ReportWire

Tag: Lawsuit

  • 5/3: CBS Evening News

    5/3: CBS Evening News

    [ad_1]

    5/3: CBS Evening News – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Former Trump aide Hope Hicks delivers riveting testimony in “hush money” trial; The infectious spirit of a beloved Tennessee crossing guard

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UPDATE: Diddy’s Legal Team Files Motion To Dismiss Claims In Lawsuit Alleging He Sexually Assaulted A Woman In 1991

    UPDATE: Diddy’s Legal Team Files Motion To Dismiss Claims In Lawsuit Alleging He Sexually Assaulted A Woman In 1991

    [ad_1]

    Sean “Diddy” Combs’ legal team has filed a motion to dismiss claims in a lawsuit accusing him of sexually assaulting a woman in 1991.

    RELATED: Stevie J. Shares Viral Video Of “What A Real Diddy Party Looks Like” (WATCH)

    More Details Regarding Diddy’s Reported Response To The Sexual Assault Lawsuit

    According to AP News, Combs’ legal team filed the motion on Friday, April 26. The music mogul’s legal team is reportedly asserting that Diddy cannot be sued for particular claims in the lawsuit because “certain laws didn’t exist” when the incidents allegedly occurred in 1991.

    Diddy’s legal team is reportedly asking for Joi Dickerson-Neal’s claims about “revenge porn and human trafficking” to be “dismissed with prejudice.”

    CNN notes that Combs’ attorneys are continuing to label Dickerson-Neal’s allegations “false, offensive, and salacious.” Additionally, Diddy’s attorneys are reportedly asking that “allegations against Combs’ company” be dismissed as well. To note, TMZ reports that the request refers to Diddy’s companies, “Bad Boy Records or Bad Boy Entertainment.”

    However, TMZ notes that Diddy’s team has not filed to dismiss the first “two counts” in the lawsuit. Those claims allege Combs inflicted “assault,” battery, and “intentional infliction of emotional distress” on the plaintiff.

    More Details Regarding The Lawsuit & Allegations

    As The Shade Room previously reported, Dickerson-Neal filed the suit against Combs in November 2023. Furthermore, the suit was reportedly filed under New York’s Adult Survivors Act.

    At the time, it was reported that Dickerson-Neal accused Diddy of sexually assaulting her after a date in 1991. Diddy allegedly gave the woman a drug. Then, allegedly sexually assaulted her at a music studio.

    According to AP News, the woman accused Combs of recording the assault. Additionally, she alleged he shared the footage with friends.

    In an initial response to the lawsuit, a spokesperson for the mogul reportedly denied the allegations. Additionally, they labeled the claims a “money grab.”

    “This last-minute lawsuit is an example of how a well-intentioned law can be turned on its head. Ms. Dickerson’s 32-year-old story is made up and not credible. Mr. Combs never assaulted her, and she implicates companies that did not exist. This is purely a money grab and nothing more,” their statement read, per New York Post.

    RELATED: REVOLT Reacts After Diddy Steps Down As Company Chairman Amid Assault Allegations

    [ad_2]

    Jadriena Solomon

    Source link

  • Uber Eats hit with class action lawsuit in Nevada over ‘imposter’ restaurants

    Uber Eats hit with class action lawsuit in Nevada over ‘imposter’ restaurants

    [ad_1]

    LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — A class action lawsuit filed against Uber Eats, delivery drivers and “imposter” restaurants includes racketeering allegations that dishonest operations have been going on for years.

    Four restaurant companies — Esther’s Kitchen, Babystacks Cafe, Manizza’s Pizza and Gaetano’s Ristorante — are suing to recover damages lost to companies that made and sold food using their business names, all with the ongoing cooperation of Uber Eats and their delivery drivers, according to the lawsuit. Uber Eats pocketed 30% on every transaction and failed to investigate whether the imposter restaurants were who the said they were, the lawsuit alleges.

    This week, 8 News Now reported how the owner of Manizza’s Pizza caught another business in the act impersonating her brand to fill an order.

    Uber Eats said they have paused all new applications for virtual kitchens in the Las Vegas valley and is now requiring new businesses to provide business licenses and proof of a physical address.

    The website for Esther’s Kitchen in the Arts District.

    The lawsuit estimates that at least 1,000 restaurants in the valley have been victimized, and seeks damages in excess of $15,0000 for each of those companies. Allegations of additional damages are also detailed in the lawsuit, which was filed Wednesday in Clark County District Court.

    Plaintiffs represented by Bighorn Law, a North Las Vegas law firm, argue that Uber Eats allows virtual kitchens to impersonate restaurants — deliberately.

    “The Uber Defendants set the app up in this manner intentionally to harm small restraint businesses, including Plaintiffs, in an effort to take up more of the local restaurant market share as these local restaurants were pushed out due to the impact of this fraud and conversion,” the lawsuit alleges.

    Manizza’s Pizza (KLAS)

    The setup “resulted in parties creating false identities that co-opted known restaurants brands and identities … and allowed unknown individuals to siphon business for themselves using the goodwill created by the actual business owners,” according to the lawsuit.

    The drivers are complicit because they knew the food was not coming from the actual restaurant listed in the app, the lawsuit argues.

    The lawsuit names Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, Uber Eats territory lead Berchman Melancon, two Uber Eats drivers identified only as Nick and Karina, and additional people and companies yet to be identified.

    Allegations include fraud, conversion, defamation and negligence, arguing that the actions qualify as racketeering under Nevada’s RICO statutes. Racketeering laws were widely used to combat organized crime activities.

    [ad_2]

    Greg Haas

    Source link

  • Foxtrot and Dom’s Face a Lawsuit While Former Vendors Scramble For Solutions

    Foxtrot and Dom’s Face a Lawsuit While Former Vendors Scramble For Solutions

    [ad_1]

    The debris continues to fall in Chicago where earlier this week, the city saw all 15 Foxtrot convenience stores and two Dom’s Kitchen & Market locations suddenly close. Ex-employees have filed a class-action lawsuit against Outfox Hospitality, claiming they weren’t given proper notice of mass layoffs.

    Protestors assembled Friday morning outside of Foxtrot’s commissary in Pilsen, but legal experts remain divided on whether Outfox will be held legally accountable. Earlier this year, unionized ex-workers at the Signature Room won their lawsuit that accused restaurant management of violating the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, a safe measure requiring companies to file a notice of mass layoff with the government. Eater reviewed an email sent to some ex-Foxtrot workers dated 11 p.m. Tuesday, April 23, and signed by Outfox CEO Rob Twyman notifying employees that their jobs would be immediately eliminated and stating the message was following state law. The letter does not mention the 60-day notice the law stipulates and came after the stores closed.

    Outfox formed after Chicago-based Dom’s and Foxtrot combined last year. Foxtrot debuted as a delivery-only app in 2016 that expanded into the convenience store space opening locations in Texas, and the D.C. area. Dom’s debuted in 2021 in Lincoln Park. Both entities had major designs on scaling. In the aftermath of the closures, a Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing — which former employees told Eater to look out for — has yet to pop up, clouding the picture of what went wrong. Outfox hasn’t responded to media inquiries and former vendors tell Eater they haven’t heard anything from them either. They now join the graveyard of Chicago grocery brands like White Hen Pantry, Dominick’s Finer Foods, and Moo & Oink.

    Grabbed and gone.
    John J. Kim/Chicago Tribune/Tribune News Service via Getty Images

    But as the legal theater begins to play out, workers are setting up online fundraisers and scrambling for jobs. In Chicago, the 17 potential real estate vacancies (liquidation could slow things down), are creating a feeding frenzy. Independent grocers, liquor shop owners, and would-be restaurant owners are contacting their real estate agents, hoping to cut deals with landlords on some prime retail spaces on the North Side.

    Fresh Market Place in Bucktown is an independent grocer that’s become a champion of local vendors, where many chefs from Chicago’s top restaurants shop.

    “I would, at the very least, I would listen to an offer,” Fresh Market GM Kostas Drosos says. “I definitely will inquire — or maybe I have inquired already.”

    The demand for the Foxtrot and Dom’s locations contrasts with what’s happening on the West and South sides, where residents have clamored for more investment. The city has struggled to find a tenant in Englewood to replace Whole Foods. Locals seeking an upscale retailer with a similar cachet were rendered disappointed by the pending arrival of Yellow Banana, a division of Ohio-based Save A Lot. Some Chicagoans aren’t missing Foxtrot or Dom’s. You can’t miss what you never had.

    Meanwhile, Fancy Plants Cafe owner Kevin Schuder spent much of the week trying to reach Dom’s and Foxtrot, hoping to connect them with the Great Chicago Food Depository. He’s had no luck, and his frustrations spiked after a Sun-Times report saying workers were instructed to throw away food. Drosos compares that to when Stanley’s, a tiny independent market on the corner of North and Elston Avenue, was razed in anticipation of the Lincoln Yards development. He remembers handing out business cards and hiring a few Stanley’s workers in the two weeks before its closure in 2019.

    “Stanley’s put in notice two weeks out and said ‘Come on in, guys!’” Drosos recalls. “They were giving away the food — come in, we’re going to be closing and we’re giving discounts.”

    Foxtrot and Dom’s shared some similarities, but it wasn’t a precise fit. Both wanted to attract upscale restaurant customers. They recruited chefs for cooking demonstrations and sold gourmet items with the chefs’ names. The latter was ripped from Trader Joe’s playbook. The concerns were detailed nicely earlier this month in an article by Adam Reiner in Taste.

    But as Foxtrot raced for scale, with locations in high-rent areas like Fulton Market, execs may have skipped a step in establishing community roots, something Drosos says is integral to Fresh Market’s success. In Andersonville, Foxtrot attempted to open near Andale Market, a small independent shop that stocked specialty items from the kind of vendors Foxtrot desired. Locals pushed back.

    That disconnect with Foxtrot and its community might be why Palita Sriratana says her sales at Fresh Market and Here Here Market exceeded her brand’s sales at Foxtrot. In November, her company Pink Salt was selected through Foxtrot’s Up and Comer competition, recognizing vendors selling new snacks, dips, and coffees — stuff Foxtrot wanted to scale and sell nationwide. Sriratana makes a Thai chili jam, which belongs in the same genre as chile crunch, David Chang be damned.

    Sriratana describes the terms of winning as restrictive. They sounded like the stringent restrictions reality TV show contestants face; to be considered, candidates couldn’t already be in “major retailers.” There were “unrealistic” deadlines as Pink Salt geared up for the holiday gift-giving season — Foxtrot wanted enough jars of jam to stock at 54 stores versus the eight stores initially ordered. Sriratana says “she held her breath” and carried on with production. She says the system feels “predatory to a very vulnerable group of small makers.” Pink Salt is currently free from any restrictions.

    “I feel sad for the brands that opened [production orders] and took out loans to meet their scale,” Sriratana says.

    Here Here, founded in 2021, aimed to give vendors like Sriratana more control. Disha Gulati founded the startup in 2021 to give chefs including Rick Bayless and Stephanie Izard a digital marketplace for sauces, pasta, and spices, It allowed lesser-known names a chance to establish their brands nationally. Over the past few days, Gulati and Drosos have been inundated with requests from former Foxtrot vendors wanting shelf space. Both say they’ll expedite the process to help. Gulati says she spends much of her time connecting vendors so they could better share their experiences and succeed. She feels that’s why they feel a “strong sense of community on our platform.”

    Foxtrot had an eye toward upscale customers.
    Garrett Sweet/Eater Chicago

    Gulati was careful not to villainize Outfox, saying she doesn’t know what pressures they faced: “Them going under might have been inevitable,” she says.

    But when discussing how Outfox closed without warning without informing vendors, Gulati says: “One hundred percent they should have done it differently.”

    Justin Doggett has sold his Kyoto Black bottled cold brew coffees at Foxtrot since 2021 when the store reps approached him saying they wanted to stock his coffee. He never worried about Foxtrot reverse engineering his Kyoto-style cold brews: “It’s fairly unique, it’s a very niche product,” he says.

    Foxtrot represented his biggest wholesale customer — all 15 Chicago Foxtrots stocked Kyoto Black. The sudden loss of the marketplace has forced Doggett to launch a campaign to grow his monthly subscription base, where customers would buy coffee directly from him. He says he’s had zero contact with Foxtrot since the announcement and feels blindsided.

    “Their closure represents a loss of thousands of dollars of sales per month,” Doggett wrote in a Facebook post from Tuesday, April 23. “It also devastates my brand presence. People would order from me directly all the time because they first had my coffee at Foxtrot.”

    Doggett says he made $120 in coffee deliveries on Monday. If this was in June, prime cold brew season, that delivery could have been larger. He’s looking for 800 new monthly customers; basically converting his Foxtrot customers to direct customers.

    Some independent coffee shops, the same ones that Foxtrot sought to compete with, are helping out. Side Practice Coffee and Drip Collective have offered to sell Kyoto Black while Doggett adjusts. He knows that he won’t make up for the loss immediately. He also stressed that the workers he interacted with treated him well and shouldn’t be conflated with the corporate business.

    History has repeated itself for Sriratana who has experience with start-ups suddenly closing; Pink Salt was also the name for her Thai food stall inside Fulton Galley, a food hall in Fulton Market. It closed in 2019, without warning, after being open for five months. The space — located less than a half mile west from Outfox’s headquarters — is now a Patagonia store.

    “My experience with Fulton Galley made me not trust the partnership with Foxtrot and pushed me to really value independent businesses — I cannot stress that enough,” she says.

    [ad_2]

    Ashok Selvam

    Source link

  • Reggie Bush says he is

    Reggie Bush says he is

    [ad_1]

    Reggie Bush says he is “enjoying the moment” after Heisman Trophy is reinstated – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Reggie Bush reflects on the reinstatement of his Heisman Trophy after 14 years, discusses his ongoing defamation lawsuit against the NCAA and shares his insights on the future of college football. This marks his first in-depth interview since the Heisman Trust’s decision to return the award.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • SEC prosecutors quit after ‘abuse of power’ in DEBT Box case

    SEC prosecutors quit after ‘abuse of power’ in DEBT Box case

    [ad_1]

    Two SEC lawyers, Michael Welsh and Joseph Watkins, have resigned from the agency due to “materially false and misleading representations” made in a crypto case last year.

    The pair were reportedly instructed to quit the securities regulator or be fired following their respective parts in the lawsuit against Digital Licensing Inc., commonly known as DEBT Box.

    Bloomberg first reported the news on April 22, citing unnamed sources familiar with the matter who confirmed that Welsh and Watkins bowed out from the U.S. SEC earlier this month. 

    The resignations came after Federal District Court Judge Robert Shelby reprimanded the SEC for abuse of power in the DEBT Box case, in which Welsh was the Commission’s primary attorney, and Watkins led the investigative team. 

    SEC vs. DEBT Box

    In July, DEBT Box and its founders were accused of stealing over $49 million from investors. Welsh and Watkins argued that the crypto firm was moving money offshore, petitioning Judge Shelby and the court to freeze assets. The motion was granted, and DEBT Box was placed in receivership as an extra measure. 

    However, Judge Shelby overturned his ruling after further evaluating the commission’s argument, which found that the duo made incorrect statements in court. The Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, Gurbir Grewal, later apologized for apparent misconduct, while the court decided that DEBT Box was due monetary compensation to foot legal fees. 

    Following sanctions against the Wall Street watchdog, federal prosecutors motioned to dismiss the case without prejudice. As a result, DEBT Box is suing the regulator and seeking around $1.5 million in damages.


    Follow Us on Google News

    [ad_2]

    Naga Avan-Nomayo

    Source link

  • CesiumAstro claims former exec spilled trade secrets to upstart competitor AnySignal | TechCrunch

    CesiumAstro claims former exec spilled trade secrets to upstart competitor AnySignal | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    CesiumAstro alleges in a newly filed lawsuit that a former executive disclosed trade secrets and confidential information about sensitive tech, investors and customers to a competing startup.

    Austin-based Cesium develops active-phased array and software-defined radio systems for spacecraft, missiles and drones. While phased-array antenna systems have been used on satellites for decades, Cesium has considerably advanced and productized the tech over its seven years in operation. The startup has landed more than $100 million in venture and government funding, which it has used to develop a suite of products for commercial and defense customers.

    The technology is niche: Only a handful of companies work at the cutting edge of space-based radio technology, and Cesium no doubt pays close attention to any new entrant in this field. AnySignal, a startup that came out of stealth last October but was formally incorporated in 2022, certainly caught the company’s eye, not least because it allegedly edged out Cesium in a sales bid to a major customer and by attempting to solicit the interest of one of Cesium’s early investors — both examples stated in the lawsuit.

    According to the suit, filed on March 25, these examples are directly related to former VP of Product Erik Luther’s misappropriation of trade secrets and confidential information on investors and customers, which Cesium alleges he subsequently disclosed to AnySignal. Notably, Luther did not leave Cesium to work for AnySignal, instead taking a role as head of marketing at a company that operates in a different sector entirely. But the suit says that Luther maintained “personal connections” with AnySignal’s co-founders, having worked with AnySignal CEO John Malsbury previously at a different company.

    This resulted in AnySignal “recruiting and inducing Luther … to improperly disclose” the confidential and trade secret information, the suit says. AnySignal’s CEO and CesiumAstro did not respond to TechCrunch’s request for comment; a lawyer representing Luther referred TechCrunch to the March 29 legal filings cited below.

    Cesium is clear on its position in the lawsuit: It does not believe that AnySignal could have developed its complex radio technology on its timeline and with its existing resources — “absent CesiumAstro’s technical diagrams and specifications (to which Luther had access).”

    “With only a few employees and $5 million in investor funding, [AnySignal] would not even be in the same orbit as CesiumAstro, which has spent tens of millions of dollars working with (now) 170 employees for seven years to develop its technologies,” the suit says. “But with Luther’s help, AnySignal has launched to directly compete with CesiumAstro in the specialized space for software-defined radios.”

    Luther strongly denied all the allegations in two separate documents filed with the court on March 29; regarding the claim that he worked in concert with AnySignal, he says the allegation is “not only false…but invented out of whole cloth.” (The response also denies Cesium’s claim that it is an “industry leader.”)

    Cesium “does not cite any facts or evidence whatsoever linking Luther and any of AnySignal’s business efforts and the alleged evidence that [Cesium] does cite do not support [its] contentions,” Luther’s lawyer claims in the filing. He goes on to say that Cesium takes a “Grand Canyon-sized leap from the paltry, easily explainable evidence it cites to the remarkable allegation that Luther has been secretly assisting AnySignal and feeding them [Cesium’s] trade secrets without citing any evidence whatsoever.”

    El Segundo-based AnySignal was founded in May 2022 by Malsbury and COO Jeffrey Osborne, and emerged from stealth touting $5 million in seed funding last year. The company is developing a software-defined radio platform; Cesium’s lawsuit names it as a “direct competitor.” In February, a month before the suit was filed, AnySignal announced it had landed a partnership with private space station developer Vast for an advanced communication system for Vast’s flagship station, Haven-1.

    The suit was filed in Western District of Texas under no. 1:24-cv-314.

    [ad_2]

    Aria Alamalhodaei

    Source link

  • Lawsuit alleges Detroit police commissioners ‘sabotaged’ efforts to resolve backlog of citizen complaints

    Lawsuit alleges Detroit police commissioners ‘sabotaged’ efforts to resolve backlog of citizen complaints

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Steve Neavling

    Melanie White, the former executive manager for the Detroit Board of Police Commissioners, filed a lawsuit against the city of Detroit.

    A former top executive with the Detroit Board of Police Commissioners claims in a lawsuit that she was discriminated against because of her gender and that “a clique” of commissioners “sabotaged” her attempts to resolve a backlog of hundreds of citizen complaints against cops.

    The lawsuit filed in Wayne County Circuit Court on Wednesday alleges Melanie White was unlawfully fired from her job as executive manager after she was tasked with eliminating a “massive citizen complaint backlog.”

    The suit, which names the city of Detroit and former Board of Police Commissioners Chairman Bryan Ferguson, claims she was subjected to “a campaign of vitriol, verbal bullying, harassment, character assassination, unequal treatment and violations.”

    According to the lawsuit, Ferguson and other commissioners sabotaged her efforts to close the backlog “to justify her suspension and later termination.”

    Ferguson later resigned in July 2023 after he was arrested for allegedly getting a blow job from a sex worker in his truck on the city’s northwest side.

    Despite reporting the sabotage to Mayor Mike Duggan, he did nothing to address a work stoppage by employees who disliked White, the lawsuit states.

    White’s attorney Carl Edwards says Ferguson was clearly biased against women and treated White unfairly because of her gender.

    “It’s tragic,” White’s attorney Carl Edwards tells Metro Times. “A woman with 20 years of experience with a sterling record of work performance lost her job because of a man who is a serial sex harasser who favors men over women. It’s an awful case.”

    White also helped several women coworkers file gender discrimination complaints because they were paid “substantially” less than their male counterparts.

    At that point, White had a target on her back, Edwards says.

    White took a mental health leave of absence from January to March 2023 “because of severe bullying, harassment, hatred, retaliation and discrimination” by Ferguson, the lawsuit states. During her absence, Ferguson ordered her belongings to be removed from her office and sent to a storage room, according to the lawsuit.

    Several days after she returned to work, White says Ferguson suspended her and escorted her from her workplace with the help of a “fully armed” cop.

    Less than a week later, a top city attorney notified Ferguson that the suspension was improper and violated board policies and procedures. The attorney ordered Ferguson to reinstate White, but he refused, the suit alleges.

    During the COVID-19 pandemic, citizen complaints began to pile up because of a significant reduction in staff.

    Under pressure from the public, Duggan held a meeting in January 2022 with White, police Chief James White, and several commissioners to eliminate the backlog, which had “skyrocketed,” the suit states. Duggan’s staff developed a software to monitor the progress of the work.

    In another meeting with the mayor in October 2022, White complained that some police commissioners and staff members were obstructing progress on the backlog. Since the software allowed city officials to monitor the work, Duggan’s administration should have been able to identify the saboteurs, according to the suit.

    “They didn’t have to rely on anything Melanie White said,” Edwards says. “They had direct eyes on it. That’s what makes this case so egregious. The program was being sabotaged, and they took no action. To me, it’s baffling.”

    To demonstrate that White was a good employee, the lawsuit points out that the board’s three previous chairs described her as “excellent” and “outstanding.” In October 2022, Chief White called her “an amazing professional.”

    But when Ferguson became chairman in July 2022, White’s “job performance was consistently and unfairly criticized,” the suit states.

    Duggan’s office declined to comment. Metro Times couldn’t reach Ferguson for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Steve Neavling

    Source link

  • Naked inmate ‘left to die alone’ in pool of blood, Nevada suit says. Mom wants answers

    Naked inmate ‘left to die alone’ in pool of blood, Nevada suit says. Mom wants answers

    [ad_1]

    A mother has filed a lawsuit over the death of her son, who she says was beaten to death by corrections officers at a Nevada prison.

    A mother has filed a lawsuit over the death of her son, who she says was beaten to death by corrections officers at a Nevada prison.

    Getty Images/istockphoto

    After Christian Walker was transferred to a different Nevada prison, he died within two days, according to a lawsuit filed over his death.

    His mother reportedly learned corrections officers brutally beat him, twice, before he was “left to die alone in a cell,” the lawsuit says.

    The day after Walker’s arrival at High State Prison in Clark County, he was admitted to a Las Vegas trauma center with severe injuries and needed 17 stitches, mostly on his head, in April 2023, a complaint states.

    UMC Trauma Center’s intake records say the 44-year-old inmate was hit in the head, possibly with a baton, and that he didn’t “remember what happened,” according to a complaint filed April 11.

    Walker returned to prison hours later after he was treated and discharged, according to the complaint.

    The next evening, a porter brought Walker a dinner tray and found him naked in his cell, underneath his metal bed frame “in a fetal position, with blood and bruises all down his back and legs” and “lying in a pool of blood, moaning,” the complaint says.

    According to the complaint, the porter called two officers over to Walker’s cell, but no member of the jail staff, including medical personnel, checked on him the entire night of April 14, 2023.

    Corrections officers are accused of beating Walker with batons before and after his stay at the trauma center, according to the complaint, which says they also punched, kicked and pepper sprayed him.

    The morning of April 15, 2023, a first responder responded to Walker’s cell after a report of a cardiac arrest, and he was pronounced dead, the complaint says.

    However, it’s believed Walker died the night before, as suggested by the discoloration of Walker’s skin noticed by the first responder on his “badly beaten body,” according to the complaint.

    Prison officials and the Clark County Office Of The Coroner/Medical Examiner are accused of working together to cover up how he died. A copy of the coroner’s autopsy report provided to McClatchy News lists his manner of death as “natural.”

    Annette Walker, his mother, said at an April 12 news conference that her son “was beaten to death.”

    She is suing the Nevada Department of Corrections, its director James Dzurenda and several prison officials, correctional officers and other prison staff members. The county coroner is also listed as a defendant.

    In an emailed statement, William C. Quenga, the department’s public information officer, told McClatchy News that “we are aware of the lawsuit and cannot comment on active case.”

    The county declined a request for comment, as county officials cannot comment on pending litigation, public information officer Stephanie Wheatley told McClatchy News via email.

    The complaint says “This lawsuit stands for something much larger than Christian….It stands as a loud, strong signal to NDOC officials that their careless attitude towards cruelty will no longer be tolerated.”

    Christian’s final days

    Walker had been incarcerated for more than two decades before he died, and was convicted of second-degree murder in connection with killing his girlfriend in 1997, the Las Vegas Sun reported in 2001, when his appeal to reduce his conviction to manslaughter was denied.

    Annette Walker said her son “was not perfect,” and described him as “the greatest gift in my life.”

    While serving his sentence at Southern Desert Correctional Center until his transfer to High Desert State Prison “due to a medical episode,” Annette Walker said her son became a minister, earned his master’s degree and “wanted to use his story to help others avoid the mistakes he made.”

    Annette Walker had Dr. Lary Simms, who previously worked as the county’s medical examiner, review the county’s autopsy report on her son’s death, according to the complaint.

    The coroner’s autopsy report says Walker’s cause of death was “hypertensive cardiovascular disease,” which contributed to his “natural” death.

    Simms disagreed with the findings, and suggested “blunt head trauma” caused Walker’s death instead and that he died of brain swelling, the complaint says.

    An anonymous letter dated June 2023 was sent to a nonprofit organization to “expose” what really happened to Walker and how there’s been many “unusual” prison deaths, according to the lawsuit. The name of the nonprofit was not specified in the lawsuit.

    The letter says it was written by employees of the Nevada Department of Corrections.

    Photos of Walker included in the complaint show him after he died. The images are graphic, showing his swollen, bloody and bruised face.

    A hope for ‘meaningful changes’

    At the news conference, Annette Walker said her lawsuit isn’t about “vengeance.”

    “I am seeking answers. Answers to why my son was murdered, why the system that was supposed to help him, and others, rehabilitate, ended up being where his life was taken,” she said.

    “Christian’s death raises serious questions about the treatment of inmates, about the conditions within our prisons, and about the very nature of our justice system,” Annette Walker also said.

    “I miss my son very much every day…Christian Walker’s life mattered, and it is up to us to ensure that his story is heard and that meaningful changes follow,” she added.

    Julia Marnin is a McClatchy National Real-Time reporter covering the southeast and northeast while based in New York. She’s an alumna of The College of New Jersey and joined McClatchy in 2021. Previously, she’s written for Newsweek, Modern Luxury, Gannett and more.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Officer uses chain to strangle man in solitary confinement as guards watch, lawsuit says

    Officer uses chain to strangle man in solitary confinement as guards watch, lawsuit says

    [ad_1]

    A Georgia corrections officer strangled a pretrial detainee in solitary confinement and other officers watched, according to a federal lawsuit.

    A Georgia corrections officer strangled a pretrial detainee in solitary confinement and other officers watched, according to a federal lawsuit.

    Screengrab via Wukela Communications on YouTube

    Inside a solitary confinement jail cell in Georgia, a pretrial detainee restrained to a chair freed his right arm from a restraint.

    When he did, four Appling County Jail corrections officers entered Tremar Harris’ cell to secure him again on Jan. 29, 2022, according to a new federal lawsuit. That’s when one of them used a chain to strangle him, the suit says.

    Officer William Rentz wrapped an unused leg restraint around Harris’ neck and pulled it against his throat for about four seconds before letting go, according to a complaint filed April 16 in the Southern District of Georgia.

    The complaint includes a photo from jail surveillance footage showing the chain around Harris, who had his eyes closed and mouth open. Rentz is seen standing over him, holding the chain around his neck, according to the complaint. The photo shows three other officers looking down at Harris.

    As Rentz choked Harris, he’s accused of saying: “Gonna put you back in the cotton field with the other boys” in an apparent reference to slavery, according to the complaint.

    Meanwhile, corrections officers Daydan Brannon, Cannon Mcleod and Ansley Fennell watched and didn’t try to stop or report the “unlawful use of force,” the complaint says.

    Rentz was fired after the incident, according to the complaint. And the next month, he was arrested on charges of aggravated assault, violation of oath of office and one count of battery in connection with assaulting Harris as he was restrained, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation announced in February 2022.

    In March 2023, Rentz was indicted on charges of simple battery and violation of oath by a peace officer, according to the indictment provided to McClatchy News by Cheryl A. DiPrizio, the executive assistant for the Brunswick Judicial Circuit’s district attorney’s office.

    His criminal case is still pending, records show.

    Four months ago, Harris sued Rentz in federal court over the strangulation incident, accusing him of cruel and unusual punishment in violation of his constitutional rights, according to a complaint filed Jan. 19.

    Now, Harris’ latest lawsuit names Brannon, Mcleod and Fennell, who are all employed by the Appling County Sheriff’s Office, as defendants. He accuses them of also violating his rights by failing to intervene on Jan. 29, 2022.

    The Appling County Sheriff’s Office didn’t respond to a request for comment from McClatchy News on April 17. Information regarding Brannon, Mcleod and Fennell’s legal representation wasn’t available.

    Patrick T. O’Connor, an attorney defending Rentz in the civil case, told McClatchy News on April 17 that his client “did not choke Mr. Harris.”

    “Mr. Rentz never made the offensive comments falsely attributed to him,” O’Connor also said in an emailed statement.

    Harris’ most recent lawsuit says he feared he could potentially die as Rentz choked him.

    At the time, Harris was detained at the Appling County Jail on a misdemeanor charge, specifically possession of a drug related object, his attorney Harry M. Daniels told McClatchy News.

    In jail, Rentz is also accused of “excessively” shocking Harris inside his cell with a “shock shield” that delivers electrical shocks, according to the complaint.

    Rentz did so hours before strangling Harris, according to the separate complaint filed against Rentz in January.

    After Harris was repeatedly shocked, he was restrained in the restraint chair and left alone in his cell for hours, the complaint says.

    The status of the criminal case

    In December, Rentz pleaded not guilty to the charges against him in the criminal case in Appling County Superior Court, records show.

    He was due in court for a calendar call on April 2, according to court records.

    This “is often the last court date before jury selection at trial,” according to the Turner Law Firm in Savannah.

    McClatchy News contacted defense attorneys representing Rentz in the criminal case for comment and didn’t receive an immediate response.

    It’s unclear when Rentz is due back in Superior Court.

    As for Brannon, Mcleod and Fennell, Harris’ lawsuit says “they had the ability, opportunity, skill and time to prevent and immediately stop Officer Rentz from strangling (Harris).”

    “Instead of doing their jobs stopping this unlawful, hateful and sadistic act, they chose to stand and watch as their fellow officer tortured a fellow human being,” Daniels said in an April 17 news release.

    Julia Marnin is a McClatchy National Real-Time reporter covering the southeast and northeast while based in New York. She’s an alumna of The College of New Jersey and joined McClatchy in 2021. Previously, she’s written for Newsweek, Modern Luxury, Gannett and more.

    [ad_2]

    Julia Marnin

    Source link

  • Eastpointe agrees to unique settlement after ex-mayor’s public meeting outburst

    Eastpointe agrees to unique settlement after ex-mayor’s public meeting outburst

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Courtesy of Mary Hall-Rayford

    Mary Hall-Rayford is one of four plaintiffs who filed a lawsuit against Eastpointe Mayor Monique Owens.

    A group of First Amendment attorneys reached a unique and powerful settlement with the city of Eastpointe after its then-mayor shouted at residents and refused to let them speak during a public meeting in September 2022.

    As part of the lawsuit settlement, the city agreed to designate Sept. 6, the day that Eastpointe Mayor Monique Owens shouted down residents, as “First Amendment Day.”

    On Tuesday, the council also voted to apologize to the residents — Mary Hall-Rayford, Karen Beltz, Karen Mouradjian, and Cindy Federle — and entered into a consent decree prohibiting the city from enforcing unconstitutional limitations on the public criticizing elected officials.

    Each of the plaintiffs also received $17,910 in addition to attorneys’ fees.

    The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) filed the lawsuit in U.S. District Court in November 2022, alleging the mayor violated the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of four residents who tried to criticize Owens at a public meeting.

    “The First Amendment protects every American’s right to criticize government officials,” FIRE attorney Conor Fitzpatrick tells Metro Times. “With this settlement, Eastpointers can have confidence their voices will be heard and local governments can be left with no doubt there are serious consequences for violating the First Amendment.”

    click to enlarge Ex-Eastpointe Mayor Monique Owens. - City of Eastpointe

    City of Eastpointe

    Ex-Eastpointe Mayor Monique Owens.

    The first-term mayor, who was later convicted of fraudulently applying for a $10,000 COVID-19 grant, prevented residents from speaking during the September 2022 meeting, insisting they had no right to criticize her. As the meeting descended into chaos, with Owens berating a resident for explaining the First Amendment, the council’s four other elected members walked out of the meeting and didn’t return.

    It wasn’t the first time Owens prevented residents from criticizing her during the council’s public comment period. According to the lawsuit, Owens frequently used her authority “to suppress dissent and criticism by interrupting and shouting down members of the public who criticize her or raise subjects she finds personally embarrassing.”

    Owens, the city’s youngest and first Black mayor, ran for reelection last year but didn’t collect enough votes during the primary election to advance to the November general election.

    Former Councilman Michael Klinefelt is now the mayor of Eastpointe.

    Fitzpatrick says the settlement is a victory for free speech rights everywhere in America.

    “Regular Americans should feel comfortable going to their local government or school board meeting and make their views heard,” Fitzpatrick says. “This is what American democracy is about. There are some countries where you can be put in jail for criticizing a public official or asking the wrong question. Luckily that is not the case in the United States of America, and the U.S. Constitution makes sure that is not the case.”

    At the September 2022 meeting, residents were questioning Owens’s actions after she alleged that Councilman Harvey Curley, who is in his 80s, assaulted her by yelling and putting his hands in her face during the open ceremony for Cruisin’ Gratiot in June 2022. Owens was trying to speak at the event, but Curley was opposed, explaining that he didn’t want to politicize the event since it was operated by a nonprofit.

    The Macomb County Sheriff’s Office dismissed the case, and the Macomb County Circuit Court denied Owens’s request for a personal protective order.

    Hall-Rayford, a community activist, school board member, and former chaplain, was the first to speak at the September meeting, but she didn’t get far.

    “I’m going to stop you right there,” Owens said as soon as Hall-Rayford began to speak. “We’re going to stop the council meeting because I’m not going to let you speak on something that has to do with police.”

    City attorney Richard S. Albright informed Owens that she didn’t have the right to prevent a resident from speaking.

    As part of the lawsuit in December 2022, the city agreed to prohibit Owens from interrupting or shutting down speakers during public comment periods.

    [ad_2]

    Steve Neavling

    Source link

  • Douglas County sues State of Colorado over what it calls ‘unconstitutional’ immigration laws

    Douglas County sues State of Colorado over what it calls ‘unconstitutional’ immigration laws

    [ad_1]

    DOUGLAS COUNTY, Colo. — Douglas County has filed a lawsuit against the State of Colorado over what it’s calling “unconstitutional” immigration laws that “prohibit local government from cooperating with federal immigration.

    The lawsuit was filed Monday morning.

    It targets two laws signed by Gov. Jared Polis in recent years. The first is House Bill 19-1124, which prohibits law enforcement from assisting in non-criminal immigration and prohibits probation officers from giving information to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement or ICE. The second law this lawsuit targets is House Bill 23-1100, which prohibits local governments from entering into intergovernmental agreements with the federal government for civil immigration enforcement.

    Douglas County Commissioners George Teal, Abe Laydon and Lora Thomas were joined by other local leaders Monday morning as they announced the lawsuit.

    “It is our intent to bring suit specifically to address the illegal immigration crisis,” said Commissioner Teal.

    Commissioner Teal, along with others, said during the press conference that the purpose of the lawsuit is to prevent an influx of immigrants in Douglas County, like the one seen in Denver in the past year.

    “Federal policies along the southern border has resulted in an unlimited string of illegal immigrants into our communities and we see it as the duty of the county to push back against the state laws that prohibit us from working with federal authorities to keep Douglas County and our communities safe,” Teal said.

    David Walcher, undersheriff for the Douglas County Sheriff’s Office, said if successful, the lawsuit would allow law enforcement officers to have more communication with federal officials, like ICE.

    Douglas County sues State of Colorado over what it calls ‘unconstitutional’ immigration laws

    “What we need is communication and cooperation, and probably most importantly, information sharing with our federal partners,” he said. “I would really like to see more information sharing so we can act upon what we learned from our federal partners, and they can act upon what they learned from us.”

    El Paso County also joined in on the lawsuit against the state. El Paso County Commissioner Carrie Geitner was present during the press conference as well. She echoed the same message Douglas County Commissioners had, saying law enforcement officials in that community want more enforcement abilities.

    “We are very frustrated and our sheriff is very frustrated with the way that his hands have been tied in the effort to keep our community safe,” Geitner said.

    Gov. Polis’ office said they will not comment on pending litigation.


    The Follow Up

    What do you want Denver7 to follow up on? Is there a story, topic or issue you want us to revisit? Let us know with the contact form below.

    [ad_2]

    Veronica Acosta

    Source link

  • Atrium Health shared patient data with Facebook, class-action lawsuit alleges

    Atrium Health shared patient data with Facebook, class-action lawsuit alleges

    [ad_1]

    A federal lawsuit filed Wednesday against Atrium Health alleges that the hospital network allowed Facebook to get patient information to use for targeted ads.

    A federal lawsuit filed Wednesday against Atrium Health alleges that the hospital network allowed Facebook to get patient information to use for targeted ads.

    Kaiser Health News

    A class-action lawsuit filed in North Carolina accuses Atrium Health of allowing Facebook and Google to access patient information online to use in targeted ads.

    The plaintiffs, identified only as North Carolina-resident J.S. and Michigan-citizen J.R., allege they received spam mail and Facebook ads related to their medical conditions after sharing information with Atrium.

    Facebook’s Meta Pixel, a free piece of code that can be installed on websites, intercepted private information on Atrium’s website in violation of federal law, the lawsuit alleges. It was filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina.

    Atrium is a Charlotte-based healthcare organization with seven emergency departments, 40 hospitals, and 1,400 other care locations across North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Alabama, according to its website. It sees about 34,000 patients a day, the lawsuit says. It is part of Advocate Health, the third-largest nonprofit health system in the United States.

    Screenshots filed with the federal lawsuit show how Pixel collected information by following the plaintiffs’ searches for pulmonology, neurology, radiology and emergency departments, as well as COVID testing locations and alcohol-rehab centers. The plaintiffs allege they first discovered misconduct in June 2022.

    U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina

    J.R. — an Atrium patient of nearly 20 years — alleges that Facebook and other social media started to push medication and prescription ads into her feed after she submitted “protected health information,” including specific symptoms and treatments, to Atrium.

    Pixel followed search activity on Atrium’s website before patients logged in to their portal, the lawsuit alleges.

    “The full scope of [Atrium’s] interceptions and disclosures of … communications to Meta can only be determined through formal discovery,” says the new lawsuit.

    A screenshot filed in a federal lawsuit shows how Atrium Health allowed Facebook to get patient information to use for targeted ads.
    A screenshot filed in a federal lawsuit shows how Atrium Health allowed Facebook to get patient information to use for targeted ads. U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina

    The lawsuit indicates Atrium removed Pixel “following a wave of negative press and litigation against other healthcare companies for the same unlawful activities.”

    A 2022 investigation by nonprofit newsroom The Markup named North Carolina’s Atrium Health Carolinas Medical Center, Duke University Hospital, Novant Health and WakeMed. The Markup found that 33 of the top 100 hospitals in America use the Meta Pixel.

    Also in 2022, Meta was sued in the Northern District of California after a Facebook user began receiving targeted ads for heart and knee conditions she entered in her private patient portal at the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center.

    Atrium’s actions, according to the lawsuit, violated those patients’ expectations of privacy and constituted “criminal conduct.”

    Atrium Health did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Julia Coin covers local and statewide topics — including destructive fires, illegal gambling and the pervasiveness of drugs in schools — as The Charlotte Observer’s breaking news and courts reporter. Michigan-born and Florida-raised, she studied journalism at the University of Florida, where she covered statewide legislation, sexual assault on campus and Hurricane Ian’s destruction.
    Support my work with a digital subscription

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Goofy sued for negligence, inflicting trauma, in Disneyland collision

    Goofy sued for negligence, inflicting trauma, in Disneyland collision

    [ad_1]

    Oh, Goofy, what have you done now?

    Katrina Amian Redfern Griffin was bent over, tying her daughter’s shoes during a trip to Disneyland in April 2022, when a park employee dressed as Goofy — the klutzy but lovable cartoon canine — barreled straight into her, according to a lawsuit she filed in Orange County Superior Court.

    Then, she claims, he fell on top of her with all of his weight, driving her into the “hard cement floor.”

    Griffin suffered “severe, traumatic, debilitating, and permanent” physical injuries from the collision, along with emotional pain and suffering, she said.

    Now, Griffin is suing Disneyland, the unnamed employee inside the Goofy costume, and Goofy’s “handler,” another employee who was supposed to guide the big, silly character around the park to make sure he didn’t bump into anything, according to the lawsuit.

    Representatives for Disney did not immediately respond to a request for comment Friday evening.

    Personal injury lawsuits might not be the most pressing issue for Disney lawyers right now. The entertainment empire is embroiled in a number of high-profile legal battles that have placed it on the front lines of the nation’s culture wars.

    The movie division fired actor Gina Carano from the film “The Mandalorian” in 2021 after her social media posts questioned the results of the 2020 election and likened the treatment of American conservatives to German Jews during the Holocaust.

    Carano, in turn, sued Disney for wrongful termination, claiming she had been fired for standing up to the “online bully mob who demanded her compliance with their extreme progressive ideology.”

    In Florida, Disney is fighting an extended court battle with Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, who took political control of the land upon which Walt Disney World sits after company officials opposed the state’s “Don’t Say Gay” law, which bans classroom lessons on sexual orientation and gender identity in early grades.

    But even as other issues swirl, injuries at Disney theme parks, the company’s bread and butter, have continued to make headlines.

    In October, Emma McGuinness sued Walt Disney World, claiming she had suffered a nightmarish “wedgie” on the park’s Humunga Kowabunga water slide.

    Online marketing for the slide promises the “ride of your life” and that “you won’t know what’s coming as you zoom 214 feet downhill in the dark and spray your way to a surprise ending!”

    McGuinness’ surprise was severe and permanent bodily injury, according to her lawsuit.

    Specifically, when she neared the pool at the bottom of the giant drop, her legs came uncrossed, allowing clothes and water to be “violently forced inside her” by the impact.

    She went to the hospital with severe vaginal lacerations and her bowel protruding through her abdominal wall, among other internal injuries, the suit claimed.

    Griffin, the woman who said she was bowled over by Goofy at Disneyland, did not provide details of her physical injuries in her lawsuit.

    She is asking Disney to pay for her medical bills and lost earnings and to compensate her for the physical, mental and emotional pain she says she suffered.

    Neither Griffin nor her attorney could be reached for comment on Friday.

    [ad_2]

    Jack Dolan

    Source link

  • Wayne County public defender sues judges for alleged bias against lower-income defendants

    Wayne County public defender sues judges for alleged bias against lower-income defendants

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Attorney Sundus Jaber filed a whistleblower lawsuit against 35th District Court over the treatment of her indigent clients.

    A young public defender claims in a federal lawsuit that she was pushed out of her job at 35th District Court in Plymouth for passionately fighting on behalf of her lower-income clients.

    Sundus K. Jaber filed a whistleblower lawsuit in U.S. District Court in late March, claiming she was prevented from representing indigent defendants in criminal cases in Judge James Plakas’s courtroom in retaliation for vigorously defending her clients.

    Jaber, a Muslim who wears a hijab, says she was mistreated and harassed by judges and their staff at the expense of her clients.

    On her first day as a public defender, Judge Ronald Lowe advised Jaber that she would be removed if she fights too much on behalf of her clients, saying she “needs to understand that 95% of the people she will represent are guilty,” according to the lawsuit.

    Lowe then said, “If you contest more than 5% of cases, we will boot you out of here,” the suit alleges.

    Lowe’s alleged remarks fly in the face of the 6th Amendment, which entitles criminal defendants to “effective assistance of counsel,” regardless of their income.

    “The ability of a person charged in the criminal system to pay for counsel should not dictate whether they receive constitutionally-sound representation that is free from interference by the judiciary,” the lawsuit states.

    Jaber, who became a licensed attorney in 2020, says the experience has been eye-opening and disheartening, but she won’t be deterred.

    “It is hard to be a young lawyer trying to build her skills and reputation, and realizing how much power a judge has to influence your career and standing in the legal community,” Jaber tells Metro Times. “It has been difficult to stay working under these conditions and worry about whether my belief in providing a vigorous defense will hurt my career. But I know I’m doing the right thing.”

    Numerous studies nationwide have shown that public defenders grapple with overwhelming caseloads, hindering their ability to offer adequate legal support to individuals charged with crimes.

    After Jaber launched complaints that her indigent defendants were mistreated at the hands of Plakas, Lowe, and court staff, the judges asked for her removal.

    Jaber filed her complaints with the Regional Managed Assigned Counsel Office (RMACO), which is a nonprofit that assigns public defenders to district courts in Wayne County. According to the suit, RMACO Director Teresa Patton, who originally recruited Jaber to serve as one of the two lead public defenders for the 35th District Court, didn’t take her complaints seriously and refused to meet with Jaber after she retained counsel.

    On Feb. 13, Patton notified Jaber that she could only represent indigent clients in front of Judge Michael J. Gerou, one of three judges for the 35th District Court. The move cut “her workload and thus her income by half,” the lawsuit states.

    Patton warned Jaber that if she filed a lawsuit over the issue, she would be removed entirely from the court system.

    The lawsuit alleges the judges and RMACO violated her First Amendment Rights, the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, and the Michigan Whistleblower Protection Act.

    Jaber says her experience demonstrates the systematic mistreatment of indigent defendants at 35th District Court, which has a reputation among criminal defense attorneys of being unfair to defendants, especially those who cannot afford to hire their own attorneys.

    “Wayne County has a difficult time recruiting a criminal defense attorney to accept appointments for indigent defendants at the 35th District Court because of the Court’s reputation among the bar as being generally inhospitable to public defenders who vigorously defend cases and generally allowing its staff to be extremely and inappropriately hostile,” the suit alleges.

    Four defense attorneys told Metro Times on condition of anonymity that they try to avoid the 35 District Court because their clients often receive unfair treatment.

    “It is hard enough to be a defendant in this justice system, and I always wonder if you can ever get a fair shake,” Jaber says. “When a court and its personnel treat people like this, I know it makes defendants lose hope and faith that the outcome is unfair. Defendants represented by someone who won’t put the work into their defense can face potential life-changing consequences with longer loss of liberty or more serious convictions that affect their future, even at the district court level.”

    Metro Times couldn’t reach the 35th Circuit judges or RMACO for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Steve Neavling

    Source link

  • Portland Public Schools And After-School Program Sued After A 9-Year-Old Girl Is Allegedly Raped – KXL

    Portland Public Schools And After-School Program Sued After A 9-Year-Old Girl Is Allegedly Raped – KXL

    [ad_1]

    PORTLAND, Ore. – (AP) – A young girl and her guardian have sued an Oregon nonprofit organization, Portland Public Schools and Multnomah County for $9 million, alleging they were negligent when male classmates sexually abused her at school and raped her during an after-school program when she was a nine-year-old third grader.

    The child, who is now 11, attended a Portland elementary school and an after-school program operated by Multnomah County on her school campus in partnership with Latino Network and Portland Public Schools.

    The lawsuit says the girl was subjected to multiple episodes of nonconsensual sexual touching during school hours. In March 2022, she hit a male classmate in the face to protect herself when he touched his mouth to hers, but the lawsuit said the school suspended both her and her attacker for the incident.

    The next month, two other male students trapped her in a bathroom stall during recess at their after-school program and raped her, the lawsuit said. The school learned about the assault when the parent of one of the male perpetrators heard about it from their child and reported it.

    The lawsuit alleges the school and after-school program failed to immediately notify law enforcement and undertook an internal investigation. It says school district personnel interviewed the girl without notifying law enforcement or her parents of the sexual assault or about their interview.

    The school suspended the two males for one day and said they would stay in school with a safety plan. But the girl’s father didn’t believe this would keep his daughter safe and so enrolled her and her younger brother in another Portland public school. Both the girl and her brother missed almost one month of schooling as a result.

    The lawsuit said Portland Public Schools should have known that the plaintiff was vulnerable and at risk of continued sexual assault by male students. It alleges the school district was negligent in failing to adequately train and teach students about appropriate sexual boundaries and how to report abuse.

    The lawsuit alleges the school system made the plaintiff feel that she would be reprimanded if she protected herself from unwanted sexual contact. It says the school system was negligent for failing to report the student’s vulnerabilities to after-school program staff and to train employees to monitor, recognize and report child sex abuse.

    It alleges Latino Network and Multnomah County were negligent for failing to maintain awareness of students during the after-school program and adequately train after-school program employees to monitor, recognize and report child sexual grooming and abuse.

    Portland Public Schools said in a statement that it learned of these new allegations when it received the lawsuit, and it is investigating. It said it is required to report any instance of possible child abuse and neglect to the Oregon Department of Human Services, and such reports are confidential.

    “We take our responsibilities as mandatory reporters seriously and follow the law around reporting,” it said.

    Multnomah County said it does not comment on pending litigation. Latino Network said the news of the lawsuit is “painful” to the organization, which is committed to trauma-informed practices.

    “We take the allegations very seriously and are working with our legal representation to provide counsel to our organization,” it said.

    The lawsuit was filed on March 20 in Circuit Court in Multnomah County.

    More about:

    [ad_2]

    Grant McHill

    Source link

  • Kanye West Wanted A ‘Jail’ At His School, Students’ Heads Shaved: Lawsuit

    Kanye West Wanted A ‘Jail’ At His School, Students’ Heads Shaved: Lawsuit

    [ad_1]

    Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, has been sued by an ex-employee who says that the controversial rapper made discriminatory remarks and compared himself to Adolf Hitler while running his Los Angeles-area private school, where he allegedly wanted children to be locked in cages and have shaved heads.

    Trevor Phillips filed suit in Los Angeles Superior Court on Tuesday, accusing Ye of creating a hostile work environment and then retaliating when Phillips spoke up about unsafe work conditions and other issues at Donda Academy.

    Representatives for Ye did not immediately respond to HuffPost’s request for comment.

    According to suit, Phillips was first hired by the rapper to work on Yeezy, his apparel brand, around November 2022, at a time when multiple businesses were breaking ties with Ye for going on a series of antisemitic tirades in public.

    Phillips was then brought on at Donda Academy. In the suit, he says that while working for the school, he heard Ye make various remarks targeting gay and Jewish people, such as: “Yeah I am going for the gays! FIRST the Jews, THEN the gays.”

    He also says that he was ordered to do dangerous electrical work at the campus, and that he saw the rapper treating Black members of the school’s staff “considerably worse than white employees.”

    Ye is shown in Los Angeles in November 2022. A former employee alleges that the rapper created a hostile work environment at his Donda Academy.

    Phillips claims he also heard Ye telling two students that “he wanted them to shave their heads and that he intended to put a jail at the school — and that they could be locked in cages.”

    When Phillips raised concerns about Ye’s conduct, the suit says the musician “responded mercilessly, with incessant harassment, humiliation, and attempts to both mentally control, and destroy, Phillips.”

    The suit includes screenshots of a text message attributed to Ye, where he tells Phillips, “I am on some complete Hitler level stuff,” before adding, “Minus the gas chambers.”

    Phillips’ suit says that Ye appeared to fire and rehire him at random, but that he was dismissed for the final time during a Sunday service at the school last May.

    During the incident, he claims that Ye confronted him over a garden project and screamed, “I was going to punch you in the face,” in front of dozens of staff members and students.

    Phillips is seeking more than $35,000 in damages, according to the complaint.

    He is not the first to take legal action related to Ye and Donda Academy. Three former teachers and an ex-assistant principal have also sued, alleging discrimination and wrongful termination.

    Their complaints have revealed other strange details about Donda Academy, which allegedly served only sushi at lunchtime and banned chairs from campus.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ex-deputy says he was fired after refusing to affiliate with alleged deputy gang

    Ex-deputy says he was fired after refusing to affiliate with alleged deputy gang

    [ad_1]

    A former Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputy says he was fired after refusing to take part in law enforcement gang activity, according to a lawsuit filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court.

    Federico Carlo, the ex-lawman behind the suit, alleges he was wrongly accused of giving a Nazi salute and sharing a sexually explicit photo, then “abruptly terminated” by a “tattooed Regulator deputy gang member” who is now the acting commander overseeing training and personnel.

    The acting commander, Capt. John Pat Macdonald, did not respond to a request for comment, and the department did not answer questions about whether he has or had a Regulator tattoo.

    “The department has not officially received this claim but strives to provide a fair and equitable working environment for all employees,” officials wrote in an emailed statement to The Times. “Any act of retaliation, harassment, and discrimination will not be tolerated and is a violation of the department’s policy and values.”

    Neither Carlo nor his attorney offered comment for this story. Carlo sued the county and is asking for unspecified damages.

    The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department has long been plagued by allegations that some of its highest-ranking officials sport tattoos representing exclusionary deputy subgroups. Last month, former Undersheriff Tim Murakami admitted under oath that he once had a tattoo associated with an East Los Angeles Station group known as the Cavemen.

    Last year, the news site Capital & Main reported that current Undersheriff April Tardy admitted to having a station tattoo that some in the department said signified the V Boys deputy gang. And in 2022, Larry Del Mese, chief of staff to former Sheriff Alex Villanueva, publicly admitted membership in the Grim Reapers.

    Yet last week sheriff’s officials told The Times the issue is “not reflective of the entire department” and pointed out that there are “multiple investigations related to deputy gangs” currently underway, and that a new anti-gang policy is being negotiated with the deputy labor unions.

    For decades, the Sheriff’s Department has been bedeviled by allegations about gangs of deputies running roughshod over certain stations and floors of the jail. The groups are known by monikers such as the Executioners, the Vikings and the Regulators, and their members often bear the same sequentially numbered tattoos.

    The group at the center of Carlo’s lawsuit, the Regulators, is typically affiliated with the Century Sheriff’s Station in Lynwood. It is one of the older deputy subgroups in the department, and it is commonly represented by the symbol of a skeleton in a cowboy hat. In recent years there have been some indications — including in a Rand Corp. study commissioned by county lawyers — that the group is no longer actively adding new members. Late last year, though, oversight officials spotted a Regulators sticker outside the Century Regional Detention Facility next door to the station.

    The suit filed in late February traces Carlo’s problems back to 2005, when, he alleges, a deputy who was then the leader of the Regulators labeled him a “rat” because he refused to lie on probable cause reports.

    A few years later, the suit says, two other alleged Regulators flunked Carlo out of training for the airborne division, which, he alleges, “had everything to do” with the fact that he “was not a member of a deputy gang and refused to violate the law.”

    By mid-2019, Carlo was working at the department’s Emergency Vehicle Operations Center in Pomona as an instructor. He clashed with some of the other instructors who he said were risking safety by cutting corners to save time. After he complained and asked to be moved to another shift, tension started building between him and some of the other instructors — one of whom challenged him to a fight, according to the lawsuit. Later, that same deputy allegedly created disturbances, once by disrupting a class Carlo was teaching and another time by nearly crashing a patrol car into another deputy.

    Eventually, Carlo reported the problems to his superiors. During a meeting with his lieutenant in 2022, Carlo allegedly told him that there had been “numerous vehicle collisions” caused by instructors, and that he’d even been hurt in one such crash himself. According to the lawsuit, when Carlo questioned why the lieutenant hadn’t done more to supervise the training, the lieutenant ordered him to rewrite the unit’s safety guidelines and give a briefing to the whole unit on them.

    That March, according to the lawsuit, Carlo found out that a complaint had been filed against him alleging he’d made a Nazi salute when speaking about a sergeant with a German-sounding name.

    A few weeks later, the suit says, Carlo was temporarily transferred out of the unit, as officials investigated the complaint. Near the end of summer, Carlo’s lieutenant called to tell him he’d be coming back to the training center — only to reverse course a few days later because another complaint had been filed against him, this time for sexual harassment.

    It emerged that after the unit briefing that Carlo’s lieutenant instructed him to do earlier that year, two of the deputies who attended started talking and allegedly realized Carlo had shown them both an explicit picture on his phone. They said he’d implied it was an image of him and a female sergeant, according to the lawsuit. One of the deputies was the instructor who’d previously challenged Carlo to a fight.

    “This was false,” the suit said. “No such photo ever existed.”

    Though in 2022 officials closed the complaint about the Nazi salute — an accusation Carlo also denied — they kept investigating the sexual harassment complaint, according to the suit. In 2023, after what the lawsuit described as “years of retaliation, harassment [and] discrimination,” Carlo was fired.

    “On April 13, 2023, plaintiff was terminated under false pretenses,” the suit says. “Captain Pat [Macdonald], the supervisor who made the decision on plaintiff’s termination, is a tattooed Regulator deputy gang member.”

    Department officials confirmed to The Times that Carlo “separated from the department” last April after an internal investigation. But they did not comment on the accusations about Macdonald’s alleged Regulators tattoo, and they did not answer questions as to whether he is still believed to have it.

    The Regulators have long been the subject of misconduct allegations. Nearly two decades ago, The Times reported on allegations that members of the group extorted money from other deputies, acted like gang members and controlled shift scheduling and administration at the station.

    At the time, some in the department compared the Regulators to the earlier Lynwood Vikings, a now-defunct group once described by a federal judge as a “neo-Nazi white supremacist gang.”

    Deputies with Regulators tattoos told The Times then that they didn’t do anything inappropriate and had been unfairly maligned. They said their ink represented a close-knit group of deputies who worked hard.

    “It’s like the all-stars of a baseball team,” one tattooed deputy said at the time. “You get the best.”

    [ad_2]

    Keri Blakinger

    Source link

  • Signature Room Workers Win $1.5 Million Lawsuit Against Their Former Bosses

    Signature Room Workers Win $1.5 Million Lawsuit Against Their Former Bosses

    [ad_1]

    Six months after closing, workers from the Signature Room have won a $1.5 million lawsuit against their former employers as a federal judge ruled that Infusion Management Group broke Illinois law by failing to give workers proper notice of their decision to shutter, which happened on September 28.

    Unite Local No. 1 represented 132 former workers at the restaurant that stood on the 95th floor of the Hancock Center. State law, under the Workers Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, mandates employers to inform their employees with a 60-day notice of their decision to close. This applies to workplaces with 75 or more full-time employees. The $1.5 million is for back pay and benefits. That total comes out to about $11,363 per worker if it’s divided equally. The court ruling was made on March 14, according to the Sun-Times. The paper also reports workers celebrated with a cake decorated with the words “Justice is served.” Infusion wasn’t reached for comment.

    Tortilla plant workers file NLRB complaint

    Seven months after factory workers from El Milagro tortillas won an NLRB complaint against their employers, workers from another Chicago tortilla factory are claiming their employers aren’t treating them fairly. On Thursday, Authentico Foods workers filed a retaliation complaint with the NLRB as a news release from Arise Chicago says employees at Authentico’s Archer Heights factory have been threatened with layoffs. Arise, a faith-based worker’s rights group that’s done labor organizing in Chicago’s Spanish-speaking communities frames the threat as retaliation for worker protests that have dated back to 2022. Authentico is the maker of the popular supermarket brands El Ranchero and La Guadalupana. Inspired by their peers at El Milagro, workers at Authnetico’s three plants claim similar complaints — abusive managers, low pay, and insufficient breaks under state law.

    One Off launches app

    One Off Hospitality, the owners of Big Star, the Publican family of restaurants, Avec, and influential cocktail bar Violet Hour, have launched an app with a customer loyalty program. The 27-year-old group, founded in 1997 when Blackbird opened in West Loop, is one of the city’s most recognized groups thanks to partners Donnie Madia, executive chef Paul Kahan, Eduard Seitan, Peter Garfield, Terry Alexander, and the late Rick Diarmit.

    The app offers discounts with a points system based on customer spending and allows One Off to better track customer preferences. In a news release, CEO Karen Browne says the project has been years in the making and that made sense “as a growing restaurant group.”

    One Off joins Lettuce Entertain You Enterprises as Chicago-based restaurant groups with apps and programs.

    [ad_2]

    Ashok Selvam

    Source link

  • Lawsuit seeks to save trees, protect residents at contaminated AB Ford Park in Detroit

    Lawsuit seeks to save trees, protect residents at contaminated AB Ford Park in Detroit

    [ad_1]

    Three Detroit residents filed a lawsuit against the city this week in hopes of halting a controversial plan to remove more than 250 trees from AB Ford Park and cover the contaminated park in two feet of new soil.

    The lawsuit, filed in Wayne County Circuit Court on Monday, alleges the city violated the Michigan Environmental Protect Act and is endangering residents by exposing them to toxic pollutants.

    The residents — Terry Swafford, Brenda Gail Watson, and Emma Miller — are seeking “protection of the air, water, and other natural resources and the public trust in these resources from pollution, impairment, or destruction,” according to a lawsuit filed by their lawyer Lisa Walinske of the Detroit East Community Law Center.

    Walinske tells Metro Times that she plans to file an emergency preliminary injunction later this week to stop the work until the city pulls the proper permits and provides sufficient evidence through scientific tests that its proposed solution won’t endanger residents.

    In late February, the city announced that it was closing the waterfront park in the Jefferson Chalmers neighborhood to begin removing the trees, some of which are more than 100 years old and are used by bald eagles and other wildlife.

    The city insists the trees won’t survive after crews cover the 32-acre park in two feet of fresh soil.

    The plan comes nearly two years after environmental testing uncovered excessive levels of arsenic, mercury, lead, barium, cadmium, copper, zinc, volatile organic compounds, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the soil.

    Despite this, the city kept a large portion of the park open to the public without revealing the findings. The test results weren’t disclosed until after Metro Times raised questions about why the city hadn’t been more transparent about the findings.

    Despite increasing concerns about the park, the Detroit City Council unanimously approved the renovation plan on Tuesday.

    The lawsuit also alleges the city’s plan will increase pollution in the neighborhood because an average of 20 to 30 heavy trucks will trudge through nearby streets every day from March to September to cover the park in new soil.

    In addition, the lawsuit claims the city’s plan will destroy habitat, cause soil erosion, and increase the risks of floods because the additional soil will raise the level of the river’s edge, blocking stormwater runoff.

    The city “is not taking sufficient remediation steps to ensure that the soil contamination does not harm the visitors to the park, does not harm the adjoining waterway and does not have a negative environmental effect on the Park’s ecosystem,” the lawsuit states.

    In effect, the city’s plan to cover the contaminated soil in even more dirt will “encapsulate toxic pollutants” at the edge of the Detroit River without remediating the contamination, the lawsuit alleges. Since the park is in a designated floodplain, excessive rain could cause the toxic pollutants to spread.

    The lawsuit also raises concerns about a large mound of “toxic soil” at the park’s entrance that is across the streets from homes. The dirt was dumped there during previous renovations, and the contamination is spreading “with each passing breeze.”

    After the remediation, the city plans to include walkways, a playground, basketball court, fitness and picnic areas, tennis and pickleball courts, a fishing node, beach, and waterfront plaza.

    [ad_2]

    Steve Neavling

    Source link