ReportWire

Tag: LEGAL

  • Dirty Money Breakdown: Who Is Sam Bankman-Fried? | Entrepreneur

    Dirty Money Breakdown: Who Is Sam Bankman-Fried? | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Sam Bankman-Fried was the boy-wonder face of crypto: a 30-year-old who founded one of the biggest cryptocurrency exchanges in the world, a celebrated philanthropist worth an estimated $16 billion.

    But earlier this year, SBF was arrested in the Bahamas and charged with wire fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering, among other things. He was then extradited to the US and released from jail on a $250 million bond. Then, like a lot of people who are down on their luck, he moved back in with his parents.

    SBF’s trial is set for Oct. 2. While we await his fate in court, Dirty Money co-hosts Jon Small and Dan Bova spoke with Entepreneur.com editor Samantha Silverman to get all the dirty details on SBF’s rise and spectacular fall.

    If you ever wanted to know who SBF really is, we encourage you to invest your time in watching the above video. Don’t worry. We’d never ask you to invest in something that wasn’t actually going to make you smarter and richer, we swear!

    About Dirty Money

    Dirty Money is a new podcast series from Entrepreneur Media telling the tales of legendary scammers, con artists, and barely-legal lowlifes who stop at nothing to bilk their marks of millions. Hosted by Entrepreneur editors Dan Bova and Jon Small, the podcast takes a deep dive into the deviants behind the deeds

    Related: The Very Crazy Story of Crazy Eddie, the Electronics and Scamming Giant

    [ad_2]

    Dan Bova

    Source link

  • Aide to former Maryland governor killed as FBI closed in for arrest

    Aide to former Maryland governor killed as FBI closed in for arrest

    [ad_1]

    April 3 (Reuters) – A fugitive and former top aide to former Maryland Governor Larry Hogan was killed in Tennessee after a confrontation with the FBI, the Washington Post reported, citing the former aide’s lawyer.

    Roy McGrath, 53, who in 2020 was appointed chief of staff to the Republican former governor, was wanted for failing to appear in court last month on fraud charges.

    McGrath had pleaded not guilty to charges of wire fraud and falsification of records in October 2021 and was released on bond, but he did not appear in court for his trial.

    The U.S. Marshals Service, part of the Justice Department, said last month it had initiated an interstate fugitive investigation and published a “Wanted” poster of McGrath.

    “The loss of Roy’s life is an absolute tragedy, and I think it’s important for me to say that Roy never wavered about his innocence,” attorney Joseph Murtha said, according to the Post report.

    The exact circumstances of Roy’s death remained unclear. The Baltimore Sun said he was shot but it was uncertain whether it was self-inflicted or by the FBI.

    The FBI said in a statement it was reviewing an agent-involved shooting, the Post reported.

    “During the arrest the subject, Roy McGrath, sustained injury and was transported to the hospital. The FBI takes all shooting incidents involving our agents or task force members seriously,” the FBI statement said.

    McGrath died in the hospital, the Baltimore Sun reported, citing William Brennan, an attorney for McGrath’s wife.

    Hogan, who served as Maryland’s governor from 2015 to 2023, had considered running for the 2024 Republican nomination for president as a critic of Donald Trump. But Hogan announced last month before McGrath went missing that he would not run.

    Hogan said in a statement he and his wife, Yumi Hogan, were saddened by the “tragic situation,” the Baltimore Sun reported.

    “We are praying for Mr. McGrath’s family and loved ones,” Hogan said.

    Reporting by Daniel Trotta; Editing by Edmund Klamann

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump hush money case: What is an indictment? An arraignment? A gag order?

    Trump hush money case: What is an indictment? An arraignment? A gag order?

    [ad_1]

    April 3 (Reuters) – Former U.S. President Donald Trump is scheduled to be arraigned at a Manhattan courthouse on Tuesday following his indictment on criminal charges after a probe into hush money paid to a porn star.

    Below is an explanation of what it means to be indicted and arraigned, and other key terms related to Trump’s case.

    INDICTMENT

    An indictment is a court document containing charges that were voted on by a grand jury, a group of people who decide whether a prosecutor has enough evidence to pursue criminal charges.

    An indictment formally charges a defendant with a crime and provides a basis for legal prosecution.

    Following an indictment, a defendant is given formal notice of the charges, a right enshrined in the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

    A defendant can then be formally arraigned on whatever charges are brought. Law enforcement officials fingerprint and photograph most defendants facing arraignments.

    ARRAIGNMENT

    An arraignment is where a defendant is brought to court to hear charges and have a chance to enter a plea, which is generally guilty or not guilty.

    A judge or prosecutor typically reads the charges aloud. A defendant is usually represented by lawyers, especially in cases that are high-profile or could lead to jail or prison.

    If a defendant pleads not guilty, a judge will typically accept the plea and schedule the next court appearance, and perhaps a tentative trial date.

    If a defendant pleads guilty, the judge will impose punishment, typically at a later date.

    Trump’s lawyers have said he will plead not guilty on Tuesday.

    Lawyers for some defendants who plead not guilty may engage in plea bargaining, where they negotiate a guilty plea with prosecutors to avoid a trial. Defendants would typically plead guilty to some but not all charges they face.

    BAIL

    Judges in New York state criminal court have three options for bail: They can set bail, order a defendant released without bail, or order a defendant’s detention.

    The purpose of bail in New York is to ensure that a defendant returns to court, without taking into account the risk a defendant may cause further harm. In 2019, New York ended cash bail for most cases involving misdemeanors and nonviolent felonies, such as Trump’s case.

    GAG ORDER

    A gag order is when a judge prohibits lawyers, parties and witnesses from talking about a case in public.

    Gag orders are common in criminal cases. That is especially true when there is a risk that someone may make statements that could incite violence, be viewed as threatening to prosecutors or witnesses, or taint the jury pool.

    A defendant who violates a gag order in New York can be held by a judge to be in criminal contempt, a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail. A judge will typically warn a defendant before issuing a contempt citation.

    If a gag order is imposed against Trump, he can appeal and argue that it undermines his First Amendment right to free speech as he runs for president.

    Reporting by Rami Ayyub and Jonathan Stempel; editing by Noeleen Walder and Jonathan Oatis

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Free Webinar | April 6: When to Use an LLC, S-Corp, or C-Corp? | Entrepreneur

    Free Webinar | April 6: When to Use an LLC, S-Corp, or C-Corp? | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Making your business official through incorporation can help attract investors, save you money during tax time and protect your personal assets from debts and liabilities. Incorporation can come in the form of an LLC, S-Corp or C-Corp. So which is right for you?

    Mark J. Kohler, CPA, attorney, and author of The Tax and Legal Playbook, and Mat Sorensen, attorney, CEO of Directed IRA & Directed Trust Company, and author of The Self-Directed IRA Handbook, will be breaking down all of the options and help you determine which entity is right for your business.

    Topics to be covered:

    • Pros and cons of an LLC

    • How an S-Corp saves taxes

    • Understanding asset protection of your entity

    • Why the C-Corp isn’t the right fit for most businesses

    • What state you should set-up your entity in

    • Avoiding bad advice and scams for your entity

    Don’t miss out! Register now join us on April 6th at 3:00 PM ET.

    About the Speakers:

    Entrepreneur Press author Mark J. Kohler, CPA, attorney, co-host of the Podcast “Main Street Business”, and a senior partner at both the law firm KKOS Lawyers and the accounting firm K&E CPAs. Kohler is also the author of “The Tax and Legal Playbook, 2nd Edition”, and “The Business Owner’s Guide to Financial Freedom”.

    Mat Sorensen is an attorney, CEO, author, and podcast host. He is the CEO of Directed IRA & Directed Trust Company, a leading company in the self-directed IRA and 401k industry and a partner in the business and tax law firm of KKOS Lawyers. He is the author of “The Self-Directed IRA Handbook”.

    [ad_2]

    Entrepreneur Staff

    Source link

  • DOL: Company Forced Workers to Stay 3 Years or Pay Back Wages | Entrepreneur

    DOL: Company Forced Workers to Stay 3 Years or Pay Back Wages | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Advanced Care Staffing, an employment agency that operates in New York, Connecticut, and New Jersey, is being sued by the Department of Labor (DOL), Insider reported.

    The suit, which was filed on March 20, contends that Advanced Care forced employees to enter into contracts that required them to work at least three years — or pay back their wages. And, the suit adds, Advanced Care forced employees to pay back wages, plus legal fees, if they didn’t.

    It was filed in the Eastern District of New York.

    “Under this scheme, the pay that ACS promises its employees may be converted into nothing more than a loan that employees must repay with interest and fees,” the suit said.

    In the suit, the DOL said one employee was asked to pay back what amounted to more in pay than he ever made at the company, to cover fees what Advanced Care called “future profits,” the DOL claimed.

    Companies cannot, “workers as insurance, unconditionally guaranteeing a future profit stream for the employer,” the suit noted.

    Advanced Care did not respond immediately to Entrepreneur’s request for comment.

    But David N. Kelley, whose firm is acting as representation on the case, told Insider the contentions were “unsupported by either the facts or the law.”

    Kelley said the company provided contracts for nurses from outside the U.S. to come to the country and work and covered things like immigration and housing costs, with the contractual bargain being employees would stay with Advanced Care for three years.

    “To be clear, ACS has never demanded – and no nurse has ever repaid – their earned wages to ACS,” Kelley added to the outlet.

    Kelley is an attorney at the firm Dechert with experience with high-power litigation with regulators, per his company bio.

    [ad_2]

    Gabrielle Bienasz

    Source link

  • Tory Lanez Files to Appeal Megan Thee Stallion Shooting Conviction

    Tory Lanez Files to Appeal Megan Thee Stallion Shooting Conviction

    [ad_1]

    Tory Lanez has filed a motion seeking a new trial after being found guilty in December for shooting Megan Thee Stallion. He currently faces more than 20 years in prison for felony weapons and charges, TMZ and Rolling Stone report

    Lanez’s attorney Jose Baez reportedly claims jurors were “erroneously allowed” to view an Instagram comment that appears to show Lanez writing that Megan’s former friend Kelsey Harris wasn’t the shooter. Lanez, who later claimed that Harris was responsible for the shooting, also filed a declaration from his content creator Joshua Farias claiming he was behind the social media comment.

    Pitchfork has reached out to Megan Thee Stallion’s attorney for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Evan Minsker

    Source link

  • Lawsuit Over Childish Gambino’s “This Is America” Dismissed

    Lawsuit Over Childish Gambino’s “This Is America” Dismissed

    [ad_1]

    A copyright infringement lawsuit filed against Donald Glover in 2021 over the Childish Gambino song “This Is America” was dismissed in a New York federal court on Friday, documents viewed by Pitchfork confirm. The rapper Kidd Wes, real name Emelike Wesley Nwosuocha, claimed that Glover’s song infringed on his own 2016 song “Made in America.” The judge dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice to leave to amend, and according to Kidd Wes’ attorneys, he is considering an appeal.

    “Mr. Nwosuocha is understandably disappointed, and is considering an appeal of the decision,” Imran H. Ansari and La’Shawn N. Thomas wrote in a statement to Pitchfork. “He stands by his music, creativity, and the independence of grassroots artists to create their own music, and receive credit where credit is due, without the fear of it being apportioned by another.”

    The dismissal from Judge Victor Marrero notes that Kidd Wes didn’t obtain a compositional copyright registration in addition to his sound recording copyright. “Even if Nwosuocha had a copyright registration for the composition of Plaintiff’s Composition, however, dismissal would be warranted here because the elements of Plaintiff’s Composition purportedly infringed upon are insufficiently original to warrant protection, or because they are not substantially similar to the Challenged Composition,” the dismissal reads.  

    After noting differences in the lyrics and individual songs’ themes, the judge writes, “More could be said on the ways these songs differ, but no more airtime is needed to resolve this case.”

    In addition to Donald Glover, Kidd Wes also named “This Is America” co-writer Young Thug, “This Is America” producer Lüdwig Goransson, and multiple record and publishing companies as defendants in the lawsuit. Pitchfork has reached out to Childish Gambino’s representatives for further comment.

    [ad_2]

    Evan Minsker

    Source link

  • Putin ally proposing banning ICC in Russia

    Putin ally proposing banning ICC in Russia

    [ad_1]

    March 25 (Reuters) – Russia’s parliament speaker on Saturday proposed banning the activities of the International Criminal Court (ICC) after the court issued an arrest warrant for President Vladimir Putin, accusing him of the war crimes.

    Vyacheslav Volodin, an ally of Putin’s, said that Russian legislation should be amended to prohibit any activity of the ICC in Russia and to punish any who gave “assistance and support” to the ICC.

    “It is necessary to work out amendments to legislation prohibiting any activity of the ICC on the territory of our country,” Volodin said in a Telegram post.

    Volodin said that the United States had legislated to prevent its citizens ever being tried by the Hague court and that Russia should continue that work.

    Any assistance or support for the ICC inside Russia, he said, should be punishable under law.

    The ICC issued an arrest warrant earlier this month accusing Putin of the war crime of illegally deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine. It said there are reasonable grounds to believe that Putin bears individual criminal responsibility.

    Russian officials have cautioned that any attempt to arrest Putin, Russia’s paramount leader since the last day of 1999, would amount to a declaration of war against the world’s largest nuclear power.

    In its first warrant for Ukraine, the ICC called for Putin’s arrest on suspicion of unlawful deportation of children and unlawful transfer of people from the territory of Ukraine to the Russian Federation since Feb. 24, 2022.

    The Kremlin says the ICC arrest warrant is an outrageously partisan decision, but meaningless with respect to Russia. Russian officials deny war crimes in Ukraine and say the West has ignored what it says are Ukrainian war crimes.

    Big powers such as Russia, the United States and China are not members of the ICC though 123 countries are state parties to the Rome Statute, including Britain, France, Germany and some former Soviet republics such as Tajikistan.

    Ukraine is not a member of the ICC, although Kyiv granted it jurisdiction to prosecute crimes committed on its territory.

    Reporting by Guy Faulconbridge; Editing by Stephen Coates

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

    Guy Faulconbridge

    Thomson Reuters

    As Moscow bureau chief, Guy runs coverage of Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States. Before Moscow, Guy ran Brexit coverage as London bureau chief (2012-2022). On the night of Brexit, his team delivered one of Reuters historic wins – reporting news of Brexit first to the world and the financial markets. Guy graduated from the London School of Economics and started his career as an intern at Bloomberg. He has spent over 14 years covering the former Soviet Union. He speaks fluent Russian.
    Contact: +447825218698

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • California farmers flood their fields in order to save them

    California farmers flood their fields in order to save them

    [ad_1]

    HELM, California, March 24 (Reuters) – When Don Cameron first intentionally flooded his central California farm in 2011, pumping excess stormwater onto his fields, fellow growers told him he was crazy.

    Today, California water experts see Cameron as a pioneer. His experiment to control flooding and replenish the ground water has become a model that policy makers say others should emulate.

    With the drought-stricken state suddenly inundated by a series of rainstorms, California’s outdated infrastructure has let much of the stormwater drain into the Pacific Ocean. Cameron estimated his operation is returning 8,000 to 9,000 acre-feet of water back to the ground monthly during this exceptionally wet year, from both rainwater and melted snowpack. That would be enough water for 16,000 to 18,000 urban households in a year.

    “When we started doing this, our neighbors thought we were absolutely crazy. Everyone we talked to thought we would kill the crop. And lo and behold, believe me, it turned out great,” said Cameron, vice president and general manager of Terra Nova Ranch, a 6,000-acre (2,400-hectare) farm growing wine grapes, almonds, walnuts, pistachios, olives and other crops in the San Joaquin Valley, the heart of California’s $50 billion agricultural industry.

    If more farmers would inundate their fields rather than divert precipitation into flood channels, that excess could seep underground and get stored for when drought conditions return.

    California swings between disastrous drought and raging floodwaters. This season has been especially rainy, with 12 atmospheric rivers pounding California since late December, placing greater importance on flood control. More wet weather is forecast in the coming week.

    Terra Nova’s basins are filled with 1.5 to 3.5 feet of water, Cameron said Wednesday. He plans to eventually flood 530 acres of pistachio trees and 150 acres of wine grapes plus another 350 acres that are planted only when excess floodwater is available.

    The state Department of Water Resources provided $5 million and Terra Nova another $8 million for the project, which includes a pumping system. So far there has been virtually zero return for the company, Cameron said, though it may acquire future water rights for its groundwater contributions.

    Cameron “is definitely what we call the godfather of on-farm recharge. He’s really the pioneer who began doing it first,” said Ashley Boren, CEO of Sustainable Conservation, an environmental group with a focus on supporting sustainable groundwater management.

    This mimicking of nature – letting water flow across the landscape – is the most cost-effective way to manage peak flood flows, experts say, while banking the surplus for drier days.

    “It’s not only going to benefit us, it will benefit our neighbors,” Cameron said.

    Cameron began his 30-year-old passion project before the state passed the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) of 2014, a law that sought to avoid a looming disaster from overdrafts.

    Since then, policy makers have worked on economic incentives for more farmers to follow suit. Some water districts that are responsible for implementing SGMA have offered growers credits toward water rights in exchange for recharge. Pending state legislation would simplify permitting and guarantee water rights for participating growers.

    California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order on March 10 making it easier for farmers to divert floodwaters onto their lands until June.

    There is no statewide monitoring of on-farm recharge, but Sustainable Conservation is keeping track of four water districts in the San Joaquin Valley that recorded 260 farmers replenishing their aquifers this year, returning at least 50,000 acre-feet (61.7 million cubic meters) back into the ground as of mid-February.

    California, which has a strategic goal of adding 4 million acre-feet of storage, recently provided $260 million in grants to Groundwater Sustainability Agencies established under SGMA. The state received applications seeking $800 million, indicating demand for projects, said Paul Gosselin, deputy director of the state’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Office.

    Besides cost, growers face other obstacles to on-farm recharge. A farm must have access to the water, cannot hurt endangered species and cannot flood land subjected to certain fertilizers or pesticides or dairy farm waste.

    In the Merced River Watershed, willing farmers could recapture enough future floodwater to replace 31% of the groundwater they are overdrafting under existing conditions, said Daniel Mountjoy, director of resource stewardship for Sustainable Conservation, who participated in a state study. That could jump to 63% with changes in reservoir management and infrastructure improvements, he said.

    To achieve sustainability throughout the San Joaquin Valley, an estimated 750,000 to 1 million acres of irrigated farmland would have to be fallowed, Mountjoy said.

    “We’re at the beginning of a lot of momentum for groundwater recharge programs,” said Gosselin, of the state groundwater office. “The last two years (of extreme drought) was a wakeup call for everybody.”

    Reporting by Mike Blake in Helm and Daniel Trotta in Carlsbad, Calif. Editing by Donna Bryson and David Gregorio

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

    Michael Roy Blake

    Thomson Reuters

    Mike Blake is a senior photographer with Reuters and a member of the Pulitzer Prize winning team for Breaking News Photography in 2019. He began his career with Reuters in Toronto, Canada in 1985 and has traveled the World covering Olympic Games (18 in total) and World sporting events as well as breaking news and feature stories. Previously based in Vancouver and now Los Angeles, Blake attended Emily Carr College of Art and began his career making prints at a major daily newspaper. Blake grew up skateboarding and taking pictures and continues to do so now in his spare time.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • In victory for labor unions, Michigan governor repeals ‘right-to-work’ law

    In victory for labor unions, Michigan governor repeals ‘right-to-work’ law

    [ad_1]

    March 24 (Reuters) – Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer on Friday signed a package of bills repealing the state’s so-called “right to work” law that allowed workers to opt out of unions, a long-sought victory for labor organizers facing an era of diminished power.

    Whitmer became the first governor since the 1960s to roll back right-to-work legislation. Twenty-six other U.S. states and the territory of Guam still have right-to-work laws on the books, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

    “Michigan workers are the most talented and hard-working in the world and deserve to be treated with dignity and respect,” Whitmer, a two-term Democrat, said in a statement.

    Michigan House Bills 4004 and 4007 and Senate Bill 34 passed the Democratic-controlled state legislature earlier this month. House Bill 4007 requires that contractors hired by the state pay a so-called prevailing wage, the amount used when hiring union workers.

    The Michigan state legislature, controlled at the time by Republicans, in 2012 passed a right-to-work law over the objections of union activists. It was signed into law by then-Governor Rick Snyder, also a Republican.

    Republicans opposed repealing that law this year, arguing that it would hurt businesses and make the state less attractive to companies.

    Union membership has declined sharply in the United States since its peak in the 1950s, when more than a third of workers belonged to a union.

    Membership dropped to an all-time low of 10.1% in 2022 despite a surge in organizing during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to data released in January by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    Reporting by Dan Whitcomb; editing by Grant McCool

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ticketmaster Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Drake Ticket Prices

    Ticketmaster Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Drake Ticket Prices

    [ad_1]

    A Canadian law firm has filed a class action lawsuit against Ticketmaster over allegedly price gauging tickets for Drake’s upcoming tour, the Toronto Star reports. The Montreal-based firm LPC Avocat Inc. claims that the ticketing behemoth “intentionally misleads consumers for their own financial gain.”

    According to the complaint, obtained by the Toronto Star, a Montreal man purchased two “Official Platinum” seats for Drake’s July 14 concert at the Bell Centre, each costing $789.54. The following day, a new show (on July 15) was allegedly added to Ticketmaster with the same seats listed at roughly $350 less.

    In the suit, LPC Avocat Inc. alleges that Ticketmaster knew about the July 15 Drake concert in advance, but withheld the information. It also alleges that the “Official Platinum” seats were ordinary seats sold “at an artificially inflated premium in bad faith.”

    The Toronto Star reports that plaintiffs are seeking “compensatory damages in the aggregate amount of the difference between the prices charged for ‘Official Platinum’ tickets and what their regular price ought to have been,” per the complaint. They are also seeking $300 per customer in punitive damages.

    Ticketmaster is currently facing multiple lawsuits over fraud, price fixing, anticompetitive behavior, and more—especially with regards to the fiasco surrounding Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour ticket sales. The company is also facing a Senate hearing and an antitrust investigation for abuse of power. Swift, the Cure, Neil Young, and others have publicly criticized Ticketmaster for misusing its monopoly in the ticketing field.

    Pitchfork has reached out to representatives for Ticketmaster and Drake for further information and comment.

    [ad_2]

    Madison Bloom

    Source link

  • The Isley Brothers’ Rudolph Isley Sues Ronald Isley Over Band’s Trademark

    The Isley Brothers’ Rudolph Isley Sues Ronald Isley Over Band’s Trademark

    [ad_1]

    Rudolph Isley has sued his brother Ronald Isley, claiming he improperly registered the trademark for “The Isley Brothers” as a sole individual, excluding him from an asset in a partnership in which they are equal members, Rolling Stone reports, and documents viewed by Pitchfork confirm. The suit seeks a declaration that the mark “The Isley Brothers” is jointly owned by each brother, and an asset in which they “sole and equal members.” Rudolph Isley also asserts that because he is “unaware of the degree to which Ronald exploited the Mark, the licenses and/or other transactions that Ronald entered into” he seeks a judgement forcing Ronald to account for and pay his 50-percent share of the proceeds he’s collected on the trademark. Check out the full lawsuit below.

    Documents obtained from the United States Patent and Trademark Office show that on November 2, 2021, Ronald Isley applied to register exclusive rights to “The Isley Brothers” trademark for “Visual recordings and audiovisual recordings featuring music and animation” as a sole individual. The USPTO registered the trademark on August 16, 2022. 

    Rudolph and Ronald Isley co-founded the Isley Brothers with their brother O’Kelly in 1954. Rudolph claims after O’Kelly’s death in 1986, that he and Ronald each held 50 percent share of ownership in the group and “The Isley Brothers” trademark. Both parties agree Rudolph retired from performing and recording with the band in 1989. Rudolph asserts in his suit that he “remained active in promoting and managing the Group’s properties,” citing a 2018 publishing deal and a recent sync of “Shout” in the 2023 Super Bowl commercial this past year. The current lineup of the Isley Brothers includes Ronald and Ernie Isley; they shared a re-work of their 1975 hit “Make Me Say It Again Girl, Pts. 1 & 2” featuring Beyoncé in August, and a year earlier appeared on Jimmy Kimmel Live! to perform “Friends and Family” with Snoop Dogg. In April 2021 Ronald and Ernie squared off against surviving members of Earth, Wind, & Fire in a Steve Harvey-hosted Easter special VERZUZ battle. 

    In his suit, Rudolph Isley included a letter as evidence written by Navarro W. Gray, an attorney representing his brother Ronald, in response to a letter sent by Rudolph’s attorney Brian D. Caplan. The letter addresses several claims: That Ronald repaid a $2 million loan from Rudolph with his share of a tax credit for The Isley Brothers, LLC; that Ronald did not “set up a separate entity to receive Isley Brothers related revenue” but to do business solely related to his own career; that “fake sites” not affiliated with Ronald Isley are selling unauthorized merch; and that SoundExchange, the rights management firm charged with distributing the Isley Brothers royalties, has always issued payments in equal share and no corrections to royalty payouts need to be made. 

    [ad_2]

    Matthew Ismael Ruiz

    Source link

  • Bad Bunny Sued by Ex-Girlfriend for Using Her Voice Memo in Songs Without Permission

    Bad Bunny Sued by Ex-Girlfriend for Using Her Voice Memo in Songs Without Permission

    [ad_1]

    Bad Bunny is being sued by Carliz De La Cruz Hernández, his ex-girlfriend, for the unauthorized use of one of her voice recordings in his music, according to a new lawsuit viewed by Pitchfork. The voice memo features De La Cruz saying “Bad Bunny, baby” in a breathy voice and has been used in the 2016 single “Pa Ti” and Un Verano Sin Ti’s “Dos Mil 16.” She filed the lawsuit this month in a Puerto Rico court, claiming that both her voice and the phrase—which she allegedly came up with—are being used without her permission. She’s seeking $40 million as compensation.

    “Thousands of people have commented directly on Carliz’s social media networks, as well as every time she goes to a public place, about ‘Bad Bunny, baby.’ This has caused, and currently causes, De La Cruz to feel worried, anguished, intimidated, overwhelmed and anxious,” reads a loose translation of the lawsuit. Also sued are Rimas Entertainment and Bad Bunny’s manager Noah Kamil Assad Byrne. Pitchfork has reached out to Bad Bunny’s representatives for comment.

    Bad Bunny and De La Cruz started dating in 2011 and attended college together at the University of Puerto Rico the following year. According to the lawsuit, the Reggaetón artist was allegedly writing songs and often sought her input during this time period. She was allegedly in charge of handling invoices, managing contracts, and scheduling events. The lawsuit claims the phrase “Bad Bunny, baby” first surfaced in 2015, and Bad Bunny asked De La Cruz to record herself saying it. According to the complaint, the couple ultimately broke up in 2017.

    In the lawsuit, De La Cruz claims that a representative for Bad Bunny contacted her in early May to gain permission to use her voice memo in a song. According to the complaint, she refused an offer of $2,000 to buy the recording and asked to discuss a contract for licensing her voice. “De La Cruz reiterated that the only way to formalize an agreement is if this was done in writing,” reads a translation of the lawsuit. 

    De La Cruz claims that she and the representative met up to hear the track, and she once again refused to authorize the tag in the song, allegedly saying that she did not feel comfortable with it. One day before the release of Un Verano Sin Ti, the representative sent her a contract that was “excessively comprehensive, so she felt cheated,” according to the lawsuit. Hours before the album’s release, a different Rimas employee then allegedly sent an alternate contract seeking permission to use her voice memo in the upcoming “Dos Mil 16” and, retroactively, “Pa Ti.” The lawsuit claims that Un Verano Sin Ti came out one day later with the unauthorized voice memo.

    [ad_2]

    Nina Corcoran

    Source link

  • French Montana Sued for Negligence Over Shooting on Music Video Set

    French Montana Sued for Negligence Over Shooting on Music Video Set

    [ad_1]

    French Montana was sued today (March 20) for negligence over the shooting that occurred during the filming of a music video in Miami Gardens, Florida on January 5. At least 10 people were injured in the incident. The lawsuit from Carl Leon, who was present at the time of filming, alleges that French Montana neglected to ensure proper security, police detail, or overall safe operating practices.

    Leon’s lawsuit alleges that he “suffered great bodily injury and damages far in excess of the jurisdictional limits of this court.” The lawsuit also names Coke Boys Records, the Licking restaurant where the shooting took place, and property owner Gayles Plaza. Leon is seeking damages in excess of $50,000 and a jury trial.

    When reached by Pitchfork, Leon’s lawyer, Josiah D. Graham, offered no comment. Pitchfork has also reached out to representatives for French Montana.

    When the shooting was reported, the Licking distanced themselves from the filming in a statement to CNN: “We were not aware of a video being filmed and found out last [minute] French Montana was shooting a scene in the back parking lot. We have no idea what actually took place. The Licking restaurant has nothing to do with the incident and has given police the necessary footage requested.”

    French Montana offered this statement on social media at the time: “We unfortunately were at the wrong place, at the wrong time when an incident took place that left people hurt. Our thoughts & prayers are w/ the victims & families at this time.”

    [ad_2]

    Evan Minsker

    Source link

  • The Weeknd Settles Copyright Lawsuit Over “Call Out My Name”

    The Weeknd Settles Copyright Lawsuit Over “Call Out My Name”

    [ad_1]

    In 2021, the Weeknd was sued for copyright infringement over his 2018 My Dear Melancholy, song “Call Out My Name.” Producers Suniel Fox and Henry Strange claimed the Weeknd and co-defendants Nicolás Jaar and Frank Dukes had infringed on their song “Vibeking.” The lawsuit claimed that the two songs were “strikingly and/or substantially similar, if not identical” and cited multiple alleged similarities. 

    On March 17, Fox and Strange’s attorneys filed in court that the two sides have reached a settlement. Pitchfork has reached out to the Weeknd’s representatives and the producers’ attorneys for comment.

    When the lawsuit was first filed, Jaar clarified that he didn’t have a hand in the creation of “Call Out My Name”—just that the song featured an interpolation of his song from 2016’s Sirens, “Killing Time.” 

    [ad_2]

    Evan Minsker

    Source link

  • 6 Employee Benefits Every Leader Needs to Know | Entrepreneur

    6 Employee Benefits Every Leader Needs to Know | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    As an employer, it’s critical to be a rule follower and toe the legal line, including abiding by payroll and tax requirements, and it’s particularly vital to pay attention to employee-related regulations like mandatory benefits. Not keeping a steady eye on them means more than simply disgruntled workers, but fines, penalties and perhaps even jail time.

    Which benefits might you be legally required to provide?

    [ad_2]

    Mike Kappel

    Source link

  • Hurricane Chris Found Not Guilty of Second-Degree Murder

    Hurricane Chris Found Not Guilty of Second-Degree Murder

    [ad_1]

    Hurricane Chris has been acquitted of felony charges of second-degree murder and illegal possession of stolen things, The Associated Press reports. The rapper had been charged in connection with the June 2020 shooting death of 32-year-old Danzeria O. Farris Jr. in Shreveport, Louisiana.

    In a statement to The Shade Room, Hurricane Chris said, “I wanna thank God, my attorneys at the Washington & Wells Law Firm, and my family for standing with me as my life was on the line. They wanted to give me life if I was found guilty. Now I can hug my son and think about raising him to be a man. This situation drained me and affected my health greatly. God, I give You all the glory. I got my life back, and words can’t explain how I feel. Thanks to everyone who wished me well.”

    Hurricane Chris is best known for his 2007 single “A Bay Bay.” His most recent full-length, King Cane, arrived in 2017, and he more recently released the song “Stepped On” in December 2022.

    [ad_2]

    Matthew Strauss

    Source link

  • Exclusive: Ukraine accuses Russian snipers of abusing child, gang raping mother

    Exclusive: Ukraine accuses Russian snipers of abusing child, gang raping mother

    [ad_1]

    • Soldiers assaulted family soon after invasion, prosecutors say
    • Ukraine accuses Russian army of widespread sexual assaults
    • President Vladimir Putin’s government denies atrocities

    KYIV, March 14 (Reuters) – Ukraine has accused two Russian soldiers of sexually assaulting a four-year-old girl and gang raping her mother at gunpoint in front of her father, as part of widespread allegations of abuse during the more than one-year-long invasion.

    According to Ukrainian prosecution files seen by Reuters, the incidents were among a spree of sex crimes Russian soldiers of the 15th Separate Motorized Rifle Brigade committed in four homes of Brovary district near the capital Kyiv in March 2022.

    Russia’s Defence Ministry did not respond to a request for comment. Phone numbers listed for the brigade were out of order. Two officials at the Samara Garrison, of which the brigade is a part, said they were unable to give contacts for the unit when contacted by Reuters, with one saying they were classified.

    During Moscow’s failed push to capture Kyiv after its Feb. 24 invasion, soldiers entered Brovary a few days later, looting and using sexual violence as a deliberate tactic to terrorise the population, the Ukrainian prosecutors said.

    “They singled out the women beforehand, coordinated their actions and their roles,” said the prosecutors, whose 2022 documents were based on interviews with witnesses and survivors.

    Most of the alleged atrocities took place on March 13, when soldiers “in a state of alcoholic intoxication, broke into the yard of the house where a young family lived,” the prosecutors alleged.

    The father was beaten with a metal pot then forced to kneel while his wife was gang raped. One of the soldiers told the four-year-old girl he “will make her a woman” before she was abused, the documents said.

    The family survived, though prosecutors said they are investigating additional crimes in the area including murders during the same period.

    President Vladimir Putin’s government, which says it is fighting Western-backed “neo-Nazis” in Ukraine, has repeatedly denied allegations of atrocities. It has also denied that its military commanders are aware of sexual violence by soldiers.

    The soldiers were both snipers, aged 32 and 28, the files said, adding that the former had died while the younger, named as Yevgeniy Chernoknizhniy, returned to Russia.

    When Reuters asked for the identities of both soldiers, prosecutors provided only the name of the younger man. When Reuters called a number in online databases for him, a person saying he was Chernoknizhniy’s brother said he was deceased.

    “He died. There’s no way you can get hold of him,” said the man, crying. “That’s all that I can say.”

    Reuters was unable to independently confirm his assertion.

    GROWING ACCUSATIONS

    The two snipers were among six suspects accused in the Brovary assaults, which prosecutors say is one of the most extensive investigations of sexual abuse since the invasion.

    After the alleged attack on the girl and her parents, the two soldiers entered the house of an elderly couple next door, where they beat them, prosecutors said, also raping a 41-year-old pregnant woman and a 17-year-old girl.

    At another location where several families lived, the soldiers forced everyone into the kitchen and gang raped a 15-year-old girl and her mother, they said.

    All the victims survived, prosecutors said, and were receiving psychological and medical assistance.

    A pre-trial investigation is ongoing into the possible role of superior officials in the Brovary attacks, prosecutors said, in a case adding to growing allegations of systematic sexual abuse by Russian soldiers.

    Ukraine’s Prosecutor General’s office says it is investigating more than 71,000 reports of war crimes received since Russia sent tens of thousands of troops over the border.

    Ukrainian investigators know the probability of finding and punishing suspects is low and potential trials would be mainly in absentia, but there are also international efforts to prosecute war crimes including by the International Criminal Court.

    While suspects are unlikely to be surrendered by Moscow, anyone convicted in absentia may be placed on international watchlists, which would make it difficult to travel.

    Russia has also accused Ukrainian forces of war crimes, including the execution of 10 prisoners of war.

    A U.N. human rights monitoring mission in Ukraine has said that most of the dozens of sexual violence accusations pointed at the Russian military.

    So far, Ukrainian prosecutors have convicted 26 Russians of war crimes – some prisoners of war, some in absentia – of which one was for rape.

    Reporting by Anthony Deutsch in Amsterdam and Stefaniia Bern in Kyiv;
    Additional reporting by Anton Zverev and Maria Tsvetkova;
    Editing by Alison Williams and Andrew Cawthorne

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Online Dating Scammer Steals $1.8 Million from His Victims | Entrepreneur

    Online Dating Scammer Steals $1.8 Million from His Victims | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Look out for people on dating apps who offer investment opportunities too good to be true.

    That’s the message from the District Attorney’s Office in New York City, which recently brought charges against a lying Lothario they allege swindled his lovers out of millions.

    Nelson Counne, who also goes by “Nelson Roth” or “Justin Roth,” was indicted in a Manhattan court for bilking more than $1.8 million from five women through a series of romance and investment scams.

    “He allegedly fed lie after lie to women he falsely claimed to have a romantic interest in, enticing them with investment opportunities that never existed while using their funds to repay past victims, lure in new ones, and fund his lifestyle,” said District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg, Jr.

    Related: The Scam Artist Who Robbed Backstreet Boys and NSYNC Blind. ‘Some of the Guys Couldn’t Pay Their Car Payment.’

    Dating for dollars

    Counne, 69, met most of his victims via online dating sites, where he posed as a wealthy retired art dealer and investor with homes in London, Manhattan, and the South of France, according to the indictment.

    In reality, Counne doesn’t own any homes and never travels internationally—he doesn’t even have a passport. His sole source of income was the money he stole from his lovers between 2012 and 2021.

    The scam worked like this: After winning his victims’ affection and trust, Counne convinced many of them to invest with him. He never shared any details of his business dealing, claiming the investments were in a “gray area between legal and illegal” and that he had access to inside information.

    Some of his phony investments included Alibaba and a start-up purportedly run by a former Google executive, which would provide an online lottery that potential college students could pay to enter for a chance to win tuition coverage.

    “Most of the victims were initially hesitant, but Counne persisted until each agreed to invest,” according to a press release by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office.

    A Ponzi scheme

    The DA alleges that Counne ran a classic Ponzi scheme, using the money from one of his marks to pay another. This enabled him to appear wealthy to new victims and repay previous victims suspicious of his fraud.

    Counne now faces charges of scheme to defraud in the first degree, grand larceny in the second degree, and grand larceny in the third degree.

    Romance scams like this are not uncommon. In 2021, some 24,000 victims reported losing approximately $1 billion to romance scams, according to the FBI.

    [ad_2]

    Jonathan Small

    Source link

  • Musicians Rally Fans to Oppose U.S. Tour Visa Hike

    Musicians Rally Fans to Oppose U.S. Tour Visa Hike

    [ad_1]

    Musicians in the United States and abroad have spent the last several weeks rallying fans against proposed increases in visa costs, and now, they’re pushing for a final surge of support. Visa costs for international artists could nearly triple under a new policy, creating a potentially prohibitive barrier to working musicians. Today (March 13) is the last day for public commentary on the matter, ending at 11:59 p.m. Eastern. Find more information here

    The Department of Homeland Security’s U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services proposed the visa changes in January, arguing that the new rates were necessary due to increased costs at the agency. Under the new guidelines, O-1 visas for “individuals with extraordinary ability or achievement” would increase from $460 to $1,655. The P-2 visas for individual or group performers would make a similar jump, from $460 to $1,615. 

    The Union of Musicians and Allied Workers led a letter-writing campaign of its own in response to the proposed increase, aiming for 1,600 letters speaking out against the new policy. Artists like The Weather Station, Ducks Ltd., and Primal Scream’s Simone Marie Butler have all spoken out against the higher fees. In the United Kingdom, Let the Music Move has encouraged British musicians—who have been mired in deeper European visa complications as a result of Brexit—to take action, too.

    [ad_2]

    Allison Hussey

    Source link