ReportWire

Tag: joe biden

  • This Election Is The Closest Presidential Race In At Least 60 Years: Polls

    This Election Is The Closest Presidential Race In At Least 60 Years: Polls

    [ad_1]

    The 2024 presidential election cycle is the first time in at least 60 years that a single candidate hasn’t been ahead 5 points or more in the polls for three-plus weeks, according to an analysis by Harry Enten, host of CNN’s Margins of Error. That margin has existed in every campaign since 1964, Enten explained, except this one—including when President Joe Biden was still running.

    “The race has been consistently close in a way I’ve never seen,” Enten wrote on X. “The bottom line is this election is up for grabs with 2 months to go.”

    Several national and battleground state polls show Vice President Kamala Harris and former president Donald Trump either tied or within a few percentage points of one another—the results seeming to hover squarely within margins of error.

    Pollsters in this election have had a uniquely tumultuous campaign to track. From Biden’s fraught debate performance in June to the failed assassination attempt on Trump in July, followed by Biden bowing out of the race and Harris’s energized and expedited summer campaign, it’s felt like each week has brought another unprecedented event for Americans to weigh in on.

    Plus, according to a Pew Research Center report, the mere presence of Trump on the ballot can negatively impact the reliability of polling. “Compared with other elections in the past 20 years, polls have been less accurate when Donald Trump is on the ballot,” Pew’s vice president Courtney Kennedy and senior survey advisor Scott Keeter wrote.

    This discrepancy, they found, is likely due to two things. First, pollsters often use past election turnout to predict who will vote in the upcoming race, and “research has found that Trump is popular among people who tend to sit out midterms but turn out for him in presidential election years.” Second, Kennedy and Keeter note, “Republicans in the Trump era have become a little less likely than Democrats to participate in polls.”

    In addition to documenting a historically close race, pollsters have been tracking what issues are driving voters to the ballot box this year.

    An August Economist/YouGov poll of 1,567 American adults found that “Inflation/prices” was the top issue on voters’ minds, at 24%, followed by “Jobs and the economy” at 13%, and “Immigration” at 12%.

    A set of New York Times/Siena College polls of registered voters in seven battleground states conducted from August 6 to 15 found that “For women younger than 45, abortion has overtaken the economy as the single most important issue to their vote.”

    Throughout the 2024 campaign cycle, one thing has remained notably clear: this election could be decided by just a few key battleground states.

    Democratic voters in Omaha, Nebraska, have been putting signs in their yards with a singular blue dot, a symbol of Harris’s potential stronghold in a red state. Nebraska is one of only two states that awards electoral votes by congressional district, rather than by statewide winner.

    “For all of the pathways for Harris and Trump to reach the White House,” CNN’s Jeff Zeleny writes, “the race for 270 electoral votes could come down to Nebraska’s sprawling 2nd District covering Omaha and parts of two nearby counties, which hold many similarities to suburban areas across the country.”

    On top of Omaha’s blue dot, the final tallies in seven states—Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada—may grant either Trump or Harris the 270 needed to win.

    In the case of an Electoral College tie, a centuries-old constitutional mechanism could end up deciding the election. If both Harris and Trump take home 269 Electoral College votes, the House would decide the election, per the 12th Amendment—that hasn’t happened since 1824.

    Should it be tossed to the House, each state delegation would be allotted one vote. Currently, Republicans control 26 House delegations; Democrats control 22, and two others are tied. Meaning, Trump could lose the popular vote—as he has the last two times he’s run for executive office—tie in the general election, and still end up in the White House.

    A close election could exacerbate already percolating right-wing theories of voter fraud—and risk a revival of Trump’s 2020 Big Lie, the unfounded claim that the election was stolen from him by Biden.

    [ad_2]

    Katie Herchenroeder

    Source link

  • Senator Rick Scott: Biden and Harris Driving America’s Economy into Ground

    Senator Rick Scott: Biden and Harris Driving America’s Economy into Ground

    [ad_1]

    Florida Senator Rick Scott slammed President Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, saying the Democrats are driving America’s economy into the ground.

    In a recent video, the Republican Senator called out the Biden-Harris administration’s failed economic policies that he said “are killing American businesses and economy.”

    “It’s no secret that Bidenomics and Harris price hikes are crushing our economy and making the American dream feel out of reach,” Florida Senator Rick Scott said. “We can only fix this problem if Washington politicians face the facts.”

    The Florida Republican incumbent wants to “stop the tax and spending spree” in order to get America’s fiscal house in order.

    Senator Scott also released an update on his actions to address the Biden-Harris administration’s economic crisis and skyrocketing inflation, along with his own quarterly economic snapshot.

    In the video, the Florida Senator points out “the soaring cost of breakfast,” and the national debt problem. He added that “choices made by Washington elites are directly impacting your bottom line.”

    Sen. Rick Scott also channeled Republican President Donald Trump in his political messaging.

    “As Florida’s U.S. Senator, I’m fighting like hell to make our economy great again so that every American can live their American dream,” the Republican concluded in the political video message.

     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Proposals to tax unrealized capital gains would ‘kill the stock market,’ billionaire investor Mark Cuban says

    Proposals to tax unrealized capital gains would ‘kill the stock market,’ billionaire investor Mark Cuban says

    [ad_1]

    BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/Getty Images

    • Mark Cuban said that taxing unrealized capital gains would “kill the stock market.”

    • President Joe Biden proposed taxing unrealized gains for people worth over $100 million.

    • Kamala Harris is unlikely to endorse Biden’s plan, Cuban said.

    Any proposal to tax unrealized capital gains would “kill the stock market,” the billionaire investor Mark Cuban said in a CNBC interview on Thursday.

    As part of his wide-ranging tax proposals, President Joe Biden has suggested taxing unrealized capital gains for people with a net worth of more than $100 million.

    While Vice President Kamala Harris has not endorsed or dismissed Biden’s proposal on unrealized capital gains, Cuban said, it’s dead on arrival.

    “If you tax unrealized gains, you’re going to kill the stock market, and it’s going to be the ultimate employment plan for private equity because companies are not going to go public because you can get whipsawed,” Cuban said.

    Cuban’s “whipsaw” comment alluded to the main question investors have surrounding proposed taxes on unrealized capital gains: What happens if those unrealized capital gains eventually turn into unrealized capital losses in a volatile stock market?

    But according to Cuban, who said he’d been talking with the Harris campaign often in recent weeks, Harris is highly unlikely to endorse such a plan.

    “They realize that’s the issue,” he said, adding of Harris: “Even though she is not directly conflicting the Biden tax plan, to her, her value proposition is we need to tax everybody fairly, starting from the Biden plan as a starting point. But that’s not necessarily her ending point.”

    Harris has already rejected some aspects of Biden’s tax proposals, offering her own vision of what she would propose as president.

    While Biden proposed to move the long-term capital-gains tax rate to 39.6% for households with taxable income of more than $1 million, Harris says that’s too high and has proposed raising it to 28% instead.

    “The point I’m really trying to convey is: She’s open-minded. She’s not an ideologue. She wants to do what’s best for business,” Cuban said.

    Cuban defended the Democratic presidential nominee despite criticism that Harris has yet to unveil a slew of detailed economic-policy proposals with the November election fast approaching.

    “Like any good CEO trying to turn around a battleship, there’s only so much you can do every single day,” Cuban said. “Like any good CEO, you’ve got to do it when you get it right.”

    Read the original article on Business Insider

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hunter Biden pleads guilty in tax case, hours after jury selection for trial was to begin

    Hunter Biden pleads guilty in tax case, hours after jury selection for trial was to begin

    [ad_1]

    Hunter Biden, son of U.S. President Joe Biden, arrives at court for his trial on tax evasion in Los Angeles on Sept. 5, 2024.

    Ringo Chiu | AFP | Getty Images

    Hunter Biden pleaded guilty to all nine counts in his criminal tax case in Los Angeles federal court on Thursday afternoon, hours after jury selection was due to begin for a trial of the son of President Joe Biden.

    Biden’s sentencing was scheduled for Dec. 16.

    The plea came after prosecutors strongly opposed Biden’s surprise offer earlier in the day to enter a special plea — known as an Alford plea — that would allow him to maintain that he believed he was innocent but concede that prosecutors had enough evidence to convict him at trial.

    If the Alford plea had been accepted by U.S. District Judge Mark Scarsi, Biden would have been convicted of the charges.

    The plea that Biden ended up making to Scarsi is an “open plea,” or one done without a plea deal with prosecutors, which might have included a reduction in the number of criminal counts he faced and an agreement on the likely terms of his sentencing.

    Biden, 54, was charged in the case with three felony counts and six misdemeanors related to failing to pay at least $1.4 million in federal taxes between 2016 and 2019.

    He was accused of deducting money that he paid to sex workers on his taxes as a business expense and of spending “millions of dollars on an extravagant lifestyle rather than paying his tax bills,” according to an indictment.

    “Mr. Biden will agree that the elements of each offense have been satisfied,” Biden’s lawyer Abbe Lowell told Scarsi after returning from a recess following arguments over the proposed Alford plea.

    When Scarsi asked special counsel Leo Wise, the prosecutor, if that was sufficient, Wise said he would prefer that Biden admit his actions as alleged in an indictment.

    “Will Mr. Biden agree that that is the truth? Because the truth matters,” Wise said. “He should have to say that the facts are true!”

    Lowell then argued that was not required under the law.

    “He just has to agree to the elements,” Lowell said. “I know Mr. Wise would like Mr. Biden to say, ‘and in addition, I was a really bad person when I did this,’ but that’s not what the law requires.”

    Scarsi said, “So we’re going to take an open plea from Mr. Biden. And I will ask if you committed conduct that satisfies element in the indictment.”

    Wise then began reading the 56-page indictment out loud in court. That reading took almost 90 minutes to complete.

     In June, Biden was found guilty after trial in another case where he was accused of crimes related to his purchase of a handgun in 2018 while being a user and addict of crack cocaine.

    He is awaiting sentencing in that case, which was tried in U.S. District Court in Delaware.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    On Thursday morning in Los Angeles federal court, more than 100 potential jurors assembled for jury selection in Biden’s tax case.

    But Biden’s lawyer Lowell surprised prosecutors and others in the court when he told Scarsi, “There is no reason to proceed with jury selection as Mr. Biden intends to change his plea.”

    Lowell told Scarsi there was “no agreement” with prosecutors about Biden’s planned Alford plea. But the lawyer said there is no requirement for such an agreement.

    “The law is very clear. If the defendant satisfies rule 11b, the court is required to accept the plea,” Lowell said.”

    Lowell also said, “I don’t think we would agree under conventional plea circumstances.”

    Wise, the special counsel, told Scarsi, “This is the first we’ve heard of this.” Wise asked for time to discuss the proposed change of plea privately.

    “I think this can be resolved today,” Lowell said. “It doesn’t need days.”

    After a recess, Wise told the judge, “I want to make it crystal clear: The U.S. opposes an Alford plea.”

    “We will not under any circumstances accept an Alford plea,” said Wise. “It’s not in the public interest, it’s contrary to the rule of law and we think it’s an injustice.”

    Hunter Biden is not innocent. Hunter Biden is guilty,” said Wise.

    “We were as shocked as anyone else,” the prosecutor said about the proposed Alford plea.

    He said the prosecution is not in a position to evaluate that plea offer Thursday.

    “There’s no way to rush this at this point. And it shouldn’t be rushed,” Wise said. 

    Under Department of Justice guidelines, federal prosecutors “may not consent” to an Alford plea “except in the most unusual circumstances and only after the Assistant Attorney General, Tax Division, or a higher Departmental official, has approved a written request.”

    Lowell told Scarsi that Biden is not asking for special treatment, noting that “people all over the U.S.” take Alford pleas.

    “He is asking for the same rights as others,” Lowell said. “He is willing to say that the government has put forth sufficient evidence to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. … I don’t know why the government wants to punt.”

    Scarsi called another recess after hearing the arguments and telling attorneys, “I haven’t seen a case that tells me I have to accept an Alford plea.”

    But the judge also said, “Assuming I have the opportunity to reject an Alford plea, why shouldn’t I?”

    “I need a reason why I accept or reject a plea,” Scarsi said. 

    After that recess, Biden returned to the courtroom, where Lowell said he would enter his open guilty plea, dropping the suggestion of an Alford plea.

    President Biden, as he left the White House earlier Thursday to travel to Wisconsin, ignored shouted questions from reporters about his son’s plan to change his original not-guilty plea in the case.

    This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Donald Trump falsely suggests Kamala Harris misled voters about her race

    Donald Trump falsely suggests Kamala Harris misled voters about her race

    [ad_1]

    CHICAGO (AP) — Donald Trump falsely suggested Kamala Harris had misled voters about her race as the former president appeared Wednesday before the National Association of Black Journalists in Chicago in an interview that quickly turned hostile.

    The Republican former president wrongly claimed that Harris, the first Black woman and Asian American to serve as vice president, had in the past only promoted her Indian heritage.

    “I didn’t know she was Black until a number of years ago when she happened to turn Black and now she wants to be known as Black. So, I don’t know, is she Indian or is she Black?” Trump said while addressing the group’s annual convention.

    Harris is the daughter of a Jamaican father and an Indian mother, both immigrants to the U.S. As an undergraduate, Harris attended Howard University, one of the nation’s most prominent historically Black colleges and universities, where she also pledged the historically Black sorority Alpha Kappa Alpha. As a U.S. senator, Harris was a member of the Congressional Black Caucus, supporting legislation to strengthen voting rights and to reform policing.

    Trump has leveled a wide range of criticism at Harris since she replaced President Joe Biden atop the likely Democratic ticket last week. Throughout his political career, the former president has repeatedly questioned the backgrounds of opponents who are racial minorities.

    Michael Tyler, the communications director for Harris’ campaign, said in a statement that “the hostility Donald Trump showed on stage today is the same hostility he has shown throughout his life, throughout his term in office, and throughout his campaign for president as he seeks to regain power.”

    “Trump lobbed personal attacks and insults at Black journalists the same way he did throughout his presidency — while he failed Black families and left the entire country digging out of the ditch he left us in,” Tyler said. “Donald Trump has already proven he cannot unite America, so he attempts to divide us.

    White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre was asked during her briefing with reporters on Wednesday about Trump’s remarks and responded with disbelief, initially murmuring, “Wow.”

    Jean-Pierre, who is Black, called what Trump said “repulsive” and said, “It’s insulting and no one has any right to tell someone who they are, how they identify.”

    Trump has repeatedly attacked his opponents and critics on the basis of race. He rose to prominence in Republican politics by propagating false theories that President Barack Obama, the nation’s first Black president, was not born in the United States. “Birtherism,” as it became known, was just the start of Trump’s history of questioning the credentials and qualifications of Black politicians.

    He has denied allegations of racism. And after Biden picked Harris as his running mate four years ago, a Trump campaign spokesperson then pointed to a previous Trump political donation to Harris as proof that he wasn’t racist.

    “The president, as a private businessman, donated to candidates across all aisles,” the spokesperson, Katrina Pierson, told reporters. “And I’ll note that Kamala Harris is a Black woman and he donated to her campaign, so I hope we can squash this racism argument now,” Pierson said.

    During this year’s Republican primary, he once referred to former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, the daughter of Indian immigrants, as “Nimbra.”

    What to know about the 2024 Election

    Later Wednesday, Trump did not repeat his criticism of Harris’ race at a campaign rally in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, although he called her “phony” and said she has been trying to change her image. He also repeatedly mispronounced her first name.

    “If she becomes your president, our country is finished,” Trump charged.

    Before he took the stage, Trump’s team displayed what appeared to be years-old news headlines describing Harris as the “first Indian-American senator” on the big screen in the arena.

    Trump’s appearance Wednesday at the annual gathering of Black journalists immediately became heated, with the former president sparring with interviewer Rachel Scott of ABC News and accusing her of giving him a “very rude introduction” with a tough first question about his past criticism of Black people and Black journalists, his attack on Black prosecutors who have pursued cases against him and the dinner he had at his Florida club with a white supremacist.

    “I think it’s disgraceful,” Trump said. “I came here in good spirit. I love the Black population of this country. I’ve done so much for the Black population of this country.”

    Trump continued his attacks on Scott’s network, ABC News, which he has been arguing should not host the next presidential debate, despite his earlier agreement with the Biden campaign. He also several times described her tone and questions as “nasty,” a word he used in the past when describing women, including Hillary Clinton and Meghan the Duchess of Sussex.

    The Republican also repeated his false claim that immigrants in the country illegally are “taking Black jobs.” When pushed by Scott on what constituted a “Black job,” Trump responded by saying “a Black job is anybody that has a job,” drawing groans from the room.

    At one point, he said, “I have been the best president for the Black population since Abraham Lincoln.”

    The audience responded with a mix of boos and some applause.

    Scott asked Trump about his pledge to pardon people convicted for their roles in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol and specifically whether he would pardon those who assaulted police officers.

    Trump said, “Oh, absolutely I would,” and said, “If they’re innocent, I would pardon them.”

    Scott pointed out they have been convicted and therefore are not innocent.

    “Well, they were convicted by a very, very tough system,” he said.

    At one point, when he was defending his supporters who entered the Capitol on Jan. 6, he said, “Nothing is perfect in life.”

    He compared the 2021 insurrection to the protests in Minneapolis and other cities in 2020 following the death of George Floyd by Minneapolis police and to more recent protests at the Capitol last week by demonstrators opposed to the war in Gaza. Trump falsely claimed that no one was arrested in those other demonstrations and that only his supporters were targeted.

    As Trump made the comparison, a man in the back of the room shouted out, “Sir, have you no shame?”

    The former president’s invitation to address the organization sparked an intense internal debate among NABJ that spilled online. Organizations for journalists of color typically invite presidential candidates to speak at their summer gatherings in election years.

    As he campaigns for the White House a third time, Trump has sought to appear outside his traditional strongholds of support and his campaign has touted his efforts to try to win over Black Americans, who have been Democrats’ most committed voting bloc.

    His campaign has emphasized his messages on the economy and immigration as part of his appeal, but some of his outreach has played on racial stereotypes, including the suggestion that African Americans would empathize with the criminal charges he has faced and his promotion of branded sneakers.

    Trump and NABJ also have a tense history over his treatment of Black women journalists. In 2018, NABJ condemned Trump for repeatedly using words such as “stupid,” “loser” and “nasty” to describe Black women journalists.

    The vice president is not scheduled to appear at the convention, but NABJ said in a statement posted on X that it was in conversation with her campaign to have her appear either virtually or in person for a conversation in September.

    Harris addressed Trump’s comments briefly Wednesday night while speaking at a gathering of Sigma Gamma Rho, a historically Black sorority, in Houston.

    “It was the same old show,” she said. “The divisiveness and the disrespect.”

    Harris added: “And let me just say, the American people deserve better.”

    ___

    Price reported from New York. Associated Press writers Aaron Morrison and Steve Peoples in New York, Gary Fields in Chicago and Will Weissert and Farnoush Amiri in Washington, Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania and Chris Megerian in Houston contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • With charges and sanctions, US takes aim at Russian disinformation ahead of November election

    With charges and sanctions, US takes aim at Russian disinformation ahead of November election

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration seized Kremlin-run websites and charged two Russian state media employees in its most sweeping effort yet to push back against what it says are Russian attempts to spread disinformation ahead of the November presidential election.

    The measures, which in addition to indictments also included sanctions and visa restrictions, represented a U.S. government effort just weeks before the November election to disrupt a persistent threat from Russia that American officials have long warned has the potential to sow discord and create confusion among voters.

    Washington has said that Moscow, which intelligence officials have said has a preference for Republican Donald Trump, remains the primary threat to elections even as the FBI continues to investigate a hack by Iran this year that targeted the presidential campaigns of both political parties.

    What to know about the 2024 Election

    “The Justice Department’s message is clear: We will have no tolerance for attempts by authoritarian regimes to exploit our democratic systems of government,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said.

    One criminal case disclosed by the Justice Department accuses two employees of RT, a Russian state media company, of covertly funding a Tennessee-based content creation company with nearly $10 million to publish English-language videos on social media platforms including TikTok and YouTube with messages in favor of the Russia government’s interests and agenda, including about the war in Ukraine.

    The nearly 2,000 videos posted by the company have gotten more than 16 million views on YouTube alone, prosecutors said.

    The two defendants, Kostiantyn Kalashnikov and Elena Afanasyeva, are charged with conspiracy to commit money laundering and violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act. They are at large. It was not immediately clear if they had lawyers.

    The Justice Department says the company did not disclose that it was funded by RT and that neither it nor its founders registered as required by law as an agent of a foreign principal.

    Though the indictment does not name the company, it describes it as a Tennessee-based content creation firm with six commentators and with a website identifying itself as “a network of heterodox commentators that focus on Western political and cultural issues.”

    That description exactly matches Tenet Media, an online company that hosts videos made by well-known conservative influencers Tim Pool, Benny Johnson and others.

    Johnson and Pool both responded with posts on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, calling themselves “victims.” Calling Russian President Vladimir Putin a “scumbag,” Pool wrote that “should these allegations prove true, I as well as the other personalities and commentators were deceived.”

    In his post, Johnson wrote that he had been asked a year ago to provide content to a “media startup.” He said his lawyers negotiated a “standard, arms length deal, which was later terminated.”

    Tenet Media’s shows in recent months have featured high-profile conservative guests, including RNC co-chair Lara Trump, former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy and U.S. Senate candidate Kari Lake.

    In the other action, officials announced the seizure of 32 internet domains that were used by the Kremlin to spread Russian propaganda and weaken international support for Ukraine. The websites were designed to look like authentic news sites but were actually fake, with bogus social media personas manufactured to appear as if they belonged to American users.

    The Justice Department did not identify which candidate in particular the propaganda campaign was meant to boost. But internal strategy notes from participants in the effort released Wednesday by the Justice Department make clear that Trump was the intended beneficiary, even though the names of the candidates were blacked out.

    The proposal for one propaganda project, for instance, states that one of its objectives was to secure a victory for a candidate who is currently out of power and to increase the percentage of Americans who believe the U.S. has been doing too much to support Ukraine. President Joe Biden has strongly supported Ukraine during the invasion by Russia.

    Intelligence agencies have previously charged that Russia, which during the 2016 election launched a massive campaign of foreign influence and interference on Trump’s behalf, was using disinformation to try to meddle in this year’s election. The new steps show the depth of those concerns.

    “Today’s announcement highlights the lengths some foreign governments go to undermine American democratic institutions,” the State Department said. “But these foreign governments should also know that we will not tolerate foreign malign actors intentionally interfering and undermining free and fair elections.”

    The State Department announced it was taking action against several employees of Russian state-owned media outlets, designating them as “foreign missions,” and offering a cash reward for information provided to the U.S. government about foreign election interference.

    It also said it was adding media company Rossiya Segodnya and its subsidiaries RIA Novosti, RT, TV-Novosti, Ruptly, and Sputnik to its list of foreign missions. That will require them to register with the U.S. government and disclose their properties and personnel in the U.S.

    In a speech last month, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco said Russia remained the biggest threat to election integrity, accusing Putin and his proxies of “targeting specific voter demographics and swing-state voters to in an effort to manipulate presidential and congressional election outcomes.” Russia, she said was “intent on co-opting unwitting Americans on social media to push narratives advancing Russian interests.”

    She struck a similar note Thursday, saying at an Aspen Institute event that the foreign influence threat is more diverse and aggressive than in past years.

    “More diverse and aggressive because they involve more actors from more countries than we have ever seen before, operating in a more polarized world than we have ever seen before, all fueled by more technology and accelerated by technology, like AI, and that is what we have exposed in the law enforcement actions we took today,” she said.

    Much of the concern around Russia centers on cyberattacks and disinformation campaigns designed to influence the November vote.

    The tactics include using state media like RT to advance anti-U.S. messages and content, as well as networks of fake websites and social media accounts that amplify the claims and inject them into Americans’ online conversations. Typically, these networks seize on polarizing political topics such as immigration, crime or the war in Gaza.

    In many cases, Americans may have no idea that the content they see online either originated or was amplified by the Kremlin.

    Groups linked to the Kremlin are increasingly hiring marketing and communications firms within Russia to outsource some of the work of creating digital propaganda while also covering their tracks, the officials said during the briefing with reporters.

    Two such firms were the subject of new U.S. sanctions announced in March. Authorities say the two Russian companies created fake websites and social media profiles to spread Kremlin disinformation.

    The ultimate goal, however, is to get Americans to spread Russian disinformation without questioning its origin. People are far more likely to trust and repost information that they believe is coming from a domestic source, officials said. Fake websites designed to mimic U.S. news outlets and AI-generated social media profiles are just two methods.

    Messages left with the Russian Embassy were not immediately returned.

    _____

    Associated Press writers Dan Merica and Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington, Ali Swenson in New York and Alan Suderman in Richmond, Va., contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Biden says rural electrification and internet improvements underscore ‘American comeback’

    Biden says rural electrification and internet improvements underscore ‘American comeback’

    [ad_1]

    WESTBY, Wisconsin (AP) — President Joe Biden traveled to rural southwest Wisconsin on Thursday to champion new investments in electrification and expanded high-speed internet, proclaiming that “all these investments mean family farms can stay in the family.”

    In the town of Westby, Biden announced $7.3 billion in investments for 16 cooperatives that will provide electricity for millions of families in rural areas across 23 states, with the goal of lowering the cost of badly needed electricity connections in hard-to-reach areas.

    Funding for the project comes from the Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act, signed into law in August 2022 and passed in Congress along party lines. The law invests roughly $13 billion in rural electrification across multiple programs and will create 4,500 permanent jobs and 16,000 construction jobs, according to the White House, which called the effort the largest investment in rural electrification since the New Deal in the 1930s.

    Biden also championed 2021’s infrastructure law, which was approved with some support from congressional Republicans and which he said had provided 72,000 additional Wisconsin homes and small businesses with high-speed internet.

    “Just like we’re making the most significant investment in rural electrification since FDR, we’re also making the most significant investment ever in affordable, high-speed internet because affordable high-speed internet is just as essential today as electricity was a century ago,” Biden said, referring to New Deal architect and President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

    Biden said “all of these investments mean family farms can stay in the family, rural entrepreneurs can build their dreams, your children and grandchildren won’t have to leave home to make a living.”

    “That’s stopping now because we’re spreading opportunities to benefit everyone,” he added.

    Before talking policy, Biden addressed Wednesday’s school shooting in Georgia, where a 14-year-old student fatally shot four people. The president lamented that, during a back-to-school season that should have been a “joyous and exciting,” another community in America was instead left “absolutely shattered” by gun violence.

    Biden endorsed calls for stricter requirements for owners to lock up and better secure their firearms — leaning into the fact that he himself is a gun owner.

    “There are too many people who are able to access guns that shouldn’t be able to,” he said. “So let’s require safe storage of firearms. I know I’ve mine locked up.”

    Biden also praised Vice President Kamala Harris, whom he endorsed after dropping his reelection bid in July. And he sharply criticized her opponent in November, former President Donald Trump, for failing to keep promises to spur public works and instead running up towering federal deficits by passing tax cuts that Biden argued primarily benefited the rich.

    “In thousands of cities and towns across the country and across Wisconsin, we’re seeing the great American comeback story,” Biden said, contrasting that with Trump and top Republicans who he said talk “about how bad off we are.”

    “Today’s announcement is about far more than just giving rural America the power to turn on the lights. It’s about giving the power to shape our own future,” Biden said.

    Democrats consider Wisconsin to be one of the must-win states in November’s presidential election between Trump and Harris. Biden won the state in 2020 by about 20,000 votes, flipping Wisconsin to the Democratic column after Trump narrowly won it in 2016.

    Thursday was also personal for Biden, who returned to Wisconsin to revisit a promise he made early in his presidency to provide, among other infrastructure improvements, better internet to rural areas.

    “It isn’t a luxury; it’s now a necessity, like water and electricity,” Biden said at the La Crosse Municipal Transit Utility in June 2021. White House deputy chief of staff Natalie Quillian said the latest visit means Biden has “delivered on so many of those promises.”

    ___

    This story has been corrected to reflect that the goal is to bring down the cost of electricity connections, not internet connections, in hard-to-reach areas.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • GOP lawsuits set the stage for state challenges if Trump loses the election

    GOP lawsuits set the stage for state challenges if Trump loses the election

    [ad_1]

    Before voters even begin casting ballots, Democrats and Republicans are engaged in a sprawling legal fight over the 2024 election through a series of court disputes that could even run past Nov. 5 if results are close.

    Republicans filed more than 100 lawsuits challenging various aspects of vote-casting after being chastised repeatedly by judges in 2020 for bringing complaints about how the election was run only after votes were tallied.

    After Donald Trump made ” election integrity ” a key part of his party’s platform following his false claims of widespread voter fraud in 2020, the Republican National Committee says it has more than 165,000 volunteers ready to watch the polls.

    Democrats are countering with what they are calling “voter protection,” rushing to court to fight back against the GOP cases and building their own team with over 100 staffers, several hundred lawyers and what they say are thousands of volunteers.

    Despite the flurry of litigation, the cases have tended to be fairly small-bore, with few likely impacts for most voters.

    “When you have all this money to spend on litigation, you end up litigating less and less important stuff,” said Derek Muller, a law professor at Notre Dame University.

    The stakes would increase dramatically should Trump lose and try to overturn the results. That’s what he attempted in 2020, but the court system rejected him across the board. Trump and his allies lost more than 60 lawsuits trying to reverse President Joe Biden’s win.

    Whether they could be successful this year depends on the results, experts said. A gap of about 10,000 votes — roughly the number that separated Biden and Trump in Arizona and Georgia in 2020 — is almost impossible to reverse through litigation. A closer one of a few hundred votes, like the 547-vote margin that separated George W. Bush and Al Gore in Florida in 2000, is much more likely to hinge on court rulings about which ballots are legitimate.

    “If he loses, he’s going to claim that he won. That goes without saying,” Rick Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, said of Trump. “If it looks like what we had last time … I expect we’ll see the same kind of thing.”

    Trump has done nothing to discourage that expectation, saying he would accept the results of the election only if it’s “free and fair,” raising the possibility it would not be, something he continues to falsely contend was the case in 2020. He also continues to insist that he could only lose due to fraud.

    “The only way they can beat us is to cheat,” Trump said at a Las Vegas rally in June.

    To be clear, there was no widespread fraud in 2020 or any election since then. Reviews, recounts and audits in the battleground states where Trump disputed his loss reaffirmed that Biden won. And Trump’s attorney general said there was no evidence that fraud tipped the election.

    Trump installed his daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, as co-chair of the Republican National Committee, which then named attorney Christina Bobb as the head of its election integrity division. Bobb is a former reporter for the conservative One America News Network who has been indicted by Arizona’s attorney general for being part of an effort to promote a slate of Trump electors in the state, even though Biden won it.

    Echoing Trump, the RNC said it’s trying to counter Democratic mischief.

    What to know about the 2024 Election

    “President Trump’s election integrity effort is dedicated to protecting every legal vote, mitigating threats to the voting process and securing the election,” RNC spokeswoman Claire Zunk said in a statement. “While Democrats continue their election interference against President Trump and the American people, our operation is confronting their schemes and preparing for November.”

    This time around, Democrats say they’re prepared for whatever Republicans might do.

    “For four years, Donald Trump and his MAGA allies have been scheming to sow distrust in our elections and undermine our democracy so they can cry foul when they lose,” Jen O’Malley Dillon, Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign manager, said in a statement. “But also for four years, Democrats have been preparing for this moment, and we are ready for anything.”

    The highest-profile litigation so far has been in Georgia, over new rules from a Republican-appointed majority on the State Board of Elections, which has echoed Trump’s conspiracy theories. The rules could allow members of local election boards to try to refuse to certify results, a gambit Trump supporters have tried, unsuccessfully, to reverse losses in 2020 and 2022.

    A Trump-aligned group sued to have courts declare that election board members have that power while Democrats sued to overturn the new rules. GOP Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger has questioned the wisdom of the board changing procedures so close to the election. Legal experts say the state board’s rules conflict with longstanding state law that certification is not optional.

    Whether local boards delay or refuse to certify the results from the upcoming election has been a growing concern, especially after a handful of local officials took that step during this year’s primaries. But experts say the fears of a certification crisis are overblown, in large part because most state laws are clear that state or local boards must certify the official results brought to them by election offices. The courtroom remains the most important venue for candidates who want to challenge results.

    “Trying to deny certification is a really poorly thought out theory,” Ben Ginsberg, a Republican election lawyer, said on a Thursday call with reporters. “It has never worked.”

    The litigation to date has often been about relatively esoteric matters, but some cases could have implications after November if Trump loses. The RNC has filed lawsuits in Michigan, Nevada and North Carolina alleging the states need to remove inactive or ineligible voters from their rolls. Late last month, Republicans sued North Carolina over a favorite issue — the risk of noncitizens voting, which is rare. They contend the state wasn’t doing enough to safeguard against it.

    So far none of the claims have succeeded. But if Trump loses in those states by a narrow margin, that sort of pre-election litigation could pave the way for him to claim in court that the vote was invalid.

    The other area that could have ramifications in November and beyond is whether mail ballots arriving after Election Day can be counted. Nineteen states allow that as long as the ballots are sent before polls close. The RNC sued to overturn this provision in Nevada and Mississippi, but both cases were dismissed by judges.

    The RNC appealed those cases, and the first is scheduled to be heard by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals later this month. It’s the sort of issue that could end up before the U.S. Supreme Court. Some Trump allies in 2020 hoped the court would declare him the winner, but the late-arriving mail ballot litigation at the time showed the limits of that tactic.

    The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that the state had to count mail ballots that arrived up to four days after Election Day. Republicans then appealed that ruling to the nation’s highest court, and late-arriving mail was counted separately in November 2020 while everyone waited for the Supreme Court to weigh in.

    In the end, the Supreme Court didn’t take up the case. Trump lost Pennsylvania by more than 80,000 votes, so the 10,000 late-arriving mail ballots wouldn’t have even made a difference.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hunter Biden enters surprise guilty plea to avoid tax trial months after his gun conviction

    Hunter Biden enters surprise guilty plea to avoid tax trial months after his gun conviction

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES (AP) — President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, pleaded guilty Thursday to federal tax charges, a surprise move meant to spare his family another painful and embarrassing criminal trial after his gun case conviction just months ago.

    Hunter Biden’s decision to plead guilty to misdemeanor and felony charges without the benefits of a deal with prosecutors caps a long-running saga over his legal woes that have cast a shadow over his father’s political career. It came hours after jury selection was supposed to begin in the case accusing him of failing to pay at least $1.4 million in taxes.

    The president’s son was already facing potential prison time after his June conviction on felony gun charges in a trial that aired unflattering and salacious details about his struggles with a crack cocaine addiction. The tax trial was expected to showcase more potentially lurid evidence as well as details about Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings, which Republicans have seized on to try to paint the Biden family as corrupt.

    “I will not subject my family to more pain, more invasions of privacy and needless embarrassment,” Hunter Biden said in an emailed statement after he entered his plea. “For all I have put them through over the years, I can spare them this, and so I have decided to plead guilty.”

    Although President Joe Biden’s decision to drop out of the 2024 presidential election muted the potential political implications of the tax case, the trial was expected to carry a heavy emotional toll for the president in the final months of his five-decade political career.

    “Hunter put his family first today, and it was a brave and loving thing for him to do,” defense attorney Abbe Lowell told reporters outside the federal courthouse in Los Angeles.

    Hunter Biden, 54, quickly responded “guilty” as the judge read out each of the nine counts. He showed no emotion as he walked out the courthouse holding his wife’s hand. He ignored questions shouted at him by reporters before climbing into an SUV and driving off.

    The charges carry up to 17 years behind bars, but federal sentencing guidelines are likely to call for a much shorter sentence. He faces up to $1.35 million in fines. Sentencing is set for Dec. 16 in front of U.S. District Judge Mark Scarsi, who was nominated to the bench by former President Donald Trump.

    He faces sentencing in the Delaware case on Nov. 13 — the week after the general election. Those charges are punishable by up to 25 years in prison, though he is likely to get far less time or avoid prison entirely.

    More than 100 potential jurors had been brought to the courthouse Thursday to begin the process of picking the panel to hear the case alleging a four-year scheme to avoid paying taxes while spending wildly on things like strippers, luxury hotels and exotic cars.

    Prosecutors were caught off guard when Hunter Biden’s lawyer told the judge Thursday morning that Hunter wanted to enter what’s known as an Alford plea, under which a defendant maintains their innocence but acknowledges prosecutors have enough evidence to secure a conviction.

    Special counsel David Weiss’ team objected to such a plea, telling the judge that Hunter Biden “is not entitled to plead guilty on special terms that apply only to him.”

    “Hunter Biden is not innocent. Hunter Biden is guilty,” prosecutor Leo Wise said.

    After a break in the hearing, Hunter Biden’s lawyers said he had decided to plead guilty to all nine charges.

    Last year, it had looked like he was going to be spared prison time under a deal with prosecutors that would have allowed him to plead guilty to misdemeanor tax offenses. Prosecutors would have recommended two years of probation and he would have escaped prosecution on a felony gun charge as long he stayed out of trouble for two years.

    But the agreement imploded after a judge questioned unusual aspects of it, and Hunter Biden was subsequently indicted in the two cases. The defense has accused special counsel Weiss of caving to political pressure to indict the president’s son after Trump and other Republicans blasted what they described as a “sweetheart deal.”

    The indictment brought last year grew out of an investigation into Hunter Biden’s taxes that began in 2018 under the Trump administration. Hunter Biden confirmed the existence of the investigation in December 2020 — the month after his father won the election — saying he learned about it for the first time the previous day.

    Prosecutors alleged that Hunter Biden lived lavishly while flouting the tax law, spending his cash on things like strippers and luxury hotels — “in short, everything but his taxes.”

    The charges in both the gun and tax cases stemmed from a period in Hunter Biden’s life in which he struggled with drug and alcohol abuse before becoming sober in 2019. His lawyers had been expected to argue that his substance abuse struggles affected his decision-making and judgment, so he could not have acted “willfully,” or with intention to break the tax law.

    “As I have stated, addiction is not an excuse, but it is an explanation for some of my failures at issue in this case,” Hunter Biden said in a statement. “When I was addicted, I wasn’t thinking about my taxes, I was thinking about surviving. But the jury would never have heard that or know that I had paid every penny of my back taxes including penalties.”

    His decision to plead guilty came after the judge issued some unfavorable pre-trial rulings for the defense, including rejecting a proposed defense expert lined up to testify about addiction. Scarsi had also placed some restrictions on what jurors would be allowed to hear about the traumatic events that Hunter Biden’s family, friends and attorneys say led to his drug addiction.

    Hunter Biden’s attorneys had asked Scarsi to also limit prosecutors from highlighting details of his expenses that they say amount to a “character assassination,” including payments made to strippers or pornographic websites.

    Prosecutors had also planned to introduce evidence about Hunter Biden’s overseas business dealings, including his work for a Romanian businessman who prosecutors said in court papers sought to “influence U.S. government policy” while Joe Biden was vice president.

    ___

    Lauer reported from Philadelphia. AP writer Zeke Miller contributed from Washington.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Harris, Trump talking economics on campaign trail

    Harris, Trump talking economics on campaign trail

    [ad_1]

    Harris, Trump talking economics on campaign trail – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Vice President Kamala Harris is unveiling her planned initiatives for small businesses Wednesday at a campaign rally in New Hampshire while former President Donald Trump will deliver an economic address Thursday in New York. CBS News’ Nidia Cavazos and Taurean Small have the latest from both campaigns.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Florida Sues Over Violent Foreign Nationals Being Released from Prison into U.S.

    Florida Sues Over Violent Foreign Nationals Being Released from Prison into U.S.

    [ad_1]

    Office of Governor Ron DeSantis, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

    By Bethany Blankley (The Center Square)

    The state of Florida is suing the Biden-Harris administration to obtain information on how many illegal foreign nationals convicted of violent crimes who served time in prison were released into the U.S. instead of being deported.

    “Historically, when illegal aliens were brought to the U.S. to be prosecuted for their crimes, it was well understood that the aliens would be deported once they have served their sentence,” Florida’s lawsuit, filed by Attorney General Ashley Moody, states. “That was until the Biden-Harris Administration implemented their shockingly irresponsible immigration policy, pushing unknown numbers of dangerous criminals straight from federal prison into our communities and causing chaos, anarchy, and crime.”

    RELATED: Illegal Immigrants Keep Trying to Ride San Diego School Buses With Students on Board

    The lawsuit was filed after Florida received no response to a Freedom of Information Act request it submitted in March seeking information about criminal illegal foreign nationals allegedly being released into the U.S. instead of being deported.

    It was filed in the U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida Fort Myers Division and names U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and the Federal Bureau of Prisons as defendants.

    “In addition to flat out refusing to secure the border, reports indicate that President Biden and failed Border Czar Kamala Harris refuse to deport dangerous illegal immigrant prisoners into our communities once they are released from prison,” Moody said. “This administration has made it clear they will not turn over documents showing this dangerous and unlawful scheme in a timely manner. Now, American cities are suffering in a very public way. I will not stand idly by and allow this dereliction of duty.”

    When filing the FOIA request in March, she said, “The Biden administration has full knowledge that prisoners from other countries are making their way into the United States through our wide-open border. Now, we are demanding to know reasons why the Biden administration is releasing criminal illegal aliens in U.S. prisons directly into the interior, rather than deporting them back to their country of origin,” saying, “the American people deserve to know.”

    The complaint states the administration is “unlawfully withholding records” and by doing so, harming Florida by “continuously denying Florida access to documents that it has a legal right to.” It also states the harm is irreparable until ICE is compelled to follow the law. The lawsuit asks the court to order the defendants to respond to Florida’s request and cover attorney fees.

    RELATED: California Legislature Allows ‘Undocumented’ Immigrants to Get Free $150K Home Down Payments

    In the complaint, Moody also alludes to the different processes followed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection Air & Marine Operations, Border Patrol, and U.S. Coast Guard officials when apprehending an illegal border crosser at a land border versus at sea.

    Unlike those illegally entering at the southwest or northern borders by land, who are largely processed into the U.S. instead of for removal, when apprehended at sea, most illegal foreign nationals are repatriated to their country of origin, The Center Square has reported.

    U.S. Coast Guard 7th District in South Florida crews continue to interdict and repatriate foreign nationals attempting to illegally enter the U.S. off the coast of Florida, including a record number under the Biden-Harris administration, The Center Square has reported.

    According to Coast Guard records, in six months from Oct. 1, 2022, to May 17, 2023, for example, crews interdicted or encountered 6,679 Cubans and 4,473 Haitians, The Center Square previously reported.

    By comparison, crews apprehended 838 Cubans in fiscal 2021, 49 in fiscal 2020, 313 in fiscal 2019 and 259 in fiscal 2018, The Center Square reported.

    These numbers exclude interdiction efforts of Miami Sector Border Patrol agents, also exclusively reported on by The Center Square.

    RELATED: American Dream Out of Reach? Only 10% Polled Said They Can Afford to Buy a Home

    Critics argue if the policies implemented at sea, off the coast of Florida, or on Florida shores were implemented at U.S. northern and southwest land borders, potentially millions of illegal foreign nationals would have been processed for removal instead of being released into the country with a notice to appear before an immigration judge several years into the future.

    Those apprehended by federal and local officials on the Florida coast after they illegally arrived by sea, who didn’t legally arrive at ports of entry with any immigration claim, are primarily processed for removal and “are generally not eligible to claim asylum or to appear before an immigration judge,” Moody notes.

    Under the Biden-Harris administration, “criminal aliens [are brought] to the United States [by the federal government] so the aliens can be prosecuted consistent with federal law and serve time in prison. But everyone has always assumed – in both Democrat and Republican Administrations – that such aliens would be deported the moment they finished their criminal sentence,” she said. “Otherwise, the decision to bring a criminal to the United States for prosecution results in a benefit to that alien in the form of the right to permanently remain in the United States.

    “For the first time in history, however, the Biden-Harris Administration has abandoned that practice … In other words, as things stand, asylum seekers caught on the high seas have been returned to their home country without even seeing an immigration judge, while drug traffickers and other serious criminals brought to the United States only for the purpose of serving prison time are being released straight into our communities to wreak havoc on our citizenry.”

    Syndicated with permission from The Center Square.

    [ad_2]

    The Center Square

    Source link

  • Benjamin Netanyahu dismisses Israel-Hamas war cease-fire demands as U.K. limits weapons exports

    Benjamin Netanyahu dismisses Israel-Hamas war cease-fire demands as U.K. limits weapons exports

    [ad_1]

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said he will “not give in to pressure” to agree to a cease-fire with Hamas in the face of massive protests in his country as well as President Biden saying he’s not doing enough to end the nearly 11-month war in Gaza and Britain’s government restricting the sale of some weapons to Israel.

    Speaking Monday after dramatic protests following the killing of six Israeli hostages, Netanyahu said he would not back down on some of his demands in the ongoing cease-fire negotiations aimed at stopping the fighting, at least temporarily, to allow the release of dozens of hostages still held in Gaza.

    In the televised address late Monday night, Netanyahu asked for forgiveness for not saving the six hostages, including Israeli-American Hersh Goldberg-Polin. According to Israeli officials, they were killed by Hamas hours before their bodies were recovered. All six were found by the Israeli military in a Hamas tunnel over the weekend.


    Israeli-American hostage killed in Gaza laid to rest

    04:04

    “I ask for your forgiveness for not bringing them back alive,” Netanyahu said. “We were close but we didn’t succeed. Hamas will pay a very heavy price for this.”

    Netanyahu insisted that “the achievement of the war’s objectives” requires Israel to maintain control of the Philadelphi Corridor, the strip of land along the border between southern Gaza and Egypt. Egypt’s government has voiced its objection to an Israeli military presence on that border, and Hamas has demanded a complete Israeli withdrawal from the area as part of any cease-fire agreement.

    Tens of thousands of people took to the streets in Israel on Sunday and Monday to demand that Netanyahu bring an end to the war and secure the release of the 101 remaining hostages, about 35 of whom are believed to be dead.

    “He’s ruining the country. Divides us in order to keep his control,” one protester told CBS News.

    ISRAEL-PALESTINIAN-CONFLICT-PROTEST-HOSTAGES
    Demonstrators march during a protest calling for a cease-fire deal to secure the release of Israelis held hostage by militants in Gaza since October, in Tel Aviv, Israel, Aug. 31, 2024.

    JACK GUEZ/AFP/Getty


    President Biden met with negotiators working on the cease-fire negotiations alongside mediators from Egypt and Qatar on Monday. When asked by reporters whether he thought Netanyahu was doing enough to secure a deal that would end the war and see the release of the hostages, he said, “No.”

    Adding more international pressure, the U.K. government announced Monday that it would suspend some of its arms exports to Israel, citing a “clear risk” that the weapons could be used in violation of international humanitarian law. The government said it was suspending 30 of the approximately 350 licenses for items being used in the current conflict.

    “The U.K. continues to support Israel’s right to self-defense in accordance with international law,” British Foreign Secretary David Lammy said.

    Netanyahu called the U.K. move “shameful” and “misguided.”

    In Gaza, the fighting continued as the World Health Organization raced to meet its goal of vaccinating at least 90% of the children living in the enclave against polio. The health ministry in Gaza said around 160,000 Palestinian children in the territory had been vaccinated in the first two days of the emergency vaccination campaign.

    contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Wes Moore, Kamala Harris’ approval numbers trending up in Maryland, poll says – WTOP News

    Wes Moore, Kamala Harris’ approval numbers trending up in Maryland, poll says – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    The survey, released Tuesday morning by Annapolis-based Gonzales Research & Media, is the first time Wes Moore has edged over 60% — a rating held by his predecessor Larry Hogan for the majority of his two terms.

    WTOP’s Linh Bui reports that Maryland Gov. Wes Moore has gained momentum after his primetime speech at the Democratic National Convention.

    This article was republished with permission from WTOP’s news partners at Maryland Matters. Sign up for Maryland Matters’ free email subscription today.

    More than six in 10 voters in a new Maryland poll said they approve of the job being done by Gov. Wes Moore (D).

    Vice President Kamala Harris, right, is greeted by Maryland gubernatorial candidate Wes Moore during a campaign event, Saturday, Oct. 29, 2022, in Baltimore, Md. (AP Photo/Julio Cortez)(AP/Julio Cortez)

    The survey, released Tuesday morning by Annapolis-based Gonzales Research & Media, is the first time Moore has edged over 60% — a rating held by his predecessor Larry Hogan (R) for the majority of his two terms.

    Moore, entering the back half of his first term, has seen his national profile rise both as a campaign surrogate for President Joseph Biden and later Vice President Kamala Harris. Those efforts led to a prime time speaking spot in the recent Democratic National Convention.

    Pollster Patrick Gonzales attributed the surge in Moore’s approval to crisis management in Maryland.

    “So, if I had to pick one thing — I have no empirical data or empirical proof — I would pick the way he’s handled the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge and the aftermath dealing with it,” said Gonzales.

    In a February Gonzales poll, 58% of voters said they approved of the job done by Moore. That poll was released more than a month before the March 26 collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge.

    The span fell into the Patapsco River in the early morning hours after the Dali, a 984-foot container ship, lost power and struck a bridge support. Six workers were on the bridge doing overnight road repairs.

    In the poll released Tuesday, nearly 64% of voters said they approved of the job done by Moore so far. Nearly 39% said they strongly approved of the first-term governor’s performance. That included more than eight in 10 Democratic voters and more 35% of Republican voters who expressed favorable opinions about Moore.

    Just under 25% said they disapproved of Moore’s performance. With the exception of Republican voters, Moore held favorable majorities across all age, geographic, racial demographic groups in the survey.

    Gonzales surveyed 820 registered voters who said they are likely to vote in November. The poll asked voters about Moore and other issues including the coming presidential election and the direction of the country.

    The poll, conducted between Aug. 24-30, has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5%.

    Optimism over the country’s direction

    Marylanders appear to feel a bit better about the direction of the country than they did six months ago.

    According to the survey, 50.4% said the country is headed in the right direction. About 45% of those who responded said it was headed in the wrong direction.

    The numbers represent an improvement from the February Gonzales poll. In that survey, 54% said the country was headed in the wrong direction.

    Republicans and independents and white voters are among the most pessimistic. The discontent was felt the greatest on the Eastern Shore and in Western Maryland where more than six in 10 voters were pessimistic.

    Those areas also tend to be some of the most Republican areas of the state.

    Nearly 73% of Black voters surveyed expressed optimism about the direction of the country.

    Biden approval remains steady

    Job approval numbers for Biden slipped a bit since the February poll but remain within the margin of error.

    Overall, 53% of those surveyed said they approved of Biden’s job performance. More than six in 10 of those who approved said they “strongly approved.”

    Again, there were few surprises: Biden’s job approval closely tracks the partisan divide in national electoral politics. More than 76% of Democrats approved of Biden’s efforts. More than 80% of Republicans and 58% of independents disapproved.

    Nearly 76% of Black Maryland voters said they approved of Biden’s work — the highest of any demographic in the poll.

    WTOP’s Linh Bui reports that Vice President Kamala Harris is getting a boost in Maryland, according to a recent poll.

    A bounce for Harris

    A lot has happened since February. One of the biggest events was Biden’s decision to end his re-election bid and endorse his running mate, Vice President Kamala Harris.

    Maryland voters have changed their opinion about Harris since February.

    Six months ago, 46% of statewide voters said they approved of the job done by Harris. That same poll found 47% disapproved of her efforts.

    In the poll released Tuesday, Harris has bounced back with more than 55% with a favorable job approval number. Fewer than four in 10 voters said they disapproved.

    Negative attitudes toward Trump strongly held

    Meanwhile, Maryland voters have not changed their opinions on Donald Trump, the former president and current Republican nominee.

    Roughly 57% of those surveyed held a negative opinion of the job Trump did as president. Of those who felt negatively about Trump’s job performance, more than nine in 10 voters “strongly disapproved.”

    More than four in 10 said they approved.

    Again, the poll showed the vast majority of Democrats and Republicans lining up to support the candidate of their party. Independent voters were almost evenly split.

    “Keep in mind that the intensity of disapproval has always been there since 2017 and the first time I ever did a poll in Maryland on Trump,” Gonzales said. “I’m not going to put too fine a point on it, but his numbers today aren’t quite as bad as they were in February when it was 61% disapprove, 38% approve. They still stink and that’s just the way it is.”

    Few surprises for presidential contest in Maryland

    There is also little drama in terms of the presidential matchup between Harris and Trump. Maryland is a state where Democratic voters outnumber their Republican counterparts by a roughly 2-1 margin.

    Maryland has not gone to a Republican presidential candidate since 1988. Additionally, Trump remains wildly unpopular in the state.

    Nearly 56% of voters surveyed said they planned to vote for Harris while 35% said they would cast a ballot for Trump.

    “It’s not looking not looking like 2020, but this looks pretty much like Maryland,” Gonzales said.

    In 2020, Biden garnered more than 65% of the vote and defeated Trump in the state by nearly 33 points. Gonzales said Biden’s electoral performance was a historic high in Maryland.

    Gonzales said that more than 90% of voters who said the nation was on the right track planned to vote for Harris. Seven of 10 voters who said the country was headed in the wrong direction said they would vote for Trump.

    Gonzales offered one note of caution for the national picture based on his Maryland poll.

    “The only cautionary sign that I see in that matchup number is that stated preference today among independents in Maryland is 38% for Harris, 36% for Trump,” the pollster said. “If I’m a Democrat, I don’t like seeing a poll in Maryland that among independents only has me up by two points over Trump.

    “It doesn’t put Maryland in play for Trump but it might have implications in other parts of the country,” Gonzales said.

    RFK endorsement of no consequence

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the independent presidential candidate, will have negligible effect on the race in Maryland.

    Kennedy suspended his presidential campaign two weeks ago. He then endorsed Trump’s bid.

    The unaffiliated candidate will appear on the Maryland ballot in November. Last week, state elections officials confirmed he surpassed the 10,000 signatures needed for inclusion.

    The announcement has not swayed voters to Trump in any meaningful way.

    Of those surveyed, 74% said Kennedy’s endorsement had no effect on who they would vote for.

    The balance of those voters were nearly evenly split with a slight edge to Trump.

    But many of those voters were already in the Trump camp.

    Of the 12.8% who said they would be more likely to vote for Trump as a result of Kennedy’s announcement, more than three in four acknowledged they were already voting for Trump, Gonzales said.

    [ad_2]

    Jose Umana

    Source link

  • Biden says Benjamin Netanyahu isn’t doing enough on cease-fire, hostage deal

    Biden says Benjamin Netanyahu isn’t doing enough on cease-fire, hostage deal

    [ad_1]

    Biden says Benjamin Netanyahu isn’t doing enough on cease-fire, hostage deal – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    President Biden said Monday that he does not believe Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is doing enough to reach a cease-fire and hostage release deal between Israel and Hamas. CBS News contributor Robert Berger has more.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Israel recovers the bodies of 6 hostages in Gaza

    Israel recovers the bodies of 6 hostages in Gaza

    [ad_1]

    Israel on Sunday said it had recovered the bodies of six hostages in Gaza, including a young Israeli-American man who became one of the most well-known captives held by Hamas as his parents met with world leaders and pressed for his release. Video above: Parents of Israeli-American hostage speakThe military said all six had been killed shortly before the arrival of Israeli forces trying to rescue them. Their recovery sparked calls for mass protests against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whom many families of hostages and much of the wider Israeli public blame for failing to bring them back alive in a deal with Hamas to end the 10-month-old war. Negotiations over such a deal have dragged on for months.Netanyahu expressed sorrow over the deaths and said Israel would hold Hamas accountable for killing them in “cold blood.” he said the killings prove that the militant group does not want a a cease-fire agreement.“Whoever murders hostages doesn’t want a deal,” he said.Militants seized Hersh Goldberg-Polin, 23, and four of the other hostages at a music festival in southern Israel during Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack, which triggered the war.The native of Berkeley, California, lost part of his left arm to a grenade in the attack. In April, a Hamas-issued video showed him, his left hand missing and clearly speaking under duress, sparking new protests in Israel urging the government to do more to secure his and others’ freedom.The army identified the other dead hostages as Ori Danino, 25; Eden Yerushalmi, 24; Almog Sarusi, 27; and Alexander Lobanov, 33; who were also taken from the music festival. The sixth, Carmel Gat, 40, was abducted from the nearby farming community of Be’eri.It said the bodies were recovered from a tunnel in the southern Gaza city of Rafah, around a kilometer (half a mile) from where another hostage, Qaid Farhan Alkadi, 52, was rescued alive last week.“According to preliminary information, they were cruelly murdered by Hamas terrorists shortly before we reached them,” Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari, the Israeli military spokesperson, told reporters.Hamas has offered to release the hostages in return for an end to the war, the withdrawal of Israeli forces and the release of a large number of Palestinian prisoners, including high-profile militants.Izzat al-Rishq, a senior Hamas official, blamed the hostages’ deaths on Israel and the United States, saying they would still be alive if Israel had accepted a cease-fire proposal that Hamas said it had agreed to back in July. He did not mention the hostages by name.Families of hostages call for a ‘complete halt of the country’Netanyahu has vowed to continue the war until Hamas is destroyed and says military pressure is needed to bring home the hostages.Israel’s Channel 12 reported that he got into a shouting match at a security Cabinet meeting late Thursday with his defense minister, Yoav Gallant, who accused him of prioritizing control of a strategic corridor along the Gaza-Egypt border — a major sticking point in the talks — over the lives of the hostages. The Cabinet reportedly voted in favor of remaining in the corridor over the objections of Gallant, who said it would prevent a hostage deal.An Israeli official confirmed the report and said three of the hostages — Goldberg-Polin, Yerushalmi and Gat — had been slated to be released in the first phase of a cease-fire proposal discussed back in July. The official was not authorized to brief media about the negotiations and spoke on condition of anonymity.“In the name of the state of Israel, I hold their families close to my heart and ask forgiveness,” Gallant said Sunday after the remains were recovered. He later called for the Cabinet to reverse its decision.A forum of hostage families called for a massive protest on Sunday, demanding a “complete halt of the country” to push for the implementation of a cease-fire and hostage release.“A deal for the return of the hostages has been on the table for over two months. Were it not for the delays, sabotage, and excuses those whose deaths we learned about this morning would likely still be alive,” it said in a statement.U.S. President Joe Biden, who has met with Goldberg-Polin’s parents, said he was “devastated and outraged.”“It is as tragic as it is reprehensible,” he said. “Make no mistake, Hamas leaders will pay for these crimes. And we will keep working around the clock for a deal to secure the release of the remaining hostages.”Vice President Kamala Harris said her prayers were with the Goldberg-Polin family and condemned Hamas.A high-profile campaignGoldberg-Polin’s parents, U.S.-born immigrants to Israel, became perhaps the most high-profile relatives of hostages on the international stage. They met with Biden, Pope Francis and others and addressed the United Nations, urging the release of all hostages.On Aug. 21, his parents addressed a hushed hall at the Democratic National Convention — after sustained applause and chants of “bring him home.”“This is a political convention. But needing our only son — and all of the cherished hostages — home is not a political issue. It is a humanitarian issue,” said his father, Jon Polin. His mother, Rachel, who bowed her head during the ovation and touched her chest, said “Hersh, if you can hear us, we love you, stay strong, survive.”She and her husband sought to keep their son and the others held from being reduced to numbers, describing Hersh as a music and soccer lover and traveler with plans to attend university since his military service had ended. At events she often addressed her son directly in the hope he could hear her, urging him to live another day. Some 250 hostages were taken on Oct. 7. Before the military’s announcement of the latest discovery of bodies, Israel said it believed 108 hostages were still held in Gaza, of which about one-third were dead. In late August, the Israeli military recovered the bodies of six hostages in southern Gaza.Eight hostages have been rescued by Israeli forces, the most recent found on Tuesday. More than 100 were freed during a weeklong cease-fire in November in exchange for the release of Palestinians imprisoned by Israel.Two previous Israeli operations to free hostages killed scores of Palestinians. Hamas says several hostages have been killed in Israeli airstrikes and failed rescue attempts. Israeli troops mistakenly killed three Israelis who escaped captivity in December.Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, when they stormed into southern Israel on Oct. 7, attacking army bases and several farming communities.Israel’s retaliatory offensive in Gaza has killed over 40,000 Palestinians, according to local health officials, who do not say how many were fighters and how many civilians. It has displaced the vast majority of Gaza’s 2.3 million people, often multiple times, and plunged the besieged territory into a humanitarian catastrophe.In a separate development Sunday, Palestinian militants killed three people when they opened fire on an Israeli vehicle in the occupied West Bank, where Israel has been carrying out large-scale military raids in recent days. Israel’s Magen David Adom rescue service confirmed the casualties.

    Israel on Sunday said it had recovered the bodies of six hostages in Gaza, including a young Israeli-American man who became one of the most well-known captives held by Hamas as his parents met with world leaders and pressed for his release.

    Video above: Parents of Israeli-American hostage speak

    The military said all six had been killed shortly before the arrival of Israeli forces trying to rescue them. Their recovery sparked calls for mass protests against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whom many families of hostages and much of the wider Israeli public blame for failing to bring them back alive in a deal with Hamas to end the 10-month-old war. Negotiations over such a deal have dragged on for months.

    Netanyahu expressed sorrow over the deaths and said Israel would hold Hamas accountable for killing them in “cold blood.” he said the killings prove that the militant group does not want a a cease-fire agreement.

    “Whoever murders hostages doesn’t want a deal,” he said.

    Militants seized Hersh Goldberg-Polin, 23, and four of the other hostages at a music festival in southern Israel during Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack, which triggered the war.

    The native of Berkeley, California, lost part of his left arm to a grenade in the attack. In April, a Hamas-issued video showed him, his left hand missing and clearly speaking under duress, sparking new protests in Israel urging the government to do more to secure his and others’ freedom.

    The Hostages Families Forum via AP

    This combination of six undated photos shows hostages, from top left, Hersh Goldberg-Polin, Ori Danino, Eden Yerushalmi, from bottom left, Almog Sarusi, Alexander Lobanov, and Carmel Gat, who were held hostage by Hamas militants in Gaza.

    The army identified the other dead hostages as Ori Danino, 25; Eden Yerushalmi, 24; Almog Sarusi, 27; and Alexander Lobanov, 33; who were also taken from the music festival. The sixth, Carmel Gat, 40, was abducted from the nearby farming community of Be’eri.

    It said the bodies were recovered from a tunnel in the southern Gaza city of Rafah, around a kilometer (half a mile) from where another hostage, Qaid Farhan Alkadi, 52, was rescued alive last week.

    “According to preliminary information, they were cruelly murdered by Hamas terrorists shortly before we reached them,” Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari, the Israeli military spokesperson, told reporters.

    Hamas has offered to release the hostages in return for an end to the war, the withdrawal of Israeli forces and the release of a large number of Palestinian prisoners, including high-profile militants.

    Izzat al-Rishq, a senior Hamas official, blamed the hostages’ deaths on Israel and the United States, saying they would still be alive if Israel had accepted a cease-fire proposal that Hamas said it had agreed to back in July. He did not mention the hostages by name.

    Families of hostages call for a ‘complete halt of the country’

    Netanyahu has vowed to continue the war until Hamas is destroyed and says military pressure is needed to bring home the hostages.

    Israel’s Channel 12 reported that he got into a shouting match at a security Cabinet meeting late Thursday with his defense minister, Yoav Gallant, who accused him of prioritizing control of a strategic corridor along the Gaza-Egypt border — a major sticking point in the talks — over the lives of the hostages. The Cabinet reportedly voted in favor of remaining in the corridor over the objections of Gallant, who said it would prevent a hostage deal.

    An Israeli official confirmed the report and said three of the hostages — Goldberg-Polin, Yerushalmi and Gat — had been slated to be released in the first phase of a cease-fire proposal discussed back in July. The official was not authorized to brief media about the negotiations and spoke on condition of anonymity.

    “In the name of the state of Israel, I hold their families close to my heart and ask forgiveness,” Gallant said Sunday after the remains were recovered. He later called for the Cabinet to reverse its decision.

    A forum of hostage families called for a massive protest on Sunday, demanding a “complete halt of the country” to push for the implementation of a cease-fire and hostage release.

    “A deal for the return of the hostages has been on the table for over two months. Were it not for the delays, sabotage, and excuses those whose deaths we learned about this morning would likely still be alive,” it said in a statement.

    U.S. President Joe Biden, who has met with Goldberg-Polin’s parents, said he was “devastated and outraged.”

    “It is as tragic as it is reprehensible,” he said. “Make no mistake, Hamas leaders will pay for these crimes. And we will keep working around the clock for a deal to secure the release of the remaining hostages.”

    Vice President Kamala Harris said her prayers were with the Goldberg-Polin family and condemned Hamas.

    A high-profile campaign

    Goldberg-Polin’s parents, U.S.-born immigrants to Israel, became perhaps the most high-profile relatives of hostages on the international stage. They met with Biden, Pope Francis and others and addressed the United Nations, urging the release of all hostages.

    On Aug. 21, his parents addressed a hushed hall at the Democratic National Convention — after sustained applause and chants of “bring him home.”

    “This is a political convention. But needing our only son — and all of the cherished hostages — home is not a political issue. It is a humanitarian issue,” said his father, Jon Polin. His mother, Rachel, who bowed her head during the ovation and touched her chest, said “Hersh, if you can hear us, we love you, stay strong, survive.”

    She and her husband sought to keep their son and the others held from being reduced to numbers, describing Hersh as a music and soccer lover and traveler with plans to attend university since his military service had ended. At events she often addressed her son directly in the hope he could hear her, urging him to live another day.

    Some 250 hostages were taken on Oct. 7. Before the military’s announcement of the latest discovery of bodies, Israel said it believed 108 hostages were still held in Gaza, of which about one-third were dead. In late August, the Israeli military recovered the bodies of six hostages in southern Gaza.

    Eight hostages have been rescued by Israeli forces, the most recent found on Tuesday. More than 100 were freed during a weeklong cease-fire in November in exchange for the release of Palestinians imprisoned by Israel.

    Two previous Israeli operations to free hostages killed scores of Palestinians. Hamas says several hostages have been killed in Israeli airstrikes and failed rescue attempts. Israeli troops mistakenly killed three Israelis who escaped captivity in December.

    Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, when they stormed into southern Israel on Oct. 7, attacking army bases and several farming communities.

    Israel’s retaliatory offensive in Gaza has killed over 40,000 Palestinians, according to local health officials, who do not say how many were fighters and how many civilians. It has displaced the vast majority of Gaza’s 2.3 million people, often multiple times, and plunged the besieged territory into a humanitarian catastrophe.

    In a separate development Sunday, Palestinian militants killed three people when they opened fire on an Israeli vehicle in the occupied West Bank, where Israel has been carrying out large-scale military raids in recent days. Israel’s Magen David Adom rescue service confirmed the casualties.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Harris says Trump ‘disrespected sacred’ Arlington for ‘political stunt’

    Harris says Trump ‘disrespected sacred’ Arlington for ‘political stunt’

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris and Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump.

    Brendan Mcdermid | Elizabeth Frantz | Reuters

    Vice President Kamala Harris on Saturday skewered former President Donald Trump for filming at the Arlington National Cemetery, accusing him of exploiting his visit for political purposes, which is prohibited.

    “Let me be clear: the former president disrespected sacred ground, all for the sake of a political stunt,” Harris wrote in a lengthy X post. “This is a man who is unable to comprehend anything other than service to himself.”

    A half-hour later, Trump’s running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, fired back at Harris in his own social media post: “President trump was there at the invitation of families whose loved ones died because of your incompetence.”

    “Why don’t you get off social media and go launch an investigation into their unnecessary deaths?” Vance added.

    The Trump campaign echoed that line of defense in its own social media post, responding to Harris: “You’ve never ONCE taken responsibility for the 13 heroes killed on your watch — while you bragged about being the last person in the room.”

    Over the past week, Trump has faced heat for his Monday visit to Arlington Cemetery, during which his campaign staffers “abruptly pushed aside” a cemetery worker trying to enforce federal laws that prohibit conducting “political activities” on military cemetery grounds, according to a U.S. Army spokesperson.

    Trump made the trip to the cemetery to commemorate the three-year anniversary of the killing of 13 U.S. service members in a bombing at Kabul Airport during the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, which he has repeatedly blamed on President Joe Biden and Harris.

    While Trump met with families of the victims, his campaign staff took various photos and videos, several of which were posted to his social media platforms.

    The Arlington Cemetery issued a statement confirming the incident between the campaign and the cemetery staff member, which NPR was first to report.

    “Federal law prohibits political campaign or election-related activities within Army National Military Cemeteries, to include photographers, content creators or any other persons attending for purposes, or in direct support of a partisan political candidate’s campaign,” the cemetery said.

    The Trump campaign has repeatedly denied any physical altercation and said it had approval to have a photographer and videographer on the premises. A Trump campaign spokesperson said the incident was the result of a cemetery staffer having a “mental health episode.”

    Trump on Friday said he only took pictures at the site because the victims’ families wanted to.

    “I stood with different people over different graves and took pictures. I didn’t want to take pictures, but I wanted to take them if they wanted to take them,” he said in a moderated conversation with Moms for Liberty co-founder Tiffany Justice.

    The Harris campaign has pounced on the controversy, scorning Trump for disrespecting U.S. troops and pointing to several other incidents where the former president has faced backlash for reportedly making disparaging comments about veterans, which he has denied.

    “This is nothing new from Donald Trump,” Harris wrote in her Saturday post. “It is my belief that someone who cannot meet this simple, sacred duty should never again stand behind the seal of the President of the United States of America.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Donald Trump holds town hall in La Crosse, Wisconsin with Tulsi Gabbard as moderator

    Donald Trump holds town hall in La Crosse, Wisconsin with Tulsi Gabbard as moderator

    [ad_1]

    LA CROSSE, Wis. — Donald Trump campaigned Thursday in Michigan and Wisconsin as the former president ramps up battleground state travel heading into the traditional Labor Day turn toward the fall election.

    Trump’s intense focus on recapturing states he won in 2016 but lost narrowly in 2020 continues with stops in the middle of Michigan and western Wisconsin.

    Trump visited La Crosse on Thursday evening for a town hall moderated by former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, who endorsed him in Detroit. It is Trump’s first visit to Wisconsin since the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, which ended three days before President Biden dropped out of the race and made way for Vice President Kamala Harris.  

    Trump supporters started lining up in the early morning hours to get into the event. While all available seats were taken, several thousand were in attendance. It’s a smaller venue than Trump usually addresses. Trump likes late, packed rallies, but has admitted his advisors have been pressuring him to stay on message, and they believe the smaller format enhances his ability to do so.

    During one speech on Thursday, Trump said if he wins a second term, he wants to make IVF treatment free for women but did not detail how he would fund his plan or precisely how it would work.

    “I’m announcing today in a major statement that under the Trump administration, your government will pay for — or your insurance company will be mandated to pay for — all costs associated with IVF treatment,” he said at an event in Michigan. “Because we want more babies, to put it nicely.”

    Gabbard opened the town hall by talking about her own IVF journey, giving herself injections in airport bathrooms and the heartbreak of failed embryo transfers. While the treatments ultimately didn’t work for her, she applauded Trump’s proposal.

    “I can’t tell you how life-changing that would be for so many families,” she said.

    Donald Trump Campaigns For President In La Crosse, Wisconsin
    LA CROSSE, WISCONSIN – AUGUST 29: Republican presidential nominee, former U.S. President Donald Trump holds a town hall campaign event with former U.S. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (I-HI) on August 29, 2024 in La Crosse, Wisconsin. Trump is campaigning in key battleground states ahead of the November presidential election.

    / Getty Images


    Trump first came out in favor of IVF in February after the Alabama state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law, briefly pausing treatment and sparking national backlash.

    Trump has since claimed the Republican party is a “leader” on the issue, even as at least 23 bills aiming to establish fetal personhood have been introduced in 13 states so far this legislative session, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research group that supports abortion rights. That kind of legislation, which asserts that life begins at conception, could imperil fertility treatments that involve the storage, transportation and destruction of embryos.

    IVF can costs tens of thousands of dollars for medical appointments, medication and surgery, and is not covered by many health insurance plans.

    Trump has in general been opposed to various kinds of federal mandates, and originally ran against the Affordable Care Act — also known as Obamacare — which included popular provisions like protections for people with preexisting health conditions.

    In a statement, Harris’ campaign said Trump shouldn’t be believed.

    “Trump lies as much if not more than he breathes, but voters aren’t stupid,” said Harris-Walz 2024 spokesperson Sarafina Chitika. “Because Trump overturned Roe v. Wade, IVF is already under attack and women’s freedoms have been ripped away in states across the country. There is only one candidate in this race who trusts women and will protect our freedom to make our own health care decisions: Vice President Kamala Harris.”

    During the town hall, Trump also took aim at Democratic vice presidential candidate Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz.

    “Minnesota, they picked this guy. He is a weird dude. I’m not weird. He’s weird,” Trump said. “I would love to win Minnesota because these people aren’t digging this guy.”

    Trump’s recent campaign push in battleground states 

    Trump started his day on Thursday with a rally in Potterville, Michigan, near the state capital of Lansing. Trump won Eaton County, where part of Lansing is located, in both 2016 and 2020, but by a smaller margin the second time. It will be his third visit to the state in the past nine days and second this week after a speech to the National Guard Association in Detroit on Monday.

    Trump’s visits come three days after his campaign staffers were accused of pushing a female employee at Arlington National Cemetery.

    He was at the cemetery for a visit with Gold Star families who lost loved ones during the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan in 2021. An Army spokesperson said the incident was “unfortunate,” and added it was “also unfortunate” that the “employee and her professionalism has been unfairly attacked.”

    Along with Pennsylvania, which Trump will visit on Friday, these three Midwestern states make up a northern industrial bloc Democrats carried for two decades before Trump won them in 2016. Biden recaptured them on his way to the White House in 2020.

    Trump and his vice-presidential pick, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, have blitzed the battleground states in recent weeks, with Vance in both states this week as well.  

    The battleground offensive comes as a reinvigorated Democratic Party rallies around Harris and her new running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz.

    Harris and Walz are aiming to leverage the surge in enthusiasm among the party’s base since her campaign launch just over a month ago. They hope this excitement — which was on full display at last week’s convention in Chicago — will extend to more moderate areas as they embark on a two-day bus tour in Georgia, including events in the state’s rural southern regions.

    Trump’s events in Michigan and Wisconsin are both in swing congressional districts.

    Potterville is in Michigan’s 7th District, which features a mix of Republican-dominated counties like Clinton and Shiawassee, and Democratic strongholds such as Ingham, home to the state Capitol and Michigan State University. This district is expected to be one of the nation’s most competitive this fall following incumbent Democratic Rep. Elissa Slotkin’s decision to run for the state’s open U.S. Senate seat.

    La Crosse, meanwhile, is a hub within Wisconsin’s 3rd Congressional District, where Republican Derrick Van Orden won narrowly in 2022. Democrat Rebecca Cooke won the Aug. 13 primary to face him in November.

    [ad_2]

    CBS Minnesota

    Source link

  • Kamala Harris details Biden’s phone call about history-making decision to drop out of 2024 race

    Kamala Harris details Biden’s phone call about history-making decision to drop out of 2024 race

    [ad_1]

    In her first interview since becoming the Democratic presidential nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris on Thursday shared that she learned President Biden was ending his reelection bid when he called her personally to inform her.

    In her sit-down interview alongside her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Harris told CNN’s Dana Bash that on July 21 she received a phone call from Mr. Biden while she was with her family.

    That same day Mr. Biden posted a letter to social media announcing his shocking decision to end his campaign.

    “I’ll give you a little too much information,” Harris said. “My family was staying with us, including my baby nieces, and we had just had pancakes.”

    The family was “sitting down to do a puzzle, and the phone rang and it was Joe Biden, and he told me what he had decided to do,” Harris said. “And I asked him, ‘Are you sure?’ And he said, ‘yes.’ And that’s how I learned about it.”

    The vice president did not directly answer a question about whether Mr. Biden offered his endorsement over the phone, or if she specifically asked for it.  

    “He was very clear that he was going to support me,” Harris said.   

    In his July 21 letter, Mr. Biden did not immediately endorse Harris, but instead did so in a separate social media post shortly after. It was with that endorsement that Harris was very quickly able to put together a coalition of support, in the process discouraging other potential candidates and halting any chance of an open Democratic primary.

    Mr. Biden faced mounting pressure to drop out of the race from a growing chorus of political leaders within his own party in the weeks that followed his disastrous June 27 debate performance against former President Donald Trump. But Harris maintained unwavering public support for him, calling him “our nominee” and saying she was “proud to be Joe Biden’s running mate.”

    When asked by Bash if she had regrets about how she defended Mr. Biden’s capacity to serve another four years, she responded, “No, not at all.” 

    Harris told CNN that while speaking with Mr. Biden by phone that day, her “first thought was about him, to be honest,” not about her own candidacy.

    “I think history is going to show a bunch of things about Joe Biden’s presidency,” she said. “I think history is going to show that in so many ways it was transformative.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Pentagon Withholds Docs on Whether DEI Hiring Improves National Security

    Pentagon Withholds Docs on Whether DEI Hiring Improves National Security

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Secretary of Defense, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

    By Casey Harper (The Center Square)

    The U.S. Department of Defense is under scrutiny for refusing to release records about exactly how spending on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion helps with national security.

    The Center to Advance Security in America in May filed with the DOD a Freedom of Information Act Request, the legal pathway to obtain government documents. The FOIA sought to find out what DOD officials estimate is the real impact on national security of DEI spending, for which Congress approved $86.5 million in fiscal year 2023.

    RELATED: 16 State Coalition Sues Biden Administration to Block Amnesty Plan

    However, James Fitzpatrick, an Army Veteran who leads CASA, told The Center Square that the DOD has confirmed it received the FOIA request but still has not released any documents more than 100 days later.

    “The Department of Defense has stated that diversity, equity, and inclusion is the American military’s greatest strength but has rarely detailed how,” reads the FOIA, which was obtained by The Center Square. “Given the recent hiring freeze on DEI related positions, it must follow that national security has been affected in some way. The information obtained is necessary to evaluate the impact of DEI initiatives and financing on prioritizing efforts to advance national security.”

    The FOIA request specifically asks for documentation about how DOD estimates a recent hiring freeze on DEI hires will actually impact national security. DOD regularly estimates readiness and national security impacts, especially in its funding requests to Congress for various kinds of equipment, programs and more.

    The most recent National Defense Authorization Act ordered a hiring freeze on new DEI positions while the Government Accountability Office reviews that spending.

    CASA filed suit against the DOD Wednesday, a lawsuit that was exclusively obtained by The Center Square.

    “If diversity, equity and inclusion are truly the military’s greatest strengths, or there have been times where they have said it is critical to the success of the military, then if the DOD is imposing a DEI hiring freeze … then there must be a corresponding lack of national security that goes along with it, if their position is spending more on DEI means military gets better and stronger,” Fitzpatrick told The Center Square.

    DOD officials and documents repeatedly emphasize the importance of diversity in defending the nation.

    RELATED: Wisconsin Supreme Court: Green Party’s Stein Can Remain on Presidential Ballot

    Under FOIA law, federal agencies are generally required to provide documents within about three weeks. THe DOD has staff dedicated to handling these requests.

    “They are legally required to produce records,” Fitzpatrick said. “They haven’t. They are well over the friendly threshold to provide records, and really they just need to engage in a conversation. By this point they very well should have reached out and said they’ve started the search.”

    DEI Pentagon spending has become increasingly common and controversial in recent years. DEI spending includes well-paid DEI hires, training programs on gender pronouns and white privilege for troops, and efforts to recruit non-white Americans for certain roles.

    The DOD’s fiscal year 2022-2023 “Department of Defense Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility Strategic Plan” typifies the kind of language federal officials use about the necessity of diversity spending.

    Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness began the report with a message, saying that “leveraging this strategic diversity and expanding access to attract, retain, and advance the best talent our nation has to offer are the only way DoD will be able to outthink, outmaneuver, and outfight any adversary or threat.

    RELATED: Poll: Majority Strongly Opposes Noncitizens Voting and Blame Kamala Harris for Border Crisis

    “The 2022 National Defense Strategy highlights that for DoD to maintain the Joint Force’s military advantage globally and prevent attacks against our homeland, we must build a resilient force by developing and combining our strengths to maximum effect and investing in our people,” he continued. “Advancing diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) across the Department is not about checking a box; it’s about obtaining the critical skills and experience to build the Total Force necessary to secure our nation for years to come.”

    DOD did not respond to a request for comment in time for publication.

    Syndicated with permission from The Center Square.

    [ad_2]

    The Center Square

    Source link

  • Having a family is expensive. Here’s what Harris and Trump have said about easing costs

    Having a family is expensive. Here’s what Harris and Trump have said about easing costs

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The high cost of caring for children and the elderly has forced women out of the workforce, devastated family finances and left professional caretakers in low-wage jobs — all while slowing economic growth.

    That families are suffering is not up for debate. As the economy emerges as a theme in this presidential election, the Democratic and Republican candidates have sketched out ideas for easing costs that reveal their divergent views about family.

    On this topic, the two tickets have one main commonality: Both of the presidential candidates — and their running mates — have, at one point or another, backed an expanded child tax credit.

    Vice President Kamala Harris, who accepted the Democratic Party’s nomination last week, has signaled that she plans to build on the ambitions of outgoing President Joe Biden’s administration, which sought to pour billions in taxpayer dollars into making child care and home care for elderly and disabled adults more affordable. She has not etched any of those plans into a formal policy platform. But in a speech earlier this month, she said her vision included raising the child tax credit.

    Former President Donald Trump, the Republican, has declined to answer questions about how he would make child care more affordable, even though it was an issue he tackled during his own administration. His running mate, Sen. JD Vance of Ohio, has a long history of pushing policies that would encourage Americans to have families, floating ideas like giving parents votes for their children. Just this month, Vance said he wants to raise the child tax credit to $5,000. But Vance has opposed government spending on child care, arguing that many children benefit from having one parent at home as caretaker.

    The candidates’ care agendas could figure prominently into their appeal to suburban women in swing states, a coveted demographic seen as key to victory in November. Women provide two-thirds of unpaid care work — valued at $1 trillion annually — and are disproportionately impacted when families can’t find affordable care for their children or aging parents. And the cost of care is an urgent problem: Child care prices are rising faster than inflation.

    Kamala Harris: Increase the child tax credit

    When Harris addressed the Democratic National Convention, she talked first about her own experience with child care. She was raised mostly by a single mother, Shyamala Gopalan, who worked long hours as a breast cancer researcher. Among the people who formed her family’s support network was “Mrs. Shelton, who ran the day care below us and became a second mother.”

    As vice president, Harris worked behind the scenes in Congress on Biden’s proposals to establish national paid family leave, make prekindergarten universal and invest billions in child care so families wouldn’t pay more than 7% of their income. She announced, too, the administration’s actions to lower copays for families using federal child care vouchers, and to raise wages for Medicaid-funded home health aides. Before that, her track record as a senator included pressing for greater labor rights for domestic workers, including nannies and home health aides who may be vulnerable to exploitation.

    What to know about the 2024 Election

    This month at a community college in North Carolina, Harris outlined her campaign’s economic agenda, which includes raising the child tax credit to as much as $3,600 and giving families of newborns even more — $6,000 for the child’s first year.

    “That is a vital — vital year of critical development of a child, and the costs can really add up, especially for young parents who need to buy diapers and clothes and a car seat and so much else,” she told the audience. Her running mate selection of Tim Walz, who established paid leave and a child tax credit as governor of Minnesota, has also buoyed optimism among supporters.

    Donald Trump: Few specifics, but some past support

    For voters grappling with the high cost of child care, Trump has offered little in the way of solutions. During the June presidential debate, CNN moderator Jake Tapper twice asked Trump what he would do to lower child care costs. Both times, he failed to answer, instead pivoting to other topics. His campaign platform is similarly silent. It does tackle the cost of long-term care for the elderly, writing that Republicans would “support unpaid Family Caregivers through Tax Credits and reduced red tape.”

    The silence marks a shift from his first campaign, when he pitched paid parental leave, though it was panned by critics because his proposal excluded fathers. When he reached the White House, the former president sought $1 billion for child care, plus a parental leave policy at the urging of his daughter and policy adviser, Ivanka Trump. Congress rejected both proposals, but Trump succeeded in doubling the child tax credit and establishing paid leave for federal employees.

    In his 2019 State of the Union address, Trump said he was “proud to be the first president to include in my budget a plan for nationwide paid family leave, so that every new parent has the chance to bond with their newborn child.”

    This year, there are signs that his administration might not pursue the same agenda, including his selection of Vance as a running mate. In 2021, before he joined the Senate, Vance co-authored an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal opposing a proposal to invest billions in child care to make it more affordable for families. He and his co-author said expanding child care subsidies would lead to “unhappier, unhealthier children” and that having fewer mothers contributing to the economy might be a worthwhile trade-off.

    Vance has floated policies that would make it easier for a family to live off of a single income, making it possible for some parents to stay home while their partners work. Along with his embrace of policies he calls pro-family, he has tagged people who do not have or want children as “sociopaths.” He once derided Harris and other rising Democratic stars as “childless cat ladies,” even though Harris has two stepchildren — they call her “Momala” — and no cats.

    Even without details about new care policies, Trump believes that families would ultimately get a better deal under his administration.

    The Trump-Vance campaign has attacked Harris’ record on the economy and said the Biden administration’s policies have only made things tougher for families, pointing to recent inflation.

    “Harris … has proudly and repeatedly celebrated her role as Joe Biden’s co-pilot on Bidenomics,” said Karoline Leavitt, a campaign spokeswoman. “The basic necessities of food, gas and housing are less affordable, unemployment is rising, and Kamala doesn’t seem to care.”

    ___

    The Associated Press’ education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

    [ad_2]

    Source link