ReportWire

Tag: jack dorsey

  • Jack Dorsey’s Block slashes nearly half workforce in AI ‘overhaul’ – Tech Digest

    [ad_1]

    Share


    Block – the parent company of Square, Cash App and Tidal – announced on Thursday that it is cutting more than 4,000 jobs.

    The reduction, which represents nearly half of the firm’s total workforce, is part of a radical structural overhaul aimed at embedding artificial intelligence across every facet of its operations.

    Following the announcement, Block’s shares surged by as much as 25% in after-hours trading. Investors appeared to shrug off the $500 million in expected restructuring charges, instead rewarding CEO Jack Dorsey’s vision of a leaner, high-margin future.

    The layoffs bring the company’s headcount down from roughly 10,000 to fewer than 6,000 employees.

    In a candid letter to shareholders, Dorsey, the co-founder of Twitter, framed the decision as an inevitable evolution of the modern corporation. “Intelligence tools have changed what it means to build and run a company,” Dorsey stated.

    “A significantly smaller team using the tools can do more and do it better.” He further suggested that Block is simply an early adopter of a trend that will soon become universal, adding: “I don’t think we’re early to this realization. I think most companies are late.”

    The layoffs at Block represent a pivotal moment in the AI boom, signalling a shift from experimental “hype” to profound changes in the global labour market. While tech giants including Amazon, Google and Meta have also cut thousands of roles recently to pivot toward AI investment, Block is among the first major players to explicitly credit AI automation for such a massive reduction in the workforce.

    Analysts at Evercore ISI described the announcement as a “seminal moment,” noting that tools such as OpenAI’s Codex and Anthropic’s Claude Code are now capable of automating complex software engineering tasks that previously required large teams.

    This shift was echoed by Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who recently noted that projects once requiring entire departments are now being finished by a single talented person equipped with the right tools.

    Despite the workforce reduction, Block’s underlying business remains resilient. The company posted a strong holiday quarter, driven by a 33% surge in Cash App’s gross profit. By cutting costs now, Dorsey argues that Block is securing its future on its “own terms”, rather than being forced into a reactive crisis later.

    For latest tech stories go to TechDigest.tv


    Discover more from Tech Digest

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

    [ad_2]

    Chris Price

    Source link

  • Block expects profit growth to accelerate over next three years

    [ad_1]

    Block Inc. expects profit growth to accelerate over the next three years as Jack Dorsey’s payments firm anticipates launching products at a faster clip while doubling down on efforts to integrate its consumer-focused Cash App and merchant payment service Square. In 2026, Block forecasts 17% gross profit growth year-over-year to $11.98 billion. The outlook marks […]

    [ad_2]

    Bloomberg News

    Source link

  • ‘Divine’ is a Jack Dorsey-backed Vine reboot for 2025

    [ad_1]

    Nearly a decade after going offline, Vine is (sort of) back and, in a truly bizarre twist, Jack Dorsey is at least partially responsible. An early Twitter employee has released a beta version of a rebooted Vine — now called “Divine” — that revives the app’s six-second videos and includes a portion of the original app’s archive.

    The project comes from Evan Henshaw-Plath, a former Twitter employee who goes by “Rabble,” and has backing from Dorsey’s nonprofit “and Other Stuff,” which funds experimental social media apps built on the open source nostr protocol. Rabble has so far managed to resurrect about 170,000 videos from the original Vine thanks to an old archive created before Twitter shut down the app in 2017. In an FAQ on Divine’s website, he says that he also hopes to restore “millions” of user comments and profile photos associated with those original posts as well.

    But Divine is more than just a home for decade-old clips. New users can create six-second looping videos of their own for the platform. The app also has many elements that will be familiar to people who have used Bluesky or other decentralized platforms, including customizable controls for content moderation and multiple feed algorithms to choose from. The site’s FAQ says Divine plans to support custom, user-created algorithms too.

    Divine is also taking a pretty strong stance against AI-generated content. The app will have built-in AI detection tools that will add badges to content that’s been verified as not created or edited with AI tools. And, according to TechCrunch, the app will block uploads of suspected AI content.

    “We’re in the middle of an AI takeover of social media,” Divine explains on its website. New apps like Sora are entirely AI-generated. TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram are increasingly flooded with AI slop—videos that look real but were never captured by a camera, people who don’t exist, scenarios that never happened. Divine is fighting back. We’re creating a space where human creativity is celebrated and protected, where you can trust that what you’re watching was made by a real person with a real camera, not generated by an algorithm.”

    While all that may sound intriguing, Divine has a long way to go before it can accomplish all that. The app hasn’t made it onto either app store yet, though it’s already added 10,000 people to an iOS beta, according to its founder. In the meantime, you can also browse some of the app’s videos, including some old Vine posts, on its website, though not all of the videos are working properly at the moment.

    Still, any kind of reboot is good news for fans of the original, who have long hoped the app might make a comeback. Elon Musk has suggested more than once that he would revive Vine in some way, but has yet to follow through.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why Jack Dorsey Wanted His Company’s Name to Be ‘Boring’

    [ad_1]

    When Jack Dorsey co-founded Square in 2009, he narrowed in on a single goal, which was helping sellers make the sale. The Oakland-based company’s first product was a square-shaped smartphone attachment that allowed vendors of all sizes to accept payments by credit card.  

    But if Square had simply focused on hardware to process card payments, “we would’ve been a very small company and I would not be here talking to at all,” Dorsey said at an event in New York City on Wednesday in which the company introduced a slate of new features for Square.  

    Instead, the company persisted in asking why business owners wanted to take credit cards in the first place. They didn’t love the hassle and fees of credit cards, but customers were increasingly using cards for everything and no longer carrying cash. If vendors didn’t take cards, they’d miss out on sales. 

    The card readers were a start, but ultimately, Dorsey said his focus is on creating products that make it more affordable and frictionless to do business. Over the past 16 years, it has rolled out financial services, marketing tools, and business management software.  

    Today, its parent company Block (NYSE: XYZ) has a market capitalization of $49 billion. With Dorsey as CEO, Block has grown to include the mobile payments company Cash App, streaming service Tidal, and buy now, pay later service Afterpay.  

    New Square services to save time and money 

    The marquee feature Square announced on Wednesday is a service called Neighborhoods, which lets businesses set up online ordering storefronts in Cash App and participate in a common loyalty program. It saves businesses the hassle of building dedicated apps, but allows them to offer some of the features that have made apps from Starbucks, McDonald’s, and Dunkin so popular, without the hassle of building a dedicated app. The processing fee for vendors using Neighborhoods is just 1 percent.  

    Square is also now integrated with popular delivery apps including DoorDash, Uber Eats, and GrubHub, so restaurants can see all of their incoming orders on a single platform, rather than juggling different tablets for each service. If restaurants also use Square’s banking services, they can access those payments right away, rather than waiting more than a week for the payments to clear with the delivery platforms.  

    The company also announced several upgrades to its AI services aimed at helping with planning and business insights. Early testers have been particularly impressed by the ordering guide, which allows restaurants to compare ingredient prices across vendors using standardized units and to track prices over time. Square head of product Willem Avé tells Inc. that the goal is that with five minutes of work in the tool, a business could reduce their food costs by 10 percent. 

    Bitcoin and streamlined pricing 

    Square now allows businesses to accept bitcoin payments, convert a percentage of incoming revenue into bitcoin, and store bitcoin in crypto wallets within Square. For the first year, Square will not charge transaction fees for bitcoin payments. Dorsey, a longtime crypto advocate, suggested that the audience in New York, which included many business owners that use Square, should consider using bitcoin as a way to diversify their finances and hedge against inflation.  

    Square also introduced a three-tiered subscription plan (free; a $49 service that includes web and marketing services; or $149 a month for 24/7 support and additional software upgrades), doing away with a complex system of add-ons. Avé says the change was intended to make it easier for users to add new products (a restaurant can now sell merch or tickets to events without adding new features) and that the features announced on Wednesday are available to all users. 

    Square’s goal: be boring 

    Like offerings from Clover, Shopify, and Toast, Square’s devices proliferated as contactless and mobile payments caught on, particularly during the coronavirus pandemic. Today Square’s mobile card readers, terminals, and other devices are used by more than 4 million sellers, from major retailers to mom-and-pop shops and craft fair vendors. 

    Dorsey, who also co-founded Twitter and created the open-source social media platform Bluesky, said Square has always been giving time back to entrepreneurs, so they can focus on what they’re building. 

    He and co-founder Jim McKelvey chose the name Square because it was boring and faded into the background. “We didn’t want something that was in front of our customers. We wanted a name…that felt like it was something that a seller could put their whole business on,” Dorsey said. “I think it set the tone for the company.” 

    [ad_2]

    Jennifer Conrad

    Source link

  • Bluesky now lets you upload videos, but there are some caveats

    Bluesky now lets you upload videos, but there are some caveats

    [ad_1]

    It’s easy to forget that there’s another social network besides Threads for people tired of Elon Musk’s . Bluesky is a fine alternative, as it definitely “feels” like Twitter. However, it has been lacking some of the features that made Twitter such an internet hotspot back in the day. Well, we just got a big one. The company just announced that users .

    There are some caveats. First of all, the videos have to be under a minute. That’s a fairly huge hurdle for just about every piece of content other than TikTok-style shorts. As a comparison, allows for five minute videos. Also, the videos autoplay by default, though that can be handled in the settings. Finally, there’s a hard limit of 25 videos per user each day, though the company says it could tweak that in the future.

    The platform supports most of the major video file types, including .mp4, .mpeg, .webm, and .mov files. Users can also attach subtitles to each video, which is a nice little bonus. There are some guardrails in place to protect against “spam and abuse.” Only users who have verified their email address can upload videos and illegal content will be “purged” from the infrastructure. There’s also a way to submit reports to the moderation team. Additionally, each video will be .

    Update to version 1.91 of the mobile app to get started, though it also works via the desktop client. Not every user will be able to access this feature right away, as version 1.91 will be a gradual rollout to “ensure a smooth experience.”

    Bluesky into the mix, which is something Threads doesn’t have. The platform may be a distant third, when compared to X and Threads, but it’s certainly growing. A massive influx of Brazilian users recently joined the social media site after .

    [ad_2]

    Lawrence Bonk

    Source link

  • “Are You Saying No to Elon Musk?”: Scenes from the Slash-and-Burn Buyout of Twitter

    “Are You Saying No to Elon Musk?”: Scenes from the Slash-and-Burn Buyout of Twitter

    [ad_1]

    At around 9:00 a.m. on October 27, 2022, Parag Agrawal, the CEO of Twitter, summoned his leadership team into one of the large glass-doored conference rooms that lined the suite of offices on the seventh floor of Twitter’s San Francisco headquarters. After months of tension and worry, there was a grim clarity in the air—Musk was finally completing the acquisition.

    Twitter’s top-ranking employees crammed into the room. Agrawal’s deputies were there, as well as vice presidents from finance, product, human resources, and sales. Even more executives dialed in on video conference from New York and around the globe, their faces tiling the screen at the end of the room.

    It was clear to everyone there that it was Agrawal’s last meeting. He sat at the conference room table, CFO Ned Segal by his side. The mood was somber—everyone in the room understood that many among them might soon be swept away by Elon Musk’s tsunami.

    No one was more likely to be fired than Agrawal. For months, Musk had made clear his disdain for Twitter’s chief executive in barbed tweets, curt text messages, and explosive video calls. Agrawal had taken most of Musk’s outbursts quietly, advised by Twitter’s battalion of lawyers not to argue with the billionaire or speak about the deal to employees—or even executives—because anything he said might leak to the media.

    After months of near-silence to the wider group, Agrawal spoke, remaining calm and analytical. “We might close today,” he announced. The court-imposed deadline for Musk to complete the transaction was the next day, Friday, but it seemed he could get it done a day early. Agrawal told the executives he was proud of what they’d accomplished.

    There was no agenda, he told everyone, and opened the discussion. “What’s going to happen now?” one executive in attendance asked. Segal tried to explain how the closing would work but said candidly that no one could be sure. After all, the man on the other side of the transaction was unpredictable.

    There was plenty of work left to do to finalize the deal, but Agrawal allowed Twitter’s leaders to riff, share, and ask anything they wanted. They had never had a meeting quite like it before. Sales executives wanted to know what they should tell advertisers. Human resources leaders wanted to know what they could tell employees, and when they were allowed to share any information.

    Then one of the employees in the room broached the question that everyone was thinking but no one dared say: “What’s going to happen to you guys?”

    Segal repeated the same line he’d told employees before. “I haven’t talked to him,” he said. “I’ll remain open until I do.” Agrawal nodded along.

    “Each of you needs to make your own decision,” Agrawal said.

    The executives had endless questions, but their leaders had few answers.

    Segal could sense their frustration and, after months of facing unanswerable questions, he cracked. Fighting to keep his composure, he told them he didn’t know what was coming next. “People remember how you handle yourself when it’s hard, not when it’s easy,” he said, his voice choking with emotion. He tried to express the weight of the responsibility all of them had—to the company and to each other—to see the sale through.

    Several of the executives in the room were startled to see Segal, normally polished, perky, and on message, get emotional. As the meeting ended, some of them embraced each other, while others hung back to say their goodbyes to their bosses.

    Antonio Gracias, a private equity investor who was Musk’s close friend and de facto finance shepherd in the deal, had told Twitter’s team on Wednesday that he had all the money in place to close the transaction. It was a pleasant surprise to Segal, who, upon learning that Gracias had the funds, nudged the board. They should move up the close, the chief financial officer suggested. Finishing the transaction early would leave Musk one less day to back out. While Twitter’s leadership had no idea where some of Musk’s money was coming from—new, undisclosed investors had joined Musk’s take-private effort—they were more than willing to take his $44 billion.

    Members of Twitter’s finance teams had adopted a gallows humor approach to the deal and made a joke of trying to track Musk’s money. When he sold new tranches of Tesla stock and filed the required public disclosures of the transactions, they tallied up his funds, trying to figure out if Musk had enough cash on hand to buy their company. At one point, Musk’s lawyers also accidentally sent Twitter’s finance team a full spreadsheet of all the people and investment firms from which they solicited money. That screwup was immediately followed by a legal threat to the Twitter recipients to delete the email and its contents.

    Of course, there was no way of knowing where the billionaire kept all his money or how he planned to use it. Twitter employees debated whether Musk was sitting on a secret stash of cryptocurrency or had obtained fresh margin loans using his private SpaceX shares as collateral. The Wall Street Journal later reported that Musk borrowed $1 billion from SpaceX that October, paying the money back with interest the following month.

    To Twitter, it didn’t really matter where Musk’s money came from—so long as he paid. But given how many agreements Musk had already tried to break, nothing was certain. There was a world where the richest man on earth, they believed, could test the court-appointed deadline by saying he simply did not have the available funds to do the deal.

    In a normal transaction, the buyer would be transparent with the seller about where his funds were flowing from. But Musk, in what Twitter executives believed was an effort to protect his investors from scrutiny, had dumped all the funds into a single account so that Twitter couldn’t trace their origins.

    On a call with Segal and Twitter’s finance executives and lawyers on Thursday, Gracias changed his tune. His boss was actually short, Gracias explained. Musk was missing more than $400 million, and Gracias demanded that Twitter wire money from its own coffers to Musk so that the deal could close. Segal was dumbfounded. Robert Kaiden, Twitter’s strait-laced chief accounting officer, and the half dozen other people who listened in to the conversation couldn’t believe what they were hearing.

    [ad_2]

    Kate Conger and Ryan Mac

    Source link

  • Jack Dorsey Exits Bluesky Confirms on ‘Freedom Technology’ X | Entrepreneur

    Jack Dorsey Exits Bluesky Confirms on ‘Freedom Technology’ X | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Jack Dorsey, co-founder and former CEO of X/Twitter until he resigned in 2021, has left the board of X rival Bluesky, a decentralized social media network he helped create, fund, and promote.

    Bluesky started as a small research project within then-Twitter in 2019 and became its own platform in 2022. The company’s goal is to create a common operating standard for social media platforms so that apps can work between them. It works a lot like Twitter, which it was designed to replace.

    Dorsey has been on Bluesky’s board since the platform split from Twitter, now X, two years ago, but took to X on Saturday to simply write “no” when asked if he was still on the board.

    He also posted and pinned: “Don’t depend on corporations to grant you rights. defend them yourself using freedom technology. (you’re on one)” on the same day, deeming X “freedom technology.”

    Jack Dorsey. Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images

    On Sunday, Bluesky posted an official statement on their site thanking Dorsey “for his help funding and initiating” Bluesky. The company stated it was looking for a new board member “who shares our commitment to building a social network that puts people in control of their experience.”

    We sincerely thank Jack for his help funding and initiating the bluesky project. Today, Bluesky is thriving as an open source social network running on atproto, the decentralized protocol we have built.

    — Bluesky (@bsky.app) May 5, 2024 at 4:11 PM

    Dorsey also reportedly unfollowed over 2,000 people this weekend and weighed in on government surveillance.

    Related: Jack Dorsey Blasts Mark Zuckerberg Over Threads Follow Request: ‘Too Soon’

    He now follows just three people on X: Elon Musk, Edward Snowden, and Stella Assange.

    The seemingly public approval of X is a change of tune for Dorsey, who openly called out Elon Musk’s leadership of X last year.

    Dorsey also founded the fintech conglomerate Block, which the Department of Justice is currently investigating after a former employee alleged compliance issues.

    Dorsey mainly dismissed the news report at Block’s earnings call last week.

    Related: ‘Should Have Walked Away’: Jack Dorsey Says ‘It All Went South’ After Elon Musk Took Over Twitter

    [ad_2]

    Sherin Shibu

    Source link

  • Jack Dorsey departs Bluesky board | TechCrunch

    Jack Dorsey departs Bluesky board | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    Bluesky’s most prominent backer has left its board.

    On Saturday, Jack Dorsey posted on X about grants for open protocols from his philanthropic Start Small initiative. This prompted someone to ask Dorsey if he was still on the Bluesky board, and he responded with a terse “no.” Dorsey did not answer any of the follow-up posts asking him to explain his departure.

    It’s not clear when Dorsey left the board; as of Sunday morning, Bluesky’s corporate FAQ still identified him as a board member. Later that afternoon, the company published the following statement:

    We sincerely thank Jack for his help funding and initiating the bluesky project. Today, Bluesky is thriving as an open source social network running on atproto, the decentralized protocol we have built.

    With Jack’s departure, we are searching for a new board member for the Bluesky public benefit company who shares our commitment to building a social network that puts people in control of their experience. More to come!

    Dorsey first announced Bluesky in 2019, back when he was still CEO of Twitter. He wrote that Twitter (now X) was “funding a small independent team of up to five open source architects, engineers, and designers to develop an open and decentralized standard for social media.”

    Since then, Bluesky has become an independent public benefit corporation, led by CEO Jay Graber, with VC backing, and it opened to the general public in February.

    Dorsey appears to have deleted his Bluesky account at some point last year, though his departure was only acknowledged at the time by a smattering of social media posts. (He also deleted his Instagram account.) Despite this, he remained the biggest name associated with the project.

    Back on X, Dorsey has had a pretty active weekend. In addition to dropping corporate news, he’s also weighed in on the beef between Drake and Kendrick Lamar, unfollowed nearly every other account, and posted, “don’t depend on corporations to grant you rights. defend them yourself using freedom technology. (you’re on one)”

    This story has been updated with a statement from Bluesky confirming Dorsey’s departure.

    [ad_2]

    Anthony Ha

    Source link

  • Jack Dorsey says (on X) that he’s not on the Bluesky board anymore

    Jack Dorsey says (on X) that he’s not on the Bluesky board anymore

    [ad_1]

    Jack Dorsey has apparently exited the Bluesky board. As spotted by , the former Twitter CEO who was previously Bluesky’s highest-profile proponent shared the life update this weekend on X, where he’s been posting a lot lately. In response to a user who asked “are you still on the bsky board,” only, “no.” That’s it, nothing more. Engadget has reached out to the company for comment and will update this story if we hear back.

    The decentralized social network started as a project by a team at then-Twitter back in 2019, but it eventually split off on its own. It only opened to the public this March after being invite-only for almost a year. While Jack Dorsey sat on its board, Bluesky is led by Jay Graber, its CEO since 2021. since Elon Musk’s takeover, but it seems he’s now swung back around. On Saturday, , “don’t depend on corporations to grant you rights. defend them yourself using freedom technology. (you’re on one).”

    The company has made no mention yet of Dorsey’s departure, and he’s still named as a board member on its . Dorsey seemingly deleted his own Bluesky account months ago, TechCrunch notes.

    [ad_2]

    Cheyenne MacDonald

    Source link

  • Block reportedly greenlit transactions involving terrorist groups and sanctioned nations

    Block reportedly greenlit transactions involving terrorist groups and sanctioned nations

    [ad_1]

    Block appears to be squarely in the government’s sights. Prosecutors from the Southern District of New York are reportedly probing extensive compliance lapses at the parent company of Square and Cash App. NBC News says a former Block employee has handed over documents to federal authorities, painting a picture of how the company failed to gather required risk-assessment information from customers and subsequently processed illegal transactions.

    The documents allegedly show that Block greenlit multiple crypto transactions involving known terrorist organizations. Furthermore, Square reportedly processed thousands of transfers involving nations under economic sanctions. “From the ground up, everything in the compliance section was flawed,” the whistleblower allegedly told NBC News. “It is led by people who should not be in charge of a regulated compliance program.”

    Most transactions allegedly involved credit cards, dollar transfers or Bitcoin and weren’t reported to the government as mandated by law. In addition, Block reportedly refused to “correct company processes” when notified of the breaches.

    The investigation follows a separate report from NBC News in February highlighting two different whistleblowers who flagged the same issues at Block. They cited “questionable Cash App transactions with entities under sanction by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, operations known to sell personal information and credit card data for illegal purposes, and offshore gambling sites barred to U.S. citizens.”

    The practice allegedly spanned multiple years. NBC News says it reviewed around 100 pages of documents from the whistleblower involving people or organizations in countries under US sanctions, including Russia, Iran, Venezuela and Cuba. Some of them were reportedly from as recent as 2023.

    Graphic from finance company Block showing Jack Dorsey's face on a cube.

    Block

    The whistleblower claims Block’s management was aware of the alleged offenses. “It’s my understanding from the documents that compliance lapses were known to Block leadership and the board in recent years,” Edward Siedle, a former SEC attorney representing the whistleblower, told NBC News.

    The whistleblower says that, besides senior management, Block’s board was told about the compliance issues. Coincidentally or not, several board members made unexpected exits recently, including former US treasury secretary Lawrence Summers, who resigned in February, and Sharon Rothstein, who had been on the board since 2022. Block told NBC News that they were leaving to devote more time to other activities and that their exits weren’t “a result of any disagreements with the company on any matter relating to the company’s operations, policies or practices.”

    Federal authorities have taken a greater interest in modern financial platforms in recent years after at least some of them had become something of a Wild West. Of course, FTX’s fraudulent practices and subsequent collapse led to a seismic decline in the cryptocurrency industry. Although it isn’t clear if the feds have gotten involved, Elon Musk’s X (the husk of what was once Dorsey’s Twitter) reportedly violated US sanctions by accepting blue-check subscription payments from terrorist organizations.

    [ad_2]

    Will Shanklin

    Source link

  • X is funding a lawsuit against Jack Dorsey’s Block to support the ‘right to freedom of speech’

    X is funding a lawsuit against Jack Dorsey’s Block to support the ‘right to freedom of speech’

    [ad_1]

    X is funding a lawsuit filed by Chloe Happe against her former employer Block, which was founded by Jack Dorsey, the same person who founded the website formerly known as Twitter. In her lawsuit, Happe said Block had wrongfully fired her in retaliation for two posts she made on what she called her “pseudonymous, satirical account” on X while on her personal time. One of the posts made after the October 7 Hamas attacks on Israel referenced refugees fleeing Gaza and and coming to the region of Kurdistan. In another, she used ableist language and a slur against transgender people while referencing the use of a “gender neutral restroom in the office.”

    Happe repeatedly stressed that she “expressed her political views, opinions, or beliefs in the form of satire.” She said she did not mention Block in any post on her anonymous account and that she did not make those posts during her work hours. Happe also said that she “voluntarily deleted” the post on refugees within days of posting. She deleted the post with the slurs on the same day she made it upon seeing that X had limited its visibility.

    But Block still obtained copies of the posts and wouldn’t tell her if another employee had complained about it, she argued in her lawsuit, admitting that she initially denied making them out of fear that she could get in trouble. She accused Block of terminating her, without severance, solely because she expressed views the company disagreed with. Happe argued that Block’s policies expressly allowed its employees to engage in speech like her post, so it was the company that violated its own rules. Jack Dorsey, the founder of both Block (a financial services company) and Twitter, had publicly endorsed Elon Musk before the latter took over ownership of the social media platform. Last year, though, he changed his tune and criticized Musk, saying “it all went south” after he took over and that he “should have walked away” from the acquisition.

    On his account, Elon Musk retweeted X’s announcement that it’s supporting Happe’s lawsuit with the caption: “Supporting your right to freedom of speech.” The company had previously funded other lawsuits in the name of “free speech.” One of those cases is Gina Carano’s lawsuit against Lucasfilm and Disney, which she accused of removing her from The Mandalorian for expressing views that were “not in line with the acceptable narrative of the time.” Carano notably questioned the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and added “boop/bop/beep” as her pronouns. She also shared a post on Instagram that compared the treatment of conservatives in America to the treatment of Jews in Nazi-era Germany.

    Happe is asking the court to order her reinstatement as a Block employee. She is also asking for compensatory and punitive damages, including for loss of pay from the time she was terminated.

    This article contains affiliate links; if you click such a link and make a purchase, we may earn a commission.

    [ad_2]

    Mariella Moon

    Source link

  • Bluesky CEO Jay Graber Says She Won’t ‘Enshittify the Network With Ads’

    Bluesky CEO Jay Graber Says She Won’t ‘Enshittify the Network With Ads’

    [ad_1]

    Our goal is to combine both approaches—to run a moderation service that tries to provide a baseline and to also have an open ecosystem where anyone who wants to innovate can come in and start building. I think this is particularly useful around cases where information is really fast moving and there’s specialized knowledge. There are organizations out there already in the business of fact-checking, or figuring out if a verified account is actually a politician or not. They can start annotating and putting that information into the network, and we can build off that collective intelligence.

    Recently there was a very high-profile incident on X where deepfake porn of Taylor Swift started spreading and the platform was not super prompt at clamping down. What’s your approach to moderating deepfakes?

    From the start we’ve been using some AI-detection services—image labeling services—but this is an area where there’s a lot of innovation and we’ve been looking at other alternatives.

    This is also where a third-party labeling system could really come into use. We can move faster as an open collective of people—she has lots of fans who could help identify content like this very proactively.

    What are the benefits of federation—where a social network is decentralized, consisting of a bunch of independent servers instead of one central hub—for the casual internet user?

    The goals here are to give developers the freedom to build, and users the right to leave. The ability for people to host their own data means that users always have other alternatives, and that their experience doesn’t have to just come from us. For example, if a user wants to try a wholly different app, or a whole different experience, or they want to move to a parallel social network.

    If someone was to use your protocol and build, say, a Taylor Swift deepfake porn community, is there anything you could do to stop that?

    With the open web model, someone can always put their own website on the internet, but it doesn’t have to be indexed. We’re also playing a role in surfacing and indexing content. For really bad stuff out there, we’re trying to make sure that it never gets shown, by de-promoting it and not connecting to it.

    Can you explain your business model?

    We really think that money follows value. There’s been skepticism that this whole model of social can work. People are even wondering what it is. So, first of all, we’re trying to prove that this ecosystem has value to users and developers, and that it can kick off an era of open innovation.

    From there, we’re going to monetize while following our values. Early on, Twitter was very open and everyone built on it. But then they shut down at some point, right? They turned into much more of a platform, and less something that looked like a protocol.

    Our whole approach is getting back to protocols, not platforms, and there are certain guarantees that we’ve built into the protocol. It’s locked open. Once we have proven out this approach, I think there’s lots of ways that money is going to flow through the ecosystem. We’re going to start exploring some of those models this year.

    [ad_2]

    Kate Knibbs

    Source link

  • Twice in Two Months: Jack Dorsey’s Block Conducts Another Round of Layoffs

    Twice in Two Months: Jack Dorsey’s Block Conducts Another Round of Layoffs

    [ad_1]

    Block Inc., a fintech company co-founded by former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, has laid off some of its employees, making it the second time in two months that the company is cutting down on its workforce.

    The cuts are in line with a previous statement by Dorsey, who said that the firm is aiming to reduce its total headcount by 10% by 2024.

    More Workforce Slashes at Block

    In a note to Block staff on Jan. 30, 2024, as viewed by Business Insider, Dorsey, co-founder and CEO of Block, said the workforce slash will affect employees at CashApp, Foundational, and Square – subsidiaries controlled by Block.

    Dorsey stated that CashApp, Foundational, and Square each did an assessment to find out which parts of the teams needed to be reduced, restructured, and reorganized.

    Although the exact number of workers affected was not stated, Dorsey said in the note that a “large number of our teammates” were laid off. Meanwhile, Business Insider, citing a person familiar with the matter, revealed that Block reportedly let go of nearly 1000 employees.

    “We decided it would be better to do it at once rather than arbitrarily space them out, which didn’t seem fair to the individuals or to the company. When we know we need to take an action, we want to take it immediately, rather than let things linger on forever.”

    An Absolute Cap

    The latest development marks the second time in two months that job cuts have happened across Block, the first time being in December 2023.

    Digital music streaming app Tidal, another subsidiary of Block, laid off more than 10% of its employees following a previous announcement by Dorsey in November.

    The Block CEO at the time said that the company was planning to put the “absolute cap” on the number of Block workers at 12,000 by the end of 2024, down from over 13,000 recorded by Q3 2023, giving employees the heads up about workforce trimming.

    In a letter to shareholders, Dorsey said that the company put a cap on its workers before its initial public offering (IPO), stating that given the success of the move, Block was going to implement the measure once again.

    “We are going to do that again now, by creating an absolute cap on the number of people we have at the company, held firm at 12,000 people until we feel the growth of the business has meaningfully outpaced the growth of the company.”

    SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)

    Binance Free $100 (Exclusive): Use this link to register and receive $100 free and 10% off fees on Binance Futures first month (terms).

    [ad_2]

    Anthonia Isichei

    Source link

  • Jack Dorsey Rolls Out Self-Custody Bitcoin Wallet With Key Recovery Tool

    Jack Dorsey Rolls Out Self-Custody Bitcoin Wallet With Key Recovery Tool

    [ad_1]

    Jack Dorsey’s Block has announced the full, global rollout of Bitkey – the firm’s self-custodial Bitcoin (BTC) wallet – in a bid to encourage HODLers to take full control of their coins.

    “Move your Bitcoin off the exchanges,” said Dorsey via X (formerly Twitter) on Thursday, attaching a link to Bitkey’s website which is currently selling the wallets for $150 apiece.

    Bitkey’s Unique Security Model

    Per a press release from Block on Thursday, Bitkey’s rollout is available to ninety-five countries across six continents including the United States, Canada, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, El Salvador, and others.

    The wallet’s product suite includes a mobile app for users to manage their funds, and a biometrically secured hardware device for storing a private key.

    As a “multi-signature” wallet, moving coins from a Bitkey requires permission from two of three keyholders: the hardware device, the user’s phone, and Block itself. This security model is intended to protect users in case they lose one or both of their keys.

    For example, if a user loses or replaces their phone, they can still use Bitkey’s cloud backup service to recover their mobile key. Backups stored on Bitkey’s cloud are encrypted, and can only be decrypted using a key exclusively stored in the customer’s hardware device.

    Alternatively, if a customer loses their hardware wallet, they may trigger an in-built fund recovery process within their app. After a security waiting period, Bitkey will send users a new device, and will collaborate with the customer to transfer their old balance to their new keys.

    Even if both a user’s hardware wallet and phone are lost, they pre-arrange “trusted contacts” to help verify their identity to Bitkey, who can help recover both their mobile and hardware keys for them.

    Making Self Custody Feasible

    Bitkey Business Lead Lindsey Grossman noted that the wallet was designed to make people feel more secure about self-custody of their keys, and more willing to remove their coins from centralized exchanges.

    “People have often felt stuck: worried about the lack of control they might experience on a custodial platform or exchange, yet also anxious about the unforgiving product experiences that exist in other self-custody wallets historically available,” she stated.

    Dorsey has endorsed numerous Bitcoin-related initiatives in the past to promote decentralization and security throughout the ecosystem. Last month, he led a $6 million raise for the non-custodial Bitcoin mining pool OCEAN.

    SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)

    Binance Free $100 (Exclusive): Use this link to register and receive $100 free and 10% off fees on Binance Futures first month (terms).

    [ad_2]

    Andrew Throuvalas

    Source link

  • Music Streaming Service Tidal Lays Off More Than 10% of Staff

    Music Streaming Service Tidal Lays Off More Than 10% of Staff

    [ad_1]

    Tidal, the high-fidelity music streaming service majority owned by Jack Dorsey-led financial company Block, has laid off more than 10% its staff, representing about 40 staffers who have been let go.

    The cuts at Tidal are part of Block’s stated goal of capping its total employee base at 12,000. As of Dec. 31, 2022, Block, which was previously named Square, had 12,428 full-time employees worldwide.

    “We can confirm, as part of Block and its recent announcement to cap the number of employees at the company to focus on business growth, Tidal has carefully considered how to right-size our team to ensure we are able to continue to build and invest in critical areas of the business,” Sade Ayodele, head of global communications for Tidal, said in a statement. “We do not take these decisions lightly, and we are sincerely grateful for the contributions of our impacted teammates.”

    The Tidal layoffs were first reported by Bloomberg. Citing anonymous sources, the publication reported that the cuts include “a portion of the curation team that builds playlists.”

    Tidal was formed in 2015, after Jay-Z led a consortium of artists in a $56 million deal to acquire Norwegian streaming company Aspiro. Other Tidal artist-owners included Beyoncé, Alicia Keys, Coldplay’s Chris Martin, Kanye West, Madonna, Nicki Minaj and Rihanna.

    In 2021, a Dorsey’s Block (then called Square) acquired a majority stake in Tidal. Block owns 87.5% of the equity in Tidal. At the time, Dorsey said the company’s deal for Tidal “comes down to one simple idea: finding new ways for artists to support their work.”

    “New ideas are found at intersections, and we believe there’s a compelling one between music and the economy,” Dorsey said in a statement. “I knew Tidal was something special as soon as I experienced it, and it will continue to be the best home for music, musicians and culture.”

    [ad_2]

    Todd Spangler

    Source link

  • Block’s Bitcoin revenue grew nearly 40% while value of its Bitcoin holdings rose

    Block’s Bitcoin revenue grew nearly 40% while value of its Bitcoin holdings rose

    [ad_1]

    Block’s share price soared in after hours trading after the payments company surpassed analyst expectations for its third quarter earnings, which included news of a double digit jump in Bitcoin revenue.

    The company’s Bitcoin revenue grew 37.5% to $2.42 billion from $1.76 billion in the same period last year. Gross profit the company reaped from Bitcoin rose to $44 million, compared to $36 million last year. 

    Block also touted the value of the Bitcoin holdings in its corporate treasury, which amounted to $216 million based on market prices. The value of its holdings based on market prices were $114 million higher than the value on its books. 

    The discrepancy between book value and market value is due to a quirk in accounting rules (set to be changed) that require firms to record any decreases in Bitcoin price as an impairment charge, but prevents them from recognizing increases in the value of their Bitcoin holdings until the assets are sold. In the third quarter of 2023, the company did not recognize a Bitcoin impairment loss.

    In total, Block’s net revenue grew 24% year-over-year to $5.62 billion from $4.52 billion a year ago. Bitcoin revenue made up about 43% of total revenue. The jump in revenue that came from the cryptocurrency was fueled by strong performance of the company’s CashApp product. 

    Cash App revenue grew 34% to $3.58 billion, up from $2.68 billion a year ago. 

    Block shares were trading at about $50, up 15% after market close on Thursday.

    Learn more about all things crypto with short, easy-to-read lesson cards. Click here for Fortune’s Crypto Crash Course.

    [ad_2]

    Marco Quiroz-Gutierrez

    Source link

  • Square CEO Alyssa Henry is stepping down, and Jack Dorsey will take over for now | CNN Business

    Square CEO Alyssa Henry is stepping down, and Jack Dorsey will take over for now | CNN Business

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Alyssa Henry, the CEO of Square – a unit of Jack Dorsey’s fintech company, Block – will leave her post at the company next month.

    Henry, who has worked at Block for over nine years, will step down as chief executive of Square on October 2, according to a regulatory filing on Monday.

    Square is the payments solutions arm of Block, which has multiple other business units, including the popular Cash App platform, under its umbrella.

    Dorsey, whose current title is Block Head and Chairperson, will take on an additional role of “Square Head,” the filing added.

    The reason for Henry’s departure was not immediately clear.

    “As CEO of Square, Alyssa Henry helped transform the business into a software-led technology company, guided the team during the uncertainty of global pandemic lockdowns, and expanded our breadth of services for small businesses around the world,” a Block company spokesperson told CNN in a statement Monday.

    “Square is what it is today in large part because of Alyssa’s leadership and we wish her the best in her future endeavors,” the statement added.

    Henry served in various roles at Square and has been effectively leading the company since 2015. Prior to Square, she held roles at Amazon Web Services and Microsoft.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The family office for Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey backs French rival to Microsoft Excel

    The family office for Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey backs French rival to Microsoft Excel

    [ad_1]

    The logo of the spreadsheet software Microsoft Excel is shown on the display of a smartphone.

    Thomas Trutschel | Photothek | Getty Images

    French business planning software startup Pigment has raised $88 million in a funding round led by ICONIQ, the private investment fund that manages the money of tech billionaires such as Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey.

    Pigment is best known for its business planning and forecasting platform that’s designed to be more user-friendly than Microsoft’s spreadsheet software Excel.

    related investing news

    CNBC Pro

    The company, co-founded and helmed by dual CEOs Eleonore Crespo and Romain Niccoli, told CNBC it planned to use the funding to expand its reach in the U.S. and artificial intelligence.

    Venture capital firms Felix Capital, Meritech, IVP, and FirstMark also participated in the funding round.

    Pigment counts the likes of Klarna, Miro and Tommy Hilfiger owner PVH as its customers.

    The company’s tools are mainly used by finance teams to plan and make financial and business decisions. As well as Microsoft, Pigment also views enterprise software tools from giants like Google, SAP and Oracle as rivals.

    Crespo said that, in 2022, Pigment grew its revenues by 600% and its total user base increased tenfold — and insisted it was well positioned to compete with behemoth incumbent Microsoft.

    “We not only have users in the finance team but outside of finance, and that’s super interesting for investors to hear that we are not a finance platform but a business database that can serve any business leader out there from HR to sales to marketing, to R&D [research and development],” she said.

    “We are here to sell [to] any business leader. And not only that, but they have heard from their portfolio companies that we managed to serve the most forward-looking companies out there.”

    Pigment also plans to use the latest influx of money to invest in the development of AI products.

    It introduced a new service called Pigment AI last month, on the heels of heightened buzz surrounding AI and products like ChatGPT, which lets clients query data, identify patterns and automate analysis and reporting.

    Crespo said there are no plans to increase headcount substantially and Pigment was instead looking to grow in a more sustainable way, given the pressure from investors on businesses to achieve profitability in favor of breakneck growth.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Are Bluesky Social’s Good Vibes Doomed?

    Are Bluesky Social’s Good Vibes Doomed?

    [ad_1]

    Bluesky, the hot new invite-only Twitter look-alike, was supposed to provide a much-needed reprieve from an otherwise toxic social media ecosystem. But by the time I joined Bluesky, in early May, I wondered if the party was over. For the uninitiated, Bluesky began in 2019 as a decentralized social media experiment at Twitter and separated into its own company last year, with former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey as a board member. (By “decentralized,” the company means it’s creating an open-sourced protocol for building social apps—Bluesky Social being one of them.) In recent months—namely after Elon Musk’s Twitter takeover—the site has become a playground for those in media, politics, and tech deemed capable of ushering a new platform to the masses. Outlets like Wired and Rolling Stone highlighted the app as a pleasant possible alternative to Twitter. It began as a playful, punny, and free environment that looked a whole lot like Twitter, but where posts were “skeets” and ranged from quaint pictures of blue skies to nudes.

    But one exchange between Bluesky CEO Jay Graber and Bluesky users has suggested that the app has yet to actually grapple with the difficult questions around content moderation that have roiled other social media platforms. It began when multiple users called for the removal of a user with the handle @commie.cafe, who had allegedly deadnamed trans women, harassed and doxxed them, and engaged in other harmful behavior. In response to users’ concerns, Graber wrote, “We’re watching, and will take action based on behavior. Blocks prevent interaction.” That reply prompted many to question why the company wouldn’t take its users’ concerns seriously and act proactively against users accused of engaging in harmful behavior on other platforms. 

    “How many people have to directly inform you of the presence of a dangerous, toxic person before you are willing to stop watching and take action?” one user wrote in response to Graber. 

    “A lot of folks are scared/worried here, especially after years of Twitter not really dealing with this stuff well. Don’t be Twitter, be better,” another user replied to Graber. The user accused of transphobic acts appears to no longer be on the platform. Bluesky did not respond to a request for comment on the incident, nor did it answer a question regarding  whether the company took any actions against the user. 

    This not only offered a glimpse into Bluesky’s content-moderation approach, it also called into question whether the company would take any steps to preserve its good vibes. Its nine-person team is building a platform with a wait list of 1.9 million email addresses, belonging to those seeking to join the more than 72,000 users on the invite-only beta version of the app. But as users flock to the app for its potential as a replacement for Twitter, some early users wonder whether the platform can continue being a welcome relief from harassment, hate speech, and graphic content. Or will it ultimately make mistakes similar to those of its predecessors?

    The company remains mum on its plans for dealing with these issues going forward, aside from posting some details on its Frequently Asked Questions page. I reached out to the company’s spokesperson with a detailed list of questions regarding whether the company would prioritize users of marginalized backgrounds, the degree to which it would enforce its content-moderation policies, and what investments it would make into content moderation. But a spokesperson for the company is not granting interviews, because everyone is “heads down on work.”

    On its site, Bluesky notes that it plans to use automated filtering, manual administrator actions, and community labeling to moderate the platform. In addition to its basic filtering for objectionable content, the company wants to enable users and developers to add additional filters and other moderation controls on top. In another post, Graber notes that developers running their own servers will be able to set their own content-moderation policies at the server and community levels, “but I need it to be calm enough for long enough that we can build out the rest of the system to give people more direct controls.” The company declined to say whether it plans to hire more human moderators and implement additional measures to protect users who are part of marginalized communities, especially as the user base grows.

    Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and other prominent social media platforms made the mistake of underestimating the extent to which dangerous online rhetoric could lead to offline harm, Yoel Roth, Twitter’s former head of trust & safety and a tech policy fellow at the University of California Berkeley, said. And while it’s not feasible to take a totally localized approach to content moderation as it expands abroad, Roth said he hopes the next generation of social platforms will take seriously what has worked and not worked with their veteran predecessors. “One of the promises of federated platforms like Bluesky is that it can give people more choices about what goes and what doesn’t,” Roth said, referencing Bluesky’s idea to give creators independence from the platform itself. “But you still have to draw that line somewhere, of what doesn’t go anywhere, and that’s the battlefield of content moderation.”

    As for AI helping with some content-moderation functions, Miro Dittrich, a senior researcher at the Center for Monitoring, Analysis and Strategy, said that the technology cannot be trusted to work at scale on its own, as has been true for other social platforms. Roth agreed: If Bluesky does use AI as part of its content moderation, companies should test these tools before building their whole moderation strategy around them, he said. Enabling developers to create their own interfaces to set content boundaries could have unintended consequences too. If, for example, a user doxxes someone or posts nonconsensual sexual imagery, those posts could be de-indexed so that Bluesky users can’t view them, but the images could still be available on someone’s personal server and end up on the internet; it’s not certain whether that’s a sufficient solution, said Sol Messing, a research associate professor at New York University and former discovery data science lead at Twitter.

    [ad_2]

    Tatiana Walk-Morris

    Source link

  • Jack Dorsey Says Twitter ‘Went South’ After Musk Deal | Entrepreneur

    Jack Dorsey Says Twitter ‘Went South’ After Musk Deal | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    “No.”

    That was Jack Dorsey’s response when he was asked on his app, Bluesky, if Twitter’s current owner and CEO, Elon Musk, was right for the job. This is the opposite of his position last year, when he Tweeted: “Elon is the singular solution I trust.”

    Dorsey added that the board should not have “forced the sale” and that “it all went south.”

    Dorsey’s Bluesky posts were reviewed by CNN and CBS.

    RELATED: Elon Musk Says Twitter Is Valued At Less Than Half of What He Paid For It Just Days After Sending Frantic Email to Employees

    Musk acquired Twitter in October 2022 for $44 billion and then laid off thousands of employees. The app has experienced outages, glitches, and a whiplash news cycle over verifications and Twitter Blue.

    Still, Dorsey deflected any blame for the deal, noting that the board would have accepted the highest offer.

    “This is true for every public company,” he wrote, adding that the board authorized the deal, not just him, and the other alternatives were “hedge funds and Wall Street activists.”

    “The company would have never survived as a public company,” Dorsey said on the app, per CNN. “I wish it were different.”

    Bluesky hit the App Store in March, but a code is still needed to set up an account.

    RELATED: ‘This Will Be a Nightmare’: Mark Cuban Slams Elon Musk’s New Twitter Verification System

    [ad_2]

    Entrepreneur Staff

    Source link