ReportWire

Tag: Jane Doe

  • ‘We are heartbroken’: Florida couple sues IVF clinic after DNA test reveals baby isn’t theirs

    [ad_1]

    A Florida couple has filed an emergency lawsuit against a fertility clinic, alleging their newborn child is not genetically related to either of them after an in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedure.The couple, identified in court documents as John and Jane Doe to protect their privacy, is suing IVF Life, Inc. D/B/A Fertility Center of Orlando and Dr. Milton McNichol, M.D.According to the complaint filed in Palm Beach County Circuit Court, the couple used their own egg and sperm to create three viable embryos at the clinic.In March 2025, one of the embryos was implanted in Jane Doe, resulting in a successful full-term pregnancy. The couple’s healthy female child, Baby Doe, was born on Dec. 11, 2025.The parents became suspicious when Baby Doe displayed physical characteristics of a child who was not racially Caucasian, despite both John and Jane Doe being Caucasian.Genetic testing subsequently confirmed that Baby Doe has “no genetic relationship to either of the Plaintiffs,” indicating the implanted embryo was not one of the couple’s.While the Does expressed a deep emotional bond with the child they carried and delivered, the lawsuit states their belief that Baby Doe “should legally and morally be united with her genetic parents.”The couple also fears that another person may be pregnant with or raising one or more of their own embryos or children.The couple claims they notified the defendants on Jan. 5, 2026, requesting cooperation to unite Baby Doe with her genetic parents and to determine the disposition of their remaining embryos. They have received no “substantive response.”The Plaintiffs are seeking emergency injunctive relief, asking the court to compel the defendants to take several actions, including:Immediately notifying all patients who had embryos in storage before Jane Doe’s implantation about the allegations in the complaint and providing them with a copy.Paying for free genetic testing for all patients and their children whose births resulted from embryo implantation through the defendants’ services over the past five years.Disclosing any parentage discrepancies discovered through this testing.Official statement from Fertility Center of OrlandoWe are actively cooperating with an investigation to support one of our patients in determining the source of an error that resulted in the birth of a child who is not genetically related to them. Multiple entities are involved in this process, and all parties are working diligently to help identify when and where the error may have occurred. Our priority remains transparency and the well-being of the patient and child involved. We will continue to assist in any way that we can regardless of the outcome of the investigation.Official Statement from the couple”Our baby was born just over a month ago via emergency C-section. Her birth was the result of the miracle of in vitro fertilization—a journey that took years of careful medical procedures, tremendous expense, and deep emotional and physical sacrifice. The result is a beautiful, healthy baby girl whom we love more than words can express.I have a million things I want to say and so many emotions I wish I could share, but for now, this is what we are able to tell you: due to a medical error- the wrong embryo implanted by the doctor – our baby is not genetically related to either of us. While we are beyond grateful to have her in our lives and love her immeasurably, we also recognize that we have a moral obligation to find her genetic parents. Our joy over her birth is further complicated by the devastating reality that her genetic parents—whom we do not yet know—or possibly another family entirely, may have received our genetic embryo. We are heartbroken, devastated, and confused. This situation has completely dictated and complicated our lives since the moment of her birth. Aside from necessary outings where we have been forced to pretend everything is okay, we have been living like prisoners in our own home. We hope that by sharing this it will allow us to begin living more freely and to finally celebrate the one beautiful thing that has come from all of this: our daughter. Our baby girl is completely innocent and so undeserving of any of this. We’re also sharing this to prevent harmful rumors or misinformation, as we’ve already seen inaccurate information circulating in a few stories and articles.Please bear with us as we navigate this deeply confusing and painful time, living with the heartbreak of not knowing what happened to our genetic embryos or whether we may have a biological child (or children) somewhere out there in the hands of strangers. The added fear that our daughter could be taken from us at any time is almost unbearable. There are so many details and potential outcomes to this story, but for now, we will leave it here until further progress has been made by our legal counsel. Until then, please keep our family in your hearts and prayers, and if you have any information on the family who might be at the other side of this, please contact us.”

    A Florida couple has filed an emergency lawsuit against a fertility clinic, alleging their newborn child is not genetically related to either of them after an in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedure.

    The couple, identified in court documents as John and Jane Doe to protect their privacy, is suing IVF Life, Inc. D/B/A Fertility Center of Orlando and Dr. Milton McNichol, M.D.

    According to the complaint filed in Palm Beach County Circuit Court, the couple used their own egg and sperm to create three viable embryos at the clinic.

    In March 2025, one of the embryos was implanted in Jane Doe, resulting in a successful full-term pregnancy. The couple’s healthy female child, Baby Doe, was born on Dec. 11, 2025.

    The parents became suspicious when Baby Doe displayed physical characteristics of a child who was not racially Caucasian, despite both John and Jane Doe being Caucasian.

    Genetic testing subsequently confirmed that Baby Doe has “no genetic relationship to either of the Plaintiffs,” indicating the implanted embryo was not one of the couple’s.

    While the Does expressed a deep emotional bond with the child they carried and delivered, the lawsuit states their belief that Baby Doe “should legally and morally be united with her genetic parents.”

    The couple also fears that another person may be pregnant with or raising one or more of their own embryos or children.

    The couple claims they notified the defendants on Jan. 5, 2026, requesting cooperation to unite Baby Doe with her genetic parents and to determine the disposition of their remaining embryos. They have received no “substantive response.”

    The Plaintiffs are seeking emergency injunctive relief, asking the court to compel the defendants to take several actions, including:

    • Immediately notifying all patients who had embryos in storage before Jane Doe’s implantation about the allegations in the complaint and providing them with a copy.
    • Paying for free genetic testing for all patients and their children whose births resulted from embryo implantation through the defendants’ services over the past five years.
    • Disclosing any parentage discrepancies discovered through this testing.

    Official statement from Fertility Center of Orlando

    We are actively cooperating with an investigation to support one of our patients in determining the source of an error that resulted in the birth of a child who is not genetically related to them. Multiple entities are involved in this process, and all parties are working diligently to help identify when and where the error may have occurred. Our priority remains transparency and the well-being of the patient and child involved. We will continue to assist in any way that we can regardless of the outcome of the investigation.

    Official Statement from the couple

    “Our baby was born just over a month ago via emergency C-section. Her birth was the result of the miracle of in vitro fertilization—a journey that took years of careful medical procedures, tremendous expense, and deep emotional and physical sacrifice. The result is a beautiful, healthy baby girl whom we love more than words can express.

    I have a million things I want to say and so many emotions I wish I could share, but for now, this is what we are able to tell you: due to a medical error- the wrong embryo implanted by the doctor – our baby is not genetically related to either of us.

    While we are beyond grateful to have her in our lives and love her immeasurably, we also recognize that we have a moral obligation to find her genetic parents. Our joy over her birth is further complicated by the devastating reality that her genetic parents—whom we do not yet know—or possibly another family entirely, may have received our genetic embryo.

    We are heartbroken, devastated, and confused.

    This situation has completely dictated and complicated our lives since the moment of her birth.

    Aside from necessary outings where we have been forced to pretend everything is okay, we have been living like prisoners in our own home. We hope that by sharing this it will allow us to begin living more freely and to finally celebrate the one beautiful thing that has come from all of this: our daughter.

    Our baby girl is completely innocent and so undeserving of any of this. We’re also sharing this to prevent harmful rumors or misinformation, as we’ve already seen inaccurate information circulating in a few stories and articles.

    Please bear with us as we navigate this deeply confusing and painful time, living with the heartbreak of not knowing what happened to our genetic embryos or whether we may have a biological child (or children) somewhere out there in the hands of strangers. The added fear that our daughter could be taken from us at any time is almost unbearable.

    There are so many details and potential outcomes to this story, but for now, we will leave it here until further progress has been made by our legal counsel. Until then, please keep our family in your hearts and prayers, and if you have any information on the family who might be at the other side of this, please contact us.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Cold case breakthrough in Maryland reunites siblings who’ve been separated for more than 70 years – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    The woman at the center of what police in Howard County have for decades simply called “The Jane Doe Case” has finally been identified, and that breakthrough has reunited two of her children.

    The woman at the center of what police in Howard County, Maryland, have for decades simply called “The Jane Doe Case” has finally been identified, and that breakthrough has reunited two of her children, who hadn’t seen each other for more than 70 years.

    Sarah Belle Sharkey, whose name at birth was Sadie Belle Murray, was found unconscious and beaten in a Woodstock field in July 1971 and died in the hospital from her injuries two months later.

    Until Thursday, the identity of the victim in the Howard County Police Department’s oldest cold case homicide remained a mystery. While the question of who killed Sharkey remains, her identification brought closure to two people who had been searching for it for a lifetime.

    This breakthrough was made with the help of genetic genealogy, which uses DNA and existing ancestry databases to establish familial relationships and build family trees. After submitting Sharkey’s DNA to a private company in October, investigators found out Charles Sharkey was a direct familial match. He was initially thought to be a distant cousin of the victim.

    Then, Howard County detectives were able to locate Charles’ sister, Mildred Cantwell.

    Sarah Belle gave birth to Charles and Mildred many years before her death, and both children were placed in orphanages at a young age. They hadn’t seen each other in more than 70 years, and while they had vague memories about being taken to orphanages, neither knew what happened to their mother or siblings.

    Sarah Belle Sharkey, whose name at birth was Sadie Belle Murray, was found unconscious and beaten in a Woodstock field in July 1971 and died in the hospital from her injuries two months later.(Courtesy Howard County Police Department)

    “Learning about my mother was closure for me,” 81-year-old Mildred, who now lives in Springfield, Illinois, said in a news release. “I always wondered … and I am glad to have that closure. Being reunited with my brother is awesome. He’s the only thing in that family that I remember. The closure is worth everything because I always wondered what happened to her.”

    Charles and Mildred now talk nearly every day and are planning to meet in person in the coming months, according to Howard County Police Chief Gregory Der.

    “It’s something that I thought would have never happened,” Charles, who’s now 79 and lives in Cleveland, said. “I thought I’d never connect again with my family. I tried there for a while, even traveling to Pennsylvania where we were born and Cleveland where we were adopted. I got nowhere. There was nothing.”

    While investigators now know Sarah Belle’s identity, there’s still a lot they don’t know about her and what happened to her. Police believe she was living in Pennsylvania, and aren’t sure why she was found in Howard County.

    “The work doesn’t stop here, this is really now where much of the work begins,” Howard County police spokesperson Sherry Llewellyn said at a news conference.

    Anyone with information about Sarah Belle Sharkey or what may have happened to her should call the Howard County Police Department at 410-313-7867.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Thomas Robertson

    Source link

  • Maryland ‘Jane Doe’ homicide victim from 1998 identified as DC woman – WTOP News

    Maryland ‘Jane Doe’ homicide victim from 1998 identified as DC woman – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    The body of a homicide victim found in a Charles County, Maryland, field in 1998 has now been identified as a woman from Southeast D.C.

    Side-by-side images of Jane Doe composite and LaQuand Denise “Niecey” Williams. (Courtesy Charles County Sheriff’s Office)

    The body of a homicide victim found in a Charles County, Maryland, field in 1998 has now been identified as a woman from Southeast D.C., according to a news release.

    LaQuanda Denise “Niecey” Williams of Southeast D.C. was 31 years old when her decomposing body was discovered in an overgrown Bel Alton field, near Irving Road and Route 301, by Charles County Sheriff’s Office investigators on June 18, 1998.

    “Learning the identity of Jane Doe after 25 years is a testament to the relentless dedication of our investigators,” said Charles County Sheriff Troy D. Berry in a statement issued Friday.

    Sheriff Berry said the identification of Williams is a “significant step forward in bringing answers to light and ensuring that she is no longer Jane Doe, but a person with a name and a story.”

    Investigators in 1998 found Williams was not carrying identification, and without any matching fingerprints on file, the case went cold, as WTOP previously reported in 2018.

    While investigators were unable to determine Williams’ identity at the time, they were able to determine her death was a homicide.

    “Now, we have a name to work with in an attempt to identify the person responsible for her murder. We won’t give up in our pursuit for justice,” Sheriff Berry said in a news release.

    While tips came in every year as a result of the Charles County Sheriff’s Office’s annual media push to identify the body, it said there wasn’t a breakthrough until news coverage last June by NBC Washington reporter Megan McGrath — which generated a lead.

    The Sheriff’s office said a tip by a relative was received by forensic science investigators the night that the 2023 report was broadcast, and officials told Williams’ family that an unidentified body from 1998 was their loved one on Oct. 25, 2023.

    The Sheriff’s office asks anyone with information regarding the homicide of LaQuanda Williams to contact Detective Shankster at 301-932-3037 or shanksterc@ccso.us. Anyone with information about any crime can reach Charles County Crime Solvers by calling 1-866-411-TIPS or submitting information online at www.charlescountycrimesolvers.com

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2024 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Matt Small

    Source link

  • The names of more than 170 Jeffrey Epstein associates were just revealed in unsealed court documents. Here's what we know.

    The names of more than 170 Jeffrey Epstein associates were just revealed in unsealed court documents. Here's what we know.

    [ad_1]

    • The names of more than 170 Jeffrey Epstein associates were just unsealed.

    • Powerful associates like Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Glenn Dubin, and Jean Luc Brunel are in the documents.

    • The list of names also include many of Epstein’s victims.

    A federal judge in New York has unsealed the identities of about 170 associates of Jeffrey Epstein as part of a long-running lawsuit between one of his accusers and his sex-trafficking partner Ghislaine Maxwell.

    Former President Bill Clinton is perhaps the biggest name disclosed in the documents. He was previously identified as “Doe 36” and was named in dozens of redacted court filings. He didn’t object to unsealing the documents naming him, and the documents aren’t expected to level any new accusations of wrongdoing against him. In one newly unsealed document, an excerpt of a deposition given by Maxwell, Maxwell says that she didn’t know how many times Clinton flew on Epstein’s private jet but that she’s “sure” he had a meal while flying on it.

    The documents also bring fresh scrutiny to Prince Andrew, a longtime friend of Epstein who said he cut ties with him in 2010. Another Doe whose name is expected to be unredacted is Johanna Sjoberg, one of Epstein’s victims who previously said the prince fondled her at his Manhattan mansion.

    Many on social media and cable news have speculated that the list contains a comprehensive secret cache of the dead pedophile’s friends — and perhaps descriptions of their lurid acts — but the reality is more complicated.

    The names include some powerful people tied to Epstein. But the list also includes the identities of some of his victims, household staff, and other people whose names incidentally came up in the course of a long-running court case between Virginia Roberts Giuffre and Maxwell. In court documents, these people were previously identified as a John or Jane Doe.

    One of the Does, for example, previously identified as “J. Doe 005” in court documents, is Carolyn Andriano. Andriano testified against Maxwell at her criminal trial, describing in excruciating detail how she trafficked her to Epstein for sex beginning when she was 14 years old. She said in court that Epstein engaged in sexual activity with her more than 100 times and that he said she was “too old” for him after she turned 18.

    Andriano testified using only her first name but gave her full name in an interview with the Daily Mail after the trial. The judge who ordered her name unsealed cited that interview as a reason to now make her name public in the earlier court documents. Andriano, a 36-year-old mother of five, died of an apparent overdose in May, The Daily Beast previously reported.

    Another previously sealed name, “Doe 185,” is Courtney Wild. She led a legal battle to invalidate Epstein’s controversial 2007 plea deal with federal prosecutors and has given multiple media interviews about her experience with Epstein.

    Two other Does — 63 and 64 — are Annie and Maria Farmer, two sisters who have accused Epstein of sexual abuse. Annie Farmer testified at Maxwell’s trial, and both have given media interviews about their experience.

    Out of the more than 170 anonymous Does whose names were scheduled to be unsealed Wednesday, two received extensions allowing them to continue fighting in court to remain anonymous.

    One of them, Doe 107, is also one of Epstein’s victims, whose lawyer has argued in court filings that she should be able to keep her privacy. The identity of the other, Doe 110, is not yet clear.

    We’ve seen a lot of these records before

    Epstein died in a Manhattan federal jail while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges in 2019. Maxwell, one of his ex-girlfriends, was found guilty at trial in late 2021 of trafficking girls to Epstein for sex and sexually abusing some of them herself. She’s serving a 20-year prison sentence in Tallahassee, Florida.

    Before the criminal charges, Giuffre brought civil lawsuits against both of them, accusing them of trafficking her. Epstein settled her lawsuit against him in 2009 for $500,000.

    The lawsuit against Maxwell, brought later, was settled in 2017, but not after a pitched court battle that included numerous depositions and a discovery process that dredged up emails, flight manifests, news articles, and other records related to Epstein, Maxwell, and Giuffre.

    Since the settlement, the civil case has experienced a long afterlife as various parties have sought to unseal the records.

    virginia roberts giuffre

    Virginia Roberts holds a photo of herself at age 16, when she says Palm Beach multimillionaire Jeffrey Epstein began abusing her sexually.Emily Michot/Miami Herald/Tribune News Service via Getty Images

    Alan Dershowitz has sought to get numerous filings unsealed, arguing they would disprove Giuffre’s misconduct accusations against him as well (the two settled a large number of lawsuits and counter-lawsuits against each other and their lawyers in 2022, with Giuffre stating she “may have made a mistake” saying Epstein trafficked her to Dershowitz).

    The Miami Herald litigated to unseal documents, some of which were used for its explosive series about how Epstein negotiated a light plea deal on misconduct accusations around 2007 with prosecutors in Florida. The right-wing influencer and conspiracy theorist Michael Cernovich also hired a lawyer to try to unseal documents that he had posted on social media.

    US District Judge Robert Sweet, who originally oversaw Giuffre’s lawsuit against Maxwell, died in 2019, leaving the task of unsealing documents to US District Judge Loretta Preska, who took over the docket.

    The process has been a yearslong slog. Preska has weighed different priorities, including the public’s presumption of access to court documents versus the privacy interests of people whose names have come up in litigation.

    In December, for example, she ruled that Andriano, Wild, and the Farmer sisters waived any rights to privacy after giving media interviews.

    During the efforts to unseal this batch of records, Preska gave the Does a January 1 deadline to raise any new objections to unsealing their identities. Now that that deadline has passed, lawyers for Giuffre and Maxwell have been ordered to confer and then publish unsealed versions of the documents on the court docket.

    The Epstein Doe names include some powerful people

    Many documents in the Giuffre v. Maxwell lawsuit have been unredacted in different places at different times.

    The result is that some documents — which can be as benign as an already-public Daily Mail article about Epstein’s former friend Prince Andrew or as explosive as one of Maxwell’s deposition transcripts — form a sort of puzzle where journalists can put together more complete versions by looking at unredacted portions in different places on the court docket.

    That means that journalists have been able to figure out the identities of many Does even before they were officially unsealed.

    As Business Insider previously reported, “Doe 183” — whose lawyer fought vociferously in secret court filings to keep his identity under wraps — was connected to Les Wexner, the billionaire former L Brands CEO who gave Epstein billions of dollars in the 1990s and 2000s.

    (Wexner has said he wasn’t aware of Epstein’s misdeeds and cut off ties with him when he was convicted of soliciting girls for prostitution in 2007.)

    jeffrey epstein ghislaine maxwell back anglejeffrey epstein ghislaine maxwell back angle

    American financier Jeffrey Epstein and British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell attend a birthday party for Michael Caine at The Canteen restaurant in Chelsea, London, 17th June 1997.Dave Benett/Getty Images

    Many of the Doe parties turned out to be victims. In a previous round of unsealing, Preska disclosed that two of them were Emmy Taylor and Sarah Ransome. It didn’t make sense for their identities to remain private, Preska said, because Taylor has filed lawsuits related to her status as an Epstein victim, and Ransome has written a book about her experience being trafficked by Epstein.

    The current unsealing round comes after Preska announced on December 18 that she would unseal the largest batch yet, listing about 50 pages of Does going up to “Doe 187.” Since the identities of some of those Does have been previously made public — including “Doe 183” — that left about 170 Does remaining to name.

    Preska said she’d give 14 days from her December 18 ruling to allow any Does to come forward and contest the unsealings. Two have since come forward. A lawyer for Doe 107 said she lives in “a culturally conservative country and lives in fear of her name being released.” Preska has given her until January 22 to provide additional documentation to bolster that argument for privacy.

    Another anonymous person, identified as Doe 110, also asked for an extension to file court documents requesting privacy. Preska said Wednesday that she would rule on that “in due course.” It isn’t clear whether Doe 110 is also a victim or someone else affiliated with Epstein.

    Among the other unsealed names is Dershowitz (originally “Doe 24”), who has said for years that documents related to him should be made public.

    As the Daily Mail previously reported, “Doe 162” was identifiable as Johanna Sjoberg, who gave interviews that corroborated some of Giuffre’s claims about Prince Andrew and said the British royal fondled both of them at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion in 2001. Prince Andrew has denied the allegations and settled a civil sexual misconduct lawsuit Giuffre brought against him in 2022.

    The Miami Herald previously reported that powerful people whose names would be unsealed included Glenn Dubin, the hedge fund executive with a close relationship to Epstein (his wife testified in Maxwell’s defense at her trial), and Jean-Luc Brunel, the modeling agent who also killed himself in jail, in France, before his rape trial.

    Some of the Does appear to be linked to Epstein’s powerful associates but do not necessarily mean they were implicated in wrongdoing.

    “Doe 8,” for example is Doug Band, a former aide for Bill Clinton. Preska pointed out that he gave a long interview with Vanity Fair about his interactions with Epstein. In the interview, Band said that he sought to push Epstein out of Clinton’s orbit but that Clinton continued to spend time with him anyway.

    Read the original article on Business Insider

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Marilyn Manson accused of raping underage girl in horrific new lawsuit – National | Globalnews.ca

    Marilyn Manson accused of raping underage girl in horrific new lawsuit – National | Globalnews.ca

    [ad_1]

    A new lawsuit filed against Marilyn Manson alleges that the rocker sexually assaulted an underage girl multiple times on his tour bus and threatened to kill her family if she told anyone about it.

    The woman — who filed the suit anonymously under the name Jane Doe — claims that Manson (whose real name is Brian Warner) assaulted and raped her many times over the course of four years, from 1995 to 1999.

    The woman, who is now 44, also brought claims against the shock rocker’s former record labels, Interscope Music and Nothing Records, according to the lawsuit filed Monday in New York’s Nassau County Supreme Court.

    She alleges that the labels knew about Manson’s abusive nature and “celebrated and promoted (it) for their collective financial gain,” reports USA Today.

    Read more:

    Cops hunt for U.S. kidnapping and torture suspect, warn he may be on dating apps

    Read next:

    West Edmonton Mall closes Mindbender indoor roller-coaster

    Story continues below advertisement

    The labels “were well aware of [Manson’s] obsession with child pornography and pedophilia and his desire to expose children across America to sexual themes,” the suit charges.

    “This lawsuit goes beyond the named predator and targets the record labels that packaged and profited from their artist’s criminal behavior, and it is an indictment of the music industry for maintaining a culture that celebrates, protects, and enables sexual predators,” Doe’s attorney, Karen Barth Menzies, said in a statement provided to USA Today.

    According to the complaint, Doe first met Manson in 1995 outside a concert venue in Dallas, Texas. She, along with three other underage female fans, were waiting to meet the singer.

    The musician allegedly asked them “what each of their ages were, what grades in school they were in, and where their parents were at the time,” before inviting Jane Doe “and one of the other younger girls onto the tour bus,” reports Pitchfork.

    Story continues below advertisement

    On the bus, the lawsuit reads, “Warner performed various acts of criminal sexual conduct upon Plaintiff (Jane Doe), who was a virgin at the time, including but not limited to forced copulation and vaginal penetration.”

    The lawsuit continues, “One of the band members watched Defendant Warner sexually assault Plaintiff. Plaintiff was in pain, scared, upset, humiliated and confused. After he was done, Defendant Warner laughed at her. Plaintiff is informed and thereon alleges that all of the sexually abusive and harassing conduct alleged herein was done to satisfy Defendant Warner’s own prurient sexual desires. Then Defendant Warner demanded Plaintiff to ‘get the f— off of my bus’ and threatened Plaintiff that, if she told anyone, he would kill her and her family.”

    Read more:

    U.S. high school students design ‘life-changing’ robotic hand for classmate

    Read next:

    Parks Canada updating its reservation system to book camping and other activities

    The suit continues, reports Pitchfork, saying that after the alleged assault, Manson’s manager gave Doe Manson’s contact information and urged her to “stay in touch.” Manson, it is alleged, began calling Doe at home, “soliciting Plaintiff to send explicit sexual photos of her and her friends to his fan club, Satan’s Bakesale.”

    The suit goes on to detail other descriptions of alleged abuse, including another sexual assault on his tour bus in 1995, as well as multiple instances of sexual coercion and abuse in 1999, when Doe was 19 years old.

    Story continues below advertisement

    In 2021, women began to come forward with allegations of abuse against Manson, including his ex-girlfriend Evan Rachel Wood.


    Marilyn Manson and Evan Rachel Wood are pictured in 2006.


    John Shearer/WireImage

    “The name of my abuser is Brian Warner, also known to the world as Marilyn Manson,” Wood wrote on Instagram at the time, although it appears the post has now been deleted. “He started grooming me when I was a teenager and horrifically abused me for years. I was brainwashed and manipulated into submission.

    “I am done living in fear of retaliation, slander, or blackmail. I am here to expose this dangerous man and call out the many industries that have enabled him before he ruins any more lives. I stand with the many victims who will no longer be silent.”

    Shortly after Wood’s post, Manson was dropped by his record label. Several other women came forward with similar allegations and at least four of them filed lawsuits. Two of the lawsuits were dismissed, and just last week a settlement was reached on another.

    Story continues below advertisement

    Manson has also filed a defamation lawsuit against Wood and her girlfriend, Ilma Gore, accusing the pair of fabricating sexual abuse allegations to ruin his reputation.

    If you think someone is being abused, here is some information on supporting them and additional information on safety planning.

    If you think someone is abusive to their partner, here is a list of resources to help.

    Are you experiencing abuse? Here’s how to get help

    &copy 2023 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

    [ad_2]

    Michelle Butterfield

    Source link

  • Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase Seek To Quash Lawsuits By Jeffrey Epstein Accusers

    Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase Seek To Quash Lawsuits By Jeffrey Epstein Accusers

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan Chase are asking a federal court to throw out lawsuits that claim the big banks should have seen evidence of sex trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein, the high-flying financier who killed himself in jail while facing criminal charges.

    The banks said in filings late Friday they didn’t commit any negligent acts that caused harm to the women who filed the lawsuits and that the lawsuits failed to show that they benefitted from Epstein’s sex trafficking.

    The filings in federal district court in New York came about a month after two women who were both identified as Jane Doe sued the banks and the government of the U.S. Virgin Islands, where Epstein had a home on a small island that he owned.

    The lawsuits, which seek class-action status to represent other Epstein victims, claim that the banks knowingly benefitted from Epstein’s sex trafficking and “chose profit over following the law” to earn millions of dollars from the financier.

    They suggested that the banks should have steered clear of Epstein after his 2006 arrest in Florida — he eventually pleaded guilty to state charges of soliciting prostitution — and fallout from a federal investigation and news coverage.

    “Without the financial institution’s participation, Epstein’s sex-trafficking scheme could not have existed or flourished,” the lawsuits claim.

    JPMorgan Chase said Friday that the Jane Doe in its case “is entitled to justice … But this lawsuit against JPMC is directed at the wrong party, is legally meritless, and should be dismissed.”

    Deutsche Bank said it provided “routine banking services” to Epstein from 2013 to 2018, and the lawsuit “does not come close to adequately alleging that Deutsche Bank … was part of Epstein’s criminal sex trafficking ring.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Police Let Jogger Keep Body She Found After No One Claims It Within 90 Days

    Police Let Jogger Keep Body She Found After No One Claims It Within 90 Days

    [ad_1]

    Image for article titled Police Let Jogger Keep Body She Found After No One Claims It Within 90 Days

    CHAMPAIGN, IL—After failing to identify the legal owner within the standard 90 days, police officials announced Thursday that they would allow a local jogger to keep the body she found since no one claimed it. “We held it in lost and found for the mandatory waiting period, but no one turned up to claim it or even reported it missing,” said Chief of Police Dan Michaelson of the rotting Jane Doe corpse that had been tossed in the humid evidence locker for nearly three months, informing the jogger that it was all hers now if she still wanted it. “Most people who find something this valuable would have stolen it—or at least kept a few entrails for themselves. We get a lot of these that are completely empty inside by the time they’re turned in, if they’re brought in at all. So as a token of our appreciation for being a good Samaritan, we want to officially offer you ownership of this putrid torso that has been mostly eaten by maggots. You earned it.” Michaelson went on to reward the jogger’s patience with the bureaucratic process with a free item from the station’s loose limb bin.

    [ad_2]

    Source link