ReportWire

Tag: is

  • Pokémon Go ‘Eggs-pedition Access: January’ research steps, and is it worth it?

    Pokémon Go ‘Eggs-pedition Access: January’ research steps, and is it worth it?

    [ad_1]

    “Eggs-pedition Access: January” is a ticketed limited timed event during Pokémon Go season “Timeless Travels”.

    For $4.99, it unlocks a Timed Research that will be available until Jan. 31 at 8 p.m. in your local time.

    The Timed Research steps, ticket bonuses, as well as whether or not it may be worth it, is discussed below.


    What are the Eggs-pedition Access: January’ ticket bonuses?

    As well as the Timed Research, the ticket also gives you these bonuses until the end of the January:

    • 1 single-use Incubator for your first spin of the day
    • Triple XP for your first spin and catch of the day
    • Gift opening limit increased to 50 per day (up from 20)
    • Gift sending limit increased to 150 per day (up from 100)
    • Gift storage limit increased to 40 gifts (up from 20)

    Eggs-pedition Access: January’ Timed Research quest steps

    You have until the end of the month to complete the following Timed Research:

    Step 1 of 4

    • Catch 30 Pokémon (2,500 XP)
    • Catch 15 different species of Pokémon (2,500 XP)
    • Transfer 20 Pokémon (2,500 XP)

    Rewards: 2,500 XP

    Step 2 of 4

    • Use 25 berries to help catch Pokémon (2,500 Stardust)
    • Send 5 gifts to friends (2,500 Stardust)
    • Hatch 3 eggs (2,500 Stardust)

    Rewards: 2,500 Stardust

    Step 3 of 4

    • Earn 25 hearts with your buddy (5,000 XP)
    • Open 5 gifts (5,000 XP)
    • Catch 20 water- or flying-type Pokémon (5,000 XP)

    Rewards: 5,000 XP

    Step 4 of 4

    • Make 30 curveball throws (5,000 Stardust)
    • Explore 5 km (5,000 Stardust)
    • Evolve 10 Pokémon (5,000 Stardust)

    Rewards: 5,000 Stardust, Togetic encounter


    Is the ‘Eggs-pedition Access: January’ ticket worth it?

    If you love hatching eggs, then yes — the ticket is worth it for the incubators alone. If you spin a stop every day, you’ll get 31 single-use Incubators, which means you can hatch 31 eggs. 31 single-use Incubators equal about 10 regular Incubators (which are priced at 150 PokéCoins individually, meaning 1500 PokéCoins for 10 Incubators costs approximately $15) making it a good deal for $4.99. You will have to remember to spin a PokéStop every day to make the most of this deal, though.

    Meanwhile, the increases in gift storage, sending and sending is particularly useful for players who routinely trade gifts en masse. Regularly opening gifts and levelling friendship is one of the best ways to get XP in Pokémon Go, so if you want to maximize your gains, then this is well worth factoring into the price of the ticket.

    Otherwise, if you are buying this for research alone, it offers just a smattering of Stardust, XP, and a single Togetic (which was found regularly in the wild over the recent December Community Day weekend), which are rewards which you will gain through regular play with little effort.

    [ad_2]

    Matthew Reynolds

    Source link

  • The Grand Historical Epic Is Back in Fashion

    The Grand Historical Epic Is Back in Fashion

    [ad_1]

    One of the year’s biggest talking points in pop culture has been the possible (hopeful?) twilight of comic book movies as the dominant form of entertainment in Hollywood, but far less attention has been devoted to what might take its place. If the superhero genre really is beginning to fade, then a lot of theatrical real estate is about to open up. But open up for what, exactly? Well, 2023 might have already given us an answer.

    Though Barbie emerged from the great Barbenheimer throwdown as the top domestic and international grosser of 2023, Oppenheimer’s success was almost certainly the bigger surprise. Oppenheimer currently sits at fifth in domestic box office totals and third in international earnings, and its $952 million worldwide gross is the same as Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania ($476 million), The Flash ($271 million), and The Marvels ($206 million) managed to rake in combined.

    To say the industry didn’t see this coming is an understatement. Earlier this year on the Ringer podcast The Town, host Matthew Belloni and Bloomberg’s Lucas Shaw held a box office draft in which each speaker was allowed to saddle their opponent with one movie they thought would be a bomb, and Shaw picked Oppenheimer to “curse” Belloni with. I don’t bring this up to mock Shaw’s pick, but rather to point out how common and widespread the opinion was that Oppenheimer would be a huge money loser. On paper, that viewpoint made perfect sense: It’s a three-hour, partially black-and-white period piece mostly consisting of long-dead scientists debating theories and ethics with each other in dull rooms, and it stars a guy whose most prominent movie role was playing the third villain in a Batman movie nearly 15 years earlier. It didn’t really scream “billion-dollar grosser” to the industry. But as the great screenwriter William Goldman loved to say of show business: “Nobody knows anything.”

    If you ask 10 people why Oppenheimer became such a sensation, you’ll probably get 10 different answers. Some people think the film had brilliant marketing, while others think its success mostly boils down to the Barbenheimer social media phenomenon, and the fun of participating in meme culture. Some think Christopher Nolan’s name just has that much sway over the box office, while others think audiences were really into the idea of watching a nuclear bomb go off in IMAX. But another possibility that has to be seriously considered is that the film scratched an itch among audiences for an underserved kind of moviegoing experience: the grand historical epic.

    While Oppenheimer is certainly in a box office category of its own, it’s not the only indication of historical epics breaking back into the zeitgeist. Ridley Scott’s Napoleon and Martin Scorsese’s Killers of the Flower Moon both made over $150 million at the global box office, which is a lot of money for two lengthy dramas expected to be available on a streaming service (Apple TV+) just a couple of months after release. 2022’s The Woman King similarly exceeded box office expectations and generated discussion of the movie potentially reviving the historical action genre, while Netflix’s All Quiet on the Western Front was nominated for nine Academy Awards and won four. And, next Thanksgiving, the genre will make a big splash again with the release of Gladiator 2, Ridley Scott’s long-awaited sequel starring Paul Mescal, Denzel Washington, and Pedro Pascal.

    If we’re looking for what could replace the box office cachet of comic book movies, historical epics make a lot of sense as a possible answer. Since movie theaters first opened, audiences have shown they’ll pay for a reliable experience. That’s why stars used to be so important, because each star used to make only one kind of movie and play only one kind of role, essentially acting as their own franchise. From Charlie Chaplin to Shirley Temple, John Wayne to Doris Day, Clint Eastwood to Harrison Ford, and Arnold Schwarzenegger to Jim Carrey, these stars became box office phenomenons because audiences could depend on them to deliver certain kinds of experiences, again and again. When franchises took over the cinematic marketplace a few decades ago, it wasn’t a shift in what audiences wanted, it was a shift in the dependability of movie stars. Actors began challenging themselves more and more, like Tom Cruise suddenly making three-hour art films with Stanley Kubrick and Paul Thomas Anderson, or Jim Carrey, the most emotive comedian of his generation, playing Andy Kaufman, who famously refused to emote. Moves like this fundamentally breached the reliability audiences sought from stars, so audiences found that reliability somewhere else.

    Something Oppenheimer, Napoleon, and Killers of the Flower Moon all have in common is that they’re easy to describe and quick to pique interest. When you tell prospective audiences things like, “a Christopher Nolan movie about inventing the atomic bomb,” or “Joaquin Phoenix as Napoleon, by the Gladiator guy,” or “DiCaprio and De Niro in a 1920s crime epic by Martin Scorsese,” audiences know exactly what you’re selling. Those are highly marketable, highly intriguing concepts. Or, to put a finer point on it, they convey reliability to the people you’re asking to pay you a not-insignificant amount of money.

    When it comes to superhero movies and other IP-driven projects, people want that reliability, but they don’t want to overtly feel like sheep. John Wayne may have basically played the same character 75 times, but he didn’t do that literally, and when every franchise movie feels like it’s some version of “Volume 7, Part 3,” it becomes too much. Audiences don’t want to do all the homework to keep up with that. The promise of a Schwarzenegger or Eastwood movie was that you (generally) didn’t have to see any other films to make sense of them, which allowed each generation of moviegoers to enter the theater with a fresh slate.

    But with few exceptions, studios aren’t creating new franchises anymore—because the existing ones have been on an unprecedented run of profitability—and that’s led to a status quo in which the sequel numbers (or reboot, or remake, or spinoff, or prequel) just keep going higher and higher. At some point it’s all too much, and maybe we’re at that point. You used to be able to watch a James Bond movie without ever having seen one before, but even that’s not true anymore. When everything becomes about building an elaborate mythology, the simple entertainment value is gone. If you have to remember what happened in the post-credits scene of Fast and Furious: Tokyo Drift to understand what’s happening in F9, then we’re no longer talking about reliable mass entertainment.

    While historical epics may provoke a Wikipedia deep dive after the credits roll, it’s unlikely they’ll require any homework before entering the theater. They’re typically self-contained, and they usually revolve around larger stories that audiences already have some awareness of. While The Marvels had to constantly re-explain the Kree-Skrull War, Oppenheimer didn’t have to explain World War II. In other words, the narrative world-building is already halfway done. And many historical epics operate at a perfect middle ground between populism and prestige; these movies often have rousing action set pieces and huge special effects budgets, while they also have big, prestigious casts and frequently end up competing for Oscars (as Oppenheimer and Killers of the Flower Moon surely will be in a few months). And their creation typically involves just enough hubris that the world’s greatest filmmakers find them irresistible.

    Historical epics might have some momentum going, but that doesn’t mean they’re going to be produced on the scale of Marvel movies anytime soon. Beyond Gladiator 2, there’s only a handful of notable titles in development: a Hannibal movie in the works at Netflix, starring Denzel Washington and directed by his Training Day and Equalizer collaborator, Antoine Fuqua; a Cleopatra movie starring Gal Gadot, which has already switched directors once and still has no production date; and another Master and Commander movie being planned at 20th Century Studios, which was first reported two and a half years ago and has seen few updates since. None of those three movies will come out in 2024, and it’s highly unlikely any of them come out in 2025, either.

    The other questions around movies like this are logistical: How many directors can reliably deliver films at this scale? Which actors, with the ongoing extinction of the bona fide movie star, can not only play these roles, but also successfully sell them to the masses? Will studios continue to shell out hundreds of millions of dollars to make three-hour blockbusters about centuries-old historical figures, some of whom are more forgotten than others? The biggest reason the industry was so worried about Oppenheimer’s box office performance isn’t because it didn’t trust Nolan, it’s because the movie cost $100 million and was directed in a way that downplayed the more high-concept parts of the story. And then there are Napoleon and Killers of the Flower Moon, which both reportedly cost $200 million. It’s complicated to talk about budgets with those two, because they were made by Apple, which cares a lot more about winning Oscars and increasing streaming subscriptions than it does about box office performance. But the risk is still there, and those price tags loom large. With few test cases for the genre on the horizon, one massive dud could be all it takes to stop this historical epic renaissance dead in its tracks. Or will studio execs’ fears be allayed once viewers see a rousing trailer with Denzel as a Carthaginian warlord, looking like a total badass while riding a giant elephant into battle?

    One thing is clear: Oppenheimer, Napoleon, and Killers of the Flower Moon seemed to tap into a significantly underserved taste demographic among audiences. There’s an opportunity to exploit that, but it’ll take time and a whole lot of money. Will audiences be patient enough, and will studios be willing to spend enough? We may get answers to some of these questions next November, when a Gladiator movie once again asks us if we’re not entertained. A lot could be riding on our collective response.

    Daniel Joyaux is a writer based in Ann Arbor, Michigan. His work has appeared in Vanity Fair, Roger Ebert, Rotten Tomatoes, The Verge, and Cosmopolitan, among others. You can follow him on Twitter @Thirdmanmovies and on Letterboxd at Djoyaux.

    [ad_2]

    Daniel Joyaux

    Source link

  • Sci-Fi Is Having a Renaissance on Television

    Sci-Fi Is Having a Renaissance on Television

    [ad_1]

    From the early days of The Twilight Zone and Star Trek to contemporary hits like The X-Files, Battlestar Galactica, and Lost, television has long been home to compelling science fiction. But the quality of the genre’s offerings hasn’t always been matched with an uptick in quantity. It wasn’t until 1992 that the Sci-Fi Channel (since rebranded as Syfy) debuted, and its programming tends to skew more Sharknado than The Expanse. In fact, The Expanse was shaping up to be one of Syfy’s greatest original series before it was canceled after three seasons: a microcosm of how traditional cable rarely lends itself to big-budget space operas and other sci-fi projects of that scale.

    Of course, Amazon’s Prime Video swooped in and revived The Expanse, allowing the show to end on its own terms after six seasons. (If you’re a sci-fi fanatic and still haven’t watched The Expanse, what are you waiting for?) In hindsight, Prime Video was the perfect home for a series like The Expanse: a streamer that has heavily invested in small-screen adaptations of The Wheel of Time, The Lord of the Rings, and The Peripheral. But Prime Video is hardly an outlier in the streaming landscape. As consumers continue to bypass cable, streamers aren’t just responsible for producing more scripted television than ever before: they’ve helped kick-start a science-fiction boom.

    In the era of Peak TV, audiences have been treated to several sci-fi shows that managed to penetrate the zeitgeist. Westworld might’ve fallen on hard times, but it once had the most-watched first season of any HBO series; heading into its fifth and final season, Stranger Things remains the crown jewel of Netflix’s original programming. But for every hit like Stranger Things, there’s also been high-profile failures in the genre: Altered Carbon, which was once rumored to be Netflix’s most expensive series, was canceled after two seasons; Brave New World was one of the flagship shows of Peacock’s launch, and it lasted only one season. That sentiment extends to a galaxy far, far away: with the notable exception of Andor and the early seasons of The Mandalorian, Star Wars has delivered diminishing returns on the small screen. (The less said about The Book of Boba Fett, the better.)

    All told, science fiction had yet to find the Goldilocks zone on television, striking the right balance between quality and quantity. But if 2023 marked the moment when Peak TV finally plateaued, it has also ushered in a new golden age of sci-fi. It’s not just that there’s more worthwhile sci-fi on television than ever before: the shows that have cut through the noise are doing it in different ways. The best sci-fi series this year covered all the bases: alt-history dramas, dystopian thrillers, AI-infused dramedies, galaxy-spanning space operas, time-traveling character studies. The wider world of television may be in a state of disarray since the streaming bubble burst, but sci-fi fans can keep riding the wave of the genre’s recent successes.

    Leading the charge is Apple TV+, the streaming arm of the world’s first trillion-dollar company. Like Amazon, Apple has the resources to funnel considerable money into streaming without a pressing need for profitability because it doesn’t make up the bulk of its business. But where these companies differ is how their streaming ambitions have been embraced by audiences. By and large, Prime Video’s big swings have failed to match their hefty price tags; conversely, Apple TV+ has stealthily emerged as one of the most reliable destinations for prestige television outside of HBO. More importantly, Apple TV+ has firmly established itself as the go-to streamer for big-budget sci-fi.

    In 2023, Apple TV+ released new seasons of For All Mankind, an alt-history drama in which the Soviet Union landed the first man on the moon, and Foundation, an ambitious adaptation of Isaac Asimov’s seminal book series. What unites these shows is how they’re driven by big-picture ideas: each season of For All Mankind jumps ahead a decade to show humanity’s progress in the Space Race; Foundation is intended to span a millennium. At the same time, For All Mankind and Foundation wouldn’t be nearly as gripping without individuals making profound personal sacrifices for the greater good, be it jumping forward centuries in a hibernation pod or leaving Earth behind to colonize Mars. That For All Mankind and Foundation manage to excel as feats of immersive world-building without coming at the expense of the interiority of its characters’ lives has become something of a calling card for Apple’s sci-fi projects.

    Elsewhere, this year saw Apple TV+ debut Silo, a mystery-box thriller set in a dystopian future in which mankind lives underground, and Monarch: Legacy of Monsters, a small-screen extension of the Godzilla-led MonsterVerse. Once again, the blockbuster scale of these shows is what draws you in, but it’s the emotional investment in the fates of the characters—something that’s been a persistent issue for the MonsterVerse on the big screen—that keeps viewers around for the long haul. If Syfy is a haven for sci-fi fans on basic cable, Apple TV+ has become more than a viable streaming alternative: the platform is buoyed by diverse projects within the genre that all share impressive production values. As a result, Apple hasn’t just found a niche in the Streaming Wars: the company has emphatically cornered the market on imaginative, thought-provoking sci-fi. (Look out for Constellation, a psychological thriller led by Noomi Rapace and Jonathan Banks, in February 2024.)

    The current sci-fi boom might be most pronounced on Apple, but other streamers got in on the act this year. Among the best of the rest was the Max animated series Scavengers Reign, which followed the scattered survivors of a cargo ship marooned on the planet Vesta Minor. With an animation style best described as “Studio Ghibli by way of body horror,” Scavengers Reign was a refreshingly unique addition to the genre, which puts the series in stark contrast with the broader direction of Warner Bros. Discovery: a company so anti-art under CEO David Zaslav that it’s tried killing off well-received projects for a tax write-off. (When even Batman titles are being shipped off to competitors, you know things are dire.) It’s little wonder that Scavengers Reign may hold the title for the most underrated show of 2023: Max barely bothered to promote it, leaving its future in jeopardy. Hopefully, more Max users discover the transportive wonders of Scavengers Reign before, god forbid, the series goes the way of Westworld.

    Other shows tapped into modern anxieties around the emergence of artificial intelligence with a touch of levity: Peacock’s wonderfully wacky limited series Mrs. Davis pitted an advanced algorithm with a profound influence on the world against a literal nun; the funniest episode of Black Mirror’s sixth season imagined a future in which Netflix turned our lives into content. (Mrs. Davis cocreator Damon Lindelof and Black Mirror creator Charlie Brooker also tinkered with real AI in relation to their shows; both were left unimpressed.) Meanwhile, Disney continued rolling out new entries in the Marvel Cinematic Universe and Star Wars, which remained a mixed bag. Loki’s second season wasn’t as sharp as its debut, but it’s still one of the rare success stories of the MCU post-Endgame; Ahsoka wasn’t the strongest endorsement for Dave Filoni’s new role as Lucasfilm’s chief creative officer. (At least we have another season of Andor on the way—at this rate, Tony Gilroy is the franchise’s only hope.)

    I don’t mean to pile on Disney for delivering a comparatively underwhelming slate of sci-fi this year. For all its triumphs in the genre, Apple TV+ isn’t immune to duds like Hello Tomorrow! and Invasion. But on the whole, science fiction continues to head in a promising direction. The very best of these shows don’t just have the look and feel of a tentpole, but the level of emotional depth that only a serialized project can offer. When it comes to the sheer output of quality series, it feels like there’s never been a better time to be a sci-fi fan—and the best may be yet to come. In March 2024, Netflix is set to release 3 Body Problem, the highly anticipated adaptation of Liu Cixin’s acclaimed Three-Body trilogy, led by Game of Thrones showrunners David Benioff and D.B. Weiss.

    As the first series from Benioff and Weiss since Thrones, 3 Body Problem comes with plenty of fanfare—and, for anyone still reeling from Thrones’ lackluster ending, perhaps a bit of trepidation. In an earlier era of television, sci-fi obsessives would’ve had to pin all their hopes on a big swing like 3 Body Problem living up to the hype. But that’s what makes the current state of science fiction on television so thrilling: There are so many rich, immersive universes worth exploring.

    [ad_2]

    Miles Surrey

    Source link

  • Bradley Cooper Is Trying So Hard

    Bradley Cooper Is Trying So Hard

    [ad_1]

    In several respects, Leonard Bernstein was a man split in two. Dreaming of becoming the first great American conductor but finding more success as a composer for Broadway musicals, he also struggled with his sexuality, marrying a woman he loved but regularly cheating on her with men. His life was a balancing act, his ego pulling him in different directions—between self-fulfillment and self-preservation, self-interest and altruism. So perhaps it makes sense that Bradley Cooper—cowriter, director, and star of the Bernstein biopic Maestro—seems to be wrestling between reverence for his subject and a need to prove himself.

    Maestro has an unabashedly operatic style, from its visual language to its performances. From the start, director of photography Matthew Libatique (who already worked with Cooper on the actor’s wildly successful directing debut, A Star Is Born) juggles between über-intimate close-ups and dramatic camera angles and movements. As young Bernstein learns that he will get to conduct the New York Philharmonic at the last minute that same evening, he rushes out of bed, leaving his male lover there, to take in the view of the empty auditorium of Carnegie Hall, the camera sweeping before him, the huge space dwarfing him. Bernstein’s extravagance is mirrored in the camerawork. Yet even this inciting moment doesn’t entirely workthe too-smooth digital look of that camera movement juts against the analog authenticity of the movie’s black-and-white color scheme. And that’s just the first of many stylistic—perhaps even hubristic—leaps through which Cooper tries to bring together Bernstein’s private and public lives.

    Cooper had been working on bringing Maestro to the screen since 2018, but in his Variety “Actors on Actors” interview with Emma Stone, he explained how he’d been passionate about conducting since childhood, pretending to conduct to a recording of Tchaikovsky’s “Opus 35 in D Major” for hours. He’d had “years and years of rehearsal inside of [him],” he said, or at least a burning desire to play such a character for a long time. All of this is very evident in how particular Cooper’s choices and points of focus are. Combining Bernstein’s art and his more ambiguous real life in an impressionistic medley in which the walls between stage and home disappear, Cooper aims for something both raw and almost dreamlike, but the final result feels overdetermined, at once too polished and not precise enough. In his own acting as Lenny (as everyone called Bernstein), Cooper reaches for an extreme kind of realism and imitation, adopting the gestures, voice ticks, and wrinkles of his protagonist in such a committed way that the prosthetic nose, in this context, almost doesn’t stand out so much. What does, however, is the effort required, and not just of Cooper, but of everyone involved.

    As a filmmaker, Cooper seems to have been very concerned with recreating the buzzing, bohemian atmosphere and way of being that Bernstein and his fellow artists shared, with scenes of artists talking passionately about music and movies and singing around a piano until the small hours. But he’s only captured an idea of what that energy must have been like—the overlapping exchanges and full-throated laughter often feel forced and mechanical, bereft of any sense of true, underlying connection. Lenny’s meet-cute with his eventual wife, Felicia (Carey Mulligan), plays like two people quipping with themselves rather than speaking to each other. And by being so committed to nailing such specific beats, Cooper misses the things that actually matter: the composer’s warmth; his benevolence; the pleasure that radiated through him when he would relish in his passion.

    What Maestro does capture is the sense of two people sharing a life together. Smartly avoiding the usual traps of the biopic, Cooper focuses on Lenny and Felicia’s relationship, in small stolen moments and a few major turning points. These intimate scenes help paint a picture of what happiness looked like for the Bernsteins. But Cooper’s fluctuation between frankness and artistic suggestion ends up making their struggle amorphous and mysterious. We find again the fast progression through changes that was also present in A Star Is Born, but which in that film wasn’t as frustrating, perhaps because we understood that the degradation of the couple’s relationship was largely due to Jackson Maine’s alcoholism. Maestro also faces a greater challenge than A Star Is Born, in that its real-life couple did not meet a classically tragic end—they actually reconciled despite the strain that Bernstein’s disavowal of his sexuality put on their marriage. The answers and conclusions of this story are much more complicated—a level of nuance to which Cooper’s deconstructed and flamboyant approach can’t rise. The subtleties of Bernstein’s life are only glimpsed, as though Cooper couldn’t choose between showing the real person and paying homage to the artist. But this man’s troubles weren’t an acting exercise for him, nor were they for Felicia, whose cancer diagnosis is exploited for maximum pathos.

    Cooper does seem to truly love Bernstein’s work, and his focus on the artist’s conducting makes for some beautiful and impressive moments. Even those, however, appear more like personal challenges for Cooper to conquer than instances of musical excellence intended for the viewer. In A Star Is Born, Cooper seemingly understood that the film needed Lady Gaga’s presence and musical talent in order to function. The duets between Jackson and Ally were rousing because they showed the intimacy and connection the two shared. In that same conversation with Emma Stone, Cooper explained his decision to rerecord all the music that Bernstein conducted or created: “I knew that if I put his music in the movie, then that would do everything that a biopic would ever do anyway—if you want to learn about Martin Scorsese, you just watch all his films, rather than watch an interview.” Thus, for Cooper, the challenge of conducting six minutes of Mahler’s “2nd Symphony” at Ely Cathedral as Bernstein represented an opportunity to try to recapture the artistic essence of Bernstein and share it with the viewer, as though to become a vehicle for it. But is such a thing even possible, especially when we’re talking about the sheer artistic expression of a person? Unlike the couple at the center of A Star Is Born, Cooper’s Bernstein feels detached from his surroundings—and while some of that makes sense for a man so unsure about his own identity, it doesn’t justify the distance one feels between him and his audience. Cooper wanted to literally become Bernstein, but he worked so hard at it that he seemingly forgot why he—himself, but also Bernstein—wanted to make music in the first place.

    Manuela Lazic is a French writer based in London who primarily covers film.

    [ad_2]

    Manuela Lazic

    Source link

  • dirtier divergent pushy

    dirtier divergent pushy

    [ad_1]

    It just honestly seems like search engines are getting worse in general. Whether it’s the fact their primary focus is on ads, or maybe it’s the websites they link to just trying to show up, but it just seems like you can never actually find what you want when you search, just someone selling something.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What to know about Lego Fortnite if you’re just getting started

    What to know about Lego Fortnite if you’re just getting started

    [ad_1]

    The people behind Fortnite, the popular build-and-battle-royale game, have released a new, kid-friendly take on the game: Lego Fortnite. The game uses Lego bricks and characters to give players a different kind of experience that focuses on long-term survival, crafting, building, and online cooperation with friends. It’s a lot like another survival/crafting game, Minecraft, but powered by Lego bricks and familiar characters.

    Lego Fortnite was a hit from day one; Millions of players are building and battling monsters together in online worlds full of characters to meet, creatures to slay, and mysteries to discover. It’s also free (unlike Minecraft), and co-developers Epic Games and The Lego Group have gone to great lengths to make it safe for kids to enjoy.

    Here’s a quick rundown of what Lego Fortnite is, where to download it, and everything else you should need to know about Fortnite’s popular new spinoff.

    What is Lego Fortnite?

    While the popular version of Fortnite is a battle royale game where players fight each other to be the last player standing, Lego Fortnite isn’t a shooter or a battle royale at all. It’s a game of exploration, building with Lego bricks, and crafting items (like pickaxes and torches).

    In Survival mode, players take on the role of a little Lego hero character. They’ll gather resources, build structures, tools, and weapons, and explore a huge open world. They’ll also interact with other Lego characters who will join their group and help them out with missions. There’s some combat too, but it’s mainly against Lego versions of skeletons, wolves, spiders, and other beasts. This mode is called Survival because players have to gather and craft what they need: food to stave off hunger, wood to build structures and craft tools, and other elements to create more complex items.

    There’s also a non-violent Sandbox mode, where players can simply build whatever they want with Lego bricks to get creative and explore the world freely.

    How to download Lego Fortnite

    Playing and downloading Lego Fortnite is free. You’ll need an Epic Games account to play, which is also free. All you have to do is download the main Fortnite game client, and you’ll find Lego Fortnite on the main screen of a menu that looks like a Netflix library screen.

    On game consoles like Nintendo Switch, PlayStation 5, and Xbox Series X, you can download Fortnite by searching each platform’s store, or by using the links below from a web browser:

    Note that if you find and download Lego Fortnite from one of the above online stores, you’re actually downloading the full Fortnite game client, through which you can play Lego Fortnite. Confusing, yes, but at least everything’s centralized.

    How to get and activate an Epic Games account

    To play Lego Fortnite (or any Fortnite game), you’ll need an Epic Games account. You can sign up for one using an email address at the Epic Games website, use an existing login from Apple, Facebook, Lego.com, or Google, or log in with an existing account from Nintendo, PlayStation, Xbox, or Steam.

    You can also create a version of that account called a Cabined Account, which is intended for children 13 years old or younger. Players with Cabined Accounts can play Lego Fortnite, but they won’t be able to access features like voice chat or make in-game purchases with money until their parent or guardian provides consent. You can read more about parental controls in Fortnite games at Epic’s website.

    How V-Bucks work with Lego Fortnite (and how to redeem them)

    Epic Games’ virtual currency for Fortnite, known as V-Bucks, works in the core version of Fortnite and new experiences like Lego Fortnite, Rocket Racing, and Fortnite Festival. V-Bucks can be spent on in-game items, like outfits and other virtual items.

    V-Bucks can be purchased within Fortnite and via gift cards. You can redeem V-Bucks gift cards at the official Fortnite website.

    If you (or your child) have spent V-Bucks in Fortnite battle royale, most of the cosmetics in that game carry over to Lego Fortnite. There are some exceptions, like characters in Fortnite who have guns as part of their design, but many cosmetics tied to a core Fortnite account can be used across games.

    Lego Fortnite multiplayer and playing with friends

    You can play Lego Fortnite with friends online. Up to eight players can play together cooperatively in the same game world.

    But you can’t play Lego Fortnite (yet) in split-screen mode on the same platform. If you have multiple kids playing Lego Fortnite, they’ll all need their own console, tablet, or PC to play. Lego Fortnite supports cross-play across all platforms, so players on Switch, for example, can play with their friends on PlayStation 5, Android, PC, and anywhere else Fortnite is available.

    Do you need a separate online subscription to play Lego Fortnite?

    Lego Fortnite, like other Fortnite games, does not require an online subscription like Nintendo Switch Online, PlayStation Plus, or Xbox Live Gold/Xbox Game Pass to play.

    Guides for Lego Fortnite

    Lego Fortnite is new, but already pretty big. Here’s how to get started, with some answers to a few tricky questions:

    [ad_2]

    Michael McWhertor

    Source link

  • The final scene in the DCEU dares you to think of it as a metaphor for the whole franchise

    The final scene in the DCEU dares you to think of it as a metaphor for the whole franchise

    [ad_1]

    Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom flows into theaters this weekend with the dubious honor of being the final film in the DC Extended Universe. And that means its final scene — its credits scene — is the final shot of Warner Bros. great attempt to equal the Marvel Cinematic Universe with its own pet superhero setting.

    But it also means that the typical use of a superhero movie credits scene doesn’t apply here. There aren’t any future franchise events for Lost Kingdom to point to. What’s a blockbuster to do?

    If you’ve seen Lost Kingdom, you know, and if you haven’t, maybe you’re just here to rubberneck. But here’s what it did.

    [Ed. Note: This piece contains spoilers for Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom.]

    Image: Warner Bros. Pictures/DC Comics

    Lost Kingdom’s credits scene isn’t about anything weighty, it’s just a call back to a gross-out gag from earlier in the film. Orm (Patrick Wilson), the redeemed bad guy from the first Aquaman, is enjoying his first surface-world hamburger when he spies a cockroach scurrying across the dock-side picnic table.

    Earlier in the movie, his brother Aquaman (Jason Momoa) tricked him into thinking that live cockroaches are an every day surface-world snack. So Orm grabs the roach, slaps it between the layers of his sandwich, and takes a big, happy bite. Good night, sweet DCEU, may flights of angels sing thee to thy rest.

    But here I must implore my fellow human beings: We absolutely musn’t make this a metaphor. No matter how resonant, absurd, or funny the credits scene on Lost Kingdom, we must resist.

    Orm’s burger is, inevitably, a roachy Rorschach test. The insect can be whatever you didn’t like about the DCEU, and Orm happily eating it is the fans you don’t like lapping it up. Or, Orm is the executives whose meddling ruined the franchise happily choosing their comeuppance (the roach), which is the collapse of the whole thing (an honestly very appetizing burger). Or maybe, the burger is the Snyder Cut, somehow, and Orm is Joss Whedon? I’m sure somebody could flesh out that video essay.

    But we have to draw a line in the sand, like Topo the octopus scurrying away from the blood-drinking Deserters and back to the safety of deep water. We have to restrain ourselves, like Orm touching the Black Trident. We have to escape, like the fish in the sea, able to say that in the end, at the end of an era, we didn’t take the bait.

    [ad_2]

    Susana Polo

    Source link

  • Dimension 20 documentary sweats the small stuff, focusing on master of miniatures Rick Perry

    Dimension 20 documentary sweats the small stuff, focusing on master of miniatures Rick Perry

    [ad_1]

    Back when I was running the game for my local Dungeons & Dragons group, I would always pride myself on bringing something handmade each time we got together around the table. Maybe it was a leather-bound book filled with vintage David Sutherland illustrations of the Tomb of Horrors, or a 3D map of a few rooms from Castle Ravenloft with just the right assortment of miniatures from my collection. As a lifelong fan of D&D, Rick Perry knows that impulse well. But as production designer and creative producer on Dropout’s Dimension 20, he’s operating at a scale that’s on another level entirely.

    Season 21 of Dimension 20, an actual play program on the streaming television service Dropout, will premiere on Jan. 10, 2024. It’s an incredible run that shows no sign of slowing down, and Perry’s work has been integral in its popularity. To celebrate his impact, Dropout has released a feature documentary titled The Legendary Rick Perry and the Art of Dimension 20. In advance of its release, Polygon sat down with the lifelong Texan, now a resident of Washington state, to discuss his work.

    A miniature high school dance inside the gymnasium at Fantasy High.
    Image: Dropout

    While world class Dungeon Masters like Brennan Lee Mulligan, Aabria Iyengar, Gabe Hicks, and Matthew Mercer lead each game at the start of each Dimension 20 season with a high-level creative direction, it’s up to Perry and his team of skilled artists to bring that vision to life in miniature on the table. That means creating hundreds of inch-tall figures from scratch using clay and sculpting tools; kitbashing dozens of scale models into fantastical landscapes to anchor the viewer in the world; and crafting dynamic, multi-tiered battle maps where skilled improv actors can chew up the set.

    Just like the props you bring to your home games, it’s bait, really, that he willfully uses to draw players — and viewers — closer to the center of whatever complex story he’s trying to tell.

    Dimension 20 [requires] a massive amount of creative genesis to create a 20-episode series,” Perry said, “[one that] that takes place in a completely new world where we don’t know what color the sky is, or what food the people are eating. So there’s this massive amount of creative activity that has to start at the beginning of it, and that takes a big chunk of time.”

    The documentary details how that creative work begins at his homestead on Lopez Island in San Juan County, Washington at an outdoor sink first cobbled together by his father-in-law in the 1970s. It then moves into a converted three-car garage that once held farming equipment, but is now filled with bins labeled for the miniatures they contain — a box of trolls here, bugbears in the corner. Only after weeks, sometimes months of effort on the farm with a whole team of designers do the larger pieces get crated up and shipped to Los Angeles. Often, Perry said, that’s where the real work begins.

    Rick Perry in a blue ball cap stands next to three of his teammates inside a rough hewn shop with exposed timbers. Bins of miniatures sit on shelves in the background.

    Rick Perry (right) with his team on Lopez Island taking the original Fantasy High Dungeon Master’s screen from storage for the first time in four years.
    Image: Dropout

    The trick, he went on, is to stay nimble — even when you’re building maps for tabletop encounters that won’t happen for weeks.

    “It’s part of the DNA of Dimension 20,” Perry said, “because at the very beginning when we decided we wanted these eight battle maps that are custom, that have this mix of say high school and fantasy, it’s not like something we can just crank out really fast. We need to know ahead of time in order to make skater dwarves, and all this sort of stuff.

    “That means that we have to map all that out down to every detail — as much as we can,” Perry continued. That sort of on-rails gameplay is, unfortunately, anathema to modern role-play, which emphasizes creative freedom for the Dungeon Master as well as the players at the table. It’s always a challenge, Perry said, to keep things on track. But with a miniature set that, often times, costs just as much as a full-scale one, it’s up to everyone involved to keep the trains running on time.

    “That tells the Dungeon Master that these are landmarks,” Perry said. “These [scenes that we are building] are places that you have to pilot the ship through these little hoops. We try to build in as much flexibility, as much opportunity for improvisation as possible, meaning that sometimes where a battle map falls, they could switch places or we could cut one. We try not to cut one because they cost money to make. And it’s a business venture, the show, and we want all that production value to appear on screen.”

    The nearly 45-minute film goes even further in its exploration of Perry and his work, delving deep into his childhood and his time spent in college as a member of a troupe of performance artists. For fans of Dimension 20, it’s a rare behind-the-scenes look at how its particular brand of storytelling comes to life. But for artists, craftspeople, or even just casual hobbyists who paint miniatures on the weekend for fun, it’s the story of a kindred spirit who has found a vital, transformative role in the creative industry.

    The Legendary Rick Perry and the Art of Dimension 20 is now streaming on Dropout.

    [ad_2]

    Charlie Hall

    Source link

  • Hollywood Is Hiding Its Musicals

    Hollywood Is Hiding Its Musicals

    [ad_1]

    In 2023, one never knew when and where a musical might appear. The Marvels mixed in a musical sequence when Carol Danvers and Co. visit the planet Aladna, whose inhabitants converse solely in song and dance. Yellowjackets made a mini-musical inside the mind of Misty, who imagines the scene while suspended in a sensory deprivation tank. Doctor Who gave us goblins singing about eating a baby. Star Trek: Strange New Worlds committed to the bit best by airing a full musical episode.

    When musical interludes pop up in unexpected places, such as non-musical movies and shows, it makes sense that we’re surprised. But this year, even full-on movie musicals were liable to sneak up on us. There’s a reason musicals suddenly seemed so stealthy: Movie studios didn’t want us to see them coming. There’s a musical cover-up happening here.

    Wonka comes out Friday, and by now, you probably know it’s a musical. (Though director Paul King calls it “more like a movie with songs.”) When the first trailer came out in July, though, there was little to no indication that the movie featured music at all.

    In May, the first trailer for The Color Purple promised “a bold new take on the beloved classic,” but barely gave any indication of what that take is. (A grand total of two words were sung on screen.) The trailer notes that the movie is based on the 1982 novel by Alice Walker, but it doesn’t disclose—let alone boast—that it’s also adapted from the Tony-winning Broadway play (and stars some of the same actors).

    Then, in November, the trailer for Mean Girls made millennials feel old by declaring, “This isn’t your mother’s Mean Girls.” In what way is it different from your mother’s Mean Girls? Well, most prominently, it’s a musical—except that this genre switch isn’t prominent at all. The trailer doesn’t let the secret slip.

    The phenomenon also extends to animated movies, like Netflix’s Leo and Miraculous: Ladybug & Cat Noir, the Movie—both musicals, though one wouldn’t know it from the footage chosen to entice streaming audiences. Hollywood is still making musicals, but the industry doesn’t seem to want anyone to know. Why are so many musicals nowadays deep undercover, wearing drama disguises or comedy camouflage? Why must they be smuggled onto our screens?

    “It’s a simple answer, studios believe people won’t go see a musical,” says Jeff Gritton, who edited trailers at Trailer Park, Inc. for 13 years. “I don’t know all their focus group and testing numbers, but at some point they decided people won’t see a musical.”

    You don’t have to go back to 2016’s La La Land or 2017’s The Greatest Showman to find movies that put their musical feet forward in their teasers or trailers. But outside of Disney remakes, you do have to go back about that far to find many movies that did so and succeeded.

    “A lot of musicals recently have underperformed, and pretty significantly,” says Josh Lynn, president of box office forecasting company Piedmont Media Research. “There were a slew of live-action musicals that came out after Hamilton, and for the most part they really disappointed relative to insider hopes.” Lynn mentions 2021’s Dear Evan Hansen, In the Heights, Everybody’s Talking About Jamie, and West Side Story (in addition, of course, to Cats, the 2019 moviemusical bomb). CBR dubbed 2021 “the year of the movie musical,” but most of those musicals flopped.

    The pandemic didn’t help the musicals that came out in theaters, but post-Hamilton musicals—even those that were well-received by critics—didn’t draw eyeballs on streaming services, either. “Over and over, musicals, whether big or not, just failed to resonate with customers,” streaming analyst Entertainment Strategy Guy wrote for The Ankler in early 2022. In addition to the aforementioned duds, he listed several others that failed to crack the streaming charts: Netflix’s Tick, Tick… Boom!, A Week Away, and Diana: The Musical, Prime Video’s Annette, and Come From Away and High School Musical: The Musical: The Series, on Apple TV+ and Disney+, respectively. “The biggest hit of 2020 inspired some of the biggest misses of 2021,” ESG concluded about the movies that floundered in Hamilton’s wake.

    What did all of the movies mentioned in the preceding paragraphs have in common, aside from being musicals? Every single one of them admitted they were musicals up front. Their trailers made the mistake of telling viewers what to expect.

    Isn’t telling viewers what to expect the point of trailers? Maybe for the viewers, but from the studio’s perspective, accuracy and transparency are important only if they serve the larger objective. “Trailers are only made to get people to go see the movie—that’s it,” says one industry figure who has worked as a trailer production company’s editor, creative director, and senior executive and who requested anonymity because studios disapprove of talkative vendors. “It’s not to say, ‘We made this great piece of art.’ … Every time you see a piece of motion picture marketing, it is simply to get as many people out to the theaters or to watch it on streaming as humanly possible. … The goal of everything on our end is to get asses in the seats, and it’s by any means necessary.”

    Studios and trailer houses go to great lengths to up their ass-in-seat counts. Kevin Goetz, the founder and CEO of entertainment research and content testing firm Screen Engine/ASI and the author of 2021 book Audience-ology: How Moviegoers Shape the Films We Love, says that trailers are the second-most-important driver of awareness of and interest in movies, after word of mouth. Thus, they’re subject to extensive testing designed to strip out any elements that might repel people and double down on qualities that could help set the hook—which has to happen quickly in a streaming setting, where the watcher isn’t a captive audience the way they would be in a theater.

    Typically, the studio’s head of marketing has a strategy that’s arisen from research and guides the potential tone of the trailer. That exec contracts with a trailer house (or multiple trailer houses) to create various versions that play up or deemphasize certain aspects of the film (such as its fondness for song-and-dance routines). The resulting trailers get polished, tested, tweaked, and tailored to certain markets. “Obviously, you want to persuade, but by making the trailer more accessible for as many people as you can, you can exponentially raise the currency of that piece of advertising,” Goetz says.

    That’s where non-musical trailers for musicals come in. “Musicals are embraced by many folks, but they’re also not embraced by many folks,” Goetz says. “And what are you trying to do in a trailer? It’s not the truth-in-advertising department, it’s the marketing department.” The trailer, he continues, is “a vehicle to give the essence without putting a stake in the ground and [categorizing] the movie too early for those who are turned off to musicals.”

    In most cases, Goetz says, “There’s enough talking in the movie to tell you what the movie’s about without going into a song and making the movie feel like … ‘This is for them, but it’s not for me.’” After a musical’s cover is blown by hype or its premiere, follow-up or post-release trailers and teasers can embrace the film’s true nature. (Subsequent trailers for Wonka and The Color Purple have been slightly more musical.) But Goetz’s recommended course early on falls in line with how the studios seem to see things: “Keep to the traditional as long as you can, and then reveal the musical nature. … If I can eke out another $10 million by holding that message—not really tricking them, but not telling them—then I think that I’m going to do that.” The anonymous trailer creator concurs. “I think it’s smart marketing,” he says. “That would be my instinct, especially with something like The Color Purple or Wonka. I would try to obscure any musical theater.”

    That may be painful for musical theater heads to hear, but provided the people who’d be less likely to see a movie if it were marketed as a musical outnumber the people who’d be more likely to see it, the math should favor keeping the musical quiet at first. After all, Goetz says, “There’ll be very few people who are actually going to walk out of the theater because, ‘God dammit, it was a musical and you didn’t tell me that.’” (In fact, he says, low-information moviegoers who make it to the theater without seeing through the ruse tend to be pleasantly surprised.)

    Goetz agrees that the undercover musical is on the rise, and he says the studios know what they’re doing. “They’re not doing this in a vacuum. They’ve got research to support it,” he says. “I would imagine they cut a musical trailer or two, which just didn’t test nearly as well in terms of conversion. There’s always a reason for the decisions they make. They do very little that is against what the audience wants, because the stakes are just so high.”

    You’re entitled to feel a little manipulated by the ears-only secrecy surrounding modern musicals, but you probably can’t take the marketers to court. Last year, two fans of Ana de Armas sued Universal over the actress’s absence from 2019 musical Yesterday, because she’d been cut out of the film after appearing in the trailer (which did feature musical performances, because, Beatles). A federal judge ruled that trailers are subject to false advertising laws, meaning studios must be careful about overpromising and underdelivering. But non-musical musical trailers are more like lies of omission. “If you had musical numbers that were not in the movie and you said, ‘I was going to see a musical and there was no music to be found,’ that’s a potential suit,” Goetz says. But in this case, “You could say, ‘Judge, we’re not trying to say it’s not a musical. It’s that the music is an added bonus. We didn’t want to give that away. We want people to be surprised.’”

    However wise (and legally aboveboard) these trailer tactics may be, though, there are a few potential problems with excising the music from a musical. On the one hand, you save yourself some potential trouble getting trailer clearances for original compositions in the film. On the other hand, though, you risk losing what makes the movie special, as you might if you removed the jokes from a comedy trailer or the car chases and firefights from an action trailer. Travis Weir, a theatrical editor who predominantly cuts behind-the-scenes footage in his work with studios, points out that with a musical, “the songs are a huge part of the soul and character of the film. You’re not just cutting up a movie, or setting it to music in a novel way to imply something about the movie. It is the movie. So that’s an added challenge.”

    Depending on the type of musical, doing away with the music may not leave a lot to work with. With a movie like 2012’s Les Misérables, the anonymous trailer producer says, it “would’ve been impossible to just do the dramatic parts, because it’s so singing intensive. … The films that are structured more like operas are incredibly difficult to cut around.” Granted, a movie like Les Mis is probably too famously a musical to fool anyone anyway. And most musicals include enough dialogue to give editors sufficient trailer material. “A trailer is two minutes and 20 seconds,” the longtime trailer maker says, “so getting two minutes and 20 seconds of drama out of a long [movie], it’s not as difficult as one would think.”

    However, when the music is removed, there may be something slightly off about the actors’ line deliveries—an uncanny quality that comes from divorcing the dialogue from the showy, whimsical, heightened habitat of a musical. “It’s like a tonal phantom limb,” Weir says. “You can feel the itch that something else is supposed to be there.” The first trailer for Wonka was divisive and led to some sniping at Timothée Chalamet, arguably because the context of his performance wasn’t clear. But the backlash doesn’t seem to have hurt the movie’s review scores or box office expectations.

    There’s still some room on the small screen for unabashed musicals, like Schmigadoon! and the forthcoming Hazbin Hotel. For the time being, though, don’t count on being tipped off by a trailer to a musical movie unless it features a famous musical figure, à la Bohemian Rhapsody, Rocketman, Respect, Elvis, or Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody. Those movies make the music hard to hide—and anyone who wants to see them is probably into the tunes. Beyond biopics and Lady Gaga vehicles, recognizable names are a must. “It’s easier to sell a preexisting IP to a studio (‘Look how many tickets people have bought to Mean Girls the musical over the past five years!’), even if the marketing people have to try to hide the fact that it’s a musical,” Lynn says. (Though when they hide that Mean Girls is a musical, they also obscure the reason for remaking it.)

    As we’ve seen since 2021, the musical status quo can change quickly. Those studio execs must have thought they knew what they were doing when they gave green lights to so many musicals a few years ago, and look how well that worked out for them. (William Goldman’s maxim about the movie industry still applies.) Maybe Wonka, The Color Purple, and Mean Girls will make so much money that they’ll start another run on dancing and singing. All it takes is one Chicago, Mamma Mia!, or Pitch Perfect to create copycats.

    Max Khosla, cofounder and creative director of trailer music company Trailer Bros, says, “The trends change every year and the marketing team at the studio makes many changes every year to better sell the movie. Every decision is profit-based.” Maybe the potential for profit will grow. Goetz laments that the musical “doesn’t feel like a theatrical genre anymore” and expresses sadness that the few remaining major musicals are facing such an uphill battle at the box office that they’re forced to hide who they are. But he offers some optimism: When “one does really well—let’s say when Wicked comes out and it really is huge—then maybe people will say, ‘Musicals are back.’” Maybe then, like poor Prince Herbert in Monty Python and the Holy Grail, musically inclined characters in trailers will once again get a chance to sing.

    [ad_2]

    Ben Lindbergh

    Source link

  • Not Healthy

    Not Healthy

    [ad_1]

    Dear diary, today is the fourth day of this logging contract, I have 10 days to go until my first break, my skin is wind burned, the arthritis in my hands means I can barely hold a coffee cup and I think I’m starting to have paranoid delusions. The fae call to me.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Joe Hisaishi Is Studio Ghibli’s Unsung MVP

    Joe Hisaishi Is Studio Ghibli’s Unsung MVP

    [ad_1]

    Many factors contribute to Hayao Miyazaki’s mastery of the animated medium. His imaginative worlds. Their impeccable art design. A unique blend of nature, magic, and technology, all of which fascinate the 82-year-old creator, who has just released his maybe-final film, The Boy and the Heron.

    That list leaves out one very important yet underrated piece of Miyazaki’s success: a collaborator who not only hasn’t won an Oscar, but has never even been nominated for one. Composer Joe Hisaishi, who’s worked on all 11 films Miyazaki has directed since 1984’s Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind, is Studio Ghibli’s unsung MVP.

    I will admit up front that I know almost nothing about music theory. I’m just a naive listener who’s passionate about these soundtracks. Watch this video if you want to understand more about the actual composition principles that help Hisaishi’s scores resonate.

    But from my uneducated perspective, the 73-year-old Hisaishi’s greatest strength is his versatility. Even though many of Miyazaki’s protagonists occupy similar roles, he makes very different movies, from close character studies to delightfully strange fantasies to sprawling environmentalist sagas. And Hisaishi—whose real name is Mamoru Fujisawa; his pen name is inspired by Quincy Jones—manages to keep pace with those changes in direction, using each soundtrack to reflect the genres at hand.

    “When I look back I’m amazed that I could write music for these very different films,” Hisaishi told The New York Times recently.

    His music can convey an epic scope, as it does throughout Princess Mononoke and Castle in the Sky. It can be playful, as in Howl’s Moving Castle’s “A Walk in the Skies” and Porco Rosso’s “Flying Boatmen.” It can be romantic, as with “The Flower Garden” from Howl’s and the opening song from The Wind Rises.

    And while Hisaishi’s work is often slower and focused on character, he can also score an action scene with the best of them. “The Dragon Boy” from Spirited Away is fast-paced and frantic, building and building and building until an ultimate crest and denouement.

    The Ghibli soundtracks offer a wide variety in both substance and style. Some of Hisaishi’s pieces rely mainly on a lone piano, like the powerful “Ask Me Why” from The Boy and the Heron. For others, he calls on choirs. He also evinces an electronic influence, especially in his earlier work on Nausicaä and My Neighbor Totoro.

    All the while, he terrifically fuses Eastern and Western influences. Hisaishi’s music “connects with people, regardless of their culture, and that’s really powerful,” James Williams, the managing director of the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra in London, told The New York Times last year. “What Joe has done is somehow retain that integrity of Japanese culture, brought in that Western tonal system and found a way for the two to retain their identities in perfect harmony.”

    That nimbleness allows Hisaishi to tap into the emotions of so many varied characters, which he describes as his chief goal when scoring Miyazaki’s films. “It’s about emotion, something the character might be feeling,” Hisaishi told the Times.

    Thus he offers the melancholy of Spirited Away’s “One Summer’s Day” and the hopefulness of Kiki’s Delivery Service’s “A Town With an Ocean View”—pieces that both score the opening adventures of two young girls yet diverge in mood as they parallel the heroines’ opposing outlooks on life.

    “A Town With an Ocean View” might not be my absolute favorite Hisaishi track—it’s near the top, but if I had to pick just one, I might lean toward the wistfulness and grandeur of Nausicaä’s opening theme—but I consider it the most emblematic of what makes his work so appealing. When it starts to play in Kiki’s, the titular witch is just arriving in said town, enthusiastic about exploring the world and in awe of all the new sights and sounds around her. The peppy, vibrant music perfectly captures this open-minded, inquisitive, coming-of-age sensation.

    In a sense, all of Miyazaki’s movies channel this desire for exploration. If there’s another common thread among Hisaishi’s compositions, it’s an ability to convey this feeling of curiosity and mystery, as at the start of Kiki’s, in Spirited Away’s “A Road to Somewhere,” and throughout much of The Boy and the Heron.

    Miyazaki’s creations shine because they fill viewers with a sense of wonder and blend the fantastical with the personal, and Hisaishi’s soundtracks are a crucial component in balancing the two poles. “San and Ashitaka in the Forest of the Deer God” is almost religious in its invocation of awe, yet it also keeps the characters centered in a key moment in the Mononoke tale.

    I admit I have a personal bias toward Hisaishi because of my connection to his music. At our wedding last year, my wife walked down the aisle to Howl’s Moving Castle’s “Merry-Go-Round of Life.” And mere days after pitching this piece to my editor, I discovered that Hisaishi was my top artist for 2023 on Spotify Wrapped.

    There’s a reason for this ranking: My wife and I moved this year, and we used a Ghibli playlist as background accompaniment while packing, unpacking, painting, and building new furniture. (We joked while listening that we were the “Very Busy Kiki” the track references.)

    After all that listening, I can say with confidence that Hisaishi’s music works outside the context of the films too. There’s a reason that so many YouTube videos of Ghibli music collections have millions of views. Hisaishi’s pieces have—and this is a very technical music term—good, relaxing vibes. He’s also done plenty of accomplished work beyond these soundtracks: other film scores, solo albums, a concert tour.

    Yet it is his partnership with Miyazaki for which he is best known, and it’s in Miyazaki’s movies that his melodies resonate strongest. Hisaishi and Miyazaki really are animation’s answer to John Williams and Steven Spielberg. (Except unlike Hisaishi, Williams has five Academy Awards and 53 nominations. Give Hisaishi his proper due, Academy voters!)

    At this point, I am half inclined to just keep listing tracks that work so wonderfully. I’ve barely even touched on Totoro or Castle in the Sky or half of the beautiful melodies in Spirited Away. But there’s a new task at hand, because the Boy and the Heron soundtrack is now available. My favorite so far is either “A Trap,” which is fast and tense, or “Sanctuary,” which swings the other direction: slow and calming. But it’s still early. I have a lot more listening to do.

    [ad_2]

    Zach Kram

    Source link

  • Taylor Swift is TIME’s Person of the Year

    Taylor Swift is TIME’s Person of the Year

    [ad_1]

    Taylor Swift was named TIME’s 2023 Person of the Year and, in conjunction with that honor, gave a rare interview for the profile. Nora and Nathan talk about why she might have decided to give the interview (1:00), some of the major revelations that came from the piece (15:58), and what it means for her future music that she’s in a very happy moment in her life (48:21).

    Hosts: Nora Princiotti and Nathan Hubbard
    Producer: Kaya McMullen

    Subscribe: Spotify

    [ad_2]

    Nora Princiotti

    Source link

  • Fortnite’s new map is too bougie for me

    Fortnite’s new map is too bougie for me

    [ad_1]

    Gone are the days of scrounging up loot at dilapidated taco joints and rusty playgrounds in Fortnite. Epic Games released a massive new update to the battle royale game this week as part of Chapter 5 Season 1. The patch literally blew up the OG map with a meteor, replacing it with an entirely new, much fancier map. Instead of rough locales like Greasy Groves or Tomato Temple, players now explore palatial manors like Lavish Lair or the manicured vineyards of Pleasant Piazza. Fortnite is basically a fancy European vacation now, and it feels a bit outside my personal budget.

    Developers stuffed the new map with luxurious points of interest. Another example: Grand Glacier, a hotel nestled on a snow-capped mountain that looks like it’s straight out of Wes Anderson’s The Grand Budapest Hotel. If the mountains aren’t your thing, you can head over to the Ritzy Riviera, a picturesque shore-side town with villas nestled into a sloped hillside. At places like Classy Courts, decrypted playgrounds with broken concrete have been replaced with manicured hedges.

    Image: Epic Games

    Call me a traditionalist, but I like to do dumb shit in Fortnite. I personally play as Kakashi from Naruto, and style him with an Among Us backpack as I regale other players with emotes like the Gangnam Style dance. Part of what made me fall in love with Fortnite was the garishness of it all. It’s a bright, cartoony game where you can go fishing with Ariana Grande, then turn around and scuffle with Goku. In the new season, a lot of that whimsy is still there: Peter Griffin is now a skin, and appears as an NPC you can fight. But that tone doesn’t seem to be reflected in the map, which forms a central part of the game.

    It isn’t that previous maps were lacking in high-end locations. Prior to the return of the OG map, Chapter 4 Season 4 added the cyberpunk-inspired Mega City and the sweeping Japanese estates of Kenjutsu Crossing. While Kenjutsu resembles the more elaborate locales in the current iteration of the game, some of those additions still evoked a sort of surrealism: Mega City’s sci-fi elements felt true to the less realistic elements of Fortnite.

    All that said, locations are subject to change with each update. So it’s possible that further meteors or other ill fates might befall some of these fancy locales and bring back some of the good old Fortnite charm — rough hedges and all.

    [ad_2]

    Ana Diaz

    Source link

  • Dickens’ A Christmas Carol has a Metroidvania sequel in big year for Christmas games

    Dickens’ A Christmas Carol has a Metroidvania sequel in big year for Christmas games

    [ad_1]

    Whether 2023 is one of the best years for video games is up for debate. But it is certainly one of the best years for Christmas video games, thanks to a surprising number of festive, holiday-themed releases. That includes a video game sequel to Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol, starring Ebenezer Scrooge and made in the Metroidvania style.

    While many live service games will drench themselves in Christmas and Hanukkah-themed cosmetics and map makeovers this month, not since Sega’s Christmas NiGHTS into Dreams… has there been such an eclectic mix of festive fare. Some are naughty, and some are nice. And at least one, a gory slasher that will appeal to fans of Rockstar Games’ murderous Manhunt, is definitely not for kids.

    Here’s a look at 2023’s Christmas games.

    Ebenezer and the Invisible World

    Set after the events of Ebenezer Scrooge’s encounter with Jacob Marley and the spirits of Christmas Past, Present, and Yet to Come, Ebenezer and the Invisible World sees the once-miserly grump setting off on a new adventure. Invigorated by Christmas cheer, Ebenezer is enlisted by another ghost to help alter the destiny of evil industrialist and population-principle-believer Caspar Malthus. Aiding Ebenezer in his mission are many more ghosts — which are basically summonable familiars and power-ups that are heavily inspired by Castlevania: Symphony of the Night. (Ebenezer even has Alucard’s back dash.)

    Ebenezer and the Invisible World is an enjoyable action-adventure game with greater depth than you might think. The game’s hand-drawn graphics and wide array of characters and quests keep the whole thing moving along pleasantly; plus it’s just fun to see old Ebenezer wielding a giant ax or spinning a flaming spear. He’s very spry for his age!

    Ebenezer and the Invisible World is available now on Nintendo Switch, PlayStation 4, PlayStation 5, Windows PC, Xbox One, and Xbox Series X.

    Lake: Seasons Greetings

    The video game Lake is a cozy, narrative adventure set in the sleepy village of Providence Oaks, Oregon. Set in the year 1986, players stepped into the shoes of Meredith Weiss, a metropolitan, career-driven woman who returns home to temporarily take over her father’s postal route. Lake: Season’s Greetings delivers similar smalltown vibes, but this time, players tour the town as Thomas Weiss, Meredith’s father, as Christmastime approaches.

    Lake: Season’s Greetings is a prequel to the original Lake, available as DLC for that game. These cozy, wintry vibes are available on PS4, PS5, Windows PC, Xbox One, and Xbox Series X.

    Christmas Massacre

    Make it a silent night, make it a deadly night with the stealth-slasher Christmas Massacre, which made its debut on PlayStation 4 and PlayStation 5 in November. (It’s been on PC since 2021.) Inspired by snuff game Manhunt, top-down shoot-’em-up Hotline Miami, and PlayStation 1-era aesthetics, Christmas Massacre lets you slay as Larry, a man who is clearly not well, because his Christmas tree is commanding him to kill.

    Obviously, Christmas Massacre is probably not something you should play with the whole family, but if over-the-top violence and gore done super lo-fi is your thing, it’s a fun romp, as murder rampages go. You will be flamethrowing roomfuls of children and nuns, just as a heads up.

    Christmas Massacre is available on PS4, PS5, and Windows PC via Steam.

    The Grinch: Christmas Adventures

    Dr. Seuss’ The Grinch stars in a 2D side-scrolling platform adventure game that may or may not be any good — I haven’t played it! But The Grinch: Christmas Adventures gives players control of The Grinch himself (and his dog Max, in two-player local co-op) on another Christmas-ruining mission. Like Ebenezer and the Invisible World, this is a one-year-later sequel to the original source material. And like The Grinch Who Stole Christmas, Grinch’s Christmas Adventures promise to teach him a “valuable lesson about the true spirit of the holiday.” Hopefully he learns for good this time!!

    The Grinch: Christmas Adventures is out now on Nintendo Switch, PlayStation 4, PlayStation 5, Windows PC, Xbox One, and Xbox Series X.

    Final Fantasy 7 Ever Crisis: The Holy Flame’s Gift

    Image: Square Enix

    Square Enix’s mobile remake of the expanded Final Fantasy 7 franchise has a new holiday event, which isn’t a stand-alone game, but a new story that features two important elements.

    One is a Christmasy new Tifa costume that is currently riling up Tifa fans worldwide. You can see that above.

    The other is that the chief antagonist of Final Fantasy 7 Ever Crisis’ new holiday-themed story is a gingerbread Cactuar. Amazing!

    Final Fantasy 7 Ever Crisis is currently available on Android and iOS devices, and is coming to PC via Steam on Dec. 7, Square Enix just announced. The game’s The Holy Flame’s Gift story is available now.

    [ad_2]

    Michael McWhertor

    Source link

  • Doctor Who time traveled back to 2008 to save the show in 2023

    Doctor Who time traveled back to 2008 to save the show in 2023

    [ad_1]

    The hero of BBC’s long-running sci-fi series Doctor Who is, famously, not a real medical doctor, but they have been a bit ill. What should have been a promising changing of the guard in 2018 — with new showrunner Chris Chibnall and the first woman cast as The Doctor since the series’ 1963 debut — only served to accelerate a gradual downward slide that began in the latter half of previous showrunner Steven Moffat’s seven-year tenure.

    In response, the BBC has decided the cure to The Doctor’s ails lies with the man who revived the show from a 15-year coma in 2005: Russell T. Davies. And with his first episode, last weekend’s hour-long special “The Star Beast,” Davies has delivered the goods. “The Star Beast” isn’t quite the reboot Davies is here to deliver — that’ll come in 2024 when Ncuti Gatwa takes over as The Fifteenth Doctor. Instead, “The Star Beast” is meant as catnip for lapsed and disappointed fans that were introduced during Davies’ first Who revival. It’s a blatant nostalgia play that, hilariously, carries on as if nothing has happened since Davies left the show in 2008. And you know what? It kills.

    Loosely based on “Doctor Who and The Star Beast,” a comics serial by Pat Mills and Watchmen co-creator Dave Gibbons, the new special pulls triple duty: delivering a snappy, classic Doctor Who adventure, introducing an overarching mystery that will tie “The Star Beast” to two more specials coming in following weeks, and briefly introducing the Doctor to newcomers. It excels at its first two tasks, and stumbles pretty extravagantly at the third. Luckily, there’s so much charm here that “The Star Beast” never feels anything other than delightful, even at its clumsiest.

    That charm is essential, because Davies’ first Doctor Who episode in 15 years is lampshading what, in most circumstances, would read as desperation. The mystery at the center of “The Star Beast” and the specials that follow is why — and how — did The Thirteenth Doctor (Jodie Comer) regenerate back into the same body she had as the Tenth Doctor (fan-favorite David Tennant). For a show built around a time-traveling humanoid alien who never dies but instead “regenerates” into a new body with a new personality so the show can explain away recasting its lead, “continuity” has always been more a suggestion than a rule. But Davies bringing back Tennant as the newly-christened Fourteenth Doctor and also Catherine Tate as beloved companion Donna Noble is extravagantly cheeky, even for this show.

    Image: Disney Plus

    What reunites them is the eponymous Star Beast, a giant Furby-lookin’ guy called The Meep, who crashes on Earth and befriends Donna’s daughter, Rose. The Meep is being hunted by insectoid soldiers who look like Power Rangers villains, catching Donna and her family in the crossfire and bringing The Doctor back into their lives again.

    It’s all very silly, and an astonishing display from two actors who do not seem to have missed a beat since they last played these roles in 2008. Even with its messy exposition and open, lavish courtship of fans that grew to love the show during the first Davies era, “The Star Beast” is a good reminder that Donna and The Tenth Doctor were popular for a very good reason. Doctor Who has never had the biggest budget or the slickest sensibilities; it was and remains a childrens’ show that fans happily carried into adulthood. The most beloved of Doctors — Tom Baker, Matt Smith, David Tennant, and a few wild card picks — made this text, imbuing the character with a childlike whimsy, playing a very old man who never stopped believing there was magic to be found in the universe.

    David Tennant is still remarkably good at this, and “The Star Beast” makes as good a case for The Doctor as any. He’s endlessly curious, always a little odd, and trusts that kindness and intelligence will win the day over violent antagonists. Tennant’s Doctor is not afraid to treat every square inch of ground as a stage from which he will play to the back of the room. There is no line too silly for him to bellow with conviction. There is no creature too strange for him to care about.

    The Doctor and Donna in the 60th Anniversary Doctor Who specials

    Image: Disney Plus

    “The Star Beast” takes a little bit longer to recapture what makes Donna Noble such a great presence, but when she finally gets going, Catherine Tate is a force of nature: Never that impressed with The Doctor, happy to argue with him even with armageddon on the line, and fully capable of steamrolling anyone who looks askance at her or her loved ones.

    It is hard not to love these two characters, to not want to travel all of time and space with them again. In a way we have, from 2008 to 2023, in a transition so seamless it’s shocking. Perhaps this shouldn’t be such a surprise. When Doctor Who is at its best, it’s like The Doctor has always been there: an old imaginary friend that still charms you as an adult. The earnest wonder and curiosity the character represents never really gets old. This is why the show endures: You don’t need a season of Doctor Who to be won over, you just need a moment. Those moments can come at any time, during runs both maligned and excellent. The Tenth Doctor and Donna Noble were incredibly good at making those moments in their time together. Here’s to a few more, before it’s someone else’s turn.

    The Doctor Who 60th Anniversary specials are on Disney Plus, with the first now streaming and two more premiering weekly. Previous seasons of Doctor Who are available to stream on Max.

    [ad_2]

    Joshua Rivera

    Source link

  • Promising Young Woman writer-director Emerald Fennell says her latest, Saltburn, is a ‘lick the rich’ movie

    Promising Young Woman writer-director Emerald Fennell says her latest, Saltburn, is a ‘lick the rich’ movie

    [ad_1]

    As the environmental, political, and above all, economic tension between the ultra-rich and the rest of the world continues to grow, it’s a topic that keeps driving dark, memorable movies — from Bong Joon-ho’s Oscar-winner Parasite to 2022’s The Menu, Pig, and Triangle of Sadness to a sub-track at the 2023 Fantastic Fest film festival, including this year’s Nick Stahl movie What You Wish For and the blistering Brazilian movie Property. Emerald Fennell’s Saltburn, which played as a secret screening at Fantastic Fest, seems to fit the bill perfectly as well: It follows an Oxford freshman, Oliver (Barry Keoghan, sure to turn up in awards-season conversation again) as he awkwardly infiltrates the social circle of his ultra-rich classmate Felix Catton (Priscilla co-star Jacob Elordi). What follows is part horror movie, part classic Gothic novel, as Oliver hungers to be like Felix — or just to be Felix.

    But in an interview after Fantastic Fest, Fennell told Polygon she doesn’t entirely see Saltburn as yet another eat-the-rich exercise.

    “I think I consider it more ‘Lick the rich, suck the rich, and then bite the rich, and then swallow them,’” she said.

    Image: Prime

    Saltburn is an intoxicating experience: a visually rich, caustic crime thriller in the vein of The Talented Mister Ripley. Oliver, whose background takes a while to fully unfold within the film, is obsessed with the luxury, comforts, and casual arrogance of Felix and his wealthy family. But as they spend more time with Oliver, embracing his attractiveness and cleverness and welcoming him into Saltburn, the family estate, they also drop hints that he’s probably just the plaything of the season, likely to be discarded out of boredom.

    Fennell’s movie — her follow-up to the challenging, much-discussed revenge story Promising Young Woman — isn’t entirely sympathetic toward Oliver, who’s clearly grasping and needy as well as ruthless. At the same time, it isn’t fully on board with Felix and his superficial, selfish family members, either.

    “It’s really about having sympathy with everyone, always,” Fennell says. “Certainly for me as a writer and director — and for the actors, too — it always has to be an exercise in empathy. None of these people thinks of themselves as a bad person. It was the same with Promising Young Woman. It’s not interesting for me to make things that make moral judgments about people — all I’m interested in doing is understanding. So for me, the first thing about the Catton family was that we understood why Oliver would be, against his better judgment, completely and utterly beguiled.”

    As Fennell has explained in other interviews, Saltburn is a movie about fame, fandom, the internet, and parasocial relationships, about the kind of connections people make from a distance and build into elaborate, often unhealthy fantasies. Part of drawing that line was making Felix the kind of superstar who would earn a fandom: He’s handsome, charming, and skilled at everything he tries, but he’s also surprisingly kind.

    “It’s the thing about Felix — we think we’re going to hate him, we assume we’re going to hate him,” Fennell said. “And then the moment we meet him for the first time, it’s impossible to resist. They’re all impossible to resist. The world is impossible to resist. It was important that we understood from the get-go why, against our better judgment, we would all want to be at Saltburn, and would do anything to get in and anything to stay.”

    Oliver (Barry Keoghan), dressed for a costume party in deer horns and an elaborately beaded white suit, stands on a blanket on a dock with his back to the camera, looking out over a pond full of huge light-up floating plastic lilies, and beyond them, an immense Gothic estate, in the movie Saltburn

    Image: Prime

    Both Saltburn and Promising Young Woman are about toxic hunger, about a protagonist so monomaniacal about getting something that they’re willing to cut any moral corners to get there. In terms of other connections, though, Fennell says her own obsessions may be showing in the new film.

    “You’re always trying to do something new and make something different, but you can never get too far away from yourself,” she says. “I think certainly I have a preoccupation with genre, and the way we use it as filmmakers and experience it as cinema goers. Promising Young Woman was looking at the specific genre of the female-lead revenge movie. Saltburn is looking at the Gothic country-house tradition. Promising Young Woman was looking to subvert the genre, and that’s exactly what I’m hoping to do here.”

    The reason Saltburn feels like so many classic British stories about class, Gothic manors, and dark secrets is because Fennell wanted the movie to be a recognizable world, a genre exercise where viewers think they know what the rules are, and what’s coming next.

    “It’s only with that familiarity that you can really apply pressure, and dig into the genre,” Fennell said. “So stylistically, I’m always going to be preoccupied with where a movie exists in the world of movies. You can’t pretend a movie exists outside of the world.”

    As far as other comparisons to her work go, Fennell notes that both Promising Young Woman and Saltburn are thwarted love stories. “They’re stories about what we do with love that can’t be, for whatever reason, that can’t carry on in the form it starts in. With Promising Young Woman, it was the love story between Cassie and Nina, and it was a love story with Ryan, Bo Burnham’s character — both of them loves that kind of can’t work out. And Saltburn is a movie about loving someone, and loving his world — a world that’s never going to love you back. What do you make yourself into? What do you do to yourself when that becomes apparent? How do you get that love?”

    It may seem a little counterintuitive to compare internet fame with Gothic novels like Brideshead Revisited, Wuthering Heights, and Northanger Abbey. But Fennell thinks of these books and online obsessions as closely connected.

    Oliver (Barry Keoghan) sits at a long dining-room table in a very dark room with Felix (Jacob Jacob Elordi) and other members of his family, all in formalwear, in the movie Saltburn

    Image: Prime

    “There is always a tension, always, between ourselves and other people,” she said. “If the Gothic tradition is about an outsider being introduced to a world which is both desirable and frightening — that’s absolutely what we’re doing with the internet, and our relationship with the world of fame and beauty.

    “Online, fame isn’t just about people anymore. It’s about their wardrobes, the way they organize their wardrobes, the labels they put on their drawers, every detail of people’s lives. It’s their food, their clothes, it’s everything. I think we are absolutely, now more than ever — and particularly post-COVID — in this kind of voyeuristic, sadomasochistic relationship with these things. I certainly, myself, feel a new desire post-COVID to touch.”

    Referencing one of the more visceral and much-described scenes in Saltburn, where Oliver licks Felix’s bathwater out of the drain, Fennell said, “I think it makes sense that this film is preoccupied in many ways with the stuff of human secretion, in whatever form that is. There’s a transgression now, post-COVID, to touching and feeling, and getting intimate, in ways that may be surprising. And I think that’s absolutely what the Gothic tradition was always about. It was about introducing people, but particularly women, to this idea of the transgressive desire, and the things that maybe weren’t within reason. They’re outside of reason, they become completely all-consuming.”

    Saltburn is in theaters now.

    [ad_2]

    Tasha Robinson

    Source link

  • Remember when Frozen helped solve the Dyaltov Pass incident?

    Remember when Frozen helped solve the Dyaltov Pass incident?

    [ad_1]

    A decade later, Frozen is still a pretty incredible looking movie. Despite accusations of Disney Face and a slew of movies that have aped its art style, Disney’s landmark 2013 film remains a pretty astounding display of digital animation prowess. Among the many fantastic looking elements, perhaps the most impressive is the snow. But Frozen’s snow has done more than simply look pretty — the technology that Disney used to make it helped solve the decades-old mystery of Dyatlov Pass.

    For those who don’t know, the Dyatlov Pass incident is a hiking tragedy that happened in Russia’s Ural Mountains in 1959. A group of nine people were discovered dead a few weeks after pitching their tent in the snowy slopes. What was particularly haunting about the bodies, however, was the state in which they were found [Ed. note: This description is a little graphic]: Several seemed to have been dragged many feet from the campsite, while others were even further away. Some were discovered in various states of undress, injury, and disfigurement, missing eyeballs or tongue, and with cracked ribs and skulls. The bodies were also, bizarrely, lightly irradiated. In other words, it seemed like a graphic and grisly massacre, but no one could provide an explanation that exactly fit the facts.

    That mystery made space for decades of fantastical theories to crop up, including Yetis, aliens, wild animals, infrasound, the Soviet military, or (most boring and plausible) an avalanche. But for years, the avalanche theory was considered an insufficient explanation. In the initial investigation, and several subsequent ones, researchers found none of the typical evidence that might suggest an avalanche had been triggered. But in 2019, a group of physicists determined that an extremely small avalanche could technically be possible in that area.

    Image: Walt Disney Animation Studios

    The next question for researchers was whether or not an avalanche of that size could really cause the kinds of injuries the nine victims were found with — and that’s exactly where Frozen comes into play.

    When Johan Gaume, head of the Snow Avalanche Simulation Laboratory at EPFL, a Swiss federal technical institute, saw Frozen, he was immediately impressed with the way the snow in the movie moved. So impressed, in fact, that he met with Disney to talk about the animation technology they used to create it. Gaume then augmented the code slightly in order to create a more realistic model for how an avalanche of that size might look and behave, and more importantly how it might impact and injure a human body.

    Between the Frozen code, his own simulations, and some old crash-test data from General Motors, Gaume and his team determined that a small avalanche actually could be enough to create the kind of blunt-force trauma injuries suffered by the victims of Dyatlov’s tragedy. According to their research, an avalanche of that size, in those specific conditions could do things like break ribs or cause serious head injuries, or even enough soft tissue damage to result in death — unlike most avalanche victims, who tend to die of asphyxiation.

    Queen Elsa stands looking worried on the frozen balcony of her frozen palace, surrounded by frozen walls and frozen bannisters, in… what was that movie called again? Chilly, or something like that?

    Image: Walt Disney Animation Studios

    But while Gaume’s model does give some compelling support to the avalanche theory, it can’t quite account for all of Dyatlov’s Pass’ mysteries. For instance, why were the bodies irradiated (possibly due to thorium present in some camping lanterns, but unconfirmed) or what happened to the eyes and tongues of certain members of the group (possibly scavenged by animals, though there aren’t many other signs that point to that on the bodies). Another of the ongoing mysteries is why exactly the bodies were so far from the camp or why they were undressed — though various kinds of panic and hypothermia could potentially account for that.

    But at the end of the day, we’re still one step closer to figuring out the answers that have eluded researchers for years, and it’s all because of Frozen.

    Honestly, Disney should lean into it. Frozen 3 and Frozen 4 are on the way — what’s keeping the House of Mouse from realistically modeling radiation spread, katabatic winds, and possibly the alpine speed of a Yeti?

    [ad_2]

    Austen Goslin

    Source link

  • Thanksgiving is Spider-Man’s holiday

    Thanksgiving is Spider-Man’s holiday

    [ad_1]

    Marvel built its comic book revolution on the back of one idea: rendering colorful superheroes as relatable. In the mid 20th century, DC do-gooders were essentially square-jawed Sunday school teachers, which let Marvel corner the market on heroes with human depth and fragility. The Fantastic Four were vulnerable to insecurity and in-fighting. The X-Men represented the cost of bigotry on a wide scale.

    But Spider-Man represented this new wave best. Consumed by youthful everyman angst and desperate to find balance in his life, Spider-Man is broadly sympathetic. We identify with his struggles and his little glimmers of connection and triumph — which makes him the perfect superhero for Thanksgiving. And Spider-Man writers know it.

    Image: Jacob Chabot/Marvel Comics

    Thanksgiving has a complicated history, tied to the roots of American colonialism, and more recently processed through a lens of joyful capitalism. But feeding friends and family is perhaps one of the most humane acts we can pursue. It’s less about the spirit of giving, and more about admitting that people have innate, basic needs, like food and social comfort, and that those needs are best fulfilled when people work in tandem. Honestly, we should try to do it more on every other day of the year: The number of people volunteering to help feed the homeless and families in need peaks around November and December, but that energy needs to be carried through the preceding 10 months, too.

    Spider-Man represents these needs, even though very few of us have to balance photojournalist work, a fraught dating life, and pummeling Dr. Octopus. Peter Parker is often the most financially strapped among his Avengers buddies, and frequently the loneliest, too. Those are recognizable traits among many young people, even those without radioactive-spider powers. When you’re growing up and trying to figure out the world, it’s easy to feel lost and isolated. But feelings of loneliness spike during the holidays, meaning that there’s a good chance you’ll feel even more like Peter Parker when late November rolls around.

    Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire) smiles sidelong at Norman Osborn (Willem Dafoe) as Norman starts to carve the turkey at Thanksgiving dinner in Sam Raimi’s 2002 Spider-Man

    Image: Columbia Pictures/Disney Plus

    It’s what makes the Thanksgiving scene in the 2002 Spider-Man film so engaging. That whole movie is an exercise in heart-on-your-sleeve sweetness. Everyone who’s seen it knows the Thanksgiving dinner rapidly descends into chaos, with Norman Osborn ominously sticking his fingers into Aunt May’s sweet-potato casserole, figuring out Spider-Man’s secret identity, and delivering a grossly sexist diatribe to his son Harry, leaving Harry and Mary Jane at odds with each other. Aunt May and Peter clearly wind up with a ton of leftovers after everyone else storms out.

    But for Peter, who’s just lost his Uncle Ben and has been facing the initial trials of being Spider-Man, there’s a nice moment of personal respite at the opening of that scene, where he walks into a room where he knows he’s loved, bearing an offering of cranberry sauce,. Sure, everyone in that room is trying to hold things together. Mary Jane wants to impress Norman, Harry wants to impress Norman and Mary Jane, Peter loves Mary Jane but doesn’t dare hurt Harry, and Aunt May is finishing what’s presumably a dope turkey, in an attempt to care for all of them.

    It’s the trying that counts: Life can be hard, weird, and cruel, but while sitting down for a meal with our nearest and dearest, maybe for at least a little while, we won’t need to have it all figured out.

    Spider-Man, in a blur of motion, goes whipping by a Thanksgiving Day parade balloon of a turkey in a pilgrim hat, as a surprisingly chubby Venom pursues him in the Spectacular Spider-Man episode “Nature Vs. Nurture”

    Image: Sony Pictures Television/Disney Plus

    Not all Spider-Man Thanksgiving dinners end up falling apart, and some succeed in reminding Peter that he isn’t alone. The first season of The Spectacular Spider-Man ends with a bang: One of Peter’s closest pals, Eddie Brock, has become Venom, and has threatened everyone Peter holds dear. This comes just after Peter himself was infected by the symbiote, and went through the now-iconic throes of pushing everyone away. Aunt May has just gotten out of the hospital, and even noted jerk “Flash” Thompson has given Peter hell for how awful he’s been acting.

    Peter, attempting to make things right, opts to cook the Thanksgiving meal all by himself, but mostly succeeds in ruining the kitchen. No worries — Gwen Stacy and her father, along with a recuperating Aunt May and her doctor, all help out, and the episode concludes with a pleasant dinner. There are no big turns or twists, aside from Aunt May revealing that she’s publishing a cookbook. It’s just simple, earned solace in a life marked by chaos. Peter even gets a kiss from Gwen on his porch, a sequence conducted with a John Hughes sense of satisfying romantic flair.

    The Spider-Man balloon at the 88th Annual Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade

    Photo: Laura Cavanaugh/FilmMagic

    Various Spider-Man comics have also dabbled in seeing what Thanksgiving looks like when you’re young and arachnid-themed, but real life has associated Spider-Man with the holiday, too. Spider-Man is the only Marvel character to rate a balloon in the Macy’s Thanksgiving Parade. Other Marvel characters have appeared on floats, but only Spider-Man has been inflated to 80 feet and pulled through the Upper West Side. (That also makes him the only Marvel character to have his head horrifically torn open by a tree branch.)

    From his first comic book appearance, Spider-Man has been a reminder that life is hard and complicated, and being a superhero doesn’t preclude anyone from experiencing ordinary frustrations, setbacks, and confusion. But no matter how Spider-Man’s Thanksgiving escapades turn out, they remind readers and viewers that the holiday is about the hope of mutual connection, support, and nurturing. Even if the girl of your dreams is out of reach and the Green Goblin is on your case, a table, some friends, and Aunt May’s rad turkey might just make everything better for a little while.

    [ad_2]

    Daniel Dockery

    Source link

  • Every Xbox console is at least $50 off for Black Friday

    Every Xbox console is at least $50 off for Black Friday

    [ad_1]

    If you’ve been waiting for a Black Friday price cut on the Xbox Series X or Series S, Best Buy, GameStop, and Target have knocked $50 off the standard price of either console, discounting the Series X to $449.99, and the Series S to $249.99. The Diablo 4 Xbox Series X bundle at Walmart and Microsoft is even cheaper at $439.99.

    But before you buy, take note that some retailers have better bonuses than others. At Best Buy, the discounted Series X comes with a $50 Best Buy gift card. And, if you happen to be a member of My Best Buy Plus (a $50 annual service), you can get another $50 off the total, resulting in a final cost of just $399.99 for the console.

    Target is offering a slightly sweeter deal on top of the $50 discount. If you buy any Xbox Series X that it has in stock, you’ll also get a $75 Target gift card.

    [ad_2]

    Alice Newcome-Beill

    Source link

  • Dex-Starr is the goodest of kitties

    Dex-Starr is the goodest of kitties

    [ad_1]

    context:
    cat is put in a bad cause its trying its best to protect his human, some ******* throw him into a river, the anger he feels is so strong that it makes him worthy of a red ring,
    his human gets killed so he hunts down the ******* that did it and kills them all

    [ad_2]

    Source link