compared with analysts’ expectations of about $2.15 billion.

    In the weeks leading up to Disney’s results, there has been a whirlwind of fear and doubt over the current state of the company’s streaming services — including ESPN — as well as linear-TV ad sales, the actors’ and writers’ strikes that have shut down Hollywood, Disney’s theme parks and its legal and political battle with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

    Front and center is the health of Disney+ as it battles streaming rivals like Apple Inc. 
    AAPL,
    -0.90%
    ,
     Netflix Inc. 
    NFLX,
    -2.14%
    ,
     Amazon.com Inc. 
    AMZN,
    -1.49%
    ,
     Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. 
    WBD,
    -2.15%

    and Comcast Corp.
    CMCSA,
    -0.26%
    .
    Macquarie Equity Research analyst Tim Nollen believes in Disney’s streaming services over the long term but said “we see too many near-term issues to overcome to support a more constructive view.”

    Disney+ had 146.1 million subscribers globally, 7% fewer than the 157.8 million it had in the previous quarter. The decline mostly came from India, where Disney lost the rights to stream a popular cricket league last year.

    Disney and DeSantis, who is running for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, have filed dueling lawsuits that stem from the company’s criticism last year of a Florida law that bans classroom discussion of sexuality and gender identity with younger children. Earlier this week, a group of mostly former Republican high-level government officials called DeSantis’s takeover of Disney World’s governing district “severely damaging to the political, social, and economic fabric” of Florida.

    The somber vibe prompted Deutsche Bank analysts on Tuesday to lower their price target on Disney shares 8% to $120, with “lower advertising revenue, underperformance at the box office, and lighter parks attendance in Orlando” chief among their concerns.

    “This is Iger’s most important earnings call since returning to Disney late last year. He came in with a punch list that was too long to realistically knock off in two years,” Rick Munarriz, an analyst at the Motley Fool, said in an email. “Now the board has given him four years, and every word he uses during Thursday afternoon’s earnings call has to carry some serious heft.”

    Disney’s call was to start at 4:30 p.m. Eastern.

    Shares of Disney have inched up 0.7% this year, while the S&P 500
    SPX
    has climbed 16%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Roblox Misses on Earnings. The Videogame Stock Sinks.

    Roblox Misses on Earnings. The Videogame Stock Sinks.

    [ad_1]

    Roblox Stock Falls Sharply. Blame the Wider Loss.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • You just won the Mega Millions jackpot — what should you do next?

    You just won the Mega Millions jackpot — what should you do next?

    [ad_1]

    Robert Pagliarini, author of “The Sudden Wealth Solution,” has been guiding lottery winners for decades. And he has seen plenty of people run through their winnings faster than you can say “jackpot!” Or, friends and family (and certainly office lottery pool players) can see their winnings tied up in legal battles for years, as the parties argue over who gets how much. About 70% of lottery winners lose or spend all the money in five years or less, after all. 

    “Money — especially when you’re talking about this level of money — absolutely upends people’s lives,” Pagliarini, the president of Pacifica Wealth Advisors, told MarketWatch. “You should be excited, but you should also be prepared, for sure.” 

    These are his five tips for what to do if you win the lottery or get another windfall.

    Document that the winning ticket is YOURS

    Sign your name on the winning ticket, take a picture of yourself holding the winning ticket — in fact, take a video of yourself holding the signed, winning ticket, for good measure. 

    “The first step is really all about securing the ticket … because whoever has it is the owner,” says Pagliarini. “There’s no record of you having purchased that ticket with those numbers. So having that ticket is everything.” 

    Related: Hoping to win Mega Millions? This woman hit a $112 million Mega Millions jackpot.

    You have to document that this ticket is yours, which is why Pagliarini says legal experts recommend signing it. “I would absolutely sign it myself,” he adds. 

    And then put that ticket in a safe place, like a home safe or lockbox.

    Don’t tell anyone yet!

    You may want to sing the good news from the rooftops that your financial troubles are over. Problem is, everyone else’s troubles aren’t — and Pagliarini warns that, for your own personal safety and peace of mind, it’s better not to let the world know you’ve just become a billionaire overnight — if you can help it. Unfortunately, most states make you disclose that you’ve won.

    “We’re used to seeing people with the big check on TV, which looks pretty cool — but now everybody in the entire world knows that you’re worth $1 billion. And that’s not really the kind of publicity that you want,” says Pagliarini. “You’re going to be hit up for lots of money requests as people come out of the woodwork. And that adds such a huge amount of stress when you’re in a situation that is already stressful.” 

    You generally have 180 days to collect the winnings, and you’re going to have to make some big, life-changing decisions during that time. Staying anonymous, if you can, will give you the space to make those decisions with a clear head. 

    Unfortunately, as noted, most states compel lottery winners to come forward publicly. If you have to reveal yourself and do press interviews, protect your personal information. Some past Powerball winners didn’t answer questions about any meaningful or personal significance associated with the winning numbers that they played, for example, or they refused to share details about their children. One couple simply moved out of their house and refused to speak with the media at all while they settled their affairs.

    “My rule is basically, you tell one family member, and then you immediately try to get professional help,” Pagliarini adds. Which leads us to…. 

    Get a lawyer and a financial adviser

    Bring in the professional help as soon as you can. An attorney can help you decide the best time to claim your lottery prize, and offer more advice on keeping your ticket safe. They can also help navigate your rights and protect your best interests with regards to how much you need to present yourself publicly. And they can also help you manage your safety. 

    Meanwhile, a financial adviser can assess your financial situation and help you decide whether it makes sense to take a lump sum of cash, or to collect your winnings over annual payments. A financial adviser can also help you manage your money so that you can check things off your bucket list without overspending.

    “You know you’ve won, and then typically you have about 180 days to collect the winnings,” says Pagliarini. “So you’ve got to do some serious planning.” You need all the help you can get.  

    Do you take the lump-sum payment or the annuity payment?

    Pagliarini considers staying anonymous as the first big decision a lottery winner makes. The second most important question, however, is how they collect their winnings. Do you want to take a lump sum, or do you want to take the annuity (aka, a payout over time)?

    “This is really the biggest financial decision you’ll ever make in your entire life,” he says. (Granted, it’s one that most of us will never have to make, since the odds of winning the lottery, let alone a jackpot of this size, are infinitesimal.)  

    He notes that most people take the lump-sum payment, and in some circumstances this can be a better decision. But keep in mind that if you win a $1 billion Powerball jackpot, for example, you are not getting $1 billion.

    “They send you about 60-ish percent of whatever the lump sum is,” Pagliarini notes. So for a $1 billion prize, for example, “you would get around $600 million instead of $1 billion,” he said. And after state taxes, depending on where you live, and federal taxes, that jackpot may be closer to $300 million in the end. Whereas, the annuity is given as 30 payments over 29 years, which will come closer to hitting the advertised $1 billion jackpot than lump-sum takers would get. So being patient can pay off in the long run, especially with a bigger prize like this.

    As far as taxes are concerned, Pagliarini still leans toward annuity — especially for a smaller jackpot, like if it was $1 million. That’s because you would get a lump-sum payment of about $600,000, which would put you in the highest federal and state income tax bracket (for single filers anyway) that year — versus taking an extra $30,000 a year for 30 years. “That annuity payment is probably not going to catapult you into the highest tax bracket,” he says. But for a $1 billion-plus jackpot like this, you’re going to be in the highest tax bracket whichever payout you choose, he says.

    But there’s another reason to consider going the annuity route, Pagliarini says — it can save you from yourself. 

    “The biggest advantage of the lump-sum payout is that you get most of the money up front, and then you can do whatever you want with it,” he says, such as pay off debt, invest it, buy a house, etc. “But that actually happens to be the biggest disadvantage of the lump sum,” he continues. And that’s because, if you overspend your winnings and run out of cash with your lump sum, then you are out of luck. But the annuity payments are almost like a do-over each year, he says, because you can learn from your mistakes and spend the next annual windfall more wisely. “I’ve advised most people honestly to take the annuity,” he says. “It just allows you to really make mistakes, but have them not be a total derailment.” 

    If you still can’t make up your mind, he also has a free online quiz to help you decide whether you should take a lump sum or an annuity payment

    Keep it simple when deciding where to put your new money.

    So you’ve secured your ticket, tried to keep it quiet, hired some professional help, and decided how you are going to collect your winnings. Then what do you do with all of this cash? 

    Every financial situation is different, of course, which is where a financial adviser can help you sort out the nuances to make this lottery win a real dream come true for you. But in general, Pagliarini recommends keeping things simple — even considering that this $1 billion jackpot (even whittled down after taxes) would allow you to do basically whatever you wanted to do. 

    “If I were meeting with you, we would sit down and make some serious decisions, and prioritize what you want to do,” he says, “such as paying off debt, and discussing what is on your wish list. Do you want to buy a new house or a second house, or buy your family houses?” He suggests pricing out your wish list together with your adviser to see whether you could afford to do everything you want.

    But you still want money left over to live on. “We want to make sure the money left over is generating enough income so that they could survive on that for as long as they wanted — and particularly in this case, I’m sure generations would be able to survive on this amount of money,” he says. “I would invest in index funds. I wouldn’t get esoteric with limited partnerships and venture capital. Just go for a diversified portfolio, because as soon as you start deviating from ‘simple’ you can really increase your chances of just losing it all.” 

    He notes that because lottery winnings don’t feel “earned,” the prize may not feel like “real” money — which is one of the reasons so many lottery winners don’t manage their newfound wealth well. Again, about 70% of lottery winners lose or spend all that money in five years or less. “If the money doesn’t feel earned or real, you’re going to make decisions with that money that are probably not going to be in your best interest,” he adds. “You’re giving it away more freely, spending more freely, or freely investing in things a lot riskier than you would have done if you had to sweat and earn that money.” 

    So keep it simple. “Don’t think just because you have x-millions of dollars now that you really have to get ‘sophisticated,’” he adds.

    And some bonus advice for office pools

    This is more of an extra, hindsight tip for before you and your co-workers start throwing in a buck apiece for a long-shot bid at a jackpot like this. Pagliarini warns that office pools can get “tricky,” so it’s good to sign a contract setting some ground rules before you all pool together. 

    “There’s been a lot of litigation around office pools, because maybe somebody forgets to play one week, and that’s the week everyone wins. Or someone thought they played this week, but on this particular week they didn’t,” he says. “So loosey-goosey situations can end up in court to battle it out.”

    A much simpler solution to avoid this is to have an office pool contract that spells out who is in this pool, how much they are contributing, and it also determines in advance whether the group will take the lump-sum payment or the annuity payment. 

    “Because the last thing that you want is to win $1 billion or $100 million dollars, and then to be tied up in court for four years,” says Pagliarini. “That’s no fun.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Penn dumps Barstool for ESPN-branded sports-gambling service

    Penn dumps Barstool for ESPN-branded sports-gambling service

    [ad_1]

    Online sports-betting company Penn Entertainment Inc. sealed a $1.5 billion deal with Walt Disney Co.’s
    DIS,
    +1.50%

    ESPN to launch ESPN Bet, a branded sportsbook for fans in the U.S., and pivoted away from Barstool Sports on Tuesday, selling the platform back to founder Dave Portnoy.

    Penn Entertainment
    PENN,
    -0.68%

    will rebrand its current sportsbook and relaunch as ESPN Bet in the fall in 16 legalized-betting states where Penn is licensed.

    The rebrand — which includes the mobile app, website, and mobile website — sent Penn’s stock soaring 13% in after-hours trading Tuesday. ESPN Bet will benefit from exclusive promotional services across ESPN’s platforms, including access to ESPN talent, the companies said.

    Penn will pay ESPN $1.5 billion over 10 years as part of the strategic partnership, and will grant ESPN $500 million of warrants to purchase about 31.8 million Penn common shares, with additional bonus warrants possible.

     “Together, we can utilize each other’s strengths to create the type of experience that existing and new bettors will expect from both companies, and we can’t wait to get started,” Penn Entertainment Chief Executive Jay Snowden said in a release. 

    Penn also said it has divested 100% of its stake in Barstool Sports to Portnoy, allowing the sports media platform “to return to its roots of providing unique and authentic content to its loyal audience without the restrictions associated with a publicly traded, licensed gaming company.”

    For Penn, the ESPN partnership represents “a clear step up from Barstool in terms of mass appeal…and minimal regulatory risk,” according to Wells Fargo analyst Daniel Politzer, who said it was a “nearly impossible challenge for a publicly traded, licensed gaming company” to own “a media platform that thrived on viral/provocative content.”

    Still, he said in a note to clients that “it’s premature to conclude this is a game change” since past partnerships between online sports-betting companies and media players have come up short of what initial fanfare would’ve suggested.

    The news sent rival DraftKings Inc. shares
    DKNG,
    +0.25%

    sinking about 5% in after-hours trading.

     The decline in DraftKings shares comes as they’ve advanced 178% so far in 2023, through Tuesday’s close. Two analysts upgraded DraftKings’ stock just this week.

    See more: DraftKings’ stock has nearly tripled this year — and it just won a new fan

    Disney shares rose fractionally in after-hours trading.

    Mike Murphy contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Starbucks sees a big rebound in China, but results fail to impress investors

    Starbucks sees a big rebound in China, but results fail to impress investors

    [ad_1]

    Shares of Starbucks Corp. fell after hours Tuesday after the coffee chain reported third-quarter same-store sales that missed expectations, despite a big rebound in China.

    The coffee chain reported fiscal third-quarter net income of $1.14 billion, or 99 cents a share, compared with $912.9 million, or 79 cents a share, in the same quarter last year. Adjusted for restructuring and impairment costs, Starbucks earned $1 a share.

    Revenue rose 12.5% to $9.17 billion, compared with $8.15 billion in the prior-year quarter. Same-store sales rose 10% worldwide, with a 7% gain in North America. Those same-store sales jumped 24% internationally, with a 46% gain in China.

    Analysts polled by FactSet expected Starbucks
    SBUX,
    -0.31%

    to report adjusted earnings per share of 95 cents, on revenue of $9.29 billion and same-store sales growth of 11%.

    Operating margins rose to 17.3%, from 15.9% a year ago, with higher prices and productivity offset by greater spending on employee wages and benefits.

    Shares slipped 1.2% after hours on Tuesday. Shares of Starbucks are roughly where they were at the beginning of the year.

    Starbucks executives over the past year have said that amid stubborn inflation, customers see coffee as an affordable luxury worth treating themselves to. But Wall Street has struggled to find a reason to push the stock higher amid questions about trends in North America and slowing same-store sales in the years ahead, as well as China’s uneven economic recovery as it shakes off pandemic restrictions.

    UBS analysts said that demand in the U.S. was likely still “solid.” But they said that the focus would be on demand in China. Quo Vadis analyst John Zolidis, meanwhile, said that along with China, investors had been focused on the chain’s efforts to set up more drive-through locations in the U.S., and any benefits from higher-priced cold drinks and customizable orders.

    The coffee chain also continues to fight with its unionized employees. Bargaining has stalled. Last month, unionized workers accused Starbucks of banning Pride-themed decorations. Starbucks aggressively denied those allegations.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Live Nation reportedly focus of Justice Department antitrust probe

    Live Nation reportedly focus of Justice Department antitrust probe

    [ad_1]

    Ticketmaster parent Live Nation Entertainment Inc.
    LYV,
    -7.84%

    is expected to become the focus of an antitrust suit from the U.S. Department of Justice by the end of the year, according to a report late Friday. Citing three unidentified sources close to the matter, Politico reported Friday that the DoJ intends to claim Live Nation is abusing its power in the live music industry. A request for comment from the DoJ was not returned as of publication time. A new case would add to the embattled company’s many policy and legal battles, which, if successful, could lead to a breakup of the company, Politico had reported previously. Earlier in the month, JetBlue Airways Corp.
    JBLU,
    +1.95%

    said it was unwinding a joint venture with American Airlines Group Inc.
    AAL,
    +1.33%

    after a court ruling in May siding with the DoJ.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Banc of California is expected to keep leading regional banks higher as PacWest deal ignites sector

    Banc of California is expected to keep leading regional banks higher as PacWest deal ignites sector

    [ad_1]

    Banc of California Inc.’s proposed agreement to acquire PacWest Bancorp. helped send regional-bank stocks considerably higher on Wednesday. But even after a two-day increase of 12% for its shares, the acquiring bank remains the favorite name among analysts covering regional players in the U.S.

    The merger agreement was announced after the market close on Tuesday, but the rumor mill had already sent Banc of California’s
    BANC,
    +0.62%

    stock up by 11% that day. Then on Wednesday, shares of PacWest Bancorp
    PACW,
    +26.92%

    shot up 27% to $9.76, which was above the estimated takeout value of $9.60 a share when the deal was announced. The merger deal, if approved by both banks’ shareholders, will also include a $400 million investment from Warburg Pincus LLC and Centerbridge Partners L.P.

    A screen of regional banks by rating and stock-price target is below.

    Deal coverage:

    With PacWest closing above the initial per-share deal valuation, it is fair to wonder whether or not its shareholders will vote to approve the agreement. In a note to clients on Wednesday, Wedbush analyst David Chiaverini called Banc of California’s offer “fair, but not overwhelmingly attractive,” and wrote that PacWest was “a likely seller before the mini banking crisis occurred in March.”

    While Chiaverini went on to predict the deal’s approval by PacWest’s shareholders, he added that he “wouldn’t be surprised if there were some dissent among a minority of shareholders [which could] possibly open the door to the potential emergence of a third-party bid.”

    More broadly, Odeon Capital analyst Dick Bove wrote to clients on Wednesday that the merger deal, along with increasing involvement of private-equity firms in lending businesses, the expected enhancement of regulatory capital requirements for banks and other factors could lead to more consolidation among smaller banks.

    He went on to write that we might be entering a period for the banking industry similar to the 1990s, “when rules were being changed and acquisitions were rampant,” which “created new investment opportunities.”

    The SPDR S&P Regional Banking exchange-traded fund
    KRE,
    +4.74%

    rose 5% on Wednesday but was still down 17% for 2023, while the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY,
    +0.02%

    was up 19%, both excluding dividends.

    KRE holds 139 stocks, with 98 covered by at least five analysts working for brokerage firms polled by FactSet. Out of those 98 banks, 45 have majority “buy” ratings among the analysts. Among those 45, here are the 10 with the most upside potential over the next 12 months, implied by consensus price targets:

    Bank

    Ticker

    City

    Total assets ($mil)

    July 26 price change

    Share buy ratings

    July 26 closing price

    Consensus price target

    Implied 12-month upside potential

    Banc of California Inc.

    BANC,
    +0.62%
    Santa Ana, Calif.

    $9,370

    1%

    71%

    $14.71

    $18.58

    26%

    Enterprise Financial Services Corp.

    EFSC,
    +1.83%
    Clayton, Mo.

    $13,871

    2%

    80%

    $41.75

    $49.25

    18%

    First Merchants Corp.

    FRME,
    +3.52%
    Muncie, Ind.

    $17,968

    4%

    100%

    $32.38

    $37.33

    15%

    Amerant Bancorp Inc. Class A

    AMTB,
    +3.47%
    Coral Gables, Fla.

    $9,520

    3%

    60%

    $20.26

    $23.30

    15%

    Old Second Bancorp Inc.

    OSBC,
    +3.39%
    Aurora, Ill.

    $5,884

    3%

    100%

    $16.15

    $18.50

    15%

    F.N.B. Corp.

    FNB,
    +2.87%
    Pittsburgh

    $44,778

    3%

    75%

    $12.91

    $14.50

    12%

    Columbia Banking System Inc.

    COLB,
    +3.95%
    Tacoma, Wash.

    $53,592

    4%

    55%

    $22.63

    $25.32

    12%

    Wintrust Financial Corp.

    WTFC,
    +3.43%
    Rosemont, Ill.

    $54,286

    3%

    92%

    $86.05

    $95.33

    11%

    Synovus Financial Corp.

    SNV,
    +6.01%
    Columbus, Ga.

    $60,656

    6%

    75%

    $34.06

    $37.73

    11%

    Home BancShares Inc.

    HOMB,
    +4.56%
    Conway, Ark.

    $22,126

    5%

    57%

    $24.09

    $26.67

    11%

    Source: FactSet

    Click on the tickers for more about each bank.

    Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information available for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

    Any stock screen can only be a starting point when considering whether or not to invest. If you see any stocks of interest here, you should do your own research to form your own opinion.

    Don’t miss: How you can profit in the stock market from an incredible financial-services trend over the next 20 years

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • British billionaire owner of Tottenham football club charged with ‘brazen’ insider trading

    British billionaire owner of Tottenham football club charged with ‘brazen’ insider trading

    [ad_1]

    U.S. prosecutors have called an offsides on the British billionaire owner of Tottenham Hotspur soccer team, charging him with a “brazen insider-trading scheme,” in which he passed secret stock tips worth millions to his girlfriends, private pilots and assistants for years.

    Joe Lewis, 86, who is one of the richest people in the United Kingdom, is accused of taking inside information about companies in which he was a large investor and handing it out to people around him for them to use to get rich.  

    “Notwithstanding his vast personal wealth, Lewis provided the inside information to his employees, romantic partners, and friends as a way to give them compensation and gifts,” federal prosecutors wrote in an indictment filed in New York.

    Prosecutors say Lewis, who Forbes has estimated to be worth $6.1 billion, carried on with the scheme from 2013 through 2021, helping his employees and friends make millions of dollars in illicit gains. 

    Some people who benefited from Lewis’ loose lips included staff on his private, $250 million super yacht, the Aviva.

    In some cases, prosecutors allege Lewis gave his pilots short-term, $500,000 loans to buy stock and then pay him back after they scored big based on his tips.

    “Thanks to Lewis, those bets were a sure thing,” said Damian Williams, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York. “That’s classic corporate corruption. It’s cheating and it is against the law.”

    Lewis’ private equity company, Tavistock Group, has investments in hundreds of companies ranging from agriculture, sports, resort properties and life-sciences businesses. The firm owns works of art by painters like Pablo Picasso, Henri Matisse and Gustav Klimt.

    Investigators say Lewis shared information about publicly-traded life-science groups Solid Biosciences
    SLDB,
    +0.88%

    and Mirati Therapeutics
    MRTX,
    -2.43%
    ,
    as well as beef producer Australian Agricultural Co.
    AAC,
    -2.79%

    and a special purpose acquisition company, BCTG. 

    Prosecutors also allege that he hid how much of a stake he owned in cancer therapeutics company Mirati “through a pattern of false filings and misleading statements” in order to manipulate markets.  

    A message sent to representatives of Tavistock wasn’t immediately returned.

    Making his fortune as a currency trader, Lewis became more widely known when he acquired the Tottenham football club in 2001 for $35.5 million. 

    He has lived as a tax exile in the Bahamas for years. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • AMC had its busiest weekend since 2019, boosted by ‘Barbie’ and ‘Oppenheimer’

    AMC had its busiest weekend since 2019, boosted by ‘Barbie’ and ‘Oppenheimer’

    [ad_1]

    AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. AMC
    AMC,
    +1.62%

    has had its busiest weekend since 2019, boosted by the blockbuster openings of “Barbie” and “Oppenheimer,” the company said Monday. More than 7.8 million moviegoers in the U.S. and worldwide saw a movie at AMC between Thursday and Sunday, AMC said, in a statement. That marks AMC’s biggest and busiest weekend since 2019 based on global attendance and global admissions revenue. At its U.S. locations, the movie theater chain and meme stock darling also set a new post-reopening single-day attendance record Saturday. It was also AMC’s busiest day since July 2019, the company said. On Saturday, AMC also recorded its second-highest food and beverage day at its U.S. locations. “What a fabulous weekend for moviegoers at AMC’s movie theatres in the U.S. and abroad. AMC sends an enormous thank you and congratulations to Greta Gerwig, Margot Robbie, Ryan Gosling, and the entire team at Warner Bros., and to Christopher Nolan and the team at Universal Pictures,” said AMC CEO Adam Aron, in a statement. “They’ve demonstrated that well-made, well-marketed films that captivate audiences can open on the same weekend and both enjoy great success.” Aron also highlighted the “on-going solid performances” of “Mission Impossible: Dead Reckoning Part One” and “Sound of Freedom.” AMC’s stock skyrocketed 35.7% in premarket trades Monday after Friday’s surprise court setback for the company’s stock-conversion plan.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • AMC, Chevron, Tesla, Domino’s, Microsoft, and More Stock Market Movers

    AMC, Chevron, Tesla, Domino’s, Microsoft, and More Stock Market Movers

    [ad_1]


    • Order Reprints
    • Print Article
    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • AMC revises stock-conversion settlement plan after Friday’s surprise court setback

    AMC revises stock-conversion settlement plan after Friday’s surprise court setback

    [ad_1]

    AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. has submitted a revised proposal for its stock-conversion plan, after a judge rejected a settlement Friday that would have given a green light to the deal.

    In a letter to investors that was posted Sunday on Twitter, AMC Chief Executive Adam Aron said that a modified proposal was filed Saturday with the Delaware Chancery Court intended to address the court’s concerns. If the court agrees, Aron said he hopes to implement the plan “as soon as possible.”

    Movie-theater chain AMC
    AMC,
    +1.62%

     has wanted to turn its its so-called APE
    APE,
    -2.17%

    — or AMC Preferred Equity — preferred units into common stock as part of its battle to eliminate debt. But Delaware Chancery Court Vice Chancellor Morgan Zurn on Friday rejected a settlement with opposing shareholders that would have allowed that conversion to move forward. That sent AMC shares rocketing more than 60% higher in after-hours trading Friday.

    “AMC must be in a position to raise equity capital,” Aron stressed in his letter Sunday, saying that if the company is unable to do so, the risk of running out of cash in 2024 or 2025 rises.

    “The risk of financial collapse is not whimsical,” Aron said, noting the bankruptcies of rival theater chain Cineworld/Regal and retailer Bey Bath & Beyond.

    AMC shares are up 8% year to date, but have sunk 54% over the past 12 months.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Am I being tricked into overtipping when I eat out? Should I tip before or after sales tax is added?

    Am I being tricked into overtipping when I eat out? Should I tip before or after sales tax is added?

    [ad_1]

    Dear Quentin,

    I’ve read your previous responses to letters on tipping, and my thoughts are simple: Tipping is dependent on the service given. I won’t tip at a deli counter, but I will tip more in a diner. I see no reason to tip a deli counter person on a regular basis. The person who rings up my groceries isn’t allowed to accept tips, and they do a lot more than put a sandwich in a bag.

    As far as restaurants go, 15% is the starting point and I will go up from that as warranted. I do tend to tip a high percentage in diners. The waitstaff there are generally fabulous, deal with lower price points and a varied clientele. I feel they also suffer from customer bias where some people seem to think it’s only a diner not a fancy restaurant.

    ‘Helping others is not always through money. I volunteer my time with several charities and donate blood.’

    The job is the same whether my meal is $10 or $100. I try to pay in cash to ensure the waitstaff is promptly getting their tip, and to ensure that the money does indeed go to the wait staff. Are we expected to tip on a total that includes credit-card charges? What’s more, helping others is not always through money. I volunteer my time with several charities and donate blood.

    What troubles me is that throughout the New York City metro area, tipping recommendations in restaurants are based on faulty calculations. My friends and I all agree that tips are supposed to be based on the price of the meal — that is the subtotal or pre-tax figure. Restaurants frequently encourage people to tip on the final amount. 

    A Fair Tipper

    Related: I’m sick and tired of tipping 20% every time I eat out. Is it ever OK to tip less? Or am I a cheapskate? 

    Dear Fair,

    Yes, yes, yes, and yes. 

    Yes, wait staff in diners work as hard as any restaurant worker, and they deserve whatever your optimum tip — 15% or 20% — and as much as you would tip in a white-tablecloth restaurant. Yes, consumers should not be expected to tip in a deli — unless you have a good relationship with the staff, and you tip occasionally for goodwill. If you choose to “skip” the charity donation in a pharmacy, that’s OK too. Yes, donations and tips are increasingly being conflated, and that’s not always a good thing. We should be comfortable with the charity and 100% sure that the donation is going to the charity in question. 

    And your main point: Yes, tipping on the subtotal before tax and before credit-card charges is absolutely fair, although a lot of people — especially when calculating the tip among friends — tip on the after-tax total. Why? Perhaps we don’t want to be seen splitting hairs over the tax among friends and/or in front of a service worker who has given us exemplary service. Calculating tips is often done under pressure, and no one likes to be seen as a cheapskate. I almost always tip on the total amount, knowing that the sales tax is included, primarily because I figure that extra $1 or more is going to the person who served my table.

    My colleague, MarketWatch news editor Nicole Pesce, put together a guide for how much you should tip everyone, and who you should NOT tip. She also cited three reasons why tipping has become such a note of contention, and why it appears we are tipping more: people tipped staff more during the pandemic (they were, after all, putting their health and lives at risk with their jobs); 40-year high inflation over the last 12 months has increased the cost of everything and, as such our tips rose in tandem with prices; and, finally, digital tipping appears to be ubiquitous, and people have been suffering from tipping fatigue. 

    ‘You’re not the only one: Americans are souring on tipping.’

    You’re not the only one with tipping fatigue, though: Americans are generally souring on tipping. A large majority (66%) of U.S. adults have a negative view about tipping, according to a poll released by the personal-finance site Bankrate last month. The bottom line: consumers feel they are being forced to compensate employees for low pay (41%) and they don’t appreciate all that digital guilt tipping (32%) and, as a result, they believe that tipping culture has gotten out of control (30%). Respondents also said they were confused about how much to tip (15%), but a small minority (a paltry 16%) said they would be willing to pay higher prices in lieu of tipping.

    People appear to be less generous with their tipping amounts, and they also appear to be tipping less often. What’s perhaps most surprising from Bankrate’s research is that only 65% of diners actually tip when they eat out (that’s down from 73% last year). After restaurants, people are most likely to tip barbers/hairdressers (53% of those polled) and food-delivery workers (50%). From thereon, only a minority of people say they tip taxi or rideshare drivers (New York City cabs, which give tipping options upon payment, may be an outlier here), hotel housekeepers, baristas and food-delivery workers.

    It’s important that we have this conversation about tipping because expectations and digital tipping methods are evolving all the time. On the one hand, people are facing higher prices and they are understandably feeling under pressure to tip. On the other hand, this conversation naturally overlaps with the working conditions and pay of service workers. Americans are tipping less than they did during the worst days of the pandemic. Service workers — along with medical personnel, bus and train drivers and first responders — were among the heroes of the pandemic. That is something I hope we never forget.

    “The person who rings up my groceries isn’t allowed to accept tips, and they do a lot more than put a sandwich in a bag,” the letter writer says.


    MarketWatch illustration

    Also read:

    ‘I respect every profession equally, but I feel like so many people look down on me for being a waitress’: Americans are tipping less. Should we step up to the plate? 

    ‘We’re very upset!’ We gave a friend $400 concert tickets and $2,000 Rangers seats, but weren’t invited to his wedding. Do we speak up?

    ‘All of these tips add up’: If a restaurant adds a 20% tip, am I obliged to pay? Should tipping not be optional? 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • AMC Entertainment Shares Soar After Judge Blocks Equity Transactions

    AMC Entertainment Shares Soar After Judge Blocks Equity Transactions

    [ad_1]

    AMC Entertainment shares soared 70% after-hours Friday after a judge rejected a proposed court settlement that would have cleared the way for the movie-theater giant to complete a set of equity transactions enabling it to issue substantially more shares.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • AMC stock surges 60% after Delaware judge puts brakes on APE-to-stock conversion plan

    AMC stock surges 60% after Delaware judge puts brakes on APE-to-stock conversion plan

    [ad_1]

    Shares of AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. rocketed more than 60% higher on Friday after a judge in Delaware shot down a settlement that would have allowed the movie-theater chain to move ahead with a plan, maligned by some investors, to dump more shares onto the market, according to reports.

    AMC
    AMC,
    +1.62%

    has wanted to turn its its so-called APE — or AMC Preferred Equity — preferred units into common stock. But Delaware Chancery Court Vice Chancellor Morgan Zurn rejected an earlier settlement that would have allowed that conversion to move forward.

    The theater chain has been looking to find ways to boost its share count and sell more shares — a tack that helped it through the COVID-19 pandemic — as it tries to shore up its finances and rein in its debt, the Wall Street Journal noted.

    But not every investor was on board with the plan, amid worries about share dilution.

    “At this juncture, the Court’s only task is to approve or reject the proposed
    settlement,” wrote in the ruling, obtained by Bloomberg Law. “The focus of the settlement is on the claims presented in this case. The Court cannot address issues that do not pertain to the fairness of the settlement.”

    “Such issues raised by AMC stockholders include theories about synthetic shares, Wall Street corruption, dark pool trading, insider trading and RICO violations, and a request for a share count,” the ruling continued. “The Court’s role is limited to considering settlement-specific issues, like the strength of the plaintiffs’ claims, the consideration the class would receive, and the scope of the release the class would give in exchange for that consideration.”

    “To cut to the chase, the settlement cannot be approved as submitted,” the ruling added later.

    AMC did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Women’s World Cup 2023: When does the USWNT play? How much do the players make?

    Women’s World Cup 2023: When does the USWNT play? How much do the players make?

    [ad_1]

    The 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup kicks off this week in what is expected to be the biggest sporting event of the summer.

    The tournament favorite, the United States Women’s National Team, plays its first game on Friday against Vietnam at 9 p.m. EST.

    Here’s everything you need to know about this year’s highly anticipated World Cup:

    When is the Women’s World Cup?

    The tournament started on July 20 and ends on Aug. 20.

    The first games took place on Thursday when host nations New Zealand and Australia each won their matches.

    See also: The top 5 highest-paid women’s soccer players at the 2023 Women’s World Cup

    Where is the World Cup?

    The 2023 Women’s World Cup is being co-hosted by Australia and New Zealand.

    Matches will be held in nine cities including Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, Perth, Auckland, Wellington, Dunedin and Hamilton. The championship match will be held in Sydney.

    What is the time difference between New Zealand/Australia and the U.S.?

    The tournament’s location presents a major time difference for viewers in the U.S.

    Wellington, New Zealand, is 16 hours ahead of New York, and 19 hours ahead of Los Angeles. And Sydney, Australia, is 14 hours ahead of Eastern Standard Time.

    Most of the group stage games will start late at night or early in the morning for east coast viewers.

    What channel is the Women’s World Cup on?

    For U.S. viewers, the World Cup will be broadcast by Fox
    FOX,
    -0.98%

    and games will appear on the flagship Fox channel, Fox Sports 1, as well on Telemundo in Spanish.

    Fox is part of nearly all major cable bundles, and cord-cutters can stream the games on YouTubeTV, FuboTV
    FUBO,
    -4.83%
    ,
    Hulu + Live TV, and Sling TV.

    When does the USWNT play?

    As noted above, the USWNT plays its first group stage game on Friday, July 21, against Vietnam at 9 p.m. EST.

    The U.S. will then compete against the Netherlands on July 26 and Portugal on Aug. 1, and then compete in the knockout stage if they advance.

    Who won the last Women’s World Cup?

    The U.S. won the 2019 Women’s World Cup in France, after beating the Netherlands in the final, as well as the 2015 World Cup in Canada.

    The U.S. has a total of four Women’s World Cup titles, the most of any nation in the world, while the U.S. men’s team has never won the World Cup.

    When was the first Women’s World Cup?

    There have only been eight Women’s World Cups in history with the first tournament occurring in 1991, while the men’s version of the tournament first started in 1930.

    Only four countries have won the women’s tournament: the U.S., Germany, Norway and Japan.

    Who are the Women’s World Cup favorites?

    Below are the betting odds for the 2023 World Cup from DraftKings
    DKNG,
    +1.30%

    Sportsbook prior to the start of the tournament:

    • USA: +250

    • England +250

    • Spain +450

    • Germany +650

    • France +1000

    • Australia +1200

    • Sweden +1400

    • Netherland +2000

    • Brazil: +2500

    • Canada: +3500

    • Japan: +3500

    • Norway: +4000

    • Denmark: +6500

    • Italy: +8000

    • New Zealand: +15000

    For those not familiar with oddsmaking, a “+” symbol indicates an underdog. For example, a $100 bet placed on a +450 side would net a $450 profit, in addition to getting back your original $100.

    What is the Women’s World Cup prize money?

    The 2023 Women’s World Cup has $150 million in prize money, up 300% from the $30 million in total given out in 2019.

    While a significant increase, the amount is still much lower than the $440 doled out at the 2022 men’s tournament in Qatar. FIFA, which organizes the World Cup, said it’s an “objective” to achieve pay parity between the men’s and women’s tournaments by 2027.

    Below are the player and nation financial allocations for the 2023 Women’s World Cup:

    Player financial allocation:

    • Group stage: $30,000

    • Round of 16: $60,000

    • Quarter Final: $90,000

    • Fourth place: $165,000

    • Third place: $180,000

    • Second Place: $195,000

    • Champions: $270,000

    Nation financial allocation:

    • Group stage: $1,560,000

    • Round of 16: $1,870,000

    • Quarterfinal: $2,180,000

    • Fourth place: $2,455,000

    • Third place: $2,610,000

    • Second place: $3,015,000

    • Champion: $4,290,000

    Each player is guaranteed $30,00 for participating in the tournament, up from $14,000 in 2019.

    That’s significant for many of the players, who in some cases don’t have club teams that pay salaries, are semi-pros or even amateurs.

    See also: Women’s World Cup players must capitalize on money-making opportunities right now — while the eyes of the world are on them

    What’s the latest on the gender pay gap in U.S. soccer?

    As stated above, pay equity for tournament prizes is not the same for World Cup winners between the men and women’s tournaments, but what about in the U.S.?

    U.S. women soccer players last year reached a landmark agreement with the sport’s American governing body to end a six-year legal battle over equal pay, a deal in which they are promised $24 million plus bonuses that match those of the men.

    The U.S. Soccer Federation and the women announced a deal that will have players split $22 million, about one-third of what they had sought in damages. The USSF also agreed to establish a fund with $2 million to benefit the players in their post-soccer careers and charitable efforts aimed at growing the sport for women.

    The USWNT routinely advocated for pay parity during tournament appearances over the past decade.

    In addition to equal pay, high-profile players on the USWNT like Megan Rapinoe, Alex Morgan and Carli Lloyd, among many others, have publicly opposed forms of discrimination off the soccer field. These causes include advocating for gender rights, LGBTQ+ rights, voting rights and the Black Lives Matter movement.

    [ad_2]

    Source link