ReportWire

Tag: justin kuritzkes

  • Challengers Attempts to Challenge Jules and Jim in the Love Triangle Genre

    Challengers Attempts to Challenge Jules and Jim in the Love Triangle Genre

    [ad_1]

    In what is now surely the “instant classic” movie poster for Challengers, there is an illustrated version of Tashi Duncan (Zendaya)—her hair cropped short—wearing sunglasses that reflect two tennis-playing men, Patrick Zweig (Josh O’Connor) and Arthur “Art” Donaldson (Mike Faist), in each lens. A faint hint of a devious smirk on her face, everything about the poster suggests that she’s not only the “puppetmaster” of these two white boys, but also someone who gets a perverse (and sexual) thrill out of watching them compete with each other…specifically over (tennis) courting her favor (and yes, Challengers is now easily among the best “tennis movies,” complete with a Venus Williams nod of approval [sorry King Richard]). 

    Director Luca Guadagnino, who perfected the art of homoerotic repression constantly about to bubble to the surface in 2017’s Call Me By Your Name, does so to an even more sophisticated and nuanced degree here. With a script penned by playwright Justin Kuritzkes (who also happens to be married to Past Lives writer-director Celine Song), the barbing nature of the dialogue is mirrored not only by the high-octane back and forth on the tennis court, but also the high-octane soundtrack—provided by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross—to match. Even during moments when audiences wouldn’t typically expect…namely, during tense scenes of dialogue where the sparring is done with words instead of rackets. And oh, how there are so many tense scenes that make it irresistible for Guadagnino to use the Reznor/Ross-produced music (which, at times, sounds like it was made by New Order). Not that there aren’t plenty of other moments when “normal” music is used, too. Specifically to indicate what year of the 2000s it is. Even though, when Tashi first comes up to Patrick and Art’s hotel room, and it’s supposed to be 2006, Blood Orange’s “Uncle ACE” is playing in the background—a song that didn’t come out until 2013. But “whatever,” one supposes…guess it’s all about the “mood” and not “historical accuracy” (just ask the music supervisors on Saltburn and Madame Web). Earlier in their pursuit, when Patrick and Art home in on Tashi at a party thrown in her honor on Long Island, Nelly’s “Hot in Herre” is playing like it’s 2002. 

    When we get to 2007, other 00s-era bops include Blu Cantrell’s 2001 single, “Hit ‘Em Up Style (Oops!)” and Lily Allen’s 2006 smash, “Smile” (which plays faintly in the background of the cafeteria at Stanford while Tashi and Art have lunch together). It seems Guadagnino isn’t as interested in matching the music to the year when we enter 2010 and beyond, with the film commencing in August of 2019 before it flashes back to thirteen years earlier and then keeps flip-flopping in between certain years prior. From the beginning, though, it’s made clear that the real relationship—the core one—is between Patrick and Art. In 2006, they play together as “Fire and Ice” (though it’s never said which one is fire and which ice—hair color-wise, Art would be fire and Patrick ice, but personality-wise, each man can be both…“bi,” if you will).

    Their feelings of love beyond friendship are immediately conveyed in the way they embrace one another on the court after winning a game of doubles. Later on, as they walk through the tournament eating hot dogs (a very specific food choice) together, they geek out about their passion for tennis before settling into the audience stand to watch a match. It is at this point that Patrick starts to talk up Tashi, calling her the “hottest woman I’ve ever seen” (cue Katy Perry singing, “California gurls/We’re undeniable/Fine, fresh, fierce/We got it on lock”). Art has no idea what he’s talking about until Tashi steps onto the court at that very moment and proceeds to do some sensual stretches before making the game her bitch. 

    Art is now convinced about going to the party on Long Island to try to talk to her. And they do. They wait all night, until everyone else is leaving, to really talk to her. During their first proper conversation together, Tashi tells Patrick and Art that every tennis match is like being in a relationship with someone. And the audience gets to watch it all unfold. She seems to direct this metaphor more toward Patrick, who she thinks hasn’t yet learned what tennis really is yet, despite being a better player than Art. Indeed, Patrick had agreed to let Art win the match the following day until Tashi shows up in their hotel room and plants the seed of competition in their mind by saying that she’ll only give her number to the boy who wins the match the next day. So it is that a shift in Patrick and Art’s dynamic occurs. Where once they were on an even playing field with little source of conflict, Tashi is the wrench thrown into their formerly repressed homoeroticism. But she brings it out in them when, during a “three-way” kiss, it doesn’t take long for it to become a two-way between Patrick and Art, who have to be reminded that Tashi is even still there when she demands, “Stop.” She then chooses to go no further because, as she puts it, “I’m not a homewrecker.” A “half-joke” with more truth in it than not. For Patrick and Art are in love, and Tashi is essentially breaking up the purity of that love with her introduction as a presence to compete for. The Patrick/Art rapport is, needless to say, one that mirrors the Jules/Jim one as described by the narration, “Jules and Jim’s friendship had no equivalent in love. They delighted together in the smallest things. They accepted their differences with tenderness. From the start, everyone called them Don Quixote and Sancho Panza.”

    As the audience watches the drama of Challengers unfurl over these ten-plus years (intercutting back and forth like a tennis ball in the timeline), it always seemed Art wanted Tashi because Patrick did, and because “winning” her would somehow prove he had “superior game.” What’s more, in its psychologically fraught way, being with Tashi is a means to become even closer to him…to figuratively “cross swords” (instead of just rackets) by having entered the same woman. Tashi’s eventual leaning toward Art, despite being with Patrick (who won the match that day in ‘06 in order to gain her number) first, is a direct result of what Patrick said to her when they eventually broke up: she wanted someone to boss around, to be her “fan,” not her peer. In short, she wanted a whipping boy. But she also wanted someone like Patrick, too. Someone who pushes back and is unpredictable—fiery. Essentially, she does need and want both of them because she can’t get their respective personalities in just one man. And while she might seem like the alpha throughout the sizzling narrative, her formation at the top of the triangle betrays the reality that, without her, Patrick and Art would still go on as friends-bordering-on-lovers anyway. Were it not for her, as a matter of fact, they would have remained friends instead of “breaking up.”

    It is in this regard that Challengers might present a dangerous underlying message (though not one that is anything new in our misogynistic society). And that is: whenever a woman gets involved, it ruins everything “precious” and “beautiful” about a male friendship. Invokes jealousies and pettiness that never would have arisen had it not been for “that bitch” (see also: Dawson’s Creek). There are numerous love triangle movies to this effect, not least of which is Jules and Jim. In fact, Tashi has nothing on Catherine (Jeanne Moreau), the woman whose affections Jules and Jim vie for until Jules ends up marrying and having a child with her. Which is exactly what Art does with Tashi. Except that, rather than shunning Jim from their lives, they welcome him into it. Moreover (Moreau-ver?), it’s obvious Catherine still has a thing for him, too. And Jules even wants Jim to be with her, suggesting as much when he notices how bored and lifeless she’s become.

    Patrick is the Jim of the permutation in Challengers—the ballsier, less mild-mannered of the male duo that Tashi can’t help continuing to be attracted to. Even if she’s endlessly bored by each of them individually, but excited by them when they, er, come together. In turn, Patrick and Art are excited by Tashi because she is the conduit that sparks the sexual charge between them (this most overtly manifested during the hotel kissing scene when she only briefly divides them before they end up kissing each other). 

    The reason Patrick and Art are attracted to Tashi is also for the same reason Jules and Jim are attracted to Catherine: she is a “disruptor” to their calm, static “friendship.” Someone who will shake things up, make life interesting and, yes, challenge them. Sometimes to be better, but, more often than not, to be the worst versions of themselves. Which, again, doesn’t exactly serve as a great PSA for women. Forever painted as “manipulative” and “calculated.” But at least in Challengers, Tashi doesn’t end up killing Patrick—so that’s progress on the toxicity front. Regardless of whether or not one sees Challengers as a monogamy or polyamory story, a gay or a straight one.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • With Challengers, Justin Kuritzkes Serves an Ace

    With Challengers, Justin Kuritzkes Serves an Ace

    [ad_1]

    Photo: Christopher Anderson for New York Magazine

    The writer Justin Kuritzkes became obsessed with pro tennis after watching Naomi Osaka beat Serena Williams at the 2018 U.S. Open in an infamous match fraught with argument. As Williams pleaded her case to the umpire, Kuritzkes realized how cinematic the situation could be: how alone each player was, yet how linked to each other. He started watching tennis all the time, and when he ran out of big matches, he found smaller ones like the Challenger tournaments — low-budget events that could help someone qualify for the highest level of competition. Some of the players there may be among the top 300 in the world, but they’re fighting for prize money that won’t even cover their expenses. Kuritzkes knew the feeling. At the time, he was a well-regarded playwright who struggled to get anything produced. “Although the stands at a Challenger are mostly empty, the players’ emotions are just as if they were at the U.S. Open because they’re fighting for their lives. It’s the humiliation of being a gladiator and nobody’s even there to watch you die,” he says. “I connected with that deeply as a theater person. If you asked me if I know the 271st most successful theater actor in America, I probably do. And I guarantee you they’re broke.”

    In 2021, he decided to channel his tennis fixation into a screenplay — and now that screenplay is Challengers, a Zendaya-led production full of enough unsatisfied desire and close-ups of sweaty, beautiful young men to confirm that Luca Guadagnino directed it. The film follows three tennis players who have spent their entire adult lives entangled in one another’s careers and beds: Zendaya plays Tashi Donaldson, a former prodigy who should have gone pro but couldn’t. Mike Faist is her husband, Art, a six-time Grand Slam winner whom Tashi both coaches and disdains. And then there’s Patrick Zweig (Josh O’Connor), an all-id ex-friend and doubles partner to Art and ex-boyfriend to Tashi. When Patrick reencounters the couple at a Challenger in suburban New York, it throws all three of them into racket-smashing, early-onset midlife crisis.

    Challengers is Zendaya’s first big-screen leading role, and she plays Tashi full of withholding and coiled, frustrated ambition; her idea of a pep talk before a match is telling her husband to “decimate that little bitch.” This is also Kuritzkes’s first screenplay. Now 33, he spent his 20s writing comic and disturbing plays that were supported by prestigious residencies and fellowships but rarely produced for the stage. Hollywood has been a lot faster to welcome him: After Challengers, he’s got another film with Guadagnino, an adaptation of the William S. Burroughs book Queer. Next, he’s adapting Don Winslow’s mob novel City on Fire with Austin Butler set to star. This would all seem more unprecedented if his wife hadn’t just done something similar: Kuritzkes is married to Celine Song, the former playwright whose own debut film, Past Lives, was nominated for two Oscars.

    Even if most of the people who saw Past Lives didn’t know Kuritzkes’s name, Song’s press tour gave him a kind of secondhand, not-quite-accurate fame: The film is about a New York playwright who reengages with a childhood crush from South Korea and begins to question her marriage to her white husband. In interviews, Song talked at length about how her film was inspired by her own life. Now Kuritzkes has written a ménage à trois of his own. Like Past Lives, it hinges on a young woman who is forced to confront the romantic road not taken. Unlike Song, he’s not willing to discuss that theme. “Challengers is an intensely personal film to me — in ways that I’m not interested in talking about,” he says.

    He dismisses the films’ similarities. “Love triangles are one of the most basic plots in cinema,” he says. “Even in a relationship between two people, there’s always a sort of imagined third presence.” I ask what that third presence might be. “Well, for a lot of people, it’s, like, Jesus,” he jokes. “Or it’s their conception of themselves, or their parents, or their friends. But in a love triangle, that third presence is not imagined.” Either way, he says, the parallels between his life and Past Lives or Challengers don’t matter: “Once it gets transformed into a work of art, the connection between that and the real thing is irrelevant. That’s just fuel that you’re using to propel a vehicle.”

    Justin Kuritzkes on the set of Challengers.
    Photo: Niko Tavernise/Niko Tavernise

    Kuritzkes and I meet at the Fort Greene Park tennis courts in early April, settling down on a cold bench to watch the amateurs hit. To the left, four middle-aged white men play competent doubles. To the right, two young people struggle just to get the ball over the net. Suddenly, a horde of 14-year-olds stream onto the courts, running and yelling as they gather for what’s either an after-school tennis camp or an ad hoc hazing. When Kuritzkes was around that age, he had already quit his tennis lessons. “I could tell exactly how bad I was. I would have moments where it clicked and then wouldn’t be able to replicate it. That drove me crazy because I was like, Well, why can’t I just do that every time?” he says. “I decided I was as good as I was ever going to get and it wasn’t good enough. So I was done.”

    Kuritzkes grew up in L.A., the son of a real-estate-lawyer mother and gastroenterologist father, and went to the prep school Harvard-Westlake, where he graduated one year behind Lily Collins and three years ahead of Ben Platt and Beanie Feldstein. The school had a student playwriting festival, and Kuritzkes became a regular participant, writing 10-to-15-minute plays. “The immediacy of theater was intoxicating,” he says. “You can just write something, get two chairs, and have actors do it and the audience will suspend their disbelief.” When he went off to Brown, “I already knew I was a playwright,” he says. In between working on his thesis, he started making character-study videos on his laptop, warping his face using the built-in effects of Photo Booth. In his most-watched video, “Potion Seller,” he plays a knight who keeps begging a merchant for potions.

    He met Song the summer after he graduated, in 2012, during a fellowship in Montauk. Song fictionalized this first encounter in Past Lives in a woozy scene where protagonist Nora (Greta Lee) flirts with future husband Arthur (John Magaro) under the fairy lights at a dreamlike residency. Nora departs on a long definition of the Korean concept of in-yun — “It means providence, or fate” — before circling back to say it’s just “something Koreans say to seduce someone.”

    Song has said they connected over their work, so I ask Kuritzkes, half-joking, how long it took before he showed her his YouTube videos. He stiffens. “I’m so thrilled and happy to talk about Celine in virtually every context, but I would never want to speak for her in the context of an interview,” he says. Too much in-yun has been spilled already. I point out that Song has spoken freely about their lives together. “I wouldn’t want anybody to confuse the character and me because it erases the work that she and her actor did, or it pollutes it,” he says. I ask if he thinks people do confuse him with the character. “I don’t know,” he replies, looking me straight in the eye. “Do you?”

    In Past Lives, the husband is a gentle presence who recedes into the background. In real life, Kuritzkes comes off as preternaturally self-assured. “He has had that from a very young age,” says theater director Danya Taymor. “It’s not arrogance. He just believes in himself.” Shortly after Kuritzkes and Song started dating, “Potion Seller” went so viral that The New Yorker eventually published a parody of it; the video now has over 11 million views. The couple married in 2016, the same year Kuritzkes’s play The Sensuality Party — his thesis from Brown, a series of interlocking monologues from college kids who have an orgy that turns nonconsensual — was produced Off Broadway with Taymor directing. When Kuritzkes and another friend, the director Knud Adams, wanted to stage Kuritzkes’s play Asshole, they built the set themselves and rehearsed in their respective apartments. The play is about a doctor who oversees the force-feeding of prisoners at a government black site and is obsessed with his own asshole. Kuritzkes had written it in 2014 after reading about the force-feeding of Guantánamo prisoners on hunger strike. “The fact that everybody could go about our normal lives after hearing about it really freaked me out,” he says. “I started to think, Well, what would really repulse somebody? It would be a guy playing with his own asshole and smelling his own shit.” The production, at the Brooklyn theater Jack, was a surprise hit. As Adams remembers, “We sold out all our shows. But then it’s not hard to sell out Jack — there are 40 seats.”

    Writing Challengers was an exercise in following desire. Deep in the grips of tennis mania, Kuritzkes had begun to wonder what could make watching the game even more interesting. “If I knew exactly what was at stake on an emotional level beyond the court for the people playing and the people watching, that would be just eating a plate of chocolate truffles to me.” His agent sent the script to the producers, Amy Pascal and Rachel O’Connor, who got it to Zendaya, who loved it. The actress wanted both to star and to co-produce. “One of the things I remember saying to Zendaya when we first met was that the cultural space that Zendaya occupies in the world is the space that the character Tashi was supposed to occupy — that was the life she was supposed to have,” says Kuritzkes. “I think she really connected with that ambition and that pain.” The producers and Zendaya who got Guadagnino onboard.

    With Challengers, Kuritzkes became part of a machine: He was working with Guadagnino and the film’s tennis consultant, the coach and commentator Brad Gilbert, on the many gameplay scenes, which were choreographed like fights. Each one had to be shot with both body doubles and the actors, and only Faist came in with tennis experience. “During breaks, we would sometimes pick up racquets and play. I have really funny videos on my phone of Luca,” says Kuritzkes, smiling. “It was so adorable. He just couldn’t hit the ball to save his life.”

    Kuritzkes says that he always imagined a charge between Art and Patrick — “There is eroticism present in every intimate friendship, especially one between two guys who have spent their lives in locker rooms and dorm rooms and on the court together” — and that Guadagnino’s interpretation pushed it further. Mostly, though, the boys are each other’s foils, with Patrick always willing to play the heel. In Guadagnino’s hands, this inevitably bends erotic. When the two first become infatuated with Tashi, Art says earnestly that she’s “a remarkable young woman.” Patrick replies, “I know. She’s a pillar of the community.” He lowers to a whisper: “I’d let her fuck me with a racquet.” Kuritzkes says that although none of the characters is based on a real player, it was important for Tashi to be a Black woman. “The story of American tennis is Black women for the past however many decades,” he says. “I also knew that I didn’t want to not specify the races of the characters. That always feels to me like you’re avoiding something. Her being a Black woman informs a lot about how she navigates her situation and how she navigates her relationship with these guys.” The Zendaya line making the rounds in the film’s trailer — “I’m taking such good care of my little white boys” — sounds affectionate only on paper.

    When Kuritzkes was a kid, he felt bad that so many of the films he loved, like Jules et Jim and Y Tu Mamá También, were about love triangles; he felt guilty getting so much pleasure from watching a scenario in which someone was being wronged, rejected, or hurt. Now he believes movies are exactly the right place for it. “Part of the joy of watching it is thinking, At least my life isn’t as messed up as that, or, My life is as messed up as that, and thank God I’m not alone,” he says. “What’s good for art is the opposite of what’s good for life.”


    See All



    [ad_2]

    Madeline Leung Coleman

    Source link