ReportWire

Tag: King Charles III

  • Queen Camilla Reveals Her Hidden 'Harry Potter' Weakness

    Queen Camilla Reveals Her Hidden 'Harry Potter' Weakness

    [ad_1]

    Queen Camilla has a good number of personal skills and charms. She reportedly enjoys gardening and swimming in the sea, and loves to read. But about that reading—the passion is there, but the ability to do individual character voices in Harry Potter? Not so much.

    In a clip from the first episode of The Queen’s Reading Room Podcast released Monday, the monarch said that she enjoys reading the beloved seven-part book series to her grandchildren, “more than anything else,” but that when it comes to grunting out Hagrid’s lines declaring his passion for Blast-Ended Skrewts or Professor McGonagall’s morsels of Transfiguration wisdom, someone else in the house wears the crown.

    Instagram content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    “I can’t mimic voices for love or money, I’m completely hopeless at it,” she said. “I was a really bad actor at school, and I’ve never been able to master the art of mimicry. But my husband [King Charles], he does it brilliantly. He can do all the voices.”

    However, this latest tidbit is well out of spoiler territory (though we’d pay all the Galleons in Gringotts to hear Charles toss out his best “nitwit, oddment, blubber, tweak!”): Camilla revealed Charles’ voice acting skills in the 2018 documentary Prince, Son, and Heir: Charles at 70.

    “He reads Harry Potter and he can do all the different voices,” she said, “and I think children really appreciate that.”

    [ad_2]

    Kase Wickman

    Source link

  • Prince Andrew Won’t Face a New Police Investigation—But He Might Still Be Evicted From Royal Lodge

    Prince Andrew Won’t Face a New Police Investigation—But He Might Still Be Evicted From Royal Lodge

    [ad_1]

    This week, a new tranche of documents from a court case related to late financier and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein were unsealed, bringing the name of Prince Andrew back into the center of the story. Though little new information was uncovered in the first set of documents, it did lead the anti-monarchy pressure group Republic to ask the Metropolitan Police to open an investigation into the disgraced prince. A spokesperson for the police force told the BBC that there were no plans to open a new investigation. The spokesperson said, “As with any matter, should new and relevant information be brought to our attention we will assess it.” (Prince Andrew has long denied any wrongdoing regarding sexual abuse accusations made against him.)

    Still, the return of the controversy has made an impact on King Charles III, according to the Daily Mail. Royal sources told the tabloid that it will only “crystalize” the king’s determination to solve the “Andrew problem” and could lead Charles to renew a push to evict Andrew from Royal Lodge, the 30-room mansion where he lives with his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson.

    When reached by Vanity Fair, Buckingham Palace declined to comment on the Daily Mail’s report, citing a policy against commenting on “private family matters.”

    Since the beginning of his reign 15 months ago, the monarch has sought a middle ground when it comes to his much-discussed younger brother. Though Andrew was stripped of his military titles and his HRH status the month before he came to a 2022 settlement with accuser Virginia Giuffre, he has been permitted to play a public role as a family member at events like the funeral of the late Queen Elizabeth II and the coronation last May. During last month’s family walk to Christmas services, Andrew was a part of the larger group alongside his daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, and his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson.

    That hasn’t stopped the king from attempting to cast Andrew further from the royal spotlight, and last spring, The Mirror reported that Charles was planning to evict Andrew from Royal Lodge to reflect his status. The plans reportedly failed after Andrew refused to leave, and after surgery for breast cancer last summer, Ferguson spent weeks recovering in the house, and the relocation plans were reportedly shelved.

    There is reason to doubt that future attempts to move Andrew and Ferguson are the consequence of the recent revival of the Epstein story, however, and directly responsive to the king’s will. Andrew reportedly signed a long-term lease to Royal Lodge upon moving into the house in 2003, and it is managed by the Crown Estate, an independent property arm that manages property held in right of the crown. 

    When Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were asked to leave Frogmore Cottage last year, the message didn’t come directly from the king. In the book Endgame, Omid Scobie reports that the eviction notice came in the form of a letter from Sir Michael John Stevens, the keeper of the Privy Purse. Still, the dispute’s timing left little ambiguity on its relation to the king and his wishes. According to the New York Post, the decision to evict Meghan and Harry took place one day after the release of the prince’s revealing memoir, Spare, in January 2023.


    Listen to Vanity Fair’s DYNASTY podcast now.

    [ad_2]

    Erin Vanderhoof, Katie Nicholl

    Source link

  • Meet Queen Camilla’s Children

    Meet Queen Camilla’s Children

    [ad_1]

    Camilla Shand married British Army officer Andrew Parker Bowles in 1973. She had already dated and broken up with Prince Charles, but they remained friends. So, it raised a few eyebrows when the couple asked Prince Charles to be the godfather of the first child, Thomas Henry Charles, born December 18, 1974. Their daughter, Laura Rose, completed the family when she was born on January 1, 1978.

    “People blame their upbringing for everything, but my childhood—and my sister’s—was absolutely idyllic,” Tom said in an interview with The Telegraph. The couple raised their children on large, shabby-chic estates in the Wiltshire countryside. According to Queen Consort, they were very close to Camilla’s sister Annabel Elliot’s children, Ben, Alice, and Catherine. While Andrew was often away for work, Camilla was a lively, hands-on, easy-going mother. “Don’t worry, darling,” Tom once recalled her saying whenever he got in trouble.

    According to Angela Levin, author of Camilla: From Outcast to Queen Consort, the children loved when Prince Charles, who they called “Sir,” would come to visit. “I’ve always adored my stepfather; he’s always been kind and good and a lovely man,” Tom has noted, per Camilla. “He is a man of warmth, intelligence and humanity.”

    But occasionally the children were part of the dramas enfolding their parents’ lives, even if they didn’t know it. According to Penny Junor’s Queen Consort, Diana, already aware of Prince Charles and Camilla’s continuing relationship, firmly vetoed Tom serving as a page at their 1981 wedding. Prince Charles relented, and Tom instead attended the ceremony with his mother, according to Queen Consort, standing on his seat at times for a better view.

    This innocence would be shattered in the early ’90s, when Prince Charles and Camilla’s affair became a worldwide scandal. “When it first started we thought it was entirely normal growing up to have five or six paparazzi hanging around—we would go up there with binoculars and say, ‘Oh, look, Mummy, there’s five today,’” Tom once recalled, according to Queen Consort. “They’re bullies…and they made you very angry. When you were 15 or 16 and you’re coming out of an airport and they were really winding you up, all I wanted to do was smack them in the face and beat the hell out of them. But you couldn’t do that.”

    [ad_2]

    Hadley Hall Meares

    Source link

  • King Charles “Would Love” to Have His Whole Family Together at Christmas

    King Charles “Would Love” to Have His Whole Family Together at Christmas

    [ad_1]

    When the royals gather for Christmas this year, there will be some notable absentees as well as some new additions around the dinner table at Sandringham. 

    Despite rumors that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle hope to travel to the UK for the holidays, Vanity Fair has learned they will not be coming to England to join King Charles and the royal family for the festive season. 

    According to one royal insider, there is “no chance” of Harry, Meghan, and their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, being invited to join the royal family because there is still so much “hostility” toward them.

    Last month, Harry and Meghan spoke with King Charles for his 75th birthday, with Archie and Lilibet sweetly singing “Happy Birthday” to the monarch in a video recording, which led to speculation about the possibility of a reunion. Yet VF has learned there has been little communication between the Sussexes and the king since then. 

    The source added that while King Charles “would love” to have all of his family together at Christmas he is “nervous” about inviting Harry and Meghan into the inner sanctum. “The king would love nothing more than to have Christmas with his sons and all his grandchildren, but it’s not that simple and there is no chance the Sussexes will be coming. It would make things very difficult because there is still so much hostility towards Harry and Meghan, particularly from the Prince and Princess of Wales,” they said. “Charles is also deeply nervous about the risks of conversations being leaked by the Sussex camp, which is why there have been very few of them.”

    While Harry and Meghan have been quiet about royal matters in recent months, there has been negative fallout following the November release of Omid Scobie’s book Endgame in which the names of the royals who allegedly made comments about the color of Archie’s skin ahead of his birth were published in the Dutch edition. One source who recently spent time with senior members says, “The king finds these suggestions about racism extraordinary and frankly unbelievable. It is all so far removed from the truth and what was actually said.”

    Sources close to Prince William and Princess Kate say they would not want to be in the same room as Harry and Meghan “let alone spend Christmas with them.”

    In keeping with a tradition they started shortly after their wedding, William and Kate will enjoy Christmas day with the royal family, and then a second Christmas at Anmer Hall with the Middleton family.

    And in a break with tradition, Queen Camilla’s children Tom Parker Bowles and Laura Lopes, along with their families, have been invited to join the royals this Christmas. In previous years, Camilla has left Sandringham after Christmas dinner to host her own family dinner at Ray Mill, her home in Wiltshire. Camilla is very close with her children and five grandchildren. Her sister Annabel Elliot, who serves as one of Camilla’s personal aides, will also attend the celebrations. 

    According to reports, because of the additional numbers, Christmas dinner will be served in the white drawing room rather than the dining room where the late queen used to host the festive meal. 

    While King Charles is ringing in the changes as a new monarch, he is keen to maintain the traditions his mother enjoyed. The entire royal family will attend church on Christmas morning and meet members of the public afterward.

    Charles, who is overseeing an extensive refurbishment of Sandringham’s gardens, will also stay in Norfolk for New Year’s Eve. Usually, the king welcomes the New Year in Scotland, but sources say he will extend his Norfolk break and head to the Highlands later in January. 

    [ad_2]

    Katie Nicholl

    Source link

  • King Charles’s Greek-Flag Tie Unveils a Bit of the Logic Behind His Tie Choices

    King Charles’s Greek-Flag Tie Unveils a Bit of the Logic Behind His Tie Choices

    [ad_1]

    Last year, King Charles III didn’t get to attend the annual United Nations Climate Change Conference due to a request from the government, and the series of events made headlines against the backdrop of political turmoil. The 28th edition of the event, which those in the know usually abbreviate to COP, began in Dubai last week, and though the monarch was one of its highest-profile guests, his presence didn’t attract too much attention. That is, until Friday, when he met with Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and delivered a speech wearing a tie with a motif of the Greek flag.

    Just days before, Sunak had canceled a meeting with Greece’s prime minister, Kyriakos Mitsotakis, due to the long-running dispute over the Elgin Marbles, and nearly instantly, speculative headlines wondered if the king was secretly telegraphing an opinion. Was he showing off his sympathy for the movement to return the legendary artworks questionably residing at the British Museum? Or silently joining the voices in British politics—including Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer and George Osborne, former chancellor and current head of the museum’s board—condemning Sunak’s move? 

    According to the BBC, however, royal sources claimed his sartorial decision was made at random. They also pointed out that he wore the same tie just a week prior during a visit by South Korean president Yoon Suk Yeol. “They insisted the tie worn by the king when he met Mr. Sunak did not have any connection with Greece or the diplomatic row about the sculptures,” the outlet wrote. Others noted that his late father, Prince Philip, was born in Greece and that Charles has often vacationed in the country.

    Still, the entire affair gives us a somewhat unprecedented look into the thought process by which the king picks out his ties every day, and it seems that he doesn’t think too hard about such decisions. At eight years old, Charles Philip Arthur George was first publicly photographed in a necktie when he arrived at the Cheam School for his first day. Since then, he has worn one most days of his life, the obvious exceptions being when he’s played in polo matches and spent time on the ski slopes.  

    In his biography The King, Christopher Andersen noted that Charles even wore them during his years at the University of Cambridge, where fellow students thought he was unusually formal. On casual days, you were likely to see the future king wearing “corduroys, tweed jackets, immaculately polished dress shoes, button-down shirts, and a tie.” If you’ve spent nearly seven decades wearing ties almost daily, it makes sense that you might not give them too much thought. 

    Still, he clearly cares about curating his wardrobe, down to the smallest elements. “I mind about detail and color and things like that—and color combinations,” he told Edward Enninful in a 2020 British Vogue interview. “I’m lucky because I can find marvelous people who are brilliant makers of the things that I appreciate, and because of that, I try to keep them going for longer.”

    Since the beginning of his reign, the monarch has mostly worn ties with royal blue graphic elements, including poppies, arrows, and intricate filigree, along with a few striped ties matching his chosen suits or tartans on trips to Scotland. His modest yet extensive collection also includes a few off-the-wall examples, however, like a purple zebra tie he has worn at least three times over the last few months (including twice in Kenya) and one featuring cats and owls. Other than periodic repetition over two to three weeks and a bit of seasonal variation, there isn’t too much rhyme or reason.

    On Tuesday, the king wore yet another tie with a connection to Greece, which featured the blue-and-white cross design that appears on both the current flag and older iterations of its monarchy’s royal standard. It could have been a bit of cheek from an independent-minded king, or it could have been just another choice from the rotation—he’d already worn it at least four other times this year.

    [ad_2]

    Erin Vanderhoof

    Source link

  • Omid Scobie Isn’t Afraid to “Burn Bridges” With His New Royal Family Book Endgame

    Omid Scobie Isn’t Afraid to “Burn Bridges” With His New Royal Family Book Endgame

    [ad_1]

    Three years ago, Omid Scobie became one of the first journalists to get to the bottom of the mystery of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s royal exit when he and coauthor Carolyn Durand published the bestselling biography, Finding Freedom: Harry and Meghan and the Making of a Modern Royal Family. Soon, the book’s sympathetic approach to the Sussexes and its runaway success turned Scobie into part of the story. When his reporting came up as a part of Meghan’s case against the Mail on Sunday’s parent company, Associated Newspapers, the British tabloids opened fire.

    This week, Scobie is back for another round with his new book, Endgame: Inside the Royal Family and the Monarchy’s Fight for Survival. It’s equally well-sourced and full of just as many details as its predecessor, but this time around Scobie is stepping out of the role of omniscient narrator and breaking down what the palace is really like behind-the-scenes—something he told Vanity Fair he had to do “completely without favor or fear.” He shares specific details about his more contentious conversations with royal aides and makes allegations about the palace press team’s machinations with the media. “Yes, I realize it closes the door in many places and burns bridges,” Scobie added. “I also think that it’s the right time to tell this story.”

    Though Endgame revisits past controversies and details a few of the bumps in the road for Meghan and Harry after their exit from the royal family, it mainly centers on the challenges faced by Prince William, Princess Kate, King Charles III, and Queen Camilla as they lead the monarchy forward into the future. He makes the case that the discord between the various factions in the royal family and their staff isn’t trivial. Instead, it’s a reflection of how well the family is adapting to its role in a nation in flux. Though the book’s title might seem pessimistic, Scobie doesn’t think the monarchy is in its final throes.

    Last week, he spoke with VF to explain his belief that the royals need to learn to make a better case for themselves in the 21st century, and that challenge starts behind the scenes. “Having a household that’s reflective of modern day society is incredibly important to them, yet we still look at the people around the senior members of the royal family and mostly see people from exactly the same background, be it socioeconomically or ethnically,” he said. “Ultimately it’s a case of reaffirming the need and importance of the royal family in modern Britain 2023, which I think many times they struggle to do.”

    Vanity Fair: By the time the book is released, a few of the stories may have already been revealed in excerpts and headlines. Beyond that, what do you hope that people will really understand before they dive in?

    Omid Scobie: I hope that people understand that despite press coverage, this is not a book about Harry and Meghan. This is not Finding Freedom part two. It’s a really important look at the current state of the British royal family written in a way I don’t think anyone has ever done before at a time when I think is more important than ever. And I hope that rather than trying to ignore or reject this kind of dialogue that it’s embraced because I think that ultimately it always leads to better things.

    It’s confrontational, but you’re not trying to tear things down. When you announced the title, I remember reading comments from a few people who perhaps misunderstood the definition of the word “endgame” and were taking it to be a declaration of the end of the royal family, which is quite clearly not what you think! What influenced the title choice? What is the current match that is in the end stages?

    We’ve reached this pinnacle moment with the royal family where the firm as we know it, is essentially at risk. I say “as we know it” because I’m certainly not one to go out declaring the end of the monarchy—I think that that’s very unlikely. Regardless of any Republican movement or apathy amongst younger people, those days are far away. But we’ve only recently reached the end of a 70-year reign, which we celebrated and felt upheld the values and the morals of what the Crown promotes and champions. I thought it was a really important time to look at whether that’s still the case because the recent events, actions, decisions, and goings on within the House of Windsor in the last five or six years give us a completely different story.

    As it is a publicly funded institution, I think it’s important that we’re able to actually stand back and take a look at the big picture. It’s for those of us who feel more comfortable questioning the purpose and the relevance of the monarchy, but also for those within it who have the ability to either take it forward in a really positive direction where growth and modernization and all of those things are possible. Or whether they’ll be completely ignored and we see perhaps what’s happened across other parts of Europe, where monarchies have shrunk in importance and relevance.

    [ad_2]

    Erin Vanderhoof

    Source link

  • Renewed Israel-Gaza war crowds out climate at COP28

    Renewed Israel-Gaza war crowds out climate at COP28

    [ad_1]

    Press play to listen to this article

    Voiced by artificial intelligence.

    DUBAI — The war in Gaza crashed into the United Nations climate summit on Friday, as furious sideline diplomacy, blunt censures of violence and an Iranian boycott shoved global warming to the side.

    It was a sharp change in tone from the COP28 opening on Thursday, which ended on an upbeat note as countries promised to support climate-stricken communities. The mood darkened the following day as news broke that the week-old truce between Israel and Hamas was collapsing. 

    Israeli President Isaac Herzog spent much of the morning in meetings telling fellow leaders about “how Hamas blatantly violates the ceasefire agreements,” according to a post on his X account. He ended up skipping a speech he was meant to give during Friday’s parade of world leaders.

    There were other conspicuous no-shows. Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman was absent, despite being listed as an early speaker. And Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian Authority leader, also disappeared from the final speakers’ list after initially being scheduled to talk just a few slots after Herzog. 

    Then, shortly after leaders posed for a group photo in the Dubai venue on Friday, the Iranian delegation announced it was walking out. The reason, Iran’s energy minister told his country’s official news agency: The “political, biased and irrelevant presence of the fake Zionist regime” — referring to Israel. 

    By Friday afternoon, the Iranian pavilion had emptied out. 

    The backroom drama played out even as leader after leader took the stage in the vast Expo City campus to make allotted three-minute statements on their efforts to stop the planet from boiling. The World Meteorological Organization said Thursday that 2023 was almost certain to be the hottest year ever recorded.

    U.N. climate talks are often buffeted by outside events. This is the second such meeting held after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. That war provoked some public barbs and backroom discussions at last year’s summit in Egypt, but leaders still maintained their scheduled speaking slots and a veneer of focus on the matter they were supposedly there to discuss.

    This year, that veneer cracked. 

    “There are currently a number of very, very serious crises that are causing great suffering for many people. It was clear that these would also affect the mood at the COP,” a German diplomat, granted anonymity to discuss the issue candidly, told POLITICO. 

    But that can’t distract officials working on climate change, the diplomat added: “It is also clear that no one on our planet, no country on Earth, can escape the destructive effects of the climate crisis.” 

    Tell-tale signals

    There had been early signs that the conflict would spill over into discussions at the climate summit. 

    Sameh Shoukry, president of the COP27 climate conference and Egyptian minister of foreign affairs, Sultan Ahmed al-Jaber, president of COP28 | Sean Gallup/Getty Images

    At Thursday’s opening ceremony, Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry — president of last year’s COP27 summit — asked all delegates to stand for a moment of silence in memory of two climate negotiators who had recently died, “as well as all civilians who have perished during the current conflict in Gaza.” 

    On Friday, Jordanian King Abdullah II, Iraqi President Abdul Latif Rashid, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan were among the leaders who used their COP28 speeches to draw attention to the war.

    “This year’s COP must recognize even more than ever that we cannot talk about climate change in isolation from the humanitarian tragedies unfolding around us,” Abdullah said. “As we speak, the Palestinian people are facing an immediate threat to their lives and wellbeing.”  

    Ramaphosa went further: “South Africa is appalled at the cruel tragedy that is underway in Gaza. The war against the innocent people of Palestine is a war crime that must be ended now. 

    But, he added, “we cannot lose momentum in the fight against climate change.”

    Asked for comment, an official from the United Arab Emirates, which is overseeing COP28, said the country had invited all parties to the conference and “are pleased with the exceptionally high level of attendance this year.” 

    The official added: “Climate change is a global issue and as the host for this significant, momentous conference, the UAE  welcomes constructive dialogue and continues to work with all international partners and stakeholders across the board to deliver impactful results for COP28.”  

    The other summit in Dubai

    In the back rooms of the conference venue, leaders were holding urgent talks on the war. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken huddled with Herzog on Thursday, according to a post on Herzog’s X account. 

    “In addition to participating in the COP, I’ll have an opportunity to meet with Arab partners to discuss the conflict in Gaza,” Blinken told reporters Wednesday while in Brussels for a NATO gathering. He didn’t offer further details.

    A senior Biden administration official told reporters Vice President Kamala Harris would also be “having discussions on the conflict between Israel and Hamas” during her trip to Dubai.

    On his X account, Herzog said he had met with “dozens” of leaders at the summit. His post featured photographs of Britain’s King Charles III, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, India’s Narendra Modi and Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. He also posted about meetings with Blinken and UAE leader Mohamed bin Zayed.

    Erdoğan met with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni at COP28 to discuss the war in Gaza, according to a statement by the Turkish communications directorate that made no mention of climate action. 

    U.K. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak made no secret of the fact that he intended to use some of his brief visit to Dubai to talk about regional security.

    U.K. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak made no secret of the fact that he intended to use some of his brief visit to Dubai to talk about regional security | Sean Gallup/Getty Images

    “I’ll be speaking to lots of leaders … not just [about] climate change, but also the situation in the Middle East,” he told reporters on his flight out of the U.K. Thursday night.

    The reignited Israel-Hamas conflict came to dominate his time at the summit. Meetings with other leaders were arranged with regional tensions in mind — not climate. Sunak met Israel’s Herzog and Jordan’s Abdullah, as well as Egyptian President Abdel Fatah al Sisi and the emir of Qatar.  

    “Given the events of this morning in Israel and Gaza, the prime minister has spent most of his bilateral meetings discussing that situation,” Sunak’s spokesperson told reporters in Dubai.

    The meetings focused on “what more we can do both to support the innocent civilians in Gaza, to de-escalate tensions, to get more hostages out and more aid in,” the spokesperson said.

    Even the U.K.’s ostensibly nonpolitical head of state, King Charles III — in Dubai to give an opening address to world leaders — was deployed to aid the diplomatic effort. Buckingham Palace said the king would “have the opportunity to meet regional leaders to support the U.K.’s efforts to promote peace in the region.”

    Separately, French President Emmanuel Macron was planning to meet various leaders on the security situation and then fly on for talks in Qatar, according to an Elysée Palace official. 

    Meanwhile, three of Europe’s leaders who have been the strongest backers of the Palestinians — Irish leader Leo Varadkar, Belgian Prime Minister Alexander de Croo and Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez — held talks on the fringes of COP on Friday morning.

    Earlier on Friday, Israel withdrew its ambassador to Spain, blasting what it called Sánchez’s “shameful remarks” on the situation.

    Brazil’s Lula, whose country will host a major COP conference in 2025, lamented that just as more joint action is needed to prevent climate catastrophe, war and violence were cleaving the world apart.  

    “We are facing what may be the greatest challenge that humanity has faced till now,” he said. “Instead of uniting forces, the world is going to wars. It feeds divisions and deepens poverty and inequalities.”

    Zia Weise, Suzanne Lynch and Charlie Cooper reported from Dubai. Karl Mathiesen reported from London.

    Clea Calcutt contributed reporting from Paris. Nahal Toosi contributed reporting from Washington, D.C. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Prince Harry and Charles’ “awkward” conversation after book

    Prince Harry and Charles’ “awkward” conversation after book

    [ad_1]

    Prince Harry made the “first steps” to reach out to King Charles III after the publication of his bombshell memoir but was met with a “cold” and “awkward” reception, according to a new book by the prince’s biographer, Omid Scobie.

    In his new book, Endgame, which charts the monarchy’s “fight for survival” in the 21st century, Scobie has written extensively about the issues faced and exposed by Harry and Meghan Markle in relation to other senior members of the royal family.

    Following the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s split from the monarchy in 2020, they have since spoken publicly about the motivation for doing so, citing issues including the hostile tabloid press, palace aides and royal family members.

    In January 2023, Harry published the most revealing account of behind palace walls life since his mother, Princess Diana, covertly cooperated on a 1992 biography exposing the breakdown of her marriage and infidelity of her husband, Charles.

    From left, Prince Harry in Windsor, September 10, 2022, and King Charles III in Scotland, July 3, 2023. According to a new book, Harry and Charles exchanged an “awkward” phone call after the publication of the princes’ bombshell memoir.
    Chris Jackson/Getty Images/ Andrew Milligan – WPA Pool/Getty Images

    Harry’s Spare memoir made a number of allegations and claims against senior royals, most explicitly his brother, Prince William, and stepmother, Queen Camilla.

    No members of the family addressed the book in public, in line with a blanket “no comment” position taken by Buckingham Palace. The book saw the popularity of the monarchy and its individual members drop, most significantly affecting Harry and Meghan themselves.

    In Endgame, Scobie writes that in the fallout of the book’s publication, it was Harry who made the first move to establish contact with his father.

    “Encouraged by a close friend, the Duke of Sussex reached out to Charles by phone to try to discuss some of the unresolved issues between them,” he said, before citing a “friend of the prince,” who told him: “It was an awkward conversation, but he knew if he didn’t make those first steps, there would never be any progress. There were no raised voices, no arguments…but the King was cold and brief rather than open to any proper dialogue.”

    Scobie told readers that with “no significant resolution or outcome” from the conversation between father and son, Charles had “once again wasted an opportunity to take the upper hand and let bygones be bygones for the sake of family harmony.”

    The continued strain in the relationships between Harry and royal family members was highlighted on the world stage in May 2023, when the prince traveled to London to attend his father’s coronation.

    No longer a working member of the family, Harry (who attended without Meghan) was seated not with his brother and sister-in-law, William and Kate, but two rows behind in Westminster Abbey, between an elderly royal relative and the husband of his cousin, Princess Eugenie.

    The continuation of the royal rift, has, Scobie suggests, been met with frustration by those in connection with the monarchy.

    “It’s complex, but there’s increasing frustration from some of the wider circle of family members that Charles won’t just fix things for the sake of everyone,” Scobie quoted a “royal source” as saying in his book, before telling readers: “The institution needs it. Just three months after the publication of Spare, the royal family’s approval rating fell to its-lowest level in years.”

    Endgame was published by Dey Street, an imprint of HarperCollins.

    James Crawford-Smith is Newsweek‘s royal reporter, based in London. You can find him on X (formerly Twitter) at @jrcrawfordsmith and read his stories on Newsweek‘s The Royals Facebook page.

    Do you have a question about King Charles III, William and Kate, Meghan and Harry, or their family that you would like our experienced royal correspondents to answer? Email royals@newsweek.com. We’d love to hear from you.