ReportWire

Tag: Lawsuit

  • They claimed their high school coach sexually abused them years ago. Now he’s in custody

    They claimed their high school coach sexually abused them years ago. Now he’s in custody

    [ad_1]

    Michael Guzman was a popular teacher at Woodrow Wilson High School in El Sereno around the turn of the century.

    He taught history and coached the girls’ basketball team.

    But more than two decades later — after he had moved on to different schools in different districts — Guzman, an assistant principal at Gabrielino High in San Gabriel, was arrested this month and charged with four counts of lewd acts on a child stemming from allegations from about 20 years ago, according to court documents and interviews with two of the alleged victims.

    Though so much time has passed, the victims — Maria Barajas and Clarissa Vizcaino — who went to the Los Angeles Police Department decades after the alleged abuse said that the memories of their treatment at the hands of Guzman stuck with them, scarred them and sometimes caused ruptures in their adult relationships.

    “I just kind of put it in this box and put it away for a long time,” said Barajas, who’s 42.

    Guzman, 57, has denied in court papers having any sexual relationship with Barajas and Clarissa Vizcaino, 38, when they were underage. Neither Guzman nor his attorney in the civil suit immediately responded to a request for comment.

    Barajas and Vizcaino said they were not close friends at Woodrow Wilson. They were different ages. Barajas was a senior on the varsity team coached by Guzman, while Vizcaino was a freshman on the junior varsity team, also coached by Guzman.

    What they had in common was that they both played basketball and were allegedly favorites of Guzman. Barajas and Vizcaino claim that Guzman began to groom them when they were freshmen in high school, Barajas in 1995 and Vizcaino in 1998, eventually moving on from his relationship with Barajas and beginning a new one with Vizcaino.

    Vizcaino said Guzman would have her come close to him in his office and put his cheek to her cheek or tell her how good she smelled even before they allegedly ever had sex.

    “At that time, I had never had anyone be that affectionate with me. I had never had an actual real boyfriend or kissed anyone,” Vizcaino said.

    Barajas said it was more than a year into them knowing each other before her relationship with Guzman allegedly turned sexual. One day in a car her sophomore year, he allegedly began rubbing her leg, she said. The two then began a sexual relationship that lasted through her senior year, Barajas claimed.

    Barajas and Vizcaino both claim that Guzman began having sexually inappropriate interactions with them when they were between 14 and 15 years old, according to a lawsuit the duo filed in Los Angeles Superior Court in 2022.

    Guzman was around 35 at the time of the misconduct, according to the lawsuit.

    Michael Guzman, center, stands with the Woodrow Wilson High School girls’ basketball team. Standing in front of him is Clarissa Vizcaino.

    (Ashley Pileika)

    Vizcaino even kept a diary from 2000, when she was about 15 and in the midst of her alleged relationship with Guzman. She wrote about playing basketball with “Guzman” or “Guz” as she sometimes called him. One time, when she went to get water during practice, he followed her out and allegedly kissed her near the gym. She also took down sexually inappropriate comments that Guzman allegedly made to her at school.

    A key part of the claims the women have made against the Los Angeles Unified School District in their lawsuit is that other staff at Woodrow Wilson knew or should have known about the alleged abuse that was taking place, but that they failed to do anything about it.

    Guzman gave the girls rides alone in his car, which other teachers knew, according to the suit. He also once told Vizcaino that the principal at Woodrow Wilson knew about their sexual relationship but would not say anything because the principal had also had inappropriate sexual relationships on campus, the suit claims. The lawsuit also says that other coaches on the basketball team should have known what was going on.

    “While we take all student matters seriously, Los Angeles Unified does not comment on pending or ongoing litigation,” said Elvia Perez Cano, an LAUSD spokesperson.

    The exterior of a cream-colored school building with the words Woodrow Wilson High School on a wall

    Woodrow Wilson High School in April 2022.

    (Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times)

    After Barajas and Vizcaino graduated, Guzman moved on and worked at other schools.

    “An overarching objective of Maria and Clarissa in coming forward is to ensure what happened to them does not happen to others. The grooming, the trauma — the lifelong impact of child sexual abuse is real, and victims deserve justice,” said Ashley Pileika, an attorney for Barajas and Vizcaino. “We are grateful to the LAPD and [the L.A. County district attorney’s] office for prioritizing this case and the safety of children in the greater Los Angeles community.”

    Before he ended up at Gabrielino, a public school in the San Gabriel Unified School District, Guzman worked in two other districts and at numerous different schools, according to an article about him in the Gabrielino school newspaper. Guzman worked in education for 30 years leading up to his arrest and had just started at Gabrielino this year.

    “I am having a great time, learning the ins-and-outs of the school’s culture,” Guzman told a student reporter at Gabrielino this year.

    The San Gabriel Unified School District said that Guzman was placed on unpaid administrative leave after the news of his arrest. The district said in a statement that it had no information suggesting that Guzman committed any misconduct while at Gabrielino.

    “Hearing that a person entrusted to work with students may have committed a crime such as this is, of course, deeply troubling and disturbing, and our thoughts are with the alleged victim or victims in this case,” San Gabriel Unified School District Supt. Jim Symonds said in a statement shared with The Times.

    Barajas and Vizcaino both said that their alleged experiences with Guzman have shaped who they are, especially in their romantic relationships.

    “I feel like all my life I wanted to be a mom and to be married and I’m a 42-year-old single woman without children,” Barajas said. “I came to that realization, knowing how it’s because that history of mine has affected every decision I’ve ever made.”

    Vizcaino also said that she struggled in romantic relationships and believes it has to do with Guzman.

    “I wasn’t in a real relationship until my mid-20s because I was still waiting for him. Every relationship has been some sort of abusive or toxic,” she said.

    It was not until May, seven months after they filed the lawsuit, that Vizcaino and Barajas went to the police.

    When the police realized that Vizcaino still was able to contact Guzman, they set up a call where they hoped the former coach would admit to the conduct he was accused of, Vizcaino said. They called Guzman from the precinct and put him on speaker phone, Vizcaino said.

    She said she asked pointed questions like, “Why did you have sex with me at school when I was 15?”

    She said she told him she was angry. She asked him about specific incidents.

    And while Guzman allegedly apologized repeatedly on the call, Vizcaino said it was not enough for the detective to make an immediate arrest.

    “It was a clear confession to me. But the detective wanted more information,” she said.

    It took six more months before Guzman was finally arrested Nov. 13. Three days later, he was released on bond.

    [ad_2]

    Noah Goldberg

    Source link

  • A work potluck party at San Pedro Taco Bell turned into a boozy bash with sex and vomiting, lawsuit claims

    A work potluck party at San Pedro Taco Bell turned into a boozy bash with sex and vomiting, lawsuit claims

    [ad_1]

    A company Christmas potluck for employees of a San Pedro Taco Bell turned into a boozy bash, with one worker having sex with his wife in front of spectators and another vomiting into a guacamole bowl, according to a lawsuit by one of the employees.

    The worker, Alana Bechiom, filed the lawsuit last week in Los Angeles Superior Court. She’s seeking unspecified damages in the suit.

    When Bechiom reported the incident to human resources, the lawsuit claims, three co-workers who took part in the party were fired, but Bechiom said she was physically threatened and her car window was smashed, and she claims Taco Bell and and the franchise owner did nothing to protect her against the threats.

    “While we don’t own or manage this location, the franchisee who owns and operates this restaurant has shared that they take these claims very seriously,” a Taco Bell spokesperson said in a statement.

    The franchise owner, Alvarado Restaurant Group, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    The alcohol-fueled party took place on Dec. 18, 2022 at the Taco Bell on 1031 S. Gaffey St. in San Pedro, where Bechiom had worked as a cashier, according to court records.

    Workers were “encouraged to bring food in a potluck-styled buffet,” and Bechiom had decided to take a guacamole bowl to the party.

    When she walked in, however, the lawsuit claims, she noticed the windows in the restaurant were covered with wrapping paper, and the cameras in the Taco Bell lobby were also covered.

    She had been socializing in the parking lot for a while but, when Bechiom walked back in, according to court records, she found one of her male co-workers was “having sex with his wife in front of everyone at the party.”

    The co-worker’s wife, the lawsuit states, was bent over and kissing two other co-workers, including a supervisor, simultaneously.

    “[Bechiom] was shocked, disgusted and outraged by what she saw and ran,” according to the suit.

    But before leaving, the lawsuit states she went back into the Taco Bell to get her guacamole bowl. Instead she found two of her co-workers vomiting, with one retching into her bowl.

    Bechiom complained to her supervisor about what she saw and about someone vomiting into her bowl, but the supervisor then threatened to fight her, according to the suit.

    After she reported the incident, three of the Taco Bell employees, including the supervisor and the male co-worker who had sex with his wife, were fired, the lawsuit claims.

    But Bechiom claims she continued to receive threats from co-workers who called her a “snitch.” Four days after the party, she claims, someone smashed the window of her car.

    When she reported the threats, she claims, Taco Bell and the franchise owner offered to transfer her.

    Bechiom resigned, and is suing Taco Bell and Alvarado Restaurant Group for alleged discrimination, sexual harassment, retaliation and failure to investigate.

    [ad_2]

    Salvador Hernandez

    Source link

  • Daryl Hall gets restraining order against John Oates amid legal battle

    Daryl Hall gets restraining order against John Oates amid legal battle

    [ad_1]

    Daryl Hall has filed a restraining order against his one-time musical collaborator, John Oates. The pair made up the pop rock duo Hall & Oates, and put out 18 studio albums together between 1972 and 2006.

    Hall filed the temporary restraining order request in a Nashville Chancery Court on Nov. 16. Oates and the co-defendants – his wife, Aimee J. Oates, and business manager Richard Flynn, who are both co-trustees of his trust – were served on Nov. 20.

    It is unclear what promoted the restraining order, but it is labeled as a Contract/Debt case on the website for the Nashville Chancery Court. CBS News has reached out to Hall’s attorney as well as Flynn for further information, and is awaiting a response.

    While they put out several hits like “Rich Girl” and “You Make My Dreams Come True” and were nominated for five Grammys together, the duo appears to have grown apart. During an interview on the “Club Random with Bill Maher” last year, Hall said they’ve “always been very separate.”

    “John and I are brothers, but we are not creative brothers,” Hall said. “We are business partners. We made records called Hall & Oates together, but we’ve always been very separate, and that’s a really important thing for me.” Hall also said he did most of the work, citing the duo’s 1980 song “Kiss on My List,” for which Oates is not labeled as a songwriter, but Hall is.

    Hall, 77, and Oates, 75, met while they were freshmen at Temple University. During a 2013 interview with Dan Rather, Hall said they met at a gig. A fight broke out, and they left in the elevator together and struck up a conversation that led to a friendship and musical collaboration.

    In 2017, ahead of a tour together, the duo sat down with “CBS Sunday Morning” for an interview. 

    “Did I think that I’d be working with John and we’d be sitting side-by-side all these years later?” Hall said. “No, it didn’t even occur to me.”

    “Our job is the job that everyone dreams of,” said Oates. “Play instruments, sing, write music, make records. Why would you wanna quit?”

    “If you look on every album we’ve ever made, it says, ‘Daryl Hall and John Oates,’” said Oates. “Now, it may seem a subtle distinction. But we’ve always looked at ourselves as two individuals who are distinctly different, who work together. And to this day, that’s how we view ourselves.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Dodgers ordered to pay $100,000 to fan beaten by stadium security at 2018 opening day

    Dodgers ordered to pay $100,000 to fan beaten by stadium security at 2018 opening day

    [ad_1]

    A Riverside County man who alleges that he was wrongfully beaten by security personnel at Dodger Stadium on opening day in 2018 has been awarded $105,000 in punitive damages in Los Angeles Superior Court.

    The court on Friday assessed $100,000 of Francisco Rodriguez’s damages against the Dodgers and $5,000 against Dodgers security officer Erik Pena, who was found to have acted with malice. Several other security officers included in the lawsuit were found not to have acted inappropriately.

    Rodriguez alleged that security officers forcibly ejected him after he objected to the way another fan was being dealt with during the March 29, 2018, game against the San Francisco Giants. The guards escorting Rodriguez to the exit continually battered him, including jabbing his ribs with a baton and repeatedly punching him with closed fists, according to the lawsuit, which also alleges that a guard placed his knee on Rodriguez, who told him, “I can’t breathe.”

    The Dodgers said that Rodriguez grabbed Pena by the collar outside the stadium gates and slugged him on the right cheek, according to court documents. Rodriguez admitted taking a swing at Pena and said the guard retaliated by punching him as many as six times.

    The Dodgers have several lawsuits against them in the courts. Three suits filed in April 2022 outline three incidents in which security officers allegedly perpetrated acts of assault, battery, false imprisonment, civil rights violations and emotional distress against fans at Dodger Stadium.

    According to court documents, the team’s security force is composed of “non-sworn persons,” uniformed off-duty sworn Los Angeles Police Department officers and sworn off-duty law enforcement officers without badges.

    A Times investigation in September reported that security at Dodger Stadium increased after a 2011 incident in which two Dodgers fans confronted Giants fan Brian Stow and his friends in the parking lot after a game. They sucker-punched and kicked Stow, causing brain damage. The men were sent to prison for assault and mayhem.

    The Dodgers and the LAPD responded to a report by Major League Baseball that cited a deterioration of crowd behavior and “a culture of apathy and indifference” among the team’s security staff by beefing up security with trained LAPD officers.

    “We will expend whatever resources necessary to keep fans safe at Dodger Stadium,” said Charlie Beck, chief of police at the time. “This is going to be a game-changer.”

    After Beck announced a crackdown, police in 2011 wrote only 20 reports, 12 of which involved assault, battery or other alleged violence against 12 victims at Dodger Stadium. By 2014, however, that total had grown to 69, including 33 violent incidents and 47 victims.

    In 2022, 71 crime reports, including 35 violent incidents and 47 victims, were filed, and as of mid-August 2023, police had filed another 53 reports — 27 for violence against 33 victims. The alleged behavior included battery, battery on a police officer, simple assault and assault with a deadly weapon.

    The Dodgers forbid pregame tailgate parties in the parking lot, revoke season tickets for bad behavior and eject rowdy fans. Yet stricter enforcement by security staff has led to the rash of lawsuits for excessive use of force.

    [ad_2]

    Steve Henson

    Source link

  • Elon Musk’s X, formerly Twitter, sues Media Matters as advertisers flee over report of ads appearing next to neo-Nazi posts

    Elon Musk’s X, formerly Twitter, sues Media Matters as advertisers flee over report of ads appearing next to neo-Nazi posts

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk’s social media company X, formerly known as Twitter, filed a lawsuit against liberal advocacy group Media Matters for America on Monday, saying it manufactured a report to show advertisers’ posts alongside neo-Nazi and white nationalist posts in order to “drive advertisers from the platform and destroy X Corp.”

    Advertisers have been fleeing X over concerns about their ads showing up next to pro-Nazi content — and hate speech on the site in general — while billionaire owner Musk has inflamed tensions with his own posts endorsing an antisemitic conspiracy theory.

    IBM, NBCUniversal and its parent company Comcast said last week that they stopped advertising on X after the Media Matters report said their ads were appearing alongside material praising Nazis. The Media Matters report also pointed to ads from Apple and Oracle that appeared next to antisemitic material on X, and the group said it had found ads from Amazon, NBA Mexico, NBCUniversal and others next to white nationalist hashtags.

    Other major companies including Apple, Warner Bros. Discovery, Disney and Paramount Global (the parent company of CBS) announced they were pulling advertising from the platform. It was a fresh setback as the platform tries to win back big brands and their ad dollars, X’s main source of revenue.

    But San Francisco-based X says in its complaint filed in federal court in Fort Worth, Texas, that Media Matters “knowingly and maliciously” portrayed ads next to hateful material “as if they were what typical X users experience on the platform.”

    X’s complaint claims that Media Matters “manipulated algorithms governing the user experience on X to bypass safeguards and create images of X’s largest advertisers’ paid posts adjacent to racist, incendiary content, leaving the false impression that these pairings are anything but what they actually are: manufactured, inorganic and extraordinarily rare.”

    The filing followed Musk’s post over the weekend vowing, “The split second court opens on Monday, X Corp will be filing a thermonuclear lawsuit against Media Matters and ALL those who colluded in this fraudulent attack on our company.”

    Media Matters, which is based in Washington, D.C., responded to the lawsuit Monday evening with a statement from its president, Angelo Carusone, saying: “This is a frivolous lawsuit meant to bully X’s critics into silence. Media Matters stands behind its report.”

    Carusone said in an earlier statement that Media Matters will continue its work. “If he sues us, we will win,” he said.

    In an interview with Reuters on Monday, Carusone said the group’s findings suggest safety protections touted by X were failing to prevent ads from appearing next to harmful content.

    “If you search for white nationalist content, there are ads flourishing. The system they say exists is not operating as such,” he said.

    Shortly after X announced its lawsuit, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton released a statement saying his office would investigate Media Matters for “potentially fraudulent activity,” echoing X’s claim that the nonprofit manipulated its results.

    Advertisers have been skittish on X since Musk’s takeover more than a year ago. Under his ownership, the site dramatically cut its workforce, disbanded its Trust and Safety advisory group and did away with its user verification system. 

    In July, Musk posted that the site he paid $44 billion for had “negative cash flow” due to about a “50% drop in advertising revenue plus heavy debt load.”

    Musk has also sparked outcry with his own posts, including one last week in which he responded to a user who accused Jews of “pushing … hatred against whites” by writing: “You have said the actual truth.” 

    Musk has faced accusations of tolerating antisemitic messages on the platform since purchasing it last year. Under his ownership, X rolled back rules that removed “violative hateful content” on the platform, the Anti-Defamation League said in a June report. According to the ADL’s analysis, 27% of online harassment in the first half of 2023 occurred on X, up from 21% in 2022. 

    X CEO Linda Yaccarino, who joined the company in May, said the company’s “point of view has always been very clear that discrimination by everyone should STOP across the board.”

    “I think that’s something we can and should all agree on,” she wrote on the platform last week.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Shakira Settles Tax Fraud Case On First Day Of Trial By Paying MASSIVE Fine To Avoid Possible Prison Time! – Perez Hilton

    Shakira Settles Tax Fraud Case On First Day Of Trial By Paying MASSIVE Fine To Avoid Possible Prison Time! – Perez Hilton

    [ad_1]

    Shakira is avoiding the possibility of prison time in her tax fraud dispute involving the nation of Spain!

    On Monday, the first day of the Colombian-born singer’s tax fraud trial began in Barcelona. But before things could really get going on the allegations that she supposedly skipped out on paying taxes to Spain while living there in the 2010s, everything came to a screeching halt! Because Shakira settled things up ASAP!

    Related: Shakira Fans Roast Gerard Piqué For Falling Into Stage Hole! Oops!!

    Per the BBC, the New York Times, and others, the 46-year-old singer cut a deal with Spanish prosecutors to end the mess and avoid any possible prison time if she were to have been found guilty. According to those outlets, the deal is pretty steep in terms of a payday for Spain: Shakira gets a three-year suspended sentence and a fine equivalent to $7.5 million USD. That’s a LOT of coin!!

    Still, for Shakira, it was clearly worth it. The prosecution against her is over now, with no chance of being found guilty or going to prison for supposedly failing to pay those income taxes between 2012 and 2014. She had been facing up to eight years in prison on the charge — and as much as a $26 million fine — if found guilty. So, when compared to what might have happened in court, she definitely got off a little easier, we suppose.

    The Hips Don’t Lie singer released a statement about the settlement on Monday, too. Obtained by People and others, the singer claimed in the statement that she chose to settle in the best interests of her children — sons Milan, 9, and Sasha, 7 — who she shares with soccer star ex Gerard Piqué. The sexy singer stated:

    “While I was determined to defend my innocence in a trial that my lawyers were confident would have ruled in my favor, I have made the decision to finally resolve this matter with the best interest of my kids at heart who do not want to see their mom sacrifice her personal well-being in this fight.”

    She went on:

    “I need to move past the stress and emotional toll of the last several years and focus on the things I love — my kids and all the opportunities to come in my career, including my upcoming world tour and my new album, both of which I am extremely excited about. I admire tremendously those who have fought these injustices to the end, but for me, today, winning is getting my time back for my kids and my career.”

    And she also strongly maintained her innocence on the tax fraud allegations:

    “Throughout my career, I have always strived to do what’s right and set a positive example for others. … [Authorities in Spain] pursued a case against me as they have against many professional athletes and other high-profile individuals, draining those people’s energy, time, and tranquility for years at a time.”

    Wow! Those are some strong words about what was supposedly going on behind the scenes! But regardless of whatever really happened a decade ago, it’s all over now. Shakira has settled up, and she’s ready to move on! Thoughts, Perezcious readers??

    [Image via MEGA/WENN]

    [ad_2]

    Perez Hilton

    Source link

  • Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs and Cassie settle lawsuit one day after she accused him of rape and abuse

    Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs and Cassie settle lawsuit one day after she accused him of rape and abuse

    [ad_1]

    Sean “Diddy” Combs and R&B singer Cassie reached a settlement Friday in an incendiary lawsuit she filed the day before accusing the mogul and entrepreneur of rape and a “cycle of abuse” during their decade-plus relationship.

    No details of the settlement were released, though Combs’ attorney previously accused Cassie of seeking an eight-figure payout in recent months. Combs had denied the allegations through his attorney.

    Cassie dated the famed hip-hop producer for about 11 years before they split in 2018. She filed her sex trafficking and sexual assault lawsuit against him in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York just days before the expiration of a “lookback window” that allowed adults who alleged they were sexually abused to sue despite the statute of limitations having run out.

    “I have decided to resolve this matter amicably on terms that I have some level of control,” the singer, who sued under her legal name Casandra Ventura, said in a statement issued through her legal team. “I want to thank my family, fans and lawyers for their unwavering support.”

    Combs issued a similar statement, saying, “We have decided to resolve this matter amicably. I wish Cassie and her family all the best. Love.”

    Ventura’s attorney, Douglas Wigdor, said he was “very proud of Ms. Ventura for having the strength to go public with her lawsuit. She ought to be commended for doing so.”

    In the lawsuit, the 37-year-old Ventura accused Combs, 54, of raping her in her home after she tried to leave him; physically attacking and injuring her; forcing her to engage in sex acts with male sex workers while filming the encounters; running around with a firearm; introducing her to “a lifestyle of excessive alcohol and substance abuse”; and requiring her “to procure illicit prescriptions to satisfy his own addictions.”

    According to the lawsuit, Ventura met Combs in 2005, when she was 19 and he was 37. After signing her to his label, the suit alleges, Combs took control of her professional and personal life, and began sexual and physically abusing her with increasing frequency.

    “He signed her to his label, Bad Boy Records, and within a few years, lured Ms. Ventura into an ostentatious, fast-paced and drug-fueled lifestyle, and into a romantic relationship with him — her boss, one of the most powerful men in the entertainment industry, and a vicious, cruel, and controlling man nearly two decades her senior,” the lawsuit said.

    The lawsuit detailed bruises Ventura said she suffered as a result of the alleged abuse, as well as accounts of drug use, voyeurism, male sex workers and more.

    Diddy’s lawyer, Ben Brafman, said in a statement to The Times Thursday that his client “vehemently” denied the “offensive and outrageous allegations” and accused Ventura of being “persistent” in demanding more than $30 million from Diddy for the last six months.

    Brafman added that the lawsuit — which also named Combs’ businesses Bad Boy Entertainment and Bad Boy Records among the defendants, as well as Epic Records and Combs Enterprises LLC — was “riddled with baseless and outrageous lies, aiming to tarnish Mr. Combs’ reputation and seeking a payday.”

    The lawsuit was brought during the one-year window provided by New York’s Adult Survivors Act, which created a one-year “lookback window” during which adults who allege they were sexually abused could sue despite the statute of limitations having run out. Other lawsuits were filed in that state this month against Aerosmith frontman Steven Tyler, music executive Antonio “L.A.” Reid and former Grammys chief Neil Portnow.

    That window expires next week.

    Times staff writers Nardine Saad, Emily St. Martin and Stacy Perman contributed to this report.

    Resources for survivors of sexual assault

    If you or someone you know is the victim of sexual violence, you can find support using RAINN’s National Sexual Assault Hotline. Call (800) 656-HOPE or visit online.rainn.org to speak with a trained support specialist.

    [ad_2]

    Christie D’Zurilla

    Source link

  • Cassie Ventura reaches settlement in lawsuit alleging abuse, rape by ex-boyfriend Sean

    Cassie Ventura reaches settlement in lawsuit alleging abuse, rape by ex-boyfriend Sean

    [ad_1]

    Singer Casandra Ventura, who performs under the name Cassie, has reached a settlement just one day after bringing a federal lawsuit in New York against musician and entrepreneur Sean “Diddy” Combs in which she accused him of rape and physical abuse during their relationship, her attorney confirmed in a statement.

    “I have decided to resolve this matter amicably on terms that I have some level of control. I want to thank my family, fans and lawyers for their unwavering support.” Ventura said in the statement.

    “We have decided to resolve this matter amicably,” Combs said in his own statement. “I wish Cassie and her family all the best. Love.” 

    Terms of the settlement were not disclosed.

    Cassie Ventura and Sean
    Cassie Ventura and Sean “Diddy” Combs attend the Heavenly Bodies: Fashion & The Catholic Imagination Costume Institute Gala at The Metropolitan Museum of Art on May 7, 2018, in New York City. 

    John Shearer/Getty Images for The Hollywood Reporter


    The complaint filed Thursday described the 54-year-old Combs as a “vicious, cruel, and controlling man,” who “asserted complete control over Ms. Ventura’s personal and professional life,” and detailed abuse he allegedly inflicted on her after meeting her in 2005 when the singer was 19 years old.

    The two dated on-and-off from about 2007 to 2018. 

    “After years in silence and darkness, I am finally ready to tell my story, and to speak up on behalf of myself and for the benefit of other women who face violence and abuse in their relationships,” Ventura had said in a statement to CBS News Thursday. “With the expiration of New York’s Adult Survivors Act fast approaching, it became clear that this was an opportunity to speak up about the trauma I have experienced and that I will be recovering from for the rest of my life.”

    The suit leveled multiple allegations against Combs, including that he raped Ventura in her home after she tried to leave him, that he “often punched, beat, kicked and stomped on Ms. Ventura, resulting in bruises, burst lips, black eyes and bleeding,” and that in 2012 he blew up rapper Kid Cudi’s car after finding out he was romantically interested in Ventura.

    Combs denied the allegations, and an attorney for the rapper said Ventura attempted to blackmail him for $30 million. 

    “Mr. Combs vehemently denies these offensive and outrageous allegations,” Combs’ lawyer, Ben Brafman said in a statement to CBS News Thursday. “For the past 6 months, Mr. Combs has been subjected to Ms. Ventura’s persistent demand of $30 million, under the threat of writing a damaging book about their relationship, which was unequivocally rejected as blatant blackmail.”  

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bruised & Bloodied Cassie IG Photo Resurfaces Amid Diddy Abuse Claims! What REALLY Happened?! – Perez Hilton

    Bruised & Bloodied Cassie IG Photo Resurfaces Amid Diddy Abuse Claims! What REALLY Happened?! – Perez Hilton

    [ad_1]

    [Warning: Potentially Triggering Content]

    Oh no… Oh god no… This is so brutal…

    On Thursday, Cassie filed a shocking lawsuit against her famous ex Diddy, claiming he abused her for over a decade. The singer, born Casandra Ventura, said the music mogul would abuse her and then hide her from the public. The suit reads:

    “Throughout their relationship Mr. Combs was prone to uncontrollable rage, and frequently beat Ms. Ventura savagely.”

    He would then, the suit goes on to claim, put his battered GF up in a hotel somewhere nice for a week, sweeping it all under the rug — and she’d come out showing none of the damage:

    “After every instance in which he beat Ms. Ventura, Mr. Combs used his money and power to orchestrate extensive efforts to hide the evidence of his abuse, including by hiding Ms. Ventura in hotels for days at a time to let her bruises heal.”

    But at least one time we have seen Cassie with her face all bloodied and bruised.

    Video: Diddy FORCED Cassie To Shave Her Head?! Wild Story Resurfaces After Abuse Allegations!

    In the hours since her lawsuit went public, tons of old interviews and stories about Diddy have resurfaced. But this may be the most compelling image we’ve seen. Cassie posted a photo on her Instagram back in 2014, showing off her face with a huge cut on her forehead and a fat lip.

    The caption of the since-deleted post was chipper enough, as she showed off her sunglasses:

    “New #raybans on my way home #toomuchfun #Dubai”

    But the image… See for yourself.

    Cassie ATV Accident Photo 2014
    (c) Cassie/Instagram

    As mentioned, the photo has been long since deleted, apparently pretty quickly after it went up. We can tell it’s real because of coverage at the time — but the post itself was gone FAST. Thankfully some fan managed to screengrab it. Because it may end up being evidence…

    So why didn’t anyone accuse Diddy at the time? Well, looking back, the story going around was that Cassie had gotten herself banged up in an ATV accident while partying in Dubai. But was that just a story? Another way Diddy covered it up? Because too many people saw her??

    If so, how interesting that Cassie even posted the pic. If this really was evidence of abuse, and not an ATV crash, this could have been a cry for help. Cassie sending up a flare for someone to see… and no one noticed??

    Heartbreaking to think about.

    If you or someone you know is experiencing domestic violence, help is available. Consider calling the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 800-799-7233, or text START to 88788, or go to https://www.thehotline.org/

    [Image via RHS/WENN/Cassie/Instagram.]

    [ad_2]

    Perez Hilton

    Source link

  • Former Danity Kane Members Aubrey O’Day & Dawn Richard Speak Out In Support Of Cassie Amid Diddy Abuse Lawsuit

    Former Danity Kane Members Aubrey O’Day & Dawn Richard Speak Out In Support Of Cassie Amid Diddy Abuse Lawsuit

    [ad_1]

    Aubrey O’Day and Dawn Richard, former Danity Kane members , have spoken out in support of Cassie, following her lawsuit against their ex-manager, Sean “Diddy” Combs.

    Source: Jerritt Clark / Getty

    As previously reported Cassandra “Cassie” Ventura filed a lawsuit against the music mogul on Thursday, which alleges her ex-boyfriend spent years abusing her while she was signed to his record label. After meeting Diddy when she was only 19, the singer claims her then-boyfriend began controlling her through a “lifestyle of excessive alcohol and substance abuse” in addition to mental and physical harm.

    Cassie

    Source: Jon Kopaloff FilmMagic / Getty

    Following news of this bombshell lawsuit, two other women who were signed to Diddy’s Bad Boy Records have spoken out in support of Cassie.

    Aubrey O’Day and Dawn Richard are former members of girl group Danity Kane, which was formed on MTV’s reality TV show Making The Band in 2005. They went on to be signed by Diddy, and though their years as an active group were sporadic, all of the women have experience working with the mogul.

    Richard took to X to voice her support for Cassie after news broke, writing: “Praying for Cassie and her family, for peace and healing. You are beautiful and brave.”

    O’Day also responded to the news, taking to her Instagram to post a screenshot of the lawsuit headline in her Story and writing, “Been trynna tell y’all for years. Prayers up for this queen @cassie.”

    In another upload, she shared a clip from Making The Band, which showed Diddy and O’Day getting into a yelling match before he stood up and questioned why she should be in the group.

    She added a caption to the clip that read: “If you think what made the cut was as ugly as it got… you’re wrong.”

    Aubrey also shared another photo of Diddy and referenced his song, “Lonely,” writing, “He was right. It gets dark and lonely.”

    O’Day previously spoke out against Diddy in December 2022, claiming on an episode of the Call Her Daddy podcast that she was fired from the label because she “wasn’t willing to do what was expected.”

    “Not talent-wise, but in other areas,” she told the host.

    “You know, I have such a love-hate [relationship] with it all because I don’t think I would’ve been able to be so successful in so many other areas had I not been trained under Diddy,” Aubrey admitted. “He was the hardest person that you can work for, and it was torture. And not the work part of it, but the other stuff — mind games.”

    She also spoke out against Diddy giving artists their publishing rights if they agreed to sign NDAs.

    In an interview with Cosmopolitan in 2018, the group said that Diddy would try “power moves” to prove he owned their careers. At the time, Richard said the women would have to walk on eggshells every time they spoke to him.

    [ad_2]

    Rebecah Jacobs

    Source link

  • In new $40M lawsuit, man cleared of Malcolm X slay blames FBI for hiding evidence of real killers

    In new $40M lawsuit, man cleared of Malcolm X slay blames FBI for hiding evidence of real killers

    [ad_1]

    An innocent man exonerated in the assassination of Malcolm X says in a $40 million lawsuit that the FBI and J. Edgar Hoover hid evidence pointing to the real killer to protect the agency’s undercover operations to undermine the civil rights movement.

    In a lawsuit filed against the U.S. Thursday, Muhammad Aziz, 85, describes a string of FBI reports and evidence bolstering his innocence in the 1965 Audubon Ballroom killing, and lays out how Hoover and the FBI kept that evidence secret during his trial and for years after.

    “FBI employees concealed this information for the purposes of…  protecting and concealing the scope, nature, and activities of its domestic ‘Counterintelligence Program,’ also called ‘COINTELPRO,’ and to divert blame from individuals whom certain FBI employees did not want to see prosecuted for their crimes,” Aziz’s lawsuit alleges.

    Through COINTELPRO, the FBI infiltrated and co-opted domestic political and social movements, with Hoover directing the bureau to “expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, and otherwise neutralize” Black activist groups.

    J. EDGAR HOOVER

    AP

    J. Edgar Hoover (AP)

    Aziz, a U.S. Navy veteran who served multiple tours of duty, was 26 and a father of two when he was arrested for Malcolm X’s murder. He and his late co-defendant, Khalil Islam, were railroaded in a Manhattan Supreme Court trial rife with misconduct. Islam’s estate filed a similar lawsuit Thursday.

    Malcolm X

    Malcolm X speaks to reporters in Washington, D.C., May 16, 1963.

    AP

    Malcolm X speaks to reporters in Washington, D.C., May 16, 1963.

    Aziz spent 20 years in prison, and Islam, who died in 2009, served 22 years. Both men were exonerated in 2021 after an investigation by then Manhattan D.A. Cyrus Vance’s office.

    Last year, the city and state agreed to pay Aziz and Islam’s estate $36 million in settlement money.

    “The worst offender of all was the FBI, and they have never acknowledged their role in this case let alone done anything to atone for it,” Aziz’s lawyer, David Shanies, told the Daily News. “It’s about compensating a person whose life was destroyed, and that’s something no about of money can fix.”

    Three gunman, one of them using a shotgun, murdered Malcolm X on Feb, 21, 1965, inside the Washington Heights Ballroom in front of a horrified crowd of 400 that included NYPD and FBI informants and undercover officers.

    One of the killers, Mujahid Abdul Halim, was captured by a group of civilians as he fled the scene.

    Police arrested Aziz and Islam days later, even though the FBI had evidence pointing to another suspect, a Nation of Islam leader named William Bradley, as the man holding the shotgun, according to the lawsuit.

    The lawsuit refers to “evidence of a significant ongoing relationship between Bradley and the FBI,” and is seeking to unearth those ties.

    Bradley, who died in 2018, denied his involvement in the killing.

    [ad_2]

    John Annese

    Source link

  • Hunter Biden sues former Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne for defamation

    Hunter Biden sues former Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne for defamation

    [ad_1]

    Hunter Biden is suing former Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne for defamation, accusing the former retail industry executive of falsely claiming that he sought a bribe from Iran. 

    The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in federal court in the Central District of California, comes after Biden, the son of President Joe Biden, in September sued Rudy Giuliani and the IRS, with the former complaint alleging that Giuliani hacked an external hard drive associated with Biden’s laptop and the latter alleging that the tax agency violated his privacy.

    In his latest lawsuit, Biden claims Byrne made false statements in June when he claimed Biden had contacted the Iranian government and offered to have his father “unfreeze” $8 billion in Iranian funds in exchange for an $800 million bribe. The complaint claims Byrne reposted his allegations in October on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, to his roughly 290,000 followers. 

    “These claims are complete nonsense,” the suit alleges. “To falsely accuse [Hunter Biden] of engaging in these criminal acts is not only reckless and baseless but utterly outrageous and despicable, and it constitutes defamation per se.”

    The complaint alleges that Byrne “has been told that his allegations are false, that they are causing serious harm to [Biden] and that they should be retracted immediately. Rather than retract, however, Byrne has doubled down.”


    Talking Points: Hunter Biden’s impact on President Biden’s reelection bid

    06:27

    The lawsuit seeks general and punitive damages, as well as for Byrne to cover Biden’s attorney’s fees and costs. 

    Byrne didn’t immediately return a request for comment. On X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, he wrote, “Hunter’s lawyer must be out of his mind.”

    In response to the September lawsuit, Giuliani’s attorney said, “Hunter Biden has previously refused to admit ownership of the laptop. I’m not surprised he’s now falsely claiming his laptop hard drive was manipulated by Mayor Giuliani, considering the sordid material and potential evidence of crimes on that thing.”

    Byrne has faced controversy before. The businessman stepped down from Overstock in 2019 after making cryptic comments about the “Deep State” that spooked the company’s investors, sending Overstock shares plummeting. He also told the New York Times he had had an affair with convicted Russian agent Maria Butina.

    A former Marshall scholar who has a PhD in philosophy from Stanford University, Byrne has lately been focused on his “Deep Capture” website, which publishes right-leaning pieces with titles such as “What’s Wrong with Woke” and pieces about alleged election fraud.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Omegle shuts down online chat service amid legal challenges

    Omegle shuts down online chat service amid legal challenges

    [ad_1]

    Omegle, an online chat service that billed itself as an anonymous forum to “talk to strangers,” has shut down amid allegations it served as a hotbed for criminal activities. 

    In a lengthy statement Thursday, Omegle founder Leif K-Brooks said the service is closing because combating misuse of the platform is “no longer sustainable, financially nor psychologically.” In recent years, Omegle has faced a slew of lawsuits alleging the platform, which connected people via text and video chat, became a breeding ground for sexual harassment and facilitated the sexual exploitation of minors by pairing underaged users with sexual abusers.  

    “The stress and expense of this fight – coupled with the existing stress and expense of operating Omegle, and fighting its misuse – are simply too much,” Brooks said in the statement.  

    The website shut its anonymous chat function Thursday.

    Omegle, founded in 2009, rapidly rose to prominence, becoming a mainstay of 2010s internet culture alongside similar anonymous chat services such as Chat Roulette. Since its launch, the platform had racked up tens of millions of monthly visitors, Similar Web data shows. However, that popularity made the platform a magnet for bad actors whose conduct posed profound content moderation challenges for the company.

    “There can be no honest accounting of Omegle without acknowledging that some people misused it, including to commit unspeakably heinous crimes,” Brooks said in the statement. 

    Legal Liabilities 

    Rampant misuse of Omegle spurred several lawsuits against the service, including one in which lawyers alleged the chat service paired an 11-year-old girl with a sexual predator, a court filing shows. Omegle settled that $22 million civil suit last week, Gizmodo reported.  

    “By failing to take action to prevent predators from carrying out these crimes against helpless children on Omegle and failing to cure its negligent design and manufacture, these predatory users felt empowered and incentivized to continue their abusive and malicious use of the product,” a lawyer alleged in the complaint.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Nike sues New Balance and Skechers over patent infringement

    Nike sues New Balance and Skechers over patent infringement

    [ad_1]

    Sports apparel giant Nike is suing two of its competitors, arguing that New Balance and Skechers are wrongfully using technology that Nike developed for making shoes light-weight and strong. 

    Nike filed two patent infringement lawsuits on Monday, one in federal court in Massachusetts against New Balance and another federal suit in California against Skechers. The cases come after Nike sued Puma in 2018, Adidas in 2021 and Lululemon this year over the same issue. 

    Nike’s lawsuit focuses on Flyknit, a special type of fiber the company developed and which it uses for the so-called upper of shoes, or the parts of a shoe above the sole and which cover the foot. Flyknit is a high-strength fiber that supports the user’s feet but is also lightweight and breathable, according to Nike

    Nike said in court documents that Flyknit took more than a decade of research to develop and helps the company reduce materials waste. Nike has saved 3.5 million pounds of waste since Flyknit’s launch and diverted 182 million plastic bottles from nine landfills by switching to recycled polyester in all Nike Flyknit shoes, according to a 2016 analysis from New York University.

    Nike said in court documents that the company has sent cease-and-desist letters to New Balance this year regarding Flyknit, but alleged that “New Balance’s infringement is accelerating in breadth and scope despite notice from Nike.”

    “Due to the success of Nike’s Flyknit, many of Nike’s competitors have copied and made unauthorized use of Nike’s Flyknit technologies,” Nike lawyers claim in the Skechers lawsuit. “Skechers has likewise used Nike’s Flyknit technologies without authorization.”

    Flyknit patents

    Nike said in its lawsuits that it owns the Flyknit technology through nine patents filed between September 2012 and July 2023. Nike accused New Balance of using Flyknit to sell certain footwear, including the Fresh Foam X 1080 v12, the Fresh Foam X Vongo v5, the FuelCell SuperComp Trainer and the Tekela v4 Magia FG. In the lawsuit against Skechers, Nike alleged Skechers infringed upon Flyknit technology by selling its Ultra Flex 3.0, the Glide Step Sparkle and other shoes. 

    Nike and Skechers didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment Tuesday. 

    New Balance told CBS MoneyWatch in a statement Tuesday that it “fully respects competitors’ intellectual property rights, but Nike does not own the exclusive right to design and produce footwear by traditional manufacturing methods that have been used in the industry for decades.”

    Nike wants a federal judge to block New Balance and Skechers from selling shoes with copied Flyknit material. In the lawsuits, Nike has also asked for “an award of damages,” but didn’t specify a dollar amount. 

    Nike settled its Flyknit lawsuit against Adidas in August 2022 and settled its Puma case in January 2020. Nike’s case against Lululemon, which began in January, is ongoing. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Robert De Niro yells at former assistant Graham Chase Robinson in courtroom as testimony gets heated

    Robert De Niro yells at former assistant Graham Chase Robinson in courtroom as testimony gets heated

    [ad_1]

    Actor Robert De Niro shouted “Shame on you!” as he testified Tuesday in a New York courtroom, directing the comments toward his former executive assistant and vice president who seeks millions of dollars after accusing her onetime boss of being abusive.

    Graham Chase Robinson watched with her lawyers while De Niro’s anger built as attorney Andrew Macurdy pelted him with some tabloid-style accusations his client made about De Niro’s behavior toward Robinson as she served his needs, large and small, from 2008 until several months into 2019.

    Robinson, 41, seeks $12 million in damages for emotional distress and reputational harm that she claims has left her jobless and unable to recover from the trauma of working for De Niro. She was making $300,000 annually when she quit, frustrated by her interactions with De Niro’s girlfriend and the effect she believed the girlfriend was having on the actor.

    The jury is also considering evidence pertaining to a lawsuit De Niro filed against Robinson in which he claimed that she stole things from him, including 5 million points that could be used for airline flights. De Niro is seeking the return of three years of Robinson’s salary.

    Macurdy asked De Niro whether it was true that he sometimes urinated as he spoke with Robinson on the telephone.

    “That’s nonsense,” De Niro answered. “You got us all here for this?”

    Robert De Niro Lawsuit
    In this courtroom sketch, Robert De Niro testifies in Manhattan federal court, Tuesday, Oct. 31, 2023, in New York. 

    Elizabeth Williams / AP


    Macurdy told De Niro he called Robinson “b– to her face.”

    “I was never abusive, ever,” the actor snapped back, though he conceded that he might have used the word in conversations with her.

    And the claim that he told Robinson he preferred that she scratch his back rather than using a back scratching device drew another angry rebuke from De Niro, who said it might have happened once or twice, but “never was with disrespect or lewdness.”

    Finally, he angrily looked toward Robinson and shouted: “Shame on you, Chase Robinson!”

    Quickly, he blurted an apology in a quieter voice, as he glanced toward Judge Lewis J. Liman.

    “I wasn’t abusive. I was upset.”  

    The actor admitted that there were no written rules for those who worked for him because, he said, he relied on the “rules of common sense.” He said he promoted Robinson with the title of vice president of his company, Canal Productions, at her request but he added that her duties didn’t change.

    At times, De Niro would flatly deny something, only to later admit that there might be truth to it in a manner different than how it was suggested.

    Asked if he once yelled at Robinson when she was in Europe and had failed to call and remind him of an important meeting in California, De Niro answered that he hadn’t, only to quickly add: “I raised my voice.”

    “I got angry that one time,” he said. “I berated her. I wasn’t abusive. I was upset.”

    “You called her a brat,” Macurdy said.

    “I could have,” De Niro answered.

    Sometimes, De Niro sounded like he wanted to leave the witness stand.

    “I don’t have time for this,” he said at one point.

    He rejected Macurdy’s suggestion that he sued Robinson before she sued him because he wanted publicity.

    “It draws attention to me. It’s the last thing I wanted to do,” De Niro said.

    De Niro, 80, has won two Oscars in a six-decade movie career that has featured memorable roles in films including “The Deer Hunter” and “Raging Bull.” Currently, he is in Martin Scorsese’s “Killers of the Flower Moon.”

    CBS New York previously reported that a profanity-laced voicemail allegedly from De Niro emerged in 2019 along with the accusations of discrimination and harassment.

    “You’re living in Spain and you’re [expletive] upset with me. You tell me how nice you have it and your life over there and you [expletive] don’t answer my calls. How dare you. You’re about to be fired. You’re [expletive] history,” the voicemail says.

    The 19-page lawsuit also states that De Niro made jokes about his Viagra prescription and asked her to do supposedly stereotypical female duties, such as cleaning his apartment and mending his clothes, CBS New York reported.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Britney Spears Says She Wrote a New Song After Memoir Release

    Britney Spears Says She Wrote a New Song After Memoir Release

    [ad_1]

    Just days after her memoir, The Woman In Me, hit shelves and made it abundantly clear, in Britney Spears’ own accounting, that she felt her long legal conservatorship had stolen the joy of performing her music, Spears is dangling the juiciest pop morsel in front of her fans.

    “I wrote a new song!!!” she captioned an Instagram post on Sunday. “Hate you to like me !!! No beef with anyone … just being a narcissist in a claimed, self-entitled way !!! It’s to accumulate interest by giving ego with my eyes closed because I hear important people do that these days.”

    Instagram content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    She paired the announcement not with an audio clip but a photo of her own face, golden curls flowing and eyes closed. 

    Spears, who claimed last week that her book is the highest-selling celebrity memoir of history, wrote in it that she was “struggling” with whether she’d perform again. She wrote that being forced to perform during the 13-year legal conservatorship that gave others total control over her stole her creative joy. 

    “Pushing forward in my musical career is not my focus at the moment,” she wrote. She collaborated with Elton John on a single, “Hold Me Closer” in 2022 and wrote that it felt “great,” but Spears admitted that she still had healing and thinking to do.

    “I keep getting asked when I’m going to put on shows again,” she wrote later in the book. “I confess that I’m struggling with that question. I’m enjoying dancing and singing the way I used to when I was younger and not trying to do it for my family’s benefit, not trying to get something, but doing it for me and my genuine love of it.”

    Spears has already teased a sequel to The Woman In Me—after all, plenty has already happened since the events she recounted, like her pending divorce from husband Sam Asghari. In a now-deleted Instagram post from over the weekend, Spears wrote that we should expect another volume in 2024. Perhaps by then we’ll also have gotten to hear this song.

    Representatives for Britney Spears did not immediately return a request for comment. 

    [ad_2]

    Kase Wickman

    Source link

  • Breezy Bottle Beatdown? Chris Brown Sued For Allegedly Beating A Man ‘Unconscious’ With A Tequila Bottle

    Breezy Bottle Beatdown? Chris Brown Sued For Allegedly Beating A Man ‘Unconscious’ With A Tequila Bottle

    [ad_1]

    Another day, another assault allegation against Chris Brown.

    Source: Prince Williams / Getty

    Chris Brown faces a new lawsuit for allegedly beating up a man at a London nightclub in February. The man suing is Abe Diaw. He claims the “Summer Too Hot” singer hit him in the face with a bottle of Don Julio 1942 tequila at TAPE in London.

    According to TMZ, Diaw claims Chris wielded the tequila bottle like a weapon as he pummeled Diaw over the head with “crushing blows.”

    Brown then apparently was “beating” Diaw in the head with “crushing blows” and knocked him unconscious. It went on to claim that Brown allegedly “continued to ruthlessly stomp” on him for “30 seconds.”

    Diaw’s injuries landed him in the hospital. He reportedly sustained lacerations on his head and torn ligaments in his leg.” The lawsuit states it left him with “permanent” damage and “severe emotional distress.”

    Diaw also claimed that the nightclub TAPE caught the altercation on surveillance footage. He also said that cops in London have the alleged beatdown video. Diaw went on to say he could identify Chris in the footage and claims Brown is a fugitive in the United Kingdom as a result of the alleged incident.

    Chris Brown’s Long History Of Assault Accusations And Upcoming New Album

    Lovers & Friends Music Festival

    Source: Kaitlyn Morris / Getty

    Unfortunately for Chris, this isn’t the first time an alleged victim wanted to take him to court. Chris has dealt with legal trouble since 2009. Most recently, in May, Brown and Usher reportedly fought the day before sharing the stage at the Lovers & Friends festival in Las Vegas.

    TMZ reported that Brown was attempting to talk to Teyana Taylor at his surprise birthday party and became angry when she ignored him. Usher intervened and tried to calm the singer. The outlet said that Brown then told his crew they were leaving. When they exited the facility, Usher followed after them and allegedly got jumped outside the party.

    No footage of this incident was released. Chris Brown’s rep and lawyers still have not made a statement regarding any of these incidents.

    In brighter news for Brown, he revealed details about his upcoming project. His 11th studio album, 11:11, will drop on Nov. 11 with 22 tracks.

    Are you excited for his new music? Let us know your thoughts below!

    [ad_2]

    lizsmith23

    Source link

  • SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce Slams Regulator’s Approach on LRBY Case

    SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce Slams Regulator’s Approach on LRBY Case

    [ad_1]

    Hester Peirce of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission has issued a dissenting remark on the regulator’s approach to the crypto sector. In a statement on October 27, the crypto-friendly commissioner lambasted the SEC’s enforcement actions against the LRBY blockchain company. 

    Back in March 2021, the US securities regulator filed a lawsuit against LBRY, claiming the sale of the firm’s LBC token represented an offering of unregistered securities. In November 2022, the US Court finally ruled in favor of the SEC, subjecting LBRY to penalties imposed by the Commission.

    Although LBRY did file an intent to appeal this ruling, it appears the blockchain firm will not be following through with this action, having recently announced plans to wind down its operations due to financial debts to the SEC, a private debtor, and its legal team. 

    SEC Lawsuit Against LBRY ‘Unsettling’, Hester Peirce Says

    Diving into Hester Peirce’s most recent dissent against the SEC, the commissioner claimed to have found the agency’s enforcement action against LBRY “unsettling” and was never in support of the lawsuit against the blockchain firm. 

    Peirce stated the SEC’s decision to file a case against LBRY was quite “puzzling” as there were no “fraud allegations” in the commission’s complaint, nor did any evidence of fraudulent acts by the blockchain firm arise at the time the case was in litigation.

    Rather, the SEC commissioner claimed that LBRY employed a “more conservative” approach than most crypto firms, as the LBRY blockchain only began operations following the sale of most LBC tokens.

    In addition, Peirce also criticized the SEC for initially proposing a penalty of $44 million following its victory over LBRY, a fine that the commissioner claims to be disproportionate to the “alleged crime.” Only following the remedies hearing at the court did the SEC revise its penalty request to $111,614. 

    Peirce Urges SEC To Build Regulatory Framework For Crypto Space

    In the statement on October 27, Peirce also stated there is no defined protocol for blockchain companies like LBRY to register their token offerings with the SEC, as the application of securities law to crypto projects is still unclear. 

    Peradventure if a company was able to even register its token offering, Peirce described such an act as not being a “particularly useful effort.” Rather than launching a lawsuit against LBRY, Peirce claims the SEC could have redeployed its resources into working on a well-defined regulatory framework applicable to crypto projects such as LBRY.

    Peirce said:

    The time and resources we expended on this case could have been devoted to building a workable regulatory framework that companies like LBRY could have followed. Then, the market could have decided LBRY’s fate.

    Total crypto market valued at $1.23 trillion on the hourly chart | Source: TOTAL chart on Tradingview.com

    Featured image from iStock, chart from Tradingview

    [ad_2]

    Semilore Faleti

    Source link

  • Flight attendants claim United took them off Dodgers’ charter flights for not being ‘white, young, thin’

    Flight attendants claim United took them off Dodgers’ charter flights for not being ‘white, young, thin’

    [ad_1]

    Two United Airlines flight attendants claim in a lawsuit that they were passed over for the plum assignment of working on charter flights for the Dodgers because the players prefer a “certain look” of “white, young, thin women who are predominately blond and blue-eyed.”

    In a lawsuit filed Wednesday in Los Angeles County Superior Court, Dawn Todd and Darby Quezada alleged harassment and/or discrimination based on race, national origin, religion and age in regard to the staffing of United’s charter flights for the Dodgers and their treatment by coworkers on those flights. Todd, 50, is Black, and Quezada, 44, is of Mexican, Black and Jewish descent.

    The Dodgers are not named as defendants in the lawsuit. A team spokesperson told The Times that the Dodgers do not comment on any pending litigation.

    United responded to questions from The Times with a statement.

    “United fosters an environment of inclusion and does not tolerate discrimination of any kind,” the company wrote in an email. “We believe this lawsuit is without merit and intend to defend ourselves vigorously.”

    According to the lawsuit, Todd and Quezada both have worked for United for more than 15 years and had spent more than a decade trying to join the airline’s program that staffs the Dodgers’ flights. Such assignments can bring attendants up to three times the compensation of typical assignments because of longer flight times and other perks.

    “Plaintiffs had the necessary experience and qualifications,” the lawsuit states, “but their requests were dismissed and rejected because Plaintiffs were not white.”

    Two other United flight attendants sued the airline in 2020 for allegedly staffing teams’ flights with “young, white, female, and predominately blond/blue-eyed” flight attendants. The case was settled out of court in March 2021.

    That led the way for Todd and Quesada to become members of the Dodgers charter flight program, according to the current lawsuit, but only “after extensive interviews.”

    According to the lawsuit, “things changed again in 2022 when several white United flight attendants were added to the ‘dedicated crew.’ But, unlike Todd and Quezada, these white United flight attendants did not have to interview for these coveted positions. …

    “Instead, these white flight attendants were blatantly selected by United’s management … because of how they looked: they are white, young, thin women who are predominately blond and blue-eyed. When Todd and Quezada asked United why certain flight attendants were added … without having to interview like they did, Todd and Quezada were told that these white flight attendants fit a ‘certain look’ that the Dodgers players liked.”

    The lawsuit states that Todd and Quezada started receiving fewer assignments to Dodgers flights ended up being demoted within the program, and Quezada eventually was removed “without any justification.”

    Todd and Quezada are seeking a jury trial and an unspecified amount in damages.

    [ad_2]

    Chuck Schilken

    Source link

  • Abercrombie & Fitch, former CEO Mike Jeffries accused of running trafficking operation

    Abercrombie & Fitch, former CEO Mike Jeffries accused of running trafficking operation

    [ad_1]

    An actor has filed a class action lawsuit accusing former Abercrombie & Fitch CEO Mike Jeffries of running a “widespread sex-trafficking operation.” The lawsuit also alleges that Abercrombie & Fitch had “participation and intentional involvement” in the operation.

    Plaintiff David Bradberry claims that Jeffries used his power and influence to prey upon attractive young men by leading them to believe he would hire them as Abercrombie models, and that the clothing company enabled the abuse. 

    The financial success of the Abercrombie fashion brand fueled Jeffries’ alleged sex trafficking organization, which he ran from at least 1992 through 2014, the lawsuit, filed in District Court for the Southern District of New York Friday, claims. Abercrombie & Fitch declined to comment on the lawsuit, noting that it doesn’t comment on pending litigation, while Jeffries’ attorney didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

    The company enabled Jeffries, allowing him to “sexually terrorize aspiring male models,” the lawsuit alleges.

    Jeffries lured attractive young men to his Hamptons estate in what were described as casting interviews. He forced them to strip down, sign non-disclosure agreements, then take drugs and engage in sex acts with himself, his partner Matthew Smith, and others, the lawsuit claims. 

    It’s not the first time Jeffries has faced such allegations, with a BBC News investigation earlier this month reporting that he faced allegations of exploitation by men recruited for sex events he hosted around the world.

    The price of being an Abercrombie model

    “The models were led to believe that being sexually abused by the CEO of Abercrombie and his partner at a remote private location arranged by the company was the price that was paid to obtain one of the most coveted roles in the industry— an Abercrombie model,” the lawsuit alleges.

    Abercrombie’s support of Jeffries enabled him to “successfully rape, sexually assault, and coercively sex traffic David Bradberry” and others, the suit claims.

    The lawsuit accuses the company of prioritizing profits over the law by propagating the notion that succumbing to sexual abuse was a normal part of the casting process. 

    In the legal filing, Bradberry detailed his own alleged abuse by Jeffries in 2010. It started with a “scout” forcing him to allow the scout to perform oral sex on him in order to secure a meeting with Jeffries. Bradberry was rewarded with cash, the lawsuit claims. Bradberry later met Jeffries in Washington, D.C., and London, England, where he was coerced into “commercial sex acts” with Jeffries and others, it claims.

    Bradberry claims he understood that if he complied, he’d be in the running to become an Abercrombie model. He was later invited to a casting event at Jeffries’ Hamptons house, along with six other hopeful models. Bradberry alleges Jeffries and Smith escorted him into a room where two men were having sex, and was given party drugs known as “poppers.” 

    Bradberry claims Jeffries anally raped him. He was later paid $2,500 and flown to France, where he was allegedly forced to perform more sexual acts on Jeffries. At the time, he still aspired to be an Abercrombie model, the lawsuit states.

    [ad_2]

    Source link