ReportWire

Tag: jim jordan

  • Rep. Jim Jordan on Justice Department potentially prosecuting Jack Smith:

    [ad_1]

    House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan has long been a critic of former special counsel Jack Smith. On Thursday, Jordan had a chance to question Smith during his congressional testimony. CBS News chief Washington correspondent Major Garrett spoke with Jordan about that and more.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jack Smith pushes for public testimony to confront ‘mischaracterizations’ of Trump probes

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    EXCLUSIVE: Former Special Counsel Jack Smith is requesting to testify in open, public hearings before the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, Fox News Digital has learned.

    Fox News Digital exclusively obtained a letter Smith’s attorneys sent to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley Thursday afternoon, after both panels signaled interest in testimony from the former special counsel.

    EXCLUSIVE: JACK SMITH TRACKED PRIVATE COMMUNICATIONS, CALLS OF NEARLY A DOZEN GOP SENATORS DURING J6 PROBE, FBI SAYS

    “Given the many mischaracterizations of Mr. Smith’s investigation into President Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified documents and role in attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Mr. Smith respectfully requests the opportunity to testify in open hearings before the House and Senate Judiciary Committees,” Smith attorneys Lanny Breuer and Peter Koski wrote.

    Jack Smith, then-U.S. special counsel, speaks during a news conference in Washington, Aug. 1, 2023.  (Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    “During the investigation of President Trump, Mr. Smith steadfastly adhered to established legal standards and Department of Justice guidelines, consistent with his approach throughout his career as a dedicated public servant,” they wrote.

    “He is prepared to answer questions about the Special Counsel’s investigation and prosecution, but requires assurance from the Department of Justice that he will not be punished for doing so,” they continued. “To that end, Mr. Smith needs guidance from the Department of Justice regarding federal grand jury secrecy requirements and authorization on the matters he may speak to regarding, among other things, Volume II of the Final Report of the Special Counsel, which is not publicly available.”

    Smith’s attorneys also noted that in order to provide “full and accurate answers to your questions, Mr. Smith requires access to the Special Counsel files, which he no longer has the ability to access.”

    Rep. Jim Jordan

    Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee leaves the Republican caucus meeting at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, Oct. 12, 2023.  (Jose Luis Magana/The Associated Press )

    JACK SMITH DEFENDS SUBPOENAING REPUBLICAN SENATORS’ PHONE RECORDS: ‘ENTIRELY PROPER’

    “With the guidance and access described above, Mr. Smith is available to testify in an open hearing at your earliest convenience,” they wrote.

    A source familiar told Fox News Digital that Smith’s attorneys are planning to officially seek guidance from the Department of Justice on the matter.

    The letter from Smith’s attorneys comes after Jordan, R-Ohio, requested Smith appear for a closed-door transcribed interview and provide all records from his work related to President Donald Trump.

    Sen. Chuck Grassley

    Senator Chuck Grassley, a Republican from Iowa and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, speaks during a hearing in Washington, DC, US, on Tuesday, Sept. 16, 2025 (Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    The letter also comes after Grassley, R-Iowa, and nearly two dozen Senate Republicans demanded that the Department of Justice and FBI release documents on Smith’s decision to subpoena telecommunications companies for phone records of a number of Senate Republicans during his probe into Jan. 6, 2021.

    Fox News Digital exclusively reported earlier in October that Smith tracked the private communications and phone calls of GOP Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Josh Hawley of Missouri, Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, Bill Hagerty of Tennessee, Dan Sullivan of Alaska, Tommy Tuberville of Alabama and GOP Rep. Mike Kelly of Pennsylvania as part of his “Arctic Frost” investigation.

    An official said the records were collected in 2023 by Smith and his team after subpoenaing major telephone providers. 

    Patel and Grassley shaking hands

    FBI Director Kash Patel shakes hands with Republican Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa during a Senate Judiciary hearing on Sept. 16, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    An FBI official told Fox News Digital that Smith and his team tracking the senators were able to see which phone numbers they called, the location the phone call originated and the location where it was received.

    A source said the calls were likely in reference to the vote to certify the 2020 election. 

    Smith, though, called his decision to subpoena several Republican lawmakers’ phone records, calling the move “entirely proper” and consistent with Justice Department policy.

    “As described by various Senators, the toll data collection was narrowly tailored and limited to the four days from January 4, 2021 to January 7, 2021, with a focus on telephonic activity during the period immediately surrounding the January 6 riots at the U.S. Capitol,” Smith’s lawyers wrote Tuesday to Grassley. 

    Merrick Garland, Donald Trump and Jack Smith

    A split image featuring US Attorney General Merrick Garland, President Donald Trump and Special Counsel Jack Smith (Ting Shen/Bloomberg via Getty Images | Photo by Rebecca Noble/Getty Images | Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Smith was appointed special counsel by Attorney General Merrick Garland in November 2022.

    Smith, after months of investigating, charged President Donald Trump in the U.S. District Court for Washington, D.C., in his 2020 election case, but after Trump was elected president, Smith sought to dismiss the case. Judge Tanya Chutkan granted that request. 

    Smith’s case cost taxpayers more than $50 million. 

    Fox News’ Ashley Oliver contributed to this report. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • House Republicans launch investigation into distribution of L.A. fire charity funds

    [ad_1]

    Two House Republicans launched an investigation on Wednesday that will, in part, examine how a California charitable organization used a $500,000 grant that was meant to support victims of the deadly Palisades and Eaton fires, a move that is expanding congressional scrutiny over the response to the disaster.

    Reps. Kevin Kiley (R-Rocklin) and Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) sent a letter to the head of the California Volunteers Fund asking for financial records related to a $500,000 grant it received from the disaster-relief charity FireAid, which raised an estimated $100 million for fire victims through its flagship benefit concerts in January.

    “It is not publicly known how the California Volunteers Fund distributed this $500,000, or what individuals or entities received funds,” Kiley and Jordan wrote in a letter Wednesday to Dave Smith, the fund’s chief executive. “It is also unclear whether the state-based California Volunteers, run out of the Governor’s Office, received any of the FireAid-originated funds via the California Volunteers Fund.”

    Kiley and Jordan added that they want to examine all documents and communications related to the California fires between the California Volunteers Fund and California Volunteers, an entity that the charity supports and is housed within Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office.

    In their letter, they said FireAid has “come under scrutiny for diverting donations to nonprofits instead of providing direct relief to fire victims.”

    The California Volunteers Fund and the governor’s office did not immediately respond to a request seeking comment.

    The congressional inquiry into the distribution of disaster relief funds comes after months of pressure from Republican politicians, including President Trump, who have questioned FireAid’s methods and priorities. In July, Kiley called for an investigation into the charitable funds, urging the attorney general to open an investigation into the matter.

    Politically, the investigation comes as Newsom — whose office was mentioned several times in the letter — becomes a frequent political target of Trump and Republicans amid speculation that he could be eyeing a potential 2028 presidential run.

    In response to the criticism, FireAid commissioned two audit reports, including an independent review led by law firm Latham & Watkins that found no evidence of fraud or misuse of funds. The reports were sent to local and federal officials and the Department of Justice.

    “The law firm conducted an independent review of the charity, and shared conclusive findings affirming that FireAid has acted in accordance with mission, has strong accountability measures and aid is reaching affected communities,” the FireAid organization said in a statement about the review findings at the time.

    [ad_2]

    Ana Ceballos

    Source link

  • Trump-backed Matt Van Epps wins GOP primary in Tennessee House race

    [ad_1]

    Matt Van Epps is projected to win a crowded Republican primary Tuesday in the special election to replace a former Tennessee GOP congressman, according to the Associated Press.

    Van Epps will face off in December against Democratic state Rep. Aftyn Behn, who is projected to win a four-way primary for the Democratic nomination.

    Van Epps clinched the GOP victory following an endorsement from President Trump that came after in-person early voting ended. Eleven Republicans were on the ballot for the seat vacated by former Rep. Mark Green, who resigned over the summer due to “an opportunity in the private sector that was too exciting to pass up.” Among them, two candidates suspended their campaigns after Mr. Trump weighed in and joined the president in endorsing Van Epps.

    Republican Congressional candidate Matt Van Epps speaks during a forum on Sept. 8, 2025, in Dickson, Tenn.

    George Walker IV / AP


    “Thank you to the people of Middle and West Tennessee! Our Donald J. Trump-endorsed campaign won in a landslide tonight,” Van Epps said on social media. “Now, on to December 2nd! We’re going to win the general and keep this seat RED!”

    If Republicans hold onto the seat, it would slightly expand their margin in the U.S. House, where the GOP holds a single-digit majority. The general election in December could also gauge the popularity of Mr. Trump’s second-term agenda, especially with Republican-leaning suburban voters in the Nashville area.

    The 7th Congressional District spans 14 counties, bordering both Kentucky and Alabama. Along with parts of Nashville, it includes rural areas, wealthy suburbs and part of a military installment, Fort Campbell. The seat is one of three districts that GOP lawmakers drew as safely red in 2022 by dividing left-leaning Nashville. Its voters elected Green by 21 percentage points in 2024 and by nearly 22 points in 2022.

    Of its nine seats in the House, Tennessee currently has one Democrat, Rep. Steve Cohen of Memphis. Republican redistricting in 2022 allowed the GOP to flip another Democratic seat that was drawn to include only part of Nashville.

    Van Epps previously served in several roles under Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee. During the primary campaign, Van Epps leaned into his military experience, including as a Tennessee Army National Guard lieutenant colonel and as an Army Special Operations helicopter pilot. Among the competitors he defeated were state Reps. Jody Barrett and Gino Bulso.

    Behn was is a social worker and community organizer who has focused on women’s reproductive health rights, including as a plaintiff in a lawsuit against a Tennessee law banning adults from helping minors get an abortion without parental permission. A judge has halted the provision’s enforcement.

    Mr. Trump endorsed Van Epps in a Truth Social post late last week that praised him as an “America First Patriot.”

    “A West Point Graduate, and Combat Decorated Army Helicopter Pilot, Matt knows the WISDOM and COURAGE required to Defend our Country, Support our Incredible Military/Veterans, and Ensure PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH,” Mr. Trump wrote.

    The nod from Mr. Trump followed Van Epps’ prior endorsements from Lee, Green and Republican Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio. 

    Outside groups spent more than $3.1 million on the race, almost all on the GOP side, with about $1.1 million opposing Barrett.

    The Republican primary contenders praised Mr. Trump and expressed staunch opposition to anything perceived as liberal or “woke.” Meanwhile in the Democratic primary, the four candidates attacked the legislation Mr. Trump dubbed the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” in addition to his tariffs.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jim Jordan pressed to subpoena climate group accused of ‘judicial manipulation’

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    FIRST ON FOX: A conservative climate policy group is urging House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, to subpoena records from the Environmental Law Institute’s Climate Judiciary Project as part of an ongoing probe into the influence of climate advocacy groups in climate policy litigation. 

    Hon. Jason Isaac, CEO of the American Energy Institute, a conservative pro-U.S. energy production policy group, wrote a letter to Jordan last week pointing to evidence from a Sept. 12 Multnomah County v. ExxonMobil et al. court filing that he says suggests “covert coordination and judicial manipulation.”

    “This new evidence raises serious red flags about the credibility of both the so-called science being used in climate lawsuits and the judicial training programs behind the bench,” Isaac told Fox News Digital. 

    According to Isaac’s letter to Jordan, the court filing submitted by Chevron Corporation earlier this month reveals that “one of the plaintiffs’ lead attorneys, Roger Worthington, had undisclosed involvement in at least two so-called scientific studies that the county is presenting as independent, peer-reviewed evidence.”

    TRUMP ADMIN SCORES LEGAL WIN IN $16B CLIMATE FIGHT AS FEDERAL APPEALS COURT LIFTS BLOCK ON GRANT TERMINATIONS

    Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, speaks to reporters as House Republicans hold a caucus meeting at the Longworth House Office Building on Oct. 13, 2023, in Washington.  (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    One of those studies “acknowledged funding from the Climate Judiciary Project in a draft version, but that disclosure was inexplicably removed from the final publication,” Isaac said in the letter. 

    Earlier drafts of the study, labeled “DO NOT DISTRIBUTE,” were found on Worthington’s law firm website, the letter revealed. 

    TOP ENERGY GROUP CALLS FOR PROBE INTO SECRETIVE ‘NATIONAL LAWFARE CAMPAIGN’ TO INFLUENCE JUDGES ON CLIMATE

    According to the American Energy Institute, the study seeks to “attribute global economic losses from climate change to specific oil companies.” The website also included a “pre-publication draft of a CJP judicial training module” with internal editorial comments, according to the letter. 

    Isaac told Jordan this mark-up raises “serious questions about how and why a plaintiffs’ attorney had early access to, and possibly editorial influence over, materials being presented to state and federal judges as ‘neutral’ science.”

    Another module was designed to “educate” participant judges on how to apply “attribution science” in the courtroom, according to Isaac. 

    Attribution science seeks to measure how much human-caused climate change is responsible for certain extreme weather events, per Science News Explores’ definition

    “The Environmental Law Institute has claimed neutrality, yet documents suggest coordination with plaintiffs’ counsel who stand to profit from the outcomes,” Isaac told Fox News Digital. “If the same lawyers suing energy companies are shaping the studies and educating the judges, that is not justice; it is manipulation. Congress is right to dig deeper, and the American Energy Institute is proud to support that effort.” 

    Isaac is requesting that Jordan formally request “communications, draft documents, funding agreements, and internal editorial notes related to the scientific studies and CJP curriculum.”

    While commending Jordan’s leadership, Isaac said, “Judges and the public deserve to know whether the courtroom is being quietly shaped by coordinated climate advocacy posing as neutral expertise.”

    Isaac said the Environmental Law Institute and Worthington should answer several questions about their involvement in the studies, including the “judicial education module on attribution science.”

    Climate protester

    A climate protester scales the Wilson Building as part of an Earth Day rally against fossil fuels on April 22, 2022.  (Getty Images)

    “Does ELI regularly seek input from plaintiffs’ attorneys on its judicial education modules?” Isaac questioned. 

    “ELI did not fund the Nature study, and the Climate Judiciary Project has not coordinated with Mr. Worthington,” Environmental Law Institute spokesman Nick Collins told Fox News Digital in a statement. 

    “CJP does not participate in or provide support for litigation,” Collins added. “Rather, CJP provides evidence-based continuing education to judges about climate science and how it arises in the law. Our curriculum is fact-based and science-first, grounded in consensus reports and developed with a robust peer review process that meets the highest scholarly standards.”

    When 23 Republican state attorneys general sent a letter last month to Environmental Protection Agency chief Lee Zeldin calling on him to cancel funding to the Environmental Law Institute, Collins told Fox News Digital that the Climate Judiciary Project’s projects are far from “radical.”

    “The programs in which the Climate Judiciary Project (CJP) participates are no different than other judicial education programs, providing evidence-based training on legal and scientific topics that judges voluntarily choose to attend,” Collins said.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Fox News Digital has reached out to Jordan and Worthington for comment on the letter but did not immediately hear back. 

    Fox News Digital’s Emma Colton contributed to this story. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jim Jordan Illegally Interferes In Criminal Investigation With Fani Willis Subpoena

    Jim Jordan Illegally Interferes In Criminal Investigation With Fani Willis Subpoena

    [ad_1]

    House Judiciary Committee Chair Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) is abusing his power and attempting to illegally interfere in a criminal investigation by subpoenaing Fulton County DA Fani Willis.

    Why Did Jim Jordan Subpoena Fani Willis?

    Chair Jordan subpoenaed Fani Willis under the pretense of investigating the use of federal funds in Donald Trump’s criminal prosecutions.

    CNN reported:

    Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis has been subpoenaed by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan to produce documents related to the use and spending of federal funds, according to copy of the subpoena obtained by CNN.

    Willis is the Georgia district attorney who brought the 2020 election subversion case against former President Donald Trump.

    The subpoena is part of a broader investigation by Jordan, an Ohio Republican, that is focused on Willis’ use of federal funds.

    Jordan’s House committee has no oversight authority over the Fulton County, Georgia District Attorney’s Office. Jordan has demonstrated no legislative purpose for his subpoena. Rep. Jordan has been trying to interfere in the Georgia criminal investigation of Trump since August 2023.

    Jim Jordan Has Been Warned That Interfering In Criminal Prosecutions Is A Crime

    Jordan has tried this stunt before. He has interfered in the Manhattan criminal case against Donald Trump related to the Stormy Daniels hush money payments, and he has tried to interfere with Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigations into Trump.

    When Jim Jordan tried to interfere in Alvin Bragg’s investigation, Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) notified Jordan that interfering in a local prosecution is a crime. Lieu tweeted, “Dear @Jim_Jordan: Local prosecutors, including DA Bragg, owe you nothing. In fact, it is illegal for you and @JudiciaryGOP to interfere in an ongoing criminal investigation, or a criminal trial (if there is one).”

    Chairman Jordan is abusing his power to further Trump’s narrative that the prosecutions of the former president are political.

    Willis’s subpoena should go nowhere, just like Jordan’s efforts to interfere in the other criminal investigations.

    A Special Message From PoliticusUSA

    If you are in a position to donate purely to help us keep the doors open on PoliticusUSA during what is a critical election year, please do so here. 

    We have been honored to be able to put your interests first for 14 years as we only answer to our readers and we will not compromise on that fundamental, core PoliticusUSA value.

    [ad_2]

    Jason Easley

    Source link

  • House Republicans subpoena prosecutor in Hunter Biden investigation

    House Republicans subpoena prosecutor in Hunter Biden investigation

    [ad_1]

    Washington — House Republicans issued a subpoena Tuesday to a federal prosecutor involved in the criminal investigation into Hunter Biden, demanding answers for what they allege is Justice Department interference in the yearslong case into the president’s son.

    Republican Rep. Jim Jordan, chair of the House Judiciary Committee, called on Lesley Wolf, the assistant U.S. attorney for Delaware, to appear before the committee by Dec. 7, according to a copy of the congressional subpoena obtained by The Associated Press.

    “Based on the committee’s investigation to date, it is clear that you possess specialized and unique information that is unavailable to the committee through other sources and without which the committee’s inquiry would be incomplete,” Jordan wrote in an accompanying letter to Wolf.

    The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    The subpoena to Wolf is the latest in a series of demands Jordan and fellow Republican chairmen have made as part of their sprawling impeachment inquiry into President Biden. The president’s son and brother James received subpoenas last week as Republicans look to gain ground in their nearly yearlong investigation, which has so failed to uncover evidence directly implicating the president in any wrongdoing.

    The inquiry is focused both on the Biden family’s international business affairs and the Justice Department’s investigation into Hunter Biden, which Republicans claim has been slow-walked and stonewalled. The U.S. attorney’s office in Delaware has been investigating Hunter Biden since at least 2019, as CBS News has reported.

    Wolf, who serves with David Weiss, the U.S. attorney for Delaware and now special counsel in charge of the case, has been accused by whistleblowers from the Internal Revenue Service of “deviating from standard investigative protocol” and showing preferential treatment because Hunter Biden is the president’s son.

    Republicans have claimed that it was clear that the prosecutors didn’t want to touch anything that would include Hunter Biden’s father. In one instance, Gary Shapley, an IRS employee assigned to the case, testified that in a meeting with Weiss and Wolf after the 2020 election, he and other agents wanted to discuss an email between Hunter Biden associates where one person made reference to the “big guy.” Shapley said Wolf refused to do so, saying she did not want to ask questions about “dad.”

    In another incident, FBI officials notified Hunter Biden’s Secret Service detail in advance of an effort to interview him and several of his business associates in order to avoid a confrontation between two law enforcement bodies. 

    Justice Department officials have countered these claims by pointing to the extraordinary set of circumstances surrounding a criminal case into a subject who at the time was the son of a leading presidential candidate. Department policy has long warned prosecutors to take care in charging cases with potential political overtones around the time of an election, to avoid any possible influence on the outcome.

    Weiss himself appeared for a closed-door interview this month and denied accusations of political interference.

    “Political considerations played no part in our decision-making,” he told the committee.

    Nonetheless, Republicans are demanding Wolf appear before lawmakers as she has “first-hand knowledge of the Department’s criminal inquiry of Hunter Biden,” and refused a voluntary request to come in over the summer.

    Jordan wrote in the letter to Wolf: “Given your critical role you played in the investigation of Hunter Biden, you are uniquely situated to shed light on whether President Biden played any role in the department’s investigation and whether he attempted, in any way, to directly or indirectly obstruct either that investigation or our investigation.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jim Jordan outlines timeline for Joe Biden impeachment inquiry probe

    Jim Jordan outlines timeline for Joe Biden impeachment inquiry probe

    [ad_1]

    Representative Jim Jordan, an Ohio Republican, said Sunday that the House will make a decision on whether to bring charges of impeachment against President Joe Biden by early next year.

    The House Oversight Committee is currently conducting an inquiry into the Biden family after then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, a Republican from California, announced the investigation in early September. At the center of the Biden impeachment inquiry is his alleged involvement in his son Hunter Biden‘s foreign business dealings. The White House has repeatedly denied that the president ever had any involvement in his son’s business.

    On Wednesday, Representative James Comer, chairman of the House Oversight Committee signed subpoenas for Hunter Biden and the president’s brother, James Biden, along with other members of their family and Rob Walker, a former business associate of the president’s son. Hunter Biden has been asked to appear for a deposition on December 13, James Biden is expected to attend a deposition on December 6 and Walker is scheduled for November 29.

    President Joe Biden speaks to autoworkers at the Community Complex Building on November 09, 2023 in Belvidere, Illinois. Representative Jim Jordan says that the House will make a decision to bring charges of impeachment against President Joe Biden by early next year.
    Scott Olson/Getty Images

    Representative Jordan, a member of the House Oversight Committee, outlined a timeline for the probe into Biden and his family during an interview on Fox NewsSunday Morning Features with host Maria Bartiromo.

    “I believe that we will get the depositions and the interviews done in this calendar year and then make a decision early next year whether there are actual, the evidence warrants going through articles of impeachment and moving to that stage of the investigation,” the Republican told Bartiromo.

    “We have a constitutional duty to do oversight. We’re now in the impeachment inquiry phase of our oversight duty. We’re driven by the facts. We’re driven by the evidence. Not by the politics like the Democrats are when they attacked President Trump,” Jordan said.

    The congressman, who is a close Trump ally, was referring to the former president’s two impeachments, in 2019 and then again in 2021. Trump also faces significant legal troubles, with multiple criminal indictments against him and a civil fraud trial underway in New York.

    Newsweek reached out to Jordan and the White House via email for comment.

    The White House has said that House Republicans have a political agenda against Biden.

    “With just over a week to go until House Republicans may again thrust the country into a harmful and chaotic government shutdown, the most extreme voices in their party like James Comer are trying to distract from their repeated failures to govern,” White House spokesman Ian Sams wrote in a memo addressing Wednesday’s subpoenas.

    “Instead of using the power of Congress to pursue a partisan political smear campaign against the President and his family, extreme House Republicans should do their jobs,” he added.

    The House Oversight Committee has spent months investigating the Biden family, issuing subpoenas for Hunter Biden’s and James Biden’s bank records and former associates of the president’s son to testify. According to House Republicans, the Biden family has cumulatively received more than $24 million from foreign nationals, including from countries like China, Russia, Ukraine, Romania and Kazakhstan, over a five-year period.

    “The House Oversight Committee has followed the money and built a record of evidence revealing how Joe Biden knew, was involved, and benefited from his family’s influence peddling schemes. Now, the House Oversight Committee is going to bring in members of the Biden family and their associates to question them on this record of evidence,” Comer said in a statement.

    The GOP congressman said that the records reveal how the Biden family benefited from the business dealings “to the detriment of U.S. interests.”

    The Biden administration and Democrats have said repeatedly that Republicans have not uncovered evidence of any criminality by the president. While Hunter Biden did earn substantial sums from foreign business deals, it’s not clear that any of these actions were illegal or that they benefited the president financially.

    Meanwhile, House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, received backlash from Make America Great Again (MAGA) supporters after he indicated in a closed-door meeting with House GOP moderates this week that there is insufficient evidence at the moment to move forward with formal impeachment proceedings.

    Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican and staunch Trump supporter, mentioned previous House Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s support in launching the impeachment inquiry while criticizing Johnson.

    “After 8 R’s and all D’s ousted him, we found checks to Joe Biden and evidence of a massive money laundering scheme and now the new guy you are told is way better doesn’t want to impeach. Such progress,” Greene wrote in an X, formerly Twitter, post.