ReportWire

Tag: Investment strategy

  • 67% Of Investors Say Trump Is Better For Stocks Than Biden, But Market Predictions Are All Over The Map

    67% Of Investors Say Trump Is Better For Stocks Than Biden, But Market Predictions Are All Over The Map

    [ad_1]

    67% Of Investors Say Trump Is Better For Stocks Than Biden, But Market Predictions Are All Over The Map

    In a landscape where economic policy and market performance often intersect, a CNBC survey found that investors prefer former President Donald Trump’s potential impact on the stock market.

    The poll, which surveyed 400 investors, traders, and money managers, found that 67% believe Trump would benefit stocks more.

    Don’t Miss:

    CNBC said the sentiment appears to be rooted in historical performance. During Trump’s four-year tenure, the S&P 500 surged 68%, while the Nasdaq saw a 137% climb. In contrast, under Biden’s administration thus far, the same indexes have gained 44% and 34%, respectively.

    However, the investment community is divided on the market’s near-term trajectory. The survey found an even split among respondents; a third anticipate a drop, another third expect gains, while the remaining third see a rangebound market.

    Trending:

    That uncertainty reflects the factors influencing today’s economic landscape. While presidential policies can sway market sentiment, other elements often play a more important role. As Kristina Hooper, chief global market strategist at Invesco, told the New York Times, “Markets are politically agnostic. With good reason: it doesn’t matter.”

    See Also:

    The recent market rally has been largely attributed to investor enthusiasm surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) rather than political developments. CNBC noted that Microsoft emerged as the front-runner in the AI race, with 50% of survey respondents viewing it as best positioned to capitalize on the tech. Surprisingly, Nvidia did not make the top of that list.

    The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy decisions continue to be a factor. Two-thirds of those polled expect the Fed to cut interest rates before year’s end (with many seeing a rate cut as soon as September), a move that could impact the market.

    Interestingly, despite the clear preference for Trump regarding market performance, investors showed concerns about the current state of the major indexes. Eighty percent of respondents admitted feeling uneasy about the heavy concentration of tech stocks in the benchmarks.

    Trending:

    Looking beyond equities, the survey highlighted India as the most attractive overseas market, followed by Japan and Europe. Corporate bonds emerged as the preferred investment vehicle in the absence of stocks.

    As the 2024 election approaches, investors are reminded that while presidential rhetoric often ties market performance to administration policies, the reality is far more nuanced. Historical data shows that markets have generally trended upward regardless of which party occupies the White House.

    Ultimately, as the survey results indicate, while investor sentiment may lean toward Trump for potential market gains, the road ahead for stocks appears as unpredictable as ever.

    Read Next:

    “ACTIVE INVESTORS’ SECRET WEAPON” Supercharge Your Stock Market Game with the #1 “news & everything else” trading tool: Benzinga Pro – Click here to start Your 14-Day Trial Now!

    Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?

    This article 67% Of Investors Say Trump Is Better For Stocks Than Biden, But Market Predictions Are All Over The Map originally appeared on Benzinga.com

    © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 2 Monster Stocks to Hold for the Next 20 Years

    2 Monster Stocks to Hold for the Next 20 Years

    [ad_1]

    Finding up-and-coming consumer brands while they are relatively unknown can be a very rewarding investment strategy. The stock market presents these opportunities to investors all the time. You just have to pay attention to what brands people are shopping for more frequently.

    Here are two fast-growing brands that could make investors a small fortune over the next 20 years.

    1. Cava Group

    Investors who jumped on board Chipotle Mexican Grill, McDonald’s, or Starbucks in their early years of growth are sitting in the catbird seat today. Cava Group (NYSE: CAVA) is the latest high-flying restaurant stock that is worth betting on for the long haul.

    There are plenty of burger, steak, pizza, Italian, Chinese, and Mexican restaurant chains, but there are not many establishments in the U.S. with a Mediterranean-focused menu. The cuisine is seen as a healthy and sophisticated alternative in a sea of the same old options. This is why Cava has experienced impressive customer traffic this year in a challenging consumer spending environment, which has driven double-digit increases in same-store sales.

    Strong growth has sent the stock up 185% over the last year, but it’s not too late to buy it. Cava’s 35% year-over-year revenue growth is on par with Chipotle’s growth in its early years as a public company. A $10,000 investment in Chipotle in 2006 would have grown to $634,000 today, and Cava is following a similar growth path.

    Cava has a huge runway of growth. Its quarterly revenue of $231 million is a fraction of Chipotle’s $2.9 billion. It took Chipotle almost two decades to expand to its current size. Cava is currently in 25 U.S. states and just opened in Chicago with the strongest customer response the business has seen to date.

    Importantly, Cava is growing its store base at a rate of about 8% to 9% per year, but management is expanding in a disciplined manner. It posted a net profit of $19 million last quarter. The company will become more profitable as it expands across the U.S., and that should support more new highs for Cava stock.

    2. On Holding

    The athletic apparel industry has been another ripe market for monster winners in the stock market. A $10,000 investment in Nike 44 years ago would now be worth $7.7 million with dividends reinvested. Investors might have a second crack at gains like this, because On Holding (NYSE: ONON) is currently growing at a similar rate to Nike in the 1980s.

    On is one of the hottest apparel brands right now. There were 66 On-sponsored athletes at the Paris Olympics this year. Like Nike, On generates most of its sales from performance shoes, a segment that grew 28% year over year on a constant-currency basis last quarter.

    On is seeing strong growth across all the various running shoe styles it offers, but management noted that its all-day comfort shoe Cloudtilt is flying off the shelves. The brand just launched its new Cloudsurfer Next shoe at a relatively low price point that management expects to expand its addressable market.

    The popularity of On shoes, especially among athletes, shows the potential of the brand to benefit from partnerships. This is similar to how Nike built its brand. It has already experienced a significant increase in brand awareness from a partnership with actress and singer Zendaya, who has a massive following on social media.

    Nike didn’t have the advantage of social media 40 years ago, so On could see its brand grow at a more rapid clip than Nike did. On that note, analysts expect the company to grow earnings at an annualized rate of 34% over the next several years, which should support stellar returns for investors.

    Should you invest $1,000 in Cava Group right now?

    Before you buy stock in Cava Group, consider this:

    The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Cava Group wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

    Consider when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $731,449!*

    Stock Advisor provides investors with an easy-to-follow blueprint for success, including guidance on building a portfolio, regular updates from analysts, and two new stock picks each month. The Stock Advisor service has more than quadrupled the return of S&P 500 since 2002*.

    See the 10 stocks »

    *Stock Advisor returns as of August 26, 2024

    John Ballard has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Chipotle Mexican Grill, Nike, and Starbucks. The Motley Fool recommends Cava Group and On Holding and recommends the following options: short September 2024 $52 puts on Chipotle Mexican Grill. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

    2 Monster Stocks to Hold for the Next 20 Years was originally published by The Motley Fool

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What Stocks Does Donald Trump Own? New Financial Disclosure Revealed

    What Stocks Does Donald Trump Own? New Financial Disclosure Revealed

    [ad_1]

    What Stocks Does Donald Trump Own? New Financial Disclosure Revealed

    As Donald Trump campaigns for a return to the White House, his latest financial disclosure offers a look into the investment strategy of the businessman-turned-politician.

    The Aug. 13, 2024, filing shows a portfolio that spans from high-flying tech stocks to reliable dividend payers. Outside of the individual stocks Trump owns, his disclosure lists real estate holdings valued in the hundreds of millions, and government bonds valued in the millions.

    Don’t Miss:

    If Trump were a money manager, he might be defined as one who balances growth potential with steady income.

    While Trump’s 64.9% stake in Trump Media & Technology Group dwarfs his other holdings at $2.4 billion, his investments in other companies are substantial and diverse. The former president has placed large bets on multiple ‘magnificent seven’ stocks, with stakes valued between $500,001 and $1 million each in Apple, Microsoft and NVIDIA.

    Trending:

    Those holdings suggest Trump has embraced Wall Street’s enthusiasm for artificial intelligence (AI), the nascent sector that has driven much of the market’s gains in recent months. His portfolio also includes positions in other magnificent seven stocks, including Alphabet and Amazon, valued between $100,000-$250,000 and $250,000-$500,000 respectively.

    But the former president’s strategy extends beyond Silicon Valley darlings. His disclosure lists hundreds of individual stocks, including positions in financials like JPMorgan Chase and Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway.

    See Also:

    Trump’s portfolio also features a significant number of dividend stocks, which include household names like Coca-Cola, Johnson & Johnson and Procter & Gamble.

    Here’s a look at some of the stocks Trump owns that are valued at more than $15,000.

    • Apple Inc ($500,000 – $1,000,000)

    • Microsoft Corp ($500,000 – $1,000,000)

    • Nvidia Corp ($500,000 – $1,000,000)

    • Amazon.com, Inc ($250,000 – $500,000)

    • Alphabet Inc (Google) ($100,000 – $250,000)

    • Meta Platforms Inc ($100,000 – $250,000)

    • Berkshire Hathaway Inc ($100,000 – $250,000)

    • PepsiCo Inc ($100,000 – $250,000)

    • JPMorgan Chase & Co ($100,000 – $250,000)

    • Tesla Inc ($50,000 – $100,000)

    • Coca-Cola Co

    • Exxon Mobil Corp

    • Chevron Corp

    • Home Depot Inc

    • McDonald’s Corp

    • AbbVie Inc

    • Adobe Inc

    • Broadcom Inc

    • Booking Holdings Inc

    • Caterpillar Inc

    • Cisco Systems Inc

    • ConocoPhillips

    • Lockheed Martin Corp

    • Netflix Inc

    • Pfizer Inc

    • Qualcomm Inc

    • Union Pacific Corp

    • United Parcel Service, Inc.

    As the 2024 election race goes on, Trump’s investment choices may face increased scrutiny. His stake in Trump Media & Technology Group, which owns the social media platform Truth Social, is likely to be the most talked about Trump holding.

    Trending:

    The “lockup” agreement preventing insiders from selling shares is set to expire in late September, potentially allowing Trump to cash out some of his $2.4 billion position. According to the disclosures, Trump owns 114,750,000 shares of the media brand or 64.9% of the entire company.

    Read Next:

    “ACTIVE INVESTORS’ SECRET WEAPON” Supercharge Your Stock Market Game with the #1 “news & everything else” trading tool: Benzinga Pro – Click here to start Your 14-Day Trial Now!

    Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?

    This article What Stocks Does Donald Trump Own? New Financial Disclosure Revealed originally appeared on Benzinga.com

    © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The ‘rent-first’ lifestyle is catching on. From cars to clothes and even caskets, here’s when it makes sense to buy vs. rent

    The ‘rent-first’ lifestyle is catching on. From cars to clothes and even caskets, here’s when it makes sense to buy vs. rent

    [ad_1]

    Owning isn’t always what it’s cracked up to be.

    For many reasons — including affordability — more Americans are choosing to rent everything from cars and apartments to clothing and furniture these days, according to a report by Intuit Credit Karma.

    Far beyond the traditional tuxedo, the rental industry has expanded in recent years to include power tools, musical instruments, designer handbags, baby gear and even funeral caskets.

    Now, 28% of adults routinely rent goods and services, Credit Karma found. However, when factoring in housing, that percentage jumps to 47%. 

    The growing share of renters is largely due to higher prices, although some people simply prefer renting over buying, opting for a “rent-first” lifestyle, according to the survey, which polled more than 2,000 adults in June.

    More from Personal Finance:
    ‘Emotion-proof’ your portfolio ahead of the election
    ‘Recession pop’ is in: How music hits on economic trends
    More Americans are struggling even as inflation cools

    Aside from affordability concerns, more than half — 58% — of those polled said they find value in renting, because it allows for more flexibility and is a way to avoid overconsumption, which has become an increasing concern among millennial and Gen Z adults. 

    “Renting is a great option for many people,” said Carolyn McClanahan, a certified financial planner and founder of Life Planning Partners in Jacksonville, Florida. However, it always pays to do the math, she advised.

    “Some people do great renting clothes and, for special events, this can be good,” said McClanahan, who also is a member of CNBC’s Advisor Council. “However, if you know you have a lot of special events, a few really good [owned] pieces can last a long time.”

    Clothing prices have been hard hit by inflation. Since July 2020, men’s and women’s apparel prices are up 15% and 13.3%, respectively, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ consumer price index.

    Meanwhile, It may not make as much sense to lease a car, McClanahan said, “as that ends up being higher costs long-term.”

    Although monthly lease payments tend to be lower than car loan payments, financing a car with a new or used auto loan usually ends up costing less than a lease in the long run, especially for consumers who hold onto vehicles for years.

    Additionally, car lease agreements often come with routine service included in the terms, but the downside is there are also mileage limits and potential charges for wear and tear.

    More importantly, car buyers will benefit from owning the vehicle outright at the end of a loan term, and have built equity in the asset.

    To buy or rent a house in today’s market

    Since housing costs are the biggest expense for most people, it may make sense to rent, at least initially.

    “Unless you are absolutely sure you are dedicated to being in a home for at least five years, you should definitely rent,” McClanahan said. “Only when you are settled with life, jobs and family is when it probably makes sense to buy a home.”

    Because millennials are more likely to postpone marriage and starting a family, they are able to cast a wider net when looking for place to live, or relocate for a job, if necessary, which makes renting more worthwhile.

    “This generation is different,” said Dottie Herman, vice chair at Douglas Elliman. “They believe in homeownership but now there is a choice.”

    According to Herman, “it’s not quite as important to them to own a house. A lot of them say, ‘I’ll rent, and I’ll think about it.’”

    Of course, some Americans, especially young adults, are renting because they must.

    Higher mortgage rates and a shortage of houses on the market relative to buyer demand have kept home prices elevated and created an affordability crunch for would-be buyers. Sometimes renting is the only option available.

    Close to three-fourths of would-be homeowners said affordability is their greatest obstacle, according to a report by Bankrate. Among younger adults, 50% said homeownership is only achievable for the wealthy, Credit Karma also found. 

    Even though wealth creation has been concentrated amongst homeowners in recent years, often there is a pressure to buy, when it may not make financial sense, according to Michael Krowe, director of financial planning at Edelman Financial Engines.

    “Don’t make a home purchase simply because you think it’s going to surge in value,” he said. “You might think your home is an investment — it’s not. Your home is a place to live.”

    “Buy a home because you like the neighborhood, schools and proximity to friends and family,” Krowe said. There may be benefits to renting in this market, he added, particularly if it allows you to avoid stretching beyond your means.

    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Making sense of the markets this week: September 1, 2024 – MoneySense

    Making sense of the markets this week: September 1, 2024 – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    Couche-Tard takes aim at Slurpee King

    Because I grew up in near Winnipeg, the Slurpee Capital of the World, I thought I knew everything the 7-Eleven universe had to offer. Then, I visited Japan and Thailand last year. I realized that I hadn’t seen anything yet. (All figures in U.S. dollars in this section.)

    In much of Thailand and Japan (among other places in Asia), the convenience store is a daily touchstone stop. In Tokyo, there are more than 3,000 7-Eleven stores, a large part of the country’s 56,000-plus convenience store locations. While 7-Eleven was a big part of my childhood, it pales in comparison to the role it plays within many Asian communities. 

    So, it quickly caught my attention when Canadian corporate darling Alimentation Couche-Tard (ATD/TSX) announced it was making a friendly takeover bid for Tokyo-based Seven & I Holdings Co (SVNDY/NIKKEI). The possible deal is historic for many reasons.

    1. The acquisition of Seven & I Holdings Co is the largest-ever Japanese target of a foreign buyer. 
    2. It’s the first test of new 2023 takeover rules by Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), designed to make foreign acquisitions more welcoming and Japanese companies more internationally competitive. 
    3. It would likely top Enbridge’s $28 billion acquisition of Spectra Energy Corp back in 2016, to become Canada’s largest-ever corporate takeover.
    4. It would combine Couche-Tarde’s convenience store empire of 16,700 stores in 31 countries, with 7-Eleven’s 85,800 stores in 19 countries.
    5. By combining ATD’s and 7-Eleven’s U.S. market share, Couche-Tard would control more than 12% of the U.S. convenience store market, with the closest competitor being Casey’s General Stores at only 1.7%.
    6. It’s a massive bite to take for ATD, currently valued at about $56 billion, since 7-Eleven is currently worth about $38 billion.
    7. The potential acquisition is so large that many analysts believe ATD would have to raise $18 billion in new equity to complete the deal. That would be the biggest stock offering in Canada by a wide margin. It would also be in addition to the $2 billion in cash on hand ATD has, and its ability to borrow about $20 billion. There’s speculation that Canadian pension plans would be a key source of capital in order to get a deal done.

    Neither company disclosed the precise terms of the deal, but Couche-Tard described the offer as “friendly, non-binding.” That’s a key differentiator from a “hostile takeover.” (A hostile takeover is when a company tries to purchase more than half of another company’s shares on the free market against the wishes of the targeted company’s management, thus taking over operational control.)

    This move is not totally out of the blue for ATD, as the company has taken big acquisitional swings before. The Quebec-based operator has a long history of successfully integrating new acquisitions. Its attempt three years ago to purchase French grocery chain Carrefour for $25 billion was scuttled at the last minute by the French Finance Minister citing food security issues. Similar protectionist governmental instincts could prevent this massive deal from getting done. 

    That said, Couche-Tard has been circling (Circle K-ing?) 7-Eleven for over two years now. Perhaps it believes it has what it takes to navigate the new Japanese corporate legal waters and get the deal done.

    While there will likely be some nervous customers of 7-Eleven (nobody wants to see change at their favourite corner store), Seven & I Holdings’ shareholders must be happy. Shares were up 22% upon announcement of the proposed acquisition.

    1900 vs. 2023 stock markets

    It’s always worth keeping the long run in mind when thinking about trends and market forces. When we consider just what an incredible run the U.S. stock market has achieved over the last few years, it’s important to remember that it’s unlikely to continue that outperformance forevermore.

    [ad_2]

    Kyle Prevost

    Source link

  • UBS loves this high-flying sector that’s up 10% in the quarter. Here’s how to play it

    UBS loves this high-flying sector that’s up 10% in the quarter. Here’s how to play it

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Making sense of the markets this week: August 25, 2024 – MoneySense

    Making sense of the markets this week: August 25, 2024 – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    On Tuesday, Statistics Canada stated that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measured inflation of 2.5% for July. That’s down from 2.7% in June, and is the lowest inflation rate recorded since 2021.

    Deceleration in headline inflation led by shelter component , 12-month % change

    CPI basket items June 2024 July 2024
    All-items Consumer Price Index 2.7% 2.5%
    Food 2.8% 2.7%
    Shelter 6.2% 5.7%
    Household operations, furnishings and equipment -0.9% -0.1%
    Clothing and footwear -3.1% -2.7%
    Transportation 2% 2%
    Health and personal care 3.0% 2.9%
    Recreation, education and reading 0.6% -0.2%
    Alcoholic beverages, tobacco products and recreational cannabis 3.1% 2.7%
    Source: Statistics Canada

    In fact, if you take shelter out of the equation, we’re getting close to zero inflation. And that’s significant for two reasons:

    1. The shelter-inflation rate (primarily a measurement of rent and mortgage expenses) did come down substantially between June and July.
    2. As the Bank of Canada (BoC) cuts interest rates, the inflation component of the CPI will inevitably go down as Canadians will have access to mortgages with lower rates.

    Notably, passenger vehicle prices were down 1.4% in July. Clothing and footwear was also down by 2.7%. Food and gas were up by 2.7% and 1.9% respectively. British Columbia and New Brunswick had the highest inflation rate growth, while Manitoba and Saksatchewan had the lowest.

    It’s pretty clear there’s no longer an overall inflation crisis in Canada. It’s now simply a home affordability issue at this point. Economists were widely predicting that this continuing trend of a downward inflation rate would clear the way for continued interest-rate cuts in the coming months. Money markets are now predicting a 0.25% cut minimum on September 4, with a 4% probability that the cut will be 0.50%. Looking further down the road, those same markets are predicting there is a 76% chance we will see a 2% decrease by October of 2025. 

    I hope you locked in those guaranteed investment certificates (GICs) or bonds when you could still snag those high rates Check out MoneySense’s list of the best GIC rates in Canada, and my article on low-risk investments over at MillionDollarJourney.com.

    A bullseye for Target

    Target Corporation posted a big earnings beat on Wednesday and shareholders saw its shares increase in value by 11.20%. The Minneapolis-based discount retailer is the seventh-largest in the U.S.

    Retail earnings highlights

    All numbers are in U.S. dollars.

    • Target (TGT/NYSE): Earnings per share of $2.57 (versus $2.18 predicted). Revenue of $25.45 billion (versus $25.21 billion estimate).
    • Lowe’s Companies (LOW/NYSE): Earnings per share of $4.10 (versus $3.97 predicted), and revenues of $23.59 billion (versus $23.91 billion predicted).

    Same-store sales for Target grew 3% last quarter, after five straight quarters of declining sales. More purchases of discretionary items like clothing were responsible for the positive reversal to the declining sales trend.

    Target’s COO Michael Fiddelke had a very cautious tone, though. “While we’ve been pleased with our performance so far this year, our view of the consumer remains largely the same. The range of possibilities and the macroeconomic backdrop in consumer data and in our business remains unusually high.” And Target CEO Brian Cornell cited price reductions and a value-seeking consumer as reasons for increased foot traffic in the quarter.

    It was very much a mediocre earnings report for Lowes, though, as it beat earnings expectations decisively but cut its full-year forecast. Shares were down by about 1% on Tuesday after the earnings announcement. 

    Lowe’s CEO Marvin Ellison said consumers were waiting for cuts in interest rates before taking on large home improvement projects. Because 90% of Lowes’ customers are homeowners (as opposed to contractors), they are particularly sensitive to movements in interest rates, he shared. Same-store sales were down 5.1% year over year.

    [ad_2]

    Kyle Prevost

    Source link

  • U.S. job growth revised down by the most since 2009. Why this time is different

    U.S. job growth revised down by the most since 2009. Why this time is different

    [ad_1]

    People line up as they wait for the JobNewsUSA.com South Florida Job Fair to open at the Amerant Bank Arena on June 26, 2024, in Sunrise, Florida. 

    Joe Raedle | Getty Images

    There’s a lot of debate about how much signal to take from the 818,000 downward revisions to U.S. payrolls — the largest since 2009. Is it signaling recession?

    A few facts worth considering:

    • By the time the 2009 revisions came out (824,000 jobs were overstated), the National Bureau of Economic Research had already declared a recession six months earlier.
    • Jobless claims, a contemporaneous data source, had surged north of 650,000, and the insured unemployment rate had peaked at 5% that very month.
    • GDP as reported at the time had already been negative for four straight quarters. (It would subsequently be revised higher in the two of those quarters, one of which was revised higher to show growth, rather than contraction. But the economic weakness was broadly evident in the GDP numbers and ISMs and lots of other data.)

    The current revisions cover the period from April 2023 to March, so we don’t know whether current numbers are higher or lower. It may well be that the models used by the Bureau of Labor Statistics are overstating economic strength at a time of gathering weakness. While there are signs of softening in the labor market and the economy, of which this could well be further evidence, here’s how those same indicators from 2009 are behaving now:

    • No recession has been declared.
    • The 4-week moving average of jobless claims at 235,000 is unchanged from a year ago. The insured unemployment rate at 1.2% has been unchanged since March 2023. Both are a fraction of what they were during the 2009 recession.
    • Reported GDP has been positive for eight straight quarters. It would have been positive for longer if not for a quirk in the data for two quarters in early 2022.

    As a signal of deep weakness in the economy, this big revision is, for now, an outlier compared to the contemporaneous data. As a signal that job growth has been overstated by an average of 68,000 per month during the revision period, it is more or less accurate.

    But that just brings average employment growth down to 174,000 from 242,000. How the BLS parcels out that weakness over the course of the 12-month period will help determine if the revisions were concentrated more toward the end of the period, meaning they have more relevance to the current situation.

    If that is the case, it is possible the Fed might not have raised rates quite so high. If the weakness continued past the period of revisions, it is possible Fed policy might be easier now. That is especially true if, as some economists expect, productivity numbers are raised higher because the same level of GDP appears to have occurred with less work.

    But the inflation numbers are what they are, and the Fed was responding more to those during the period in question (and now) than jobs data.

    So, the revisions might modestly raise the chance of a 50 basis-point rate reduction in September for a Fed already inclined to cut in September. From a risk management standpoint, the data might add to concern that the labor market is weakening faster than previously thought. In the cutting process, the Fed will follow growth and jobs data more closely, just as it monitored inflation data more closely in the hiking process. But the Fed is likely to put more weight on the current jobless claims, business surveys, and GDP data rather than the backward looking revisions. It’s worth noting that, in the past 21 years, the revisions have only been in the same direction 43% of the time. That is, 57% of  the time, a negative revisions is followed the next year by a positive one and vice versa.

    The data agencies make mistakes, sometimes big ones. They come back and correct them often, even when it’s three months before an election.

    In fact, economists at Goldman Sachs said later Wednesday that they think the BLS may have overstated the revisions by as much as half a million. Unauthorized immigrants who now are not in the unemployment system but were listed initially as employed amounted for some of the discrepancy, along with a general tendency for the initial revision to be overstated, according to the Wall Street firm.

    The jobs data could be subject to noise from immigrant hiring and can be volatile. But there is a vast suite of macroeconomic data that, if the economy were tanking like in 2009, would be showing signs of it. At the moment, that is not the case.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jim Cramer names 3 stocks to possibly sell in this very overbought market

    Jim Cramer names 3 stocks to possibly sell in this very overbought market

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ride out future market and economic volatility with these all-weather stocks, Bank of America says

    Ride out future market and economic volatility with these all-weather stocks, Bank of America says

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jim Cramer says a double developer stock upgrade signals city real estate back

    Jim Cramer says a double developer stock upgrade signals city real estate back

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Harris calls for expanded child tax credit of up to $6,000 for families with newborns

    Harris calls for expanded child tax credit of up to $6,000 for families with newborns

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris speaks at an event with U.S. President Joe Biden (not pictured) in Prince George’s County, Maryland, U.S., August 15, 2024. 

    Elizabeth Frantz | Reuters

    Vice President Kamala Harris on Friday unveiled an economic plan, including an expanded child tax credit worth up to $6,000 in total tax relief for families with newborn children.

    The Democratic presidential nominee’s plan aims to restore the higher child tax credit enacted via the American Rescue Plan in 2021, which provided a maximum credit of up to $3,600 per child, according to a fact sheet from the campaign.

    The 2021 credit was up to $3,000 or $3,600, depending on the child’s age and family’s income. Harris’ proposed tax break would increase for middle- to lower-income families for one year after a child is born.

    “We will provide $6,000 in tax relief to families during the first year of a child’s life,” said Harris during a policy speech in Raleigh, North Carolina.

    More from Personal Finance:
    Vance wants to raise the child tax credit to $5,000. Here’s why that could be difficult
    The expanded child tax credit failed in the Senate. Here’s what it means for families
    Trump and Harris both want no taxes on tips. Why policy experts don’t like the idea

    The plan comes less than one week after Sen. JD Vance of Ohio, former President Donald Trump‘s GOP running mate, floated a $5,000 child tax credit

    A Trump campaign official told CNBC: “Trump will consider a significant expansion of the child tax credit that applies to American families.”

    While Harris has followed President Joe Biden’s footsteps with her proposed child tax credit expansion, the $2,400 bonus for newborns is “different and somewhat surprising,” said Kyle Pomerleau, senior fellow and federal tax expert with the American Enterprise Institute. “That, to me, sounds very much like a response to JD Vance.”

    The Harris campaign did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

    ‘Bipartisan momentum’ for the child tax credit

    Senate Republicans earlier in August blocked an expanded child tax credit that passed in the House with broad support. However, Republican lawmakers are expected to revisit the measure after the election.

    “There is bipartisan momentum behind expanding the [child tax credit],” said Andrew Lautz, associate director for the Bipartisan Policy Center’s economic policy program.

    There is bipartisan momentum behind expanding the [child tax credit].

    Andrew Lautz

    Associate director for the Bipartisan Policy Center’s economic policy program

    The size of the expansion and future credit design will hinge on which party controls the White House and Congress. But the House-passed bill and Senate negotiations could be a starting point, Lautz said.

    Future child tax credit expiration

    Without action from Congress, the maximum child tax credit will drop from $2,000 to $1,000 once Trump’s 2017 tax cuts expire after 2025.

    The American Rescue Plan temporarily increased the maximum child tax credit from $2,000 to either $3,000 or $3,600, depending on the child’s age. Families received up to half via monthly payments for 2021.

    The child poverty rate fell to a historic low of 5.2% in 2021, largely due to the credit’s expansion, according to a Columbia University analysis.

    If there’s a future child tax credit expansion, Pomerleau doesn’t expect it to be as large as the tax break that Harris or Vance have proposed.

    Amid the federal budget deficit, lawmakers are already wrestling with trillions in expiring tax cuts that are “prohibitively expensive,” he said.

    Expanding the child tax credit to $3,000 or $3,600 could cost an estimated $1.1 trillion over a decade, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Meanwhile, the expansion to $6,000 for newborns could cost $100 billion.

    The Harris campaign’s economic plan fact sheet said she would fulfill her “commitment to fiscal responsibility,” including calls for higher taxes on wealthy Americans and large corporations.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Making sense of the markets this week: August 18, 2024 – MoneySense

    Making sense of the markets this week: August 18, 2024 – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    The U.S. is set to cut rates—finally

    After much speculation about when the U.S. will finally begin cutting its interest rates, the CME FedWatch tool reports a 100% chance that the U.S. Federal Reserve will cut its rates in September. Market watchers are pretty confident, with a 36% chance that the U.S. Fed will go right to a 0.50% cut instead of nudging the rate down. And looking ahead, the futures market predicts a 100% chance of 0.75% in rate cuts by December this year, with a 32% chance of a 1.25% rate decrease. The forecasts became stronger this week as the annualized inflation rate in the U.S. slowed to 2.9%, its lowest rate since March 2021. There are a lot of percentages here, but the gist is people are expecting big interest rate cuts.

    Those probabilities should take some of the currency pressure off of the Bank of Canada (BoC) when it makes its next interest rate decision on September 4. If the BoC were to continue to cut rates at a faster pace than the U.S. Fed, the Canadian dollar would substantially depreciate and import-led inflation would likely become an issue.

    Source: CNBC

    Here are some top-line takeaways from the U.S. Labor Department July CPI report:

    • Core CPI (excluding food and energy) rose at an annualized inflation rate of 3.2%.
    • Shelter costs rose 0.4% in one month and were responsible for 90% of the headline inflation increase.
    • Food prices were up 0.2% from June to July.
    • Energy prices were flat from June to July.
    • Medical care services and apparel actually deflated by 0.3% and -0.4% respectively.

    When combined with the meagre July jobs report, it’s pretty clear the U.S. consumer-led inflation pressures are receding. As the U.S. cuts interest rates and mortgage costs come down, it’s quite likely that shelter costs (the last leg of strong inflation) could come down as well.


    Walmart: “Not projecting a recession”

    Despite slowing U.S. consumer spending, mega retailers Home Depot and Walmart continue to book solid profits.

    U.S. retail earnings highlights

    Here are the results from this week. All numbers below are reported in USD.

    • Walmart (WMT/NYSE): Earnings per share of $0.67 (versus $0.65 predicted). Revenue of $169.34 billion (versus $168.63 billion predicted).
    • Home Depot (HD/NYSE): Earnings per share of $4.60 (versus $4.49 predicted). Revenue of $43.18 billion (versus $43.06 billion predicted).

    While Home Depot posted a strong earnings beat on Wednesday, forward guidance was lukewarm, resulting in a gain of 1.60% on the day. Walmart, on the other hand, knocked the ball out of the park and raised its forward guidance and booked a gain of 6.58% on Thursday.

    Walmart Chief Financial Officer John David Rainey told CNBC, “In this environment, it’s responsible or prudent to be a little bit guarded with the outlook, but we’re not projecting a recession.” He went on to add, “We see, among our members and customers, that they remain choiceful, discerning, value-seeking, focusing on things like essentials rather than discretionary items, but importantly, we don’t see any additional fraying of consumer health.”

    Same-store sales for Walmart U.S. were up 4.2% year over year, and e-commerce sales were up 22%. The mega retailer highlighted its launch of the Bettergoods grocery brand as a way to monetize the trend toward cheaper food-at-home options, and away from fast food. 

    [ad_2]

    Kyle Prevost

    Source link

  • Pendal: Liquidating mainland property companies a step in the right direction

    Pendal: Liquidating mainland property companies a step in the right direction

    [ad_1]

    Share

    Amy Xie Patrick, Head of Income Strategies at Pendal discusses the systemic issues facing the Chinese economy and the effects of liquidating Chinese property companies.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A U.S. construction boom is sending rents lower and creating perks for renters

    A U.S. construction boom is sending rents lower and creating perks for renters

    [ad_1]

    Aleksandarnakic | E+ | Getty Images

    A construction boom in the U.S. has resulted in lower rents and other benefits for renters.

    Record-construction activity since the pandemic has increased the supply of empty units, meaning more inventory is available for renters. More multifamily units were completed in June than in any month in nearly 50 years, according to Zillow Group, an online marketplace for real estate.

    Landlords are taking notice and are now adding rent concessions — discounts, incentives or perks to attract new renters — like free weeks of rent or free parking. 

    About one-third, 33.2%, of landlords offered at least one rent concession in July across the U.S., up from about one-quarter, 25.4%. last year, Zillow found.

    More from Personal Finance:
    Here’s when it makes sense to tap your home equity: It ‘won’t go stale’
    Housing affordability is ‘moving in the right direction,’ economist says
    What to know before you refinance or buy

    Meanwhile, the median asking rent prices for apartments in one- to three-bedroom units fell in July, the first time that’s occurred since 2020, according to Redfin, a real estate brokerage site.

    The median asking rent price for a studio or one-bedroom apartment fell 0.1% to $1,498 a month; two-bedroom apartments decreased 0.3% to $1,730; and units with three bedrooms or more, were down 2.% to $2,010, per Redfin data. 

    Rents are still high because of how much prices climbed during the pandemic, said Chen Zhao, who leads the economics team at Redfin. But now, rent growth has flattened, which can be seen as “good news for renters,” she said.

    Sun Belt states are leading the trend

    Metro areas in Florida and Texas, two Sun Belt states that have introduced a high number of newly built apartments since the pandemic, are seeing significant rent price declines as more units become available, according to Redfin.

    For example, the median asking rent price in Austin, Texas, fell to $1,458 in July, a 16.9% decline from a year prior, according to Redfin. It was the biggest drop among all other analyzed metro areas in the national report, the firm noted.

    The median asking rent price in Jacksonville, Florida, declined 14.3% in the same time frame, to $1,465, per Redfin.

    To compare at a state-wide level, the median rent price in Texas stands at $1,950, according to Zillow. That comparable price in Florida is $2,500, it found.

    Rent concessions are up from a year ago in 45 of the 50 largest metro areas in the U.S., according to Zillow.

    The annual increase in the share of rental listings offering concessions is the highest in Jacksonville, Florida, which saw concessions rise 17 percentage points, followed by Charlotte, North Carolina (15.7 points), Raleigh, North Carolina (14.7 points), Atlanta (14.5 points); and Austin, Texas (14.1 points), per Zillow data.

    How wage growth helps rent costs 

    Historically, wage growth and rent growth have been very linked, said Orphe Divounguy, a senior economist with Zillow’s Economic Research team.

    How tight the labor market is can be predictive of how tight the housing market is going to be, he explained.

    The labor market has eased recently, with the number of candidates outpacing the jobs available. In July, nonfarm payroll increased by just 114,000 for the month, down from 179,000 in June, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The unemployment rate jumped to 4.3%, the highest level since October of 2021.

    “When wages are rising rapidly, that helps to support housing demand,” said Divounguy. “As the labor market loosens, we expect the rental market to continue to loosen.”

    Wages are growing 4% to 5% year over year, said Zhao: “That’s good. That means that rents are actually falling relative to wages. Your wages are increasing more than rents are.” 

    To be sure, wage growth has slowed. Wages and salaries increased 5.1% in June for the 12-month period ended in June 2024, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 

    Wage growth peaked at 9.3% in January 2022, and has slid down to 3.1% by mid-June, returning to pre-pandemic wage levels, according to Indeed Hiring Lab Institute.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Home equity is ‘not like bread,’ expert says — ‘It won’t go stale.’ Here’s when it makes sense to tap it

    Home equity is ‘not like bread,’ expert says — ‘It won’t go stale.’ Here’s when it makes sense to tap it

    [ad_1]

    Iuliia Isaieva | Moment | Getty Images

    Homeowners are sitting on $17 trillion in equity as of the end of the first quarter of 2024, according to CoreLogic. The average homeowner gained $28,000 in equity compared to a year earlier.

    For many people, there’s no need to touch that money.

    Home equity is “not like bread,” said Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate. “It won’t go stale if it just sits there.”

    More from Personal Finance:
    Average consumer now carries $6,329 in credit card debt
    This labor data trend is a ‘warning sign,’ economist says
    59% of Americans wrongly think the U.S. is in a recession, report finds

    There is one exception, however: If you need to make major home improvements or repairs, tapping home equity can be a viable solution, experts say.

    Home equity is ‘a less expensive borrowing option’

    Among polled homeowners, 55% see home improvements or repairs as a good reason to tap home equity, according to a new survey by Bankrate. The site surveyed 2,294 U.S. adults, including 1,133 homeowners, in late June.

    Using home equity is “certainly a less expensive borrowing option than resorting to personal loans or credit cards,” McBride said. 

    As of Aug. 7, the current average home equity loan interest rate is 8.59%, according to Bankrate. The average HELOC interest rate is 9.37%.

    To compare, the average personal loan interest rate is 12.38% , Bankrate found. The average credit card interest rate stands at 24.92%, according to LendingTree.

    While cash from savings continues to be the most common way homeowners fund renovation projects, or 83%, credit card use has increased, according to the 2024 U.S. Houzz & Home Study. Houzz surveyed 33,830 homeowners of ages 18 and older from Jan. 19 to Feb. 27.

    About 37% of homeowners paid for their repair projects with credit cards, up from 28% who did so in 2022, Houzz found.

    While tapping equity is cheaper, it still has risks. Rates are higher given the Federal Reserve’s spate of rate hikes, and you need to go in with a plan to pay off the debt.

    Remodeling can add value

    Using home equity to invest in your home can make sense, said Jessica Lautz, deputy chief economist at the National Association of Realtors. Such projects not only help preserve the house, they may even enhance its value, boosting profits when you eventually sell.

    The highest percentage cost recovered for exterior projects was from new roofing, at 100%, according to the latest Remodeling Impact Report by NAR. For interior projects, the highest percentage cost recovered was from refinishing hardwood floors, at 147%, and installing new wood flooring, at 118%, NAR found.

    “We’ve found that hardwood floors have more universal appeal,” said Lautz. “For something like a roof, it’s a big project. … People may want to have that completed before they move into a home, make sure that the roof is in good working order.”

    Tapping home equity for vacations, big purchases

    More than 1 in 10 millennial homeowners said vacations or buying big-ticket items are good reasons to tap your home equity, according to Bankrate. But experts say this move is a “don’t.”

    “If you have to finance the cost of your vacation, you can’t afford the vacation,” McBride said.

    Plus, big-ticket items, such as a car or electronics, are depreciating in value from the point of purchase, he explained.

    “You’re not only buying a depreciating asset, but you’re financing the purchase of that depreciating asset,” McBride added.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The ‘carry trade’ unwind has barely begun, investor says

    The ‘carry trade’ unwind has barely begun, investor says

    [ad_1]

    Mark Carnegie, founding partner of M.H. Carnegie & Co, told CNBC that Japanese regional banks could face a situation worse than the 2023 U.S. banking crisis.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Morgan Stanley says buying these quality defensive stocks is the best option for investors right now

    Morgan Stanley says buying these quality defensive stocks is the best option for investors right now

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 59% of Americans wrongly think the U.S. is in a recession, report finds

    59% of Americans wrongly think the U.S. is in a recession, report finds

    [ad_1]

    We are not in a recession

    “Right now we have a ‘Goldilocks’ economy,” said Gene Goldman, chief investment officer at Cetera Financial Group in El Segundo, California.

    The country’s economy has continued to expand since the Covid-19 pandemic, sidestepping earlier recessionary forecasts.

    Officially, the National Bureau of Economic Research defines a recession as “a significant decline in economic activity that is spread across the economy and lasts more than a few months.” The last time that happened was early in 2020, when the economy came to an abrupt halt.

    In the last century, there have been more than a dozen recessions, some lasting as long as a year and a half.

    Still, regardless of the country’s economic standing, many Americans are struggling in the face of sky-high prices for everyday items, and most have exhausted their savings and are now leaning on credit cards to make ends meet.

    “Money is top of mind,” said Vishal Kapoor, senior vice president of product at Affirm. “Consumers are resilient but they’re feeling the pinch of higher prices.”

    Economists have wrestled with the growing disconnect between how the economy is doing and how people feel about their financial standing.

    We’re in a ‘vibecession’

    We’re in a “vibecession,” Joyce Chang, JPMorgan’s chair of global research, said at the CNBC Financial Advisor Summit in May.

    Over the last few years “the wealth creation was concentrated amongst homeowners and upper-income brackets,” Chang said, “but you probably have about one-third of the population that’s been left out of that — that’s why there’s such a disconnect.”

    Rising rents coupled with high borrowing costs and low wage growth have hit some especially hard. “Lower income households are not keeping up,” Goldman said. “Everything looks great but when you look beneath the surface, the disparity between the wealthy and nonwealthy is widening dramatically.”

    It’s not only a “vibe,” however.

    As more consumers stretch to cover increased prices and higher interest rates, there are new indications of financial strain.

    A growing number of borrowers are falling behind on their monthly credit card payments. Over the last year, roughly 9.1% of credit card balances transitioned into delinquency, the New York Fed reported for the second quarter of 2024. And more middle-income households anticipate struggling with debt payments in the coming months.  

    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tim Walz vs. JD Vance: What the 2024 presidential running mates could mean for your wallet

    Tim Walz vs. JD Vance: What the 2024 presidential running mates could mean for your wallet

    [ad_1]

    Democratic vice presidential candidate and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (L), and Republican Vice Presidential candidate Sen. JD Vance (R-OH).

    Getty Images

    Housing

    Affordable housing is an important topic for many Americans and both Walz and Vance have addressed the issue.

    In May 2023, Walz signed housing legislation that included $200 million in down payment assistance. The bill also had $200 million for housing infrastructure and $40 million for workforce housing.

    “We expect Walz to be an advocate for demand-side approaches to housing,” Jaret Seiberg, analyst at TD Cowen wrote in a July statement. “These are the type of housing ideas we would expect in a Harris administration,” she wrote.

    Demand-side approaches to housing aim to help individual households by improving housing quality or reducing monthly housing costs.

    Meanwhile, Vance, who is also a proponent of affordable housing, highlighted the issue in his Republican National Convention acceptance speech and along the campaign trail.

    “Prior to running for Senate, Vance argued that one key to tackling poverty is to address affordable housing,” and he has opposed institutional ownership of rental homes and Chinese buyers for U.S. real estate, Seiberg wrote.

    Child tax credit

    Without action from Congress, trillions of tax breaks enacted by Trump are scheduled to expire after 2025, including the child tax credit, which will drop from $2,000 to $1,000 per child. 

    Congress in 2021 approved a temporary expansion of the child tax credit, including upfront monthly payments, which reduced the child poverty rate to a historic low of 5.2% for 2021, according to a Columbia University analysis.

    Following the federal policy, Minnesota enacted a refundable state-level child tax credit in 2023, which Walz described as “signature accomplishment.”    

    Minnesota’s new child tax credit is unusual in its narrowness, but it is the most generous in the nation for low-income households.

    Jared Walczak

    Vice president of state projects at the Tax Foundation

    “Minnesota’s new child tax credit is unusual in its narrowness,” said Jared Walczak, vice president of state projects at the Tax Foundation. “But it is the most generous in the nation for low-income households.” 

    However, a permanent federal child tax credit expansion could be difficult, particularly amid a divided Congress and increasing concerns over the federal budget deficit.

    Walz’s campaign did not respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

    Senate Republicans blocked a federal child tax credit expansion last week, and Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, described the vote as a “blatant attempt to score political points.”

    Despite the failed procedural vote, Crapo voiced openness to negotiating a “child tax credit solution that a majority of Republicans can support.”

    Democrats scheduled the vote partially in response to Vance, who has positioned himself as a pro-family candidate. Vance was not present for the Senate vote, but has expressed support for the child tax credit.

    Vance’s campaign did not respond to CNBC’s request for comment. 

    Student loans

    Vance has spoken out against student loan forgiveness policies.

    “Forgiving student debt is a massive windfall to the rich, to the college educated, and most of all to the corrupt university administrators of America,” Vance, a Yale Law School graduate wrote on X in April 2022. “Republicans must fight this with every ounce of our energy and power.”

    Outstanding education debt in the U.S. stands at around $1.6 trillion. Nearly 43 million people — or 1 in 6 adult Americans — carry student loans. Women and people of color are most burdened by the debt.

    Vance does seem to approve of loan forgiveness in extreme cases. In May, he helped introduce legislation that would excuse parents from student loans they took on for a child who became permanently disabled.

    Jane Fox, chapter chair of the Legal Aid Society Attorneys union, UAW local 2325, said it was hypocritical and incorrect of Vance to frame debt relief as a benefit to those who are well off.

    “Student debt forgiveness is a working-class issue,” Fox said. “Those in the 1% who went to elite institutions and then worked in private equity as Senator Vance did rarely need debt relief.”

    Vance’s campaign did not respond to CNBC’s request for comment.   

    Meanwhile, Walz, a former school teacher, has supported programs to alleviate the burden of student debt on people, said higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz.

    He signed a student loan forgiveness program for nurses into law in Minnesota, Kantrowitz said, as well as a free tuition initiative for low-income students.

    “As my daughter prepares to head off to college next year, affordability and student loan debt are at the front of our minds,” Walz wrote on Facebook in 2018. “Every Minnesotan deserves a shot at a great education without being held back by soaring costs and student loan debt.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link