ReportWire

Tag: Kamala Harris

  • Trump and Harris both support a bigger child tax credit. But which families should get it?

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Never before in a presidential election cycle has there been so much discussion of the child tax credit — a tool many Democrats and Republicans have endorsed as a way to lift children and young families out of poverty.

    Just three years ago, child poverty rates fell significantly when President Joe Biden’s administration raised the child tax credit and made even the poorest families eligible. But the expansion only lasted a year. Congress declined to renew it.

    There is hope for another increase in the tax credit, regardless of who wins Tuesday’s presidential election, but tension remains over who should qualify.

    Democrats seek a massive — and costly — expansion of the social safety net. Vice President Kamala Harris has pitched a major increase to the child tax credit as part of her presidential campaign. Rather than providing the benefit through a tax refund, she wants to send monthly payments to parents, even those who aren’t working and pay no income tax. Republicans have expressed support for increasing the tax credit but also concern that for some parents, it could become an incentive not to work.

    For all its economic prosperity, childhood poverty remains pervasive in the United States. Children under 5 are the age group most likely to encounter poverty and eviction, and more than one in six young people under 18 live below the federal poverty line. Meanwhile, it’s getting more expensive to raise a child, with the cost of groceries, child care and housing going up.

    “Expanding the child tax credit is the single most effective option on the table for reducing child poverty in America,” said Christy Gleason of Save the Children, a global humanitarian organization focused on the well-being of children. “Families are demanding it. Voters are demanding it.”

    Currently, the child tax credit gives families a $2,000 discount on their tax bill for every child under the age of 17 in their care. Families that pay less than $2,000 in income tax get a smaller benefit, and parents who are out of the workforce get none.

    Harris has made expanding the tax credit central to her campaign’s messaging on the economy. Her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, has a resume that includes passing a state child tax credit.

    Former President Donald Trump doubled the amount of the child tax credit during his administration. His presidential campaign declined to provide specifics on his plans for the child tax credit except to say he would weigh significantly increasing it.

    Trump’s running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, raised the possibility of increasing the child tax credit to $5,000 so that more parents can stay home with their children in an interview on CBS’ Face the Nation. But some Republicans have been leery about expanding it to parents who are not working outside the home.

    After voting down a child tax credit bill in August, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky said for stay-at-home parents the benefit amounts to “cash welfare instead of relief for working taxpayers.”

    The stakes of that debate are high for parents who are unable to work because of a disability, or because they are caring for children or elderly parents. Many have been excluded from the benefit because they are not earning income.

    Kandice Beckford, 25, is among those. She was a medical assistant at Howard University Hospital in Washington, D.C., last year when her pregnancy made her too sick to work, forcing her to quit.

    She was homeless even when she was earning a paycheck, bouncing between the homes of friends and relatives. When she left the hospital after giving birth in April, she still had no permanent place to stay. There was little she could do except connect with social service agencies — and pray.

    “I’m a godly woman, so I really tried to leave most of that in God’s hands,” Beckford said. “It was worrisome, but I tried not to let it overpower my life and my thinking.”

    Beckford’s story underscores the financial precarity many families — and single mothers in particular — face in raising children. If she doesn’t return to work this year, she won’t qualify for any benefit.

    The Harris proposal would make every household eligible regardless of income, providing $6,000 in benefits to families with newborns and $3,600 for each child after that. She wants to pay it out in monthly payments so families would not have to wait for a tax return. Harris plans to raise taxes on corporations and the wealthiest Americans to pay for the plan, in part by allowing tax credits adopted under the Trump administration in 2017 to expire.

    As president, Trump doubled the child tax credit from $1,000 to $2,000 and raised the income cap, allowing families earning up to $400,000 to receive the benefit. The child tax credit passed under his administration will expire at the end of next year. If the next Congress and president do not act, the credit will fall back to $1,000 a child.

    In 2021, as part of his American Rescue Plan, President Joe Biden expanded the credit to $3,000 per child — and $3,600 for children under the age of 6 — and made it available to every household with citizen children, regardless of their income. It cut child poverty in half by one measure. But those gains were erased when it expired.

    In September, Beckford finally got into a shelter for women and their children in Maryland and was connected with a social service agency that has helped her with many of the expenses a new baby brings, including a stroller and car seat, clothing and toys.

    When asked about her dreams for her daughter Inari, Beckford ticked off a list: She wants Inari to be smarter than her and to get “the best education there is to have.” Inari is already exceeding her development milestones, and Beckford is relishing in her growth.

    Her last wish was something that sounded basic, but has proven elusive for Beckford and so many other American mothers.

    “I want her to have a stable life,” Beckford said.

    ___

    Associated Press writer Josh Boak contributed to this report.

    ___

    The Associated Press’ education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

    __

    This story has been corrected to note that Biden expanded the child tax credit in his American Rescue Plan, not the Inflation Reduction Act.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Could We Have The First Native American Woman Governor? DEI Expert Weighs In On What Allyship Should Look Like If History Is Made. | Entrepreneur

    Could We Have The First Native American Woman Governor? DEI Expert Weighs In On What Allyship Should Look Like If History Is Made. | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    As the 2024 election season comes to a close, we’re encountering a year of historic firsts — nationally and locally. If Vice President Kamala Harris and Governor Tim Walz were to win the White House this year, the highest-ranking Native American woman in the country would become the governor of Minnesota. That woman is Peggy Flanagan.

    Lauded as one of Minnesota’s rising stars and currently the highest-ranking Native woman elected to executive office, Peggy Flanagan is a politician, community organizer and Indigenous activist from the White Earth Nation. She has been serving as the lieutenant governor of Minnesota since 2019 and is currently next in line to assume the governorship if Tim Walz becomes vice president.

    So what does this all mean? History could be made this November and help catapult the first Native woman — and consequently, long-overlooked Native issues — into broader American public discourse. It’s perfect timing, too, as we approach Native American History Month this November.

    Even though we’re zooming in on politics in this piece, entrepreneurs across the spectrum can learn something about positioning diverse leaders in the right spaces and supporting their work and advancement throughout their tenure.

    Flanagan needed allies like Walz and others to lift her voice and put her into positions where she could make an impact. We can all learn more about what it means to be a better ally for those who are the “firsts” in their space. Here are three strategies around allyship I recommend to my diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) consultancy clients.

    Related: The Burden of Breaking Barriers is Pushing Black Leaders to Breaking Point. This DEI Expert Reveals Where We Are Going Wrong.

    Let diverse leaders lead

    There have been many firsts in the realm of politics in recent years. There was the first Black president, Barack Obama, in 2008, then the first openly gay governor, Jared Polis, from Colorado in 2019, and potentially, the first woman and Southeast Asian president, Kamala Harris, in 2024.

    All these great firsts had this in common: they had allies and partners that let them take the lead and shine. Peggy Flanagan has been an outstanding leader in the realm of DEI for decades. In 2017, she helped form Minnesota’s first People of Color and Indigenous Caucus (POCI). She worked tirelessly to improve education, health and economic outcomes for Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) in her state.

    In addition, she has been a fearless advocate of Indigenous people’s rights. While serving as a legislator, she sponsored a first-of-its-kind task force focused on Missing Murdered Indigenous Women (MMIW), a phenomenon happening across the country where Indigenous women experience violence and go missing shortly thereafter. Local police municipalities in many states often don’t search for missing Indigenous women or investigate their disappearances. Unfortunately, MMIW cases usually go unsolved. All that is to say that when we let diverse leaders lead, they can do powerful things by raising awareness about issues that may have never crossed our minds. As allies, our job is to lift these leaders up and amplify their work.

    Beware of performative allyship

    While many people want to take credit for knowing the trailblazers in politics and DEI and take pride in having supported them on their way up, the truth is that it can be a lonely journey for many leaders who had to actualize their dreams on their own. They sponsored their legislation and wrote it themselves with their teams. They sat in rooms with decision-makers where they worked hard to get colleagues on board with their bold new initiatives. They attended many thankless events where they carried the burden of organizing, leading and managing the outcomes alone.

    Many people want to take credit for the work BIPOC has been doing by saying they were “there” at the event or “support” so-and-so leaders’ work wholeheartedly. But still, BIPOC individuals are often the people who did all the work, and still, the allies are nowhere to be found. Performative allyship can often look like claiming to be an ally when it’s politically or socially advantageous but not during times when true grit, work, and dedication are required — and the cameras and spotlights are off. Avoid falling into the trap of lifting up leaders like Flanagan when it’s most convenient for you and not for the leaders and their causes.

    Related: How Brands Can Go From Performative Allyship to Actual Allies

    Be a success partner

    What’s most helpful for rising leaders whom you wish to support is not only to say you stand behind certain causes but to actually show up and prove it. Support bills that improve Indigenous health, education and rights. Speak about Flanagan’s work in the public domain, thereby ensuring colleagues who might be interested in those issues are aware of them. Donate to organizations and nonprofits that bolster the work that Indigenous leaders are doing to move the needle on change. It’s not enough to say, “I’m for Indigenous people’s rights,” or to do a land acknowledgment when you haven’t actually done the work, spent the time, or put your money where your mouth is.

    Related: It’s Not Enough to Simply Acknowledge Indigenous People’s Day. Here Are 4 Ways Employers Can Take Action, Help and Support Native Americans.

    Final thoughts

    No matter what happens this November, leaders like Peggy Flanagan are on the rise. When one person moves on to a higher office, BIPOC and LGBTQ+ officials who have been waiting for their moment to shine can finally rise, too. The future is bright for a new generation of leadership in the U.S. that better represents the diversity of the country while inspiring more just, equitable and inclusive policies at local and national levels.

    [ad_2]

    Nika White

    Source link

  • Biden Sees Baby In A Chicken Costume For Halloween, So Of Course He Pretends To Bite Him

    Biden Sees Baby In A Chicken Costume For Halloween, So Of Course He Pretends To Bite Him

    [ad_1]

    Credit: Screenshot via Sky News Australia

    It’s unclear what compels him to do so, but President Biden continued a longstanding tradition of pretending to bite a baby during a Halloween event at the White House on Wednesday.

    Whereas some people might find it endearing, Biden’s little Chompfest usually sends social media into an uproar for it’s creepy factor.

    Not to mention, with his mental faculties diminished to the point where Democrats were forced to undemocratically remove him from his reelection bid, one has to wonder if he was even aware the baby wasn’t an actual chicken.

    Anyway, a mother at the event brought her baby up to the President. He was adorable in his little chicken costume.

    Bden proceeded to provide the world with an image that will go down in infamy.

    I’ll Take The Treat: Biden Bites A Baby

    Now, let’s circle back to my original comment here that maybe he was just confused. Perhaps he thought the mother was carrying a big ol’ Purdue chicken.

    But alas, that theory kind of goes out the window when you realize ol’ Joe Biden was pictured pretending to take a bite out of not just one baby … but four babies!

    And only one of them was dressed as a chicken.

    You’ve gotta love the state of presidential politics these days. Biden spent the day biting babies yesterday while Donald Trump was giving a speech wearing an orange vest after having driven in a garbage truck.

    One man is a genius, though; the other man is making people question their own sanity by wondering what exactly they’re looking at.

    I’m starting to think that Biden’s dogs had to be removed from the White House due to learned behavior from their owner.

    RELATED: Biden Desperately Tries To Clean Up After Ruining Kamala’s Big Night With ‘Garbage’ Insult

    Why Does He Do These Things?

    As noted, President Biden has a history of doing this with the biting and the babies. It’s like nobody on his team took the time to pull him aside and explain that politicians for years have kissed babies for photo ops, not nibbled on them.

    Here he is absolutely terrifying a small girl during a trip to Finland just last year.

    On a much more serious note, Biden’s inappropriate behavior isn’t limited to the young folk. Several women have come forward to accuse the President of inappropriately touching them and making them feel uncomfortable over the years.

    Former Nevada Assemblywoman Lucy Flores wrote a column alleging Biden inappropriately kissed her and smelled her hair.

    He even has a history of making female Secret Service agents uncomfortable by skinny dipping or walking around the house without clothes.

    Tara Reade, a former Senate staffer, accused President Biden of sexual assault.

    But this baby biting thing. Man, is it any wonder Kamala Harris doesn’t want him anywhere near the campaign trail right now?

    Harris Campaign To Joe Biden With The Election On The Line: Don’t Call Us, We’ll Call You

    [ad_2]

    Rusty Weiss

    Source link

  • Pennsylvania is the top prize among battleground states. Here’s what to expect for the 2024 election.

    Pennsylvania is the top prize among battleground states. Here’s what to expect for the 2024 election.

    [ad_1]

    Pennsylvania was a pivotal state in the 2020 presidential election, sealing Joe Biden’s victory over Donald Trump after four days of vote counting. So it’s no surprise the Keystone State is again front and center this election cycle, with both Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump investing time and resources there ahead of Election Day.

    In the past few weeks, the presidential candidates have been regulars in Pennsylvania, often joined on the campaign trail by celebrities and fellow politicians. They’ve made some memorable pit stops — from Harris snapping selfies at Famous 4th Street Deli to Trump donning an apron during a campaign event at a McDonald’s in Bucks County, which Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro calls the “swingiest of all swing counties in the swingiest of all swing states.” Trump also returned to Butler for a rally at the same fairgrounds where he survived an assassination attempt in July.

    CBS News’ Battleground Tracker shows an effectively tied race in Pennsylvania a week before Election Day. The state is part of the Democrats’ “blue wall” along with Michigan and Wisconsin, considered crucial for the party’s path to the White House. 

    Here’s what you need to know ahead of Election Day:

    Pennsylvania Election Day fast facts

    • Polls open: 7 a.m. ET
    • Polls close: 8 p.m. ET
    • Mail-in ballot deadline: 8 p.m. ET on Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2024
    • Where to vote: Look up your polling place here
    • Electoral votes: 19
    • Voter turnout: 76% of registered voters cast ballots in 2020, government data shows

    Pennsylvania vote-counting rules

    Every state has its own rules when it comes to vote counting. In Pennsylvania, state law requires county election workers to wait until polls open on Election Day (7 a.m. ET) to start processing — removing ballots from envelopes — and counting mail-in ballots. 

    Pennsylvania counties also can’t begin to record or release mail-in ballot results until after the polls close at 8 p.m. ET. That means there will be a lag in announcing the final tallies and, in turn, projecting the state’s winner. How long of a delay, however, is unclear.

    Pennsylvania’s Electoral College votes

    Pennsylvania has 19 electoral votes, making it an important prize in the presidential race. The state had 20 electoral votes in the 2020 race but lost one in the congressional redistricting that followed the 2020 Census.

    When will we know who won Pennsylvania?

    In 2020, Mr. Biden was named the projected winner of Pennsylvania late morning on Saturday, Nov. 7 — the fourth day of vote counting — after taking an insurmountable lead in the state. Winning the state’s then-20 electoral votes helped him top the 270 needed to win the presidency.

    But it’s hard to draw any conclusions from 2020 when more voters opted for mail-in voting for the first time due to the ongoing spread of COVID-19. It was the first year Pennsylvania allowed no-excuse mail-in voting, leading to a record 2.6 million mail-in ballots. In 2020, 38% of Pennsylvanians voted either early or by mail, compared to 4% in 2016, according to CBS News’ records.

    The Pennsylvania Supreme Court also ruled in 2020 that mail-in ballots couldn’t be rejected over signature mismatches.

    Kathy Boockvar, former Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, told CBS News that 2024 will likely look different since election officials have had four more years of practice, bought new equipment and have a better idea of how much staffing they’ll need.

    “Nobody knows on election night who wins or loses. What we hope to do is count the ballots securely, accurately, and then after that as quickly as humanly possible,” Boockvar said.

    In 2020, about 54% of total votes cast were reported by 12 a.m. ET after Election Day, according to the Associated Press. The “overwhelming majority of ballots” were counted by Thursday night into Friday morning in 2020, according to Boockvar.

    Boockvar estimates this year, given all of the lessons learned from 2020 and improvements made to the counting system, that the majority of ballots will be counted by the end of Wednesday instead of Thursday, which may help speed up the process of projecting a winner.

    However, if the race is close, then that may delay things further. Pennsylvania has an automatic recount if the margin in any statewide race is 0.5% votes or less. The state also allows losing candidates to file a request for a machine recount if they pay for it. A refund may be available depending on the findings. 

    Could Latino voters in Pennsylvania decide the election?


    Latino voters face surge in misinformation as election nears

    05:00

    In order to secure a Pennsylvania victory, both Harris and Trump may need to win over Latino voters. There are nearly 580,000 eligible Latino voters in Pennsylvania, according to the UCLA Latino Policy & Politics Institute’s latest data. Pennsylvania’s share of eligible Latino voters has more than doubled since 2000, the data shows.

    Roughly about half of the Latino population lives in the center part of the state called the “222 Corridor” — a stretch of small cities including Reading, Allentown, Lancaster and Bethlehem, where the presidential candidates and their running mates have visited frequently.

    A recent poll from the Hispanic Federation and Latino Victory Foundation found that 66% of Latino respondents said they’d vote this year in Pennsylvania.

    Who won Pennsylvania in past presidential elections?

    Pennsylvania has voted for the presidential winner dating back to 2008, when Barack Obama was elected president. Here’s a look at who has claimed the state over the years:

    • 2020: Democrat Joe Biden defeats Donald Trump
    • 2016: Republican Donald Trump defeats Hillary Clinton
    • 2012: Democrat Barack Obama defeats Mitt Romney
    • 2008: Democrat Barack Obama defeats John McCain
    • 2004: Democrat John Kerry defeats George W. Bush
    • 2000: Democrat Al Gore defeats George W. Bush

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Compare Trump and Harris’ views on LGBTQ rights and marriage equality

    Compare Trump and Harris’ views on LGBTQ rights and marriage equality

    [ad_1]

    Washington — Among the topics voters may consider in the 2024 presidential election are LGBTQ rights — and it’s an issue where former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris have starkly different messages and backgrounds.

    A large majority of Americans support legal protections for LGBTQ people, according to a survey from the Public Religion Research Institute. But support is stronger in blue states than red states, and has declined overall in recent years — especially among Republicans. And support for same-sex marriage has also seen a slight decline.

    Meanwhile, 38% of Americans said LGBTQ rights are a factor in their voting decisions, and 30% say they will vote only for a candidate who aligns with them on the issue. 

    Here’s what to know about the candidates’ views and records on the issue:

    Donald Trump on LGBTQ issues

    The former president has been inconsistent on the issue during his time in the public eye, and his administration rolled back protections for LGBTQ people — especially transgender individuals.

    In the late 1990s and early 2000s, before he entered politics, Trump expressed support for domestic partnership laws that granted couples the same benefits of married couples — a position that the GOP widely opposed at the time — and often showed personal tolerance for LGBTQ issues more broadly. In a 1999 interview, where he also said he was “very pro-choice” Trump said that “it would not disturb me” for gay people to serve in the military. 

    Years later, Trump said in 2011, amid speculation about a possible presidential bid, that he was “opposed to gay marriage.” In 2015, he said he supports “traditional marriage.”

    Trump became the first GOP presidential nominee to mention LGBTQ issues in his 2016 RNC speech, pledging to protect the community in the aftermath of the Pulse nightclub shooting. 

    Trump chose a conservative running mate in 2016, Mike Pence, who had staunchly opposed same-sex marriage, but Trump’s own comments on the topic varied. 

    Trump said during his 2016 campaign that he would “strongly consider” appointing Supreme Court justices who would overturn the 2015 ruling that legalized same-sex marriages. Then, days after he was elected, he said he was “fine” with same-sex marriage and suggested he wouldn’t appoint justices to the high court with the goal of overturning the ruling. His wife, Melania Trump, called him “the first president to enter the White House supporting gay marriage” as he sought reelection in 2020.

    On transgender issues, Trump said in 2016, amid a controversy over a North Carolina bathroom ban, that transgender people should “use the bathroom they feel is appropriate.” But his administration went on to reverse a policy that required schools to allow transgender students to use bathrooms that correspond with their gender identity, and his administration banned some transgender people from serving in the military while Trump was in office — a policy that President Biden reversed. Trump’s administration also tried to repeal health protections for transgender people and sought to end protections for transgender individuals in federal prison, among other policies.

    Anti-trans sentiments would go on to become a prominent talking point for Republicans on the campaign trail in the 2022 midterm elections. In early 2023, Trump said he would use his powers, should he return to the White House, to punish doctors who provide gender affirming care for minors and impose consequences for teachers who discuss it with students. 

    In the final months of the 2024 campaign, Trump and his allies leaned into anti-trans rhetoric, spending millions on advertisements focusing on the issue in battleground states.  

    Meanwhile, Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance, sponsored legislation in 2023 that would ban access to gender-affirming care for minors, along with a bill to bar the State Department from allowing the gender marker “X” on passports. The Ohio Republican also said he would vote no on the Respect for Marriage Act, which provided federal protections for same-sex and interracial marriages, while campaigning for Senate in 2022, citing religious liberty concerns.

    Kamala Harris on LGBTQ issues

    Harris has generally been an early adopter of pro-LGBTQ policies and stances, doing so before other prominent members of her party.

    The former San Francisco district attorney officiated some of the nation’s first same-sex marriages in 2004, after then-mayor Gavin Newsom directed the county clerk to approve the marriages although the law didn’t yet recognize them. The marriages were invalidated months later. Then, when she was elected as California’s attorney general in 2010, Harris said she would not defend in court a voter-approved measure known as Proposition 8, which outlawed same-sex marriage.

    As district attorney, Harris had prosecuted violence against LGBTQ people, establishing a hate crime unit to look into crimes against LGBTQ youth. As attorney general, she sought to end the “panic defense” that allowed homicide defendants to seek lesser sentences if they attested to being panicked by the victim’s sexual orientation. 

    Harris has been criticized by LGBTQ advocates for denying gender-affirming surgeries for transgender inmates when she served as attorney general; she said she was bound by the Department of Corrections policy in place at the time. She later expressed support for providing such care to inmates during her 2020 presidential bid. During that campaign, where she ran on a more progressive platform, Harris also said she supports decriminalizing sex work, though she noted that it’s not a simple issue.

    As a senator, Harris sponsored a handful of bills aimed at addressing discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, along with other LGBTQ issues. Harris’ record has also been tied to the Biden administration, which expanded Title IX protections for LGBTQ students, although they were blocked by the Supreme Court. In 2022, Mr. Biden signed the Respect for Marriage Act into law, enshrining federal protections for same-sex and interracial marriages. 

    Harris’ running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, has a reputation as an advocate for LGBTQ rights. When Walz was a high school teacher, he served as the faculty adviser who helped form his school’s first gay-straight alliance in the ’90s.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Will Your Elected Officials in Congress Accept the Results of the Election?

    Will Your Elected Officials in Congress Accept the Results of the Election?

    [ad_1]

    We are in the final days of a momentous presidential election between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. Do you know whether your elected officials will accept the outcome?

    WIRED reached out to every single senator and member of the US Congress asking whether they would accept the results of the election as called by the Associated Press. Why the AP? Because in the absence of a national election authority, calls made by the AP—a nonprofit cooperative—have long been accepted as authoritative. We wanted something politically neutral, particularly because some local and state-level officials have indicated that they may not certify the results.

    You can look up your zip code or state in the search bar below to find your congressional representative and senator, as well as their response to our question about whether they will accept the AP’s results. In some instances, your zip code may not match your current congressional district, as district boundaries can change over time.

    We organized the legislators’ responses into three categories: those who will accept the results of the elections as reported by the AP, those who won’t, and those who have not responded. This is a living document, and we will continue to update it with responses from representatives as we continue to receive them. When possible, we are also including the full responses from lawmakers to add further context to their responses. For instance, some lawmakers may say that they will accept the results when states certify but not based on the AP call.

    A note is attached to the results of all lawmakers who signed the “Unity Commitment” in September, vowing to certify the results after “all legal means” to challenge the outcome “have been exhausted.” Additionally, the results indicate if a lawmaker previously declared a commitment “to certifying the election results” as part of a USA Today poll conducted in mid-October.

    It’s the first presidential election since the January 6, 2021, insurrection, when Trump supporters stormed the Capitol and baselessly claimed the election had been stolen.

    In the interceding years, election denial has gone from being the purview of fringe conspiracists to a staple of major figures on the American right. Trump has already indicated plans to challenge election results this year, and hundreds of Republican candidates for office have cast doubt on them as well. Senator JD Vance of Ohio, the Republican vice presidential candidate, has said that he would not have certified the 2020 election unless states had sent alternative pro-Trump electors.

    Election officials across the country have delayed or refused the certification of state and local election results. Conspiracy theories about the results of the 2024 election have already flooded the internet, as election denial groups, the Trump campaign, and people such as billionaire and X owner Elon Musk have spread falsehoods about election fraud.

    In the face of the proven willingness of Trump and his allies to attempt to seize power after losing an election, a statement from elected officials that they will accept the results of the election as declared by a neutral arbiter is critical information for voters preparing to cast their ballots.

    Dell Cameron, Vittoria Elliott, Leah Feiger, David Gilbert, Makena Kelly, and Dhruv Mehrotra contributed to this project.

    [ad_2]

    WIRED Staff

    Source link

  • Looking back at the 2020 presidential election

    Looking back at the 2020 presidential election

    [ad_1]

    Looking back at the 2020 presidential election – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Americans went to the polls under very different circumstances in 2020. CBS News chief Washington correspondent Major Garrett takes a look back ahead of Election Day on Nov. 5.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Donald Trump’s Ground Game in Michigan Is Mostly Glitchy Apps and Vibes

    Donald Trump’s Ground Game in Michigan Is Mostly Glitchy Apps and Vibes

    [ad_1]

    “I think it’s what happens when you let a bunch of grifters take over,” a Trumpworld source said of Musk’s seat-of-the-pants operation, requesting anonymity to speak candidly about internal discussions on the campaign’s lack of a voter turnout strategy. “Shit is always gonna produce shit.”

    Musk’s PAC has continued doing most of the heavy lifting, carrying out the outsourced ground game for Trump like Never Back Down did for Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, who was lambasted for it by Trump’s team. Musk has offered voters the chance to win $1 million by signing a petition-turned-sweepstakes supporting the First and Second Amendments and his door knockers get paid $30 per hour “with bonuses for performance.” But there are serious questions within Trump’s orbit over how effective the late effort will be.

    “What happens is, you skim a bunch of money off the top, and then you hire the dumbest people and pay them a little bit of money,” the Trumpworld strategist said. “There’s no way of tracking whether it’s effective or not. It’s hard to track the output, and thus the effectiveness of the output.”

    Victoria LaCivita, Trump’s Michigan communications director and the daughter of Chris LaCivita, Trump’s co-campaign manager, described the campaign’s voter turnout operation as part of “the most sophisticated and modern campaign, ever. Our team is only expanding—we are adding new staff, offices, and volunteers weekly—with more enthusiasm, energy, and support from people and states that Democrats have taken for granted.”

    A Trump campaign spokesperson also told WIRED they have “dozens of campaign offices all across the state, including the [Upper Peninsula], Detroit, Macomb, Oakland, Lansing, Livingston, Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo, and Burton,” along with 100 paid staff in Michigan, plus 6,000 “Trump captains,” and “countless volunteers in every corner of Michigan.”

    A spokesperson for Michigan Republican senate candidate Mike Rogers’ campaign said they have 36 staffers with “several” field offices, aiming to hit “north of 70,000” doors per week.

    Democrats have also claimed a robust voter turnout operation across 52 field offices and at least 375 staffers. But for Michigan Democrats hitting the pavement each weekend, they’ve been wondering when the Trump cavalry is supposedly coming.

    “It’s been fascinating. It’s been weird? It’s been weird,” Michigan state senator Mallory McMorrow, a Harris campaign surrogate who’s been deployed to speak in front of younger voters in battleground states, tells WIRED.

    [ad_2]

    Jake Lahut

    Source link

  • Here’s what could decide the election: How battleground state voters perceive inflation

    Here’s what could decide the election: How battleground state voters perceive inflation

    [ad_1]

    In a tight presidential race in which Americans cite the state of the economy as the most important issue, one aspect of the country’s performance could prove decisive: How voters in battleground states currently perceive inflation.

    Americans rank the economy and inflation as their top two issues in the November 5 election, according to CBS News and other polls. But perhaps even more important than current price levels is how voters in key states interpret their experience with inflation, according to Bernard Yaros, lead economist at Oxford Economics. 

    All eyes on Pennsylvania

    Yaros notes that voters’ views on inflation are particularly important in Pennsylvania, a state experts say could be a tipping point in the contest between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump. Pennsylvanians appear to be more sensitive to inflation than people in many other states, with Yaros’ research finding that every 1 percentage point increase in inflation before a presidential election is linked to tens of thousands of Pennsylvanians voting against the incumbent and for the challenger. 

    That dynamic could be due to the state’s lower median annual household income of about $73,000, which is slightly below the U.S. median of $75,000. The Keystone State also tends to have an older population, at an average age of 41, compared with 39 years old for the U.S., Census data shows. Older, less affluent Americans 

    “Lower-income people devote more of their income to essentials — they will react more negatively” to inflation shocks, Yaros told CBS MoneyWatch. Pennsylvania “also has a slightly older demographic, so people on fixed incomes are going to feel the bite from high inflation.”

    With new CBS News polling showing a statistical dead heat between Harris and Trump in Pennsylvania, the path to victory in the state may boil down to whether voters experience inflation in one of two ways, Yaros said. 

    Overall U.S. prices jumped 22% between January 2020 and September of this year, forcing consumers to shell out more for everything from groceries to car insurance. But in the past year, inflation has cooled to an annual rate of 2.4%, approaching the Federal Reserve’s target of 2%.

    Given these trends, a key question that could tilt the balance in Pennsylvania, as well as in other battleground states, is whether local voters focus on the cumulative rise in prices since 2020 or instead take cheer from how inflation has cooled over the last year, Yaros said.


    If voters fixate on how prices for many goods and services remain significantly higher than before the pandemic — what Yaros calls the “sticker-shock model” — Trump is forecast to win Pennsylvania by more than 90,000 votes, the economist’s analysis found. If, by contrast, voters zero in on the more recent descent in prices, Harris is projected to secure the state by 70,000 votes. 

    Why inflation leaves scars

    Some battleground states have experienced a higher rate of inflation since 2020 than the nation more broadly, especially those in Sun Belt states like Arizona. While those areas are now seeing a step-down in prices, prices in the Middle Atlantic states, which includes Pennsylvania as well as New Jersey and New York, rose 3.4% last month — a full percentage point higher than the national rate, government data shows.

    Yaros’ model shows that voters in other battleground states like Arizona, Georgia and Wisconsin — states won by Biden in 2020 — could also swing in favor of Trump if voters there view inflation through the sticker-shock model. Meanwhile, Americans typically dislike high inflation more than other economic shocks, such as rising unemployment, he said.

    “You have a rich history of literature that shows people disliking inflation much more than they dislike other negative macroeconomic outcomes, such as higher unemployment,” Yaros said, pointing to a 1997 paper from Nobel-prize winning economist Robert J. Shiller.

    He added, “Unemployment affects only a subset of the economy, but when you have periods of high inflation, that affects everyone.”

    It’s difficult to predict which outlook will prevail in the battleground states, Yaros said. But, he added, “The research we’ve done, which has shown how lower-income folks have seen their share of spending toward discretionary spending permanently reduced because of the inflation shock, that would argue in favor of people fixating on the high price levels, still being upset with the political status quo.”

    Inflation: How do you view it?

    The Consumer Price Index measures the change in prices over time of a typical basket of goods and services. But many Americans tend to conflate inflation with the actual prices they’re paying at the store. 

    In other words, even though inflation has cooled, prices remain high; what’s more, they’ll stay high unless there’s a period of deflation, which typically only occurs when there’s a steep economic downturn. It also explains why more than 1 in 4 people polled by YouGov in August said they think the current inflation rate is over 10%, or more than quadruple the actual inflation rate.

    “People who aren’t economists, when they think about inflation, are thinking about the price level,” Yaros said. “‘A gallon of milk is $3, not $2 like it used to be, and I’m upset about it’.”

    Why the “misery index” could portend

    Voters who focus on the recent cooler rate of inflation might be inclined to support Harris, in what Yaros calls his “misery-index model,” based on the misery index, an informal measure that looks at the sum of the nation’s unemployment rate and the annual inflation rate. 

    Currently, the misery index stands at 6.5%, below its 9.1% average since 1947.

    Historically, the misery index has accurately predicted the presidential outcome, with a high index number predicting that the incumbent party was set to lose. For instance, the misery index reached 15% in 2020, indicating that President Trump was vulnerable in that year’s race.


    To be sure, plenty of other factors could sway voters this year, from immigration to abortion, Yaros acknowledged. And despite Americans’ glum outlook about the economy, consumers are still spending.

    “We’ve seen such a disconnect between consumer sentiment measures and actual consumer spending, so people could be saying one thing and acting differently,” he said. “I don’t think anyone can say for sure what way this is going to break.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Harris/Walz campaign has its own Fortnite map

    The Harris/Walz campaign has its own Fortnite map

    [ad_1]

    We’re in the final stretch of the 2024 presidential election and both sides are pulling out all the stops to get those all-important undecided voters. The Harris/Walz campaign is exploring an unconventional option: a map in Epic Games’ mega online multiplayer hit Fortnite.

    The “Freedom Town, USA” map available at 7331-5536-6547 is a little different from the usual Fortnite matches. Forbes senior contributor Paul Tassi played the new map and reported that there aren’t any guns in Freedom Town (probably for obvious reasons). Instead, the game focuses on racing with cars and parkour style. The map also has some campaign signs and decorations for Vice President Kamala Harris and Gov. Tim Walz’s presidential run.

    Video games have become a cornerstone of the Harris/Walz campaign. Harris’ camp has its own Twitch page that’s been broadcasting games like World of Warcraft and the latest Madden title as a way to spark discussions with the voting public. The Fortnite map, however, doesn’t look like it’s doing a great job of getting the message out to players. As of this story’s publishing, the map only has less than 300 active players.

    Political ads and recruitment in video games isn’t just limited to this campaign cycle. Then-candidate Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign introduced the concept to politics when they purchased ads in 18 games including Need for Speed: Carbon and Madden NFL 13 on Microsoft’s Xbox Live service and the mobile version of Tetris, according to NPR.

    [ad_2]

    Danny Gallagher

    Source link

  • Kamala Harris Crowd Tonight Will Be As Big As The World Series

    Kamala Harris Crowd Tonight Will Be As Big As The World Series

    [ad_1]

    Police estimate that the size of the crowd for Kamala Harris’s Washington, DC speech will equal Game 3 of the World Series.

    Nicolle Wallace said:

    Harris will ask voters to turn the page on Donald Trump. So here is what we’re hearing today, first. 20,000 people was the attendance number that they expected and planned for. Then it got bumped up to 40,000 people they were expecting. By far the largest rally of Harris’ presidential campaign.

    The latest Metropolitan Police in Washington, D.C. suggest 52,000 people could be in attendance tonight. And an exact match, the exact same number of people the capacity crowd at last night’s game three of the World Series. 

    Video:

    Kamala Harris

    will draw the largest audience of any candidate in this campaign. Trump has drawn nothing close, and Harris will be delivering her message to a national audience.

    These are Obama level crowds that Harris will end up drawing both in Houston and in D.C. If a campaign has momentum in the final week of the election, it looks like it is Kamala Harris.

    To comment on this story, join us on Reddit.

    [ad_2]

    Jason Easley

    Source link

  • Exclusive! Xaviaer DuRousseau Reacts To Social Media Pulling His Beyoncé Fan Receipts After Dissing Her On Live TV

    Exclusive! Xaviaer DuRousseau Reacts To Social Media Pulling His Beyoncé Fan Receipts After Dissing Her On Live TV

    [ad_1]

    Xaviaer DuRousseau isn’t about to let the internet shame him for dragging Beyoncé on live television. In a statement to The Shade Room, the media personality reacted to backlash over his out-of-the-blue digs and BeyHive comments. Additionally, he doubled down on his disses despite social media pulling receipts of him previously stanning both Bey and Jay-Z.

    Xaviaer DuRousseau Says Beyoncé’s Focus Should Be Her Music

    His insults for the ‘Cowboy Carter’ artist follow her appearance at VP Kamala Harris’ rally in Houston this past weekend. Speaking on Fox News, he called Harris “absolutely desperate” in the race to win the White House. DuRousseau said that the Democratic nominee is “bringing any celebrity she can to try to get any kind of endorsement.” Furthermore, he stated that Harris has “no substance herself.”

    RELATED: Beyoncé & Kelly Rowland Deliver Powerful Speeches In Support Of VP Kamala Harris At Houston Rally (VIDEOS)

    As for Beyoncé, Xaviaer DuRousseau said the singer’s focus should be on her music rather than political events. “Beyoncé needs to focus on trying to keep her album on the charts because it’s already gone,” the media personality said. Later on the platform X (formerly Twitter), he claimed that dragging Beyoncé on live TV is the “bravest thing” he’s “ever done in [his] career.” He also called her fanbase “domestic terrorists.” Peep his comments down below.

    BeyHive Pulls Receipts Of Media Personality Praising Her, He Reacts

    As clips of Xaviaer DuRousseau’s comments on Fox caught traction, social media users put on their investigative caps. After a lil’ digging on X (formerly Twitter), presumed Beyoncé supporters found at least SIX tweets of DuRousseau stanning the Carters that go as far back as 2023.

    “Conservatives DRAG me every time I say this, but I’m obsessed with the CArters and will defend them as if I’m on their payroll. Jay-Z and Beyoncé are a Royal Family,” he wrote in June 2023.

    In two other posts, Xaviaer DuRousseau said Bey was “objectively more talented than the Beatles” and defended her “vocal range, genre versatility, dancing, directing, producing and filmmaking” in comparison. Swipe below to see his other stan posts.

    Not long after, Xaviaer DuRousseau spoke directly to The Shade Room about the stan receipts. He doubled down on his stance that Beyoncé’s focus should be her music, and not campaigning for Kamala Harris in the election’s final stretch.

    “The receipts may have gagged me, but they do not discredit what I said on FOX News. I am STILL a Beyoncé fan. It’s not my fault that she doesn’t promote her music, and that’s why her album FLED the charts like Harriett Tubman in the middle of the night. Maybe that wouldn’t have happened if she focused on her album rather than politics.”

    Additionally, Xaviaer DuRousseau dragged Rihanna into his messy digs, saying: “Beyoncé fans need to be honest about her lack of marketing. She needs to also take some business notes from Ms. Fenty on how to promote her businesses! I wish Beyoncé the best, and that starts with electing Donald Trump as president.” 

    RELATED: Oop! Donald Trump Speaks About Beyoncé Sharing A Speech At VP Kamala Harris’ Rally Instead Of Performing (VIDEO)

    What Do You Think Roomies?

    [ad_2]

    Cassandra S

    Source link

  • Final Trump vs. Harris Polls Show It’s Down to the Wire

    Final Trump vs. Harris Polls Show It’s Down to the Wire

    [ad_1]

    Photo-Illustration: Intelligencer; Photos: Getty Images

    A week before Election Day, an estimated 47 million votes have already been cast in the presidential race between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. It’s possible the polls are wrong, but it’s unlikely they will change much before this long and winding campaign cycle ends. Polling analysts, who have varying methods of averaging polls, have slightly different takes on the race. But without splitting hairs, it’s hard to see this as anything other than an incredibly close race where late turnout trends and polling errors wind up telling us what we cannot know right now: the identity of the 47th president.

    In national polling averages, Kamala Harris leads by 1.5 percent per FiveThirtyEight; 1.2 percent per Nate Silver; 2 percent according to the Washington Post (which rounds numbers) and one percent according to the New York Times (which also rounds numbers). RealClearPolitics, which unlike the other outlets doesn’t weigh polls for accuracy or adjust them for partisan bias, shows Trump leading nationally by an eyelash (0.1 percent).

    While national polls can help us understand trends and underlying dynamics, mostly because they tend to have larger samples, the fact that they have been so very close for weeks if not months suggests they can’t tell us who will actually win. The best we can do is extrapolate, based on the relationship between the national popular vote and the electoral vote count in previous election. It makes Democrats nervous to see Harris leading Trump by under 2 percent in the national polls because Hillary Clinton lost in 2016 while winning the national popular vote by 2.1 percent, while Joe Biden barely won in 2020 despite winning the popular vote by 4.5 percent. But we have no idea if Trump will again have an Electoral College advantage, and if so how large it might be. (Harris might actually perform better in the Electoral College than in the popular vote, as Barack Obama did in 2012.) And while we don’t know how polling errors will cut, it does seem the overall quality of polls this year is higher than in recent presidential elections.

    So it’s a better idea to focus on polls in the seven battleground states. But they too are crazy close overall. You can identify leaders in all seven if you get down to fractions. FiveThirtyEight currently shows Trump leading in five of those seven states (Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania), but by less than a single point in Nevada and Pennsylvania. Harris leads in Michigan and Wisconsin, but again, it’s by less than one percent. A look at the rounded battlefield-state numbers in the New York Times averages is eye-opening: It shows four battleground states (Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin) as “even,” with Harris leading in Michigan by less than one percent, Trump leading in Georgia by one percent, and Trump leading in Arizona by 2 percent. A one percent uniform swing could give Harris 308 electoral votes or Trump 312 electoral votes. The Washington Post’s battleground-state averages make the same point in a slightly different way. They show Harris leading in four states (Michigan by 2 percent, Nevada by less than one percent, Pennsylvania by one percent, and Wisconsin by one percent) and Trump in three (Arizona by two percent, Georgia by two percent, and North Carolina by one percent). But then the Post makes this crucial observation: “Every state is within a normal-sized polling error of 3.5 points and could go either way.”

    Both national and state polls suggest that the dynamics of the Harris-Trump contest remain reasonably clear. On the issues, Trump is very strong with voters who care most about immigration and continues to lead in most polls (though by shrinking margins) among voters focused on the economy. Meanwhile, Harris has a big lead among voters worried about abortion rights. If you start with the Biden-Trump divisions in the electorate from 2020, Harris has improved the Democratic performance among college-educated white voters, while Trump has improved the Republican performance among Black and Latino voters. Unsurprisingly, this puts a small thumb on the scales for Harris in the states with relatively low nonwhite voting blocs (e.g., Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin), and helps Trump in Sun Belt states like Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, and North Carolina. But there are some contradictory undercurrents, with the Harris campaign working hard to bring Black men back into her column, while Trump’s entire get-out-the-vote strategy is based on mobilizing low-propensity voters from his core demographic groups (especially non-college-educated white voters). The significant reaction this week of opinion leaders to slurs about Puerto Ricans (a crucial swing demographic in extremely close and pivotal Pennsylvania) offered up by a comedian at Trump’s wild New York City rally shows that campaign-trail events can still affect the outcome.

    So it’s a good idea to keep an eye on late-breaking polls during the final days of the campaign, and to try not to get too distracted by potentially misleading data points and claims. There’s a lot of scrutiny of early voting trends, for example. But aside from reflecting a general drop in voting by mail since the pandemic election of 2020, and the efforts of Republicans to encourage early in-person voting in particular by their partisans, it’s hard to know what the numbers mean since most early voters would otherwise be voting on Election Day and Democrats tend to be relatively “late” early voters. Some of the old reliable indicators of presidential-election outcomes are of limited use. Yes, the president’s job-approval rating is currently at a terrible 39.5 percent (per FiveThirtyEight), but then Kamala Harris has done a reasonably good job of presenting herself as a “change” candidate despite her own incumbency. And yes, Harris has a small but steady advantage over Trump in personal favorability (FiveThirtyEight has her ratio at 46.3 per cent favorable to 47.5 unfavorable, while Trump’s is 43.5 percent favorable to 52.1 percent unfavorable), but so did Hillary Clinton in 2016.

    If you had to pick a likely winner at this point, the official forecasters all lean toward Trump by the narrowest of margins (The Economist has the most robust Trump win probability, at 56 percent; Nate Silver and Decision Desk HQ have Trump at 54 percent; FiveThirtyEight shows him at 53 percent). Some analysts look at the race in terms of Electoral College scenarios that aren’t very clear; here’s the New York Timescharacterization of the overall race: “Neither candidate currently holds a polling lead in enough states to reach 270 electoral votes. Polls in the tipping point states are essentially tied.” Larry Sabato’s Crystal Ball expresses contradictory “gut feelings,” citing trends favoring Trump but noting a sense of déjà vu from 2022 that favors Harris.

    In other words, it’s going down to the wire.


    See All



    [ad_2]

    Ed Kilgore

    Source link

  • Protest over war in Gaza breaks out while Harris campaigns in Michigan

    Protest over war in Gaza breaks out while Harris campaigns in Michigan

    [ad_1]

    Protest over war in Gaza breaks out while Harris campaigns in Michigan – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Vice President Kamala Harris rallied in Michigan Monday, but as she spoke she was again interrupted by a group protesting the war in Gaza. Michigan has the largest percentage of Arab Americans voters, and some Democrats fear support from those voters has slipped away.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • “Progress 2028” may look like a Democratic response to “Project 2025,” but it’s not

    “Progress 2028” may look like a Democratic response to “Project 2025,” but it’s not

    [ad_1]

    At first glance, an initiative called “Progress 2028” appears to be a progressive version of “Project 2025,” the conservative blueprint spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation that includes policy proposals for the next president. 

    However, Progress 2028 is not linked to Vice President Kamala Harris or any progressive group, according to an analysis by CBS News; rather, it is a campaign funded by conservatives with the goal of linking Harris to policy ideas she has not supported in her presidential campaign.

    According to Virginia State Corporation Commission records shared by OpenSecrets, a conservative nonprofit called Building America’s Future registered Progress 2028 on Sept. 23. The website progress2028.com was then registered three days later. 

    Building America’s Future has received millions from conservative supporters, including billionaire Elon Musk, according to The Wall Street Journal, and has promoted Trump campaign material while running ads critical of the Biden administration.

    What does Progress 2028 claim?

    The website makes a number of false claims about Harris’ positions. It says she would prioritize a nationwide gun buyback program and is committed to banning fracking, which she says she will not do. Its Facebook ads also incorrectly state she “WILL FIGHT TO EXPAND MEDICARE FOR UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS” as well as give them drivers licenses and housing subsidies.

    These claims do not reflect Harris’ policy positions or campaign platform. In fact, undocumented immigrants remain ineligible for Social Security benefits and Medicare, according to the Social Security Administration, and there is no evidence Harris is attempting to change these policies.

    During the Democratic primaries in 2019, Harris previously expressed support for banning fracking and buyback programs for assault weapons alone, but during her 2024 presidential run she said she no longer supports either proposal and would not ban fracking.

    A Harris-Walz campaign spokesman told CBS News that Progress 2028 is a “lie to deceive voters.”

    The group behind Progress 2028 spent more than $265,000 on such ads in the week between Oct. 15 and Oct. 21, according to Facebook’s Ad Library

    fb-ad.png
    Progress 2028 has spent thousands on online ads.

    Progress 2028 launched new ads as recently as Saturday, Oct. 26. 

    Progress 2028’s Facebook ads have received millions of impressions, though their own social media accounts have had limited engagement so far. A Facebook page for Progress 2028 has less than 100 followers.

    “This type of political advertising isn’t new and has been found across the media landscape for decades,” said Meta spokesperson Ryan Daniels in a statement. Meta also noted it requires a disclaimer for political ads and will block new political ads during the final week of the campaign, a practice they introduced in 2020.

    Project 2025 remains a talking point of campaign

    Democrats, including President Biden and Vice President Harris, have repeatedly claimed that former President Donald Trump is involved in or will follow Project 2025. 

    Trump has not adopted the blueprint as his campaign platform and has attempted to distance himself from it. However, dozens of former Trump administration officials contributed to Project 2025, and CBS News identified at least 270 proposals out of 700 in their published blueprint that match Trump’s past policies and current campaign promises. 

    A number of polls in recent months suggest that a majority of Americans view Project 2025 unfavorably.

    CBS News has reached out to Progress 2028 for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Brené Brown vs. Joe Rogan

    Brené Brown vs. Joe Rogan

    [ad_1]

    Pick your poison: Over the weekend, depending on your political flavor, you could have chosen between listening to a comedian hurl insults on stage at Madison Square Garden as part of a campaign rally; watching a sitting U.S. representative and a vice-presidential contender play video games and talk about scrapping the filibuster via Twitch; hearing a presidential candidate’s thoughts on whale psychology; or listening to a vulnerability researcher (?) and a presidential candidate gab about birth order.

    Our sharpest political minds these are not.

    It’s almost like everyone is avoiding talking about the actual issues—things like how to reduce inflation, how to bring government spending under control, how to make Social Security solvent, how to create an orderly and just immigration process, or how to improve the quality of our schools. The podcasting industry has, between the last election cycle and now, taken a glorious wrecking ball to cable news, creating a whole bunch of scrappy independent upstarts that presidential candidates (and their political consultants) finally understand to be an important way voters are receiving news and commentary. Unfortunately, the candidates themselves appear to have their heads filled with little more than fluff.

    First, a predictable scandal: Tony Hinchcliffe, an insult comedian known for his off-color jokes, took to the stage to open for Donald Trump at Madison Square Garden yesterday. He made jokes about the Clintons, Diddy, and Latinos “making babies” and how they love to “come inside“—”just like they did to our country!”

    He also said, “I don’t know if you guys know this but there’s literally a floating island of garbage in the middle of the ocean right now. I think it’s called Puerto Rico.” This became a political scandal, possibly jeopardizing Trump’s ability to win Puerto Rico’s electoral college votes. (Oh, wait…)

    “When you have some a-hole calling Puerto Rico ‘floating garbage,’ know that that’s what they think about you….It’s what they think about anyone who makes less money than them,” said New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in a response livestream with the Democrsats’ vice-presidential candidate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz. (They’re apparently quite chummy now, or so they want voters to believe.)

    “Can’t get over this dude telling someone else to change tampons when he’s the one shitting bricks in his Depends after realizing opening for a Trump rally and feeding red-meat racism alongside a throng of other bigots to a frothing crowd does, unironically, make you one of them,” Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote on X. “You don’t ‘love Puerto Rico.’ You like drinking piña coladas. There’s a difference.”

    Were Puerto Ricans in attendance at the rally offended by this? Not really, or so it seems. But this whole saga is actually pretty emblematic of how this whole election has gone: We’ve almost entirely neglected to talk about actual issues. The Trump campaign keeps courting controversy, again and again and again, while the Harris/Walz campaign frequently defines itself in opposition to the Trumpists, reactive and apoplectic but rarely proactively defining what it is they would actually do.

    Trump did Rogan: The most unhinged, meandering, and occasionally entertaining presidential candidate met his match in the most unhinged, meandering, and occasionally entertaining podcaster, and it was wild. Donald Trump and Joe Rogan talked about whale psychology. They talked about how Trump staffed his administration. They talked about the CHIPS and Science Act—which aimed to reduce reliance on Asia-manufactured chips, handing out subsidies for companies to produce semiconductor parts here at home—which Trump called “put[ting] up billions of dollars for rich companies,” saying he instead favored slapping large tariffs on the companies to try to boost growth of American manufacturing capacity. He explained his comments about the “enemy from within” and how he takes it to mean that there are “people that I really think want to make this country unsuccessful.” He, at times, got quite catty toward the ladies on The View.

    Meanwhile, you have J.D. Vance—ostensibly the policy guy of the Trump campaign—talking about globalization on comedian Tim Dillon’s podcast. Vance said “London doesn’t feel fully English anymore,” while “New York of course is the classic American city. Over time, I think New York will start to feel less American.” (Is he saying that large cosmopolitan cities are adopting a certain sameness over time? What exactly is he predicting or talking about?)

    Between Trump’s protectionism, Hinchcliffe’s off-color jokes, and Vance’s unclear issues with globalization, it all comes together to paint a portrait of a campaign with very different values and priorities than, say, what I have.

    Then there’s Kamala: The Democratic presidential candidate went on vulnerability/empathy/shame researcher Brené Brown’s podcast and it was…kind of full of nothing. Brown asked Harris plenty of questions about her background—birth order! Harris’ nickname given to her by her sorority!—but never did they ever get to anything serious. They talked about the core values of “daring leaders.” If you had been playing a drinking game where you take a shot every time someone says “lived experience” or “Venn diagrams,” you would be face down on the rug.

    Maybe we don’t deserve better from our leaders. Maybe our politics were always fated to be ground down to this. But boy is it depressing to see it all laid out before you, via hours and hours of longform content on different podcasts, consumed by polar-opposite portions of America who increasingly seem to believe they have very little in common with one another.


    Scenes from Miami: I’m in Miami for an event run by Founders Fund, and I went to a Catholic Church yesterday that is coming out in full force against Florida Amendment 4, which would add abortion protections to the state constitution, including the text: “No law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient’s health, as determined by the patient’s healthcare provider.” (More on Amendment 4 here.)

    Currently, Florida outlaws abortion after 6 weeks, and doctors and activists have been engaged in a campaign to draw attention to edge-case stories where women have been forced into medically difficult situations because the law purportedly does not make it clear that doctors are allowed to abort in life- and health-threatening circumstances. Proponents claim Amendment 4 will clarify this. The bishops of Florida, on the other hand, write: “We urge all Floridians of goodwill to stand against the legalization of late-term abortion and oppose the abortion amendment. In doing so, we will not only protect the weakest, most innocent, and defenseless of human life among us but also countless women throughout the state from the harms of abortion.”


    QUICK HITS

    • On Saturday, Israeli fighter jets hit multiple “air-defense systems, missile-making facilities and launchers” in Iran, reports Bloomberg, in response to Iran’s attack on Israel earlier this month. The attack was not extremely damaging in terms of lives lost—four Iranian soldiers have been reported killed—but it showed critical vulnerabilities in Iran’s weapons and nuclear-development infrastructure. An American military official, “speaking to reporters on the condition of anonymity, said President Joe Biden’s administration had worked with Israel to come up with a ‘proportional’ response and urged Iran not to retaliate again,” per Bloomberg.
    • On a campaign stop in West Philadelphia, Kamala Harris “announced a plan to boost Puerto Rico’s economy and power grid,” again per Bloomberg.
    • “Egypt has proposed an initial two-day ceasefire in Gaza to exchange four Israeli hostages of Hamas for some Palestinian prisoners, Egypt’s president said on Sunday as Israeli military strikes killed 45 Palestinians across the enclave,” reports Reuters.
    • Interesting trend piece on how younger women are eschewing wearing their engagement rings and wedding bands daily; as a surfer, I am precluded from wearing mine for much of the summer, but I didn’t realize all the others were copying me.
    • This “coach in chief” New York Times article is the most cringe thing I’ve read in a long while. Consume with caution.

    [ad_2]

    Liz Wolfe

    Source link

  • Analysis of the 2024 presidential race as campaigns enter final stretch before Election Day

    Analysis of the 2024 presidential race as campaigns enter final stretch before Election Day

    [ad_1]

    Analysis of the 2024 presidential race as campaigns enter final stretch before Election Day – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    CBS News chief election and campaign correspondent Robert Costa breaks down the final week before the 2024 presidential election and what to expect from the campaigns.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump attacks Harris at mega-rally at New York’s Madison Square Garden

    Trump attacks Harris at mega-rally at New York’s Madison Square Garden

    [ad_1]

    Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has rallied his Make America Great Again (MAGA) base at a rally in New York City, again vowing to crack down on migration while slamming his Democratic rival, Kamala Harris.

    Trump repeatedly attacked migrants during his speech at Madison Square Garden on Sunday, pledging to follow through on his campaign promise to carry out the largest deportation operation in United States history if elected.

    “November 5 will be the most important date in the history of our country and together, we will make America powerful again,” said the former president, who painted a portrait of a country plagued by economic and social crises.

    Trump was joined by a slew of Republicans and other allies during the event. Many launched into ad hominem attacks against Harris – one speaker called her “the devil” – and used incendiary rhetoric against migrants, immigrant communities, and perceived opponents.

    Trump also blamed Harris – whom he described as a “radical left Marxist” who is unintelligent and “unfit” to serve as president – for the problems the country faces. “You’ve destroyed our country,” he said, referring to the US vice president.

    The rally comes just nine days before Americans go to the ballot box on November 5 to elect their next president, with polls showing Trump and Harris locked in a neck-and-neck fight for the White House.

    Trump speaks during the rally at Madison Square Garden, in New York, October 27 [Andrew Kelly/Reuters]

    The election is hinging on seven critical battleground states – including Georgia, North Carolina and Pennsylvania – where the race remains too close to call.

    Reporting from New York on Sunday evening, Al Jazeera’s Alan Fisher explained that the election will likely come down to a few thousand voters who “are going to make the final verdict” in those swing states.

    “And it’s there that the candidates will concentrate their efforts in the last nine days of this election campaign,” Fisher said.

    Both the Harris and Trump camps have been urging their supporters to get out to vote in the final stretch of their respective campaigns.

    More than 41 million Americans had already voted in early in-person voting or via mail-in ballots by midday on Sunday, according to a tally by the Election Lab at the University of Florida.

    Harris was in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on Sunday, making stops at a church, barbershop and a Puerto Rican restaurant before spending time with youth basketball players at a local community centre.

    During a rally on Sunday evening, the Democratic vice president sought to portray her Republican rival as a divisive force in American politics and warned of the “high stakes” of the upcoming vote.

    But she struck a more conciliatory note than at some of her most recent campaign events, where Harris has accused Trump of being a “fascist” and “unhinged”.

    Kamala Harris
    ‘Let’s talk with each other about what we have in common,’ Harris said during her rally in Philadelphia, October 27 [Eloisa Lopez/Reuters]

    That may be a result of a recent warning from a leading pro-Harris political action committee, which said such attacks against the Republican may not be connecting with voters, The New York Times reported.

    “Let’s approach this moment in a way that in the face of strangers, we see a neighbour,” Harris said during her Philadelphia event.

    “Let’s talk with each other about what we have in common,” she said.

    “Let’s build community and let’s knock on doors. Let’s text and call potential voters. Let’s reach out to our family and our friends and our classmates and our neighbours, tell them about the stakes in this election and tell them about their power.”

    But Harris’s camp seized on some of the disparaging remarks from Trump and other speakers during the event at Madison Square Garden, including a comedian who said Puerto Rico was “a floating island of garbage”.

    “Puerto Rico is home to some of the most talented, innovative and ambitious people in our natin. And Puerto Ricans deserve a president who sees and invest[s] in that strength,” Harris said in a campaign video shared on social media.

    The exchange could provide a boost to Harris, as there are large Puerto Rican populations in the key swing states of North Carolina, Georgia and Pennsylvania.

    As the campaign blitz continues ahead of election day, the Democrat will be going back to Michigan – another key swing state – on Monday to hold a rally alongside her vice-presidential running mate, Tim Walz.

    For his part, Trump will be in Atlanta, Georgia, to try to rally his supporters in a state that he narrowly lost to Democratic President Joe Biden in 2020.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump rally at MSG sees numerous speakers slur Latinos, Harris, political opponents with racist remarks | amNewYork

    Trump rally at MSG sees numerous speakers slur Latinos, Harris, political opponents with racist remarks | amNewYork

    [ad_1]

    During Donald Trump’s rally at Madison Square Garden on Oct. 27, 2024, podcast host and comedian Tony Hinchcliffe, who referred to Puerto Rico as “a floating island of garbage” — a line that drew some groans from the crowd — and crudely claimed Latinos “enjoy making babies.” 

    REUTERS/Andrew Kelly