ReportWire

Tag: LEGAL

  • James Safechuck and Wade Robson’s Lawsuits Against Michael Jackson’s Company Restored

    James Safechuck and Wade Robson’s Lawsuits Against Michael Jackson’s Company Restored

    [ad_1]

    A tentative ruling in the California Court of Appeal paves the way for the resumption of lawsuits filed by James Safechuck and Wade Robson—the two men who allege that Michael Jackson sexually abused them when they were children in the HBO documentary Leaving Neverland—against Jackson’s company MJJ Productions Inc, the Los Angeles Times reports and documents viewed by Pitchfork confirm. 

    The company previously argued that they could not be expected to protect the children from Jackson because he was the company’s sole owner; in the tentative ruling, as three-judge panel stated that it was not excused from its duty to protect them, stating that “it would be perverse” to find they had no duty simply because the company had only one shareholder. The two plaintiffs had each filed suit separately, but the cases appear to be merged for the potential trial. 

    “A sexual abuser’s passing does not deprive his victims of their day in court and, in turn, justice and healing,” Robson and Safechuck said in a statement provided by their attorney. “Jackson is not sued personally in this case—his company is, and his company will have every opportunity to defend itself in the trial. We are pleased that the Court of Appeal has taken its time and considered all of the facts and applicable law in these cases. We look forward to oral arguments next month and the eventual decision of the Court of Appeal.” Pitchfork has reached out to representatives for the defendants for comment.

    Robson and Safechuck allege that Jackson’s staff were complicit in Jackson’s alleged grooming and sexual abuse, and aided in covering it up, calling them “co-conspirators, collaborators, facilitators and alter egos for the childhood sexual abuse alleged.” Employees allegedly bought gifts and toys for Jackson’s victims using company funds, including a credit card issued by MJJ Productions. The suit claims that MJJ Productions policies were designed to allow Jackson to be alone with children, and that security staff were instructed to keep their distance when Jackson had “play time” with children at his home. 

    Wade Robson had previously denied that Jackson molested him, and testified in Jackson’s defense at the singer’s criminal trial in 2005. Robson first sued the Michael Jackson Estate in 2013, and Safechuck originally filed his suit against MJJ Productions Inc. and MJJ Ventures Inc. in 2014. Both suits were dismissed in 2017 because the statutes of limitations had expired. 

    In 2019 Robson and Safechuck had their cases against Jackson restored due to a California law called the Phoenix Act, which has led abuse victims—including Evan Rachel Wood, who advocated for the legislation—to file new suits. The law allows alleged sexual abuse victims to file complaints up until the age of 40 (as opposed to the previous age of 26). It also gives alleged victims a three-year window to sue for past acts in which the statute of limitations had expired.

    While the original suits were levied against the Michael Jackson Estate, a 2015 decision dismissing that aspect of the lawsuit will be upheld. The remaining defendants are MJJ Productions, Inc., and MJJ Ventures, Inc. 


    If you or someone you know has been affected by sexual assault, we encourage you to reach out for support:

    RAINN National Sexual Assault Hotline
    http://www.rainn.org 
    1 800 656 HOPE (4673)

    Crisis Text Line
    SMS: Text “HELLO” or “HOLA” to 741-741

    [ad_2]

    Madison Bloom, Matthew Ismael Ruiz

    Source link

  • Influencer Andrew Tate to stay under house arrest, court rules

    Influencer Andrew Tate to stay under house arrest, court rules

    [ad_1]

    BUCHAREST, June 23 (Reuters) – Internet personality Andrew Tate will remain under house arrest in Romania for another 30 days from the end of June pending trial on charges of human trafficking, a Bucharest court ruled on Friday.

    Tate was indicted on Tuesday along with his brother Tristan and two Romanian female suspects for human trafficking, rape and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit women.

    They are under house arrest pending an investigation into abuses against seven women whom prosecutors say were lured through false claims of relationships, accusations the suspects have denied.

    The four suspects were held in police custody from Dec. 29 until March 31 before a Bucharest court put them under house arrest, which prosecutors on Tuesday sought to extend.

    The Tate brothers are citizens of the United States and Britain. Andrew Tate, a self-described misogynist, built up a following of millions on social media, promoting his own lavish lifestyle in posts which critics say denigrate women.

    The court needs to approve preventative restrictive measures such as house arrest every 30 days. It held a hearing on Wednesday and said it would rule on Friday.

    “We’re not the first affluent wealthy men who have been unfairly attacked,” Tate told reporters on Wednesday after the hearing. “I love this country, I’m going to stay here regardless no matter what and I look forward to being found innocent at the end of everything.”

    The trial will not start immediately. Under Romanian law, the case gets sent to the Bucharest court’s preliminary chamber, where a judge has 60 days to inspect the case files to ensure legality.

    Trafficking of adults carries a prison sentence of up to 10 years, as does rape.

    Prosecutors also said they were investigating the four suspects in a separate ongoing case on allegations of money laundering, witness tampering, and child and adult trafficking.

    Reporting by Luiza Ilie and Octav Ganea; Editing by Alan Charlish and Peter Graff

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • AI’s Growing Impact on Marketing in the Legal Industry | Entrepreneur

    AI’s Growing Impact on Marketing in the Legal Industry | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    The legal space is ultra-competitive. Attorneys and legal professionals will already know this not-so-secret fact. Marketing yourself and your team is vital to attract clients to your firm/organization.

    Historically, the legal space has been dominated by bombastic personalities taking to television and billboards that line the busy highways of America. While both methods have their positive attributes, a trend has begun to emerge throughout the industry; the rise of AI integration into general marketing.

    AI‘s growing prevalence in the industry and the general public has confused many people. So let’s start here, what exactly is AI?

    Artificial intelligence (AI) is defined by Britannica as “the ability of a digital computer or computer-controlled robot to perform tasks commonly associated with intelligent beings.”

    Related: Small Businesses Can and Should Consider Investing in AI Technology — With a Cautious Approach

    AI has long been a staple tool among professionals in the legal field. Many law firms or legal organizations feature an AI chatbot on their homepage and landing pages. These bots assist with the intake of new clients. The bots are trained to collect relevant information and direct clients to helpful links and pages on a firm’s site.

    AI bots like ChatGPT or Google’s Bard primarily sparked the current buzz surrounding AI. Both of these AI bots are conversational AIs. Both have shown to have extensive ability to generate content quickly. Savvy marketers know that content plays a significant factor in converting potential clients and helping drive you up the Google rankings.

    Some marketing professionals use Bard and ChatGPT to transform how they generate content internally. VentureBeat’s editorial director Michale Nuñez recently disclosed that his team is using AI to assist in content generation. The exact details of the full scope of AI-generated content were not fully explained.

    Deep conversations regarding its ethical framework are emerging with the prevalence of AI-generated content. Concerns regarding plagiarism and misinformation are among the most common points of contention. Is it ethical to eliminate the human element associated with written content? How deep is the oversight on this content before it’s published? Can AI show an inherent bias?

    The debate on the ethical ramifications is still ongoing and unclear. However, this is not stopping many marketers from dipping their toes into the pool. Beyond Google Bard, the company wants to integrate AI assistance into general searches.

    Google has been very active in looking to integrate AI into more aspects of its services beyond Bard. In the company’s own words, they are “supercharging” searches. Through the integration of generative AI, Google is working to simplify searching; one way is by suggesting questions related to the topic.

    Related: Why AI is Changing the Future of Personal Branding

    Currently, Google is allowing users to experiment with AI in searches. Upon searching a term in the experimental new system, users are given the option for AI to suggest content based on their inquiry.

    If a potential client were to look up a search term like “How much does a personal injury lawyer cost,” they would likely see a list of local PI attorneys optimizing for that content. The AI-empowered may suggest an inquiry like “How much does a PI attorney charge?”

    The AI bot will pull a snippet from a website with relevant inquiry to the search and attempt to answer the question without users having to click the link. In this case, it will be pertinent regarding the cost of attorneys. However, they are encouraged to follow the link if the inquiry is sufficient or need additional information.

    For marketers working in the legal field, this is especially interesting. Take, for example, a search for a local personal injury lawyer. In the trial, we tested this by searching for a PI lawyer near me. The AI suggested a handful of local attorneys and a follow-up question for the inquiry, which would offer more content.

    Some marketers may question how different this is compared to already existing searches? In short, they’re different. Comparing a search of the same topic in the AI-recommended environment versus the standard search shows two different results in the featured snippet and several ranking pages for the search term.

    This isn’t always the case, though. Searching for “PI lawyers near me” in the AI search generated similar results from the traditional search, which featured the Map Pack at the top.

    There is concern about whether an AI-powered bot can decipher content to determine fact or fiction. The more these new AI-powered tools are used, the more they will learn and grow.

    Factual, informative, and educational content may be critical if AI prioritizes learning. The best advice for creating high-converting content may be to write from an expert point of view.

    Related: What Happens When Self-Driving Cars Crash? The Legal Ramifications of Automation

    As AI becomes increasingly integrated into the daily activities of marketing professionals, the narrative and scope of how to optimize content will surely change. Already, AI is being used to optimize content for search engines, moderate chats, create web pages, and even more.

    [ad_2]

    Hank Stout

    Source link

  • How Entrepreneurs Can Meet Demands While Training a Skilled Workforce | Entrepreneur

    How Entrepreneurs Can Meet Demands While Training a Skilled Workforce | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    By focusing on innovation, collaboration and adaptability, entrepreneurs can meet an industry’s demands and contribute to the growth and development of an economy.

    Entrepreneurs in France’s technician training industry play a crucial role in shaping the country’s skilled workforce. This article explores the significance of technician training, the challenges entrepreneurs face in the field, and their strategies to succeed.

    Recognizing the importance of technician training

    Technician training programs are essential for meeting the growing need for skilled professionals in various sectors. In a rapidly evolving technological landscape, entrepreneurs in the field understand the significance of equipping individuals with the necessary technical skills and knowledge to excel in their respective industries. By offering comprehensive training programs, entrepreneurs provide aspiring technicians with the foundation they need to succeed in their careers.

    The formation of technicians is crucial for filling the skills gap in industries such as manufacturing, construction, automotive and information technology. These technicians are the backbone of the workforce, playing vital roles in troubleshooting, maintenance, repair and overall operational efficiency.

    Related: What New Aviation Practices Can Teach Us About Collaboration and Innovation

    Navigating challenges in the technician training industry

    Entrepreneurs in the technician training industry face various challenges as they strive to create successful businesses and provide quality education. One significant hurdle is navigating regulatory requirements and ensuring compliance with educational standards. Entrepreneurs must stay updated with the ever-changing regulations, accreditation processes and licensing requirements to ensure their training programs meet the necessary criteria.

    Another challenge is securing adequate funding to establish and maintain training facilities, acquire modern equipment and hire qualified instructors. Entrepreneurs often must explore different funding sources, such as grants, loans and partnerships with industry stakeholders, to overcome financial constraints and invest in their training infrastructure.

    Additionally, staying abreast of technological advancements is crucial in technician training. Entrepreneurs need to continuously update their curriculum and teaching methods to align with industry trends and emerging technologies. Embracing digital platforms, virtual reality simulations and online learning tools can enhance the effectiveness and accessibility of technician training programs.

    Related: Consumer Demand Driving Growth in the Tech Sector of Franchise

    Strategies for entrepreneurial success in technician training

    Entrepreneurs in the technician training industry employ various strategies to establish and grow successful ventures. Building strong partnerships with industry stakeholders, such as local businesses, trade associations and professional organizations, is vital for understanding market demands, aligning curriculum with industry needs and providing students with valuable industry exposure. These collaborations can lead to internships, apprenticeships and job placement opportunities, ensuring that graduates are job-ready.

    Moreover, entrepreneurs must prioritize recruiting and retaining qualified instructors who possess both industry experience and teaching expertise. By assembling a knowledgeable and passionate faculty, entrepreneurs create an engaging learning environment and foster the development of practical skills.

    Investing in modern training facilities and equipment is another key strategy for success. Up-to-date labs, workshops and simulation centers provide students with hands-on experience and practical training opportunities. Entrepreneurs should continuously assess and update their facilities to meet industry standards and technological advancements.

    To set themselves up for success, entrepreneurs in technician training should also embrace technology as a tool for innovation and education. Integrating e-learning platforms, online assessments, and interactive learning resources can enhance the learning experience and prepare students for the digital era.

    Additionally, entrepreneurs should actively engage with industry trends and developments, attending conferences, workshops and industry events to stay updated on the latest advancements. This knowledge allows entrepreneurs to adapt their curriculum and training methodologies to meet evolving industry needs.

    Entrepreneurs in technician training must also prioritize continuous improvement and quality assurance. Implementing rigorous evaluation processes, feedback mechanisms and student performance assessments can help entrepreneurs monitor and enhance the effectiveness of their training programs. By actively seeking feedback from students, industry partners and employers, entrepreneurs can identify areas for improvement and make necessary adjustments to ensure their graduates meet industry expectations.

    In expanding their reach and impact, entrepreneurs in technician training should consider establishing partnerships with educational institutions, both locally and internationally. Collaborating with universities, vocational schools and other training providers can create pathways for students to pursue higher education or advanced certifications, further enhancing their career prospects. These partnerships also enable entrepreneurs to access additional resources, share best practices and foster a culture of continuous learning and innovation.

    Furthermore, entrepreneurs should prioritize fostering an entrepreneurial mindset among their students. Encouraging creativity, problem-solving and critical thinking skills can empower technicians to not only excel in their roles but also explore entrepreneurial opportunities within their industries. By instilling an entrepreneurial spirit, entrepreneurs contribute to the growth of small businesses, startups and innovation-driven enterprises.

    In conclusion, entrepreneurship in the technician training industry plays a vital role in nurturing a skilled workforce for France’s future. Through innovation, collaboration and adaptability, entrepreneurs are equipping individuals with the technical skills and knowledge necessary to excel in various industries. However, they must navigate challenges such as regulatory compliance, securing funding, and staying abreast of technological advancements.

    By implementing effective strategies, building strong partnerships, embracing technology and fostering a culture of continuous improvement, entrepreneurs can ensure the success of their technician training programs. As they continue to shape the future of technician training, entrepreneurs contribute to the growth and competitiveness of the French economy while empowering individuals to thrive in their careers and drive innovation in their respective industries.

    [ad_2]

    Henri Al Helaly

    Source link

  • YNW Melly Trial Hears Evidence From Experts and Witnesses in First Week

    YNW Melly Trial Hears Evidence From Experts and Witnesses in First Week

    [ad_1]

    YNW Melly has been in a Florida court this week, on trial for the alleged murder of two friends, with experts and witnesses providing testimony. The rapper born Jamell Maurice Demons, who pleaded not guilty in 2019, may face the death penalty if found guilty of first-degree murder. YNW Melly’s lawyer, David Howard, said in opening arguments that the state’s investigation had been “incompetent and incomplete,” arguing his client had no reason to kill his friends.

    On Monday, the first day of trial, prosecutors presented the case they put forward upon the initial charges in 2019: YNW Melly shot and killed Christopher “YNW Juvy” Thomas Jr. and Anthony “YNW Sakchaser” Williams on Friday, October 26, 2018, in South Florida, and then staged the crime scene to look like a drive-by shooting. They cited surveillance video of Melly with his co-defendant, Cortlen “YNW Bortlen” Henry, as well as the two victims, in YNW Bortlen’s car when YNW Bortlen had claimed the shooting happened. Prosecutors also claimed that phone data, blood spatter evidence, and a bullet casing in the car indicate the four young men were together the night of the crime and that the victims were shot dead from inside the car, according to trial footage viewed by Pitchfork and updates from LawAndCrime.com.

    Later on Monday, prosecutors played audio of YNW Bortlen describing the supposed drive-by shooting to a detective while under questioning; the detective told him there was no evidence of such a shooting at the given location. The prosecution also presented a brief Instagram exchange in which they argue YNW Melly admitted to the killing.

    On Tuesday, two crime scene investigators described sweeping the Jeep that the state claims YNW Melly and YNW Bortlen used to stage the drive-by shooting. The defense’s cross-examinations ascertained that fingerprints gathered in such sweeps are not visible to the naked eye, and that not every item gathered was DNA-tested, due to relatively recent cost-saving measures. The defense additionally prompted one crime scene investigator to concede that she may not have changed her gloves when picking up different bottles of evidence, which could lead to a “small” risk of cross-contamination. The investigator said, however, she definitely changed gloves when moving between parts of the Jeep.

    Wednesday’s hearing began with testimony about identifying shell casings from Broward Sheriff’s Office Crime Lab manager. Because no gun has been found, the prosecution failed to show that YNW Melly shot the victims—a point that the defense lawyer reiterated in cross-examination. The third day ended with prosecutors submitting evidence, including a photo of YNW Bortlen’s seemingly unblemished hands after the shooting, which, according to the defense, he narrowly avoided by ducking in the car when the assailants drove by.

    On Thursday, the fourth day, the judge took a recess to hear the prosecution and defense’s arguments for and against, respectively, the admission of Snapchat videos as evidence; the defense claimed the videos, which show YNW Melly and friends goofing around, are innocuous.

    Thursday also featured extensive testimony from Felicia Holmes, a registered nurse whose daughter, Mariah Hamilton, is said to have been dating YNW Melly when Christopher “YNW Juvy” Thomas Jr. and Anthony “YNW Sakchaser” Williams were killed in 2018. For much of her testimony, Holmes said that she could not remember the events of 2018 or subsequent statements she made to police. She also said she felt “threatened” by the state’s prosecutors.

    The trial will recommence on Tuesday, June 20.

    [ad_2]

    Jazz Monroe

    Source link

  • Slowthai Pleads Not Guilty to 2 Rape Charges

    Slowthai Pleads Not Guilty to 2 Rape Charges

    [ad_1]

    Slowthai has pleaded not guilty to two charges of raping a woman in 2021. The rapper entered the plea today (June 15) at a Crown court in Oxford, the English city where the two crimes—oral and vaginal rape—allegedly took place. Slowthai, born Tyron Kaymone Frampton, appeared in court alongside another man, Alex Blake Walker, who pleaded not guilty to two charges of rape and one of sexual assault. The trial is scheduled to begin on July 1, 2024.

    Both were granted bail, on the condition that they keep their solicitors informed of where they are living.

    Slowthai appeared in court for the first time on May 16, the first time the charges were publicized. Major UK festivals including Glastonbury had scrubbed his names from posters by the following morning, and his remaining shows have since been canned or postponed. On social media, Slowthai denied the charges.


    If you or someone you know has been affected by sexual assault, we encourage you to reach out for support:

    RAINN National Sexual Assault Hotline
    http://www.rainn.org
    1 800 656 HOPE (4673)

    Crisis Text Line
    SMS: Text “HELLO” or “HOLA” to 741-741

    [ad_2]

    Jazz Monroe

    Source link

  • Trump indictment: Reuters/Ipsos poll shows most Republicans think charges are politically motivated 

    Trump indictment: Reuters/Ipsos poll shows most Republicans think charges are politically motivated 

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON, June 13 (Reuters) – A vast majority of Republicans believe federal criminal charges against Donald Trump are politically motivated, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll completed on Monday that also showed him far ahead of his nearest rival in the race for the Republican presidential nomination.

    The polling, which began on Friday, a day after Trump was indicted, found that 81% of self-identified Republicans said politics was driving the case, reflecting the deep polarization of the U.S. electorate. President Joe Biden, a Democrat, has repeatedly said he has no involvement in the case brought by the Department of Justice.

    The number of Republicans who believe the former president is being unfairly targeted vastly exceeds the 30-35% of Trump supporters who are estimated by political analysts to make up his core base.

    Some 62% of respondents in the Reuters/Ipsos poll, including 91% of Democrats and 35% of Republicans, said it was believable that Trump illegally stored classified documents at his home in Florida as alleged by prosecutors.

    The indictment did not appear to dent Trump’s standing in the Republican nominating contest for the 2024 presidential election. The specific charges, including obstruction of justice, became public on Friday afternoon when the indictment was unsealed.

    Some 43% of self-identified Republicans said Trump was their preferred candidate, compared to 22% who picked Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, Trump’s closest rival.

    In early May, Trump led DeSantis 49% to 19%, but that was before DeSantis formally entered the race.

    The rest of the Republican field, which includes former Vice President Mike Pence who declared his candidacy last week, had low single-digit levels of support.

    Trump flew to Miami on Monday to face federal charges of unlawfully keeping U.S. national security documents and lying to officials who tried to recover them. Trump, who will appear in court on Tuesday, has proclaimed his innocence and vowed to continue his campaign to regain the presidency in the November 2024 general election.

    Many Republican contenders in the 2024 race have accused the U.S. Justice Department of political bias and say it is being “weaponized” against Biden’s biggest Republican challenger. The department says all investigative decisions are made without regard to partisan politics.

    Trump also faces charges in New York in a state criminal case related to alleged hush money payments to a pornographic film star. A Reuters/Ipsos poll in March found that Republicans also saw that investigation as politically motivated.

    Biden’s approval rating stood at 41% last week, close to the lowest level of his presidency. Trump had a 40% approval rating at this point in his 2017-2021 presidency.

    The latest poll included responses from 1,005 adults nationwide and had a credibility interval, a measure of precision, of 4 percentage points for all voting-age Americans and between 6 and 7 percentage points for Republicans.

    Reporting by Jason Lange; Editing by Andy Sullivan, Ross Colvin and Howard Goller

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 7 Strategies to Conquer Mergers and Acquisitions | Entrepreneur

    7 Strategies to Conquer Mergers and Acquisitions | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are complex transactions that require careful negotiation and due diligence. Negotiating for M&A involves a variety of considerations, including valuation, deal structure, financing, legal and regulatory compliance and post-merger integration.

    Let’s explore some key strategies and best practices for negotiating successful M&A deals.

    1. Conduct thorough due diligence

    Before entering into any negotiation, conducting thorough due diligence on the target company is essential. Due diligence helps to identify potential risks and opportunities associated with the acquisition, including financial and operational risks, legal and regulatory compliance issues, intellectual property rights and customer and supplier relationships. This information is critical to determining the target company’s value and identifying any deal breakers.

    For example:

    • You’ll want to clearly understand and have documentation substantiating the capitalization of the target. The last thing you want is for an unknown stockholder to come out of the woodwork after the deal closes.
    • You want to ensure the target owns all of its intellectual property (or has sufficient license rights, as applicable) and there are no major risks of infringement claims against the target.
    • Has the target been involved in litigation? Or is someone threatening litigation?

    2. Determine the deal structure

    The deal structure refers to how the acquisition will be financed and structured. The most common types of deal structures include stock purchases, asset purchases and mergers. Each structure has different legal and tax implications, and it is important to consult with legal and financial advisors to determine the most advantageous structure for the deal.

    Related: We Can’t Rely on Venture Capital Funding to Build a Just and Thriving Entrepreneurial Economy. Here’s What to Do Instead

    3. Set realistic valuation expectations

    One of the most challenging aspects of negotiating an M&A deal is determining the value of the target company. Both the buyer and the seller will have different valuation expectations based on their respective financial models and industry market conditions.

    To reach a successful negotiation, both parties must be willing to compromise and adjust their valuation expectations. Having a thorough understanding of the target company’s financials, market position and growth potential is essential to developing a realistic valuation.

    4. Establish clear goals and objectives

    Successful negotiations require clear goals and objectives. Both parties should identify their respective priorities and interests as well as their areas of flexibility and non-negotiables. The parties should work together to develop a mutually beneficial agreement that satisfies their respective goals and objectives.

    For example:

    • Both the buyer and target need to decide how important risk mitigation is to them. A risk-averse buyer will want tight indemnification rights for future liabilities arising from issues with the target. A risk-averse target will want less onerous indemnification obligations and low caps on such obligations. If the target is more willing to take risks, they may agree to buyer-friendly indemnification terms in favor of some other ask on other terms.
    • Some deals are a mix of cash and stock — which gets more complicated if the buyer is a private company. In such deals, as the target, you need to decide what you care about more — cash or stock. If you value one more than the other, where certain consideration is contingent, you will want the consideration you value more not to be subject to as many contingencies.
    • If the deal has earnouts, as a target, you will want to negotiate protections. For example, if the earnout requires specific revenue goals post-acquisition, what if the buyer stops selling your product/service? Or stops putting resources into it? There are deal terms that would protect you in such events. As a buyer, on the other hand, how much do you want your hands tied to help the target receive earnouts? You want as much freedom as possible.

    Related: 7 Deadly Sins of Merger and Acquisition Negotiations

    5. Develop a negotiation strategy

    Developing a negotiation strategy is critical to achieving a successful M&A deal. The parties should identify their respective bargaining strengths and weaknesses, as well as the potential risks and opportunities associated with the deal. As discussed in our last article on negotiations, it’s paramount to identify an alternative to the agreement if it cannot be reached.

    The parties should also consider the timing and sequencing of negotiations, the use of concessions and trade-offs and the importance of maintaining good working relationships throughout the negotiation process. From a timing perspective, it often makes sense to get big-ticket items out of the way early so that no one wastes their time on details when no deal is possible.

    In addition, using advisors like lawyers and bankers to do a lot of the negotiating can help preserve relationships. Let your lawyer play bad cop for a while, and you can swoop in at the end. This mitigates the harm from you as the principal having fights over the entire process.

    6. Focus on post-merger integration

    The success of post-merger integration often determines the success of an M&A deal. A comprehensive integration plan developed by both parties should address key issues such as culture, leadership, communication, technology and operations. The parties should also consider successfully retaining key employees, maintaining customer relationships and ensuring a smooth transition for all stakeholders.

    From an employee perspective, this can take different forms. Sometimes you can negotiate re-vesting of deal consideration for some key employees, which requires them to stay employed for some time post-acquisition. Also, non-compete agreements, common in M&A, can incentivize key employees to remain employed with the buyer post-acquisition.

    Those, of course, are “stick” approaches rather than “carrot” approaches. Buyers are often much more well-resourced than their targets. So, higher salaries and bonuses and post-acquisition equity issuances can provide positive incentives to retain employees.

    Clear and unified messaging is important for customer and vendor relationships. Providing prompt notice and assurances of continuing dedication to the relationship is often enough. Of course, individual outreach is often recommended for particularly sensitive situations or priority partners/customers.

    Related: How to Avoid Post-Merger Identity Crisis

    7. Consider alternative dispute resolution mechanisms

    In some cases, disputes may arise during the negotiation or implementation of an M&A deal. To avoid costly and time-consuming litigation, the parties should consider alternative dispute resolution mechanisms such as mediation or arbitration. These mechanisms can help to resolve disputes in a timely and cost-effective manner while preserving the relationship between the parties.

    Negotiating for M&A requires a strategic approach, which involves complex legal and financial issues requiring specialized expertise. It is essential to seek the advice of experienced legal and financial advisors to navigate these complexities and ensure the deal is structured and executed properly. However, by following these best practices, parties can increase the likelihood of reaching a successful M&A deal that benefits all stakeholders.

    [ad_2]

    Mital Makadia

    Source link

  • A Guide To the FTC’s New Subscription Provision | Entrepreneur

    A Guide To the FTC’s New Subscription Provision | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) proposed a “click-to-cancel” provision to their Negative Option Rule, requiring retailers to make it just as easy for their customers to cancel a recurring subscription as it was when they initially subscribed. Merchants should take action now to streamline their subscription cancellation process and invest in tools that provide more self-service options for reactivating subscriptions and managing automated billing schedules.

    So-called “negative option” services are nothing new. These businesses provide products on a trial basis, then later initiate a subscription unless the customer specifically declines service before billing. However, the US Federal Trade Commission announced changes to their negative option rules with a factsheet published back in March.

    These proposed changes would seek to avoid misrepresentation and require more detailed disclosures. It would also require sellers to adopt a simple, streamlined cancelation process.

    As the FTC explains, this “click-to-cancel” provision seeks to make it just as easy for customers to cancel a recurring subscription as it was for them to initiate it.

    Related: The Subscription Economy Is Growing Fast. Here’s How Your Business Can Adapt and Thrive.

    What’s changing?

    The proposal is part of the FTC’s review of their Negative Option Rule. This decades-old legal framework requires sellers to disclose the terms of a sale before initiating a subscription. The existing ruleset also requires that merchants provide information about how consumers can cancel a subscription service.

    Despite this rule being in place, the regulatory agency reports that they receive thousands of complaints each year from consumers regarding subscription services. These complainants typically claim to have either been billed for services without giving consent or to have dealt with a retailer who makes it incredibly difficult—even impossible—to cancel.

    The updated rules would mandate that if customers can sign up for a service online, they must be able to cancel on the same website. This process should also involve the same (or fewer) number of steps as were involved in initiating service. It would also prohibit misrepresentation and require that merchants give people important information in clear ways so that buyers know what they’re agreeing to.

    The amended rules would “set clear, enforceable, performance-based requirements” and be applicable to all subscription features in all media. The FTC ultimately wants to ensure that people can cancel services “without jumping through lots of hoops.”

    “Some businesses too often trick consumers into paying for subscriptions they no longer want or didn’t sign up for in the first place,” said FTC Chair Lina Khan, regarding the agency’s rationale. “The proposed rule would require that companies make it as easy to cancel a subscription as it is to sign up for one. The proposal would save consumers time and money, and businesses that continued to use subscription tricks and traps would be subject to stiff penalties.”

    Related: ‘Click to Cancel’ Rule Could End the Cycle of Subscription Traps

    Better subscription practices will reduce chances of disputes and chargebacks

    Buyers expect convenience and efficiency in the digital marketplace. One clear indicator of this is the rapid growth of first-party misuse of the chargeback process.

    Visa asserts that first-party fraud of this variety is responsible for 75 percent of digital eCommerce chargebacks. So-called “friendly fraud” commonly happens to subscription retailers when consumers contact their bank, rather than the merchant, to cancel a subscription. The retailer on the other end of the chargeback is often unaware that a dispute is being raised against them until it’s too late.

    Relative to the number of ecommerce transactions in the US, the growth of chargebacks has surged ahead by nearly 20 percent, according to a study published by Chargebacks911. This is a worrying statistic, as the chargeback process penalizes retailers with “guilty-before-innocent” fines and fees. Add to that the fact that chargebacks typically require significant resources for merchants to address. That’s assuming they can look beyond false dispute reason codes and identify chargeback sources to address the problem at all.

    Unfortunately, in the absence of information exchanged between the customer and retailer, an open door for first-party fraud becomes a permanent wedge.

    Related: Your Subscription Service, Just More Successful

    Better communication will be essential

    Reducing friction when it comes to canceling subscriptions is a net-positive move for both consumers and merchants. It will naturally improve the customer experience and aligns with growing market demand.

    The best approach for merchants is to try and avoid this problem by meeting customers’ expectations. By streamlining the customer experience and providing better lines of communication, merchants can prevent many disputes before they happen. Providing the means for customers to cancel a subscription is only part of the challenge, though. Merchants need comprehensive, self-service experiences to remain competitive and address growing demands.

    Today’s consumer wants intuitive flexibility, payment scheduling options and frictionless convenience. If retailers can’t live up to those expectations, they will face steep competition with their customers’ banks and credit card companies, many of which supply a “concierge-like” service to address customers’ needs efficiently and wants.

    As mentioned above, the year-over-year growth of chargebacks is largely attributed to disputes filed on subscription products and services. We’re not going to see this shift in consumer expectations reversed, either; instead, merchants must adapt to evolving customer expectations.

    Related: How to Give Your Subscribers an ‘Ease of Ordering’

    Adapt to survive in the new digital space

    Whether or not this proposed rule change is adopted by the FTC, it has been suggested for decades that merchants should have clearly stated terms and conditions when it comes to recurring billing. This is no longer enough, though.

    Merchants should act now to streamline their subscription cancellation process. A tedious cancellation process could push customers to dispute charges or even file complaints with entities like the FTC or Better Business Bureau, regardless of whether the retailer is compliant and following payment processing guidelines that govern their account.

    I advise that companies include recurring billing information, as well as terms and conditions, within the checkout process and to make sure the information is easily accessible for customers. I also suggest that companies increase the frequency of reminders and billing confirmations before renewal dates. Finally, merchants should invest in tools that provide more self-service options for reactivating subscriptions and managing automated billing schedules.

    There’s no “silver bullet” to solve the problem of subscription and negative-option chargebacks. However, bringing processes up to standard in terms of providing better, more transparent service can allow merchants to prevent many disputes from happening in the first place.

    [ad_2]

    Monica Eaton

    Source link

  • The Growing Trend of Personal Injury Impacts on Small Business | Entrepreneur

    The Growing Trend of Personal Injury Impacts on Small Business | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    The personal injury industry is worth roughly $53.1 billion as of 2022. The majority of these claims fall under motor vehicle accident claims or medical malpractice.

    With more than 64,000 personal injury law firms in the United States, it’s an increasing reality that small business owners will face a claim against them or their insurance provider over the years.

    Although a car accident claim may not be directly relevant to all small business owners, other types of personal injury claims are. More relevant claims would likely involve product liability or a workplace accident lawsuit.

    For small businesses to grow, businesses to incorporate more services and offer their expertise to more people. But as business owners increase their reach, many will eventually encounter a situation involving a personal injury claim.

    Personal injury claims are among the most common types of lawsuits filed. For example, in 2020, personal injury/product liability increased by 97% over the previous year.

    Related: 7 Workplace Injuries That Can Put You Out of Business

    Suppose someone is injured while on your property or by one of your products; you and or your insurance provider may be in a position to be held liable for the injury. But how could this have been avoided in the first place? Various factors play into establishing fault.

    Accidents and the unforeseen occur constantly. It’s critical, though, to think as critically as possible and prepare yourself and your staff for the possibility of this situation. Savvy small business owners will know to not only be ready for this possibility but assume it will happen eventually.

    Protect your team through adequate insurance coverage

    At a minimum, small business owners are recommended to carry commercial general liability insurance. This will help support your staff in case of an injury on your property. It goes in tandem with creating a safe work environment, which is also critical. Keep floors clean, walkways available, and doors are clearly marked. If you work with specialized equipment, ensure all staff members are trained and certified to use said equipment.

    Be up to date on the law and keep an evolving record

    The rules that govern local small businesses include employment, environmental and product liability laws. Knowing the latest changes and amendments to these and related laws are essential, as they will impact your business operations. Keeping digital and printed records of all rules is recommended for quick accessibility and reference. Document everything if something occurs on your property leading to an accident, injury, or complaint. If you are sued or face a legal challenge, showing all your steps with written documentation can be hugely beneficial.

    Related: What Happens When Self-Driving Cars Crash? The Legal Ramifications of Automation

    Keep a written policy on customer service and be responsive to customer complaints

    To minimize confusion and help your staff interact with customers, display your customer service policy for any patrons visiting your establishment or office. This policy should include clear guidelines for an emergency involving an injured guest or staff member. If anyone is injured on your premises, request medical assistance immediately. Taking any injuries seriously in this situation is paramount.

    It may not be easy but keep a positive outlook

    It’s understandable to feel stressed when faced with injuries and a potential personal injury suit against you or your insurance policy. You should consult with an experienced legal counsel in these scenarios. Many personal injury lawyers often also provide defense litigation services. Talking with a legal expert who knows both sides of the personal injury coin can go a long way in helping to provide you relief in a stressful situation.

    Small business owners are expected to keep their products and property safe. This was what’s commonly referred to as the duty of care. Many personal injury claims will revolve around the legal claim that this duty was broken.

    Duty of care is typically defined as a base requirement that a person be attentive, exercise caution, and be mindful while in public. The small business owner and their patron/user are expected to follow this. A personal injury case could be possible if one party is found to have acted in a directly negligent fashion.

    Related: 5 Reasons Personal Injury Law Firms Are Thriving

    Defending yourself and your business from an accusation of negligence will be a significant deciding factor in the validity of the case. This is why thinking ahead is crucial to running a successful business. In addition, speaking to a trusted legal counsel on potential issues that could arise in connection with your business will help to minimize risk and protect all parties.

    [ad_2]

    Hank Stout

    Source link

  • How You Structure Your Business to the IRS Matters. Here’s Why. | Entrepreneur

    How You Structure Your Business to the IRS Matters. Here’s Why. | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    The business formation structure you chose at startup may no longer be the best one for your business. As you grow, your company’s legal entity can affect your tax bill, personal assets and ability to attract investors, raise money and expand your business.

    Those are many variables, so let’s explore your options.

    Related: Which Business Structure Is Right for You?

    Sole proprietorships

    Most startups in the U.S. start — and stay — as sole proprietorships. Of 33 million U.S. small businesses, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) says 28.3 million are nonfarm sole proprietorships.

    Sole proprietorships are the simplest form of legal business entity. The setup process is easy. While sole proprietorships without employees don’t need an Employer Identification Number (EIN), it’s recommended since many banks won’t let you open a business account without one.

    There is a downside, however. There is no legal separation between a sole proprietor and the business. So, you are personally liable for any debts, obligations and lawsuits against your company. If your company is sued, your personal assets (property, bank accounts, etc.) can be at risk.

    For tax purposes, sole proprietors report their profits and losses on their individual tax returns (IRS Forms 1040) and attach a Schedule C Profit or Loss From Business, showing income, expenses and allowable tax deductions. In addition to income taxes, sole proprietors pay self-employment taxes of 12.4% for social security and 2.9% for Medicare. Taxes are due April 15.

    Partnerships

    Many entrepreneurs start businesses with family or friends or look for partners when their businesses grow. Like sole proprietorships, there is no legal separation between the partners and the company, so the partners’ personal assets are at risk if something goes wrong.

    Unless specified differently in the partnership agreement, all partners are equally responsible for paying taxes. Partnerships use IRS Form 1065, Schedule K, to list partners and the business’s revenues and expenses. Plus, all partners must pay self-employment and estimated taxes. Partnership tax returns are due March 15.

    Related: 5 Tips for Structuring Your New Business Like a Pro

    LLCs offer liability protection

    As their businesses grow, many entrepreneurs become uncomfortable with their personal assets being at risk and explore incorporating their companies.

    There are two ways to incorporate: forming a Limited Liability Company (LLC) or a C Corporation. Both structures are considered separate legal entities and protect business owners from the company’s liabilities, shielding their personal assets.

    Owners of LLCs are called members. Single-member LLCs are taxed like sole proprietorships using tax form 1040 and Schedule C. Multi-member LLCs are taxed like partnerships and use partnership forms 1065 and Schedule K and K-1. LLC members must still pay self-employment taxes. You can also opt for an S Corp election (see below).

    You must file Articles of Organization with your state to form an LLC. And while not required, it’s recommended that you create an operating agreement. An operating agreement defines the roles and responsibilities of a multi-member LLC.

    LLCs are becoming increasingly popular due to their relatively simple management structure, fewer compliance requirements and flexible tax treatment. They’re essentially a “have your cake and eat it too” option. For instance, multi-member LLCs can allocate percentages of the company’s profits and losses to the members as they see fit.

    LLCs have fewer and less complex compliance responsibilities than C Corps. They don’t have to elect officers or a board of directors. There are some ongoing compliance requirements — check with your state to learn more.

    The biggest disadvantage of owning an LLC is that you can’t issue company stock, making it more challenging to raise money.

    C Corps offer robust liability protection

    As your business grows, you may want stronger liability protection and opt to form a C Corporation. While C Corps are more complex to form and operate, they provide the most robust liability protection for the company’s shareholders. C Corps must file Articles of Incorporation in the state where you operate.

    A C Corp is a separate business entity and files a tax return on its profits and losses using IRS Form 1120. But the owners/shareholders are considered corporation employees, receive W-2s and are taxed as individual taxpayers, often called “double taxation.”

    However, C Corps can deduct employee-related costs, like wages, health care, retirement plans, operational expenses and fringe benefits like company cars. Ultimately, the current C Corp flat tax rate of 21% may be lower than what sole proprietorships and partnerships pay,

    In C Corps, the company and its employees each contribute 6.2% of the employee’s wages to Social Security and 1.45% to Medicare. Plus, employers contribute to their state-run unemployment insurance funds (SUI).

    It’s easier to raise money and attract investors since C Corps can offer unlimited numbers of shares and multiple classes of stock.

    C Corps typically have higher registration costs and more compliance requirements, including adopting bylaws, submitting annual reports, holding shareholder and board of director meetings and more.

    Related: The 5 Biggest Tax Differences Between an LLC and Corporation

    The S Corp tax election

    LLCs and C Corps can elect to be taxed as S Corporations, allowing them to divide profits into wages and dividends. While dividend distributions aren’t subject to employment taxes, shareholders must be paid reasonable compensation as defined by the IRS. Electing to be taxed as an S Corp can lower your overall tax bill while maintaining liability protection. S Corps use IRS Form 1120-S, and tax returns are due on March 15. To elect S Corp status, you must file IRS Form 2553 no later than March 15 of the tax year the election is to take effect.

    However, only American citizens and residents can be S Corp shareholders, and only 100 shares can be issued, so check with your accountant before choosing this path.

    Get advice

    It’s crucial to weigh the advantages and disadvantages of the different business structures. For many entrepreneurs, the liability protection and possible tax savings outweigh the added costs and complexity of incorporation.

    With so much at stake, it’s recommended that you consult with your accountant or attorney to help determine which structure is best for your business today and for future growth.

    [ad_2]

    Nellie Akalp

    Source link

  • Where Is Anna Delvey Now? She’s Launching Her Own Podcast | Entrepreneur

    Where Is Anna Delvey Now? She’s Launching Her Own Podcast | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Convicted fraudster and faux-heiress Anna “Delvey” Sorokin is launching a podcast called “The Anna Delvey Show.”

    Known for posing as a German heiress to deceive New York’s elite out of money (and self-respect), Delvey was also portrayed in Netflix‘s 2022 series “Inventing Anna” by Emmy Award-winning actor Julia Garner.

    After being convicted of grand larceny and theft of services in 2019, Delvey served time and was released from prison in 2021. However, she was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement shortly after for overstaying her visa. She spent time in an ICE detention center before being released on bond. Delvey is currently living in an apartment in Manhattan’s East Village with an ankle monitor as she awaits a decision from the immigration court on whether she can stay in the country.

    RELATED: Listen: ‘Dirty Money’ Podcast on Scam Artist Anna ‘Delvey’ Sorokin

    Since her release from prison, Delvey has been featured in several magazine interviews and made podcast appearances, but now she is hosting her own show produced by Audio Up and Reunion Audio.

    “On this show, I will dive into the concept of rules and talk with the people who create or break them, from art, politics, fashion, tech, finance, law and more,” Delvey said in the trailer, released on YouTube on Wednesday. “‘The Anna Delvey Show’ will share honest, unfiltered conversations that will question traditional notions of what’s right and wrong.”

    The podcast will be distributed through global podcast publisher Audio Boom, making it available on all major podcast listening platforms.

    “The Anna Delvey Show,” which has yet to drop a release date, will be recorded from her apartment and will be released weekly with guest appearances from Whitney Cummings, Julia Fox, Emily Ratajkowski, and more celebrities.

    In the trailer, Delvey notes: “I’m interested in examining how rule breaking can build you up as well as tear you down while also creating a polarizing reaction from the public.”

    Delvey is also moving into music, apparently. Per the trailer, Delvey wrote a song that will be produced by Audio Up CEO Jared Gutstadt and Reunion Audio founder Sean Glass.

    [ad_2]

    Sam Silverman

    Source link

  • ‘That ’70s Show’ Star Convicted on Two Counts of Rape | Entrepreneur

    ‘That ’70s Show’ Star Convicted on Two Counts of Rape | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Danny Masteron, the actor known for his roles on “That ’70s Show” and “The Ranch” was found guilty in a Los Angeles courtroom on Wednesday on two counts of rape. But the jury was deadlocked on a third count resulting in a mixed verdict.

    This was the second rape trial for Masterson, who played Steven Hyde on That 70s Show—the first trial ended in a deadlock last November, resulting in a mistrial.

    Drugging drinks

    Prosecutors accused Masterson of raping three women on separate occasions at his home in the Hollywood Hills between 2001 and 2003. Two of his accusers are members of the Church of Scientology, which Masterson also belongs to. According to court documents, the Church discourages women from reporting rapes to the police — a claim that the Church vehemently denies.

    The AP reported that Deputy District Attorney Reinhold Mueller told the courtroom that Masterson slipped drugs into the drinks of his girlfriend and two women he knew through the Church of Scientology.

    “The evidence will show that they were drugged,” Mueller said.

    Both women described harrowing experiences of becoming weak and woozy and then waking up at Masterson’s home, where he threatened one with a gun and called another “white trash” while repeatedly spitting on her.

    The trial lasted two weeks, and it took the jury a week to reach a verdict. It is seen as a victory for the #MeToo movement, which has been working to raise awareness of sexual assault and harassment.

    Masterson is scheduled to be sentenced on January 24, 2023, and faces up to 30 years in prison.

    [ad_2]

    Jonathan Small

    Source link

  • Third Man Arrested in 2002 Shooting of Run-D.M.C.’s Jam Master Jay

    Third Man Arrested in 2002 Shooting of Run-D.M.C.’s Jam Master Jay

    [ad_1]

    Federal prosecutors in Brooklyn have indicted a third man in connection with the 2002 shooting death of Run-D.M.C.’s Jam Master Jay, the New York Times reports. Jay Bryant, a 49-year-old resident of Queens, New York, was charged with murder while engaged in drug trafficking as well as other trafficking-related charges. Bryant was already in custody awaiting trial on a separate drug-related indictment. 

    Jam Master Jay (born Jason William Mizell) founded Run-D.M.C. in 1983 with Joseph “Rev Run” Simmons and Darryl “D.M.C.” McDaniels. He was shot to death at 37 on October 30, 2002 in a recording studio in Jamaica, Queens. Prosecutors allege Bryant was seen entering the studio building just before the shooting, and that clothing with his DNA was found at the scene. 

    Two men, Karl Jordan Jr. and Ronald Washington, were arrested in 2020 in connection to the shooting and indicted on similar charges of murder while engaged in drug trafficking. Jordan and Washington pleaded not guilty; their trial in scheduled to begin in January 2024. Washington had been named as a suspect as early as 2007.

    In 2018, Netflix released ReMastered: Who Killed Jam Master Jay?, the third episode of its music documentary series, exploring the circumstances of his unsolved murder case.

    [ad_2]

    Matthew Ismael Ruiz

    Source link

  • High Times: Marijuana Positivity in Workplace Drug Tests Reaches 25-Year Record – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    High Times: Marijuana Positivity in Workplace Drug Tests Reaches 25-Year Record – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    [ad_1]

    Seyfarth Synopsis: Across nationwide testing, marijuana positivity rates for 2022 reached 4.3% (up from 2.7% in 2017), with biggest gains found in states that legalized recreational marijuana.

    Impairment and related safety hazards have been disrupting the workplace resulting in lost time, absenteeism, safety hazards, and serious industrial accidents. We track annual positivity test reports from Quest Diagnostics, one of the country’s largest drug testing laboratories. Quest’s recently released 2023 Drug Testing Index reveals that while positivity rates for some drugs declined, the rise in positivity rates for marijuana and amphetamine continues to climb. Of the more than six million general workforce marijuana tests that Quest performed in 2022, 4.3% came back positive, up from 3.9% the prior year. Worse still, post-accident marijuana positivity of urine drug tests in the general U.S. workforce was 7.3%, an increase of 9% compared to 6.7% in 2021. While not entirely clear, it is possible that the widespread state legalization of marijuana has contributed to an increase in test positivity and also workplace safety hazards.

    Scientific testing indicates greater likelihood of errors in judgment and workplace accidents where an employee is impaired by marijuana. A National Safety Council white paper continues to recommend a Zero Tolerance Policy for marijuana in safety-sensitive positions. Federal OSHA further advocates for post-accident drug testing as a legitimate part…

    [ad_2]

    MMP News Author

    Source link

  • Pink Floyd’s Roger Waters Investigated by German Police Over Satirical Nazi Costume

    Pink Floyd’s Roger Waters Investigated by German Police Over Satirical Nazi Costume

    [ad_1]

    Roger Waters is under investigation by German police for “incitement of the people” after wearing a satirical, Nazi-style costume on stage in Berlin, Reuters reports. The outfit was based on the fictional fascist officer Pink, whom Bob Geldof played in Pink Floyd’s 1982 film The Wall, a satirical critique of a society’s descent into fascism. Though Waters’ outfit did not explicitly replicate Nazi uniforms, which are illegal in Germany, police said it was “capable of violating the dignity of the victims, as well as approving, glorifying or justifying the violent and arbitrary rule of the Nazi regime in a way that disrupts public peace.” Waters’ representatives did not respond to a request for comment.

    Waters, an outspoken critic of Zionism and Israel, faced political opposition to his German tour. Frankfurt’s local government attempted to ban his concert in the city, alleging that Waters’ “persistent anti-Israel behavior” amounted to antisemitism. Officials noted that some of the musician’s shows had incorporated a pig-shaped balloon adorned with the Star of David and various corporate logos. A court overturned the ban, on the basis that the performances can be “viewed as a work of art” and that Waters “did not glorify or relativize the crimes of the Nazis or identify with Nazi racist ideology.” Waters is scheduled to play in Frankfurt on Sunday, May 28.

    UPDATE 5/27: On Friday evening (May 26), Waters shared the following statement on social media: 

    My recent performance in Berlin has attracted bad faith attacks from those who want to smear and silence me because they disagree with my political views and moral principles. 

    The elements of my performance that have been questioned are quite clearly a statement in opposition to fascism, injustice, and bigotry in all its forms. Attempts to portray those elements as something else are disingenuous and politically motivated. The depiction of an unhinged fascist demagogue has been a feature of my shows since Pink Floyd’s “The Wall” in 1980. 

    I have spent my entire life speaking out against authoritarianism and oppression wherever I see it. When I was a child after the war, the name of Anne Frank was often spoken in our house, she becamea  permanent reminder of what happens when fascism is left unchecked. My parents fought the Nazis in World War II, with my father paying the ultimate price. 

    Regardless of the consequences of the attacks against me, I will continue to condemn injustice and all those who perpetrate it. 

    [ad_2]

    Jazz Monroe

    Source link

  • How to Navigate Conflict While Building Trust | Entrepreneur

    How to Navigate Conflict While Building Trust | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    When a prospective client contacts my law office about representation in a legal action, one of the first things my staff does is conduct a “conflicts check.” As an attorney, I am ethically bound to provide my clients with the best advocacy. This won’t be possible if I have a real or perceived conflict with them or their case.

    For business people, the possibility of a conflict is no less critical. Whether hiring staff, negotiating agreements or seeking counsel, entrepreneurs should feel confident that the person on the other side of the table will have their best interests at heart.

    As professionals, our primary mission should be to face conflicts with integrity, ensuring we honor our commitments to our clients and ourselves.

    What is a conflict?

    For lawyers, the most prominent kind of conflict is representing both sides in a dispute. Imagine a divorce attorney agreeing to represent both the husband and wife in their divorce: It simply wouldn’t happen unless there was a full written disclosure of the conflict and a knowing waiver by both sides. The legal code of ethics says that if I have a relationship with or have worked for a party on the other side in a dispute, I cannot possibly provide my prospective client with unbiased representation. I should refer them to another attorney.

    Not all conflicts are so apparent, however. Even when there isn’t an obvious overlap, there could still be bias or some personal agenda that colors how the lawyer — or any other professional — views or will handle the matter before them. Judges, for example, are expected to recuse themselves (step away from a case) if they have any type of interest in a party or matter before them. They may have invested money in a company, played golf with the company’s president or sat on the church board with one of the parties, and this could cause them to favor that party over the other for reasons other than the facts or the law.

    For business people, some conflicts are clear-cut. You would probably not want to work with a consultant who provided the same services to one of your direct competitors. You might also have good reasons not to hire someone married or related to a key person at a competitor.

    But what about a potential investor? A C-Suite candidate? At what point could an interest, relationship, or connection with that other party become hazardous to your business?

    Related: 6 Strategies to Resolve Conflict at Work

    Why are conflicts bad?

    In my legal role, if I have had any kind of relationship with the other party, I probably know too much about them – their strategies, finances and other internal matters – to be able to offer unbiased insights to a new client. I might even put my first client at risk by inadvertently disclosing trade secrets or other confidential information. Even if I strongly believe that I can distance myself from the prior engagement, the very appearance of conflict should be enough to stop me from agreeing to take on the new case.

    The same holds true in business transactions. A clear conflict of interest threatens to expose confidential information such as processes, formulas and customer lists, but bias or personal interest can also taint the information and advice we receive from others. Despite the best intentions of the consultant or contractor, the risk is high that they could compromise your business or otherwise not act in your best interest.

    Any time an individual has a personal interest in a matter, whether it’s a financial investment, a friendship, or even a religious or political belief, it can affect how they view it. Although the person may truly believe he can set his interests aside, it is the rare individual who can actually remove the tinted glasses from his eyes.

    Related: Have a Business Idea? Here’s How To Put It into Action.

    How do you identify conflicts?

    It starts with asking questions. Unlike law offices, businesses aren’t legally or ethically required to check for conflicts whenever a client or vendor walks in. But this doesn’t mean that checks shouldn’t be performed.

    Before hiring a worker or engaging a contractor, take the time to learn about where they have worked and what they have done. Not only will this protect you against negligently exposing your information, but it may prevent your company from unknowingly learning another company’s trade secrets.

    Nondisclosure agreements are important tools for ensuring that your confidential information is respected and protected. Still, the bottom line is that once a trade secret has been shared, the barn door can never be closed. It is far better to keep the door shut first than seek damages after the horse has escaped.

    In the best-case scenario, the contractor, consultant, or job candidate will be candid and up-front during your introductory meeting, putting their cards on the table so you can make an informed decision. But they may not always recognize potential conflicts, so the onus is on you to ask questions until you feel satisfied that you know what you need to know.

    Related: Online Legal Tools Save Time and Money. But They Aren’t Lawyers.

    The bottom line

    Although you cannot ask your workers to share legally protected information — medical or family history, politics or religion, gender identity — the more you know about their prior work, priorities and values, the better informed your decision will be.

    If, at any time during their tenure with your company, you identify a real or potential conflict, address it immediately. Share your concerns with the other party and ask for information to confirm or rule out any conflict. Contractors or consultants with real or perceived conflicts can be phased out and replaced if necessary. For conflicted employees, document your decision and conduct an exit interview to remind them of their obligation to maintain trade secrets and other protected information.

    Remember, the journey of business is fraught with competition and conflict. The truly successful entrepreneur will navigate these issues proactively, ensuring that any real conflicts are outside rather than within their own walls.

    [ad_2]

    Arash Homampour

    Source link

  • Ron DeSantis joins White House race, tripped up by chaotic Twitter launch

    Ron DeSantis joins White House race, tripped up by chaotic Twitter launch

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON, May 23 (Reuters) – Florida Governor Ron DeSantis suffered a chaotic start to his 2024 presidential election race on Wednesday when glitches marred an online forum hosted by Twitter owner Elon Musk that was meant to showcase DeSantis’ fitness for the job.

    The Twitter broadcast of the hour-long interview , which had been intended as the formal launch for the DeSantis campaign, lost sound for extended stretches and thousands of users were either unable to join or were dropped.

    It was an inauspicious start for a campaign predicated on the governor’s executive competence.

    “We must end the culture of losing that has infected the Republican Party in recent years,” DeSantis said in the event with Musk once the problems were largely resolved. The hashtag #DeSaster was trending on Twitter.

    DeSantis’ entrance in the Republican contest sets up a showdown with his one-time ally, former President Donald Trump, who lost the 2020 presidential election to Democrat Joe Biden.

    The Florida governor framed himself as a get-it-done executive who stood up to the federal government over COVID policies and who has put an indelibly conservative stamp on his home state.

    He defended his efforts in Florida to prohibit the teaching of concepts such as gender identity and systemic racism as protecting young children and pushing back against progressive ideology.

    With a rising national profile and what are expected to be deep financial resources, DeSantis, 44, immediately became Trump’s biggest rival for the Republican nomination.

    “Government is not about entertainment, not about building a brand,” DeSantis said, taking a veiled swipe at Trump. Notably he never mentioned Trump by name during the event.

    Trump, 76, didn’t hesitate to mock DeSantis on his social media platform, Truth Social, over the stumbling start to his campaign.

    “My Red Button is bigger, better, stronger, and is working (TRUTH!)” Trump posted, “Yours does not.”

    Musk conceded there had been “technical issues because of the sheer scale” of the event, but added that “it’s just really great for the people to hear directly from presidential candidates.”

    At one point, the Twitter event drew more than 600,000 listeners. By its conclusion, there were fewer than 300,000.

    DeSantis’ campaign spokesman Bryan Griffin said on Twitter that enthusiasm for DeSantis had “literally busted up the internet.”

    The campaign raised $1 million in an hour, Griffin said.

    TRUMP AHEAD IN POLLS

    Polls show Trump with more than a 2-to-1 edge over the Florida governor, who has long been considered a Republican rising star and the herald of a new generation of leaders in the party. Trump, who announced in November, also has a head start in organizing his campaign in key early voting states.

    DeSantis’ central argument for his candidacy likely will be that he is the only Republican who can defeat Biden.

    “Our president, while he lacks vigor, flounders in the face of our nation’s challenges and he takes cues from the woke mob,” DeSantis said.

    Mainstream Republicans will be watching DeSantis carefully to see if he can recover from his missteps on foreign policy, such as his initial reluctance to express support for Ukraine in its war with Russia.

    In the weeks leading up to his presidential bid, DeSantis toured the country, visiting states such as Iowa and New Hampshire that will hold early nominating contests. He has boasted of his record as Florida’s governor, including his battles with the federal government over pandemic policies.

    DeSantis and his advisers were determined to wait to enter the race until the Florida Legislature could hand him a series of policy victories – and lawmakers have done just that.

    He signed measures that severely restricted abortions in the state, made it easier for residents to carry concealed weapons, expanded a voucher program to allow students to attend private schools and eliminated funding for diversity programs at public universities, among other things.

    DeSantis remains in a pitched battle with Walt Disney Co (DIS.N) over the company’s criticism of laws prohibiting the teaching of gender identity concepts in public schools. The company has filed a federal lawsuit accusing DeSantis of weaponizing state government to punish its operations.

    Other declared Republican candidates include Nikki Haley, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, and Tim Scott, a U.S. senator from South Carolina.

    Reporting by Jasper Ward; Editing by Doina Chiacu

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • US colleges game out a possible end to race-conscious student admissions

    US colleges game out a possible end to race-conscious student admissions

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON, May 24 (Reuters) – In 1998, the year a voter-approved measure barring the use of race-conscious admissions policies for public colleges and universities in California took effect, the percentage of Black, Hispanic and Native American students admitted at two of the state’s elite public schools plummeted by more than 50%.

    Those figures for UCLA and the University of California, Berkeley offer a cautionary tale as administrators at schools around the United States await a Supreme Court decision due by the end of June that is expected to prohibit affirmative action student admissions policies nationwide.

    That potential outcome in cases involving Harvard University and the University of North Carolina has brought new urgency to efforts by schools to maintain or increase racial and ethnic diversity in their student populations, according to interviews with senior administrators at a dozen colleges and universities.

    “We cannot afford as a nation to regress on our goals to create an educated and equitable society,” said Seth Allen, head of admissions at Pomona College in California. “So it’s incumbent on higher education to figure out how to work collectively together to ensure that we’re not furthering the enrollment gap among different groups of students.”

    Many selective U.S. colleges and universities for decades have used some form of affirmative action to boost enrollment of minority students, seeing value in having a diverse student population not only to offer educational opportunity but to bring a range of perspectives onto campuses.

    Affirmative action refers to policies that favor people belonging to certain groups considered disadvantaged or subject to discrimination, in areas such as hiring and student admissions.

    Schools are exploring numerous options. Administrators said they are drafting strategies to expand their recruitment of diverse applicants, remove application barriers and increase the rate of minority students who accept their admissions offers.

    An official at Rice University in Houston said the school will lean on student essay responses to ensure it admits students from diverse backgrounds. The U.S. Air Force Academy will focus on recruiting more students from diverse congressional districts.

    The president of Skidmore College in New York said connecting with high school counselors will become “more important than ever” to broaden the school’s applicant pool.

    Many schools said they already have waived fees, made standardized testing optional and are looking to improve financial aid offers – steps that could help boost minority enrollment.

    All of the administrators said their plans could change to comply with the scope of the Supreme Court’s reasoning in the Harvard and UNC cases. Some acknowledged that whatever steps schools take to circumvent a ban on race-conscious admissions policies might face legal challenges of their own.

    “We’re likely to see a whole new generation of lawsuits arise from the new admission standards that will be adopted by colleges and universities,” said Danielle Holley, current dean of Howard University School of Law in Washington and incoming president of Mount Holyoke College in Massachusetts.

    Lawsuits backed by an anti-affirmative action activist accused Harvard and UNC of unlawful discrimination in student admissions either by violating the U.S. Constitution’s promise of equal protection under the law or a federal law barring discrimination based on race and other factors.

    UNC was accused of discriminating against white and Asian American applicants. Harvard was accused of bias against Asian American applicants. The schools denied these allegations.

    GOING LOCAL

    Many of the school administrators said they plan to focus resources on recruitment, a part of the admissions cycle they do not expect the court will restrict.

    Admissions officers said they were broadening their outreach to high schools and community-based organizations in neighborhoods with lower incomes and educational attainment – places often populated by racial minorities.

    Yvonne Berumen, vice president of admissions at Pitzer College in California, said her team might run essay workshops at high schools in those targeted zip codes – postal regions – in hopes of generating applications.

    Chris George, dean of admissions at St. Olaf College in Minnesota, said high school data from national organizations like the College Board, which offers information on neighborhood income and housing stability, will help guide which high schools the college sends representatives to visit and the recruitment events they attend.

    Community-based organizations that identify local students who show academic promise and help them apply to college will be crucial partners for identifying and recruiting potential applicants from diverse backgrounds, the administrators said.

    “They become extensions of our recruiting and admissions team in many ways, and we’re seeing each year a bigger and bigger percentage of our students come from those community-based organizations,” said Kent Devereaux, president of Goucher College in Maryland.

    Administrators at schools located in or near major cities, including Pomona College near Los Angeles and Sarah Lawrence College in New York, said they would hope to draw more students from racially diverse local high schools and take more transfer students from local community colleges.

    Colonel Arthur Primas Jr., the U.S. Air Force Academy’s admissions director, said his racially diverse recruiting team will continue to visit schools in U.S. congressional districts with heavy concentrations of minorities and will try to encourage more students to seek nominations to the academy from their local members of Congress.

    “The Air Force Academy has had a long tradition of actively recruiting diverse candidates,” Primas said. “But we’re going to have to really be expansive.”

    Reporting by Gabriella Borter; Additional reporting by Donna Bryson; Editing by Will Dunham and Colleen Jenkins

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

    Gabriella Borter

    Thomson Reuters

    Gabriella Borter is a reporter on the U.S. National Affairs team, covering cultural and political issues as well as breaking news. She has won two Front Page Awards from the Newswomen’s Club of New York – in 2020 for her beat reporting on healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, and in 2019 for her spot story on the firing of the police officer who killed Eric Garner. The latter was also a Deadline Club Awards finalist. She holds a B.A. in English from Yale University and joined Reuters in 2017.

    [ad_2]

    Source link