ReportWire

Tag: Lawsuit

  • Lawsuit over Alabama’s transgender care ban for minors can proceed as judge denies federal request for a stay

    Lawsuit over Alabama’s transgender care ban for minors can proceed as judge denies federal request for a stay

    [ad_1]

    A Nation in Transition | CBS Reports


    A Nation in Transition | CBS Reports

    22:23

    A federal judge declined Tuesday to pause litigation challenging Alabama’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors as similar cases wind upward toward the U.S. Supreme Court.

    U.S. District Judge Liles Burke said no to a request from the U.S. Department of Justice to put the Alabama case on hold until appellate courts decide if they will hear related petitions on whether states can enact such bans. The Justice Department asked for the stay because, “this exceptional legal landscape is quickly evolving.”

    Burke wrote that the case will move forward for now. He said a stay might be appropriate later if those petitions are granted.

    Transgender young people and their families have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review an appellate court decision that allowed bans in Kentucky and Tennessee to remain in effect. In the Alabama case, families with transgender children have asked the full 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to review a decision that would let the Alabama law take effect.

    The Alabama case is scheduled to go to trial in April.

    At least 22 states have enacted laws banning or restricting gender-affirming care for minors and most of the bans are being challenged in court.

    The Alabama ban makes it a felony — punishable by up to 10 years in prison — for doctors to treat people under 19 with puberty blockers or hormones to help affirm a new gender identity. The law remains blocked by injunction until the 11th Circuit appeals court issues a mandate in the case.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • “Vanilla Gift” card issuer faces lawsuit over card-draining scam risk

    “Vanilla Gift” card issuer faces lawsuit over card-draining scam risk

    [ad_1]

    A gift card issuer is facing a lawsuit over allegations it failed to make its popular prepaid cards less susceptible to a common scam.

    The lawsuit, filed last month by San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu, alleges Incom’s “Vanilla Gift” and “One Vanilla” non-reloadable cards featured “insufficient” packaging and “lax security features” that made them susceptible to scams. 

    According to the complaint, the gift card packaging allows for “easy access to the card inside,” enabling thieves to record the barcode and PIN information so they can make unauthorized transactions, a practice known as card draining.

    The complaint also alleges that Incomm failed to improve its product’s packaging despite knowing the flawed design led to incidents of theft.

    “As the direct result of Incomm’s years-long negligence, numerous consumers and gift recipients have been needlessly subjected to card draining,” Chiu alleged in the lawsuit.  


    Tips for saving money this holiday season

    05:07

    The lawsuit also alleged that when victims reported their funds stolen, Incomm and its partners did not reimburse them and declined to provide refunds, the complaint states. 

    Card draining: What it is and how to avoid it

    Card draining is a scam in which fraudsters carefully remove an unpurchased gift card from its packaging, record its number and PIN code, then place it back in its original packaging,” according to Consumer Reports. 

    Once an unsuspecting victim purchases a tampered card and loads funds onto it, the thief will use the stolen information to make unauthorized purchases, draining the gift card of its prepaid funds. 

    Compromised gift cards may be hard to spot, but there are several ways consumers can protect themselves against being scammed, according to Pennsylvania Attorney General Michelle Henry.

    Before buying a gift card, consumers should always examine the card’s packaging for any damage and ensure sure the scratch-off covering concealing the card’s PIN number is intact, Henry advised in a consumer notice

    If a consumer discovers a card they bought has been compromised, they should immediately report the issue to the card company and ask for a refund, according to the Henry.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Millions of Apple users can claim part of a $25 million settlement. Here’s how.

    Millions of Apple users can claim part of a $25 million settlement. Here’s how.

    [ad_1]

    Subscribers to Apple Music and other services may be eligible to claim part of a $25 million settlement over the company’s subscription-share program.

    The settlement resolves a lawsuit over Apple’s Family Sharing perk, a free service that allows up to six users to access a handful of pay-per-month apps — including Apple News+, Music, TV+, Arcade and Apple Card — under one shared subscription. 

    According to the complaint, Walter Peters v. Apple Inc., Apple ran “deceptive” advertisements for Family Sharing alongside “virtually all” of the App Store’s subscription-based apps despite most of them not supporting sharing through the service. As a result, millions of customers were misled into buying subscriptions through third-party apps “that they would not otherwise have purchased,” lawyers alleged in the lawsuit. 

    Apple has denied any wrongdoing under the settlement and that it misled customers. 

    U.S. customers who had a Family Sharing plan and bought a subscription to a third-party app between June 21, 2015, and January 30, 2019, can file a claim under the settlement. 

    How do I claim money under the Apple settlement? 

    People who used Apple Family Sharing and who are eligible under the settlement can file to receive a payout through the claims website. If you have an identification number and PIN, you can file your claim through the website; if not, you must download, fill in and mail in the payment election form from the case’s website.  

    The filing deadline is March 1, 2024, according to the the settlement site. Claimants who file after the deadline will not receive compensation.  

    How much is the payout?

    Under the settlement, eligible class members can expect to receive “up to $30,” according to the “Frequently Asked Questions” section of the claims site. 

    How will I get paid? 

    If you are eligible for a payout, you can choose between two payment methods: an ACH transfer (electronic payment) or a check, according to the settlement site.

    You must indicate your payment preference by the filing deadline or risk forfeiting your piece of the settlement.

    How do I know if I’m eligible? 

    Eligible customers will receive an email with information about the settlement, The Verge reported. You are eligible if you purchased a subscription through a third-party app while belonging to the Family Sharing plan with at least one other person between June 21, 2015, and Jan. 30, 2019.

    If you haven’t received a notice despite meeting the eligibility requirements, you can still file a claim using the form on the settlement website and mail it in. 

    There’s an opt-out option for class members. Who should opt out?

    You may want to opt out if you plan on filing a separate lawsuit against Apple regarding any claims related to the the class-action suit. To do so, you must mail a letter including your contact information, signature and a statement detailing your decision to opt out of the settlement to the case’s administrator. 

    Alternatively, you can complete an opt-out request form from the settlement website, print it out and mail it. 

    The opt-out request must be sent to the following address: Peters v. Apple Class Action Settlement Administrator, P.O. Box 301134, Los Angeles, CA 90030-1134. Your request must be postmarked no later than March 1, 2024. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 12/15: CBS Evening News

    12/15: CBS Evening News

    [ad_1]

    12/15: CBS Evening News – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Jury orders Rudy Giuliani to pay $148 million in defamation case; A mysterious Secret Santa motivated students to raise thousands of dollars for those in need

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Apple agrees to pay out $25M to settle lawsuit over Family Sharing | TechCrunch

    Apple agrees to pay out $25M to settle lawsuit over Family Sharing | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    Apple has agreed to pay out $25 million to settle a class action lawsuit over its Family Sharing feature, which lets users and up to five of their family members share access to apps, music, movies, TV shows and books that they purchase. The lawsuit, which was first filed in 2019, alleged that “Apple misrepresented the ability to use its Family Sharing feature to share subscriptions to apps.”

    The news was first reported by MacRumors.

    The lawsuit says that Apple denies that it made any misleading misrepresentations and “denies all allegations of wrongdoing.” The settlement agreement notes that “Apple has concluded that continuing to defend this Action would be burdensome and expensive. Apple enters into this Agreement without in any way acknowledging any fault, liability, or wrongdoing of any kind.”

    The tech giant did not respond to TechCrunch’s request for comment.

    Court documents from the lawsuit allege that Apple advertised Family Sharing as an option on apps that did not support Family Sharing.

    “The vast majority of subscription-based Apps, which is a growing percentage of Apple Apps, cannot be shared with designated family members,” the court document reads. “They are available only to the individual user who downloads the App and sets up a subscription. All or virtually all of these Apps, however, included the statement that they support Family Sharing on their landing pages through January 30, 2019.”

    The lawsuit alleges that Apple was aware that the subscription-based apps did not support Family Sharing, but still placed an ad for Family Sharing on them. The court document goes on to note that “millions of consumers have downloaded subscription-based Apps believing that they are available for Family Sharing, only to learn after payment has been made that they are not so available.”

    U.S. residents who were enrolled in a Family Sharing group with at least one other person between June 21, 2015 and January 30, 2019 and purchased a subscription to an app from the App Store during that time may be eligible for a payment. Eligible class members will be receiving an email this week.

    Each class member that files a claim is eligible to receive $30, but this may vary depending on how many people file claims. However, the payment will not exceed $50 for each class member, and $10 million from the settlement will go toward attorney fees.

    Eligible class members have until March 1, 2024 to file a claim. A final approval hearing is scheduled for April 2, 2024.

    [ad_2]

    Aisha Malik

    Source link

  • Florida company targeted California homeowners with predatory scheme, state attorney general alleges

    Florida company targeted California homeowners with predatory scheme, state attorney general alleges

    [ad_1]

    The California attorney general has sued a Florida-based real estate firm, alleging it ran a predatory scheme that limited homeowners’ ability to sell and left them vulnerable to owing thousands of dollars.

    The company, MV Realty, has been sued over similar allegations by multiple states. In September, the firm filed for bankruptcy.

    In its lawsuit announced Thursday, the California attorney general’s office alleged MV Realty targeted financially vulnerable California homeowners with deceptive marketing, promising them $300 to $5,000 as long as they gave MV Realty the “opportunity” to be their real estate agent if they sold their house.

    In reality, MV Realty’s Homeowner Benefit Agreement was far more complicated and the company trained its representatives to give misleading responses to consumer questions and to try to provide the full agreement only at the time of signing, which limited the ability of homeowners to review confusing fine print, the lawsuit alleged.

    “MV Realty is a financial predator,” Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta said in a statement. “Through its one-sided agreements, the company lined its own pockets at the expense of vulnerable homeowners in California, holding their most valuable assets hostage.”

    MV Realty did not immediately return requests for comment by email and phone.

    According to the attorney general, the MV Realty agreement mandated homeowners use the brokerage if they sell their home in the next 40 years — far longer than typical exclusive listing agreements that last several months, the lawsuit says.

    When a homeowner sells within the four decades, the lawsuit says, MV Realty gets six months to list the property, per the agreement. If the company completes the sale, the homeowner is required to pay MV Realty the greater of 3% of the sales price or 3% of the home’s value at the time the owner signed the benefit agreement, authorities said.

    If MV Realty can’t sell the home within six months, the agreement says homeowners get 60 days to try to sell the home on their own or with another brokerage and must do so at the same price and terms MV Realty offered, according to the lawsuit.

    If homeowners can sell, they owe MV Realty nothing. But if they cannot — which authorities said is likely — homeowners must use MV Realty to sell or pay a fee of 3% of the home’s value to terminate the 40-year agreement, according to the lawsuit. On an average home in L.A. County today, that would be over $25,000.

    That termination fee is typically more than 10 times the upfront fee the homeowner received from MV Realty, the lawsuit says.

    In its lawsuit, the attorney general alleged that the agreement reduces the incentive for MV Realty to provide quality service and that the company violated California law in several ways, including unlicensed activity and improper disclosures.

    According to the attorney general, since early 2022 at least 1,443 California homeowners signed the company’s Homeowner Benefit Agreement. The company “supposedly stopped” signing up California homeowners by November 2022 but still enforces existing agreements, as well as liens that limit the homeowner’s ability to refinance, the lawsuit alleges.

    [ad_2]

    Andrew Khouri

    Source link

  • A Fourth Woman Accuses Diddy of Sexual Assault

    A Fourth Woman Accuses Diddy of Sexual Assault

    [ad_1]

    Last month, the R&B singer Cassie made a series of shocking claims about her relationship with Sean “Diddy” Combs, whom she met in 2005 when she was 19 years old. The hip-hop mogul, she said in a federal lawsuit, trapped her in a yearslong cycle of abuse, violence, and sex trafficking, and raped her toward the end of their relationship in 2018.

    Combs denied these claims and settled with Cassie the following day. But in the days that followed, two more women filed lawsuits against Combs accusing him of sexual assault. In a fourth lawsuit filed on Wednesday, a woman who is unnamed in court documents claims that Combs and two of his associates took turns raping her in 2003, when she was a 17-year-old high school student.

    According to the suit brought against Combs and two associates, the woman met the two Combs associates—Harve Pierre, the former president of Combs’s Bad Boy Entertainment, and an unnamed third man—at a lounge in the Detroit area, and Pierre told her he was “best friends” with Combs and called him with her. Combs allegedly convinced the woman to accompany Pierre and the unnamed man on a private jet to his studio in New York City. At the studio, the suit claims, the three men plied her with drugs and alcohol and began raping her. She fell into the fetal position on a bathroom floor, the suit says, and was flown back to Michigan, when she awoke.

    “Incredibly,” the suit says, “the allegations brought by Ms. Doe are in many ways even more egregious than those brought by his prior victims.”

    “Enough is enough,” Combs wrote in a statement Wednesday. “For the last couple of weeks, I have sat silently and watched people try to assassinate my character, destroy my reputation and my legacy. Sickening allegations have been made against me by individuals looking for a quick payday. Let me be absolutely clear: I did not do any of the awful things being alleged. I will fight for my name, my family and for the truth.”

    As with Cassie’s lawsuit, the new suit was filed by attorney Douglas Wigdor and includes a trigger warning on its first page: “This document contains highly graphic information of a sexual nature, including sexual assault.” The previous three suits against Combs in recent weeks were filed under the Adult Survivors Act in New York, which granted alleged victims of sexual abuse a one-year window to file civil complaints regardless of whether the statute of limitations has passed. The window expired last month, prompting a flurry of new complaints against high-profile actors, musicians, and politicians. The new suit was filed under New York City’s Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Act, which similarly granted a window from March 2023 to March 2025 for accusers to file civil complaints involving sexual assault claims after the expiration of the statute of limitations.

    The suit said that the woman read about Cassie’s lawsuit last month as well as an additional complaint filed against Pierre. (A former assistant accused Pierre last month of grooming and sexually assaulting her; the former Bad Boy executive has not commented on the claims.) “Seeing two other women bravely speak out against Mr. Combs and Mr. Pierre, respectively,” the suit said, “gave Ms. Doe the confidence to tell her story as well.”

    [ad_2]

    Dan Adler

    Source link

  • Facebook and Instagram are steering child predators to kids, New Mexico AG alleges

    Facebook and Instagram are steering child predators to kids, New Mexico AG alleges

    [ad_1]

    Meta accused of engineering social media platforms to hook kids


    Meta accused of engineering social media platforms to hook kids

    00:33

    Facebook and Instagram are steering children to explicit content even when no interest is expressed, and are enabling child predators to find and contact minors, New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez claimed Wednesday in announcing a lawsuit against parent company Meta Platforms and CEO Mark Zuckerberg. 

    Children are pressed by predators into providing photos of themselves or to participate in pornographic videos, alleges the civil suit filed on Tuesday in New Mexico state court. Torrez claimed that rather than providing “safe spaces for children,” the platforms are allowing predators to trade child pornography and solicit children for sex.

    Meta has not implemented protections due to the potential hit on its advertising revenue, according to Torrez, whose office filed the lawsuit after an undercover investigation in which it set up phony accounts of fictional teens and preteens, using photographs generated by artificial intelligence. Meta’s algorithms recommended sexual content to those accounts, which were also subject to a stream of explicit messages and propositions from adults on the platforms.

    “Meta has allowed Facebook and Instagram to become a marketplace for predators in search of children upon whom to prey,” the lawsuit alleges.

    One account had investigators posting images of a fictional 13-year-old girl in Albuquerque, New Mexico, drawing thousands of adult followers. On Facebook Messenger, the account’s chats received graphic photos and videos three to four times a week, according to the complaint.


    Meta sued by states claiming Instagram, Facebook cause harm in children and teens

    02:23

    “Mr. Zuckerberg and other Meta executives are aware of the serious harm their products can pose to young users, and yet they have failed to make sufficient changes to their platforms that would prevent the sexual exploitation of children,” Torrez said in a statement. 

    He added, “Despite repeated assurances to Congress and the public that they can be trusted to police themselves, it is clear that Meta’s executives continue to prioritize engagement and ad revenue over the safety of the most vulnerable members of our society.” 

    The state’s suit cited multiple recent criminal cases in New Mexico, including one perpetrator accused of recruiting more than 100 minor victims through Facebook.

    Meta did not immediately respond to a request for comment. However, earlier this month Meta posted a blog post about its work to fight child predators, and told CBS News that it has hired specialists focused on online child safety and is developing new technology to “root out predators.”

    “Child exploitation is a horrific crime and online predators are determined criminals,” Meta said on December 1. “They use multiple apps and websites, test each platforms’ defenses, and adapt quickly. We work hard to stay ahead.”

    The New Mexico suit comes in the wake of a suit filed in October by 41 other states and the District of Columbia contending Meta had deliberately engineered Instagram and Facebook to be addictive to children and teens.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tuohy family claims Michael Oher of

    Tuohy family claims Michael Oher of

    [ad_1]

    The legal battle between the protagonists of the inspirational 2009 film “The Blind Side” is getting more tangled. 

    Sean and Leigh Anne Tuohy — the couple who took in former NFL offensive lineman Michael Oher when he was a teenager —claim in a court filing that Oher attempted to extort $15 million from them. 

    The fight between Oher and Tuohys came to light in August when the former football player told a Tennessee judge that, contrary to the film’s depiction, he was never adopted by the Tuohy family, and that the family allegedly earned millions from the story.

    Now, the Tuohy family is claiming in legal documents filed Monday that they were threatened by Oher. The family alleges Oher sent them text messages demanding a payout of $15 million or else he would take his accusations to the press and social media. In the legal filings, the Tuohys ask that the court deny Oher’s request for a temporary injunction, arguing that his case won’t succeed because the couple isn’t engaged in commercial use of his name, likeness or image. 

    Mississippi State v Mississippi
    Michael Oher, then #74 of the Ole Miss Rebels, stands with Sean and Leigh Anne Tuohy during senior ceremonies on Nov. 28, 2008 in Oxford, Mississippi.

    / Getty Images


    The filings also allege that Oher began demanding money from the Tuohys after his professional football career had ended.

    “Around that time, perhaps because he was no longer making significant amount of money as a professional athlete, Mr. Oher became increasingly estranged from the Tuohys, believing incorrectly that they had not paid him the money he was owed,” the filing alleges.

    “He later began demanding money through texts and emails,” the filing also claims.

    Oher’s attorney didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Termination of conservatorship

    In one group of texts included in the filings, Oher allegedly wrote, “It was 10 million now I want 15 million after taxes.” He also threatened to talk with the press about his allegations, texting, “If something isn’t resolve [sic] this Friday, I’m going to to ahed and tell the world, how I was robbed by my suppose to be [sic] parents. That’s the deadline.”

    “Think how it will look when this comes out,” read another text allegedly from Oher, included in the filings.

    screenshot-2023-08-15-at-7-30-50-pm.png
    Actors Quinton Aaron and Sandra Bullock in “The Blind Side” (2009).

    imdb.com


    Earlier this year, Oher, 37, petitioned a Tennessee judge to revoke the 2004 conservatorship created by the Tuohys when he was a teenager, arguing that he was old enough to handle his own business affairs. The Tuohys “have falsely and publicly represented themselves as the adoptive parents of Michael,” the petition claimed.

    A judge in September ended the conservatorship that allowed the Tuohys to control Oher’s finances.

    In “The Blind Side,” Leigh Anne Tuohy, 63, was portrayed by Sandra Bullock, while Sean Tuohy, 64, was played by Tim McGraw. The film was based on a 2006 book by writer Michael Lewis

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Lawsuit accuses UC Berkeley of fostering antisemitism. Dean calls accusations 'stunningly inaccurate'

    Lawsuit accuses UC Berkeley of fostering antisemitism. Dean calls accusations 'stunningly inaccurate'

    [ad_1]

    UC Berkeley is being sued by Jewish groups claiming that the university has fostered a “longstanding, unchecked spread of anti-Semitism” on campus — an accusation that university officials say paints a distorted and inaccurate picture of the school.

    Filed Tuesday by the Brandeis Center and Jewish Americans for Fairness in Education, the complaint alleges Berkeley Law, the university law school, has “failed to confront, much less combat” antisemitism and that policies adopted by some student organizations discriminate against Jewish students. The lawsuit also alleges students have faced violence and harassment since Oct. 7, when Hamas launched an attack in Israel, killing about 1,200 people.

    “The University has enabled the normalization of anti-Jewish hatred on campus,” the complaint, filed in federal court in San Francisco, reads. “Jewish students feel compelled to hide their identities.”

    But university officials refuted many of the claims, and said the allegations made in the 37-page complaint don’t reflect “the facts of what is actually happening on campus.”

    Tensions have been high at the campus following the Oct. 7 attack, sparking ongoing and, at times, opposing protests occurring at the same time. But UC Berkeley officials say they’ve been reaching out to student groups, offering counseling support, and making other arrangements to protect free speech and support students on campus.

    A banner calling for a cease-fire hangs from UC Berkeley’s Sather Tower as hundreds of people, mostly students, read the names of Palestinians killed, during a protest at UC Berkeley on Nov. 16.

    (Brontë Wittpenn / San Francisco Chronicle via AP)

    “UC Berkeley believes the claims made in the lawsuit are not consistent with the First Amendment of the Constitution, or with the facts of what is actually happening on our campus,” Dan Mogulof, spokesperson for the university, said in a statement. “The university has long been committed to confronting antisemitism, and to supporting the needs and interests of its Jewish students, faculty and staff.”

    The lawsuit claims that, following the Oct. 7 attack and the ongoing protests on campus, Jewish students have been targets of harassment and physical violence, and that Jewish students have received hate emails calling for their gassing and murder.

    “Jewish students have reported being afraid to go to class, which would require them to pass through the pro-Hamas rallies taking place in Berkeley’s main thoroughfares,” the suit reads.

    The suit also alleges that several student groups, including those that represent women, Asian and LGBTQ+ law school students, have adopted policies that discriminate and exclude Jewish students, including those that call for divestment and sanctions against the state of Israel or require that speakers repudiate Zionism before being invited to speak. Representatives for some student groups could not be reached for comment.

    Berkeley Law School Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, refuted the claims.

    “The complaint filed by the Brandeis Center paints a picture of the Law School that is stunningly inaccurate and that ignores the First Amendment,” Chemerinsky said. “For example, student organizations have the First Amendment right to choose their speakers, including based on their viewpoint. Although there is much that the campus can and does do to create an inclusive environment, it cannot stop speech even if it is offensive.”

    Mogulof, spokesperson for the university, said some of the claims made in the complaint “have no basis in fact.” Despite the claims of possible discrimination in the lawsuit, he said the university was not aware of any incident where a student was excluded from a student organization based on their Jewish identity.

    He said university officials have found no incidents where students reported getting the kind of emails that were described in the complaint.

    “This is the first anyone has heard of an allegation of that sort,” he said. “I can assure you that if we have — or if we do — we will respond strongly and quickly.”

    School police have also received one incident of alleged violence that occurred on Oct. 25, he said, involving two people who tried to take an Israeli flag from a student during a rally for Palestine. When they were unable to take the flag, the suspects hit the student in the head with his own metal water bottle.

    Police are still pursuing leads in the incident, and school officials have reached out to the student.

    “The university is taking this very seriously, and the student has been offered support,” Mogulof said.

    For some, the university’s actions have not been enough.

    “I don’t want to see students physically assaulted and the university not be willing to investigate it as a hate crime,” said Hannah Schlacter, a student at UC Berkeley’s Haas School of Business.

    Schlacter, who said she’s been helping lead the campus’ Jewish student community, is also a member of Jewish Americans for Fairness in Education, one of the plaintiffs in the suit. Although not named, she said she provided testimony for the suit.

    She said she was concerned university officials did not refer to the Oct. 25 incident as a hate crime. She said another incident on Oct. 16, where two people wearing masks tried to yank away an Israeli flag from a Jewish student wearing the flag as a cape, was also not being investigated as a hate crime.

    “The university happens to not be following the policy in place to respond to these issues,” she said. “The fact of the matter is that the university is not investigating that as a hate crime and that to me is concerning.”

    She said Jewish students are also concerned about what she called “indoctrination” by professors, including an incident where a graduate student offered extra credit for students who attended a pro-Palestine demonstration.

    After school officials heard concerns, the options for extra credit for the class studying the Middle East were expanded to include any local event that involved the topic, including protests or documentaries.

    The lawsuit comes as protests have erupted in universities and city streets across the country following the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas and the ongoing military actions of Israel in Gaza.

    Some supporters of Israel have called on university leaders to better police pro-Palestinian rallies, while supporters of Palestine have also accused some campus leaders of issuing statements that condemn violent attacks by Hamas, but don’t criticize Israel’s military actions in Gaza.

    In a statement to UC Berkeley students and staff on Nov. 3, Chancellor Carol Christ said she was concerned about an alarming increase of “antisemitic expression” in the country and campus.

    “Our university condemns antisemitic expression in its very form, and we are committed to addressing it when it occurs and responding when it is reported,” she wrote.

    Palestinian students and supporters have also faced harassment, threats and doxxing, she said, and urged students to report any incident to the Office for Prevention of Harassment and Discrimination.

    About 300 UC Berkeley faculty have also signed on to a letter condemning the Oct. 7 attack. Some students on campus had referred to the attacks as “resistance” and part of a “freedom struggle,” which signatories of the letter call “repugnant and indefensible.”

    Among those who signed the letter were Christ and Chemerinsky.

    [ad_2]

    Salvador Hernandez

    Source link

  • Ronaldo hit with $1 billion class-action lawsuit for endorsing Binance NFTs

    Ronaldo hit with $1 billion class-action lawsuit for endorsing Binance NFTs

    [ad_1]

    Portuguese soccer star Cristiano Ronaldo is facing a class-action lawsuit seeking at least $1 billion in damages for his role in promoting cryptocurrency-related “non-fungible tokens,” or NFTs, issued by the beleaguered cryptocurrency exchange Binance to millions of his fans.

    The lawsuit, filed in federal court in the Southern District of Florida Monday, alleges that Ronaldo’s promotion of Binance was “deceptive and unlawful.” Binance’s partnership with high-profile figures like Ronaldo, the plaintiffs claim, led them into costly and unsafe investments.

    Under the marketing partnership, Ronaldo encouraged millions of his fans and supporters to invest with Binance, even though many of them were unfamiliar with cryptocurrencies or the platform, the lawsuit alleges. As a result of his endorsement, his fans came away with the impression that the investments were safe — such was the case with the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, who bought products sold on Binance after seeing Ronaldo’s endorsements, it claims. 

    Ultimately, they lost money, the lawsuit states.

    “Evidence now reveals that Binance’s fraud was only able to reach such heights through the offer and sale of unregistered securities, with the willing help and assistance of some of the wealthiest, powerful and recognized organizations and celebrities across the globe — just like Defendant Ronaldo,” the suit reads.

    Representatives for Ronaldo declined to comment Thursday. Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, did not immediately return requests for statement from The Associated Press.

    Ronaldo isn’t the first celebrity to be sued over their involvement with the crypto world. Last year, NFL quarterback Tom Brady, supermodel Gisele Bundchen and comedian Larry David were among a star-studded list of people accused of defrauding investors who lost money in the cryptocurrency exchange’s collapse. 

    The stars had appeared in a Super Bowl ad and other promotions for FTX. The suit argued that the celebrities’ status made them culpable for promoting FTX’s failed business model.

    Ronaldo NFT collection

    Ronaldo launched his inaugural NFT “CR7” collection with Binance in November of last year, ahead of the 2022 World Cup. The NFTs — which had starting prices ranging from the equivalent of about $77 to $10,000 — featured seven animated statues depicting Ronaldo from iconic moments in his life, from bicycle-kick goals to his childhood in Portugal.

    Monday’s suit says that the promotional efforts of Ronaldo’s Binance partnership were “incredibly successful” — alleging a 500% increase in online searches using the keyword “Binance” after the soccer star’s NFTs was announced. The collection’s premium-level NFTs sold out within the first week, the suit claims.

    The suit also alleges that Ronaldo should’ve disclosed how much Binance has paid him for the partnership. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission previously noted that federal law requires celebrities to publicly disclose how much they’re getting paid to promote securities, including crypto assets.

    NFT’s brief boom

    NFTs are ordinary digital images with an attached version number that have been added to a cryptocurrency blockchain, a process designed to make them “unique” collectibles. NFTs enjoyed a brief boom, but have since largely collapsed in value as the crypto industry has been marred by scandals and market meltdowns.

    Over the summer, Binance was accused of operating as an unregistered securities exchange and violating a slew of U.S. securities laws in a lawsuit from regulators. The crypto exchange agreed last week to pay a roughly $4 billion settlement and its founder Changpeng Zhao stepped down as CEO and pleaded guilty to a felony related to his failure to prevent money laundering on the platform.

    Ronaldo is one of the most recognizable and wealthiest athletes in the world. He leads his home country Portugal’s national team and has played for the Spanish team Real Madrid, the Italian club Juventus and Manchester United in England. He now plays for the Saudi Arabian professional team Al Nassr.

    Ronaldo has continued to promote Binance on his official website and social media platforms. Most recently, on X (the platform formerly known as Twitter) Ronaldo reposted a Binance video and wrote that he was “Cooking something up” with the crypto exchange on Tuesday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ex-Trump Club Employee Sues Over Alleged Forced Sex With Boss, Illegal NDA

    Ex-Trump Club Employee Sues Over Alleged Forced Sex With Boss, Illegal NDA

    [ad_1]

    A woman formerly employed by the Trump National Golf Club filed a lawsuit against the Donald Trump-owned business Wednesday claiming she was pressured into sex by her supervisor and coerced by Trump’s personal lawyer into signing an illegal nondisclosure agreement.

    Alice Bianco filed her lawsuit against the Bedminster, New Jersey, club in the state’s Middlesex County Superior Court. In her claim, first reported by Politico, Bianco makes a series of disturbing allegations about her experience as a server at the club in 2021 when she was 21.

    Within her first month of employment, Bianco alleges, the club’s food and beverage manager, Pavel Melichar, began sexually harassing her by making her wear short uniform skirts and giving her a bottle of Cognac as a gift, which eventually led to him forcibly kidding her and asking her “what she was going to do for him” in exchange for her job security. Melichar, who was in his mid-50s, would show Bianco videos of Trump praising him “so that she knew he was powerful,” the lawsuit alleges.

    Despite Bianco’s rejections, Melichar ramped up his harassment, the lawsuit claims, and “made it clear to her that he could make her life easy or hard.” He then allegedly “began to require [Bianco] to engage in sex as a quid pro quo for continued employment and ‘protection,’ as he called it,’” over the next two months, then retaliated against her with unfair work assignments and stolen tips when she demanded an end to the sexual harassment.

    Trump’s personal lawyer Alina Habba then stepped into the fray after one of Bianco’s co-workers wrote a letter to the former president’s personal staff accusing Melichar and other supervisors of harassment, the lawsuit states. The filing claims Habba then approached her at work and said she “had heard” about her situation and could “help her,” pressuring the young woman to fire an employment lawyer she’d hired to counsel her in the matter.

    Once Bianco was without legal representation, the lawsuit claims, Habba called her to a meeting in her car, identified herself as a rape victim and told her it was in Bianco’s best interest not to go public with her claims. Instead, Habba allegedly said, her best course of action would be to sign a nondisclosure agreement. Bianco signed it without seeing a copy of the agreement and received only a “paltry settlement,” the amount of which was not stated in the lawsuit.

    The lawsuit asks the court to block the NDA’s enforcement, let Bianco keep the settlement money, force the club to pay her legal fees and refer Habba’s actions to the New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics.

    In statements to Politico, both Melichar and Habba brushed off Bianco’s claims.

    “I don’t know anything about it and I have nothing to say,” Melichar said. Habba responded: “I always conduct myself ethically and acted no differently in this circumstance.”

    The Trump National Golf Club at Bedminster did not immediately return HuffPost’s request for comment.

    Trump is not named in Bianco’s lawsuit, but at least 26 women have come forward with sexual assault or harassment allegations against him throughout his career. Earlier this year, a federal jury held him accountable in one of the most high-profile of those accusations, finding him guilty of sexually assaulting writer E. Jean Carroll in a department store dressing room in New York City in the mid-1990s.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Maryland roommates claim police detained them at gunpoint for no reason and shot by their pet dog:

    Maryland roommates claim police detained them at gunpoint for no reason and shot by their pet dog:

    [ad_1]

    Roommates who sued a Maryland county Monday claim police officers illegally entered their apartment without a warrant, detained them at gunpoint without justification and unnecessarily shot their pet dog, which was left paralyzed and ultimately euthanized.

    The dog, a boxer mix named Hennessey, did not attack the three officers who entered the apartment before two of them shot the animal with their firearms and the third fired a stun gun at it, according to the federal lawsuit.

    The lawsuit seeks at least $16 million in damages over the June, 2, 2021, encounter, which started with Prince George’s County police officers responding to a report of a dog bite at an apartment complex where the four plaintiffs lived. What happened next was captured on police body camera video and video from a plaintiff’s cellphone.

    Two officers went to the plaintiffs’ apartment to look for the dogs reportedly involved in the biting incident. A maintenance worker gave police a master key to enter the apartment after nobody answered their knocks. The third officer arrived as the other officers entered the apartment with their guns drawn.

    Police Lawsuit Dog Death
    Erika Erazo, Erica Umana, Dayri Amaya and Brandon Cuevas pose for a photo on Sept. 5, 2021, in Landover Hills, Md. 

    Marvin Joseph/The Washington Post via AP


    Two of the plaintiffs were in their bedroom when the officers entered. One of them yelled through the door that police had no right to be there, but one of the officers said they did not need a warrant because they had “probable cause,” according to the suit.

    The lawsuit claims the officers panicked and fired their weapons at the dog after it followed one of the plaintiffs out of the bedroom and approached its primary owner, Erica Umana.

    After the shooting, the officers handcuffed the roommates and left them in police vehicles for roughly one hour before releasing them from custody.

    The plaintiffs – Umana, Erika Erazo Sanchez, Dayri Amaya Benitez and Brandon Cuevas – are suing the county and the three officers.

    Umana told the Washington Post in 2021 that she had pleaded for somebody to help her wounded dog.

    “I was just begging them, begging them,” Umana said. “They just had no remorse.”

    A spokesperson for the state’s attorney office told the Washington Post that the office declined to prosecute.

    “After reviewing all of the evidence in this matter a determination was made that actions of the officers didn’t generate criminal liability because they were acting in good faith,” the office said in a statement to The Post.

    The county offered to compensate Umana for her veterinary bills if she agreed to refrain from publicly speaking about the shooting, but she rejected the offer, according to her lawsuit.

    Police and county officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the lawsuit’s allegations.

    “This lawsuit is yet another tragically foreseeable outcome of a failed and biased system of policing in Prince George’s County, to which County leadership has continually turned a blind eye,” the suit says.

    The suit says the three officers were placed on paid administrative leave while the department investigated the incident. A department investigator accused two of the officers of “conduct unbecoming an officer” for entering the apartment without a warrant, but the third officer was cleared of wrongdoing, the suit says.

    The suit accuses the officers of using excessive force, falsely arresting the plaintiffs and violating their constitutional rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.

    William “Billy” Murphy Jr., a lawyer for the roommates, represented the family of Freddie Gray, a Black man whose death in police custody in 2015 led to riots and protests in the city of Baltimore. Murphy said the Prince George’s County police officers sued Monday engaged in “outrageously flagrant misconduct.”

    “For this to be happening in 2021 blows the mind,” Murphy said. “It is in the DNA of the founding of America that you can’t do this. You can’t get a key to somebody’s house and just walk in there without getting a search warrant.”

    The lawsuit claims the Prince George’s County Police have a decades-long history of “excessive force, unlawful searches and/or seizures and police conduct within their ranks in general.” The lawsuit then lists 42 of what it called “a sampling of such incidents” — including the January 2020 killing of an unarmed Black man, William Green.

    Green was handcuffed in a police car when he was shot and killed by Michael Owen Jr., who was a 10-year veteran of the police department. Owen was arrested on a murder charge and has a trial starting this week. The county agreed to a $20 million settlement with Green’s family, which also was represented by Murphy’s law firm.

    Malcolm Ruff, an attorney who also represents the plaintiffs in Monday’s lawsuit, said Prince George’s County police officers “have no fear of reprimand, and they think that they are going to get away with treating people the way that they did.”

    “And that’s because of the history of how Prince George’s County has handled misconduct for decades,” Ruff added.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A woman was jailed for shoplifting. Weeks later, her mother got back a decaying corpse

    A woman was jailed for shoplifting. Weeks later, her mother got back a decaying corpse

    [ad_1]

    Melinda Bettencourt was still in her nightgown when the police showed up at the door. It was a slow Saturday morning last fall, but her heart raced when she heard the uneasy tone in the officer’s voice.

    The Fresno woman knew her youngest daughter, Amanda Bews, had been struggling for years. After battling a painful nerve condition, the 29-year-old started using drugs and had taken to living on the street. Eventually Bettencourt lost track of her. So when men with badges showed up at her home, Bettencourt feared she knew why — and she was right.

    Bews had been arrested on a pair of misdemeanor charges, and died in a Los Angeles County jail two days later. But the officer who showed up at her door couldn’t tell Bettencourt anything about how her daughter died.

    And a few weeks later, no one could explain what had happened to the rotting body Bettencourt saw at the funeral home.

    “She looked like she was mummified,” Bettencourt told The Times, describing the “horrible” shock of watching bugs hover around her dead daughter’s face as a foul stench emanated across the room.

    Even the pictures are gruesome: A side-shot of a face so bloated with death it’s gone flat. A close-up of skin, one patch bloodied and another so decayed it’s turned gelatinous. Part of the nose is missing, and the features are bloated beyond recognition.

    When Bettencourt saw what was left of her daughter, she screamed.

    “I couldn’t believe it was my baby,” she said.

    Earlier this month, after more than a year of looking for answers, San Diego-based attorneys Lauren Williams and Timothy Scott filed a lawsuit against county officials, jail medical providers and the funeral home that handled Bews’ body.

    “Folks whose family members die in custody are often waiting months for information about how their loved ones passed away. And even when they do find out from an autopsy, the answers are still vague — and that’s what we see here,” Williams told The Times.

    “We see a lot of facts consistent with the county failing to treat a case of alcohol withdrawal, but no one is accepting responsibility and calling it what it is,” she said. “And the same is true about any questions the family has about how and why Amanda’s body decomposed to the extent it did.”

    Citing pending litigation, the medical examiner’s office declined to comment. Both the funeral home and jail medical providers did not respond to emails this week. And the Sheriff’s Department sent a general statement, but did not address several specific questions about the case.

    “Any loss of life is tragic, especially those who are within our custody and care,” the statement said. “The Department takes every in-custody death seriously and strives to make every effort possible to prevent similar deaths in the future.”

    It was in her early 20s that Bews really started drinking. By that point, she had a husband and two children and, according to her mother, “nobody could really figure out why” her life took such a turn. But it was right around the same time her medical problems started.

    At first, Bews complained of pain in her feet and ankles, but the problem grew steadily worse. For months, doctors couldn’t figure out why, until a spinal tap revealed she had Guillain-Barré syndrome, a rare autoimmune disorder that causes the body to attack its own nerves, leading to tingling, weakness and pain.

    Sometimes, her mother said, Bews couldn’t walk or take care of herself. Then during a hospital stay, she was prescribed painkillers. Soon, she turned from prescription pills to heroin and alcohol. Eventually, she stopped coming home.

    “She just didn’t want to subject her kids to this,” Bettencourt said. “She was embarrassed.”

    By the time Bews got arrested, her mother hadn’t heard from her for three years. It was Sept. 7, 2022, and court filings show that sheriff’s deputies had picked her up in Santa Clarita for allegedly shoplifting at a BevMo. During her arrest, records show, she admitted to using heroin and said she’d been drinking.

    Before booking, the deputies took her to a nearby hospital, where records show she told the staff she had been drinking “a fifth to a handle [1.75 liters] a day” for the past six years. According to the lawsuit, they discharged her just after midnight and noted that she should go “TO ACUTE CARE FACILITY,” meaning she would need consistent monitoring and treatment once she arrived at the jail.

    Medical records shared with The Times show she was prescribed medications for anxiety, blood pressure and alcohol withdrawal. She was assigned to a cell in the 1400 Module, an intake unit where another woman had died months earlier. But just after midnight on Sept. 9, medical staff at the jail decided she was “cleared for detox” and did not require any medications.

    According to the lawsuit, that meant the jail staff stopped treating her — neither for her opioid withdrawal nor for the even deadlier alcohol withdrawal.

    When a nurse came to check on her a little over four hours later, Bews didn’t respond and her cellmate couldn’t rouse her. Deputies tried giving her an overdose-reversing drug, but it didn’t help.

    Lab tests found drugs in her system, but at such low levels that her lawyers said they were more indicative of withdrawal than overdose. And according to the autopsy report, her body also showed signs of dehydration, and there was vomit in her airways.

    “Based on the toxicology results, Amanda did not die of acute drug intoxication or drug overdose,” her lawyers wrote in the lawsuit. “Rather, Amanda died of untreated or inadequately treated effects of withdrawal from alcohol and drugs.”

    In addition to allegedly failing to treat Bews’ withdrawal, the suit says jailers also erred by not checking on her more often. Under state requirements, jailers are required to check on inmates at least once an hour. Though the autopsy makes clear that medical staff did not check on her for at least four hours, the records don’t say whether any jailers checked on her during that time, and the Sheriff’s Department did not clarify.

    Instead, this week the department told The Times Bews’ death had been thoroughly investigated and that “appropriate administrative action” was taken against “several” employees.

    After the police left the Bettencourts’ home that morning in September, Melinda sat down to cry. Her husband tried to calm her enough to call the phone number the officers had left behind, so she could talk to the Los Angeles detective in charge of the case.

    As she waited in vain for answers, Bettencourt had to figure out how to get her daughter’s body from Los Angeles to Fresno for the funeral.

    First, Bews’ body was sent to the Los Angeles County medical examiner for an autopsy, which ultimately declared her death an accident resulting from the “effects of heroin, methamphetamine and chronic alcohol use” — a description indicating Bews’ death was drug-related without clearly calling it an overdose.

    In mid-September — less than a week after Bews died — an embalmer from the Chapel of Light, a Fresno-based funeral home, came to pick up her body in Los Angeles.

    Though the Los Angeles County medical examiner’s office confirmed to The Times earlier this year that their standard practice is to refrigerate dead bodies to slow down decomposition, the embalmer — Catherine Valenzuela — later said the body she received was already noticeably decayed.

    “She was decomposed,” Valenzuela wrote in a Sept. 21, 2022, letter turned over to Bettencourt’s lawyers. “Her face has major skin slippage and discoloration was apparent throughout her remains.”

    According to Valenzuela’s letter, the smell was “so strong and offensive” that she drove with the windows down all the way back to Fresno. But according to Bettencourt, if there was already a clear problem, no one at the funeral home told her. She didn’t find out until several weeks later, when she and her husband showed up at the funeral home for a viewing just before the Oct. 7 service.

    An employee led the couple to a back room to see Bews’ remains. As she took in the scene — the bugs, the smell, the decaying flesh — Bettencourt’s heart raced and, for a moment, she thought she was dying, too.

    Afterwards, she realized it was a panic attack. She’s been having them ever since she learned of her daughter’s death — along with nightmares, anxiety and regret.

    “I had almost been hoping she would get arrested so she could get some help — and then I find out she got arrested and died,” she said. “I feel guilty for even thinking that now.”

    The lawsuit filed Nov. 17 in federal court lists 11 claims, including negligence, wrongful death and deliberate indifference. It doesn’t name a dollar amount in damages.

    But Bettencourt and her lawyers said that aside from any compensation, they hope the case leads to some accountability – and some more answers.

    [ad_2]

    Keri Blakinger

    Source link

  • 2 more women file lawsuits accusing Sean

    2 more women file lawsuits accusing Sean

    [ad_1]

    Two more women have accused Sean “Diddy” Combs of sexual abuse, one week after the music mogul settled a separate lawsuit with the singer Cassie that contained allegations of rape and physical abuse.

    Both of the new suits were filed Thursday on the eve of the expiration of the Adult Survivors Act, a New York law permitting victims of sexual abuse a one-year window to file civil action regardless of the statute of limitations.

    The filings detail acts of sexual assault, beatings and forced drugging allegedly committed in the early 1990s by Combs, then a talent director, party promoter and rising figure in New York City’s hip-hop community.

    One of the accusers, Joi Dickerson, said she was a 19-year-old student at Syracuse University when she agreed to meet Combs at a restaurant in Harlem in 1991. After their date, Combs “intentionally drugged” her, then brought her home and sexually assaulted her, according to the filing.

    Without her knowledge, Combs videotaped the assault and later shared it with several friends in the music industry, the suit alleges. The public exposure sent Dickerson into a “tailspin,” contributing to severe depression that landed her in the hospital and forced her to drop out of college, the lawsuit says.

    In a separate lawsuit filed Thursday, an unnamed woman accused Combs and an R&B singer, Aaron Hall, of sexually assaulting her and a friend, then beating her several days later.

    The woman — identified only as Jane Doe — said that she and her roommate returned to Hall’s home with him and Combs after a music industry event in 1990 or 1991. The accuser said she was coerced into having sex with Combs. Afterward, as she was getting dressed, “Hall barged into the room, pinned her down and forced Jane Doe to have sex with him,” the suit states.

    When the victim later spoke to her friend, who is also not named, she learned that her friend “had been forced to have sex with Combs and Hall in another room,” according to the suit. “Upon information and belief, when Combs finished with Jane Doe, he and Hall switched, and they commenced assaulting Jane Doe’s friend,” the suit states.

    A few days later, an “irate” Combs allegedly showed up at the home of the two women in an attempt to stop them from speaking out about the abuse. He then choked the woman identified as Jane Doe until she passed out, the suit states.

    In an emailed statement, a spokesperson for Combs denied the allegations, accusing the two women of seeking to exploit the New York law that temporarily extended the statute of limitations.

    An email inquiry to Hall was not returned.

    Tyrone Blackburn, an attorney for the unnamed accuser, said his client was in the process of securing medical documents and witness statements to support her suit, which was filed late Thursday “in an effort to preserve the statute of limitations.”

    The suit brought by Dickerson notes that the victim filed police reports in New York and New Jersey after the abuse. Inquiries to the New York City Police Department were not immediately returned. It was not clear which other jurisdictions the reports may have been filed.

    After the filmed assault, Dickerson said she approached friends in the music industry asking them to confirm the existence of the “revenge porn” tape, but was rebuffed by those who were “terrified that Combs would retaliate against them and that they would lose future business and music opportunities.”

    The Associated Press does not typically name people who say they have been sexually abused unless they come forward publicly, as Dickerson has done.

    In years after the alleged assaults, Combs, now 54, would found his own label, Bad Boys Records, helping to produce Mary J. Blige and Biggie Smalls on his way to becoming one of the most influential hip-hop producers and executives in the genre’s history.

    The pair of lawsuits follow a separate set of explosive allegations made last week by Casandra Ventura, who performs under the name Cassie, who said that Combs subjected her to a pattern of abuse during their years-long relationship, which began in 2005, when she was 19 and he was 37.

    Among the allegations, Ventura said Combs plied her with drugs, subjected her to “savage” beatings, and forced her to have sex with male prostitutes while he masturbated and filmed them. When she tried to end the relationship in 2018, Combs raped her, she alleged.

    The lawsuit was settled one day after it was filed for an undisclosed sum.

    In a statement shared by her lawyers, Ventura said she wanted to resolve this matter “on terms that I have some level of control.”

    Combs said: “We have decided to resolve this matter amicably. I wish Cassie and her family all the best. Love.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Daryl Hall Is Suing John Oates Over Plan To Sell Stake In Joint Venture. A Judge Has Paused The Sale.

    Daryl Hall Is Suing John Oates Over Plan To Sell Stake In Joint Venture. A Judge Has Paused The Sale.

    [ad_1]

    NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Daryl Hall has sued his longtime music partner John Oates, arguing that his plan to sell off his share of a joint venture would violate the terms of a business agreement the Hall & Oates duo had forged.

    The move quickly prompted a judge to temporarily block the sale while legal proceedings and a previously initiated arbitration continue.

    A Nashville chancery court judge issued the temporary restraining order on Nov. 16, writing that Oates and others involved in his trust can’t move to close the sale of their share of Whole Oats Enterprises LLP to Primary Wave IP Investment Management LLC until an arbitrator in a separately filed case weighs in on the deal, or until the judge’s order expires — typically within 15 days, unless a judge extends the deadline.

    Chancellor Russell Perkins issued the order the same day Hall filed his lawsuit, which was largely brought forth under seal, obscuring most details. An order Wednesday by the judge allowed more filings to be made public, though many details about the pair’s business agreement and the proposed sale remain under wraps.

    Writing in favor of sealing certain filings, Hall’s attorneys reasoned that it’s a private dispute under an agreement with confidential terms, concerning a confidential arbitration process.

    Although the publicly released version of the lawsuit didn’t specify what’s at stake in the sale, Primary Wave has already owned “significant interest” in Hall and Oates’ song catalog for more than 15 years. In a 2021 interview with Sky News, Hall alluded to disappointment with the sale of his back catalog.

    “Oh, in the early days, it got sold off for me and I didn’t get the money,” he said. In the same interview, he advised artists to retain their publishing rights, saying “all you have is that.”

    The lawsuit contends that Hall opened an arbitration process on Nov. 9 against Oates and the other defendants in the lawsuit, Oates’ wife, Aimee Oates, and Richard Flynn, in their roles as co-trustees of Oates’ trust. Hall was seeking an order preventing them from selling their part in Whole Oats Enterprises to Primary Wave Music.

    According to the lawsuit, Oates’ team intimated at the time that the sale could close within days, although no arbitrator had been picked yet to sort through the conflict.

    The lawsuit says Oates’ team entered into a letter of intent with Primary Wave Music for the sale, and alleges further that the letter makes clear that the music duo’s business agreement was disclosed to Primary Wave Music in violation of a confidentiality provision.

    “Thus, the entire Unauthorized Transaction is the product of an indisputable breach of contract,” the lawsuit states.

    The case will be taken up at a Nov. 30 court hearing.

    FILE – Daryl Hall and John Oates perform in Glendale, Ariz. on July 17, 2017 (Photo by Rick Scuteri/Invision/AP, File)

    The Associated Press sent emails to attorneys for both parties and to representatives for Primary Wave Music on Friday. Still unclear is whether the dispute centers on the music catalog of Hall & Oates, a soft-rock-and-pop duo best known for its No. 1 hits “Private Eyes,” “Rich Girl” and “Maneater.”

    Daryl Hall and John Oates got their start as Temple University students before signing with Atlantic Records in 1972. In the decades since, they have achieved six platinum albums and many more Top 10 singles with their unique approach to blue-eyed soul. Hall & Oates was inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame in 2014 and its latest album, “Home for Christmas,” was released in 2006. The duo continued to perform as of last year.

    “We have this incredibly good problem of having so many hits,” Oates told the AP in 2021, just before resuming a national tour that had been delayed because of the coronavirus pandemic. “Believe me, it’s not a chore to play those songs because they are really great.”

    Sherman reported from Copperas Cove, Texas.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • One-time aid to ex-Gov. Cuomo files Adult Survivors Act lawsuit over alleged Executive Mansion groping

    One-time aid to ex-Gov. Cuomo files Adult Survivors Act lawsuit over alleged Executive Mansion groping

    [ad_1]

    A former aide to ex-Gov. Cuomo filed an Adult Survivors Act lawsuit against her ex-boss, leveling accusations of “continuous sexual harassment” by the defendant followed by a job demotion after spurning his unwanted advances.

    The three-page Wednesday filing in Albany Supreme Court from one-time assistant Brittany Commisso details the alleged persistent and unwanted behavior by Cuomo that ran the gamut from sexualized remarks about her appearance to the sexual touching of her buttocks and forcible touching of her breast during her time in Albany as an executive assistant inside the state Executive Manor.

    “All of (this) was objectively unreasonable and abusive and reasonably perceived by plaintiff as being abusive,” the court filing charged. “She was required to suffer to maintain employment and avoid adverse changes in the condition and terms of employment, which in fact she later suffered in retaliation for rejecting and reporting the same.”

    FILE – In this image provided by CBS This Morning/Times Union Brittany Commisso, left, discusses her sexual harassment allegations against Gov. Andrew Cuomo, during an interview with CBS correspondent Jericka Duncan on CBS This Morning, Sunday, Aug. 8, 2021, in New York. (CBS This Morning and Times Union via AP, File)

    The lawsuit seeks punitive and compensatory damages from Cuomo and the state of New York. The Democratic politician was initially charged with a misdemeanor sex offense for the alleged groping when the two were alone in his office, with a complaint alleging he slipped a hand under Commisso’s blouse to touch her.

    “Ms. Commisso’s claims are provably false, which is why the Albany District Attorney dismissed the case two years ago after a thorough investigation,” said Cuomo attorney Rita Glavin. “Ms. Commisso’s transparent attempt at a cash grab will fail. We look forward to seeing her in court.”

    The Commisso criminal charge was actually dropped in January 2022 by Albany County District Attorney David Soares, who said he was “deeply troubled” by the woman’s groping claim during an investigation where he described her as “cooperative and credible.”

    The lawsuit charged that Commisso was demoted from her position in Cuomo’s office and given an assignment answering phones in the Lieutenant Governor’s office after rebuffing the governor. The plaintiff’s filing said she continues to “incur considerable expenses for treatment and other damages.”

    Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is pictured in Manhattan on Friday, June 12, 2020. (Theodore Parisienne for New York Daily News)

     

    Commisso was one of 11 women leveling sexual harassment charges against Cuomo, who resigned his post in August 2021 while denying the allegations even as an investigation by State Attorney General Letitia James produced a damning report implicating the governor.

    Commisso, in an August 2021 interview with “CBS This Morning,” provided a detailed account of her creepy encounter with the governor.

    “He came back to me and that’s when he put his hand up my blouse and and cupped my breast over my bra,” she alleged.”I exactly remember looking down. seeing his hand, which is a large hand, thinking to myself, ‘Oh, my God. This is happening.’ … It was – I don’t have the words. I don’t have the words.”

    State officials said more than 2,600 claims were made before the window closed on the ASA lawsuits, with allegations leveled against high profile defendants including actor Cuba Gooding Jr. and rock star Axl Rose.

    [ad_2]

    Larry McShane

    Source link

  • Lawsuit accuses actor Jamie Foxx of New York City sexual assault in 2015

    Lawsuit accuses actor Jamie Foxx of New York City sexual assault in 2015

    [ad_1]

    A woman has alleged in a lawsuit that actor, singer and comedian Jamie Foxx sexually assaulted her at a rooftop bar in New York in 2015, an incident the actor says “never happened.”

    The lawsuit filed Wednesday in state Supreme Court in Manhattan by a woman known in the documents only as Jane Doe alleges that Foxx rubbed her breasts and groped her under her pants against her will.

    The suit says she and a friend were seated at a table next to Foxx’s at Catch NYC in 2015. The woman’s asked Foxx for a photo, and the two women took several pictures with him, the suit says. It says that afterward, he began complimenting her “super model body” and told her she looked like the actor Gabrielle Union.

    He then grabbed her by the arm and took her to a secluded area, where he put both hands under her crop top and felt her breasts, the suits says. She tried to pull away from Foxx as he reached into her pants with his hands and touched her genitals, the suit also alleges.

    When the woman’s friend found them, he stopped and the women walked away, the suit says.

    In a statement provided to CBS News Thursday, a spokesperson for Foxx said “the alleged incident never happened.”

    “In 2020, this individual filed a nearly identical lawsuit in Brooklyn,” the statement read. “That case was dismissed shortly thereafter. The claims are no more viable today than they were then. We are confident they will be dismissed again. And once they are, Mr. Foxx intends to pursue a claim for malicious prosecution against this person and her attorneys for re-filing this frivolous action.”

    Jamie Foxx
    Jamie Foxx attends the European Premiere of Creed III at Cineworld Leicester Square in London, United Kingdom on Feb. 15, 2023. 

    Wiktor Szymanowicz/Future Publishing via Getty Images


    The woman is seeking damages to be determined at trial, the suit says.

    The lawsuit was one of many filed this week under a temporary New York law, the Adult Survivors Act, that allows adult victims to sue over alleged sexual attacks that previously would have been outside the statute of limitations. The law expired after Thursday.

    Rapper and entrepreneur Sean “Diddy” Combs was sued last week in federal court by singer Singer Casandra Ventura, who performs under the name Cassie, accusing Combs of rape and physical abuse during their relationship, which lasted from about 2007 to 2018.

    The two sides reached a settlement one day after the lawsuit was filed.  

    The Associated Press does not typically name people who say they have been sexually abused unless they come forward publicly.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jamie Foxx Denies Sexual Assault Accusations In “Frivolous” Lawsuit – Update

    Jamie Foxx Denies Sexual Assault Accusations In “Frivolous” Lawsuit – Update

    [ad_1]

    UPDATED 11/23 with Foxx’s statement: Jamie Foxx has hit back at a lawsuit filed Wednesday in New York, in which he is accused of a sexual assault that allegedly happened in 2015.

    “The alleged incident never happened. In 2020, this individual filed a nearly identical lawsuit in Brooklyn. That case was dismissed shortly thereafter,” a spokesperson for Foxx said Thursday. “The claims are no more viable today than they were then. We are confident they will be dismissed again. And once they are, Mr. Foxx intends to pursue a claim for malicious prosecution against this person and her attorneys for re-filing this frivolous action.”

    In the lawsuit, the 55-year-old Oscar winner (real name Eric Marlon Bishop) has been accused of placing his hands on an unidentified woman’s waist, then moving them under her top. He then allegedly began rubbing the plaintiff’s breasts, dragging her to a secluded area of the rooftop at Catch NYC & Roof, where he touched other areas of her body.

    The case was filed under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, which provides a one-year window for sexual assault plaintiffs to file civil claims, regardless of the statute of limitations. That window closes on Thursday and has led to a flurry of lawsuits claiming sexual assaults.

    Read the complete court documents here.

    Foxx won the Best Actor Oscar for his portrayal of Ray Charles in the film Ray, winning an Academy Award, BAFTA, Screen Actors Guild Award, and Golden Globe Award.

    The lawsuit claims the incident in question began when a friend of the plaintiff asked Foxx for a photo. The lawsuit said Foxx “seemed intoxicated at the time,” and said the plaintiff looked like Gabrielle Union, complimenting her on a “supermodel body” and her scent.

    When Foxx escalated his alleged physical assault, court papers claim the plaintiff tried to get away. The alleged assault finally halted when the plaintiff’s friend rushed to her aid.

    The plaintiff claims to have sought medical treatment and suffered pain as well as emotional distress “‘”as a result of the “sexual assault, abuse, assault and battery.”

    The lawsuit names Foxx and Catch, as well as its employees, and seeks compensation and punitive damages.

    Foxx’s reps have not commented on the lawsuit.

    [ad_2]

    Bruce Haring

    Source link

  • Maine Jackpot Winner Files Lawsuit to Protect Identity

    Maine Jackpot Winner Files Lawsuit to Protect Identity

    [ad_1]

    In most states across the US, lottery winners cannot remain anonymous. Even if the winnings are in the millions, most states require the winners to be identified, which can sometimes cause trouble for the lucky few. Maine is one of the states that requires winners to be identified. However, the winner of one of the largest Mega Millions jackpots in the state was able to collect their winnings through a limited liability company called LaKoma Island Investments earlier this year. This effectively enabled the person to remain anonymous and collect the grand prize.

    Now, a new report released by the Portland Press Herald suggests that the lucky winner is willing to go to great lengths to protect his identity. Reportedly, the person who won the $1.35 billion Mega Millions jackpot filed a lawsuit against the mother of his child with the US District Court in Portland. With scarce details on the topic, the lawsuit identifies the man only by a pseudonym and confirms that he currently resides in Maine. Similarly, the mother of his child was also identified with a pseudonym, but it was confirmed that she lives in Dracut, Massachusetts.

    The new lawsuit alleges that the woman breached a non-disclosure agreement that was signed with the winner of the jackpot. This agreement reportedly dates to February this year and was signed between the duo before the man claimed the Mega Millions jackpot. The winner of the jackpot alleges in his lawsuit that the mother of his child shared “protected subject matter” with two persons she was not allowed to under the non-disclosure agreement. The defendant is given time until December 6, 2023, to submit a response.

    The Lottery Winner Seeks Injunction, $100K in Damages

    The lucky winner of the $1.35 billion jackpot beat incredible odds of 1 in more than 300 million to win the grand prize. As with other big sums, the winner can select a lump cash payment or annual installment payments for the full sum. The winner from Maine selected a lump cash sum payment, taking a staggering $723.6 million. It’s important to note that lottery winnings across the US are taxable so this sum is before the applicable taxes.

    In his case against the mother of his child, the lottery winner seeks injunctive relief from a judge. Moreover, the winner is after some $100,000 in damages from the defendant.

    Undoubtedly, the lawsuit reaffirms the lottery winner’s dedication to concealing his identity. The legal claim explains that the non-disclosure agreement signed between the winner and the defendant was to address “the unique safety, security, and privacy concerns associated with winning the lottery.” The legal document confirmed that the winner wanted to protect his identity so he could avoid irreparable harm to himself and his assets.

    [ad_2]

    Jerome García

    Source link