ReportWire

Tag: LEGAL

  • Diplo Accused of Distributing Revenge Porn in New Police Report

    Diplo Accused of Distributing Revenge Porn in New Police Report

    [ad_1]

    In between the time of the dual restraining order agreement in January 2021 and the arbitration ruling in September 2022, Diplo and Auguste filed their competing lawsuits. Diplo filed his lawsuit against Auguste—alleging stalking, trespassing, and distributing private materials—in April 2021. Auguste filed her lawsuit against Diplo—alleging sexual battery, gender violence, and more—in June 2021.

    (Shortly after Auguste filed her lawsuit, another woman also filed a suit against Diplo, alleging that she was coerced into performing oral sex on him at an after-party in Las Vegas in 2019. She also alleged that Diplo filmed the alleged incident nonconsensually. The woman withdrew her lawsuit within a month of its filing. An attorney for Diplo said upon the complaint’s withdrawal, “As we said when we first learned of this lawsuit, there was absolutely irrefutable evidence that proved that the allegations it contained were false. As soon as we shared that plethora of evidence with the plaintiff’s lawyers, they recognized that they needed to withdraw their suit immediately.”)

    Auguste went to police with her new claim on Friday, August 18, 2023, “to report that she was the victim of Revenge Porn,” the police report states. In the report, it’s noted that Auguste told a police officer that she had allowed Diplo to take nude photographs of her and “sent […] nude videos and photographs to [Diplo] voluntarily. Those items were for him only and not to distribute to others.” She added that he “distributed some of the nude videos and photographs of her online,” as also alleged in her lawsuit.

    The same day Auguste went to the police station, she said in the report, a woman contacted her on Instagram and told her that she had six nude photographs of her; Auguste explained in the report “that they were the photographs that either [Diplo] took or that she had given to him.”

    Auguste, according to the police report, “believes that [Diplo] is distributing the nude photographs because he is mad at her for recently filing legal action against him. She stated that he wants to harass and embarrass her.”

    Auguste was granted a new temporary restraining order against Diplo on September 18. On August 24, Diplo made a request for his own temporary restraining order. That request was denied, with the Superior Court of California stating in its explanation that “[t]here are insufficient articulable facts of harassment pled in this Petition to warrant the Court’s issuance of emergency temporary orders.” In October, a judge extended Auguste’s temporary restraining order until December 2023.

    Auguste is currently enrolled in California’s Safe at Home program, which allows “victims of domestic violence, stalking, sexual assault, human trafficking and elder and dependent abuse, as well as reproductive health care workers, a substitute mailing address to receive first class, certified, and registered mail.”

    “I think it’s time the music industry stops enabling the perpetual abuse that occurs,” Shelly Auguste said in a statement to Pitchfork. “I have been silenced for far too long. I hope that with this restraining order I can finally gain peace and protection. I hope that with the criminal investigation, the justice system gets it right this time.”


    If you or someone you know has been affected by sexual assault, we encourage you to reach out for support:

    RAINN National Sexual Assault Hotline
    http://www.rainn.org
    1 800 656 HOPE (4673)

    Crisis Text Line
    SMS: Text “HELLO” or “HOLA” to 741-741

    If you are being sexually harassed, you can report it to the authorities at your job, school, or local law enforcement. For more information go to https://www.rainn.org/ThatsHarassment

    [ad_2]

    Carly Lewis

    Source link

  • Jussie Smollett’s Felony Disorderly Conduct Conviction Upheld by Appeals Court

    Jussie Smollett’s Felony Disorderly Conduct Conviction Upheld by Appeals Court

    [ad_1]

    Jussie Smollett, the former Empire actor who was convicted of staging and reporting a hate crime on himself in 2019, may have to finish a 150-day jail sentence that was cut short last year, The Associated Press reports. Smollett had appealed his conviction, but an Illinois court has now upheld it. The AP reports that, while Smollett challenged evidence, jury selection, the role of special prosecutor, and other facets of the case, an Illinois appellate court ruled against him in a 2-1 decision.

    In January 2019, Smollett, who is Black and gay, reported to the Chicago Police Department that he had been the victim of a racist and homophobic attack. In the ensuing months, the two suspects originally arrested in connection with the alleged attack were released from police custody. Days later, Smollett was charged with felony disorderly conduct for filing a false police report about the attack.

    After losing his spot on the remainder of Empire’s fifth season, Smollett was hit with a 16-count grand jury indictment for filing false police reports and posing as a victim of a hate crime. Smollett pleaded not guilty on all counts, and the charges were ultimately dropped.

    He was indicted again, however, on six counts of disorderly conduct for the bogus 2019 police report. After pleading not guilty to the new indictment, Smollett was convicted on all six counts in December 2021.

    Smollett was originally sentenced to 150 days in county jail in March of last year, but an appeals court ordered his release after the actor had served six days of the stint. At the time, the court ruled that Smollett should be released pending the appeal of his conviction. Smollett’s release was contingent on a personal recognizance bond of $150,000 that would require him to be in attendance at court.

    [ad_2]

    Madison Bloom

    Source link

  • FTX Seeks Court Approval to Wipe Out US IRS’s $24B Claim

    FTX Seeks Court Approval to Wipe Out US IRS’s $24B Claim

    [ad_1]

    The bankrupt estate of FTX has made a bold move to challenge the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS), seeking court approval to reduce a $24 billion claim against it to zero.

    According to FTX, this move is crucial to prevent the IRS claims from derailing the progression of its bankruptcy proceedings.

    FTX Seeks to Nullify IRS’s $24 Billion Claim

    Earlier this year, the IRS imposed a massive tax bill on FTX and its associated Alameda groups of companies, amounting to approximately $44 billion, prioritizing the claims of customers who suffered financial losses due to the exchange’s collapse.

    The IRS’s claims included two substantial amounts: a $20.4 billion and a $7.9 billion claim against Alameda Research LLC. These figures stem from allegations of unpaid partnership taxes, amounting to about $20 billion, and millions in unmet income and payroll tax obligations.

    Despite the initial claim, the IRS revised its demand, scaling it to $24 billion. However, in its November 29 filing, FTX contests this revised figure, describing it as grounded in “mere speculation and conjecture.”

    The firm highlighted that the IRS has not provided a clear basis for these estimates, as the agency’s audit teams have reportedly been unable to justify the calculations or share them with the debtors.

    FTX Challenges IRS’s $24 Billion Claim

    FTX’s argument against the IRS claim is based on the assertion that the amount is hugely inflated. The firm argues that the $24 billion claim is more than fifty times its total earnings, hundreds of times more than any plausible tax obligation, and several times the total value available for distribution to its creditors.

    Adding to the complexity, FTX revealed that the IRS had dismissed tax returns prepared by Ernst & Young LLP, a respected accounting firm, on the grounds of insufficient substantiation. This rejection raises questions about the IRS’s assessment methods and the validity of its claims.

    The insolvent exchange also expressed concerns that resolving the IRS claims could span multiple years, potentially leading to a lengthy legal battle that would hinder the progress of its bankruptcy proceedings.

    FTX advocates for the court to estimate the IRS claims at $0.00 to avoid such delays and ensure timely distributions to its customers and creditors. The firm asserts that such a move is crucial to prevent the IRS claims from derailing the progression of its bankruptcy proceedings.

    SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)

    Binance Free $100 (Exclusive): Use this link to register and receive $100 free and 10% off fees on Binance Futures first month (terms).

    [ad_2]

    Wayne Jones

    Source link

  • Hall and Oates Open Up About Their Dissolution in New Court Filings

    Hall and Oates Open Up About Their Dissolution in New Court Filings

    [ad_1]

    Daryl Hall accused his Hall and Oates bandmate and partner John Oates of the “ultimate partnership betrayal” in a new court document filed Wednesday, which supports his Nashville chancery court lawsuit over an alleged breach of their business partnership. Hall described Oates’ plan to sell his half of their company Whole Oats Enterprises to Primary Wave as having happened “completely behind my back” and without his written consent, the AP and Rolling Stone report. “I am deeply troubled by the deterioration of my relationship with, and trust in, John Oates,” Hall wrote in his declaration.

    In his filing, Hall claimed that he and Oates were in the middle of mediation to potentially dissolve or untangle Whole Oates Enterprises as part of what Hall described as a “global divorce.” Hall described Oates’ behavior in the past several years as “adversarial and aggressive instead of professional and courteous.”

    Hall said he then learned of Oates’ attempted sale to Primary Wave. Hall offered harsh words about Primary Wave’s business practices, citing the potential of “unimaginable” harm to Whole Oats’ many assets (including the duo’s trademarks, likenesses, royalties, and online properties). “I have no intention of becoming partners with Primary Wave, and the Oates Trust cannot be permitted to thrust a new partner upon me in this outrageous fashion.” The judge issued a temporary restraining order to block Oates’ planned sale the same day Hall filed the lawsuit.

    Oates filed his response in court on Wednesday, calling Hall’s statements “inflammatory, outlandish, and inaccurate.” He added: “I have no idea who or what is motivating Daryl to take these steps and make such salacious statements, but I am deeply hurt.”

    “Over the years, Daryl has consistently and publicly been adamant about being perceived as an individual rather than as part of a duo or group. Thus, he has insisted on our being known as ‘Daryl Hall and John Oates,’ rather than the more commonly known ‘Hall & Oates,’” Oates wrote. “On this point I agree. I now must act with truthfulness and make decisions that are right for myself, my family, and my artistic future.”

    Primary Wave has owned a partial interest in Hall and Oates’ song catalog for 15 years. Hall has spoken publicly about regretting that deal. “Never sell your publishing,” he said. “Maybe if you’re, you know, 80 years old and you decided to retire, then you can sell your publishing, but I wouldn’t even suggest it then. I don’t believe in that concept.”

    [ad_2]

    Evan Minsker

    Source link

  • Atletico Madrid to Sue WhaleFin for $44M in Unpaid Sponsorship Fees: Report

    Atletico Madrid to Sue WhaleFin for $44M in Unpaid Sponsorship Fees: Report

    [ad_1]

    The renowned Spanish football club Atletico Madrid is reportedly gearing up to take legal action against WhaleFin, a Singapore-based cryptocurrency exchange.

    The dispute centers around a breach of contract involving unpaid sponsorship fees amounting to €40 million ($44 million).

    Atletico Madrid Seeks $21 Million in Damages in Lawsuit

    Atletico Madrid, the esteemed Spanish football club, is preparing for a legal battle with WhaleFin, a Singaporean cryptocurrency exchange, over a €40 million unpaid sponsorship deal.

    The club, which entered a five-year agreement with WhaleFin for the 2022/23 season, claims the company has breached the contract terms by not fulfilling payment obligations. In response, Atletico Madrid is seeking €20 million in damages.

    The backdrop to this legal challenge involves the financial struggles faced by Amber Group, the owner of WhaleFin. Reports from December 2022 highlighted Amber Group’s difficulties, leading to the termination of a similar sponsorship deal with the English Premier League’s Chelsea FC, valued at $25 million annually, just seven months into the agreement.

    During that period, the Singapore-based cryptocurrency trading firm made the decision to downsize its workforce by approximately 300 employees. It had also started winding down its retail operations, further emphasizing its financial challenges.

    Inter Milan and Roma Cut Ties with DigitalBits

    The situation with Atletico Madrid bears similarities to issues faced by other European football clubs in their dealings with cryptocurrency firms.

    Inter Milan and Roma, prominent Italian clubs, experienced similar sponsorship failures with the blockchain company DigitalBits. The two clubs had to sever ties with DigitalBits after it failed to pay over €27 million ($30 million) combined in sponsorship fees.

    Roma’s dealings with DigitalBits began with a three-year shirt sponsorship agreement with Zytara Labs in July 2021. Inter Milan signed a four-year contract for sleeve sponsorship rights, which were later upgraded to front-of-shirt rights for the 2022-23 season.

    However, Inter Milan disclosed problems with the partnership as early as October last year, leading to it seeking a new shirt sponsor. By March, it was revealed that Inter had not received any payments for the season from DigitalBits, despite an agreement worth €85 million.

    Consequently, Inter Milan and Roma removed the DigitalBits logo from their shirts due to continued payment failures.

    SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)

    Binance Free $100 (Exclusive): Use this link to register and receive $100 free and 10% off fees on Binance Futures first month (terms).

    [ad_2]

    Wayne Jones

    Source link

  • Diddy Sued by Two More Women, Accused of Sexual Assault, Sex Trafficking, Revenge Porn, and More

    Diddy Sued by Two More Women, Accused of Sexual Assault, Sex Trafficking, Revenge Porn, and More

    [ad_1]

    Note: This article contains descriptions of alleged sexual assault.


    Less than a week after settling a sexual assault lawsuit brought by Cassie, Sean “Diddy” Combs has been sued by two more women, one of whom alleges rape, the other sex trafficking and revenge porn, among other claims. The separate lawsuits—by Joi Dickerson-Neal and a woman identified as Jane Doe—were both filed under New York’s Adult Survivors Act and pertain to alleged incidents in the early 1990s.

    Joi Dickerson-Neal accuses Diddy of assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, sex trafficking, gender-motivated violence, and making and disseminating revenge porn. She claims that, while studying psychology at Syracuse University, she agreed to a date with Diddy, with whom she had starred in a music video. She alleges that, during the date, Diddy drugged her, took her to another location, then secretly filmed himself sexually assaulting her. Days later, she claims, a male friend told her that he and several others had seen the footage.

    Dickerson-Neal was hospitalized for severe depression and suicide ideation, according to the lawsuit. It adds that she was left with “overwhelming feelings of humiliation, embarrassment, violation, and constant apprehension” about who had seen the video. The lawsuit also names Bad Boy Entertainment and Combs Entertainment LLC as defendants.

    In a statement shared with Pitchfork, Dickerson-Neal added: “Truthfully, it has all been said in my lawsuit. I am so thankful for the bravery of the other women that came forward, the Adult Survivors Act which opened up the filing window to seek justice, and the unwavering support from my attorneys. For 32 years, the only people I have been able to confide in were my close friends and therapists. I’m feeling as if the darkness has been lifted and I can freely move forward in achieving my full potential.”

    The lawsuit attributed to Jane Doe also names the singer Aaron Hall as a defendant (along with MCA Inc., MCA Music Entertainment Group, Geffen Records, 10 John and Jane Does, and 10 unknown entities summarized as “ABC Corps.”). She alleges that she and a friend were at an MCA event when Diddy and Hall invited them to an afterparty. After arriving at Hall’s apartment, she claims, Diddy coerced her into sex, before Hall “barged into the room, pinned her down,” and raped her. She alleges that, in another room, the two men also forced her friend to have sex with them. Two days later, the lawsuit alleges, Diddy—worried that “the girl he was with at the time” would find out about the alleged incident—came to the home where the two women were staying and choked Doe until she passed out.

    When reached by Pitchfork, a spokesperson for Sean “Diddy” Combs stated: “These are fabricated claims falsely alleging misconduct from over 30 years ago and filed at the last minute. This is nothing but a money grab. Because of Mr. Combs’ fame and success, he is an easy target for anonymous accusers who lie without conscience or consequence for financial benefit. The New York Legislature surely did not intend or expect the Adult Survivors Act to be exploited by scammers. The public should be skeptical and not rush to accept these bogus allegations.”


    If you or someone you know has been affected by sexual assault, we encourage you to reach out for support:

    RAINN National Sexual Assault Hotline
    http://rainn.org
    1 800 656 HOPE (4673)

    Crisis Text Line
    SMS: Text “HELLO” or “HOLA” to 741-741

    [ad_2]

    Jazz Monroe

    Source link

  • Anti-Flag’s Justin Sane Sued for Raping Fan in 2010

    Anti-Flag’s Justin Sane Sued for Raping Fan in 2010

    [ad_1]

    At the motel, Sarhadi claims that Justin Sane screamed, “Football Tackle!” and tackled her onto the bed, then strangled her and forced her to perform oral sex. She says she was crying and repeatedly told him to stop, but he ignored her, penetrating her vagina with his penis and eventually passing out on top of her. She says she was able to escape his hotel room without waking him.

    Sarhadi says the incident left her with a number of psychological injuries, and that she has had treatment for “C-PTSD, clinical depression, ADHD resulting from trauma, emotional hyperarousal, and rejection sensitivity dysphoria.” She is seeking damages for lost income and medical and mental health costs, accusing Justin Sane of assault, sexual battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. She also accuses Hardwork and Doe 1 of negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress.

    In her statement, Sarhadi says that, when she first shared her story, she did so for her “own personal healing” and “had no intention of naming Justin or pursuing a lawsuit.” But hearing from other alleged survivors of abuse at his hands encouraged her to take action. “In the last five months I have learned the levels of his depravity and witnessed the inaction of those around him who could have and should have intervened to protect us,” she says.

    Dr. Ann Olivarius, an attorney for Sarhadi, said in her own statement, “I predict that in five years the music industry will be viewed the same way as the Catholic Church or the Boy Scouts—a powerful force that also enabled and shielded sexual predators for decades. ‘Drugs, sex & rock ‘n roll’ was a reality that meant a lot of young women got abused. The bands had handlers who made it all happen and executives who covered it all up because so much money depended on it.”

    After the first allegation surfaced, several women came forward with similar accusations of predatory behavior and sexual abuse by Justin Sane, as the lawsuit notes. At the time, the other members of Anti-Flag released a statement condemning him and thanking the survivors for coming forward. Pitchfork has emailed Justin Sane for comment.


    If you or someone you know has been affected by sexual assault, we encourage you to reach out for support:

    RAINN National Sexual Assault Hotline
    http://rainn.org
    1 800 656 HOPE (4673)

    Crisis Text Line
    SMS: Text “HELLO” or “HOLA” to 741-741

    [ad_2]

    Jazz Monroe

    Source link

  • Axl Rose Sued Over Alleged 1989 Sexual Assault

    Axl Rose Sued Over Alleged 1989 Sexual Assault

    [ad_1]

    Note: This article contains graphic descriptions of alleged sexual assault.


    Sheila Kennedy has sued Guns N’ Roses singer Axl Rose for allegedly sexually assaulting her in 1989. Kennedy, a former Penthouse model, alleges in the lawsuit that Rose used his celebrity to “manipulate, control, and violently sexually assault” her at a party, causing “symptoms akin to post-traumatic stress disorder.” Legal representatives for Kennedy filed the summons and complaint today (November 22), requesting a jury trial, under New York’s Adult Survivors Act.

    According to the lawsuit, Kennedy met Rose at a nightclub and invited her and another model to his New York hotel room for a party with one of his friends. Kennedy says she initially consented to Rose’s advances, but changed her mind when he became aggressive during sex with the other model, and when he appeared to try to instigate group sex. She claims that, shortly afterward, she went to Rose’s friend’s hotel room when Rose stormed in, blocked her exit, and threw her to the floor. According to the lawsuit, Rose then “grabbed her by the hair and dragged her across the suite back to his bedroom,” causing her knees to bleed.

    The lawsuit alleges that Kennedy was crying and trying to gather her belongings when Rose threw her onto the bed and tied up her hands with pantyhose. “He dragged Kennedy to his bedroom like a caveman,” the lawsuit continues, and anally raped her without a condom. She feared that he would retaliate if she tried to escape, so waited for the assault to finish before she left, according to the lawsuit.

    As a result of the alleged assault, Kennedy was diagnosed with anxiety and depression, has difficulty with physical and emotional intimacy, and avoids social scenarios where she might hear Rose’s music, the lawsuit alleges. She is seeking damages for assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and gender-motivated violence.

    When reached by Pitchfork, Alan S. Gutman, an attorney for Axl Rose, stated:

    Simply put, this incident never happened. Notably, these fictional claims were filed the day before the New York State filing deadline expires.

    Though he doesn’t deny the possibility of a fan photo taken in passing, Mr. Rose has no recollection of ever meeting or speaking to the Plaintiff, and has never heard about these fictional allegations prior to today.

    Mr. Rose is confident this case will be resolved in his favor.

    Pitchfork has also reached out to Sheila Kennedy’s attorneys for comment.


    If you or someone you know has been affected by sexual assault, we encourage you to reach out for support:

    RAINN National Sexual Assault Hotline
    http://rainn.org
    1 800 656 HOPE (4673)

    Crisis Text Line
    SMS: Text “HELLO” or “HOLA” to 741-741

    [ad_2]

    Jazz Monroe

    Source link

  • A$AP Rocky to Stand Trial on Charge He Fired Gun at Former Friend

    A$AP Rocky to Stand Trial on Charge He Fired Gun at Former Friend

    [ad_1]

    A$AP Rocky must stand trial for allegedly shooting his former friend Terell “A$AP Relli” Ephron in 2021, a Los Angeles judge ruled yesterday (November 21), The Associated Press reports. The judge said there was enough evidence for Rocky to face the two felony counts of assault with a semiautomatic firearm. Rocky has pleaded not guilty to both charges. He faces up to 24 years in prison, prosecutors said.

    The judge emphasized that, while there is sufficient evidence for a trial, preliminary hearings have a much lower evidence standard, The AP reports. Rocky’s attorney, Joe Tacopina, said outside court, “We’re not disappointed, not surprised, we expected to go to trial, we’ve been planning for trial all along. Rocky is going to be vindicated when all this is said and done, without question.”

    In the preliminary hearing, the prosecution and defense analyzed footage from the scene of an alleged shooting, in which prosecutors claim to have identified Rocky. Using bodycam footage, Tacopina established that police found no evidence of the shooting after searching a sidewalk and street about 20 minutes after the apparent sound of gunshots. Surveillance footage captured images of a hooded figure carrying what appears to be a gun, but detectives said the gun was not recovered.

    A$AP Relli has also sued A$AP Rocky, both for the alleged shooting and for defaming him in the press.

    [ad_2]

    Jazz Monroe

    Source link

  • Cassie Settles Sexual Assault Lawsuit with Sean “Diddy” Combs

    Cassie Settles Sexual Assault Lawsuit with Sean “Diddy” Combs

    [ad_1]

    The R&B and singer Cassie, who had accused Sean “Diddy” Combs of rape, sexual battery, and sex trafficking in a bombshell lawsuit this week, has settled her suit with the hip-hop mogul. Her attorney, Douglas H. Wigdor, announced the development in a press release Friday night (November 17), a day after the New York Times first reported on the suit.

    Both parties shared brief statements about the swift end to the case, with Cassie writing, “I have decided to resolve this matter amicably on terms that I have some level of control. I want to thank my family, fans and lawyers for their unwavering support.”

    Diddy, for his part, offered, “We have decided to resolve this matter amicably. I wish Cassie and her family all the best. Love.” Wigdor said that neither his client nor Diddy would make further comment on the matter, and did not disclose the sum of the settlement.

    In her suit, Cassie, whose legal name is Casandra Elizabeth Ventura, detailed numerous instances of sexual, verbal, and physical abuse over the course of several years, along with accusations of sex trafficking and forced drug use. She filed the suit under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, which expires on November 23. Former Danity Kane members Dawn Richard and Aubrey O’Day, who had both worked with Diddy via Making the Band, expressed their support for Cassie


    If you or someone you know has been affected by sexual assault, we encourage you to reach out for support:

    RAINN National Sexual Assault Hotline
    https://www.rainn.org
    1 800 656 HOPE (4673)

    Crisis Text Line
    SMS: Text “HELLO” or “HOLA” to 741-741

    If you or someone you know have been affected by domestic abuse, we encourage you to reach out:

    The National Domestic Violence Hotline
    https://thehotline.org
    1-800-799-SAFE (7233)

    [ad_2]

    Allison Hussey

    Source link

  • US Authorities Seize $54 Million in Crypto From New Jersey Narcotics Ring

    US Authorities Seize $54 Million in Crypto From New Jersey Narcotics Ring

    [ad_1]

    New Jersey’s U.S. Attorney’s Office has filed a civil forfeiture action against Christopher Castelluzzo and two other members of an unnamed drug trafficking group based in New Jersey.

    According to the filing, the other two members of the group are Luke Atwell – a friend and business partner of Castelluzzo’s who is currently serving a similar sentence – and Brian Krewson, another friend of the two who reportedly manages their estate for the time being.

    Attempts to Move Crypto For Tax Avoidance

    The stash was allegedly discovered after Castelluzzo – who is currently serving two concurrent 20-year sentences – attempted to communicate with members of his outfit while in prison in order to move the funds to another country in a bid to avoid taxation.

    According to FBI Agent James Dennehy, the seizure is testimony of his agency’s capabilities to uncover illicit funds no matter where they may be.

    “Our forfeiture action of $54 million should serve as a lesson to those who mistakenly believe we can’t trace their illicit behavior or their ill-gotten proceeds. We will successfully hold all criminals responsible in the open, with real-world consequences.”

    Operating Since The Early Days

    Although the total haul of $54 million is significant, the number does not reflect the true amount of illegal substances that the pair actually sold.

    According to the forfeiture action, the two defendants had been selling drugs for crypto on various dark web markets ever since 2013.

    Although 0.49 BTC were still held by Castelluzzo, the vast majority of the haul was reinvested into other cryptocurrencies – which have since massively grown in value.

    For instance, the lion’s share of the confiscated funds is in Ether – with 30,000 ETH seized. These tokens were purchased at Ethereum’s original ICO.

    Further investments were also made into Chainlink, Polkadot, Algorand, and eight more cryptocurrencies (excluding BTC and ETH).

    U.S. Attorney Phillip R. Sellinger stated that the U.S. justice system will continue to track down the proceeds of illegal activity in whatever form they may be.

    “The civil action we are taking today seeks to recover millions of dollars of cryptocurrency, which the defendant allegedly obtained from drug sales. Whether it’s as simple as bags of cash or as sophisticated as cryptocurrency, we will take the steps necessary to seize financial gains defendants obtain from criminal activity.”

    Sellinger’s statement is remarkably similar to the one made by an attorney after SBF’s guilty verdict, suggesting a possible guideline regarding statements on crypto – more specifically, neither attorney blamed crypto as the catalyst for criminal activity. Instead, the attorneys indicated that the proceeds of criminal behavior are still illicit, regardless of whether they are stored in rolls of cash or on USB sticks.

    SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)

    Binance Free $100 (Exclusive): Use this link to register and receive $100 free and 10% off fees on Binance Futures first month (terms).

    [ad_2]

    Cristian Lipciuc

    Source link

  • A Legal Battle Over Injections in SLC?! Plus ‘Salt Lake City,’ ‘Beverly Hills,’ and ‘Potomac.’

    A Legal Battle Over Injections in SLC?! Plus ‘Salt Lake City,’ ‘Beverly Hills,’ and ‘Potomac.’

    [ad_1]

    Rachel Lindsay and Jodi Walker kick off today’s Morally Corrupt with a breakdown of the piping hot tea concerning Heather Gay’s Beauty Lab + Laser and Monica Garcia’s legal battle over injections (14:09), followed by an in depth discussion of The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City Season 4, Episode 9 (20:52). Then, Jodi and Rachel recap The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills Season 13, Episode 3 (42:08), before Callie Curry returns to the pod to dish about the Real Housewives of Potomac Season 8 premiere (1:04:16).

    Host: Rachel Lindsay
    Guests: Jodi Walker and Callie Curry
    Producers: Devon Manze
    Theme Song: Devon Renaldo

    Subscribe: Spotify

    [ad_2]

    Jodi Walker

    Source link

  • Murderer Killed a Man over Non-existent Casino Winnings, Sentenced to Life in Prison

    Murderer Killed a Man over Non-existent Casino Winnings, Sentenced to Life in Prison

    [ad_1]

    A man for Oklahoma has been sentenced to life in prison for the murder of a man who jokingly bragged about winning at a local casino. As it turned out, the supposed winner had no money, which infuriating the killer.

    Back in October 2020, the killer, Kevin Marvell Jackson, 22, was attending a house party in Muskogee with his girlfriend Natalie McMahon. There, he met with the victim, Bradley Dillon, 19, and another friend named Dakota Berryhill.

    At one point, Dillon and Berryhill left the party and went to Creek Nation Casino Muskogee, a local gambling property. While on their way back to the party, the two called their friends and joked about winning $10,000.

    The money tempted Jackson and, without taking time to consider whether Dilon and Berryhill had truly won a prize, he prepared to rob them. Jackson quickly grabbed a gun and hid his face with a ski mask. Then, he waited for the two other men to return and ambushed them as they got out of the car.

    Jackson then learned that the two men had no money. Angry, he threatened them with a gun, telling them to drive to an ATM and withdraw some. At that point, Berryhill got scared, jumped back into the car and drove away, leaving his Dillon behind. The frustrated killer then took the young man’s life, shooting him five times.

    Jackson Will Spend His Life Behind Bars

    Dillon was rushed to St. Francis Hospital but was pronounced dead. In the meantime, the police began the search for the killer.

    A woman by the name Vicky Garza saw the murder and helped the police identify the killer. Facebook Messenger conversations with McMahon helped the law enforcers incriminate him. However, it wouldn’t be before several weeks that the murderer was finally arrested.

    Jackson’s despicable crime has now earned him two life sentences without the right for parole. He was also sentenced to 180 in prison for robbery in an Indian Country and 180 months in prison for using a firearm for a violent crime.

    Attorney Christopher Wilson commented on the matter, saying that there is no room in society for people who commit “such callous acts” as Jackson.

    In other legal news, two Las Vegas dealers were arrested for allegedly helping two regular baccarat players win big sums.

    [ad_2]

    Fiona Simmons

    Source link

  • SafeMoon CEO Bail Approved, Then Halted

    SafeMoon CEO Bail Approved, Then Halted

    [ad_1]

    SafeMoon, a project whose goal was to “safely” moon a token – mostly by preventing holders from cashing out with large fees – plummeted once investors found out that the investment pools were not actually locked as promised within the same month that the project reached a market cap of $5.7 billion.

    Founders’ Trial Underway

    According to court documents, prosecutors believe that SFM tokens were actually used to fund a life of luxury for those at the helm of the project.

    “As alleged, the defendants deliberately misled investors and diverted millions of dollars to fuel their greedy scheme and enrich themselves by purchasing a custom Porsche sports car, other luxury vehicles, and real estate.”

    This opinion is strengthened by the smart contract exploit worth nearly $9 million suffered by the project earlier this year, which many believe was an inside job.

    According to prosecutors, founders Kyle Nagy, Thomas Smith, and Braden John Karony have committed securities fraud. Karony – the CEO of the project – faces a statutory maximum of 45 years in jail if found guilty.

    Bail Order to Be Reviewed By Judge

    Earlier this month, Karony and Smith were arrested, while Nagy remains free for undisclosed reasons. Smith has since managed to secure bail in exchange for a $500k bond and is reportedly pursuing a plea deal.

    Karony also attempted to secure a temporary release – however, the prosecution blocked his bid a day later.

    On the 8th of November, Karony was also granted bail for the same amount as his co-executive. If granted, Karony would be allowed to live in his Miami apartment with no access to crypto exchanges and wallets. He would also have been barred from promoting any of his businesses in any form.

    However, New York District Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall has stayed Judge Oberg’s decision to approve bail following a hearing in Utah.

    According to the prosecution, Karony presents a significant flight risk, having major connections in Europe – including his fiancée.

    Furthermore, the court allegedly failed to accurately assess the defendant’s assets. The prosecution believes that Karony still has access to millions of dollars – compared to which 500k is a drop in the bucket.

    “If convicted, the defendant faces a statutory maximum of 45 years’ imprisonment. These facts all provide powerful incentives for the defendant to leverage his substantial (and opaque) financial assets and foreign ties to avoid that outcome.”

    Karony’s bail conditions will be reviewed at a later date – and may be revoked entirely.

    SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)

    Binance Free $100 (Exclusive): Use this link to register and receive $100 free and 10% off fees on Binance Futures first month (terms).

    [ad_2]

    Cristian Lipciuc

    Source link

  • 3 Proven Strategies for Law Firms to Boost Efficiency | Entrepreneur

    3 Proven Strategies for Law Firms to Boost Efficiency | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    In today’s highly competitive legal landscape, law firms are constantly seeking ways to optimize their operations. Efficiency has become more than just a buzzword; it is a requisite for staying ahead and delivering top-notch service to clients.

    As the complexities of legal practice increase, embracing new strategies for improving efficiency can set a firm apart. Let’s delve into some of the strategies law firms can deploy to enhance their workflow and maximize productivity.

    Related: 6 Transformative Methods for Boosting Workplace Efficiency

    Efficiency matters: Time is money for law firms

    In the legal realm, every second counts. Not only do lawyers bill by the hour, but the nature of their work demands acute attention to detail within tight deadlines. For a law firm, wasted time translates directly into lost revenue and potential missed opportunities.

    Efficient practices can drastically reduce operational costs. Furthermore, by minimizing wasted time and maximizing billable hours, firms can enhance their profitability. The ripple effect of increased efficiency not only boosts the firm’s bottom line but also leads to more satisfied clients. In a competitive legal market, the firms that prioritize efficiency are the ones that will stand out and excel.

    The legal industry is characterized by its dynamic nature. With ever-changing regulations, case laws and client demands, attorneys are always on their toes. Efficiency is the secret weapon that can help them stay ahead. It ensures that they can adapt quickly, offer competitive rates and deliver optimal results. After all, a more efficient lawyer can provide faster, more accurate services, which is what every client hopes for when hiring legal representation.

    1. Timeboxing is a must

    The concept of timeboxing revolves around allocating specific blocks of time for particular tasks. By setting clear boundaries for how long a task should take, lawyers can prevent themselves from going down rabbit holes. It’s a method that works wonders in keeping distractions at bay. Ensuring each task receives undivided attention maximizes efficiency.

    By adhering to the time allocated for a task, legal professionals maintain focus and productivity. This method ensures that they are working effectively and efficiently. Timeboxing also ensures that there’s ample time left for other essential obligations. In essence, it’s about working smarter, not just harder.

    2. Provide top-tier technology

    The digital age has revolutionized the way law firms operate. To remain competitive and provide the best service, firms must invest in the latest technological advancements. Among the selection of tech tools available, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as particularly transformative for legal research. AI can analyze vast amounts of data in minimal time, streamlining the research process.

    Furthermore, certain AI-driven platforms come equipped with quick summary features. These tools allow lawyers to swiftly grasp the essence of extensive documents. Leveraging such technology aids in faster and more informed decision-making. In a profession where time is of the essence, these tech solutions are indispensable.

    Related: How to Enhance Business Automation and Unlock New Levels of Operational Efficiency

    3. Reduce administrative tasks

    Administrative tasks, though necessary, can be time-consuming. Such tasks can eat into the hours that could otherwise be dedicated to legal work. Outsourcing or automating these tasks can significantly free up a lawyer’s time. Leveraging technology for appointment management or routine paperwork can simplify these operations.

    By reducing manual administrative duties, legal professionals can focus more on their core competencies. This means more time for client consultations, court appearances and case research. Moreover, it allows for more strategic planning and case preparation. Ultimately, streamlining administrative tasks enhances overall efficiency and client service.

    In the world of law, time is a precious commodity. For firms, the goal is to ensure that every minute spent is valuable and contributes positively to the bottom line. Efficiency isn’t just about speed; it’s about making the best use of available resources and time. Firms that successfully harness the strategies mentioned above can expect not only enhanced productivity but also improved client satisfaction. Maximizing the value of time means working smarter, not necessarily harder. When legal professionals make the most of every moment, it results in higher quality work, better client relationships and a more fulfilling professional experience. That makes the legal industry better for all parties involved.

    Related: 3 Key Steps to Make Your Business More Efficient and More Profitable

    Enhanced efficiency has a cascading effect on a law firm’s overall operations. By streamlining processes, firms can serve their clients better, faster and with higher accuracy. This not only bolsters the firm’s reputation but also fortifies client trust. Moreover, this relentless pursuit of efficiency stimulates a proactive environment where attorneys and support staff are encouraged to consistently perform at their peak, leading to a workplace that nurtures success and job satisfaction.

    In the end, an efficient law firm isn’t just about saving time or reducing costs — it’s about creating a culture that values innovation, continuous improvement and, above all, client satisfaction. So, as you move forward, remember that boosting efficiency is an ongoing journey, one that reaps significant rewards for both the firm and its clientele.

    [ad_2]

    Keri Gohman

    Source link

  • Court Says Encore Boston Harbor Didn’t Shortchange or Mislead Customers

    Court Says Encore Boston Harbor Didn’t Shortchange or Mislead Customers

    [ad_1]

    A Massachusetts consumer claimed that Encore Boston Harbor and its ownership group, Wynn Resorts, shortchanged its customers. However, the court sided with the casino.

    In a lawsuit filed in August 2019, Richard Schuster, who claims to be one of the casino’s first patrons, alleged that the property’s ticket redemption units had technical issues that didn’t properly disperse coins. Schuster also said that the coinless machines introduced shortly after the casino’s opening were unfair.

    The man alleged that Encore Boston Harbor shortchanged him on the 12 visits he made to the property, echoing other similar cases. Because of that, he accused the property of violating Massachusetts’ consumer protection laws and violating its contract.

    Wynn Says Schuster Was Fully Aware of How to Redeem His Tickets

    However, Wynn Resorts officials explained that the ticket redemption units dispense cash in the amount of the nearest whole dollar value. The coinless machines would then issue a ticket with the rest of the change that players can redeem at a cashier window.

    Schuster alleged that the coinless machines discourage consumers from seeking to redeem their change, allowing the casino to keep it. He himself would often throw away the tickets instead of redeeming them at a cashier window.

    Upon examining the facts, the court agreed that Wynn’s coinless machines did not breach any regulations. It also rejected Schuster’s claim that the machines were unethical. Judge Allison Burroughs noted that Schuster had all the information he needed to redeem his change, despite claiming that it should have been included on the tickets.

    Following the verdict, Schuster appealed the judge’s ruling to the First Court of Appeals. However, Wynn’s attorneys want the case dismissed, claiming that the consumer had not been subjected to any unfair or deceptive conduct.

    According to Wynn’s representatives, the plaintiff did not receive any misleading information and was, in fact, aware of how to redeem his tickets. The casino emphasized that Schuster ultimately chose to “do something with his TRU tickets other than what he was instructed to do.”

    The casino company added that its coinless TRU ticket machines are fully in line with Massachusetts’ standards.

    [ad_2]

    Angel Hristov

    Source link

  • The Twins Who Brought Down Drug Lord El Chapo | Entrepreneur

    The Twins Who Brought Down Drug Lord El Chapo | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Joaquín Guzmán, better known as El Chapo (which translates to “Shorty”), was head of the Sinaloa drug cartel, one of the most powerful criminal organizations in Mexico. He lorded over a violent empire that was estimated to be worth $2 billion until he was captured in 2016 and eventually sentenced to life in prison.

    On this episode of Dirty Money, we speak with Charlie Webster, an investigative journalist, and co-host (with none other than 50 Cent) of the podcast Surviving El Chapo. Their show revolves around identical twins Jay and Pete Flores, who were instrumental in putting El Chapo behind bars.

    From the Projects to Power

    The brothers, who were raised in the projects of Chicago, ran a multi-million-dollar drug empire. Their connections with Mexican cartels put them in direct contact with the most famous drug lord, the aforementioned El Chapo. But when the brothers were arrested by the Feds, they went from selling drugs on the streets to dealing priceless information to the government.

    Webster explains the brothers’ rise to power and the aftermath of their decision to cooperate to land El Chapo in the clink — what it was like to come face-to-face with the powerful drug lord in court and what their lives have been like ever since.

    Related: Why Do We Let Ourselves Get Scammed?

    Thanks for listening, and remember: just say no to dealing drugs on behalf of psychotic drug lords who kill people for fun.

    Subscribe to Dirty Money on Apple | Spotify | Stitcher | Google Play

    About Dirty Money

    Dirty Money is a new podcast series from Entrepreneur Media telling the tales of legendary scammers, con artists, and barely-legal lowlifes who stop at nothing to bilk their marks of millions. Hosted by Entrepreneur editors Dan Bova and Jon Small, the podcast takes a deep dive into the deviants behind the deeds.

    [ad_2]

    Dan Bova

    Source link

  • Sick of It All Sue Mobb Deep and Supreme for Trademark Infringement

    Sick of It All Sue Mobb Deep and Supreme for Trademark Infringement

    [ad_1]

    The estate of late Mobb Deep rapper Prodigy, surviving member Havoc, and the streetwear brand Supreme have been sued in New York District Court for trademark infringement and unfair competition, Billboard reports and documents viewed by Pitchfork confirm. A complaint filed by plaintiff Bush Baby Zamagate—the label that owns the intellectual property of the New York hardcore band Sick of It All—accuses the rap group and clothing brand of copying the band’s dragon logo on T-shirts and hats for a Summer 2023 capsule collection.

    In the suit, Bush Baby Zamagate says Supreme and Mobb Deep are guilty of “willful infringement and unfair competition” from “improper and illegal use of a nearly identical logo mark to Plaintiff’s inherently distinctive, incontestable, and famous logo.” They are asking the court to prevent the defendants from using the logo “or any other mark or marks confusingly similar thereto,” a full accounting of revenue generated using the logo, the delivery of any products with the logo for destruction and cease of online use, compensatory damages, and attorney’s fees. Summons were issued to defendants last week; they have 21 days to respond to the suit. Pitchfork has reached out to representatives of Bush Baby Zamagate, Supreme, and Havoc for comment.

    Supreme announced its Mobb Deep collaboration in June, featuring T-shirts screen-printed with a dragon logo and “SUPREME” in all caps on the front, with “Drop a Gem on ‘Em” printed on the back, and a baseball cap with the same dragon logo featured prominently on the front. A news post on Hypebeast.com cited in the suit reported that the logo had been dubbed the “Alleyway Crew” dragon, and was “borrowed from hardcore punk band Sick of It All.” “Alleyway Crew Tapes” is referenced on the J-card for Sick of it All’s self-titled 1986 cassette, which features a drawing of Calvin from Bill Watterson’s comic strip Calvin & Hobbes.

    The suit claims Sick of It All has used the dragon logo since 1987 and has common law rights over the mark, which can be seen in the liner notes for the band’s 1989 album Blood, Sweat and No Tears, as well as on the cover of the 1991 EP We Stand Alone. The first known instance of the dragon logo appearing on Mobb Deep products was the 12” promo single for “Drop a Gem on ‘Em,” distributed to DJs in 1996 to promote their forthcoming album Hell on Earth. The song was written as a response to Tupac Shakur’s infamous diss track “Hit ‘Em Up.” In 2000, Sick of It All covered Mobb Deep’s “Survival of the Fittest” for the Loud Records compilation Loud Rocks.

    [ad_2]

    Matthew Ismael Ruiz

    Source link

  • Man Arrested and Charged in Tupac Shakur Murder Case in Surprise Breakthrough

    Man Arrested and Charged in Tupac Shakur Murder Case in Surprise Breakthrough

    [ad_1]

    A man connected to Tupac Shakur’s death has been arrested and charged with murder with use of a deadly weapon, marking an unlikely breakthrough in a case that has vexed investigators since the rap icon was shot dead on the Las Vegas Strip in 1996.

    Nevada police detained Duane Keith “Keefe D” Davis today (September 29), and a grand jury indicted him in the killing of Shakur, The Associated Press reports. Davis, who has long been known to investigators, has admitted in interviews and in his 2019 memoir, Compton Street Legend, that he was in the Cadillac with Shakur’s shooter. He is now the first person to be arrested in direct connection with the killing.

    In court today, a prosecutor announced that Davis was also charged with the intent to promote, further, or assist a criminal gang.

    Davis’ arrest and indictment follow the execution of a search warrant in Henderson, Nevada, in July, related to the ongoing investigation. (The house that police investigated belongs to Davis’ wife.) Las Vegas police have long maintained their case was hampered by a lack of cooperation from witnesses, though independent investigations have unearthed significantly more information than what has been revealed by law enforcement.

    The case originates in May 1996 when Orlando “Baby Lane” Anderson allegedly assaulted Travon “Tray” Lane, associate of Death Row Records boss Suge Knight, at a shoe store. On September 7, after a boxing match between Mike Tyson and Bruce Seldon at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, Lane told Shakur he saw Anderson in the lobby. Shakur then led an assault on Anderson that security cameras captured. He returned to his hotel room at the Luxor before departing with Knight for Club 662, where he was scheduled to perform at a charity event.

    En route, a white Cadillac pulled up to the passenger side of Shakur’s car. The shooter rolled down the rear seat window of the Cadillac and fired a .40 S&W Glock 22, hitting Shakur four times. One bullet entered Shakur’s right lung, and the musician was taken to the University Medical Center of Southern Nevada to receive treatment. He died six days later after the removal of his right lung caused respiratory failure and cardiac arrest.

    Anderson was arrested in a “gang sweep” one month later. Investigators interviewed Anderson and identified him as the man in the surveillance footage, but did not charge or arrest him, believing the person in the footage could not have killed Shakur. Lieutanent Larry Spinosa told reporters, “At this point, Orlando Anderson is not a suspect in the shooting of Tupac Shakur.”

    [ad_2]

    Jazz Monroe, Matthew Ismael Ruiz

    Source link

  • Lizzo Denies Claims in Formal Response to Harassment Lawsuit

    Lizzo Denies Claims in Formal Response to Harassment Lawsuit

    [ad_1]

    Lizzo has issued a formal denial in response to the harrasment lawsuit filed by three of her former dancers last month. In her answer to the complaint—filed in a Los Angeles court on Wednesday, September 27, and viewed by Pitchfork—Lizzo and her lawyers also requested the dismissal of the lawsuit without prejudice while, like the plaintiffs, demanding a jury trial.

    Arianna Davis, Crystal Williams, and Noelle Rodriguez are suing Lizzo, the Big Grrrl Big Touring production company, and dance captain Shirlene Quigley. Through the the complaint, the women accuse Lizzo of sexual harassment, disability discrimination, racial harassment, and creating a hostile work environment. After the lawsuit became public knowledge, Lizzo released a statement on social media denying the allegations, calling them “false,” “unbelievable,” and “outrageous.”

    In the new filing, Lizzo’s lawyers issue a general denial and over 30 lines of defense explaining why they believe the lawsuit doesn’t hold water. The attorneys also claim that plaintiffs “ratified, acquiesced, condoned and/or approved of” Lizzo’s acts, as well as those of Big Grrl Big Touring production company and Shirlene Quigley.

    In a statement shared with Pitchfork, the plaintiffs’ attorney, Neama Rahmani, wrote:

    Lizzo’s answer merely consists of boilerplate objections that have nothing to do with the case. That said, the key takeaway is that Lizzo is agreeing to our clients’ demand for a jury trial. We look forward to presenting our case in court and letting a panel of her peers decide who is telling the truth, Lizzo and her team who continue to shame the victims or the plaintiffs and so many others who have come forward sharing similar stories of abuse and harassment.

    Last week, Lizzo’s former tour employee Asha Daniels sued the singer over subpar working conditions, alleging that she was denied breaks during 20-hour shifts. She also claimed that Amanda Nomura, a member of Lizzo’s team, called Black women on the tour “dumb,” “useless,” and “fat.”

    [ad_2]

    Madison Bloom

    Source link