ReportWire

Tag: Larry Nassar

  • FBI Addresses Epstein Letter Claiming Trump Likes Young Girls Hours After It Goes Viral – How People Are Reacting To Their Response! – Perez Hilton

    [ad_1]

    The Department of Justice is speaking out about that alarming letter about Donald Trump

    As we previously reported, the DOJ released thousands more documents from the Jeffrey Epstein files on Tuesday morning — including ones that mention Trump. We reported how an email in the files alleges Trump flew on Epstein’s private jet multiple times — including four times with Epstein’s partner and co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell. But one of the other most troubling documents to drop? It’s a letter the convicted sex offender allegedly sent to Larry Nassar, the former US gymnastics team doctor convicted of sexually assaulting young gymnasts, while they were both in federal prison in August 2019, which features a disturbing line about the president. The message said:

    “As you will know by now, I have taken the ‘short route’ home. Good luck! We shared one thing … our love & caring for young ladies and the hope they reach their full potential. Our president also shares our love of young, nubile girls. When a young beauty walked by he loved to ‘grab snatch’, whereas we ended up snatching grub in the mess halls of the system. Life is unfair. Yours, J. Epstein.”

    Related: Nicki Minaj Goes Full MAGA! She Praises Trump, Reaffirms Anti-Trans Views, & More!

    “Our president” was Donald Trump at the time. Take a look at it (below):

    (c) Department of Justice

    The letter was postmarked on August 13, 2019, just three days after Epstein died by suicide. According to the file, the feds obtained the note when it came back to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York since Nassar was moved from Tucson, Arizona, to a Florida prison. An FBI agent reportedly requested that a laboratory perform a handwriting analysis to prove Epstein wrote the letter, but the results are unknown.

    The letter has since gone viral online, with people calling out the alleged comment about Trump. In fact, the new round of files, including the letter, led to an Epstein survivor and now former Trump supporter to call for his impeachment. Hours after the new batch of documents dropped on Tuesday, the Department of Justice announced on X (Twitter) that they are “currently looking into the validity of this alleged letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Nassar and we will follow up as soon as possible.” However, they made a point to note three things right off the bat:

    “- The postmark on the envelope is Virginia, not New York, where Jeffrey Epstein was jailed at the time.

    -The return address listed the wrong jail where Epstein was held and did not include his inmate number, which is required for outgoing mail.

    -The envelope was processed three days AFTER Epstein’s death.”

    Well, nearly two hours later, the DOJ is already coming forward with the supposed answers as to whether the letter is legit or not. The verdict? The department claimed on X (Twitter) that the letter is “FAKE.” Yes, in all caps. The tweet said:

    “The FBI has confirmed this alleged letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Nassar is FAKE. The fake letter was received by the jail, and flagged for the FBI at the time.”

    According to the DOJ, the FBI came to that conclusion for three reasons:

    “-The writing does not appear to match Jeffrey Epstein’s.

    -The letter was postmarked three days after Epstein’s death out of Northern Virginia, when he was jailed in New York.

    -The return address did not list the jail where Epstein was held and did not include his inmate number, which is required for outgoing mail.”

    Hmm. The DOJ concluded the post, saying:

    “This fake letter serves as a reminder that just because a document is released by the Department of Justice does not make the allegations or claims within the document factual. Nevertheless, the DOJ will continue to release all material required by law.”

    They determined all that in… only two hours? Really? People, as you can imagine, are not buying a single word the DOJ says following the extremely short investigation. Many even have a lot of questions — including if the letter was fake, why was it included in the files in the first place, why are the results of the handwriting analysis not in the files, and more.

    And let’s not forget, the Associated Press reported about the Epstein letter to Nassar back in 2023. The publication obtained over 4,000 pages of documents related to Epstein’s death from the federal Bureau of Prisons under the Freedom of Information Act at the time, including his attempt to connect with Nassar by mail. The actual details of the letter were unknown back then, though. Regardless, why didn’t the DOJ say something if it’s fake? We also need to point out that the department has only called out supposed “untrue and sensationalist claims” against Trump — and no one else mentioned in the files, which is eyebrow-raising in itself. Not to mention, a photo of him reportedly disappeared from the files. So, all that has people skeptical about what the DOJ claims. See some of the reactions (below):

    “The hand writing assessment was done when? Release the results from the investigation.”

    “This information seems incredibly important. Was it included in the release of that letter? If not, why not?”

    “You completed your investigation in 2 hours?”

    “Then who wrote the letter? Who sent it? Too many unknowns if it’s fake.”

    “Y’all are the same people who released it so are you that incompetent you didn’t check to make sure something that damn scathing involving Trump was real or not before you released it?  More likely one of you f**ked up and it released it with the rest.”

    “If it wasn’t authentic, why was it released as part of the files in the first place?”

    “Ok so where is the FBI document from 2019 (when it was discovered) concluding that it was fake? You put out a tweet and expect us to believe it???”

    “What steps did you take to confirm this? Seems to me you are just regurgitating your statement from earlier. Was there an official analysis done on this originally that you were able to reference so quickly? Seems odd. Not much time has elapsed since you announced you were looking into it?”

    “That’s it? Those are your only reasons? The handwriting is the only valid point. Where’s the report on this? Where and when was the analysis done?”

    “The @FBI requested handwriting analyis on the Epstein-Nassar letter in 2020, according to last night’s file dump (below). Question: Where are the results? Follow up: Did the DOJ examine those results today, 16 hours after the letter’s release, or was a new analysis conducted?”

    It’s clear a lot of people feel like this admin’s response to literally any claim of wrongdoing is to just throw the word “fake” on it and call it a day. But what are YOUR thoughts on the DOJ’s response, Perezcious readers? Are you just as skeptical? Why or why not? Let us know in the comments.

    [Image via MEGA/WENN, New York Sex Offender Registry]

    [ad_2]

    Perez Hilton

    Source link

  • DOJ Claims Epstein Files Letter From Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Nassar Is Fake

    [ad_1]

    No prior connection between Jeffrey Epstein and Nassar was publicly known. The note makes a reference to “our president”—at that point, Donald Trump, in his first term—and a seeming predilection for “young, nubile girls.” Epstein’s opening greeting also may refer to an intention to end his own life.

    The additional files related to Jeffery Epstein released by the Justice Department on Tuesday, December 23 include a note addressed to “L.N.” signed by “J. Epstein.”

    “Dear L.N.,” the letter reads, “As you know by now, I have taken the ‘short route’ home. Good luck! We shared one thing … our love and caring for young ladies and the hope they’d reach their full potential. Our President also shares our love of young, nubile girls. When a young beauty walked by, he loved to ‘grab snatch,’ whereas we ended up snatching grub in the mess halls of the system. Life is unfair.”

    [ad_2]

    Kase Wickman

    Source link

  • Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged jailhouse letter to Larry Nassar surfaces in federal records – Detroit Metro Times

    [ad_1]

    A newly released tranche of Justice Department records tied to Jeffrey Epstein includes a handwritten letter addressed to Larry Nassar, the former Michigan State University and USA Gymnastics doctor who sexually abused hundreds of young athletes over nearly two decades.

    The letter, which appears to have been written by Jeffrey Epstein, was addressed to “L.N.” and postmarked Aug. 13, 2019, just three days after Epstein was found dead in his jail cell in New York. Epstein’s death was ruled a suicide.

    Nassar, a Michigan-based physician who served as a longtime doctor for USA Gymnastics and Michigan State University, is serving a 60-year federal prison sentence on child pornography charges. More than 150 women and girls told a Michigan judge in 2018 that Nassar sexually abused them under the guise of medical treatment.

    The letter, included in files released Tuesday by the Justice Department, contains crude and disturbing language that appears to reference sexual abuse and incarceration. It also includes an indirect reference to President Donald Trump.

    A letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Nassar was among the records released by the Justice Department this week. Credit: U.S. Department of Justice

    “Dear L.N.,” the letter reads, “As you know by now, I have taken the ‘short route’ home. Good luck! We shared one thing … our love and caring for young ladies and the hope they’d reach their full potential. Our President also shares our love of young, nubile girls.”

    The letter ends with, “Life is unfair,” and is signed, “J. Epstein.”

    The envelope, addressed to Nassar at a federal prison in Tucson, Arizona, was marked “return to sender” because the addressee was “no longer at this address,” according to an FBI document also released by the Justice Department.

    A separate FBI laboratory examination request shows that on Sept. 25, 2019, an agent received a call from the Bureau of Prisons regarding the letter after it was intercepted at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan. In July 2020, the FBI requested a handwriting analysis to determine whether Epstein authored the letter or if it was written by someone else. The documents do not disclose the results of that analysis.

    It remains unclear whether Epstein and Nassar had any personal relationship.

    Larry Nassar. Credit: Michigan Department of Corrections

    Epstein, a wealthy financier with ties to powerful political and business figures, was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges when he died in custody. Nassar remains incarcerated in federal prison.

    Another batch of recently released Justice Department documents also included a Michigan-related lawsuit alleging that Epstein met his first known victim in the 1990s at Interlochen Center for the Arts, a renowned fine arts summer camp near Traverse City.

    The complaint, filed in 2020 and later settled, said the girl was 13 when Epstein and co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell approached her at Interlochen, groomed her over several years, and sexually abused her. The lawsuit also alleges Epstein later brought her to Mar-a-Lago, where he introduced her to Trump.

    Trump has denied any wrongdoing and has not been charged in connection with Epstein.


    [ad_2]

    Steve Neavling

    Source link

  • AG Nessel shuts down MSU Larry Nassar investigation after document review

    AG Nessel shuts down MSU Larry Nassar investigation after document review

    [ad_1]

    Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has officially closed the long-running investigation into Michigan State University’s handling of the Larry Nassar sexual abuse case, citing a lack of new information in recently released documents that the university had withheld for years, she revealed in a report released Wednesday.

    Despite MSU’s eventual decision to release the documents in December 2023, Nessel expressed frustration and disappointment that the records provided no new insights into how Nassar was able to perpetrate his abuse for so long.

    “MSU has repeatedly justified withholding the documents because they contained information that was allegedly protected by the attorney-client privilege,” the report states. “Our review has revealed that this justification was not always appropriate. A significant number, if not a majority, of the documents did not appear to us to be covered by the privilege. Accordingly, there was no justifiable reason to withhold those documents for any period of time, let alone an extended period.”

    The investigation, originally launched in January 2018 by former Attorney General Bill Schuette, was hindered by MSU’s refusal to release thousands of documents, claiming they were protected by attorney-client privilege. This refusal persisted despite a judicially authorized search warrant and numerous requests from the Attorney General’s Office. As a result, the investigation was forced to close in March 2021 due to MSU’s lack of cooperation.

    However, in April 2023, with new leadership in place at MSU, Nessel renewed her request for the release of the withheld documents. Yet, the university’s leadership continued to resist, delaying any action until December 2023, when the MSU Board of Trustees finally voted to release the records. Nessel’s office received the first batch in March 2024, with the final batch arriving in April 2024.

    The review of the 6,014 documents revealed that a significant portion of them were not, in fact, protected by attorney-client privilege, as MSU had claimed, Nessel said. Many documents contained irrelevant information, such as public relations matters, insurance issues, and internal communications unrelated to Nassar’s abuse. Even the documents that did contain privileged information offered no new insights into who at MSU knew about Nassar’s abuse or when they knew it, the attorney general said

    Nessel noted that some documents were improperly withheld, including communications between non-attorneys and instances where an attorney was merely copied on an email. Inconsistencies in the redaction of documents also raised concerns about MSU’s handling of the privilege. Despite this, the review found no evidence of a concerted effort to cover up knowledge of Nassar’s conduct, according to Nessel.

    The Attorney General’s Office expressed particularly concern over the impact of MSU’s prolonged withholding of the documents. Survivors of Nassar’s abuse had hoped that the release of these documents would provide answers and accountability. Instead, the long delay only resulted in disappointment and frustration.

    “This is a disappointing close to our years-long investigation into the abuse that hundreds of young women were subjected to over the course of more than a decade,” Nessel said in a statement. “While I appreciate that MSU eventually cooperated, the withheld documents provided victims with a sense of false hope, for no justifiable reason. Simply put, there remains no fulfilling answer to the question of how this abuse was able to be perpetuated on so many, for so long, without MSU, or anyone else, putting a stop to it”.

    While the eventual release of the documents was a positive step toward transparency, Nessel criticized MSU for its years of delay, which only served to exacerbate the emotional toll on survivors and hinder the investigation. The final closure of the investigation marks the end of an “epic document saga,” leaving many questions unanswered and reinforcing the perception that MSU “circled the wagons” and “stonewalled” the investigation it had initially requested, the report states.

    According to the report, the investigation’s conclusion brings to a close another chapter in the ongoing saga of the Nassar scandal, but it leaves behind a legacy of missed opportunities for justice and accountability.

    In a statement to the victims, Nessel said the following:

    “I commend you for your bravery in coming forward and sharing your stories, and for never giving up on the pursuit of justice and transparency.

    “While the investigation is closed, this is not where this story ends. You have created a sisterhood that has worked together to create systemic changes, not just here in Michigan, but nationwide to ensure that schools are better prepared to prevent, investigate and stop abuse, to ensure that survivors are believed, and treated better in the judicial system and to change the culture in how sexual assault is seen by the public at large.

    “Your advocacy, resilience and your strength have left this world a better place. And while this may not be the justice you sought; I do believe the changes in how we treat sexual abuse on campuses and in courtrooms alike is a form of justice that will impact generations to come all across the nation.”

    [ad_2]

    Steve Neavling

    Source link

  • 4/17: CBS Evening News

    4/17: CBS Evening News

    [ad_1]

    4/17: CBS Evening News – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Justice Department nears settlement with Larry Nassar victims; Caitlin Clark’s salary highlights pay disparity between NBA and WNBA

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Lawyers For Nassar Assault Survivors Have Reached $100 Million Deal With Justice Department – KXL

    Lawyers For Nassar Assault Survivors Have Reached $100 Million Deal With Justice Department – KXL

    [ad_1]

    (Associated Press) – The U.S. Justice Department has agreed to pay approximately $100 million to settle claims with about 100 people who say they were sexually assaulted by sports doctor Larry Nassar, a source with direct knowledge of the negotiations told The Associated Press on Wednesday.

    The deal has not been finalized and no money has been paid, the source said on condition of anonymity because the person was not authorized to speak before a formal announcement.

    An internal investigation found that FBI agents mishandled abuse allegations by women more than a year before Nassar was arrested in 2016.

    The settlement was first reported by The Wall Street Journal. A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment.

    Nassar was a Michigan State University sports doctor as well as a doctor at Indianapolis-based USA Gymnastics. He is serving decades in prison for assaulting female athletes, including medal-winning Olympic gymnasts, under the guise of treatment.

    Lawyers filed claims against the government, focusing on a 15-month period when FBI agents in Indianapolis and Los Angeles had knowledge of allegations against Nassar but apparently took no action, beginning in 2015. The Justice Department inspector general confirmed fundamental errors.

    Nassar’s assaults continued until his arrest in fall 2016, authorities said.

    The assault survivors include decorated Olympians Simone Biles, Aly Raisman and McKayla Maroney.

    “I’m sorry that so many different people let you down, over and over again,” FBI Director Christopher Wray told survivors at a Senate hearing in 2021. “And I’m especially sorry that there were people at the FBI who had their own chance to stop this monster back in 2015 and failed.”

    The Michigan attorney general’s office ultimately handled the assault charges against Nassar, while federal prosecutors in western Michigan filed a child sex abuse images case against him.

    Michigan State University, which was also accused of missing chances over many years to stop Nassar, agreed to pay $500 million to more than 300 women and girls who were assaulted. USA Gymnastics and the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee made a $380 million settlement.

    More about:

    [ad_2]

    Grant McHill

    Source link

  • Michigan State University football coach Mel Tucker suspended without pay amid investigation into reported accusation of sexual harassment | CNN

    Michigan State University football coach Mel Tucker suspended without pay amid investigation into reported accusation of sexual harassment | CNN

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Michigan State University announced Sunday it has suspended head football coach Mel Tucker without pay, less than a day after USA Today reported he has been under investigation about alleged sexual harassment.

    Vice president and director of athletics Alan Haller said at a news conference Tucker is the subject of an ongoing investigation that began in December. An investigative report was submitted in July and a formal hearing will take place the week of October 5, Haller said.

    According to the USA Today report, published Saturday night, Tucker is alleged to have made sexual comments and masturbated while on a phone call with Brenda Tracy, an advocate and rape survivor.

    Tracy reported the call to the university’s Title IX office, USA Today reported. “The idea that someone could know me and say they understand my trauma but then re-inflict that trauma on me is so disgusting to me, it’s hard for me to even wrap my mind around it,” Tracy told USA Today. “It’s like he sought me out just to betray me.”

    In a letter to investigators, Tucker characterized his and Tracy’s relationship as “mutually consensual and intimate,” according to USA Today.

    “I am not proud of my judgment and I am having difficulty forgiving myself for getting into this situation, but I did not engage in misconduct by any definition,” he wrote, according to USA Today.

    CNN has not independently verified the details of the report.

    An attorney for Tracy, Karen Truszkowski, said no police report was filed. She declined to share any documents or comment further.

    “As you can imagine, this is a delicate issue and I have to balance the public interest with protecting my client,” Truszkowski said.

    CNN also reached out to Tucker’s agent following the announcement of his suspension but has not heard back.

    Tracy started the nonprofit Set The Expectation, where she speaks to athletes about ending sexual violence, according to her website. Tracy was raped in 1998 by four college football players, leading to her advocacy.

    She served as an honorary captain for Michigan State’s spring football game in 2022, and the football team posted a photo on Instagram of Tucker and Tracy together.

    “We are excited to welcome (Tracy) back to campus as our honorary captain for Saturday’s spring game!” the team wrote.

    Tucker, a longtime coach in college and the NFL over the past two decades, became Michigan State’s head coach in 2020. In his second season, the team went a sterling 11-2, and he signed a massive 10-year, $95 million contract that made him one of the highest paid coaches in all of college football. Last year, though, the team finished a disappointing 5-7, including blowout losses to rivals Michigan and Ohio State.

    During Tucker’s suspension, secondary coach Harlon Barnett will fill in as acting head coach, Haller announced, and former MSU head coach Mark Dantonio will become an associate head coach. The Spartans play the Washington Huskies at home this Saturday.

    The long shadow of Larry Nassar

    The investigation comes as the university has continued to face scrutiny over its past handling of sexual abuse allegations against Larry Nassar, the former Michigan State University and USA Gymnastics doctor who abused hundreds of young girls and women.

    At Nassar’s sentencing in Michigan in 2018, dozens of women came forward with stories of his abuse and the ways Michigan State University ignored their claims and enabled his actions. The university agreed to pay $500 million to settle lawsuits brought by 332 victims.

    Nassar was sentenced in Michigan to up to 175 years in prison after pleading guilty to seven counts of criminal sexual conduct. A total of 156 women gave victim impact statements in court.

    An attorney for a group of Nassar’s victims sued Michigan State University in July, alleging the school’s board of trustees held “illegal secret votes” to prevent the release of thousands of documents in the case, according to the court filing. A spokesperson for the university declined to comment at the time.

    The university pushed back on comparisons between the two cases.

    “This morning’s news might sound like the MSU of old; it was not,” interim president Teresa K. Woodruff said Sunday afternoon. “It is not because an independent, unbiased investigation is and continues to be conducted.”

    Woodruff made note of counseling resources available for anyone who may be affected by this news and mentioned the Center for Survivors and Office for Civil Rights on campus.

    “If you have heard or experienced or know of behavior that does not seem appropriate, please know that you have the support and resources here at MSU,” Woodruff said.

    Kenny Jacoby, the USA Today reporter who broke the story, told CNN’s Poppy Harlow and Phil Mattingly on “CNN This Morning” on Monday how the Nassar case has left a long shadow on campus.

    “There is deep mistrust on the MSU campus from students, from employees, from alumni and in the East Lansing community after the betrayal that was the Larry Nassar scandal,” Jacoby said. “They repeatedly missed opportunities to stop one of the most prolific sexual abusers in American history.

    “So when MSU takes this long to suspend the coach without pay – people tend to think of that as they’re covering this up, and that doesn’t sit well with most of these people.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Larry Nassar was stabbed after making a lewd comment watching Wimbledon, source says

    Larry Nassar was stabbed after making a lewd comment watching Wimbledon, source says

    [ad_1]

    A prisoner suspected of stabbing Larry Nassar at a federal penitentiary in Florida said the disgraced former sports doctor provoked the attack by making a lewd comment while they were watching a Wimbledon tennis match on TV, a person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press.

    The inmate, identified as Shane McMillan, was previously convicted of assaulting a correctional officer at a federal penitentiary in Louisiana in 2006 and attempting to stab another inmate to death at the federal Supermax prison in Florence, Colorado, in 2011, court records show.

    McMillan attacked Nassar in his cell Sunday with a makeshift weapon, stabbing him multiple times in the neck, chest and back before four other inmates rushed in and pulled him off of Nassar, according to the person familiar with the matter.

    Correctional officers assigned to the unit at the United States Penitentiary Coleman responded to Nassar’s cell and performed what officials said were life-saving measures. He was taken to a hospital, where he remained in stable condition Wednesday with injuries including a collapsed lung.

    Dr. Larry Nassar Faces Sentencing At Second Sexual Abuse Trial
    Larry Nassar sits in court listening to statements before being sentenced by Judge Janice Cunningham for three counts of criminal sexual assault in Eaton County Circuit Court on February 5, 2018 in Charlotte, Michigan.

    Scott Olson / Getty Images


    Cell doors on most federal prison units are typically open during the day, letting prisoners move around freely within the facility. Because Nassar was attacked in his cell, the incident was not captured on surveillance cameras, which only point at common areas and corridors.

    McMillan, 49, told prison workers that he attacked Nassar after the sexually abusive ex-U.S. gymnastics team doctor made a comment about wanting to see girls playing in the Wimbledon women’s match, the person said.

    The person was not authorized to publicly discuss details of the attack or the ongoing investigation and did so on the condition of anonymity.

    Messages seeking comment were left with lawyers who’ve represented McMillan in his past cases.

    Sunday’s attack was the second time Nassar has been assaulted in federal custody. He is serving decades in prison for sexually abusing athletes, including college and Olympic gymnastics stars, and possessing explicit images of children.

    The attack underscored persistent problems at the federal Bureau of Prisons, including violence, short staffing and an inability to keep even its highest profile prisoners safe.

    The Bureau of Prisons insists that there was adequate staffing at the prison where Nassar was stabbed, about 46 miles (74 kilometers) northwest of Orlando, though documents obtained by the AP show one-third of correctional officer positions remain unfilled at the prison.

    In a statement Wednesday, the agency said it was “imperative that we increase our staffing levels” and said it was recruiting officers and using financial incentives to try to retain workers. Officials said they are also still working to “tackle the problem violence in our facilities” and have enhanced their security procedures, but would not provide details.

    “The BOP takes seriously our duty to protect the individuals entrusted in our custody, as well as maintain the safety of correctional staff and the community,” agency spokesperson Scott Taylor said.

    McMillan is scheduled to be released from prison in May 2046, according to a Bureau of Prisons inmate database and court records, though that could change if he is charged and convicted of attacking Nassar.

    McMillan was originally sentenced to more than 20 years in federal prison after pleading guilty in Wyoming to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine in 2002. He had been expected to be released next year before his convictions for the Louisiana and Colorado prison attacks more than doubled his sentence.

    McMillan arrived at the Coleman, Florida, penitentiary last December, according to records obtained by the AP. He’d spent the previous four years at a federal penitentiary in Tucson, Arizona, following stints at federal prisons in Allenwood, Pennsylvania, and adjacent to the Supermax lockup in Colorado, the records show.

    Nassar was transferred to Coleman from the Tucson penitentiary in August 2018. His lawyers said he’d been assaulted within hours of being placed in general population at the Arizona prison.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Larry Nassar stabbed multiple times in prison

    Larry Nassar stabbed multiple times in prison

    [ad_1]

    Larry Nassar stabbed multiple times in prison – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Larry Nassar, the convicted sex offender and former USA Gymnastics team doctor, is recovering after being stabbed multiple times in a Florida prison. Manuel Bojorquez reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Multimillion-Dollar Payouts Are on the Rise in Sexual-Misconduct Lawsuits. Colleges’ Insurers Have Had Enough.

    Multimillion-Dollar Payouts Are on the Rise in Sexual-Misconduct Lawsuits. Colleges’ Insurers Have Had Enough.

    [ad_1]

    After the rulings are handed down in sexual-misconduct lawsuits against colleges, a second legal battle quietly begins.

    Determining who pays the legal fees and settlements — which, in the most sweeping cases, can total hundreds of millions of dollars — often leads to behind-the-scenes squabbles as colleges and their insurance carriers parse general liability policies.

    That tension is playing out between Baylor University and Lexington Insurance Company, which sued in January to stop covering claims against the university in a vast sexual-assault scandal.

    In higher education, insurers and institutions have typically been a united front: Colleges pay premiums, carriers pay up after a crisis. Now, cracks in the relationship are forming, especially as more sexual-misconduct lawsuits are lodged and settlements grow larger. Insurance companies and colleges are increasingly concerned about risk — both financial and reputational.

    In response, many insurers are simply walking away from higher-education coverage. Those that remain are taking precautions to avoid the financial fallout of sexual misconduct, putting the burden of legal fees and payouts more squarely on the shoulders of colleges.

    The Penn State Effect

    The tipping point came in the case of the former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky at Pennsylvania State University, which led to one of the first public rifts between a college and its insurer.

    The abuses perpetrated by Sandusky involved hundreds of victims over the more than four decades he was employed by Penn State. Thirty-two victims sued the university for damages, and settled for $93 million, as reported by PennLive.

    But neither Penn State nor its then-insurance company, Pennsylvania Manufacturers’ Association Insurance, wanted to pay.

    In 2016, after a three-year court case, a judge ruled on the “interpretation” of the contracts between PMA and Penn State — in essence, how the university’s insurance policies could be triggered by claims of sexual misconduct, and if the policies applied to Sandusky-related claims.

    Complicating the case was that, as is typical, Penn State’s insurance policies often changed year-to-year, and many victims were abused by Sandusky multiple times over several years. The judge’s opinion stated that claims made by each victim would trigger the policy of the year when the first incident of abuse occurred.

    But for some years, the university’s insurance coverage didn’t apply in certain situations — letting PMA off the hook. Penn State’s insurance policies in the mid-1990s, for example, did not cover sexual abuse or molestation. After 1998, PMA did not need to cover Penn State because the policies no longer applied when university officials first learned about Sandusky’s abuse and did not act to prevent it. And, beginning in 2005, only one claim related to Sandusky could be filed each year, according to the policies.

    While the public does not know how much of the multimillion-dollar settlement was paid by Penn State or PMA, the case touched off a new era in higher-ed insurance, said Kyle D. Logue, a professor at the University of Michigan Law School who’s an expert in insurance law.

    As a result, general liability policies are narrowing to exclude sexual abuse, said Logue. This pattern is common in insurance, he said: As insurers realize that certain risks are extremely large, or largely under the control of the institution that’s being insured, exclusions are added to protect against that risk.

    Sexual-misconduct coverage in general liability policies might only be approved if the colleges meet certain requirements. United Educators, an insurance company that works exclusively with schools and colleges, requires applicants to have policies in place on sexual-misconduct prevention and ways to report and investigate incidents. Other insurers simply no longer offer sexual-misconduct coverage.

    Claiming Otherwise

    With Penn State in recent memory, Lexington Insurance is following a similar playbook at Baylor and hoping to pre-emptively steer clear of a big payout. The pending sexual-misconduct lawsuit brought by 15 former students alleges that the plaintiffs were sexually assaulted by other students and staff members between 2004 and 2017 and that the university didn’t act to protect them.

    At Baylor, as at Penn State, the insurance policies were triggered for the year an incident occurred; a policy from 2014, for example, was triggered by a claim filed two years later.

    Filed on January 10, Lexington’s lawsuit alleges that Baylor’s policies didn’t cover sexual misconduct between 2012 and 2016, when the majority of the alleged sexual abuse occurred. For the remaining alleged assaults, the sexual abuse does not meet the definition of an “occurrence” — namely, an accident — because the university may have failed to prevent the incident under the federal gender-equity law known as Title IX, Lexington argues.

    (A spokesperson for Baylor University said the university “continues to work with Lexington regarding previous claims” but switched insurers for its general liability coverage “a few years ago.”)

    Amid such high-profile scandals, many insurers want to minimize their risks, opting for a different approach known as a claims-based policy. Under that system, when universities file claims with their insurer, that triggers the current year’s policy, which often no longer covers sexual abuse — no matter what year the misconduct occurred.

    “The shift to claims-made policies provides more general protection for the insurer than the specific exclusion does,” said Logue, in an email response to The Chronicle.

    United Educators maintained its occurrence-based coverage because it is “preferable for our members,” according to a spokesperson.

    Striking Out on Their Own

    As outside insurance companies become more wary of higher ed, many colleges are joining the ranks of corporations and creating a new structure to insure their risks.

    That new structure — known as a captive insurance company — is a separate legal entity, but the university is involved in its main operations, including creating policies and managing claims. Yale University, the University of California system, Rutgers University, and the University of Minnesota are among the colleges that self-insure with captive insurance companies.

    Michigan State University created such a company, called Lysander Series, after settling a lawsuit with the 300-plus victims of Larry Nassar, the former university sports doctor who abused women and girls under the guise of performing medical treatment. According to reporting from The Wall Street Journal, Michigan State rejected a policy with reduced coverage from its longstanding insurer, United Educators, and created Lysander instead.

    In 2019, at the time of its creation, a Michigan State spokesperson told the Journal that the policy from Lysander Series “broadly excludes insurer liability for sexual misconduct.” A United Educators spokesperson said the company does not “publicly disclose member or insurance policy details.”

    MSU also took to court its 13 former insurers to cover the $500-million settlement with Nassar’s victims. As of last September, Michigan State had recouped around $100 million, according to the Lansing State Journal. In November, a judge found that the American Physicians Assurance Corporation was not obligated to pay $31 million for costs related to the Nassar case under a 2000-2001 insurance policy.

    Sealing the Cracks

    The Nassar case was “one of the worst of the worst,” said Bryan Elie, vice president for underwriting at United Educators.

    But the conflicts in college insurance are only going to increase as more victims come forward about abusive behavior and sexual-misconduct lawsuits proliferate, experts say.

    In 2014 a report compiled by United Educators of publicly available cases involving sexual misconduct listed one case that topped $1 million. In 2022 that number jumped to five. Settlements within the University of California system and at the University of Southern California topped $615 million and $852 million, respectively.

    “Those trends have just been growing and growing,” said Kimberly Pacelli, a partner at the Title IX consulting firm TNG.

    Invariably, while conducting trainings for colleges’ Title IX coordinators, Pacelli notices that administrators realize the nature of their work is inherently risk management.

    “We always recommend that [Title IX coordinators] interface with their finance and administration folks to really understand who’s their insurer and what the insurance covers,” said Pacelli.

    Meanwhile, insurers are getting more invested in training colleges on Title IX policies to further minimize their risk. “From our perspective, our goal is to help the institution,” said Elie. He added: “Don’t let a serial predator take root.”

    [ad_2]

    Elissa Welle

    Source link