ReportWire

Tag: jd vance

  • It Sure Sounds Like Trump Thinks JD Vance Is Going to Lose the Debate to Tim Walz

    It Sure Sounds Like Trump Thinks JD Vance Is Going to Lose the Debate to Tim Walz

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump has preemptively declared that Tuesday night’s VP debate will be “rigged” against JD Vance, a baseless claim that he has made before every debate during this election cycle. Which doesn’t say much about his confidence in his running mate!

    In a Fox Nation interview that was, for some reason, conducted by former Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway, the ex-president said that he would personally “love to have two or three more debates” against Kamala Harris but “they’re so rigged and so stacked. You’ll see it tomorrow with JD. It’ll be stacked.”

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    There is, of course, no evidence whatsoever that any of the debates that Trump has participated in have been rigged against him, nor any evidence that tonight’s proceedings will be “stacked” against Vance. Rather, Trump has made these claims about previous debates because he’s incapable of admitting when he’s lost. Following his debate last month versus Harris, the former president whined about being fact-checked by the moderators and declared “everybody at ABC” should be fired. He also absurdly floated the idea that Harris received the debate questions ahead of time (which ABC News denied) and that her earrings were actually listening devices, saying, “I hear she got the questions, and I also heard she had something in the ear.”

    At the same time, Trump also embarrassingly claimed he “won” the event, when he quite obviously did not. That probably had something to do with the fact that he spent the debate bragging about his relationship with right-wing authoritarians; refused to admit he lost the election; claimed—for not the first time—that Democrats think it’s okay to “execute” babies; rambled incoherently about “transgender operations on illegal aliens that are in prison”; and now famously declared, of Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio: “They’re eating the dogs…they’re eating the cats.”

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Vice-Presidential Debate Between Tim Walz and J.D. Vance: All the Details

    Vice-Presidential Debate Between Tim Walz and J.D. Vance: All the Details

    [ad_1]

    Photo-Illustration: Intelligencer; Photos: Getty Images

    Donald Trump and Kamala Harris may not debate again before Election Day, but their running mates certainly will. On Tuesday night, CBS News will host the one and only vice-presidential debate between Senator J.D. Vance and Governor Tim Walz, and things are bound to get heated — if not weird — between the two Midwesterners. It might even be the first time in American history that two vice-presidential candidates debate the pros and cons of pet cats. Here’s what to know.

    When is the debate?

    The vice-presidential debate will begin at 9 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 1, live from the CBS Broadcast Center in Manhattan. It’s expected to last 90 minutes with two four-minute commercial breaks.

    Where can I watch the debate on TV?

    It will be broadcast on CBS, as well as simulcast on numerous other networks, including PBS, NBC, CNN, C-SPAN, Fox News, MSNBC, and more.

    How can I stream the debate online?

    The debate will be live-streamed on CBS News’ YouTube channel, CBS News 24/7, Paramount+, C-SPAN, and multiple other sites.

    Who is moderating?

    CBS Evening News anchor Norah O’Donnell and Face the Nation host Margaret Brennan will moderate.

    Will the candidates’ mics be muted?

    The candidates’ microphones will remain on by default — but CBS says it reserves the right to turn them off if needed.

    Will the candidates’ statements be fact-checked?

    CBS says the moderators won’t be focused on live fact-checking what the candidates say, but it is embedding a QR code, the New York Times points out:

    QR code — the checkerboard-like, black-and-white box that can be scanned by a smartphone — will appear onscreen for long stretches of the CBS telecast. Viewers who scan the code will be directed to the CBS News website, where a squad of about 20 CBS journalists will post fact-checks of the candidates’ remarks in real time. The code will appear only on CBS; viewers who tune in on a different channel will not see it. 

    Will there be a studio audience?

    No. As at this year’s two presidential debates, there will be no live studio audience.

    What are the other debate rules?

    Per CBS News:

    • The topics and questions will not be provided to the candidates in advance, and only the moderators are allowed to ask questions.

    • There will be no opening statements, but each candidate will be able to give a two-minute closing statement. After winning a coin toss, Vance elected to deliver his closing statement last.

    • The candidates will be given two minutes to answer each question, one minute for rebuttals, and, potentially, one minute each for follow-ups at the moderators’ discretion.

    • The candidates will not be allowed to interact with their campaign staff during the two commercial breaks.

    • Vance and Walz will be standing at identical lecterns with Walz on the left side of the stage and Vance on the right.

    • Props and pre-written notes are forbidden. Each candidate will be given a blank notepad, a pen, and a bottle of water.

    Do vice-presidential debates matter?

    Not very much, typically, but it’s at least possible this VP debate could. Unless Harris and Trump both agree to another debate, this will be the last time the campaigns face off directly on prime-time television. It’s a very close race, so swaying even a small number of voters in a key battleground state could make a real difference. And these two particular vice-presidential candidates have each made a surprising amount of national news in recent months. If the past year in politics has taught us anything, it’s to expect the unexpected.

    Will Walz or Vance wear a secret earpiece, use AI contact lenses, or be subject to hostile stage lighting?

    It’s 2024, so there will undoubtedly be some wild conspiracy theories circulating online soon after the debate, suggesting that one of the candidates was given some unfair advantage via technical wizardry and/or partisan spycraft. It was rigged, someone always says, while pointing to some elaborate subterfuge. But please exercise healthy skepticism when encountering such theories, particularly if shared by a certain very online billionaire.

    This post has been updated.

    [ad_2]

    Chas Danner

    Source link

  • What are Tim Walz’s economic policies? Here’s a look at what he’s done in Minnesota.

    What are Tim Walz’s economic policies? Here’s a look at what he’s done in Minnesota.

    [ad_1]

    Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz may be best known for his Midwestern roots, having grown up in Nebraska and spent years as a public school teacher and football coach in Minnesota. But voters will get a chance during his debate Tuesday with vice presidential rival Sen. JD Vance on CBS to hear more about Walz’s views on taxes and the economy, a critical issue in the November election.

    With polls pointing to a tight 2024 presidential race, the share of voters who describe the economy as good has inched up, helping lift support for the Democratic ticket of Vice President Kamala Harris and Walz. Yet almost 6 in 10 voters describe the economy as “bad,” CBS News polling shows, with the economy ranking as the most important issue among likely voters.

    Already, Walz’s approach toward economic issues is visible through his actions as governor of Minnesota, a job he’s held since 2019 and where he is now serving his second term. His policies have included enacting the largest state Child Tax Credit in the nation and enacting free school meals for the state’s K-12 students, while raising taxes on high earners in the state to help pay for those and other social programs.

    Walz’s track record with taxes

    Walz “has added to the progressivity of Minnesota’s tax code,” noted Carl Davis, research director at the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP), a left-leaning think tank. “Having a system like Minnesota’s, where you ask more of folks at the top, that type of progressive system makes it a whole lot easier to pay for spending on side initiatives like free school lunch.”

    The taxes and social programs that Walz signed into law in Minnesota echo some of the plans that the Harris-Walz ticket have so far rolled out, including a more generous federal Child Tax Credit and plans to increase taxes on higher earners and corporations. 

    “The parallels are pretty obvious” between Walz’s track record in Minnesota and the Harris-Walz national campaign, Davis said. 

    Minnesota’s Child Tax Credit

    A number of states enacted or expanded a Child Tax Credit following the pandemic, when the federal government boosted the national CTC to as much as $3,600 per child. That bigger benefit was credited with helping reduce child poverty to historic lows, but when that enhanced CTC expired in 2022, child poverty rates surged.

    That prompted some states, including Minnesota, to explore enacting their own CTCs, ITEP’s Davis noted. 

    Minnesota’s CTC of $1,750 per child is the most generous state child tax credit in the U.S., according to the Tax Policy Center, a tax-focused think tank. Walz touted it as “the best child tax credit in the country” and encouraged Minnesota parents to file their taxes in order to claim the benefit. 

    Vance, meanwhile, has proposed expanding the federal CTC to $5,000, but Republican lawmakers earlier this year blocked a modest expansion in the tax benefit. Vance didn’t vote on the failed Senate bill to provide a bigger CTC to low-income families, as he wasn’t present for the vote. He told “Face the Nation” in August that the vote was for “show” and destined to fail, regardless of the direction of his vote.

    The debate on Tuesday is likely to pit Walz’s ideas for how to help families afford the rising cost of living against Vance’s economic views, which aside from expanding the CTC have included criticizing Democrats as “anti-family.”

    Lowering Social Security taxes

    Walz has also sought to help Minnesota residents on the other end of the age spectrum — retirees. As part of the state’s 2023 tax bill, Walz eliminated Minnesota income taxes on Social Security benefits for three-quarters of beneficiaries. 

    Under the Minnesota law, couples with annual income of less than $100,000 and single filers earning less than $78,000 are now exempted from state taxes on their Social Security checks.

    Scrapping taxes on Social Security benefits has also been proposed by former President Donald Trump, who earlier this year vowed to eliminate federal income tax on the monthly government payments. About 40% of the nation’s 67 million Social Security recipients earn enough from their benefits to owe taxes to the IRS. 

    But there’s one major difference between the dueling proposals: Walz paid for his cuts to Social Security taxes — as well as the CTC — by raising taxes on higher-income households, according to the Tax Policy Center. Trump and Vance, meanwhile, have indicated they want to lower taxes on corporations and renew the tax cuts in the 2017 Tax Cuts & Jobs Act, which gave the most generous tax cuts to higher earners.

    Walz accomplished his tax cuts for families and seniors by limiting the amount of standard or itemized deductions that high-income filers could claim, as well as reducing a deduction for dividend income and creating a surtax on capital gains income, the Tax Policy Center notes.

    How does Minnesota’s economy compare? 

    Minnesota’s gross domestic product has expanded about 5% since 2018, when Walz was elected governor, according to the Minnesota Compass, a data site created by Wilder Research, a Minnesota-focused research group that focuses on topics such as homelessness and public health. 

    Since the height of the pandemic, when employers cut workers across the nation, Minnesota has regained its lost jobs and is now back to where it was before the health emergency, its data shows.


    How Tim Walz, JD Vance are preparing to debate

    02:56

    Minnesotans also earn more than the typical American worker, with median income in the state of $85,000 in 2023, compared with about $78,000 nationally, Minnesota Compass found. To be sure, Minnesota residents’ incomes have paced ahead of the U.S. median for at least three decades, long predating Walz’s election, the data shows.

    The state ranks highly for doing business, with one recent study from business news site CNBC ranking it No. 6 among the 50 U.S. states based on a number of criteria, including competitiveness, workforce, infrastructure, economy, quality of life and business friendliness.

    A number of businesses have recently planned expansions or investments in Minnesota, including a $5 billion expansion from the Mayo Clinic and a historic $525 million investment from Polar Semiconductor.

    The state’s relatively strong economy also helped generate enough tax revenues to provide surpluses at the start of the 2019 and 2021 budget cycles, as well as an enormous $17.6 billion budget surplus for 2023. The latter helped the state fund the ambitious social programs signed into law by Walz, which include free school meals for children

    —With reporting by the Associated Press. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • CBS News says it will be up to Vance and Walz to fact-check each other in veep debate

    CBS News says it will be up to Vance and Walz to fact-check each other in veep debate

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — CBS News, hosting vice presidential candidates JD Vance and Tim Walz for the general election campaign’s third debate next week, says it will be up to the politicians — not the moderators — to check the facts of their opponents.

    The 90-minute debate, scheduled for 9 p.m. Eastern on Tuesday in a Manhattan studio that once hosted the children’s program “Captain Kangaroo,” will be moderated by the outgoing “CBS Evening News” anchor Norah O’Donnell and “Face the Nation” host Margaret Brennan.

    Tim Walz and JD Vance meet for their first vice presidential debate:

    During ABC’s debate between presidential contenders Kamala Harris and Donald Trump earlier this month, network moderators on four occasions pointed out inaccurate statements by Trump, and none by Harris. That infuriated the former president and his supporters, who complained it was unfair.

    Last spring, CNN moderators did not question any facts presented by Trump and President Joe Biden in the debate where Biden’s poor performance eventually led to him dropping out of the race.

    On Friday, CBS said the onus will be on Vance and Walz to point out misstatements by the other, and that “the moderators will facilitate those opportunities” during rebuttal time. The network said its own misinformation unit, CBS News Confirmed, will provide real-time fact-checking during the debate on its live blog and on social media, and on the air during post-debate analysis.

    With its plans, CBS News is clearly indicating it wants to take a step back from the heat generated by calling attention to misleading statements by candidates. Some argue that offstage fact-checking is too little, too late and not seen by many people who watch the event.

    It’s not the first time

    Angie Drobnic Holan, director of the international fact-checking network at the Poynter Institute, said she has seen examples of moderators who have successfully encouraged candidates to keep their opponents honest.

    “I’ll be interested in seeing how this works in practice,” she said. “Having said that, you’re basically off-loading one of your journalistic responsibilities onto the candidates themselves, so I don’t think that it’s ideal. It takes journalistic courage to be willing to fact-check the candidates, because the candidates are absolutely going to complain about it. I don’t think the moderators’ first goal is to avoid controversy.”

    During the ABC debate, moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis corrected Trump statements on abortion, the 2020 election, crime statistics and reports that immigrants in Ohio were eating pets.

    Unlike the two presidential debates, the two sides agreed that the vice presidential candidates’ microphones will not be turned off while their opponent is speaking, increasing the chance for genuine back-and-forth exchanges and the risk that the two men will talk over each other. CBS says it reserves the right to shut off a “hot mic” when necessary. Each candidate will have two minutes for a closing statement, with Vance winning a virtual coin toss and choosing to get the last word.

    The stakes are high for CBS News

    It’s a big moment for CBS News, long mired in third place in the evening news ratings. O’Donnell just announced she was stepping down from the role. Brennan is considered a rising star.

    Like with the presidential debates, CBS is making its feed available for other networks to televise, and many are expected to take advantage of the opportunity.

    There will be no audience when Vance and Walz meet at a West Side studio that, in its past, has hosted editions of “60 Minutes,” “CBS Sunday Morning,” “Inside the NFL,” “Geraldo” and “Captain Kangaroo.”

    It’s not known whether there will be other opportunities to see Trump and Harris together on the same stage before the Nov. 5 election. Harris has accepted an invitation from CNN for another debate on Oct. 23, but Trump has rejected it. In a poll taken by Quinnipiac University and released earlier this week, likely voters said by roughly a two-to-one margin that they’d like them face off again.

    CBS’ “60 Minutes” is looking to land both Harris and Trump for back-to-back interviews that will air on Oct. 7, but neither candidate has committed to it yet.

    ___

    David Bauder writes about media for the AP. Follow him at http://x.com/dbauder.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • FACT FOCUS: A look at claims made during the second night of the Democratic National Convention

    FACT FOCUS: A look at claims made during the second night of the Democratic National Convention

    [ad_1]

    The second night of the Democratic National Convention was filled with excitement as a celebratory roll call marked Vice President Kamala Harris’ nomination to be the party’s candidate for president. As speaker after speaker addressed the convention extolling her qualities to lead the country, they also spelled out differences with her opponents, former President Donald Trump and Ohio Sen. JD Vance, at times misrepresenting the Republicans’ stances.

    Here’s a look at the facts.

    Missing context on Vance and the child tax credit

    Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer: “Senate Republicans pretend to care about middle-class families, but they voted no on expanding the child tax credit. And JD Vance didn’t even show up to vote.”

    THE FACTS: Vance did indeed skip an August vote on a bill to expand the child tax credit and restore some tax breaks for businesses.

    The bill failed to advance in the Senate as Republicans largely opposed the measure, arguing that they would be in position to get a better deal next year, The Associated Press reported at the time.

    But there’s more to the story.

    Vance has also said he would support expanding the child tax credit, currently at $2,000, to $5,000. He said the Senate vote was a “show vote,” when bills are designed to fail but allow parties to highlight issues before voters.

    The cost of Trump’s economic plan

    Schumer on Trump’s plan to create tariffs: “He wants to impose what is, in effect, a national sales tax on everyday products and basic necessities that we import from other countries. It will mean higher prices on just about every one of your daily needs. Donald Trump’s plan would cost a typical family $3,900 a year.”

    THE FACTS: Trump has proposed imposing a tariff of anywhere from 10% to 20% on all imports and up to 60% on imports from China.

    It’s Day 3 of the DNC, and there are 75 days until Election Day. Here’s what to know:

    Economists do expect it would raise prices on many goods. The Tax Policy Center, a joint project of the Urban Institute and the Brookings Institution, estimates it would reduce average incomes in the top 60% of earners by 1.8%. And the Center for American Progress Action Fund, a progressive advocacy group, has calculated that the higher tariffs would cost households an extra $3,900 a year.

    However, Trump has said the tariff revenue could be used to cut other taxes, which would reduce the overall cost of the policy.

    Trump’s changing views on the Affordable Care Act

    New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham: “Donald Trump and JD Vance want to dismantle our healthcare system, repeal the Affordable Care Act, and limit protections for preexisting conditions.”

    THE FACTS: Trump has repeatedly promised to replace former President Barack Obama’s health care law with a plan of his own. For example, three years after a Congress fully controlled by Republicans failed to repeal “Obamacare” in 2017, Trump urged the Supreme Court to overturn it.

    More recently, the Republican presidential nominee threatened to reopen the contentious fight.

    “The cost of Obamacare is out of control, plus, it’s not good Healthcare,” he wrote in a November 2023 post on his Truth Social site. “I’m seriously looking at alternatives. We had a couple of Republican Senators who campaigned for 6 years against it, and then raised their hands not to terminate it. It was a low point for the Republican Party, but we should never give up!”

    But Trump backed off a potential repeal in April. He said in a video posted to Truth Social that he is “not running to replace the ACA” and that he intends to make it “much better, stronger and far less expensive.”

    Another misrepresentation of Trump’s bleach comment

    What to know about the 2024 Election

    Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, on Trump during the COVID-19 pandemic: “And Donald, well, Donald told us to inject bleach.”

    THE FACTS: This claim was also made on the first day of the Democratic National Convention by Rep. Robert Garcia of California.

    It’s an overstatement. Trump actually asked whether it would be impossible to inject disinfectant into the lungs.

    “And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in one minute,” he said at an April 2020 press conference. “And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning, because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it’d be interesting to check that, so that you’re going to have to use medical doctors with, but it sounds interesting to me. So, we’ll see, but the whole concept of the light, the way it kills it in one minute. That’s pretty powerful.”

    ___

    Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • FACT FOCUS: A look back at some of the questionable claims made during the Democratic convention

    FACT FOCUS: A look back at some of the questionable claims made during the Democratic convention

    [ad_1]

    The Democrats’ star-studded, four-day convention drew to a close as Vice President Kamala Harris accepted the party’s nomination for president. The festivities were high on entertainment and praise for Harris and running mate Tim Walz. But while most speakers stuck to the script — and the facts — the convention was not without false information or statements that begged for additional context.

    Here’s a look at the facts around some of those claims.

    Trump’s views on an abortion ban

    VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS said Trump would “ban medication abortion and enact a nationwide abortion ban with or without Congress.”

    THE FACTS: While Trump has said in the past that he would support a national ban on abortion, he said Thursday morning on Fox & Friends: “I would never. There will not be a federal ban. This is now back in the states where it belongs.”

    In April, he said he would leave the issue up to the states in a video on his Truth Social platform.

    Days later, asked by a reporter upon arriving in Atlanta whether he would sign a national abortion ban, Trump shook his head and said “no.”

    But just a month earlier Trump suggested he’d support a national ban on abortion around 15 weeks of pregnancy. He also often brags about appointing the Supreme Court justices who overturned Roe v. Wade, ending the constitutional right to an abortion.

    Trump has previously supported a federal ban on abortion at 20 weeks of pregnancy. In a letter to anti-abortion leaders during his 2016 campaign, Trump expressed his commitment to this view by vowing to sign the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act.

    The Republican presidential nominee advocated for the bill again in 2018, at that year’s annual March for Life festival in Washington. The bill, which included exceptions for saving the life of a pregnant woman, as well as rape or incest, was passed by the House in 2017, but failed to move forward in the Senate.

    Trump told CBS News on Monday that he would not enforce the Comstock Act to restrict the sale of abortion medication by mail. The act, originally passed in 1873, was revived in an effort to block the mailing of mifepristone, the pill used in more than half of U.S. abortions.

    Trump and Project 2025

    COLORADO REP. JASON CROW: “Donald Trump’s Project 2025 would abandon our troops, abandon our veterans, our allies and our principles.”

    THE FACTS: Many speakers at the convention have linked Trump to Project 2025. Trump has repeatedly disavowed the conservative initiative, saying on social media he hasn’t read it and doesn’t know anything about it. At a rally in Michigan, he said Project 2025 was written by people on the “severe right” and some of the things in it are “seriously extreme.” He has also denied knowing who is behind the plan.

    Project 2025 has also said it is not tied to a specific candidate or campaign. And yet, it is connected in many ways to Trump’s orbit. Some of the people involved in Project 2025 are former senior officials from the Trump administration. The project’s former director is Paul Dans, who served as chief of staff at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management under Trump.

    Trump’s campaign spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt was featured in one of Project 2025’s videos. John McEntee, a former director of the White House Presidential Personnel Office in the Trump administration, is a senior adviser. McEntee told the conservative news site The Daily Wire earlier this year that Project 2025’s team would integrate a lot of its work with the campaign after the summer when Trump would announce his transition team.

    What to know about the 2024 Election

    Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance, penned the forward of a yet unreleased book written by Kevin Roberts, president of The Heritage Foundation, which created Project 2025.

    __ CROW again: “Trump plans to do Putin’s bidding by abandoning Ukraine and walking away from our NATO allies. In chapters two and three, he plans to fire our national security and military professionals and then replace them with MAGA loyalists.”

    THE FACTS: In regards to the Russia-Ukraine war, Project 2025 lays out three schools of thought about U.S. involvement, one of them being that it should not continue. However, it does not advocate for any one over the other.

    Crow’s claim that national security and military professionals will be replaced with Trump supporters does ring true. Among its recommendations are that senior CIA leaders “must commit to carrying out the President’s agenda and be willing to take calculated risks.” It also states that the National Security Council should be made up of “personnel with technical expertise and experience as well as an alignment to the President’s declared national security policy priorities.”

    Trump’s alleged comments about those captured or killed in military service

    ARIZONA SEN. MARK KELLY: “Trump thinks that Americans who have made the ultimate sacrifice are suckers and losers.”

    THE FACTS: Kelly was among many DNC speakers who brought up similar claims. He was referencing allegations first reported in The Atlantic on Sept. 3, 2020, that Trump made disparaging remarks about members of the U.S. military who have been captured or killed, including referring to the American war dead at a World War I cemetery outside Paris in 2018 as “suckers” and “losers.”

    But the truth is that it hasn’t been proven definitively, one way or the other, whether Trump actually made these comments.

    The Republican presidential nominee said the day the Atlantic story came out that it is “totally false,” calling it “a disgraceful situation” by a “terrible magazine.”

    Speaking to reporters after he returned to Washington from a campaign rally in Pennsylvania soon after, Trump said: “I would be willing to swear on anything that I never said that about our fallen heroes. There is nobody that respects them more. No animal — nobody — what animal would say such a thing?”

    And yet, a senior Defense Department official with firsthand knowledge of the events and a senior U.S. Marine Corps officer who was told about Trump’s comments confirmed some of his remarks to The Associated Press after the Atlantic story was published, including the ones about “suckers” and “losers.”

    Walz’s accomplishments as governor

    MINNESOTA SEN. AMY KLOBUCHAR, touting Tim Walz’s accomplishments as governor of the state: “Tim has delivered — paid leave, school lunches and the biggest tax cut in Minnesota history.”

    THE FACTS: Over the last two years, Walz has indeed signed legislation to create a paid family and medical leave program in Minnesota, and for free school breakfasts and lunches for all students regardless of income.

    Walz also signed what his administration and Democratic legislative leaders have touted as the largest tax cut in state history, about $3 billion worth as part of the two-year budget approved last year. It included a one-time refundable tax credit of $260 for single filers and up to $1,300 for a family with three children. It also established a child tax credit of up to $1,750 per child for lower-income families, subject to income limits. In addition, it exempted more people from state taxes on Social Security income, but left the tax in place for higher-income seniors.

    But critics take issue with his characterization of it as the biggest tax cut in state history. The Center of the American Experiment, a conservative think tank, points out that low-income Minnesotans don’t pay the state income tax, so in its view giving them tax credits amounts to income redistribution and welfare — not tax cuts.

    Republican legislators tried to hold out for permanent tax cuts for everyone, but Democrats control both chambers of the Legislature and went for targeted relief instead.

    Bill Clinton’s keeping score

    FORMER PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON on Wednesday: “Since the end of the Cold War in 1989, America has created 51 million new jobs. I swear I checked this three times. Even I couldn’t believe it. What’s the score? Democrats 50, Republicans one.”

    THE FACTS: The math shows Clinton is technically right, but the underlying story is more nuanced. There were four recessions since the end of the Cold War — each of them beginning during the Republican presidencies of George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush and Donald Trump. That’s the simplest explanation for the trend outlined by Clinton.

    Let’s get precise: The U.S. economy has added almost 51.6 million jobs since January 1989, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That includes a net 1.3 million jobs added under Republicans.

    It’s worth noting that this simple scoreboard is incomplete. There can be reasons for a recession that have nothing to do necessarily with the president — as market economies can have minds of their own. There can be bad policy choices in previous administrations that led to downturns happening later. And job growth generally comes from the combination of rising populations, improvements in workers’ skills and the actions of private employers. The U.S. economy is big and diverse enough that areas in the industrial Midwest struggled even as parts of the Sunbelt boomed.

    After George H.W. Bush endured a brief downturn, the economy recovered and 2.3 million jobs were added during his term. But Americans still felt the economy was poor and elected Clinton.

    Growth jumped during Clinton’s eight years as more women entered the labor force and 22.9 million jobs were added. But shortly after he left office, the tech bubble in the stock market burst and the U.S. economy entered into a brief recession. The economy shed jobs for a little over two years, then mounted a comeback only to slam headfirst into the mortgage bust and the 2008 financial crisis that produced the Great Recession and mass layoffs. Still, over eight years, George W. Bush added a little over 2.1 million jobs because the U.S. population was still growing.

    Democrat Barack Obama inherited the disastrous economy in early 2009 and endured a grindingly slow but successful recovery. The U.S. economy added 11.3 million jobs.

    Trump took the presidency and promised an unprecedented economic boom. The job market continued to build on its health during Obama’s final four years, only to get crushed by the coronavirus pandemic as shutdowns for health reasons led to unemployment. As a result, the country had 3.1 million fewer jobs when his term ended.

    President Joe Biden oversaw a recovery with additional pandemic aid and other investments that accelerated hiring, but it was accompanied by higher inflation that left much of the public feeling pessimistic about the economy. Still, his presidency — still ongoing — has added more than 15.8 million jobs.

    Whether Trump said women should be punished for having abortions

    ALEXIS MCGILL JOHNSON, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Action Fund, on Wednesday: “Do we want a president who said women should be punished for having abortions?”

    THE FACTS: Asked whether he would be comfortable with states deciding to punish women who access abortions after the procedure is banned, Trump said in an April interview with Time magazine: “The states are going to say. It’s irrelevant whether I’m comfortable or not. It’s totally irrelevant, because the states are going to make those decisions.”

    Trump said outright during his 2016 campaign that women who get illegal abortions should receive “some form of punishment.” The comment came during a heated exchange with MSNBC host Chris Matthews at a town hall taping in Green Bay, Wisconsin.

    But Trump quickly did an about-face. His campaign sought within hours to take back his comment in two separate statements, ultimately saying he believes abortion providers — not their patients — should be the ones punished.

    The first statement said he believed the issue should rest with state governments, while the second entirely rejected the idea that a woman should face repercussions for undergoing an illegal abortion.

    “If Congress were to pass legislation making abortion illegal and the federal courts upheld this legislation, or any state were permitted to ban abortion under state and federal law, the doctor or any other person performing this illegal act upon a woman would be held legally responsible, not the woman,” Trump said in the second statement. “The woman is a victim in this case as is the life in her womb.”

    Trump faced backlash from both abortion-rights supporters and anti-abortion activists, The Associated Press reported at the time.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Melissa Goldin in New York, Josh Boak in Chicago and Steve Karnowski in Minneapolis, contributed to this report.

    ___

    Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Latest: Candidates try to counter criticisms in dueling speeches

    The Latest: Candidates try to counter criticisms in dueling speeches

    [ad_1]

    Derided by Donald Trump as a “communist,” Vice President Kamala Harris is playing up her street cred as a capitalist. Attacked by Harris as a rich kid who got $400 million from his father on a “silver platter,” Trump is leaning into his raw populism.

    The two presidential candidates delivered dueling speeches Wednesday that reflect how they’re honing their economic messages for voters in battleground states. Both are trying to counter criticism of them while laying out their best case for a public that still worries about the economy’s health.

    Follow the AP’s Election 2024 coverage at: https://apnews.com/hub/election-2024.

    Here’s the latest:

    Speaker Johnson demands Zelenskyy remove Ukraine’s ambassador to US after Pennsylvania visit

    House Speaker Mike Johnson is calling on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to fire his country’s ambassador to the U.S. as Republicans criticize the war-torn leader’s visit to a swing-state Pennsylvania site producing munitions for the Russia-Ukraine war as a political stunt.

    The Republican Johnson’s demand Wednesday came as Zelenskyy addressed the United Nations in New York on the eve of his visit to Washington, D.C., where he has plans Thursday to brief senators on Capitol Hill about the war effort before meeting with President Joe Biden at the White House.

    “The tour was clearly a partisan campaign event designed to help Democrats and is clearly election interference,” Johnson wrote in a letter to Zelenskyy.

    Johnson said no Republicans were invited to the plant tour arranged by Ambassador Oksana Markarova to Scranton, Pennsylvania, which is Biden’s hometown.

    Johnson called the visit an “intentionally political move” and said it “has caused Republicans to lose trust in Ambassador Markarova’s ability to fairly and effectively serve as a diplomat in this country. She should be removed from her post immediately.”

    Read more here.

    Majority of Chinese Americans plan to vote this November

    More than three-fourths of Chinese Americans say they plan to vote in the upcoming general election, according to a survey conducted by the Committee of 100 and the NORC Center for Public Affairs at the University of Chicago.

    Potential voter turnout is one of several findings released Wednesday from the survey of 504 Chinese American adults. Other questions examine the threats and discrimination members of the community face, along with concerns over the impact of China-U.S. relations on the community.

    Chinese Americans make up more than a quarter of the Asian American population, the fastest growing segment in the U.S., the survey said. In an election expected to be decided by just thousands of votes in a small number of states, voter turnout will be critical.

    Vivien Leung, an assistant professor of Political Science, Santa Clara University, who worked on the report estimated that the Chinese American turnout was 55 percent in 2020. She said the turnout was lower than for other Asian American Pacific Islander groups. “Understanding the mental health, discrimination and political perspectives of Chinese Americans is essential to create inclusive and informed policies,” said Cindy Tsai, Interim President, Committee of 100. The Committee of 100 is a New York-based advocacy group for Chinese Americans.

    A Democratic group is setting aside money to give to states for post-election litigation

    The Democratic Association of Secretaries of State says it’s setting aside $5 million to give to states’ top elections officers for post-election litigation.

    What to know about the 2024 Election

    The group is launching a legal defense fund to help the Democratic Secretaries of State in Maine, Michigan, Nevada and North Carolina with expected litigation over the results of the 2024 election. The step comes as former President Donald Trump has signaled that he’ll challenge a possible loss in court.

    “This effort will help ensure that Secretaries of State can do their jobs of administering free and fair elections, and ensure that voters have their voices heard at the ballot box,” Travis Brimm, the group’s executive director, said in a statement.

    Trump’s campaign says he’ll hold a rally in town that was site of July assassination attempt

    Trump next month plans to return to Butler, Pennsylvania, where he was struck by a bullet in an assassination attempt.

    The former president’s campaign said Wednesday that Trump will hold a rally Oct. 5 at the same place he did during the July 13 attack.

    The Republican presidential candidate plans to honor Corey Comperatore, the ex-fire chief who was shot and killed at the July rally, along with two other attendees who were injured by the shooter.

    “After not one, but two attempts on his life in the past nine weeks, President Trump is more determined than ever to see his mission through to the end,” Trump’s campaign said in a statement.

    Biden’s advice for Harris to win the election is for her to ‘be herself’

    President Joe Biden said his advice to Vice President Kamala Harris for winning the November election was to “be herself.”

    Biden was in New York on Wednesday and sat down with the co-hosts of ABC’s “The View.” He fielded a range of questions about the presidential race, ending his reelection campaign and tensions in the Middle East.

    Biden endorsed Harris for the Democratic presidential nomination and said she is “smart as hell.”

    “She has the energy. She has the intelligence. She has the grit. She has the stamina, and she has the guts to do the right thing,” he said.

    Biden, 81, also said he was “at peace” with his decision to end his campaign but remained confident he could have defeated Republican Donald Trump.

    Harris will visit the US-Mexico border on Friday

    Vice President Kamala Harris is visiting the U.S.-Mexico border in Arizona on Friday as her campaign increasingly tries to make the issue of immigration more of a strength.

    That push could counter a line of attack from Harris’ opponent, former President Donald Trump.

    Two people familiar with the matter confirmed the trip but insisted on anonymity Wednesday to confirm details that had not been announced publicly.

    Trump has built his campaign partly around calling for cracking down on immigration and the southern border, even endorsing using police and the military to carry out mass deportations should he be elected in November.

    Since taking over for President Joe Biden at the top of the Democratic presidential ticket, Harris has leaned into her experience as a former attorney general of California, saying she frequently visited the border and prosecuted drug and people smuggling gangs in that post.

    As she campaigns around the country, the vice president has also frequently criticized top Republicans for voting down a sweeping, bipartisan immigration package in Congress earlier this year after Trump opposed it.

    — By Zeke Miller and Colleen Long

    Wisconsin mayor says he did nothing wrong when he removed an absentee ballot drop box

    The mayor of a central Wisconsin city who ran for office on his opposition to absentee ballot drop boxes said Wednesday he did nothing wrong when he put on work gloves, donned a hard hat and used a dolly to cart away a drop box outside City Hall.

    Wausau Mayor Doug Diny posed for a picture Sunday to memorialize his removal of the city’s lone drop box that had been put outside City Hall around the same time late last week that absentee ballots were sent to voters.

    “This is no different than the maintenance guy moving it out there,” Diny said Wednesday. “I’m a member of staff. There’s nothing nefarious going on here. I’m hoping for a good result.”

    The move, which prompted a protest in the city Tuesday night and anger among drop box advocates, is the latest example in swing state Wisconsin of the fight over whether communities will allow absentee ballot drop boxes. Several Republican-run municipalities, including six in Milwaukee County, two in Waukesha County and three in Dodge County, have opted against using drop boxes for the presidential election in November, while they’re being embraced in heavily Democratic cities including Milwaukee and Madison.

    The Wisconsin Supreme Court, then controlled by conservatives, banned the use of drop boxes in 2022. But in July, the now-liberal controlled court reversed that decision and said drop boxes could be used. However, the court left it up to each community to decide whether to install them.

    Vance says the war in Ukraine has taken resources ‘at a time when Americans are suffering’

    Vance says the “biggest problem” with the Russia-Ukraine war is that it “has distracted and consumed a lot of resources at a time when Americans are suffering.”

    During a call Wednesday with reporters about union support for the Trump-Vance campaign, the GOP vice presidential nominee echoed Trump’s claims that “Russia would have never invaded Ukraine” if Trump, not Biden, had been in office.

    And if Trump is returned to the White House, Vance said “everything is going to be on the table, but I think that nothing is going to definitively be on the table” in terms of Trump’s approach to negotiating an end to the war.

    Vance did not respond directly when asked about Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s recent criticism of him as “too radical” in an interview with The New Yorker. The Ohio senator has criticized U.S. support for Ukraine in the war, saying in his speech at the Republican National Convention this summer that there should be “no more free rides for nations that betray the generosity of the American taxpayer.”

    Vance says he doesn’t think he needs to prepare as much as Walz is for the debate

    Republican vice presidential nominee JD Vance says he’s not planning to have a debate camp because “we have well developed views on public policy.”

    Speaking to reporters on a call with union supporters Wednesday, the Ohio senator said he feels no pressure to do “anything similar” to the debate preparation being done by Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the Democratic vice presidential nominee.

    “I don’t think we have to prepare that much” because “we don’t have to hide our record from the American people,” Vance said.

    Vance also said former President Donald Trump supports the rights of workers to unionize and collectively bargain, but he demurred from full-throated support by also saying states should choose their own labor laws that can support or reduce unionization efforts.

    Trump’s supporters gather at a manufacturing plant ahead of speech

    Trump was set to address a relatively small crowd inside a massive Charlotte-area manufacturing plant.

    The Republican former president’s supporters gathered among metal machines and and palettes of red, white and blue tubing. Trump’s podium was flanked by rows of work stations, metal beams and a large campaign sign that proclaimed, “JOBS! JOBS! JOBS!”

    Harris will do a sit down interview with MSNBC

    Vice President Kamala Harris will sit down with Stephanie Ruhle of MSNBC on Wednesday in Pittsburgh.

    The Democratic candidate is visiting the city to give a speech on the economy and manufacturing.

    Harris has faced criticism for avoiding media interviews during her abbreviated campaign for the presidency. The conversation with Ruhle will be her first one-on-one interview with a national network since becoming her party’s nominee. Harris previously sat down with CNN’s Dana Bash alongside Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, her running mate.

    Top Muslim-voter organization endorses Harris as Middle East conflict escalates

    Vice President Kamala Harris has secured the endorsement of one of the nation’s largest Muslim American voter mobilization groups, marking a significant boost to her campaign since many Muslim and Arab American organizations have opted to support third-party candidates or not endorse.

    Emgage Action, the political arm of an 18-year-old Muslim American advocacy group, endorsed Harris’ presidential campaign Wednesday, saying in a statement provided first to The Associated Press that the group “recognizes the responsibility to defeat” former President Donald Trump in November.

    The group, based in Washington D.C., operates in eight states, with a significant presence in the key battlegrounds of Michigan and Pennsylvania. The organization will now focus its ongoing voter-outreach efforts on supporting Harris, in addition to down-ballot candidates.

    A tale of crushing security lapses and missed chances to stop the man who shot Trump

    The acting director of the Secret Service was incensed at what had happened that July evening. “What I saw made me ashamed,” Ronald Rowe Jr. said. “I cannot defend why that roof was not better secured.”

    The unguarded roof, easily within shooting distance of the rally stage, is just one of the myriad questions behind the worst Secret Service security failure in decades. The more that investigators unpack from that day, the more missed opportunities that could have prevented the attack are revealed.

    As the United States grapples with a second attempt on Donald Trump’s life, in Florida, there remains a reckoning to be done from the Pennsylvania shooting on July 13 that killed one man and wounded three — the ex-president among them.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ohio Haitians Bring Criminal Charges Against Trump, Vance Over Springfield Comments

    Ohio Haitians Bring Criminal Charges Against Trump, Vance Over Springfield Comments

    [ad_1]

    News Talk Cleveland Featured Video

    CLOSE

    Source: Michael M. Santiago / Getty

    A Haitian group in Ohio has brought criminal charges against former President Donald Trump and Ohio Senator JD Vance. These charges stem from comments made about the Haitian population in Springfield, Ohio.

    The nonprofit, called Haitian Bridge Alliance, filed at Clark County Municipal Court on Tuesday. You can see the list of charges by scrolling down.

    In a recent debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump stated the Haitian community in Springfield is eating household pets like cats and dogs.

    Get Breaking News & Exclusive Content in Your Inbox:  

    From FOX 8:

    The attorney for the organization says there is probable cause the two committed crimes and they want a judge to affirm that, file charges and issue arrest warrants for both men.

    “We want the judge to issue arrest warrants for Trump and Vance immediately, there is probable cause,” lead counsel Subodh Chandra told the FOX 8 I-Team Tuesday.

    Reports show that Trump and Vance are being accused of disrupting public service, making false alarms, committing telecommunications harassment, committing aggravated menacing, and Violating the prohibition against complicity.

    Lead counsel for Haitian Bridge Alliance said in a statement, “We want the judge to issue arrest warrants for Trump and Vance immediately, there is probable cause.”

    It is unknown if at this time if the Springfield Municipal Court will issue charges against Trump and Vance.

    This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

    For His Next Scam, Donald Trump Is Now Pushing Tokens For His Poorly Explained New Crytpo Platform, World Liberty Financial

    VP Kamala Harris ‘Glad’ Trump Wasn’t Assassinated In Latest Attempt On His Life

    Donald Trump, Subject Of Apparent Assassination Attempt At His Florida Golf Course

    [ad_2]

    Matty Willz

    Source link

  • Oops: Cat at Center of JD Vance’s Pet-Eating Claims Is Alive and Well

    Oops: Cat at Center of JD Vance’s Pet-Eating Claims Is Alive and Well

    [ad_1]

    “We have told those at the national level that they are speaking these things that are untrue,” Springfield mayor Rob Rue, a registered Republican, told the Journal, adding that the claims have nevertheless been “repeated and doubled down on.”

    Today in the horrifying effects of antiabortion laws

    In Louisiana’s rush to criminalize the possession of abortion medicine, GOP lawmakers may end up killing new mothers. Per The Washington Post:

    Staff in some Louisiana hospitals are doing timed drills, sprinting from patient rooms and through halls to the locked medicine closets where the drugs used for abortions, incomplete miscarriages and postpartum hemorrhaging will have to be kept—as newly categorized controlled substances—starting Oct. 1. That’s hardly the only preparation taking place across the state as a law targeting mifepristone and misoprostol, the first of its kind in the country, goes into effect in two weeks.

    Pharmacists are still trying to decipher guidance from state officials about the two drugs and the diagnosis codes that will be required before prescriptions for them can be filled. And they and doctors are speaking out about the extra layers of difficulty expected because of the law, which they worry will put patients experiencing serious pregnancy-related complications at even greater risk.

    In addition to inducing abortions, misoprostol is also used, among other things, to stop postpartum hemorrhages, which just so happen to be a leading cause of maternal mortality in Louisiana.

    “It adds a few minutes,” Jennifer Avegno, director of the New Orleans Health Department, told the Post of the upcoming restrictions on the drug. “Most patients would likely make it. But I’ve seen myself what can happen when someone is bleeding out from a miscarriage. And a few minutes could mean life and death in some cases.”

    Republicans continue to grossly suggest Harris isn’t really a mother despite stepchildren she helped raise

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Elsewhere!

    Trump’s Talk of Prosecution Rattles Election Officials

    The New York TimesRead More

    JD Vance got a former professor to delete a blog post Vance wrote in 2012 attacking GOP over anti-immigrant rhetoric

    CNN • Read More

    Teamsters will not endorse for president, in blow to Democrats

    The Washington PostRead More

    The Dangers of America’s Fraught Political Climate

    Vanity FairRead More

    How JD Vance Became Trump’s Pet Liar

    New YorkRead More

    Zuckerberg shrinks from politics as Musk goes all-in for Trump

    The Washington PostRead More

    House Republicans poised to reject funding bill with shutdown just around the corner

    NBC News • Read More

    Laura Loomer Ate Dog Food for a Company That Is Obsessed With “Masculinity” and Being “Naked”

    Vanity FairRead More

    Train cancelled after squirrels board and ‘refuse to leave’

    The TelegraphRead More

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • JD Vance Says NATO Should Only Get Support If Europe Plays Nice With Elon Musk

    JD Vance Says NATO Should Only Get Support If Europe Plays Nice With Elon Musk

    [ad_1]

    JD Vance, vice presidential candidate and generally weird guy, made a recent appearance on the YouTube show of Shawn Ryan where he defended the honor of Elon Musk. Strangely, Vance insisted that if European countries aren’t nicer to the billionaire owner of X, the U.S. shouldn’t support the NATO alliance.

    Vance told Ryan he forgot “exactly which official it was within the European Union,” who had been mean to Musk, but said the regulator “sent Elon this threatening letter that basically said, ‘We’re going to arrest you if you platform Donald Trump, who by the way is the likely next president of the United States.’”

    Vance appears to be thinking of Thierry Breton, a European regulator, sent Musk a letter back in August. Breton was concerned about the way extremist content has been promoted recently on X, though he didn’t threaten to arrest Musk. Vance insisted all of this amounted to censorship, a word he doesn’t seem to understand very well.

    “So what America should be saying is, ‘Oh, if NATO wants us to continue supporting them and NATO wants us to continue to be a good participant in this military alliance, why don’t you respect American values and respect free speech,’” Vance said.

    To be clear, there’s nothing in the NATO treaty that requires European countries to ignore their own laws about the spread of misinformation and hate speech in order to appease the U.S. or senators from Ohio, for that matter.

    “It’s insane that we would support a military alliance if that military alliance isn’t going to be pro-free speech,” Vance continued. “I think we can do both, but we’ve got to say American power comes with certain strings attached. One of those is respect free speech, especially in our European allies.”

    Vance then went on to insult other nations of the world while trying to put Europe in its place.

    “Like, look, I’m not going to go to some backwards country and tell them how to live their lives, but European countries should theoretically share American values, especially about some very basic things like free speech,” Vance said.

    Vance has been a controversial figure ever since he was named as Trump’s running mate, repeatedly insulting people who don’t have children and saying that “childless cat ladies” are ruining America. The vice presidential candidate was also instrumental in spreading a racist lie that Haitian migrants to Ohio were eating pets in the town of Springfield, Ohio.

    But somehow the entire Trump campaign seems to become more and more extreme and racist by the day. An ad Trump posted Tuesday to Truth Social depicts Harris and Walz in 1960s-style Chinese Communist attire and calls Walz a Manchurian candidate. The ad is replete with racist music, featuring racist claims, and is just one of the more racist things you’ll see come out of any so-called “mainstream” political campaign.

    There are 49 days until Election Day. If you haven’t registered to vote, you should do that. Because this election matters.

    [ad_2]

    Matt Novak

    Source link

  • Springfield, Ohio, schools ramp up security after false claims about Haitian immigrants prompt bomb threats

    Springfield, Ohio, schools ramp up security after false claims about Haitian immigrants prompt bomb threats

    [ad_1]

    The city of Springfield, Ohio, is stepping up security as viral, false claims about Haitian immigrants stealing and eating pets continue to circulate after being amplified by former President Donald Trump and his running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance.

    Gov. Mike DeWine announced Monday afternoon he was sending three dozen state troopers to provide added security to schools in the city after a “series of unfounded bomb threats.”

    “Look, parents are scared, and when parents are scared, we need to react. And I don’t blame them,” DeWine said in an interview with CBS News.

    The Republican governor said in a statement that many of the threats “are coming in from overseas” from people “who want to fuel the current discord surrounding Springfield.”

    DeWine has pushed back against the false claims about immigrants, saying that he trusts city officials who say they have not received any credible reports of such conduct.

    “The internet is the internet. Crazy stuff occurs on the internet. You read crazy stuff all the time. It gets spread. And I think sometimes, you know, that’s just what happens. So my job, I think, and the job of the mayor, is to say, ‘Look, this is not true,’” DeWine said.

    The decision to station state troopers came after two elementary schools in Springfield were evacuated and two local colleges moved their classes online due to the threats. The city also canceled a major cultural festival at the end of the month as a safety precaution.

    “If they just backed off their words a little bit, this could help our environment. This would help. We need help, not hate. We need help,” Springfield Mayor Rob Rue told CBS News.

    Over the weekend, members of the far-right Proud Boys were seen marching through the streets, and a branch of the Ku Klux Klan spread leaflets with hateful messages.

    Last week, Vance shared the baseless rumor on social media, saying, “Reports now show that people have had their pets abducted and eaten by people who shouldn’t be in this country.”

    Trump then repeated it during his debate against Vice President Kamala Harris. “In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs — the people that came in — they’re eating the cats,” Trump said at the debate. “They’re eating — they’re eating the pets of the people that live there. And this is what’s happening in our country, and it’s a shame.”

    Vance addressed the controversy over the weekend, saying he condemns all violence, but he also defended sharing the debunked claims and refused to correct the record.

    “People are frustrated with the national media attention. Some people are also grateful that finally someone is paying attention to what’s going on,” Vance said on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan.” “You’re never going to get this stuff perfect.”

    In an interview with CNN’s Dana Bash, Vance said, “If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention the suffering of the American people, then that’s what I’m going to do.”

    When asked if it’s OK for a senator to make something up, DeWine said, “Well, I don’t know that that’s what he meant. I think he wants to use this, I guess, to illustrate a problem that we really do have, and that is a problem along our southern border.”

    The governor acknowledged that there are challenges that come with 15,000 immigrants settling in a city with a population of just under 60,000 in the last couple of years — like health care systems being overloaded.

    In Springfield’s Little Haiti, Romane Pierre is a manager at a Creole restaurant that has been bombarded with calls. He believes Vance should apologize.

    “A lot of people call me and say, ‘Do you sell cat, do you sell dog?’ I say, ‘No, we don’t sell these kinds of things,’” Pierre said.

    “Haitian are good people,” he added.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 9/15: Face the Nation

    9/15: Face the Nation

    [ad_1]

    9/15: Face the Nation – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    This week on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Republican vice-presidential nominee Sen. JD Vance of Ohio talks about his amplification of false claims about Haitian immigrants in his home state. Plus, former Trump economic adviser Gary Cohn talks about the former president’s tariff plan.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • JD Vance Downplays Laura Loomer’s Racist Comments, Doubles Down On Immigrant Conspiracy

    JD Vance Downplays Laura Loomer’s Racist Comments, Doubles Down On Immigrant Conspiracy

    [ad_1]

    Senator JD Vance continued to peddle unfounded claims about Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, on Sunday and said he didn’t “like” far-right activist Laura Loomer’s racist social media post about Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris.

    When NBC’s Meet the Press Kristen Welker asked Vance about Loomer’s comments, he alleged that he’d only read them this morning, because “I knew that you’d ask me about it.”

    “Look, Kristen,” Vance began, “I make a mean chicken curry, I don’t think that it’s insulting for anybody to talk about their dietary preferences or what they want to do in the White House.”

    “Do I agree with what Laura Loomer said about Kamala Harris? No, I don’t. I also don’t think that this is actually an issue of national import. Is Laura Loomer running for president? No,” he continued. “Kamala Harris is running for president, and whether you’re eating curry at your dinner table or fried chicken, things have gotten more expensive thanks to her policies.”

    In addition to her comments about Harris, Loomer has been in the news this month for her increasing influence on Donald Trump’s campaign for the presidency. Loomer was among those Trump took on his private plane en route to Philadelphia for ABC’s presidential debate last week. When asked about this, Trump responded that “a lot” of people fly with him because “it’s a very big plane.” Trump said Loomer is a “free spirit” and “supporter.”

    Trump was also alongside Loomer at official September 11 memorials in New York and Pennsylvania this week. Loomer has promoted the conspiracy that 9/11 was an “inside job” and recently said in a CNN interview that, “I’ve never denied the fact that Islamic terrorists carried out the 9/11 terrorist attacks. In fact, the media calls me anti Muslim precisely for the reason that I spend so much time focusing on talking about the threats of Islamic terrorism in America.”

    On Sunday, Welker pressed Vance on Loomer’s comments and how they relate to his Indian-American wife and potential second lady, Usha Vance.

    “Senator, were you and your wife offended, and do you disavow those comments that even some Trump allies say are blatantly racist?” Welker asked. “Kristen, I just told you, I don’t like those comments,” Vance replied. “I also don’t look at the internet for every single thing to get offended by.”

    Loomer saw Vance on Meet The Press—and lauded the VP hopeful’s responses.

    “Vance,” Loomer wrote on X, formerly Twitter, “has done a fantastic job as an Ohio Senator, and he has given a voice to the forgotten men and women who want to talk about real issues.”

    “Donald Trump and JD Vance are giving those people a voice to tell the TRUTH about how they are being replaced by Kamala Harris’s invaders,” she posted, adding, “PS: I hope I can try the Senator’s chicken curry one of these days.”

    Minutes before in the interview, Vance again doubled down on the unfounded claim that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, are harming and eating household pets and geese.

    “Months ago, I raised the issue of Haitian illegal immigrants draining social services and generally causing chaos all over Springfield, Ohio,” Vance posted on X earlier this week.

    “Reports now show that people have had their pets abducted and eaten by people who shouldn’t be in this country. Where is our border czar?”

    So far, the xenophobic rumors have been spouted by Vance, Elon Musk, Charlie Kirk, the founder and president of Turning Point USA, and Trump himself—to name a few.

    On the debate stage in Philadelphia on Tuesday night, Trump said without any proof, “In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs. The people that came in. They’re eating the cats. They’re eating—they’re eating the pets of the people that live there.”

    [ad_2]

    Katie Herchenroeder

    Source link

  • JD Vance defends amplifying false claims about immigrants, saying “you’re never going to get this stuff perfect”

    JD Vance defends amplifying false claims about immigrants, saying “you’re never going to get this stuff perfect”

    [ad_1]

    Washington — Sen. JD Vance, the Republican nominee for vice president, on Sunday defended amplifying debunked claims about Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, while refusing to correct the record amid threats to the community in recent days.  

    “People are frustrated with the national media attention. Some people are also grateful that finally, someone is paying attention to what’s going on,” Vance, Ohio’s junior senator, said on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan.” “You’re never going to get this stuff perfect.”

    Vance and former President Donald Trump, along with other allies, have amplified baseless rumors about immigrants in the Ohio city in recent days. On Sept. 9, Vance wrote in a post on X that people “have had their pets abducted and eaten by people who shouldn’t be in this country,” while putting the blame on the Biden-Harris administration. Then, Trump reiterated the claim during the presidential debate against Vice President Kamala Harris, before pledgeding to deport the legal Haitian immigrants to Venezuela days later. 

    Meanwhile, there have been bomb threats in recent days against schools and hospitals in the Springfield area, according to officials, sending hospitals into lockdowns and prompting multiple schools to evacuate. 

    Vance condemned the threats of violence on Sunday, making clear that the individuals who made the threats should be “prosecuted to the full extent of the law.” But he added that “we don’t believe in a heckler’s veto in this country.”

    vance-ftn-09152024.png
    Sen. JD Vance on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Sept. 15, 2024.

    CBS News


    “You can condemn violence, on the one hand, while also saying that there have been terrible problems caused by Kamala Harris’ open border in Springfield,” Vance said. 

    When asked about members of the Proud Boys marching through Springfield on Saturday, Vance said while he doesn’t align himself with the views of the far-right group, the development is being used as a distraction from the larger issues facing Springfield. 

    “I am much more concerned about the vice president of the United States failing to do her job than I am that a dozen people carried the wrong flag when they were marching in Springfield, Ohio, yesterday,” Vance added. 

    On the claims related to immigrants eating pets, Vance said he’s heard “about a dozen things” from constituents, 10 of which he said are verifiable.

    Springfield’s police chief, mayor and Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, a Republican, have all made clear that there have been no credible reports of pets being stolen and eaten by immigrants. And while DeWine refuted the claim to CBS News last week, the governor acknowledged that there are challenges that come with 15,000 immigrants settling in a city with a population of just under 60,000 in the last couple of years — like health care systems being overloaded. 

    Vance pointed to the significant increase of immigrants moving to Springfield, arguing that the toll on the city’s health care and education systems has amounted to a “terrible tragedy.”

    “We’re not mad at Haitian migrants for wanting to have a better life,” Vance said. “We’re angry at Kamala Harris for letting this happen to a small Ohio town. And thank God Donald Trump has called attention to it and would fight back against these policies if the American people reward him with the presidency.”

    Vance has blamed Harris for implementing a program that brought the immigrants to Ohio. Under the temporary protected status program, thousands of immigrants from countries experiencing armed conflict or environmental disasters have been provided deportation protections and work permits under multiple administrations. 

    Vance claimed inaccurately on Sunday that Trump extended the Temporary Protected Status for Haiti in 2017 before ending it in 2018. But the status, which was first created in 2010 and extended by the Obama administration multiple times, was also extended in 2020 after the Trump administration’s effort to bring an end to the status was struck down in court. It has since been extended by the Biden administration. 

    Vance also reiterated the baseless claims about immigrants eating pets on Saturday, responding on X to a video that alleged immigrants in Dayton, Ohio, were eating cats. 

    “Kamala Harris and her media apparatchiks should be ashamed of themselves,” the Ohio Republican said. “Another ‘debunked’ story that turned out to have merit.”

    Police in Dayton, Ohio, said Saturday that there is no evidence immigrants are eating pets, calling the claims “outlandish.”

    Asked about the newest claim on Sunday, Vance said by sharing it, he was representing his Ohio constituents and their concerns. 

    “Everybody who has dealt with a large influx of migration knows that sometimes there are cultural practices that seem very far out there to a lot of Americans. Are we not allowed to talk about this in the United States of America?” Vance said. “I’m going to talk about what my constituents are sending me.” 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Venture capitalists are divided on Harris or Trump

    Venture capitalists are divided on Harris or Trump

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES (AP) — Being a venture capitalist carries a lot of prestige in Silicon Valley. Those who choose which startups to fund see themselves as fostering the next big waves of technology.

    So when some of the industry’s biggest names endorsed former President Donald Trump and the onetime VC he picked for a running mate, JD Vance, people took notice.

    Then hundreds of other VCs — some high profile, others lesser-known — threw their weight behind Vice President Kamala Harris, drawing battle lines over which presidential candidate will be better for tech innovation and the conditions startups need to thrive. For years, many of Silicon Valley’s political discussions took place behind closed doors. Now, those casual debates have gone public — on podcasts, social media and online manifestos.

    Venture capitalist and Harris backer Stephen DeBerry says some of his best friends support Trump. Though centered in a part of Northern California known for liberal politics, the investors who help finance the tech industry have long been a more politically divided bunch.

    “We ski together. Our families are together. We’re super tight,” said DeBerry, who runs the Bronze Venture Fund. “This is not about not being able to talk to each other. I love these guys — they’re almost all guys. They’re dear friends. We just have a difference of perspective on policy issues.”

    It remains to be seen if the more than 700 venture capitalists who’ve voiced support for a movement called “VCs for Kamala” will match the pledges of Trump’s well-heeled supporters such as Elon Musk and Peter Thiel. But the effort marks “the first time I’ve seen a galvanized group of folks from our industry coming together and coalescing around our shared values,” DeBerry said.

    “There are a lot of practical reasons for VCs to support Trump,” including policies that could drive corporate profits and stock market values and favor wealthy benefactors, said David Cowan, an investor at Bessemer Venture Partners. But Cowan said he is supporting Harris as a VC with a “long-term investment horizon” because a “Trump world reeling from rampant income inequality, raging wars and global warming is not an attractive environment” for funding healthy businesses.

    Several prominent VCs have voiced their support for Trump on Musk’s social platform X. Public records show some of them have donated to a new, pro-Trump super PAC called America PAC, whose donors include powerful tech industry conservatives with ties to SpaceX and Paypal and who run in Musk’s social circle. Also driving support is Trump’s embrace of cryptocurrency and promise to end an enforcement crackdown on the industry.

    Although some Biden policies have alienated parts of the investment sector concerned about tax policy, antitrust scrutiny or overregulation, Harris’ bid for the presidency has reenergized interest from VCs who until recently sat on the sidelines. Some of that excitement is due to existing relationships with Silicon Valley that are borne out of Harris’ career in the San Francisco area and her time as California’s attorney general.

    “We buy risk, right? And we’re trying to buy the right type of risk,” Leslie Feinzaig, founder of “VCs for Kamala” said in an interview. “It’s really hard for these companies that are trying to build products and scale to do so in an unpredictable institutional environment.”

    What to know about the 2024 Election

    The schism in tech has left some firms split in their allegiances. Although venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, founders of the firm that is their namesake, endorsed Trump, one of their firm’s general partners, John O’Farrell, pledged his support for Harris. O’Farrell declined further comment.

    Doug Leone, the former managing partner of Sequoia Capital, endorsed Trump in June, expressing concern on X “about the general direction of our country, the state of our broken immigration system, the ballooning deficit, and the foreign policy missteps, among other issues.” But Leone’s longtime business partner at Sequoia, Michael Moritz, wrote in the Financial Times that tech leaders supporting Trump “are making a big mistake.”

    Shaun Maguire, a partner at Sequoia, posted on X that he donated $300,000 to Trump’s campaign after supporting Hilary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election. Federal Election Commission records show that Maguire donated $500,000 to America PAC in June; Leone donated $1 million.

    “The area where I disagree with Republicans the most is on women’s rights. And I’m sure I’ll disagree with some of Trump’s policies in the future,” Maguire wrote. “But in general I think he was surprisingly prescient.”

    Feinzaig, managing director at venture firm Graham & Walker, said that she launched “VCs for Kamala” because she felt frustrated that “the loudest voices” were starting to “sound like they were speaking for the entire industry.”

    Much of the VC discourse about elections is in response to a July podcast and manifesto in which Andreessen and Horowitz backed Trump and outlined their vision of a “Little Tech Agenda” that they said contrasted with the policies sought by Big Tech.

    They accused the U.S. government of increasing hostility toward startups and the VCs who fund them, citing Biden’s proposed higher taxes on the wealthy and corporations and regulations they said could hobble emerging industries involving blockchain and artificial intelligence.

    Vance, a U.S. senator from Ohio who spent time in San Francisco working at Thiel’s investment firm, voiced a similar perspective about “little tech” more than a month before he was chosen as Trump’s running mate.

    “The donors who were really involved in Silicon Valley in a pro-Trump way, they’re not big tech, right? They’re little tech. They’re starting innovative companies. They don’t want the government to destroy their ability to innovate,” Vance said in an interview on Fox News in June.

    Days earlier, Vance had joined Trump at a San Francisco fundraiser at the home of venture capitalist and former PayPal executive David Sacks, a longtime conservative. Vance said Trump spoke to about 100 attendees that included “some of the leading innovators in AI.”

    DeBerry said he doesn’t disagree with everything Andreesen Horowitz founders espouse, particularly their wariness about powerful companies controlling the agencies that regulate them. But he objects to their “little tech” framing, especially coming from a multibillion-dollar investment firm that he says is hardly the voice of the little guy. For DeBerry, whose firm focuses on social impact, the choice is not between big and little tech but “chaos and stability,” with Harris representing stability.

    Complicating the allegiances is that a tough approach to breaking up the monopoly power of big corporations no longer falls along partisan lines. Vance has spoken favorably of Lina Khan, who Biden picked to lead the Federal Trade Commission and has taken on several tech giants. Meanwhile, some of the most influential VCs backing Harris — such as LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman; and Sun Microsystems co-founder Vinod Khosla, an early investor in ChatGPT-maker OpenAI — have sharply criticized Khan’s approach.

    U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna, a Democrat whose California district encompasses part of Silicon Valley, said Trump supporters are a vocal minority reflecting a “third or less” of the region’s tech community. But while the White House has appealed to tech entrepreneurs with its investments in clean energy, electric vehicles and semiconductors, Khanna said Democrats must do a better job of showing that they understand the appeal of digital assets.

    “I do think that the perceived lack of embrace of Bitcoin and the blockchain has hurt the Democratic Party among the young generation and among young entrepreneurs,” Khanna said.

    Naseem Sayani, a general partner at Emmeline Ventures, said Andreessen and Horowitz’s support of Trump became a lightning rod for those in tech who do not back the Republican nominee. Sayani signed onto “VCs for Kamala,” she said, because she wanted the types of businesses that she helps fund to know that the investor community is not monolithic.

    “We’re not single-profile founders anymore,” she said. “There’s women, there’s people of color, there’s all the intersections. How can they feel comfortable building businesses when the environment they’re in doesn’t actually support their existence in some ways?”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ohio police dispute new allegations immigrants are eating pets in Dayton

    Ohio police dispute new allegations immigrants are eating pets in Dayton

    [ad_1]

    Police in Dayton, Ohio, have said there is no evidence that immigrants are eating pets, calling new allegations that emerged online on Saturday “irresponsible.” 

    The police statement was issued hours after a new video and article alleged African immigrants in Dayton were seen preparing to grill dead cats. The claim was shared by Sen. JD Vance of Ohio, the Republican vice presidential nominee, Donald Trump Jr., and others on X.

    Dayton Police Chief Kamran Afzal said in a statement, “We stand by our immigrant community and there is no evidence to even remotely suggest that any group, including our immigrant community, is engaged in eating pets. Seeing politicians or other individuals use outlandish information to appeal to their constituents is disheartening.” 

    The new claim followed baseless allegations that Haitian immigrants were abducting and eating pets in Springfield, a city less than 30 miles from Dayton. Former President Donald Trump repeated the claim in Tuesday night’s debate, despite city officials saying there was no evidence of this happening. 

    On Saturday, Vance doubled down on the claims that immigrants were eating pets, sharing the new allegation on X. 

    “Kamala Harris and her media apparatchiks should be ashamed of themselves,” Vance wrote. “Another ‘debunked’ story that turned out to have merit.”

    Since Trump’s debate claims, there have been several bomb threats made against schools and hospitals in the Springfield area. On Saturday, Springfield’s Wittenberg University announced that it would be “taking extreme precautions” after receiving an on-campus shooting threat via email which “targeted Haitian members of our community.”

    In response, the FBI told CBS News in a statement that it was “working in coordination with the Springfield Police Department and Wittenberg University to determine the credibility of recent threats, share information, and take appropriate investigative action.”

    New claim 

    Christopher Rufo, a conservative writer and activist published the new claim on Substack and the allegations are based on a video originally posted to social media in August 2023. 

    CBS News confirmed the original video was first posted to social media in August 2023 by a man who lives in Dayton, Ohio. CBS News reached out to the man for comment but did not hear back on Saturday afternoon.

    The video shows what appears to be animal carcasses on a grill. The man filming the footage alleges, without evidence, that they are cats. 

    “What is this they got on the grill?” the man says in the video. When two cats appear near the grill, the man jokes that the cats “better get missing — looks like his homey’s on the grill!” 

    Rufo said he spoke to the man who filmed the video, and the man believes the carcasses were cats. Rufo said he worked on the story with IM-1776, an online magazine, and one of their reporters visited the building where the incident was alleged to have happened. The reporter spoke to neighbors, who said that African immigrants lived in the building. Neighbors told the reporter they believed the people who owned the grill were also African immigrants, although the residents’ origin or identity wasn’t verified by CBS News.

    The new allegation also prompted backlash and skepticism, with many users saying the carcasses look more like chickens. CBS News has reached out to veterinary experts for their opinion on what type of carcass is on the grill. 

    Dayton Mayor Jeffrey J. Mims, Jr. also issued a statement, calling the claim “totally false and dangerously irresponsible of politicians aiming to sow division and fear.” Mims said there had been “absolutely zero reports of this type of activity.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump’s debate line about immigrants eating pets ‘echoes’ racist rhetoric of past world leaders, professor says

    Trump’s debate line about immigrants eating pets ‘echoes’ racist rhetoric of past world leaders, professor says

    [ad_1]

    During Tuesday’s presidential debate, former President Donald Trump made a claim that quickly went viral on social media — and prompted an immediate fact check.

    During a rant about border control, Trump repeated a conspiracy theory about Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, that has gained traction in some right-wing circles. 

    “In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs, the people that came in,” he said. “They’re eating the cats. They’re eating the pets of the people that live there.”


    MORE: Authors of Jan. 6 graphic novel to send copies to every public high school and library in Pa.


    ABC News anchor and moderator David Muir interjected, saying there are no credible reports of pets being harmed or abused by immigrants in Springfield. But that has not stopped Trump or his running mate, Sen. JD Vance (Ohio), from spreading this and other inflammatory conspiracy theories about Haitian migrants in the Ohio city. In a lengthy Tuesday post to X, formerly known as Twitter, Vance implied that they were also spreading communicable diseases like tuberculosis and HIV.

    Though the extreme nature of these claims might feel new, they have a long and ugly history. Social media users and commentators quickly likened the comments to the dehumanizing rhetoric Nazi Germany deployed against Jewish people leading up to and during World War II. 

    Katie Sibley, a history professor at St. Joseph’s University, believes the comparisons are valid. As she notes, antisemites including Adolf Hitler have long leaned on blood libel myths that date back to the Middle Ages, which accuse Jewish people of kidnapping Christian babies for ritualistic sacrifice. Sometimes, these pernicious stories incorporate cannibalism, with the blood of the children allegedly used to make matzah.

    “It’s really striking,” Sibley said of the similarities in language. “Here we have people who were accused of eating pets, somebody else’s treasured, small, beloved creature. It sort of echoes that.”

    Language’s link to violence

    As scholars have emphasized, dehumanizing language often precedes violence. In the lead-up to the 1994 Rwandan genocide, the Hutu people frequently referred to the Tutsi population as “cockroaches” on a popular radio station. In the mid-1930s, Nazi propaganda depicted Jewish people as worms and “poisonous” serpents. Damaging lies like the blood libel myth were also plastered on the cover of Der Stürmer, the virulently antisemitic German newspaper, and even continued to spread after the concentration camps were liberated. Mobs killed 42 Jews and injured another 40 in a pogrom in the Polish city of Kielce in 1946 after an 8-year-old boy went missing for two days.

    Threats of violence are now starting to emerge in Springfield. Its City Hall was evacuated Thursday over an emailed bomb threat that read, in part, “We have Haitians eating our animals.” The author of the email also claimed to have placed explosives at two DMVs and two elementary schools.

    According to the Haitian Times, many immigrant families in Springfield have kept their children home from school out of fear for their safety.

    Loss of legal rights

    Apart from violence, damaging conspiracy theories are also linked to the suppression of rights throughout history. In 1877, the San Francisco health officer blamed an outbreak of smallpox on “unscrupulous, lying and treacherous Chinamen, who have disregarded our sanitary laws.” Politicians refused to provide Chinese immigrants proper health care, sending them to the filthy “pesthouse” on hospital grounds. 

    This scapegoating and discrimination continued into the 20th century. In 1900, after a Chinese immigrant was diagnosed with the first case of bubonic plague in the United States, the city destroyed local businesses in Chinatown and ransacked homes, burning possessions to “fumigate” the area. The xenophobia toward Chinese immigrants extended far beyond San Francisco, leading to the Chinese Exclusion Act, which banned Chinese laborers from entering the country for a decade.

    “This really had an impact,” Sibley said. “People were very much mistreated. Their communities were cut off, and they were barged in upon by the police.

    “There is that bridge from rhetoric to actual laws.”

    As Sibley notes, racist rhetoric also preceded the internment of about 117,000 Japanese Americans during World War II. Politicians including Chase Clark, the governor of Idaho, compared them to “rats.”

    Trump’s comments in context

    This is not the first time critics have accused Trump of weaponizing language, or echoing Nazi rhetoric. But his and Vance’s comments — along with campaign ads linking immigrants to crime — have alarmed marginalized communities and the historians who have studied these cycles again and again.

    “We think in this country, we’re not going to have those kind of laws anymore,” Sibley said. “You know, we got rid of the Chinese Exclusion Act, and we got rid of internment, of course, after World War II. But remember that when Trump first came into office, he talked about a Muslim registry. 

    I think what’s changed is that the rhetoric has been accepted increasingly, sadly, in the public space.” 


    Follow Kristin & PhillyVoice on Twitter: @kristin_hunt
    | @thePhillyVoice
    Like us on Facebook: PhillyVoice
    Have a news tip? Let us know.

    [ad_2]

    Kristin Hunt

    Source link

  • Your words: ‘It’s upsetting that Donald Trump and JD Vance have such anger and disdain’; ‘We must savor our moments to praise the Supreme Court’

    Your words: ‘It’s upsetting that Donald Trump and JD Vance have such anger and disdain’; ‘We must savor our moments to praise the Supreme Court’

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Shutterstock

    Former President Donald Trump and running mate JD Vance at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee (July 15, 2024)

    ¶ JD Vance’s anger toward educators is bad for families

    J.D. Vance’s angry, hurtful comments that teachers who don’t have children “disorient and really disturb” him are consistent with his long history of attacking families and public schools.

    Teachers, teacher aides, paraprofessionals, school nurses, bus drivers, cafeteria workers, janitors, librarians, social workers, counselors and dozens of other essential school employees work every day to help kids learn and grow. So often they pay for supplies for children out of their own pockets to make sure they have what they need.

    Vance doesn’t seem to understand that being an effective educator and not having biological kids are completely unrelated. I support our educators because they support our kids, and it’s upsetting that Donald Trump and J.D. Vance have such anger and disdain for people who do not share their views.

    Enough is enough. We have more in common than what divides us, and that’s why I am excited for the hopeful vision Kamala Harris and Tim Walz have for our families and the future of our great nation.

    — Reginald Vinson, Altamonte Springs

    ¶ The Supreme Court and Florida’s social media laws: An excellent decision

    Do we consider Facebook, X, Instagram and TikTok newspapers? Editorial mediums? Free-speech platforms? Public space? 

    Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody and the opposing counsel, NetChoice LLC, argued this question last month. Moody defended Florida laws that protected conservative speech online, and upon being challenged in the court, failed to win over the justices in a heated litigation. These laws would prohibit social media companies from removing some conservative posts, and under Florida statutes, reduce “censorship.” 

    To understand this case we must understand how social media companies filter their content: “Third parties,” or anyone who uses social media apps, make content in the form of online posts. These posts are sometimes restricted if the company agrees it’s harmful to other users or unfit for the “content stream.” As summarized by Oyez.com, “[social media companies] curate and edit the content that users see, which involves removing posts that violate community standards and prioritizing posts based on various factors.”

    NetChoice summarized their argument simply: “Content moderation should be understood as an expressive editorial activity afforded stringent First Amendment protection.” In removing “overly conservative” posts, social media companies are either, according to Moody, censoring free speech, or according to NetChoice, expressing free speech, and it all depends on what they are. If they were private companies, which is what the court decided, they are entitled to the same First Amendment rights as you and I. 

    Lawrence Lessig of Harvard, Tim Wu of Columbia, and Zephyr Teachout of Fordham don’t think so. They argued “[Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok] are not space-limited publications dependent on editorial discretion in choosing what topics or issues to highlight. Rather, they are platforms for widespread public expression and discourse. They are their own beast, but they are far closer to a public shopping center or a railroad.”

    This comes as shocking: These professors are liberal, so naturally, they would be opposed to laws protecting conservatism. But they see social media companies as more than private: They see them as vehicles in need of government intervention to protect the common good. This is how this case crosses ideological lines. 

    For three reasons, I affirm the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision to prohibit government intervention in private companies. 

    First, the role of the Supreme Court is to interpret the Constitution. This case considered Florida’s First Amendment protections. They ruled, however, that government intervention in a private company — no matter how big — is unwarranted. Florida, in attempting to protect the rights of conservatives, sacrificed the rights of others, sacrificed the rights of private companies that should have the ability to moderate their platform without intervention from the federal government. I completely and wholeheartedly agree with this stance — preserving the distinction between private and administrative spheres is necessary for a functioning democracy. 

    Second, without considering precedent, let us dive into politics. An inherent contradiction arises, almost a legal cognitive dissonance, on the conservative side in this case. They want to protect the First Amendment by eroding it. They want to limit government intervention, as traditional conservatives do, by increasing it. Proponents of private entities want to erode the notion of what it means to be private, going against the foundation of their ideology.

    Finally, we ask the question: How big is too big a company? At what point does a social media company have too much influence? At what point does a social media company deserve First Amendment restriction? How is it fair that some private companies, started by private citizens, have to worry about First Amendment infringement? 

    These questions can’t be answered. They simply establish the idea that there could never be a point at which the courts could restrict a private entity. An argument could always be made that a corporation is overly biased in content moderation. Similarly, an argument could always be made that the influence of “X” company is not enough to levy government restrictions. In this way, a numerical measure like a certain level of earnings of a private business or an amount of content deemed “biased” could never be made to place government restrictions in the private sector. Similarly, what we deem “conservative” — thus needing government protection from “biased” removal — is arbitrary. 

    The Supreme Court issued the right decision, and the lower courts will follow their lead. We must savor the moments to praise the court, and this is one of them.

    Julius Olavarria, Orlando

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    Orlando Weekly readers

    Source link

  • JD Vance Says the Solution to the Childcare Crisis Is to Have Grandparents Do It for Free

    JD Vance Says the Solution to the Childcare Crisis Is to Have Grandparents Do It for Free

    [ad_1]

    Ever since JD Vance’s comment about the country being run by “childless cat ladies” was met with immense backlash, the VP hopeful and his allies have attempted to spin his complaint as being about the supposed roadblocks Democrats have put up to raising children in the US. “What he was really saying,” Vance’s wife insisted last month, “is that it can be really hard to be a parent in this country, and sometimes our policies are designed in a way that make it even harder.” Take the cost of childcare, which has exploded in recent years. Critics focus on Vance’s words, but he’s actually come up with a solution to the problem that will truly knock your socks off. In fact, you might want to brace yourself for its genius. Ready? Okay. It’s to…have family members take care of your kids for free.

    That’s right: While speaking at a conservative event on Wednesday, Vance was asked, “What can we do about lowering the cost of day care?” His verbatim answer: “Such an important question, Charlie [Kirk], and I think one of the things that we can do is make it easier for families to choose whatever model they want, right? So one of the ways that you might be able to relieve a little bit of pressure on people who are paying so much for day care is…maybe grandma and grandpa [want] to help out a little bit more, or maybe there’s an aunt or uncle that wants to help out a little bit more. If that happens, you relieve some of the pressure on all the resources that we’re spending on day care.”

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Yes, Vance’s brilliant solution to skyrocketing day care costs is for working parents to enlist grandparents and aunts and uncles—who either don’t have jobs of their own or are somehow able to take time off from work—to take care of their kids for free. It’s something stressed-out parents have definitely never thought of, and for the few who actually might have this magical scenario available to them, surely they aren’t taking advantage of it already. It’s so simple that it’s hard to believe child-hating Democrats like Kamala Harris never thought of it themselves.

    But Vance, of course, isn’t so out of touch that he thinks the majority of parents have a roster of family members they can call on to take care of their children for numerous hours a week. So he’s also got another idea: “Now…let’s say you don’t have somebody who can provide that extra set of hands,” he said. “What we’ve got to do is actually empower people to get trained in the skills that they need for the 21st century. We’ve got a lot of people who love kids, who would love to take care of kids but they can’t, either because they don’t have access to the education that they need or, maybe more importantly, because the state government says you’re not allowed to take care of children unless you have some ridiculous certification that has…nothing to do with taking care of kids. So empower people to get the skills they need. Don’t force every early-childcare specialist to go and get a six-year college degree where they’ve got a whole lot of debt and Americans are much poorer because they’re paying out the wazoo for day care. Empower working families, empower people who want to do these things for a living, and that’s what we’ve got to do.”

    So, just to get it out of the way, it’s not clear what “six-year college degree” the senator is talking about that is supposedly required to work at a day care. But apparently his solution—if, again, you don’t have free childcare at your disposal—is to have the government get rid of the pesky regulations currently in place to ensure the individuals looking after your children are qualified to do so. Of course, he doesn’t actually specify what “ridiculous certification” he’d get rid of; perhaps he’s talking about CPR? He definitely could be!

    Incidentally, given these robust policy plans Vance has put forth, you might be wondering what legislation he’s backed during his time in the Senate that would help parents. And the answer is: none that can be identified by the naked eye. Despite calling for a child tax credit of $5,000 per child in an interview with CBS News, he failed to show up for a vote last month on legislation that would—wait for it—expand the child tax credit.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Harris, Trump talking economics on campaign trail

    Harris, Trump talking economics on campaign trail

    [ad_1]

    Harris, Trump talking economics on campaign trail – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Vice President Kamala Harris is unveiling her planned initiatives for small businesses Wednesday at a campaign rally in New Hampshire while former President Donald Trump will deliver an economic address Thursday in New York. CBS News’ Nidia Cavazos and Taurean Small have the latest from both campaigns.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link