ReportWire

Tag: Investment strategy

  • Kamala Harris has supported affordable housing in the past. This refloated policy might benefit renters

    Kamala Harris has supported affordable housing in the past. This refloated policy might benefit renters

    [ad_1]

    US Vice President Kamala Harris speaks on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, DC, US, on Monday, July 22, 2024.

    Ting Shen | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Harris’ record on housing issues

    As attorney general for California, Harris drafted and helped pass the California Homeowner Bill of Rights; it is a set of laws designed to protect homeowners from unfair practices. The California Homeowner Bill of Rights became law on January 1, 2013.

    Harris secured a $18 billion agreement as part of a national multistate settlement to benefit thousands of homeowners who lost their homes due to improper foreclosure or fraud in 2012.

    As senator, Harris introduced the Rent Relief Act in 2018, a bill that offers tax credits to renters who earn below $100,000 and spend over 30% of their income on rent and utilities.

    Harris resubmitted a second variation of the bill in 2019, which includes a mechanism from the Treasury to pay the tax credit on a monthly basis to eligible households. The latter version also caps the credit at 100% of small area fair market rents instead of 150% of FMR.

    Harris last month announced the recipients of an $85 million grant under the Pathways to Removing Obstacles for Housing, or PRO Housing, a first-of-its-kind project through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development aimed to increase building activity and lower housing and rental costs for families in the U.S.

    That news came on the heels of a May announcement from Harris budgeting $5.5 billion through HUD to boost affordable housing, invest in economic growth, build wealth, and address homelessness in communities across America.

    Such policies come at a time when the country is facing rising homelessness rates and burdensome costs to buy or rent. In 2023, a record 653,100 people experienced homelessness in 2023, up from 256,600 the year prior, according to a report by the Harvard University Joint Center for Housing Studies.

    ‘There’s potential for a lot of good’

    The latest housing policies the Biden Administration has rolled out generally aim at increasing the supply of affordable housing and lowering costs for buyers and renters.

    Harris has been involved in Biden’s housing policy-making, and it’s likely that her campaign will carry on similar blueprints for housing, experts say.

    “Generally speaking, it does seem like affordable housing, zoning has been something that has been a talking point of hers for a while now,” said Jacob Channel, a senior economist at LendingTree. “If they keep on the same course that the Biden administration was on, I think there’s potential for a lot of good.”

    As a Harris candidacy begins to look more likely, people have been talking about a policy Harris originally floated in her 2020 Presidential campaign: the LIFT the Middle Class Act.

    The bill would give a refundable tax credit of up to $3,000 per person, or $6,000 per married couples who file joint tax returns, for qualifying middle- and working-class Americans.

    Some experts point out the LIFT Act might be better for renters than the 5% rent cap increase Biden proposed in mid-July.

    The proposal calls on Congress to cap rent increases from landlords with 50 existing units or more at 5% or risk losing federal tax breaks.

    “The concern with the rent cap is that the supply of housing would change,” said Francesco D’Acunto, an associate professor of finance at Georgetown University.

    While the rent cap may lead consumers to believe that prices will not increase more than a certain amount, it could lead to negative side effects, such as landlords taking their properties off of the rental market, said Karl Widerquist, an economist and professor of philosophy at Georgetown University.

    Landlords who lose access to tax breaks will still be able to raise rents and the plan would exclude new construction and buildings undergoing major renovations, Channel explained.

    The tax credit wouldn’t create the same distortions as the rent cap, and it also targets the negative effects of rent inflation, D’Acunto said.

    To be sure, Harris’ LIFT the Middle Class Act has received push back in the past. While it’s not a perfect policy, the LIFT Act is “essentially an expansion in the right direction,” Widerquist said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A Silicon Valley executive had $400,000 stolen by cybercriminals while buying a home. Here’s her warning

    A Silicon Valley executive had $400,000 stolen by cybercriminals while buying a home. Here’s her warning

    [ad_1]

    Real estate, with its large transaction sizes and frequent use of bank wires, has proven to be an especially lucrative target for cybercriminals.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Investment banking is back — and the recovery is just getting started

    Investment banking is back — and the recovery is just getting started

    [ad_1]

    A combination file photo shows Wells Fargo, Citibank, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Goldman Sachs.

    Reuters

    Investment banking was the rock star of big bank earnings this season.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The death of the personal check: As retailers move toward ‘check zero,’ here’s what that means for you

    The death of the personal check: As retailers move toward ‘check zero,’ here’s what that means for you

    [ad_1]

    Nadya Lukic | E+ | Getty Images

    Most Americans may not even remember the last time they wrote a check.

    Only 15% of adults said they wrote a few checks a month in 2023, according to a recent report by GoBankingRates. At the time of the late November survey, 46% of the more than 1,000 respondents said they hadn’t written a single check in 2023.

    These days, consumers are far more likely to “tap and go.”

    In fact, in the years since the Covid pandemic, Americans have fully embraced contactless and digital payment methods, while check writing has steadily declined into near-oblivion.

    Some retailers rule out paper checks

    As of July 15, Target joined a growing list of retailers, including the Aldi supermarket chain, Whole Foods, Old Navy and Lululemon, that no longer accept personal checks as payment.

    Even more businesses are likely to follow suit, according to Scott Anchin, vice president of operational risk and payments policy for the Independent Community Bankers of America. That’s in part because check fraud is a significant issue, he said.

    “The check is inherently insecure,” Anchin said. “Handing over a check is akin to sharing a screenshot of bank details alongside a Venmo transfer — no one would consider this safe.”

    With significant advancements in security, thanks to authentication, monitoring and data encryption, the shift by retailers and consumers to contactless and digital payment methods will only continue to grow, accelerating the move toward a “check zero” world, he said.

    So, if personal checks are heading toward extinction, who, if anyone, is affected?

    Who uses checks anyway?

    In 2024, check writers skew older and are likely at the margins of the banking community, according to Anchin. Americans over the age of 55 are the most likely to write checks every month, GoBankingRates also found.

    However, it wasn’t always that way.

    Although checks, as we know them today, first originated in the 11th century, they didn’t become mainstream until the early 20th century, following the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, according to a historical survey by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.

    But back then, “everyday people didn’t have checking accounts, that was for rich people,” said Stephen Quinn, professor of economics at Texas Christian University and co-author of the Atlanta Fed’s report. “It wasn’t until after World War II that checking accounts were a common thing.”

    Postwar prosperity greatly expanded the use of checking accounts to middle-class households, making checks the most widely used noncash payment method in the U.S., the Atlanta Fed found.

    Personal checks continued to gain steam until the mid-1990s, when credit and debit cards largely took over. Since 2000, check-writing has plummeted by nearly 75%.

    Despite the rapid decline, “a form of payment with a thousand-year history is unlikely to vanish overnight,” the Atlanta Fed report said.

    And yet, today’s young adults are increasingly eschewing the traditional banking and credit infrastructure altogether in favor of peer-to-peer payment apps.

    Quinn said his students rely almost exclusively on digital wallet payments such as Apple Pay, Venmo and Zelle — hardly anyone carries cash, and it’s likely that few even know how to write a check.

    More from Personal Finance:
    CFPB cracks down on popular paycheck advance programs
    More Americans are struggling even as inflation cools
    I lost my wallet. Here’s what experts say I should do

    In this way, mobile payment apps have become de facto bank accounts — even though, unlike banks or credit unions, these financial services are not FDIC-insured.

    Still, there remains a place for personal checks, Quinn said.

    “The paper check might linger where it began, at the high end — for large one-off payments,” he said, such as charitable donations or real estate transactions. “In this way, checks might hold on for some time.”

    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Making sense of the markets this week: July 21, 2024 – MoneySense

    Making sense of the markets this week: July 21, 2024 – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    Inflation continues to fall as temperature rise

    As we’re moving through summer’s dog days and heat records are being broken around the world, Canadian inflation is moving in the opposite direction. Statistics Canada released that the year-over-year Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase cooled to 2.7% in June. As inflation continues its downward trend, it generally indicates that the Bank of Canada’s monetary policy is working.

    Source: Statistics Canada

    Consumer price index June 2024 report highlights

    The main takeaways from the monthly CPI report are:

    • Core CPI (excluding food and energy) stayed stubbornly higher than the headline CPI, coming in at an annualized 2.9%.
    • Shelter continues to dominate the overall inflation picture, as prices were up 6.2%.
    • Services, another major inflation concern, were up 4.8%.
    • Durable good prices have substantially deflated, as they fell at an annualized rate of 1.8%.
    • Similarly, prices for clothes and shoes were down 3.1%.
    • Gas prices were down 3.1% from May to June, and have been pretty stable over the last year.
    • Grocery prices went up at an annualized rate of 2.1%, lower than the overall CPI figure.

    The business and individual sentiment surveys point to decreasing inflation expectations going forward, and are significant indicators that the Bank of Canada (BoC) has succeeded in curbing the scariest runaway inflation scenarios. The early 1980s saw the rise of denim and ultra-high interest rates. While ’80s fashion might be back, it’s pretty clear that the era’s monetary policy isn’t.

    Decreased inflation is welcomed news by many Canadians, but it’s probably cold comfort to those with mortgages due for renewal this month. The country as a whole might be happier that demand-pull inflation is down, but that just really means: “People have way less money to spend on most things because their mortgage or rent payments just went through the roof.”

    The lower inflation rates and decreased inflation sentiments should empower the BoC to continue to slowly but surely cut interest rates in the coming months. It would be shocking if the BoC didn’t lower interest rates by 0.25% when it makes its decision next week.

    To check out the effects of inflation rates right now, use this table. 

    powered by Ratehub.ca

    Read more: Canada’s inflation rate falls to 2.7% in June, driving hopes for July rate cut

    Netflix subscribers must be nostalgic for TV commercials

    Earnings day went largely as predicted for Netflix last Thursday, as earnings and revenues were quite close to the company’s guidance last quarter.

    Netflix earnings highlights

    Currency figures in this section are reported in USD.

    • Netflix (NFLX/NASDAQ): Earnings per share of $4.88 (versus $4.74 predicted). Revenue of $9.56 billion (versus $9.53 billion estimate).

    Netflix sold more memberships than was predicted (277.65 million versus 274.40 million). The bulk of that subscriber growth was in its advertising-supported platform. The markets seemed to take the news in stride, as share prices were largely flat in after-market trading.

    Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos highlighted the company’s focus on ads going forward, saying that the streamer would no longer partner with Microsoft. Instead, it’s investing in its own platform. He also mentioned that Netflix’s push into live sports would attract more ad dollars, specifically mentioning the NFL games on Christmas Day as important opportunities. He summed up the company’s push into live sports saying, “We’re in live [TV] because our members love it, and it drives a ton of engagement and a ton of excitement… and the good thing is advertisers like it for the exact same reason.”

    With Netflix up over 43% this year, and at a price to earnings (P/E) ratio of over 44, one could make the argument the stock is priced appropriately, and that it will have to expertly execute future growth plans to have any chance of justifying that high price tag.

    [ad_2]

    Kyle Prevost

    Source link

  • Some renters may be ‘mortgage-ready’ and not know it. Here’s how to tell

    Some renters may be ‘mortgage-ready’ and not know it. Here’s how to tell

    [ad_1]

    Halbergman | E+ | Getty Images

    Are you ready to buy a home? Many renters have no idea.

    Millions of renter households in 2022 would have been able to buy a house that year, according to a new analysis by Zillow, which is based on estimates from the American Community Survey by the U.S. Census Bureau.

    In 2022, 39% of the 134 million families residing in the U.S. did not own the home they lived in, according to Census data. Among those who did not own their home, roughly 7.9 million families were considered “income mortgage-ready,” meaning the share of their total income spent on a mortgage payment for the typical home in their area would have been 30% or lower, Zillow found

    Some people simply choose to rent over buying. But on the other hand, households might be unaware they can afford a mortgage, said Orphe Divounguy, senior economist at Zillow.

    More from Personal Finance:
    What Project 2025 could mean for your wallet
    ‘Rentvesting’ can be a path to owning a home
    3 money moves to make ahead of a Fed rate cut

    If you’re coming to the end of your current housing lease, it may be smart to see if you’re in a position to buy, said Melissa Cohn, regional vice president at William Raveis Mortgage.

    “If rental prices are coming up, maybe it’s a good time to consider [buying instead],” she said.

    Getting verbally prequalified from a lender can help, said Cohn. “The first step is trying to understand whether or not it’s worth getting all the paperwork together,” she said.

    But keep in mind that you’ll need to go into that important conversation with a working familiarity of crucial facts like your annual income and debt balances.

    Understanding the status of your credit and your debt-to-income ratio is a good place to start.

    1. There’s ‘no harm’ in checking your credit

    2. Debt-to-income ratio

    A debt-to-income ratio that is too high is the “No. 1 reason” applicants are denied a mortgage, said Divounguy. Essentially, a lender thinks that based on the ratio the applicant may struggle to add a mortgage payment on top of existing debt obligations.

    In order to figure out a realistic budget when home shopping, you need to know your debt-to-income ratio.

    “Your debt-to-income ratio is simply the amount of monthly debt that you’re paying on your credit report,” said Nevins. “Think car payments, student loan payments, minimum payments on credit cards … any debt that you’re paying and the estimated monthly mortgage payment.”

    One rule of thumb to figure out your hypothetical budget is the so-called 28/36 rule. That rule holds that you should not spend more than 28% of your gross monthly income on housing expenses and no more than 36% of that total on all debts.

    Sometimes, lenders can be more flexible, said Nevins, and will approve applicants who have a 45% or even higher debt-to-income ratio.

    For example: If someone earns a gross monthly income of $6,000 and has $500 in monthly debt payments, they could afford a $1,660 a month mortgage payment if they follow the 36% rule. If the lender accepts up to 50% DTI, the borrower may be able to take up a $2,500 monthly mortgage payment.

    “That’s really the max for most loan programs that somebody can get approved for,” Nevins said.

    Affordability and financial readiness will also depend on factors like the median home sales price in your area, how much money you can put into the down payment, the area’s property taxes, homeowner’s insurance, potential homeowners association fees and more.

    Speaking with a mortgage professional can help you “map out” all the factors to consider, said Cohn: “They give people goalposts, like this is what you need to get in order to be able to purchase.”

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Our 5 top-performing stocks since June’s monthly meeting (only one is Big Tech)

    Our 5 top-performing stocks since June’s monthly meeting (only one is Big Tech)

    [ad_1]

    A trader works, as a screen broadcasts a news conference by U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell following the Fed rate announcement, on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in New York City, U.S., June 12, 2024. 

    Brendan Mcdermid | Reuters

    It’s been another great run for stocks since the Club’s last monthly meeting in June.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Regional bank earnings reports may not matter as group rips higher on rate cut optimism

    Regional bank earnings reports may not matter as group rips higher on rate cut optimism

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Morgan Stanley tops estimates on stronger-than-expected trading and investment banking

    Morgan Stanley tops estimates on stronger-than-expected trading and investment banking

    [ad_1]

    Ted Pick, CEO Morgan Stanley, speaking on CNBC’s Squawk Box at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos, Switzerland on Jan. 18th, 2024.

    Adam Galici | CNBC

    Morgan Stanley said second-quarter profit and revenue topped analysts’ estimates on stronger-than-expected trading and investment banking results.

    Here’s what the company reported:

    • Earnings: $1.82 a share vs. $1.65 a share LSEG estimate
    • Revenue: $15.02 billion vs. $14.3 billion estimate

    The bank said profit surged 41% from the year-earlier period to $3.08 billion, or $1.82 per share, helped by a rebound in Wall Street activity. Revenue rose 12% to $15.02 billion.

    Shares of the bank had declined earlier in the session after the bank’s wealth management division missed estimates on a decline in interest income. They were up less than 1% on Tuesday.

    Wealth management revenue rose 2% to $6.79 billion, below the $6.88 billion estimate, and interest income plunged 17% from a year earlier to $1.79 billion.

    Morgan Stanley said that’s because its rich clients were continuing to shift cash into higher-yielding assets, thanks to the rate environment, resulting in lower deposit levels.

    Morgan Stanley investors value the more steady nature of the wealth management business versus the less predictable nature of investment banking and trading, and they will want to hear more about expectations for the business going forward.

    Still, the bank benefited from its Wall Street-centric business model in the quarter, as a rebound in trading and investment banking helped the bank’s institutional securities division earn more revenue than its wealth management division, flipping the usual dynamic.

    Equity trading generated an 18% jump in revenue to $3.02 billion, exceeding the StreetAccount estimate by about $330 million. Fixed income trading revenue rose 16% to $1.99 billion, topping the estimate by $130 million.

    Investment banking revenue surged 51% to $1.62 billion, exceeding the estimate by $220 million, on rising fixed income underwriting activity. Morgan Stanley said that was primarily driven by non-investment-grade companies raising debt.

    “The firm delivered another strong quarter in an improving capital markets environment,” CEO Ted Pick said in the release. “We continue to execute on our strategy and remain well positioned to deliver growth and long-term value for our shareholders.”

    Last week, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and Citigroup each topped expectations for revenue and profit, a streak continued by Goldman Sachs on Monday, helped by a rebound in Wall Street activity.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bank of America shares jump 5% after saying net interest income rebound is coming

    Bank of America shares jump 5% after saying net interest income rebound is coming

    [ad_1]

    Bank of America on Tuesday said second-quarter revenue and profit topped expectations on rising investment banking and asset management fees.

    Here’s what the company reported:

    • Earnings: 83 cents a share vs. 80 cents a share LSEG estimate
    • Revenue: $25.54 billion vs. $25.22 billion estimate

    The bank said profit slipped 6.9% from the year earlier period to $6.9 billion, or 83 cents a share, as the company’s net interest income declined amid higher interest rates. Revenue climbed less than 1% to $25.54 billion.

    The firm was helped by a 29% increase in investment banking fees to $1.56 billion, edging out the $1.51 billion StreetAccount estimate. Asset management fees rose 14% to $3.37 billion, buoyed by higher stock market values, helping the firm’s wealth management division post a 6.3% increase in revenue to $5.57 billion, essentially matching the estimate.

    Net interest income slipped 3% to $13.86 billion, also matching the StreetAccount estimate.

    But new guidance on the measure, known as NII, gave investors confidence that a turnaround is in the making. NII is one of the main ways that banks earn money.

    The measure, which is the difference between what a bank earns on loans and what it pays depositors for their savings, will rise to about $14.5 billion in the fourth quarter of this year, Bank of America said in a slide presentation.

    That confirms what executives previously told investors, which is that net interest income would probably bottom in the second quarter.

    Wells Fargo shares fell on Friday when it posted disappointing NII figures, showing how much investors are fixated on the metric.

    Shares of Bank of America climbed 5.4%, aided by the NII guidance.

    Last week, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and Citigroup each topped expectations for revenue and profit, a streak continued by Goldman Sachs on Monday, helped by a rebound in Wall Street activity.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • This senior housing stock could soar 25% as the population ages, says Bank of America

    This senior housing stock could soar 25% as the population ages, says Bank of America

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why Wells Fargo shares will rise once the Fed starts cutting interest rates

    Why Wells Fargo shares will rise once the Fed starts cutting interest rates

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Dimon and other Wall Street CEOs react to Trump assassination attempt: ‘Deeply saddened’ by violence

    Dimon and other Wall Street CEOs react to Trump assassination attempt: ‘Deeply saddened’ by violence

    [ad_1]

    The leaders of Wall Street’s most powerful firms are speaking out to condemn the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump at a Pennsylvania rally over the weekend.

    JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon told employees Sunday that he and his management team were “deeply saddened by the political violence” and attempt on Trump’s life. The shooting killed one bystander and injured two more.

    “We must all stand firmly together against any acts of hate, intimidation or violence that seek to undermine our democracy or inflict harm,” Dimon said in the memo. “It is only through constructive dialogue that we can tackle our nation’s toughest challenges.”

    Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon addressed the matter at the start of an earnings call Monday morning, calling the attempted assassination a “horrible act of violence.”

    “We are grateful that he is safe and also want to extend my sincere condolences to the families of those who were tragically killed and severely injured,” Solomon said. “It is a sad moment for our country. There’s no place in our politics for violence.”

    The shooting on Saturday shocked a nation gearing up for a contentious November election. Wall Street firms don’t officially endorse political candidates since they have to deal with both Republican and Democrat officials, though their executives and employees often donate to campaigns.

    Watch CNBC's full interview with BlackRock chairman and CEO Larry Fink

    BlackRock CEO Larry Fink told CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street” on Monday that the weekend events were “a tragedy.”

    “It is a statement of America today, though. We need to create hope. All of us have a responsibility, every political candidate, every leader, every pastor, minister, rabbi, we all have a responsibility of bringing our community together to bring hope,” Fink said.

    BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, said Sunday in an email that it ran an advertisement in 2022 in which the suspected shooter, Thomas Matthew Crooks, appears briefly in the background along with other students of Bethel Park High School in Pennsylvania.

    “We will make all video footage available to the appropriate authorities, and we have removed the video from circulation out of respect for the victims,” BlackRock said in a statement.

    Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan also addressed employees over the weekend.

    “We are deeply saddened for the family of the rally attendee who died at the event,” Moynihan said in the staff email. “Our thoughts are with former President Donald Trump, all those injured, and their families.”

    — CNBC’s Jim Forkin contributed to this report.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Goldman Sachs is set to report second-quarter earnings — here’s what Wall Street expects

    Goldman Sachs is set to report second-quarter earnings — here’s what Wall Street expects

    [ad_1]

    David Solomon, Goldman Sachs interview with David Faber, September 7, 2023.

    CNBC

    Goldman Sachs is scheduled to report second-quarter earnings before the opening bell Monday.

    Here’s what Wall Street expects:

    • Earnings: $8.34 per share, according to LSEG
    • Revenue: $12.46 billion, according to LSEG
    • Trading Revenue: Fixed Income of $2.96 billion, Equities of $3.17 billion, per StreetAccount
    • Investing Banking Revenue: $1.80 billion, according to StreetAccount

    Expectations have been set high for Goldman Sachs, with Wall Street businesses in the midst of a rebound after a dismal 2023.

    That’s because out of the six biggest U.S. banks, Goldman is the most reliant on investment banking and trading to generate revenue.

    Another focal point for the quarter will be in asset and wealth management, areas that Goldman CEO David Solomon has wagered can be a growth engine for the bank.

    On Friday, rivals JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup both topped expectations thanks to surging investment banking fees and better-than-expected equities trading results.

    Bank of America and Morgan Stanley report results on Tuesday.

    This story is developing. Please check back for updates.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Buying into Charlie Scharf’s 5-year turnaround plan for Wells Fargo just got a bit cheaper

    Buying into Charlie Scharf’s 5-year turnaround plan for Wells Fargo just got a bit cheaper

    [ad_1]

    Charlie Scharf, CEO, Wells Fargo, speaks during the Milken Institute Global Conference in Beverly Hills, California on May 2, 2023. speaks during the Milken Institute Global Conference in Beverly Hills, California on May 2, 2023. 

    Patrick T. Fallon | Afp | Getty Images

    When Charlie Scharf took the reins at Wells Fargo five years ago, the bank was in turmoil. A series of scandals landed it in the regulatory doghouse — dealing a major blow to the 172-year-old firm’s reputation and leading to a multi-billion-dollar plunge in its stock market value.

    Fast forward to 2024: Wells Fargo looks like a different bank altogether — and despite Friday’s post-earnings decline, the turnaround is still humming.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The housing market, explained in 6 charts

    The housing market, explained in 6 charts

    [ad_1]

    Prospective home buyers leave a property for sale during an Open House in a neighborhood in Clarksburg, Maryland on September 3, 2023.

    Roberto Schmidt | AFP | Getty Images

    It’s no secret that the housing market looks far different than it did a few years ago.

    While surging mortgage rates and housing prices have taken away consumers’ purchasing power, low supply has kept the market competitive. As a result, affordability has tumbled dramatically from the early days of the pandemic.

    These six charts help explain what this unique moment looks like — and what it means for you:

    The 30-year mortgage rate, a popular option for home buyers utilizing financing, is key to understanding the market. This rate is essentially the borrowing costs tied to purchasing a home with financing. A higher rate, in reality, results in more interest due on a home loan.

    For the past several months, this rate has hovered around the 7% level. While it has cooled after touching 8% late last year, it’s still far higher the sub-3% rates consumers could lock in during the first years of the pandemic.

    Housing prices are also central to the equation for everyday Americans decision how much, or if, they can afford to spend. The Case-Shiller national home price index, which is calculated by S&P Dow Jones Indices, has notched record highs this year.

    High prices can elicit different feelings by group. For hopeful homeowners, it can raise red flags that they are planning to buy at the wrong time. But current owners can see reason to celebrate, as it likely means their own property’s value has risen.

    With both mortgages and prices up, it’s not surprising that affordability is down compared with the early innings of the pandemic.

    There’s a few different readings of affordability painting a similar picture. One from the National Association of Realtors found affordability tumbled more than 33% between 2021 and 2023 alone.

    The Atlanta Federal Reserve’s gauge showed the economic feasibility of home ownership plummeted more than 36% when comparing April to the pandemic high seen in summer 2020.

    Another way the Atlanta Fed tracks this is through the share of income needed by the typical American to afford the median home. Nationally, it last required 43% of their pay, well above the 30% marker considered the threshold for affordability. It has been considered unaffordable, or above 30%, since mid 2021.

    The Atlanta Fed also breaks out what’s driving the current lack of affordability. While significant pay increases in recent years have helped line wallets, the bank found that the negative impact of higher rates and list prices have more than outweighed the benefits of a bigger paycheck.

    While the current mortgage rates are high, a team at the Federal Housing Finance Agency found a very small proportion of borrowers are actually locked in at these lofty levels.

    Just shy of 98% of mortgages were below the average rate seen in the fourth quarter of last year, the FHFA found. Nearly 69% had a rate that was a whopping 3 percentage points below that average.

    There’s two major reasons for why such a small share are paying current rates. The most obvious is that the housing market got hot when rates were low, but cooled significantly in the current period of higher borrowing costs.

    The other answer is the race to refinance when rates were below or near 3% early in the pandemic. That allowed people who were already homeowners to take advantage of these relatively low levels.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • With high prices and mortgage rates, aspiring and current homeowners feel ‘stuck’

    With high prices and mortgage rates, aspiring and current homeowners feel ‘stuck’

    [ad_1]

    A home available for sale is shown on May 22, 2024 in Austin, Texas. 

    Brandon Bell | Getty Images

    When Rachel Burress moved into her mother’s house around a decade ago, it seemed like a short-term stop on the path to homeownership.

    The 35-year-old hairdresser spent those years improving her credit score and saving for a down payment. But with mortgage rates hovering near 7% and home prices skyrocketing, it doesn’t feel like the mother of three will be signing on the dotted line for a place of her own anytime soon.

    “I don’t even know if I’ll ever get out and own my own home,” said Burress, who lives about 20 miles outside of Fort Worth, Texas, in a town called Aledo. “It feels like we are just stuck, and it is so hard to handle.”

    Burress’ experience is reflective of the millions of Americans who’ve seen their financial and personal lives hindered by elevated price tags and high borrowing costs for homes. This can help to explain the sour sentiment about the state of the national economy.

    It also sheds light on an existential anxiety for many: The American dream seems to be even more out of reach these days.

    A double whammy

    For aspiring homebuyers such as Burress, the combination of high mortgage rates and rising list prices has left them feeling boxed out.

    The 30-year mortgage rate, a popular option for home financing in the U.S., has bounced around 7% for the past several months. It pulled back after hitting 8% for the first time since 2000 late last year. But that’s still a big jump from the sub-3% levels seen in the early years of the pandemic — which prompted a flurry of sales and refinancing in the housing market.

    On the other side of the equation, rising sticker prices are also adding pressure. The Case-Shiller national home price index has hit all-time highs this year. Zillow’s home value index topped $360,000 in May, a nearly 50% increase from the same month five years ago.

    In turn, affordability is down sharply compared with a few years ago. An April reading on the economic feasibility of homeownership from the Atlanta Federal Reserve was more than 36% off the pandemic high registered in the summer of 2020.

    Nationally, the share of income needed to own the median-priced home last came in above 43%, per the Atlanta Fed. Any percentage over 30% is considered unaffordable.

    The Atlanta Fed also found that the negative effects of high rates and prices more than outweighed the benefits from growing incomes for the typical American. That underscores the strength of these detractors, given that the average hourly wage on a private payroll has climbed more than 25% between June of 2019 and 2024.

    ‘A tough spot’

    This tough environment has chilled activity for potential buyers and sellers alike.

    Theoretically, current homeowners should be excited to see their property values rising quickly. But the prospective sellers are deterred by concerns about what rate they’d get on their next home, creating what a team at the Federal Housing Finance Agency called the “lock-in effect.”

    There’s already evidence of this stalling in the market: Rates at these levels resulted in more than 875,000 fewer home sales in 2023, according to the team behind a FHFA working paper released earlier this year. That’s a sizable chunk, as the National Association of Realtors reported around 4 million existing houses were sold in the year.

    On top of that, the FHFA found that a homeowner is 18.1% less likely to sell for every 1 percentage point their mortgage rate is under the current level. The typical borrower had a mortgage rate that was more than 3 percentage points below what they would have gotten in the final quarter of 2023.

    If a homeowner had instead bought at the end of last year, the FHFA team found that their monthly principal and interest payments would cost around $500 more.

    Given this, co-author Jonah Coste said current owners touting these low mortgage rates are undoubtedly better off than those looking to buy a first home today. But he said there’s a big catch for this cohort: Moving for a job opportunity or to accommodate a growing family becomes much more complicated.

    “They’re not able to optimize their housing for their new life situation,” Coste said of this group. “Or, in some extreme circumstances, they’re not doing the big life changes that would necessitate having to move.”

    That’s the predicament Luke Nunley finds himself in. In late 2020, the 33-year-old health administrator bought a three-bed, two-bath house with his wife in Kentucky at an interest rate under 3%. This home has more than doubled in value in almost four years.

    After welcoming three kids, they’re holding off on a fourth until mortgage rates or home prices come down enough to upsize. Nunley knows the days of getting a rate below 3% are long gone, but can’t justify anything above 5.5%.

    “It’s just a tough spot to be in,” Nunley said. “We’d be losing so much money at current rates that it’s basically impossible for us to move.”

    Most Americans skirt 7%

    Nunley is part of the overwhelming majority of Americans not paying these lofty mortgages.

    The FHFA found that nearly 98% of mortgages were fixed at a level below the average rate of around 7.2% in the final quarter of last year. Like Nunley’s, close to 69% had rates more than 3 percentage points lower.

    The buying boom early in the pandemic is one answer for why so many people aren’t paying the going rate. This eye-popping figure can also be explained by the rush to refinance during that period of low borrowing costs in 2020 and 2021.

    While these low mortgage rates can help to fatten the pocketbooks of those holding them, Jeffrey Roach, LPL Financial’s chief economist, warned that it can be bad news for monetary policymakers. That’s because it doesn’t offer signs of interest rate hikes from the Federal Reserve successfully cooling the economy.

    To be clear, mortgage rates tend to follow the path of Fed-set interest levels, but they aren’t the same thing. Still, Roach said that so many people being locked into low borrowing rates on their homes helps explain why tighter monetary policy hasn’t felt as restrictive as it has historically.

    “Our economy is a lot less interest-rate sensitive,” Roach said. “That means the high rates aren’t really doing what it should be doing. It’s not putting the brakes on, like you would normally expect.”

    Low housing supply has kept prices up, even as elevated borrowing fees bite into purchasing power. That flies in the face of conventional wisdom, which suggests that prices should slide as rates rise.

    Looking longer term, experts said an increase in the volume of new housing can help expand access and cool high prices. In particular, Daryl Fairweather, chief economist at housing market database Redfin, said the national market could benefit from more townhomes and condos that are usually less expensive than typical homes.

    Townhouse for sale sign, Corcoran Realty, in driveway of row houses, Forest Hills, Queens, New York. 

    Lindsey Nicholson | UCG | Universal Images Group | Getty Images

    ‘The ultimate goal’

    For now, this new reality has created generational differences in homeownership and what the road to it looks like.

    Zillow found that 34% of all mortgage holders received a financial gift or loan from family or friends for a down payment in 2019. In 2023, that number jumped to 43% as affordability plummeted.

    It’s also much harder for young people to get on track for purchasing a home than it was for their parents, Zillow data shows. Today, it takes almost nine years to save 20% for a down payment using 10% of the median household income every month. In 2000, it required less than six years.

    “It’s not the avocado toast,” said Skylar Olsen, Zillow’s chief economist, referencing a joke that millennials spend too much on luxuries like brunch or coffee.

    Olsen said younger generations should adjust their expectations around ownership given the tougher environment. She said these Americans should expect to rent for longer into adulthood, or plan to attain their first home in part through extra income from renting out a room.

    For everyday people like Burress, the housing market remains top of mind, as the Texan considers her financial standing and evaluates candidates in the November election. The hairdresser has continued helping her mom with payments on home insurance, utility bills and taxes in lieu of a formal rent.

    Burress is still hoping to one day put that money toward an equity-building property of her own. But time and time again, unexpected expenses like a totaled car or macroeconomic variables such as rising mortgage rates have left her feeling like the dream is out of reach. 

    “It is the ultimate goal for me and my family to get out of my mom’s house,” she said. But, “it feels like I’m on a hamster wheel.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Here’s why Wells Fargo stock is down 7% despite the bank’s quarterly earnings beat

    Here’s why Wells Fargo stock is down 7% despite the bank’s quarterly earnings beat

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Making sense of the markets this week: July 14, 2024 – MoneySense

    Making sense of the markets this week: July 14, 2024 – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    Are U.S. rate cuts on the way?

    While Canada’s inflation rate is obviously at the forefront around decision making for the Bank of Canada (BoC) in setting the key interest rate, inflation below the border is also a major consideration. Arguably, policymakers are loath to devalue the Canadian dollar beyond a certain level. Consequently, if U.S. inflation stays high—and U.S. interest rates correspondingly stay high—it will likely impact just how quickly the BoC can cut our interest rates.

    “The Canadian and American economies are very closely intertwined, especially when it comes to the cost of borrowing. Historically the BoC and the Fed have mirrored each other in terms of monetary policy (the act of cutting, holding, or hiking their benchmark interest rates).”

    —Penelope Graham, mortgage expert

    Markets were mostly flat on Thursday after the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics announced that headline CPI was down 0.1% from May, and the 12-month inflation reading was now 3%.

    Source: CNBC

    U.S. inflation highlights

    The CPI report included the following details:

    • Core CPI (excluding food and energy) increased 0.1% and up 3.3% from a year ago.
    • Gas prices were down 3.8%.
    • Food prices were up 0.2%.
    • Shelter prices were up 0.2%.
    • Used vehicles prices were down 1.5%.
    • Real hour earnings were up 0.4% for the month.

    Overall, the down-trending inflation rate, as well as Fed Chairman Jerome Powell’s comments about holding interest rates too high for too long this week, both seem to indicate a probable rate cut in September. CME Group’s FedWatch tracker uses futures contracts to predict the likelihood of interest rate movements, and it currently shows a strong likelihood of two interest rate cuts before the end of 2024. There is even a 40% probability of three cuts before year end.

    Obviously this is welcome news to indebted Americans, but also to Canadian consumers who want to see interest rates come down here sooner rather than later.

    —Kyle Prevost

    Pepsi’s revenues taste flat

    Beverage-and-snack behemoth PepsiCo released lukewarm earnings news on Thursday. For those who aren’t familiar with Pepsi’s corporate structure, it long ago ceased to be a single-beverage entity. With brands ranging from numerous snack and soft drink choice to breakfast cereals, Pepsi is a diversified food conglomerate, including FritoLay and Quaker.

    Source: Chathura Nalanda via LinkedIn

    Pepsi earnings highlights

    All figures in U.S. dollars.

    • PepsiCo (PEP/NASDAQ): Earnings per share came in at $2.28 (versus $2.16 predicted) on revenues of $22.50 billion (versus $22.57 billion predicted). Shares were down nearly 2% in early trading on Thursday.

    The company cited a declining demand in North America as the main factor in slowing revenue growth. Company executives explained that North American consumers were becoming more price conscious after failing to “push back” on significant price increases over the last few years. Low-income shoppers were highlighted as being the most willing consumer group to shift to cheaper private-label options. As well, increasing agricultural commodity costs were cited as an increasing operating expense. It’s worth noting that some market watchers believe weight-loss drugs, such as Ozempic and Wegovy, may curb demand for snack foods in the North American market.

    FritoLay’s North America sales were down 4% year over year, while North American beverages were down 3%. Those sales declines were offset by international revenue increasing by 7% year to date. Management highlighted that this was the 13th straight consecutive quarter with at least mid-single-digit organic revenue growth for international operations.

    [ad_2]

    Kyle Prevost

    Source link

  • Citigroup tops expectations for profit and revenue on strong Wall Street results

    Citigroup tops expectations for profit and revenue on strong Wall Street results

    [ad_1]

    Jane Fraser, CEO of Citi, speaks during the Milken Institute Global Conference in Beverly Hills, California, on May 1, 2023. 

    Patrick T. Fallon | AFP | Getty Images

    Citigroup on Friday posted second-quarter results that topped expectations for profit and revenue on a rebound in Wall Street activity.

    Here’s what the company reported:

    • Earnings: $1.52 a share vs. $1.39 a share expected, according to LSEG
    • Revenue: $20.14 billion vs. $20.07 billion expected

    The bank said net income jumped 10% from a year earlier to $3.22 billion, or $1.52 a share. Revenue rose 4% to $20.14 billion.

    Equities trading revenue rose 37% to $1.5 billion, driven by strength in derivatives and a rise in hedge fund balances, roughly $300 million more than the StreetAccount estimate.

    Fixed income revenue dipped 3% to $3.6 billion, essentially matching analysts’ expectations, on lower activity in rates and currency markets.

    Investment banking revenue surged 60% to $853 million, driven by strong issuance of investment-grade bonds and a rebound in IPO and merger activity from low levels in 2023.

    Shares of the bank fell nearly 2%.

    “Our results show the progress we are making in executing our strategy and the benefit of our diversified business model,” Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser said in the release. “Markets had a strong finish to the quarter leading to better performance than we had anticipated.”

    Citigroup was just this week rebuked for failing to fix its regulatory shortfalls.

    Last year, Fraser announced plans to simplify the management structure and reduce costs at the third-biggest U.S. bank by assets. But earnings will take a backseat if Citigroup cannot appease regulators’ concerns about its data and risk management.  

    JPMorgan Chase announced results earlier Friday, while Goldman Sachs, Bank of America and Morgan Stanley report next week.

    Correction: This article has been updated to correct that Citigroup reported revenue of $20.14 billion for the second quarter. A previous version misstated the figure due to a rounding error.

    [ad_2]

    Source link