ReportWire

Tag: JPMorgan Chase

  • A major bank has banned ChatGPT—should your company follow suit?

    A major bank has banned ChatGPT—should your company follow suit?

    [ad_1]

    Finance and artificial intelligence aren’t like oil and water. There are areas where the two mix, like expense reporting. But when it comes to generative-A.I. applications such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT, a financial institution is taking a pass.

    This week, there have been reports that JPMorgan Chase & Co. is restricting staff from using the ChatGPT chatbot. The firm’s mandate wasn’t made in response to a certain event but part of standard controls for third-party software usage, the Telegraph first reported. JPMorgan didn’t immediately respond to my request for comment. 

    Launched in November by OpenAI, ChatGPT is a chatbot that can answer questions and can generate content on any topic you can think of, and even write articles. It’s trained to follow language and thought patterns like humans. (Read more about OpenAI founder Sam Altman here.)

    To discuss ChatGPT in the workplace, I had a chat with Vikram R. Bhargava, assistant professor of strategic management and public policy at the George Washington University School of Business, who conducts research on A.I. and the future of work.

    “I think that a lot of us, including people working in finance, were sort of stunned by the performance of ChatGPT when we first started playing around with it,” Bhargava says. “A number of employees and even banks might be tempted to use these tools to make their life a little easier,” he says. For example, asking it to come up with a relevant Excel formula for a modeling task that an analyst or an associate might do, he explains. But not fully knowing how the technology operates, “does create a little bit of discomfort in heavily relying on it,” he says.

    “The thing with banking, of course, is that it’s a very heavily regulated industry, and this technology is also new to regulators,” Bhargava says. Along those lines, Mira Murati, chief technology officer at OpenAI, told Time in a recent interview that regulators will need to get involved with ChatGPT and govern the use of A.I. in a way that’s “aligned with human values.”

    “I don’t know the specifics of the rationale behind JPMorgan’s decision, but it does strike me as prudent,” Bhargava says. “This technology is rapidly evolving. One of the difficulties is—what might be true of ChatGPT as it stands, might not be true in three months.”

    JPMorgan isn’t a novice when it comes to A.I. The bank recently ranked No. 1 in data intelligence startup Evident’s A.I. Index, the first public benchmark of the major banks on their artificial intelligence maturity. The index covers the largest 23 banks in North America and Europe. JPMorgan spends $14 billion in technology annually, of which approximately half is dedicated to investments, the firm said in an announcement.  

    “Leading in A.I. and knowing how to use A.I. responsibly, sometimes might require the firm to abstain from using the given technology,” Bhargava says. 

    Michael Schrage, a research fellow at the MIT Sloan School Initiative on the Digital Economy, spoke with finance chiefs at Fortune’s CFO Collaborative event in January about the possibilities of generative A.I. in finance. I asked him his thoughts on JPMorgan’s reported restriction.

    Schrage says he’s not certain how OpenAI currently manages, collects, and analyzes “prompts” (how you get ChatGPT to do what you want). But he suggests prompts may be an issue for a bank concerned about privacy rules, compliance, and proprietary processes. Prompts that are too detailed may inadvertently reveal information that the bank or its clients would prefer not to be shared, Schrage says.

    “In the same way that Google and Bing know what topics, themes, and names are being searched, it’s similarly probable that OpenAI is tracking the level of detail and specificity of prompts,” he says.

    Again, Schrage is not sure of how OpenAI handles and tracks prompts, but says: “It’s easy to imagine and enact ways where prompts can be anonymized, aggregated, masked, and shielded to minimize revealing sensitive information while still getting good ‘generative advice’ and insight.” I reached out to OpenAI to ask about prompts, but haven’t received a response.

    Many CFOs are already cautious and experimenting with A.I. And, it will be some time before they’d feel comfortable incorporating ChatGPT, Alexander Bant, chief of research for CFOs at Gartner, recently told me

    What would make financial institutions more open to ChatGPT? “They need a little bit more security in knowing how the use of this technology interacts with the current regulatory environment,” Bhargava says. But are there perhaps some tasks where a company can experiment without being reprimanded by the Securities and Exchange Commission? 

    “Let’s say there’s an entry-level employee on your team who might not write the clearest, most concise emails,” Bhargava explains. “So, using ChatGPT might facilitate clearer communication.”

    The jury’s still out on applying ChatGPT in finance, but generative A.I. isn’t going anywhere.


    Have a good weekend. See you on Monday.

    Sheryl Estrada
    sheryl.estrada@fortune.com

    Big deal

    Hyperproof, a SaaS-based compliance and risk management company, has released its 2023 IT Compliance and Risk Benchmark Report. The company found that security, compliance, and risk management professionals were more concerned with short-term, immediate threats, as opposed to handling larger-scale decisions like long-term security issues. Respondents said their No. 1 concern was cybersecurity risks (36%), followed by third-party risk (29%), and lack of support and resources dedicated to IT risks and compliance (24%). The research also found that companies are poised and ready to level up their risk and compliance management processes in the coming years. 

    Going deeper

    Here are a few Fortune weekend reads:

    The housing market correction has already caused homeowners to lose $2.3 trillion,” by Lance Lambert

    These are the top cybersecurity startups to watch in 2023, according to VCs,” by Lucy Brewster

    The ‘free money’ tech investment is over and the ‘old economy’ is set to become the big winner, according to Bank of America,” by Will Daniel

    These 5 sleep habits could add 5 years to your life, say experts,” by L’Oreal Thompson Payton

    Leaderboard

    Here’s a list of some notable moves this week:

    Sandeep Singh Aujla was promoted to CFO at Intuit Inc. (Nasdaq: INTU), the global financial technology platform that makes TurboTax, Credit Karma, QuickBooks, and Mailchimp, effective Aug. 1. Aujla has held senior finance positions at Intuit for seven years and is currently the SVP of finance for Intuit’s largest business unit, the Small Business and Self-Employed Group (SBSEG), and for Intuit’s technology organization. Michelle Clatterbuck, who has served as CFO since February 2018, plans to step down as CFO on July 31.

    Joanne Knight was promoted to CFO at Cargill, a global food corporation that provides agricultural and financial services. Knight currently serves as Cargill’s acting CFO. Before this role, she was VP of finance for Cargill’s agriculture supply chain enterprise, including ocean transportation and the world trading group. Before Cargill, Knight spent 10 years in finance, marketing, and business leadership roles at General Mills that included P&L responsibility. She also held finance leadership roles at Wachovia.

    Robert Higginbotham was appointed interim CFO at Foot Locker, Inc., effective March 1, according to the company’s form 8-K filed on Feb. 21. Higginbotham will serve in this role in addition to his current duties as SVP of investor relations and financial planning and analysis, a role he began in December 2022. The company continues to conduct a search to identify a successor to current EVP and CFO Andrew E. Page who will depart on Feb. 28. Previously, Higginbotham served as VP of investor relations.

    Ryan Clemen was promoted to CFO at SelectQuote, Inc. (NYSE: SLQT), an insurance sales agency. Clement was named interim CFO in May 2022. Before joining SelectQuote in January 2022 as the SVP of financial planning and analysis, Clement served as the CFO of Sifted (formerly VeriShip). Before Sifted, Clemen spent seven years at Edelman Financial Engines, where he served in various senior-level finance and operational roles.

    David Rudow was named CFO at Unite Us, a software company enabling cross-sector collaboration. Rudow will lead the Unite Us finance organization. He served most recently as CFO at nCino taking the company public in 2020. For more than 20 years, Rudow served in senior leadership positions, including SVP at CentralSquare Technologies and senior analyst roles for several leading investment banking and asset management firms. 

    Kevin Schubert was named CFO at Rubicon Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: RBT), a digital marketplace for waste and recycling, effective immediately. In addition to his current responsibilities as president, Schubert will now oversee Rubicon’s end-to-end financial operations. Prior to serving as the company’s president, Schubert was Rubicon’s chief development officer. Before joining Rubicon, he held senior executive and advisory roles with public companies, most recently, CFO for Ocean Park Group.

    Overheard

    “I have all the respect for [Fed Chair Jerome] Powell, but the fact is we lost a little bit of control of inflation.”

    —JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said in an interview during CNBC’s Halftime Report.

    [ad_2]

    Sheryl Estrada

    Source link

  • Jeffrey Epstein shared photos of young women with JPMorgan Chase exec, lawsuit claims

    Jeffrey Epstein shared photos of young women with JPMorgan Chase exec, lawsuit claims

    [ad_1]

    Late New York financier Jeffrey Epstein sent images of young women to a senior executive at JPMorgan Chase that the bank knew about but ignored for years, according to claims in a lawsuit made public this week. 

    The U.S. Virgin Islands is suing JPMorgan, accusing it of facilitating Epstein’s alleged sex trafficking across Florida and the U.S. territory by “channeling funds” to fund his activities and by concealing his conduct. The U.S. territory filed its lawsuit last month, although specifics about the allegations were only made public on Wednesday. The lawsuit accuses Chase of participating in a sex-trafficking venture.

    The bank on Thursday declined to comment about the lawsuit. 

    Epstein was arrested and faced federal charges in 2019 for allegedly sexually abusing numerous underage girls over several years in exchange for money. Epstein pleaded guilty in 2008 to similar sexual offenses involving minors in Florida, according to the lawsuit. 

    Virgin Islands prosecutors allege Epstein compensated the girls, most of whom were from Eastern Europe, by wiring them funds from a Chase account. 

    “These women were trafficked and abused during different intervals between at least 2003 and July 2019, when Epstein was arrested and jailed, and these women received payments, typically multiple payments, between 2003 and 2013 in excess of $1 million collectively,” the prosecutors allege in the lawsuit. 

    Chase managed 55 separate accounts for Epstein between 1998 and 2013 under the company’s private banking division, the suit states. Jes Staley, who was head of that division and later became CEO of Barclays, exchanged about 1,200 emails with Epstein between 2008 and 2012, according to the suit. Staley and Epstein had developed a close friendship over the years, the lawsuit alleges. 

    In one message from December 2009, Epstein allegedly wrote to Staley, “[Y]ou were with Larry and I had to put up with…” and attached an image of a young woman. Later that same month, Epstein sent a blank email that contained another photo of a young woman, the suit states. 

    The lawsuit doesn’t describe what type of images Epstein allegedly shared with Staley, but court documents redacted the images from view. 


    Ghislaine Maxwell says meeting Jeffrey Epstein was “greatest mistake of my life”

    02:07

    A lawyer representing Staley told The Telegraph in the U.K. that “our client had no involvement in any of the alleged crimes committed by Mr. Epstein.” 

    Chase had opportunities to cut ties with Epstein in 2006, 2010 and 2011, but instead continued banking with him, the lawsuit alleges. 

    “JPMorgan knew early on that Epstein was an extremely high-risk client but decided, at multiple points during the relationship, to continue servicing Epstein’s accounts because of his vast wealth and connections with other high net worth individuals,” the lawsuit claims.

    Staley left Chase in 2013 and later joined British investment bank Barclays as chief executive. Staley stepped down from Barclays in November 2021 as investigators in the U.K. began probing his ties to Epstein. 

    Epstein, who was a U.S. Virgin Islands resident and registered sex offender, died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial in a New York jail. A federal judge last year sentenced Epstein’s former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell to 20 years in prison for helping him recruit girls. 

    Chase closed its Epstein accounts in 2013. The bank cooperated with federal prosecutors as they investigated Epstein’s sex trafficking operation. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • JPMorgan is spending and talking the most on AI, index shows | Bank Automation News

    JPMorgan is spending and talking the most on AI, index shows | Bank Automation News

    [ad_1]

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. has a head start when it comes to developing and deploying artificial intelligence in banking, according to a new study. The Wall Street bank hires more people with skills needed for AI, files more patents and makes more public pronouncements on the uses and ethical implications of the technology, the Evident […]

    [ad_2]

    Bloomberg News

    Source link

  • Bank of America, Citi, Credit Suisse and JPMorgan launch loan platform | Bank Automation News

    Bank of America, Citi, Credit Suisse and JPMorgan launch loan platform | Bank Automation News

    [ad_1]

    Bank of America, Citi, Credit Suisse and JPMorgan have launched a syndicated loan platform solution that captures bank data in real time. The new platform, Versana, aggregates and normalizes data from member banks to create straight-through processing in the $5 trillion syndicated loan market, Versana Chief Executive Cynthia Sachs told Bank Automation News. Nearly five […]

    [ad_2]

    Whitney McDonald

    Source link

  • JPMorgan, IFC lead $27M investment for Colombian fintech | Bank Automation News

    JPMorgan, IFC lead $27M investment for Colombian fintech | Bank Automation News

    [ad_1]

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. and International Finance Corp. are leading a $27 million round of investment in KLYM, a data-driven fintech that focuses on providing working capital to small and midsize companies in Latin America. KLYM will use the capital to expand, with Brazil as the main priority in 2023, Diego Caicedo, co-founder and chief […]

    [ad_2]

    Bloomberg News

    Source link

  • JPMorgan, BofA show gains in headcount as Wells Fargo’s drops | Bank Automation News

    JPMorgan, BofA show gains in headcount as Wells Fargo’s drops | Bank Automation News

    [ad_1]

    Despite the layoffs across the finance industry, there were no signs of a staffing pullback in JPMorgan Chase & Co’s or Bank of America Corp.’s fourth-quarter results. JPMorgan’s headcount rose 2% to 293,723 from 288,474 last quarter, the company said in its earnings release Friday. This is up 8% from 271,025 a year earlier. Overall […]

    [ad_2]

    Bloomberg News

    Source link

  • JPMorgan Chase tech spend falls 8% in Q4 | Bank Automation News

    JPMorgan Chase tech spend falls 8% in Q4 | Bank Automation News

    [ad_1]

    JPMorgan Chase reported increased revenue and mobile usership in the fourth quarter of 2022 despite a year-over-year decrease in tech spend. WHY IT MATTERS: The $3.3 trillion bank’s tech spend in Q4 fell 8% YoY to $2.2 billion while total tech spend for 2022 declined 6% YoY to $9.3 billion, according to the bank’s earnings […]

    [ad_2]

    Whitney McDonald

    Source link

  • A 29-year-old’s alleged fraud has stained Jamie Dimon’s acquisition spree | Bank Automation News

    A 29-year-old’s alleged fraud has stained Jamie Dimon’s acquisition spree | Bank Automation News

    [ad_1]

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon has spent the past year reassuring analysts and investors that the bank’s multibillion-dollar binge on technology ventures is part of a carefully designed plan that will pay off. But a lawsuit filed by the bank against the founder of one of those ventures — a complaint […]

    [ad_2]

    Bloomberg News

    Source link

  • Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase Seek To Quash Lawsuits By Jeffrey Epstein Accusers

    Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase Seek To Quash Lawsuits By Jeffrey Epstein Accusers

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan Chase are asking a federal court to throw out lawsuits that claim the big banks should have seen evidence of sex trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein, the high-flying financier who killed himself in jail while facing criminal charges.

    The banks said in filings late Friday they didn’t commit any negligent acts that caused harm to the women who filed the lawsuits and that the lawsuits failed to show that they benefitted from Epstein’s sex trafficking.

    The filings in federal district court in New York came about a month after two women who were both identified as Jane Doe sued the banks and the government of the U.S. Virgin Islands, where Epstein had a home on a small island that he owned.

    The lawsuits, which seek class-action status to represent other Epstein victims, claim that the banks knowingly benefitted from Epstein’s sex trafficking and “chose profit over following the law” to earn millions of dollars from the financier.

    They suggested that the banks should have steered clear of Epstein after his 2006 arrest in Florida — he eventually pleaded guilty to state charges of soliciting prostitution — and fallout from a federal investigation and news coverage.

    “Without the financial institution’s participation, Epstein’s sex-trafficking scheme could not have existed or flourished,” the lawsuits claim.

    JPMorgan Chase said Friday that the Jane Doe in its case “is entitled to justice … But this lawsuit against JPMC is directed at the wrong party, is legally meritless, and should be dismissed.”

    Deutsche Bank said it provided “routine banking services” to Epstein from 2013 to 2018, and the lawsuit “does not come close to adequately alleging that Deutsche Bank … was part of Epstein’s criminal sex trafficking ring.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • JPMorgan Asset Management, Trovata collaborate on corporate investing | Bank Automation News

    JPMorgan Asset Management, Trovata collaborate on corporate investing | Bank Automation News

    [ad_1]

    J.P. Morgan Asset Management and cash management fintech Trovata are collaborating to offer access to higher yields on corporate investments amid rising interest rates and economic uncertainty through its Morgan Money platform, a multicurrency, trading and risk management system that launched in 2019. The collaboration will combine J.P. Morgan’s investment capabilities with Trovata’s ability to […]

    [ad_2]

    Whitney McDonald

    Source link

  • JPMorgan said to seal deal to buy 48.5% of Greece’s Viva Wallet | Bank Automation News

    JPMorgan said to seal deal to buy 48.5% of Greece’s Viva Wallet | Bank Automation News

    [ad_1]

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. has signed the final terms to acquire a 48.5% stake of Greece’s payment firm Viva Wallet, according to press reports in the country. The U.S. bank will buy out all the minority holders for an amount that is expected to be above €820 million ($869 million), the news website kathimerini.gr reported, […]

    [ad_2]

    Bloomberg News

    Source link

  • Europe Fintech Funding: ‘Unicorn’ Younited secures $63M | Bank Automation News

    Europe Fintech Funding: ‘Unicorn’ Younited secures $63M | Bank Automation News

    [ad_1]

    Paris-based fintech Younited has reached unicorn status after breaking through the $1 billion valuation mark following a $63 million raise from its main shareholders including Goldman Sachs, Eurazeo and Bpifrance.    The 13-year-old fintech, which operates in five European countries, provides a cloud-based software-as-a-service (SaaS) platform that utilizes data from APIs and open banking to […]

    [ad_2]

    Brian Stone

    Source link

  • Full interview: JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon on

    Full interview: JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon on

    [ad_1]

    Full interview: JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Watch the full version of an interview with JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon that aired on Dec. 11, 2022, on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan.”

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What Kim Kardashian And Kanye West Can Tell Us About Financial Market Regulation

    What Kim Kardashian And Kanye West Can Tell Us About Financial Market Regulation

    [ad_1]

    The week after the Securities and Exchange Commission settled charges against Kim Kardashian for (allegedly) illegally promoting a cryptocurrency, JPMorgan Chase
    JPM
    and Ye (formerly Kanye West), much like Kim and Ye, went their separate ways. For very different reasons, both moguls’ mishaps provide an opportunity to discuss what’s wrong with financial market regulation in the United States.

    The problems go much deeper than just legacy securities and banking regulation. They even bleed over to the newly forming fintech industry.

    While it very well may have been JP Morgan’s intent to steer clear of political controversy by dropping Kanye West as a client, it remains unclear exactly what West did to anger JP Morgan. (For what it’s worth, it does appear that JP Morgan sent their letter to Ye before his recent controversial comments.) Perhaps all the clickbait headlines caused him to launch an alarming anti-inflation tirade in JP Morgan’s headquarters.

    Whatever the reason, if JP Morgan and West want to sever their relationship, that’s between them.

    But it’s not surprising that some people suspect political motives could be behind the breakup. (Between JP Morgan and Ye, not Kim and Ye.) Again, I have no idea what truly happened and I’m not defending anything he may have said or done.

    Regardless, as I’ve pointed out before, the much bigger threat to Americans is how much power federal regulators have over banks, not whether banks can ditch their customers.

    Federal regulators can ultimately revoke banks’ federal deposit insurance and shut them down. If regulators deem, for example, that lending to fossil fuel companies puts a bank’s reputation at risk, or that doing so constitutes an unsafe or unsound practice, they can force the bank to change who it does business with. They have enormous leverage to do so.

    That sort of leverage has many climate change activists excited, but they should reconsider. As soon as people with different views run the agencies, the very same authority could be used to target today’s popular activities and activists. The United States has spent decades leading most developed nations down the same path, discounting fundamental principles in the name of preventing mistakes, financial crises, money laundering, tax evasion, and terrorist financing.

    Federal regulators could easily use their authority to target groups engaged in constitutionally protected political protests. (Fourth Amendment protections, for example, have been severely watered down.)

    The details of Kim Kardashian’s mishap are a bit different, especially in that they involve a capital markets regulator.

    As reported by the Wall Street Journal, the SEC believes that Kim Kardashian violated securities laws when she used her Instagram page to promote a crypto token (EMAX) without disclosing that she was paid $250,000 for the post. Sometime after her post, EMAX lost most of its value.

    To be extra clear: The problem isn’t that EMAX took a deep nosedive, or that Kim promoted a crypto token which (according to the SEC) is a security. The problem is that she didn’t disclose she was being paid to promote EMAX.

    In their Wall Street Journal piece, law professors M. Todd Henderson and Max Raskin explain that:

    Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 requires any person who gives publicity to the sale of a security to disclose any compensation for doing so. The SEC has enforced this anti-touting rule aggressively, bringing cases against people who have published entirely accurate internet posts about companies in return for undisclosed benefits.

    On the one hand, if Kim Kardashian didn’t disclose that she was being paid, it looks to be a clear violation of securities law. On the other hand, this law seems odd given that there are no similar laws preventing celebrities (or anyone else) from regularly touting banks and gambling services.

    Moreover, as Henderson and Raskin point out:

    The jurisdictional limits of the SEC allow it to go after her [Kim Kardashian] and Floyd Mayweather, while Matt Damon’s Super Bowl ad for Crypto.com, part of a $65 million campaign, escapes enforcement because it was promoting a platform and not a security.

    Setting all these technical and legal arguments aside and ignoring whether securities laws might provide a false sense of security, the bigger problem here is that federal officials have overly broad discretion to act in the name of “protecting” people from making “bad” investment choices. In other words, a guiding principle behind federal securities laws is that federal officials need to prevent Americans from making mistakes and losing money. The SEC has gone way past prosecuting fraud.

    Congress should not have given securities regulators so much discretion and it should not have based securities laws on these principles. The same critique applies to U.S. banking law. What Americans have, though, is a complex web of rules and regulations that blunts innovation and competition, as well as the ability to raise private capital.

    In the extreme (not the absurd), the result of this kind of regulatory system is that government officials can allocate credit to politically favored interests.

    So, Congress should rethink these principles, but that’s not what they’re doing. Instead, these same ideas, and these same harmful outcomes, are playing out right now as the House tries to craft new stablecoin legislation.

    For months, Financial Services chair Maxine Waters (D-CA) and ranking member Patrick McHenry (R-NC) have been negotiating a bill to regulate stablecoins. Negotiations seem to have broken down, and based on the discussion draft, that’s probably a good thing.

    During DC Fintech Week, Yahoo! reported that McHenry told his audience “It [the bill] doesn’t look like a modern regulatory regime. It actually looks pretty retrograde.” He then characterized the “current status of the legislation as an ‘ugly baby,’” and added that “It is a baby nonetheless, and we’re grateful and hopeful it can grow and prosper into something that is a lot more attractive.”

    As I and my fellow Cato scholars wrote in early October, the “best part of the draft is that the House…is not trying to enact the President’s Working Group recommendation to ‘require stablecoin issuers to be insured depository institutions.’” The problem, though, is that Congress is arguing over which assets stablecoins should be backed with, who can hold stablecoins, what people can do with stablecoins in their own digital wallets, and which regulator should be in charge.

    Congress should write laws to protect Americans from fraud and theft. But that goal does not require Congress to dictate which assets can legally back stablecoins. Let fintech companies and other financial firms experiment, and let people take risks with their own money. Most people aren’t going to use something called a stablecoin if it isn’t stable, so anyone issuing stablecoins better figure out how to make them stable.

    Moreover, Congress should not protect legacy firms or the best-connected upstart firms from competition. That’s how free enterprise breaks down, not how it works best for the largest number of people.

    The notion that Congress or any other group of federal officials knows the best way to create stable or safe assets, much less stable and safe markets, is completely wrong. History has proven the opposite is true. Countless government regulations have created and magnified stability and safety problems.

    Hopefully, McHenry’s wish comes true, and Congress comes up with a bill that’s much more attractive.

    Unfortunately, that outcome is wishful thinking unless Congress changes its underlying approach. This time, though, a misstep is likely to keep the U.S. payments system stuck somewhere in the 20th century while the rest of the world races ahead. With or without Kim and Ye.

    [ad_2]

    Norbert Michel, Contributor

    Source link