ReportWire

Tag: LAW

  • Newsom signs formal apology for California’s role in slavery

    Newsom signs formal apology for California’s role in slavery

    [ad_1]

    Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a formal apology for California’s role in slavery and legacy of racism against Black people as part of a series of reparations bills he approved Thursday.

    “The State of California accepts responsibility for the role we played in promoting, facilitating, and permitting the institution of slavery, as well as its enduring legacy of persistent racial disparities,” Newsom said in a statement. “Building on decades of work, California is now taking another important step forward in recognizing the grave injustices of the past — and making amends for the harms caused.”

    Though California banned slavery in its 1849 Constitution, the state had no laws that made it a crime to keep someone enslaved or require that they be freed, which allowed slavery to continue. A disproportionate representation of white Southerners with pro-slavery views also held office in the Legislature, state court system and in its congressional delegation.

    Assembly Bill 3089, which requires the state to issue a formal apology, also mandates that the California install a plaque memorializing the apology in the state Capitol. Assemblymember Reggie Jones-Sawyer (D-Los Angeles), who introduced the bill, called it a “monumental achievement.”

    “Healing can only begin with an apology,” Jones-Sawyer said in a statement. “The State of California acknowledges its past actions and is taking this bold step to correct them, recognizing its role in hindering the pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness for Black individuals through racially motivated punitive laws.”

    Despite the bill signings, advocates for reparations have criticized the governor and Democratic lawmakers for making meager progress on its “first in the nation” effort to study, propose and adopt remedies to atone for slavery that began in 2020.

    After a state task force spent two years developing recommendations for the Legislature, the California Legislative Black Caucus announced a package of priority bills in January focused largely on enacting policy changes in education, healthcare and criminal justice, while omitting cash payments in light of the state’s financial troubles.

    Advocates for reparations have criticized Newsom and Democratic lawmakers for making meager progress on the issue.

    (Laurel Rosenhall / Los Angeles Times)

    Newsom also signed bills to provide new oversight of book bans in California prisons, require that grocery stores and pharmacies give written notice at least 45 days before closing, expand a state law prohibiting discrimination based on hairstyle to include youth sports and to try to increase and track participation in career training education among Black and low-income students, among other legislation.

    But the governor took heat when the Legislature refused to take up other bills for a vote that would have created a California American Freedmen Affairs Agency and established a Fund for Reparations and Reparative Justice to pay for and carry out reparations policies approved by lawmakers.

    A day before signing the legislation issuing a formal apology, Newsom vetoed two other reparations bills. One sought to begin the process of reversing racially motivated land and property seizures under the Freedman Affairs agency that lawmakers declined to approve. The other would have expanded Medi-Cal coverage, pending federal approval, to include benefits for medically supported food and nutrition.

    “This bill would result in significant and ongoing general fund costs for the Medi-Cal program that are not included in the budget,” Newsom wrote in his veto statement.

    [ad_2]

    Taryn Luna

    Source link

  • California governor signs laws to protect actors against unauthorized use of AI

    California governor signs laws to protect actors against unauthorized use of AI

    [ad_1]

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed off Tuesday on legislation aiming at protecting Hollywood actors and performers against unauthorized artificial intelligence that could be used to create digital clones of themselves without their consent.The new laws come as California legislators ramped up efforts this year to regulate the marquee industry that is increasingly affecting the daily lives of Americans but has had little to no oversight in the United States.The laws also reflect the priorities of the Democratic governor who’s walking a tightrope between protecting the public and workers against potential AI risks and nurturing the rapidly evolving homegrown industry.“We continue to wade through uncharted territory when it comes to how AI and digital media is transforming the entertainment industry, but our North Star has always been to protect workers,” Newsom said in a statement. “This legislation ensures the industry can continue thriving while strengthening protections for workers and how their likeness can or cannot be used.”Inspired by the Hollywood actors’ strike last year over low wages and concerns that studios would use AI technology to replace workers, a new California law will allow performers to back out of existing contracts if vague language might allow studios to freely use AI to digitally clone their voices and likeness. The law is set to take effect in 2025 and has the support of the California Labor Federation and the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, or SAG-AFTRA.Another law signed by Newsom, also supported by SAG-AFTRA, prevents dead performers from being digitally cloned for commercial purposes without the permission of their estates. Supporters said the law is crucial to curb the practice, citing the case of a media company that produced a fake, AI-generated hourlong comedy special to recreate the late comedian George Carlin’s style and material without his estate’s consent.“It is a momentous day for SAG-AFTRA members and everyone else because the AI protections we fought so hard for last year are now expanded upon by California law thanks to the legislature and Governor Gavin Newsom,” SAG-AFTRA President Fran Drescher said in a statement. “They say as California goes, so goes the nation!”California is among the first states in the nation to establish performer protection against AI. Tennessee, long known as the birthplace of country music and the launchpad for musical legends, led the country by enacting a law protecting musicians and artists in March.Supporters of the new laws said they will help encourage responsible AI use without stifling innovation. Opponents, including the California Chamber of Commerce, said the new laws are likely unenforceable and could lead to lengthy legal battles in the future.The two new laws are among a slew of measures passed by lawmakers this year in an attempt to reign in the AI industry. Newsom signaled in July that he will sign a proposal to crack down on election deepfakes but has not weighed in other legislation, including one that would establish first-in-the-nation safety measures for large AI models.The governor has until Sept. 30 to sign the proposals, veto them or let them become law without his signature.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed off Tuesday on legislation aiming at protecting Hollywood actors and performers against unauthorized artificial intelligence that could be used to create digital clones of themselves without their consent.

    The new laws come as California legislators ramped up efforts this year to regulate the marquee industry that is increasingly affecting the daily lives of Americans but has had little to no oversight in the United States.

    The laws also reflect the priorities of the Democratic governor who’s walking a tightrope between protecting the public and workers against potential AI risks and nurturing the rapidly evolving homegrown industry.

    “We continue to wade through uncharted territory when it comes to how AI and digital media is transforming the entertainment industry, but our North Star has always been to protect workers,” Newsom said in a statement. “This legislation ensures the industry can continue thriving while strengthening protections for workers and how their likeness can or cannot be used.”

    Inspired by the Hollywood actors’ strike last year over low wages and concerns that studios would use AI technology to replace workers, a new California law will allow performers to back out of existing contracts if vague language might allow studios to freely use AI to digitally clone their voices and likeness. The law is set to take effect in 2025 and has the support of the California Labor Federation and the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, or SAG-AFTRA.

    Another law signed by Newsom, also supported by SAG-AFTRA, prevents dead performers from being digitally cloned for commercial purposes without the permission of their estates. Supporters said the law is crucial to curb the practice, citing the case of a media company that produced a fake, AI-generated hourlong comedy special to recreate the late comedian George Carlin’s style and material without his estate’s consent.

    “It is a momentous day for SAG-AFTRA members and everyone else because the AI protections we fought so hard for last year are now expanded upon by California law thanks to the legislature and Governor Gavin Newsom,” SAG-AFTRA President Fran Drescher said in a statement. “They say as California goes, so goes the nation!”

    California is among the first states in the nation to establish performer protection against AI. Tennessee, long known as the birthplace of country music and the launchpad for musical legends, led the country by enacting a law protecting musicians and artists in March.

    Supporters of the new laws said they will help encourage responsible AI use without stifling innovation. Opponents, including the California Chamber of Commerce, said the new laws are likely unenforceable and could lead to lengthy legal battles in the future.

    The two new laws are among a slew of measures passed by lawmakers this year in an attempt to reign in the AI industry. Newsom signaled in July that he will sign a proposal to crack down on election deepfakes but has not weighed in other legislation, including one that would establish first-in-the-nation safety measures for large AI models.

    The governor has until Sept. 30 to sign the proposals, veto them or let them become law without his signature.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • NYC bills propose sign marking Wall Street as first slave market, along with reparations study

    NYC bills propose sign marking Wall Street as first slave market, along with reparations study

    [ad_1]

    New York City lawmakers approved legislation Thursday to study the city’s significant role in slavery and consider reparations to descendants of enslaved people.

    If signed into law, the package of bills passed by the City Council would follow in the footsteps of several other municipalities across the U.S. that have sought ways to address the country’s dark history, as well as a separate New York state commission that began working this year.

    New York fully abolished slavery in 1827. But businesses, including the predecessors of some modern banks, continued to benefit financially from the slave trade — likely up until 1866. The lawmakers behind the proposals noted that the harms caused by the institution are still felt by Black Americans today.

    “The reparations movement is often misunderstood as merely a call for compensation,” Council Member Farah Louis, a Democrat who sponsored one of the bills, told the City Council on Thursday. She explained that systemic forms of oppression are still impacting people through redlining, environmental racism and services in predominantly Black neighborhoods that are underfunded.

    The bills still need to be signed by Democratic Mayor Eric Adams. City Hall signaled his support in a statement calling the legislation “another crucial step towards addressing systemic inequities, fostering reconciliation, and creating a more just and equitable future for all New Yorkers.”

    The bills would direct the city’s Commission on Racial Equity to suggest remedies to the legacy of slavery, including reparations. It would also create a truth and reconciliation process to establish historical facts about slavery in the state.

    One of the proposals would also require that the city install an informational sign on Wall Street in Manhattan to mark the site of New York’s first slave market, which operated between 1711 and 1762. A sign was placed nearby in 2015, but Public Advocate Jumaane D. Williams, a Democrat who sponsored the legislation, said its location is inaccurate.

    The commission would work with the existing state commission, which is also considering the possibility of reparations. A report from the state panel, which held its first public meeting in late July, is expected in early 2025. The city effort wouldn’t need to produce recommendations until 2027.

    The city’s commission was created out of a 2021 racial justice initiative during then-Mayor Bill de Blasio’s administration, which also recommended the city track data on the cost of living and add a commitment to remedy “past and continuing harms” to the city charter’s preamble.

    “Your call and your ancestors’ call for reparations had not gone unheard,” Linda Tigani, executive director of the racial equity commission, said at a news conference ahead of the council vote.

    A financial impact analysis of the bills estimated that the studies would cost $2.5 million.

    New York is the latest city to study reparations. Tulsa, Oklahoma, where a notorious massacre of Black residents took place in 1921, announced a similar commission last month.

    Evanston, Illinois, became the first city to offer reparations to Black residents and their descendants in 2021, including distributing some payments of $25,000 in 2023, according to PBS. The eligibility was based on harm suffered as a result of the city’s discriminatory housing policies or practices.

    San Francisco approved reparations in February, but the mayor later cut the funds, saying that reparations should instead be carried out by the federal government. California budgeted $12 million for a reparations program that included helping Black residents research their ancestry, but it was defeated in the state’s Legislature this month.

    [ad_2]

    The Associated Press

    Source link

  • Gun control foes push to repeal restrictions

    Gun control foes push to repeal restrictions

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Opponents of Massachusetts’ new gun control law are gearing up to repeal the tough restrictions, which they say will hurt businesses, cost jobs and deprive people of their constitutional rights.

    A law signed by Democratic Gov. Maura Healey in July expanded the state’s bans on “assault” weapons and high-capacity magazines, outlawed so-called “ghost” guns and set new restrictions on the open carry of firearms, among other provisions.

    The move was in response to concerns about mass shootings and gun violence.

    But critics of the new restrictions say they are unconstitutional and argue the changes will do little to reduce gun violence. They’ve started gathering signatures on petitions to put a repeal of the law before voters in the 2026 elections.

    The chief organizer of the repeal effort, Cape Cod Gun Works owner Toby Leary, said on Thursday that the petition-gathering effort is well underway and he is seeing strong support for putting the question on the ballot.

    “A lot of businesses and jobs are at stake,” Leary said during a livestreamed briefing sponsored by the state’s Republican Party. “The effects of this law on businesses will be catastrophic. Jobs will be lost. Businesses and livelihoods will be lost.”

    Leary said among the many concerns gun shop owners have about the new restrictions is that the expansion of banned firearms will reduce the kinds of rifles and other weapons that can be sold in the state, which will hurt bottom lines. He estimates about 50% of his business will be “put on hold” if the law isn’t repealed.

    “But this is also about freedom,” Leary said. “This law is so unconstitutional on every level. A lot of ordinary people are going to run afoul of this law.”

    Massachusetts already has some of the toughest gun control laws in the country, including real-time license checks for private gun sales and stiff penalties for gun-based crimes.

    Gun control advocates argue the strict requirements have given the largely urban state one of the lowest gun-death rates in the nation, while not infringing on the right to bear arms.

    Despite those trends, Democrats who pushed the gun control bill thorough the Legislature argued that gun violence is still impacting communities across the state whether by suicide, domestic violence or drive-by shootings.

    Second Amendment groups have long argued that the tougher gun control laws are unnecessary, and punish law-abiding gun owners while sidestepping the issue of illegal firearms.

    The new law, which passed despite objections from the Legislature’s Republican minority, added dozens of long rifles to a list of prohibited guns under the assault weapons ban, and outlawed the open carry of firearms in government buildings, polling places and schools, with exemptions for law enforcement officials.

    It sets strict penalties for possession of modification devices such as Glock switches that convert semi-automatic firearms into fully automatic, military-style weapons. The state’s red flag law, which allows a judge to suspend the gun license of someone deemed at risk to themselves or others, was also expanded under the law.

    The repeal effort is one of several seeking to block the law. The Massachusetts Gun Owners’ Action League, which is affiliated with the National Rifle Association, plans to file a federal lawsuit seeking to overturn the new law’s training and licensing requirements. Other legal challenges are expected.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Increased Traffic Enforcement Efforts Curb Dangerous Driving in Tampa

    Increased Traffic Enforcement Efforts Curb Dangerous Driving in Tampa

    [ad_1]

    Increased traffic enforcement efforts try to curb dangerous driving in Tampa, with a particular focus on the Courtney Campbell Causeway over the extended Labor Day weekend. This increased presence resulted in a significant number of traffic stops and citations, highlighting the department’s commitment to public safety.

    Over the extended weekend, officers conducted 207 total traffic stops along the Courtney Campbell Causeway, issuing 103 warnings and 106 citations for speeding. Citywide, officers conducted 1,183 traffic stops, issuing 1,012 warnings and 531 citations.

    Dangerous Driving Tampa According to Tampa Police, the goal for the weekend operation was to balance education and enforcement. Drivers were reminded of the importance of obeying traffic rules and sharing the road responsibly. However, the department also made it clear that street racing and takeovers are not tolerated in the City of Tampa.

    “Our officers, whether in cars, on motorcycles, or in the air, are dedicated to ensuring the safety of our community,” said Tampa Police Chief Lee Bercaw. “The Labor Day weekend operation is just one example of their everyday commitment to reducing traffic-related incidents and ensuring our roads are safe for everyone.”

    In one notable incident, just before 2:00am on September 1st, Tampa Police officers responded to an attempted street takeover event near the Tampa Convention Center. A BMW sedan was observed entering the intersection and performing burnouts and slides before heading southbound on Franklin St. onto Harbour Island. Aviation officers provided ground units with the vehicle’s updated location and direction of travel. The car was stopped, and the driver, 18-year-old Elian Michele, was arrested for Unlawful Racing on a Highway While Engaged in a Coordinated Street Takeover, and two narcotics charges. The BMW was impounded. This remains an active investigation, according to local law enforcement.

    “Those who engage in such reckless and dangerous behavior will face the full consequences of the law,” said Chief Bercaw, reiterating the department’s stance on street racing and takeovers. “It should be clear that this type of activity is not tolerated in Tampa. You will be caught, you will be arrested, and your car will be seized.”

    The Tampa Police Department reminds the community of the following consequences if they are involved in or spectating dangerous driving like illegal street racing, takeovers, or stunt driving:
    •    Suspect(s) can be charged with a third-degree felony
    •    Suspect(s) can be fined up to $4,000
    •    Vehicles can be seized or impounded
    •    Suspect(s) can lose their license for two years
    •    Spectators can be fined

    If you see a street takeover or illegal street racing, do not engage. Leave the area and report it immediately by calling 911.

    In Hillsborough County, the final results of Operation Summer’s End, a joint-agency enforcement initiative focused on addressing DUI (Driving Under the Influence) and BUI (Boating Under the Influence) offenses in Central Florida were also recently announced.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • New York Cracked Down on Airbnb One Year Ago. NYC Housing Is Still a Mess

    New York Cracked Down on Airbnb One Year Ago. NYC Housing Is Still a Mess

    [ad_1]

    It’s been one year since New York enacted a law that barred most whole-apartment rentals for short-term stays on platforms like Airbnb. Since then, the number of stays under 30 days has plummeted in the city, but Airbnb is raising questions about whether the lawmakers’ stated goals—lowering rents and opening up apartments for full-time residents—have been achieved.

    Airbnb fought New York’s Local Law 18 in court, calling it a “de facto ban” on the platform, but failed to block it. Now, the company is asking New York to reconsider. In a recent post, the company called the outcomes of the law “predictable.” In the city, rent prices remain high and housing availability low; hotel prices have seen small increases, too. “The data is showing the law isn’t working,” Theo Yedinsky, vice president of public policy at Airbnb, tells WIRED. “We’re asking for what I think are pretty reasonable, sensible changes.”

    The law only allows people to rent out rooms in their homes to two guests for stays shorter than 30 nights, and requires hosts to register their apartments with the city. For stays under 30 nights, hosts must be home. (Entire apartments and homes can still be found on platforms like Airbnb, Vrbo, and Booking.com, but must be rented for 30 nights or longer.) Yedinsky says Airbnb is calling for New York to let people rent out their full primary residence when they’re away for short periods of time, and to undo a regulation mandating that there be no locks on internal doors in under-30-night stays.

    When New York passed the law, it was seen by many as a test case for ways to rein in short-term rentals. Other cities around the world have grappled with how to regulate rentals, which can bring noise and parties, and may siphon off housing for locals to tourists. (In 2022, more apartments were listed on Airbnb than were available for long-term lease in New York. Many of those listings were illegal, but the city lacked an enforcement mechanism until last year.) This summer, Barcelona went even further than New York, announcing that all short-term rentals will be barred from the city come late 2028.

    Those opposing the law say the regulations are onerous. They block not just megalandlords, but many one- and two-family homeowners from making spare income to offset their own housing costs. In the days after the law took effect, the number of short-term rentals on Airbnb fell by 15,000, a nearly 70 percent drop. The impact has been most dramatic outside of Manhattan. Some neighborhoods in surrounding boroughs have seen the number of short-term rental listings drop by 90 percent since the law took effect, according to data analytics firm AirDNA.

    As of July, in New York there were just over 5,000 short-term rentals on Airbnb, but more than 32,000 stays available for 30 or more nights, according to Inside Airbnb, a housing advocacy group that tracks the platform. Those figures suggest that many short-term stays haven’t been converted to yearlong leases, but instead remain on Airbnb as mid-length stays.

    [ad_2]

    Amanda Hoover

    Source link

  • Objections filed as Steward pushes for sale of hospitals

    Objections filed as Steward pushes for sale of hospitals

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — As Steward Health Care prepares to make the case in federal court Wednesday that the deals it reached to sell four Massachusetts hospital facilities should be quickly approved, a number of others would like to have a word — including key lenders for the bankrupt company, the Archdiocese of Boston, and the Internal Revenue Service.

    The blur of activity includes ongoing negotiations between Steward and Massachusetts state government over a second, and larger, infusion of public funding that the company says is required to keep its hospitals here open until the sales close, possibly on Sept. 30.

    Massachusetts aided Steward with $30 million to stay afloat in August and now is poised to provide the company another $42 million in payments and advances by the end of this week, according to a court filing late Monday.

    An array of objections have been lodged in U.S. Bankruptcy Court since Steward announced the hospital sales. A sale hearing is scheduled for 11 a.m. Wednesday, when Judge Christopher Lopez will weigh whether the deals are the best possible way for the company to wind down operations and maximize the value the assets return for its lenders and creditors. Steward says they are and should be approved.

    The court is likely to consider an objection filed by the “first in, last out” or FILO lenders that have pumped hundreds of millions of dollars into Steward as the company headed for bankruptcy. Those lenders said they “cannot possibly consent to the proposed sales of the Massachusetts Hospitals in their current form, and they do not.”

    “The Debtors’ sale process has resulted in bids for the Massachusetts Hospitals for an aggregate purchase price of $343 million, subject to certain adjustments … However, this figure is misleading as the entirety of the Purchase Price will be allocated towards the real property and therefore flow to benefit the purported landlord (MPT and Macquarie) and more specifically will flow to the purported landlord’s secured lender,” the FILO lenders wrote in the objection.

    The objection from the IRS relates to a section of each asset purchase agreement that says Steward has filed all of its tax returns. The federal government says that isn’t actually the case, echoing the way state government was repeatedly frustrated by Steward’s failure to file financial disclosures.

    “The United States states that either the terms of the respective Asset Purchase Agreements should be revised to correctly reflect that certain required federal tax returns for certain of the Seller Debtors have not been filed with the IRS and that the applicable Seller Debtor has a legal obligation to file such tax return,” or the court should require Steward to file the returns in question before the transactions close, the U.S. Department of Justice wrote on behalf of the IRS.

    The limited objection from the Archdiocese of Boston stems back to the history of many Steward hospitals as part of the Caritas Christi network. The church said its sale of the hospitals to Steward in 2010 was the best option “that would allow the Hospitals to continue to operate as Catholic health care facilities.”

    An agreement between the archdiocese and Steward requires the company to return any and all religious items and remove “all symbols of Catholic identity (e.g. interior signage, trade and service marks associated with Catholic identity in both paper and electronic form) and cease using a list of Catholic-related names.

    The church said it would object to the hospital sales “to the extent that the Debtors seek to transfer the Restricted Names or the Religious Items or authorize the buyers to continue to use symbols of Catholic identity,” but added that it appears no such transfer is contemplated. That suggests that there will be new names for St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, the Holy Family hospitals, St. Anne’s Hospital and Good Samaritan Medical Center, since the church says Steward “acknowledged and agreed that the … names were ‘integrally related’ to the Hospitals’ Catholic identity.”

    [ad_2]

    By Colin A. Young | State House News Service

    Source link

  • Grand Theft Auto Comes To Life In Punk Singer’s Alleged Crime Spree And High-Speed Chase

    Grand Theft Auto Comes To Life In Punk Singer’s Alleged Crime Spree And High-Speed Chase

    [ad_1]

    Sometimes we come across news that makes it seem is if there are real lifeGrand Theft Auto” characters walking among us. Take the lead singer of an LA punk band who made his way to the other wise peaceful region of Yosemite National Park and allegedly spent the day tearing shit up in a very un-punk way.

    The LA Times reports that Anthony Mehlhaff — lead singer of a punk band called Cancer Christ — may have turned into a real life Trevor from GTA V on August 21. According to local authorities, Mehlhaff began his Yosemite visit by harassing a pregnant waitress at a restaurant. It only got wilder from there, according to the Times:

    The front man for a hardcore Los Angeles punk band named Cancer Christ faces a slate of criminal charges after allegedly going on a “terrorizing trek” through Yosemite National Park and surrounding areas Wednesday, according to local law enforcement.

    Anthony Mehlhaff, 40, allegedly assaulted a restaurant employee, led park rangers on a car chase, crashed the car, stole a bicycle and then threatened workers at another lodge with a knife, according to Mariposa County Sheriff Jeremy Briese.

    Then, Mehlhaff allegedly stripped to his underwear, attempted to kidnap a store manager, stole that manager’s car and started ramming it into another vehicle on a local road, crashed again and was taken into custody before assaulting deputies during an assessment at a local hospital, Briese wrote in a statement about the incident.

    “This man drove all around our county terrorizing our visitors and community members,” Briese said. “I am extremely happy that no one was seriously injured. This man’s behavior was erratic and dangerous.”

    Mariposa County Sheriffs arrested Mehlhaff and charged him with everything from vehicle theft and robbery to kidnapping. He’s being held on $100,000 bail. According to the Times, in social media posts Mehlhaff refers to himself as “Saint Anthony” while he and his band seem to think of themselves as a religion and their fans, “congregants.” This description of the band’s music from its own website honestly explains a lot:

    “Spreading the gospel through their unique brand of Reptilian Power Violence, Saint Anthony and The Snake People have been sent down from Heaven on a holy mission to make all politicians, pedophiles, and police officers suffer slowly,” the band’s website read.

    While that is all well and good, real punk rockers rage against the system. They don’t terrorize innocent people just going about their days. Seems Mehlhaff has a lot to learn.

    This story originally appeared on Jalopnik, our sister site, on Monday, August 26.

    .

    .

    [ad_2]

    Lawrence Hodge

    Source link

  • Florida Law and Order Priorities Highlighted by Governor DeSantis, AG Moody, Sheriff Judd

    Florida Law and Order Priorities Highlighted by Governor DeSantis, AG Moody, Sheriff Judd

    [ad_1]

    Florida Governor Ron DeSantis highlighted law and order priorities, including protecting from fentanyl and illegal drugs, and curbing illegal immigration, with Attorney General Ashley Moody, Sheriff Grady Judd, and others in law enforcement.

    Last year, Governor DeSantis signed legislation establishing the State Assistance for Fentanyl Eradication (SAFE) grant program, which provides law enforcement with the funding needed to conduct large-scale drug operations across the state, including many in Central Florida.

    Florida has also enacted a suite of legislation to crack down on crime, curb illegal immigration, increase penalties for drug and human traffickers, and recruit law enforcement officers to the state.

    And when two state attorneys refused to carry out the duties of their positions and enforce the law, Governor DeSantis removed them from office.

    “Leadership matters,” said Republican Governor Ron DeSantis. “Law and order is maintained when leaders insist on enforcing the law. Florida has enacted legislation to combat crime, recruited police officers from all over the country, refused to allow cities to defund the police, and—when necessary—removed rogue state attorneys who refused to enforce the law.”

    “Florida is a law-and-order state, and through proactive leadership and diligent law enforcement efforts we continue to prosper, break tourism records and lead in new business formations,” said Attorney General Ashley Moody. “This is due in large part to the brave men and women in law enforcement, and we will always work to ensure they are supported by Florida leadership.”

    In 2023, the Governor approved $20 million in funding for Florida’s SAFE program administered by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. This state-funded grant has allowed local law enforcement agencies to effectively fight against drug trafficking and get hundreds of pounds of deadly drugs off our streets.

    “I commend Governor DeSantis and the Florida legislature for their support of law enforcement in Florida,” said Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd. “We are a law and order state, and proud of it. Because of this, our communities are thriving. Florida is a safe place to live, work, and play.”

    Examples of Florida being a law and order state from SAFE grant success stories include:

    • In January 2024, the Polk County Sheriffs Office utilized SAFE to arrest 11 suspects trafficking in fentanyl and cocaine, seizing 30 pounds of cocaine and nearly 8 pounds of fentanyl.
    • In March 2024, Santa Rosa County and Escambia County Sheriffs’ offices, working alongside the DEA, seized 3 grams of fentanyl, marijuana, prescription pills, and several handguns.
    • In April 2024, FDLE operations in conjunction with Sheriffs’ Offices in Seminole County and Palm Beach County resulted in arrests of nearly 40 drug traffickers.
    • In April 2024, officers in the Fort Myers region successfully seized nearly 4kg of cocaine, 90g of fentanyl, 69g of MDMA, 375g of marijuana, two AR-15 weapons, and more than $60,000 in currency.
    • In July 2024, FDLE Pensacola, Santa Rosa County and Okaloosa County Sheriff’s offices, Fort Walton Beach Police Department, FHP, and the DEA announced the arrest of 19 drug traffickers facing charges including trafficking in cocaine, methamphetamine, fentanyl, conspiracy to distribute, and racketeering.
    • In August 2024, a SAFE-funded investigation dismantled a drug trafficking operation in St. Petersburg which was responsible for manufacturing hundreds of doses of fentanyl daily throughout Polk County, specifically in Lakeland.
      • Officers confiscated 10.7 kilos of fentanyl, along with cocaine, oxycodone, marijuana, 3 illegal firearms, and over $500,000 in cash.

    “Florida is a national model in eradicating drugs from our communities and taking criminals off the street,” said Florida Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Executive Director Dave Kerner. “In every corner of this great state, you will find State Troopers and local law enforcement working together to interdict drugs and arrest those who profit off of it. Instead of being demonized, Governor DeSantis celebrates the dangerous work our law enforcement officers do every day, and our men and women in law enforcement deeply appreciate that.”

    In total, SAFE funds have resulted in over 650 arrests and the seizure of more than 145 pounds of fentanyl, 220 pounds of cocaine, and 60,000 fentanyl pills – numbers officials say show Florida is a law and order state.

    “Thanks to Governor Ron DeSantis and his leadership, Florida’s law enforcement officers have arrested hundreds of dangerous drug traffickers and taken fentanyl and other deadly drugs off our streets,” said Florida Department of Law Enforcement Commissioner Mark Glass. “Florida is a national role model and stands in stark contrast to crime-plagued blue states.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Colorado’s new housing law helping Evergreen woman spend more time with family

    Colorado’s new housing law helping Evergreen woman spend more time with family

    [ad_1]

    DENVER — A Colorado family is taking advantage of the state’s new housing law to spend more time together.

    House Bill 24-1152 was signed into law in May and allows homeowners to build accessory dwelling units (ADUs), also known as mother-in-law suites, by requiring certain communities to allow them to help ease the housing crunch.

    Laurel Triscari and her daughter Ami Roeschlein love to spend time together. As Roeschlein’s mom got older, they talked about her moving closer to family.

    “So she lives up in Evergreen where it, you know, it gets snowy. She’s under 80, but getting closer to it, and so having to shovel her driveway or her front steps is just not feasible. We wanted a place for her to be able to age in place,” said Roeschlein.

    The two looked into ADUs for two years and found a company to help them. Triscari could be closer, and the family could have grandma in their backyard.

    The company, Anchored Tiny Homes, said that since the new law took effect, business has really picked up.

    “We are busy. There are three to 400 folks reaching out a week right now asking to see if they can get an ADU built in their backyard,” said Brent Dowling, the co-owner of Anchor Tiny Homes.

    Dowling said that not only are ADUs cost-effective, but you also have the power to craft a home of your own.

    As Triscari and her daughter wait for their ADU to be finished, they look forward to more time together.

    Colorado’s new housing law helping Evergreen woman spend more time with family

    Coloradans making a difference | Denver7 featured videos

    At Denver7, we’re committed to making a difference in our community. We’re standing up for what’s right by listening, lending a helping hand and following through on promises. See that work in action, in the featured videos in the playlist above.

    [ad_2]

    Wanya Reese

    Source link

  • With Healey away, DiZoglio pitches NDA ban

    With Healey away, DiZoglio pitches NDA ban

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — With Gov. Maura Healey and other Beacon Hill leaders out of state for the Democratic National Convention, state Auditor Diana DiZoglio is using the Statehouse bully pulpit to draw attention to the issue of nondisclosure agreements.

    On Tuesday, DiZoglio proposed an executive order that would — if she had signed it as acting governor — ban state agencies from using such agreements if they involve claims of discrimination, harassment or retaliation and require existing agreements to be posted on the state comptroller’s website for the public to view.

    “This is just a proposal to make meaningful change for transparency and accountability and prevent the use of taxpayer dollars for these agreements,” the Methuen Democrat told reporters at a briefing. “We want to work with the administration.”

    The proposal comes after DiZoglio’s office released an audit of the Massachusetts Convention Center Authority, claiming the agency violated state laws and its own procurement policies by failing to secure board approval for a no-bid media contract and a nondisclosure agreement for a $1.2 million settlement with an employee alleging racial discrimination.

    “That is absolutely unacceptable and we need to take bold and meaningful action across our state government to prevent that type of abuse of power from continuing to occur,” DiZoglio said.

    DiZoglio said she hopes the governor will considering signing the order, or work with her to adopt restrictions on the use of NDAs by the state government and quasi-public entities. Her office is conducting a statewide audit of NDA settlements.

    A Healey spokeswoman issued a statement Tuesday, saying only that the governor is “cooperating with the ongoing audit and will continue to discuss this issue with the auditor.”

    Under state law, the state auditor is fifth in the line of gubernatorial succession behind the lieutenant governor, secretary of state, attorney general and treasurer if the governor dies in office or leaves the state for vacation or official business.

    With Healey and top Democrats attending the Democratic National Convention in Chicago this week, DiZoglio was possibly in line to take over as acting governor.

    That didn’t happen, because Lt. Gov. Kim Driscoll stayed behind and Secretary of State Bill Galvin returned from the DNC on Tuesday, taking over as acting governor. Driscoll departed for Chicago on Tuesday afternoon, according to Galvin’s office.

    But that didn’t stop DiZoglio — who is rumored to be eyeing a run for governor in the 2026 elections — from using the brush with the governor’s office to highlight a key initiative.

    DiZoglio said she likely would have signed the executive order as acting governor if Healey’s predecessor, Republican Charlie Baker, were still occupying the governor’s office.

    “Because the previous administration repeatedly and consistently opposed any and all reforms to the abuse of taxpayer dollars that are used in these non-disclosure agreements,” she said. “That is not the case with this current administration.”

    As a state lawmaker, DiZoglio pushed for a state ban on nondisclosure agreements, which are commonly used by large companies to protect trade secrets, resolve arbitration cases and settle workplace conflicts.

    DiZoglio, victims rights advocates and other critics who are pushing to restrict the practice, say NDAs are increasingly shielding powerful men from accusations of abuse or rape.

    Disgraced Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein and former Fox News star anchor Bill O’Reilly are among those who’ve been accused of hiding allegations of sexual harassment for years with out-of-court settlements and nondisclosure agreements that forbid the parties from talking about the cases.

    A firestorm surrounding the public accusations of sexual harassment against Weinstein and other men, fueled by the #MeToo movement, focused public attention on the ability of wealthy and powerful people to avoid scrutiny for decades despite repeated allegations.

    But DiZoglio says NDAs are also being used by the state to shield actions by the state government and quasi-governmental agencies like the convention authority.

    Still, legal experts say a total ban on nondisclosure and arbitration clauses raises constitutional issues.

    Pro-business groups such as the Associated Industries of Massachusetts argue that arbitration and other non-judicial remedies are crucial to resolving workplace conflicts. Banning the practice would clog the courts with employment law cases, the group asserts.

    To date, at least six states — California, Maryland, New Jersey, Tennessee, Vermont and Washington — have banned the use of nondisclosure agreements in settlements involving claims of sexual assault, harassment or discrimination.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Gun rights group chips in $100K for court challenge

    Gun rights group chips in $100K for court challenge

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — A national gun rights group pledges to help fund a legal challenge to overturn the state’s tough new gun control law that critics say will do little to prevent gun violence while depriving people of their constitutional rights.

    The Firearm Industry Trade Association said it has donated $100,000 to the Massachusetts Gun Owners’ Action League to support the group’s legal challenge against new restrictions on firearms licensing signed into law by Gov. Maura Healey.

    “Massachusetts is known as a birthplace of the American Revolution, but these lawmakers have turned their backs to rights that belong to the people and instead are instituting an Orwellian state over the citizens of the Commonwealth,” Lawrence G. Keane, the association’s senior vice president and general counsel, said in a statement.

    “The fight to protect liberty and individual rights begins anew and we are confident that when federal courts apply scrutiny to this law, it will be relegated to the trash bin where it belongs,” Keane said.

    The new law, signed by Healey last month, adds dozens of long rifles to a list prohibited under the state’s “assault” weapons ban and outlaws the open carry of firearms in government buildings, polling places and schools, with exemptions for law enforcement officials.

    It sets strict penalties for possession of modification devices such as Glock switches that convert semiautomatic firearms into fully automatic, military-style weapons. The measure also expands the state’s red flag law, which allows a judge to suspend the gun license of someone deemed at risk to themselves or others.

    Massachusetts already has some of the toughest gun control laws in the country, including real-time license checks for private gun sales and stiff penalties for gun-based crimes.

    But Second Amendment groups argue tougher gun control laws are unnecessary and punish law-abiding gun owners while sidestepping the issue of illegal firearms.

    GOAL, which is affiliated with the National Rifle Association, has dubbed the restrictions the “The Devil’s Snare” and say it represents the greatest attack on civil rights in modern U.S. history. The group has filed a federal lawsuit seeking to overturn the new law’s training and licensing requirements. Other legal challenges are expected.

    Members of the group have also filed a petition with the Secretary of State’s Office to begin gathering signatures on a petition to put a repeal of the law before voters next year. The group wants to suspend the law ahead of a 2026 statewide referendum.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Fubo wins injunction to delay Disney-Fox-Warner’s live sports streamer Venu

    Fubo wins injunction to delay Disney-Fox-Warner’s live sports streamer Venu

    [ad_1]

    The sports streaming service Fubo has temporarily fended off a huge financial threat from Disney-Fox-Warner’s potential competitor Venu Sports and its collection of sports broadcasting licenses thanks to a recent court ruling. A federal judge in the Southern District of New York granted Fubo’s request for an injunction in its antitrust case against the joint sports streaming venture and its parent companies.

    US District Judge Margaret Garnett wrote in an opinion issued earlier today such a concentrated collection of media power would eliminate consumers’ choices. The launch of Venu would also “hike prices on both consumers and other distributors” and create a “multi-year monopolistic runway” in the sports streaming sector for Disney, Fox and Warner.

    “Even if the [joint venture] defendants swear that such price-hiking and competition excluding will not actually occur (though…there is good reason to believe that it will),” the opinion reads, “one purpose of antitrust injunctions is to prevent anticompetitive incentives from forming in the first place so that American consumers do not have to simply take their word for it and hope for the best.”

    Garnett also wrote the injunction is needed because of “quintessential harms that money cannot adequately repair” if Fox-Disney-Warner’s Venu Sports moves forward.

    Fox-Disney-Warner first announced its plans to launch a live sports streaming channel in February and later revealed the name and price for its Venu Sports streaming service. The joint sports streaming venture will cost viewers $42.99 a month with a seven-day free trial and promises 14 channels of live sporting events with access to ESPN+ and four of its spinoff channels, the Fox network and both of its Fox Sports channels and a handful of Warner Bros. owned cable networks such as TNT and TruTV, according to a press release.

    Fubo filed its lawsuit a couple of weeks after Fox-Disney-Warner’s initial announcement. Fubo’s antitrust lawsuit accused the trio of media giants of staging “a years-long campaign” to weaken its sports streaming service. The suit also claimed the joint venture would concentrate too many entities in one service and would hinder competitiveness and jack up prices for viewers and distributors.

    The injunction puts a temporary hold on Fox-Disney-Warner’s plans for Venu Sports. Its fate will ultimately be determined by the antitrust case in federal court.

    [ad_2]

    Danny Gallagher

    Source link

  • Methuen council taking another vote on Searles Estate

    Methuen council taking another vote on Searles Estate

    [ad_1]

    METHUEN — The City Council will likely vote on the purchase of the historic Searles Estate for the second time next month.

    The council voted against the purchase of the property for $3.25 million last week, which would typically mean the end of the proposed resolution. But after recent legal advice from City Solicitor Kenneth Rossetti, Chair Joel Faretra said he will bring the matter back for another vote at the council’s next meeting in September.

    City officials aim to preserve the historic site by acquiring the property from the Sisters of the Presentation of Mary. Those opposed have cited fiscal responsibility and said the city does not have a comprehensive plan for the aging estate.

    The Searles Estate encompasses 25 acres, with 19 available for purchase by the city. The estate is valued at $10 million. The acquisition would also include $1 million in artifacts.

    The vote Aug. 5, which left the community sharply divided, included two councilor absences and an abstention, leading to a potential conflict of interest.

    Only six of nine councilors voted. Faretra, Nicholas DiZoglio, Ronald Marsan and Allison Mary Saffie voted in favor while Neily Soto and Patricia Valley were opposed.

    Faretra said he was informed that the majority party can bring an item back for a vote, rather than just the prevailing side.

    Soto said preserving the estate is important but that it should be done through a public-private partnership which places less of a burden on taxpayers.

    Twelve potential buyers have looked at the estate over the years. One developer presented a plan that would demolish the estate and build apartments, according to the city.

    Sisters of the Presentation of Mary purchased the estate in 1957 to house Presentation of Mary Academy, which closed in 2020. Since then, the religious order has endeavored to find a buyer.

    The order was founded in France in 1796 and came to the United States in 1853, according to its website.

    The estate would likely need about $250,000 in annual maintenance, according to Chief Administrative & Financial Officer Maggie Duprey.

    The Methuen Historical Society has called the estate an “irreplaceable treasure” and urged the council and the community to support the purchase.

    The next council meeting is scheduled for Sept. 3 but that date will likely be adjusted due to the state primary elections, Faretra said.

    [ad_2]

    By Teddy Tauscher | ttauscher@eagletribune.com

    Source link

  • Planning Board to take up 3A zoning

    Planning Board to take up 3A zoning

    [ad_1]

    The Dec. 31 deadline for this commuter rail community to comply with state MBTA Communities Act requirements to create multifamily zoning districts near train stations is zooming down the tracks.

    With less than five months to go, Gloucester’s Planning Board is scheduled to meet in person and on Zoom Thursday afternoon to review multifamily zoning district scenarios and changes to zoning ordinance meant to bring the seaport into compliance with the law known as Section 3A.

    The meeting is scheduled to take place in person at the Harbormaster’s Conference Room at 19 Harbor Loop on Aug. 8 at 5 p.m. A link to the meeting on Zoom, https://gloucester-ma-gov.zoom.us/j/86065315420, and the agenda can be found on the city’s website at www.gloucester-ma.gov.

    The Planning Board is scheduled “to review and discuss districts and draft zoning amendment language to comply with Chapter 40A 3A/MBTA Communities requirements,” the single-item agenda states.

    Planning Board Chair Rick Noonan said the board will be presented with the proposed multifamily zoning districts, the draft zoning amendment language and use table changes from the city’s consultant, RKG Associates.

    The Planning Board is expected to make a recommendation on the draft language for the ordinance changes for the City Council to take up. The council’s three-member Planning and Development Standing Committee will also weigh in.

    Both the Planning Board and the City Council would then hold public hearings on the proposed changes, and a public forum is being planned.

    “It’s been a fairly tight choreographed effort by all of us,” Noonan said. The work has involved digesting the public input as best the board and consultants could and work to craft sensitive zoning “as best we can.

    “We are at a good place to start the review,” he said, noting the amount of work that’s been done to get to this point. He said there are plans for a joint meeting among the Planning Board and the City Council, making sure to get as much public input as possible “keeping in mind there is a drop dead date.”

    The MBTA Communities Act requires each of the 177 designated MBTA communities to provide for at least one district of reasonable size permitting multifamily housing by right, according to a slide presentation on the law in May by RKG Associates and Innes Associates.

    The zoning cannot have age restrictions and it must be suitable for families with children. The zoning must have a minimum gross density of 15 dwelling units per acre and a portion of the district must be located within a half mile of a commuter rail station, in Gloucester’s case.

    Ethan Forman may be contacted at 978-675-2714, or at eforman@northofboston.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Ethan Forman | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Packies urge Healey to tighten wine shipment rules

    Packies urge Healey to tighten wine shipment rules

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Package store owners are urging Gov. Maura Healey to close a “loophole” in a 2015 law authorizing direct shipments of wine, which critics say is allowing “ghost” retailers to engage in “modern-day bootlegging.”

    In a letter to Healey, Massachusetts Package Store Association Executive Director Rob Mellion called on her to sign into a law a bill that limits licenses for direct wine shipments only to companies that sell under a brand name owned or exclusively licensed to the winery.

    The measure was approved by the state Legislature last week before lawmakers recessed after formal sessions ended.

    Third-party retailers are engaging in “modern day bootlegging” by exploiting a loophole in the law that allows them to get licenses to ship directly to consumers, Mellion said.

    “They operate outside of the regulatory framework by means of an unintended loophole that has inadvertently allowed for a technical mechanism to obtain a license when they masquerade as a winery,” he wrote. “This misrepresentation is costing Massachusetts millions of dollars annually in unreported sales and lost excise taxes. It also substantially increases the risk of underage access to alcohol beverages.”

    Mellion cited data from the state Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission showing compliance checks conducted in 2022 by state regulators found 96% of out-of-state shippers of alcohol beverages didn’t verify the age of consumers buying the booze.

    In 2014, Massachusetts joined 40 other states in legalizing winery direct-to-consumer shipping after then-Gov. Deval Patrick signed a budget package that included language legalizing direct shipping in the state. The law went into effect on Jan. 1, 2015.

    That law was prompted in part by a 2008 federal court ruling that struck down a previous limit on direct-to-consumer sales. Out-of-state wineries — led by former Patriot quarterback star Drew Bledsoe, who owns a vineyard in Washington — argued that the restriction gave wine-sellers in Massachusetts an unfair competitive advantage.

    Out-of-state wineries and alcohol distributors are required to get permits for $300, allowing them to ship up to 12 cases a year to each customer in Massachusetts. They must label packages as containing alcohol and indicate that they must be delivered to someone of legal drinking age. Massachusetts taxes must be applied to the sale, as well.

    But Mellion said the new law would ensure that wine shipments to Massachusetts residents would come direct from the licensed winery. He said retailers have lobbied to defeat the measure.

    “It has been very hard to stop these large and extremely well-financed corporate interests who use their influence to undermine three-tier regulations,” he wrote. “That is why it has taken three consecutive legislative sessions to stop the bootlegging.”

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Gloucester Police welcomes two new officers

    Gloucester Police welcomes two new officers

    [ad_1]

    Two new officers who are also Gloucester natives have joined the ranks of the Gloucester Police Department.

    Officers Ryan Muniz and Kalyn Koller bring a wealth of knowledge, enthusiasm, and a commitment to serving Gloucester, the department said.

    Muniz graduated from the Massachusetts Police Training Committee Northern Essex Community College Police Academy in May. He attended Gloucester Public Schools and graduated from Gloucester High in 2019. In high school, he played hockey, golf, and tennis, and captained the hockey and golf teams.

    After high school, Muniz attended the University of Massachusetts Amherst, graduating in 2023 with a bachelor’s degree. Following his graduation, he worked at the Essex County Sheriff’s Department before joining the Gloucester force. Muniz recently completed his field training and is now eager to make a positive impact and engage with the community he has always called home, the department said.

    Koller graduated from the MPTC Lynnfield Police Academy last Tuesday and began her field training shortly thereafter. Koller, 24, is a Gloucester native who graduated from Rockport High in 2019, where she played softball and basketball. She earned her criminal justice degree from Endicott College, graduating with dean’s lst honors. During her time at Endicott, Koller interned with the Gloucester Police Department, an experience that solidified her dedication to a career in law enforcement.

    “I am honored to announce my appointment as a new officer with the Gloucester Police Department. I look forward to serving and giving back to the community I have always called home,” she said.

    Chief Edward Conley expressed his confidence in the new officers, saying, “We are thrilled to welcome Officers Muniz and Koller to our team. Their dedication, local roots, and commitment to service will undoubtedly strengthen our department and enhance our ability to serve the Gloucester community.”

    [ad_2]

    By Times Staff

    Source link

  • Steward’s creditors accused of ‘brinkmanship’

    Steward’s creditors accused of ‘brinkmanship’

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — The Healey administration is lashing out at Steward Health Care System’s creditors for seeking to block $30 million in state funding to help transition the bankrupt company’s hospitals to new owners.

    In a new filing in U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Assistant Attorney General Andrew Troop accuses a group representing creditors seeking to collect $9 billion in debt from Steward of engaging in “brinksmanship” in an effort “to wring out more value from qualified bidders or the commonwealth to salvage their own bad financial, investment or lending decisions.”

    “Many of these creditors seem to have lost sight of the importance of providing safe healthcare over the long term, and instead seem intent on saddling bidders with potentially critical levels of debt or obligations, which will only make this crisis a recurring one,” Troop wrote in the seven-page statement.

    While the state is “unable” to stop Steward from closing the two hospitals, Troop said it still has “significant police powers” to intervene in the federal bankruptcy process if it “does not result in a clear path to the sale of the hospitals.”

    The fiery statement comes as a federal judge in Texas weighs a request from a group representing Steward’s myriad creditors to reject Gov. Maura Healey’s plan to devote $30 million in repurposed Medicaid funding to help transition the sale of six of Steward’s hospitals as part of the company’s bankruptcy proceedings.

    Steward plans to put its 31 U.S. hospitals – including Holy Family’s locations in Methuen and Haverhill – up for sale to pay down $9 billion in outstanding liabilities owed to creditors. The company filed for federal bankruptcy protections in May.

    Steward said it was not able to find buyers for Carney Hospital in Dorchester and Nashoba Valley Medical Center in Ayer and announced plans to shut down the facilities in the next 30 days.

    U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez, who is overseeing the case, approved the request to close the hospitals following a hearing Wednesday in a Texas courtroom.

    Bids on Steward’s Massachusetts hospitals and other states were due last week, but the company has not disclosed prospective buyers. A hearing on the sales was scheduled for Thursday, but the company asked the federal judge presiding over the case to postpone the proceedings until Aug. 13, without citing a reason.

    Last week, Healey officials announced plans to provide $30 million in Medicaid funding to help ensure a “smooth transition” to new ownership for the company’s six remaining hospitals. Healey told reporters earlier this week that “not a dime” of the money will go to Steward or its management team.

    But in a court filing this week, a committee representing Steward’s creditors asked Lopez to block the move, arguing that the transition funding would come “at the expense of the rest of debtors, their estates and their creditors.”

    On Wednesday, Lopez approved a request by Steward and others to reject a master lease for all the hospital properties, saying the move “is in the best interests of the Debtors, their respective estates, creditors, and all parties in interest.”

    The Attorney General’s Office sided with Steward on the lease issue and has accused the hospitals’ landlords – Medical Properties Trust and Macquarie Asset Management – of trying to block the move “to extract concessions from the Steward estate and their mortgagee.

    “These hospitals – while each in name a lessee – have been forced to pay the costs typically associated with property ownership, including real estate taxes, maintenance, and insurance,” Troop said in the latest court filing.

    Steward’s landlords objected to the request to reject the master lease, arguing in court filings that federal law prohibits the company from stopping rent payments “when their express intention is to continue conducting business in the landlords’ property pending a proposed sale.”

    “If a debtor were permitted to reject a lease and stop paying rent, while continuing to conduct business in the landlord’s property, every debtor would do that,” lawyers for the two property owners wrote in a legal filing. “But of course that is not allowed.”

    During the hearing Wednesday, Lopez also heard arguments for approving the Healey administration’s request to use the $30 million for transition costs, but it was not clear when he would issue his ruling on the funding.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Steward’s creditors accused of ‘brinkmanship’

    Steward’s creditors accused of ‘brinkmanship’

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — The Healey administration is lashing out at Steward Health Care System’s creditors for seeking to block $30 million in state funding to help transition the bankrupt company’s hospitals to new owners.

    In a new filing in U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Assistant Attorney General Andrew Troop accuses a group representing creditors seeking to collect $9 billion in debt from Steward of engaging in “brinksmanship” in an effort “to wring out more value from qualified bidders or the commonwealth to salvage their own bad financial, investment or lending decisions.”

    “Many of these creditors seem to have lost sight of the importance of providing safe healthcare over the long term, and instead seem intent on saddling bidders with potentially critical levels of debt or obligations, which will only make this crisis a recurring one,” Troop wrote in the seven-page statement.

    While the state is “unable” to stop Steward from closing the two hospitals, Troop said it still has “significant police powers” to intervene in the federal bankruptcy process if it “does not result in a clear path to the sale of the hospitals.”

    The fiery statement comes as a federal judge in Texas weighs a request from a group representing Steward’s myriad creditors to reject Gov. Maura Healey’s plan to devote $30 million in repurposed Medicaid funds to help transition the sale of six of Steward’s hospitals as part of the company’s bankruptcy proceedings.

    Steward plans to put its 31 U.S. hospitals — including Holy Family’s locations in Methuen and Haverhill — up for sale to pay down $9 billion in outstanding liabilities owed to creditors. The company filed for federal bankruptcy protections in May.

    Steward said it wasn’t able to find buyers for Carney Hospital in Dorchester and Nashoba Valley Medical Center in Ayer and announced plans to shut down the facilities in the next 30 days.

    U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez, who is overseeing the case, approved the request to close the hospitals following a Wednesday hearing in a Texas courtroom.

    Bids on Steward’s Massachusetts hospitals and other states were due last week, but the company hasn’t disclosed prospective buyers. A hearing on the sales was scheduled for Thursday, but the company asked the federal judge presiding over the case to postpone the proceedings until Aug. 13, without citing a reason.

    Last week, Healey officials announced plans to provide $30 million in Medicaid funds to help ensure a “smooth transition” to new ownership for the company’s six remaining hospitals. Healey told reporters earlier this week that “not a dime” of the funds will go to Steward or its management team.

    But in a court filing this week, a committee representing Steward’s creditors asked Lopez to block the move, arguing that the transition funding would come “at the expense of the rest of debtors, their estates and their creditors.”

    On Wednesday, Lopez approved a request by Steward and others to reject a master lease for all the hospital properties, saying the move “is in the best interests of the Debtors, their respective estates, creditors, and all parties in interest.”

    The Attorney General’s office sided with Steward on the lease issue and has accused the hospitals’ landlords — Medical Properties Trust and Macquarie Asset Management — of trying to block the move “to extract concessions from the Steward estate and their mortgagee.

    “These hospitals – while each in name a lessee – have been forced to pay the costs typically associated with property ownership, including real estate taxes, maintenance, and insurance,” Troop said in the latest court filing.

    Steward’s landlords objected to the request to reject the master lease, arguing in court filings that federal law prohibits the company from stopping rent payments “when their express intention is to continue conducting business in the landlords’ property pending a proposed sale.”

    “If a debtor were permitted to reject a lease and stop paying rent, while continuing to conduct business in the landlord’s property, every debtor would do that,” lawyers for the two property owners wrote in a legal filing. “But of course that is not allowed.”

    During Wednesday’s hearing, Lopez also heard arguments for approving the Healey administration’s request to use the $30 million for transition costs, but it wasn’t clear when he would issue his ruling on the funding.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link