ReportWire

Tag: Ken Paxton

  • It’s Allred vs. Cruz and Other Results From Super Tuesday Primaries in North Texas

    It’s Allred vs. Cruz and Other Results From Super Tuesday Primaries in North Texas

    [ad_1]

    In a post-2016 world, every election night is at the least an interesting one. That goes double for this year’s primaries in Texas. Although the presidential nominations aren’t exactly hotly contested, Super Tuesday has had a big circle around it for many since last September, when Attorney Gen. Ken Paxton won his Senate impeachment trial, if not last May, when the state House voted overwhelmingly to impeach him.

    Since being reinstated to his office, Paxton has followed through on his promised batch of revenge endorsements of challengers taking on incumbent House members who voted to impeach him. Collin County, Paxton’s home, had several races including GOP incumbents Paxton wanted out. For his part of the GOP civil war, Gov. Greg Abbott has taken aim at those incumbents who opposed his efforts to push a school voucher program through in 2023.

    Well before polls closed locally at 7 p.m. CNN listed the Texas Senate race as one of the top few their analysts were closely monitoring last night. The notion of Democratic U.S. Rep. Colin Allred, a former NFL player, squaring off against GOP Sen. Ted Cruz, who has proven to be relatively bulletproof, has political implications well beyond the Red River.

    Technical issues in Irving and logistical difficulties in Denton County were reported by NBC 5 during its 6 p.m. broadcast. A few minutes prior to polls closing, WFAA reported that lengthy lines of people were still waiting to cast their votes in Collin County. Since “election integrity” has improbably become almost as hot of an issue as immigration and abortion, such inconveniences have risen to the top of the newscast.

    Here’s how Super Tuesday unfolded in North Texas.

    Who will face Ted Cruz?

    Allred, a Dallas Democrat, duked it out Tuesday night with state Sen. Roland Gutierrez for a chance to unseat Cruz. With 50% of the votes counted around 9 p.m. Tuesday, Allred was projected as the winner with his total of the votes hovering around 60%. It was an anti-climactic result to a race many predicted would go to a runoff because of the nine of candidates on the ballot.

    Mark Hand, assistant professor of political science at the University of Texas at Arlington, said he was surprised by Allred’s showing even though he had out-raised Gutierrez by a wide margin in campaign donations.

    “I thought that he would lead. I didn’t know that he would win so commandingly,” he told the Observer Tuesday night. However, the most recent poll Hand had seen showed Cruz up some 12 points over Allred and Gutierrez. “So, he’s [Allred] got an uphill battle,” Hand added.

    Another poll Hand saw showed Cruz at 45% with Allred in the low-30s. “For someone with the name ID that Ted Cruz has – everyone knows who Ted Cruz is, everyone has an opinion about Ted Cruz – that 45% could turn out to be a ceiling for him,” Hand said. This should give Democrats some confidence.

    Wendy Davis, the former state Senator and gubernatorial candidate, was at Allred’s watch party at Rodeo Goat in Dallas. Speaking to the Observer, she explained why Allred is a good matchup against Cruz in November.

    “I think Colin is obviously the type of person not afraid of a challenge,” Davis said before adding that Allred managed to defeat Pete Sessions in 2018, a longtime Republican who lost to Allred after District 32 was redrawn in favor of Democrats. “He’s demonstrated deeply held Democratic values while working across the aisle. … There are a lot of Republican voters looking for an alternative.”

    “There’s too many ‘me guys’ in D.C.” Allred said during his victory speech, taking aim at his Republican opponent. “But none as big as Ted Cruz. In our democracy, ‘we’ has always been more powerful than ‘me’. We the people. We hold these truths to be self-evident. We shall overcome. Yes, we can. And we don’t have to be embarrassed by our Senator. We can get a new one.”

    Dallas Races of Note

    The race for the Democratic nomination for Dallas County sheriff was an eye-catching one thanks to former office holder and one-time Texas gubernatorial candidate Lupe Valdez throwing her hat in the ring. Votes for Valdez started the night slow and stayed slower than those for incumbent Marian Brown, but the race appeared headed for a runoff.

    Incumbent Sen. Nathan Johnson faced off with state Rep. Victoria Neave Criado for the Texas Senate District 16 seat, declaring victory around 8:30 p.m. “I’m eager to get back to work,” Johnson told WFAA. He said if the results send any message, it’s that Texans want things to get done. Johnson, a Democrat, will not face a Republican opponent in November.

    “I’ve learned a great deal over the past five years and built key relationships with advocates, subject matter experts, agencies and, of course, with legislators,” Johnson told the Observer recently. “As a result, I am more effective now than I was when first elected. I aim to use that experience to continue effectively fighting right-wing destructiveness, winning policy advances and changes for SD 16 residents and building strength and trust in the Democratic Party.”

    The race for U.S. House District 32, Allred’s district, was packed with 14 candidates, including 10 Democrats. The Democrats included Dallas trauma surgeon Dr. Brian Williams, state Rep. Julie Johnson, Callie Butcher, Raja Chaudhry, Alex Cornwallis, Kevin Felder, Zachariah Manning, Jan McDowell, Justin Moore and Christopher Panayiotou.

    By 10 p.m. Tuesday, over half of the votes were going to Johnson, while Williams trailed behind at about 21%. To avoid a runoff in such a crowded field, similar to how Allred avoided one in his race, was perhaps both unexpected and impressive.

    Her supporters argued she was more than ready for the job. “We need effective members of Congress,” Johnson told the Observer last month. “I’m the only one in this field that has actually won a competitive general election, that knows what it’s like to beat Republicans significantly, and that has any legislative experience at all.”

    The Speaker vs. The AG

    With 99% of the votes counted, Paxton-backed David Covey and Texas House Speaker Dade Phelan appeared headed toward a runoff. This result was surprising to Hand. Phelan, who led the charge to impeach Paxton, has been as big of an enemy to Paxton as anyone else in Austin.

    “It looks like if the numbers hold that he [Phelan] might lose his seat and if he does, that’s one of the three most powerful state officials and, I think, the first ever speaker of the House to lose a re-election race,” Hand said. “It’ll change the relationship that’s historically existed between the House and the Senate for the last few years.”

    He said it also looks like Paxton is going three-for-three on ousting judges from the Texas Criminal Court of Appeals who ruled in a way that he didn’t like a few years ago. According to The Texas Tribune, judges Sharon Keller, Barbara Hervey and Michelle Slaughter all voted against allowing Paxton to have unilateral ability to prosecute voter fraud. “It looks like all three of them are going to lose their seats,” Hand said.

    Even though many of the challengers the AG endorsed were losing or headed for runoffs late into the evening, Hand thinks the judicial wins will mean a lot to Paxton.

    “In terms of the checks and balances in the state, I think that’s surprising and probably also a bit worrying in terms of the independence of the three branches,” he said. “I think Paxton goes to bed tonight with a smile on his face.”

    What Happened in Collin County

    In Collin County, dozens of voters at the Allen Municipal Court building waited outside for an hour and a half, shuffling past posters and placards promoting warring endorsements by Gov. Abbott and Attorney Gen. Paxton. As the sun went down and the clock inched closer to closing time, the line only continued to grow.

    According to elections administrators, more than 54,000 people voted in Collin County on Election Day, on top of 8,000 early voters — roughly 19% of registered voters. Wade Emmert, the former Dallas County GOP chair, wasn’t surprised by the solid turnout or the long lines.

    “Collin County is the epicenter of the proxy war between Governor Abbott and Ken Paxton and the impeachment versus school vouchers vote,” Emmert said during WFAA’s live election broadcast.

    Just a few days earlier, at the Allen City Hall building that sits a short walk from the municipal court, two candidates on either side of that “proxy war” shared a tense moment. Jeff Leach, the incumbent in House District 67, is a former Paxton protege who voted to impeach the attorney general. In the primary, he was challenged by the Paxton-endorsed Daren Meis, a former Allen City Council member.

    “I’m asking you to step away from me,” Leach told Meis while the two were greeting voters on the last day of early voting. “Your face is red, your eyes are bloodshot, and you said ‘Fuck you’ to me.”

    Meis, who appeared to be asking Leach to share details about his donors, laughed at Leach and called him “dishonest.”

    Election night was less dramatic. Roughly 30 minutes after the polls closed, with dozens of voters still in line and facing long waits, reports indicated that Leach had earned two-thirds of the early vote.

    Emmert said he thought the lawmaker’s “impassioned” speech before the impeachment vote would have rallied more support for Meis.

    “I’m not surprised to see Jeff winning, but I thought Meis would’ve done a little better than that,” Emmert said.

    Elsewhere in Collin County, incumbents Matt Shaheen and Candy Noble — who, like Leach, voted in favor of impeachment — appeared to win their races with 99% of the votes counted. Both received Abbott’s endorsement.

    Of the Collin County contests that pitted the governor’s candidates of choice versus Paxton’s picks, only one appeared to be trending in the attorney general’s direction. Keresa Richardson led fellow challenger Chuck Branch and the incumbent Frederick Frazier in the race for House District 61, which covers parts of Frisco, Anna and Celina. The race was unique in that Paxton endorsed both of Frazier’s challengers. With 99% of the vote counted before midnight, Richardson led Frazier with 39% of the vote to Frazier’s 33%, meaning the pair will face off in a runoff May 28.

    Katrina Pierson, a spokesperson for Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, was in one of the closest races of the night: House District 33, which includes Rockwall County. Incumbent Justin Holland has been under fire by members of his own party ever since he voted to advance a House bill that, if passed, would have raised the legal age for purchasing certain semiautomatic weapons. His party’s criticism only intensified after Holland voted to impeach Paxton.

    In a late 2023 statement shared on social media, the Rockwall County GOP said Holland has “grown increasingly unresponsive to voters and the Republican Party.”

    “In doing so,” it continued, “he has insulted and belittled local Republican voters and your Rockwall County Republican Party.”

    With 99% of the vote counted, The Associated Press reported that Pierson and Holland would also square off in a runoff in May.

    Brandon Rottinghaus, a political science professor at the University of Houston, was surprised by Collin County’s overall allegiance to incumbents and their effective rebuff of Paxton.

    “They say revenge is best served cold,” Rottinghaus told the Observer, “and Ken Paxton’s revenge tour is ice cold in North Texas.”

    That allegiance appears to have extended from Collin County and into neighboring House District 65 in Denton County where Republican incumbent Kronda Thimesch had a slight lead over Mitch Little, one of Paxton’s defense attorneys during the AG’s impeachment trial. At midnight, with 95% of the vote counted, Thimesch led by more than 400 votes, or 51.6% to Little’s 48.4%, and The AP had not called the race. But the night wasn’t completely sour for the attorney general. His candidates of choice fared far better in rural areas like the deeply conservative district covering Hunt, Hopkins, and Van Zandt counties.

    Overall, though, the night was a much bigger success story for Greg Abbott. Lawmakers like Glenn Rogers, Hugh Shine, Steve Allison and Travis Clardy — all opposed to Abbott’s school voucher push — lost their seats to challengers backed by the governor.

    [ad_2]

    Kelly Dearmore

    Source link

  • Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton beat impeachment. Now he wants Super Tuesday revenge on his foes

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton beat impeachment. Now he wants Super Tuesday revenge on his foes

    [ad_1]

    AUSTIN, TexasTexas Attorney General Ken Paxton beat impeachment. On Super Tuesday, he wants political revenge.

    The Republican, who just six months ago was on the brink of removal from office, is charging into Texas’ primaries on a dramatic campaign to oust dozens in his own party. They include rank-and-file legislators, state judges and one of the most powerful figures in Texas: Republican House Speaker Dade Phelan, who oversaw the historic vote last year to impeach Paxton on corruption charges.

    Paxton’s purge attempt is part of a wild brawl engulfing the state’s dominant political party, where the attacks are blunt and the haymakers personal. Phelan recently punched back with a video reminding voters of Paxton’s extramarital affair, saying Paxton broke an “oath to his wife and God.”

    Paxton himself is not on the ballot — he won a third term in 2022 — but the clean-the-House effort by one of former President Donald Trump ‘s most vocal defenders could reshape the Texas GOP for years to come, tilting the deeply conservative Legislature further to the right.

    “I’ve never see anything like this primary,” said Bill Miller, a longtime Republican strategist in Texas. “The party is at civil war. There’s too much stuff going on to call it anything else.”

    Paxton has targeted more than 30 Republican incumbents who drew primary challengers. And he didn’t stop there. Flexing his post-acquittal political muscle, the attorney general is trying to remove three female Republican judges from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, one of the most conservative panels in the country, after it limited the powers of his office in a 2021 ruling.

    All the while, Paxton is still in legal jeopardy.

    He is facing trial in April on felony security fraud charges that could lead to 90 years in prison if convicted. He is also fighting a subpoena for sworn testimony in a civil lawsuit that mirrors some of the impeachment charges. And a federal criminal investigation is ongoing into some of the same allegations.

    “By the grace of God I’m here today,” Paxton told a political rally in suburban Dallas last month. “This matters more than anything I’ve ever done, that we win these races and that we win the Texas House.”

    Some of Paxton’s endorsements, and the millions of dollars flowing to them from third-party groups, clash with the Super Tuesday agenda of Republican Gov. Greg Abbott. The governor has his own list of GOP House members he’s trying to throw overboard, angry that they voted against using tax money for private schools.

    The double-barreled attacks have put extreme pressure on those lawmakers who happen to have fallen into the crosshairs of both men.

    Abbott concentrated on a policy fight, but “(Paxton) is like a rabid dog that simply is angry at a large majority of House members,” said Rice University political science professor Mark P. Jones. “He is willing to back anyone who wanted to mount a primary challenge.”

    Paxton’s biggest target is Phelan and the symbolic victory that would come with toppling House leadership.

    Phelan’s two sessions as House speaker were a bonanza for conservatives: Since 2021, Texas has passed some of the most restrictive abortion laws in the country, supported Abbott’s headline-making anti-immigration crackdown, banned gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors, and eliminated diversity, equity and inclusion programs in higher education.

    But it was Phelan’s House that also set Paxton’s impeachment in motion, and the two men have blistered each other with attacks ever since. Paxton has accused Phelan of being drunk on the job, and has campaigned against Phelan in his home district. Trump has piled on, endorsing Phelan’s opponent.

    Phelan responded with a scathing campaign ad recounting some of the impeachment corruption allegations. It specifically noted Paxton’s affair with a legislative staffer.

    “Vengeful Paxton is the reason Trump’s involved himself in our race,” Phelan says in the 30-second spot. “If Paxton will break an oath to his wife and God, why would he tell Trump — or you — the truth?”

    Even if most of Paxton’s endorsed challengers lose, knocking out a House speaker would be a “political earthquake,” Miller said.

    At the courthouse, Paxton has targeted the three judges who were part of an 8-1 majority that stripped the attorney general’s power to prosecute voter fraud without permission from local district attorneys.

    The voter fraud issue closely ties Paxton with Trump. Paxton led an effort in 2020 that asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Trump’s electoral defeat to President Joe Biden.

    Paxton’s aim is to remove two of the court’s longest-serving judges: Judge Barbara Hervey was elected in 2001 and Presiding Judge Sharon Keller was elected in 1994. Judge Michelle Slaughter was elected in 2018.

    “The Court follows the law, period,” Slaughter posted on X, formerly known as Twitter. “We cannot and will not be partisan political activists.”

    Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    [ad_2]

    Jim Vertuno, Associated Press

    Source link

  • Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton beat impeachment. Now he wants Super Tuesday revenge on his foes

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton beat impeachment. Now he wants Super Tuesday revenge on his foes

    [ad_1]

    AUSTIN, TexasTexas Attorney General Ken Paxton beat impeachment. On Super Tuesday, he wants political revenge.

    The Republican, who just six months ago was on the brink of removal from office, is charging into Texas’ primaries on a dramatic campaign to oust dozens in his own party. They include rank-and-file legislators, state judges and one of the most powerful figures in Texas: Republican House Speaker Dade Phelan, who oversaw the historic vote last year to impeach Paxton on corruption charges.

    Paxton’s purge attempt is part of a wild brawl engulfing the state’s dominant political party, where the attacks are blunt and the haymakers personal. Phelan recently punched back with a video reminding voters of Paxton’s extramarital affair, saying Paxton broke an “oath to his wife and God.”

    Paxton himself is not on the ballot — he won a third term in 2022 — but the clean-the-House effort by one of former President Donald Trump ‘s most vocal defenders could reshape the Texas GOP for years to come, tilting the deeply conservative Legislature further to the right.

    “I’ve never see anything like this primary,” said Bill Miller, a longtime Republican strategist in Texas. “The party is at civil war. There’s too much stuff going on to call it anything else.”

    Paxton has targeted more than 30 Republican incumbents who drew primary challengers. And he didn’t stop there. Flexing his post-acquittal political muscle, the attorney general is trying to remove three female Republican judges from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, one of the most conservative panels in the country, after it limited the powers of his office in a 2021 ruling.

    All the while, Paxton is still in legal jeopardy.

    He is facing trial in April on felony security fraud charges that could lead to 90 years in prison if convicted. He is also fighting a subpoena for sworn testimony in a civil lawsuit that mirrors some of the impeachment charges. And a federal criminal investigation is ongoing into some of the same allegations.

    “By the grace of God I’m here today,” Paxton told a political rally in suburban Dallas last month. “This matters more than anything I’ve ever done, that we win these races and that we win the Texas House.”

    Some of Paxton’s endorsements, and the millions of dollars flowing to them from third-party groups, clash with the Super Tuesday agenda of Republican Gov. Greg Abbott. The governor has his own list of GOP House members he’s trying to throw overboard, angry that they voted against using tax money for private schools.

    The double-barreled attacks have put extreme pressure on those lawmakers who happen to have fallen into the crosshairs of both men.

    Abbott concentrated on a policy fight, but “(Paxton) is like a rabid dog that simply is angry at a large majority of House members,” said Rice University political science professor Mark P. Jones. “He is willing to back anyone who wanted to mount a primary challenge.”

    Paxton’s biggest target is Phelan and the symbolic victory that would come with toppling House leadership.

    Phelan’s two sessions as House speaker were a bonanza for conservatives: Since 2021, Texas has passed some of the most restrictive abortion laws in the country, supported Abbott’s headline-making anti-immigration crackdown, banned gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors, and eliminated diversity, equity and inclusion programs in higher education.

    But it was Phelan’s House that also set Paxton’s impeachment in motion, and the two men have blistered each other with attacks ever since. Paxton has accused Phelan of being drunk on the job, and has campaigned against Phelan in his home district. Trump has piled on, endorsing Phelan’s opponent.

    Phelan responded with a scathing campaign ad recounting some of the impeachment corruption allegations. It specifically noted Paxton’s affair with a legislative staffer.

    “Vengeful Paxton is the reason Trump’s involved himself in our race,” Phelan says in the 30-second spot. “If Paxton will break an oath to his wife and God, why would he tell Trump — or you — the truth?”

    Even if most of Paxton’s endorsed challengers lose, knocking out a House speaker would be a “political earthquake,” Miller said.

    At the courthouse, Paxton has targeted the three judges who were part of an 8-1 majority that stripped the attorney general’s power to prosecute voter fraud without permission from local district attorneys.

    The voter fraud issue closely ties Paxton with Trump. Paxton led an effort in 2020 that asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Trump’s electoral defeat to President Joe Biden.

    Paxton’s aim is to remove two of the court’s longest-serving judges: Judge Barbara Hervey was elected in 2001 and Presiding Judge Sharon Keller was elected in 1994. Judge Michelle Slaughter was elected in 2018.

    “The Court follows the law, period,” Slaughter posted on X, formerly known as Twitter. “We cannot and will not be partisan political activists.”

    Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    [ad_2]

    Jim Vertuno, Associated Press

    Source link

  • Texas Republican Twitter Beef: John Cornyn Calls Out Ken Paxton Over Indictments, “Russian Propaganda”

    Texas Republican Twitter Beef: John Cornyn Calls Out Ken Paxton Over Indictments, “Russian Propaganda”

    [ad_1]

    The Republican Civil War of Texas that became tremendously public in May 2023 continues to rage on as the primaries draw ever nearer. The latest battle took place not in the state Capitol, nor on a ballot, but in the Twitterverse. State Attorney Gen. Ken Paxton, who has made it his mission to fight against as many Republican state senators and representatives as he can, took aim at U.S. Senator John Cornyn on Tuesday morning.

    Cornyn, for his part, seemed ready to fight back, regardless of party affiliation, and he brought out the big guns. 

    It all started when Paxton sent out an X post quoting another post from conservative publisher Michael Quinn Sullivan, which took a shot at Cornyn over his vote in favor of the $95 billion aid package for Ukraine and Israel. Sullivan wrote that “while Texans slept” the senator, seemingly all by himself, sent billions of dollars “to help with their border problems.”

    Paxton, keen hearing the screech one of the GOP’s favorite dog whistles —  anything related to the border — added that it was “unbelievable” that Cornyn would “stay up all night to defend other countries [sic] borders, but not America.”

    Seems quality sleep is something Paxton and a certain sect of conservatives are passionate about.

    In a mic drop moment not often seen between two prominent members of the same party, Cornyn lit the fuse to every cannon he had at his disposal against the embattled but empowered attorney general.

    “Ken, your criminal defense lawyers are calling to suggest you spend less time pushing Russian propaganda and more time defending longstanding felony charges against you in Houston, as well as ongoing federal grand jury proceedings in San Antonio that will probably result in further criminal charges,” Cornyn wrote.

    In reliable fashion, the rest of X was as ready to pounce as Cornyn was. GIFs involving popcorn eating, girls fighting and dudes popping out their lawn chairs to take it all in populated timelines across the state immediately. One person posted that this testy exchange was something “you didn’t expect to see,” but we’ll assume he isn’t from around these parts, because in Texas in 2024, there’s very little as reliable as death, Texas and Republicans bickering with other Republicans. 



    [ad_2]

    Kelly Dearmore

    Source link

  • Texas AG Paxton sues cities over marijuana decriminalization – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news

    Texas AG Paxton sues cities over marijuana decriminalization – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news

    [ad_1]





    Texas AG Paxton sues cities over marijuana decriminalization – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news





























    skip to Main Content

    [ad_2]

    AggregatedNews

    Source link

  • Texas attorney general refuses to grant federal agents full access to border park:

    Texas attorney general refuses to grant federal agents full access to border park:

    [ad_1]

    Eagle Pass, Texas — Texas’ attorney general on Friday forcefully rejected a request from the Biden administration to grant federal immigration officials full access to a park along the southern border that the state National Guard has sealed off with razor wire, fencing and soldiers.

    For three weeks, the federal government and Texas have clashed over Shelby Park, a city-owned public park in the border town of Eagle Pass that was once a busy area for illegal crossings by migrants. Texas National Guard soldiers deployed by Gov. Greg Abbott took control of Shelby Park earlier in January and have since prevented Border Patrol agents from processing migrants in the area, which once served as a makeshift migrant holding site for the federal agency.

    The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the Border Patrol, had given Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton until Friday to say the state would relent and allow federal agents inside Shelby Park. On Friday, however, Paxton rebuffed that demand, saying Texas state officials would not allow DHS to turn the area into an “unofficial and unlawful port of entry.”

    “Your request is hereby denied,” Paxton wrote in his letter.

    Paxton pledged to continue “Texas’s efforts to protect its southern border against every effort by the Biden Administration to undermine the State’s constitutional right of self-defense.”

    Inside Shelby Park, Texas guardsmen have been setting barriers to impede the passage of migrants hoping to cross into the U.S. illegally, and instructing them to return to Mexico across the Rio Grande. The Texas Department of Public Safety also recently started arresting some adult migrants who enter the park on state criminal trespassing charges. 

    Texas attorney general refuses to grant federal agents full access to border park:
    Texas guardsmen set up barriers at Shelby Park in Eagle Pass, Texas, designed to impede the passage of migrants. Jan. 23, 2023.  

    CBS News


    Abbott and other Texas officials have argued the state’s actions are designed to discourage migrants from entering the country illegally, faulting the federal government for not doing enough to deter unauthorized crossings. But the Biden administration said Texas is preventing Border Patrol agents from patrolling the Rio Grande, processing migrants and helping those who may be in distress.

    Immigration enforcement is a federal responsibility. Texas state officials are not legally authorized nor trained to screen migrants for asylum, arrest them for immigration violations or deport them to a foreign country. However, Abbott signed a law last month that he hopes will allow Texas officials to arrest migrants on illegal entry state-level charges and force them to return to Mexico. The Justice Department is seeking to block that law before it takes effect in March.

    The Supreme Court earlier this week allowed Border Patrol to cut the razor wire Texas has assembled near the riverbanks of the Rio Grande, pausing a lower court order that had barred the agency from doing so. The razor wire in Shelby Park has remained in place, however, since federal officials have not been granted full access to the area.

    While the Supreme Court has not ruled on Texas’ seizure of Shelby Park, that dispute could also end up being litigated in federal court if the Biden administration sues the state over the matter.

    While the White House has called his policies inhumane and counterproductive, Abbott has argued he is defending his state from an “invasion,” and his actions in Eagle Pass have received the support of other Republican governors across the country.

    U.S. officials processed more than 302,000 migrants at and in between ports of entry along the southern border last month, an all-time high that shattered all previous records, according to official government data published Friday. Illegal border crossings have since plummeted, a trend U.S. officials have attributed to increased Mexican immigration enforcement and a historical lull after the holidays.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Impeach Paxton Again? Not Likely, but the Texas AG’s Latest Move Isn’t Helping His Cause

    Impeach Paxton Again? Not Likely, but the Texas AG’s Latest Move Isn’t Helping His Cause

    [ad_1]

    When Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton reached a settlement with whistleblowers in February 2023 he unwittingly initiated a House investigation into accusations of corruption and bribery. The House impeached him, but in September, the Senate, for the most part, voted along party lines to reinstate him to the position to which he’s been elected three times.

    Now, more recent legal move by the Lone Star State’s top lawyer might’ve just tickled the tripwire for yet another round of impeachment discussions, if one GOP senator has his way.

    On Jan. 18 Paxton announced his office would no longer contest the whistleblower lawsuit and requested a final judgment. The McKinney resident used the occasion to present himself as a Texas-defending martyr of sorts.

    “Now, in the best interests of the State of Texas, the Office of the Attorney General is moving on from an employment lawsuit against the agency by four employees that presents the same issues brought against Attorney General Paxton in the impeachment trial,” the release stated. “The OAG has made the determination that these bad-faith efforts to prolong legal proceedings are an unjustifiable waste of taxpayer resources and an intolerable distraction that risks compromising critical state business.”

    Perhaps it was a case of hoping to manifest an outcome, but the headline of the news release announcing his intentions seemed to be more wishful thinking than legal fact, stating “Attor­ney Gen­er­al Ken Pax­ton Releas­es State­ment End­ing Lit­i­ga­tion with For­mer Employees.”

    Just to refresh your memory, a group that included some of Paxton’s top aides filed a wrongful termination suit against their former boss in 2020 under the Texas Whistleblower Act. The suit claimed the plaintiffs were fired by Paxton in retaliation for reporting him to the FBI for what they felt were misdeeds amounting to abuse of his office, especially as they pertained to helping real estate developer and Paxton campaign contributor Nate Paul.

    Immediately after Paxton’s latest attempt to somehow bring the case to a close, an attorney representing the whistleblowers said the matter isn’t over, regardless of the AG’s legal maneuvering.

    “[T]his is but another desperate stunt by Ken Paxton to try to avoid a court order compelling him to answer questions about his grimy behavior,” attorney Tom Nesbitt told Austin’s Fox 7 immediately after Paxton’s Jan. 18 announcement.

    It’s important to note here that in his announcement, the AG didn’t mention his apparent allergy to being deposed, something a Travis County judge recently ruled that Paxton must do. As of now, he’s set to be deposed on Feb. 1. Paxton has a long history of finding ways to lengthen court cases, and University of North Texas political science professor Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha told the Observer via email that this latest move is likely “a useful delay.”

    On Thursday night, the party line broke up a bit, if only just symbolically. State Sen. Drew Springer, a Republican from Muenster, one of the GOP state senators who was unmoved by nearly two weeks of eyewitness testimony detailing in highly specific terms just how severe Paxton’s alleged abuse of power was during the impeachment trial, admitted he was finally moved.

    “At this stage, and the point of this letter, I am asking the Senate whether there is a legal mechanism to reopen the impeachment proceedings,” Springer wrote in a statement posted to X. “Failure to at least consider this possibility runs the risk of AG Paxton making a mockery of the Texas Senate.”

    To be clear, according to Springer, now, four months after the fact, is the time to consider the possibility of removing Paxton, rather than in September 2023 when a real, live Senate impeachment trial was underway.

    Springer is not seeking re-election this year, so perhaps there’s a hint of “What are they gonna do, not vote for me?” attitude in play. After all, he is not facing any of the Paxton-backed challengers that now dot the state’s GOP primaries. But it is still significant in that the question is being asked by a one-time Paxton backer after this latest offering of the AG’s signature opaque, obtuse brand of legalese.

    Of course, Paxton replied with a shot of his own, calling Springer “a bad senator,” according to Texas Tribune reporter Patrick Svitek on Thursday night.

    The outgoing senator’s call for another impeachment trial is eye-catching, but it’s difficult to imagine that it will go very far, given how the September trial played out. UNT’s Eshbaugh-Soha isn’t convinced the climate is ripe for such a move.

    “This seems risky, especially right now,” he stated. “Perhaps from an electoral standpoint, impeachment proceedings after the primaries (and after any incumbent Republican legislators have fought off any primary challenges from the right) is a possibility. But everyone spent a lot of political capital on the first round. Why would Springer think that a conviction is more likely now than a few months ago? The Legislature has not become more opposed to Paxton (in terms of new membership or any changes of heart), and so the needle has not moved much, if at all, even with the judge’s decision to depose Paxton.”



    [ad_2]

    Kelly Dearmore

    Source link

  • Texas Supreme Court pauses ruling allowing woman to obtain emergency abortion

    Texas Supreme Court pauses ruling allowing woman to obtain emergency abortion

    [ad_1]

    Texas Supreme Court pauses ruling allowing woman to obtain emergency abortion – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The Texas Supreme Court late Friday night put a hold on a lower court ruling which would have allowed a woman who is 20 weeks pregnant with a fatal fetal diagnosis to obtain an abortion. The all-Republican state Supreme Court issued its hold without offering an opinion. Jared Hill has details.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A Black student was suspended for his hairstyle. Now, his family is suing Texas officials.

    A Black student was suspended for his hairstyle. Now, his family is suing Texas officials.

    [ad_1]

    CROWN Act empowering more people to express themselves with natural hair


    CROWN Act empowering more people to express themselves with natural hair

    02:36

    The family of Darryl George, a Black high school student in Texas, filed a federal civil rights lawsuit on Saturday against Gov. Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton over George’s ongoing suspension by his school district for his hairstyle.

    George, 17, a junior at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu, has been serving an in-school suspension since Aug. 31 at the Houston-area school. School officials say his dreadlocks fall below his eyebrows and ear lobes and violate the district’s dress code.

    Education Hair Discrimination
    In this photo provided by Darresha George, her son Darryl George, 17, a junior at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu, Texas, sits for a photo showing his locs, at the family’s home.

    Darresha George via AP


    George’s mother, Darresha George, and the family’s attorney deny the teenager’s hairstyle violates the dress code, saying his hair is neatly tied in twisted dreadlocks on top of his head.

    The lawsuit accuses Abbott and Paxton of failing to enforce the CROWN Act, a new state law outlawing racial discrimination based on hairstyles. Darryl George’s supporters allege the ongoing suspension by the Barbers Hill Independent School District violates the law, which took effect Sept. 1.

    How can there be racial discrimination based on hairstyles?

    The lawsuit alleges Abbott and Paxton, in their official duties, have failed to protect Darryl George’s constitutional rights against discrimination and against violations of his freedom of speech and expression. Darryl George “should be permitted to wear his hair in the manner in which he wears it … because the so-called neutral grooming policy has no close association with learning or safety and when applied, disproportionately impacts Black males,” according to the lawsuit.

    The lawsuit, filed in Houston federal court by Darryl George’s mother, is the latest legal action taken related to the suspension.

    On Tuesday, Darresha George and her attorney filed a formal complaint with the Texas Education Agency, alleging Darryl George is being harassed and mistreated by school district officials over his hair and that his in-school suspension is in violation of the CROWN Act.

    They allege that during his suspension, Darryl George is forced to sit for eight hours on a stool and that he’s being denied the hot free lunch he’s qualified to receive. The agency is investigating the complaint.

    Darresha George said she was recently hospitalized after a series of panic and anxiety attacks brought on from stress related to her son’s suspension.

    On Wednesday, the school district filed its own lawsuit in state court asking a judge to clarify whether its dress code restrictions limiting student hair length for boys violates the CROWN Act.

    Barbers Hill Superintendent Greg Poole has said he believes the dress code is legal and that it teaches students to conform as a sacrifice benefiting everyone.

    The school district said it would not enhance the current punishment against Darryl George while it waits for a ruling on its lawsuit.

    What is the CROWN Act?

    The CROWN Act, an acronym for “Create a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair,” is intended to prohibit race-based hair discrimination and bars employers and schools from penalizing people because of hair texture or protective hairstyles including Afros, braids, dreadlocks, twists or Bantu knots. Texas is one of 24 states that have enacted a version of the act.

    A federal version of it passed in the U.S. House last year, but was not successful in the Senate.

    Darryl George’s school previously clashed with two other Black male students over the dress code.

    Barbers Hill officials told cousins De’Andre Arnold and Kaden Bradford they had to cut their dreadlocks in 2020. The two students’ families sued the school district in May 2020, and a federal judge later ruled the district’s hair policy was discriminatory. Their case, which garnered national attention and remains pending, helped spur Texas lawmakers to approve the state’s CROWN Act law. Both students initially withdrew from the school, with Bradford returning after the judge’s ruling.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton acquitted in impeachment trial

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton acquitted in impeachment trial

    [ad_1]


    CBS News Texas

    Live

    Austin, Texas  Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton was acquitted Saturday in the GOP-controlled state Senate on all 16 articles of impeachment, which included counts of bribery, dereliction of duty and disregard of official duties.

    Paxton, who has been suspended since May, when he was impeached by the Texas House, will likely be reinstated as attorney general.

    Although more than 60 Republicans in the Texas House crossed party lines in May to impeach Paxton, his hold on the state Senate remained solid and only two Republicans voted to remove him from office on any of the counts. Paxton is a former state senator and his wife, Angela Paxton, is currently a state senator. She was barred from voting in the proceedings, but since she attended the trial, the state still needed 21 of the 31 senators to vote to convict. 

    Paxton had denied all wrongdoing. He did not attend the trial except for the first day, when he pleaded not guilty. 

    Paxton is a close ally of former President Donald Trump, and the former president posted ahead of the last day in support of Paxton, calling it a “shameful impeachment.”

    This is a breaking story. It will be updated. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s impeachment trial: Senate begins deliberations

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s impeachment trial: Senate begins deliberations

    [ad_1]

    Austin, Texas — The Texas Senate on Friday morning began deliberating in the impeachment trial of state Attorney General Ken Paxton, who will be removed from office if he is convicted of any of the 16 articles of impeachment.

    Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick told the 30 state senators who are acting as jurors that they could leave only to go home at night and were not to speak to anyone about the trial or watch any news coverage. If a verdict is not reached by Sunday evening, he said he would consider sequestering the senators.

    The articles of impeachment include bribery and abuse of public trust. Paxton, who attended the trial on the first day and the last day, pleaded not guilty last week. He has denied all wrongdoing. 

    Republicans hold a 19-12 advantage in the Texas Senate, and the state requires a two-thirds majority, or 21 votes, to convict Paxton on any of the charges. State Sen. Angela Paxton, the attorney general’s wife, has been barred from voting or participating in deliberations, but she still counts toward the number of senators necessary to convict — meaning the state still needs 21 votes. 

    Paxton’s defense sought to dismiss the impeachment vote as a political “witch hunt” and partisan fight within the GOP against Paxton, a close ally of former President Donald Trump. 

    House impeachment manager Jeff Leach, who represents Paxton’s home base in Collin County, Texas, countered that Paxton had been a “dear friend and political mentor,” but “the people of Texas deserve answers.” 

    Only two Texas statewide officials have ever been removed from office after a conviction, Gov. James Ferguson, in 1917, and District Judge O.P. Carrillo, in 1975. If Paxton is convicted, the Senate will likely also hold a separate vote to determine if Paxton should be barred from holding office. 

    Read breakdowns of each day’s testimoy and more at CBS News Texas

    What are the charges against Paxton?

    In May, the Texas state House voted overwhelmingly to impeach Paxton on a  121-23 vote. The Senate decided to hear arguments on 16 of the articles of impeachment. 

    The accusations stem from Paxton’s involvement with Austin real estate developer Nate Paul, who has been indicted in a separate case. 

    Several aides in Paxton’s office came forward in 2020, alleging that Paxton influenced employees to get involved in legal disputes that would benefit Paul and his business. In return, they said Paul provided extensive favors for Paxton, including providing home renovations and employing a woman with whom Paxton was allegedly having an affair. 

    Paxton’s defense sought to prove his impeachment was just an attempt to settle a score by political opponents in the state House and his own former aides. In his closing argument, his lawyer, Tony Buzbee, accused the Bush family — in particular, George P. Bush, who primaried Paxton in 2022 — of manufacturing the impeachment allegations.

    “The Bush era ends today in the state of Texas,” Buzbee said. “They can go back to Maine.” 

    After the whistleblowers came forward, some resigned, but others were fired. Those  who were fired filed a lawsuit in November 2020 alleging that they had suffered retaliation. On Feb. 10, Paxton announced the attorney general’s office had settled the lawsuit for $3.3 million. On Feb. 21, Paxton put a line item in the budget for the $3.3 million to settle the lawsuit with taxpayer money. 

    That request led the state House to open an investigation into Paxton. On May 23, the House General Investigating Committee went public about its probe into the proposed whistleblower settlement. According to the committee, the settlement would prevent a trial and the details from becoming public. 

    On Thursday, the defense called the attorney general’s director of human resources, Henry De La Garza, who testified that the whistleblowers were not fired for retaliation but rather for “egregious” policy violations. 

    What happened at Paxton’s impeachment trial? 

    The trial featured dramatic testimony from former top Paxton aides. All conservative Republicans, they testified that they were concerned about Paxton’s relationship with Paul. Paxton’s former top lieutenant, Jeff Mateer, testified that part of his job was to “protect the attorney general,” but he “failed.” 

    Paxton publicly called the whistleblowers “rogue employees.” His lawyers questioned why the whistleblowers went to the FBI, rather than to Paxton, with their concerns.

    Witnesses said that amid the COVID-19 pandemic, as Texas promoted a policy of opening up, Paxton allegedly rewrote the state’s policy to exclude foreclosure sales — a policy that appeared to benefit Paul. Former deputy first assistant Ryan Bangert testified that Paxton’s insistence was “bizarre,” and he was “acting like a man with a gun to his head.”

    “I believed, based on my experience over the previous nine months, that the attorney general had abandoned his obligation to work on behalf of the interests of the people of Texas to serve the interests of one person — Nate Paul,” Bangert said.

    Former Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel Ryan Vassar, meanwhile, testified that Paxton pressured him and Bangert to provide legal opinions that would have prevented foreclosure on some of Paul’s property amid the COVID-19 pandemic. 

    What does this have to do with Paxton’s alleged affair? 

    Paxton’s defense tried to separate the affair allegations from the articles of impeachment. His alleged affair was not among the counts in the articles of impeachment. 

    On Friday, defense attorney Tony Buzbee said “we know why they mentioned Laura Olson,” the woman with whom Paxton allegedly had an affair. “They want to shame him.” 

    “If this impeachment is about marital impropriety, then line up,” Buzbee said, implying others in the Legislature have had affairs. 

    Olson herself was called to the stand on Wednesday, although her appearance was postponed and then canceled for undisclosed reasons.

    Mateer, the former top aide to Paxton, testified that the alleged affair is “relevant” to the allegations because it “answered one of the questions I kept struggling with.”

    “Why would General Paxton jeopardize all this great work that we’ve been doing in the Office of the Attorney General,” Mateer continued. “Why would he be engaged in these activities on behalf of one person…?” 

    Paul allegedly hired the woman with whom Paxton had an affair, and Paxton allegedly paid for an apartment in Austin for her. 

    Paxton’s former chief of staff, Katherine “Missy” Cary, testified in the trial’s second week about the impact of Paxton’s alleged affair on his office. 

    “The ethics advice in 2018 was when you try to keep things secret when you are a statewide elected official who is running for office, it can be ethically, legally and morally challenging — and it was beginning to bleed over to people in the office,” Cary said. 

    Cary said in 2018, there were complaints in the office from security and travel details about their hours and non-state business, such as the alleged affair. She also recounted that Angela Paxton used to call the office regularly to ask about her husband’s schedule or his whereabouts, which led to complaints from the office staff members that they were “uncomfortable.” 

    And she recalled that during lunch one day, she ran into Paxton, who was with the woman with whom he allegedly had an affair and introduced her as his realtor. She testified that in the summer of 2018, she confronted Paxton, who confirmed the affair. She said he was “contrite” and “listened to what I had to say very carefully” about the “ethical implications” of having an affair.

    “There’s ethical risks, there’s political risks, there’s legal risks … these things can open one up to bribery and misuse of office, misuse of state time,” she said.

    Cary told senators that at one point in 2018, she believed he had ended the affair, but she learned in 2019 that it was still going on. Cary testified that she spoke to him again about the alleged affair, but Paxton was “frantically upset” and said he “still loved” the woman with whom he was allegedly having an affair. 

    “Imagine if we impeached everyone here in Austin that had had an affair — we’d be impeaching for the next 100 years,” Buzbee said. Cary declined to respond. “Just because someone had an affair doesn’t mean that they’re a ‘criminal,’ does it?”

    What are the criminal charges against Paxton, and is that case affected by the impeachment?

    Paxton was indicted in 2015 by a Collin County, Texas, grand jury on two first-degree felony charges of securities fraud and a third-degree felony charge of failure to register. He has pleaded not guilty, and he has successfully delayed a trial in the case while he’s in office.

    The impeachment case is completely separate from those allegations, and Paxton still faces a trial on those charges. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ken Paxton’s wife Angela attends his impeachment trial as witness says his alleged affair is “relevant”

    Ken Paxton’s wife Angela attends his impeachment trial as witness says his alleged affair is “relevant”

    [ad_1]

    Texas state Sen. Angela Paxton on Tuesday had so far attended both days of the impeachment trial of Attorney General Ken Paxton, her husband who has been accused, among other things, of misusing his office to cover up an alleged affair — and of using his relationship with a campaign donor to benefit the alleged affair. 

    The Texas Senate is deciding whether to convict Ken Paxton on 16 articles of impeachment, which include bribery, misuse of public office and unfitness of office. If he is convicted of any one of them, he will be removed as attorney general and could be barred from running for office again. 

    While Ken Paxton is not being impeached for the alleged affair, his former top aide, Jeff Mateer, testified Wednesday that he believed it is “relevant” to the accusations in the articles of impeachment. Paxton is accused of abusing his office to benefit Austin, Texas, real estate developer Nate Paul. In return, the articles of impeachment allege, Paul hired the woman with whom Ken Paxton was allegedly having an affair. 

    In addition to being present at the hearing, Angela Paxton shared a kiss with Ken Paxton before it began. 

    Texas Attorney General Impeachment
    Texas state Attorney General Ken Paxton, right, is hugged by his wife State Sen. Angela Paxton, R-McKinney before the impeachment trial for Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in the Senate Chamber at the Texas Capitol, Tuesday, Sept. 5, 2023, in Austin, Texas.

    Eric Gay / AP


    What does Ken Paxton’s alleged affair have to do with his impeachment?

    Mateer testified that in 2018, Ken Paxton revealed the affair in a meeting with senior campaign staff and the staff of the attorney general’s office. Angela Paxton helped organize and attended the meeting, according to Mateer. He said Ken Paxton “asked for forgiveness” and described it as “emotional and sympathetic.”

    Mateer said he believed that Ken Paxton had “repented” and he assumed going forward that the affair was over. When he learned the alleged affair had resumed, he said it “answered one of the questions I kept struggling with.”

    “Why would General Paxton jeopardize all this great work that we’ve been doing in the Office of the Attorney General?” Mateer continued. “Why would he be engaged in these activities on behalf of one person, all these different things?” 

    Mateer said that when he learned the woman with whom Paxton allegedly had the affair was employed by Paul, he resigned the following Friday

    In evidence released by the House impeachment managers, Andrew Wicker, a former top aide to Ken Paxton who came on in 2019, said he had been told about an “intervention” about the alleged affair. 

    Wicker, who has been described as a “second son” to Ken Paxton, told House impeachment managers that while Ken Paxton’s home was being renovated — renovations which the House impeachment managers allege were paid for by Paul — the attorney general stayed at the Omni Barton Creek in Austin. Wicker said the security detail had been called off, so he would personally pick up Ken Paxton and take him to work.

    In 2020, Wicker’s family was also staying at the Omni Barton Creek when they ran into Ken Paxton and a woman at the elevator. 

    “No words were said,” Wicker said. “General Paxton walked out, shook my hand, shook my father’s hand and the lady walked out. Didn’t acknowledge us or say anything. Just, you know, walked out.”

    According to Wicker, when he described the encounter to communications staffer Marc Rylander, he said, “Great, she’s back.”

    Can Angela Paxton vote as a juror in the impeachment trial? 

    Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who is presiding over the trial, noted on the first day of the impeachment trial that there have been special rules put in place for Angela Paxton, who under normal circumstances would serve as a juror as she is a state senator. Since she is married to Ken Paxton, she will not be a juror and she cannot be party to any private deliberations. 

    Over the summer, Angela Paxton said she would be present every day of her husband’s impeachment trial. “As a member of the Senate, I hold these obligations sacred and I will carry out my duties, not because it is easy, but because the Constitution demands it and my constituents deserve it,” Angela Paxton said in a statement in June. 

    The Texas state Constitution states that “each member of the Senate shall be in attendance when the Senate is meeting as a court of impeachment.”

    A two-thirds majority — 21 of the 31 senators — is needed to remove Ken Paxton from office, and Republicans currently have a 19-12 majority in the chamber. Although she will not be voting, her presence means there are still 31 senators on the floor, effectively giving a vote against removing Ken Paxton. 

    What has Angela Paxton said about the alleged affair?

    Patrick has put in place a gag order about the trial, which Ken Paxton referenced at a picnic over the weekend in Collin County. Other than when she said she would attend the trial, Angela Paxton has not addressed the allegations. 

    She introduced her husband at that picnic, describing him as “the love of my life, my best friend, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.”

    Who is Angela Paxton?

    Prior to her election to the state senate in 2018, Angela Paxton was a math teacher and a school counselor. She and Ken Paxton met when they were students at Baylor University, and they have said that June 1 is what they call “I Love You Day,” or the anniversary of the day they first told each other they love each other. 

    The Paxtons have four children and three grandchildren. Angela Paxton was put up for adoption when she was born, something she has said has influenced her strong anti-abortion views. 

    “I’m blessed to be an adoptive child and to be here,” she said in a 2016 speech. “I have been very aware my whole life that that might not have been the case … but this young woman chose life for me.”

    The Paxtons were among the founders of the Stonebriar Community Church in Frisco, where Angela Paxton mentored young women on how to dress modestly but with style, according to Texas Monthly. The couple now belongs to the Plano megachurch Prestonwood Baptist Church. 

    A staunch conservative, Angela Paxton was known on the campaign trail for singing a song that included the lyrics: “I’m a pistol-packing mama whose husband sues Obama.” 

    The 2018 primary was. at that point, the most expensive in the state’s Senate history, according to the Texas Tribune. But she was backed by Patrick, the lieutenant governor, who said she had “been a friend for years.” 

    Angela Paxton’s district went for former President Donald Trump by more than 9 points in 2016. But she won by barely 2 points in 2018 against Democrat Mark Phariss, who had sued the state of Texas after being denied a marriage license, according to the Texas Tribune. Despite Angela Paxton’s win, the GOP lost its supermajority in the state Senate and lost 12 House seats. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Impeachment Trial Of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton Is Set To Begin

    Impeachment Trial Of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton Is Set To Begin

    [ad_1]

    AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — The Texas Senate is set to gavel in Tuesday for the impeachment trial of Attorney General Ken Paxton, a political reckoning of years of alleged corruption that could lead to his permanent ouster from office.

    The fate of Paxton, a 60-year-old Republican, is in the hands of GOP senators with whom he served before winning a statewide race to take charge of the attorney general’s office in 2015.

    In an era of bitter partisanship, the historic proceeding is a rare instance of a political party seeking to hold one of its own to account for allegations of wrongdoing. The impeachment also came as a sudden rebuke to Paxton, who has built a national profile fighting high-profile legal battles, including trying to overturn the 2020 presidential election, and who won a third term in 2022 despite long-pending state criminal charges and an FBI investigation.

    The Republican-led House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to impeach Paxton in May, largely based on his former deputies’ claims that the attorney general used his power to help a wealthy donor who reciprocated with favors including hiring a woman with whom Paxton had an extramarital affair. The 20 articles of impeachment include abuse of public trust, unfitness for office and bribery.

    The 121-23 vote immediately suspended Paxton and made him only the third sitting official in Texas’ nearly 200-year history to be impeached.

    Paxton has decried the impeachment as a “politically motivated sham” and an effort to disenfranchise his voters. The attorney general’s lawyers say he won’t testify in the Senate trial. He has said he expects to be acquitted.

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton makes a statement at his office, May 26, 2023, in Austin, Texas. The Texas Senate is set to gavel in Tuesday, Sept. 5, 2023, for the impeachment trial of state Attorney General Ken Paxton, a formal airing of corruption allegations that could lead Republican lawmakers to oust one of their own as lead lawyer for America’s largest red state.

    Paxton faces trial by a jury — the 31 state senators — stacked with his ideological allies and a “judge,” Republican Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who loaned $125,000 to his last reelection campaign. His wife, Sen. Angela Paxton, will attend the trial but cannot participate or vote. Two other senators play a role in the allegations against Paxton.

    A two-thirds majority — or 21 senators — is required for conviction, meaning that if all 12 Senate Democrats vote against Paxton, they still need at least nine of the 19 Republicans to join them.

    The trial will likely bring forth new evidence. But the outline of the allegations against Paxton has been public since 2020, when eight of his top deputies told the FBI that the attorney general was breaking the law to help Austin real estate developer Nate Paul.

    The deputies — largely conservatives whom Paxton handpicked for their jobs — told investigators that Paxton had gone against their advice and hired an outside lawyer to probe Paul’s allegations of wrongdoing by the FBI in its investigation of the developer. They also said Paxton pressured his staff to take other actions that helped Paul.

    In return, Paul allegedly hired a former aide to a Republican state senator with whom Paxton was having an affair and bankrolled the renovations of one of the attorney general’s properties, a million-dollar home in Austin.

    Paul was indicted in June on federal criminal charges that he made false statements to banks to secure more than $170 million in loans. He pleaded not guilty and has broadly denied wrongdoing in his dealings with Paxton.

    The two men bonded over a shared feeling that they were the targets of corrupt law enforcement, according to a memo by one of the staffers who went to the FBI. Paxton was indicted on securities fraud charges in 2015 but is yet to stand trial. The Senate is not taking up, at least initially, three impeachment articles about the alleged securities fraud and a fourth related to Paxton’s ethics filings.

    Federal prosecutors continue to examine Paul and Paxton’s relationship, so the evidence presented during his impeachment trial poses a legal as well as a political risk to the attorney general.

    After going to the FBI, all eight of Paxton’s deputies quit or were fired. Their departures led to an exodus of other seasoned lawyers and saw the attorney general’s office consumed by dysfunction behind the scenes.

    Four of the deputies later sued Paxton under the state whistleblower act. The bipartisan group of lawmakers who led Paxton’s impeachment in the House said it was him seeking $3.3 million in taxpayer funds to settle with the group that prompted them to investigate his dealings.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Texas seeking repayment from Planned Parenthood of millions in Medicaid funds

    Texas seeking repayment from Planned Parenthood of millions in Medicaid funds

    [ad_1]

    Austin, Texas — Texas wants Planned Parenthood to give back millions of dollars in Medicaid reimbursements – and pay far more in fines on top of that – in a lawsuit that appears to be the first of its kind brought by a state against the largest abortion provider in the U.S.

    A hearing was set for Tuesday in front of U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, who earlier this year put access to the most common method of abortion in the U.S. in limbo with a ruling that invalidated approval of the abortion pill mifepristone.

    The case now before him in America’s biggest red state doesn’t surround abortion, which has been banned in Texas since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year. But Planned Parenthood argues the attempt to recoup at least $17 million in Medicaid payments for health services, including cancer screenings, is a new effort to weaken the organization after years of Republican-led laws that stripped funding and imposed restrictions on how its clinics operate.

    At issue is money Planned Parenthood received for health services before Texas removed the organization from the state’s Medicaid program in 2021. Texas had begun trying to oust Planned Parenthood four years earlier and is seeking repayment for services billed during that time.

    “This baseless case is an active effort to shut down Planned Parenthood health centers,” said Alexis McGill Johnson, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

    Texas brought the lawsuit under the federal False Claims Act, which allows fines for every alleged improper payment. Planned Parenthood says that could result in a judgement in excess of $1 billion.

    It’s not clear when Kacsmaryk will rule.

    The lawsuit was announced last year by Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who is nowtemporarily suspended from office pending the outcome of his impeachment trial next month over accusations of bribery and abuse of office.

    Spokespersons for the office didn’t return a message seeking comment Monday. Last year, Paxton said it was “unthinkable that Planned Parenthood would continue to take advantage of funding knowing they were not entitled to keep it.”

    Jacob Elberg, a former federal prosecutor who specialized in health care fraud, described Texas’ argument as weak.

    He called the False Claims Act the government’s most powerful tool against health fraud. Cases involving the law in recent years have included a health records company in Florida and a Montana health clinic that submitted false asbestos claims.

    Elberg said it is “hard to understand” how Planned Parenthood was knowingly filing false claims at a time when it was in court fighting to stay in the program and Texas was still paying the reimbursements.

    “This just isn’t what the False Claims Act is supposed to be about,” said Elberg, faculty director at Seton Hall Law School’s Center for Health & Pharmaceutical Law.

    Planned Parenthood has roughly three dozen health clinics in Texas. One has closed since the Supreme Court ruling last year that allowed Texas to ban abortion.  

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • FBI arrests Nate Paul, businessman linked to impeachment of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

    FBI arrests Nate Paul, businessman linked to impeachment of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

    [ad_1]

    The FBI on Thursday arrested a businessman at the center of the scandal that led to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s historic impeachment, a move that came amid new questions about the men’s dealings raised by financial records the Republican’s lawyers made public to try to clear him of bribery allegations.

    Nate Paul, 36, was taken into custody by federal agents and booked into an Austin jail in the afternoon, according to Travis County Sheriff’s Office records. It was not immediately clear what charges led to his arrest, but the records showed he was being held on a federal detainer for a felony.

    Paul’s arrest followed a yearslong federal investigation into the Austin real estate developer — a probe that Paxton involved his office in, setting off a chain of events that ultimately led to his impeachment last month.

    Lawyers for Paul did not immediately respond to requests for comment. One of Paxton’s defense attorneys, Dan Cogdell, said he had no additional information on the arrest. The FBI declined to comment, and a spokesman for federal prosecutors in West Texas did not respond to inquiries.

    FBI agents examining Paul’s troubled real estate empire searched his Austin offices and palatial home in 2019. The next year, eight of Paxton ‘s top deputies reported the attorney general to the FBI on allegations of bribery and abusing his office to help Paul, including by hiring an outside lawyer to examine the developer’s claims of wrongdoing by federal agents.

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
    July 29th, 2015 Austin, Texas USA: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton testifies in front of the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services, just a few days before a grand jury indicts him on three felonies.Two charges of first-degree securities fraud and one count of third-degree failure to register. Paxton is expected to surrender on August 3rd, 2015

    Robert Daemmrich Photography Inc/Corbis via Getty Images


    The allegations by Paxton’s staff prompted an FBI investigation, which remains ongoing, and are central to articles of impeachment overwhelmingly approved by the GOP-led state House of Representatives.

    On Wednesday, Paxton’s defense team showed a packed room of journalists a bank statement that included a 2020 wire transfer purportedly showing him, and not a donor, paying more than $120,000 for a home renovation.

    The wire transfer was dated Oct. 1, 2020 — the same day Paxton’s deputies signed a letter informing the head of human resources at the Texas attorney general’s office that they had reported Paxton to the FBI.

    The $121,000 payment was to Cupertino Builders, whose manager was an associate of Paul, state corporation and court records show.

    The company did not incorporate as a business in Texas until more than three weeks after the transaction took place. A company of the same name was formed in Delaware in April of that year, although public filings there do not make clear who is behind it.

    Last year a court-appointed overseer for some of Paul’s companies wrote in a report that Cupertino Builders was used for “fraudulent transfers” from his business to Narsimha Raju Sagiraju, who was convicted of fraud in California in 2016. The report described Sagiraju as Paul’s “friend.”

    Paul, who also employed a woman with whom Paxton acknowledged having an extramarital affair, has denied bribing Paxton. In a deposition, Paul described Sagiraju as an “independent contractor” and said he didn’t remember how they first met.

    The timing of the payment — and the identity of who was paid for renovations at Paxton’s home in Austin — was not publicly known before his new legal team held a news conference Wednesday in which they put financial documents on a projector screen while criticizing the impeachment. They were first reported by The Wall Street Journal.


    Ken Paxton headed to Senate trial after impeachment

    01:41

    Tony Buzbee, a prominent Houston attorney who was hired by Paxton over the weekend and led the news conference, said by email Thursday that receipts “clearly demonstrate” Paxton paid for the repairs. He did not address questions about the timing of the payments or Cupertino Builders.

    “Without any evidence the politicians leading this sham impeachment falsely accused General Paxton of not paying for the repairs to his home. That is a lie,” Buzbee said.

    Since becoming just the third sitting official in Texas history to be impeached, Paxton has attacked the proceedings as politically motivated and rushed, saying he was never given the chance to rebut the accusations in the state House.

    “We have the receipts,” Buzbee told reporters Wednesday as the documents flashed onscreen. “This is the type of evidence we tried to offer them once we found out this foolishness was going on.”

    Paxton is temporarily suspended from office pending the outcome of a trial in the Texas Senate that is set to begin no later than Aug. 28. The jury will be the members of the 31-seat Senate; one of them, Paxton’s wife, Sen. Angela Paxton, has not said whether she will recuse herself.

    The Paxtons purchased the Austin house in 2018. When it was remodeled two years later, Paxton’s former staff alleged in court documents, Paul “was involved in” the work.

    Among the 20 articles of impeachment are accusations that Paxton used the power of his office to help Paul over unproven claims of an elaborate conspiracy to steal $200 million of the developer’s properties. The FBI searched Paul’s home in 2019, but he has not been charged and his attorneys have denied wrongdoing.

    The city has no record of building permits from the time of the renovations. A different Austin contractor — not Cupertino Builders — received a federal grand jury subpoena in 2021 for records related to work on Paxton’s home that started in January 2020.

    Cupertino Builders was formed in October 2020 and dissolved less than two years later, according to Texas corporation records. Its manager was Sagiraju, who said in a deposition for an unrelated case that he did “consulting” work for Paul’s business and had an email address with Paul’s company.

    Sagiraju acknowledged that he served prison time for securities fraud and grand theft in California before moving to Austin, according to a transcript of the deposition. He said he was first introduced to Paul by a mutual friend before his prison term and they later did “a few projects” together.

    A lawyer for Sagiraju did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    Paxton was separately indicted on securities fraud charges in 2015, though he has yet to stand trial.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • FBI Arrests Texas Businessman Linked To Impeachment Of AG Ken Paxton

    FBI Arrests Texas Businessman Linked To Impeachment Of AG Ken Paxton

    [ad_1]

    AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — The FBI on Thursday arrested a businessman at the center of the scandal that led to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s historic impeachment, a move that came amid new questions about the men’s dealings raised by financial records the Republican’s lawyers made public to try to clear him of bribery allegations.

    Nate Paul, 36, was taken into custody by federal agents and booked into an Austin jail in the afternoon, according Travis County Sheriff’s Office records. It was not immediately clear what charges led to his arrest, but the records showed he was being held on a federal detainer for a felony.

    Paul’s arrest followed a yearslong federal investigation into the Austin real estate developer — a probe that Paxton involved his office in, setting off a chain of events that ultimately led to his impeachment last month.

    Lawyers for Paul did not immediately respond to requests for comment.One of Paxton’s defense attorneys, Dan Cogdell, said he had no additional information on the arrest. The FBI declined to comment, and a spokesman for federal prosecutors in West Texas did not respond to inquires.

    FBI agents examining Paul’s troubled real estate empire searched his Austin offices and palatial home in 2019. The next year, seven of Paxton ’s top deputies reported the attorney general to the FBI on allegations of bribery and abusing his office to help Paul, including by hiiring an outside lawyer to examine the developer’s claims of wrongdoing by federal agents.

    The allegations by Paxton’s staff prompted separate FBI investigation of the attorney general, which remains ongoing, and are central to articles of impeachment overwhelmingly approved by the GOP-led state House of Representatives.

    On Wednesday, Paxton’s defense team showed a packed room of journalists a bank statement that included a 2020 wire transfer purportedly showing him, and not a donor, paying more than $120,000 for a home renovation.

    The wire transfer was dated Oct. 1, 2020 — the same day Paxton’s deputies signed a letter informing the head of human resources at the Texas attorney general’s office that they had reported Paxton to the FBI.

    The $121,000 payment was to Cupertino Builders, whose manager was an associate of Paul, state corporation and court records show.

    The company did not incorporate as a business in Texas until more than three weeks after the transaction took place. A company of the same name was formed in Delaware in April of that year, although public filings there do not make clear who is behind it.

    Last year a court-appointed overseer for some of Paul’s companies wrote in a report that Cupertino Builders was used for “fraudulent transfers” from his business to Narsimha Raju Sagiraju, who was convicted of fraud in California in 2016. The report described Sagiraju as Paul’s “friend.”

    Paul, who also employed a woman with whom Paxton acknowledged having an extramarital affair, has denied bribing Paxton. In a deposition, Paul described Sagiraju as an “independent contractor” and said he didn’t remember how they first met.

    The timing of the payment — and the identity of who was paid for renovations at Paxton’s home in Austin — was not publicly known before his new legal team held a news conference Wednesday in which they put financial documents on a projector screen while criticizing the impeachment. They were first reported by The Wall Street Journal.

    Tony Buzbee, a prominent Houston attorney who was hired by Paxton over the weekend and led the news conference, said by email Thursday that receipts “clearly demonstrate” Paxton paid for the repairs. He did not address questions about the timing of the payments or Cupertino Builders.

    “Without any evidence the politicians leading this sham impeachment falsely accused General Paxton of not paying for the repairs to his home. That is a lie,” Buzbee said.

    Since becoming just the third sitting official in Texas history to be impeached, Paxton has attacked the proceedings as politically motivated and rushed, saying he was never given the chance to rebut the accusations in the state House.

    “We have the receipts,” Buzbee told reporters Wednesday as the documents flashed onscreen. “This is the type of evidence we tried to offer them once we found out this foolishness was going on.”

    Paxton is temporarily suspended from office pending the outcome of a trial in the Texas Senate that is set to begin no later than Aug. 28. The “jury” will be the members of the 31-seat Senate; one of them, Paxton’s wife, Sen. Angela Paxton, has not said whether she will recuse herself.

    The Paxtons purchased the Austin house in 2018. When it was remodeled two years later, Paxton’s former staff alleged in court documents, Paul “was involved in” the work.

    Among the 20 articles of impeachment are accusations that Paxton used the power of his office to help Paul over unproven claims of an elaborate conspiracy to steal $200 million of the developer’s properties. The FBI searched Paul’s home in 2019, but he has not been charged and his attorneys have denied wrongdoing.

    The city has no record of building permits from the time of the renovations. A different Austin contractor — not Cupertino Builders — received a federal grand jury subpoena in 2021 for records related to work on Paxton’s home that started in January 2020.

    Cupertino Builders was formed in October 2020 and dissolved less than two years later, according to Texas corporation records. Its manager was Sagiraju, who said in a deposition for an unrelated case that he did “consulting” work for Paul’s business and had an email address with Paul’s company.

    Sagiraju acknowledged that he served prison time for securities fraud and grand theft in California before moving to Austin, according to a transcript of the deposition. He said he was first introduced to Paul by a mutual friend before his prison term and they later did “a few projects” together.

    A lawyer for Sagiraju did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    Paxton was separately indicted on securities fraud charges in 2015, though he has yet to stand trial. ___ Bleiberg reported from Dallas. Associated Press journalists Adam Kealoha Causey in Dallas and Derek Karikari in New York contributed.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Texas AG Ken Paxton’s wife may vote in his impeachment trial over corruption and affair

    Texas AG Ken Paxton’s wife may vote in his impeachment trial over corruption and affair

    [ad_1]

    After the Texas House of Representatives voted last week to impeach Attorney General Ken Paxton for alleged bribery, obstruction of justice and abuse of office, the senate must now serve as jury in his impeachment trial —and among the senators who will decide the fate of the attorney general is his wife, Angela Paxton.

    Ken Paxton has been suspended after being accused, among other things, of using his position to secure a job for a woman with whom he was having an affair. The state’s Constitution says that all senators must now serve as jurors in his trial, putting Angela Paxton at the center of the state’s political storm.

    Rep. Andrew Murr, the head of the House committee that was investigating Paxton, did not answer reporters’ questions on Monday if Angela Paxton would recuse herself from the vote, which could remove the attorney general from office, and she did not return a request for comment. 

    Ken Paxton denies the allegations. Over the weekend he posted photos on social media with some of his children and grandchildren, writing “there’s nothing better than a weekend spent with loved ones.”

    Texas Attorney General Impeachment
    Texas state Sen. Angela Paxton, R-McKinney, wife of impeached state Attorney General Ken Paxton, sits in the Senate Chamber at the Texas Capitol in Austin, Texas, Monday, May 29, 2023. 

    Eric Gay / AP


    What does Ken Paxton’s alleged affair have to do with the impeachment?

    Many of the allegations against Paxton stem from his relationship with Austin real estate developer Nate Paul, a campaign donor. According to the House Investigating Committee, the attorney general misused his office to help Paul with a fraud lawsuit, against the advice of his deputy attorney general.

    In return, the articles of impeachment against Paxton allege Paul rewarded Paxton with a home remodeling and that he “benefited from Nate Paul’s employment of a woman with whom Paxton was having an extramarital affair.”

    “Paul received favorable legal assistance from, or specialized access to the office of the attorney general,” the articles of impeachment said. 

    According to Rep. Ann Johnson, a member of the House Investigating Committee, having the San Antonio woman employed in Austin made her “more convenient” to Paxton.

    Erin Epley, lead counsel for the House Investigating Committee,  said that when members of the attorney general’s staff found out about the affair, they were retaliated against. 

    “There are also people on staff who, for example, found out about the affair and confronted Attorney General Ken Paxton who ended up with a pay raise but moved out of their scope of employment with less access with less control,” Epley said. 

    Did Angela Paxton know about the alleged affair?

    Epley said Angela Paxton found out about the affair in 2019. 

    “The affair was not public,” Epley said last week. “There was a desire to keep it private, according to these interviews, and the interviews establish that now-Senator Angela Paxton learned of the affair in 2019, that the affair ended briefly, but then it resumed and was underway again by 2020.” 

    Who is Angela Paxton? 

    According to her website, Angela Paxton was adopted as a child and became the first person in her family to attend college. She and Ken Paxton met as students at Baylor University and they married in 1986.

    According to the Texas Tribune, June 1 is “I love you day,” or the anniversary of the first time Ken told her he loved her. 

    Angela and Ken Paxton have four adult children and three grandchildren.

    Angela Paxton was a math teacher and school counselor before she successfully ran for her husband’s former state senate seat in 2018, representing the Dallas suburbs. The district had gone for former President Donald Trump for more than 9 points in 2016, but she won by barely 2 points in 2018, according to the Texas Tribune, although the Texas GOP lost 12 House seats in that election and lost their supermajority in the state Senate. 

    On the campaign trail, she was known for singing a song that included the lyrics: “I’m a pistol-packing mama whose husband sues Obama.” 

    According to an affidavit from 2022, Angela Paxton drove her husband out of state to avoid being issued a subpoena. 

    Angela Paxton has not recused herself in other matters regarding her husband, including voting on the budget, which sets his salary. She has also been accused of introducing legislation that would directly benefit her husband. 

    What happens now with Ken Paxton’s impeachment trial — and will Angela Paxton recuse herself? 

    Although Republicans hold a 86-64 majority in the Texas House, the chamber voted overwhelmingly to impeach Paxton, 122-23, with one Republican and one Democrat voting present. 

    Republicans hold a 19-12 majority in the state Senate, and removal from office requires two-thirds of the chamber. 

    On Monday, the Texas House appointed 12 impeachment managers, who will present the government’s case against Paxton. The Senate trial will begin no later than Aug. 28, Murr said Monday. 

    When asked by CBS News Texas’ Jack Fink if Angela Paxton will recuse herself, Murr, one of the impeachment managers, replied: “I don’t have a comment on that at this time.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Texas Lawmakers Set Timeline For Attorney General Ken Paxton’s Impeachment Trial

    Texas Lawmakers Set Timeline For Attorney General Ken Paxton’s Impeachment Trial

    [ad_1]

    The impeachment trial of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) will begin no later than Aug. 28, lawmakers said Monday, teeing up the first such proceedings in nearly a half century.

    Texas’ Republican-led House voted to impeach Paxton on Saturday after a state ethics panel recommended he be removed from office following a long investigation into abuse of office. The move came after investigators presented a slate of alleged misdeeds, including bribery, retaliation against staffers and misuse of his position to help a political ally.

    A committee of seven state Senators will meet next month to adopt a slate of rules for the impeachment proceedings. A dozen lawmakers from the state House will make the case to their colleagues that Paxton abused his office.

    It’s unclear if Paxton’s wife, state Sen. Angela Paxton (R), will recuse herself from the proceedings.

    “We will manage this process with the weight and reverence it deserves and requires,” state Rep. Andrew Murr (R), the chairman of the House investigation, told reporters Monday. He did not comment if Paxton’s wife would participate in the trial.

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaks to reporters in front of the US Supreme Court in Washington, DC, on April 26, 2022.

    STEFANI REYNOLDS via Getty Images

    Paxton, a longtime ally of former President Donald Trump, has lambasted the effort as a political attack and denied any wrongdoing, vowing to vehemently defend himself during the impeachment trial. It’s unclear who will represent him.

    “The ugly spectacle in the Texas House today confirmed the outrageous impeachment plot against me was never meant to be fair or just,” he said in a statement on Saturday. “It was a politically motivated sham from the beginning.”

    Paxton has been suspended from his official duties while the trial moves forward. His top deputy, Brent Webster, is currently leading his office in the interim although Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) will be required to name a more formal temporary replacement.

    It’s a monumental episode in Texas politics and a moment of reckoning for the state’s Republican majority. Only two other officials have ever been impeached and removed from office in state history, and the latest was nearly 50 years ago, according to The Dallas Morning News.

    The investigation into Paxton’s behavior began in March after the attorney general reached a $3.3 million settlement with former staffers that sued him, saying they were fired in retaliation after accusing him of crimes. Paxton asked the Texas Legislature to fund the agreement, but lawmakers balked at the request and said there wasn’t enough explanation as to why the state should foot the bill.

    Paxton has attacked Phelan, the Republican Texas House Speaker, in recent days, accusing him of being drunk during a session last week.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s impeachment trial to begin no later than August 28

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s impeachment trial to begin no later than August 28

    [ad_1]

    A historic impeachment trial in Texas to determine whether Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton should be permanently removed from office will begin no later than August in the state Senate, where the jury that would determine his future could include his wife, Sen. Angela Paxton.

    Setting the date was one of the last orders of business lawmakers took Monday during a sluggish end to this year’s legislative session in Texas, where the impeachment laid bare fractures in America’s biggest red state beyond whether Republicans will oust one of the GOP’s conservative legal stars.

    It drags Republicans — who for years have pushed fast-changing Texas farther to the right — into a summer of unfinished business and soured feelings that are likely to spill into 2024’s elections.

    Republican Gov. Greg Abbott called for a special session that began at 9 p.m., central time, adding that multiple special sessions would be required.

    At the center of the conflict is Paxton, who the GOP-controlled House overwhelmingly impeached this weekend on charges that include bribery and misuse of office following nearly a decade of scandal and criminal accusations that have dogged the state’s top lawyer. He is suspended from office pending trial in the state Senate, which set a start date of no later than Aug. 28.

    Underlining how Paxton’s impeachment has upended the Texas Capitol, the session ended with a dozen House lawmakers walking across the building and delivering the articles of impeachment to the Senate, where there are 31 senators who could act as jurors.

    In a complicating twist, one of them is Paxton’s wife, Republican Sen. Angela Paxton, who has not spoken publicly since the impeachment or said whether she will recuse herself from the proceedings. She declined to comment Monday when approached by The Associated Press outside the Senate chamber.

    The chairman of the House investigation, Republican state Rep. Andrew Murr, also declined to comment on whether it would be appropriate for Sen. Paxton to participate.

    “We will manage this process with the weight and reverence it deserves and requires,” Murr said.

    The impeachment made for a dramatic finale to the 140-day legislative session in Texas, where Republicans started the year with large GOP majorities following a dominant midterm election, a historic $33 billion surplus and a governor seen as a possible 2024 presidential contender.

    But instead of a smooth victory lap this spring, Republicans spent months clashing with each other over promises to cut property taxes and provide vouchers to public school students, and in the end, delivered neither before time was up. The first special session Abbott announced on Monday would take up the property tax issue as well as border security, he said in a statement.

    Both were priorities of Abbott, who was silent as the session ended. He could also appoint an interim attorney general but has made no public comment about Paxton since impeachment proceedings began last week.

    Among those who have rushed to Paxton’s defense are activists on the GOP’s hard right and former President Donald Trump, the leading contender for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, who over the weekend posted on his social media platform that the governor was “MISSING IN ACTION!”

    In a state where Republicans have controlled every lever of power for decades — and have used that dominance to put Texas out front nationally over contentious measures to restrict abortion and immigration — the failure of several promises in the state Capitol underscored how they do not always move in lockstep.

    “There are certainly battle lines that exist within the Republican Party,” said Brandon Rottinghaus, a professor of political science at the University of Houston. “I don’t think they’re ideological. I think you could read into this that the House is tired of being pressured by far-right Republicans and this is their way of putting in some barriers.”

    The rifts are not new in Texas, and more broadly, Republicans succeed in passing a slew of measures they held up as victories for conservatives, including bans on gender-affirming care and banning offices of diversity, equity and inclusion at the state’s universities.

    They also put Harris County, the third-largest county in the nation that is controlled by Democrats, under new laws that forced them to fire their elections administrator and opens a path for state officials to take greater control over their elections.

    Paxton is only the third sitting official in Texas’ nearly 200-year history to be impeached. He called the House investigation that led up to his impeachment “corrupt” and has broadly denied wrongdoing. The raft of accusations against him include an indictment on securities fraud charges and allegations that he misused his office to try to thwart an FBI investigation into one of his donors.

    “What happened this week is nothing I take pride in,” Phelan told the chamber. “It is not anything I was proud of. But it was necessary. It was just.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ken Paxton headed to Senate trial after impeachment

    Ken Paxton headed to Senate trial after impeachment

    [ad_1]

    Ken Paxton headed to Senate trial after impeachment – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The Texas Senate is set to pick a date for the upcoming impeachment trial of state Attorney General Ken Paxton. Paxton was impeached by the House in a bipartisan vote on Saturday. Astrid Martinez has the latest.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link