[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Trump spent his Friday morning on Fox & Friends, joining his favorite Fox News program in-studio rather than calling in as he typically does. The former president was in town after speaking at the annual Al Smith charity dinner in Manhattan Thursday evening.
Trump’s appearance was typically all over the place, with the former president talking about defunding the Department of Education, expressing an openness to campaigning with Nikki Haley, and even knocking Fox News for airing negative ads against him.
When one host complimented Trump’s jokes at the Al Smith dinner and asked who wrote them, the former president said he had a surprising answer. “I had a lot of people helping, a lot of people. A couple of people from Fox. Actually, I shouldn’t say that, but they wrote some jokes. And, for the most part, I didn’t like any of them,” he said.
A spokesman for Fox News denied Trump’s claim in a statement to CNN. “FOX News confirmed that no employee or freelancer wrote the jokes,” it read.
There was also a moment when Trump claimed that cows would cease to exist under a Harris presidency.
Trump ended the interview by saying he was planning to pay a visit to Rupert Murdoch. “I’m gonna tell him very simple because I can’t talk to anyone else about it. Don’t put on negative commercials for 21 days,” he said, referring to the span of time before Election Day. “And don’t put on their horrible people that come and lie. I’m gonna say, ‘Rupert, please, do it this way,’ and then we’re gonna have a victory.”
[ad_2]
Intelligencer Staff
Source link

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
*** lot of work is being done to make sure you’re safe at the polls and that the election process isn’t interrupted. And two important things to know if you’re voting in person this year, if there are long lines and polls close while you’re still in line, stay in line, you have *** right to vote and election officials will outline *** plan. And if you make *** mistake on your ballot, you can ask for *** new one and start over head to our app or our website and check out the commitment 2024 section for information on your local and national races, ballot issues and information on how to vote and join our news teams on election night for information and results as we learn that, thank you for joining us.
Know your rights: Essential things to know before voting at the polls
Did you make a mistake on your ballot or do you need accommodations?
A number of laws protect voters as they play their part in our democracy, so they can cast their vote confidently. Before heading to the polls on Election Day, here are the rights you need to know that protect you by law:If the polls close while you’re still in line, stay in line. You have the right to vote. If you make a mistake on your ballot, you can ask a poll worker for a new one. If the machines are down at your polling place, you can ask for a paper ballot.If you are registered to vote but your name is not listed in the poll book, you are still entitled to a provisional ballot. Your ballot will be held separately from the regular ballots until an election official determines whether you are qualified to vote and are registered. If you meet those requirements, they will count your provisional ballot.If you are a voter with a disability and need accommodations, all polling places for federal elections must be fully accessible. Voters with disabilities and those unable to read or write can choose a person to assist in all aspects of the voting process except if the assistant is the voter’s employer or union. If you have difficulty reading or writing English, you can ask for assistance. Certain jurisdictions, determined by the Census Bureau, must provide all election information that is available in English in the covered minority language. The election process must be equally accessible in the minority language as it is in English. It is illegal to intimidate, threaten or coerce someone from voting or attempting to vote, as well as people who are urging or helping others to vote. How can I report a violation? To report a possible civil rights violation, you can report it to the Civil Rights Division online at civilrights.justice.gov or by phone at 800-251-3931.To report possible federal crimes, including potential threats against voters, election officials, or election fraud, you can contact the FBI either online at tips.fbi.gov or by phone at 800-CALL-FBI.This segment is part of a half-hour news special called Commitment 2024: Get the Facts. The special helps voters get the facts on the voting process and debunks election-related disinformation that could surface in the final hours before Election Day. To watch the full special, check your local listing for air dates or watch on the Very Local app.
A number of laws protect voters as they play their part in our democracy, so they can cast their vote confidently.
Before heading to the polls on Election Day, here are the rights you need to know that protect you by law:
To report a possible civil rights violation, you can report it to the Civil Rights Division online at civilrights.justice.gov or by phone at 800-251-3931.
To report possible federal crimes, including potential threats against voters, election officials, or election fraud, you can contact the FBI either online at tips.fbi.gov or by phone at 800-CALL-FBI.
This segment is part of a half-hour news special called Commitment 2024: Get the Facts. The special helps voters get the facts on the voting process and debunks election-related disinformation that could surface in the final hours before Election Day.
To watch the full special, check your local listing for air dates or watch on the Very Local app.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Donald Trump’s appearance at the famous Al Smith dinner on Thursday was marked by his characteristic blend of humor and political commentary.
It was a glorious opportunity for the 45th President to remove whatever little filter he has and go full bore.
He took the opportunity to joke about the state of the Democrat Party and aimed devastating barbs at Vice President Kamala Harris, her running mate Tim Walz, Cryin’ Chuck Schumer, and liberals in general.
Harris was notably absent from the event but sent a video message instead. It was as cringe as you might imagine, actually using a Saturday Night Live character that mocks Catholics … at an event aiming to raise funds for Catholic charities.
Just completely out of touch.
Even comedian Jim Gaffigan, not exactly an avid Trump supporter by any stretch, took a moment to absolutely shred Harris for not making an appearance.
The follow up from Jim Gaffigan…
Just brutal https://t.co/nqEnB3sJOF— Kevin Dalton (@TheKevinDalton) October 18, 2024
But it was Trump that truly shined here, as anybody could have expected. The Republican nominee is at his best when he’s just letting loose. While his opponent continues to look and act completely like a robot, Trump delivered time and time again as a likable dude who you’d just love to hang out with.
Here are some of his best moments…
What better place to start than a joke at Kamala’s expense? Trump hammered her with this line at the Al Smith dinner referencing her plea to bail out rioters and arsonists in Minneapolis after the George Floyd riots.
“If you really wanted Vice President Harris to accept your invitation, I guess you should have told her the funds were going to bail out the looters and rioters in Minneapolis, and she would have been here, guaranteed,” Trump said.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: “But if you really wanted Vice President Harris to accept your invitation, I guess you should have told her the funds were going to bail out the looters and rioters in Minneapolis and she would’ve been here guaranteed.” pic.twitter.com/sRBNMBOKgJ
— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) October 18, 2024
He then took an epic shot at what we thought was Joe Biden at first, but take a listen. It’s even better.
“Right now we have someone in the White House who can barely talk, barely put together two coherent sentences, who seems to have the mental faculties of a child,” Trump lamented. “But enough about Kamala Harris.”
I’m DED 🤣🤣🤣
TRUMP: “Right now we have someone in the White House who can barely talk, barely put together two coherent sentences, who seems to have the mental faculties of a child…
But enough about Kamala Harris.”
— I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 (@ImMeme0) October 18, 2024
Then there was this barb at her supporters. More specifically, the folks at the ‘Dudes for Harris‘ headquarters. Paternity Pete, David Hogg, and the like.
“There’s a group called ‘White Dudes for Harris’ but I’m not worried about them at all, because their wives and their wives’ lovers are all voting for me,” he quipped.
🚨🔥😂 OMG ! TRUMP is the funniest man alive!
He is roasting White Dudes for Harris
Harry Sisson is flipping out right now and thinks this was inappropriate and doesn’t want people to laughing at the joke
😂😂😂😂😂
I see why Kamala didn’t go to the Al Smith Dinner pic.twitter.com/RQDcKmfuXT
— Terrence K. Williams (@w_terrence) October 18, 2024
Man, they’re going to be livid about that line when they get out of spin class this morning. Speaking of white ‘dudes’ for Harris, Trump figuratively murdered her running mate, Tim Walz, on a couple of occasions.
“I used to think Democrats were crazy for saying that men have periods,” Trump quipped at one point. “But then I met Tim Walz.”
Trump: “I used to think Democrats were crazy for saying that men have periods. But then I met Tim Walz.”
I can’t 😂 pic.twitter.com/XdRB35FDyC
— Sara Rose 🇺🇸🌹 (@saras76) October 18, 2024
The former President also took aim at Walz’s propensity to make claims about his military record and public service that ultimately ended up being proven untrue.
“Unfortunately, Governor Walz isn’t here himself,” he stated. “But don’t worry, he’ll say that he was.”
Donald Trump at the Al Smith Charity Dinner: “Unfortunately, Governor Walz isn’t here himself. But don’t worry, he’ll say that he was.” pic.twitter.com/KnECD1pSvo
— Andy Ngo 🏳️🌈 (@MrAndyNgo) October 18, 2024
And of course, it’s always nice to see Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) – aka Cryin’ Chuck – being made uncomfortable. And Trump delivered in spades with this comment:
“Chuck Schumer is here looking very glum — But look on the bright side, Chuck, considering how woke your party has become, if Kamala loses, you still have a chance to become the first woman president.”
Trump just ROASTED Chuck Schumer 🤣🔥
“Chuck Schumer is here looking very glum — But look on the bright side, Chuck, considering how woke your party has become, if Kamala loses, you still have a chance to become the first woman president”
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) October 18, 2024
While Trump delivered the most sensational lines of the night, we’d be remiss if we didn’t cover one particular comment by emcee Jim Gaffigan. While it was meant to be a joke, it really isn’t when you think about it.
The comedian addressed the elephant in the room. The coup Democrats just staged against their own voters’ wishes.
“The Democrats have been telling us Trump’s reelection is a threat to democracy,” he snarked. “In fact, they were so concerned of this threat, they staged a coup, ousted their democratically elected incumbent, and installed Kamala Harris.”
Jim Gaffigan: “The Democrats have been telling us Trump’s reelection is a threat to democracy. In fact, they were so concerned of this threat, they staged a coup, ousted their democratically elected incumbent, and installed Kamala Harris.” pic.twitter.com/ZVgqMbT2p5
— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) October 18, 2024
Every word of that is true. Biden was ousted. Harris was installed. And it was the biggest assault on democracy this country has seen in years.
Think about it for a minute. They removed the man Democrats voted for because of the sole reason they thought he couldn’t win. What’s to stop them from doing that again? And again.
Democrat votes no longer mean anything, if they ever did. (Superdelegates, anyone?)
We’re less than three weeks out from the election and Trump looks as relaxed as he ever was. Harris, meanwhile, looks stiff and completely out of tune with the average American.
Who are you going to vote for?
[ad_2]
Rusty Weiss
Source link

[ad_1]
Photo: Erin Schaff/AFP/Getty Images
One of the primary knocks on Kamala Harris from the far left during her failed run for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination was that she was a “cop.” The accusation was, in essence, that the former San Francisco district attorney and California attorney general was not a “progressive prosecutor,” or at least not progressive enough. She locked up too many people, for too long, without embracing the popular criminal-justice-reform proposals of that particular moment.
At the time, the New York Times ran an op-ed by a law professor entitled “Kamala Harris Was Not a Progressive Prosecutor,” which accused her of landing “often on the wrong side of history.” The accompanying photograph showed an unflattering image of Harris, mouth pursed and wagging her finger. An online activist accused Harris of “rampant anti-Blackness” and generated tens of thousands of likes. USA Today published a piece titled, “Public defender: I worked with Kamala Harris. She was the most progressive DA in California.” At the time, the piece was intended as a defense of Harris. Today, the same headline could fuel an opposition attack ad.
Indeed, the criticism that Harris was not sufficiently progressive as a prosecutor sounds anachronistic now — bizarre, even — but at the time, Harris was on her heels. She struggled to parry the “Kamala is a cop” narrative and, at times, even downplayed her own law-enforcement credentials.
But now Harris has taken a strikingly different, and far more effective, position on her prosecutorial past. It has become a cornerstone of her campaign as she shifts to the center, eager to dispel any suggestion that she was some bleeding-heart liberal, San Francisco flower-child DA who wept for her downtrodden defendants. In one of her first speeches after becoming the presumptive Democratic nominee for president in July, she jumped right in: “I took on perpetrators of all kinds — predators who abused women, fraudsters who ripped off consumers, cheaters who broke the rules for their own gain. So hear me when I say, I know Donald Trump’s type.”
Of course, it doesn’t hurt her rhetorical cause that the guy she’s running against happens to be a convicted felon — for the moment, at least. The Manhattan hush-money case stands on dubious legal footing and will soon face appellate scrutiny. But for now it’s on the books, and it’ll stay there through the election. (The other criminal cases against Trump are sputtering, and nothing’s going to be resolved anytime soon, certainly not before November.) Still, what a gift: The DA gets to run against the defendant.

Harris’s turnabout seems to be equal parts strategy and serendipity. Clearly, she has chosen to lean in and celebrate her prosecutorial background rather than apologize for it. But the times also have changed so drastically, so quickly, that the megawoke days of 2019 and 2020 feel like another historical epoch. Not long ago, politicians openly argued in favor of defunding the police, Lego halted marketing of police sets, and television networks canceled highly rated shows that followed cops on the beat. Now, candidates strain to avoid any perception that they might not fully support law enforcement.
The Trump campaign, for its part, has mostly whiffed on this issue. It’s cast about for a 2024 version of Willie Horton to throw at Harris. But thus far the effort hasn’t stuck in any meaningful way, in part because Trump’s messaging has been sporadic and scattershot. Some of the Trump campaign’s focus (fleeting as it has been) has landed on a man named Edwin Ramos — a multiple-murderer who was prosecuted by Harris’s office, convicted, and sentenced to life in prison in 2014. The rap is that Harris wouldn’t seek the death penalty in the Ramos case, or in another involving the murder of a San Francisco police officer. That criticism just hasn’t landed forcefully enough with the electorate. The fact that Harris’s office put both defendants behind bars, for life, seems to have blunted the negative impact.
While Trump’s team flounders on her prosecutorial past, Harris is boasting on the campaign trail about the countless hardened criminals she put away, as any former prosecutor would do. (Kids, trust me, if you want to go into electoral politics someday, start off at the prosecutor’s office.) She reminds voters that she stood up for crime victims. During the presidential debate, she said that she would never ask victims about their political party — a strange point, given that no prosecutor would ever do so — but that she always would ask them “How are you?” She even has made a point recently to tout her gun ownership and to tie it to her prosecutorial past: “I have a Glock. And I’ve had it for quite some time. And look, Bill, my background is in law enforcement. So there you go,” she proudly declared during her recent 60 Minutes interview. And in her interview with Fox News this week, Harris effectively brandished her prosecutorial credentials to parry questions that implied she was soft on border crime, reminding Bret Baier that she had prosecuted transnational cartels.
I suspect the Trump campaign will try again to paint her as a permissive, soft-on-crime DA — but the cement has already largely dried on the issue. Those “Kamala the Cop” memes certainly hurt Harris the last time she ran. But now she wears the label like a badge.
This article will also appear in the free CAFE Brief newsletter. You can find more analysis of law and politics from Elie Honig, Preet Bharara, Joyce Vance, and other CAFE contributors at cafe.com.
[ad_2]
Elie Honig
Source link
[ad_1]
WASHINGTON (AP) — Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ campaign is dismissing accusations that she and a co-author plagiarized parts of a 2009 book on the U.S. criminal justice system as a desperate attempt by “rightwing operatives” to distract voters.
Plagiarism experts and academics who reviewed the claims said several were benign or could not be proven, and others were more due to careless writing than malicious intent.
The allegations surrounding the book, “Smart on Crime: A Career Prosecutor’s Plan to Make Us Safer,” surfaced Monday when conservative activist Christopher Rufo posted an article on his Substack platform that listed a handful of passages he said were copied from other sources without any or adequate attribution.
“Taken in total, there is certainly a breach of standards here,” Rufo wrote. “Harris and her co-author duplicated long passages nearly verbatim without proper citation and without quotation marks, which is the textbook definition of plagiarism.”
James Singer, a spokesman for the Harris campaign, said in an emailed statement that the plagiarism allegations represent a partisan attack on a book Harris co-authored more than a decade ago.
“Rightwing operatives are getting desperate as they see the bipartisan coalition of support Vice President Harris is building to win this election, as (former president Donald) Trump retreats to a conservative echo chamber refusing to face questions about his lies,” Singer wrote. “This is a book that’s been out for 15 years, and the vice president clearly cited sources and statistics in footnotes and endnotes throughout.”
Rufo’s article cited a new study of Harris’ 248-page book by Stefan Weber, an Austrian academic known in Europe as a “plagiarism hunter.” Among the findings, the book plagiarized a section from a Wikipedia article and made up a childhood anecdote that originated with Martin Luther King Jr., according to Weber.
Trump’s running mate, Ohio Republican Sen. JD Vance, seized on the allegations to needle Harris.
“Hi, I’m JD Vance. I wrote my own book, unlike Kamala Harris, who copied hers from Wikipedia,” he wrote on X. Vance’s 2016 memoir, “ Hillbilly Elegy ” recounts his blue-collar upbringing in Kentucky and Ohio.
The allegation involving King centers on a story Harris said her mother told her about a time when she was fussing as a toddler. Her mother, according to the book, asked her what was wrong and what she wanted. “I wailed back, ‘Fweedom,’” Harris wrote. Weber said Harris appropriated the anecdote, without attribution, from an interview King gave in 1965.
But other plagiarism experts questioned the severity of the claims. Jonathan Bailey, a consultant and publisher of the website Plagiarism Today, said in a Tuesday post that the King story allegation first arose in early 2021 and couldn’t be proven based on available evidence. But several other plagiarism accusations are more troublesome, he said, including Weber’s allegation that Harris’ book copied and pasted, without citation, a section of a Wikipedia article.
But the patterns in the book point to “sloppy writing habits, not a malicious intent to defraud,” he said.
What to know about the 2024 Election
“Though some of the passages, such as the Wikipedia one, are sloppy to the point of negligence, when you look at the portion of the book involved, the nature of the issues, and the citations provided, negligence remains more likely than malice in my eyes,” Bailey wrote.
Miguel Roig, a psychology professor at St. John’s University in New York who studies plagiarism in the sciences, said the lapses described by Weber meet the definition of plagiarism. But, he added, context is important. The problematic passages amount to a small total of the overall book and “hardly seems like an attempt to defraud,” he said.
“Any time minor issues like these occur, the offending authors should simply acknowledge the obvious errors, apologize, and make corrections where feasible, and just move on,” Roig said.
Harris wrote “Smart on Crime” when she was the district attorney for San Francisco. The book spelled out her ideas for improving public safety and making the criminal justice system more effective. In 2010, a year after the book was published, she was elected attorney general of California.
Harris’ co-author, Joan O’C. Hamilton, works as a book collaborator and ghostwriter, according to her website.
Weber, the plagiarism researcher in Austria, said in an email that much of the work to check Harris’s book was done by an associate whom he did not identify. But he said the associate was “driven by personal choice and interest, not by political motivations.” This was Weber’s first “international case,” he said.
He also said he was unaware until the Harris review had been released that Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, had published books.
“Every scientist can feel free to check the books of Donald Trump or whomsoever as we did it with Kamala Harris,” Weber said.
Debora Weber-Wulff, a professor of media and computing at Berlin University of Applied Sciences in Germany and no relation to Weber, sided with Bailey’s assessment and said the book’s publisher would have to decide whether any problems justify removing it from sales. Any legal action is unlikely because the original author of the plagiarized content would have to pursue a potentially costly lawsuit.
“No one in their right mind would invite a suit like this,” Weber-Wulff said. “Only the lawyers profit.”
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
MINNEAPOLIS — Analysts say national polls that show how tight the race is between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris are not key indicators ahead of the election.
Instead, they say your focus should be on polls in the swing states since the winner of the presidency is not determined by the popular vote, but by the electoral college.
Hamline University professor David Schultz says nothing has really shifted in months in national polls.
“Ignore all the national polls,” he said. “What’s really critical to look at are the polls in the swing states, and they are close.”
States like Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin will likely decide the election, Schultz said.
University of Minnesota professor Larry Jacobs said “I think folks need to kind of chill out on the poll consumption… I think the key thing to know is this race is as close as we’ve seen. It may be another photo finish like we saw in 2016 and 2020.”
Democratic strategist Abou Amara said that the polls are important for both campaigns because they still make key decisions based on them.
“The polling is driving nearly every decision of the campaign,” Amara said. “Where you’re going to campaign, who you’re going to talk to, the messages you want to get across, and the timing in which you’re going to do that.”
Republican strategist Amy Koch says the national polls are meaningless.
“Trump has been in the lead in six of the seven battlegrounds,” she said. “If that holds, Trump will win this election.”
[ad_2]
Esme Murphy
Source link

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Vice President Kamala Harris, who is registered to vote in California, said Wednesday that she still needs to take a look at Proposition 36, a tough-on-crime measure on California’s Nov. 5 ballot that would reverse some progressive criminal justice reforms voters approved a decade ago.
“I’ve not voted yet and I’ve actually not read it yet,” Harris told reporters ahead of a flight from Detroit to New Jersey, in response to a question about Proposition 36. “But I’ll let you know.”
Harris’ campaign has previously declined to answer questions from The Times about how she will vote on Proposition 36. Continued silence from the Democratic presidential nominee, who has touted her record as California’s top law enforcement official, comes as Republicans work to make crime a key point of attack this election season.
At a campaign rally in California over the weekend, former President Trump, the GOP nominee, cast the state as a lawless mess with “the most homelessness, the most crime, the most decay and the most illegal aliens.”
Helmed by a group of prosecutors, and financed by WalMart, In-N-Out Burger and the California Republican Party, Proposition 36 would impose harsher sentences for repeat offenses of drug possession and retail theft, and would turn some crimes involving fentanyl and shoplifting from misdemeanors into felonies.
It would also give people who routinely commit drug crimes the option to receive substance abuse treatment, but skeptics have raised questions about how counties would pay for treatment.
The California GOP endorsed Proposition 36 and, according to state campaign finance reports, has spent more than $1 million in favor of the measure. The political committee behind Proposition 36, which has promoted its bipartisan support, donated $1 million to the California Republican Party in recent weeks.
Several polls have found strong voter support for Proposition 36, despite opposition from Gov. Gavin Newsom and Democratic leaders of the state Legislature.
If passed, Proposition 36 would change key parts of Proposition 47, a 2014 ballot measure that was overwhelmingly approved by Californians. As attorney general at the time, Harris did not take a position on Proposition 47. She had decided it would be a conflict of interest to weigh in, a top aide said, because she was in charge of writing the title and ballot summaries that are presented before voters.
Proposition 47 reduced the number of people serving prison sentences for nonviolent theft and drug offenses, and redirected millions of dollars each year into anti-recidivism programs. Instead, Proposition 47 called for misdemeanor charges for individuals who steal merchandise valued under $950 or commit some drug crimes.
[ad_2]
Anabel Sosa, Noah Bierman
Source link

[ad_1]
Lord Jamar, a popular rapper and actor who has appeared on The Sopranos, tore into Vice President Kamala Harris, saying she is “insulting to black people.”
Jamar, a founding member of the hip-hop group Brand Nubian, made the comments in an interview with “The Art of Dialogue” on Saturday.
“This woman, to me, is not qualified to run, you know, a Dunkin’ Donuts or a 7-Eleven, let alone the corporation that we call the United States of America,” he declared.
In his expletive-laden analysis of the election, Jamar focused on elements that often lead to Harris being declared unlikable.
“She cackles all the […] time. She lies. She doesn’t answer a […] question — not once during that debate did she answer anything that was asked of her,” he added.
Lord Jamar, whose real name is Lorenzo Dechalus, is exposing a major problem for Kamala Harris – she has no credibility with black voters, particularly men.
Barack Obama recognizes that fact. It’s why he lectured black men and called them sexist for not wanting to cast their vote for the Vice President.
Harris struggles immensely in trying to connect with minority communities. A rich history of trying to prosecute parents in low-income minority families for their kids’ school attendance doesn’t help. Nor does an extensive past of prosecutions involving marijuana.
And her recent plan to help the black community by enticing them with weed and crypto is further damaging her poll numbers with black male voters.
She doesn’t have an authentic bone in her body. Jamar recognizes that.
“She (Harris) thinks we are stupid and that we’re going to vote for her off of identity politics,” he said.
“I feel that she’s so bad … she’s the one that scares me. I feel that she’s so bad that guess what? I might just go […] around and vote for Trump and this is my first time saying this out loud,” he added.
Jamar chastised Democrats for “think(ing) you’re gonna shame” somebody into voting for Harris.
“Absolutely not.”
Jamar’s comments were more than just ripping Kamala Harris. They were also about defending Trump a little bit from lies coming out of her campaign.
For instance, the ‘he said he’s going to be a dictator’ hoax.
“People want to act like Trump is the worst […] in the world, but guess what? He was already president and all this […] that you’re talking about didn’t happen,” he said.
“He didn’t make himself a dictator and this whole […] about ‘he’s going to make himself a dictator’ is really taken so out of context that it’s ridiculous,” added Jamar.
“He said he’d make himself a dictator on the first day, you know, to do some – implement some […] and then, you know, but that was, trust me, said tongue-in-cheek, it was not said seriously.”
As reported by The Political Insider, Trump’s comments were meant in jest. Somehow Democrats, the Harris campaign, and the media all turned that into ‘he’s literally telling you he’s Hitler.’
Jamar believes that it’s not just black men who aren’t with Kamala Harris either.
“Trust me the sentiment on the street in the real world is a lot of people are not […] with this woman,” he said. “They see right through her, and they’re trying to blame it on Black men, but no, I see a lot of Black women that are not […] with her neither.”
Harris is heading for an election nightmare where she scores a lower percentage of the black vote than Joe ‘white as the driven snow’ Biden.
[ad_2]
Rusty Weiss
Source link

[ad_1]
People cheer at a Trump rally in Aurora, Colorado, on October 11, 2024.
Photo: Michael Ciaglo/Getty Images
It’s been clear for some time that Donald Trump is laying the groundwork to attempt to deny and challenge an election defeat. But Team Trump is also working to ensure that he won’t have to deny the results — and not just by convincing more voters that his policies are better for America. To put it very simply, the Trump campaign, the Republican Party, and its super-PAC allies are devoting a lot of resources to suppressing the Democratic vote in key states. These strategies include:
In addition to reducing the Harris vote (via a combination of ballot-eligibility challenges or heavy-handed intimidation of voters), all these MAGA boots on the ground can help build the post-election case that a Harris win was tainted with fraud. This time, Team Trump’s legal team will be much more organized than Rudy Giuliani’s Keystone Cops ensemble, which tried to capitalize on scattered election-fraud rumors and social-media claims in 2020. With so many campaign operatives working as election administrators or observers, there will be plenty of election-fraud allegations to fuel Trump lawsuits, with or without merit.
All this activity, along with years of Trump claims that Democrats cannot beat him without cheating, will predispose his MAGA base to accept whatever he chooses to claim about the “integrity” of the election. As the initial votes come in on Election Night, he may repeat his premature victory claim from 2020 and demand that vote counting stop with him slightly ahead (if indeed that “red mirage” reappears before it’s dispelled by the “blue shift” of mail ballots). If he does, we could see on-the-ground Trump operatives and volunteers demand that state- and county-election offices “stop the steal.” He will have another moment of truth if the Associated Press and other major media outlets call the race for Harris, which will be deemed conclusive by most people outside MAGA-land.
Trump will ultimately have to decide whether to concede or remain defiant on December 11, the federal deadline for state certifications of the vote. The Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022 was designed to minimize the odds of any challenge to the results after that date.
But whether or not the 45th president has a workable strategy for turning defeat into victory after Election Day, there’s no question his minions are trying hard to twist the system to maximize the possibility that Trump will win without having to stage another insurrection. If Trump does wind up back in the White House, he may interrupt his cries of triumph and threats of vengeance long enough to utter pieties about wanting to be the president of all the people. That ought to include not just letting them, but encouraging them, to vote.
[ad_2]
Ed Kilgore
Source link

[ad_1]
On Tuesday, Oct. 15, Spelman College hosted a screening of Chisholm ’72: Unbought & Unbossed, a documentary chronicling Shirley Chisholm’s 1972 campaign as the first Black woman to run for president of the United States. The screening took place on campus in the Camille Olivia Hanks Cosby Ed.D. Auditorium.
This screening aligns with the 2024 presidential election currently featuring Kamala Harris, the first female and African American Vice President, who is the current Democratic presidential nominee.
“Looking for a road to freedom, take the Chisholm trail.” These lyrics were sung by Jesse Jackson’s Operation PUSH Choir during Shirley Chisholm’s history-making run for President of the United States. The phrase “Chisholm Trail” is a clever play on words, connecting Shirley Chisholm’s name with the historic cattle-driving route used in the post-Civil War era. Just as that trail symbolized progress and opportunity, Chisholm’s presidential run carved a new path in the post-Civil Rights era, inspiring generations to pursue political freedom and representation, a message particularly relevant as the 2024 election approaches.
The documentary, opened with a rap ad from the “Rock the Vote” campaign, aimed at encouraging youth involvement in politics. From there, it moved to Chisholm’s 1972 announcement of her candidacy for president, setting the tone for the film’s exploration of her groundbreaking campaign. Chisholm was not only the first Black woman to run for the highest office in the nation, but she also broke new ground as an African American in U.S. politics.
The film, which runs 1 hour and 17 minutes, provides a rich look at Chisholm’s life, including her family’s move from Barbados to New York and her rise in political advocacy. It also features testimonials from key figures in her life, such as Victor L. Robles, her ex-husband Conrad Chisholm, Octavia Butler, Reverend Walter Fauntroy, and Bobby Seale.
Following the screening, a panel discussion was held featuring the film’s director, Shola Lynch, who made her directorial debut with this documentary in 2004, and is now the Diana King Endowed Professor at Spelman College. Joining her was Dr. Ayoka Chenzira, Professor Emerita of Art and Visual Culture at Spelman. The two engaged in a thoughtful conversation about Chisholm’s legacy and the impact her candidacy had on future generations of women and people of color in politics.
“If I couldn’t see her, how would the rest of the world see her?” Lynch recalled, referring to the lack of media coverage around Chisholm’s run. “The news didn’t cover her run for president because nobody thought that she would win.” Lynch also spoke about the research process behind the documentary. “It’s not a documentary if you don’t do research,” she said, remarking on the importance of digging into archives, especially for Black history, which is often under-documented. “Even in the film, the best footage was taken by two students who talked Chisholm into letting them follow her around.”
The discussion was opened up to audience questions, allowing attendees to reflect on their personal connections to Chisholm’s legacy and how her story resonates today. During the Q&A session, Lynch reflected on how history is much like a relay race, with each generation building on the last. “We wouldn’t be here today if it weren’t for Shirley Chisholm, and I wish she was around to see it,” Lynch said. She noted that Chisholm was not the only trailblazer, mentioning others like Jesse Jackson and Barack Obama, whose campaigns furthered the legacy Chisholm helped create.
Lynch also challenged the audience to think about their own activism. “If you’re a political person, if you’re an activist, if you believe in justice, how is that part of your life every day?” Lynch asked, urging everyone to reflect on how they can honor the work of leaders like Chisholm by actively participating in shaping the future of political freedom and representation.
As Chisholm stated in the documentary, “I want to be remembered as a woman who fought for change in the 20th century.” Her legacy, evident in the 2024 election and beyond, knowingly, or unknowingly continues to inspire and encourage a new generation of political activists and leaders.
[ad_2]
Noah Washington
Source link

[ad_1]
CUMMING, GA. – The first day to cast ballots as part of the early voting period in Georgia was Tuesday, Oct. 15, and former United States President Donald J. Trump, the Republican candidate for the presidency, wasted no time returning to the Peach State to talk to voters. United States Vice President Kamala Harris has a rally scheduled in Cobb County on Saturday. Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff and Minnesota First Lady Gwen Walz were also campaigning in metro Atlanta on behalf of the Harris-Walz campaign this week. Former United States President Bill Clinton was also on the campaign trail, speaking with supporters in Columbus, Fort Valley, and Perry over the weekend.
As of 2 pm there were nearly 190,000 votes cast throughout the state, according to the Secretary of State’s Office.
Trump was in Cumming for a taping of a town hall on The Faulkner Focus show. Hosted by Fox News on-air talent Harris Faulkner, the town hall was held in the Reid Barn and is scheduled to air on Wednesday, Oct. 16 at 11 am. Trump took part in a similar town hall in Oak, Pennsylvania, on Monday night. The former president also held a rally at the Cobb Energy Performing Arts Centre. Harris held a rally at the same venue in September.
The town hall had a unique look as the audience comprised only women. This was by design, according to Faulkner, because women make up the majority of voters in this country. According to data from the Center for American Women and Politics, more than 82% of women registered voters took part in the 2020 election. In comparison, 72% of registered male voters cast ballots in 2020.
Faulkner mentioned the record-setting early voting in Georgia to Trump and he took a moment to ask the crowd who they voted for and chants of “Trump, Trump” began. Trump said “Thank you” in response.
Members of the audience were allowed to ask Trump questions and the first was from a woman from Milton and was about affordability of gas and groceries. He answered the question in parts, but also drifted to mentioning the border and “letting all of these criminals into our country.”
Trump said, “We had the best economy in the history of our country,” a number of times during the first 10 minutes of the town hall.
The second question from a member of the audience from Brooklyn, New York, and now living in Fulton County, was about addressing the transgender issue in women’s sports. “That’s such an easy question. We’re not going to let that happen,” said Trump. He told stories of transgender athletes in volleyball and boxing competitions. Asked how he would stop it, Trump said, “You just ban it. The president just bans it.”
Questions from the all-female audience ranged from the cost of child care, immigration, immigrant crime, the death of Laken Riley, the young Augusta University nursing student that was murdered by an illegal immigrant in February, abortion, foreign policy, and the recent responses to hurricanes Helene and Milton.
Trump failed to give definitive answers on how he would address the fiscal concerns, but still received applause for the answers he gave. He said things like, “We are going to end all sanctuary cities. We can do things in terms of moving people out.”
Regarding immigration, Trump answered a Vietnamese women’s question with, “We don’t want murderers, we don’t want drug dealers, we don’t want human traffickers.”
On Harris and the border Trump repeated a common phrase he uses at rallies: “She was made the border czar and she is the worst.” He also mentioned Aurora, Colorado and Springfield, Ohio, as places that are overrun by immigrants. Faulkner did say that many of the immigrants are in this country legally.
“They are destroying our country,” Trump said. “Our country is in trouble.”
On the recent hurricane response Trump said the United States gives “hundreds of millions of dollars to countries, many of them you have never heard of.” He called the responses from the current Biden-Harris administration and FEMA the worst in the history of the country.
Following the third commercial break, abortion was the topic of discussion. Pamela, a Danville, California native and Cumming, Georgia resident asked Trump why the government is involved in women’s reproductive rights.
Trump gave a rambling response that could not be seen as a definitive answer to Pam’s question. “This issue has torn the country apart for 52 years,” he said. He went on to say that leaving abortion laws in the hands of the individual states is what’s best for this particular issue.
Alicia, a Black wife, mother, and United States Army veteran from Fulton County, said she voted for Trump on Tuesday morning and said she “hopes it gets counted.” Her question to Trump was about restoring peace around the world without having to be the world’s police force.
“We cannot be taken advantage of any longer,” Trump said during his answer to Alicia’s question.
Faulkner participated in a similar-looking panel with Trump during the first day of the annual National Association of Black Journalists convention (NABJ) in Chicago in July. Along with ABC News Senior Congressional Correspondent Rachel Scott and Kadia Goba, a politics reporter at Semafor, Faulkner interviewed the former president on a stage in a large ballroom. The panel is best known for going off the rails than it is for any policy or political points that were made.
Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear spearheaded a Kamala Harris rally in Forsyth County in July before Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz was selected as her running mate. For generations, the Republican stronghold has been skewing bluer these days, but there will have to be a huge change for Democrats to win this county. In 2020, Trump secured nearly 66% of the county’s vote (85,122) compared to current United States President Joseph R. Biden’s 32% (42,203). Despite the results in Forsyth County, Biden still managed to win the state by just under 12,000 votes.
[ad_2]
Donnell Suggs
Source link
[ad_1]
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Former President Donald Trump on Tuesday amplified false rumors that Haitian immigrants in Ohio were abducting and eating pets, repeating during a televised debate the type of inflammatory and anti-immigrant rhetoric he has promoted throughout his campaigns.
There is no evidence that Haitian immigrants in an Ohio community are doing that, officials say. But during the debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump specifically mentioned Springfield, Ohio, the town at the center of the claims, saying that immigrants were taking over the city.
“They’re eating the dogs. They’re eating the cats. They’re eating the pets of the people that live there,” he said.
Harris called Trump “extreme” and laughed after his comment. Debate moderators pointed out that city officials have said the claims are not true.
Trump’s comments echoed claims made by his campaign, including his running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, and other Republicans. The claims attracted attention this week when Vance posted on social media that his office has “received many inquiries” about Haitian migrants abducting pets. Vance acknowledged Tuesday it was possible “all of these rumors will turn out to be false.”
Officials have said there have been no credible or detailed reports about the claims, even as Trump and his allies use them to amplify racist stereotypes about Black and brown immigrants.
While president, Trump questioned why the U.S. would accept people from “s—-hole” countries such as Haiti and some in Africa. His 2024 campaign has focused heavily on illegal immigration, often referencing in his speeches crimes committed by migrants. He argues immigrants are responsible for driving up crime and drug abuse in the United States and taking resources from American citizens.
Here’s a closer look at how the false claims have spread.
On Sept. 6, a post surfaced on X that shared what looked like a screengrab of a social media post apparently out of Springfield. The retweeted post talked about the person’s “neighbor’s daughter’s friend” seeing a cat hanging from a tree to be butchered and eaten, claiming without evidence that Haitians lived at the house. The accompanying photo showed a Black man carrying what appeared to be a Canada goose by its feet. That post continued to get shared on social media.
On Monday, Vance posted on X. “Reports now show that people have had their pets abducted and eaten by people who shouldn’t be in this country. Where is our border czar?” he said. The next day, Vance posted again on X about Springfield, saying his office had received inquires from residents who said “their neighbors’ pets or local wildlife were abducted by Haitian migrants. It’s possible, of course, that all of these rumors will turn out to be false.”
Other Republicans shared similar posts. Among them was Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, who posted a photo of kittens with a caption that said to vote for Trump “So Haitian immigrants don’t eat us.”
Hours before Trump’s debate with Harris, he posted two related photos on his social media site. One Truth Social post was a photo of Trump surrounded by cats and geese. Another featured armed cats wearing MAGA hats.
A billboard campaign launched by the Republican Party of Arizona at 12 sites in metropolitan Phoenix plays off the false rumors. The billboard image resembles a Chick-fil-A ad, portraying four kittens and urging people to “Vote Republican!” and “Eat Less Kittens.”
What to know about the 2024 Election
Chick-fil-A said the party didn’t reach out to the restaurant chain before running the ad, declining to comment further. In a statement, the state party said the ad humorously underscores the need for border security.
The office of the Springfield city manager, Bryan Heck, issued a statement knocking down the rumors.
“In response to recent rumors alleging criminal activity by the immigrant population in our city, we wish to clarify that there have been no credible reports or specific claims of pets being harmed, injured or abused by individuals within the immigrant community,” Heck’s office said in an emailed statement.
Springfield police on Monday told the Springfield News-Sun that they had received no reports of stolen or eaten pets.
Gov. Mike DeWine, R-Ohio, held a news conference Tuesday to address the influx of Haitian immigrants to Springfield. He said he will send state troopers to Springfield to help local law enforcement deal with traffic issues and is earmarking $2.5 million over two years to provide more primary health care to immigrant families.
DeWine declined to address the allegations, deferring comment to local officials. But he repeatedly spoke in support of the people of Haiti, where his family has long operated a charity.
An entirely unrelated incident that occurred last month in Canton, Ohio, quickly and erroneously conflated into the discussion.
On Aug. 26, Canton police charged a 27-year-old woman with animal cruelty and disorderly conduct after she “did torture, kill, and eat a cat in a residential area in front (of) multiple people,” according to a police report.
But Allexis Ferrell is not Haitian. She was born in Ohio and graduated from Canton’s McKinley High School in 2015, according to public records and newspaper reports. Court records show she has been in and out of trouble with the law since at least 2017. Messages seeking comment were not returned by several attorneys who have represented her.
She is being held in Stark County jail pending a competency hearing next month, according to the prosecutor’s office.
The posts create a false narrative and could be dangerous for Haitians in the United States, according to Guerline Jozef, founder and executive director of the Haitian Bridge Alliance, a group that supports and advocates for immigrants of African descent
“We are always at the receiving end of all kind of barbaric, inhumane narratives and treatments, specifically when it comes to immigration,” Jozef said in a phone interview.
Her comments echoed White House national security spokesman John Kirby.
“There will be people that believe it, no matter how ludicrous and stupid it is,” Kirby said. “And they might act on that kind of information, and act on it in a way where somebody could get hurt. So it needs to stop.”
Springfield, a city of roughly 60,000, has seen its Haitian population grow in recent years. It’s impossible to give an exact number, according to the city, but it estimates Springfield’s entire county has an overall immigrant population of 15,000.
The city also says that the Haitian immigrants are in the country legally under a federal program that allows for them to remain in the country temporarily. Last month the Biden administration granted eligibility for temporary legal status to about 300,000 Haitians already in the United States because conditions in Haiti are considered unsafe for them to return. Haiti’s government has extended a state of emergency to the entire country due to endemic gang violence.
Another matter cropping up and raised by Trump in an email Monday is the August 2023 death of an 11-year-old boy after a vehicle driven by an immigrant from Haiti hit the boy’s school bus. After that, residents demanding answers about the immigrant community spoke out at city council meetings.
Catalini reported from Trenton, New Jersey, and Shipkowski from Toms River, New Jersey.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Republicans turned Tim Walz’s outing at a dog park nearly three years ago into an attack on the Democratic vice presidential nominee this week, working on a false online narrative to paint Walz as a liar.
The intended takeaway was that Walz somehow lied about the identity of his dog, Scout, by describing two different dogs as his beloved pet in separate X posts. Social media users shared screenshots of the posts as alleged proof that the Minnesota governor exhibits a pattern of deceit, garnering thousands of likes, shares and reactions across platforms.
In one post, from June 2022, Walz is pictured hugging a black dog. The caption reads, “Sending a special birthday shoutout to our favorite pup, Scout.” The other, posted in October 2022, showed Walz beside a brown and white dog with the caption: “Couldn’t think of a better way to spend a beautiful fall day than at the dog park. I know Scout enjoyed it.”
In response, Walz supporters shared posts on social media showing that Walz was simply playing with someone else’s dog while mentioning Scout in the caption.
The seemingly innocuous post was not the only fodder that has been used against Walz in recent days. A joke he cracked in a campaign video with Vice President Kamala Harris about eating “white guy tacos” was used to accuse him of lying about how much he seasons his food. Opponents have also taken issue with Walz describing himself as a former high school football coach, pointing out that he was the defensive coordinator.
False and misleading claims of such a trivial nature might not seem particularly harmful, but a deluge of them could easily add up to real damage at the polls, according to experts. This is especially true when they go after a figure such as Walz, who is still relatively unknown on the national stage, though the fact that he is not at the top of the ticket could lessen the impact on the Harris-Walz campaign.
“It might seem trivial, and in some cases they really truly are, but they’re trying to make a larger attack about character that fits in a bigger narrative that is being created around this persona,” Emily Vraga, a professor at the University of Minnesota who studies political misinformation, said of the recent attacks on Walz. “This becomes kind of a piece of the puzzle they’re trying to assemble.”
She added that “the sheer amount” of false claims can create the perception that there is some truth to them, even if voters don’t believe every single one.
Nathan Walter, an associate professor at Northwestern University who also studies misinformation, agreed that any one piece of misinformation doesn’t have to be significant in order to be damaging.
“The idea is to attack someone’s personality, and then these attacks become really almost like the canary in the coal mine, right?” he said. “So if he lies about his dog, if he lies about his illustrious career as a coach, he probably lies about many other things.”
Democrats have recently deployed a similarly shallow line of attack on the Republican ticket, Ohio Sen. JD Vance and former President Donald Trump, branding the pair as “weird.”
Mixed in with the frivolous attacks on Walz is criticism about other inconsistencies. For example, earlier this month Walz went after Vance by saying, “If it was up to him, I wouldn’t have a family because of IVF.” But his wife Gwen Walz issued a statement last week that disclosed they had relied on a different fertility treatment known as intrauterine insemination, or IUI.
What to know about the 2024 Election
Walz’s military record has also faced intense scrutiny from the right. One such concern is that he portrayed himself as someone who spent time in a combat zone when speaking out about gun violence in 2018. “We can make sure that those weapons of war, that I carried in war, is the only place where those weapons are at,” he said at the time.
Walz never served in a combat zone during 24 years in the Army National Guard, but held many other roles. They included work as an infantryman and field artillery cannoneer, as well as a deployment to Italy in a support position of active military forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Vraga described the more superficial attacks as a “spaghetti approach,” in which Republicans are throwing out a lot of claims to see if they stick in place of a meatier narrative, dominating online discourse in the meantime. Plus, the idea that Walz is a liar “plays into this established worldview that we have about politicians as untrustworthy,” according to Walter.
Even in the polarized political climate of 2024, where many people on all sides hold strong beliefs unlikely to be changed by online name-calling, negative campaigning has the potential to repel potential voters altogether.
Such attacks could be used to demobilize voters, especially those who are not deeply engaged. “You might just start feeling like, why bother with politics at all?” Vraga said. “It’s just nasty.”
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
In a press conference from his Los Angeles-area golf club, former President Donald Trump revisited several topics from Tuesday night’s debate, repeating several false and misleading claims on issues including crime, the economy and immigration.
Here’s are the facts:
CLAIM: New numbers show that crime has skyrocketed under the Biden administration.
THE FACTS: Violent crime surged during the pandemic, with homicides increasing nearly 30% in 2020 over the previous year — the largest one-year jump since the FBI began keeping records.
But FBI data released in June shows that the overall violent crime rate declined 15% in the first three months of 2024 compared to the same period last year. One expert has cautioned, however, that those figures are preliminary and may overstate the actual reduction in crime.
On Friday, Trump cited numbers he said were from the “bureau of justice statistics” to claim crime was up. This appears to be a reference to the National Crime Victimization Survey recently released by the Justice Department, which shows that the number of times people were victims of violent crime increased by about 40% from 2020 to 2023. The report notes, however, that while the rate of violent victimizations in 2023 was higher than it was in 2020 and 2021, it was not statistically different from the rate in 2019, when Trump was president.
That survey aims to capture both crimes reported to police and crimes that are not reported to police and is conducted annually through interviews with about 150,000 households. It doesn’t include murders or crimes against people under the age of 12.
CLAIM: Thousands of people are being killed by “illegal migrants” in the U.S.
THE FACTS: This is not supported by evidence. FBI statistics do not separate crimes by the immigration status of the assailant, nor is there any evidence of a spike in crime perpetrated by migrants, either along the U.S.-Mexico border or in cities seeing the greatest influx of migrants, like New York. In fact, national statistics show violent crime is on the way down.
CLAIM: Prices have gone up “like no one’s ever seen before.”
THE FACTS: That’s not accurate. Inflation did soar in 2021-22, though it rose by much more in 1980 when inflation topped 14%. It peaked at 9.1% in June 2022.
Economists largely blame the inflation spike on the pandemic’s disruptions to global supply chains, which reduced the supply of semiconductors, cars and other goods. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine also pushed up gas and food prices. And Biden’s stimulus checks and other spending contributed by turbocharging spending coming out of the pandemic.
Inflation has now fallen to 2.5%, not far from the Federal Reserve’s 2% target. Prices are still about 19% higher than they were before the pandemic, but the Census Bureau reported Tuesday that household incomes have risen by a similar amount, leaving inflation-adjusted incomes at roughly the same level as they were in 2019.
CLAIM: The voting system isn’t honest. Millions and millions of ballots are sent out “all over the place. Some people get two, three, four or five.”
THE FACTS: Election officials have procedures in place to ensure that only one mail ballot is issued to each eligible voter. When a voter requests a mail ballot, election officials will verify that person’s eligibility by checking voter registration records — looking to match the voter’s information to what’s on file and, in some cases, checking that the voter’s signature matches as well.
What to know about the 2024 Election
When a ballot is sent out by an election office, that ballot is assigned to that specific voter. If someone else tries to use that ballot, the voter’s information will not match the office’s records for that ballot and it will be rejected. Election officials constantly update their voter lists to ensure they are accurate, removing dead people, those who have moved out of state or are not eligible.
In some cases, ballots are canceled — if a voter makes a mistake and requests a new ballot or decides to vote in person instead of using a mail ballot. In those cases, the original ballot is marked in such a way that if that original ballot were to show up at the election office it would be flagged and rejected.
At one point in his remarks, Trump singled out California, where all voters receive a ballot in the mail. He suggested he would win if votes were counted honestly. He has made this claim before and it is a reach. Just 23% of California voters are registered as Republican while 46% are registered as Democrats. He lost to Hillary Clinton in 2016 in California by 4.2 million votes, and he lost the state to Biden in 2020 by 5.1 million votes.
CLAIM: A whistleblower forced the government’s recent downward revision of job gains by 818,000.
THE FACTS: That’s false. The preliminary revision occurred as part of a normal annual process and was released on a previously disclosed date. Every year the Labor Department issues a revision of the number of jobs added during a 12-month period from April through March in the previous year.
The adjustment is made because the government’s initial job counts are based on surveys of businesses. The revision is then based on actual job counts from unemployment insurance files that are compiled later. The revision is compiled by career government employees with little involvement by politically appointed officials.
CLAIM: Harris and the Biden administration are secretly flying in hundreds of thousands of “illegal immigrants.”
THE FACTS: Migrants are not secretly being flown into the U.S. by the government. Under a Biden policy in effect since January 2023, up to 30,000 people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela can enter the country monthly if they apply online with a financial sponsor and arrive at a specified airport, paying their own way. Biden exercised his “parole” authority, which, under a 1952 law, allows him to admit people “only on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.”
___ Associated Press writers Alanna Durkin Richer, Chris Rugaber, Christina Almeida Cassidy and Elliot Spagat contributed to this story.
AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck.
[ad_2]