ReportWire

Tag: Kamala Harris

  • Harris condemns Trump rhetoric, says voters should make sure he ‘can’t have that microphone again’

    Harris condemns Trump rhetoric, says voters should make sure he ‘can’t have that microphone again’

    [ad_1]

    By MATT BROWN and DARLENE SUPERVILLE, Associated Press

    PHILADELPHIA (AP) — Vice President Kamala Harris on Tuesday decried Republican Donald Trump for inflammatory rhetoric about migrants in Springfield, Ohio and on other topics, saying voters should make sure he “can’t have that microphone again.”

    Sitting down for a rare extended campaign interview Tuesday with trio of journalists from the National Association of Black Journalists, Harris said her heart breaks after threats of violence have disrupted the city following comments amplified by Trump and his running mate alleging, without evidence, that immigrants are kidnapping and consuming people’s pets.

    Two days after Secret Service agents foiled an apparent assassination attempt on Trump, who blamed Democratic rhetoric for the latest threat to his life, Harris said “there are far too many people in our country right now who are not feeling safe.” She referenced the threats to immigrants, but also the conservative Project 2025 blueprint for the next Republican administration and a GOP-led efforts to restrict abortion access.

    “Not everybody has Secret Service,” she said. “Members of the LGBTQ community don’t feel safe right now, immigrants or people with an immigrant background don’t feel safe right now. Women don’t feel safe right now.”

    Harris said she personally has confidence in the Secret Service and feels safe under their protection. She spoke briefly with Trump on Tuesday to express her gratitude that he was safe, but in the interview said his rhetoric should be disqualifying.

    “When you have that kind of microphone in front of you, you really ought to understand at a deep level that your words have meaning,” Harris said, without mentioning Trump by name. “Let’s turn the page and chart a new way forward and say you can’t have that microphone again.”

    Harris said the Republican attacks on the city and migrants there were “lies that are grounded in tropes that are age old.”

    The sedate interview in Philadelphia stood in contrast to former President Donald Trump ’s appearance before the same organization just a month ago that turned contentious over matters of race and other issues.

    The Trump interview opened a chapter in the campaign in which the Republican candidate repeatedly questioned Harris’ racial identity, baselessly claiming that she had only belatedly “turned Black” at some point in her professional career. Trump has since repeatedly questioned Harris’ racial identity on the campaign trail and during the September presidential debate.

    Harris, the daughter of a Jamaican father and an Indian mother, has repeatedly dismissed Trump’s remarks as “the same old show.” During her September debate with Trump she said it was a “tragedy” that he had “attempted to use race to divide the American people.”

    The vice president insisted she’s working to earn the vote of Black men and not taking any constituency for granted. Black male voters are traditionally one of the most consistently Democratic leaning demographics in the nation. But Republicans have tried to make inroads, while Democrats worry about flagging enthusiasm at the polls.

    “I think it’s very important to not operate from the assumption that Black men are in anybody’s pocket,” Harris said. “Black men are like any other voting group. You gotta earn their vote, so I’m working to earn the vote, not assuming I’m gonna have it because I’m Black”

    Harris declined to say if she supported reparations for descendants of slaves, but said, “we need to speak truth about the generational impact of our history in terms of the generational impact of slavery, the generational impact of red lining.” She said expressed openness to studying the question “to figure out exactly what we need to do,” but said her focus was on building economic opportunity.

    In Trump’s interview with NABJ, he lambasted the moderators and drew boos and groans from the audience at times. The interview also sparked debate within the NABJ convention itself, which operates both as a networking and communal space for Black professionals in media as well as a newsmaking event.

    Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris is interviewed by members of the National Association of Black Journalists at the WHYY studio in Philadelphia, Tuesday, Sept. 17, 2024. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

    As with Trump’s appearance, the audience was made up of NABJ members and college students.

    Trump, his running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, and other Republicans have criticized Harris for largely avoiding media interviews or interacting on the record with reporters who cover her campaign events. She and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, gave a joint interview to CNN last month. Her campaign recently said she will be doing more local media, and last week she sat for her first solo television interview since becoming the Democratic nominee, taking questions from a Philadelphia station.

    Asked whether Americans are better off today than four years ago when she and President Joe Biden entered office, Harris did not directly answer the question, instead referencing the state of the economy during the COVID-19 pandemic and bringing up her plans to try to lower housing costs and promoting herself as a “new generation” of leader.

    Harris said her candidacy offers the country a chance at “turning the page on an era that sadly has shown us attempts to by some to incite fear to create division in our country.”

    Harris has largely sidestepped traditional media appearances and instead focused on rallies, grassroots organizing and social media engagement, where the vice president can sidestep questions from independent journalists about her policy record and proposed agenda.

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Harris vs. Trump Polls: Kamala’s Debate Bounce Emerges

    Harris vs. Trump Polls: Kamala’s Debate Bounce Emerges

    [ad_1]

    Photo-Illustration: Intelligencer; Photos: Getty Images

    There’s very little question that Kamala Harris was the stronger contestant in the September 10 debate in Philadelphia. Snap polls said so, but if there was any doubt it should have been resolved by the intense and incessant claims from Team Trump that the event was “rigged” by its media sponsor and the moderators.

    The bigger question, though, is whether the debate will move the race in Harris’s direction in subsequent polls. It’s too early to say definitively, but there is enough initial polling to suggest that it did Harris some significant good at a time when there were fears among her supporters that her high-flying campaign was finally drifting back toward hard ground. The New York Times’ Nate Cohn summarizes the early evidence:

    It’s still too soon to judge the fallout from the presidential debate, but the polls already suggest that Kamala Harris might be poised to gain.

    The initial surveys of people who watched the debate found that most viewers thought she won, and the candidate deemed the winner in the post-debate surveys usually tends to gain in the polls.

    The first few polls taken entirely since Tuesday’s debate show her faring better than polls taken beforehand …

    According to our average, she has already gained about one point nationwide, rising from a 1.7-point lead on Wednesday morning to a 2.7-point lead as of Monday morning. That one-point shift has been reasonably consistent across the six national polls that took surveys before and after the debate.

    That could be just the beginning of the good news for Harris, as Cohn continues:

    In the days ahead, Ms. Harris may gain even more ground. For one, most of the post-debate polls have come from online panels. They tend to shift less than other polls, as they’re often composed of highly engaged voters and weighted more heavily than the typically more volatile phone surveys, which will probably arrive this week.

    There’s another reason: Many people don’t watch debates, but they do hear the post-debate coverage — like the continuing discussion of Mr. Trump’s false claim that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, have been eating pets. Extended coverage of a debate can help the perceived winner just as much as the debate itself, and yield additional polling gains in the days or even weeks thereafter.

    One big question is whether the second attempted assassination of Trump in Florida on September 15 is distracting voters from further contemplation of the former president’s erratic performance on September 10 or might produce a sympathetic reaction in his favor. It will be a while before we have the answer, which will help determine where the race has settled post-debate. And by next week, we should also be getting robust post-debate poll findings from battleground states, where, of course, the election will ultimately be decided.

    At this point, to be clear, the balance of power between Harris and Trump in the Electoral College is on a razor’s edge. But to some extent the Sun Belt–Rust Belt divide between Republican-leaning and Democrat-leaning battleground states has reemerged. In the FiveThirtyEight averages, Trump leads in Arizona by 0.8 percent (47.4 to 46.7 percent), in Georgia by the same 0.8 percent (47.8 to 47.0 percent), and in North Carolina by an even smaller 0.4 percent (47.5 to 47.1 percent). Harris is hanging on to a 0.4 percent lead (46.9 to 46.5 percent) in the fourth Sun Belt state, Nevada. And she leads in all the Rust Belt (also known as Blue Wall) battleground states: in Michigan by 1.5 percent (47.6 to 46.1 percent), in Pennsylvania by 0.6 percent (47.4 to 46.8 percent), and in Wisconsin by 2.7 percent (48.6 to 46.0).

    If you build an electoral vote map based on these numbers (with everything else staying as it was in 2020), then Harris leads with 276 electoral votes to Trump’s 262. But two notes of caution are in order, beyond the seven weeks of campaigning left in which lots could happen. The candidates remain within a point of each other in the two most likely tipping-point states, according to most estimates, Georgia and Pennsylvania. And as it happens the two states with the greatest polling errors underestimating Trump’s vote in 2016 and 2020 are Pennsylvania and Michigan, where Harris might need a bigger polling lead.

    One possible advantage that Harris might retain is a favorability edge that leaves more undecided voters open to supporting her. At present her ratio (per FiveThirtyEight) is now positive at 46.6 percent favorable and 46.5 unfavorable. Trump’s ratio is at 42.9 percent favorable and 52.5 percent unfavorable. It’s not a huge gap, but this is a profoundly big contest that may turn on small things.


    See All



    [ad_2]

    Ed Kilgore

    Source link

  • Harris Blasts Trump for Georgia Mother’s Abortion Ban Related Preventable Death

    Harris Blasts Trump for Georgia Mother’s Abortion Ban Related Preventable Death

    [ad_1]

    Vice President Kamala Harris hammered Donald Trump for a mother’s abortion ban related death in Georgia.

    Vice President Kamala Harris said in reaction to the news that a 28-year-old Georgia mother’s preventable death was the direct result of an abortion ban that was made possible because of Trump’s three Supreme Court Justices:

    This young mother should be alive, raising her son, and pursuing her dream of attending nursing school.

    This is exactly what we feared when Roe was struck down. In more than 20 states, Trump Abortion Bans are preventing doctors from providing basic medical care. Women are bleeding out in parking lots, turned away from emergency rooms, losing their ability to ever have children again. Survivors of rape and incest are being told they cannot make decisions about what happens next to their bodies. And now women are dying. These are the consequences of Donald Trump’s actions.

    Harris pointed out that the basic freedom for women and girls to get medical care has been taken from too many of us, “There is so much at stake in this election, including restoring the freedoms that have been taken away from us. If Donald Trump gets the chance, he will sign a national abortion ban, and these horrific realities will multiply. We must pass a law to restore reproductive freedom. When I am President of the United States, I will proudly sign it into law. Lives depend on it.”

    Donald Trump has waffled on where he stands on a federal abortion ban, ultimately refusing to say he would veto such a ban if it came to his desk. He has also in the past expressed sentiments such as women should be punished for seeking an abortion and has repeatedly taken credit for Roe being overturned, claiming against the evidence that it’s what everyone wanted.

    ProPublica published a new report Monday detailing the gruesome death of a young single mother in Georgia, “the first time an abortion-related death, officially deemed ‘preventable,’ is coming to public light.”

    Amber Nicole Thurman needed a D and C after the abortion pill she took did not expel all of the tissue. She suffered from a grave infection that required immediate medical care, but it was 2022 and her state of Georgia had made performing the procedure a felony, so “Thurman waited in pain in a hospital bed, worried about what would happen to her 6-year-old son, as doctors monitored her infection spreading, her blood pressure sinking and her organs beginning to fail.

    It took 20 hours for doctors to finally operate. By then, it was too late.”

    An official state committee recently concluded, “The otherwise healthy 28-year-old medical assistant, who had her sights set on nursing school, should not have died.”

    It’s important to note that the failure to expel all of the tissue can happen during a miscarriage, too. It’s a horrible experience to go through even the beginnings of that infection, let alone being left for your organs to fail because doctors are trying to abide by an abortion ban that supposedly has some exceptions in it.

    When Roe was overturned, the legacy media called even doctors who supported abortion “activists.” They “fact-checked” the threat to a ten-year-old pregnant rape victim because they didn’t understand that not only are all pregnant ten-year-olds rape victims, but also a pregnancy can be harmful to a young girl’s body so much so that abortion is considered a human right.

    Now there is proof that women are dying from these bans that were put into place by Republican politicians who claim their religion is “pro-life” even though the Bible says life begins at birth. And of that life that begins at birth? Republicans have shown little care for children being threatened with gun violence in school and women and girls whose lives depend on getting timely medical care.

    To comment on this story, join us on Reddit.

    Sarah Jones
    Latest posts by Sarah Jones (see all)

    [ad_2]

    Sarah Jones

    Source link

  • Taylor Swift, fresh off the VMAs, back at Arrowhead to watch boyfriend Travis Kelce and the Chiefs

    Taylor Swift, fresh off the VMAs, back at Arrowhead to watch boyfriend Travis Kelce and the Chiefs

    [ad_1]

    KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) — Taylor Swift capped a headline-grabbing week that included her endorsement of Kamala Harris for president and seven trophies from the MTV Video Music Awards by showing up at Arrowhead Stadium to watch the Kansas City Chiefs on Sunday.

    Swift arrived about 90 minutes before kickoff to see her boyfriend, Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce, and the two-time defending Super Bowl champions play the Cincinnati Bengals in a rematch of two of the past three AFC championship games.

    Swift has become close friends with Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes and his wife, Brittany, over the past year. And that led to some controversy this week after the 14-time Grammy winner said she supported Harris over Donald Trump in the November election.

    Trump has been referencing Brittany Mahomes in interviews and speeches since last month, after she liked — and then unliked — an Instagram post by the Republican presidential nominee outlining the “2024 GOP platform.” Trump posted soon afterward on Truth Social: “I want to thank beautiful Brittany Mahomes for so strongly defending me.”

    Swift’s endorsement of Harris led Trump to say in a phone interview with Fox News this week: “I actually like Mrs. Mahomes much better, if you want to know the truth. She’s a big Trump fan. I like Brittany. I think Brittany is great.”

    Trump went even further Sunday, posting on Truth Social in call caps: “I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!”

    Patrick Mahomes declined to endorse anyone when asked about the situation, instead urging people to register to vote.

    “I don’t want my place and my platform to be used to endorse a candidate or do whatever, either way,” the two-time NFL MVP said before practice Wednesday. “I think my place is to inform people to get registered to vote. It’s to inform people to do their own research and then make the best decision for them and their family.”

    Brittany Mahomes has since stayed out of the political spotlight except to respond to critics on social media, saying in a post: “To be a hater as an adult, you have to have some deep rooted issues you refuse to heal from childhood.”

    Some critics thought politics may have caused a rift between her and Swift two weeks ago, when they did not sit together for the Chiefs’ season-opening win over Ravens. But they were back together that weekend in New York for the U.S. Open.

    On Wednesday night, Swift pushed her total of MTV Video Music Awards to 30, tying Beyonce for the record among all artists. Her hefty haul included the night’s biggest trophy for video of the year, for which she thanked her “boyfriend Travis” for being on set for the “Fortnight” music video and cheering her on.

    “Everything this man touches turns to happiness and fun and magic,” Swift said, before again using her platform to encourage fans over 18 to register to vote for the 2024 presidential election.

    The popular songstress began her high-profile romance with Kelce last season, when he invited Swift to watch him play a game at Arrowhead. The “Anti-Hero” singer took him up on the offer for a September matchup with the Bears.

    Since then, Swift and the four-time All-Pro tight end have spent plenty of time together, often with the cameras following their every move. Swift has become a regular at Chiefs games whenever she is on a break from her Eras Tour, and Kelce accompanied her to several performances during the offseason, even making an onstage cameo at Wembley Stadium in London.

    ___

    AP NFL: https://apnews.com/hub/nfl

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elon Musk Insists “Joke” Noting No One Has Tried to Assassinate Biden or Harris Would Have Been Much Funnier in Context

    Elon Musk Insists “Joke” Noting No One Has Tried to Assassinate Biden or Harris Would Have Been Much Funnier in Context

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk, the richest person in the world and the world’s biggest internet troll, posted and then deleted a comment over the weekend in which he seemingly wondered about the lack of assassination attempts on Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, following what authorities said was a second assassination attempt on Donald Trump. Then he claimed he was merely joking, and insisted that the joke would have been extremely funny in context.

    Musk was responding to a user on X who wrote, “Why they want to kill Donald Trump?” The X owner, who has endorsed the ex-president, replied: “And no one is even trying to assassinate Biden/Kamala.” His post included a thinking-face emoji.

    Not surprisingly, the social media musing drew intense backlash. In a not-very-helpful pair of follow-ups on Monday, Musk wrote: “Well, one lesson I’ve learned is that just because I say something to a group and they laugh doesn’t mean it’s going to be all that hilarious as a post on X.” In another, he said: “Turns out that jokes are WAY less funny if people don’t know the context and the delivery is plain text.”

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    In reality, the “lesson” Musk should have learned is that it’s beyond the pale to seemingly suggest it’s strange that no one has attempted to assassinate specific individuals, particularly given the reach of his account, which is followed by more than 197 million people. Aside from that, one wonders who made up the collection of people originally on the receiving end of Musk’s “hilarious” joke, and what context he thinks would have improved the reaction of your average X user.

    In a statement, the White House called Musk’s post “irresponsible” and echoed remarks in which Biden and Harris said there is no room for political violence in the United States. “Violence should only be condemned, never encouraged or joked about,” spokesman Andrew Bates said.

    Musk is, of course, no stranger to creepy, outrageous social media posts. Last week, after Taylor Swift endorsed Harris and signed her post “Childless Cat Lady,” the Tesla CEO wrote: “Fine Taylor … you win … I will give you a child and guard your cats with my life.”

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Elon Musk Is a National Security Risk

    Elon Musk Is a National Security Risk

    [ad_1]

    Shortly following reports of an apparent second assassination attempt against former US president and 2024 Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, Elon Musk decided to speak up.

    “And no one is even trying to assassinate Biden/Kamala 🤔,” Musk, X’s owner, wrote in a now deleted post, in response to another person asking, “Why they want to kill Donald Trump?”

    After deleting the post—which could be interpreted as a call to murder President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump’s Democratic opponent in the US presidential election—Musk indicated that it was merely a joke that fell flat given the context. “Well, one lesson I’ve learned is that just because I say something to a group and they laugh doesn’t mean it’s going to be all that hilarious as a post on 𝕏,” he wrote, adding, “Turns out that jokes are WAY less funny if people don’t know the context and the delivery is plain text.”

    The incident was the latest in a long line of increasingly incendiary political posts from Musk, whose substantial defense contracts with the US government may give him access to highly sensitive information even while he makes potential threats against the sitting commander in chief. And they point to the more pressing risk that Musk’s recent rhetoric has posed: the potential to inspire further political violence.

    While Sunday night’s post is gone, it appears likely that Musk could receive some attention from federal law enforcement, if he hasn’t already.

    The United States Secret Service declined WIRED’s request to comment on Musk’s post. “We can say, however, that the Secret Service investigates all threats related to our protectees,” USSS spokesperson Nate Herring tells WIRED.

    “In my experience, the Secret Service would take such a comment very seriously,” says Michael German, a former FBI special agent and a liberty and national security fellow at NYU School of Law’s Brennan Center for Justice. “Typically, agents would go out and interview the subject to ensure that there wasn’t an existing threat, and to make the subject aware that the agency takes such statements seriously.”

    German notes that it’s possible the FBI could also launch an investigation. However, it’s unlikely that Musk would face any charges for his post. “On its face, the tweet would not meet the ‘true threat’ test, in that it wasn’t a direct threat to do harm to the vice president, so it wouldn’t likely proceed to prosecution,” German says. Still, “it would create a record of the investigations.”

    The FBI declined WIRED’s request to comment on Musk’s post. X did not immediately respond to WIRED’s request for comment.

    Both Biden and Harris have released statements condemning the apparent attempt on Trump’s life and political violence more broadly. In a statement to ABC News, the White House condemned Musk’s post. “Violence should only be condemned, never encouraged or joked about,” the statement says. “This rhetoric is irresponsible.”

    Where things get dicier for Musk is his role as a major contractor for the US Department of Defense and NASA. According to Reuters, SpaceX signed a $1.8 billion contract in 2021 with the National Reconnaissance Office, which oversees US spy satellites. The US Space Force also signed a $70 million contract late last year with SpaceX to build out military-grade low-earth-orbit satellite capabilities. Starlink, SpaceX’s commercial satellite internet wing, is providing connectivity to the US Navy.

    [ad_2]

    Andrew Couts

    Source link

  • FACT FOCUS: Trump blends falsehoods and exaggerations at rambling NJ press conference

    FACT FOCUS: Trump blends falsehoods and exaggerations at rambling NJ press conference

    [ad_1]

    Former President Donald Trump on Thursday gave his second news conference in as many weeks as he adjusts to a newly energized Democratic ticket ahead of next week’s Democratic National Convention.

    At his New Jersey golf club, the Republican nominee blended falsehoods about the economy with misleading statements and deeply personal attacks about his Democratic opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris.

    Here’s a closer look at the facts.

    Inflation did not take the toll Trump claimed. Growth surged under Biden

    TRUMP: “As a result of Kamala’s inflation, price hikes have cost the typical household a total of $28,000. … When I left office, I left Kamala and crooked Joe Biden a surging economy and no inflation. The mortgage rate was around 2%. Gasoline had reached $1.87 a gallon. … Harris and Biden blew it all up.”

    THE FACTS: Trump made numerous economic claims that were either exaggerated or misleading. Prices did surge during the Biden-Harris administration, though $28,000 is far higher than independent estimates. Moody’s Analytics calculated last year that price increases over the previous two years were costing the typical U.S. household $709 a month. That would equal $8,500 a year.

    Separately, the U.S. economy was growing quickly as it reopened from COVID in 2020, as Trump’s term ended, and it continued to do so after Biden took office. Growth reached 5.8% in 2021, Biden’s first year in the White House, as the rebound continued, faster than any year that Trump was in office. Mortgage rates were low when Trump left because of the pandemic, which caused the Federal Reserve to cut its key rate to nearly zero. Gas prices fell as the economy largely shut down and Americans cut back sharply on their driving.

    ‘Foreign born’ is not the same as ‘migrants’

    TRUMP: “Virtually 100% of the net job creation in the last year has gone to migrants.”

    THE FACTS: This is a misinterpretation of government jobs data. The figures do show that the number of foreign-born people with jobs has increased in the past year, while the number of native-born Americans with jobs has declined. But foreign-born is not the same as “migrants” — it would include people who arrived in the U.S. years ago and are now naturalized citizens.

    In addition, the data is based on Census research that many economists argue is undercounting both foreign- and native-born workers. According to a report by Wendy Edelberg and Tara Watson at the Brookings Institution released this week, native-born employment rose by 740,000 in 2023, while foreign-born rose by 1.7 million. Much of the disparity reflects the fact that the native-born population is older than the foreign-born, and are more likely to be retired. In addition, the unemployment rate for native-born Americans is 4.5%, lower than the 4.7% for foreign-born.

    A thief is not allowed to steal up to $950

    TRUMP: “You’re allowed to rob a store as long as it’s not more than $950. … If it’s less than $950 they can rob it and not get charged.”

    THE FACTS: Trump was referring to regulations in California that allegedly allow for theft under $950. But his claim is not correct — a 2014 proposition modified, but did not eliminate, sentencing for many nonviolent property and drug crimes.

    Proposition 47 raised the minimum dollar amount necessary for theft to be prosecuted as a felony, instead of a misdemeanor, from $400 to $950.

    Alex Bastian, then-special adviser to Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascón, who co-authored Prop 47, told The Associated Press in 2021 that the minimum was raised “to adjust for inflation and cost of living,” but that most shoplifting cases were already prosecuted as misdemeanors any since they didn’t exceed $400.

    Prop 47 was enacted to comply with a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court order, which upheld that the state’s overcrowded prisons violated incarcerated individuals’ Eighth Amendment rights against cruel and unusual punishment. It instructed California to reduce its state prison population by 33,000 individuals within two years.

    What to know about the 2024 Election

    Harris has not said in this campaign she wants to defund police

    TRUMP, on Harris: “You know, she wants to defund the police.”

    THE FACTS: Harris expressed praise for the “defund the police” movement after the murder of George Floyd in 2020, questioning whether money was being effectively spent on public safety. However, she has not said during her current campaign that she is in favor of defunding law enforcement.

    The Biden administration tried to overhaul policing, but the legislation stalled on Capitol Hill, and Biden ultimately settled for issuing an executive order. It also pumped more money into local departments.

    Trump did not win Pennsylvania in 2020

    TRUMP: “I won Pennsylvania and I did much better the second time. I won it in 2016, did much better the second time. I know Pennsylvania very well.”

    THE FACTS: False. Trump did win the state in 2016, when he beat Democrat Hillary Clinton to win the presidency. But he lost the state in 2020 to President Joe Biden, a Pennsylvania native. According to the official certified results, Biden and Harris received 3.46 million votes, compared to Trump and Vice President Mike Pence with 3.38 million votes, a margin of about 80,000 votes.

    Oil production in U.S. hit record under Biden

    Trump says he will bring energy prices down by reversing President Joe Biden’s policy of encouraging renewable energy at the expense of fossil fuels.

    TRUMP: “We’re going to drill baby drill, we’re going to get the energy prices down, almost immediately.”

    THE FACTS: Oil production in the U.S. hit an all-time high under Biden’s administration.

    The U.S. Department of Energy reported in October that U.S. oil production hit 13.2 million barrels per day, passing a previous record set in 2020 by 100,000 barrels. Department statistics also show that the U.S. has produced more crude oil per year than any other nation — for the past six years.

    Economy has shown recent signs of strength, not evidence of collapse

    TRUMP: “We’re going to have a crash like the 1929 crash if she gets in.”

    THE FACTS: The economy has shown recent signs of strength — not evidence that America is on the edge of economic collapse.

    On Thursday the S&P 500 jumped 1.6%, its sixth gain in a row. The Dow Jones Industrial Average also increased Thursday, as did the Nasdaq composite.

    Recent economic reports show that shoppers increased their retail spending last month and fewer workers sought unemployment benefits.

    Fears the economy was slowing emerged last month following a sharp drop in hiring and higher unemployment rates. But those worries were assuaged earlier this month when better-than-expected jobless numbers led to Wall Street’s best rally since 2022.

    Harris was not named border ‘czar’

    TRUMP: “She was the border czar but she didn’t do anything. She’s the worst border czar in history. … She was the person responsible for the border and she never went there.”

    THE FACTS: Biden tapped Harris in 2021 to work with Central American countries to address the root causes of migration and the challenges it creates. Illegal crossings are one aspect of those challenges, but Harris was never assigned to the border or put in charge of the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees law enforcement at the border.

    Black unemployment is lower under Biden

    TRUMP: “The Black population had the best numbers they’ve ever had on jobs, on income, on everything. The Hispanic population had the best numbers.”

    THE FACTS: It’s true that Black and Hispanic unemployment fell to then-record lows under Trump, but that was upended by COVID. When Trump left office, Black unemployment had soared to 9.3% and Hispanic unemployment to 8.5%. Under Biden, Black unemployment fell to a new record low of 4.8% in April 2023, while Hispanic unemployment in September 2022 matched the all-time low of 3.9% it had reached under Trump.

    ___

    Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck.

    __

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • FACT FOCUS: False claims follow Minnesota governor’s selection as Harris’ running mate

    FACT FOCUS: False claims follow Minnesota governor’s selection as Harris’ running mate

    [ad_1]

    Vice President Kamala Harris’ announcement on Tuesday that Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz will be her running mate in the 2024 presidential election increased the spread of false claims about the Midwestern Democrat, some of which appeared on social media even before Harris made her pick public.

    Here’s a look at the facts.

    ___

    CLAIM: Walz said on CNN that he wants to invest in a “ladder factory” to help people scale the wall on the U.S.-Mexico border and illegally enter the U.S.

    THE FACTS: That’s false. Posts are misrepresenting a comment Walz made on an episode of CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360” last week. In the full segment, the Democrat criticizes former President Donald Trump’s plan to build a wall on the southern border by joking about the hypothetical investment. He then gives multiple other examples of how to address illegal crossings into the U.S. through Mexico.

    Amid Harris’ Tuesday announcement, social media users used a clip from the segment to make it seem as though the Minnesota governor was advocating for illegal immigration.

    “He talks about this wall, I always say, ‘let me know how high it is, if it’s 25 feet then I’ll invest in a 30-foot-ladder factory,’” Walz says, referencing Trump. “That’s not how you stop this.”

    One X post that shared the clip reads: “FLASHBACK: Kamala’s VP pick, Tim Walz, says he should invest in a ‘ladder factory’ to help illegal aliens climb the border wall.”

    But Walz was not offering to help people enter the U.S. without authorization. He was actually discussing how to prevent this from happening.

    In the full segment, after making the investment quip, Walz gives alternative ideas for how to handle illegal crossings on the southern border. Arrests for such crossings reached a record high in December, but dropped to a new low for the Biden administration at the end of July following a temporary ban on asylum.

    “You stop this using electronics, you stop it using more border control agents and you stop it by having a legal system that allows for that tradition of allowing folks to come here just like my relatives did,” Walz says near the end of the segment. “To come here, be able to work and establish the American dream.”

    He also spoke in support of a bipartisan border security package intended to cut back on illegal crossings that the Senate voted down in February.

    — Associated Press writer Melissa Goldin contributed this report.

    ___

    CLAIM: Walz changed the Minnesota flag so that it resembles the Somali flag.

    THE FACTS: Minnesota did unfurl a new state flag and accompanying seal in May, but the changes were made to replace an old design that Native Americans said reminded them of painful memories of conquest and displacement. The State Emblems Redesign Commission was established during the 2023 legislative session to oversee the development of a new design.

    Changes were made to eliminate an old state seal that featured the image of a Native American riding off into the sunset while a white settler plowed his field with a rifle at the ready. The seal was a key feature of the old flag.

    The commission included public officials, design experts and members of tribal and other communities of color. Its purpose statement dictated that the designs “must accurately and respectfully reflect Minnesota’s shared history, resources, and diverse cultural communities. Symbols, emblems, or likenesses that represent only a single community or person, regardless of whether real or stylized, may not be included in a design.”

    What to know about the 2024 Election

    The public submitted more than 2,600 proposals and the commission picked one from Andrew Prekker, 25, of Luverne, as the basis for the flag.

    Prekker said Walz had nothing to do with the creation of the flag, and Somalia had nothing to do with the flag design. Minnesota is home to the largest Somali population in the U.S. and is home to U.S. Rep. Ilhan Oman, who was born in Somalia and is a member of an informal group of progressive Democratic House members known as The Squad.

    “The inspiration behind my flag were three main concepts inspired by Minnesota’s history and culture: The North Star, the Minnesota shape, and three stripes representing different facets of Minnesotan identity,” he wrote in an email.

    Prekker’s original design had the white star on the blue background with white, green and light blue stripes stretching over the rest of the flag. The flag was compared online with flags from states in Somalia that have green, white and blue stripes and a star. The stripes were dropped by the commission in the final design.

    The final version of the flag features a dark blue shape resembling Minnesota with a white, eight-pointed star on it. The right side is light blue and is meant to symbolize the state’s abundant waters that led to it being known as the Land of 10,000 Lakes.

    The Somali flag has a five-point star on a light blue background. “There is no connection to Somalia or any other country, and in complete honesty I didn’t even know Somalia existed before the whole flag debacle. Any similarities people want to see are a coincidence. It is a Minnesotan flag, and that is what I designed it for,” Prekker said.

    ___

    Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • FACT FOCUS: A look at claims made by Trump at news conference

    FACT FOCUS: A look at claims made by Trump at news conference

    [ad_1]

    In his first news conference since Vice President Kamala Harris became the Democratic nominee for president, former President Donald Trump said he would debate her on Sept. 10 and pushed for two more debates. The Republican presidential nominee spoke for more than an hour, discussing a number of issues facing the country and then taking questions from reporters. He made a number of false and misleading claims. Many of them have been made before.

    Here’s a look at some of those claims.

    CROWD SIZES

    CLAIM: “The biggest crowd I’ve ever spoken — I’ve spoken to the biggest crowds. Nobody’s spoken to crowds bigger than me. If you look at Martin Luther King when he did his speech, his great speech, and you look at ours, same real estate, same everything, same number of people, if not we had more. And they said he had a million people, but I had 25,000 people.”

    THE FACTS: Trump was comparing the crowd at his speech in front of the White House on Jan. 6, 2021, to the crowd that attended Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous “I Have a Dream” speech on Aug. 28, 1963, at the Lincoln Memorial.

    But far more people are estimated to have been at the latter than the former.

    Approximately 250,000 people attended the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, at which King gave his speech, according to the National Park Service. The Associated Press reported in 2021 that there were at least 10,000 people at Trump’s address.

    Moreover, Trump and King did not speak in the same location. King spoke from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, which looks east toward the Washington Monument. Trump spoke at the Ellipse, a grassy area just south of the White House.

    ___

    JAN. 6

    CLAIM: “Nobody was killed on Jan. 6.”

    THE FACTS: That’s false. Five people died in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot and its immediate aftermath. Pro-Trump rioters breached the U.S. Capitol that day amid Congress’ effort to certify Democrat Joe Biden’s 2020 election victory.

    Among the deceased are Ashli Babbitt, a Trump supporter shot and killed by police, and Brian Sicknick, a police officer who died the day after battling the mob. Four additional officers who responded to the riot killed themselves in the following weeks and months.

    Babbitt, a 35-year-old Air Force veteran from San Diego, was shot and killed by a police officer as she climbed through a broken part of a Capitol door during the violent riot. Trump has often cited Babbitt’s death while lamenting the treatment of those who attended a rally outside the White House that day and then marched to the Capitol, many of whom fought with police.

    ___

    DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION

    CLAIM: “The presidency was taken away from Joe Biden, and I’m no Biden fan, but I tell you what, from a constitutional standpoint, from any standpoint you look at, they took the presidency away.”

    THE FACTS: There is nothing in the Constitution that prevents the Democratic Party from making Vice President Kamala Harris its nominee. That process is determined by the Democratic National Committee.

    Harris officially claimed the nomination Monday following a five-day online voting process, receiving 4,563 delegate votes out of 4,615 cast, or about 99% of participating delegates. A total of 52 delegates in 18 states cast their votes for “present,” the only other option on the ballot.

    The vice president was the only candidate eligible to receive votes after no other candidate qualified by the party’s deadline following President Joe Biden’s decision to drop out of the race on July 21.

    What to know about the 2024 Election

    ___

    THE ECONOMY

    CLAIM: Suggesting things would be different if he had been in office rather than Biden: “You wouldn’t have had inflation. You wouldn’t have had any inflation because inflation was caused by their bad energy problems. Now they’ve gone back to the Trump thing because they need the votes. They’re drilling now because they had to go back because gasoline was going up to 7, 8, 9 dollars a barrel.”

    THE FACTS: There would have been at least some inflation if Trump had been reelected in 2020 because many of the factors causing inflation were outside a president’s control. Prices spiked in 2021 after cooped-up Americans ramped up their spending on goods such as exercise bikes and home office furniture, overwhelming disrupted supply chains. U.S. auto companies, for example, couldn’t get enough semiconductors and had to sharply reduce production, causing new and used car prices to shoot higher. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in March 2022 also sent gas and food prices soaring around the world, as Ukraine’s wheat exports were disrupted and many nations boycotted Russian oil and gas.

    Still, under Biden, U.S. oil production reached a worldwide record level earlier this year.

    Many economists, including some Democrats, say Biden’s $1.9 trillion financial support package, approved in March 2021, which provided a $1,400 stimulus check to most Americans, helped fuel inflation by ramping up demand. But it didn’t cause inflation all by itself. And Trump supported $2,000 stimulus checks in December 2020, rather than the $600 checks included in a package he signed into law in December 2020.

    Prices still spiked in countries with different policies than Biden’s, such as France, Germany and the U.K., though mostly because of the sharp increase in energy costs stemming from Russia’s invasion.

    ___

    IMMIGRATION

    CLAIM: “Twenty million people came over the border during the Biden-Harris administration — 20 million people — and it could be very much higher than that. Nobody really knows.”

    THE FACTS: Trump’s 20 million figure is unsubstantiated at best, and he didn’t provide sources.

    U.S. Customs and Border Protection reports 7.1 million arrests for illegal crossings from Mexico from January 2021 through June 2024. That’s arrests, not people. Under pandemic-era asylum restrictions, many people crossed more than once until they succeeded because there were no legal consequences for getting turned back to Mexico. So the number of people is lower than the number of arrests.

    In addition, CBP says it stopped migrants 1.1 million times at official land crossings with Mexico from January 2021 through June 2024, largely under an online appointment system to claim asylum called CBP One.

    U.S. authorities also admitted nearly 500,000 migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela under presidential authority if they had financial sponsors and arrived at an airport.

    All told, that’s nearly 8.7 million encounters. Again, the number of people is lower due to multiple encounters for some.

    There are an unknown number of people who eluded capture, known as “got-aways” in Border Patrol parlance. The Border Patrol estimates how many but doesn’t publish that number.

    ___

    CLAIM: Vice President Kamala Harris “was the border czar 100% and all of a sudden for the last few weeks she’s not the border czar anymore.”

    THE FACTS: Harris was appointed to address “root causes” of migration in Central America. That migration manifests itself in illegal crossings to the U.S., but she was not assigned to the border.

    ___

    NEW YORK CASES

    CLAIM: “The New York cases are totally controlled out of the Department of Justice.”

    THE FACTS: Trump was referring to two cases brought against him in New York — one civil and the other criminal.

    Neither has anything to do with the U.S. Department of Justice.

    The civil case was initiated by a lawsuit from New York Attorney General Letitia James. In that case, Trump was ordered in February to pay a $454 million penalty for lying about his wealth for years as he built the real estate empire that vaulted him to stardom and the White House.

    Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a state-level prosecutor, brought the criminal case. In May, a jury found Trump guilty on 34 felony counts in a scheme to illegally influence the 2016 election through a hush money payment to a porn actor who said the two had sex.

    ___ Associated Press writers Melissa Goldin and Elliot Spagat and economics writer Christopher Rugaber contributed to this article. ___

    Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck.

    __

    An earlier version of this story mixed up “latter” and “former” in the third paragraph. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech on Aug. 28, 1963, drew a far larger crowd than Donald Trump’s speech near the White House on Jan. 6, 2021.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump falsely claims a crowd photo from Harris’ campaign rally in Detroit was created using AI

    Trump falsely claims a crowd photo from Harris’ campaign rally in Detroit was created using AI

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has been spreading false claims that an image of thousands of people waiting at Detroit’s airport as Democrat Kamala Harris arrived for a campaign rally was fabricated with the help of artificial intelligence.

    Reporters, photographers and video journalists representing The Associated Press and other news organizations who either traveled with Vice President Harris or were on the airport tarmac documented the crowd size last Wednesday as she arrived on Air Force Two. Harris’ campaign also denied the photo in question was manipulated and posted about it on social media.

    Fifteen thousand people attended the Detroit airport rally, Harris’ campaign said. Harris and Walz spoke from inside a hangar where people were packed in. The crowd also spilled out onto the tarmac. The Wayne County Airport Authority, which oversees the airport, referred questions about the size of the crowd to Harris’ campaign.

    Thousands of people have been showing up at her campaign rallies.

    By the Harris campaign’s count, 12,000 people turned out for rallies in Philadelphia and Eau Claire, Wisconsin, last week, followed by 15,000 in Glendale, Arizona. In Las Vegas on Saturday, more than 12,000 people were inside a university arena when law enforcement halted admission because people were getting ill waiting outside in the extreme 109-degree heat. About 4,000 people were waiting in line when the doors were closed.

    An Associated Press reporter who covered the Harris events in Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona and Nevada, witnessed the throngs of people in attendance.

    Trump pushed his false claims in back-to-back posts on his social media site on Sunday.

    “Has anyone noticed that Kamala CHEATED at the airport? There was nobody at the plane, and she ‘A.I.’d’ it, and showed a massive ‘crowd’ of so-called followers, BUT THEY DIDN’T EXIST!.” he wrote. He included a post from another individual who made similar allegations about photo manipulation.

    A minute later Trump posted, “Look, we caught her with a fake ‘crowd.’ There was nobody there!” He included a photo of the crowd that was partly shaded and partly exposed to the sun.

    Harris’ campaign confirmed on Monday that the photo being questioned was taken by a staff member and was not in any way modified using AI.

    Hany Farid, a University of California, Berkeley, professor who focuses on digital forensics and misinformation, analyzed the photo using two models trained to detect patterns of generative AI and found no evidence of manipulation. The models were developed by GetReal Labs, a company Farid co-founded.

    Farid, responding Monday in an email, said he compared several versions of the photo and the only alteration he detected was some simple change to brightness or contrast, and perhaps sharpening. He said many other images and videos from the event last Wednesday show the same basic scene.

    Trump started pushing false theories about the Harris campaign photo a few days after he held a news conference at his Florida estate on Thursday and was asked about the crowds at his Democratic rival’s rallies. Trump said no one draws crowds as big as he does.

    “I’ve spoken to the biggest crowds. Nobody’s spoken to crowds bigger than me,” Trump claimed at the news conference, his first since Harris became the Democratic presidential nominee.

    What to know about the 2024 Election

    He went on to falsely compare the crowd at his speech in front of the White House on Jan. 6, 2021, to the crowd at Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous “I Have a Dream” speech on Aug. 28, 1963, at the Lincoln Memorial.

    But King drew far more people. Approximately 250,000 people attended the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, at which King gave his speech, according to the National Park Service. The Associated Press reported in 2021 that there were at least 10,000 people at Trump’s address.

    Some of Trump’s top advisers and supporters have been urging the former president to focus his criticisms on Harris’ policies and talk more about the border and the economy.

    “Stop questioning the size of her crowds,” was the advice former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., offered during a Fox News appearance on Monday.

    The Harris campaign needled Trump on a variety of issues in an email Monday titled “9 Days Since Trump’s Last Swing State Event.” The note included a bullet point that said, “he’s very mad about crowd sizes, claiming it’s all fake and AI-generated. (Maybe if he campaigned he’d get crowds too?)”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump’s VP pick JD Vance defends spreading false story about migrants

    Trump’s VP pick JD Vance defends spreading false story about migrants

    [ad_1]

    Top US Republican politicians continue to repeat debunked rumours about Haitian immigrants eating pets in Ohio town.

    Former President Donald Trump’s running mate in the US election, Republican Senator JD Vance, has defended amplifying false stories about migrants stealing and eating pets in the United States, saying in an interview that the political ends justify the means.

    During several television appearances on Sunday, Vance was questioned about the unfounded claims he and Trump have made about Haitian migrants in the city of Springfield, Ohio, as part of a wider attack on the immigration policies of the Democratic presidential candidate, Vice President Kamala Harris.

    Trump had touted the false story during his first – and likely only debate – with Harris last week, with 67 million viewers tuning in. Local officials have repeatedly said they have received no evidence to support the rumours.

    But Vance remained defiant on Sunday, saying in an interview with CBS News that he had received “verifiable and confirmable” accounts from residents of the Ohio community, without providing further evidence of the alleged incidents.

    “Everybody who has dealt with a large influx of migration knows that sometimes there are cultural practices that seem very far out there to a lot of Americans,” he said. “Are we not allowed to talk about this in the United States of America?”

    In another exchange on CNN, Vance was asked to “affirmatively say” that there is no evidence to support the stories about Haitian migrants eating pets.

    Vance again replied he was only responding to constituents’ concerns.

    “If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that’s what I’m going to do … because you guys are completely letting Kamala Harris coast,” Vance replied, before backpedaling.

    “I say that we’re creating a story, meaning we’re creating the American media focusing on it,” Vance said.

    For his part, Trump on Saturday again referenced Springfield, Ohio, during a speech near Los Angeles, vowing to deport Haitian immigrants from the community if elected in the November 5 vote.

    Trump and his Republican allies have also been sharing cat-themed memes to push the anti-immigrant narrative.

    Trump posts ‘I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT’

    For years, political violence experts have warned that the Trump campaign’s bellicose rhetoric and flippant approach to misinformation stoke social tensions and raise the spectre of violence.

    Just two days after the debate, hospitals, schools and government buildings in Springfield, Ohio were forced to close amid a series of bomb threats that referenced the influx of migrants in the community.

    On Friday, US President Joe Biden called the attacks “simply wrong”.

    “This has to stop, what [Trump’s] doing. It has to stop,” Biden said.

    Critics have also pointed to the Trump campaign’s approach as further evidence of US election seasons becoming increasingly dominated by ephemeral cultural spectacle meant to stoke partisan outrage, while sidelining meaningful policy discussion.

    In the latest example, Trump on Sunday responded to pop star Taylor Swift’s recent endorsement of Harris. The nod is considered a major political boon for the Democratic candidate, with Swift boasting hundreds of millions of ardent fans across the world.

    In a brief, all-caps post on his Truth Social account, Trump wrote: “I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Venture capitalists are divided on Harris or Trump

    Venture capitalists are divided on Harris or Trump

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES (AP) — Being a venture capitalist carries a lot of prestige in Silicon Valley. Those who choose which startups to fund see themselves as fostering the next big waves of technology.

    So when some of the industry’s biggest names endorsed former President Donald Trump and the onetime VC he picked for a running mate, JD Vance, people took notice.

    Then hundreds of other VCs — some high profile, others lesser-known — threw their weight behind Vice President Kamala Harris, drawing battle lines over which presidential candidate will be better for tech innovation and the conditions startups need to thrive. For years, many of Silicon Valley’s political discussions took place behind closed doors. Now, those casual debates have gone public — on podcasts, social media and online manifestos.

    Venture capitalist and Harris backer Stephen DeBerry says some of his best friends support Trump. Though centered in a part of Northern California known for liberal politics, the investors who help finance the tech industry have long been a more politically divided bunch.

    “We ski together. Our families are together. We’re super tight,” said DeBerry, who runs the Bronze Venture Fund. “This is not about not being able to talk to each other. I love these guys — they’re almost all guys. They’re dear friends. We just have a difference of perspective on policy issues.”

    It remains to be seen if the more than 700 venture capitalists who’ve voiced support for a movement called “VCs for Kamala” will match the pledges of Trump’s well-heeled supporters such as Elon Musk and Peter Thiel. But the effort marks “the first time I’ve seen a galvanized group of folks from our industry coming together and coalescing around our shared values,” DeBerry said.

    “There are a lot of practical reasons for VCs to support Trump,” including policies that could drive corporate profits and stock market values and favor wealthy benefactors, said David Cowan, an investor at Bessemer Venture Partners. But Cowan said he is supporting Harris as a VC with a “long-term investment horizon” because a “Trump world reeling from rampant income inequality, raging wars and global warming is not an attractive environment” for funding healthy businesses.

    Several prominent VCs have voiced their support for Trump on Musk’s social platform X. Public records show some of them have donated to a new, pro-Trump super PAC called America PAC, whose donors include powerful tech industry conservatives with ties to SpaceX and Paypal and who run in Musk’s social circle. Also driving support is Trump’s embrace of cryptocurrency and promise to end an enforcement crackdown on the industry.

    Although some Biden policies have alienated parts of the investment sector concerned about tax policy, antitrust scrutiny or overregulation, Harris’ bid for the presidency has reenergized interest from VCs who until recently sat on the sidelines. Some of that excitement is due to existing relationships with Silicon Valley that are borne out of Harris’ career in the San Francisco area and her time as California’s attorney general.

    “We buy risk, right? And we’re trying to buy the right type of risk,” Leslie Feinzaig, founder of “VCs for Kamala” said in an interview. “It’s really hard for these companies that are trying to build products and scale to do so in an unpredictable institutional environment.”

    What to know about the 2024 Election

    The schism in tech has left some firms split in their allegiances. Although venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, founders of the firm that is their namesake, endorsed Trump, one of their firm’s general partners, John O’Farrell, pledged his support for Harris. O’Farrell declined further comment.

    Doug Leone, the former managing partner of Sequoia Capital, endorsed Trump in June, expressing concern on X “about the general direction of our country, the state of our broken immigration system, the ballooning deficit, and the foreign policy missteps, among other issues.” But Leone’s longtime business partner at Sequoia, Michael Moritz, wrote in the Financial Times that tech leaders supporting Trump “are making a big mistake.”

    Shaun Maguire, a partner at Sequoia, posted on X that he donated $300,000 to Trump’s campaign after supporting Hilary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election. Federal Election Commission records show that Maguire donated $500,000 to America PAC in June; Leone donated $1 million.

    “The area where I disagree with Republicans the most is on women’s rights. And I’m sure I’ll disagree with some of Trump’s policies in the future,” Maguire wrote. “But in general I think he was surprisingly prescient.”

    Feinzaig, managing director at venture firm Graham & Walker, said that she launched “VCs for Kamala” because she felt frustrated that “the loudest voices” were starting to “sound like they were speaking for the entire industry.”

    Much of the VC discourse about elections is in response to a July podcast and manifesto in which Andreessen and Horowitz backed Trump and outlined their vision of a “Little Tech Agenda” that they said contrasted with the policies sought by Big Tech.

    They accused the U.S. government of increasing hostility toward startups and the VCs who fund them, citing Biden’s proposed higher taxes on the wealthy and corporations and regulations they said could hobble emerging industries involving blockchain and artificial intelligence.

    Vance, a U.S. senator from Ohio who spent time in San Francisco working at Thiel’s investment firm, voiced a similar perspective about “little tech” more than a month before he was chosen as Trump’s running mate.

    “The donors who were really involved in Silicon Valley in a pro-Trump way, they’re not big tech, right? They’re little tech. They’re starting innovative companies. They don’t want the government to destroy their ability to innovate,” Vance said in an interview on Fox News in June.

    Days earlier, Vance had joined Trump at a San Francisco fundraiser at the home of venture capitalist and former PayPal executive David Sacks, a longtime conservative. Vance said Trump spoke to about 100 attendees that included “some of the leading innovators in AI.”

    DeBerry said he doesn’t disagree with everything Andreesen Horowitz founders espouse, particularly their wariness about powerful companies controlling the agencies that regulate them. But he objects to their “little tech” framing, especially coming from a multibillion-dollar investment firm that he says is hardly the voice of the little guy. For DeBerry, whose firm focuses on social impact, the choice is not between big and little tech but “chaos and stability,” with Harris representing stability.

    Complicating the allegiances is that a tough approach to breaking up the monopoly power of big corporations no longer falls along partisan lines. Vance has spoken favorably of Lina Khan, who Biden picked to lead the Federal Trade Commission and has taken on several tech giants. Meanwhile, some of the most influential VCs backing Harris — such as LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman; and Sun Microsystems co-founder Vinod Khosla, an early investor in ChatGPT-maker OpenAI — have sharply criticized Khan’s approach.

    U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna, a Democrat whose California district encompasses part of Silicon Valley, said Trump supporters are a vocal minority reflecting a “third or less” of the region’s tech community. But while the White House has appealed to tech entrepreneurs with its investments in clean energy, electric vehicles and semiconductors, Khanna said Democrats must do a better job of showing that they understand the appeal of digital assets.

    “I do think that the perceived lack of embrace of Bitcoin and the blockchain has hurt the Democratic Party among the young generation and among young entrepreneurs,” Khanna said.

    Naseem Sayani, a general partner at Emmeline Ventures, said Andreessen and Horowitz’s support of Trump became a lightning rod for those in tech who do not back the Republican nominee. Sayani signed onto “VCs for Kamala,” she said, because she wanted the types of businesses that she helps fund to know that the investor community is not monolithic.

    “We’re not single-profile founders anymore,” she said. “There’s women, there’s people of color, there’s all the intersections. How can they feel comfortable building businesses when the environment they’re in doesn’t actually support their existence in some ways?”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What are voters looking for? 

    What are voters looking for? 

    [ad_1]

    A woman cheers during a Kamala Harris rally in Greensboro, North Carolina on Thursday, Sept. 12. Photo by Julia Beverly/The Atlanta Voice

    At a small restaurant in the Summerhill section of Atlanta, Opal Williams, a boomer and Atlanta native, made her way to a picnic bench and grabbed a sign that read, “Reproductive Freedom”. She was attending a Harris-Walz reproductive freedom event, but that topic  wasn’t at the top of her mind. 

    When asked what she considered crucial this election, Williams said social security, Medicare, and the economy.” 

    She told The Atlanta Voice that she doesn’t believe United States Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee for the presidency, has been clear enough on those topics, and that concerned her.

    “I vote for my intertest and for the interest of my family, said Williams.

    Marnita Lawrence, a grandmother from Douglas County, held signs too, but she was more focused on her candidate of choice: United States Vice President Kamala Harris.

    “I think there’s a momentum going, but hopefully it will translate into votes,” Lawrence said. 

    Asked  what she thinks about Harris’ historic run to the White House, Lawrence said, “We don’t believe it until we see it, but I’m hopeful.”

    Marnita Lawrence said she hopes the positive momentum Vice President Kamala Harris has received of late will continue through November. Photo by Kerri Phox/The Atlanta Voice

    A month earlier during the Democratic National Convention (DNC), which took place in Chicago, more than 50,000 people visited the city, according to local reports. Many of those visitors have made their way to the United Center, host site of the DNC, while many others were protesting everything from the war in Gaza, the indoctrination of Harris to the top of the Democratic ticket, abortion, and former United States President Donald Trump and all things MAGA. The city’s pre-segregated “free speech zone” was at Park No. 578, which is located on W. Maypole Avenue, a quarter-mile from the United Center. The more popular site for protests, however, was at Union Park, which is a larger park and more suitable for gatherings like protests and concerts, for example. 

    “Are you planning to vote in the upcoming election?” Nearly every person The Atlanta Voice asked had one answer: “No.”

    Sheila Williams sat in a wheelchair sheltered under a tent as protesters marched down Washington Boulevard. Pinned on either side of her jacket were mini flyers declaring that “the whole damn system’s got to go,” and to “stop following the bourgeois electoral bullsh*t.”

    “At my age, I should be at home in a rocking chair, but here I am with my walker out here to say, enough is enough,” Williams said. “All these people out here in the streets today that are protesting about racism, protesting about abortion rights, protesting about genocide, protesting about police brutality, protesting about so many things that are elements of this system. America was never great.”

    “We’re coming into an unprecedented election. We’re saying this year isn’t going to be a normal election year,” said Leo Pargo, a leading member of the Revcom Corps for the Emancipation of Humanity Chicago. “Biden-Harris on one side supporting this genocide. The fascist Trump on the other side is going after women’s rights, LGBTQ rights, demonizing migrants that are forced to come here from all over the world. We’re saying this isn’t a time to side between one oppression or another.”

    Art H. (above) made his way to Chicago from his native Seattle to sell t-shirt. Photo by Donnell Suggs/The Atlanta Voice

    Over by the United Center, Art H. sold t-shirts and hats with pro-Harris/Walz themes on them. He said his t-shirts have the clearest photo of Harris on them out of any people are going to see on the streets. “People don’t understand, Trump understands the visibility of his face is how you get your image out there,” Art explained. 

    Asked if he was going to vote in November, Art, a resident of Seattle, Washington who is in town for the convention, said he was. “It’s my duty.”

    Darius Smith, working security outside of a library a block away from the United Center, said he was also planning to vote in this election. 

    “I’m going to vote out of obligation,” Smith said. “Ever since I was 18 years old I always tried to vote for the candidate that benefits poor people the most.” 

    There were potential voters from around the country making their way to Chicago before the election takes place. Whether or not this presidential election garners more voters than the nearly 150 million voters that took part in 2016 remains to be seen. A lot of those voters will be a part of the working class that both campaigns are targeting this election. The “9-5” workers that make up the majority of American voters. During the reporting for this story, The Atlanta Voice asked founder and CEO of Homebase John Waldmann, an all-in-one small business organization, why he believes nearly 35% of hourly workers are undecided with less than 90 days until Election Day, November 5?

    “It’s possible some local workers feel it’s too early to know which candidate is going to address their unique concerns,” Waldmann said via email. “The good thing is that there is still time to win over these voters. Our data uncovers a few areas where candidates can address those needs.  

    Waldmann said hourly workers may be more vulnerable to policy changes that directly impact their livelihoods, from inflation to taxes on tips. “More than other audiences, they may be waiting for debates and more substantive policy discussions before they decide on their preferred candidate,” said Waldmann. 

    According to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, there are just over 80 million wage workers (ages 16 and older). Asked if that is a demographic/voting block both sides of the aisle need to target, Waldmann said there was no doubt about it.

    “Hourly workers account for over 80 million American workers. Small businesses employ nearly half of the American workforce and represent almost 44% of America’s GDP,” Waldmann said. “Their votes are incredibly powerful, and matter more than ever this election cycle. Considering nearly 35% of hourly workers are undecided, there’s a huge opportunity for both candidates to dig into hourly workers’ concerns and priorities to gain their trust – and votes.”

    When speaking with voters, inflation came up most often when asked what concerned them the most this election season. Waldmann believes inflation has a direct influence on hourly workers’ day-to-day financial stability and overall quality of life. 

    “More importantly, this impact often feels immediate and personal. With the cost of living skyrocketing across many cities, and inflation making it challenging to afford everyday goods and services like groceries, gas, and housing, hourly workers could be feeling the pinch more acutely when prices rise,” he said. “Hourly workers aren’t just young folks holding a summer job – they are also adults with families to take care of and bills to pay. More than anything, they want a candidate who makes them feel heard.”

    [ad_2]

    Donnell Suggs and Laura Nwogu

    Source link

  • 9/14: Saturday Morning

    9/14: Saturday Morning

    [ad_1]

    9/14: Saturday Morning – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Harris, Trump campaign in battleground states; Why this London restaurant uses a new chef every week

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Next January 6 Could Happen in Places Like Springfield, Ohio

    The Next January 6 Could Happen in Places Like Springfield, Ohio

    [ad_1]

    Photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images

    At Tuesday’s presidential debate, Donald Trump launched into a rant about Haitian immigrants kidnapping and eating pets in Springfield, Ohio. “They’re eating the dogs!” he bellowed. “The people that came in, they’re eating the cats! They’re eating the pets of the people that live there!” No spectators were allowed inside the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia, where the debate was held, which meant Trump’s live audience consisted primarily of Kamala Harris, two stone-faced moderators from ABC News, and the cavernous silence of the auditorium. He looked and sounded unwell, like a man who had totally lost control of himself.

    Observers were quick to assume that Trump had fallen for a right-wing conspiracy theory that began as a rumor simmering in the bowels of Facebook and was later pushed by, among others, his own vice-presidential candidate, J.D. Vance. But that impression was somewhat misleading. Though Trump had spent much of the evening spiraling off-topic, his rant about Haitians was made at least partially by design. The point was not whether the claims were true or false but to snatch at any excuse to proclaim that brown and Black immigrants should be ostracized — and to use a cadre of conservative influencers and memelords to encourage a conspiratorial frenzy that could easily spill into violence.

    It was Vance who first brought the Springfield rumor to Trump’s attention. Since the pandemic, the city has attracted as many as 20,000 Haitian immigrants with promises of warehouse jobs and manufacturing work. Last year, one of them veered a minivan into oncoming traffic and struck a school bus, killing an 11-year-old boy. The boy’s father has since insisted his son’s death was an accident and implored people not to exploit it for hateful ends, but that is precisely what happened. There remains no evidence that Haitian migrants have been killing and eating pets — a fact that has been confirmed by both the police and countless reporters who have investigated the rumor. Yet on Monday, the day before the debate, Vance posted about it on X: “Reports now show that people have had their pets abducted and eaten by people who shouldn’t be in this country.”

    The post soon began percolating throughout the conservative web. Ted Cruz and Elon Musk posted memes of kittens begging to be saved from Haitian dinner plates, racking up hundreds of thousands of reposts. Even after local authorities had confirmed the claim was baseless, Vance was undeterred, inviting his followers to “keep the cat memes flowing” anyway. CNN’s Kaitlan Collins asked him, “Why push something that’s not true?” Vance replied with a slight smirk, “Whether those exact rumors turn out to be mostly true, somewhat true, whatever the case may be, this town has been ravaged by 20,000 migrants coming in.”

    When Trump boosted the story at the debate, the reverberations were felt instantly. A so-called social-media war room that included the notorious conspiracy theorists Laura Loomer, Jack Posobiec, and Chaya Raichik spammed the web with defenses of Trump and attacks on Springfield’s Haitian population. Google Trends reported that the top search in 49 states during the debate was “abortion” — except in Ohio, where it was “immigration.” The day after the debate, Musk responded to Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris on X by pledging to “give” her a child and “guard” her cats. On Thursday, bomb threats in Springfield containing what the city’s mayor, Rob Rue, described to the Washington Post as “hateful language towards immigrants and Haitians” prompted the evacuations of City Hall, the Bureau of Motor Vehicles, the Springfield Driver’s Exam Station, an Ohio License Bureau, and two schools — the Springfield Academy of Excellence and Fulton Elementary.

    “We want to move forward together,” Rue told the New York Times of the unwanted attention Trump’s rant has brought to his city, “and it just makes it more difficult to do that when we have violent actions and threats.” The chaos continued on Friday, when police announced they had received unspecified “information” that led them to close an additional middle school and evacuate two more elementary schools. At a press conference in California, Trump said “mass deportations” of immigrants could begin in Springfield if he is elected president.

    It was all emblematic of the former president’s ability to turn whole communities upside down with just a few words. For all the ways Trump has declined of late, he remains masterful at reading and cultivating his base, which wants stories about immigrants so grotesque that their xenophobic paranoias feel not only sane but righteous. Somewhat new are the droves of conservative influencers descending on Springfield and spreading viral videos of residents calling immigrants “sand monkeys.”

    It’s worth remembering that we’ve seen Trump make this play before. His lies about endemic migrant crime date back to his campaign announcement in 2015 when he characterized all Mexican immigrants as “rapists.” Ahead of both the 2018 midterms and the 2020 general election, the then-president induced panic about invading migrant caravans that abruptly disappeared from his rhetoric after votes were cast. Haiti itself has made a previous appearance on Trump’s reported list of “shithole” countries whose denizens he sought to deny immigration protections.

    Trump’s brand of conspiratorial lying transformed his unfounded claims of election theft in 2020 into a rabid mob that descended on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. Now, the question of whether Trump’s lies lead to actual violent behavior is no longer conjectural. And as Vance helpfully articulated, the point of the lying is to capture and channel a desired mood, a rallying cause that motivates people to action.

    The Republican ticket’s exploitation of that mood has now sent hundreds of Springfield children fleeing from their schools, led to the terrorization of countless city employees, reopened the psychic wounds of a grieving father, and placed a target on the backs of a migrant minority that was already regarded with suspicion. It reaffirms that Trump’s vision for returning to power will likely require an indiscriminate range of casualties. What we saw onstage on Tuesday was not merely a meltdown but a vision of the future: an angry man howling at hordes of disciples he does not see, who await his signal to spring into action.

    [ad_2]

    Zak Cheney-Rice

    Source link

  • Bill Maher Is Dumbfounded By Taylor Swift’s Influence On Male Voters After Kamala Harris Endorsement

    Bill Maher Is Dumbfounded By Taylor Swift’s Influence On Male Voters After Kamala Harris Endorsement

    [ad_1]

    Bill Maher might want to pick up a ticket to the Eras Tour on his way to the polls.

    On Friday’s episode of Real Time with Bill Maher, the comedian marveled at Taylor Swift‘s influence after she previously announced her endorsement of Kamala Harris and drove more than 400,000 potential voters to the registration site.

    “Let’s get to the big news this week,” Maher prefaced. “Taylor Swift finally told people who to vote for. Of course, immediately the response from the other side was, ‘Celebrity endorsements don’t matter.’ People are always so behind on these things. That’s the conventional wisdom for a long time, many celebrity endorsements don’t work… not in this case — I mean, just the number of people who were immediately registered from that Tweet.”

    He continued, “And I’m sorry, but we live in Starf—er, America. George Clooney is the one who got Biden to step down. I wrote the exact same editorial he did, and so many other people did too. Nobody cared. As soon as George Clooney said it, he’s gotta go.”

    Maher then attempted to unpack a “surprising” statistic about Swift’s fanbase following her post-debate endorsement of Harris.

    “This was the most surprising part of it, was who she influenced,” he said. “Swift, it says, would have more influence over male voters — 27% of male voters said they’d be more likely to vote for a candidate endorsed by Swift. I must have this phenomenon gauged all wrong. I thought it would be women.”

    Perhaps Maher should invest in a gay friend? They probably would have advised him against making the next joke he did about Swift.

    “Now that Taylor Swift has saved democracy by endorsing Kamala Harris, she has one more mission: stop making Travis Kelce dress like a douche,” said Maher in his ‘New Rules’ segment. “I don’t own a cat but I know what it smells like when they mark their turf.”

    Swift previously shared her endorsement of Harris and running mate Tim Walz on Instagram. “I will be casting my vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz in the 2024 Presidential Election,” she wrote.

    “I’m voting for @kamalaharris because she fights for the rights and causes I believe need a warrior to champion them,” added Swift. “I think she is a steady-headed, gifted leader and I believe we can accomplish so much more in this country if we are led by calm and not chaos.”

    [ad_2]

    Glenn Garner

    Source link

  • Why boosting the Child Tax Credit has become a key issue for Harris and Trump

    Why boosting the Child Tax Credit has become a key issue for Harris and Trump

    [ad_1]

    Norristown, Pennsylvania — If anyone knows how expensive it is to raise a child, it’s Raegen Selden, an office manager in Norristown, Pennsylvania. She has raised six children who range in age from 12 to 25.

    “I have two sons who are hungry every second, every minute of the day,” Selden said. “I have daughters who would like to think that they eat dainty, but they don’t.”

    Her family has always relied on the federal Child Tax Credit, first created in 1997, to help make ends meet. During the pandemic, the credit was boosted temporarily from $2,000 to $3,000 per child, and up to $3,600 for families with children under the age of 6.

    The move helped cut U.S. child poverty by 46%, according to a 2022 report from the U.S. Census Bureau.

    “Bills still needed to be paid and things still needed to be bought,” Selden said. “And it was a comfort in knowing that you had this extra income.”

    It costs an estimated $310,000 to raise a child from birth to age 18, the Brookings Institution found in a 2022 report. One of the few things both presidential candidates agree on is that the Child Tax Credit should get a big boost.

    Former President Donald Trump’s campaign is proposing a $5,000 per child yearly tax credit. Vice President Kamala Harris is proposing a credit of up to $3,600 per child, with a bump to $6,000 for newborns.

    Trump wants the credit to go to all families regardless of income, while Harris would restrict the credit to low and middle-income families only. She would also make the credit “refundable,” meaning even parents who don’t pay taxes would get the credit in cash.

    “This is a really exciting moment,” University of Maryland economics professor Melissa Kearney told CBS News. “…We have tons of evidence that supplementing the income of low-income families with children really meaningfully improves those children’s lives. We see they do better in school. Their health outcomes are improved in ways that persist into their adulthood.”

    The cost has always been a sticking point. A bill to expand the credit failed in the Senate just last month.

    Selden believes parents should receive a Child Tax Credit because their children “are taking care of our future.”

    “We want them to grow up to be great, productive citizens in this country,” she added. “And it’s like you can’t do that if they can’t eat.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Detroit hip-hop community and leaders come together for ‘Vote or Else’ event

    Detroit hip-hop community and leaders come together for ‘Vote or Else’ event

    [ad_1]

    Whether it’s a lack of trust in the U.S. political system or simply not liking the candidates, Detroit has always struggled with low voter turnout in regional and presidential elections. According to a July 2024 report from University of Michigan, about 12% of Detroiters who are eligible to vote reported they were unlikely to cast a vote in this November’s election. In June, Detroit elections administrator Daniel Baxter told Outlier Media that of Detroit’s 513,000 registered voters, about 127,000 are inactive.

    To combat this, community leaders, hip-hop artists, content creators, and national media personalities will come together for Mobilize Justice’s ““Vote or Else” event on Tuesday, Sept. 17, which is also Voter Registration Day. Hosted at Detroit’s Huntington Place convention center, Vote or Else is a full day of programming aimed at increasing voter registration and turnout and is held in partnership with the office of Mary Sheffield and the Detroit Entertainment Commission.

    The event will feature a town hall forum at 5 p.m., followed by a debate at 8:30 p.m. with actor Hill Harper, activists Tamika Mallory, Beanie Sigel, Jadakiss, Black Thought of The Roots, Pusha T and more. That will be followed by surprise musical performances starting at 9:30 p.m.

    An EP music project produced by Helluva, Havoc from Mobb Deep, Chris Store, Playa Haze, Plu20 Nash, and others is set to include contributions from Beanie Sigel, Symba, Freeway, Jadakiss, Miles Minnick, Jay Electronica, Benny the Butcher, Black Thought, Styles P, Icewear Vezzo, Rick Williams, Westside Boogie, Bun B, Baby Money, and more.

    The day’s programming will also include a voter mobilization project in Detroit in the morning as well as a visit to Wayne State University.

    “Vote or Else is a campaign that truly represents where we are as a country; it’s a call to action for our communities to unite against hate and disinformation by exercising the rights our elders fought for,” says organizer and pastor Mike McBride. “As we gather in Detroit, we’re bringing together faith leaders, musicians, cultural influencers, designers, activists, and activists dedicated to civic engagement ahead of the 2024 elections. We know our future hangs in the balance, and we must vote because our lives depend on it.”

    Overall, the hip-hop community has been engaged in this year’s presidential election. New York rapper Cardi B and Atlanta native Quavo had publicly endorsed Kamala Harris, while rappers Sada Baby, Peezy, and Icewear Vezzo have expressed support for Donald Trump.

    The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement reported in 2021 that only 43% of Black voters between 18-29 voted in the 2020 presidential election. This is one of the main demographics Vote or Else is seeking to encourage.

    The campaign has garnered the kind of presence from the hip-hop community that hasn’t been seen since 2004’s “Vote or Die” campaign, when you had hip-hop artists like Eve and LL Cool J encouraging America’s youth to vote by doing commercial spots on issues like gun control.

    More information is available at blackchurchpac.org/orelse.

    [ad_2]

    Kahn Santori Davison

    Source link

  • Merrick Garland’s DOJ Pep Rally Proves Trump Won the Debate

    Merrick Garland’s DOJ Pep Rally Proves Trump Won the Debate

    [ad_1]

    Boss Tweed via Wikimedia Commons

    By Rep. Matt Gaetz for RealClearPolitics

    Today, Merrick Garland held a pep rally at the Department of Justice (DOJ) for his employees. Why now? Well, two nights ago, we heard President Donald Trump take aim at the weaponization of DOJ, and we heard Kamala Harris’s non-response. Trump clearly won that exchange, and the Swamp now has to play clean-up for her mess.

    RELATED: U.S. Borrowing Tops $1.9 Trillion So Far This Year

    Remember that in the debate, the ABC moderators interrupted Trump’s answer about illegal immigrant crime to push fake FBI statistics, which Trump swatted aside. In her response, rather than talk about immigration, Harris brought up that Trump has been prosecuted. Trump explained that each of the cases against him were fake, failing, and coordinated by Garland and the Biden-Harris administration. Of course, we know this is true. But the icing on the cake is that Harris’ final non-answer was that Donald Trump would weaponize the DOJ.

    They are telling on themselves.

    But the Harris campaign strategy, and the orders to Garland are clear: blame Trump for things Kamala Harris and Joe Biden are doing right now.

    Frankly, it has to be tough to be an employee of Biden and Harris. You might be asked to violate Departmental Protocol and do a pre-dawn raid of a former President but turn a blind eye to a legally worse situation involving Joe and classified documents in his garage. You might be asked to surveil your neighbors at church, or at school board meetings. You might be asked not to prosecute real crimes involving immigration, opioids, or Black Lives Matter, but asked to prosecute grandma for praying on a sidewalk.

    It must be demoralizing to go into work every day like this.

    And if you complain? If you follow the rules, but go to the Inspector General, or to Congress, or to your boss? Forget that. In violation of law, you might find yourself without a job, suspended without pay, sidelined, or with your security clearance revoked. That happened under Garland and Harris to Marcus Allen, to Stephen Friend, and to so many others.

    RELATED: FACT CHECK: In Presidential Debate, Harris Deflects on Border Record

    This is unacceptable.

    So while Harris and Garland use their platforms to gaslight America, saying that the Department is “proud” to remain “independent” and free from “political interference,” ask yourself: who is really politicizing the justice system?

    Who is bussing in tens or hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants into our cities, merely for their votes? It’s Kamala Harris, not Donald Trump. Harris and the current administration are responsible for the tragedies on the border every day.

    Who refuses to say the names of Laken Riley, or Rachel Morin, or Jocelyn Nungaray, because it’s not politically expedient? Kamala Harris, not Donald Trump.

    Who has fundraised for violent criminals in Minnesota to keep them out of jail? Kamala Harris, not Donald Trump. It’s the California soft-on-crime policies that Harris brought to that state which are tearing our cities apart, even, perhaps especially in the deep red rural areas in swing states like Pennsylvania, Nevada, and Wisconsin that she wants to target.

    Whose DOJ is sending letters to county clerks across the country, and to Secretaries of State, warning them of prosecution if they get too aggressive in protecting our elections? Kamala Harris’s, not Donald Trump’s. Just this past week states acting under federal law to clean up their voter rolls were threatened by Garland. You can’t make this up.

    Whose DOJ has failed to investigate election issues across the country, from the election technology being wide-open to foreign access and control, to ballots being mailed without proof of citizenship? Kamala Harris’s, not Donald Trump’s.

    RELATED: Tim Walz’s Democrats Are Not the Blue Dog Democrats

    And whose DOJ has made head-fakes at consumer protection, while letting drug prices soar, and who was the tie-breaking vote for the Inflation Reduction Act, which has led to Medicare Part D dropping 21 drugs and raising premiums by the double-digits, with far higher increases to come in 2025? Kamala Harris, not Donald Trump.

    America is at a crossroads, and Merrick Garland is right to be concerned about the politicization of DOJ and the federal government, but maybe he and Kamala Harris should look in the mirror.

    Congressman Matt Gaetz (R) represents the 1st Congressional District of Florida. He is a member of the 117th Congress currently serving his third term in the U.S. House of Representatives. 

    Syndicated with permission from RealClearWire.

    [ad_2]

    RealClearWire

    Source link

  • Harris bolsters White House and campaign staffing as race enters final stretch

    Harris bolsters White House and campaign staffing as race enters final stretch

    [ad_1]

    Trump says he won’t debate Harris a second time


    Trump says he won’t debate Harris a second time

    02:57

    Vice President Kamala Harris continues to build out a national presidential campaign, but is also staffing up at the White House amid a crush of press inquiries in the wake of her unexpected presidential bid.

    Her office is bringing on Nate Evans, a veteran of her short-lived 2020 presidential campaign, as a senior communications adviser. He is on detail from his most recent post as principal senior adviser for strategy and communications for Linda Thomas-Greenfield, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. Before his time with the U.S. mission at the U.N., he was a deputy chief of staff for Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and served on Harris’ 2020 campaign as head of rapid response and as New Hampshire communications director.

    Kirsten Allen, Harris’ communications director, and Ernie Apreza, her press secretary, will remain in their roles at the White House.

    A growing press and communications team continues to build out at campaign headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, led by communications director Michael Tyler and Brian Fallon, a senior communications adviser to Harris who is most notably responsible for crafting her daily message and negotiating with television networks about presidential debates and interview requests. 

    They have been joined by a handful of White House staff in recent weeks, including Ian Sams, who until last month handled press inquiries for the Biden administration regarding Republican congressional oversight investigations and the special counsel probe of President Biden’s alleged mishandling of classified documents that was eventually closed without prosecution. 

    While Harris is expected to primarily focus on campaign-related activities in the closing seven weeks before Election Day, she does still attend to official duties, including attending events Wednesday to commemorate the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. She also attends high-level national security briefings at the White House. 

    With Congress negotiating a short-term spending agreement and working through dozens of final Biden nominations, there’s always a chance she could be summoned to Capitol Hill to cast tie-breaking votes in the Senate.

    [ad_2]

    Source link