ReportWire

Tag: Kamala Harris

  • Dem Party Officials Have a Plan to Remind Everyone “Trump Praised Hitler” By Projecting It Onto MSG

    Dem Party Officials Have a Plan to Remind Everyone “Trump Praised Hitler” By Projecting It Onto MSG

    [ad_1]

    The Democratic Party is keen to remind voters, especially those attending Trump’s planned rally Sunday in New York’s Madison Square Garden, and anyone nearby—that Donald Trump has repeatedly praised Adolf Hitler.

    The Democratic National Committee plans to project unmissable messages in giant, all-capital letters on the New York City landmark, while Trump delivers his closing argument inside, that read “TRUMP PRAISED HITLER,” “TRUMP=UNSTABLE,” “TRUMP=UNHINGED,” “TRUMP=UNFIT,” and “TRUMP=CHEAT.”

    As early voting begins in many states and Tuesday, November 5, looms, Democratic candidate Kamala Harris has leaned hard on Trump’s shortcomings as part of her own final press. During Wednesday night’s town hall broadcast on CNN, Harris said outright that she believes Trump is a fascist and a “danger to the well-being and security of the United States of America.”

    Retired Marine Gen. John Kelly, who served first under Trump as his secretary of homeland security, then as his chief of staff, delivered interviews this week in which he described his former boss as a fascist as well, offering up alternate descriptors of “authoritarian” and “dictator,” for the thesaurus-minded among readers. He also recalled that Trump “commented more than once that, ‘You know, Hitler did some good things, too,’” a replay of a 2021 sound bite, and in another interview recalled Trump speaking wistfully of “Hitler’s generals,” resurfacing another old chestnut that made headlines in 2022 and subsequently appears to have vacated the population’s minds.

    Kelly recalled asking for clarification that Trump meant Hitler’s generals, and upon receiving it, Kelly reminded Trump, “You do know that they tried to kill Hitler three times and almost pulled it off?” There have been two apparent assassination attempts on Trump in the past three months alone.

    Trump’s admiration of Hitler is so old-hat that his late ex-wife Ivana Trump revealed in a 1990 Vanity Fair article that Trump kept a collection of Hitler’s speeches, My New Order, in a cabinet beside his bed.

    When asked about the book, Trump responded, “If I had these speeches, and I am not saying that I do, I would never read them.”

    Harris spoke from the White House on Wednesday to recap, calling Trump “increasingly unhinged and unstable.”

    “It is deeply troubling and incredibly dangerous that Donald Trump would invoke Adolf Hitler, the man who is responsible for the deaths of 6 million Jews and hundreds of thousands of Americans,” she said. “All of this is further evidence for the American people of who Donald Trump really is. This is a window into who Donald Trump really is from the people who know him best, from the people who worked with him side by side in the Oval Office and in the Situation Room.”

    Trump’s running mate, JD Vance, once called Trump “America’s Hitler.”

    [ad_2]

    Kase Wickman

    Source link

  • Paula Poundstone visits Phoenix for Harris/Walz political fundraiser

    Paula Poundstone visits Phoenix for Harris/Walz political fundraiser

    [ad_1]

    Not much seems funny about the upcoming presidential election, but comedian Paula Poundstone is coming to Phoenix on Monday to generate some laughs — and some money for the Harris/Walz campaign. Poundstone, along with fellow comedians Jimmy Tingle and Tony Tripoli, will appear in the Valley in a program called “Headliners for Harris,” presented by Mark Robert Gordon (DNC National Committeeman, AZ) and the Maricopa County LGBTQ+ Committee…

    [ad_2]

    Timothy Rawles

    Source link

  • Elon Musk says people accusing Trump of endangering democracy are the real danger

    Elon Musk says people accusing Trump of endangering democracy are the real danger

    [ad_1]

    The world’s richest man, Elon Musk, addressed a crowded town hall Saturday in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, where he downplayed the Jan. 6 U.S. Capitol riot and suggested mail ballots were a “recipe for fraud.”

    In response to a man who asked Musk what his message was to young voters who worry “that voting for a second Trump presidency will lead to democratic backsliding,” Musk replied, “The media tries to characterize Jan. 6 as some sort of violent insurrection, which is simply not the case,” he said, prompting applause from the crowd. More than 100 law enforcement personnel were injured in the attack, some beaten with their own weapons, when a mob of Trump supporters who believed his lies that the 2020 election was stolen from him stormed the Capitol to stop the certification of votes.

    “It’s not as though the Jan. 6 protests had no merit, they had some merit,” Musk continued. “I disagree with the magnitude of what they did, but it’s not as though there were no issues,” said Musk. 

    Musk claimed that people “who say Trump is a threat to democracy are themselves a threat to democracy,” a comment that was also received with applause by the crowd of several hundred people packed into the ballroom. Many more watched the event on X, the social media platform Musk purchased two years ago.

    Trump, he said, “did actually tell people to not be violent.” While Trump did tell the crowd on Jan. 6 to protest “peacefully and patriotically,” he also encouraged them to “fight like hell” to stop Democrat Joe Biden from becoming the president. 

    Musk spent nearly two hours taking questions from town hall participants. The freewheeling session inside a ballroom at a hotel in downtown Lancaster touched on a dizzying range of topics, from space exploration and the Tesla cybertruck to immigration and the efficacy of psychiatric drugs. The town hall was part of Musk’s efforts through his super PAC to help boost Trump in swing states ahead of the Nov. 5 presidential election against Democrat Kamala Harris. Trump has said he’d give Musk a role in his administration if he wins the presidency.

    Musk was largely praised by the town hall crowd as a visionary and solicited for advice and thoughts about education, arm wrestling, tax loopholes and whether he’d buy the Chicago White Sox. (He said he was a tech guy and had to pick his battles.) Trump won Lancaster County in both the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections, and he won Pennsylvania in 2016 against Hillary Clinton but lost it in 2020 to Joe Biden.

    Musk said he was in favor of “not heavy handed” regulation of artificial intelligence and railed against “woke religion” as “fundamentally an extinctionist religion.” He said the U.S. birth rate is a significant concern.

    He said he believes Jesus was a real person who lived about 2,000 years ago and, when asked for the best advice he’s ever received, replied: “I recommend studying physics.”

    Musk, the world’s richest man, has committed more than $70 million to boost Trump in the election and, at events on behalf of his super PAC, has encouraged supporters to embrace voting early. Still, echoing some of Trump’s misgivings about the method, Musk raised his own doubts about the process. He called mail ballots “a strange anomaly that got popularized during COVID,” and he went on to say of mail voting that “really, you have an obvious recipe for fraud and inability to prove fraud.”

    Elon Musk Holds Town Hall With Pennsylvania Voters in Lancaster
    LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA – OCTOBER 26: SpaceX and Tesla founder Elon Musk speaks during an America PAC town hall on October 26, 2024 in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. 

    Samuel Corum / Getty Images


    There are a number of safeguards to protect mail-in ballots, with various ballot verification protocols, including every state requiring a voter’s signature. 

    He also called town hall participant Judey Kamora to the stage to give her a large $1 million check, part of his promotion to give away $1 million a day to a voter in a swing state who has signed his super PAC’s petition backing the U.S. Constitution.

    Musk made no mention of the Justice Department’s recent warning that his $1 million sweepstakes could violate federal election law. Nor did he comment on a Wall Street Journal report that the tech billionaire has maintained regular contact with Russian President Vladimir Putin. 

    The giveaways are just fine with Josh Fox, 32, a UPS driver from Dillsburg, Pennsylvania.

    “That’s cool,” Fox said, waiting to get into the rally earlier Saturday. “It would be nice to have it.”

    Fox, who plans to vote for Trump, dismissed any suggestion the money may violate federal election rules.

    “It’s about driving in support and driving in people who are in support of the Constitution,” Fox said.

    contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump’s deportation plans worry families with relatives in US illegally

    Trump’s deportation plans worry families with relatives in US illegally

    [ad_1]

    PHOENIX (AP) — Jocelyn Ruiz remembers when her fifth-grade teacher warned the class about large-scale patrols that would target immigrants in Arizona’s largest metropolitan area. She asked her mom about it — and unearthed a family secret.

    Ruiz’s mother had entered the United States illegally, leaving Mexico a decade earlier in search of a better life.

    Ruiz, who was born in California and raised in the Phoenix area, was overcome by worry at the time that her mother could be deported at any moment, despite having no criminal history. Ruiz, her two younger siblings and her parents quietly persevered, never discussing their mixed immigration status. They lived “as Americans,” she said.

    More than 22 million people live in a U.S. household where at least one occupant is in the country without authorization, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of 2022 Census data. That represents nearly 5% of households across the U.S. and 5.5% in Arizona, a battleground state where the Latino vote could be key.

    If Donald Trump is elected and follows through with a campaign promise to conduct the largest deportation operation in American history, it could not only upend the lives of the 11 million people who according to the U.S. Census Bureau are living in the United States without authorization — it could devastate the U.S. citizens in their families.

    The issue of immigration has been a cornerstone of Trump’s platform since he promised to “build a great wall” in 2015 as he announced his first Republican campaign for president. And despite polling that shows the economy as a top concern for voters, Trump remains fixated on the issue, criticizing the Biden administration’s handling of the southern border as an existential threat to American society as Election Day nears.

    Trump’s plans for a crackdown have motivated some mixed-status families to speak out. America’s success depends on the contributions of immigrants, they argue, and the people doing this work deserve a pathway to legal residency or citizenship.

    Others choose to be silent, hoping to evade attention.

    And there are some who support Trump, even though they themselves could become targets for deportation.

    The political divide over immigration runs deep: 88% of Trump supporters favor mass deportation, according to a recent Pew survey, compared with 27% of the voters who support Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee for president.

    Trump was asked about the impact so many deportations would have on mixed-status families when he visited the Arizona-Mexico border in August.

    “Provisions will be made, but we have to get the criminals out,” Trump responded to NBC News. He didn’t say what the provisions might include, and his campaign did not share more information when The Associated Press asked for specifics.

    Living in a mixed-status family is inherently precarious, as immigration policies and political rhetoric have ripple effects for U.S. citizens and legal residents, said Heide Castañeda, a professor of anthropology at the University of South Florida.

    “For most Americans, it’s not a familiar thing to navigate your daily life thinking about somebody in your family possibly being taken,” said Castañeda, author of “Borders of Belonging: Struggle and Solidarity in Mixed-Status Immigrant Families.” “But for mixed-status families, of course, that’s always on their minds.”

    What to know about the 2024 Election

    Politicians, she said, “think that they’re targeting a particular group, but these groups live in families and communities and households and neighborhoods.”

    In Nevada, California, New Jersey and Texas, nearly one in 10 households includes people living in the U.S. without legal permission, according to Pew. Many have lived in the country for decades and have U.S. citizens depending on them.

    Michael Kagan, director of the Immigration Clinic at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, said recent arrivals aren’t representative of the population in Nevada.

    “The vast majority have been here more than 10 years,” Kagan said, warning that their U.S. citizen relatives could inadvertently be swept up.

    Erika Andriola, 37, a longtime advocate for immigrants in Arizona, witnessed her mother and brother being detained by immigration agents in 2013. She waged a successful campaign that led to their release, but she now suffers from PTSD and separation anxiety as a result of that day.

    “It was just this like constant nightmares. I would wake up crying,” Andriola said. She and her brother are now legal residents, but their 66-year-old mother has been challenging her deportation in court since 2017.

    It’s an experience Andriola doesn’t wish upon anyone — and she says the emotional and economic tolls can affect entire communities.

    Betzaida Robinson’s brother was deported to Mexico several years ago despite never having lived there. An integral member of the family in Phoenix, he had helped pay bills and raise her two children.

    Robinson said Trump and his supporters must not be thinking about what it’s like to have a loved one taken away.

    “How about if you were in that position, what would you do and how would you feel?” she said.

    Still, there are people living in the country illegally who do support Trump, said Castañeda, the university professor. Even Andriola says she has family members who do.

    “They’re not necessarily thinking about what can happen to people like my mom,” Andriola said, “but they’re thinking about their own lives and what they think is best for them.”

    Victoria Castro-Corral is a self-described optimist from a mixed-status family in Phoenix who advises students at Chandler-Gilbert Community College. She said she has faith that a mass deportation plan will never happen — and credits her Mexican parents, who crossed the border illegally decades ago, for teaching her how to remain positive.

    “We’re here to stay,” she said.

    ___

    Gabriel Sandoval is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump refers to CNN’s Anderson Cooper by a woman’s first name

    Trump refers to CNN’s Anderson Cooper by a woman’s first name

    [ad_1]

    NOVI, Mich. (AP) — Former President Donald Trump has repeatedly referred to CNN anchor Anderson Cooper with a woman’s first name in recent days as the Republican presidential nominee focuses his closing message on a hypermasculine appeal to men.

    On a Friday morning post on Trump’s social media site Truth Social, the former president referred to one of the most prominent openly gay journalists in the U.S. as “Allison Cooper.”

    Trump made the subtext even more explicit later Friday during a rally in Traverse City, Michigan, where he criticized a town hall Cooper hosted with Vice President Kamala Harris.

    “If you watched her being interviewed by Allison Cooper the other night, he’s a nice person. You know Allison Cooper? CNN fake news,” Trump said, before pausing and saying in a mocking voice: “Oh, she said no, his name is Anderson. Oh, no.”

    On Saturday, Trump repeated the name during another Michigan rally, then followed it up during a nighttime reference in Pennsylvania. “They had a town hall,” Trump said in Michigan. “Even Allison Cooper was embarrassed by it. He was embarrassed by it.”

    In referring to Cooper with a woman’s name, Trump appeared to turn to a stereotype heterosexual people have long deployed against gay men. Such rhetoric evokes the trope of gay men as effeminate and comes as Trump aims to drive up his appeal among men in the final stages of his bid to return to the White House.

    The former president on Friday recorded a three-hour interview with Joe Rogan, a former mixed martial arts commentator whose podcast is wildly popular among young men. On Oct. 19, Trump kicked off a Pennsylvania rally discussing legendary golfer Arnold Palmer’s genitalia.

    The Trump campaign did not respond to a request for comment. A representative for Cooper declined to comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Other Running Mate

    The Other Running Mate

    [ad_1]

    Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro greets supporters in Lititz.
    Photo: Alex Kent for New York Magazine

    Rallies of serious electoral consequence aren’t usually held deep in a farm on Butter Road at 10 a.m. on a weekday. But last Thursday morning, in Lititz, Pennsylvania, a few hundred mostly older white voters gathered outside a barn covered in solar panels, clutching “Eagles Fans for Harris” signs, and swaying as they heard a parade of local Republicans reveal their support for Kamala Harris and their revulsion with Donald Trump. Jim Greenwood, who’d been recruited to run for Congress by Newt Gingrich three decades ago, diagnosed Trump with malignant narcissism and reassured anyone who worried that Harris was too liberal that Congress would have plenty of Republicans so she’d have to reach across the aisle. Speaker after speaker, including Georgia’s former Republican lieutenant governor Geoff Duncan, brought up John Kelly’s warning that his former boss is a fascist. Men in t-shirts identifying themselves as veterans nodded quietly next to guys in Teamsters hoodies and a grave-looking woman holding a “Republicans for Harris” sign as Georgia senator Raphael Warnock, the first Democrat to speak, declared the election would be a “moral moment in America” and a test of the country’s character. The crowd of a few hundred nodded and applauded politely, and lit up a bit as Warnock spoke.

    But these voters were clearly waiting for the keynote speaker.

    When Josh Shapiro stepped forward to the lectern, he seemed unsurprised by the volume of cheers, like he was used to it. Pennsylvania’s governor, dressed in a dark suit with no tie and black leather dress sneakers, thanked Duncan and Warnock for coming to conservative Lancaster County, talked up Harris’s economic agenda, and quickly pivoted to Trump. The ex-president, he argued, didn’t even have the baseline “level of respect that we try and teach our kids every day,” he said. “Donald Trump is constantly trying to create ‘others’ in our society, trying to separate people out.”

    He celebrated the country’s and state’s recent economic gains, then built towards a patriotic crescendo, nearly yelling: “This is a great nation, and we should have leaders that want to lift us up, not tear us down! I’m proud to be an American and I want a president who’s proud of his nation!” He was clearly playing for the cameras at the back of the crowd, abutting a sprawling pasture, not far from a leftover cow pie. It was obvious that the voters who’d traveled to the out-of-the-way event on a working morning were likely already converted to the Harris cause, but his real audience was current and former Republicans who might be watching on the local news and may prove critical to delivering the state to Harris.

    The final campaign stretch is proving to be a practically sleepless one for Shapiro, who was scheduled to criss-cross the state for in-person events and interviews for the remainder of the election. By the end of the week, he was slated for his 60th appearance for Harris since she became their party’s nominee three months ago, the vast majority of them in Pennsylvania, where he is unquestionably her top surrogate after falling just short of being selected as her running mate. It’s a strange position for Shapiro, who is still celebrated by Democrats for his blowout win in the governor’s race two years ago, but who is now a prominent face of a campaign that will likely be won or lost not on the airwaves, but with door-knocking and voter mobilization — operations over which he has no significant influence.

    That morning, a poll conducted by Franklin and Marshall College, just 25 minutes away from the farm, also in Lancaster County, was the latest to call the Trump-Harris race an effective tie. For days I’d been hearing Democrats sigh that they wouldn’t be surprised if the state’s final margin ended up in the area of 20,000 votes, a quarter the size of Joe Biden’s historically tight win four years earlier. Yet those same Democrats all had the same reason for cautious confidence: the campaign’s 2 million door-knocks, its 50 offices and more than 475 staffers in Pennsylvania, compared to the mysterious absence of Trump’s ground game, which appears to have been largely outsourced to Elon Musk’s super PAC.

    “Why am I optimistic, and why am I not worried about polls that show it to be a statistical dead heat? I think the groundwork has been laid more effectively by Kamala Harris,” Shapiro, 51, told me a few minutes after he left the stage in Lititz. “I think the Harris ground game is far more effective than Donald Trump in driving up the turnout, and I really do think at the end of the day, for those voters who are going to walk into the polls on November 5, they do not want to go back to the chaos of Donald Trump. All of those things combined are going to lead to a Harris victory.”

    Shapiro has been at the center of the Democrats’ push from the start, but especially since Harris, who is far less familiar to Pennsylvanians, took over the ticket from Biden, a native son who represented neighboring Delaware in the Senate for decades. Shapiro’s blitz on TV and on the campaign trail was to support her candidacy, but also to pursue his own ambition to become her running mate, though he has kept at it even after Harris picked Tim Walz. Notably, he introduced Harris in Philadelphia when she introduced Walz as her veep candidate, and other tentpole moments followed: He was ubiquitous at her convention in Chicago the next month and was the first person in the spin room to declare victory for her after her debate with Trump in September. More recently, he addressed Harris’s top donors at their final retreat in Philly and joined governors Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan and Tony Evers of Wisconsin on a bus tour through their states. But most of his campaign work has been less splashy. In addition to barnstorming, he has done more than 30 television, radio, and podcast interviews, including on local stations that have been featuring him for years but draw no national attention.

    Harris’s Pennsylvania operation has been happy to rely on him to do public messaging, for obvious reasons. Most Democratic research shows that Shapiro is by far the most popular political figure they have in the state, and at least some suburban voters have been selecting his name on their ballots since he first won a seat in the statehouse 20 years ago. And the internal data also show that many voters perceive Shapiro as a moderate. His 15-point win in 2022’s governor’s race came partially thanks to Republicans who couldn’t stomach his far-right conspiracist opponent, Doug Mastriano. So Shapiro has married events like the one in Lancaster County with appearances on Fox News and the conservative WSBA radio in York.

    Shapiro has been accused of copying Barack Obama’s speaking style, and he can sometimes come across like a walking Pennsylvania tourism ad. (At one point on Thursday, as we talked about what distinguishes his state’s voters, he started a sentence with, “This is an incredible, beautiful, wonderful tapestry of America right here in Pennsylvania.”) But in Lititz, his audience was rapt.

    “This is a familiar-looking coalition for me. A bunch of Democrats — we got some Democrats in the house — and a bunch of like-minded Republicans and independents who are here as well. You all helped power me forward to give me the opportunity to serve as the 48th governor of this great commonwealth,” he told the crowd from the stage. Now, he continued, “this coalition is being called upon to again do the hard work of winning an election, yes, of helping us get stuff done in this country, yes, but of also saving the nation.”

    Still, a few minutes later, off-stage, Shapiro cautioned against directly comparing this race to his last one. For one thing, it might raise expectations unduly in a contest likely to be decided by just a point or less. More specifically, Harris and Trump are known quantities in a race with a much higher likely turnout, and Shapiro is far from the point this time. If anything, some Pennsylvania Democrats say, he is risking his own standing by campaigning so aggressively for Harris given that he won more votes than Biden did when they were both on the ballot in 2020, with Shapiro up for re-election as attorney general. “It would be kind of easy to sit back, not really take a side, and preserve all his gains with Republicans and independents,” says Conor Lamb, the former Pittsburgh-area congressman.

    But some longtime Democratic officeholders who’ve watched Shapiro’s rise aren’t so sure. In their eyes, he is a hyper-ambitious political operator who is probably happy to help, but who is also well aware that he could rise to the top of Democrats’ 2028 presidential lists if Harris loses but he maintains visibility in the most hotly contested battleground. This group has long been skeptical of Shapiro, who has occasionally clashed with colleagues in Pennsylvania, including Senator John Fetterman, who himself has appeared repeatedly for Harris within the state — but not alongside Shapiro. To this crowd, it’s gospel that Harris chose Walz over Shapiro not because of personal chemistry with the Minnesota governor or, as the rumor went, because of fear of backlash over Shapiro’s past positions on Israel and his Jewish faith. Rather, they thought he was ruled out because of her discomfort with Shapiro’s apparent ambitions to be president himself one day. Yet Shapiro and Harris have in fact kept in touch since she chose Walz.

    There’s little doubt among top Democrats in Pennsylvania that Shapiro does have a unique connection to the state’s voters, but they also believe that it would be stupid to rely on him too much. “I always try to caution people to remember that though he won by a lot, it’s unfair to assign him a burden to try to deliver something outsized,” says Lamb. It’s lost on none of these people that for all his popularity, when he won two years ago Shapiro still received fewer votes than Trump had when he lost Pennsylvania in 2020.

    Despite Shapiro’s political stature, he has had relatively little to do with the day-to-day direction of Harris’s statewide campaign. Unlike in states such as North Carolina, where Harris’s campaign is mostly run by advisors to Democratic governor Roy Cooper, the governor’s inner orbit and the Harris campaign’s state leadership have little overlap. (Many of her Pennsylvania campaign aides have worked in recent cycles for other statewide leaders, like Fetterman.) As a result, he has stayed out of a recent spat that has shadowed the Harris campaign in Pennsylvania.

    Philadelphia is the heart of the party’s vote in the state, and one place where Harris will need blockbuster turnout. Some operatives close to the mayor, Cherelle Parker, have groused about Nikki Lu, Harris’s state director who comes from Pittsburgh, specifically blaming her for organizational shortcomings like insufficient yard sign distribution and campaign literature not being translated into the right language. In recent days, some Democrats critical of Lu have been whispering about how not long ago a bus of Chinese Americans fluent in various native languages arrived from New York to canvas Philly’s Chinatown — only to be dispatched to largely Black neighborhoods on the north side of the city.

    To hear people close to the Harris operation tell it, these complaints are overblown — and more about specific Philadelphia operatives wanting jobs and credit than any fundamental strategy or expertise problem. (The doors of Chinatown did not need another round of knocking, some Democrats told me this week, so the entire bus saga had been exaggerated in importance.) More than one local Democrat pointed out that many of the complaints — published most prominently in Politico and the Inquirer, but also in the Wall Street Journal — appeared to come from allies of Mayor Parker, and that two of Harris’s in-state leaders managed mayoral campaigns against her last year. Parker herself has appeared with Harris as recently as this week and Harris is slated to spend Sunday campaigning across Philadelphia yet again. Still, Harris supporters have remained concerned about turnout in Philadelphia and this fall Lu’s team brought in a handful of longtime Philly-based strategists, and in recent weeks Paulette Aniskoff, an Obama confidant who ran the state’s field program for him in 2008, joined up to help manage the get-out-the-vote push.

    Many Democrats have largely chalked the Philly issues up to what they call organized chaos. “Let’s not forget that in a relatively short period of time we’ve had to coordinate the Biden-Harris team, the Harris-Walz team, the Philadelphia Democratic City Committee, the Pennsylvania State Committee, and a number of former President Obama’s highly successful top team members,” says former mayor Michael Nutter.  “On the best day, coordination is always a challenge. But at the end of the day, we always get our shit together.”

    Still, the example of 2016 — when Hillary Clinton became the first Democratic nominee to lose the state since 1988 — is never far from anyone’s mind, and everyone on the ground working for Harris believes, as Nutter put it, “the candidate who wins Pennsylvania becomes the next President of the United States of America.” This is not technically true, but it is basic electoral math. The state’s 19 electoral votes are the most of any of the seven battlegrounds, and both parties see their candidate’s likeliest path to victory running through the commonwealth. This has been the case for well over a year, but this fall, the race has become completely unavoidable there: Every suburban street is lined with yard signs and every highway with political billboards, every screen is inundated with campaign ads proclaiming Trump unfit for office, Harris a California extremist, and both candidates the savior of the American economy and your children’s future. When Obama was ready to return to the campaign trail this month, the Harris campaign made sure his first stop was Pittsburgh.

    Harris supporters in conservative Lancaster County.
    Photo: Alex Kent for New York Magazine

    But there is no single closing message about Trump for Pennsylvania’s Democrats, perhaps because there can’t be when they’re trying to appeal to so many different kinds of voters who have so many different kinds of thoughts on the ex-president. A simple drive through the state reveals the diversity of messages. In Philadelphia, Richard Hooker Jr., the leader of the city’s Teamsters, considers Trump “a wild man trying to be a dictator.” But when it comes to turning out union members and mobilizing their families and friends in coordination with local Democrats, the labor activist, a UPS package handler and the first Black leader of his local, takes a different tack, telling them that Trump “is the ultimate employer, and he is very anti-worker.” He argues that “Your employer does not want you to have a pension, does not want you to have the right to strike, does not want you to have union wages, does not want you to have a contract. And neither does Trump.”

    Shapiro suggested to me that he had yet another preferred approach. His own focus in the final days would be on genuinely undecided voters who are just now beginning to pay attention to the election in the first place. “We live and breathe this stuff, but a lot of folks are just tuning in and they want to know what she’s really like, what she’s really gonna do,” he said in Lititz. For these voters, Shapiro continued, the case against Trump has little to do with fascism. “I think if you’re undecided right now, you care about the future of this country, but you also care about what’s happening in your home, at your job, with your kids, and I want to make sure that there is a clear understanding with those folks about the clear contrast that exists between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump when it comes to those economic issues.”

    Lancaster County, which is home to Amish country, is a prime example of the kind of Republican-heavy area where Harris has no real expectation of winning, but where she instead wants to minimize her margin of loss. (Trump won it by 20 points when he first ran and 16 points in 2020.) It’s a significant part of any responsible Democratic strategy in a state whose electoral geography has shifted rapidly in recent years. Both campaigns are spending big chunks of time and energy fighting for votes in the historically Democratic area around Pittsburgh that now skews red — an area where organized labor leaders had been close to Biden but where their rank-and-file has been less convinced by Harris. Meanwhile, though he has focused primarily on immigration and inflation, Trump’s campaign against Harris has also zeroed in on her past support for banning fracking, an important part of the state’s economy. (She has backed away from that position.)

    Yet with such a tight expected margin, the campaign has spread far beyond traditional lines, both sides figuring that any small slice of voters could make the difference. Each party has courted the growing Puerto Rican vote around the state, including in mid-sized cities like Bethlehem, as Trump seeks to replicate the kind of inroads with Latino voters he’s seen elsewhere in the country. Harris has spent time in rural corners but has trained much of her focus on building her support in suburban areas, especially those where white women play a significant electoral role — even if they have tended to lean more conservative in previous years. Private polling in congressional races shows Harris taking advantage of a bigger than expected gender gap, largely thanks to her focus on abortion.

    Democrats have put an extra emphasis on abortion in the counties around Philadelphia that represent a huge portion of the state’s overall vote. Delaware, Bucks, Chester, and Montgomery — Shapiro’s home base — have more than 2.5 million voters. In 2020, Biden overperformed in these counties, which saved him from slippage within Philadelphia. Now, Harris organizers and advertisers have been fanning out across the counties and saturating the local media market with messaging about Trump’s threat to abortion rights.

    It’s Philly itself that still concerns some Democrats. Though Harris is still very likely to win it by a huge margin, many local officeholders remain on edge about turnout there being on a long-term downward trajectory, and how Harris will fare among Black men. Still, some strategists believe the agita about Democrats’ local operation are of the quadrennial anxiety variety rather than serious cause for immediate concern, and that a Harris victory would be the result of Philadelphians turning out in large numbers.

    A few hours before we spoke, Shapiro had done an interview on a Philadelphia radio show with a large Black audience and showed up at a barbershop with Warnock. Shapiro has also spent time talking to Jewish Democrats about anti-Semitism, and he is a regular presence on Spanish-language radio in the state. “Any time I can have real, meaningful conversations with people who weren’t expecting to see me, who weren’t expecting to have the ear of their governor, you get for-real for-real from that, and that tells me a lot about the direction a campaign is going to go,” Shapiro said. “You get real talk.”

    In Lititz, he was single-minded about trying to appeal to Republicans. Relentlessly on-message, he insisted that he’s just a good soldier, if an especially influential one. “I’ve worked hard to create a bipartisan coalition to get stuff done in Pennsylvania. Well, to win elections, and you see part of that coalition here, but also to govern effectively,” he told me. “So anything I can do to be able to say to independents, and in Republicans in particular, ‘Y’all trusted me, you gave me the keys to the office and I’m delivering for you, I believe Kamala Harris can do the same, so give her a shot” — I’m going to continue to do that, all over Pennsylvania.”

    Shapiro and I were standing alone in a field with just his press secretary and a photographer. Across the field, a handful of voters were still staring over at us, hoping for selfies with the governor over half an hour after the event had ended. Warnock, who’d been at Shapiro’s side all morning, was already on his way back to Atlanta, where he’d meet up with Harris, Obama, Bruce Springsteen, Samuel L. Jackson, Spike Lee, and Tyler Perry for a rally with 20,000 Georgians.

    Before she joined Warnock in Georgia, Harris spent the morning in Philadelphia. The next morning, as the Democrats were ironing out plans for Bernie Sanders to visit, Walz was scheduled to touch down in Philly himself. About 24 hours after that, it was the Republican ticket’s turn in the state: J.D. Vance was headed to nearby Harrisburg and Trump to State College. But both campaigns are now trying to be everywhere in the state, all the time. That night, not far from the field where Shapiro and I were standing, the Trump team would host its own Lancaster event — a “Make America Healthy Again” town hall in neighboring Manheim with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Phil.

    As I drove away from the farm a few minutes after the event ended, I passed an Amish man driving a horse and buggy along the side of the truck-filled highway. He rolled past one Trump 2024 poster — not far from an array of signs accusing Harris of opening the border — turned his carriage away from a cluster of “Republicans for Harris” yard signs, and waited for a while for the traffic to slow down.

    [ad_2]

    Gabriel Debenedetti

    Source link

  • Washington Post becomes second major US newspaper this week to not endorse a presidential candidate

    Washington Post becomes second major US newspaper this week to not endorse a presidential candidate

    [ad_1]

    Less than two weeks before Election Day, The Washington Post said Friday it would not endorse a candidate for president in this year’s tightly contested race and would avoid doing so in the future — a decision immediately condemned by a former executive editor but one that the current publisher insisted was “consistent with the values the Post has always stood for.”

    In an article posted on the front of its website, the Post — reporting on its own inner workings — also quoted unidentified sources within the publication as saying that an endorsement of Kamala Harris over Donald Trump had been written but not published. Those sources told the Post reporters that the company’s owner, billionaire Jeff Bezos, made the decision.

    The Post’s publisher, Will Lewis, wrote in a column that the decision was actually a return to a tradition the paper had years ago of not endorsing candidates. He said it reflected the paper’s faith in “our readers’ ability to make up their own minds.”

    “We recognize that this will be read in a range of ways, including as a tacit endorsement of one candidate, or as a condemnation of another, or as an abdication of responsibility. That is inevitable,” Lewis wrote. “We don’t see it that way. We see it as consistent with the values the Post has always stood for and what we hope for in a leader: character and courage in service to the American ethic, veneration for the rule of law, and respect for human freedom in all its aspects.”

    There was no immediate reaction from either campaign.

    The Post isn’t the only one going this route

    Lewis cited the Post’s history in writing about the decision. According to him, the Post only started regularly endorsing candidates for president when it backed Jimmy Carter in 1976.

    The Post said the decision had “roiled” many on the opinion staff, which operates independently from the Post’s newsroom staff — what is known commonly in the industry as a “church-state separation” between those who report the news and those who write opinion.

    The Post’s move comes the same week that the Los Angeles Times announced a similar decision, which triggered the resignations of its editorial page editor and two other members of the editorial board. In that instance, the Times’ owner, Patrick Soon-Shiong, insisted he had not censored the editorial board, which had planned to endorse Harris.

    “As an owner, I’m on the editorial board and I shared with our editors that maybe this year we have a column, a page, two pages, if we want, of all the pros and all the cons and let the readers decide,” Soon-Shiong said in an interview Thursday with Spectrum News. He said he feared endorsing a candidate would add to the country’s division.

    In August, the newly rebranded Minnesota Star Tribune also announced it would no longer endorse candidates. The paper is owned by billionaire Glen Taylor, who also owns the Minnesota Timberwolves. Its publisher is Steve Grove, who was economic development commissioner in the administration of Gov. Tim Walz — Harris’ running mate.

    Many American newspapers have been dropping editorial endorsements in recent years. That is in large part because at a time readership has been dwindling, they don’t want to give remaining subscribers and news consumers a reason to get mad and cancel their subscriptions.

    Martin Baron, the Post’s executive editor from 2012 to 2021, was in charge of its newsroom in 2013 when Bezos bought the paper. Baron immediately condemned the decision on X Friday, saying it empowers Trump to further intimidate Bezos and others. “This is cowardice, with democracy as its casualty,” he wrote. “Disturbing spinelessness at an institution famed for courage.”

    What to know about the 2024 Election

    It comes at a time when newspapers are struggling

    The decisions come at a fraught time for American media, newspapers in particular. Local news is drying up in many places. And after being upended by the economics of the internet and drastically evolving reader habits, the top “legacy media” — including the Post, The New York Times and others — have been struggling to keep up with a changing landscape.

    Nowhere is this more true, perhaps, than in the political arena. The candidates this year have been rejecting some mainstream interviews in favor of podcasts and other niche programming, and many news organizations are vigorously ramping up to combat misinformation in near-real time on Election Day, Nov. 5.

    Trump, who for years called the media covering him “the enemy of the people,” has returned to such rhetoric in recent days. His vitriol in particular is aimed at CBS, whose broadcast license he has threatened to revoke.

    On Thursday, at a rally in Arizona, he returned to the language explicitly once more.

    “They’re the enemy of the people. They are,” Trump said to a jeering crowd. “I’ve been asked not to say that. I don’t want to say it. And some day they’re not going to be the enemy of the people, I hope.”

    The Post endorsed Trump’s Democratic rivals in 2016 and 2020, and Trump has often denounced critical coverage by the paper. On Friday, after Trump spoke in Austin, he greeted executives from Blue Origin, Bezos’ space exploration company. Trump spoke briefly with Blue Origin’s CEO and vice president of government relations. Some critics have publicly speculated that Bezos wants to avoid antagonizing Trump.

    For the Post, the decision is certain to generate debate beyond the news cycle. It seemed to acknowledge this with a note from the paper’s letters and community editor at the top of the comments section on the publisher’s column: “I know many of you will have strong feelings about this note from Mr. Lewis.”

    Indeed, by midafternoon, the column had elicited more than 7,000 comments, many critical. Said one, riffing off the Post’s slogan, “Democracy Dies in Darkness”: “Time to change your slogan to `Democracy dies in broad daylight.’”

    ___

    Steve Karnowski in Minnesota and Jonathan J. Cooper in Arizona contributed to this report. Ted Anthony, director of new storytelling and newsroom innovation at the AP, can be followed at http://x.com/anthonyted

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Two more LA Times editorial board members resign after the paper withholds a Harris endorsement

    Two more LA Times editorial board members resign after the paper withholds a Harris endorsement

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES (AP) — Two more members of the Los Angeles Times editorial board have resigned after the newspaper’s owner blocked the board’s plan to endorse Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris for president.

    Veteran journalists Robert Greene and Karin Klein announced their resignations Thursday, a day after the editorial page editor Mariel Garza left in protest over LA Times owner Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong’s decision not to endorse a candidate.

    Greene, a Pulitzer Prize winner for editorial writing, said in a statement shared with the Columbia Journalism Review that he was “deeply disappointed” in the decision not to endorse Harris.

    “I recognize that it is the owner’s decision to make,” he wrote. “But it hurt particularly because one of the candidates, Donald Trump, has demonstrated such hostility to principles that are central to journalism — respect for the truth and reverence for democracy.”

    Garza told the Columbia Journalism Review that she resigned because the Times was remaining silent on the presidential race in “dangerous times.”

    “I am resigning because I want to make it clear that I am not OK with us being silent,” Garza said. “In dangerous times, honest people need to stand up. This is how I’m standing up.”

    Garza said the board had intended to endorse Harris and that she had drafted the outline of a proposed editorial but that was blocked by Soon-Shiong.

    An LA Times spokesperson did not immediately respond to an email requesting comment.

    An editorial board operates separately from the newsroom, and its writers’ job is to present an issue and then take a side and lay out arguments to defend it.

    Editorial writer Tony Barboza, who remains on the editorial board, said in a post Friday on an internal Los Angeles Times message board that the board had planned a series of editorials that would have culminated on Sunday with a Harris endorsement.

    “All of it was killed,” he wrote. “I am deeply disturbed to see these facts mischaracterized, and the owner’s decision not to endorse in this consequential race blamed on his employees.”

    Soon-Shiong said in a post on the social media platform X that the board was asked to do a factual analysis of the policies of Harris and Republican former President Donald Trump during their time at the White House.

    Soon-Shiong, who bought the paper in 2018 and is a member of the editorial board, said the board “chose to remain silent and I accepted their decision.”

    Greene, who wrote about water, drought, and Los Angeles County government, among other topics, said he was also concerned with Soon-Shiong’s assertion that the editorial board had chosen to stay silent.

    Greene wrote that a policy analysis would have to be done by the paper’s news side and that the purpose of an editorial board is “to take a stand and defend it persuasively.”

    “I left in response to the refusal to take a stand, and to the incorrect assertion that the editorial board had made a choice,” Greene wrote.

    Klein said in a statement posted on Facebook that her decision to resign also came after seeing Soon-Shiong’s post on X.

    “The decision to resign was made simple and easy when he posted on X yesterday about his suggestion that the board create an analysis of the positives and negatives of each candidate and let the voters make their own decisions,” she wrote.

    “News side does an excellent job of neutral analysis. That’s not an editorial,” she added.

    In an interview with Spectrum News on Thursday, Soon-Shiong pushed back against criticism that he censored the editorial board.

    “As an owner, I’m on the editorial board and I shared with our editors that maybe this year we have a column, a page, two pages, if we want, of all the pros and all the cons and let the readers decide,” Soon-Shiong said.

    He said he feared endorsing a candidate would add to the country’s division.

    “I want us desperately to air all the voices on the opinion side, on the op-ed side,” Soon-Shiong said. “I don’t know how (readers) look upon me or our family as ‘ultra progressive’ or not, but I’m an independent.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Leonardo DiCaprio endorses Kamala Harris for president

    Leonardo DiCaprio endorses Kamala Harris for president

    [ad_1]

    Leonardo DiCaprio is endorsing Kamala Harris for president, with the Oscar-winning actor expressing support for the Democratic nominee in a video Friday.

    “Climate change is killing the earth and ruining our economy, we need a bold step forward to save our economy, our planet and ourselves,” DiCaprio said in the video posted to Instagram. “That’s why I’m voting for Kamala Harris.”

    DiCaprio, long an outspoken advocate for addressing the climate crisis, has supported Democratic candidates in the past. In early 2020, he attended a fundraiser for Joe Biden at the home of former Paramount Pictures chief Sherry Lansing.

    His Instagram caption cited the recent devastation from Hurricane Helene and Hurricane Milton, which he called “unnatural disasters caused by climate change.” In the video, DiCaprio praised Harris’ ambitious targets for achieving net zero emissions by 2050 and helping to build a green economy. He also noted her involvement in passing the Inflation Reduction Act. As vice president, Harris cast the tiebreaking vote on President Joe Biden’s landmark climate law that was approved with only Democratic support.

    He also criticized Trump for withdrawing the United States from the Paris climate accord and rolling back “critical environmental protections.” Trump, he said, continues to “deny the facts” and “deny the science.”

    With less than two weeks until Election Day, Harris has received the support of many high-profile entertainers including Taylor Swift, Oprah Winfrey, Meryl Streep, Chris Rock and George Clooney.

    The vice president held a rally Thursday night in the Atlanta suburbs with former President Barack Obama and musician Bruce Springsteen. Beyoncé, whose song ‘Freedom’ is a Harris campaign anthem, is expected to be at Harris’ Houston rally Friday, The Associated Press reported Thursday.

    Republican nominee Donald Trump’s celebrity supporters include Elon Musk, Dennis Quaid, Roseanne Barr and Kid Rock. In December 2016, DiCaprio and the head of his eponymous foundation met with Trump, then president-elect, to discuss how jobs centered on preserving the environment could boost the economy.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Michelle Obama left close to tears as she speaks about her own health in moving speech

    Michelle Obama left close to tears as she speaks about her own health in moving speech

    [ad_1]

    Michelle Obama took to the stage in Michigan on October 26, 2024 to support Presidential candidate Kamala Harris – and she emotionally opened up on the effects of “debilitating” effects of menopause she had experienced.

    Rocking a gorgeous tortoiseshell pants suit by Theory, Michelle came out on stage to huge cheers, and spoke passionately about the importance of the upcoming American election, and the impact the results can have on democracy as well as the healthcare of girls and women in all of our lives.

    Michelle Obama gives a speech to voters in Michigan

    “We’ve been taught shame and how to hide how our bodies work,” she began, speaking about how women’s health is still considered taboo.

    “Too many of us suffer from severe cramps and nausea days on end, every single month,” she continued, adding: “Too many women my age have no idea what’s going on with our bodies as we battle through menopause and debilitating hot flashes and depression. 

    See, fellas, most of us women we suck up our pain and we deal with it alone. We don’t share our experiences with anyone, not partners, friends, or even doctors.”

    Watch as Michelle Obama is left close to tears in emotional speech

    Michelle, 60, continued, turning the conversation to women’s healthcare and reminding listeners that women are “more than just baby-making vessels”.

    “A woman’s body is a complicated business… it brings life and that is beautiful but even when we are not bearing children there is so much that can go wrong at any moment,” she said. 

    Michelle Obama and Kamala Harris in Michigan
    Michelle Obama and Kamala Harris in Michigan

    “Every woman here knows what I am talking about: an unexpected lump, an abnormal pap smear, a mammogram, an infection or blockage which all can be early signs of life-threatening cancers.

    “In those terrifying moments, which will happen to the vast majority of women in the country, it feels like the floor falls out from under us.”

    Beyoncé officially endorsed Kamala Harris© Anadolu
    Beyoncé officially endorsed Kamala Harris

    I don’t expect any man to grasp how vulnerable this makes us feel, to understand the complexities of reproductive experience. Most women don’t understand the breadth and depth of our reproductive lives, and that is because our experiences are neglected by science. And if you happen to look like me, you are more likely to be ignored, studies show,” she revealed.

    “So let me take a minute to help folks, especially men, to get a better sense of what can happen if we keep dismantling parts of our health system as Trump plans to do.”

    U.S. President Barack Obama (R) and first lady Michelle Obama walk across the South Lawn after returning to the White House on Marine One July 12, 2016 in Washington, DC. The Obamas were returning from Dallas where they attended a public memorial service for the five Dallas police officers who were killed by a sniper last week during a Black Lives Matter demonstration.  (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)© Chip Somodevilla
    U.S. President Barack Obama (R) and first lady Michelle Obama in 2016

    Michelle, who was First Lady between 2008 and 2016, and has two daughters, Malia, 26, and Sasha, 23, then spoke to the men listening, and began to well up, as her heightened rhetoric painted real life scenarios that impact everyone.

    “Your girlfriend could be in legal jeopardy if she needs a pill from out of state or overseas, your wife or mother could be the ones at higher risk of dying from undiagnosed cervical cancer because they have no access to regular gynecological care, your daughter could be the one too terrified to call the doctor if she’s bleeding during an unexpected pregnancy,” she said.

    “It will affect you, and your sons… and then there is the tragic and very real possibility you may be the one holding flowers at the funeral, you may be the one left to raise children alone.”

    “Take our lives seriously, please, do not put our lives in the hands of politicians – mostly men – who have no clue or do not care about what we as women are going through, and don’t grasp the broad reaching health complications their misguided policies will have on our health outcomes,” she concluded.

    The campaign stop came a day after Beyonce appeared with Kamala in Houston, Texas.

    Beyonce delivers remarks at a campaign rally in support of US Vice President and Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris on 'Reproductive Freedom' at Shell Energy Stadium in Houston, Texas, United States on October 25, 2024. © Anadolu
    Beyonce delivers remarks at a campaign rally in support of US Vice President and Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris

    Taking to the stage, the singer revealed that she was “not here as a celebrity, not here as a politician, I’m here as a mother,” referring to her three children with husband Jay-Z: Blue Ivy, Rumi and Sir.

    Continuing, Beyoncé shared her idea of what she hopes for the future for her children, as she told the audience: “Imagine our daughters growing up, seeing what’s possible with no ceilings. No limitations. Imagine our grandmothers, imagine what they feel right now, those who have lived to see this historic day. Even those who are no longer physically with us, imagine all of their sacrifices.”

    [ad_2]

    Rebecca Lewis

    Source link

  • Key Moments From Donald Trump In His Oh So Friendly Conversation With Joe Rogan

    Key Moments From Donald Trump In His Oh So Friendly Conversation With Joe Rogan

    [ad_1]

    With millions of Americans already voting, and just over a week until Election Day, here’s a snapshot of what Rogan and Trump covered on Friday:

    Rogan Says Trump Has Been Attacked More Than Anyone In History

    Rogan started the interview by talking about Trump’s appearance on The View when running for president for the first time. Back then, the crowd cheered as Trump received a warm welcome on the show.

    “They all loved you,” Rogan began. “And then you actually started winning in the polls and then the machine started working towards you—there’s probably no one in history that I’ve ever seen that’s been attacked the way you’ve been attacked.”

    Trump responded by discussing his work on The Apprentice, later denigrating the all-female cast of The View, “I was very popular, and all those people loved me. I mean this, some of these women, they’re so, they’re so stupid.”

    Election Denialism

    Throughout the entire interview, Trump continued to bring up the 2020 election, reiterating his Big Lie—that he won despite an alleged coordinated effort against him. At one point, Rogan bemoans that people always “cut off” Trump when he talks about how he won four years ago—something he wouldn’t do.

    “I did great the second time. I did much better. I don’t want to get you in any disputes, but I won that second election so easy,” Trump said. The two also discussed how supposed censorship against Trump on social media and Hunter Biden’s laptop led to election interference.

    “I won by like, I lost by like—I didn’t lose,” Trump said later. Rogan laughed again.

    The host also compared questioning the election results and being labeled an election denier to questioning Covid-19 vaccinations and being branded anti-vax.

    In 2022, Rogan was “criticized for spreading what was widely seen as misinformation about the coronavirus,” the New York Times reported.

    Trump Again Goes After Harris’s Intelligence

    “Can you imagine Kamala doing this show?” Trump asked.

    “She was supposed to do it, and she might do it, and I hope she does. I will talk to her like a human being,” Rogan responded.

    Vice President Kamala Harris had been in talks to do a spot with Rogan, but it “didn’t pan out,” according to NBC News. Campaign spokesperson Ian Sams told MSNBC on Thursday that they “talked with Rogan and his team about the podcast, unfortunately, it isn’t going to work out right now because of the scheduling of this period of the campaign.”

    [ad_2]

    Katie Herchenroeder

    Source link

  • Mel Gibson Claims Kamala Harris Has “The IQ of a Fence Post”

    Mel Gibson Claims Kamala Harris Has “The IQ of a Fence Post”

    [ad_1]

    Mel Gibson has long been held up as proof that cancel culture—the elastic term applied to situations in which people experience repercussions for their actions and statements at work or on the public square—is a myth. The actor and director, who has made headlines for a bigoted and sexist rant during a traffic stop, sexually violent and racist threats against an ex-girlfriend, and allegations of domestic violence, appeared to return to grace in recent years, when stars including Jodie Foster and Andrew Garfield rallied around him, as did the members of various awards bodies eager to honor him for well-reviewed film Hacksaw Ridge. And now he seems poised to topple the claim that Hollywood denizens who support Republican candidate Donald Trump will lose their careers. This week, the star made some surprising on-camera statements about the Democratic nominee for president Kamala Harris, strongly suggesting that he’d be voting for the man in the red hat.

    It’s unfair even to Trump to assume that everyone who has made misogynistic statements, attacked Jewish people, or openly used racial slurs is a supporter of the former president. But setting aside Gibson’s conduct history—which we’ll get to in a moment—it seems he’s signaled his support for Trump in the past, when he appeared to react with dismay when Meryl Streep criticized the then-president from the 2017 Golden Globes. That signal grew stronger when Mel Gibson was approached by a photographer at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) this week.

    In a video published by TMZ, a photographer who caught Gibson as he walked through the airport asked, “The president is being voted on in days, what’s your thoughts?”

    “Oh man, that’s a big question,” Gibson responded with a grin. “I don’t think it’s going to surprise anyone who I vote for.”

    “I’m going to guess Trump,” the photographer told Gibson. “Is that a bad guess?” “I think that’s a pretty good guess,” Gibson replied, without endorsing the Republican by name.

    “What do you think the world would be like in a second [Trump] term,” the photographer asked Gibson, as he continued to walk through the terminal. “I know what it’ll be like if we let her in,” Gibson responded, with a peculiar emphasis on “her.” “And that ain’t good.”

    At that point, Gibson slowed down to, it appears, make his point to the camera. “Appalling track record,” Gibson said of Harris. “No policies to speak of. And she’s got the IQ of a fence post.”

    At that point, the video concludes, so it’s unclear if Gibson had words of praise for Harris’s opponent, or if he’s more driven by his distaste for the vice president.

    Gibson, who during a 2006 DUI arrest announced that “The Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world!” was recorded seemingly admitting to an incident of domestic violence with the mother of one of his children in tapes released in 2010, saying then that “you fucking deserved it.”

    “If you get raped by a pack of n—ers, it will be your fault,” he told her in a separate conversation from that time period, employing a racial slur against people of Black ethnic heritage.

    Despite those scandals, Gibson has continued to work in Hollywood, but if Shazam! star Zachary Levi’s dark musings are correct, his implicit support of Trump might be his final undoing.

    Levi, who announced his endorsement of Trump earlier this month, recently posted a wide-ranging video on Instagram in which he said—among other claims—that there are a number of actors who support the former president, but are afraid to say so publicly.

    “There are plenty, and by the way, they’ve sent me lots of messages, plenty of people in my industry, in Hollywood, who are terrified to publicly say they would vote for Donald Trump or be conservative in any way,” Levi said. “That’s why you don’t see them. That’s why they’re not very prevalent or prominent. They know there’s ramifications for this kind of shit.”

    “My cry to all of you out there, you closeted Trump voters, it’s now or never. Do whatever you feel like you need to do. If you need to come out publicly and say it, if you feel like you still can’t, then don’t. I would never pressure you to do that. But know that if what you’re afraid of is somehow the backlash of an industry that’s not going to exist very soon, then don’t let that hold you back.”

    But while Levi and fellow actor Dennis Quaid have, indeed, spoken openly about their affection and support for Donald Trump, it’s not like Gibson managed to even say his name. Instead, he seemed to direct his passion toward tearing Harris down, a behavior that, given his past actions, seems part of a pattern that Hollywood seems comfortable with ignoring.

    [ad_2]

    Eve Batey

    Source link

  • Non-Endorsement Chaos, Beyoncé, and Trump vs. Rogan: Live Election Updates

    Non-Endorsement Chaos, Beyoncé, and Trump vs. Rogan: Live Election Updates

    [ad_1]

    The Washington Post, where “democracy dies in darkness,” is sitting out the 2024 presidential endorsement race. For the first time since the 1988 election, the paper’s editorial board won’t be making an endorsement for president. Publisher-CEO Will Lewis announced the move to readers on Friday as “returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates.”

    Not surprisingly, there’s apparently (a lot) more to this story, which comes a few days after the Los Angeles Times announced a similar move at the behest of its billionaire owner Patrick Soon-Shiong, prompting the publication’s editorials editor and two members of its editorial board to resign.

    A billionaire owner was behind the Post’s non-endorsement, too. Here’s the Post’s reporting on itself:

    An endorsement of Harris had been drafted by Post editorial page staffers but had yet to be published, according to two sources briefed on the sequence of events who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. The decision not to publish was made by The Post’s owner — Amazon founder Jeff Bezos — according to the same sources.

    “This is cowardice, a moment of darkness that will leave democracy as a casualty. Donald Trump will celebrate this as an invitation to further intimidate The Post’s owner, Jeff Bezos (and other media owners),” former Post executive editor Martin Baron, who led the paper while Trump was president, said in a text message to The Post. “History will mark a disturbing chapter of spinelessness at an institution famed for courage.”

    NPR reports that editorial-page editor David Shipley broke the news internally at a “tense meeting” shortly before Lewis made his announcement:

    Shipley had approved an editorial endorsement for Harris that was being drafted earlier this month, according to three people with direct knowledge. He told colleagues the decision was to endorse was being reviewed by the paper’s billionaire owner, Jeff Bezos. That’s the owner’s prerogative and is a common practice. On Friday, Shipley said that he told other editorial board leaders on Thursday that management had decided there would be no endorsement, though Shipley had known about the decision for awhile. He added that he “owns” this outcome. The reason he cited was to create “independent space” where the newspaper does not tell people for whom to vote.

    Here is Bezos’s last tweet, sent after Trump was nearly assassinated in July:

    Lewis’s stated rationale has been met with skepticism by others in the business:

    Current staffers at the Post are also expressing alarm and/or outrage over the move:

    Editor-at-large Robert Kagan has resigned:

    The Post’s union says its “deeply concerned,” too:

    The Columbia Journalism Review reports that the Post’s Harris endorsement had been in the works for weeks:

    Over a period of several weeks, a Post staffer told me, two Post board members, Charles Lane and Stephen W. Stromberg, had worked on drafts of a Harris endorsement. (Neither was contacted for this article.) “Normally we’d have had a meeting, review a draft, make suggestions, do editing,” the staffer told me. Editorial writers started to feel angsty a few weeks ago, per the staffer; the process stalled. Around a week ago, editorial page editor David Shipley told the editorial board that the endorsement was on track, adding that “this is obviously something our owner has an interest in.”

    “We thought we were dickering over language—not over whether there would be an endorsement,” the Post staffer said. So the Post, both news and opinion departments, were stunned Friday after Shipley told the editorial board at a meeting that it would not take a position after all. 

    [ad_2]

    Intelligencer Staff

    Source link

  • The Best New Memoirs by Women in the U.S. Political Sphere

    The Best New Memoirs by Women in the U.S. Political Sphere

    [ad_1]

    These are some of the best political memoirs of 2024. Courtesy the publishers

    Women are climbing the ranks in American politics, from state positions to national offices—and in the case of Kamala Harris, holding the second-highest office as Vice President while campaigning for the U.S. presidency. Yet even as women make inroads at all levels, the political climate has grown more and more polarized, and the public discourse on power, policy and representation increasingly revolves around issues of gender. As a result, many high-profile women in politics have, in recent years, been inspired to share their stories in print, sparking an interest in books highlighting resilience in leadership, particularly from women who have overcome systemic barriers to attain influential positions.

    Most recently, a new crop of biographies and memoirs by leaders like Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi have pulled back the curtain on not only powerful women’s political perspectives and decision-making processes but also their personal lives. The six recently published memoirs we’ve chosen to feature here highlight these leaders’ unique contributions to governance and American culture while offering an insider’s view of pivotal national events. They’re not always easy reads, but they’re all worth reading.

    The Art of Power: My Story as America’s First Woman Speaker of the House by Nancy Pelosi

    A book covering featuring a shot of a woman from the back as seen looking out over the presidential mallA book covering featuring a shot of a woman from the back as seen looking out over the presidential mall
    The Art of Power: My Story as America’s First Woman Speaker of the House by Nancy Pelosi. Simon & Schuster

    Nothing could have prepared Nancy Pelosi, 84, for the 2022 attack on her husband, Paul, at their San Francisco home. She opens her second book—her first, Know Your Power: A Message to America’s Daughters, was published in 2008—by recounting this traumatic incident that shook her family’s sense of security. She writes that Paul, still unable to speak about it, bears the scars of that night both emotionally and physically. Pelosi’s commitment to and fight for democracy began in an era when few women held political office. Since then, she has been re-elected to the House eighteen times and served as the first female Speaker of the House from 2007 to 2011 and again from 2019 to 2023. Throughout her career, she has consistently prioritized children and their futures, describing them as the cornerstone of her platform and the guiding lens for her political decisions, a theme she expands on in her latest book.

    Something Lost, Something Gained: Reflections on Life, Love and Liberty by Hillary Rodham Clinton

    A book cover featuring a blonde woman in a green button down shirt staring forwardA book cover featuring a blonde woman in a green button down shirt staring forward
    Something Lost, Something Gained: Reflections on Life, Love and Liberty by Hillary Rodham Clinton. Simon & Schuster

    In her latest book, former First Lady and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton took her editor’s advice to heart: to write as though she’s chatting with guests at a dinner party, blending political and personal stories. Each chapter reads like an essay, offering deep insights into her life beyond politics, including her close friendship with Canadian mystery novelist Louise Penny, her admiration for Joni Mitchell and the loyalty of her grade-school friends. Yet Clinton also writes about her efforts to help evacuate Afghan women to safety and describes the routine she and her husband, Bill, maintain, checking in with each other at the end of each day no matter where they are in the world. And she definitely doesn’t shy away from addressing her 2016 presidential election loss to Donald Trump or his persistent claims that the 2020 election was stolen. “Every day, I make an effort to turn my eyes to the future instead,” she reflects.

    SEE ALSO: The 10 Best Books With Badass Older Heroines

    Melania: A Memoir by Melania Trump

    A black book cover featuring the word Melania, all in uppercase, in whiteA black book cover featuring the word Melania, all in uppercase, in white
    Melania: A Memoir by Melania Trump. Skyhorse

    With just days remaining before the upcoming presidential election, former First Lady Trump has largely stayed out of the public eye. True to form, those hoping her book will offer insights into her politics may be disappointed—this quick read reveals little about her personal politics beyond her support for abortion rights and her opposition to the violence of the January 6 Capitol Riots. In this straightforward memoir, she reflects on her Slovenian upbringing, life in the spotlight, her relationship with Donald, her fashion career, the joy of motherhood and her advocacy work. She also discusses her entrepreneurial ventures, such as her jewelry line and skincare brand, and the pride she took in building her own career apart from her husband, even as her projects encountered setbacks. The publisher billed Melania Trump’s memoir as “an in-depth account of a woman who has led a remarkable life on her own terms,” and in that regard, it certainly delivers.

    Oath and Honor: A Memoir and a Warning by Liz Cheney 

    A book cover featuring a serious looking women in glasses gazing off to the sideA book cover featuring a serious looking women in glasses gazing off to the side
    Oath and Honor: A Memoir and a Warning by Liz Cheney. Little, Brown and Company

    Cheney’s sharply focused book addresses her decision to be one of only ten Republicans (and the third-highest-ranking Republican in the House) to vote for Trump’s impeachment following the January 6 insurrection in 2021. This action led to her removal as chair of the House Republican Conference. Her appointment by Speaker Pelosi to the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol provided her with a direct avenue to share her account. The book’s title references the oath every elected official, including the President, swears, pledging allegiance to the Constitution above party loyalty. Cheney clarifies the “warning” in her subtitle on the last page of the prologue: “We cannot make the grave mistake of returning Donald Trump—the man who caused Jan. 6—to the White House, or to any position of public trust, ever again.”

    Lovely One: A Memoir by Ketanji Brown Jackson

    A book cover featuring a smiling women in a yellow blazer looking off to the sideA book cover featuring a smiling women in a yellow blazer looking off to the side
    Lovely One: A Memoir by Ketanji Brown Jackson. Penguin Random House

    When President Biden appointed Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court in 2022, it marked a historic milestone: she became the first Black woman to serve on the highest court in the United States. Jackson opens her memoir with that pivotal scene, describing the moment she’s ushered into the room to take her oath, before moving into the story of her parents’ and grandparents’ struggles with segregation. Her Miami childhood is marked by hope and more opportunity than her forebears knew, as her parents work tirelessly to support her success. But Ketanji is already a bright, curious and reflective child—qualities that will carry her through Harvard, into motherhood and marriage, and ultimately to the Supreme Court. Her name, translated by her aunt, a Peace Corps volunteer in West Africa, means “lovely one,” which inspired the memoir’s title.

    The Joy of Politics: Surviving Cancer, a Campaign, a Pandemic, an Insurrection, and Life’s Other Unexpected Curveballs by Amy Klobuchar

    A book cover featuring a smiling women in an orange jacket celebrating with her arms raised in joyA book cover featuring a smiling women in an orange jacket celebrating with her arms raised in joy
    The Joy of Politics: Surviving Cancer, a Campaign, a Pandemic, an Insurrection, and Life’s Other Unexpected Curveballs by Amy Klobuchar. Macmillan

    Minnesota-born U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar gained national prominence as a Democratic contender in the 2020 presidential race. Her journey since then has been a whirlwind both publicly and personally: she stood alongside former Vice President Mike Pence on the night of January 6, as he certified President Biden’s victory amidst the insurrection, and in her personal life, she faced the loss of her father to Alzheimer’s, her husband’s COVID-19 hospitalization and oxygen support, and her own cancer diagnosis. Klobuchar’s humor and grounded personality shine through in her fourth book, starting with a lighthearted moment in the opening paragraph where her husband jokes about his “long-haul symptom”—his desire to avoid cleaning out the basement yet again—showcasing her resilience and strength.

    The Best New Memoirs by Women in the U.S. Political Sphere

    [ad_2]

    Kristine Hansen

    Source link

  • Beyoncé Officially Endorses Kamala Harris at Houston Hometown Rally: “It’s Time to Sing a New Song!”

    Beyoncé Officially Endorses Kamala Harris at Houston Hometown Rally: “It’s Time to Sing a New Song!”

    [ad_1]

    “It’s time to sing a new song, a song that began 248 years ago,” she continued later. “The old notes—of downfall, discord, despair—no longer resonate. Our generations of loved ones before us are whispering a prophecy, a quest, a calling, an anthem. Our moment right now—it’s time for America to sing a new song. Our voices sing a chorus of unity. They sing a song of dignity and opportunity.”

    As usual, Harris entered the stage to the sound of Beyoncé’s “Freedom.” This time, she was greeted by Queen Bey herself along with her blaring song. Harris hugged Rowland and then Beyoncé, then took the podium to stump in a state with some of the nation’s most restrictive abortion laws.

    Until Friday, Beyoncé herself had kept mum on her choice of candidate. Rumors of a performance by Queen Bey on the final night of the 2024 Democratic National Convention back in August turned out to be greatly exaggerated, but, months later, in the final days before voters head to the polls, it came to fruition in Bey’s hometown.

    The singer endorsed the Biden-Harris ticket back in the 2020 election, and in 2016, headlined a performance with her husband, Jay-Z, in support of Hillary Clinton’s presidential bid. Audiences have long waited for Beyoncé to speak out officially, though she’s signaled her support in other ways.

    According to Billboard, the singer’s label sent a cease and desist letter to Donald Trump’s campaign earlier in the election cycle, telling the Republican candidate to remove a video using “Freedom.”

    The singer’s endorsement is more than just symbolic—her stamp of approval could actually sway voters. A recent poll conducted by Newsweek found that some 40% of surveyed Gen Z voters said that they were “more likely” or “significantly more likely” to vote for a candidate who had earned Beyoncé’s endorsement.

    Bey joins other powerhouse musical acts such as Taylor Swift, Chappell Roan, Charli XCX, Bruce Springsteen, and more by voicing her support for Harris.

    [ad_2]

    Kase Wickman

    Source link

  • Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris, paper reports

    Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris, paper reports

    [ad_1]

    The Washington Post Building at One Franklin Square Building in Washington, D.C., June 5, 2024.

    Andrew Harnik | Getty Images

    The Washington Post said Friday that it will not endorse a candidate in the presidential election this year — or ever again — breaking decades of tradition and sparking immediate criticism of the decision.

    But the newspaper also published an article by two staff reporters revealing that editorial page staffers had drafted an endorsement of Democratic nominee Kamala Harris over GOP nominee Donald Trump in the election.

    “The decision not to publish was made by The Post’s owner — Amazon founder Jeff Bezos,” the article said, citing two sources briefed on the events.

    Trump, while president, had been critical of the billionaire Bezos and the Post, which he purchased in 2013.

    The newspaper in 2016 and again in 2020 endorsed Trump’s election opponents, Hillary Clinton and President Joe Biden, in editorials that condemned the Republican in blunt terms.

    In a 2019 lawsuit, Amazon claimed it had lost a $10 billion cloud computing contract with the Pentagon to Microsoft because Trump had used “improper pressure … to harm his perceived political enemy” Bezos.

    The Post since 1976 had regularly endorsed candidates for president, except for the 1988 race. All those endorsements had been for Democrats.

    In a statement to CNBC, when asked about Bezos’ purported role in killing the endorsement, Post chief communications officer Kathy Baird said, “This was a Washington Post decision to not endorse, and I would refer you to the publisher’s statement in full.”

    The Post on Friday evening published a third article, signed by opinion columnists for the newspaper, who said, “The Washington Post’s decision not to make an endorsement in the presidential campaign is a terrible mistake.”

    “It represents an abandonment of the fundamental editorial convictions of the newspaper that we love, and for which we have worked a combined 218 years,” the column said. “This is a moment for the institution to be making clear its commitment to democratic values, the rule of law and international alliances, and the threat that Donald Trump poses to them — the precise points The Post made in endorsing Trump’s opponents in 2016 and 2020.”

    CNBC has requested comment from Amazon, where Bezos remains the largest shareholder.

    Amazon founder Jeff Bezos arrives for his meeting with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson at the UK diplomatic residence in New York City, Sept. 20, 2021.

    Michael M. Santiago | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    Post publisher and chief executive Will Lewis, in an article published online explaining the decision, wrote, “The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement of a presidential candidate in this election. Nor in any future presidential election.”

    “We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates,” Lewis wrote.

    “We recognize that this will be read in a range of ways, including as a tacit endorsement of one candidate, or as a condemnation of another, or as an abdication of responsibility,” he wrote.

    “That is inevitable. We don’t see it that way. We see it as consistent with the values The Post has always stood for and what we hope for in a leader: character and courage in service to the American ethic, veneration for the rule of law, and respect for human freedom in all its aspects.”

    Seven of the 13 paragraphs of Lewis’ article either quoted at length or referred to Post Editorial Board statements in 1960 and 1972 explaining the paper’s rationale for not endorsing presidential candidates in those years, which included its identity as “an independent newspaper.”

    Lewis noted that the paper had endorsed Jimmy Carter in 1976 “for understandable reasons at the times” — which he did not identify.

    “But we had it right before that, and this is what we are going back to,” Lewis wrote.

    “Our job as the newspaper of the capital city of the most important country in the world is to be independent,” he wrote. “And that is what we are and will be.”

    Post editor-at-large Robert Kagan, a member of the paper’s opinions section, resigned following the decision, multiple news outlets reported.

    More than 10,000 reader comments were posted on Lewis’ article, many of them blasting the Post for its decision and saying they were canceling their subscriptions.

    “The most consequential election in our country, a choice between Fascism and Democracy, and you sit out? Cowards. Unethical, fearful cowards,” wrote one comment. “Oh, and by the way, I’m canceling my subscription, because you are putting business ahead of ethics and morals.”

    The announcement came days after Mariel Garza, the head of The Los Angeles Times‘ editorial board, resigned in protest after that paper’s owner, Patrick Soon-Shiong, decided against running a presidential endorsement.

    “I am resigning because I want to make it clear that I am not okay with us being silent,” Garza told the Columbia Journalism Review. “In dangerous times, honest people need to stand up. This is how I’m standing up.”

    Soon-Shiong, like Bezos, is a billionaire.

    Marty Baron, the former editor of The Washington Post, called that paper’s decision “cowardice, with democracy as its casualty.”

    ″@realdonaldtrump will see this as an invitation to further intimidate owner @jeffbezos (and others),” Baron wrote. “Disturbing spinelessness at an institution famed for courage.”

    The Washington Post Guild, the union that represents the newspaper’s staff, in a statement posted on the social media site X said it was “deeply concerned that The Washington Post — an American news institution in the nation’s capital — would make a decision to no longer endorse presidential candidates, especially a mere 11 days ahead of an immensely consequential election.”

    “The message from our chief executive, Will Lewis — not from the Editorial Board itself — makes us concerned that management interfered with the work of our members in Editorial,” the Guild said in the statement, which noted the paper’s reporting about Bezos’ role in the decision.

    “We are already seeing cancellations from once loyal readers,” the Guild said. “This decision undercuts the work of our members at a time when we should be building our readers’ trust, not losing it.”

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    Former Post reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, whose stories about the Watergate break-in during the Nixon administration won the newspaper a Pulitzer Prize for Public Service, in a statement said, “We respect the traditional independence of the editorial page, but this decision 11 days out from the 2024 presidential election ignores the Washington Post’s own overwhelming reportorial evidence on the threat Donald Trump poses to democracy.”

    “Under Jeff Bezos’s ownership, the Washington Post’s news operation has used its abundant resources to rigorously investigate the danger and damage a second Trump presidency could cause to the future of American democracy and that makes this decision even more surprising and disappointing, especially this late in the electoral process,” Woodward and Bernstein said.

    Post columnist Karen Attiah, in a post on the social media site Threads, wrote, “Today has been an absolute stab in the back.”

    “What an insult to those of us who have literally put our careers and lives on the line to call out threats to human rights and democracy,” Attiah wrote.

    Rep. Ted Lieu, a Democrat from California, in his own tweet on the news wrote, “The first step towards fascism is when the free press cowers in fear.”

    Trump in August told Fox Business News that Bezos called him after the Republican narrowly escaped an assassination attempt in July at a campaign rally in western Pennsylvania.

    “He was very nice even though he owns The Washington Post,” Trump said of Bezos.

    Bezos last posted on X on July 13, hours after the assassination attempt.

    “Our former President showed tremendous grace and courage under literal fire tonight,” Bezos wrote in that tweet. “So thankful for his safety and so sad for the victims and their families.”

    Trump on Friday met in Austin, Texas, with executives from the Bezos-owned space exploration company Blue Origin, among them CEO David Limp, the Associated Press reported

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Barack Obama is “Fired Up and Ready to Go” at Harris-Walz rally in Charlotte, North Carolina

    Barack Obama is “Fired Up and Ready to Go” at Harris-Walz rally in Charlotte, North Carolina

    [ad_1]

    Photo by Carla Peay/The Atlanta Voice

    CHARLOTTE – “Imagine it’s January 20, 2025. It is also Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day. And a Black woman is holding the Frederick Douglass bible. Her name – Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. And placing her hand on that bible is another black woman – Kamala Harris.”

    It was powerful imagery by Jamie Harrison, Chairman of the Democratic National Committee. Harrison was one of many speakers at the Charlotte Convention Center to introduce former President Barack Obama on Friday, October 25 in front of a crowd of several thousand supporters.

    “Kamala Harris will be sworn in, and she will vow to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States,” Harris said. It was a sharp contrast to the words of Donald Trump, who called for the termination of the Constitution to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

    “What MAGA means is that the greatness of America is in our past. We believe it’s in our future,” Harrison said.

    Former Attorney General Eric Holder. Photo by Carla Peay/The Atlanta Voice

    Former Attorney General Eric Holder followed Harrison and talked about the danger of the Trump agenda – Project 2025.

    “Imagine Donald Trump back in power,” Holder said. “He would weaponize the Justice Department. He has installed a Supreme Court that thinks it’s OK for the president to violate federal law. He has a fascination with Hitler. This is the kind of America we would have under a second Trump presidency.”

    Holder spoke of the importance of voting, reminding the crowd of the sacrifices of our ancestors, who fought and died so we could have the right to vote.

    “Tim and Kamala are fighting the fights that matter,” Holder said. “We are not just going to save Democracy; we have the ability to enhance democracy.”  

    Following Holder was NC Attorney General and Democratic candidate for Governor Josh Stein, who still holds a double-digit lead in the polls over the Republican candidate, Mark Robinson.

    “We didn’t need the CNN story to know that Robinson is unfit for Governor,” Stein said. He reminded the crowd that Trump endorsed Robinson, despite Trump’s attempt to distance himself from Robinson since the CNN story aired in September.

    “The Republican vision is one of division, violence, and hate,” Stein said, drawing a parallel between his race and the presidential race.

    “The stakes could not be higher, and the choice could not be clearer,” Stein said.  

    When Barack Obama finally took the stage, the expected thunderous applause occurred. The former president then energized a crowd with a critique of Donald Trump that managed to be both funny and serious.

    “This man is a 78-year-old billionaire who has not stopped whining about his problems since he rode down that escalator,” Obama said. “He wants to sell you stuff, like gold sneakers and Trump bibles. His behavior has become so commonplace that people don’t take it seriously. But that doesn’t mean that a second Trump presidency would not be dangerous.”

    Obama talked about Trump’s “concepts of a plan” to replace the Affordable Care Act, his plans to use the military against “the enemy within”, and his fascination with Hitler.

    “When I was president, a lot of people disagreed with me,” Obama said. “It doesn’t mean you go after them, to try and use the military to do your bidding. This is a democracy.”

    He talked about how Trump is taking credit for the economy he (Obama) created; his plan to give tax cuts to billionaires, and if elected, how he will surround himself with people as wacky as he is.

    “People who know him best, people who served under him say how dangerous he is,” Obama said.  He also made a point to emphasize one of the most dangerous things Trump, and his running mate JD Vance, continue to do during their rallies – blame immigrants for everything.

    “We are a nation of immigrants, so unless you are Native American, everyone in this country came from somewhere else,” Obama said.

    “He thinks rounding up and deporting people is the answer to everything,” Obama said. “His plan is mean and ugly.” He acknowledged the border crisis is real but said Trump’s solution, and the way he plans to execute it, is not the way to solve the crisis. (During Obama’s tenure as president, he deported illegal immigrants, but never presented that action as the way to solve all the problems in the US, nor did he depict all immigrants – legal or otherwise – as criminals, murderers, or people from insane asylums, as Trump does.)

    He then launched into a spirited endorsement of Kamala Harris and her qualifications to be the next president. He talked about her accomplishments as a prosecutor, Attorney General, Senator, and Vice President, and said she was more than ready to become the next President.

    “Elections are not just about policies, they are about character, Obama said. “We need a leader who sees you and cares about you and thinks about you. Leaders don’t need to be perfect; they need to care.”

    Obama also stumped for Stein to become the next Governor and Mo Green to become the next Superintendent of Schools, taking a moment to remind the audience that Stein’s opponent referred to himself as a “Black Nazi”, and Green’s opponent, Michelle Morrow, said that Obama should face a firing squad. He talked about how Trump ignored the pandemic playbook he and his staff put together, and how Trump’s poor response to COVID caused the needless deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans.

    “We need a President who cares about solving problems,” Obama said. “We have people with the kind of character we need to lead us. We don’t need four years of a would-be king. Kamala Harris has spent her life fighting for people. She knows and cares what people are going through. If you elect Kamala and Tim, they will be focused on you.”

    [ad_2]

    Carla Peay

    Source link

  • Washington Post declines to endorse a presidential candidate, angering staffers and subscribers

    Washington Post declines to endorse a presidential candidate, angering staffers and subscribers

    [ad_1]

    The Washington Post’s publisher, William Lewis, on Friday said the newspaper would not endorse a presidential candidate in this year’s election or in future elections, a stance that sparked outrage from and some of its current and former employees, as well as subscribers.  

    “The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement of a presidential candidate in this election. Nor in any future presidential election. We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates,” Lewis wrote in a note published on the newspaper’s website.

    The decision follows a move by Los Angeles Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong to block that newspaper’s endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris, which has sparked the resignation of the editorials editor, Mariel Garza, followed by the resignations of two other members of its editorial board.

    Both Soon-Shiong and Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos are billionaires who made their fortunes outside the media industry. 

    Former WaPo editor objects

    Media observers decried the decisions, while some readers of the newspapers said they are canceling their subscriptions.

    “This is cowardice, with democracy as its casualty,” wrote Marty Baron, the former editor of the Washington Post, who retired in 2021, on X Friday about the Washington Post’s decision. Former President Donald Trump “will see this as an invitation to further intimidate owner @jeffbezos (and others). Disturbing spinelessness at an institution famed for courage.”

    The Washington Post Guild, which represents roughly 1,000 journalists and other workers at the media company, expressed concern that corporate management had interfered with the paper’s editorial decision-making process.

    “According to our reporters and Guild members, an endorsement for Harris was already drafted, and the decision to not to publish was made by The Post’s owner, Jeff Bezos,” the labor group said In a statement posted on X. “We are already seeing cancellations from once loyal readers. The decision undercuts the work of our members at a time when we should be building our readers’ trust, not losing it.”

    Robert Kagan, an editor at large for the Washington Post, resigned from the editorial board as result of the decision not to endorse a candidate, according to NPR’s David Folkenflik. “Kagan has been a persistent conservative critic of Trump, tying him to an autocratic tradition,” Folkenflik wrote on X. “Uniformly outraged response from staff.”

    Some readers of both the Post and the Los Angeles Times said they planned to cancel their subscriptions, with some posting images of their subscription cancellation notices. 

    “Great, another billionaire protecting his own self-interest instead of the country’s. Nice knowing you, @washingtonpost⁩. Subscription canceled,” wrote Hollywood director Paul Feig on X. 

    Zach Wahls, an Iowa state senator and a Democrat, wrote, “I am a strong believer in paying for serious, high-quality journalism, and that is exactly why I am canceling my @washingtonpost subscription over this timid, cowardly decision that could not come at a worse possible — or more revealing — time.”

    The vast majority of reader responses on social media were negative, with many saying they had canceled their subscriptions, although a few expressed support for the Washington Post. “For the first time in my adult life, I’m proud of the Washington Post,” one reader wrote.

    Lewis didn’t immediately return a request for comment, nor did Los Angeles Times executive editor Terry Tang. Washington Post Executive Matt Murray also did not respond to an email requesting comment. 

    Los Angeles Times resignations

    On Thursday, Los Angeles Times veteran journalists Robert Greene and Karin Klein announced their resignations one day after the editorial page editor Garza left in protest over Soon-Shiong’s decision not to endorse a candidate.

    Greene, a Pulitzer Prize winner for editorial writing, said in a statement shared with the Columbia Journalism Review that he was “deeply disappointed” in the decision not to endorse Harris.

    “I recognize that it is the owner’s decision to make,” he wrote. “But it hurt particularly because one of the candidates, Donald Trump, has demonstrated such hostility to principles that are central to journalism — respect for the truth and reverence for democracy.”

    Garza said the board had intended to endorse Harris and that she had drafted the outline of a proposed editorial, but that was blocked by Soon-Shiong.

    An editorial board operates separately from the newsroom, and its writers’ job is to present an issue and then take a side and lay out arguments to defend it.

    contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Russia goes all-out with covert disinformation aimed at Harris, Microsoft report says

    Russia goes all-out with covert disinformation aimed at Harris, Microsoft report says

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — The video was seen millions of times across social media but some viewers were suspicious: It featured a young Black woman who claimed Vice President Kamala Harris left her paralyzed in a hit-and-run accident in San Francisco 13 years ago.

    In an emotional retelling from a wheelchair, the alleged victim said she “cannot remain silent anymore” and lamented that her childhood had “ended too soon.”

    Immediately after the video was posted on Sept. 2, social media users pointed out reasons to be wary. The purported news channel it came from, San Francisco’s KBSF-TV, didn’t exist. A website for the channel set up just a week earlier contained plagiarized articles from real news outlets. The woman’s X-ray images shown in the video were taken from online medical journals. And the video and the text story on the website spelled the alleged victim’s name differently.

    The caution was warranted, according to a new Microsoft threat intelligence report, which confirms the fabricated tale was disinformation from a Russia-linked troll farm.

    The tech giant’s report released Tuesday details how Kremlin-aligned actors that at first struggled to adapt to President Joe Biden dropping out of the race have now gone full throttle in their covert influence efforts against Harris and Democrats.

    It also explains how Russian intelligence actors are collaborating with pro-Russian cyber “hacktivists” to boost allegedly hacked-and-leaked materials, a strategy the company notes could be weaponized to undermine U.S. confidence in November’s election outcome.

    The findings reveal how even through dramatic changes in the political landscape, groups linked to America’s foreign adversaries have redoubled their commitment to sway U.S. political opinion as the election nears, sometimes through deeply manipulative means. They also provide further insight into how Russia’s efforts to fight pro-Ukrainian policy in the U.S. are translating into escalating attacks on the Democratic presidential ticket.

    The report builds on previous concerns the U.S. has had about Russian interference in the upcoming election. Earlier this month, the Biden administration seized Kremlin-run websites and charged two Russian state media employees in an alleged scheme to secretly fund and influence a network of right-wing influencers.

    Russia-linked actors have spent several months seeking to manipulate American perspectives with covert postings, but until this point, their efforts saw little traction. Notably, some of the recent examples cited in the Microsoft report received significant social media engagement from unwitting Americans who shared the fake stories with outrage.

    “As the election approaches, people get more heated,” Clint Watts, general manager of the Microsoft Threat Analysis Center said in an interview. “People tend to take in information from sources they don’t really know or wouldn’t even know to evaluate.”

    Microsoft explained that the video blaming Harris for a fake hit-and-run incident came from a Russian-aligned influence network it calls Storm-1516, which other researchers refer to as CopyCop. The video, whose main character is played by an actor, is typical of the group’s efforts to react to current events with authentic-seeming “whistleblower” accounts that may seem like juicy unreported news to U.S. voters, the company said.

    The report revealed a second video disseminated by the group, which purported to show two Black men beating up a bloodied white woman at a rally for Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump. The video racked up thousands of shares on the social platform X and elicited comments like, “This is the kind of stuff to start civil wars.”

    What to know about the 2024 Election

    Microsoft’s report also pointed to another Russian influence actor it calls Storm-1679 that has recently pivoted from posting about the French election and the Paris Olympics to posting about Harris. Earlier this month, the group posted a manipulated video depicting a Times Square billboard that linked Harris to gender-affirming surgeries.

    The content highlighted in the report doesn’t appear to use generative artificial intelligence tools. It instead uses actors and more old-school editing techniques.

    Watts said Microsoft has been tracking the use of AI by nation states for more than a year and while foreign actors tried AI initially, many have gone back to basics as they’ve realized AI was “probably more time-consuming and not more effective.”

    Asked about Russia’s motivation, Watts said the Russia-aligned groups Microsoft tracks may not necessarily support particular candidates, but they are motivated to undermine anyone who “is supporting Ukraine in their policy.”

    Harris has vowed to continue supporting America’s ally Ukraine in its fight against Russia’s invasion if elected president. Trump has demurred when asked about whether he wants Ukraine to win the war, saying in the recent presidential debate, “ I want the war to stop.”

    At a forum in early September, Russian President Vladimir Putin appeared to suggest jokingly that he would support Vice President Kamala Harris in the upcoming U.S. election. Intelligence officials have said Moscow prefers Trump.

    The Harris campaign declined to comment. The Russian embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to emailed requests for comment.

    Earlier this summer, Microsoft found that Iranian groups have also been laying the groundwork to stoke division in the election by creating fake news sites, impersonating activists and targeting a presidential campaign with an email phishing attack.

    U.S. intelligence officials are preparing criminal charges in connection with that attack, which targeted the Trump campaign, two people familiar with the matter told The Associated Press.

    Microsoft’s new report also touches on how a Chinese-linked influence actor has used short-form video to criticize Biden and Harris and to create anti-Trump content, suggesting it doesn’t appear interested in supporting a particular candidate.

    Instead, the company said, the China-aligned group’s apparent goal is to “seed doubt and confusion among American voters ahead of the 2024 presidential election.”

    ___

    The Associated Press receives support from several private foundations to enhance its explanatory coverage of elections and democracy. See more about AP’s democracy initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Truth to Those Kamala Harris & Diddy Photos That Were Reportedly ‘Bleached’ From the Internet

    The Truth to Those Kamala Harris & Diddy Photos That Were Reportedly ‘Bleached’ From the Internet

    [ad_1]

    After the Bad Boy Records founder’s arrest in September, many people on the internet are trying to find celebrity ties to Sean “Diddy” Combs. One of those people includes Democratic Presidential Nominee Vice President Kamala Harris.

    On September 16, 2024, Diddy was arrested in Manhattan by federal agents, facing serious charges including racketeering, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York unsealed an indictment against the rapper, and he pleaded “not guilty” in a New York courtroom where he was subsequently denied bail.

    Related: Diddy Faces More Sexual Assault Lawsuits After Hundreds of Accusers Came Forward—Here’s a List of His Victims

    This arrest came months after a dramatic raid on Diddy’s homes by federal agents on March 25, 2024. At the time, a spokesperson for Homeland Security Investigations told TMZ: “Earlier today, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) New York executed law enforcement actions as part of an ongoing investigation, with assistance from HSI Los Angeles, HSI Miami, and our local law enforcement partners. We will provide further information as it becomes available.”

    If you or someone you know has experienced sexual violence, free and confidential help is available. Call the National Sexual Assault Hotline on 1-800-656-4673.

    Some netizens have shared a photo of Kamala Harris and Diddy posing with one another. In one Instagram post, a user captioned, “Kamala’s team has spent more than $5 million having images with Sean “Diddy” Combs bleached from the internet. It would be such a shame if this made the rounds.” But did she really take those photos with Diddy or are they fake?

    Did Diddy take a picture with Kamala Harris?

    The photo that has been shared multiple times is an edited photo of Diddy and his ex-girlfriend Misa Hylton with Kamala Harris’ face imposed on hers. Several news sites like Reuters, AFP, and Lead Stories have fact-checked the photo and proved it was doctored. A discreet watermark “ALLOD” and a branded disclaimer in the lower left corner says this photo is satire from the website America’s Last Line of Defense.

    Former President Donald Trump posted another fake photo of Vice President Kamala Harris with Diddy on September 20, 2024. He posted his Truth Social site and wrote: “Kamala, doing the Diddy?” the text read via TMZ. “Madam Vice President, have you ever been involved with or engaged in one of Puff Daddies freak offs?” He subsequently deleted it.

    The Democratic presidential candidate previously thanked the rap for hosting a town hall about the impact of COVID-19 on Black communities in 2020. “Thank you, @Diddy, for hosting this town hall last night,” the post on X read. “There’s a lot at stake for our communities right now, and it’s critical we bring to the forefront how coronavirus is perpetuating racial inequality and health disparities.”

    Both Diddy and Donald Trump expressed in the past that they were friends. “Donald Trump is a friend of mine, and he works very hard,” Diddy told the Washington Post in 2015. “I love Diddy. You know he’s a good friend of mine, he’s a good guy,” Trump said in an episode of The Celebrity Apprentice.

    [ad_2]

    Lea Veloso

    Source link