ReportWire

Tag: ivanka trump

  • Ivanka Trump’s Former Lawyer Has a New Client: Letitia James

    [ad_1]

    New York attorney general Letitia James became the latest target of Donald Trump’s Justice Department on Thursday when she was charged with one count of bank fraud and one count of making false statements to a financial institution for allegedly claiming a home in Norfolk, Virginia was her second residence. James has denied the allegations; in a statement, her attorney, Abbe Lowell, said the case “is being driven by President Trump’s desire for revenge,” and vowed to “fight these charges in every process allowed in the law.” If the claims against James sound familiar, it’s probably because they’re very similar to the ones brought against Dr. Lisa Cook, the Fed Board of Governors member Trump is trying to oust. And if James’s lawyer sounds familiar, it’s probably because he is also representing Cook. Oh, and his past clients have included Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump.

    Herewith, a primer on the go-to defense attorney.

    Wait, wait, wait, before we get to Lowell, what’s going on with James?

    James was indicted by a grand jury in Virginia on Thursday, and charged with mortgage fraud, having allegedly claimed that a house in Norfolk, Virginia was her second home—which allowed her to obtain more favorable loan terms—but which she rented out. Prosecutors claim James saved $18,933 with the lower interest rate. If convicted, she could face up to 30 years in prison and pay a fine up to $1 million for each count. (Similarly, Cook was charged with allegedly claiming two different homes were her primary residence, allegations she has denied, and which appear to be rapidly falling apart.) In August, attorney general Pam Bondi appointed a “special attorney” to investigate claims against James brought by Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte—who, in that same capacity, alleged wrongdoing by Cook. After prosecutors concluded they did not have sufficient evidence to win a conviction against James, and the acting US attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia resigned under pressure from the president, Trump named one of his former personal attorneys, Lindsey Halligan, as acting prosecutor, despite the fact she has…no prosecutorial experience. In her short time on the job, Halligan first brought charges against former FBI director James Comey, and then James.

    Good lord.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Barron Trump’s Fortune Tops Melania’s, Thanks to Crypto Investments

    [ad_1]

    Like his father and grandfather before him, Barron Trump seems to have a keen business sense. The son of Donald Trump and Melania Trump is enjoying a particularly lucrative 2025: at just 19 years of age, the youngest member of the Trump clan now has a larger fortune than his own mother, thanks to cryptocurrencies.

    Due to the sale of tokens, Barron’s fortune has jumped by $80 million in recent months and now totals $150 million, according to Forbes. On top of this, he is said to hold almost 2.3 billion tokens, which he could resell for $525 million.

    The first of the Trump clan to take an interest in the cryptocurrency market, Barron convinced his family to set up his own company in the field, World Liberty Financial, which came into being at the end of 2024. Barron spent his summer “meeting with business partners” and “striking deals,” writes People, before quietly resuming classes at New York University’s Washington, DC campus.

    Donald Trump’s second term in the White House has largely benefited his children, writes Forbes. In one year, Donald Trump Jr. added a zero to his fortune, which now totals $500 million. The cryptocurrency market and various contracts signed, including some in Qatar, have been even more beneficial for Eric Trump, who has seen his bank account grow from $40 million to $750 million over the same period. Ivanka Trump, for her part, is said to have $100 million—which is trifle, compared with the billion dollars held by her husband, Jared Kushner, a businessman specializing in real estate.

    The man who has benefited most from buying and selling cryptocurrencies remains the President of the United States. His investments earned him two billion dollars, out of the three billion in profits he made over the year. Jumping 70%, his fortune now stands at $7.3 billion. The Republican moves up 118 places in the Forbes 400 ranking (listing the richest men in America) to the 201st position.

    For her part, Melania has a wallet worth $20 million, which has grown thanks to “classic means for a First Lady (books, conferences, documentaries),” the media outlet notes. Not to be left unmoved by the promise of cryptocurrency, she has launched her own meme coin, $MELANIA, a speculative token whose aesthetic is based on a meme and whose value is decided by buyers. Listed on the stock exchange, its value is estimated at $200 million.

    Originally appeared in Vanity Fair France.

    [ad_2]

    Séraphine Roger

    Source link

  • As Donald Trump’s Prospects Soar, Ivanka Inches Back to the National Stage

    As Donald Trump’s Prospects Soar, Ivanka Inches Back to the National Stage

    [ad_1]

    Ivanka Trump is set to return to the national stage. According to her spokesperson and two sources close to the Trump campaign, Donald Trump’s eldest daughter is planning to attend next week’s 2024 Republican National Convention in Milwaukee to personally show support for her father. The Trump campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

    Ivanka’s presence at the convention would mark a dramatic return to the campaign trail that she has conspicuously avoided this election cycle. She famously skipped her father’s low-energy campaign launch at Mar-a-Lago in November 2022 and released a statement at the time declaring: “I am choosing to prioritize my young children and the private life we are creating as a family. I do not plan to be involved in politics.” She also did not attend his recent criminal trial in Manhattan, which saw him convicted of 34 felony counts.

    To some observers, Ivanka has served as something of a political weather vane. Early in the GOP primary, many interpreted her absence from the campaign as a sign that Trump faced insurmountable headwinds: Trump-endorsed candidates were blown out in the 2022 midterms; billionaire Republican donors like Ken Griffin and Stephen Schwarzman announced that they would support a non-Trump candidate in 2024; and Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post splashed a photo of DeSantis on the cover with the headline “DeFuture.” (Meanwhile, the Post mocked Trump’s 2024 rollout with the front-page teaser “Florida Man Makes Announcement,” story on page 26.)

    That was then. Next week Trump will be coronated in Milwaukee. Democrats, meanwhile, remain paralyzed over what to do about Joe Biden’s evident cognitive decline and failing candidacy. The Trump campaign is, privately at least, feeling confident that Trump will win in a landslide if Biden stays in the race. In other words, Ivanka would be jumping on a bandwagon that looks destined for victory. One source said Trump is annoyed that Ivanka would wait until now to get involved. “He didn’t like how she took credit for things and disappeared when things got tough,” the source said. But another source close to Ivanka disputed this, saying Trump himself has been asking Ivanka to speak at the convention. Ivanka’s polished mien would presumably appeal to independents and women, voters with whom Trump polls poorly. However, Ivanka’s spokesperson confirmed that she will not be speaking.

    Coincidentally or not, Ivanka has been boosting her public profile recently. On July 2, podcaster Lex Fridman released a three-hour interview with Ivanka (Fridman said the two became friends over their shared love of reading philosophers like Joseph Campbell, Marcus Aurelius, Alan Watts, and Viktor Frankl). Ivanka reiterated on the podcast that she doesn’t plan to formally join the campaign. “Politics, it’s a pretty dark world…. It’s just really at odds with what feels good for me as a human being,” she said.

    But sources I talked to wonder if Ivanka would be able to resist the pull of power should Trump return to the White House. After all, her husband, Jared Kushner, could be under consideration to serve as Trump’s secretary of state.

    This article was updated with confirmation that Ivanka Trump will not give a speech at the convention.

    [ad_2]

    Gabriel Sherman

    Source link

  • Anant Ambani, Radhika Merchant pre-wedding: Celebs deck up for Hastakshar event

    Anant Ambani, Radhika Merchant pre-wedding: Celebs deck up for Hastakshar event

    [ad_1]

    Tonight was the final night of Anant Ambani and Radhika Merchant’s pre-wedding. And celebs were all decked up in Indian attires, looking pretty. Check out the pictures below…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ivanka Is Done With Politics But Not Trump’s PAC Money

    Ivanka Is Done With Politics But Not Trump’s PAC Money

    [ad_1]

    Ivanka Trump at New York State Supreme Court in New York on November 8, 2023.
    Photo: Jeenah Moon/Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Over the past few years, Ivanka Trump has made it very clear that she wants nothing to do with any of the headaches associated with her father Donald Trump’s business and political operations. Ivanka worked in the Trump Organization and then her father’s White House administration for the entirety of her adult life, but she and her husband, Jared Kushner, backed away as his term ended. Then, in November 2022, she skipped her dad’s 2024 campaign announcement and posted a statement online declaring, “I do not plan to be involved in politics. While I will always love and support my father, going forward I will do so outside the political arena.”

    But it turns out she’s not averse to the perks that come with her dad’s political career, like letting his super-PAC cover her legal bills.

    Business Insider reviewed Federal Election Commission records and found that Donald Trump’s Save America PAC spent a total of $2.3 million last year for two law firms that solely represented Ivanka:

    In 2023, Save America disbursed a total of $1,303,667.11 to the law firm Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders and $1,042,479 to the firm Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel, & Frederick.

    Both firms represented Ivanka Trump in New York Attorney General Letitia James’ sprawling lawsuit against the Trump Organization, Donald Trump, his three eldest children, and several executives over its finances. The attorney general’s office alleged that the firm misrepresented its finances to obtain favorable tax, bank-loan, and insurance rates.

    The PAC spent another $5.3 million on a law firm that represented Ivanka along with her father, her brothers Don Jr. and Eric, and the Trump Organization. None of the suits that incurred the fees were related to Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign (unless you subscribe to the idea that every bad thing happening in Trump’s life is the result of political persecution).

    Trump founded the Save America PAC days after his 2020 election loss, and repeatedly solicited donated by telling supporters that he needed money for “election defense.” But much of the money Trump collected has gone to covering his legal expenses in various cases that have nothing to do with bogus “election fraud” claims. Save America and MAGA PAC, another political group controlled by Trump, have spent more than $50 million on legal fees, according to Business Insider.

    It doesn’t appear that Ivanka really needed PAC donor money to cover her $2.3 million legal bills, as she and Jared have an estimated net worth of over $1 billion. And it certainly seems hypocritical for Ivanka to take money from her father’s political action committee after she dramatically declared that she wants nothing to do with politics. But in her defense, even obscenely wealthy people like free stuff. They essentially drove a dump truck full of money up to her house. She’s not made of stone!


    See All





    [ad_2]

    Margaret Hartmann

    Source link

  • The ‘dirty dozen’ of Davos

    The ‘dirty dozen’ of Davos

    [ad_1]

    Press play to listen to this article

    Voiced by artificial intelligence.

    It’s that time of year again: Leaders, business titans, philanthropists and celebs descend on the Swiss ski town of Davos to discuss the fate of the world and do deals/shots with the global elite at the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum.

    This year’s theme: “Rebuilding trust.” Prescient, given the dumpster fire the world seems to be turning into lately, both literally (climate change) and figuratively (where to even begin?).

    As always, the Davos great and good will be rubbing shoulders with some of the world’s absolute top-drawer dirtbags. While there’s been a distinct dearth of Russian oligarchs in attendance at the WEF since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, and Donald Trump will be tied up with the Iowa caucus, there are still plenty of would-be autocrats, dictators, thugs, extortionists, misery merchants, spoilers and political pariahs on the Davos guest list.

    1. Argentine President Javier Milei

    Known as the Donald Trump of Argentina — and also as “The Madman” and “The Wig” — the chainsaw-wielding Javier Milei has it all: a fanatical supporter base, background as a TV shock jock, libertarian anarcho-capitalist policies (except when it comes to abortion), and a … memorable … hairdo.

    A long-time Davos devotee (he’s been attending the WEF for years), Milei’s libertarian policies have turned from kooky thought bubbles to concerning reality after he was elected president of South America’s second-largest economy, riding a wave of discontent with the political establishment (sound familiar?). The question now is how far Milei will go in delivering on his campaign promises to hack back public service and state spending, close the Argentine central bank and drop the peso.

    If you do get stuck talking to Milei in the congress center or on the slopes, here are some conversation starters …

    Milei’s likes: 1) American mobster Al Capone — “a hero.” 2) His cloned English Mastiff dogs — his advisers. 3) Spreading the gospel on tantric sex. 4) Selling human organs on the open market.

    Milei’s dislikes: 1) Pope Francis — “a filthy leftist” and “communist turd” — though the Milei administration has recently invited him back to Argentina to visit. 2) Taxes — insisting (incorrectly) Jesus didn’t pay ’em. 3) Sex education — a Marxist plot to destroy the family. 4) Fighting climate change — a hoax, naturally.

    2. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman

    Rumor has it that Mohammed bin Salman will make his first in-person WEF appearance at this year’s event, accompanied by a giant posse of top Saudi officials.

    It’s the ultimate redemption arc for the repressive authoritarian ruler of a country with an appalling human rights record — who, according to United States intelligence, personally ordered the brutal assassination of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul in 2018. 

    Rumor has it that Mohammed bin Salman will make his first in-person WEF appearance at this year’s event | Leon Neal/Getty Images

    Perhaps MBS would still be a WEF pariah — consigned to rubbing shoulders with mere B-listers at his own Davos in the desert — if it were not for that other one-time Davos-darling-turned-persona-non-grata: Russian President Vladimir Putin. By launching his invasion of Ukraine, which killed thousands of civilians and hundreds of thousands of troops, Putin managed to push the West back into MBS’ embrace. Guess it’s all just oil under the bridge now.

    Here’s a piece of free advice: Try to avoid being caught getting a signature MBS fist-bump. Unless, of course, you’re the next person on our list …

    3. Jared Kushner, founder of Affinity Partners

    Jared Kushner is the closest anyone on the mountain is likely to come to Trump, the former — and possibly future — billionaire baron-cum-anti-elitist president of the United States of America. 

    On the one hand, a chat with The Donald’s son-in-law in the days just after the Iowa caucus would probably be quite a get for the Davos devotee. On other hand … it’s Jared Kushner.

    The 43-year-old, who is married to Ivanka Trump and served as a senior adviser to the former president during his time in office, leveraged his stint in the White House to build up a lucrative consulting career, focused mainly on the Middle East.

    Kushner’s private equity firm, Affinity Partners, is largely funded through Gulf countries. That includes a $2 billion investment from the Saudi Public Investment Fund, led by bin Salman — which was, coincidentally, pushed through despite objections by the crown prince’s own advisers

    Kushner struck up a friendship and alliance with MBS during his father-in-law’s term in office, raising major conflict-of-interest suspicions for the Trump administration — especially when the then-U.S. president refused to condemn the Saudi leader in Jamal Khashoggi’s murder, despite the CIA concluding he was directly involved.

    4. Ilham Aliyev, Azerbaijan’s president

    What does an autocrat do with a breakaway state within his country’s borders? Take advantage of Russia’s attention being elsewhere along with the EU’s thirst for his gas to launch a lightning-fast offensive, seize control, deport those pesky ancestral residents, lock up any rascally reporters — and then call a snap election to capitalize on the freshly whipped patriotic fervor, of course!

    Not that elections matter much for Ilham Aliyev — a little ballot stuffing here, a bit of double-voting there, add a sprinkle of violence and suppression — and hey presto, you’ve got a winning recipe, for two decades and counting.

    Running Azerbaijan is something of a family business for the Aliyevs — Ilham assumed power after the death of his father, Heydar Aliyev, an ex-Soviet KGB officer who ruled the country for decades. And the junior Aliyev changed Azerbaijan’s constitution to pave the path to power for the next generation of his family — and appointed his own wife as vice president to boot.

    5. Chinese Premier Li Qiang

    Li Qiang is Chinese President Xi Jinping’s ultra-loyal right-hand man, and will represent his boss and his country at the World Economic Forum this year.

    Li’s claim to infamy: imposing a brutal lockdown on the entirety of Shanghai for weeks during the coronavirus pandemic, which trapped its 25 million-plus inhabitants at home while many struggled to get food, tend to their animals or seek medical help — and tanking the city’s economy in the process.

    Li’s also the guy selling (and whitewashing) China’s Uyghur policy in the Islamic world. In case you need a refresher, China has detained Uyghurs, who are mostly Muslim, in internment camps in the northwest region of Xinjiang, where there have been allegations of torture, slavery, forced sterilization, sexual abuse and brainwashing. China’s actions have been branded genocide by the U.S. State Department, and as potential crimes against humanity by the United Nations.

    Li Qiang will represent his boss and his country at the World Economic Forum this year | Johannes Simon/Getty Images

    The Chinese government claims the camps carry out “reeducation” to combat terrorism — a story Li has brought forward during recent meetings with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, Malaysian Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Pakistan’s caretaker Prime Minister Anwaar-ul-Haq Kakar. Guess we know whom Li will be lunching with.

    6. Rwandan President Paul Kagame

    Nicknamed “the Napoleon of Africa” in a nod to his campaign to seize power in 1994, Paul Kagame has ruled over the land of a thousand hills since. He’s often praised for overseeing what is probably the greatest development success story of modern Africa; he’s also a dictator.

    The former military officer changed the Rwandan constitution to scrap an inconvenient term limit and cement his firm grip on the levers of power, while clamping down on dissent. But despite being accused of overseeing the imprisonment, exile and torture of Rwandan dissidents and journalists, Kagame has managed to stay in the West’s good books — and on the Davos guest list. 

    7. Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico

    Slovakia just can’t seem to quit Robert Fico. 

    Forced from office in 2018 by mass protests following the murder of investigative journalist Ján Kuciak and his fiancée Martina Kušnírová, Fico rose from the political ashes to become Slovakian prime minister for the fourth time late last year. His Smer party ran a Putin-friendly campaign, pledging to end all military support for Ukraine.

    Slovakian courts are still working through multiple organized crime cases stemming from the last time Smer was in power, involving oligarchs alleged to have profited from state contracts; former top police brass and senior military intelligence officers; and parliamentarians from all three parties in Fico’s new coalition government.

    8. President of Hungary Katalin Novák

    Katalin Novák, elected Hungarian president in 2022, must’ve pulled the short straw: she’s been sent to Davos to fly the flag for the EU’s pariah state. Luckily, the 46-year-old is used to being the odd one out at a shindig: She’s both the first woman and the youngest-ever Hungarian president.

    You’d think Novák, given her background, would be a trail-blazing feminist seeking to inspire women to reach for the stars. But the arch social conservative is a hero of the international anti-abortion, anti-equality, anti-feminism movement.

    It’s her thoughts on the gender pay gap, though, that ought to get attention at the famously male-dominated World Economic Forum: In an infamous video posted back in late 2020, Novák told the sisterhood: “Do not believe that women have to constantly compete with men. Do not believe that every waking moment of our lives must be spent with comparing ourselves to men, and that we should work in at least the same position, for at least the same pay they do.” That’s us told.

    9. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet

    You may be surprised to see Hun Manet on this list: The new, Western-educated Cambodian prime minister has been touted in some circles as a potential modernizer and reformer. 

    But Hun Manet is less a breath of fresh air and a lot more continuation of the same stale story. Having inherited his position from his father, the longtime autocrat Hun Sen, Hun Manet has shown no signs of wanting to reform or modernize Cambodia. While some say it’s too early to tell where he’ll land (given his dad’s still on the scene, along with his Communist loyalists), the fact is: Many hallmarks of autocracy are still present in Cambodia. Repression of the opposition? Check. Dodgy “elections”? Check. Widespread graft and clientelism? Check and check

    10. Qatar Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim al-Thani

    How has a small kingdom of 2.6 million inhabitants in the Persian Gulf managed to play a starring role in so many explosive scandals?

    There were the influence-buying allegations that claimed the scalps of multiple European Union lawmakers. The claims of undisclosed lobbying by two Trump-aligned Republican operatives. The multiple controversies over attempts at sportswashing. Not to mention the questions raised about what officials in the emirate knew ahead of the October 7 attacks on Israel by Hamas — of which Qatar is the biggest financial backer.

    Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim al-Thani is the prime minister of Qatar, a country that’s played a starring role in many explosive scandals | Chris J. Ratcliffe/AFP via Getty Images

    You’d think that sort of record would see Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim al-Thani shunned by the world’s top brass. Nah! Just this month, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken met with the Qatari leader and told him the U.S. was “deeply grateful for your ongoing leadership in this effort, for the tireless work which you undertook and that continues, to try to free the remaining hostages.” 

    See you on the slopes, Mohammed!

    11. Polish President Andrzej Duda

    When you compare Polish President Andrzej Duda to some of the others on this list, he doesn’t seem to measure up. He’s not a dictator running a violent petro-state, hasn’t invaded any neighbors or even wielded a chainsaw on stage.

    But Duda is yesterday’s man. As the last one standing from Poland’s nationalist Law and Justice party that was swept out of office last year, Duda’s holding on for dear life to his own relevance, doing his best to act as a spoiler against the Donald Tusk-led government by wielding his veto powers and harboring convicted lawmakers. All of which is to say: When you catch up with President Duda at Davos, don’t assume he’s speaking for Poland.

    12. Amin Nasser, CEO of Aramco

    The Saudi Arabian state oil and gas company is Aramco — the world’s biggest energy firm — and Amin Nasser is its boss. If you read Aramco’s press releases, you’d be forgiven for assuming it is also the world’s biggest champion of the green energy transition. Spoiler alert: It’s far from it.

    Exhibit A: Aramco is reportedly a top corporate polluter, with environment nongovernmental organization ClientEarth reporting that it accounts for more than 4 percent of the globe’s greenhouse gas emissions since 1965. Exhibit B: Bloomberg reported in 2021 that it understated its carbon footprint by as much as 50 percent. 

    Nasser, meanwhile, has criticized the idea that climate action should mean countries “either shut down or slow down big time” their fossil fuel production. Say that to Al Gore’s face!

    This article has been updated to reflect the fact Shou Zi Chew is no longer going to attend the World Economic Forum.

    Dionisios Sturis, Peter Snowdon, Suzanne Lynch and Paul de Villepin contributed reporting.

    [ad_2]

    Zoya Sheftalovich

    Source link

  • The Specter of Family Separation

    The Specter of Family Separation

    [ad_1]

    Almost as soon as Donald Trump took office in 2017, agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement were dispatched across the country to round up as many undocumented foreigners as possible, and the travel ban put into limbo the livelihoods of thousands of people from majority-Muslim countries who had won the hard-fought right to be here—refugees, tech entrepreneurs, and university professors among them. The administration drew up plans for erecting a border wall, as well as an approach to stripping away the due-process rights of noncitizens so they could be expelled faster. These changes to American immigration policy took place in the amount of time that it would take the average new hire to figure out how to use the office printer.

    Explore the January/February 2024 Issue

    Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.

    View More

    Within days of Trump’s election, his key immigration adviser, Stephen Miller, was already gathering a group of loyal bureaucrats to start drafting executive orders. Civil servants who were veterans of the George W. Bush administration found the proposals to be so outlandishly impractical, if not also harmful to American interests and perhaps even illegal, that they assumed the ideas could never come to fruition. They were wrong. Over the next four years, lone children were loaded onto planes and sent back to the countries they had fled without so much as a notification to their families. Others were wrenched from their parents’ arms as a way of sending a message to other families abroad about what awaited them if they, too, tried to enter the United States.

    If given another chance to realize his goals, Miller has essentially boasted in recent interviews that he would move even faster and more forcefully. And Trump, who’s been campaigning on the promise to finish the job he started on immigration policy, would fairly assume if he is reelected that harsh restrictions in that arena are precisely what the American people want. “Following the Eisenhower model, we will carry out the largest domestic deportation operation in American history,” he declared during a speech in Iowa in September, referring to 1954’s offensively titled Operation Wetback, under which hundreds of thousands of people with Mexican ancestry were deported, including some who were American citizens.

    Trump and other key fixtures of his time in office have refused to rule out trying to reinstate family separations. They have been explicit about their plans to send ICE agents back into the streets to make arrests (with help from the FBI, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and the National Guard), and finish their work on the wall. They say that they will reimpose the pandemic-related expulsion policy known as Title 42, which all but shut off access to asylum, and that they will expand the use of military-style camps to house people who are caught in the enforcement dragnet. They have laid out plans and legal rationales for major policy changes that they didn’t get around to the first time, such as ending birthright citizenship, a long-held goal of Trump’s. They’ve floated ideas such as screening would-be immigrants for Marxist views before granting them entry, and using the Alien and Sedition Acts in service of deportations. Trump and his advisers have also made clear that they intend to invoke the Insurrection Act to allow them to deploy the U.S. military to the border, and to use an extensive naval blockade between the United States and Latin America to fight the drug trade. That most drug smuggling occurs at legal ports of entry doesn’t matter to Trump and his team: They seem to have reasonably concluded that immigration restrictions don’t have to be effective to be celebrated by their base.

    The breakneck pace of work during Miller’s White House tour was periodically hampered by worried bureaucrats attempting end runs around him, or by his most powerful detractors, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner, whispering reservations into the president’s ear. But Trump’s daughter and son-in-law have left politics altogether, and Miller used Trump’s term to perfect strategies for disempowering anyone else who dared to challenge him. As for job applicants to work in a second Trump administration, Miller told Axios that being in lockstep with him on immigration issues would be “non-negotiable.” Others need not apply.

    Those who choose to join Trump in this mission to slash immigration would do so knowing that they would face few consequences, if any, for how they go about it: Almost all of the administration officials who pushed aggressively for the most controversial policies of Trump’s term continue to enjoy successful careers.

    The speed of Trump’s work on immigration can obscure its impact in real time. This is why Lucas Guttentag, a law professor at Stanford and Yale and a senior counselor on immigration issues in the Obama and Biden administrations, created a database with his students to log and track the more than 1,000 immigration-policy changes made during Trump’s years in office. Most remain in place. This is worth dwelling on. Trump’s time in office already represents a resurgence of old, disproven ideas about the inherent threat—physical, cultural, and economic—posed by immigrants. And if Trump does return to office, this moment may qualify less as a blip than an era: a period like previous ones when such misconceptions prevailed, and laws like the Chinese Exclusion Act and eugenics-based national-origins quotas ruled the day.

    Returning Trump to the presidency would reopen wounds that have barely healed in the communities he has said he would target immediately. Recently, I stood outside a church in the Northeast that caters mostly to undocumented farmworkers, with a Catholic sister who oversees the parish’s programming. As we stood in the autumn light, I remarked on the picturesque scene around her place of worship and work. She replied by pointing in one direction, then another, then another, at the places where she said ICE agents used to hide out on Sunday mornings during the Trump administration, waiting to capture her congregants as they left Mass to go about their weekly errands at the laundromat and the grocery store.

    Beyond the emotional impact of Trump’s return, the economy could also face a pummeling if the number of immigrant workers, legal and otherwise, were to drop. In a November 2022 speech, Jerome Powell, the chair of the Federal Reserve, detailed the harm from COVID-related dips in immigration, which left the country short an estimated 1 million workers.

    America’s rightward shift on immigration is part of a global story in which Western countries are, in general, turning against immigrants. But the world tends to look to the United States as a guide for what sorts of checks on immigration are socially permissible. A new Trump administration would provide a pretty clear answer: just about any.

    An anything-goes approach to immigration enforcement may indeed be what the country is left with if Trump succeeds in the next general election. “The first 100 days of the Trump administration will be pure bliss,” Stephen Miller told Axios, “followed by another four years of the most hard-hitting action conceivable.”


    This article appears in the January/February 2024 print edition with the headline “The Specter of Family Separation.”

    [ad_2]

    Caitlin Dickerson

    Source link

  • Elon Musk, Bill Gates, and 'kings' would pay $1B for Mar-a-Lago, Trump expert to testify at NY fraud trial

    Elon Musk, Bill Gates, and 'kings' would pay $1B for Mar-a-Lago, Trump expert to testify at NY fraud trial

    [ad_1]

    • Trump plans to call Palm Beach real-estate broker Lawrence Moens at his NY fraud trial next week.

    • Moens has sworn Elon Musk, Bill Gates, and “kings” would pay $1B for the club, where he’s a member.

    • On Friday, the judge OK’d Moens’ testimony despite the state saying it will waste “an entire day.”

    Elon Musk, Bill Gates, and “kings” would pay $1 billion dollars for Mar-a-Lago, according to a Palm Beach real-estate broker whom Donald Trump plans to call to testify next week, as an expert defense witness in his New York civil fraud trial.

    “It’s like a fantasy list,” the broker, Lawrence Moens, said in a pre-trial deposition over the summer, describing the dozen-or-so ultra-billionaires he thinks would spring that high for the property.

    “I could dream up anyone from Elon Musk to Bill Gates and everyone in between,” he told lawyers for the state attorney general’s office during the July deposition, previewing next week’s trial testimony. “Kings, emperors, heads of state.”

    “If they want the best house in the country, that would be one of the top two or three that would be available if they were for sale,” he added, according to a transcript.

    “I wish he’d let me sell it, but it’s not for sale,” he said.

    Moens is scheduled to testify on Trump’s behalf Tuesday in the ongoing trial, where lawyers for state Attorney General Letitia James are trying to prove the former president exaggerated his net worth by as much as $3.6 billion a year in a decade’s worth of financial statements to banks, insurers and tax officials.

    Mar-a-Lago is chief among those exaggerations.

    Donald Trump allegedly inflated the value of his Palm Beach resort in financial documents by as much as $714 million.

    Donald Trump allegedly inflated the value of his Palm Beach resort in financial documents by as much as $714 million.New York attorney general’s office

    The AG’s office alleges that as part of an effort to trick banks into charging him better interest rates, Trump intentionally valued the property at astronomical levels, saying it was worth as much as $739 million. That’s the number he used in 2018, when state officials say it was only worth $25 million.

    In doing so, the state alleges, Trump relied on the false premise that Mar-a-Lago was an unrestricted property. Trump misrepresented that he could develop the 17 waterfront acres even though the former president had personally signed deeds donating away his residential development rights for tax purposes, the state alleges.

    Trump has fixated on the value of Mar-a-Lago during the trial’s nine weeks, as a matter of personal pride and as part of his defense that his net-worth statements actually underestimated the value of his properties.

    What’s at stake

    The trial judge, New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron, already found in a pretrial ruling in September that Trump’s net-worth statements were frauds.

    At issue now, in the non-jury, civil trial, is whether the over-valuations of Mar-a-Lago and other Trump properties fit the legal definition of fraud under New York criminal law, and if so, how many millions in ill-gotten gains he must pay back.

    The state alleges that over the course of a decade, Trump pocketed more than $250 million in interest savings and property sales proceeds that he’d never have had if he’d told banks what his assets were really worth.

    The state fought hard on Friday against Trump’s side calling Moens as an expert witness.

    Kevin Wallace, a lead lawyer on the case for James, called the broker “a friend of Trump” whose valuation of the club can’t be recreated or tested.

    The judge had already found in his ruling from September that those deed restrictions severely limited the club’s value, Wallace noted.

    “The defendants now want to spend a whole day arguing that you’re wrong,” he complained.

    “And that Mar-a-Lago should be valued at $1 billion because Elon Musk might want to go to Palm Beach,” he added, sounding exasperated.

    “And that’s what we’re going to do,” the judge responded. “I’m very reluctant to allow this but it’s the defense case.”

    Mar-a-LagoMar-a-Lago

    Former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida.Charles Trainor Jr./Miami Herald/Tribune News Service via Getty Images

    An unbiased witness?

    Moens is likely to be questioned on the witness stand Tuesday about whether he can give a truly unvarnished view of Mar-a-Lago’s worth. He and Trump go back a long ways, and a lot of money has passed back and forth between them.

    In 2008, Moens brokered a record $95 million sale of Trump’s starter Palm Beach oceanfront mansion to a Russian fertilizer billionaire.

    “And did you receive a commission?” Moens was asked during the July deposition.

    “Well, it was a few million dollars,” he answered. “I don’t remember the amount.”

    “Do you recall receiving $225,000 for consulting work” from Trump, an attorney for the AG, Alex Finkelstein, asked the broker, showing him Trump Organization documents saying that money crossed hands in 2014.

    Moens answered that he’d have to check his records.

    Moens also testified that he has been a broker for Eric Trump, and a member of Mar-a-Lago since 1996, months after it opened. He knows Donald Trump, Jr., and Ivanka Trump, who he testified was “a very lovely person.”

    “I’ve known her since she was a little girl,” Moens said.

    He was more circumspect about Trump, though.

    “He’s someone I’ve known for probably three decades, maybe longer,” he told the state’s lawyers, when asked how he’d describe his relationship to the former president.

    “How do you describe the word ‘friend?'” the state’s lawyer then asked.

    “I have very few friends, so I would describe them as people that are very close to me, that I see often, that I spent time with, that I have a relationship with,” Moens answered.

    “Is Donald Trump one of those people?” the broker was then asked.

    “I don’t see Donald Trump enough or spend enough time with Donald Trump to call him a friend,” he answered.

    Asked “What would you call him?” Moens added, ‘I’d like to think he’s my friend, but I would call him someone that I’ve had an association with for many years.”

    Moens will be the third Trump insider to testify on his behalf as an expert witness.

    Read the original article on Business Insider

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Judge Engoron scolds Trump’s lawyer for Putin comparison

    Judge Engoron scolds Trump’s lawyer for Putin comparison

    [ad_1]

    New York Judge Arthur Engoron and Donald Trump lawyer Christopher Kise sparred again on Thursday as the civil fraud trial against the former president and his company continued.

    Engoron reportedly ordered Kise to apologize after making a negative remark against the lead counsel in the case, sparking a back-and-forth that ultimately led to a half-hearted apology.

    The pair have verbally squabbled throughout the entirety of the proceedings resulting from New York Attorney General Letitia James’ $250 million lawsuit against Trump, his adult sons and the Trump organization for purportedly inflating the value of his properties and assets in exchange for favorable loans and tax breaks. He’s denied wrongdoing.

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks at The Ted Hendricks Stadium at Henry Milander Park on November 8, 2023 in Hialeah, Florida. On November 9, Trump lawyer Christopher Kise was reprimanded for making comments about opposing counsel in what has been a fiery week in the courtroom.
    Alon Skuy/Getty Images

    The former president and current 2024 GOP front-runner skipped the third Republican presidential debate on Wednesday evening, instead flying down to Florida to head a campaign rally in Hialeah. He testified in the New York courtroom on Monday, following testimony from sons Donald Jr. and Eric and before his daughter, Ivanka, taking the stand.

    Following a brief morning recess on Thursday, Kise reportedly made verbal jabs toward attorneys from James’ office. He told one counselor to “check the internet” for job openings.

    “Vladimir Putin has some openings,” Kise said, according to The Messenger’s Adam Klasfeld.

    Engoron remarked that the comment was “totally uncalled for” and “totally incorrect,” demanding that Kise apologize. The remark was “slightly” walked back.

    “The world is watching,” Kise said.

    Engoron also told Kise not to engage in ad hominem attacks against opposing counsel, according to legal analyst Lisa Rubin, which Kise obliged but insisted that the other side should also have to adhere to such wishes.

    Newsweek reached out to Kise via email on Thursday for comment.

    Kise’s remarks were unlike him, Palm Beach County State Attorney Dave Aronberg told Newsweek via email.

    “Chris Kise is a respected attorney who is a former Florida solicitor general,” Aronberg said. “These attacks seem out of character for him, so he must be playing to an audience of one.”

    Kise’s comments follow fiery testimony from Trump himself on Monday, who while taking the stand to ask questions went on what some considered to be a political tirade against Engoron, James and the entire trial as a whole.

    Trump’s “monologue,” as described by Klasfeld, included calling the trial “crazy.”

    “I’m sure the judge will rule against me because he always rules against me,” Trump said in response.

    Engoron, attempting to seize back control of the proceedings, asked Kise if he could rein in the former president.

    “Mr. Kise, can you control your client, this is not a political rally, this is a courtroom. I don’t want editorializing, we’ll be here forever,” the judge said, reported Law360’s Stewart Bishop.

    On Tuesday and Wednesday, Ivanka Trump took the stand and testified seemingly damning facts about past deals she was involved with over a decade while still part of the Trump Organization.

    That included the acknowledgment of email communication between her and others within the company who expressed caution about inflating her father’s net worth in order to receive a loan from Deutsche Bank to purchase the Doral Golf Resort & Spa in Miami.