ReportWire

Tag: jury

  • Jury reaches verdict in trial of Judge Hannah Dugan

    [ad_1]

    A jury on Thursday found Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan guilty of a federal felony charge that she obstructed or impeded a proceeding before a U.S. department or agency, while acquitting her on a misdemeanor count tied to concealing an individual from discovery and arrest. Her defense team released this statement shortly after the verdict was read: “While we are disappointed in today’s outcome, the failure of the prosecution to secure convictions on both counts demonstrates the opportunity we have to clear Judge Dugan’s name and show she did nothing wrong in this matter. We have planned for this potential outcome and our defense of Judge Dugan is just beginning. This trial required considerable resources to prepare for and public support for Judge Dugan’s defense fund is critical as we prepare for the next phase of this defense.” The judge did not set a sentencing date. The defense plans to fight the conviction. The maximum penalty would be five years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine.Watch: Defense attorney Steve Biskupic’s post-verdict reaction:On the prosecution side, interim U.S. Attorney Brad Schimel asked that people keep politics out of the case and the verdict. He said this was not the government trying to make an example of Dugan, but was instead a serious matter they felt necessary to pursue.Watch: Interim U.S. Attorney Brad Schimel delivers remarks after Dugan verdictProsecutors filed the charges after an April 2025 courthouse encounter involving federal agents and a defendant, in Dugan’s court on a state criminal charge, a man they were seeking to arrest. The verdict followed a week of testimony and evidence centered on what jurors heard and saw from April 18, when federal agents came to the sixth floor of the Milwaukee County Courthouse with a warrant to arrest Eduardo Flores-Ruiz.In opening statements Monday, prosecutors told jurors that Dugan “knew what she did was wrong” and argued arrests in the courthouse are “standard and routine.”The defense challenged the interpretation of events and questioned witnesses about courthouse practices, confusion over the courthouse policy for interactions with federal immigration officials. What prosecutors allegedJurors were shown surveillance video and listened to audio from inside Dugan’s courtroom, with prosecutors walking through the sequence in detail.Prosecutors pointed jurors to:Hallway surveillance video showing Dugan confronting federal agents outside her courtroom; there was no audio on the hallway video.Audio from inside the courtroom, played alongside a transcript for jurors to follow, including a moment in which Dugan’s clerk is heard saying, “We have 5 ICE guys in the hallway.”Prosecutors’ interpretation of courtroom audio, including that Dugan called Flores-Ruiz’s case out of order and told his attorney to take him out and return for a rescheduled date, which prosecutors argued was intended to get him out of the area.Evidence and testimony jurors heardThe government’s first witness included FBI Special Agent Jeffrey Baker, who testified about his actions at the courthouse that morning and what he observed. Baker described Dugan’s tone during the hallway encounter, saying, “anger would be the best way to describe it.”Jurors also heard testimony and saw exhibits related to communications among judges about how to handle interactions with federal immigration officials in the courthouse, according to the notes.WATCH FBI agents testify about courthouse confusion during immigration arrestDefense caseAfter the prosecution rested on Wednesday, the defense began calling witnesses Thursday morning. The first defense witness was Milwaukee County Judge Katie Kegel, and jurors were shown an email she sent to fellow judges that was displayed in court and included in jurors’ binders. The final witness for the defense was former Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett, a lifelong friend who described her as an “extremely honest” person who will tell you exactly how she feels. Background of the caseThe case stems from the April 18 courthouse encounter in which agents from ICE and other federal agencies arrived outside Dugan’s courtroom with a warrant for Flores-Ruiz’s arrest.Prosecutors alleged Dugan directed agents away from the arrest location and that Flores-Ruiz later left through a restricted area before being arrested outside.Flores-Ruiz’s underlying state case involved a domestic violence allegation. In opening statements, prosecutors referenced the charge he faced that day: battery — domestic abuse — infliction of physical pain or injury. Flores-Ruiz has since been deported.

    A jury on Thursday found Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan guilty of a federal felony charge that she obstructed or impeded a proceeding before a U.S. department or agency, while acquitting her on a misdemeanor count tied to concealing an individual from discovery and arrest.

    Her defense team released this statement shortly after the verdict was read:

    “While we are disappointed in today’s outcome, the failure of the prosecution to secure convictions on both counts demonstrates the opportunity we have to clear Judge Dugan’s name and show she did nothing wrong in this matter. We have planned for this potential outcome and our defense of Judge Dugan is just beginning. This trial required considerable resources to prepare for and public support for Judge Dugan’s defense fund is critical as we prepare for the next phase of this defense.”

    Adela Tesnow

    Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan reacts after hearing a guilty guilty in her federal trial

    The judge did not set a sentencing date. The defense plans to fight the conviction. The maximum penalty would be five years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine.

    Watch: Defense attorney Steve Biskupic’s post-verdict reaction:

    On the prosecution side, interim U.S. Attorney Brad Schimel asked that people keep politics out of the case and the verdict. He said this was not the government trying to make an example of Dugan, but was instead a serious matter they felt necessary to pursue.

    Watch: Interim U.S. Attorney Brad Schimel delivers remarks after Dugan verdict

    Prosecutors filed the charges after an April 2025 courthouse encounter involving federal agents and a defendant, in Dugan’s court on a state criminal charge, a man they were seeking to arrest.

    The verdict followed a week of testimony and evidence centered on what jurors heard and saw from April 18, when federal agents came to the sixth floor of the Milwaukee County Courthouse with a warrant to arrest Eduardo Flores-Ruiz.

    In opening statements Monday, prosecutors told jurors that Dugan “knew what she did was wrong” and argued arrests in the courthouse are “standard and routine.”

    The defense challenged the interpretation of events and questioned witnesses about courthouse practices, confusion over the courthouse policy for interactions with federal immigration officials.

    What prosecutors alleged

    Jurors were shown surveillance video and listened to audio from inside Dugan’s courtroom, with prosecutors walking through the sequence in detail.

    Prosecutors pointed jurors to:

    • Hallway surveillance video showing Dugan confronting federal agents outside her courtroom; there was no audio on the hallway video.
    • Audio from inside the courtroom, played alongside a transcript for jurors to follow, including a moment in which Dugan’s clerk is heard saying, “We have 5 ICE guys in the hallway.”
    • Prosecutors’ interpretation of courtroom audio, including that Dugan called Flores-Ruiz’s case out of order and told his attorney to take him out and return for a rescheduled date, which prosecutors argued was intended to get him out of the area.

    Evidence and testimony jurors heard

    The government’s first witness included FBI Special Agent Jeffrey Baker, who testified about his actions at the courthouse that morning and what he observed.

    Baker described Dugan’s tone during the hallway encounter, saying, “anger would be the best way to describe it.”

    Jurors also heard testimony and saw exhibits related to communications among judges about how to handle interactions with federal immigration officials in the courthouse, according to the notes.

    WATCH FBI agents testify about courthouse confusion during immigration arrest

    Defense case

    After the prosecution rested on Wednesday, the defense began calling witnesses Thursday morning.

    The first defense witness was Milwaukee County Judge Katie Kegel, and jurors were shown an email she sent to fellow judges that was displayed in court and included in jurors’ binders.

    The final witness for the defense was former Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett, a lifelong friend who described her as an “extremely honest” person who will tell you exactly how she feels.

    Background of the case

    The case stems from the April 18 courthouse encounter in which agents from ICE and other federal agencies arrived outside Dugan’s courtroom with a warrant for Flores-Ruiz’s arrest.

    Prosecutors alleged Dugan directed agents away from the arrest location and that Flores-Ruiz later left through a restricted area before being arrested outside.

    Flores-Ruiz’s underlying state case involved a domestic violence allegation. In opening statements, prosecutors referenced the charge he faced that day: battery — domestic abuse — infliction of physical pain or injury. Flores-Ruiz has since been deported.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Opinion | The U.K. Stabbing Is Every Commuter’s Nightmare

    [ad_1]

    For those of us who ride the commuter rails and subways daily, Saturday night’s mass stabbing on a London-bound train is a nightmare brought to life. In such confined and well-lit spaces, there isn’t any way to do what the experts say you should: run, hide and, as a last resort, fight.

    A train car moving at high speed with the doors and windows closed is a violent psychopath’s dream—a veritable barrel full of unarmed, unsuspecting fish. Most of us have our heads buried in our phones, our ears distracted by music or podcasts. Some of us are poring over newspapers or dreamily watching the countryside fly by. Rarely do any of us do a threat assessment of those nearby. We are in our own little in-between place—not home, not at work. En route. Vulnerable.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    Matthew Hennessey

    Source link

  • Former Bishop Moore High School coach arrested on human trafficking charges

    [ad_1]

    Thomas Joseph Wasman, 68, a former Bishop Moore Catholic High School coach, was arrested on Thursday for human trafficking for commercial sex with someone under the age of 18, according to the Altamonte Springs Police Department. Investigators told the diocese that no Bishop Moore students or any other diocesan schools were involved.Wasman was not a faculty member but did work as a seasonal coach, according to a statement from Bishop Moore High School.Wasman was arrested in 2015 for a misdemeanor charge of soliciting a prostitute in Orange County, the Orange County Sheriff’s Office said.He was found not guilty by a jury in the 2015 case. Statement from Bishop Moore Catholic High SchoolBishop Moore High School was recently notified, as a courtesy of the Altamonte Springs Police Department, that Mr. Tom Wasman was arrested for human trafficking for commercial sex with someone under the age of 18.Investigators have confirmed no students from Bishop Moore or any diocesan schools were involved. Mr. Wasman was not a faculty member but did work as a seasonal coach. In 2015, Mr. Wasman had been placed on administrative leave after being charged with Solicitation to Commit Prostitution.After being found not guilty by a jury and the judge’s decision to expunge his record, the Diocese conducted an additional background check and determined that Mr. Wasman could be reinstated.With this recent arrest, Mr. Wasman has been terminated effective immediately.

    Thomas Joseph Wasman, 68, a former Bishop Moore Catholic High School coach, was arrested on Thursday for human trafficking for commercial sex with someone under the age of 18, according to the Altamonte Springs Police Department.

    Investigators told the diocese that no Bishop Moore students or any other diocesan schools were involved.

    Wasman was not a faculty member but did work as a seasonal coach, according to a statement from Bishop Moore High School.

    Wasman was arrested in 2015 for a misdemeanor charge of soliciting a prostitute in Orange County, the Orange County Sheriff’s Office said.

    He was found not guilty by a jury in the 2015 case.

    Statement from Bishop Moore Catholic High School

    Bishop Moore High School was recently notified, as a courtesy of the Altamonte Springs Police Department, that Mr. Tom Wasman was arrested for human trafficking for commercial sex with someone under the age of 18.

    Investigators have confirmed no students from Bishop Moore or any diocesan schools were involved. Mr. Wasman was not a faculty member but did work as a seasonal coach. In 2015,

    Mr. Wasman had been placed on administrative leave after being charged with Solicitation to Commit Prostitution.

    After being found not guilty by a jury and the judge’s decision to expunge his record, the Diocese conducted an additional background check and determined that Mr. Wasman could be reinstated.

    With this recent arrest, Mr. Wasman has been terminated effective immediately.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • American Airlines failed to divert 8-hour flight after California man suffered 2 strokes, jury finds

    [ad_1]

    A chef from California’s Central Coast who had two strokes while traveling internationally on American Airlines was awarded more than $9 million after a federal jury concluded employees failed to follow their own protocols to help him.

    In November 2021, Jesus Plasencia, a chef from Watsonville who was 67 at the time, was traveling with his wife, Ana Maria Marcela Tavantzis, on a flight to Madrid from Miami, according to a complaint they filed in federal civil court.

    While the plane was still at the gate, Plasencia suffered a “mini stroke” and temporarily lost the ability to speak or pick up his phone, according to the complaint. His wife alerted a flight attendant and the pilot but instead of alerting medical personnel and following company policy, the lawsuit said the pilot dismissed her concerns, “joked with Plasencia, and cleared him for take-off.”

    Plasencia then had a stroke while the plane was in the air; he was hospitalized after the plane landed in Spain and was in critical condition for more than three weeks before he went back to the U.S., according to court documents. He can’t speak or write and now “depends entirely on daily, significant, around-the-clock, in-home care and intensive rehabilitation,” according to the lawsuit.

    On Thursday, a federal jury in San Jose said American Airlines was on the hook for $9.6 million for its employees failing to follow company protocol in the incident.

    According to the complaint filed in 2023, the flight crew had asked other passengers to monitor Plasencia after he suffered a stroke during the flight, but didn’t tell the pilot about the medical emergency, so the flight wasn’t diverted.

    The couple argued that because American Airlines crew hadn’t followed protocols, Plasencia was delayed getting care for nearly eight hours and could’ve potentially had a better outcome, according to the lawsuit.

    “The safety and well-being of our passengers is our highest priority,” American Airlines said in a statement. “While we respect the jury’s decision, we disagree with the verdict and are currently evaluating next steps.”

    Darren Nicholson of Burns Charest, who represented the couple in the lawsuit, argued that the airline didn’t follow stroke protocol, which calls for immediate medical assistance and diverting the aircraft.

    “It is shocking that American Airlines responded so poorly to a medical emergency like this,” he said in a statement.

    American Airlines was found liable by the jurors under the Montreal Convention, an international treaty that governs international air travel.

    [ad_2]

    Summer Lin

    Source link

  • Cardi B Wins Case Filed By Security Guard Who Claimed Rapper Assaulted Her – KXL

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES (AP) — A jury gave Cardi B a quick and absolute victory Tuesday at a trial in the lawsuit of a security guard who alleged the rap star assaulted her at a doctor’s office during her then-secret first pregnancy.

    The jury of six men and six women at a small courthouse in Alhambra, California deliberated for only about an hour before finding Cardi not liable in the lawsuit brought by Emani Ellis, who alleged Cardi cut her face with a fingernail and spat on her in the hallway of a Beverly Hills obstetrician in February of 2018.

    Only nine of the 12 jurors were required for a verdict in the civil case, but their decision in Cardi’s favor was unanimous.

    “The next person who tries to do a frivolous lawsuit against me, I’m going to counter-sue, and I’m gonna make you pay, because this is not OK,” she said outside the courthouse, where she posed for pictures with fans. “I am not that celeb that you sue, and you think is going to settle. I’m not gonna settle. Especially when I’m super completely innocent.”

    She said she had to miss her kids’ first day of school because of the trial, and said her forehead was “raw, raw, raw” after all the elaborate wig changes during the trial that at one point even left her lawyer confused over which was her real hair. (None of them were, she said with a laugh.)

    In two days of testimony last week that were livestreamed, widely viewed and full of viral moments, the hip-hop star testified she feared that Ellis was going to make her pregnancy public. She acknowledged that the two argued, but said it never got physical.

    “I will say it on my deathbed. I did not touch that woman,” she said after her win. “I did not touch that girl. I didn’t lay my hands on that girl.”

    Ron Rosen Janfaza, the lawyer for the plaintiff Ellis, did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment. He said outside court that they plan to appeal the decision.

    After several days off, the trial resumed with closing arguments Tuesday, and the jury got the case in mid-afternoon.

    Cardi said she had been visiting Los Angeles doing promotional work in February 2018 around that year’s NBA All-Star Game. She was four months into her pregnancy with the first of her three children with rapper Offset. She had told her inner circle she was having a baby, but not the public or her parents.

    The obstetrician’s office had been closed to other patients on a Saturday for her privacy.

    She said Ellis, a security guard for the building, followed her to her fifth-floor appointment. Cardi told jurors last week that she heard Ellis say her name into a phone and appeared to be filming her.

    “I told her, ‘Why are you recording?’” Cardi testified, “and she said, ’Oh my bad.’ She practically apologized.’”

    But the argument grew increasingly heated, she said.

    “As we were arguing she’s backing me, she’s walking into me,” Cardi said.

    Ellis testified that the incident left her humiliated and traumatized, and the scar on her face required cosmetic surgery. Ellis, who lost her job over the incident, sought damages that include medical expenses, compensation for emotional and physical suffering, and lost wages, along with punitive damages. She does not specify a total amount in the lawsuit but Cardi said from the stand that she is “suing me for $24 million.”

    A receptionist who broke up the argument between Cardi and Ellis largely backed the rapper’s account in testimony.

    [ad_2]

    Jordan Vawter

    Source link

  • North Andover officer who was shot to be under house arrest

    [ad_1]

    SALEM, Mass. — An off-duty North Andover police officer who was shot in her home by a colleague serving a restraining order will be released to the custody of her mother and stepfather under GPS-monitored home confinement as she awaits trial.

    Kelsey Fitzsimmons, 28, of North Andover pleaded not guilty Thursday following her arraignment on a charge of assault by means of a dangerous weapon in Essex County Superior Court.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAms676?D6 2EE@C?6J %:>@E9J qC25= D2:5 u:EKD:>>@?D 😀 D4965F=65 E@ 36 C6=62D65 uC:52J[ 2=>@DE EH@ >@?E9D 27E6C E96 D9@@E:?8 E@@< A=246]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D H6AE 😕 4@FCE 2D 96C 4F7765 92?5D E@@< 2 E:DDF6 7C@> 2 32:=:77 E@ 5CJ 96C 6J6D H96? yF586 z2E9=66? |4r2CE9J}6J>2? @C56C65 96C E@ 92G6 “23D@=FE6=J ?@” 4@?E24E H:E9 96C e>@?E9@=5 49:=5]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D’ C6=62D6 😀 A6?5:?8 2? :?DA64E:@? @7 96C 72>:=J’D 9@>6 2?5 4C:>:?2= 324<8C@F?5 49646>36C 2D @FE=:?65 😕 E96 4@?5:E:@?D @7 C6=62D6] %96 ;F586 7@F?5 DE2E6 AC@D64FE@CD >6E E96 3FC56? @7 AC@@7 E92E u:EKD:>>@?D 😀 52?86C@FD[ 3FE D6E `_ 4@?5:E:@?D E@ <66A E96 4@>>F?:EJ D276]k^Am

    kAmw6C @C56C 42>6 H:E9 2 H2C?:?8 😕 4@FCE E@ u:EKD:>>@?D’ >@E96C 2?5 DE6A72E96C[ {2FC6? 2?5 (:==:2> !286[ E92E E96J H:== 36 492C865 H:E9 4@?E6>AE :7 E96J 2DD:DE 96C 😕 D66:?8 E96 323J]k^Am

    kAm“$96 😀 2 52?86C 2?5 E96D6 2C6 E96 =62DE C6DEC:4E:G6 4@?5:E:@?D E@ 6?DFC6 E96 D276EJ @7 E96 AF3=:4 2?5 G:4E:>[” |4r2CE9J}6J>2? D2:5]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D 2?DH6C65 😕 28C66>6?E 2D E96 ;F586 :?7@C>65 96C D96 42? 36 96=5 H:E9@FE 32:= :7 D96 G:@=2E6D 2?J 4@?5:E:@?D]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D H2D C6=62D65 =2DE H66< 7C@> |2DD249FD6EED v6?6C2= w@DA:E2=[ H96C6 D96 F?56CH6?E DFC86CJ 27E6C 36:?8 D9@E 😕 E96 496DE[ qC25= D2:5] $96 😀 36:?8 96=5 2E (6DE6C? |2DD249FD6EED #68:@?2= (@>6?’D r@CC64E:@?2= r6?E6C 😕 r9:4@A66 A6?5:?8 96C C6=62D6]k^Am

    kAm~? yF?6 b_[ E9C66 }@CE9 p?5@G6C A@=:46 @77:46CD H6?E E@ u:EKD:>>@?D’ 9@>6 2E `ad !9:==:AD qC@@65 4@?7C@?E2E:@? E@@< A=246 H96? D96 H2D D6CG65 H:E9 E96 @C56C[ C6DF=E:?8 😕 96C DF776C:?8 2 8F?D9@E H@F?5]k^Am

    kAm%96 D9@E 7:C65 3J }@CE9 p?5@G6C A@=:46 ~77:46C !2EC:4< }@@?2? DECF4< u:EKD:>>@?D 😕 E96 496DE 27E6C D96 A@:?E65 96C D6CG:46 H62A@? 2E 9:> 😕 96C FADE2:CD 365C@@>[ A@=:46 DE2E65 😕 2? @77:4:2= C6A@CE 7@==@H:?8 E96 :?4:56?E]k^Am

    kAm}@@?2? 2==686D D96 AF==65 E96 EC:886C[ 3FE E96 H62A@? 5:5 ?@E 7:C6] }@@?2? DE2E65 E92E u:EKD:>>@?D EC:65 E@ C6=@25 E96 8F?’D 492>36C 27E6C :E 5:5 ?@E 7:C6[ AC@>AE:?8 9:> E@ D9@@E 96C[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 A@=:46 C6A@CE]k^Am

    kAm$96 4=2:>65 E92E D96 ?6G6C A@:?E65 E96 8F? 2E 2?@E96C @77:46C[ ;FDE 96C E6>A=6] u:EKD:>>@?D 4=2:>65 D96 H2D D9@E 3J D@>6@?6 D96 4@?D:56C65 2 7C:6?5 😕 2 72:=65 2EE6>AE E@ E2<6 96C @H? =:76]k^Am

    kAm$E2E6 AC@D64FE@C y2>6D vF3:E@D6 D2:5 E96 DE2E6 AC6D6?E65 EH@ 492C86D E@ E96 8C2?5 ;FCJi 2C>65 2DD2F=E H:E9 :?E6?E E@ >FC56C 2?5 2DD2F=E H:E9 2 5625=J H62A@?] %96 8C2?5 ;FCJ C6;64E65 E96 2C>65 2DD2F=E 492C86 2?5 :?5:4E65 96C @? E96 =6DD6C 492C86C] vF3:E@D6 D2:5 H9:=6 E96 492C86 92D 492?865[ E96 DE2E6 DE:== 2C8F65 E92E u:EKD:>>@?D 😀 2 52?86C E@ E96 4@>>F?:EJ 2?5 E96 @77:46C H9@ D9@E 96C]k^Am

    kAm%96 ?6H 492C86 4@>6D H:E9 2 >2I:>F> @7 7:G6 J62CD 😕 AC:D@? @C 9@FD6 2=E6C?2E:G6 :7 4@?G:4E65]k^Am

    kAm|4r2CE9J}6J>2?[ H9@ 56?:65 u:EKD:>>@?D’ 32:= 2AA62= EH:46[ D2:5 D96 F?56CDE@@5 D96 H2D 724:?8 2 D:8?:7:42?E=J 5:776C6?E 492C86 E92? H96? u:EKD:>>@?D =2DE 2AA62C65 367@C6 96C 7@C 2 52?86C@FD?6DD 962C:?8 pF8] `c] $96 2=D@ E@@< :?E@ 244@F?E E96 724E E92E E96 8C2?5 ;FCJ J:6=565 2 =6DD6C 492C86 32D65 @? E96 6G:56?46 :E 962C5]k^Am

    kAm%96 ;F586[ 9@H6G6C[ DE:== 7@F?5 u:EKD:>>@?D E@ 36 2 52?86C 2?5 ?@E 23=6 E@ 36 C6=62D65 @? A6CD@?2= C64@8?:K2?46 2=@?6]k^Am

    kAmvF3:E@D6 DF3>:EE65 255:E:@?2= DE2E6>6?ED E@ |4r2CE9J}6J>2? >256 3J pJ=2:2? 2?5 2? F?:56?E:7:65 =@?8E:>6 7C:6?5 @7 u:EKD:>>@?D]k^Am

    kAm%96 ?6H DE2E6>6?ED :?4=F56 4@>>6?ED @? 9@H u:EKD:>>@?D 92D 2==6865=J DECF88=65 H:E9 >6?E2= 962=E9[ 288C6DD:@? 2?5 2=4@9@= 23FD6 D:?46 9:89 D49@@=[ vF3:E@D6 D2:5] w6 25565 E92E H9:=6 96 H2D ?@E DF886DE:?8 u:EKD:>>@?D 5:5 ?@E DECF88=6 H:E9 >6?E2= 962=E9 @C A@DEA2CEF> 56AC6DD:@? 27E6C 8:G:?8 3:CE9 😕 u63CF2CJ[ E96C6 H2D E6DE:>@?J 23@FE 96C 2?86C :DDF6D 52E:?8 324< D6G6C2= J62CD]k^Am

    kAmqC25= 2C8F65 u:EKD:>>@?D H2D 2 42?5:52E6 7@C 2 AC@32E:@?2CJ D6?E6?46 2?5 DEC6DD65 E92E >65:42= AC@76DD:@?2=D C6A@CE65 9:D 4=:6?E H2D ?@E 2 52?86C 2?5 C625J E@ 36 C6=62D65 H:E9 2 >6?E2= 962=E9 EC62E>6?E A=2?] w6 D2:5 D96 C646:G65 52:=J >6?E2= 962=E9 EC62E>6?E 2E |2DD249FD6EED v6?6C2= w@DA:E2= 3FE 5@6D ?@E 92G6 E96D6 D6CG:46D 2G2:=23=6 E@ 96C 2E E96 4@CC64E:@?D 46?E6C]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D 😀 ?@E A6C>:EE65 E@ =62G6 E96 9@FD6 H:E9 E96 6I46AE:@? @7 5@4E@C G:D:ED @C E@ D66 96C 2EE@C?6J[ 2== @7 H9:49 ?665 2AAC@G2=]k^Am

    kAmw6C >@E96C 😀 😕 492C86 @7 5C:G:?8 u:EKD:>>@?D E@ 2?5 7C@> 2AA@:?E>6?ED] %96 ;F586 25G:D65 96C >@E96C E92E D96 42? @?=J 5C:G6 @? E96 2AAC@G65 C@FE6 2?5 2?JE9:?8 6=D6 H@F=5 36 4@?D:56C65 2 G:@=2E:@?]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D 😀 @C56C65 E@ 92G6 ?@ 4@?E24E H:E9 2?J G:4E:> @C H:E?6DD[ 2=@?8 H:E9 ?@ 5:C64E @C :?5:C64E 4@?E24E H:E9 96C 49:=5] $96 😀 2==@H65 E@ D66 A9@E@D @7 96C 49:=5]k^Am

    kAm$96 😀 ?@E 2==@H65 E@ 92G6 2?J H62A@?D @C 7:C62C>D 😕 E96 9@FD6] u:EKD:>>@?D 😀 E@ H62C 2 56G:46 2C@F?5 E96 4=@4< E@ 56E6C>:?6 :7 D96 92D 4@?DF>65 2=4@9@= D:?46 D96 😀 ?@E A6C>:EE65 E@ 5C:?< 2=4@9@=] $96 >FDE F?56C8@ >65:42= 2?5 ADJ49:2EC:4 EC62E>6?E 2?5 D:8? H2:G6CD D@ E96 !C@32E:@? s6A2CE>6?E 😀 23=6 E@ 4@?E24E 96C 5@4E@CD]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D 😀 5F6 324< 😕 tDD6I r@F?EJ $FA6C:@C r@FCE 7@C 2 AC6EC:2= 4@?76C6?46 ~4E] f]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Angelina Berube | aberube@eagletribune.com

    Source link

  • North Andover officer who was shot to be free while awaiting trial

    [ad_1]

    SALEM, Mass. — An off-duty North Andover police officer who was shot in her home by a colleague serving a restraining order will be released to the custody of her mother and stepfather under GPS-monitored home confinement as she awaits trial.

    Kelsey Fitzsimmons, 28, of North Andover pleaded not guilty Thursday following her arraignment on a charge of assault by means of a dangerous weapon in Essex County Superior Court.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAms676?D6 2EE@C?6J %:>@E9J qC25= D2:5 u:EKD:>>@?D 😀 D4965F=65 E@ 36 C6=62D65 uC:52J[ 2=>@DE EH@ >@?E9D 27E6C E96 D9@@E:?8 E@@< A=246] k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D H6AE 😕 4@FCE 2D 96C 4F7765 92?5D E@@< 2 E:DDF6 7C@> 2 32:=:77 E@ 5CJ 96C 6J6D H96? yF586 z2E9=66? |4r2CE9J}6J>2? @C56C65 96C E@ 92G6 “23D@=FE6=J ?@” 4@?E24E H:E9 96C e>@?E9@=5 49:=5]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?DV C6=62D6 😀 A6?5:?8 2? :?DA64E:@? @7 96C 72>:=JVD 9@>6 2?5 4C:>:?2= 324<8C@F?5 49646>36C 2D @FE=:?65 😕 E96 4@?5:E:@?D @7 C6=62D6] %96 ;F586 7@F?5 DE2E6 AC@D64FE@CD >6E E96 3FC56? @7 AC@@7 E92E u:EKD:>>@?D 😀 52?86C@FD[ 3FE D6E `_ 4@?5:E:@?D E@ <66A E96 4@>>F?:EJ D276]k^Am

    kAmw6C @C56C 42>6 H:E9 2 H2C?:?8 😕 4@FCE E@ u:EKD:>>@?DV >@E96C 2?5 DE6A72E96C[ {2FC6? 2?5 (:==:2> !286[ E92E E96J H:== 36 492C865 H:E9 4@?E6>AE :7 E96J 2DD:DE 96C 😕 D66:?8 E96 323J]k^Am

    kAm“$96 😀 2 52?86C 2?5 E96D6 2C6 E96 =62DE C6DEC:4E:G6 4@?5:E:@?D E@ 6?DFC6 E96 D276EJ @7 E96 AF3=:4 2?5 G:4E:>[” |4r2CE9J}6J>2? D2:5]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D 2?DH6C65 😕 28C66>6?E 2D E96 ;F586 :?7@C>65 96C D96 42? 36 96=5 H:E9@FE 32:= :7 D96 G:@=2E6D 2?J 4@?5:E:@?D]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D H2D C6=62D65 =2DE H66< 7C@> |2DD249FD6EED v6?6C2= w@DA:E2=[ H96C6 D96 F?56CH6?E DFC86CJ 27E6C 36:?8 D9@E 😕 E96 496DE[ qC25= D2:5] $96 😀 36:?8 96=5 2E (6DE6C? |2DD249FD6EED #68:@?2= (@>6?VD r@CC64E:@?2= r6?E6C 😕 r9:4@A66 A6?5:?8 96C C6=62D6]k^Am

    kAm~? yF?6 b_[ E9C66 }@CE9 p?5@G6C A@=:46 @77:46CD H6?E E@ u:EKD:>>@?D’ 9@>6 2E `ad !9:==:AD qC@@65 4@?7C@?E2E:@? E@@< A=246 H96? D96 H2D D6CG65 H:E9 E96 @C56C[ C6DF=E:?8 😕 96C DF776C:?8 2 8F?D9@E H@F?5]k^Am

    kAm%96 D9@E 7:C65 3J }@CE9 p?5@G6C A@=:46 ~77:46C !2EC:4< }@@?2? DECF4< u:EKD:>>@?D 😕 E96 496DE 27E6C D96 A@:?E65 96C D6CG:46 H62A@? 2E 9:> 😕 96C FADE2:CD 365C@@>[ A@=:46 DE2E65 😕 2? @77:4:2= C6A@CE 7@==@H:?8 E96 :?4:56?E]k^Am

    kAm}@@?2? 2==686D D96 AF==65 E96 EC:886C[ 3FE E96 H62A@? 5:5 ?@E 7:C6] }@@?2? DE2E65 E92E u:EKD:>>@?D EC:65 E@ C6=@25 E96 8F?’D 492>36C 27E6C :E 5:5 ?@E 7:C6[ AC@>AE:?8 9:> E@ D9@@E 96C[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 A@=:46 C6A@CE]k^Am

    kAm$96 4=2:>65 E92E D96 ?6G6C A@:?E65 E96 8F? 2E 2?@E96C @77:46C[ ;FDE 96C E6>A=6] u:EKD:>>@?D 4=2:>65 D96 H2D D9@E 3J D@>6@?6 D96 4@?D:56C65 2 7C:6?5 😕 2 72:=65 2EE6>AE E@ E2<6 96C @H? =:76]k^Am

    kAm$E2E6 AC@D64FE@C y2>6D vF3:E@D6 D2:5 E96 DE2E6 AC6D6?E65 EH@ 492C86D E@ E96 8C2?5 ;FCJi 2C>65 2DD2F=E H:E9 :?E6?E E@ >FC56C 2?5 2DD2F=E H:E9 2 5625=J H62A@?] %96 8C2?5 ;FCJ C6;64E65 E96 2C>65 2DD2F=E 492C86 2?5 :?5:4E65 96C @? E96 =6DD6C 492C86C] vF3:E@D6 D2:5 H9:=6 E96 492C86 92D 492?865[ E96 DE2E6 DE:== 2C8F65 E92E u:EKD:>>@?D 😀 2 52?86C E@ E96 4@>>F?:EJ 2?5 E96 @77:46C H9@ D9@E 96C]k^Am

    kAm%96 ?6H 492C86 4@>6D H:E9 2 >2I:>F> @7 7:G6 J62CD 😕 AC:D@? @C 9@FD6 2=E6C?2E:G6 :7 4@?G:4E65]k^Am

    kAm|4r2CE9J}6J>2?[ H9@ 56?:65 u:EKD:>>@?DV 32:= 2AA62= EH:46[ D2:5 D96 F?56CDE@@5 D96 H2D 724:?8 2 D:8?:7:42?E=J 5:776C6?E 492C86 E92? H96? u:EKD:>>@?D =2DE 2AA62C65 367@C6 96C 7@C 2 52?86C@FD?6DD 962C:?8 pF8] `c] $96 2=D@ E@@< :?E@ 244@F?E E96 724E E92E E96 8C2?5 ;FCJ J:6=565 2 =6DD6C 492C86 32D65 @? E96 6G:56?46 :E 962C5]k^Am

    kAm%96 ;F586[ 9@H6G6C[ DE:== 7@F?5 u:EKD:>>@?D E@ 36 2 52?86C 2?5 ?@E 23=6 E@ 36 C6=62D65 @? A6CD@?2= C64@8?:K2?46 2=@?6]k^Am

    kAmvF3:E@D6 DF3>:EE65 255:E:@?2= DE2E6>6?ED E@ |4r2CE9J}6J>2? >256 3J pJ=2:2? 2?5 2? F?:56?E:7:65 =@?8E:>6 7C:6?5 @7 u:EKD:>>@?D] k^Am

    kAm%96 ?6H DE2E6>6?ED :?4=F56 4@>>6?ED @? 9@H u:EKD:>>@?D 92D 2==6865=J DECF88=65 H:E9 >6?E2= 962=E9[ 288C6DD:@? 2?5 2=4@9@= 23FD6 D:?46 9:89 D49@@=[ vF3:E@D6 D2:5] w6 25565 E92E H9:=6 96 H2D ?@E DF886DE:?8 u:EKD:>>@?D 5:5 ?@E DECF88=6 H:E9 >6?E2= 962=E9 @C A@DEA2CEF> 56AC6DD:@? 27E6C 8:G:?8 3:CE9 😕 u63CF2CJ[ E96C6 H2D E6DE:>@?J 23@FE 96C 2?86C :DDF6D 52E:?8 324< D6G6C2= J62CD]k^Am

    kAmqC25= 2C8F65 u:EKD:>>@?D H2D 2 42?5:52E6 7@C 2 AC@32E:@?2CJ D6?E6?46 2?5 DEC6DD65 E92E >65:42= AC@76DD:@?2=D C6A@CE65 9:D 4=:6?E H2D ?@E 2 52?86C 2?5 C625J E@ 36 C6=62D65 H:E9 2 >6?E2= 962=E9 EC62E>6?E A=2?] w6 D2:5 D96 C646:G65 52:=J >6?E2= 962=E9 EC62E>6?E 2E |2DD249FD6EED v6?6C2= w@DA:E2= 3FE 5@6D ?@E 92G6 E96D6 D6CG:46D 2G2:=23=6 E@ 96C 2E E96 4@CC64E:@?D 46?E6C]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D 😀 ?@E A6C>:EE65 E@ =62G6 E96 9@FD6 H:E9 E96 6I46AE:@? @7 5@4E@C G:D:ED @C E@ D66 96C 2EE@C?6J[ 2== @7 H9:49 ?665 2AAC@G2=]k^Am

    kAmw6C >@E96C 😀 😕 492C86 @7 5C:G:?8 u:EKD:>>@?D E@ 2?5 7C@> 2AA@:?E>6?ED] %96 ;F586 25G:D65 96C >@E96C E92E D96 42? @?=J 5C:G6 @? E96 2AAC@G65 C@FE6 2?5 2?JE9:?8 6=D6 H@F=5 36 4@?D:56C65 2 G:@=2E:@?]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D 😀 @C56C65 E@ 92G6 ?@ 4@?E24E H:E9 2?J G:4E:> @C H:E?6DD[ 2=@?8 H:E9 ?@ 5:C64E @C :?5:C64E 4@?E24E H:E9 96C 49:=5] $96 😀 2==@H65 E@ D66 A9@E@D @7 96C 49:=5]k^Am

    kAm$96 😀 ?@E 2==@H65 E@ 92G6 2?J H62A@?D @C 7:C62C>D 😕 E96 9@FD6] u:EKD:>>@?D 😀 E@ H62C 2 56G:46 2C@F?5 E96 4=@4< E@ 56E6C>:?6 :7 D96 92D 4@?DF>65 2=4@9@= D:?46 D96 😀 ?@E A6C>:EE65 E@ 5C:?< 2=4@9@=] $96 >FDE F?56C8@ >65:42= 2?5 ADJ49:2EC:4 EC62E>6?E 2?5 D:8? H2:G6CD D@ E96 !C@32E:@? s6A2CE>6?E 😀 23=6 E@ 4@?E24E 96C 5@4E@CD]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D 😀 5F6 324< 😕 tDD6I r@F?EJ $FA6C:@C r@FCE 7@C 2 AC6EC:2= 4@?76C6?46 ~4E] f]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Angelina Berube | aberube@eagletribune.com

    Source link

  • Healey: Indicted sheriff to ‘step away’ from duties

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Embattled Suffolk County Sheriff Steven Tompkins will step down from his post while he defends himself against federal extortion charges.

    In a joint statement, Gov. Maura Healey and Attorney General Andrea Campbell said Tompkins has “agreed to step away from his position until the federal case against him is resolved” and tapped Special Sheriff Mark Lawhorne to temporarily fill the post.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“%96 2==682E:@?D 282:?DE $96C:77 %@>A<:?D 2C6 D6C:@FD[” w62=6J D2:5 😕 E96 (65?6D52J DE2E6>6?E] “%96 $F77@=< r@F?EJ $96C:77 😀 C6DA@?D:3=6 7@C >2?28:?8 >@C6 E92? 2 E9@FD2?5 6>A=@J66D[ 9F?5C65D @7 :?>2E6D 2?5 AC@8C2>D E92E 2C6 6DD6?E:2= E@ AF3=:4 D276EJ 2?5 C6923:=:E2E:@?]k^Am

    kAm“xE 😀 2 7F==E:>6 ;@3 E92E 56>2?5D 7F==E:>6 2EE6?E:@?[” D96 25565] “%96 A6@A=6 @7 |2DD249FD6EED ?665 E@ 36 23=6 E@ ECFDE 😕 E96 :?E68C:EJ @7 E96 4C:>:?2= ;FDE:46 DJDE6> 2?5 E92E E96:C 6=64E65 @77:4:2=D 2C6 7F==J 6?82865 😕 E96 H@C< @7 D6CG:?8 E96 AF3=:4]”k^Am

    kAmr2>A36== 42==65 E96 >@G6 “E96 C:89E DE6A 7@C E96 D96C:77’D @77:46 2?5 E96 AF3=:4 2D 2 H9@=6” 2?5 D2:5 :E H:== 2G@:5 “AC@=@?865 AC@4665:?8D 367@C6 E96 $FAC6>6 yF5:4:2= r@FCE” E@ C6>@G6 9:> 7C@> @77:46 2>:5 E96 2==682E:@?D]k^Am

    kAmq@E9 w62=6J 2?5 r2>A36== H6C6 724:?8 AC6DDFC6 7C@> #6AF3=:42?D E@ 42== 7@C %@>A<:?D E@ C6D:8? 27E6C 96 H2D 2CC6DE65 pF8] `d 😕 u=@C:52 27E6C 2 7656C2= 8C2?5 ;FCJ :?5:4E65 9:> @? EH@ 4@F?ED @7 6IE@CE:@? F?56C 4@=@C @7 @77:4:2= C:89E]k^Am

    kAmw6’D 244FD65 @7 6IE@CE:?8 Sd_[___ 7C@> 2 ?2E:@?2= 42??23:D C6E2:=6C E92E H2D D66<:?8 E@ @A6? 2 ?6H 5:DA6?D2CJ 😕 q@DE@?] w6 92D A=62565 ?@E 8F:=EJ E@ E96 492C86D]k^Am

    kAmu656C2= AC@D64FE@CD 2==686 %@>A<:?D AC6DDFC65 E96 42??23:D 4@>A2?J 6I64FE:G6 E@ D6== 9:> DE@4< 367@C6 E96 4@>A2?J H6?E AF3=:4] pE E96 E:>6[ E96 F??2>65 4@>A2?J H2D H@C<:?8 H:E9 E96 D96C:77’D @77:46 E@ D4C66? 8C25F2E6D @7 :ED C66?ECJ AC@8C2> E@ 2AA=J E@ H@C< 2E 5:DA6?D2C:6D]k^Am

    kAm%96 :?5:4E>6?ED 2==686 E92E %@>A<:?D E9C62E6?65 E96 4@>A2?J 96 H@F=5 3=@4< C6?6H2= @7 :ED =:46?D6 :7 :E 5:5?’E 8:G6 9:> E96 D92C6D] w6 =2E6C 56>2?565 Sd_[___ 27E6C E96 G2=F6 @7 9:D D92C6D 5C@AA65[ AC@D64FE@CD D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96 s6>@4C2E 92D 366? E96 4@F?EJ’D E@A =2H 6?7@C46>6?E @77:4:2= D:?46 a_`b H96? 96 H2D 7:CDE 6=64E65] w62=6J 6?5@CD65 9:D C66=64E:@? 42>A2:8? 😕 a_aa H96? D96 H2D E96? pEE@C?6J v6?6C2=] %@>A<:?D H2D C66=64E65 E@ 2?@E96C D:IJ62C E6C>]k^Am

    kAm%@>A<:?D’ =2HJ6C E@=5 C6A@CE6CD 7@==@H:?8 9:D 2CC2:8?>6?E =2DE %9FCD52J 2E 2 q@DE@? 4@FCE9@FD6 E92E 9:D 4=:6?E 😀 :??@46?E 2?5 6IA64ED E@ 36 G:?5:42E65 @?46 E96 42D6 😀 962C5 3J E96 4@FCE]k^Am

    kAm“}@E 6G6CJ A6CD@? 492C865 H:E9 2 4C:>6 😀 8F:=EJ] }@E 6G6CJ A6CD@? 492C865 H:E9 2 4C:>6 😀 4@?G:4E65[” pEE@C?6J |2CE:? (6:?36C8 D2:5 😕 C6>2C[ H6’C6 ?@E 8@:?8 E@ ECJ :E @FE 96C6 😕 E96 >65:2] (6 2C6 8@:?8 E@ 92G6 2 EC:2=]”k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Jury finds stone companies at fault in lawsuit by countertop cutter sick with silicosis

    Jury finds stone companies at fault in lawsuit by countertop cutter sick with silicosis

    [ad_1]

    A Los Angeles County jury found businesses that make or distribute engineered stone at fault Wednesday for the suffering of a 34-year-old stonecutter afflicted with an incurable disease.

    In a decision watched closely by silicosis experts and the stone industry, jurors deliberating at Stanley Mosk Courthouse in downtown L.A. decided largely in favor of Gustavo Reyes Gonzalez, who was diagnosed with silicosis and had to undergo a double lung transplant after years of cutting engineered stone countertops.

    The decision followed deliberations that spanned five days of the multi-week trial. Before the verdict, the two sides in the case had agreed that economic losses for Reyes Gonzalez exceeded $8 million.

    The jury decided that other damages — which could include physical pain, mental suffering and emotional distress — amounted to more than $44 million. However, because the jury did not deem the defendants wholly responsible for those damages, they will not be collectively liable for the full amount.

    It concluded that Caesarstone USA bore 15% of the responsibility, Cambria 10% and Color Marble 2.5%. The court will ultimately determine how much each defendant must pay.

    Reyes Gonzalez is among scores of California countertop cutters who have sued companies like Caesarstone and Cambria after falling ill with silicosis, which is caused by inhaling tiny particles of crystalline silica.

    His case was the first to go to trial, according to his attorneys. It tested whether companies that manufacture or distribute slabs of artificial stone, commonly marketed as quartz, could be held responsible for the ravages of silicosis, an ancient disease now emerging among countertop cutters barely in middle age.

    Scientists have linked the eruption of silicosis cases among stonecutters to the booming popularity of engineered stone, which is typically much higher in lung-scarring silica than natural stone such as granite or marble. In California, more than a dozen countertop cutters have died of silicosis in recent years. In a recent study of the emerging cases and fatalities, researchers found the median age at death was 46.

    Attorneys for Reyes Gonzalez argued that the companies had failed to provide sufficient warning about the dangers of cutting the slabs and that the risks far outweighed the benefits of their products. Gilbert Purcell, one of his lawyers, told the jury that engineered stone has “nasty, nasty risks” that had not been properly disclosed.

    “A company should never needlessly cause risk to others,” Purcell said, “and that’s what they did.”

    For instance, Purcell argued, Cambria had failed for a decade and a half to warn that silica dust could be an invisible hazard. How can workers avoid breathing dust, he argued, “when you can’t even know you’re breathing it because it’s invisible?”

    A cloud of dust envelops a countertop fabricator cutting engineered stone at a Sun Valley shop last year.

    (Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times)

    Lawyers representing companies that make or distribute engineered stone argued that the operators of the Orange County workshops where Reyes Gonzalez worked were to blame. If they had used the proper protections, he would not have gotten silicosis, said Peter Strotz, an attorney representing Caesarstone USA.

    “They knew what they had to do. They didn’t do it. … Worst of all, they deceived Mr. Reyes Gonzalez. They led him to believe he would be protected when he was not,” Strotz told the jury. He argued Caesarstone USA had done its part by providing safety information and should not be blamed for the “misuse” of its products.

    Cambria attorney Lindsay Weiss said the company had provided warnings, including labels on the slabs themselves, and offered free training to the “fabricators” who cut, grind and polish the material to shape it into countertops.

    She held up a sample of its quartz surfacing material to the jury, telling them it was safe. “The problem is when people don’t follow the law when they handle this product,” Weiss said.

    And Color Marble, a distributor, argued there was no proof that Reyes Gonzalez had cut or polished slabs sold by its company. The jury found Color Marble liable for negligence — as it did Caesarstone USA and Cambria — but did not deem it liable for other claims for product liability as it had for those firms.

    The lawsuit initially targeted a long list of companies, but all but three — Caesarstone USA, Cambria and Color Marble — were dismissed or settled before the jury reached a verdict. Attorney James Nevin, who represents Reyes Gonzalez, said most had “resolved the case pursuant to confidential agreements.”

    Strotz, representing Caesarstone USA, declined to comment on the verdict.

    Weiss said her client, Cambria, disagreed with the decision. “We think this is not a product issue. It’s a workplace safety issue,” she said. “This is handled safely every single day.”

    Raphael Metzger, one of the attorneys representing Reyes Gonzalez, called the decision “a win for public health and occupational safety.”

    He grew emotional as he praised the jurors for their work. “Only in America,” he said, “can Hispanic immigrants come here and receive justice — as they have.”

    The trial, which stretched more than a month, spotlighted the dangers facing workers like Reyes Gonzalez, who testified that he came to the U.S. from the Mexican state of Veracruz as a teenager to escape poverty. For years, he worked from morning to evening cutting slabs for countertops.

    Dust was rampant in the Orange County workshops where he labored, Reyes Gonzalez testified, at times so much that it looked like fog. His mask would grow filthy. Even when he used water while cutting, he said, “a lot of dust would come off” when the liquid had dried.

    His wife, Wendy Torres Hernandez, said that when Reyes Gonzalez got his diagnosis, he called her crying. “He was told that there was no cure for it. There was nothing that he could do,” she said.

    “I told him we would figure something out to help him, because I couldn’t just let him die,” she testified. Despondent, he told her “that he was going to start planning for his funeral.”

    Reyes Gonzalez ultimately became so sick that both his lungs needed to be replaced in a transplant. The surgery may afford him only six more years to live before he needs another set of transplanted lungs — and a doctor testified that if that did happen, he would be unlikely to get a third transplant because of his age.

    He will have to take a host of medications and carefully monitor his health until he dies. Because of the medicines he takes, Reyes Gonzalez said he cannot have children, which pains him because his wife adores them. Doctors might find a way for them in the future, he said, but cannot guarantee it.

    Lawyers for Caesarstone and other companies focused much of their questioning on members of the Silverio family, who paid Reyes Gonzalez for his work in a string of Orange County workshops. When a co-worker named Guillermo Mora de los Santos took the stand, a defense attorney questioned him about whether the Silverio shops had ever provided trainings on workplace safety or had any “silica control program.”

    Mora de los Santos said no. “We didn’t know about that — about that disease,” he said about silicosis.

    Weiss, representing Cambria, stressed to the jury that Reyes Gonzalez had described sweeping up dry dust and using compressed air to clean — practices that send dust into the air — and that he wasn’t provided with an adequate mask. Nor was water used properly, she said.

    In court, one of the Silverios denied having seen safety information from Caesarstone that included a video on silicosis risks, despite having signed a form saying he had received such materials.

    Purcell, in his closing remarks, argued that whatever the Silverios had done or not done could not absolve the defendants. “This chain of safety starts with them.”

    In its verdict, the jury had the opportunity to assign a percentage of the total responsibility to “others” besides Reyes Gonzalez and the engineered stone companies. Jurors assigned 70% to “others” and 2.5% to Reyes Gonzalez himself.

    The Silica Safety Coalition, an industry group that maintains that engineered stone can and should be cut safely, said the 70% fault attributed to “others” was an acknowledgment of the unsafe practices at his workplace.

    “We think the California jury was wrong to blame the slab suppliers for any of Mr. Reyes-Gonzalez’s injuries from his unsafe workplace condition, and we anticipate the verdict will be appealed by one or more parties,” the coalition said in a statement.

    Juror Laura Miller, who said she disagreed with most of her fellow jurors in finding the companies liable, said after the verdict that she felt the blame lay with the Silverios. To reach their decisions in the civil case, at least nine of 12 jurors had to agree on the verdicts.

    “The employer was using no precautions,” Miller said.

    Nevin, one of Reyes Gonzalez’s lawyers, said in a statement that the jury had “rightly rejected” efforts to blame “unsophisticated hirers” who had not been warned of the dangers themselves.

    His firm, Brayton Purcell LLP, now represents more than 150 countertop cutters with silicosis who labored at more than 350 shops, it said in a statement. “The problem is the products, not the shops.”

    Much of the court case revolved around the kinds of measures needed to protect workers from silica dust from engineered stone, as a string of experts testified about the risks of cutting such slabs. Among them was Dr. Kenneth Rosenman, who testified that Reyes Gonzalez got silicosis despite having used some tools that dispense water because they were “not sufficiently protective.”

    “They do not lower the dust level low enough to prevent this severe disease,” said Rosenman, chief of the division of occupational and environmental medicine at Michigan State University.

    Another witness for the plaintiff, industrial hygienist Stephen Petty, said that N95 masks would be “bottom of the barrel” protection for engineered stone dust. Even the most protective respirators, which use a tank of clean air, are not a “permanent solution” because workers tend to adjust them, breaking the seal, he said.

    Defense attorneys turned to other witnesses, including industrial hygienist Brian Daly, who said that engineered stone can be cut and polished safely. Reyes Gonzalez “would not have developed silicosis had his employer had a program that was protective” and followed workplace safety regulations, Daly testified.

    Judge William F. Fahey had excluded testimony that attorneys representing Reyes Gonzalez had sought from Georgia Tech scientist Jenny Houlroyd, saying her study was based on data that were not provided to the court, among other issues. Her analysis had concluded that it wasn’t economically feasible to employ the measures needed to safely cut engineered stone, especially for small workshops.

    Artificial stone is “a uniquely toxic product,” and neither “wet methods” nor wearing a mask would make it safe to cut and grind, Houlroyd wrote in a prepared list of her opinions.

    [ad_2]

    Emily Alpert Reyes

    Source link

  • Doomsday plot: Idaho jury convicts Chad Daybell of killing wife and girlfriend’s 2 children

    Doomsday plot: Idaho jury convicts Chad Daybell of killing wife and girlfriend’s 2 children

    [ad_1]

    An Idaho jury has convicted Chad Daybell of murder in the deaths of his wife and his girlfriend’s two youngest children.The verdict marks the end of a years-long investigation that included bizarre claims of zombie children, apocalyptic prophesies and illicit affairs. Now, the jury will be tasked with deciding if Daybell should be sentenced to death for the crimes.Prosecutors charged Daybell and his newest wife, Lori Vallow Daybell, with multiple counts of murder, conspiracy and grand theft in connection with the deaths of Vallow Daybell’s two youngest children, 7-year-old Joshua “JJ” Vallow and 16-year-old Tylee Ryan, in September 2019.Prosecutors also charged the couple in connection with the October 2019 death of Chad Daybell’s wife, Tammy Daybell.Prosecutors had said they would seek the death penalty if Daybell was convicted.Daybell’s defense attorney argued there was not enough evidence to tie Daybell to the killings, and suggested Vallow Daybell’s older brother, Alex Cox, was the culprit.Vallow Daybell was convicted last year and sentenced to life in prison without parole.

    An Idaho jury has convicted Chad Daybell of murder in the deaths of his wife and his girlfriend’s two youngest children.

    The verdict marks the end of a years-long investigation that included bizarre claims of zombie children, apocalyptic prophesies and illicit affairs. Now, the jury will be tasked with deciding if Daybell should be sentenced to death for the crimes.

    Prosecutors charged Daybell and his newest wife, Lori Vallow Daybell, with multiple counts of murder, conspiracy and grand theft in connection with the deaths of Vallow Daybell’s two youngest children, 7-year-old Joshua “JJ” Vallow and 16-year-old Tylee Ryan, in September 2019.

    Prosecutors also charged the couple in connection with the October 2019 death of Chad Daybell’s wife, Tammy Daybell.

    Prosecutors had said they would seek the death penalty if Daybell was convicted.

    Daybell’s defense attorney argued there was not enough evidence to tie Daybell to the killings, and suggested Vallow Daybell’s older brother, Alex Cox, was the culprit.

    Vallow Daybell was convicted last year and sentenced to life in prison without parole.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Prosecutors begin case against stepfather of missing girl Madalina Cojocari

    Prosecutors begin case against stepfather of missing girl Madalina Cojocari

    [ad_1]

    In an undated photo released by authorities, Madalina Cojocari is shown with a horse. The 11-year-old Cornelius girl went missing before Thanksgiving 2022 and her mother and stepfather were arrested for not reporting her disappearance.

    In an undated photo released by authorities, Madalina Cojocari is shown with a horse. The 11-year-old Cornelius girl went missing before Thanksgiving 2022 and her mother and stepfather were arrested for not reporting her disappearance.

    Photo provided by Cornelius Police

    For 23 days, Christopher Palmiter didn’t know the location of his stepdaughter, Madalina Cojocari, a Mecklenburg County prosecutor said during opening argument to a jury Friday.

    “When all of this is wrapped up, you’re not going to have the answer of what happened to Madalina,” Assistant District Attorney Austin Butler said. “But you’ll have one answer: And that’s the defendant is guilty of failure to report the disappearance of Madalina.”

    The Cornelius girl, then 11, mysteriously disappeared in 2022 following her school’s Thanksgiving break.

    In December 2022, mother Diana Cojocari and Palmiter were charged with failing to report her missing. The couple gave police conflicting information, both insinuating that the other “hid” Madalina somewhere and that each suddenly had a large bag of money following her disappearance.

    Madalina’s whereabouts remain unknown.

    Diana Cojocari pleaded guilty to the charge Monday and was released from jail after spending about 17 months there.

    Butler and Palmiter’s attorney, Brandon Roseman, both made opening arguments Friday to the jury in the case against Palmiter, 61. Jurors also heard from the state’s first two witnesses.

    The jury for the trial in Mecklenburg Superior Court is made up of 11 men and one woman. Two alternate jurors, both women, were also selected Friday.

    Next week, jurors will hear testimony from Cornelius police detectives.

    Roseman told jurors that prosecutors had made numerous assumptions about Palmiter and that it was their duty to consider all of the information and context presented in order to render a fair verdict.

    State’s first witness

    Tina Rorie, Madalina’s bus driver before her disappearance, testified that she remembered Madalina because their names rhymed, and because Madalina always thanked the driver before getting off the bus.

    Rorie said when she would drop her off after school, she’d see Madalina run towards her house and go inside. Asked if she’d seen Madalina with any adults, Rorie said she saw her once walking with a man who she assumed was her father.

    The jury was shown footage from the last time Madalina rode the bus, on Nov. 21, 2022. Rorie was asked to identify Madalina in the video, and as she did so, she began to cry.

    State’s second witness

    School counselor Danice Lampkin at Bailey Middle School made several attempts to contact Palmiter and Diana Cojocari after noticing Madalina had numerous absences in 2022.

    She said she didn’t know Madalina personally but tracked student attendance. She made sure, as a rule, to contact families when students had two absences.

    Butler presented several documents from Madalina’s school file that contained things such as her birth certificate, student enrollment form and emergency contact form and her class schedule.

    Lampkin said Madalina was doing well academically but that the absences prompted Lampkin to try to contact Diana Cojocari by phone and emails. When she couldn’t reach her, she tried Palmiter, who was listed in Madalina’s school documents as having permission to pick her up from school.

    But she couldn’t reach him either, she said, despite leaving several voicemails in November and December 2022 and sending emails.

    Butler played those five voicemails for the jury.

    In the final two voicemails, Lampkin informed the family that she’d be making a home visit if they didn’t respond, to check on the welfare of Madalina and drop off what is known as a truancy packet, which contained things such as her attendance record.

    Lampkin said she was able to get in contact with a third person identified as “Sandy” on Madalina’s emergency contact form who was not authorized to pick her up from school. Lampkin spoke with this person twice, she said. The person said Madalina was sick.

    After speaking with that person, the school received notification through a contact form on the school’s website that Madalina was sick. The form said it was submitted by Diana Cojocari, but Lampkin said there isn’t a way to know if it actually was submitted by her or not.

    Lampkin attempted to visit Madalina’s home to drop off the packet, but no one answered, so she left the packet at the door.

    The day after dropping off the packet, in December, Lampkin said, she finally heard back from Diana Cojocari who said she wanted to meet. Lampkin said she stressed that she needed to bring Madalina, but Diana never affirmed the request.

    And the day after the phone call, Diana showed up to school without Madalina. She told Lampkin her daughter was missing. Lampkin went to the school resource officer. Palmiter showed up later to speak with the school resource officer.

    Madalina was never reported missing to the school prior to the meeting, she said.

    Defense attorney cross-examination

    Roseman, Palmiter’s attorney, asked Lampkin about the school documents in the file that were shown to the jury.

    Roseman said the documents showed that Diana Cojocari was listed as Madalina’s legal guardian, not Palmiter. Palmiter didn’t sign on a line designating legal guardians.

    The father line on Madalina’s birth certificate was blank, Roseman said, showing the document.

    Roseman asked Lampkin if she knew if Palmiter had any parental rights to Madalina, and she said she didn’t know.

    He also noted that Lampkin couldn’t be sure that Palmiter lived at the address listed on Madalina’s school files. He asked if she knew whether or not he received the voicemails and emails, and she said she didn’t know. He said that because she doesn’t know his life or work schedule, she couldn’t be certain he ever received those communications.

    Butler, however, showed the jury a deed to a house that was co-owned by Diana Cojocari and Palmiter. The address on the deed matched the address on Madalina’s school documents.

    The trial will resume at 11 a.m. on Tuesday, May 28.

    This story was originally published May 25, 2024, 1:25 PM.

    Related stories from Charlotte Observer

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Parents of boys killed by Grossman take solace in her murder conviction: ‘We finally can move on’

    Parents of boys killed by Grossman take solace in her murder conviction: ‘We finally can move on’

    [ad_1]

    Nancy Iskander arrived at the graves of her two young sons a few hours after a jury on Friday convicted Rebecca Grossman of murdering them.

    It was the end of a wrenching day. Three years after Grossman sped through a Westlake Village crosswalk in her Mercedes-Benz, hitting Iskander’s sons as she watched in horror, she had finally found some level of closure.

    “Someone was held accountable for your murder sons. Sleep tight. Rest in peace,” she wrote on X along with a dusk photo of the marble headstone.

    It took jurors a little over one day to convict Grossman on all charges.

    In doing so, the jurors appeared to embrace the prosecution’s case that Grossman — the scion of a prominent medical family — was reckless and impaired by margaritas and Valium when she plowed through the residential intersection and hit the children in a marked crosswalk.

    The jury convicted Grossman on two counts of murder, two counts of gross vehicular manslaughter and one count of hit-and-run resulting in death. Those were the maximum charges sought by prosecutors. The jury could have opted for lesser charges, such as vehicular manslaughter with ordinary negligence.

    Mark Iskander, left, and his brother Jacob in a family photo.

    (Courtesy of the Iskander family)

    For Iskander, it was a moment of satisfaction and grief. She had been bearing witness for her boys, testifying in court and demanding authorities take the case seriously.

    “My family has been waiting for this for 3½ years now. I’ve been waiting for the trust of the justice system. So today we’re just giving glory to God; the God of Mark and Jacob has been with us through that time and helped us through, carried us,” she said outside court.

    She said sitting through the high-profile trial “felt like I am attending the funeral of the boys again, day after day. That’s how it felt, seeing the defendant and defense attorneys.”

    But with the conviction, she felt, it was all worth it.

    “We were trusting the justice system,” she said. “We have a justice system you can trust from our experience. It’s not a justice system where people get away with things just under the color of their skin or their wealth or anything. You commit a crime, you will be held accountable.”

    1

    Mark Iskander.

    2

    The Iskander family, including Nancy Iskander and her husband

    1. Mark Iskander 2. Jacob Iskander. (Courtesy of the Iskander family)

    On Sept. 29, 2020, when Iskander and her three sons approached the crosswalk, wearing inline skates, she began to cross Triunfo Canyon Road at Saddle Mountain Drive. Her youngest son, Zachary, was next to her on his scooter. Mark, on a skateboard, and Jacob, also wearing inline skates, followed a little over arm’s length behind.

    Prosecutors accused Grossman of reaching 81 mph before lightly braking and hitting the brothers at 73 mph, based on the car’s data recorder and the distance Mark was found from the crosswalk.

    Prosecutors allege Grossman, 60, had cocktails with her then-boyfriend Scott Erickson, a former Dodgers pitcher, and then raced with him — he in his black Mercedes sport utility vehicle and she in her white Mercedes SUV — along Triunfo Canyon Road until they reached a crosswalk.

    Iskander boys

    (Courtesy of the Iskander family)

    Prosecutors also alleged that Grossman traveled a third of a mile after hitting the children before safety features in her car automatically shut it down.

    Iskander’s witness testimony was a highly charged moment in the trial, as she described watching Grossman’s SUV plowing into her sons.

    “I heard the loud noise, and I heard the driver of that car kept going,” Iskander told jurors. “I started screaming, ‘I can’t find them.’”

    “Nobody came back to help,” Iskander said. “She did not come back to the scene.”

    “She killed my kids,” Iskander said of Grossman. “They aren’t at school. They are not playing sports. They are at the cemetery.”

    Grossman was taken into custody after the verdict. She faces a sentence of 34 years to life in prison based on the conviction. Grossman’s lead attorney, Tony Buzbee, called the verdict unexpected and vowed to appeal.

    A woman, a man and three boys

    Nancy and Karim Iskander with their children, Mark, Jacob and Zachary.

    (Courtesy of the Iskander family)

    Nancy Iskander said it didn’t bring her any joy to see Grossman in handcuffs. Grossman’s daughter was overcome with emotion and yelled, “Oh, my God,” as the first word “guilty” echoed across the courtroom.

    “No one wishes that on anyone,” Iskander said. “I promise I do not have any hate for her. My heart broke for her children. … It wasn’t easy, but it will bring me closure.”

    Iskander also took time to talk about her sons.

    “Well, they were golden-age children. They loved God. They were raised at the church. They were hardworking. They were honest. They cared about the truth,” she said. “And they were spoken for by a prosecution who’s also just that hardworking, honest, who cared about the truth.

    “Mark and Jacob didn’t die. Mark and Jacob were murdered,” she added.

    She said her family was able to cope with the tragedy because of a large support group. “We’re thankful for our community. We’re thankful to everyone here.” Her son Zachary, who was 5 on the day of the crash, continues to deal with the trauma of losing his brothers.

    Iskander’s husband, Karim, said he hoped the verdict would be a turning point.

    Two boys wearing matching clothes hold each other

    Jacob, left, and Mark Iskander.

    (Courtesy of the Iskander family)

    “We finally can move on. Finally. We have been waiting for the closure,” he said.

    He also thanked the jury, saying they saw past “the imaginary conspiracy theories and tricks…. and focused on the evidence and they took it seriously.”

    [ad_2]

    Richard Winton

    Source link

  • Paul Pelosi testifies that he knew he was in ‘serious danger’ before hammer attack

    Paul Pelosi testifies that he knew he was in ‘serious danger’ before hammer attack

    [ad_1]

    Paul Pelosi, husband of former U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, offered chilling details in federal court on Monday of the night he was allegedly attacked and bludgeoned with a hammer by a man now on trial for attempted kidnapping and assault.

    Paul Pelosi, 83, took the stand on the second day of the federal trial against David DePape, who faces federal charges for attempting to kidnap the Democratic congresswoman and assaulting her husband with the intent to interfere with the lawmaker’s official duties or retaliate against her.

    DePape, 43, is accused of traveling from his Richmond residence to the Pelosis’ San Francisco home the early morning of Oct. 28, 2022, in search of the lawmaker, allegedly with plans to hold her hostage and question her regarding far-right conspiracy theories involving the Democratic Party and a list of politicians and public figures.

    Instead of finding Nancy Pelosi, who was in Washington at the time, DePape wandered through the quiet Pacific Heights home before stumbling upon a bedroom with her husband sleeping inside.

    “The door opened and a very large man came in, with a hammer in one hand and some ties in the other hand,” Paul Pelosi testified. “And he said ‘Where’s Nancy?’ And I think that’s what woke me up.”

    Until then, it was a typical evening.

    Paul Pelosi told jurors he’d gone to dinner that night in San Francisco. He went to sleep as usual between 11:30 p.m. and midnight, bringing a cup of ice water he took to bed each evening. He didn’t set the alarm system, which the family only used when they were out of town, because it’s sensitive and will go off easily with people in the home.

    A couple of hours later, Paul Pelosi woke up in “tremendous shock” after realizing that “someone had broken into the house.”

    “And looking at him and looking at the hammer and the ties, I recognized that I was in serious danger,” he said. “And so I tried to stay as calm as possible.”

    Paul Pelosi said he told DePape that his wife was in Washington.

    “Well then we’re going to have to wait for her,” Paul Pelosi said DePape responded.

    DePape told Paul Pelosi that his wife was the “leader of the pack,” and “he had to take her out,” he testified. Because she wasn’t home, Paul Pelosi said DePape told him he had to tie him up and wait for her.

    “He had these cords in his hand. I assume that’s what he was going to use,” he said.

    Paul Pelosi said he first tried to move toward the elevator outside the couple’s bedroom, which had a telephone inside. But DePape caught on, Paul Pelosi said, so instead he moved toward his bathroom where he charged his cellphone each night.

    He called 911, but didn’t feel like he could be honest with the dispatcher about the situation. DePape still had the hammer, and was demanding that Paul Pelosi tell the dispatcher that he was just a friend of the family.

    “And looking at him and looking at the hammer and the ties, I recognized that I was in serious danger,” Paul Pelosi, shown above, told the jury in the federal trial against David DePape. “And so I tried to stay as calm as possible.”

    (Noah Berger / Associated Press)

    According to his court testimony, Paul Pelosi hung up the 911 call, and tried to reason with the intruder. DePape said he was tired, and wanted to tie Paul Pelosi up so that he could get some sleep. Paul Pelosi suggested the two men walk downstairs, where DePape left his two backpacks and other belongings. Paul Pelosi said he knew that if the police came, they needed to get downstairs where it would be easier to arrest the suspect.

    “He said, ‘Oh, the police are going to be here, it’s over for me, I’m going to have to take you out,’ things like that,” Paul Pelosi said DePape told him. “I said ‘No, they’re probably not going to come. They’re probably not going to come.’

    “And then the police were at the door.”

    Police body camera footage shows Paul Pelosi — holding his cup of water — opening the door with DePape standing next to him. The two were fighting for control of the hammer, which officers ordered them to drop.

    DePape instead grabbed it from Paul Pelosi and swung it at his head multiple times, fracturing his skull and causing injuries to his arm and hand. Photo and video evidence shown to the jury on Thursday depict Paul Pelosi lying in a pool of his blood, struggling to breathe as police tackled DePape.

    He was hospitalized for more than a week at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital for a fractured skill and other injuries. He received a dozen stitches on the back of his right arm, he said, and his badly damaged left hand was also treated. Paul Pelosi told the jurors that the plastic surgeon was able to reconstruct his hand and avoid doing skin grafts, while his head injury recovery included regaining his balance and “getting my walking back.”

    Paul Pelosi recounted the attack as his daughter, Christine Pelosi, sat in the far back corner of the courtroom and while DePape watched from beside his defense attorneys.

    Despite the graphic testimony and evidence, the trial is considered far from an easy assault case. Prosecutors bear the burden of proving that the attack was due to Nancy Pelosi’s role as House Speaker, and that DePape intended to kidnap her after breaking into the lawmaker’s home.

    Assistant U.S. Atty. Laura Vartain Horn told the federal court jury in her opening arguments on Thursday that DePape had gone to the couple’s home that early morning with the idea to hold Nancy Pelosi “hostage,” “break her kneecaps” and “teach her a lesson.”

    “When the defendant broke into the speaker’s home, he had a plan,” Horn told the jury of 12 men and three women. “It was a violent plan.”

    Prosecutors attempted to bolster their argument on Monday when questioning FBI Special Agent Stephanie Minor, who has handled the case over the last year. Minor walked the jurors through a series of videos showing DePape traveling from the East Bay to the Pelosis’ home, and described a list of his internet searches in the days leading up to the attack.

    Minor explained how DePape had extensively researched the Pelosi family, along with others on his so-called target list, and paid for a service that provided their emails and home addresses. The prosecution also played a recording of a phone call DePape made to a reporter earlier this year, in which he seemingly apologizes for not being successful in his mission.

    “I have an important message for everyone in America. You’re welcome,” he said. “I would also like to apologize…I’m so sorry I didn’t get more of them.”

    But federal public defenders Jodi Linker and Angela Chuang have disputed the argument that DePape intended to kidnap Nancy Pelosi or attack Paul Pelosi because of his wife’s official position in Congress.

    Instead, they claim that the Pelosi home was the first stop in a broader scheme to end corruption and other offenses he believed were being committed by the Democratic Party and public officials and celebrities.

    DePape’s plan was to use Nancy Pelosi to put an end to his QAnon-like theory that Democratic politicians and public officials were abusing and trafficking children, the jury was told.

    “This is not a who done it,” Linker told the jury in her opening argument. It was a “why done it,” she said, “and the why matters.”

    The assault has inspired additional conspiracies and prompted political attacks against the Pelosi family, including from former President Trump.

    “And [Nancy Pelosi’s] against building a wall at our border, even though she has a wall around her house,” Trump said to cheers and hollering during a speech at the California Republican Party’s convention in September. “Which obviously didn’t do a very good job.”

    Along with the federal criminal case, DePape faces separate state charges including assault with a deadly weapon, elder abuse, burglary and threats to a public official and their family.

    Paul Pelosi said he’s mostly recovered from his injuries, but that he still suffers from lightheadedness and headaches.

    “There are still lumps on my head. If I run my fingers, I can still feel dents and lumps,” he said. “They’re not as sensitive to the touch as they were.”

    The recovery process was “very painful,” he said. He said that he had not read news related to the incident, nor had he listened to the tapes or watched the videos.

    “I’ve tried to put it out of my mind,” he said, taking periodic pauses to maintain his composure.

    “I’ve made the best effort I possibly can to not relive this.”

    [ad_2]

    Hannah Wiley

    Source link

  • Judge vacates 67-year-old Sioux City man’s guilty verdict for enticing a minor

    Judge vacates 67-year-old Sioux City man’s guilty verdict for enticing a minor

    [ad_1]

    SIOUX CITY — A judge has vacated a jury verdict in which a Sioux City man was found guilty of offering a 14-year-old girl $600 for sex, ruling there was not enough evidence presented at trial to show the man knew the girl was underage.

    District Judge Jeffrey Neary granted a defense motion for a judgment of acquittal, found Danny Beard not guilty of the charge of enticing away a minor and dismissed the case.






    Beard




    A jury in August found Beard, 67, guilty at the conclusion of a two-day trial in Woodbury County District Court. He had faced a five-year prison sentence for the Class D felony.

    Neary, who presided over the trial, focused his ruling on the fourth element of the crime: that at the time of the Nov. 14 incident, Beard “reasonably believed (the girl) was under 16.”

    In his ruling, Neary said his review of the trial transcript and video exhibits and recollection of the evidence led him to conclude the prosecution presented no definitive evidence Beard knew the girl’s age prior to the incident.

    People are also reading…

    “It is clear to the court on this evidence that the age of (the girl) was not clear at the time of the incident and further that nothing in this evidence would indicate that (she) was under the age of 16 at the time of the incident,” Neary wrote.

    Beard was accused of pulling up next to the girl in his pickup truck as she was walking in the parking lot of her grandmother’s apartment complex, asking what a “pretty girl” like her was doing out so late and then asking, “You want to come with me?” before saying, “I’ll give you 500 (dollars).”

    Beard, who lived in the same apartment complex, parked his pickup and approached the girl as she was entering the apartment building and offered the girl $500 to come up to his apartment, then raised his offer to $600. The girl went to her grandmother’s apartment, and her grandmother filed a police report.

    Beard later told an investigator he thought the girl was someone else and that his offer of money was for cleaning his apartment, not for sex. He told police he did not know the girl’s age until after the incident.

    In his resistance to the defense’s motion for a new trial, Assistant Woodbury County Attorney James Loomis said the evidence should be taken together in context rather than singled out. Video surveillance, he said, showed not only what Beard said to the girl, but how he said it, leaving viewers to conclude he was offering money for sex. The girl also visited her grandmother several times a week and often encountered Beard, who was familiar with her and would have “reasonably known” she was under age 16.

    Neary said in his ruling that in the video and during her trial testimony, the girl appeared mature for her age, and he himself would have guessed she was between age 16-18. Neary also said it was dark at the time Beard encountered the girl, who, the judge said, resembles her older sister who was living with their grandmother.

    The prosecution’s evidence, Neary said, did little more than “raise suspicion, speculation and conjecture” that Beard would have reasonably known the girl was under age 16.

    [ad_2]

    Source link