ReportWire

Tag: Laura Ingraham

  • White House’s 50-year mortgage proposal has one notable benefit but a number of drawbacks

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — The White House says it is considering backing a 50-year mortgage to help alleviate the home affordability crisis in the country. But the announcement drew immediate criticism from policymakers, social media and economists, who said a 50-year mortgage would do little to resolve other core problems in the housing market, such as a lack of supply and high interest rates.

    Bill Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, said on X over the weekend that a 50-year mortgage would be “a complete game changer” for homebuyers. FHFA is the part of the federal government that oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which buy and insure the vast majority of mortgages in the country.

    The 30-year mortgage is a uniquely American financial product and the default way to buy a home since the New Deal. Politicians and policymakers at the time wanted to create a standardized mortgage that borrowers could afford and pay off during their working years, when the average lifespan for an American was 66 years old.

    Lower payment

    Extending the life of a mortgage to 50 years does decrease a borrower’s monthly payment.

    The average selling price of a home in the U.S. was $415,200 in September, according to National Association of Realtors. Assuming a standard 10% down payment and an average interest rate of 6.17%, the monthly payment on a 30-year mortgage would be $2,288 while the payment on a 50-year mortgage would be $2,022. That’s presuming a bank would not require a higher interest rate on a 50-year mortgage, due to the longer duration of the loan.

    But significantly higher interest

    Because even more of the monthly payment on a 50-year mortgage would go toward interest on the loan, it would take 30 years before a borrower would accumulate $100,000 in equity, not including home price appreciation and the down payment. That’s compared to 12-13 years to accumulate $100,000 in equity when paying off a 30-year mortgage, excluding the down payment.

    A borrower would pay, roughly, an additional $389,000 in interest over the life of a 50-year mortgage compared to a 30-year mortgage, according to an AP analysis.

    Other analysts came to a similar conclusion.

    “Extending a mortgage from 30 years to 50 years could double the (dollar) amount of interest paid by the homebuyer on a median priced home over the life of the loan and significantly slow equity accumulation,” wrote John Lovallo with UBS Securities.

    Broader housing issues

    A 50-year mortgage does nothing to solve one critical issue when it comes to housing affordability — the lack of supply of homes. States like California and cities like New York have recently passed legislation or made regulatory changes to allow builders to build homes faster with less regulatory red tape.

    There’s also the raw cost of homebuilding in the country. Products such as steel, lumber, concrete, copper and plastics that go into home construction are now subject to tariffs under President Trump. Further, many construction jobs were being done by undocumented workers, particularly in the Southwest, where deportations are impacting the ability for homebuilders to find enough labor to build homes.

    “Many of the big things that would address supply right now are going in the wrong direction,” said Mike Konczal, senior director of policy and research at the Economic Security Project.”

    Pulte said on X that the introduction of a 50-year mortgage was just a “potential weapon,” among other solutions the White House has considered to combat high housing prices.

    Americans don’t live long enough

    The average age of a first-time homebuyer has been creeping up for years and is now roughly 40 years of age. A 50-year mortgage would be difficult to underwrite for a bank for a 40-year-old first-time homebuyer, who would be 90 years old by the time that home is paid off. The average life expectancy of an American is now roughly 79 years, meaning there’s 11 years of life expectancy not covered in a 50-year loan.

    “It’s typically not a goal of policymakers to pass on mortgage debt to a borrowers’ children,” Konczal said.

    Others have tried longer loans

    Other parts of the financial system have extended loan terms, to mixed results. The seven-year auto loan has become increasingly common as car prices have risen and Americans keep their cars longer. Despite longer loan terms, auto loan delinquencies have been rising, and the average price of a new car is now $49,740 compared to a price of $38,948 for a new vehicle five years ago.

    Student loans were originally designed to be paid off in 10 years, and now there are multiple payment options that extend repayment out to 20 years.

    Economists pointed out that a 50-year mortgage may do the opposite of helping with home affordability by causing home price inflation by introducing more potential buyers into a market struggling with supply.

    Trump downplays idea

    After significant criticism, President Trump seemed less enthused about the 50-year mortgage. When asked by Laura Ingraham of Fox News about the idea, President Trump said it “might help a little bit” but seemed to brush it off.

    Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac cannot insure a mortgage that is longer than 30 years, so any 50-year mortgage would be considered a “non-qualifying mortgage” and would be more difficult to sell to investors. Congress would have to amend U.S. financial laws in multiple places to allow for 50-year mortgages, and there seems to be little appetite for Congress to take this on immediately.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 7 Scarily Stupid Moments From Trump’s Interview With Laura Ingraham

    [ad_1]

    In response to a question about voters in last week’s elections citing the economy as their top concern, Trump floated a conspiracy theory about Democrats feeding negative talking points to every major news network. His evidence: Nobody uses the archaic word manufactured anymore!

    “More than anything else, it’s a con job by the Democrats,” Trump said. “You know they put out something, ‘Say today, costs are up.’ They feed it to the anchors of ABC, CBS, NBC, and a lot of other, you know, CNN, etc. And it’s like a standard. I’ll never forget, they used a word like manufactured. Remember the word manufactured? ‘It’s a manufactured economy!’ Nobody uses that word. Every anchor broke in, manufactured. They do exactly what they say. It’s such a rigged system.”

    The president insisted that, contrary to what you might have heard or experienced firsthand, “costs are way down.”

    Later in the interview, he dismissed voters’ economic concerns for an entirely different reason. Americans aren’t worried about the cost of living because they’re falling victim to a fake-news “con job,” they’re actually happy with the economy, but the “polls are fake.”

    [ad_2]

    Margaret Hartmann

    Source link

  • Donald Trump’s New Self-Proclaimed Status Has People Reaching For Dictionaries

    Donald Trump’s New Self-Proclaimed Status Has People Reaching For Dictionaries

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump raised eyebrows with his latest brazen boast to Fox News personality Laura Ingraham on Tuesday.

    During a discussion on the multiple criminal and civil cases the former president is facing, the four-times-indicted Republican front-runner declared: “I’ve become an expert at law.”

    The comment sparked a ripple of laughter from the friendly audience.

    “If I didn’t run, I wouldn’t have any of these lawsuits, you know that, none of them,” Trump added, a repetition of his baseless claim that President Joe Biden is directing the 91 criminal charges.

    Biden’s campaign shared footage of the moment on X, formerly Twitter.

    “Trump says his 91 felony indictments make him an ‘expert at law,’” it captioned the clip, which was one of many offbeat Trump comments it posted from the televised town hall.

    Watch the video here:

    During the same interview, Trump likened himself to the late Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny, went off once again about water pressure and was corrected by Ingraham on a claim about mail-in voting.

    Biden’s campaign has ramped up its attacks on Trump in recent weeks, with the president reportedly asking aides to point out the “crazy shit” his likely 2024 rival says in public.

    Critics on X, meanwhile, questioned Trump’s definition of “expert” and suggested why he could be a specialist on legal matters ― but for the wrong reasons.

    Related…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump Held A Fox News Town Hall And It Was A Disaster

    Trump Held A Fox News Town Hall And It Was A Disaster

    [ad_1]

    During a Fox News town hall with Laura Ingraham, Trump was tossed a softball about Navalny, and he disastrously self-destructed.

    What Did Trump Say About Navalny During The Fox News Town Hall?

    Laura Ingraham asked Trump, “I want to give you the chance to expand on that because obviously your opponents have used that to say again, pro Putin don’t care about human rights or freedom, the freedom movement. And so what does that mean? When you said it made you more aware of your circumstances?”

    Trump answered, “Navalny is a very sad situation and he’s very brave. He was a very brave guy because he went back. He could have stayed away and frankly, probably would have been a lot better off staying away and talking from outside of the country as opposed to having to go back in because people thought that could happen and it did happen. And it’s a horrible thing, but it’s happening in our country too. We are turning into a communist country in many ways. And if you look at it, I’m the leading candidate. I get indicted. I never heard of being indicted before. I was gonna, I got indicted four times I eight or nine trials. All because of the fact that I’m, and you know, this all because of the fact that I’m in politics, they indicted me on things that are so ridiculous of Fani in Atlanta or…”

    Ingraham tried again, “Do you, do you see yourself as a potential political prisoner in the United States? Because that’s their goal is to put you in jail behind bars for the rest of your life.”

    To get more stories like this, subscribe to our newsletter The Daily.

    Trump then went into full babble, “If I was losing in the polls, they wouldn’t even be talking about me and I wouldn’t have had any legal fees…f I were out, I think, although they hate me so much. I, I think if I got out, they’d still, let’s pursue this guy. We can’t stand this guy. Look, I won an election. That wasn’t supposed to be winnable. I then did much better. The second time. I won’t get into it, because of Fox. But I want, I did a much better job the second time. We got millions and millions of more the second time. And now we’re doing much better than we did the second time and the first time almost put together.”

    Ingraham was really tried to get Trump to say that he is a political prisoner, “Are you a, are you a potential political prisoner, sir?”

    Trump continued with his incoherent babble, “Well, I think because of the fact that I’m doing so well that I’m beating Biden at a level that they’ve never seen before. This is not supposed to happen. You know, it’s much easier for a Democrat to run much easier than….”

    Ingraham cut him off, “We’re gonna take a quick break.”

    Video:

    Trump Thinks His New York Fine Is Like Navalny

    When Ingraham asked Trump how he was going to pay the $355 million he owes New York, Trump said, “It’s a form of Navalny.”

    Video:

     

    How Did Trump Perform At The New York Town Hall?

    Trump was a disaster at the Fox News town hall. In 2016, Trump was very disciplined. He hammered his lies and talking points over and over again. It was build the wall, lock her up, Hillary’s emails, make America great again, over and over and over again. Trump’s speeches in 2016 at his rallies were between 30-45 minutes. The wheels had already fallen off by 2020 when Trump would speak for hours, go off on unrelated tangents and bore many of his supporters to the point where they would leave early.

    In 2024, Trump struggles to make a coherent point. Almost all of his interviews and appearances involve conservative media or a friendly Kaitlin Collins or Kristen Welker. Even with Laura Ingraham trying to guide him through the town hall, Trump couldn’t keep it together and imploded.

    Once voters who aren’t paying attention to the election yet, get a dose of this Trump, Republicans could be in big trouble.

    but that doesn’t mean that he actually has the shoes.

    A Special Message From PoliticusUSA

    If you are in a position to donate purely to help us keep the doors open on PoliticusUSA during what is a critical election year, please do so here. 

    We have been honored to be able to put your interests first for 14 years as we only answer to our readers and we will not compromise on that fundamental, core PoliticusUSA value.

     

    [ad_2]

    Jason Easley

    Source link

  • Ripping the Headlines Today – Paul Lander, Humor Times

    Ripping the Headlines Today – Paul Lander, Humor Times

    [ad_1]

    Making fun of the headlines today, so you don’t have to

    The news, even that about priests blessing same-sex couples, doesn’t need to be complicated or confusing; that’s what any new release from Microsoft is for. And, as in the case with anything from Microsoft, to keep the news from worrying our pretty little heads over, remember something new and equally indecipherable will come out soon: 

    Really all you need to do is follow one simple rule: barely pay attention and jump to conclusions. So, here are some headlines today and my first thoughts:

    Pope okay with same-sex couples
    Pope okay with same-sex couples.

    Pope says Roman Catholic priests may bless same-sex couples

    Well, it is the season to don your gay apparel.

    Trump has extended Truth Social meltdown after Colorado Supreme Court bans him from ballot

    While Heinz Ketchup stock goes through the roof. Coincidence? You decide.

    Researchers may have found King Alfred’s pelvis

    Which, I assume, will improve his dance moves.

    Biden pardons thousands with marijuana convictions

    Too bad for Biden, by Election Day they’ll probably have forgotten.

    Predatory hawks are trained to intimidate seagulls hanging around SoFi Stadium, particularly its six-acre artificial lake

    … As opposed to Atlanta Hawks, who don’t scare anybody.

    After spending billions, over 23 million people now own NTFs that are completely worthless

    Elon Musk: Hold my Twitter.

    6 signs your marriage will last a lifetime

    Number one reason: you’re not given long to live.

    Laura Ingraham melts down over Biden ‘Nutcracker’ Christmas tap dancing video

    I guess Ingraham thinks she’s an expert on the Nutcracker because she is a nut and a cracker.

    Brad Pitt turns 60

    He doesn’t seem to age. If they did a movie about his sex life, it would be called ‘Fifty Shades of Dorian Grey.’

    ‘Dog Eats 5 100 Dollar Bills’

    Because of withholding taxes only poops out $375.56.

    ‘Dukes of Hazzard’ star John Schneider could face secret service probe for threat against President Biden

    Apparently, Schneider doesn’t like President Biden. Can someone tell me what Starsky or Hutch thinks; so I don’t have to give a rat’s ass about that, either.

    Chris Christie says he’s not dropping out of race for President

    … But that he’ll shut down that bridge when the time comes.

    Christmas shoppers safe from 600-pound alligator that was captured next to a mall in Florida

    Sounds like a bunch of croc to me.

    Orange tabby cat named Taters steals the show in first video sent by space laser from deep space

    … Marjorie Taylor Greene says she knew all along Taters was Jewish …

    Paul LanderPaul Lander
    Latest posts by Paul Lander (see all)
    ShareShare

    [ad_2]

    Paul Lander

    Source link

  • Matt Gaetz Accuses 2 GOP Reps Of Breaking Party’s ‘Core Covenant’ With Voters

    Matt Gaetz Accuses 2 GOP Reps Of Breaking Party’s ‘Core Covenant’ With Voters

    [ad_1]

    Fox News host Laura Ingraham teed it up for Gaetz by complaining that the government was “fat and way too happy with woke.” She asked why Republicans had a majority in the House if they weren’t united to cut “ridiculous spending.”

    “This was the core covenant that we have with our voters to get the majority,” Gaetz replied. “And it seems so far too many are willing to violate it.”

    The far-right representative and Ingraham harped on conservative talking points about DEI, claiming it hurts recruitment and military readiness.

    “We went from ‘be all you can be’ … to this embrace of radical gender ideology and radical race ideology,” Gaetz said. “We should not pass another authorizing act for this military that does not uproot all of the wokeness.”

    Fast-forward to 20:12 for Gaetz’s appearance.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Kevin McCarthy’s Speakership Bid Has Fox News at War With Itself

    Kevin McCarthy’s Speakership Bid Has Fox News at War With Itself

    [ad_1]

    The Republican battle over the next House Speaker has bled into the most vital media organ in conservative politics: the Fox News prime-time lineup. On one side stands Sean Hannity, who is urging the 20-or-so far-right holdouts to let Representative Kevin McCarthy claim the gavel. And on the other is Tucker Carlson, who has thrown his support behind that very group in an apparent pressure campaign to quash McCarthy’s bid.

    The disagreement boiled over Wednesday, when Hannity, who had urged the holdouts to “work it out,” confronted Representative Lauren Boebert, one of the anti-McCarthy ringleaders, on air. “So, if I’m gonna use your words and your methodology and your math, isn’t it time for you to pack it in, and your side to pack it in, considering he has over 200 and you have 20?” Hannity asked the lawmaker. Boebert responded by saying she understood “the frustration” but refused to capitulate amid the host’s grilling.

    Carlson, for his part, delivered an anti-McCarthy monologue Wednesday. “Oh, you’ve got reservations about Kevin McCarthy? You don’t want to be ruled by a man who wears a Ukrainian flag lapel pin and lives with Frank Luntz?” the host asked his audience, referencing McCarthy’s 2021 admission that he had rented a room from Luntz, an establishment Republican pollster. Carlson then argued that McCarthy was making no effort to reconcile with his detractors, most of whom are members of the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus. “Instead, like the left they purport to oppose, they’re using threats and fear to force people to support the candidate,” he said of McCarthy’s team. Carlson has also defended the cohort of insurgents from attacks made by fellow Republicans: After Representative Dan Crenshaw, a pro-McCarthy Republican from Texas, insisted that his party “cannot let the terrorists win,” the Fox host described the lawmaker as “the snarling face of the donor class.” Crenshaw replied by urging Carlson to “grow thicker skin.”

    Late Wednesday evening, after a sixth ballot failed to produce a Speaker, McCarthy offered a number of concessions to the 20 hard-liners blocking his path to the gavel. The new terms would acquiesce to many demands made by the holdouts, including allowing a rule change that would let one GOP member call a vote to oust the Speaker; granting Freedom Caucus members top committee assignments; and promising to bring likely nonviable border-security legislation to a floor vote, according to The Wall Street Journal.

    As far as Fox News goes, Carlson is in the minority. On Thursday, Fox & FriendsBrian Kilmeade had even harsher words for the holdouts than Hannity, calling the “Never McCarthy” set “insurrectionists”—a term he switched to “saboteurs” on the suggestion of his cohosts, Steve Doocy and Ainsley Earhardt. Doocy was similarly irate in another Fox & Friends segment Thursday. “I heard so many people say, ‘You know, that’s just how democracy works.’ This is not democracy. This is a televised hijacking,” he declared. “They are intent, simply, on blowing up the party, which they are doing, and this Congress. They do not care.”

    Still, Carlson did find a friend in Laura Ingraham, who ultimately sided with the exact group of conservatives whom Doocy criticized. “What looks chaotic and kind of seems counterproductive to many—it’s actually, in its own way, refreshing because it’s democracy in action,” Ingraham said Wednesday. Carlson trotted out the same line, calling the chaos a “refreshing” showcase of democracy that is only “embarrassing if you prefer the Soviet-style consensus of the Democratic Party’s internal elections.”

    [ad_2]

    Caleb Ecarma

    Source link

  • Laura Ingraham Responds To Herschel Walker Loss In Least Impartial Way

    Laura Ingraham Responds To Herschel Walker Loss In Least Impartial Way

    [ad_1]

    Fox News host Laura Ingraham failed to hide her frustration when covering the projected defeat of Donald Trump-backed GOP candidate Herschel Walker in the Georgia U.S. Senate runoff election on Tuesday night.

    “I’m pissed tonight, frankly,” said Ingraham, who for years has been a booster of Trump but has recently appeared to sour slightly on the former president.

    “I’m mad,” she added.

    Warnock’s victory hands the Democrats a 51-seat majority in the Senate. The GOP in last month’s midterms won a similarly razor-thin majority in the House.

    Ingraham had earlier accused Senate Republicans of not fully backing former football star Walker in his election against incumbent Sen. Raphael Warnock (D), even though the ex-athlete was frequently accompanied by high-profile GOP figures for his TV hits.

    “There wasn’t the intensity on the part of the Republicans as there was on the part of the Democrats,” she railed.

    “But we don’t change anything. We have the same people in place in leadership,” the right-wing personality continued. “The same people in place, apparently at the RNC, perhaps that’s not changing. We are doing the same thing over and over again.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • These Candidates Pushed 2022’s Dumbest Conspiracy—Schoolkids Using Litter Boxes—And Many (But Not All) Lost Big

    These Candidates Pushed 2022’s Dumbest Conspiracy—Schoolkids Using Litter Boxes—And Many (But Not All) Lost Big

    [ad_1]

    Topline

    Far-right candidates who promoted the thoroughly debunked theory that schools are providing litter boxes for students who identify as animals didn’t fare well Tuesday, with several key Trump-allied candidates losing their elections—although a few big names survived.

    Key Facts

    Loser: New Hampshire Republican Senate candidate Don Bolduc falsely claimed students at a New Hampshire high school had identified as “furries and fuzzies” and used litter boxes provided by the school, although the school denied his claims—he lost to Sen. Maggie Hassan (53.6% to 44.4%).

    Loser: Heidi Ganahl, a GOP candidate for Colorado governor who repeatedly claimed without evidence that public school students “all over Colorado” were dressing up as animals and communicating with barks and growls while schools are “tolerating it,” lost on Tuesday to Democrat Jared Polis 57% to 40.8%.

    Loser: GOP House candidate Catalina Lauf, running for election in Illinois, tweeted at CNN reporter Andrew Kaczynski last month, “this is not a hoax and is happening in schools in Illinois, too”—she lost this week to Rep. Bill Foster (D-Ill.).

    Loser: Minnesota’s Republican gubernatorial candidate Scott Jensen, who asked on the campaign trail why elementary school students are able to “choose their gender” or why they are given “litter boxes” at school, also lost on Tuesday, falling to Democrat Tim Walz 52.3% to 44.6%.

    Loser: Ed Thelander, a Republican House candidate in Maine, spread the myth last month before backtracking and admitting the theory had no basis, lost in a 62.8% to 37.1% landslide to Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-Maine).

    Winner: In Ohio, Trump-backed Republican J.D. Vance, who promoted the debunked theory, saying in an interview on the right-wing Billy Cunningham Show last month it’s a “crazy point we’ve reached in this country where schools are doing this stuff”—he defeated Democratic challenger Tim Ryan in the key Senate race, taking in 53.3% of the vote.

    Winner: Far-right Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R), who has supported multiple QAnon conspiracies, falsely claimed students were dressing up as cats and using litter boxes, telling reporters outside a campaign event in September, “that’s their prerogative”—she soundly defeated Democrat Marcus Flowers, receiving 65.9% of the vote.

    Undecided: Far-right GOP Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), one of the loudest supporters of the theory, has called it an “identity crisis” that goes beyond “furries” to the question of gender identity, saying “when we have a large portion of the population who can’t tell us what a woman is, there’s a crisis”—she holds a narrow lead over her Democratic challenger Adam Frisch in a surprisingly close race that hasn’t yet been called.

    Key Background

    The theory came into the national spotlight in January when Michigan GOP co-chair Meshawn Maddock posted on Facebook, “Kids who identify as ‘furries’ get a litter box in the school bathroom.” One day later, a far-right social media account called Libs of TikTok tweeted a video of a Michigan school board meeting where a woman claimed “kids who identify as a cat or a dog” use litter boxes in school bathrooms—while the school superintendent denied the claim. Libs of TikTok went on to post similar theories, in one instance calling a Kentucky sex education teacher a “predator,” a post that Fox News host Laura Ingraham picked up, calling out schools for being “essentially grooming centers for gender identity radicals.” Over the next several months, the theory caught on among far-right candidates and right-leaning media hosts, even though there was never any evidence of students identifying as animals. Earlier this year, several GOP state officials, including Colorado state Rep. Scott Bottoms, Texas state Rep. Michelle Evans and Nebraska state Rep. Bruce Bostelman, caught on to the “furries” theory, although Bostelman walked back on his claim that students are using litter boxes, admitting it had no basis. An NBC News report found at least 20 right-wing candidates and elected officials spread the debunked theory this year, and that every school district they referenced has denied the claims as untrue. School officials across the country have debunked the claims, with some writing to parents to assure them students are not using litter boxes.

    Tangent

    “Furries” is a subculture that’s existed for years among some adults who dress up as animal characters. Adults who dress up as “furries” also include a high percentage of queer members, although the community that participates in the subculture decries characterizations of the practice that focus on a perceived sexual element—a form of fear mongering that’s been called “fur-mongering.” The theory that children are identifying as cats and dogs, however, seems related to as right-wing policy makers introducing legislation that targets identity and transgender rights in schools, including Florida’s so-called “Don’t Say Gay” law preventing elementary school teachers from instructing on gender identity, as well as numerous state bills targeting trans children in school sports—although several, including in Utah and West Virginia, have been blocked in courts.

    Surprising Fact

    Last month, popular podcaster Joe Rogan, who has a huge conservative following, said on his Joe Rogan Experience that a school “had to install a litter box in the girls room” for a student who “identifies as an animal,” backtracked on his claim two weeks later, admitting “it doesn’t seem like there was any proof that they actually put the litter box in there.”

    Further Reading

    Colorado GOP Governor Candidate Latest To Fall For Student ‘Furries’ Hoax—Here’s How Many Others Have Been Duped (Forbes)

    Far-Right Boebert Pulls Ahead Of Long-Shot Opponent In Nail-Biter (Forbes)

    [ad_2]

    Brian Bushard, Forbes Staff

    Source link