ReportWire

Tag: LA City Council

  • Los Angeles’ trash collection fee could increase after city council gives final approval

    [ad_1]

    The Los Angeles City Council gave final approval Tuesday to a major increase in trash collection fees, the first rate adjustment in 17 years, with the hike expected to hit customers next month.

    Tuesday’s 11-2 vote finalized a months-long process to update fees for the city’s trash collection service, known as the Solid Resources Program.

    City officials have said the rate change is necessary to cover organic waste disposal, staff salaries, maintaining vehicles and equipment, as well as inflation.

    Council members Monica Rodriguez and Adrin Nazarian voted against the proposed ordinance while members Ysabel Jurado and Curren Price were absent during the vote.

    The proposed ordinance now heads to Mayor Karen Bass for consideration. Once signed by the mayor, the ordinance will go into effect after 30 days.

    Earlier this year, council members instructed the Bureau of Sanitation and City Attorney’s office to draft the ordinance to update trash collection fees.

    Under the fee change, single-family homes and duplex buildings will increase 54% from $36.32 to $55.95, and apartments with three to four units will increase 130% from $24.33 to $55.95. Customers’ bi-monthly bill from the Department of Water and Power will jump to $111.90, for example, once the fees are in effect.

    Low-income customers who qualify for the city’s EZ-SAVE or Lifeline programs can receive lower rates.

    The rate adjustment will add another 18% increase over the next four fiscal years, reaching $65.93 a month by the 2029-30 fiscal year for single-family homes, duplex buildings and small apartment buildings. Rate adjustments will affect approximately 743,000 households, and another 474,000 residencies that receive bulky item collection services.

    Currently, apartment buildings with five and more units pay full price.

    The new rates will put the city in line with such neighboring cities as Burbank, Culver City, Long Beach and Santa Monica — but will still be on the lower end.

    It took the City Council about six months to finalize the ordinance as it had to comply with Proposition 218, a constitutional amendment limiting the methods by which local governments can levy taxes, fees and charges without taxpayer consent, which required public hearings and an opportunity for taxpayers to oppose the fee, an effort that failed to garner enough signatures.

    Bass incorporated the rate increase in her budget for the 2025-26 fiscal year as one part of the many solutions to address a roughly $1 billion deficit. The program has received subsidies from the general fund in past years
    — with a $200 million cost this fiscal year alone.

    City officials said the rate increase will close this strain on the budget.

    The fee increase was previously criticized by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.  

    “The increase in trash fees for residents of Los Angeles and other cities in California is the direct result of a reckless law signed in 2016 by Gov. Jerry Brown, Senate Bill 1383. It mandated a 75% reduction in ‘organic
    waste’ from the 2014 level starting in 2025, supposedly to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from landfills,” according to a statement from the association.

    “The date has arrived, and compliance with the law has significantly increased the cost of trash processing. It’s very effectively reducing the disposable income of Californians. The state government should reconsider ill-advised mandates that are raising costs for cities and their overtaxed residents.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Three Los Angeles City Council Districts to pick their representatives Tuesday

    Three Los Angeles City Council Districts to pick their representatives Tuesday

    [ad_1]

    Voters in three Los Angeles City Council districts will decide Tuesday who will represent them in City Hall for the next four years. 

    Although seven seats were up for re-election this year, four candidates, Nithya Raman (CD4), Imedla Padilla (CD6), Marqueece Harris-Dawson (CD8) and John Lee (CD12) reached above 50% in the primary to avoid run-offs.

    In District 2, the race is open with incumbent Paul Krekorian unable to run due to term limits. The district encompasses portions of the San Fernando Valley including the neighborhoods of North Hollywood, Sun Valley and Van Nuys. Former State Assemblymember Adrin Nazarian and small business owner Jillian Burgos are vying for the seat. 

    In District 10, incumbent Councilmember Heather Hutt is running for the first time after being appointed following Mark Ridley Thomas’s indictment for bribery and other crimes in 2021. Hutt is facing attorney Grace Yoo. The district includes the neighborhoods including Arlington Heights, Koreatown and Mid-City. 

    In District 14, incumbent Kevin de León is facing a challenge from tenant rights attorney Ysabel Jurado. This is de León’s first re-election since a leaked audio recording, in which he was discussing redistricting with other councilmembers while using racist language, in 2022. The district includes the neighborhoods of Boyle Heights, Downtown LA and Northeast LA. 

    [ad_2]

    Benjamin Gamson

    Source link

  • City of LA Looks to Spur Development of Larger apartments

    City of LA Looks to Spur Development of Larger apartments

    [ad_1]

    Developers in Los Angeles may get bonuses for building three- and -four-bedroom apartments.

    Los Angeles City Council President Paul Krekorian has filed a motion to create a new density bonus incentive to promote the construction of large family units in new apartment buildings, Urbanize Los Angeles reported.

    The motion calls for the Planning Department to create a density bonus program to exempt the square footage of third, fourth and fifth bedrooms, as well as third and fourth bathrooms, from floor area calculations of large family apartments.

    The program would also allow developers to add an additional story of height beyond current zoning restrictions, and take advantage of bonuses for developments of mostly large family units.

    And it would require a 99-year covenant ensuring that the apartments would maintain the same unit mix and be set aside for households earning no more than 120 percent of the area median income.

    The problem, Krekorian says, is a lack of larger apartments, which makes it difficult for larger families to find appropriate and affordable rental housing. Some 17 percent of the city’s renter households live in overcrowded flats.

    He says encouraging the development of larger apartments would help the city adapt to changes brought about by a broad shift to remote work during the pandemic. 

    At the same time, larger residential units can more easily accommodate multi-generational households.

    “Fully a third of the households in the City of Los Angeles are comprised of four or more people, yet only 14 percent of the renter-occupied housing stock encompasses three- or four-bedroom units,” his motion reads. 

    “Newly constructed rental units tend to be much smaller, and a majority are studios or one-bedroom units,” the motion added. 

    The motion also clarifies that the large family unit bonus would be in addition to existing incentives through the density bonus and Transit Oriented Communities guidelines.

    The motion comes when the city of L.A. is under pressure to add 255,000 new homes by 2029. 

    As part of that effort, city planning officials are rolling out a citywide adaptive reuse ordinance, expanding upon a program which allowed for the conversion of dozens of older Downtown office buildings into homes.

    L.A. County, a pioneer of single-family housing sprawl, has more overpacked homes than anywhere in the U.S.

    For three decades, the county has led the nation in overcrowding, with 11 percent of homes now having more than one occupant per room, the Los Angeles Times reported in an expose in October 2022. More than 370,000 families in L.A. County live in overcrowded conditions.

    — Dana Bartholomew

    Read more

    [ad_2]

    TRD Staff

    Source link

  • Leaked racist remarks from former Los Angeles City Council president ignite outrage

    Leaked racist remarks from former Los Angeles City Council president ignite outrage

    [ad_1]

    The Los Angeles City Council remains in turmoil following leaked audio of racist comments made one year ago by Nury Martinez, who resigned as council president on Monday after the revelation. Martinez was a no-show at Tuesday’s meeting, taking what she called a “leave of absence,” but residents expressed their outrage and demanded resignations. 

    “Shame on you! Shame on you” one man yelled at the council members. 

    The moment of backroom bigotry happened during a call that included Martinez and councilmembers Gil Cedillo and Kevin DeLeon. Cedillo and DeLeon showed up to Tuesday’s meeting, but never spoke. All three, who are Latino Democrats, have apologized. 

    It’s unclear who recorded and leaked the call in which Martinez referred to a colleague’s son, who is Black, as “Parece changuito,” which translates from Spanish to English as “that little monkey.” 

    Hateful comments were also directed at Indigenous people, gays and Blacks. No one is heard pushing back. 

    “On these tapes I have heard the worst of what Los Angeles is — trusted servants who voiced hate and bile,” said councilmember Mike Bonin, whose son was the target of Martinez’s slur. 

    The furious father said Martinez must first resign, then ask for forgiveness. 

    Gustavo Arellano, a columnist for the Los Angeles Times, said he expects the councilmembers will be forced to resign. 

    “I’m glad Latinos especially are being some of the loudest voices against them,” he said. “They’re going to have to step down.” 

    But when that will be, he says, is “a question only their arrogance can answer.” 

    [ad_2]

    Source link