ReportWire

Tag: investing

  • Elon Musk Is Unfazed By Tesla’s Decline

    Elon Musk Is Unfazed By Tesla’s Decline

    [ad_1]

    Tesla is completely lost on Wall Street. 

    The electric vehicle manufacturer is having a dark year in the stock market. And those difficulties worsened on Dec. 13 with another sharp drop in the stock price of almost 4%. 

    In all, the Tesla stock lost has lost 54.2% of its value in 2022, translating into a drop in market capitalization of nearly $600 billion. Tesla  (TSLA) – Get Free Report is down 60%, compared to its all-time high reached in November 2021. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Vanguard sees a recession in 2023 — and one ‘silver lining’ for investors

    Vanguard sees a recession in 2023 — and one ‘silver lining’ for investors

    [ad_1]

    The last 12 months was a year of fast-rising inflation, fast-rising interest rates and fast-rising questions about a future recession.

    Prices went up while stock markets and savings account balances went down, leaving consumers and investors dizzy and their wallets hurting.

    There may be more financial pain, that’s pretty sure — but it might not be as bad as feared, according to Vanguard’s look ahead to 2023.

    The likely recession will not send jobless rates charging sharply higher, sticker shock will fade for the price of goods, and the rise in rent and mortgages will also ease, Vanguard said.

    On Tuesday, inflation data for November showed prices are continuing to cool. Analysts say that makes a 50-basis point increase, rather than a 75-basis-point increase, more likely.

    The good news: This opens up chances for stocks to rebound, the asset-manager added.

    The outlook, released this week, comes as Americans are trying to guess what 2023 holds for their finances while they manage their holiday shopping budgets, and 2022 investments.

    On Tuesday, inflation data for November showed prices are continuing to cool. From October to November, the cost of living nudged up 0.1%, lower than the 0.3% forecast, the Consumer Price Index showed. Year over year, the inflation rate receded to 7.1% from 7.7% in October, according to the CPI data.

    On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve will announce its latest decision on interest rate increases. A 50-basis point increase is widely expected after four jumbo-sized 75-basis point hikes from the central bank.

    Here’s one roadmap for what’s next, as far as Vanguard’s researchers and experts can see.

    Hot inflation will cool

    Inflation rates during 2022 climbed to four-decade highs. There have been signs of easing, such as smaller-than-expected price increases in October.

    “As we step into 2023, early signs of a recovery in goods supply and softening demand could help balance supply and demand for consumption goods and bring prices lower,” the authors noted ahead of Tuesday’s CPI numbers.

    But the cost and demand of services are going to prevent a quick fall, they noted. Signs of slowing price increases are already emerging in rents and mortgages, but they will take longer to ease than prices of consumer goods, the authors said.

    That echoes the view from Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, who said Sunday there will be “much lower inflation,” absent any unanticipated shocks to the economy.

    But while hot inflation will cool, it will still be warm to the touch. The Fed says 2% inflation is its target goal; Vanguard sees 3% inflation by the end of 2023.

    A recession is very much on the cards

    As “generationally high inflation” slowed economies across the world, the Fed and other central banks have countered with interest-rate increases to tame price increases. That “will ultimately succeed, but at a cost of a global recession in 2023,” according to Vanguard’s report. Vanguard sees a 90% chance of a recession in the United States by the end of next year.

    Vanguard is hardly alone in the recession call, so the question is how bad could the big picture look?

    In Vanguard’s view, it’s not so bad. “Households, businesses, and financial institutions are in a much better position to handle the eventual downturn, such that drawing parallels with the 1970s, 1980s, 2008, or 2020 seems misplaced,” the authors wrote.

    Job losses may be clustered

    For now, the jobless rate in a tight labor market is 3.7%, which is just a little above the lowest levels in five decades. That stands against the headline-grabbing list of companies where layoffs are mounting, notably in the tech sector.

    When a recession, in all likelihood, lands next year, “unemployment may peak around 5%, a historically low rate for a recession,” the Vanguard outlook said. As interest rates climb, the job losses “should be most concentrated in the technology and real estate sectors, which were among the strongest beneficiaries of the zero-rate environment.”

    The unemployment rate going from 3.7% to the 5% vicinity is “a sizable move,” Roger Aliaga-Díaz, Americas chief economist for Vanguard, said in a Monday press conference on the report. “But it is less dramatic of a rise than compared to past recessions perhaps.”

    Spotting the opportunities

    When interest rates go up, bond prices go down. So it’s been difficult for bonds with lower returns and “near-term pain” for investors this year, the Vanguard outlook said.

    “However the bright side of higher rates is higher interest payments. These have led our return expectations for U.S. and international bonds to increase by more than twofold,” the report said.

    Vanguard said U.S. bond return projections could be 4.1% – 5.1% annually over the next year versus its 1.4% – 2.4% return estimate last year. For U.S. stocks, the forecast could be 4.7% – 6.7% annually, while returns in emerging market equities could be between 7% and 9%.

    On Tuesday morning, stock markets are soaring higher on the cooler than expected inflation data, igniting hopes of an end of year Santa Claus rally.

    ‘There’s one silver lining of our outlook for a modest global recession. And it’s the clear silver lining of higher expected returns for investors.’


    — Joseph Davis, Vanguard’s chief global economist

    Still, the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    +0.30%

    is down nearly 5% year to date. The S&P 500
    SPX,
    +0.73%

    is off 14% in that time and for the Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    +0.38%

    is down more than 26%.

    When the market hits bottom is impossible to know, the outlook said — but it noted “valuations and yields are clearly more attractive than they were a year ago.”

    “There’s one silver lining of our outlook for a modest global recession. And it’s the clear silver lining of higher expected returns for investors,” said Joseph Davis, Vanguard’s chief global economist.

    “We’re long concerned that the low rate environment was both unsustainable and ultimately a tax and a headwind for savers and long term investors,” Davis said.

    But even with all the turbulence this year, “we certainly are starting to see the dividends to higher real interest rates around the world in the higher projected returns that we anticipate for investors over the coming decade.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Best stock picks for 2023: Here are Wall Street analysts’ most heavily favored choices

    Best stock picks for 2023: Here are Wall Street analysts’ most heavily favored choices

    [ad_1]

    Following a sharp and sustained rise in interest rates, U.S. stocks have taken a broad beating this year.

    But 2023 may bring very different circumstances.

    Below are lists of analysts’ favorite stocks among the benchmark S&P 500
    SPX,
    the S&P 400 Mid Cap Index
    MID
    and the S&P Small Cap 600 Index
    SML
    that are expected to rise the most over the next year. Those lists are followed by a summary of opinions of all 30 stocks in the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA.

    Stocks rallied on Dec. 13 when the November CPI report showed a much slower inflation pace than economists had expected. Investors were also anticipating the Federal Open Market Committee’s next monetary policy announcement on Dec. 14. The consensus among economists polled by FactSet is for the Federal Reserve to raise the federal funds rate by 0.50% to a target range of 4.50% to 4.75%.

    Read: 5 things to watch when the Fed makes its interest-rate decision

    A 0.50% increase would be a slowdown from the four previous increases of 0.75%. The rate began 2022 in a range of zero to 0.25%, where it had sat since March 2020.

    A pivot for the Fed Reserve and the possibility that the federal funds rate will reach its “terminal” rate (the highest for this cycle) in the near term could set the stage for a broad rally for stocks in 2023.

    Wall Street’s large-cap favorites

    Among the S&P 500, 92 stocks are rated “buy” or the equivalent by at least 75% of analysts working for brokerage firms. That number itself is interesting — at the end of 2021, 93 of the S&P 500 had this distinction. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 has declined 16% in 2022, with all sectors down except for energy, which has risen 53%, and the utilities sector, which his risen 1% (both excluding dividends).

    Here are the 20 stocks in the S&P 500 with at least 75% “buy” or equivalent ratings that analysts expect to rise the most over the next year, based on consensus price targets:

    Company

    Ticker

    Industry

    Closing price – Dec. 12

    Consensus price target

    Implied 12-month upside potential

    Share “buy” ratings

    Price change – 2022 through Dec. 12

    EQT Corp.

    EQT Oil and Gas Production

    $36.91

    $59.70

    62%

    78%

    69%

    Catalent Inc.

    CTLT Pharmaceuticals

    $45.50

    $72.42

    59%

    75%

    -64%

    Amazon.com Inc.

    AMZN Internet Retail

    $90.55

    $136.02

    50%

    91%

    -46%

    Global Payments Inc.

    GPN Misc. Commercial Services

    $99.64

    $147.43

    48%

    75%

    -26%

    Signature Bank

    SBNY Regional Banks

    $122.73

    $180.44

    47%

    78%

    -62%

    Salesforce Inc.

    CRM Software

    $133.11

    $195.59

    47%

    80%

    -48%

    Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc. Class A

    BIO Medical Specialties

    $418.28

    $591.00

    41%

    100%

    -45%

    Zoetis Inc. Class A

    ZTS Pharmaceuticals

    $152.86

    $212.80

    39%

    87%

    -37%

    Delta Air Lines Inc.

    DAL Airlines

    $34.77

    $48.31

    39%

    90%

    -11%

    Diamondback Energy Inc.

    FANG Oil and Gas Production

    $134.21

    $182.33

    36%

    84%

    24%

    Caesars Entertainment Inc

    CZR Casinos/ Gaming

    $50.27

    $67.79

    35%

    81%

    -46%

    Alphabet Inc. Class A

    GOOGL Internet Software/ Services

    $93.31

    $125.70

    35%

    92%

    -36%

    Halliburton Co.

    HAL Oilfield Services/ Equipment

    $34.30

    $45.95

    34%

    86%

    50%

    Alaska Air Group Inc.

    ALK Airlines

    $45.75

    $61.08

    34%

    93%

    -12%

    Targa Resources Corp.

    TRGP Gas Distributors

    $70.42

    $93.95

    33%

    95%

    35%

    Charles River Laboratories International Inc.

    CRL Misc. Commercial Services

    $201.94

    $269.25

    33%

    88%

    -46%

    ServiceNow Inc.

    NOW Information Technology Services

    $401.64

    $529.83

    32%

    92%

    -38%

    Take-Two Interactive Software Inc.

    TTWO Software

    $102.61

    $135.04

    32%

    79%

    -42%

    EOG Resources Inc.

    EOG Oil and Gas Production

    $124.06

    $158.24

    28%

    82%

    40%

    Southwest Airlines Co.

    LUV Airlines

    $38.94

    $49.56

    27%

    76%

    -9%

    Source: FactSet

    Most of the companies on the S&P 500 list expected to soar in 2023 have seen large declines in 2022. But the company at the top of the list, EQT Corp.
    EQT,
    is an exception. The stock has risen 69% in 2022 and is expected to add another 62% over the next 12 months. Analysts expect the company’s earnings per share to double during 2023 (in part from its expected acquisition of THQ), after nearly a four-fold EPS increase in 2022.

    Shares of Amazon.com Inc.
    AMZN
    are expected to soar 50% over the next year, following a decline of 46% so far in 2022. If the shares were to rise 50% from here to the price target of $136.02, they would still be 18% below their closing price of 166.72 at the end of 2021.

    Read: Here’s why Amazon is Citi’s top internet stock idea

    You can see the earnings estimates and more for any stock in this article by clicking on its ticker.

    Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information available for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

    Mid-cap stocks expected to rise the most

    The lists of favored stocks are limited to those covered by at least five analysts polled by FactSet.

    Among components of the S&P 400 Mid Cap Index, there are 84 stocks with at least 75% “buy” ratings. Here at the 20 expected to rise the most over the next year:

    Company

    Ticker

    Industry

    Closing price – Dec. 12

    Consensus price target

    Implied 12-month upside potential

    Share “buy” ratings

    Price change – 2022 through Dec. 12

    Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals Inc.

    ARWR Biotechnology

    $31.85

    $69.69

    119%

    83%

    -52%

    Lantheus Holdings Inc.

    LNTH Medical Specialties

    $54.92

    $102.00

    86%

    100%

    90%

    Progyny Inc.

    PGNY Misc. Commercial Services

    $31.21

    $55.57

    78%

    100%

    -38%

    Coherent Corp.

    COHR Electronic Equipment/ Instruments

    $35.41

    $60.56

    71%

    84%

    -48%

    Exelixis Inc.

    EXEL Biotechnology

    $16.08

    $26.07

    62%

    81%

    -12%

    Darling Ingredients Inc.

    DAR Food: Specialty/ Candy

    $61.17

    $97.36

    59%

    93%

    -12%

    Perrigo Co. PLC

    PRGO Pharmaceuticals

    $31.83

    $49.25

    55%

    100%

    -18%

    Mattel Inc.

    MAT Recreational Products

    $17.39

    $26.58

    53%

    87%

    -19%

    ACI Worldwide Inc.

    ACIW Software

    $20.75

    $31.40

    51%

    83%

    -40%

    Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.

    MODG Recreational Products

    $21.99

    $32.91

    50%

    83%

    -20%

    Dycom Industries Inc.

    DY Engineering and Construction

    $86.03

    $128.13

    49%

    100%

    -8%

    Travel + Leisure Co.

    TNL Hotels/ Resorts/ Cruiselines

    $37.98

    $56.00

    47%

    75%

    -31%

    Frontier Communications Parent Inc.

    FYBR Telecommunications

    $25.21

    $36.18

    44%

    82%

    -15%

    Manhattan Associates Inc.

    MANH Software

    $120.06

    $171.80

    43%

    88%

    -23%

    MP Materials Corp Class A

    MP Other Metals/ Minerals

    $31.39

    $44.79

    43%

    92%

    -31%

    Lumentum Holdings Inc.

    LITE Electrical Products

    $54.45

    $76.44

    40%

    76%

    -49%

    Tenet Healthcare Corp.

    THC Hospital/ Nursing Management

    $44.22

    $62.00

    40%

    80%

    -46%

    Repligen Corp.

    RGEN Pharmaceuticals

    $166.88

    $233.10

    40%

    82%

    -37%

    STAAR Surgical Co.

    STAA Medical Specialties

    $59.57

    $82.67

    39%

    82%

    -35%

    Carlisle Cos. Inc.

    CSL Building Products

    $251.99

    $348.33

    38%

    75%

    2%

    Source: FactSet

    Wall Street’s favorite small-cap names

    Among companies in the S&P Small Cap 600 Index, 91 are rated “buy” or the equivalent by at least 75% of analysts. Here are the 20 with the highest 12-month upside potential indicated by consensus price targets:

    Company

    Ticker

    Industry

    Closing price – Dec. 12

    Consensus price target

    Implied 12-month upside potential

    Share “buy” ratings

    Price change – 2022 through Dec. 12

    UniQure NV

    QURE Biotechnology

    $22.99

    $51.29

    123%

    95%

    11%

    Cara Therapeutics Inc.

    CARA Biotechnology

    $11.34

    $23.63

    108%

    88%

    -7%

    Vir Biotechnology Inc.

    VIR Biotechnology

    $25.50

    $53.00

    108%

    75%

    -39%

    Dynavax Technologies Corp.

    DVAX Biotechnology

    $11.22

    $23.20

    107%

    100%

    -20%

    Thryv Holdings Inc.

    THRY Advertising/ Marketing Services

    $18.40

    $36.75

    100%

    100%

    -55%

    Artivion Inc.

    AORT Medical Specialties

    $12.93

    $23.13

    79%

    83%

    -36%

    Cytokinetics Inc.

    CYTK Pharmaceuticals

    $38.33

    $67.43

    76%

    100%

    -16%

    Harsco Corp.

    HSC Environmental Services

    $7.17

    $12.30

    72%

    80%

    -57%

    Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc.

    LGND Pharmaceuticals

    $64.80

    $110.83

    71%

    100%

    -35%

    Corcept Therapeutics Inc.

    CORT Pharmaceuticals

    $20.84

    $34.20

    64%

    80%

    5%

    Payoneer Global Inc.

    PAYO Misc. Commercial Services

    $5.70

    $9.33

    64%

    100%

    -22%

    Xencor Inc.

    XNCR Biotechnology

    $28.69

    $46.71

    63%

    93%

    -28%

    Pacira Biosciences Inc.

    PCRX Pharmaceuticals

    $45.50

    $72.90

    60%

    80%

    -24%

    BioLife Solutions Inc.

    BLFS Chemicals

    $19.72

    $31.38

    59%

    89%

    -47%

    Customers Bancorp Inc.

    CUBI Regional Banks

    $30.00

    $47.63

    59%

    75%

    -54%

    ModivCare Inc.

    MODV Other Transportation

    $92.22

    $145.83

    58%

    100%

    -38%

    Stride Inc.

    LRN Consumer Services

    $32.56

    $51.25

    57%

    100%

    -2%

    Ranger Oil Corp. Class A

    ROCC Oil and Gas Production

    $36.98

    $58.00

    57%

    100%

    37%

    Outfront Media Inc.

    OUT Real Estate Investment Trusts

    $17.59

    $27.00

    53%

    83%

    -34%

    Walker & Dunlop Inc.

    WD Finance/ Rental/ Leasing

    $82.22

    $125.20

    52%

    100%

    -46%

    Source: FactSet

    The Dow

    Here are all 30 components of the Dow Jones Industrial Average ranked by how much analysts expect their prices to rise over the next year:

    Company

    Ticker

    Industry

    Closing price – Dec. 12

    Consensus price target

    Implied 12-month upside potential

    Share “buy” ratings

    Price change – 2022 through Dec. 12

    Salesforce Inc.

    CRM Software

    $133.11

    $195.59

    47%

    80%

    -48%

    Walt Disney Co.

    DIS Movies/ Entertainment

    $94.66

    $119.60

    26%

    82%

    -39%

    Apple Inc.

    AAPL Telecommunications Equipment

    $144.49

    $173.70

    20%

    74%

    -19%

    Verizon Communications Inc.

    VZ Telecommunications

    $37.95

    $44.60

    18%

    21%

    -27%

    Visa Inc. Class A

    V Misc.s Commercial Services

    $214.59

    $249.33

    16%

    86%

    -1%

    Microsoft Corp.

    MSFT Software

    $252.51

    $293.06

    16%

    91%

    -25%

    Chevron Corp.

    CVX Integrated Oil

    $169.75

    $191.20

    13%

    54%

    45%

    Cisco Systems Inc.

    CSCO Information Technology Services

    $49.30

    $53.76

    9%

    44%

    -22%

    UnitedHealth Group Inc.

    UNH Managed Health Care

    $545.86

    $593.30

    9%

    85%

    9%

    Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

    GS Investment Banks/ Brokers

    $363.18

    $392.63

    8%

    59%

    -5%

    Walmart Inc.

    WMT Specialty Stores

    $148.02

    $159.86

    8%

    72%

    2%

    JPMorgan Chase & Co.

    JPM Banks

    $134.21

    $143.84

    7%

    59%

    -15%

    Home Depot Inc.

    HD Home Improvement Chains

    $327.98

    $346.61

    6%

    61%

    -21%

    American Express Co.

    AXP Finance/ Rental/ Leasing

    $157.31

    $164.57

    5%

    43%

    -4%

    McDonald’s Corp.

    MCD Restaurants

    $276.62

    $288.67

    4%

    72%

    3%

    Johnson & Johnson

    JNJ Pharmaceuticals

    $177.84

    $185.35

    4%

    36%

    4%

    Coca-Cola Co.

    KO Beverages: Non-Alcoholic

    $63.97

    $66.62

    4%

    73%

    8%

    Boeing Co.

    BA Aerospace and Defense

    $186.27

    $192.69

    3%

    77%

    -7%

    Intel Corp.

    INTC Semiconductors

    $28.69

    $29.54

    3%

    13%

    -44%

    Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc.

    WBA Drugstore Chains

    $41.06

    $42.24

    3%

    17%

    -21%

    Merck & Co. Inc.

    MRK Pharmaceuticals

    $108.97

    $110.62

    2%

    65%

    42%

    Caterpillar Inc.

    CAT Trucks/ Construction/ Farm Machinery

    $233.06

    $236.23

    1%

    41%

    13%

    Honeywell International Inc.

    HON Aerospace and Defense

    $214.50

    $217.35

    1%

    54%

    3%

    Nike Inc. Class B

    NKE Apparel/ Footwear

    $112.07

    $112.58

    0%

    64%

    -33%

    3M Co.

    MMM Industrial Conglomerates

    $126.85

    $127.30

    0%

    5%

    -29%

    Procter & Gamble Co.

    PG Household/ Personal Care

    $152.47

    $150.22

    -1%

    59%

    -7%

    Travelers Companies Inc.

    TRV Multi-Line Insurance

    $187.11

    $184.24

    -2%

    18%

    20%

    Amgen Inc.

    AMGN Biotechnology

    $276.78

    $264.79

    -4%

    24%

    23%

    Dow Inc.

    DOW Chemicals

    $51.11

    $48.73

    -5%

    15%

    -10%

    International Business Machines Corp.

    IBM Information Technology Services

    $149.21

    $140.29

    -6%

    33%

    12%

    Source: FactSet

    Don’t miss: 10 Dividend Aristocrat stocks expected by analysts to rise up to 54% in 2023

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried is arrested in Bahamas, charges pending in U.S.

    FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried is arrested in Bahamas, charges pending in U.S.

    [ad_1]

    Sam Bankman-Fried, founder of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX, which faced a colossal collapse this year, was arrested in the Bahamas on Monday, and is facing criminal charges in the United States, according to a Bahamian official.

    The Attorney General of the Bahamas, through spokesman Latrae Rahming, posted a statement on Twitter detailing the arrest. Bankman-Fried, commonly known as SBF, lives in the Bahamas, where the cryptocurrency exchange was also based.

    “SBF’s arrest followed receipt of formal notification from the United States that it has filed criminal charges against SBF and is likely to request his extradition,” the statement reads.

    The U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York later tweeted that his office had filed a sealed indictment, which led to the arrest.

    “We expect to move to unseal the indictment in the morning and will have more to say at that time,” Damian Williams said in a tweet from the office’s official Twitter account.

    The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Justice Department are investigating the company, and the New York Times reported last week that Manhattan-based federal prosecutors are investigating whether Bankman-Fried steered prices of cryptocurrencies TerraUSD and Luna to benefit FTX and his Alameda hedge fund. The former chief executive of FTX was expected to testify remotely in front of a House Financial Services Committee panel on Tuesday.

    FTX, one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges in the world, filed for bankruptcy protection in November, and Bankman-Fried resigned as CEO. The new CEO of FTX, John J. Ray III, is expected to testify in front of members of Congress on Tuesday, and in prepared remarks released Monday, he said that Bankman-Fried’s management of FTX was an “utter failure” that lacked any level of financial control.

    MarketWatch staff writer Robert Schroeder contributed to this article.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 7 Common Mistakes Made By New Real Estate Investors

    7 Common Mistakes Made By New Real Estate Investors

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Real estate is one of the safest ways to create lasting wealth, and it is attracting more and more people each year. Investing in real estate is an exciting and lucrative adventure, provided that you don’t fall into the pitfalls of the sector. The lack of experience of beginner investors can cause them to fall for many tricks. So, here are seven common mistakes to avoid at all costs if you’re a beginner who wants to succeed in the real estate industry:

    1. Thinking that you will get rich quickly

    One of the major mistakes beginner real estate investors make is that they often think that the results will be tangible quickly. That is the outcome of the internet phenomenon: The public wants everything right away and without making any effort. Many industry gurus focus their communication in this direction, and they do not show that in order to succeed, it is necessary to have a spirit of self-sacrifice and also to work hard. In reality, patience and perseverance are required in this type of investment. Just searching for a profitable property can take several months if you don’t have a keen eye. Moreover, rushing into an investment without checking the property in question is often a bad omen.

    Related: A Beginner’s Guide to the 5 Easiest Ways to Become a Real Estate Investor

    2. Not having a strategy

    Some real estate investors prefer to take projects one day at a time, without having a precise plan of action. In this case, the risk is to end up with several properties which do not correspond to their profile. These investors embark on all sorts of projects without measuring the consequences, and they often find themselves ruined because of their poor investment choices. Having a well-defined strategy allows you to go in a precise direction. Following a strategy means ensuring that you don’t venture out in all directions and that you move in the right direction.

    3. Focusing your research on a specific city

    Another major mistake often made by beginner investors is focusing on a specific city — often close to their home or in a particular city because they have been told that its profitability is good. In reality, this way of searching drastically reduces the opportunities since these investors will feel obliged to buy a property in that city, even if the profitability is not there. On the contrary, it is necessary to expand the search in order to not miss any opportunities. It is easy to optimize the profitability of a property that is already profitable beforehand. On the other hand, a property that is not profitable will harm your project, even if you set up some optimization strategies.

    4. Omitting the negotiation stage

    In real estate, negotiation is a key step that takes place at different levels. In particular, it intervenes at the time of purchase of the property. Many real estate investors forget that a good deal is made at the time of purchase. If they buy at a too high price, that will impact the profitability of their project, whether it is a rental or a resale project. The purchase price constitutes an important variable in a real estate investment project. Keep in mind that if you don’t get a good deal at the time of the purchase, it is very likely that you won’t get a good deal on the resale.

    Related: How to Avoid the Common Pitfalls of Real Estate Investing

    5. Underestimating the cost and the scope of the work

    It is important to seek the help of professionals when you are tackling work related to real estate because costs can quickly become overwhelming. Often, beginner investors have no idea of the scope of the work to be done, and therefore they underestimate their costs. They only have a global or a partial vision of what they want to achieve, and they do not realize that the work can be much more consequent.

    6. Not checking the condition of the property

    Even if virtual visits are at the present time facilitated by technology, seeing the condition of a property in person allows you to check if it corresponds to your expectations. There is no point that can be neglected at this stage. It is particularly necessary to check the state of the common parts as well as the state of the roof, for example, with the help of a drone in order to be more precise. While visiting a property, it is also important to check the condition of the neighborhood. All this is done in order to avoid very high costs of work.

    7. Thinking that you can handle everything yourself

    In the real estate field, beginner investors tend to think that they can handle everything, either to make a bigger profit or simply because they find it difficult to delegate some of their work. This is a common mistake, as the time spent in the management of a property is valuable time that they can allocate to tasks that are more within their reach, such as searching for other properties or finding some solutions to optimize the profitability of a property they possess. In some cases, delegating this responsibility to professionals is a better solution. But be careful, delegating does not mean not controlling. It is necessary to think of always monitoring the state of the work.

    Related: Master These 6 Skills to Succeed as a Real Estate Investor

    If you’re just getting started in real estate investing, use these tips to avoid common mistakes. Remember this: It takes time to see results, don’t go in without a strategy, don’t limit your search, don’t skip the negotiation stage, don’t underestimate the cost or the work, thoroughly check the condition of the property, and don’t hesitate to delegate the work.

    [ad_2]

    Xavier PRETERIT

    Source link

  • 6 Tempting Investments To Avoid

    6 Tempting Investments To Avoid

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    As investors, we’re often told to be active and diversified. But are some investments not worth your time or money? Indeed, certain types of investments should be avoided at all costs. Here’s a list of common financial products and how they might affect your portfolio.

    1. Whole life insurance

    Whole life insurance costs substantially more than term insurance. Whole life premiums are typically much higher than term premiums, and the cost of whole life policies can be even higher for older individuals. It’s also important to note that since whole life policies cannot be cashed out, you can’t use them as collateral if you decide you need money from your investments in the future. Additionally, if someone dies before their policy expires (which often happens with whole life policies), their beneficiaries only receive a fraction of what they were expecting because of how much this type of insurance costs.

    In addition to these issues with cost-effectiveness and liquidity, whole life insurance also offers fewer death benefits than other types of investments due to its nature as an annuity contract instead of a mutual fund or stock portfolio; this means that there won’t be any growth potential after purchasing your plan which would otherwise come from investing in other funds or stocks over time.

    2. Low-interest saving accounts

    A low-interest savings account is an investment you can make with money that you don’t need to use immediately. Savings accounts are generally insured by the government and offer a slight interest, which is often lower than inflation. These accounts are not liquid, meaning you cannot withdraw your savings without penalty if you need them for something else. They also have high fees attached to them and may even charge high minimum balances if you aren’t putting enough money in there every month. Furthermore, since these types of investments don’t earn much interest on the cash inside them, they may lose value over time due to inflation.

    Related: How Generation Z Can Jump-start Savings (Advice Anyone Can Use)

    3. Penny stocks

    Penny stocks are low-priced shares of small companies that trade over the counter rather than through an exchange. They can be risky investments because they aren’t regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This means that penny stocks are not required to follow the same strict rules as other investments, which makes them more likely to be scams.

    Penny stock investors don’t have many options for selling their shares — penny stocks typically don’t trade on any of the major exchanges where investors can sell them for cash. If you want to sell your shares, you’ll usually need to find someone who wants them badly enough that they’ll accept less than market value. And since most people have no idea what these “spare” shares are worth, it’s easy for folks posing as brokers who say they’ll buy your shares at an inflated price (or even just a flat rate) without even checking if there’s any demand for those particular shares on an actual exchange somewhere else in the world.

    Related: 5 Things Millionaires Do That Most People Don’t

    4. Gold coins

    Gold coins are not a good investment. They’re essentially just a store of value, like other precious metals. While some people may see this as an advantage in that it can be bought and sold easily (which is true), it does not generate income as stocks or bonds do — and it can also lose value if gold prices go down. If you want to buy something tangible, buy silver instead: It’s cheaper than gold on an ounce-by-ounce basis, has more industrial uses (such as being used to manufacture electronics), and has been less volatile over time than gold has been.

    Related: Why It’s Never a Bad Time to Invest in Precious Metals

    5. Hyper-aggressive growth mutual funds

    A hyper-aggressive growth fund invests in companies with high growth potential. These funds tend to invest in risky stocks, meaning they could quickly lose value if the company’s stock price falls or the economy goes into recession. The risks of these types of funds are twofold: first, there are times when the market will crash, and your investment will be lost entirely; second, even under normal conditions, you may see an overall loss over time because these types of investments tend to fluctuate in value more than other investments (like bonds). If you’re looking for an aggressive option with a chance of making some serious money, consider an aggressive growth fund instead.

    6. Complex private limited partnerships

    There are some types of investments you should avoid at all costs. One such type is a complex private limited partnership. These investments are dangerous because they often have hidden risks that can lead to significant financial losses. A good example is the Madoff Ponzi scheme, which ended with many investors losing their savings.

    Another reason you should avoid these types of investments is that they involve high tax implications, which can be challenging to understand and may require professional assistance from an accountant or other expert to comprehensively comprehend the tax laws governing them. Some companies may also try to sell you investment opportunities with very little information about what exactly it is that they’re offering. These products are often sold by unscrupulous individuals who will take advantage of people’s lack of knowledge about financial products to make quick cash off their victims’ backs without ever completing any work on their behalf (which means no profits).

    [ad_2]

    Christopher Massimine

    Source link

  • Investors Grow More Confident Fed Will Pull Off a Soft Landing

    Investors Grow More Confident Fed Will Pull Off a Soft Landing

    [ad_1]

    Investors Grow More Confident Fed Will Pull Off a Soft Landing

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elon Musk Sounds a Dire Warning About the Economy

    Elon Musk Sounds a Dire Warning About the Economy

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk is worried about the economy. 

    For several months now, the richest man in the world has continued to sound the alarm, warning that the economy risks a deep recession if the central bank’s monetary policy stays on course. 

    While the Federal Reserve is holding its last monetary meeting of the year in the coming days, the serial entrepreneur has just made a new prediction. And like his past predictions, this one is very alarming.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Stocks finish lower, Dow drops 300 points to cap off worst week in more than 2 months

    Stocks finish lower, Dow drops 300 points to cap off worst week in more than 2 months

    [ad_1]

    U.S. stocks finished Friday’s choppy session with modest losses, capping off the worst week for stocks since September after a report on wholesale-price inflation challenged assumptions about slowing inflation in the U.S. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 2.8% this week, its biggest pullback since at least the week ended Sept. 30, according to FactSet data. The blue-chip index finished Friday’s session
    DJIA,
    -0.90%

    down 305.02 points, or 0.9%, at 33,476.46. The S&P 500
    SPX,
    -0.73%

    shed 29.13 points, or 0.7%, to 3,934.38, capping off a weekly drop of 3.4%, its biggest pullback since September. The Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    -0.70%

    fell 77.39 points, or 0.7%, to 11,004.62.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Dow industrials are on the verge of a ‘golden cross,’ even as BlackRock predicts recession like no other

    The Dow industrials are on the verge of a ‘golden cross,’ even as BlackRock predicts recession like no other

    [ad_1]

    Despite worries about inflation and an impending recession, there is at least one sign that some bullish market technical analysts might latch onto.

    An upbeat golden cross appears to be forming in the Dow Jones Industrial Average 
    DJIA,
    -0.90%
    ,
     more than nine months after a bearish death cross formed back in March, as the hawkish agenda of the Federal Reserve shattered bullishness on Wall Street.

    A golden cross occurs when the 50-day moving average for an asset price trades above the 200-day MA, while a death cross, comparatively, is when the 50-day falls below the long-term average.

    The 50-day moving average for the Dow stands at 32,200.32, at last check Friday afternoon, while the 200-day sits at 32,460.71, a roughly 260-point difference that could be traversed in the coming week or two, based on its current trajectory.


    FactSet

    A golden cross would mark the first for the Dow industrials since 2020 of August, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

    The bullish chart formation also would appear at an odd time for investors, with an apparent uptrend materializing in the stock market, even as the threat of a recession in 2023 grows.

    Read: Financial markets are flashing a warning that a recession is imminent: here’s what it means for stocks

    See: Goldman Sachs CEO says recession is likely, with 35% chance of a soft landing

    BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, is anticipating a unique recession unlike others that we’ve seen in U.S. history.

    “The new macro regime is playing out. We think that requires a new, dynamic playbook based on views of market risk appetite and pricing of macro damage,” wrote BlackRock’s Investment Institute team led by Jean Boivin.

    The BlackRock team said markets aren’t necessarily pricing in the recession that is being predicted.

    “Central banks appear set on doing ‘whatever it takes’ to fight inflation, making recession foretold, in our view,” the team at BlackRock wrote.

    As MarketWatch’s Tomi Kilgore notes, crosses, overall, aren’t necessarily good market-timing indicators.

    Check out: MarketWatch’s live blog of the market

    On top of that, MarketWatch columnist Mark Hulbert concludes that the U.S. stock market on average has performed no better in the wake of a golden crosses as it did at other times.

    In many cases, a golden cross can help put an asset’s move into perspective, however, they tend to be well telegraphed.

    Interestingly, the recession is also being widely predicted and some don’t think investors are getting the memo. As BlackRock notes, investors aren’t reflecting the damage that is to come, particularly as earnings expectations from American companies are right-sized.

    So, it might be worth it for investors to take any golden crosses in assets with a grain of salt.

    So far, the Dow industrials have outperformed over the past three months, up about 5%, compared with a decline of 2.5% for the S&P 500
    SPX,
    -0.73%

    and an 8.2% drop for the Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    -0.70%
    .

    Over the past three months, the Dow industrials have recent in aggregate on the back of gains in shares of Caterpillar
    CAT,
    -1.56%
    ,
    Boeing Co.
    BA,
    +0.20%

    Merck & Co.
    MRK,
    -1.86%
    ,
    IBM
    IBM,
    -0.47%

    and Travelers Cos.
    TRV,
    -1.10%
    .

    For the year so far, the Dow is down 7%, while the S&P 500 is off 17% and the Nasdaq is down nearly 30%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sinema ditches Democrats, but analysts say it’s no Senate earthquake, just a re-election gambit

    Sinema ditches Democrats, but analysts say it’s no Senate earthquake, just a re-election gambit

    [ad_1]

    Sen. Kyrsten Sinema announced Friday that she’s leaving the Democratic Party to register as an independent.

    So what does that mean?

    The initial reaction from analysts is that the Arizona lawmaker’s move won’t shake up how the Senate functions that much, and that it has more to do with her possible 2024 campaign for re-election.

    “At this point, we don’t expect Sinema’s defection to formally change the balance of power in the Senate,” said Benjamin Salisbury, director of research at Height Capital Markets, in a note.

    “Two independents, Senators Angus King [of Maine] and Bernie Sanders [of Vermont], formally caucus with Democrats,” Salisbury noted. “While Sinema declined to say which party she would caucus with, she did say that the change would not change how she votes, and she plans to keep her committee assignments, which is an indication to us that she will keep her affiliation with Democrats. In our view, the move is more about positioning herself for a tough 2024 reelection.”

    Sinema, who has been criticized frequently by progressive Democrats for moves such as opposing changes to the so-called carried-interest loophole, was expected to face a challenge from the left in a Democratic primary. But as an independent, she can avoid a primary and focus on the general election in her battleground state.

    Her calculation is that “the progressive Democratic ‘brand’ won’t help her to reelection in Arizona, but centrists and some from each party will,” Terry Haines, founder of Pangaea Policy, wrote in a note. “So there’s no percentage in doing anything but emphasizing her independence, and this is a high-profile, direct, and effective way of doing it.”

    Haines said the senator’s move isn’t an earthquake for the Senate: “Sinema herself says it’s not so, that she’ll continue to do the job in the same way — and there’s no reason to dispute it.”

    He also wrote that the “basic result for 2023-24 is as it was before Sinema’s announcement: domestic gridlock, basic fiscal/government spending stability, and continued foreign policy unanimity, particularly on China and Ukraine.”

    The Biden White House offered a similar reaction on Friday, saying that Sinema’s decision to “register as an independent in Arizona does not change the new Democratic majority control of the Senate, and we have every reason to expect that we will continue to work successfully with her.”

    Sinema has voted with Democrats 97% of the time, according to Bloomberg Government data.

    Related: Mitch McConnell praises Kyrsten Sinema as ‘the most effective first-term senator’ he’s seen in his career

    And see: Republicans clinch slim majority in House, likely signaling 2023 gridlock ahead

    Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said Sinema would keep her committee assignments.

    “I believe she’s a good and effective Senator and am looking forward to a productive session in the new Democratic majority Senate,” Schumer, a New York Democrat, also said. “We will maintain our new majority on committees, exercise our subpoena power, and be able to clear nominees without discharge votes.”

    For the past two years, Democrats have controlled the 50-50 Senate only because Vice President Kamala Harris can cast tiebreaking votes.

    Following Georgia Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock’s win on Tuesday over Republican challenger Herschel Walker in their closely watched runoff election, Democrats were expected to enjoy a 51-49 majority in the Senate.

    There’s talk that Sinema’s announcement on Friday may have changed that, but analysts such as Salisbury and Haines are pushing against that view.

    “Sinema’s defection is another sign of the tentative rise of overt bipartisanship in Congress,” Haines wrote. “There’s an increasing view that solving issues is what the vast majority of voters want, and some legislators seem prepared to risk the wrath of their party establishments to achieve it.”

    Most U.S. senators have been affiliated with a major political party, but more than 70 have been independents or represented a minor party, according to Senate records.

    Former Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut is a recent example of that group, as he started out as a Democrat, then became an independent but still caucused with his former party. That’s even as Democratic leaders criticized him for backing the late Republican John McCain in the 2008 presidential race.

    U.S. stocks 
    SPX,
    -0.73%

     
    DJIA,
    -0.90%

    traded mixed Friday and were on track for weekly losses.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Seattle Bank launches cloud-based CD rate website, app | Bank Automation News

    Seattle Bank launches cloud-based CD rate website, app | Bank Automation News

    [ad_1]

    Seattle Bank has launched a new website and mobile app, CD Valet, to assist customers in finding the most competitive certificate of deposit (CD) rates while leveling the competitive playing field between large financial institutions and community banks.  CD Valet is designed to help clients find CD rates and track their portfolios once they have […]

    [ad_2]

    Brian Stone

    Source link

  • This fund beats the S&P 500 by using just 75 of its components. Here’s how it works.

    This fund beats the S&P 500 by using just 75 of its components. Here’s how it works.

    [ad_1]

    What worked well during the years-long bull market through 2021 — a focus on growth, regardless of price — has ground to a halt this year. The rebirth of the value style of investing — and modest valuations overall — has taken hold.

    The approach taken by the Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF has paid off through both bull and bear markets.

    Let’s begin with a 10-year chart comparing total returns with dividends reinvested for the Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
    SPGP,
    +0.67%

    and the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY,
    +0.78%
    ,
    which tracks the benchmark S&P 500:


    FactSet

    So far this year, SPGP is down 12%, while SPY is down 16%. But the long-term chart shows significant and consistent outperformance for SPGP, even during the bull market.

    The S&P 500 GARP Index

    GARP stands for “growth at a reasonable price.” SPGP tracks the S&P 500 GARP Index, which is reconstituted and rebalanced twice a year, on the third Fridays of June and December. The next change occurs Dec. 16.

    S&P Dow Jones Indices assigns a growth score to each component of the S&P 500 by averaging the three-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for earnings and sales per share.

    The top 150 components of the S&P 500 by growth score are eligible for inclusion in the GARP index. Those 150 are ranked by “quality/value composite score,” which is the average of these three ratios:

    • Financial leverage — total debt to book value.

    • Return on equity — trailing 12 months’ earnings per share divided by book value per share.

    • Earnings-to-price — 12 months’ earnings per share divided by the share price.

    The top 75 of the 150 by QV rankings are then included in the GARP index and weighted by the growth score, with portfolio weightings ranging from 0.5% to 5%.

    There is a weighting limitation of 40% to any one of the 11 S&P sectors.

    Addressing concentration risk

    The benchmark S&P 500 Index
    SPX,
    +0.75%

    is weighted by market capitalization, which means it is more heavily concentrated than you might expect — success is rewarded, with rising stocks more heavily weighted over time.

    That can backfire during a bear market, with Amazon.com Inc.
    AMZN,
    +2.14%

    down 47% and Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    -0.34%

    down 51% this year, to name two prominent examples.

    Looking at the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY,
    +0.78%
    ,
    which is the first and largest exchange traded fund and tracks the benchmark index by holding all of its components, six companies (Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    +1.21%
    ,
    Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    +1.24%
    ,
    Amazon, both common share classes of Alphabet Inc.
    GOOGL,
    -1.30%

     
    GOOG,
    -1.26%

    and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
    BRK.B,
    +0.06%

    ) make up 19.2% of the portfolio.

    That percentage has come down this year, but a lot of risk remains concentrated in a handful of companies. (Apple alone makes up 6.4% of the SPY portfolio. Tesla is now the ninth-largest holding, making up 1.4% of the portfolio.)

    One way to address high concentration in an index fund is to use an equal-weighted approach, which Mark Hulbert recently discussed.

    For the Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF, the underlying index’s selection methodology has resulted in much less portfolio concentration than we see in SPY, with the top five holdings making up 10.9% of the portfolio.

    Here are the 10 largest holdings of SPGP:

    Company

    Ticker

    Share of portfolio

    Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

    REGN,
    +0.15%
    2.49%

    Cigna Corporation

    CI,
    +0.39%
    2.26%

    Everest Re Group, Ltd.

    RE,
    +0.24%
    2.21%

    Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated

    VRTX,
    +1.18%
    1.98%

    D.R. Horton, Inc.

    DHI,
    -0.39%
    1.97%

    Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

    EXPD,
    +0.23%
    1.96%

    Incyte Corporation

    INCY,
    +0.10%
    1.92%

    Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

    GS,
    -0.51%
    1.83%

    Ebay Inc.

    EBAY,
    +1.67%
    1.81%

    Pfizer Inc.

    PFE,
    +3.07%
    1.73%

    Source: FactSet

    Click on the tickers for more information about any company, ETF or index in this article.

    You should also read Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

    Don’t miss: 10 Dividend Aristocrat stocks expected by analysts to rise up to 54% in 2023

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why I Quit Investing In The Fiat Ponzi And Started Saving In Bitcoin

    Why I Quit Investing In The Fiat Ponzi And Started Saving In Bitcoin

    [ad_1]

    This is an opinion editorial by Mickey Koss, a West Point graduate with a degree in economics. He spent four years in the infantry before transitioning to the Finance Corps.

    Always up, always having to add more lest you fall behind. I could feel the American dream slowly slipping away every year. We dutifully paid our bills, contributed to retirement accounts, invested prudently and yet it felt like every year things got a little tighter. A little harder to contribute what we needed to. When we found Bitcoin, it gave us hope.

    [ad_2]

    Mickey Koss

    Source link

  • Feds said to investigate FTX’s SBF over possible crypto price manipulation, while senators want his testimony

    Feds said to investigate FTX’s SBF over possible crypto price manipulation, while senators want his testimony

    [ad_1]

    FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried is being investigated by federal prosecutors over whether he manipulated prices of two cryptocurrencies to benefit his companies, according to a new report, and has also been ordered to testify before a Senate committee about the collapse of his crypto platform.

    The New York Times reported Wednesday night that Manhattan-based federal prosecutors are investigating whether Bankman-Fried steered prices of TerraUSD and Luna to benefit FTX and his Alameda hedge fund. Terra and Luna saw more than $50 billion in market value wiped out when they collapsed in May. That contributed to a wider crypto crash, and eventually the implosion of FTX.

    The Times reported the probe is in its early stages, and is part of a wider investigation into FTX’s collapse and the potential misappropriation of billions of dollars of customers’ funds, which are now missing. Additionally, the Times confirmed a November Bloomberg report that FTX was also being investigated for potentially violating U.S. money-laundering laws months before FTX’s collapse.

    FTX, once one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges, collapsed and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in November after running into liquidity issues. Bankman-Fried resigned as CEO, and saw his personal fortune of about $23 billion all but evaporate. About $8 billion remains missing from FTX’s balance sheet; Bankman-Fried said in a Bloomberg interview the funds were “misaccounted,”

    Also see: As FTX collapse spurs calls for tighter rules, ‘we’re already suited up’ on crypto, SEC chief Gensler says

    Separately, the Senate Banking Committee late Wednesday ordered Bankman-Fried to testify about the collapse of FTX on Dec. 14, and said it is prepared to issue a subpoena if he does not voluntarily agree to comply by the end of the day Thursday.

    “FTX’s collapse has caused real financial harm to consumers, and effects have spilled over into other parts of the crypto industry. The American people need answers about Sam Bankman-Fried’s misconduct at FTX,” Sens. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, and Pat Toomey, R-Pa., said in a statement. 

    “You must answer for the failure of both entities that was caused, at least in part, by the clear misuse of client funds and wiped out billions of dollars owed to over a million creditors,” the senators said in a letter to Bankman-Fried.

    On Tuesday, Binance Chief Executive Changpeng Zhao called Bankman-Fried a “master manipulator” and “one of the greatest fraudsters in history.”

    Read more: Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong says it’s ‘baffling’ that Sam Bankman-Fried isn’t in custody

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Interactive: Here are the politicians who received money from FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried

    Interactive: Here are the politicians who received money from FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried

    [ad_1]

    Sam Bankman-Fried opened up his wallet to Washington in a big way during the 2022 election cycle, donating about $40 million publicly.

    So which politicians got money from the founder and former CEO of collapsed cryptocurrency exchange FTX?

    MarketWatch has compiled an interactive list below of the candidates and committees who received funds from Bankman-Fried based on the latest disclosures to the Federal Election Commission.

    Overall, he gave almost all of the $40 million to Democratic politicians or groups, and just over $200,000 to Republicans, according to the disclosures.

    In a wide-ranging interview at the New York Times Dealbook Summit last week, Bankman-Fried said donations were made to candidates who voiced support for pandemic prevention. 

    At least two Democratic senators received over $20,000 each from Bankman-Fried through joint political action committees tied to their candidacies. Those are Michigan’s Debbie Stabenow and New Hampshire’s Maggie Hassan. New York Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand got at least $10,000. Gillibrand is the co-sponsor of a crypto bill that would have the Commodity Futures Trading Commission oversee bitcoin, ether and most other digital assets and give a secondary regulatory role to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    In the wake of FTX’s collapse, politicians have been saying they will donate or have donated the money that they received from SBF to charities or other groups, or they’re giving it back.

    Gillibrand spokesman Evan Lukaske said the senator donated her funds to Ariva Inc., a Bronx-based nonprofit that offers free financial counseling. Stabenow, whose own bill empowering the CFTC to regulate crypto was backed by Bankman-Fried, plans to donate the contributions to a local charity. A representative for Sen. Hassan did not respond to requests for comment.

    Related: ‘Bedazzled by money’: Democratic ties to Sam Bankman-Fried under scrutiny after FTX collapse

    While 50 Democratic House and Senate candidates received donations, only eight Republican Senate candidates received money from the former CEO.

    SBF — known for being a Democratic megadonor — has claimed he made contributions that don’t show up in FEC disclosures. He told video blogger Tiffany Fong that he donated as much to Republicans as he did to Democrats, but the GOP donations were “dark-money” contributions, making his claim difficult to verify. Such secret contributions, allowed by the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United ruling, wouldn’t show up in the FEC disclosures used to compile MarketWatch’s list.

    Another FTX exec, Ryan Salame, became known as a Republican megadonor earlier this year, with a MarketWatch analysis in October finding that he publicly gave about $17 million to GOP groups.

    Use our interactive below to search through donations as reported to the FEC.

    Donations also filtered into committees associated with Bankman-Fried himself — Guarding Against Pandemics and GMI PAC.

    MarketWatch’s Victor Reklaitis contributed to this story.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • S&P 500, Nasdaq post worst day in month after strong data fuels worry about Fed rate hikes

    S&P 500, Nasdaq post worst day in month after strong data fuels worry about Fed rate hikes

    [ad_1]

    The S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite indexes recorded their worst day in almost a month on Monday, after a hotter-than-expected U.S. services-sector reading fueled concerns that the Federal Reserve may need to be even more aggressive in its inflation battle.

    How stocks traded
    • The Dow Jones Industrial Average
      DJIA,
      -0.26%

      finished down 482.78 points, or 1.4%, at 33,947.10.

    • The S&P 500
      SPX,
      -1.79%

      ended 72.86 points lower, or 1.8%, at 3,998.84.

    • The Nasdaq Composite
      COMP,
      -11.01%

      closed down 221.56 points, or 1.9%, at 11,239.94.

    • Those were the largest declines for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite since Nov. 9, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

    Stocks finished mixed on Friday, although they clinched gains last week, following a robust November jobs report, which stoked fears that inflation might not be so easily defeated.

    What drove markets

    Strong wage growth numbers released Friday were followed up on Monday by a robust reading for the U.S. services sector — both of which helped to stoke fears that the Fed’s interest-rate hikes, along with the central bank’s modest balance-sheet unwind, haven’t had much of an impact on the tight labor market.

    The ISM barometer of U.S. business conditions in the service sector came in stronger than expected, rising to 56.5% in November, a healthy showing that signals the U.S. economy is still expanding at a steady pace.

    “If nothing else, the ISM services report is being interpreted as very strong, and thus the economy is overheating and that means more Fed tightening,” said Will Compernolle, a senior economist at FHN Financial in New York. “Consumer resilience has proven to be more intense than I would have expected. In the two most interest-rate sensitive sectors — housing and autos — tightening has channeled into markets in meaningful ways.”

    But there has been so much pent-up demand, that higher interest rates haven’t been cooling overall spending as much as the Fed would like because companies are still having to fill a backlog of orders, he said via phone.

    In other economic data, the final November S&P Global U.S. services PMI edged up to 46.2 from 46.1, but remained in contractionary territory.

    November jobs data released on Friday showed average hourly wages grew over the past year by more than 5% as of November, beating economists’ expectations and stoking concerns that robust wage growth would continue to fuel inflation, market strategists said.

    Worries about a more-aggressive Fed also helped to drive Treasury yields higher, adding to the pressure on stocks. The yield on the 10-year note rose 9.6 basis points to 3.6% on Monday. Treasury yields move inversely to prices, and yields had fallen sharply over the past month, driven by shifting expectations about the pace of Fed rate hikes.

    Monday’s ISM services figure “surprised to the upside, suggesting that the economy is still running above its long-run sustainable path and that the Fed is going to have to slow the economy more than expected in 2023,” Bill Adams, the Dallas-based chief economist for Comerica Inc. CMA, said via phone.

    In other markets news, signs that China’s government is easing its COVID restrictions helped Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index
    HSI,
    +4.51%

    finish with a 4.5% gain.

    See also: Chinese ADRs and casino operators rally on signs of easing COVID

    Meanwhile, oil futures ended lower on Monday, a day after Sunday’s decision by OPEC and its allies to keep production quotas unchanged.

    Falling equity prices helped drive the CBOE Volatility Index
    VIX,
    +8.87%
    ,
    also known as the VIX, back above 20 on Monday. The volatility gauge had fallen sharply in recent weeks as stocks rallied, potentially signaling complacency that could ultimately hurt stocks, said Jonathan Krinsky, chief market technician at BTIG, in a note to clients.

    Companies in focus

    –Jamie Chisholm contributed reporting to this article.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The bear market rally is running out of stream, and it is time to take profits, says Morgan Stanley’s Wilson

    The bear market rally is running out of stream, and it is time to take profits, says Morgan Stanley’s Wilson

    [ad_1]

    The stock market’s bounce off the October lows is running out of room, and it is time to take profits, according to Morgan Stanley’s Michael Wilson.

    The chief equity strategist who correctly predicted this year’s stock-market selloff, now expects the S&P 500
    SPX,
    -1.79%

    to resume declines from the beginning of the year, after the benchmark last week crossed above its 200-day moving average. 

    “This makes the risk-reward of playing for more upside quite poor at this point, and we are now sellers again,” a team of strategists led by Wilson wrote in a Monday note. 

    Wilson went from one of Wall Street’s most outspoken bears to a tactical bull in October, when he anticipated a December rally of U.S. equities with the S&P 500 reaching up to 4,150 points. However, as the large-cap index now trades near the bank’s original tactical target range of 4,000 to 4,150, the strategist said investors should consider taking profits and get prepared for the new bear-market lows. 

    Wilson also said in November the S&P 500 will set a new price trough of 3,000 to 3,300 in the first quarter of 2023, before jumping back to the 3,900-level by the end of the year. 

    See: This little-known but spot-on economic indicator says recession and lower stock prices are all but certain

    U.S. stocks fell on Monday after three major benchmarks on Friday posted a second straight week of gains. The S&P 500 on Monday was off 1.8%, ending at 3,998, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    -1.40%

    declined by 1.4% and the Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    -1.93%

    slumped 1.9%. Stocks had soared last week after Federal Reserve Chairman Powell said the central bank’s pace of interest-rate increases can slow as soon as its December meeting.

    From a very short-term perspective, Wilson and his team think the S&P 500 could achieve 4,150, or about 3.8% above current levels, “over the next week or so.” However, a break of recent intraday lows of 3,938 would provide some confirmation the bear market is ready to reassert the downtrend in earnest, Wilson said.

    Morgan Stanley’s bearish call was echoed by other Wall Street banks. JP Morgan Chase & Co.’s Marko Kolanovic, once one of Wall Street’s most vocal bulls, called for equity prices to stumble early next year. He also argued that the rebound in stocks was overdone after October. Meanwhile, strategists at BofA Global Research said it is time to sell the stock-market rally ahead of a potential surge in the unemployment rate next year. 

    Wilson recommends investors stay defensive in healthcare, staples and utilities as falling rates from here should be viewed as “a growth negative rather than valuation/Fed pause positive.” In addition, growth stocks are unlikely to benefit from falling rates because of the risk to corporate earnings, especially for tech and consumer-oriented companies, which are large weights in growth indices.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • This little-known but spot-on economic indicator says recession and lower stock prices are all but certain

    This little-known but spot-on economic indicator says recession and lower stock prices are all but certain

    [ad_1]

    An obscure and arcane economic indicator suggests that Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell was wrong when he said at his Nov. 30 news conference that “There is a path to a soft, a softish landing” for the U.S. economy.

    This indicator traces to the large divergence between consumers’ views about the economy in general and their immediate personal financial circumstances in particular. A recession has occurred each time over the past four decades in which this divergence even approached its current level.

    To measure this divergence, this indicator focuses on the Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index (CCI) and the University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment Survey (UMI). While there is some overlap between what these two indices measure, there is a significant difference in emphasis, according to James Stack of InvesTech Research, from whom I first heard about this indicator. The CCI more heavily reflects consumers’ attitudes towards the overall economy, according to Stack, while the UMI is more heavily weighted towards their immediate personal circumstances.

    Perhaps not surprisingly, the CCI currently is higher than the UMI. Even as American consumers’ attitudes towards their immediate financial situations continue to sour, due to everything from inflation to higher mortgage rates to a softening housing market, the overall economy has proven to be remarkably resilient. Yet more evidence of this resilience was the Dec. 2 jobs report, in which the Labor Department reported the creation of a much-higher-than-expected number of new jobs.

    What is more surprising is the magnitude of the current divergence. According to the latest data releases from the Conference Board and the University of Michigan in late November, the CCI is 43.4 percentage points higher than the UMI. That’s close to a record; the latest reading stands at the 98th percentile of all monthly readings of the past four decades.

    Furthermore, as you can see from the chart above, a recession was in the economy’s not-too-distant future (shadowed bars) the past four times this difference rose to even 25 percentage points. 

    Consumer sentiment and the stock market

    Stark as this chart’s correlations are, it’s difficult for a sample with just four observations to be statistically significant. To test this indicator’s potential, I next measured its ability to predict the S&P 500’s
    SPX,
    -1.96%

    inflation-adjusted total return over the subsequent one- and five-year periods. The table below reflects data since 1979, which is when monthly data for both of these consumer indices first began to be reported.

    When divergence between CCI and UMI was…

    S&P 500’s average total real return over subsequent 12 months

    S&P 500’s average total real return over subsequent 5 years (annualized)

    In the highest 10% of monthly readings since 1979

    -0.4%

    -3.1%

    In the lowest 10% of monthly readings since 1979

    +14.3%

    +14.8%

    The differences shown in this table are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine.

    The bottom line? It’s not good news, for the economy in general or the U.S. stock market in particular, that consumers are so much more upbeat about the overall economy than they are about their immediate financial circumstances.

    Mark Hulbert is a regular contributor to MarketWatch. His Hulbert Ratings tracks investment newsletters that pay a flat fee to be audited. He can be reached at mark@hulbertratings.com

    More: The U.S. job market is strong, but layoffs are on the rise. Is this a good — or bad — time to ask for a raise?

    Also read: Bigger paychecks are good news for America’s working families. Why does it freak out the Fed?

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Saudi crown prince set to invest in Credit Suisse’s new investment bank

    Saudi crown prince set to invest in Credit Suisse’s new investment bank

    [ad_1]

    Saudi Arabia’s crown prince and a U.S. private-equity firm run by Barclays PLC’s former chief executive are among investors preparing to invest $1 billion or more into Credit Suisse’s
    CSGN,
    +6.61%

    CS,
    +9.39%

    new investment bank, people familiar with the matter said. 

    Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is considering an investment of around $500 million to back the new unit, CS First Boston, and its CEO-designate, Michael Klein, some of the people said. Additional financial backing could come from U.S. investors including veteran banker Bob Diamond‘s Atlas Merchant Capital, people familiar with that potential investment said. Credit Suisse previously said it had $500 million committed from an additional investor it hasn’t named.  

    Credit Suisse has received a number of proposals from investors interested in CS First Boston. Credit Suisse Chairman Axel Lehmann at a conference on Thursday said it has other firm commitments in addition to the $500 million from the unnamed investor. The bank hasn’t received a formal proposal from any Saudi entity, some of the people familiar with the matter said. 

    Credit Suisse is spinning off the New York-based investment bank as part of a fresh start after being buffeted by scandals, regulatory scrutiny and steep losses. It is raising $4.2 billion in new stock that separately will make Saudi National Bank its largest shareholder. It isn’t clear if Prince Mohammed would make the investment through that bank, or another investment vehicle. He is chairman of the country’s sovereign-wealth fund, Public Investment Fund, which along with another government fund is Saudi National Bank’s main owner. 

    An expanded version of this report appears on WSJ.com.

    Also popular on WSJ.com:

    Apple makes plans to move production out of China.

    FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried says he can’t account for billions sent to Alameda.

    [ad_2]

    Source link