ReportWire

Tag: josh o’connor

  • Josh O’Connor May Be An Internet-Favorite “Soft Boy,” But ‘SNL’ Doesn’t Know How To Harness His Charms

    [ad_1]

    For someone whose nerves were at a self-described 10 out of 10 in the week leading up to his Saturday Night Live debut, first-time host Josh O’Connor began his Studio 8H debut about as smoothly as possible: In his monologue, the Wake Up Dead Man star glided easily from self-effacing jokes — “No, I am not the mouse from Flushed Away” — ripped from the digital zeitgeist to cheekily leaning into his public persona as a “soft boy,” otherwise known as an “average 65-year-old woman” who embroiders, scrapbooks and gardens.

    The tight 3-minute opener took a delightful turn when O’Connor addressed fans pitching him to play Alfredo Linguini in a live-action remake of Walt Disney/Pixar Animation’s beloved Ratatouille (a film he has espoused affection for more than once) and chief creative officer Pete Docter’s subsequent rebuke of such a project. “Do you know how it feels to be publicly rejected from a job I didn’t even want? For the record, I don’t even want a live-action Ratatouille,” he said, before eventually interrupting his own thoughts to pivot: “Sorry, sorry, for what it’s worth: I would kill as Linguini.”

    Unfortunately, similar to the (albeit heartwarming) tale between a restaurant garbage boy and Remy the rat, O’Connor — much like Linguini — was stuck playing second fiddle tonight on SNL, puppeted to and fro from sketch to sketch that sidelined his comedic talents. The late-night mainstay struggled to bottle up O’Connor’s distinct whimsical charms (ones showcased in Emma and The Mastermind, for example) via skits that didn’t play to his strengths as a deft performer, and often didn’t know how to utilize him entirely.

    In early sketch “Let’s Find Love,” O’Connor is a boyish dating show contestant who, when presented with three potential romantic partners in a blind format, is almost immediately upstaged by an 84-year-old, scooter-riding Ashley Padilla, whose blatant disregard of reality TV (and social) norms gets big laughs early on, but eventually peters out due to repetitiveness.

    Similar problems abound in a later sketch concerning deleted scenes from The Wizard of Oz, which features Dorothy (Sarah Sherman), the Wizard (Bowen Yang) and her ragtag group (Andrew Dismukes as the Scarecrow, Kenan Thompson as the Cowardly Lion and O’Connor as the Tin Man). When Thompson’s Lion is revealed to have wished for a “big ole thing” rather than bravery, the other two male characters hop on the bandwagon to wish for the same thing. Not only is O’Connor given a few middling lines, but the skit itself can only go so far as a dick joke can carry you. (As the naughty refrain goes, it’s not the size that matters, but how you use it; in this case, not the content of the sketch, but how it’s executed.)

    Meanwhile, the night’s closing brunch sketch didn’t feature O’Connor until the latter half; playing an awkward and intruding dad whose presence is clearly unwelcome, the sketch careens through a cast of characters who take turns breaking the fourth wall via song to comment on the “quite strange” nature of their outing. It is as overstuffed as Veronika Slowikowska’s character finds Chloe Fineman’s to be, after the latter character commits a mathematical faux pas by grabbing an extra slice of flatbread.

    In one solid, pre-taped sketch spoofing Spotify’s beloved wrapped playlist, O’Connor doesn’t show up at all. Perhaps this was a scheduling conflict, and certainly, not every host has been in every sketch, but it does seem to be a glaring oversight to not include O’Connor in one of the best of the night.

    The strongest outing of the night was, without a doubt, “Bachelorette Party Strippers,” with Ben Marshall and O’Connor as the “most sensitive strippers in all of the Catskills.” With A Little Life in tow, beanies hanging loosely on their perfectly rumpled heads and multiple layers of clothing, the sketch’s golden moments include a lo-fi version of Ginuwine’s “Pony” and line readings of “You are enough” and “You have to forgive yourself,” all of which gets Padilla’s bride-to-be more than hot and bothered — though the real steamy will-they-won’t-they is found in the undeclared romance between Marshall and O’Connor’s Augie and Remington.

    And while SNL opted for resurrections this episode, it did so with varying levels of success. Another run at Yang’s Dr. Please character, first originated triumphantly during Ryan Gosling’s hosting stint last year, fizzled out quickly: O’Connor portrays an intern with little to do, especially as Padilla’s repartee with the doctor upstages everything else (“Doctor, your car…” she begins, “Was towed?” Yang asks. “No, was left at the scene of a crime,” she answers. “Just like I left it,” he concludes.) There was also round two of Mikey Day and Streeter Seidell’s animated short, “Brad and His Dad,” first introduced during Nikki Glaser’s run earlier this season, the holiday-themed No. 2 installment of which felt like little more than filler tonight.

    As for Weekend Update, there were decent jabs at President Donald Trump (“In a new interview, President Trump said that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro’s ‘days are numbered.’ As opposed to Trump, whose days are lettered,” co-anchor Colin Jost quipped, as the screen flashed with the image of a weekly pill organizer. “Trump also said that the proposed merger between Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery ‘could be a problem,’ adding ‘Bribe!’ In response, Netflix is offering Trump one night with the [KPop] Demon Hunters.”

    But perhaps the best aspect of Update was the return of Jane Wickline’s offbeat keyboard ditties. Addressing the “greatest threat to humanity right now” via song, Wickline’s ode initially presented as a foreboding warning against AI, before the track abruptly switched gears to discuss the child stars of Stranger Things. With lines like “They’re adults, we have to destroy them before they destroy everything / AI is just a distraction / The real threat here is Sadie Sink and her child co-stars on Stranger Things,” “Stranger Things is ending / They’ll have so much free time / What if they grow self aware / We need to keep them occupied / They’ll mobilize their followers, 60 million followers / We need to keep them occupied” and “Finn Wolfhard is the devil to me / The six of them are in a room right now preparing to seize the next election / And for these reasons, I stand with Vecna,” Wickline cautions the cast could go by way of Joe Rogan who “used to make people eat bugs [on Fear Factor], and now he’s President of the United States.”

    And, in what has become a bit of trend in recent years at SNL, especially this season, Lily Allen‘s second performance — the West End Girl single “Madeline” — featured a surprise appearance by Dakota Johnson, who was revealed to be the woman performing the spoken lines in the song, hidden behind a sheer curtain. The Materialists star made her grand entrance as Allen wrapped up the track, greeting the musician with a hug and kiss on the cheek.

    [ad_2]

    Natalie Oganesyan

    Source link

  • Video: ‘Wake Up Dead Man’ | Anatomy of a Scene

    [ad_1]

    new video loaded: ‘Wake Up Dead Man’ | Anatomy of a Scene

    transcript

    transcript

    ‘Wake Up Dead Man’ | Anatomy of a Scene

    The writer and director Rian Johnson narrates a sequence from his film.

    “My Name is Rian Johnson. I wrote and directed “Wake Up, Dead Man.” “All right, everyone!” This is a scene that’s about halfway through the movie. And Father Jud right here, who’s Josh O’Connor, he is the prime suspect in the murder of Monsignor Wicks, kind of the local priest that was his colleague. And all the parishioners who you see here have suspected. Jud, have given him a lot of guff, and he’s finally hit his limit, and he’s teamed with Benoit Blanc. “And they’re going to get to the bottom of this. And we’re going to start with what happened that night right here in this very room.” “You mean the time Judd admitted to all of us that he killed a man.” “O.K, no, that was the boxing thing.” So these movies really run off of scenes like this and getting all the suspects together and then having them all bounce off of each other in sometimes terrible, abrasive ways. And it’s about the relationships between everybody. It’s about Glenn Close and Cailee Spaeny in the same frame. So you get that great moment where Glenn screams. “Ahhh!” “Jesus!” “It’s a miracle!” “I can walk, Martha. It just hurts.” We’re getting movie stars who were all number one on the call sheet on their own films to come in and be a part of an actual ensemble. So this scene was one of the first scenes that we shot, because I thought it was really important to get everyone in the same room. And so you can see these actors, some of the best actors working today get in there and you can see the joy they’re taking in watching everyone else’s performance and seeing where everyone else is pitching it, especially on day one and all kind of finding their level. And I don’t for me, it makes my job very easy. But it’s amazing seeing them, seeing them work. “Who wants to go first?”

    The writer and director Rian Johnson narrates a sequence from his film.

    By Mekado Murphy

    December 12, 2025

    [ad_2]

    Mekado Murphy

    Source link

  • Reviews For The Easily Distracted:Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery – Houston Press

    [ad_1]

    Title: Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery

    Describe This Movie In One Jewel of the Nile Quote:
    TARAK: Ralph, that is not the Sufi way.
    RALPH: I don’t know what got into me, Jewels. Every time I’m around this guy he makes me crazy.

    Brief Plot Synopsis: Like if that Southern colonel from the Foghorn Leghorn cartoons solving crimes.

    Rating Using Random Objects Relevant To The Film: 3.5 Our Time in Edens out of 5.

    Credit: Wikipedia

    Tagline: N/A

    Better Tagline: “The best priests are the ones who murdered people in their past lives.”

    Not So Brief Plot Synopsis: Murder! Murder most foul has been committed at Our Lady of Perpetual Fortitude, and Monsignor Wicks (Josh Brolin) is the victim. The list of suspects is both lengthy and colorful. Is it newly installed Father Jud (Josh O’Connor)? Or perhaps Wick’s right-hand woman Martha (Glenn Close)? And let’s not forget the flock, which includes lawyer Vera Draven (Kerry Washington), the town doctor (Jeremy Renner), a former bestselling author (Andrew Scott), and a celebrated cellist (Cailee Spaeny). Thanks goodness famous detective Benoit Blanc (Daniel Craig) is on the case.

    YouTube video

    “Critical” Analysis: The Knives Out movies — of which Wake Up Dead Man is the third — aren’t really about the mysteries. The first two films solved their whodunits by the second act, backfilling details we’d assumed were tangential to the main event. Glass Onion threw in a second act twist that some felt was a cheap trick, though my problems were more with the second movie’s pacing and performances, especially compared to Knives Out’s cast.

    Writer/director Rian Johnson, closing out his 500 million dollar Netflix deal, leans more into character development this time around. Father Jud’s pre-clergy background, Vera and Cy’s shared past, and Martha’s pained history with the church and Monsignor Wicks. We’re aware of the so-called “Good Friday Murder” almost from the jump, but Johnson takes a while building to it.

    Wake Up Dead Man is at least somewhat less cluttered than its predecessor. There are still a healthy number of red herrings and fakeouts, but setting the film in a less exotic location and eschewing any body-double shenanigans keeps the action focused. It also doesn’t hurt that O’Connor, Close, and Brolin are all bringing their “A” game. Brolin especially is enjoying a one-two combo of scumbag roles (he’s Dan Killian in last weeks’ The Running Man).

    Johnson also doesn’t shy away from social commentary, though he’s less overt about it than Jacob Thrombey’s incel subreddit or Birdie Jay’s racist Tweets. Cy and Andrew Scott’s fading author Lee Ross are both hoping to ride Monsignor Wicks’ coattails to social media fame, with the former presented as an opportunist in the vein of George Santos and the latter a possible stand-in for Dilbert creator Scott Adams.

    Case in point: after sharing his litany of failed issues he tried to use to jumpstart his political career, Cy unironically remarks, “People are just numb these days. I don’t know why.”

    Yep, he’s dead all right. Credit: Netflix

    And then there’s Craig. The vaunted Benoit Blanc is still apparently the World’s Greatest Detective (sorry, Batman), but in Wake Up Dead Man, he’s fallible as well. Craig clearly enjoys the hell out of this character, and Johnson here gives him some refreshing moral ambiguity. Not everything needs to be shared with the police, after all. And if withholding ill-gotten gains makes life difficult for someone, what’s one more disgruntled asshole in the world?

    Wake Up Dead Man also marks the first time Johnson addresses questions of faith (not counting Princess Leia’s “She Is Risen” moment in The Last Jedi). The Roman Catholic Church still holds some hope and mystery for young Father Jed, while for most of the “hardened cyst of regulars” at Our Lady of Perpetual Fortitude, it’s a cudgel. Monsignor Wicks wearily refers to himself as a “warrior for Christ,” taking up spiritual arms against the forces of modernity (and, one assumes, progressivism) assailing it.

    Due respect to the Monsignor, but the Church really has no one to blame for its massive list of enemies but itself.

    One the other end of the divide is Blanc himself, who emphatically rejects the dogma … until he doesn’t. And as is the case with all these movies, you find yourself wondering if Blanc’s florid statements aren’t in service of the deeper plot.

    Is it too early to say that Johnson is Shyamalan-ing himself? I don’t think the comparison really fits, since there’s a difference between mere formula and the inevitability of one big twist. Wake Up Dead Man still suffers from the familiarity of the Knives Out blueprint, but is more thoughtful than its predecessors. All the same, it’s probably just as well we’re finally laying Benoit Blanc to rest. Figuratively speaking.

    Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery is in theaters Wednesday.

    [ad_2]

    Pete Vonder Haar

    Source link

  • Daniel Craig Returns to Solve “Impossible Crime” in ‘Wake Up Dead Man’ Trailer

    [ad_1]

    Daniel Craig is heading to church for guidance in the teaser trailer for Netflix‘s Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery.

    Writer-director Rian Johnson‘s third feature in the Knives Out franchise is set for release in select theaters Nov. 26 before its streaming debut Dec. 12. Josh O’Connor, Glenn Close, Josh Brolin, Mila Kunis, Jeremy Renner, Kerry Washington, Andrew Scott, Cailee Spaeny, Daryl McCormack and Thomas Haden Church round out the film’s ensemble cast.

    Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery centers on detective Benoit Blanc (Craig) attempting to figure out his most dangerous case yet. The first trailer (below) teases the mysterious death of a charming priest.

    “To understand this case, you need to look at the myth that’s being constructed,” Craig says in the footage. “A man gives a sermon. He then, in plain sight of everyone, walks into a sealed concrete box. Thirty seconds later, that man is lying dead. A classic, impossible crime.”

    Johnson helmed the movie from his own script. The filmmaker produced the project alongside Ram Bergman.

    Here’s the logline: “Benoit Blanc (Craig) returns for his most dangerous case yet in the third and darkest chapter of Rian Johnson’s murder mystery opus. When young priest Jud Duplenticy (O’Connor) is sent to assist charismatic firebrand Monsignor Jefferson Wicks (Josh Brolin), it’s clear that all is not well in the pews. Wicks’ modest-but-devoted flock includes devout church lady Martha Delacroix (Close), circumspect groundskeeper Samson Holt (Church), tightly-wound lawyer Vera Draven, Esq. (Washington), aspiring politician Cy Draven (McCormack), town doctor Nat Sharp (Renner), best-selling author Lee Ross (Scott) and concert cellist Simone Vivane (Spaeny). After a sudden and seemingly impossible murder rocks the town, the lack of an obvious suspect prompts local police chief Geraldine Scott (Mila Kunis) to join forces with renowned detective Benoit Blanc to unravel a mystery that defies all logic.”

    The franchise kicked off with the original Knives Out, which Lionsgate released theatrically in 2019. Not quite two years later, Netflix bought the exclusive rights to a pair of sequels, with the first follow-up — Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery — launching in late 2022.

    In his review of Wake Up Dead Man for The Hollywood Reporter, chief film critic David Rooney praised the film’s “considerable plus of Josh O’Connor as a former boxer turned priest who becomes both a murder suspect and a Watson to Benoit Blanc’s Sherlock Holmes.”

    See more first-look photos, below.

    Andrew Scott, Jeremy Renner, Cailee Spaeny, Kerry Washington, Thomas Haden Church, Glenn Close, Kerry Washington and Daryl McCormack.

    John Wilson/Netflix © 2025

    Josh O’Connor in Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery.

    Courtesy of Netflix © 2025

    Andrew Scott, Mila Kunis, Daryl McCormack, Glenn Close, Kerry Washington and Cailee Spaeny.

    John Wilson/Netflix © 2025

    Josh Brolin in Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery.

    John Wilson/Netflix © 2025

    [ad_2]

    Ryan Gajewski

    Source link

  • Josh O’Connor Takes Wake Up Dead Man to Church

    [ad_1]

    As a priest clinging to faith, O’Connor is silly, sincere, and steals the new Knives Out movie from Benoit Blanc.
    Photo: Netflix

    Like any good mystery series, the Benoit Blanc movies know the value of repetition. You could call it a formula if you felt like knocking this series of films from writer-director Rian Johnson, which kicked off with Knives Out in 2019 and continued with Glass Onion in 2022. As those two films did, Johnson’s latest, Wake Up Dead Man, premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival to this year’s most rabid crowds so far. Once again, Johnson has gathered together an all-star cast — this group includes Glenn Close, Andrew Scott, Kerry Washington, Jeremy Renner, and Josh Brolin — to set up the pins so that Daniel Craig’s dapper Southern detective can knock ’em all down. But while Wake Up Dead Man is another murder mystery, the most compelling crime in the film occurs in plain sight, as Josh O’Connor outright steals the film out from under Benoit Blanc, and he does it dressed in the vestments of a Catholic priest.

    O’Connor plays Reverend Jud Duplenticy, a young priest seeking his own salvation. He gets sent to a small upstate New York church to assist Monsignor Wicks (Josh Brolin), a kind of Catholic Colonel Kurtz — aggressive and territorial and half-mad. O’Connor plays his half of the power struggle between the two priests initially as light comedy; the English actor (playing American again, as he did in Challengers) is downright nebbishy in moments. He’s a great fit for Johnson’s tendency to puncture the moment with comic relief, which is kind of infuriating. No one that handsome should also get to have good comic timing.

    But it’s in the film’s surprising degree of sincerity that O’Connor makes himself invaluable. Wake Up Dead Man is the most earnest (and least comedic) of the three Blanc films. And it’s sincere about faith, of all things, and politics, too. My guess is that will occupy a great deal of the reaction to this movie. If Knives Out and Glass Onion were sideswipes at the anti-immigrant right and Silicon Valley fascists, respectively, Wake Up Dead Man is Rian Johnson taking dead aim at Trump and his band of hard-liners. The all-star cast mostly plays Wicks’ parishioners, each with their own little set of personal foibles that at any moment could become a motive to kill. Because yes, there is eventually a murder, and Blanc turns up in town full of theories and brio.

    But this is Father Jud’s movie. We get a third of the way into it before Blanc arrives, and by then, O’Connor has already more than capably put the film on his shoulders. An idealistic priest with a profound belief in the Church’s power to save souls could be a tough sell for another actor, but O’Connor capably lands every beat — he’s awfully formidable for a pretty boy, and awfully sympathetic for a priest. There’s a darkness on the periphery of his performance, too. No man of such intense religious faith can ever be ruled out as a killer, after all.

    Daniel Craig was deservedly lauded for the first two Blanc films, and he’s no less winning in this one. But with Wake Up Dead Man as interested in salvation as it is in its whodunit yarn, Josh O’Connor ends up as the film’s MVP: Most Valuable… Priest. (So dumb.)


    See All



    [ad_2]

    Joe Reid

    Source link

  • Josh O’Connor’s Queer Teen Romance ‘Bonus Track’ Finds U.S. Home With Sunrise Films (EXCLUSIVE)

    Josh O’Connor’s Queer Teen Romance ‘Bonus Track’ Finds U.S. Home With Sunrise Films (EXCLUSIVE)

    [ad_1]

    Sunrise Films has secured the U.S. rights for “Bonus Track” from Bankside Films, with plans for a theatrical and digital release in October.

    The feature directorial debut from Julia Jackman, “Bonus Track” is a coming-of-age queer rom-com written by Mike Gilbert, with a story by Josh O’Connor. The film stars Joe Anders (“1917”) and Samuel Small (“So Awkward”), supported by an ensemble cast including Ray Panthaki, Susan Wokoma, Jack Davenport, Alison Sudol and O’Connor in a cameo role.

    Set in 2006 England, the story follows 16-year-old aspiring musician George (Anders), who befriends Max (Small), the son of a famous musical duo, as they prepare for a year-end talent show. Their friendship evolves in unexpected ways.

    “Bonus Track” made its debut at the BFI London Film Festival and was released in the U.K. as a Sky Original film. The film is an Erebus Pictures and Sky production, in association with Lunapark Pictures and Fortune Films. Bankside Films handles international sales.

    Sunrise Films is a production and internationally focused distribution company launched by Vertigo Releasing CEO Rupert Preston and chair Nigel Williams.

    The company’s production credits include “The Accused” and “Gassed Up.” On the distribution front, Sunrise has released films such as “Beneath the Surface,” “The Girl in the Trunk,” “After Love,” and “Law of Tehran” in the U.S. They recently acquired Luna Carmoon’s Venice winner “Hoard” and the action thriller “Sunray” for U.S. distribution.

    Andrew Nerger, head of U.S. and international distribution at Vertigo Releasing, said: “We loved the utterly charming ‘Bonus Track’ from the moment we first screened — its a lovely feel good coming-of-age story full of winning performances and we simply cannot wait to bring it to audiences in the U.S.”

    [ad_2]

    Naman Ramachandran

    Source link

  • Did Everyone Sleep Through The 2024 Met Gala?

    Did Everyone Sleep Through The 2024 Met Gala?

    [ad_1]

    For sports fans, there’s the Super Bowl. For fashion fans, there’s the Met Gala.


    Every year on the first Monday in May, Anna Wintour, reigning editor-in-chief and pinnacle of fashion at
    Vogue, hosts the Met Gala. It’s technically a charity event to raise an egregious amount of money for The Costume Institute…but in reality, it’s an excuse for the biggest celebrities in the world to flaunt looks from the biggest fashion houses in the world.

    All we ever get to see from the elusive Gala is the red carpet, but for about three hours the world circulates photos of outfits…judging like they have degrees in fashion and are the next Joan Rivers. But this year’s theme was especially exciting for me.

    What was the 2024 Met Gala Theme?

    This year’s theme was
    Sleeping Beauties: Reawakening Fashion, with the focus being “Garden in Time.” A “sleeping beauty” in fashion refers to a piece that is only worn once before being stored away forever. These pieces are often tarnished after they’re worn once.

    But as always, there’s a theme within the theme. “Garden in Time” implied nods to nature, which would explain the floral prints and natural elements like mother of pearl and wood. These themes also opened the door for sustainability: reworking and re-wearing pieces that have already existed. Not creating an entirely new costume from scratch.

    Once these pieces go on display, they can’t be touched again or they’re considered ruined. While many celebrities weren’t wearing original “Sleeping Beauty” pieces, there were references to vintage collections from classic designers like Versace, Alexander McQueen, and, of course, Loewe.

    Loewe happened to be the belle of the ball this year. The hottest brand of 2024 (by far) secured high-profile celebrities like Taylor Russell, Ariana Grande, Dan Levy, Omar Apollo, and more. And not only was
    everyone wearing Loewe, the craftsmanship and detail was breathtaking in every way.

    As I continued to watch notable figure after notable figure grace the famous Met staircase, I continued to wonder where every Met Gala icon was? Where was Rihanna and A$AP Rocky? Blake Lively? Hailey and Justin Bieber? Selena Gomez, perhaps?
    THE Bella Hadid? Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce? Harry Styles? Billie Eilish and FINNEAS?

    Perhaps a few literally slept through the Met Gala this year…but nonetheless, the celebs showed up. And I’m here to critique them.

    Best Dressed

    Lana Del Rey

    Her first Met in six years and Lana Del Rey shines in custom-made Alexander McQueen. She’s on-theme, the embodiment of Mother Nature.

    Mona Patel

    Of course, this was a Law Roach style. But Mona Patel had, by far, the best dress of the night. The animated butterflies on her arms were magical.

    Tyla

    Nothing says “Sleeping Beauty” more than a gown made of sand specifically molded to Tyla’s body. She even had to get carried up the stairs in her custom Balmain.

    Zendaya

    Law Roach, the stylist you are. Zendaya treated the Met stairs as her runway with multiple show-stopping looks.

    Kendall Jenner

    I mean, the dress literally was only ever worn on a mannequin and fit Kendall Jenner – with no tailoring. That’s fate.

    Mindy Kaling

    The dress, titled “Melting Flower of Time”, was designed by Gaurav Gupta. It was walking art, stunned.

    Harris Reed

    Harris Reed is responsible for some of Harry Styles’ most iconic looks…but tonight, they were the moment.

    Taylor Russell

    Speaking of Harry Styles…Taylor Russell had one of my favorite Loewe pieces. The wood bodice corset contrasted with the gown.

    Worst Dressed

    Kylie Jenner

    I just think she could’ve done more than a vintage bridal look…

    Sabrina Carpenter

    For her first Met, I’m a bit disappointed despite the fact that her makeup is gorgeous.

    Nicholas Galitzine

    If I see one more black suit variant…

    Chase Stokes

    We call any attractive male with a suit and no shirt underneath “daring” and “fashion-forward.”

    Dan Levy

    Wishing this Loewe moment was white.

    Josh O’Connor

    The shoes?

    Mike Faist

    The turnip?

    [ad_2]

    Jai Phillips

    Source link

  • Naomi Osaka Shares Her Own Tennis Moves Set to ‘Challengers’ Score

    Naomi Osaka Shares Her Own Tennis Moves Set to ‘Challengers’ Score

    [ad_1]

    Tennis star Naomi Osaka offered her response to Luca Guadagnino’s buzzy tennis movie Challengers on Thursday, sharing her own moves on the court set to the movie’s viral techno score.

    On TikTok, Osaka posted a video of herself moving through a tennis serve and twirling her racket with her fingers after writing, “Me after watching Challengers.”

    Though the tennis player has no official ties to the hit movie, which stars Zendaya embroiled in a love triangle with Josh O’Connor and Mike Faist, screenwriter Justin Kuritzkes previously told Business Insider it was Osaka’s 2018 win over Serena Williams that partially inspired the film.

    At the 2018 US Open, then-20-year-old Osaka beat Williams in a dramatic match that was colored by three code violations for Williams, for receiving coaching, racquet abuse and verbal abuse. Williams, outraged specifically by the insinuation that she cheated by communicating with her coach, called umpire Carlos Ramos a “thief” for docking her a point, and delayed the match significantly by disputing with Ramos and the game’s referees.

    “Immediately, this struck me as this intensely cinematic situation where you’re all alone on your side of the court and there’s this one other person in this massive tennis stadium who cares as much about what happens to you as you do, but you can’t talk to them,” Kuritzkes said.

    After her win, Osaka tearfully told the crowd, which spent most of the trophy ceremony booing, “I’m sorry that it had to end like this.” Earlier in the evening, Williams told her fans to “make this the best moment we can” and “be positive.”

    “For whatever reason, it just clicked in my mind,” Kuritzkes continued of his moment of inspiration. “Well, what if you really needed to talk about something? And what if it was something beyond tennis? What if it was something that was going on with the two of you? And what if it involved the person on the other side of the net? How would you have that conversation and how could you communicate the tension of that situation using the tools that are specific to film?”

    [ad_2]

    Zoe G Phillips

    Source link

  • Tashi Duncan Is Our Style Icon Of The Summer

    Tashi Duncan Is Our Style Icon Of The Summer

    [ad_1]

    If there’s one thing the internet loves, it’s a film with a love triangle. We’ve tirelessly argued over Team Edward versus Team Jacob, Team Conrad or Team Jeremiah, Team Stefan or Team Damon, Team (insert attractive young male star) or Team (insert second attractive young male star).


    So, when Luca Guadagnino’s latest homoerotic cinematic masterpiece —
    Challengers — debuted, you knew the world would be hooked. Not only does Challengers offer up steamy scenes, but it includes a recipe for instant success: Zendaya as the female lead, and two rapidly rising young leading men — Josh O’Connor (Patrick Zweig) and Mike Faist (Art Donaldson) — for the world to fawn over.

    Yes, it’s Zendaya’s time to be the
    villain as Tashi Duncan — although the internet’s still debating whether she’s a feminist icon or just plain evil. Already receiving high praise as one of the best movies of 2024 so far — our review was pretty glowing, too.

    But I couldn’t help but notice that
    Challengers solidifies a major shift in the fashion trendscape. Zendaya and her stylist — Law Roach — are known for their emblematic looks that set trends for the following year — and years to come. The verdict is in…luxury athleisure has never been more popular.

    Similar to
    Quiet Luxury made popular by shows like SuccessionSuccessionand It-Girls like Sofia Richie, luxury athleisure gives a money vibe…without the display of labels. Challengers is all about looking like an old-money tennis pro.

    Zendaya’s been delivering some killer serves (get it?) in the name of
    Challengers and Tashi Duncan lately…so she’s our resident style icon for building your luxury athleisure closet.

    What Is Luxury Athleisure?

    The ultimate goal in fashion of late is to look effortlessly sophisticated and filthy rich, without screaming that you’re trying too hard. That means an emphasis on quality and durability as well as an absence of logo and branding. Black and white color blocking is back in a big way, as are neutrals.

    You must don luxury athleisure as if you’re an off-duty professional athlete. But only an athlete in an elite sport like tennis, horseback riding, or something posh like croquet.

    It’s about that sweater tied over your shoulders and the wide headband pushing back your blowout. The polo shirt and the pleated skort. Tube socks and crisp whites. Getting the picture?

    You see luxury athleisure outfits throughout Zendaya’s
    Challengers press tour, with clean girl tennis skirt sets and bouncy ponytails. You can perfectly picture her as Tashi Duncan but also catch a glimpse of how to achieve the luxury athleisure trend yourself.

    Zendaya’s Challengers Style

    The
    Barbie movie emphasized how fun it can be — and good for ratings — when the lead actress cosplays her character — Tashi Duncan — for press shoots. Margot Robbie constantly churned out Barbie look after Barbie look for every premiere, press opportunity, and awards show.

    So when Zendaya followed suit and debuted Tashi Duncan-esque fits…we
    knew we had a hit on our hands. Some of the style is a literal homage to the sport — tennis ball Loewe heels paired with a custom Loewe V-neck bedazzled dress…or a Thom Browne gown with racquet appliques.

    But her other appearances alongside Tom Holland at the BNP Paribas Open at Indian Wells or the Monte Carlo Masters give us insight on the ultimate Tennis-Core closet.

    Many of her looks are reminiscent of the 50s and 60s fashion that’s growing ever-popular this
    spring. Hoop skirts and Jackie O inspired skirt suits have been stellar on the press tour. And then there’s the power jumpsuits that are the epitome of office chic.

    And it’s not just Zendaya who has leaned into Tennis Core…it’s one of
    Taylor Swift’s go-to style moments. TheTortured Poets Department singer loves a good pleated skort…and she’s well known for her cardigans.

    In short, Tennis-Core is a mix of Taylor Swift, Zendaya — esp. in
    Challengers — and Sofia Richie’s style all-in-one. It’s about looking luxurious while being comfy. It’s to convey a highly active lifestyle that pays well. It’s to convey an air of money.

    What You Need To Dress Like Tashi Duncan

    So now that we want to dress — and live? — like Tashi Duncan, it’s important to emphasize elevated basics that will last you a few years. Luxury athleisure isn’t about fast fashion, it’s about high-quality, luxe materials.

    If you want to embody the baller that is Tashi, here are the items you simply
    must have in your closet.

    Cable Knit Sweaters

    Zendaya BACKGRID

    If there’s one staple item you need to complete the #TennisCore trend, it’s an oversized cable knit sweater. Nothing says old money quite like a collared cable knit. It’s giving “I know how to sail my father’s yacht…and I weekend in the Hamptons.”

    Zendaya pairs the cable knit with a white maxi skirt…but these seriously go with anything. I like to combine the classic chunky sweater with a pair of wide-leg linen trousers.

    Try these:

    Scads of Collared Tops

    challengers styleZendayaBackgrid

    While you don’t necessarily need a notch neck collar in your cable knit sweater…it’s essential for a luxe athleisure look. And luckily, a lot of athleisure brands are throwing collars on dresses, crop tops, and more.

    I’m a fan of the oversized collared shirts that you can pull on at any moment.

    Try these tops for a Tashi Duncan look:

    Pleated Skorts and Dresses

    Challengers styleZendaya Backgrid

    If you’re a Swiftie, you know that a pleated skort is Taylor’s go-to. For someone with long legs, nothing shows them off better than a skort with some detailing.
    Everyone is on the pleated skort trend lately, so you better not miss out.

    Skorts also solve the problem of accidental indecent exposure that skirts pose. With comfy shorts — and often a handy pocket — underneath, you’ll never wear a real skirt again.

    Preppy Touches

    This is all about accessorizing. Thick, sporty headbands are in — hello
    Gossip Girl’s Blair Waldorf. And, yes, I think the headband is a marvelous alternative to pulling your hair back with damaging elastics or claw clips.

    But the headband isn’t the be-all and end-all. Mules and Mary Jane flats have come back to add a preppy flare…what’s next? Sperry’s?

    If you want a few preppy accessories, here are my picks:

    Uniqlo vs. Loewe

    Let’s be honest. These two brands dominated the court in
    Challengers. If it wasn’t a Loewe look, the actors were sporting Uniqlo. And the good news is that Uniqlo is super affordable.

    If you need some UNIQLO moments, here are the best luxury athleisure pieces:

    [ad_2]

    Jai Phillips

    Source link

  • Challengers’ Josh O’Connor Teased His Sexuality After Playing Several Gay Roles

    Challengers’ Josh O’Connor Teased His Sexuality After Playing Several Gay Roles

    [ad_1]

    He’s a pro in complicated romantic roles. The question of whether Josh O’Connor is gay or in a relationship is brought up by viewers who watched the steamy tennis thriller Challengers.

    Spoilers ahead for Challengers! If you watched just the trailer of the long-awaited movie about a love triange, you’ve seen that spicy scene where Tashi (Zendaya), Art (Faist), and Patrick (O’Connor) gather in a hotel room and share a three-way kiss. Then, Tashi sits back while the other two continue. The interesting thing is that the kiss wasn’t in the early version of the script. “It wasn’t,” filmmaker Luca Guadagnino confirmed to the New York Times.

    Zendaya attends the Australian premiere of

    Speaking with Variety, Zendaya explained how it’s not your typical sports movie. “It’s much deeper,” she said. “Tennis is just a metaphor for a lot of bigger shit. For power. For codependency. They’re using tennis as their device to get these things out of their system. It’s the only way they know how to communicate.”

    While the movie is super horny, the Challengers sex scene is not what you think. In fact, it’s the build-up of sexual tension that makes it so steamy. “We were asked about the sex scenes, and Z [Zendaya] was like, ‘there aren’t any’,” O’Connor told the press in Australia when the film opened on April 18, per Elle Australia. “It wasn’t a stupid question. It’s a reasonable question because it feels so on the edge of that at all times. And actually, the tennis is the sex scene. That’s their intimacy.”

    O’Connor talked about how he related to his character a lot in the movie. “He is front-footed, he’s overly confident — all these qualities that I’ve always admired and always wanted that I’ve never quite been able to have. Just to play it and be in his shoes for a few months was bliss,” O’Connor told AP. “That’s what I’ll hold on to with Patrick. I really like Patrick. I know he’s problematic but I really like him. I find him hilarious and charming and he knows himself. And those are all qualities that I don’t necessarily have but I admire in him.”

    Is Josh O’Connor gay?

    Josh O’Connor has taken up plenty of gay roles but has spoken out about his sexuality. “I have been asked, a few times, should a straight actor play a gay part?” he told GQ. “And every time I have been honest and said… I don’t know.”

    “I’d always be really open about it. Sexuality…is more complicated than we realize. Just as Grayson talks about masculinity not being this steel rod, it’s true of queerness, too; it’s fluid and elastic, but we often don’t really have the tools to articulate that in our culture.”

    The actor has played several characters who identify in the LGBTQ+ community in shows and movies like Hide and Seek, Peaky Blinders, God’s Own Country, The Colour of His Hair, and Bonus Track.

    Is Josh O’Connor in a relationship?

    It’s not known whether or not Josh O’Connor is in a relationship. He’s been previously linked to marketing Accounting Director Margot Hauer-King (the older sister of Jonah Hauer-King) in 2019 and in 2021, they were reportedly living together in New York City. However, in 2023, he purchased a house in Gloucestershire and moved back to the UK so it’s unknown if they are still together.

    [ad_2]

    Lea Veloso

    Source link

  • Challengers Attempts to Challenge Jules and Jim in the Love Triangle Genre

    Challengers Attempts to Challenge Jules and Jim in the Love Triangle Genre

    [ad_1]

    In what is now surely the “instant classic” movie poster for Challengers, there is an illustrated version of Tashi Duncan (Zendaya)—her hair cropped short—wearing sunglasses that reflect two tennis-playing men, Patrick Zweig (Josh O’Connor) and Arthur “Art” Donaldson (Mike Faist), in each lens. A faint hint of a devious smirk on her face, everything about the poster suggests that she’s not only the “puppetmaster” of these two white boys, but also someone who gets a perverse (and sexual) thrill out of watching them compete with each other…specifically over (tennis) courting her favor (and yes, Challengers is now easily among the best “tennis movies,” complete with a Venus Williams nod of approval [sorry King Richard]). 

    Director Luca Guadagnino, who perfected the art of homoerotic repression constantly about to bubble to the surface in 2017’s Call Me By Your Name, does so to an even more sophisticated and nuanced degree here. With a script penned by playwright Justin Kuritzkes (who also happens to be married to Past Lives writer-director Celine Song), the barbing nature of the dialogue is mirrored not only by the high-octane back and forth on the tennis court, but also the high-octane soundtrack—provided by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross—to match. Even during moments when audiences wouldn’t typically expect…namely, during tense scenes of dialogue where the sparring is done with words instead of rackets. And oh, how there are so many tense scenes that make it irresistible for Guadagnino to use the Reznor/Ross-produced music (which, at times, sounds like it was made by New Order). Not that there aren’t plenty of other moments when “normal” music is used, too. Specifically to indicate what year of the 2000s it is. Even though, when Tashi first comes up to Patrick and Art’s hotel room, and it’s supposed to be 2006, Blood Orange’s “Uncle ACE” is playing in the background—a song that didn’t come out until 2013. But “whatever,” one supposes…guess it’s all about the “mood” and not “historical accuracy” (just ask the music supervisors on Saltburn and Madame Web). Earlier in their pursuit, when Patrick and Art home in on Tashi at a party thrown in her honor on Long Island, Nelly’s “Hot in Herre” is playing like it’s 2002. 

    When we get to 2007, other 00s-era bops include Blu Cantrell’s 2001 single, “Hit ‘Em Up Style (Oops!)” and Lily Allen’s 2006 smash, “Smile” (which plays faintly in the background of the cafeteria at Stanford while Tashi and Art have lunch together). It seems Guadagnino isn’t as interested in matching the music to the year when we enter 2010 and beyond, with the film commencing in August of 2019 before it flashes back to thirteen years earlier and then keeps flip-flopping in between certain years prior. From the beginning, though, it’s made clear that the real relationship—the core one—is between Patrick and Art. In 2006, they play together as “Fire and Ice” (though it’s never said which one is fire and which ice—hair color-wise, Art would be fire and Patrick ice, but personality-wise, each man can be both…“bi,” if you will).

    Their feelings of love beyond friendship are immediately conveyed in the way they embrace one another on the court after winning a game of doubles. Later on, as they walk through the tournament eating hot dogs (a very specific food choice) together, they geek out about their passion for tennis before settling into the audience stand to watch a match. It is at this point that Patrick starts to talk up Tashi, calling her the “hottest woman I’ve ever seen” (cue Katy Perry singing, “California gurls/We’re undeniable/Fine, fresh, fierce/We got it on lock”). Art has no idea what he’s talking about until Tashi steps onto the court at that very moment and proceeds to do some sensual stretches before making the game her bitch. 

    Art is now convinced about going to the party on Long Island to try to talk to her. And they do. They wait all night, until everyone else is leaving, to really talk to her. During their first proper conversation together, Tashi tells Patrick and Art that every tennis match is like being in a relationship with someone. And the audience gets to watch it all unfold. She seems to direct this metaphor more toward Patrick, who she thinks hasn’t yet learned what tennis really is yet, despite being a better player than Art. Indeed, Patrick had agreed to let Art win the match the following day until Tashi shows up in their hotel room and plants the seed of competition in their mind by saying that she’ll only give her number to the boy who wins the match the next day. So it is that a shift in Patrick and Art’s dynamic occurs. Where once they were on an even playing field with little source of conflict, Tashi is the wrench thrown into their formerly repressed homoeroticism. But she brings it out in them when, during a “three-way” kiss, it doesn’t take long for it to become a two-way between Patrick and Art, who have to be reminded that Tashi is even still there when she demands, “Stop.” She then chooses to go no further because, as she puts it, “I’m not a homewrecker.” A “half-joke” with more truth in it than not. For Patrick and Art are in love, and Tashi is essentially breaking up the purity of that love with her introduction as a presence to compete for. The Patrick/Art rapport is, needless to say, one that mirrors the Jules/Jim one as described by the narration, “Jules and Jim’s friendship had no equivalent in love. They delighted together in the smallest things. They accepted their differences with tenderness. From the start, everyone called them Don Quixote and Sancho Panza.”

    As the audience watches the drama of Challengers unfurl over these ten-plus years (intercutting back and forth like a tennis ball in the timeline), it always seemed Art wanted Tashi because Patrick did, and because “winning” her would somehow prove he had “superior game.” What’s more, in its psychologically fraught way, being with Tashi is a means to become even closer to him…to figuratively “cross swords” (instead of just rackets) by having entered the same woman. Tashi’s eventual leaning toward Art, despite being with Patrick (who won the match that day in ‘06 in order to gain her number) first, is a direct result of what Patrick said to her when they eventually broke up: she wanted someone to boss around, to be her “fan,” not her peer. In short, she wanted a whipping boy. But she also wanted someone like Patrick, too. Someone who pushes back and is unpredictable—fiery. Essentially, she does need and want both of them because she can’t get their respective personalities in just one man. And while she might seem like the alpha throughout the sizzling narrative, her formation at the top of the triangle betrays the reality that, without her, Patrick and Art would still go on as friends-bordering-on-lovers anyway. Were it not for her, as a matter of fact, they would have remained friends instead of “breaking up.”

    It is in this regard that Challengers might present a dangerous underlying message (though not one that is anything new in our misogynistic society). And that is: whenever a woman gets involved, it ruins everything “precious” and “beautiful” about a male friendship. Invokes jealousies and pettiness that never would have arisen had it not been for “that bitch” (see also: Dawson’s Creek). There are numerous love triangle movies to this effect, not least of which is Jules and Jim. In fact, Tashi has nothing on Catherine (Jeanne Moreau), the woman whose affections Jules and Jim vie for until Jules ends up marrying and having a child with her. Which is exactly what Art does with Tashi. Except that, rather than shunning Jim from their lives, they welcome him into it. Moreover (Moreau-ver?), it’s obvious Catherine still has a thing for him, too. And Jules even wants Jim to be with her, suggesting as much when he notices how bored and lifeless she’s become.

    Patrick is the Jim of the permutation in Challengers—the ballsier, less mild-mannered of the male duo that Tashi can’t help continuing to be attracted to. Even if she’s endlessly bored by each of them individually, but excited by them when they, er, come together. In turn, Patrick and Art are excited by Tashi because she is the conduit that sparks the sexual charge between them (this most overtly manifested during the hotel kissing scene when she only briefly divides them before they end up kissing each other). 

    The reason Patrick and Art are attracted to Tashi is also for the same reason Jules and Jim are attracted to Catherine: she is a “disruptor” to their calm, static “friendship.” Someone who will shake things up, make life interesting and, yes, challenge them. Sometimes to be better, but, more often than not, to be the worst versions of themselves. Which, again, doesn’t exactly serve as a great PSA for women. Forever painted as “manipulative” and “calculated.” But at least in Challengers, Tashi doesn’t end up killing Patrick—so that’s progress on the toxicity front. Regardless of whether or not one sees Challengers as a monogamy or polyamory story, a gay or a straight one.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • ‘Challengers’ teases with competitive tennis and sweltering sexy times, but falls short of euphoria

    ‘Challengers’ teases with competitive tennis and sweltering sexy times, but falls short of euphoria

    [ad_1]

    I haven’t seen a movie that edges its audience with more cruel glee than Challengers, Luca Guadagnino’s latest horny-in-theory story of complicated romance.

    Anyone expecting a moist-and-sweaty Jules et Jim set in the competitive world of professional tennis, which is what I thought when I kept seeing the trailer, will be slightly disappointed (and even a bit impressed) by how much this movie teases you. Whether it’s in the bedroom or on the court, the Call Me by Your Name director goes to extreme lengths to make sure the characters — and the audience — don’t reach a climax until the time is just right.

    The entire film takes place on a buzzing tennis court as waning tennis champion Art Donaldson (Mike Faist) and struggling has-been Patrick Zweig (Josh O’Connor), two pals-turned-rivals, play an intense game. Also there is Tashi Duncan (Zendaya), a one-time tennis prodigy who was once Zweig’s main squeeze and is now Donaldson’s devoted wife-coach.

    As Zweig and Donaldson battle it out on the court, Guadagnino tells how this twisted love triangle came to be through good ol’ non-linear storytelling. Flashbacks literally pile on top of flashbacks as we visit these three in their younger years, back when the boys were shaggy-haired BFFs who immediately became smitten with Duncan and her beautiful ferocity. We also slide into their more adult years, when Donaldson has to keep the winning going for both himself and his wife, who gets sidelined by a career-crushing injury and still can’t seem to get over her bummy-ass ex whenever they’re in the same vicinity.

    Right from the opening seconds, Guadagnino creates an athletic melodrama that crackles with lustful intensity. He even gets Oscar-winning composers Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross to supply a throbbing techno score that surfaces whenever these characters get hot and bothered — physically, mentally, emotionally — on screen.

    Guadagnino is ever the stealthy queer filmmaker; anyone hoping for Zendaya to get butt-bald-nekkid will also be disappointed by the bare, loose male genitals that are often on display. With screenwriter Justin Kuritzkes (who’s also written Guadagnino’s upcoming film, aptly titled Queer), Guadagnino subtly drops hints that these buds are more into each other than the gal in the middle. The scene where they have an in-your-face convo while eating phallic-looking churros is a dead giveaway. Faist credibly pulls off the feat of going from young, callow third wheel to middle-aged, frustrated third wheel, while O’Connor, that Jeremy Sisto-looking Brit, plays the asshole role with oily unrepentance.

    As for the star of the show, I’ve never seen a young actress so eager to play a grown-ass, take-charge woman like Zendaya, who also serves as a producer. Just as she recently showed in the mega-blockbuster Dune sequel, Zendaya always acts like she dares people to dismiss her as demure and waifish. From the get-go, Queen Euphoria is in charge of this wild ride, and those two poor, dumb bastards have no choice but to follow her lead. Even when her character ropes the two into a late-night makeout session that ends on a very homoerotic note, Zendaya quietly makes it official that it’s her world and we’re all just doing gay shit in it.

    Zendaya also has no problem playing someone whose thirst for competition supersedes her need to make rational decisions. Her character faces that dilemma that many women have dealt with: Should she stick with a stable yet unfulfilling life with her reliable simp husband, or risk all that shit for the unworthy, irresponsible douchebag who can bring the ruckus sexually (and personally)?

    I wish I was as enthused about Challengers as my fellow film-critic colleagues. Apparently, the issue of whether or not sex is essential in movies has become such a tiresome debate, some people are ready to cheer a film that at least presents the idea that its main characters want to jump each other’s bones.

    But as wild and insane as Guadagnino makes the tennis sequences between O’Connor and Faist (we even catch the match from the tennis ball’s perspective!), Challengers, like most heated, emotional, one-on-one interactions, comes to a messy, baffling finish. Not to mention that the absurdly-heightened finale declares what this movie truly is: the most bros-before-hoes movie Guadagnino has ever made.

    [ad_2]

    Craig D. Lindsey

    Source link

  • ‘Challengers’ Review: Zendaya Serves Up a Psychosexual Tennis Flick

    ‘Challengers’ Review: Zendaya Serves Up a Psychosexual Tennis Flick

    [ad_1]

    (L-R) Mike Faist as Art, Zendaya as Tashi and Josh O’Connor as Patrick in Challengers. Metro Goldwyn Mayer Pictures

    Loud, long, a little messy and very sweaty, Challengers may not be as sexy as its explosive first trailer implied, but it’s still a hell of a movie. Zendaya, Mike Faist and Josh O’Connor make for quite the toxic tennis love triangle at the center of it all, each co-star crackling with chemistry and some deeply realized character work.


    CHALLENGERS ★★★ (3/4 stars)
    Directed by: Luca Guadagnino
    Written by: Justin Kuritzkes
    Starring: Zendaya, Josh O’Connor, Mike Faist
    Running time: 131 mins.


    The film follows three people who have tied themselves to tennis, for better or worse. Tashi Duncan (Zendaya) was a junior champion poised to be the sport’s next big thing before a horrific injury forced her into coaching; she’s now married to Art Donaldson (Faist), a player who’s great but far from being one of the greats, despite Tashi’s coaching. They met over a decade prior, when Art was besties with the slightly less respectable Patrick Zweig (O’Connor). Challengers makes frequent use of flashbacks to tie this complicated threesome together, as Art and Patrick go from friends to enemies, Tashi and Patrick from lovers to nuisances, Art and Tashi from tennis pals to husband and wife.

    Much of the movie’s action takes place over a two-week competition (amusingly called Phil’s Tire Town Challenger, situated on some quaint New Rochelle courts). It’s where Art, Patrick and, inevitably, Tashi meet again after years apart, all nearing the end of their careers but at different stages of acceptance over it. When Art and Patrick face off against each other in the final round, it triggers a great deal of memories that fuel the fire of what could very well be their last match.

    Mike Faist and Zendaya in Challengers. Niko Tavernise

    That kind of non-linear storytelling gets jarring at times, and the erratic volleying between timelines is one of the film’s major faults. The hair and makeup team do wonders to distinguish these characters over the years, and the actors perform the wear and tear of aging more than well enough to keep things clear. It’s not that it’s confusing, given how each flashback feeds into the current match and vice versa, but it makes for a choppy viewing experience. And it’s not helped by an overzealous use of chyrons, with everything timestamped in a 13-year period with enough specificity that you need to do the math in your seat.

    Challengers has this same overbearing streak in other areas too. Director Luca Guadagnino, still chasing the career high of 2017’s Call Me By Your Name, goes maximalist on this movie, using bizarre camera angles, relentless slo-mo, and a few questionable needle drops. It’s occasionally overpowering, and sometimes the sound mix even makes it hard to hear the excellent, incisive dialogue. Also, the Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross soundtrack may have used too much synth, a feat this critic thought all but impossible.

    There’s a lot to nitpick here, but it’s only because so much of the movie works so well otherwise. The central drama is juicy beyond words, and the way the relationships unravel is delicious. As Tashi Donaldson-nee-Duncan, Zendaya gets to flex a very different acting muscle than what audiences have seen. She’s a tennis-obsessed sociopath (in the way that elite athletes must be, at least a little), determined to stay in the game whatever way she can. She needs to win, but, at the same time, she doesn’t have the most traditional definition of winning. In the flashback scenes to Tashi’s first meeting with the boys, she riles them up not just for her enjoyment, but for the love of the game.

    Though the film earns its R rating, it’s not through sex—the three stars are never fully nude, never go further than a steamy makeout or some dry humping. But that doesn’t stop Challengers from being exceptionally sensual, and Tashi’s voyeuristic view of Art and Patrick (and their tennis) adds to that. The boys aren’t on her level as athletes or as psychosexual tennis lovers, and watching Zendaya pull their strings with that sly grin of hers is an absolute delight. She also gets some of the movie’s best lines, delivered with an iciness that’ll knock the wind right out of you.

    Mike Faist and Josh O’Connor in Challengers. Niko Tavernise

    Faist and O’Connor deliver some fantastic dueling performances too. Faist, best known for his scene-stealing turn in the recent West Side Story redux, sheds any vestige of a theater kid background to play Art. In the flashbacks, he’s sentimental and soft, polite but with a penchant for passive aggression. In the now, he’s a tennis machine verging on a mid-life crisis that’s only exacerbated by seeing his old friend—his inevitable emotional implosion comes with a rocket serve that’ll make you jump in your seat. As for O’Connor, Patrick somehow manages to be greasier than the actor’s wayward wanderer in La Chimera and infinitely more smarmy. Patrick’s cool guy schtick is out of gas somewhere in the middle of the movie’s timeline, and though he’s self aware about it, Patrick is still a man who thinks he can charm and connive his way out of anything. He’s not likable, but he’s certainly magnetic, with the smile tugging at the corner of his mouth saying more than he ever will.

    The boys go from bunkmates to rivals to bitter foes on and off the court, and as they come to blows over the final round, Challengers serves up greatness. It takes a bit long to get there in the end, and some cinematic tricks may distract you, but when Patrick goes to serve that fateful final ball and Art runs to meet it, all with Tashi watching and waiting to feel that kind of power again, it’s game, set, match.

    ‘Challengers’ Review: Zendaya Serves Up a Psychosexual Tennis Flick

    [ad_2]

    Laura Babiak

    Source link

  • With Challengers, Justin Kuritzkes Serves an Ace

    With Challengers, Justin Kuritzkes Serves an Ace

    [ad_1]

    Photo: Christopher Anderson for New York Magazine

    The writer Justin Kuritzkes became obsessed with pro tennis after watching Naomi Osaka beat Serena Williams at the 2018 U.S. Open in an infamous match fraught with argument. As Williams pleaded her case to the umpire, Kuritzkes realized how cinematic the situation could be: how alone each player was, yet how linked to each other. He started watching tennis all the time, and when he ran out of big matches, he found smaller ones like the Challenger tournaments — low-budget events that could help someone qualify for the highest level of competition. Some of the players there may be among the top 300 in the world, but they’re fighting for prize money that won’t even cover their expenses. Kuritzkes knew the feeling. At the time, he was a well-regarded playwright who struggled to get anything produced. “Although the stands at a Challenger are mostly empty, the players’ emotions are just as if they were at the U.S. Open because they’re fighting for their lives. It’s the humiliation of being a gladiator and nobody’s even there to watch you die,” he says. “I connected with that deeply as a theater person. If you asked me if I know the 271st most successful theater actor in America, I probably do. And I guarantee you they’re broke.”

    In 2021, he decided to channel his tennis fixation into a screenplay — and now that screenplay is Challengers, a Zendaya-led production full of enough unsatisfied desire and close-ups of sweaty, beautiful young men to confirm that Luca Guadagnino directed it. The film follows three tennis players who have spent their entire adult lives entangled in one another’s careers and beds: Zendaya plays Tashi Donaldson, a former prodigy who should have gone pro but couldn’t. Mike Faist is her husband, Art, a six-time Grand Slam winner whom Tashi both coaches and disdains. And then there’s Patrick Zweig (Josh O’Connor), an all-id ex-friend and doubles partner to Art and ex-boyfriend to Tashi. When Patrick reencounters the couple at a Challenger in suburban New York, it throws all three of them into racket-smashing, early-onset midlife crisis.

    Challengers is Zendaya’s first big-screen leading role, and she plays Tashi full of withholding and coiled, frustrated ambition; her idea of a pep talk before a match is telling her husband to “decimate that little bitch.” This is also Kuritzkes’s first screenplay. Now 33, he spent his 20s writing comic and disturbing plays that were supported by prestigious residencies and fellowships but rarely produced for the stage. Hollywood has been a lot faster to welcome him: After Challengers, he’s got another film with Guadagnino, an adaptation of the William S. Burroughs book Queer. Next, he’s adapting Don Winslow’s mob novel City on Fire with Austin Butler set to star. This would all seem more unprecedented if his wife hadn’t just done something similar: Kuritzkes is married to Celine Song, the former playwright whose own debut film, Past Lives, was nominated for two Oscars.

    Even if most of the people who saw Past Lives didn’t know Kuritzkes’s name, Song’s press tour gave him a kind of secondhand, not-quite-accurate fame: The film is about a New York playwright who reengages with a childhood crush from South Korea and begins to question her marriage to her white husband. In interviews, Song talked at length about how her film was inspired by her own life. Now Kuritzkes has written a ménage à trois of his own. Like Past Lives, it hinges on a young woman who is forced to confront the romantic road not taken. Unlike Song, he’s not willing to discuss that theme. “Challengers is an intensely personal film to me — in ways that I’m not interested in talking about,” he says.

    He dismisses the films’ similarities. “Love triangles are one of the most basic plots in cinema,” he says. “Even in a relationship between two people, there’s always a sort of imagined third presence.” I ask what that third presence might be. “Well, for a lot of people, it’s, like, Jesus,” he jokes. “Or it’s their conception of themselves, or their parents, or their friends. But in a love triangle, that third presence is not imagined.” Either way, he says, the parallels between his life and Past Lives or Challengers don’t matter: “Once it gets transformed into a work of art, the connection between that and the real thing is irrelevant. That’s just fuel that you’re using to propel a vehicle.”

    Justin Kuritzkes on the set of Challengers.
    Photo: Niko Tavernise/Niko Tavernise

    Kuritzkes and I meet at the Fort Greene Park tennis courts in early April, settling down on a cold bench to watch the amateurs hit. To the left, four middle-aged white men play competent doubles. To the right, two young people struggle just to get the ball over the net. Suddenly, a horde of 14-year-olds stream onto the courts, running and yelling as they gather for what’s either an after-school tennis camp or an ad hoc hazing. When Kuritzkes was around that age, he had already quit his tennis lessons. “I could tell exactly how bad I was. I would have moments where it clicked and then wouldn’t be able to replicate it. That drove me crazy because I was like, Well, why can’t I just do that every time?” he says. “I decided I was as good as I was ever going to get and it wasn’t good enough. So I was done.”

    Kuritzkes grew up in L.A., the son of a real-estate-lawyer mother and gastroenterologist father, and went to the prep school Harvard-Westlake, where he graduated one year behind Lily Collins and three years ahead of Ben Platt and Beanie Feldstein. The school had a student playwriting festival, and Kuritzkes became a regular participant, writing 10-to-15-minute plays. “The immediacy of theater was intoxicating,” he says. “You can just write something, get two chairs, and have actors do it and the audience will suspend their disbelief.” When he went off to Brown, “I already knew I was a playwright,” he says. In between working on his thesis, he started making character-study videos on his laptop, warping his face using the built-in effects of Photo Booth. In his most-watched video, “Potion Seller,” he plays a knight who keeps begging a merchant for potions.

    He met Song the summer after he graduated, in 2012, during a fellowship in Montauk. Song fictionalized this first encounter in Past Lives in a woozy scene where protagonist Nora (Greta Lee) flirts with future husband Arthur (John Magaro) under the fairy lights at a dreamlike residency. Nora departs on a long definition of the Korean concept of in-yun — “It means providence, or fate” — before circling back to say it’s just “something Koreans say to seduce someone.”

    Song has said they connected over their work, so I ask Kuritzkes, half-joking, how long it took before he showed her his YouTube videos. He stiffens. “I’m so thrilled and happy to talk about Celine in virtually every context, but I would never want to speak for her in the context of an interview,” he says. Too much in-yun has been spilled already. I point out that Song has spoken freely about their lives together. “I wouldn’t want anybody to confuse the character and me because it erases the work that she and her actor did, or it pollutes it,” he says. I ask if he thinks people do confuse him with the character. “I don’t know,” he replies, looking me straight in the eye. “Do you?”

    In Past Lives, the husband is a gentle presence who recedes into the background. In real life, Kuritzkes comes off as preternaturally self-assured. “He has had that from a very young age,” says theater director Danya Taymor. “It’s not arrogance. He just believes in himself.” Shortly after Kuritzkes and Song started dating, “Potion Seller” went so viral that The New Yorker eventually published a parody of it; the video now has over 11 million views. The couple married in 2016, the same year Kuritzkes’s play The Sensuality Party — his thesis from Brown, a series of interlocking monologues from college kids who have an orgy that turns nonconsensual — was produced Off Broadway with Taymor directing. When Kuritzkes and another friend, the director Knud Adams, wanted to stage Kuritzkes’s play Asshole, they built the set themselves and rehearsed in their respective apartments. The play is about a doctor who oversees the force-feeding of prisoners at a government black site and is obsessed with his own asshole. Kuritzkes had written it in 2014 after reading about the force-feeding of Guantánamo prisoners on hunger strike. “The fact that everybody could go about our normal lives after hearing about it really freaked me out,” he says. “I started to think, Well, what would really repulse somebody? It would be a guy playing with his own asshole and smelling his own shit.” The production, at the Brooklyn theater Jack, was a surprise hit. As Adams remembers, “We sold out all our shows. But then it’s not hard to sell out Jack — there are 40 seats.”

    Writing Challengers was an exercise in following desire. Deep in the grips of tennis mania, Kuritzkes had begun to wonder what could make watching the game even more interesting. “If I knew exactly what was at stake on an emotional level beyond the court for the people playing and the people watching, that would be just eating a plate of chocolate truffles to me.” His agent sent the script to the producers, Amy Pascal and Rachel O’Connor, who got it to Zendaya, who loved it. The actress wanted both to star and to co-produce. “One of the things I remember saying to Zendaya when we first met was that the cultural space that Zendaya occupies in the world is the space that the character Tashi was supposed to occupy — that was the life she was supposed to have,” says Kuritzkes. “I think she really connected with that ambition and that pain.” The producers and Zendaya who got Guadagnino onboard.

    With Challengers, Kuritzkes became part of a machine: He was working with Guadagnino and the film’s tennis consultant, the coach and commentator Brad Gilbert, on the many gameplay scenes, which were choreographed like fights. Each one had to be shot with both body doubles and the actors, and only Faist came in with tennis experience. “During breaks, we would sometimes pick up racquets and play. I have really funny videos on my phone of Luca,” says Kuritzkes, smiling. “It was so adorable. He just couldn’t hit the ball to save his life.”

    Kuritzkes says that he always imagined a charge between Art and Patrick — “There is eroticism present in every intimate friendship, especially one between two guys who have spent their lives in locker rooms and dorm rooms and on the court together” — and that Guadagnino’s interpretation pushed it further. Mostly, though, the boys are each other’s foils, with Patrick always willing to play the heel. In Guadagnino’s hands, this inevitably bends erotic. When the two first become infatuated with Tashi, Art says earnestly that she’s “a remarkable young woman.” Patrick replies, “I know. She’s a pillar of the community.” He lowers to a whisper: “I’d let her fuck me with a racquet.” Kuritzkes says that although none of the characters is based on a real player, it was important for Tashi to be a Black woman. “The story of American tennis is Black women for the past however many decades,” he says. “I also knew that I didn’t want to not specify the races of the characters. That always feels to me like you’re avoiding something. Her being a Black woman informs a lot about how she navigates her situation and how she navigates her relationship with these guys.” The Zendaya line making the rounds in the film’s trailer — “I’m taking such good care of my little white boys” — sounds affectionate only on paper.

    When Kuritzkes was a kid, he felt bad that so many of the films he loved, like Jules et Jim and Y Tu Mamá También, were about love triangles; he felt guilty getting so much pleasure from watching a scenario in which someone was being wronged, rejected, or hurt. Now he believes movies are exactly the right place for it. “Part of the joy of watching it is thinking, At least my life isn’t as messed up as that, or, My life is as messed up as that, and thank God I’m not alone,” he says. “What’s good for art is the opposite of what’s good for life.”


    See All



    [ad_2]

    Madeline Leung Coleman

    Source link