ReportWire

Tag: International agreements

  • Trump stirs talk of ‘new world order’

    WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump gives. And he takes away.

    Offended by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s increasingly assertive posture toward the U.S., Trump revoked an invitation to join his Board of Peace. Many Western allies are suspicious of the organization, which is chaired by Trump and was initially formed to focus on maintaining the ceasefire in Israel’s war with Hamas but has grown into something skeptics fear could rival the United Nations.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmpAA62C:?8 2E E96 (@C=5 t4@?@>:4 u@CF>[ %CF>A DA@<6 @7 :>A@D:?8 E2C:77D @? $H:EK6C=2?5 — H9:49 96 F=E:>2E6=J =@H6C65 — 3642FD6 E96 4@F?ECJ’D =6256C “CF3365 >6 E96 HC@?8 H2J” 5FC:?8 2 A9@?6 42==] q67@C6 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>A52G@D9@FD:?88C66?=2?582K22a7b7c4`g32ba`4g_ad2b6a_g74_557eQmD96=G:?8 DH66A:?8 E2C:77Dk^2m @? >F=E:A=6 tFC@A62? 4@F?EC:6D[ %CF>A AC6DD65 s6?>2C< E@ “D2J J6D” E@ E96 &]$] AFD9 E@ 4@?EC@= vC66?=2?5 “2?5 H6 H:== 36 G6CJ 2AAC64:2E:G6] ~C J@F 42? D2J ?@ 2?5 H6 H:== C6>6>36C[” 96 D2:5[ :>A6C:=:?8 E96 }p%~ 2==:2?46]k^Am

    kAm~G6C 9:D 564256D 😕 AF3=:4 =:76[ %CF>A 92D ?6G6C 366? @?6 7@C ?:46E:6D] qFE 6G6? 3J 9:D DE2?52C5D[ E96 EF>F=E @7 E96 A2DE H66< DE@@5 @FE 3642FD6 :E 4CJDE2==:K65 9:D 56E6C>:?2E:@? E@ 6C2D6 E96 CF=6D32D65 @C56C E92E 92D 8@G6C?65 &]$] 7@C6:8? A@=:4J — 2?5 3J 6IE6?D:@? >@DE @7 E96 (6DE6C? H@C=5 — D:?46 (@C=5 (2C xx]k^Am

    kAm%96 AC6D:56?E 2?5 9:D DFAA@CE6CD 92G6 5:D>:DD65 E92E 2AAC@249 2D :?677:4:6?E[ @G6C=J 7@4FD65 @? 4@>AC@>:D6 2?5 F?C6DA@?D:G6 E@ E96 ?665D @7 A6@A=6 4@?E6?5:?8 H:E9 C2A:5 64@?@>:4 492?86] qFE 😕 :ED A=246[ %CF>A 😀 25G2?4:?8 2 DJDE6> E92E 😀 A@@C=J F?56CDE@@5 2?5 4@F=5 AC@G6 72C =6DD DE23=6[ 5C:G6? 3J E96 H9:>D @7 2 D:?8=6[ @7E6? >6C4FC:2=[ =6256C H9@ C68F=2C=J 56>@?DEC2E6D E92E A6CD@?2= 7=2EE6CJ @C 2?:>FD 42? D92A6 9:D 564:D:@?D]k^Am

    kAm#6EFC?:?8 E@ E96 &]$] 7C@> s2G@D[ 9@>6 E@ E96 (@C=5 t4@?@>:4 u@CF>[ #6AF3=:42? $6?] k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^9F3^=:D2>FC<@HD<:Qm{:D2 |FC<@HD<:k^2m @7 p=2D<2 D2:5 E96 A9C2D6 D96 962C5 “@G6C 2?5 @G6C” H2D E92E “H6 2C6 6?E6C:?8 E9:D ?6H H@C=5 @C56C” 2D D96 56D4C:365 2 D6?D6 @7 4@?7FD:@? 2>@?8 2==:6D]k^Am

    kAm“xE >2J 36 J@F ;FDE 925 2 325 E6=6A9@?6 42== H:E9 E96 AC6D:56?E 2?5 ?@H J@F’C6 8@:?8 E@ 92G6 E2C:77D 5:C64E65 2E J@F[” D96 E@=5 C6A@CE6CD] “%9:D =24< @7 DE23:=:EJ 2?5 C6=:23:=:EJ[ x E9:?<[ 😀 42FD:?8 H92E H6C6 EC25:E:@?2==J C6=:23=6 EC256 A2CE?6CD E@ 36 D2J:?8 E@ @E96C 4@F?EC:6D[ ‘w6J[ >2J36 J@F 2?5 x D9@F=5 E2=< 3642FD6 x’> ?@E DFC6 23@FE H92E’D 8@:?8 @? H:E9 E96 &?:E65 $E2E6D]’”k^Am

    kAm%96 %CF>A46?EC:4 2AAC@249 E@ 8@G6C?:?8 😀 92C5=J DFCAC:D:?8 7@C D@>6@?6 H9@ 2446AE65 9:D 7:CDE #6AF3=:42? AC6D:56?E:2= ?@>:?2E:@? 😕 a_`e 3J 564=2C:?8 E92E “x 2=@?6 42? 7:I” E96 ?2E:@?’D AC@3=6>D] pD 96 D6EE=6D :?E@ 9:D D64@?5 E6C> H:E9 2 72C >@C6 4@?7:56?E 56>62?@C E92? 9:D 7:CDE[ 96 92D 56=:89E65 DFAA@CE6CD H:E9 9:D E@E96G:4E@C 8@6DE96DA@:=D DEJ=6]k^Am

    kAm$E6G6 q2??@?[ %CF>A’D 7@C>6C 25G:D6C[ C646?E=J k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]E962E=2?E:4]4@>^A@=:E:4D^a_ae^_`^ECF>A7:CDEJ62C56>@4C24J^egdedgQmE@=5k^2m E96 pE=2?E:4 E92E %CF>A 😀 AFCDF:?8 2 “>2I:>2=:DE DEC2E68J” 2?5 E92E 96 >FDE <66A 8@:?8 “F?E:= J@F >66E C6D:DE2?46]”k^Am

    kAm“p?5 H6 92G6?’E >6E 2?J C6D:DE2?46[” q2??@? D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%92E’D 46CE2:?=J ECF6 😕 (2D9:?8E@?[ H96C6 E96 #6AF3=:42?4@?EC@==65 r@?8C6DD 92D 5@?6 =:EE=6 E@ 4964< %CF>A’D :>AF=D6D] qFE =6256CD @7 @E96C 4@F?EC:6D[ H9@ 92G6 DA6?E >F49 @7 %CF>A’D 25>:?:DEC2E:@? ECJ:?8 E@ 7:?5 H2JD E@ H@C< H:E9 9:>[ 2C6 :?4C62D:?8=J G@42=]k^Am

    kAmr2C?6J 😀 BF:4<=J 6>6C8:?8 2D 2 =6256C @7 2 >@G6>6?E 7@C 4@F?EC:6D E@ 7:?5 H2JD E@ =:?< FA 2?5 4@F?E6C E96 &]$] $A62<:?8 😕 s2G@D 29625 @7 %CF>A[ r2C?6J D2:5[ “|:55=6 A@H6CD >FDE 24E E@86E96C 3642FD6 :7 J@F 2C6 ?@E 2E E96 E23=6[ J@F 2C6 @? E96 >6?F]”k^Am

    kAm“x? 2 H@C=5 @7 8C62E A@H6C C:G2=CJ[ E96 4@F?EC:6D 😕 36EH66? 92G6 2 49@:46i E@ 4@>A6E6 H:E9 6249 @E96C 7@C 72G@C @C E@ 4@>3:?6 E@ 4C62E6 2 E9:C5 A2E9 H:E9 :>A24E[” 96 4@?E:?F65] “(6 D9@F=5 ?@E 2==@H E96 C:D6 @7 92C5 A@H6CD E@ 3=:?5 FD E@ E96 724E E92E E96 A@H6C @7 =68:E:>24J[ :?E68C:EJ[ 2?5 CF=6D H:== C6>2:? DEC@?8 — :7 H6 49@@D6 E@ H:6=5 :E E@86E96C]”k^Am

    By STEVEN SLOAN – Associated Press

    Source link

  • Trump rolls out Board of Peace at Davos forum

    DAVOS, Switzerland — President Donald Trump on Thursday inaugurated his Board of Peace to lead efforts at maintaining a ceasefire in Israel’s war with Hamas, insisting that “everyone wants to be a part” of the body he said could eventually rival the United Nations — despite many U.S. allies opting not to participate.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“%9:D :D?’E E96 &?:E65 $E2E6D[ E9:D 😀 7@C E96 H@C=5[” 96 D2:5[ 255:?8[ “x E9:?< H6 42? DAC625 :E @FE E@ @E96C E9:?8D 2D H6 DF44665 😕 v2K2]”k^Am

    kAm%96 6G6?E 762EFC65 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^>:562DEH2CD:DC26=92>2D82K2462D67:C6546d2ef66b`4db`_`ch`a`322da62`c2Qmp=: $922E9k^2m[ E96 9625 @7 2 ?6H[ 7FEFC6 E649?@4C2E:4 8@G6C?>6?E 😕 v2K2[ 2??@F?4:?8 E92E k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^:DC26=82K2A2=6DE:?:2?D92>2DC2729`6`7g2a_g2dg4_33ef`3dab_c6a5e272QmE96 #2729 3@C56C 4C@DD:?8 H:== @A6?k^2m 😕 3@E9 5:C64E:@?D ?6IE H66<] qFE E96C6 H2D ?@ 4@?7:C>2E:@? @7 E92E 7C@> xDC26=[ H9:49 D2:5 @?=J E92E :E H@F=5 4@?D:56C E96 >2EE6C ?6IE H66<]k^Am

    kAm%96 v2K2 D:56 @7 E96 4C@DD:?8[ H9:49 CF?D 36EH66? v2K2 2?5 t8JAE[ 😀 F?56C xDC26=: >:=:E2CJ 4@?EC@=] $922E9[ 2? 6?8:?66C 2?5 7@C>6C !2=6DE:?:2? pFE9@C:EJ @77:4:2= 7C@> v2K2[ 😀 @G6CD66:?8 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^:DC26=92>2DH2CA2=6DE:?:2?D82K22f7_f4b4heg_3bc4deb`achecggd672gQmE96 !2=6DE:?:2? 4@>>:EE66k^2m D6E E@ 8@G6C? E96 E6CC:E@CJ F?56C k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^>:562DEH2CD:DC26=92>2D82K2ECF>AH:E<@7733bh_`d5ad263eaf2d3h46fb55c6“ddQm&]$] DFA6CG:D:@?k^2m]k^Am

    kAmk2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>A?6E2?J29F82K23@2C5@7A62462c2ahe7fbecfc6g4e2c65245f`_h3g6dQm%96 ?6H A6246 3@2C5k^2m H2D :?:E:2==J 6?G:D:@?65 2D 2 D>2== 8C@FA @7 H@C=5 =6256CD @G6CD66:?8 E96 462D67:C6[ 3FE :E 92D >@CA965 :?E@ D@>6E9:?8 72C >@C6 2>3:E:@FD — 2?5 D<6AE:4:D> 23@FE :ED >6>36CD9:A 2?5 >2?52E6 92D =65 D@>6 4@F?EC:6D FDF2==J 4=@D6DE E@ (2D9:?8E@? E@ E2<6 2 A2DD]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A EC:65 ?@E E@ =6E E9@D6 ?@E A2CE:4:A2E:?8 CF:? 9:D F?G6:=:?8 A2CEJ[ D2J:?8 dh 4@F?EC:6D 925 D:8?65 @?E@ E96 3@2C5 — 6G6? E9@F89 9625D @7 DE2E6[ E@A 5:A=@>2ED 2?5 @E96C @77:4:2=D 7C@> @?=J `h 4@F?EC:6D A=FD E96 &]$] 24EF2==J 2EE6?565 E96 6G6?E] w6 E@=5 E96 8C@FA[ C2?8:?8 7C@> pK6C32:;2? E@ !2C28F2J E@ wF?82CJ[ “*@F’C6 E96 >@DE A@H6C7F= A6@A=6 😕 E96 H@C=5]”k^Am

    kAm%CF>A 92D DA@<6? 23@FE E96 3@2C5 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^3@2C5@7A6246ECF>AF?:E65?2E:@?DD64FC:EJ4@F?4:=dhefg4hdabh3c`e`ec5ah`f`d7c_24g6QmC6A=24:?8 D@>6 &]}] 7F?4E:@?Dk^2m 2?5 A6C92AD 6G6? >2<:?8 E92E 6?E:C6 3@5J @3D@=6E6 @?6 52J] qFE 96 H2D >@C6 4@?4:=:2E@CJ 😕 9:D C6>2C 😕 E96 $H:DD 2=AD]k^Am

    kAm“(6’== 5@ :E 😕 4@?;F?4E:@? H:E9 E96 &?:E65 }2E:@?D[” %CF>A D2:5[ 6G6? 2D 96 56?:8C2E65 E96 &]}] 7@C 5@:?8 H92E 96 D2:5 H2D?’E 6?@F89 E@ 42=> D@>6 4@?7=:4ED 2C@F?5 E96 8=@36]k^Am

    kAm$64C6E2CJ @7 $E2E6 |2C4@ #F3:@ D2:5 D@>6 4@F?EC:6D’ =6256CD 92G6 :?5:42E65 E96J A=2? E@ ;@:? 3FE DE:== C6BF:C6 2AAC@G2= 7C@> E96:C A2C=:2>6?ED]k^Am

    kAmq:8 BF6DE:@?D C6>2:?[ 9@H6G6C[ 23@FE H92E E96 6G6?EF2= 3@2C5 H:== =@@< =:<6]k^Am

    kAm#FDD:2? !C6D:56?E k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^9F3^G=25:>:CAFE:?Qm’=25:>:C !FE:?k^2m D2:5 9:D 4@F?ECJ 😀 DE:== 4@?DF=E:?8 H:E9 |@D4@H’D “DEC2E68:4 A2CE?6CD” 367@C6 564:5:?8 E@ 4@>>:E] %96 #FDD:2? H2D 9@DE:?8 !2=6DE:?:2? !C6D:56?E |29>@F5 p332D @? %9FCD52J 😕 |@D4@H]k^Am

    kAm~E96CD 2C6 2D<:?8 H9J !FE:? 2?5 @E96C 2FE9@C:E2C:2? =6256CD 925 6G6? 366? :?G:E65 E@ ;@:?] qC:E2:?’D 7@C6:8? D64C6E2CJ[ *G6EE6 r@@A6C[ D2:5 96C 4@F?ECJ H2D?’E D:8?:?8 @? “3642FD6 E9:D 😀 23@FE 2 =682= EC62EJ E92E C2:D6D >F49 3C@256C :DDF6D]”k^Am

    By JOSH BOAK, AAMER MADHANI and WILL WEISSERT – Associated Press

    Source link

  • EU lawmakers vote to hold up Mercosur trade agreement over legal concerns

    BRUSSELS — European Union lawmakers on Wednesday voted to hold up ratification of a major free trade agreement with the Mercosur group of South American countries over concerns about the legality of the deal.

    In a vote in Strasbourg, France, lawmakers narrowly approved sending the EU-Mercosur agreement to Europe’s top court to rule on whether it is in line with the bloc’s treaties. The result was 334 votes in favor to 324 against, with 11 abstentions.

    The assembly cannot vote to approve the pact until the European Court of Justice has ruled, and this could take months.

    The long sought-after free trade agreement was signed into effect on Saturday. Twenty-five years in the making, it aimed to strengthen commercial ties in the face of rising protectionism and trade tensions around the world.

    The deal was seen as a central priority of European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who shepherded it through a key vote on Jan. 9 among the EU’s 27 leaders. “The more trading partners we have world-wide, the more independent we are,” von der Leyen said at the World Economic Forum in Davos, pointing to Mercosur and another trade deal in the works with India.

    Supported by South America’s cattle-raising countries and European industrial interests, the accord is aimed at gradually eliminating more than 90% of tariffs on goods ranging from Argentine beef to German cars, creating one of the world’s largest free trade zones and making shopping cheaper for more than 700 million consumers.

    France, Europe’s major agricultural producer, wanted stronger protections for farmers and has sought to delay the pact. Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot welcomed the parliament’s vote, saying in a social media post that the assembly “expressed itself in line with the position that we have defended. France takes responsibility for saying no when it has to, and history often proves it right. The fight continues.”

    The European Commission said that it “strongly regrets” the parliament’s decision.

    However, the EU’s powerful executive branch can provisionally apply the deal until then. EU leaders are expected to discuss the way ahead at an emergency summit focused on transatlantic relations on Thursday.

    In a post on social media, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz described the EU parliament’s decision as “regrettable.”

    “It misjudges the geopolitical situation. We are convinced of the legality of the agreement. No further delays. The agreement must now be applied provisionally,” Merz wrote.

    Bernd Lange, head of the parliament’s committee on trade, said the vote was “absolutely irresponsible” and “very harmful for our economic interests.”

    Opponents should simply vote against ratification “instead of using delaying tactics under the guise of legal review,” he wrote on X.

    Ratification is considered all but guaranteed in South America, where the agreement has broad support.

    Mercosur consists of the region’s two biggest economies, Argentina and Brazil, as well as Paraguay and Uruguay. Bolivia, the bloc’s newest member, is not included the trade deal, but could join in the coming years. Venezuela has been suspended from the bloc and is not included in the agreement.

    —-

    AP writers Sam McNeil in Brussels and David McHugh in Frankfurt, Germany contributed.

    Source link

  • In their words: European governments criticize Trump’s tariff threats over Greenland

    COPENHAGEN, Denmark — European governments blasted U.S. President Donald Trump’s announcement that eight countries will face 10% tariff for opposing American control of Greenland beginning next month.

    Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Finland are on Trump’s list, though it was not immediately clear if the tariffs would impact the European Union as a bloc.

    Trump’s threat sets up a potentially dangerous test of U.S. partnerships in Europe. The U.S. president indicated the tariffs were retaliation for the deployment of symbolic levels of troops from the European countries to Greenland. Europeans said the troops were sent in response to Trump’s call for strengthened Arctic security.

    Here’s a look at what the governments of the eight countries said:

    “We agree with the U.S. that we need to do more since the Arctic is no longer a low tension area,” Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen said in a statement. “That’s exactly why we and NATO partners are stepping up in full transparency with our American allies.”

    “Threats have no place among allies,” Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre wrote on social media. “Norway’s position is firm: Greenland is part of the Kingdom of Denmark. Norway fully supports the sovereignty of the Kingdom of Denmark. There is broad agreement in NATO on the need to strengthen security in the Arctic, including in Greenland.”

    “We will not allow ourselves to be blackmailed,” Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson wrote on social media. “I will always stand up for my country, and for our allied neighbors. This is an EU issue that concerns many more countries than those now being singled out.”

    “No intimidation or threats will influence us, whether in Ukraine, Greenland or anywhere else in the world when we are faced with such situations,” French President Emmanuel Macron wrote on social media. “Tariff threats are unacceptable and have no place in this context.”

    “The Federal Government has taken note of the statements made by the U.S. President,” German federal government spokesperson Stefan Kornelius wrote on social media. “It is in closest coordination with its European partners. Together, we will decide on appropriate responses at the appropriate time.”

    “Our position on Greenland is very clear — it is part of the Kingdom of Denmark and its future is a matter for the Greenlanders and the Danes,” British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in a statement. “We have also made clear that Arctic security matters for the whole of NATO and allies should all do more together to address the threat from Russia across different parts of the Arctic. Applying tariffs on allies for pursuing the collective security of NATO allies is completely wrong.”

    “It’s inappropriate, because we’re not in favor of using trade tariffs in situations that have nothing to do with trade,” Dutch Foreign Minister David van Weel said during an interview on current affairs show “WNL op Zondag.” “As allies, I don’t think this is how you should treat each other; not seek dialogue with each other, but try to put pressure on each other. So no, I’m very unhappy about this.”

    “Among allies, issues are best resolved through discussion, not through pressure,” Finnish President Alexander Stubb, who famously bonded with Trump over their shared love of golf, wrote on social media. “Tariffs would undermine the transatlantic relationship and risk a dangerous downward spiral.”

    Source link

  • European Union and Mercosur bloc of South American nations sign landmark free trade agreement

    ASUNCIÓN, Paraguay — The European Union and the Mercosur bloc of South American countries formally signed a long-sought landmark free trade agreement on Saturday, capping more than a quarter-century of torturous negotiations to strengthen commercial ties in the face of rising protectionism and trade tensions around the world.

    The signing ceremony in Paraguay’s humid capital of Asunción marks a major geopolitical victory for the EU in an age of American tariffs and surging Chinese exports, expanding the bloc’s foothold in a resource-rich region increasingly contested by Washington and Beijing.

    It also sends a message that South America keeps diverse trade and diplomatic relations even as U.S. President Donald Trump declares dominance in the Western Hemisphere.

    European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who head’s the EU’s executive branch, said that “the geopolitical importance of this agreement cannot be overstated” amid revived skepticism about the benefits of free trade.

    “We choose fair trade over tariffs. We choose a productive long-term partnership over isolation,” she declared at the ceremony attended by the presidents of Mercosur members Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay, and by the foreign minister of the trading bloc’s biggest economy, Brazil.

    “We will join forces like never before, because we believe that this is the best way to make our people and our countries prosper.”

    In creating one of the world’s largest free trade zones, the accord — pushed by South America’s renowned cattle-raising countries and Europe’s industrial sectors craving new markets for cars and machines — brings together a market of more than 700 million consumers that accounts for a quarter of global gross domestic product.

    After decades of delay, the politically explosive deal still must clear one final hurdle: ratification by the European Parliament. Powerful protectionist lobbies on both sides of the Atlantic, particularly European farmers scared of the possible dumping of cheap South American agricultural imports, have long sought to scupper the agreement and could still stall its implementation.

    Although the accord eliminates more than 90% tariffs on goods and services between the European and Mercosur markets, some tariffs will progressively be cut over 10-15 years and key farm products like beef will be limited by strict quotas in a bid to assuage European farmers’ fears.

    Those quotas, as well as safeguard measures and generous EU subsidies to cash-strapped farmers, pushed agricultural powerhouse Italy across the line earlier this month. France, however, remains opposed to the accord.

    Source link

  • Brazil’s Lula hails historic EU-Mercosur deal ahead of no-show at its signing

    RIO DE JANEIRO — Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Friday celebrated the expected signing of the free trade agreement between the EU and four South American countries the following day at a ceremony that Lula will not attend.

    This is the first major trade agreement for Mercosur, which includes the region’s two biggest economies, Brazil and Argentina, along with Paraguay and Uruguay. The two blocs are expected to formally sign their quarter-century-in-the-making trade pact this Saturday at a ceremony in Paraguay. Bolivia, the newest Mercosur member, was not involved in negotiations but can join the agreement in the coming years.

    While local media reported that Argentina’s Javier Milei and Uruguay’s Yamandú Orsi will be present at the ceremony hosted by Paraguay’s Santiago Peña, Lula decided not to make the trip to the capital Asuncion.

    Instead, the Brazilian leader will be represented by Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira.

    That caused some surprise, in light of Lula’s energetic efforts in favor of the deal, particularly since returning to Brazil’s presidency in 2023 for a third, nonconsecutive term. Experts say the move may hint at Lula’s disappointment the deal was not signed in December, when Brazil had the rotating presidency of Mercosur.

    In Rio, Lula again pointed to how long the negotiations had taken.

    “It was more than 25 years of suffering and attempts to get a deal,” Lula said during a short statement to the press at Itamaraty Palace in downtown Rio alongside von der Leyen.

    But he hailed the historic nature of the pact.

    “Tomorrow in Asuncion, we will make history by creating one of the world’s largest free trade areas, bringing together some 720 million people and a GDP of over $22 trillion,” he said.

    The European Commission’s president paid warm tribute to Lula for his efforts in making the deal happen.

    “The political leadership, the personal commitment and passion that you have shown in the last weeks and months, dear Lula, are truly second to none,” said von der Leyen.

    In a statement ahead of von der Leyen and European Council President António Costa’s trip to South America, the European Council also said that the latest Brazilian presidency of Mercosur was crucial to advance negotiations, paving the way to its signature in Paraguay.

    The significance of creating one of the world’s largest free-trade zones while U.S. President Donald Trump yanks the United States out of the international economy is not lost on the signatories.

    “This is the power of partnership and openness. This is the power of friendship and understanding between peoples and regions across oceans,” von der Leyen said. “And this is how we create real prosperity — prosperity that is shared. Because, we agree, that international trade is not a zero-sum game.”

    The victory for the EU and Mercosur comes at the expense of the U.S. and China, experts say, as Trump aggressively asserts American authority in the resource-rich region and Beijing uses its massive trade and loans to build influence.

    The accord grants South American nations, renowned for their fertile land and skilled farmers, increased access at a preferential tax rate to Europe’s vast market for agricultural goods.

    Apex, a Brazilian government investment agency, estimates that EU-bound agricultural exports like instant coffee, poultry and orange juice will rake in $7 billion in coming years.

    But Lula on Friday warned that Mercosur would not limit itself to the “eternal role” of commodity exporters. “We want to produce and sell industrial goods with higher added value,” he said.

    Flavia Loss, an international relations professor at Foundation School of Sociology and Politics in Sao Paulo, said that Lula’s absence on Saturday may be retaliation for the delay — another sign that Brazil and Mercosur are seeking equal terms with the EU.

    “I see Lula’s absence as signaling: ‘The deal is important but we’re not going to change everything for them,’” Loss said.

    While the deal is asymmetrical and undoubtedly economically favorable to the European Union, politically the agreement is beneficial for both parties, said Roberto Goulart Menezes, an international relations professor at the University of Brasilia.

    For the European Union, which is under pressure amid Trump’s threats to seize control of Greenland, the deal shows that the group of countries is betting on the diversification of its partners and multilateralism, Goulart said, in a symbolic rebuke of Trump’s MAGA logic.

    “And for Mercosur, it illustrates that the bloc is relevant, despite accusations of being insignificant and on its last legs.”

    Source link

  • Lawmakers propose $2.5B agency to boost production of rare earths

    WASHINGTON — A bipartisan group of lawmakers have proposed creating a new agency with $2.5 billion to spur production of rare earths and the other critical minerals, while the Trump administration has already taken aggressive actions to break China’s grip on the market for these materials that are crucial to high-tech products, including cellphones, electric vehicles, jet fighters and missiles.

    It’s too early to tell how the bill, if passed, could align with the White House’s policy, but whatever the approach, the U.S. is in a crunch to drastically reduce its reliance on China, after Beijing used its dominance of the critical minerals market to gain leverage in the trade war with Washington. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed to a one-year truce in October, by which Beijing would continue to export critical minerals while the U.S. would ease its export controls of U.S. technology on China.

    The Pentagon has shelled out nearly $5 billion over the past year to help ensure its access to the materials after the trade war laid bare just how beholden the U.S. is to China, which processes more than 90% of the world’s critical minerals. To break Beijing’s chokehold, the U.S. government is taking equity stakes in a handful of critical mineral companies and in some cases guaranteeing the price of some commodities using an approach that seems more likely to come out of China’s playbook instead of a Republican administration.

    The bill that Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., and Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., introduced Thursday would favor a more market-based approach by setting up the independent body charged with building a stockpile of critical minerals and related products, stabilizing prices, and encouraging domestic and allied production to help ensure stable supply not only for the military but also the broader economy and manufacturers.

    Shaheen called the legislation “a historic investment” to make the U.S. economy more resilient against China’s dominance that she said has left the U.S. vulnerable to economic coercion. Young said creating the new reserve is “a much-needed, aggressive step to protect our national and economic security.”

    When Trump imposed widespread tariffs last spring, Beijing fought back not only with tit-for-tat tariffs but severe restrictions on the export of critical minerals, forcing Washington to back down and eventually agree to the truce when the leaders met in South Korea.

    On Monday, in his speech at SpaceX, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth revealed that the Pentagon has in the past five months alone “deployed over $4.5 billion in capital commitments” to close six critical minerals deals that will “help free the United States from market manipulation.”

    One of the deals involves a $150 million of preferred equity by the Pentagon in Atlantic Alumina Co. to save the country’s last alumina refinery and build its first large-scale gallium production facility in Louisiana.

    Last year, the Pentagon announced it would buy $400 million of preferred stock in MP Materials, which owns the country’s only operational rare earths mine at Mountain Pass, California, and entered into a $1.4-billion joint partnership with ReElement Technologies Corp. to build up a domestic supply chain for rare earth magnets.

    The drastic move by the U.S. government to take equity stakes has prompted some analysts to observe that Washington is pivoting to some form of state capitalism to compete with Beijing.

    “Despite the dangers of political interference, the strategic logic is compelling,” wrote Elly Rostoum, a senior fellow at the Washington-based research institute Center for European Policy Analysis. She suggested that the new model could be “a prudent way for the U.S. to ensure strategic autonomy and industrial sovereignty.”

    But companies across the industry are welcoming the intervention from Trump’s administration.

    “He is playing three-dimensional chess on critical minerals like no previous president has done. It’s about time too, given the military and strategic vulnerability we face by having to import so many of these fundamental building blocks of technology and national defense,” NioCorp’s Chief Communications Officer Jim Sims said. That company is trying to finish raising the money it needs to build a mine in southeast Nebraska.

    In addition to trying to boost domestic production, the Trump administration has sought to secure some of these crucial elements through allies. In October, Trump signed an $8.5 billion agreement with Australia to invest in mining there, and the president is now aggressively trying to take over Greenland in the hope of being able to one day extract rare earths from there.

    On Monday, finance ministers from the G7 nations huddled in Washington over their vulnerability in the critical mineral supply chains.

    U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who has led several rounds of trade negotiations with Beijing, urged attendees to increase their supply chain resiliency and thanked them for their willingness to work together “toward decisive action and lasting solutions,” according to a Treasury statement.

    The bill introduced on Thursday by Shaheen and Young would encourage production with both domestic and allied producers.

    Congress in the past several years has pushed for legislation to protect the U.S. military and civilian industry from Beijing’s chokehold. The issue became a pressing concern every time China turned to its proven tactics of either restricting the supply or turned to dumping extra critical minerals on the market to depress prices and drive any potential competitors out of business.

    The Biden administration sought to increase demand for critical minerals domestically by pushing for more electric vehicle and windmill production. But the Trump administration largely eliminated the incentives for those products and instead chose to focus on increasing critical minerals production directly.

    Most of those past efforts were on a much more limited scale than what the government has done in the past year, and they were largely abandoned after China relented and eased access to critical minerals.

    ___

    Funk reported from Omaha, Nebraska. AP writer Konstantin Toropin contributed to the report.

    Source link

  • Following Australia’s lead, Denmark plans to ban social media for children under 15

    COPENHAGEN, Denmark — As Australia began enforcing a world-first social media ban for children under 16 years old this week, Denmark is planning to follow its lead and severely restrict social media access for young people.

    The Danish government announced last month that it had secured an agreement by three governing coalition and two opposition parties in parliament to ban access to social media for anyone under the age of 15. Such a measure would be the most sweeping step yet by a European Union nation to limit use of social media among teens and children.

    The Danish government’s plans could become law as soon as mid-2026. The proposed measure would give some parents the right to let their children access social media from age 13, local media reported, but the ministry has not yet fully shared the plans.

    Many social media platforms already ban children younger than 13 from signing up, and a EU law requires Big Tech to put measures in place to protect young people from online risks and inappropriate content. But officials and experts say such restrictions don’t always work.

    Danish authorities have said that despite the restrictions, around 98% of Danish children under age 13 have profiles on at least one social media platform, and almost half of those under 10 years old do.

    The minister for digital affairs, Caroline Stage, who announced the proposed ban last month, said there is still a consultation process for the measure and several readings in parliament before it becomes law, perhaps by “mid to end of next year.”

    “In far too many years, we have given the social media platforms free play in the playing rooms of our children. There’s been no limits,” Stage said in an interview with The Associated Press last month.

    “When we go into the city at night, there are bouncers who are checking the age of young people to make sure that no one underage gets into a party that they’re not supposed to be in,” she added. “In the digital world, we don’t have any bouncers, and we definitely need that.”

    Under the new Australian law, Facebook, Instagram, Kick, Reddit, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, X and YouTube face fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars ($33 million) if they fail to take reasonable steps to remove accounts of Australian children younger than 16.

    Some students say they are worried that similar strict laws in Denmark would mean they will lose touch with their virtual communities.

    “I myself have some friends that I only know from online, and if I wasn’t fifteen yet, I wouldn’t be able to talk with those friends,” 15-year-old student Ronja Zander, who uses Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok, told the AP.

    Copenhagen high school student Chloé Courage Fjelstrup-Matthisen, 14, said she is aware of the negative impact social media can have, from cyberbullying to seeing graphic content. She said she saw video of a man being shot several months ago.

    “The video was on social media everywhere and I just went to school and then I saw it,” she said.

    Line Pedersen, a mother from Nykøbing in Denmark, said she believed the plans were a good idea.

    “I think that we didn’t really realize what we were doing when we gave our children the telephone and social media from when they were eight, 10 years old,” she said. “I don’t quite think that the young people know what’s normal, what’s not normal.”

    Danish officials are yet to share how exactly the proposed ban would be enforced and which social media platforms would be affected.

    However, a new “digital evidence” app, announced by the Digital Affairs Ministry last month and expected to launch next spring, will likely form the backbone of the Danish plans. The app will display an age certificate to ensure users comply with social media age limits, the ministry said.

    “One thing is what they’re saying and another thing is what they’re doing or not doing,” Stage said, referring to social media platforms. “And that’s why we have to do something politically.”

    Some experts say restrictions, such as the ban planned by Denmark, don’t always work and they may also infringe on the rights of children and teenagers.

    “To me, the greatest challenge is actually the democratic rights of these children. I think it’s sad that it’s not taken more into consideration,” said Anne Mette Thorhauge, an associate professor at the University of Copenhagen.

    “Social media, to many children, is what broadcast media was to my generation,” she added. “It was a way of connecting to society.”

    Currently, the EU’s Digital Services Act, which took effect two years ago, requires social media platforms to ensure there are measures including parental controls and age verification tools before young users can access the apps.

    EU officials have acknowledged that enforcing the regulations aiming at protecting children online has proven challenging because it requires cooperation between member states and many resources.

    Denmark is among several countries that have indicated they plan to follow in Australia’s steps. The Southeast Asian country of Malaysia is expected to ban social media account s for people under the age of 16 starting at the beginning of next year, and Norway is also taking steps to restrict social media access for children and teens.

    China — which manufacturers many of the world’s digital devices — has set limits on online gaming time and smartphone time for kids.

    Source link

  • UN human rights chief says US strikes on alleged drug boats are ‘unacceptable’

    GENEVA — The U.N. human rights chief said Friday that U.S. military strikes against boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean allegedly carrying illegal drugs from South America are “unacceptable” and must stop.

    The U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk called for an investigation into the strikes, in what appeared to mark the first such condemnation of its kind from a United Nations organization.

    Ravina Shamdasani, a spokeswoman for Türk’s office, relayed his message on Friday at a regular U.N. briefing: “These attacks and their mounting human cost are unacceptable. The U.S. must halt such attacks and take all measures necessary to prevent the extrajudicial killing of people aboard these boats.”

    She said Türk believed “airstrikes by the United States of America on boats in the Caribbean and in the Pacific violate international human rights law.”

    President Donald Trump has justified the attacks on the boats as a necessary escalation to stem the flow of drugs into the United States, but the campaign against drug cartels has been divisive among countries in the region.

    U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Wednesday announced the latest U.S. military strike in the campaign, against a boat he said was carrying drugs in the eastern Pacific Ocean. All four people aboard were killed. It was the 14th strike since the campaign began in early September, while the death toll has grown to at least 61.

    Shamdasani noted the U.S. explanations of the efforts as an anti-drug and counter-terrorism campaign, but said countries have long agreed that the fight against illicit drug trafficking is a law-enforcement matter governed by “careful limits” placed on the use of lethal force.

    Intentional use of lethal force is allowed only as a last resort against someone representing “an imminent threat to life,” she said. “Otherwise, it would amount to a violation of the right of life and constitute extrajudicial killings.”

    The strikes are taking place “outside the context” of armed conflict or active hostilities, Shamdasani said.

    Source link

  • China’s rare earth export delay offers US a chance to weaken Beijing’s grip on the market

    China’s promise to delay its newest restrictions on the export of the rare earths that are crucial to many high-tech products for one year as part of a trade agreement President Donald Trump secured creates an opportunity for the U.S. and its allies to bolster their own production and processing capabilities. But it will be hard to undercut China’s stranglehold on the market.

    The restrictions China imposed on rare earths this year have been a key issue in the trade talks between Beijing and Washington. Trump responded angrily to China’s latest rules with a threat to impose an additional 100% tariff on all Chinese imports, but he has since dropped that demand as part of this agreement.

    This week’s deal will delay the regulations that would have required foreign companies to get special approval to export items that contain even small traces of rare earths elements sourced from China even if those products were made elsewhere by foreign companies, but it doesn’t eliminate restrictions that were imposed in the spring after Trump imposed his tariffs.

    These critical minerals are needed in a broad range of products, from jet engines, radar systems, electric vehicles and robots to consumer electronics including laptops and phones. China accounts for nearly 70% of the world’s rare earths mining. It also controls roughly 90% of global rare earths processing.

    Neha Mukherjee, a rare earths analyst at Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, said the one-year delay in China’s new rare earth export controls that were announced earlier this month provides some short-term relief that will allow exports to return to a more normal level, but it doesn’t change the broader strategic picture, and it’s important for America and its allies to continue investing in the industry.

    “This move appears more tactical than structural, a pause to stabilize trade relations with the U.S. rather than a policy reversal,” Mukherjee said. “This is a temporary window for the U.S. and allies to accelerate diversification before controls likely return.”

    The White House has made it a priority to revive and expand the domestic critical minerals industry while also seeking supplies of these elements from allies. The Pentagon agreed to invest $400 million in rare-earth producer MP Materials and promised to ensure every magnet made at its massive new plant is bought and set a minimum price for its neodymium and praseodymium products for a decade.

    Ian Lange, who is an economics professor who focuses on rare earths at the Colorado School of Mines, said he thinks the U.S. and its allies can make significant progress in a year’s time to lessen China’s dominance of the rare earths market.

    There are a number of promising efforts already underway. Noveon will continue to produce rare earth magnets at its plant in Texas, and MP Materials and USA Rare Earth are both scheduled to begin producing magnets at their plants over the next year. And starting next year MP also plans to begin processing the heavy rare earths China had restricted in the spring at the only operating U.S. rare earths mine in Mountain Pass, California.

    And Lange said that other efforts to recycle rare earths and begin producing them as byproducts at existing steel and zirconium mines may also start to pay off. The United States’ recent agreement with Australia will also help provide additional materials to counter China.

    China has shown little sign of being willing to allow rare earth exports to defense contractors, which is concerning given the national security implications. But military demand for rare earths is relatively small, so America might be able to supply its needs by prioritizing rare earths from other sources for use in fighter jets, guided missiles and nuclear submarines.

    Industry executives have said this needs to be the “Manhattan Project moment” for rare earths if the United States is ever to break China’s grip over them.

    “We’re moving into overtime with China and they currently have the ball on our 10-yard line. Our best defensive move is to tie together our global refining and supply partnerships with allies and swiftly invest in innovation in the United States,” said Wade Senti, president of the U.S. permanent magnet company AML.

    Noveon Magnetics CEO Scott Dunn said the details of “how China implements this suspension will matter greatly, and with the deal limited to one year, it’s clear the U.S. must use this window to strengthen domestic capabilities and reduce long-term exposure to geopolitical risk.”

    Lange said he is optimistic overall because the United States isn’t starting from zero, and if these efforts continue at their current pace, America should be much better off in a year even if some of the things the government is investing in will take several years to become a reality.

    “Because in a year, we don’t really care what they do. We’ve got an independent supply chain. At least I don’t think we’re too far from that,” Lange said.

    ___

    Associated Press writer Didi Tang contributed to this report from Washington.

    Source link

  • China pitches itself as alternative to US protectionism after signing expanded ASEAN free trade pact

    KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia — China signed an expanded version of a free trade agreement Tuesday with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, with Chinese Premier Li Qiang pitching expanded economic ties with his country as an alternative to the protectionist policies of U.S. President Donald Trump.

    Li Qiang told an ASEAN-China summit meeting after the signing that closer cooperation could help overcome global economic uncertainties. He said “pursuing confrontation instead of solidarity brings no benefit” in the face of economic coercion and bullying, in a swipe at the U.S.

    “Unity is strength,” he said, citing remarks by President Xi Jinping made during a Southeast Asia visit earlier this year.

    His remarks were met with skepticism by Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., whose country has clashed with China over competing claims in the South China Sea, as have other ASEAN nations.

    Marcos welcomed the expanded trade pact, but stressed that “this cooperation cannot exist alongside coercion.”

    The signing of the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area 3.0 came on the final day of the annual ASEAN summit and related meetings and was witnessed by Li Qiang and Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, who is serving as ASEAN chair this year.

    It’s the third revision of the long-standing agreement, which was first signed in 2002 and came into force in 2010. The free trade area covers a combined market of more than 2 billion people and lowers tariffs on goods and boosting flows of services and investment.

    Two-way trade has surged from $235.5 billion in 2010 to nearly $1 trillion last year. ASEAN and China are each other’s top trading partners.

    Li stressed “mutual reliance” between China and ASEAN members Brunei, Cambodia, East Timor, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, calling them “good neighbors and good brothers that are close in geography, culture and sentiment.”

    “Unilateralism and protectionism have seriously impacted the global economic and trade order, while external forces are increasing their interference in the region — many countries have been unreasonably subjected to high tariffs,” he said.

    “By relying on each other and coordinating our actions, we can safeguard our legitimate rights and interests.”

    Southeast Asian political analyst Bridget Welsh said the upgraded pact would benefit both sides, especially in the areas of supply chains and sustainability.

    “It also speaks to a global reality that non-U.S. countries are coming together to strengthen trade relationships for their prosperity as a recoupling with the U.S. is ongoing,” she said,

    The prospect of a deepening trade conflict between China and the U.S. has risked weakening economic growth worldwide.

    Trump at the ASEAN summit on Sunday announced new economic details with Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam, though all countries are still subject to new tariffs he has brought in.

    Anwar stressed at the ASEAN meeting with China that the bloc seeks friendly relations with all countries.

    “The day before we were with President Donald Trump of the United States of America, and today we are back with China,” he said. “And that reflects ASEAN centrality … This is what we consider steady engagement that fosters trust that enables us to work through challenges together.”

    There were signs that tensions between the U.S. and China were cooling ahead of a planned meeting between Trump and Xi, which is expected to take place in South Korea on Thursday. Top negotiators from each country said a trade deal was coming together, which could prevent a potentially damaging confrontation between the world’s two largest economies.

    Officials said the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area 3.0 is expected to broaden integration across the region by covering new areas such as digital trade, the green economy, sustainability and support for small and medium-sized enterprises, which make up the majority of ASEAN businesses. The agreement is designed to make trade benefits more accessible, improve market entry for smaller players, streamline non-tariff procedures and lower regulatory barriers.

    Marcos said the pact could help modernize trade practices and enable both sides to better respond to emerging economic challenges, but urged China to “commit to cooperation and meaningful engagement, especially in the South China Sea.”

    Marcos said it was “regrettable” that Philippine vessels and aircraft continue to face “dangerous actions and harassment” in the South China Sea. He reiterated Manila’s objections to Beijing’s plan to establish a “nature reserve” over a hotly disputed shoal in the area.

    “Actions like these cannot hide under the veneer of marine environmental protection because they have no legal basis or effect, blatantly disregard international law, and infringe on the Philippines’ sovereignty,” he said. Still, Marcos added that Manila would continue to engage constructively with China to manage differences.

    ASEAN members Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei — along with Taiwan — have overlapping claims with China, which asserts sovereignty over nearly the entire South China Sea. Chinese and Philippine vessels have repeatedly clashed in the vital sea trade route.

    Marcos has vowed to accelerate the conclusion of a Code of Conduct to govern behavior in the disputed waters when the Philippines assumes the ASEAN chairmanship next year.

    In Beijing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiaku on Monday accused the Philippines of “deliberate infringements and provocations at sea,” blaming Manila for escalating tensions.

    Welsh, the analyst, said regional officials treat the South China Sea dispute as a separate track from security ties and don’t expect it to impact economic ties with China.

    Source link

  • Vance optimistic about Gaza ceasefire but notes ‘very hard’ work to come

    KIRYAT GAT, Israel — U.S. Vice President JD Vance on Tuesday called progress in Gaza’s fragile ceasefire better than anticipated but acknowledged during an Israel visit the challenges that remain, from disarming Hamas to rebuilding a land devastated by two years of war.

    Vance noted flareups of violence in recent days but said the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas that began on Oct. 10 is going “better than I expected.” The Trump administration’s Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, added that “we are exceeding where we thought we would be at this time.”


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96J G:D:E65 2 ?6H 46?E6C 😕 xDC26= 7@C 4:G:=:2? 2?5 >:=:E2CJ 4@@A6C2E:@? 2D BF6DE:@?D C6>2:? @G6C E96 =@?8E6C> A=2? 7@C A6246[ :?4=F5:?8 H96? 2?5 9@H 2? :?E6C?2E:@?2= D64FC:EJ 7@C46 H:== 56A=@J E@ v2K2 2?5 H9@ H:== 8@G6C? E96 E6CC:E@CJ 27E6C E96 H2C]k^Am

    kAm’2?46 EC:65 E@ 5@H?A=2J 2?J :562 E92E 9:D G:D:E — 9:D 7:CDE 2D G:46 AC6D:56?E — H2D FC86?E=J 2CC2?865 E@ <66A E96 462D67:C6 😕 A=246] w6 D2:5 96 766=D “4@?7:56?E E92E H6’C6 8@:?8 E@ 36 😕 2 A=246 H96C6 E9:D A6246 =2DED[” 3FE H2C?65 E92E :7 w2>2D 5@6D?’E 4@@A6C2E6[ :E H:== 36 “@3=:E6C2E65]”k^Am

    kAmy2C65 zFD9?6C[ &]$] !C6D:56?E s@?2=5 %CF>A’D D@?:?=2H 2?5 @?6 @7 E96 2C49:E64ED @7 E96 462D67:C6 28C66>6?E[ ?@E65 :ED 4@>A=6I:EJi “q@E9 D:56D 2C6 EC2?D:E:@?:?8 7C@> EH@ J62CD @7 G6CJ :?E6?D6 H2C72C6 E@ ?@H 2 A6246E:>6 A@DEFC6]”k^Am

    kAm’2?46 😀 6IA64E65 E@ DE2J 😕 E96 C68:@? F?E:= %9FCD52J 2?5 >66E H:E9 xDC26=: !C:>6 |:?:DE6C q6?;2>:? }6E2?J29F 2?5 @E96C @77:4:2=D]k^Am

    kAm~? %F6D52J[ }6E2?J29F 7:C65 9:D ?2E:@?2= D64FC:EJ 25G:D6C[ %K249: w2?683:[ 3FE 82G6 ?@ C62D@? 7@C E96 564:D:@?] xDC26=: >65:2 D2:5 w2?683: @AA@D65 E96 C6?6H2= @7 xDC26=’D v2K2 @776?D:G6 😕 |2C49[ 2?5 xDC26=’D 72:=65 2EE6>AE E@ 2DD2DD:?2E6 w2>2D’ =6256CD9:A 😕 2? 2:CDEC:<6 😕 “2E2C 😕 $6AE6>36C] x? 2 DE2E6>6?E[ w2?683: ?@E65 “E:>6D @7 5:D28C66>6?E” H:E9 }6E2?J29F]k^Am

    kAm{2E6 %F6D52J[ xDC26=’D >:=:E2CJ D2:5 E96 C6>2:?D @7 EH@ >@C6 v2K2 9@DE286D 925 366? C6EFC?65 E@ xDC26=[ H96C6 E96J H@F=5 36 :56?E:7:65]k^Am

    kAm$:?46 E96 462D67:C6 3682? ~4E] `_[ E96 C6>2:?D @7 `d 9@DE286D 92G6 366? C6EFC?65 E@ xDC26=] %9:CE66? @E96CD DE:== ?665 E@ 36 C64@G6C65 😕 v2K2 2?5 92?565 @G6C]k^Am

    kAmsFC:?8 9:D G:D:E %F6D52J E@ xDC26=[ ‘2?46 FC865 2 “=:EE=6 3:E @7 A2E:6?46” 2>:5 xDC26=: 7CFDEC2E:@? H:E9 w2>2D’ A246 @7 C6EFC?:?8 E96 9@DE286D]k^Am

    kAm“$@>6 @7 E96D6 9@DE286D 2C6 3FC:65 F?56C E9@FD2?5D @7 A@F?5D @7 CF33=6] $@>6 @7 E96 9@DE286D[ ?@3@5J 6G6? @HD H96C6 E96J 2C6[” ‘2?46 D2:5]k^Am

    kAmxDC26= 😀 C6=62D:?8 `d !2=6DE:?:2? 3@5:6D 7@C E96 C6>2:?D @7 6249 5625 9@DE286[ 244@C5:?8 E@ v2K2’D w62=E9 |:?:DECJ] xE D2:5 %F6D52J E92E xDC26= 925 D@ 72C EC2?D76CC65 `ed 3@5:6D D:?46 62C=:6C E9:D >@?E9]k^Am

    kAmpD 96 72465 ;@FC?2=:DED’ BF6DE:@?D @G6C E96 462D67:C6’D ?6IE DE6AD[ 96 D2:5 “2 =@E @7 E9:D H@C< 😀 G6CJ 92C5” 2?5 FC865 7=6I:3:=:EJ]k^Am

    kAm“~?46 H6’G6 8@E E@ 2 A@:?E H96C6 3@E9 E96 v2K2?D 2?5 @FC xDC26=: 7C:6?5D 42? 92G6 D@>6 >62DFC6 @7 D64FC:EJ[ E96? H6’== H@CCJ 23@FE H92E E96 =@?8E6C> 8@G6C?2?46 @7 v2K2 :D[” 96 D2:5] “{6E’D 7@4FD @? D64FC:EJ[ C63F:=5:?8[ 8:G:?8 A6@A=6 D@>6 7@@5 2?5 >65:4:?6]”k^Am

    kAmp=E9@F89 D@>6 a__ &]$] EC@@AD H6C6 C646?E=J D6?E E@ xDC26=[ ‘2?46 6>A92D:K65 E92E E96J H@F=5 ?@E 36 @? E96 8C@F?5 😕 v2K2] qFE 96 D2:5 @77:4:2=D 2C6 368:??:?8 E@ “4@?46AEF2=:K6 H92E E92E :?E6C?2E:@?2= D64FC:EJ 7@C46 H@F=5 =@@< =:<6” 7@C E96 E6CC:E@CJ]k^Am

    kAmw6 >6?E:@?65 %FC<6J 2?5 x?5@?6D:2 2D 4@F?EC:6D 6IA64E65 E@ A2CE:4:A2E6] %96 7=28D @7 y@C52?[ v6C>2?J[ qC:E2:? 2?5 s6?>2C< H6C6 @? E96 DE286 H96C6 96 DA@<6] qC:E2:? D2:5 =2E6 %F6D52J :E H@F=5 D6?5 2 D>2== 4@?E:?86?E @7 >:=:E2CJ @77:46CD E@ xDC26= E@ 2DD:DE 😕 >@?:E@C:?8 E96 462D67:C6]k^Am

    kAm(9:=6 E96 462D67:C6 92D 366? E6DE65 3J 7:89E:?8 2?5 >FEF2= 244FD2E:@?D @7 G:@=2E:@?D[ 3@E9 xDC26= 2?5 w2>2D 92G6 D2:5 E96J 2C6 4@>>:EE65 E@ E96 562=]k^Am

    kAmx?E6C?2E:@?2= @C82?:K2E:@?D D2:5 E96J H6C6 D42=:?8 FA 9F>2?:E2C:2? 2:5 6?E6C:?8 v2K2[ H9:=6 w2>2D=65 D64FC:EJ 7@C46D 4C24<65 5@H? 282:?DE H92E :E 42==65 AC:46 8@F8:?8 3J AC:G2E6 >6C492?ED]k^Am

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    By RENATA BRITO, MELANIE LIDMAN and SAMY MAGDY – Associated Press

    Source link

  • US and Australia sign critical-minerals agreement as a way to counter China

    WASHINGTON — WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese signed a critical-minerals deal at the White House on Monday as the U.S. eyes the continent’s rich rare-earth resources at a time when China is imposing tougher rules on exporting its own critical minerals abroad.

    The two leaders described the agreement as an $8.5 billion deal between the allies. Trump said it had been negotiated over several months.

    “In about a year from now we’ll have so much critical mineral and rare earth that you won’t know what to do with them,” said Trump, a Republican, boasting about the deal. “They’ll be worth $2.”

    Albanese added that the agreement takes the U.S.-Australia relationship “to the next level.”

    Earlier this month, Beijing announced that it will require foreign companies to get approval from the Chinese government to export magnets containing even trace amounts of rare-earth materials that originated from China or were produced with Chinese technology. The Trump administration says this gives China broad power over the global economy by controlling the tech supply chain.

    “Australia is really, really going to be helpful in the effort to take the global economy and make it less risky, less exposed to the kind of rare earth extortion that we’re seeing from the Chinese,” Kevin Hassett, the director of the White House’s National Economic Council, told reporters Monday morning ahead of Trump’s meeting with Albanese.

    Hassett noted that Australia has one of the best mining economies in the world, while praising its refiners and its abundance of rare earth resources. Among the Australian officials accompanying Albanese are ministers overseeing resources and industry and science, and Australia has dozens of critical minerals sought by the U.S. because they are needed in everything from fighter jets and electric vehicles to laptops and phones.

    The agreement could have an immediate impact on rare earth supplies in the United States if American companies can secure some of what Australian mines are already producing, although it will take years — if not decades — to develop enough of a supply of rare earths outside of China to reduce its dominance.

    Pini Althaus, who founded USA Rare Earth back in 2019 and is now working to develop new mines in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan as CEO of Cove Capital, said it will be crucial that the contracts to buy materials from Australian mines include price floors, similar to what the U.S. government promised MP Materials this summer, to protect against China manipulating prices.

    For decades, China has used the tactic of dumping excess critical minerals onto the market to drive prices down to force mining companies in the rest of the world out of business to eliminate any competition.

    “I think taking away that arrow in the quiver of China to manipulate pricing is an absolute crucial first step in Australia and the West being able to develop critical minerals projects to meet our supply chain demands,” said Althaus, who has spent nearly a quarter-century in the mining business.

    The agreement underscores how the U.S. is using its global allies to counter China, especially as it weaponizes its traditional dominance in rare earth materials. Top Trump officials have used the tactics from Beijing as a rallying cry for the U.S. and its allies to work together to try to minimize China’s influence.

    “China is a command-and-control economy, and we and our allies will neither be commanded nor controlled,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said last week. “They are a state economy and we are not going to let a group of bureaucrats in Beijing try to manage the global supply chains.”

    The level of investment outlined in the agreement shows how serious the two nations are about addressing the problem.

    “The U.S. and Australia will invest over $3 billion in joint critical minerals projects within six months. That’s a somewhat unprecedented speed of capital injection,” said Gracelin Baskaran, director of the Critical Minerals Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.

    But Althaus cautioned that Australia can’t supply everything the United States needs, so it is crucial that American continues to invest in the long-term effort to develop other mining and processing projects both at home and in friendly nations. He said central Asia might be one of the most promising places to invest because the region has significant rare earth reserves, and the Soviet Union already did some of the initial development work when it controlled that territory. That could cut years off the time it will take to build a new mine there.

    “Keep in mind, China has almost a 40-year head start on us,” Althaus said. “We have at least a couple of decades to catch up to China in terms of being able to meet our own supply chain requirements.”

    Albanese’s visit comes just before Trump is planning to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping in South Korea later this month.

    Another topic of discussion was AUKUS, a security pact with Australia, the U.S. and the United Kingdom that was signed during U.S. President Joe Biden’s Democratic administration.

    Trump noted Monday that AUKUS was established “a while ago” but that the agreement now is “moving along very rapidly, very well.” Albanese said that “our defense and security partnership with AUKUS is so important for us.”

    John Phelan, the Navy secretary, said that the U.S. wants to take the original AUKUS framework and improve it for the three signatory countries while clarifying “some of the ambiguity” in it.

    “So it should be a win-win for everybody,” Phelan said.

    In Beijing, the Chinese government reiterated its opposition to the pact, which would help Australia obtain and build nuclear-powered submarines.

    “We always oppose creating bloc confrontation, increasing nuclear proliferation risks and intensifying an arms race,” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said Tuesday.

    The center-left Albanese was reelected in May and suggested shortly after his win that his party increased its majority by not modeling itself on Trumpism.

    “Australians have chosen to face global challenges the Australian way, looking after each other while building for the future,” Albanese told supporters during his victory speech.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Josh Funk, Didi Tang and Ken Moritsugu in Beijing contributed to this report.

    Source link

  • Ultraconservative Sanae Takaichi on track to become Japan’s first female prime minister

    TOKYO — TOKYO (AP) — Sanae Takaichi is on track to become Japan’s first female prime minister, after her governing party secured a crucial coalition partner.

    Takaichi, 64, is set to replace Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba in Tuesday’s parliamentary vote. If she’s successful, it would end Japan’s three-month political vacuum and wrangling since the coalition’s loss in the July parliamentary election.

    The moderate centrist Komeito party had split from the ruling Liberal Democratic Party after a 26-year-long coalition. It came just days after Takaichi’s election as LDP leader, and forced her into a desperate search for a new coalition partner to secure votes so that she can become prime minister.

    The Buddhist-backed Komeito left after raising concerns about Takaichi’s ultraconservative politics and the LDP’s lax response to corruption scandals that led to the party’s consecutive election defeats and loss of majority in both houses.

    While the leaders of the country’s top three opposition parties failed to unite to seek a change of government, Takaichi went for a quick fix by teaming up with the most conservative of them: the Osaka-based Ishin no Kai, or Japan Innovation Party. The two parties on Monday signed a coalition agreement that includes joint policy goals on diplomacy, security and energy.

    The fragile new coalition, still a minority in the legislature, would need cooperation from other opposition groups to pass any legislation.

    Big diplomatic tests await the government within days — talks with U.S. President Donald Trump and regional summits. At home, Takaichi needs to quickly tackle rising prices and come up with economic stimulus measures to appease the frustrated public.

    An admirer of former U.K. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, Takaichi’s breaking of the glass ceiling makes history in a country whose gender equality ranks poorly internationally.

    But many women aren’t celebrating, and some see her impending premiership as a setback.

    “The prospect of a first female prime minister doesn’t make me happy,” sociologist Chizuko Ueno posted on X. Ueno said that Takaichi’s leadership would elevate Japan’s gender equality ranking, but “that doesn’t mean Japanese politics becomes kinder to women.”

    Takaichi, an ultraconservative star of her male-dominated party, is among those who have stonewalled measures for women’s advancement. Takaichi supports the imperial family’s male-only succession, opposes same-sex marriage and a revision to the civil law allowing separate last names for married couples, so women don’t get pressured into abandoning theirs.

    “Ms. Takaichi’s policies are extremely hawkish and I doubt she would consider policies to recognize diversity,” said Chiyako Sato, a political commentator and senior writer for the Mainichi newspaper.

    If she’s successful in the parliamentary vote, Takaichi would immediately launch her Cabinet on Tuesday and make a policy speech later in the week.

    A protege of assassinated former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, Takaichi is expected to emulate his economic and security policies.

    She would have only a few days to prepare for diplomatic talks at regional summits, and with Trump in between. She is expected to keep ties with China and South Korea stable, despite concerns over her revisionist views on wartime history and past visits to the Yasukuni Shrine.

    The shrine honors Japan’s 2.5 million war dead, including convicted war criminals. Victims of Japanese aggression, especially China and the Koreas, see visits to the shrine as a lack of remorse about Japan’s wartime past.

    Takaichi supports a stronger military, currently undergoing a five-year buildup with the annual defense budget doubled to 2% of gross domestic product by 2027. Trump is expected to demand that Japan increase its military spending to NATO targets of 5% of GDP, and purchase more U.S. weapons.

    Takaichi also needs to follow up on Japan’s pledge of investing $550 billion in the U.S. as part of a U.S. tariff deal.

    Her policy plans have focused on short-term measures such as battling rising prices and improving salaries and subsidies, as well as restrictions against a growing foreign population as Japan faces a rise in xenophobia. Takaichi hasn’t addressed bigger issues like demographic challenges.

    Takaichi’s mission is to regain conservative votes by pushing the party further to the right. The LDP’s coalition with the right-wing JIP may fit Takaichi’s view.

    On Friday, Takaichi sent a religious ornament instead of going to the Yasukuni Shrine, apparently to avoid a diplomatic dispute with Beijing and Seoul. She also reached out to smaller opposition groups, including the far-right Sanseito, apparently in a bid to bring her coalition closer to securing a majority in parliament.

    “There is no room for Takaichi to show her true colors. All she can do is cooperate per policy,” said Masato Kamikubo, a Ritsumeikan University political science professor. “It’s a pathetic situation.”

    Many observers expect a Takaichi government wouldn’t last long and an early election may follow this year.

    Experts also raised concerns about how Takaichi, a fiscal expansionist, can coordinate economic policies with Ishin’s fiscal conservative views.

    “The era of LDP domination is over and we are entering the era of multiparty politics. The question is how to form a coalition,” Sato said, noting a similar trend in Europe. “We need to find a Japanese way of forming a coalition and a stable government.”

    Source link

  • A war on drugs or a war on terror? Trump’s military pressure on Venezuela blurs the lines

    WASHINGTON — WASHINGTON (AP) — Under President Donald Trump, the drug war is looking a lot like the war on terror.

    To support strikes against Latin American gangs and drug cartels, the Trump administration is relying on a legal argument that gained traction after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, which allowed U.S. authorities to use lethal force against al-Qaida combatants who attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

    The criminal groups now being targeted by U.S. strikes are a very different foe, however, spawned in the prisons of Venezuela, and fueled not by anti-Western ideology but by drug trafficking and other illicit enterprises.

    Trump’s use of overwhelming military force to combat such groups and authorization of covert action inside Venezuela, possibly to oust President Nicolás Maduro, stretches the bounds of international law, legal scholars say. It comes as Trump expands the military’s domestic role, deploying the National Guard to U.S. cities and saying he’s open to invoking the nearly 150-year-old Insurrection Act, which allows for military deployment in only exceptional instances of civil unrest.

    So far, the military has killed at least 27 people in five strikes on boats that the White House said were carrying drugs.

    The strikes — the most recent came Tuesday, in which the U.S. killed six people — have occurred without any legal investigation or a traditional declaration of war from Congress. That raises questions about the justifications for Trump’s actions and the impact they could have on diplomatic relations with Latin American nations who recall with deep resentment repeated U.S. military interventions during the Cold War.

    The U.S. intelligence community has also disputed Trump’s central claim that Maduro’s administration is working with the Tren de Aragua gang and orchestrating drug trafficking and illegal immigration into the U.S.

    Trump’s assertion that the United States is engaged in an “armed conflict” with drug cartels is based on the same legal authority used by the Bush administration when it declared a war on terror after the Sept. 11 attacks. That includes the ability to capture and detain combatants and to use lethal force to take out their leadership.

    But the United Nations charter specifically forbids the use of force except in self-defense.

    “You just can’t call something war to give yourself war powers,” said Claire Finkelstein, a professor of national security law at the University of Pennsylvania. “However frustrated we may be with the means and results of law enforcement efforts to combat the flow of drugs, it makes a mockery of international law to suggest we are in a noninternational armed conflict with cartels.”

    After 9/11, it was clear that al-Qaida was actively plotting additional attacks designed to kill civilians. But the cartels’ main ambition is selling dope. And that, while harmful to American security overall, is a dubious justification for invoking war powers, said Geoffrey Corn, a Texas Tech law professor who previously served as the Army’s senior adviser for law-of-war issues.

    “This is the government, in my humble opinion, wanting to invoke war powers for a lot of reasons” — including political ones, Corn said.

    “Even if we assume there’s an armed conflict with Tren de Aragua, how do we know everyone in that boat was an enemy fighter?” he said. “I think Congress needs to know that.”

    Asked at the White House on Wednesday why the U.S. does not use the Coast Guard to stop the Venezuelan vessels and seize any drugs, Trump replied, “We have been doing that for 30 years and it has been totally ineffective.”

    The president also suggested the U.S. may strike targets inside Venezuela, a move that would significantly escalate tensions and the legal stakes. So far, the strikes have occurred in international waters beyond the jurisdiction of any single country.

    “We’ve almost totally stopped it by sea,” Trump said of flow of drugs. “Now we’ll stop it by land.”

    Trump was also asked about a New York Times report saying he had authorized a covert CIA operation in Venezuela. Trump, who has harshly criticized the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq that overthrew the government of Saddam Hussein, declined to say whether he had given the CIA authority to take out Maduro, saying it would be “ridiculous” to answer.

    Numerous U.S. laws and executive orders since the 1970s make it illegal to assassinate foreign officials. But in declaring the Venezuelans unlawful combatants, Trump may be seeking to sidestep those restrictions and return to an earlier era in which the United States — in places like Guatemala, Chile and Iran — regularly carried out covert regime change missions.

    “If you pose a threat, and are making war on the U.S., you’re not a protected person,” Finkelstein said.

    During Trump’s first term, Maduro was indicted on U.S. federal drug charges, including narcoterrorism and conspiracy to import cocaine. This year, the Justice Department doubled a reward for information leading to Maduro’s arrest to $50 million, accusing him of being “one of the largest narco-traffickers in the world.”

    But Trump’s focus on Venezuela overlooks a basic fact of the drug trade: The bulk of American overdose deaths are from fentanyl, which is transported by land from Mexico. And while Venezuela is a major drug transit zone, around 75% of the cocaine produced in Colombia, the world’s leader, is smuggled through the eastern Pacific Ocean, not the Caribbean.

    Under the Constitution, it must be Congress that declares war. So far, though, there has been little indication that Trump’s allies will push back on the president’s expansionist view of his own power to go after cartels the White House blames for tens of thousands of American overdose deaths each year.

    The GOP-controlled Senate recently voted down a war powers resolution sponsored by Democrats that would have required the president to seek authorization from Congress before further military strikes.

    Despite pressure even among some Republicans for a more complete account, the Trump administration has yet to provide underlying evidence to lawmakers proving that the boats targeted by the U.S. military were carrying narcotics, two U.S. officials familiar with the matter told The Associated Press. Independent Sen. Angus King of Maine said he and other members of the Senate Armed Services Committee in a classified briefing this month were also denied access to the Pentagon’s legal opinion about whether the strikes adhered to U.S. law.

    Legal pushback isn’t likely to sway the White House either. A Supreme Court decision arising from an attempt in 1973 by a Democratic congresswoman to sue the Pentagon to stop the spread of the Vietnam War to neighboring Laos and Cambodia set a high bar for any legal challenge of military orders, Finkelstein said.

    Meanwhile, relatives of the Venezuelans killed in the boat attacks face their own obstacles following several high court rulings narrowing the scope of foreign citizens to sue in the U.S.

    The military strikes took place in international waters, opening the door for the International Criminal Court to launch an investigation along the lines of its war crimes probes against Russia and Israel — which, like the United States, don’t recognize the court’s authority.

    But the Hague-based court has been consumed by a sexual misconduct probe that forced its chief prosecutor to step aside. U.S. sanctions over its indictment of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have also hindered its work.

    Source link

  • FACT FOCUS: With a truce in Israel, Trump now says he’s ended eight wars. His numbers are off

    As Israel and Hamas traded hostages and prisoners on Monday, taking a first step toward peace, U.S. President Donald Trump addressed the Knesset, Israel’s parliament, telling them he had ended his eighth war.

    “After so many years of unceasing war and endless danger, today the skies are calm. The guns are silent. The sirens are still. And the sun rises on a holy land that is finally at peace,” Trump said.

    He then upped the number of wars he claims to have ended in his first eight months in office, saying, “Yesterday I was saying seven, but now I can say eight.”

    But Trump’s claim is exaggerated. Much work remains before an end to the war between Israel and Hamas can be declared. That’s also true in other countries where Trump claims to have ended wars.

    Here’s a closer look:

    Israel and Hamas

    While the ceasefire and hostage deal is a major achievement, it is still an early and delicate moment in the path to a permanent end to the war, let alone a two state solution.

    The first steps of the agreement Trump brokered included the release of hostages in Gaza, the release of hundreds of Palestinian prisoners in Israel, a surge of humanitarian aid and a partial pullback by Israeli forces from Gaza’s main cities.

    But major elements remain to be worked out.

    After his stop in Israel, Trump gathered with other world leaders in Egypt for a “ Summit of Peace ” to discuss the ceasefire plan. Trump acknowledged that leaders had taken the “first steps to peace” and urged leaders to build on the breakthrough. Trump and other leaders signed a document that he said would “spell out a lot of rules and regulations and lots of other things, and it’s very comprehensive,” though details were not immediately available.

    The next phase of talks is expected to address disarming Hamas, creating a post-war government for Gaza, reconstruction, and the extent of Israel’s withdrawal from the territory. Trump’s plan also stipulates that regional and international partners will work to develop a new Palestinian security force.

    At least some, if not all, of those elements need to be worked out, and negotiations over those issues could break down. Trump envoy Steve Witkoff said on Monday that he and Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, were “already working” on implementation issues.

    Israel and Iran

    Trump is credited with ending the 12-day war.

    In June, Israel launched attacks on the heart of Iran’s nuclear program and military leadership, saying it wanted to stop Tehran from building a nuclear weapon. Iran has denied it was trying to do that.

    Trump negotiated a ceasefire after directing American warplanes to strike Iran’s Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites.

    Evelyn Farkas, executive director of Arizona State University’s McCain Institute, said that Trump should get credit for ending the war.

    “There’s always a chance it could flare up again if Iran restarts its nuclear weapons program, but nonetheless, they were engaged in a hot war with one another,” she said. “And it didn’t have any real end in sight before President Trump got involved and gave them an ultimatum.”

    Lawrence Haas, a senior fellow for U.S. foreign policy at the American Foreign Policy Council who is an expert on Israel-Iran tensions, agreed the U.S. was instrumental in securing the ceasefire. But he characterized it as a “temporary respite” from the ongoing “day-to-day cold war” between the two countries that often involves flare-ups.

    Egypt and Ethiopia

    This could be described as tensions at best, and peace efforts, which do not directly involve the United States, have stalled.

    The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam on the Blue Nile River has caused friction between Ethiopia, Egypt and Sudan since the power-generating project was announced more than a decade ago. In July, Ethiopia declared the project complete. It was inaugurated in September.

    Egypt and Sudan oppose the dam. Although the vast majority of the water that flows down the Nile originates in Ethiopia, Egyptian agriculture relies on the river almost entirely. Sudan fears flooding and wants to protect its own power-generating dams.

    During his first term, Trump tried to broker a deal between Ethiopia and Egypt. He could not get the countries to agree and suspended aid to Ethiopia over the dispute. In July, he posted on social media that he helped the “fight over the massive dam (and) there is peace at least for now.” But the disagreement persists, and negotiations between Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan have stalled.

    “It would be a gross overstatement to say that these countries are at war,” Haas said. “I mean, they’re just not.”

    India and Pakistan

    The April killing of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir pushed India and Pakistan closer to war than they had been in years, but a ceasefire was reached.

    Trump has claimed that the U.S. brokered the ceasefire, which he said came about in part because he offered trade concessions. Pakistan thanked Trump, recommending him for the Nobel Peace Prize. India has denied Trump’s claims, saying there was no conversation between the U.S. and India on trade in regards to the ceasefire.

    Although India played down the Trump administration’s role in the ceasefire, Haas and Farkas believe the U.S. deserves some credit for helping stop the fighting.

    “I think that President Trump played a constructive role from all accounts, but it may not have been decisive. And again, I’m not sure whether you would define that as a full-blown war,” Farkas said.

    Serbia and Kosovo

    The White House lists the conflict between Serbia and Kosovo as one Trump resolved. But there has been no threat of a war between the two neighbors during Trump’s second term or any significant contribution from the Republican president this year to improve relations.

    Kosovo is a former Serbian province that declared independence in 2008. Tensions have persisted since, but never to the point of war, mostly because NATO-led peacekeepers have been deployed in Kosovo, which has been recognized by more than 100 countries.

    During his first term, Trump negotiated a wide-ranging deal between the countries, but much of what was agreed on was never carried out.

    Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo

    Trump has played a key role in peace efforts between the African neighbors, but he is hardly alone and the conflict is far from over.

    Eastern Congo, rich in minerals, has been battered by fighting with more than 100 armed groups. The most potent is the M23 rebel group. It is backed by neighboring Rwanda, which claims that it is protecting its territorial interests and that some of those who participated in the 1994 Rwandan genocide fled to Congo and are working with the Congolese army.

    The Trump administration’s efforts paid off in June, when the Congolese and Rwandan foreign ministers signed a peace deal at the White House. The M23, however, was not directly involved in the U.S.-facilitated negotiations and said it would not abide by the terms of an agreement that did not involve it.

    The final step to peace was meant to be a Qatar-facilitated deal between Congo and M23 that would bring about a permanent ceasefire as well as a final agreement to be signed separately between Congo and Rwanda as facilitated by the administration. However, talks have stalled between the different parties amid setbacks, and deadly fighting continues in eastern Congo.

    Armenia and Azerbaijan

    In August, Trump hosted the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan at the White House, where they signed a deal aimed at ending a decades-long conflict. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan called the signed document a “significant milestone.” Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev hailed Trump for performing “a miracle.”

    The agreements were intended to reopen key transportation routes and reaffirm Armenia’s and Azerbaijan’s commitment to signing a peace treaty. The treaty’s text was initialed by the countries’ foreign ministers at that meeting, which indicated preliminary approval. But the two countries have yet to sign and ratify the deal.

    Armenia and Azerbaijan have been in a bitter conflict over territory since the early 1990s, when ethnic Armenian forces took control of the Karabakh province, known internationally as Nagorno-Karabakh, and nearby territories. In 2020, Azerbaijan’s military recaptured broad swaths of territory. Russia brokered a truce and deployed about 2,000 peacekeepers to the region.

    In September 2023, Azerbaijani forces launched a lightning blitz to retake remaining portions. The two countries have worked toward normalizing ties and signing a peace treaty ever since.

    Cambodia and Thailand

    Officials from Thailand and Cambodia credit Trump with pushing the Asian neighbors to agree to a ceasefire in this summer’s brief border conflict.

    Cambodia and Thailand clashed in the past over their shared border. The latest fighting began in July after a land mine explosion along the border wounded five Thai soldiers. Tensions had been growing since May, when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a confrontation that created a diplomatic rift and roiled Thai politics.

    Both countries agreed in late July to an unconditional ceasefire during a meeting in Malaysia.

    Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim pressed for the pact, but there was little headway until Trump intervened. Trump said on social media that he warned the Thai and Cambodian leaders that the U.S. would not move forward with trade agreements if the hostilities continued. Both countries faced economic difficulties and neither had reached tariff deals with the U.S., though most of their Southeast Asian neighbors had.

    According to Ken Lohatepanont, a political analyst and University of Michigan doctoral candidate, “President Trump’s decision to condition a successful conclusion to these talks on a ceasefire likely played a significant role in ensuring that both sides came to the negotiating table when they did.”

    ___

    Associated Press writers Michelle Price, Chinedu Asadu, Melissa Goldin, Jon Gambrell, Grant Peck, Dasha Litvinova, Fay Abuelgasim, Rajesh Roy, and Dusan Stojanovic contributed to this report. ___

    Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck.

    Source link

  • US strikes another boat accused of carrying drugs

    WASHINGTON — The United States struck another small boat accused of carrying drugs in the waters off Venezuela, killing six people, President Donald Trump said Tuesday.

    Those who died in the strike were aboard the vessel, and no U.S. forces were harmed, the Republican president said in a social media post. It’s the fifth deadly strike in the Caribbean as Trump’s administration has asserted it’s treating alleged drug traffickers as unlawful combatants who must be met with military force.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAms676?D6 $64C6E2CJ !6E6 w68D6E9 @C56C65 E96 DEC:<6 %F6D52J >@C?:?8[ D2:5 %CF>A[ H9@ C6=62D65 2 G:56@ @7 :E[ 2D 96 925 😕 E96 A2DE] w68D6E9 =2E6C D92C65 E96 G:56@ 😕 2 A@DE @? )]k^Am

    kAm%96 3=24<2?5H9:E6 G:56@ D9@H65 2 D>2== 3@2E E92E 2AA62C65 DE2E:@?2CJ @? E96 H2E6C] $64@?5D :?E@ E96 G:56@[ :E 😀 DECF4< 3J 2 AC@;64E:=6 7C@> @G6C9625 2?5 6IA=@56D] %96 3@2E 😀 E96? D66? 7=@2E:?8 27=2>6 7@C D6G6C2= D64@?5D]k^Am

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    By MICHELLE L. PRICE and KONSTANTIN TOROPIN – Associated Press

    Source link

  • Israel prepares to welcome last living hostages from Gaza

    CAIRO — Israelis on Monday prepared to welcome home the last 20 living hostages from devastated Gaza and mourn the return of the dead, in the key exchange of the breakthrough ceasefire after two years of war.

    Palestinians awaited the release of hundreds of prisoners held by Israel. U.S. President Donald Trump was arriving in the region along with other leaders to discuss the U.S.-proposed deal and postwar plans. A surge of humanitarian aid was expected into famine-stricken Gaza, where hundreds of thousands of people have been left homeless.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm(9:=6 >2;@C BF6DE:@?D C6>2:? 23@FE E96 7FEFC6 @7 w2>2D 2?5 v2K2[ E96 6I492?86 @7 9@DE286D 2?5 AC:D@?6CD >2C<65 2 <6J DE6A E@H2C5 6?5:?8 E96 5625=:6DE H2C 6G6C 36EH66? xDC26= 2?5 E96 >:=:E2?E 8C@FA]k^Am

    kAm|2;@C xDC26=: %’ DE2E:@?D H6C6 2:C:?8 DA64:2= @G6C?:89E 3C@2542DED 29625 @7 E96 9@DE286DV C6=62D6 2D 2?E:4:A2E:@? 8C6H] !6@A=6 3682? E@ 82E96C ?62C 2 =2C86 D4C66? 😕 w@DE286D $BF2C6 😕 %6= pG:G 367@C6 52H?]k^Am

    kAm%96 9@DE286DV C6EFC? 42AD 2 A2:?7F= 492AE6C 7@C xDC26=] $:?46 E96J H6C6 42AEFC65 😕 E96 ~4E@36C a_ab w2>2D 2EE24< E92E :8?:E65 E96 H2C[ ?6HD42DED 92G6 >2C<65 E96:C 52JD 😕 42AE:G:EJ 2?5 xDC26=:D 92G6 H@C? J6==@H A:?D 2?5 C:33@?D 😕 D@=:52C:EJ] %6?D @7 E9@FD2?5D 92G6 ;@:?65 E96:C 72>:=:6D 😕 H66<=J 56>@?DEC2E:@?D 42==:?8 7@C E96:C C6=62D6]k^Am

    kAmpD E96 H2C 5C28865 @?[ 56>@?DEC2E@CD 244FD65 !C:>6 |:?:DE6C q6?;2>:? }6E2?J29F @7 5C288:?8 9:D 766E 7@C A@=:E:42= AFCA@D6D[ 6G6? 2D 96 244FD65 w2>2D @7 :?EC2?D:86?46] {2DE H66<[ F?56C 962GJ :?E6C?2E:@?2= AC6DDFC6 2?5 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^:DC26=A2=6DE:?:2?D92>2DH2C?6E2?J29FA2C:29D2?4E:@?DC:89ED`e4a2effc5c47eg`hc7f26bb`2dgd__fQm:?4C62D:?8 :D@=2E:@? 7@C xDC26=k^2m[ E96 3:EE6C 6?6>:6D 28C665 E@ E96 462D67:C6]k^Am

    kAm(:E9 E96 9@DE286D’ C6=62D6[ E96 D6?D6 @7 FC86?4J 2C@F?5 E96 H2C 7@C >2?J xDC26=:D H:== 36 67764E:G6=J @G6C]k^Am

    kAmxDC26= 6IA64ED E96 a_ =:G:?8 9@DE286D E@ 36 C6=62D65 E@86E96C |@?52J] %96J H:== 36 92?565 E@ E96 x?E6C?2E:@?2= r@>>:EE66 @7 E96 #65 rC@DD 2?5 E96? E@ E96 xDC26=: >:=:E2CJ[ H9:49 H:== E2<6 E96> E@ E96 #6:> >:=:E2CJ 32D6 E@ 36 C6F?:E65 H:E9 72>:=:6D]k^Am

    kAmxE 😀 F?=:<6=J E92E E96 C6>2:?D @7 FA E@ ag @E96C 9@DE286D H:== 36 C6EFC?65 2E E96 D2>6 E:>6] p? :?E6C?2E:@?2= E2D< 7@C46 H:== H@C< E@ =@42E6 56462D65 9@DE286D H9@ 2C6 ?@E C6EFC?65 H:E9:? fa 9@FCD[ D2:5 v2= w:CD49[ xDC26=’D 4@@C5:?2E@C 7@C E96 9@DE286D 2?5 E96 >:DD:?8]k^Am

    kAm%96 E:>:?8 92D ?@E 366? 2??@F?465 7@C E96 C6=62D6 @7 !2=6DE:?:2? AC:D@?6CD] %96J :?4=F56 ad_ A6@A=6 D6CG:?8 =:76 D6?E6?46D 7@C 4@?G:4E:@?D 😕 2EE24 v2K2 5FC:?8 E96 H2C 2?5 96=5 H:E9@FE 492C86] %96J H:== 36 C6EFC?65 E@ E96 (6DE q2?< @C v2K2 @C D6?E :?E@ 6I:=6]k^Am

    kAm(9:=6 xDC26= 4@?D:56CD E96 AC:D@?6CD E@ 36 E6CC@C:DED[ !2=6DE:?:2?D G:6H E96> 2D 7C665@> 7:89E6CD 282:?DE xDC26=: @44FA2E:@?] xDC26= 92D H2C?65 !2=6DE:?:2?D 😕 E96 (6DE q2?< 282:?DE 46=63C2E:?8 27E6C A6@A=6 2C6 C6=62D65[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 2 AC:D@?6C’D 72>:=J 2?5 2 !2=6DE:?:2? @77:4:2= 72>:=:2C H:E9 E96 A=2?D] %96J DA@<6 @? 4@?5:E:@? @7 2?@?J>:EJ 3642FD6 E96J 762C65 C6EC:3FE:@?]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A H2D 7:CDE G:D:E:?8 xDC26=[ H96C6 2 (9:E6 w@FD6 D4965F=6 D2:5 96 H:== >66E H:E9 72>:=:6D @7 E96 9@DE286D 2?5 DA62< 2E E96 z?6DD6E[ xDC26=’D A2C=:2>6?E] ‘:46 !C6D:56?E ys ‘2?46 D2:5 %CF>A H2D =:<6=J E@ >66E H:E9 ?6H=J 7C665 9@DE286D]k^Am

    kAm“%96 H2C 😀 @G6C[” %CF>A 2DD6CE65 E@ C6A@CE6CD 2D 96 56A2CE65[ 255:?8 96 E9@F89E E96 462D67:C6 H@F=5 9@=5]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A H:== 4@?E:?F6 E@ t8JAE[ H96C6 !C6D:56?E p356= u2EE29 6=$:DD:VD @77:46 D2:5 96 H:== 4@492:C 2 “A6246 DF>>:E” |@?52J H:E9 C68:@?2= 2?5 :?E6C?2E:@?2= =6256CD]k^Am

    kAmk2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^9F3^>29>@F52332DQm|29>@F5 p332Dk^2m[ =6256C @7 E96 :?E6C?2E:@?2==J C64@8?:K65 !2=6DE:?:2? pFE9@C:EJ[ H:== 2EE6?5[ 2 ;F586 2?5 25G:D6C E@ p332D[ |29>@F5 2=w2332D9[ E@=5 %96 pDD@4:2E65 !C6DD] }6E2?J29F 92D C6;64E65 2?J C@=6 😕 A@DEH2C v2K2 7@C p332D[ E9@F89 E96 &]$] A=2? =62G6D E96 A@DD:3:=:EJ @A6? :7 9:D !2=6DE:?:2? pFE9@C:EJ F?56C8@6D C67@C>D] w2>2D D6:K65 4@?EC@= @7 v2K2 😕 a__f]k^Am

    kAm~E96C <6J BF6DE:@?D 😕 E96 462D67:C6 562= 92G6 J6E E@ 36 C6D@=G65[ :?4=F5:?8 E96 7FEFC6 8@G6C?2?46 @7 v2K2 2?5 H9@ H:== A2J 7@C 2 3:==:@?5@==2C C64@?DECF4E:@? AC@46DD] xDC26= H2?ED E@ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^:DC26=92>2D82K2ECF>A462D67:C6H2C`b47b`2h5`3_72h5`c27a74ec6f7`_c`Qm6?DFC6 E92E E96 H62<6?65 w2>2D 5:D2C>Dk^2m[ 2?5 }6E2?J29F 92D H2C?65 xDC26= 4@F=5 5@ :E “E96 92C5 H2J]” w2>2D C67FD6D E@ 5:D2C> 2?5 H2?ED E@ 6?DFC6 xDC26= AF==D :ED EC@@AD 4@>A=6E6=J @FE @7 v2K2]k^Am

    kAm%96 xDC26=: >:=:E2CJ 92D H:E95C2H? 7C@> >F49 @7 v2K2 r:EJ[ E96 D@FE96C? 4:EJ @7 z92? *@F?:D 2?5 @E96C 2C62D] %C@@AD C6>2:? 😕 >@DE @7 E96 D@FE96C? 4:EJ @7 #2729[ E@H?D @7 v2K2’D 72C ?@CE9 2?5 E96 H:56 DEC:A 2=@?8 v2K2’D 3@C56C H:E9 xDC26=]k^Am

    kAm&?56C E96 &]$] A=2?[ 2? :?E6C?2E:@?2= 3@5J H:== 8@G6C? v2K2[ @G6CD66:?8 !2=6DE:?:2? E649?@4C2ED CF??:?8 52JE@52J 2772:CD] w2>2D 92D D2:5 v2K2’D 8@G6C?>6?E D9@F=5 36 H@C<65 @FE 2>@?8 !2=6DE:?:2?D]k^Am

    kAm%96 A=2? 42==D 7@C 2? pC23=65 :?E6C?2E:@?2= D64FC:EJ 7@C46 😕 v2K2[ 2=@?8 H:E9 !2=6DE:?:2? A@=:46 EC2:?65 3J t8JAE 2?5 y@C52?] xE D2:5 xDC26=: 7@C46D H@F=5 =62G6 2C62D 2D E9@D6 7@C46D 56A=@J] p3@FE a__ &]$] EC@@AD 2C6 ?@H 😕 xDC26= E@ >@?:E@C E96 462D67:C6]k^Am

    kAm%96 A=2? 2=D@ >6?E:@?D E96 A@DD:3:=:EJ @7 2 7FEFC6 !2=6DE:?:2? DE2E6[ 2?@E96C ?@?DE2CE6C 7@C }6E2?J29F]k^Am

    kAm%96 &?:E65 }2E:@?D 92D D2:5 xDC26= D@ 72C 92D 2AAC@G65 `h_[___ >6EC:4 E@?D @7 2:5 E@ 6?E6C v2K2[ H9:49 H2D 36D:6865 27E6C xDC26= 6?565 E96 AC6G:@FD 462D67:C6 😕 |2C49]k^Am

    kAm%96 xDC26=: >:=:E2CJ 3@5J 😕 492C86 @7 9F>2?:E2C:2? 2:5 😕 v2K2 D2:5 E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^A9@E@82==6CJ^A9@E@DA2=6DE:?:2?DC6EFC?82K2eah2a7d2`3eaf57736f674ecbg5cg6e7Qm2>@F?E @7 2:5 6?E6C:?8k^2m H2D 6IA64E65 E@ :?4C62D6 $F?52J E@ 2C@F?5 e__ ECF46?E]k^Am

    kAm“|F49 @7 v2K2 😀 2 H2DE6=2?5[” &]}] 9F>2?:E2C:2? 49:67 %@> u=6E496C E@=5 E96 p! @? $F?52J] w6 D2:5 E96 &]}] 92D 2 A=2? 7@C E96 ?6IE EH@ >@?E9D E@ C6DE@C6 32D:4 >65:42= 2?5 @E96C D6CG:46D[ 3C:?8 😕 E9@FD2?5D @7 E@?D @7 7@@5 2?5 7F6= 2?5 C6>@G6 CF33=6]k^Am

    kAm%96 H2C 3682? H96? k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^:DC26=A2=6DE:?:2?D92>2DH2C?6HD9@DE286DaJ62CD`__fa_ade7`h43a666d6_d_h`4fc7_6e7`34bde2Qmw2>2D=65 >:=:E2?ED =2F?4965 2 DFCAC:D6 2EE24< @? D@FE96C? xDC26=k^2m @? ~4E] f[ a_ab[ 😕 H9:49 D@>6 `[a__ A6@A=6 H6C6 <:==65 2?5 ad_ E2<6? 9@DE286]k^Am

    kAmx? xDC26=’D 6?DF:?8 @776?D:G6[ >@C6 E92? ef[___ !2=6DE:?:2?D 92G6 366? <:==65[ 244@C5:?8 E@ v2K2’D w62=E9 |:?:DECJ[ H9:49 5@6D?’E 5:776C6?E:2E6 36EH66? 4:G:=:2?D 2?5 4@>32E2?ED 3FE D2JD 2C@F?5 92=7 E96 562E9D H6C6 H@>6? 2?5 49:=5C6?] %96 >:?:DECJ 😀 A2CE @7 E96 w2>2DCF? 8@G6C?>6?E[ 2?5 E96 &]}] 2?5 >2?J :?56A6?56?E 6IA6CED 4@?D:56C :ED 7:8FC6D E@ 36 E96 >@DE C6=:23=6 6DE:>2E6 @7 H2CE:>6 42DF2=E:6D]k^Am

    kAm%96 E@== H:== 8C@H 2D 3@5:6D 2C6 AF==65 7C@> CF33=6 AC6G:@FD=J >256 :?2446DD:3=6 3J 7:89E:?8]k^Am

    kAm%96 H2C 92D 56DEC@J65 =2C86 DH2E9D @7 v2K2 2?5 5:DA=2465 23@FE h_T @7 :ED a >:==:@? C6D:56?ED] xE 92D 2=D@ EC:886C65 @E96C 4@?7=:4ED 😕 E96 C68:@?[ DA2C<65 H@C=5H:56 AC@E6DED 2?5 =65 E@ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^G:56@^F?4@>>:DD:@?@7:?BF:CJ244FD6D:DC26=@786?@4:56:?82K22A6IA=2:?Daegg6_`4bg4`cc4bgca6b5g`_23`cb_hQm2==682E:@?D @7 86?@4:56k^2m E92E xDC26= 56?:6D]k^Am

    k9C ^m

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    By SAMY MAGDY and JOSEF FEDERMAN – Associated Press

    Source link

  • Citing unease over graft, Japan’s Komeito leaves the longstanding ruling coalition headed by the LDP

    TOKYO — TOKYO (AP) — The head of Japan’s Komeito says it is leaving the ruling coalition headed by the Liberal Democratic Party due to concerns over corruption, in a major setback for the woman who hopes to become the country’s next prime minister.

    The decision announced Friday by Komeito leader Tetsuo Saito deals a serious blow to the Liberal Democrats, who last weekend chose Sanae Takaichi, an ultra-conservative lawmaker, as its leader.

    Takaichi could still become Japan’s first female prime minister, but the departure of the Buddhist-backed Komeito will compel the Liberal Democrats to find at least one other coalition partner in order to stay in power.

    Speaking to reporters, she said Saito had “one-sidedly announced the decision to leave the coalition” even though she and her deputy, LDP Secretary General Shunichi Suzuki, had said the Liberal Democrats would discuss the issues he raised and respond promptly.

    “We’ve been together for 26 years and it was extremely disappointing, but this is how we ended up,” Takaichi said.

    The ruling coalition had already lost its majorities in both houses of parliament. The lower house is due to vote on a new prime minister later this month.

    Saito said his party, which has been a coalition partner with the Liberal Democrats for 26 years, had raised several concerns in a meeting with its leaders.

    They include objections to Takaichi’s stance about Japan’s wartime history and her visits to Yasukuni Shrine, seen as a symbol of its past militarism. Another was Takaichi’s hardline position toward foreigners, part of a backlash against growing numbers of foreign workers and tourists.

    But the deciding factor, he said, was the Liberal Democrats’ response to scandals over the use of political slush funds.

    Saito said he found Takaichi’s response to his concerns over history, the Yasukuni visits and foreigners to be acceptable. But he said she showed a lack of “sincerity” about doing more to clean up corruption.

    “The LDP’s response was that it will think about it, which was highly insufficient and extremely disappointing,” Saito said.

    “We have decided to return to the drawing board and stop here,” Saito said. “Our endeavor against money politics is the highest priority for the Komeito.”

    Komeito was founded in 1964 by the leader of the Buddhist sect Soka Gakkai, Daisaku Ikeda, to represent diverse public interests and fight corruption, as an alternative to political parties backed by labor unions and big corporations.

    The LDP has been beset by scandals involving dozens of lawmakers, many of them belonging to a party faction previously led by the late Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Abe’s vision for Japan is one that Takaichi has emulated.

    The Liberal Democrats have removed some senior lawmakers from top party and Cabinet posts. Takaichi has said that if she is chosen to be prime minister, she plans to put them back into key positions after they were re-elected twice more after their ousters.

    Saito told reporters Komeito lawmakers would not vote for Takaichi to become prime minister and the party won’t perform its usual role of trying to drum up support for LDP politicians, who have long relied on votes from Soka Gakkai members, the Komeito’s main source of support.

    In the vote to replace departing Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, expected around Oct. 20, he said, “I will vote for Tetsuo Saito.”

    Source link

  • Israeli Cabinet approves ‘outline’ of hostage release deal

    CAIRO — Israel’s Cabinet has approved the “outline” of a deal to release hostages held by Hamas, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said early Friday, as top Israeli officials debated a tentative deal to pause the devastating two-year war with Hamas.

    The approval is a key step in implementing a ceasefire and the exchange of hostages for Palestinian prisoners brokered by U.S. President Donald Trump. The brief statement focused on the hostage release and made no mention of the other parts of Trump’s plan for ending the war.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm|62?H9:=6[ E96 xDC26=: >:=:E2CJ 42CC:65 @FE >@C6 DEC:<6D 😕 v2K2[ :?4=F5:?8 @?6 E92E C6A@CE65=J =67E >@C6 E92? E9C66 5@K6? A6@A=6 EC2AA65 36?62E9 CF33=6] %96 ?6H DEC:<6D 9:E 2D E96 r23:?6E >6E E@ H6:89 E96 E6C>D @7 E96 3C626C865 =2E6 (65?6D52J 2?5 4@F=5 7C66 E96 C6>2:?:?8 9@DE286D 😕 6I492?86 7@C !2=6DE:?:2? AC:D@?6CD]k^Am

    kAm%96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^82K2:DC26=A2=6DE:?:2?D92>2DH2C6IA=2:?6C5d4d_df5a76h6a6adda`dgd_3cdc7e_`Qm3C@256C 462D67:C6 A=2? 25G2?465 3J %CF>A’D 25>:?:DEC2E:@?k^2m :?4=F565 >2?J F?2?DH6C65 BF6DE:@?D[ DF49 2D H96E96C 2?5 9@H w2>2D H:== 5:D2C> 2?5 H9@ H:== 8@G6C? v2K2] qFE E96 D:56D 2AA62C65 4=@D6C E92? E96J 92G6 366? 😕 >@?E9D E@ 6?5:?8 2 H2C E92E 92D <:==65 E6?D @7 E9@FD2?5D @7 !2=6DE:?:2?D[ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^G:56@^367@C62?527E6CG:56@DD9@H>F49@782K2C65F465E@CF:?D3J:DC26=:3@>32C5>6?E2?5@776?D:G6_hf634b3`egbcge7362a4cdge`hc3g3bQmC65F465 >F49 @7 v2K2 E@ CF33=6k^2m[ 3C@F89E k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^82K272>:?69F?86C:DC26=462D67:C62d7gg6a_53a2d4c7fdc“f56h35252ehQm72>:?6 E@ A2CED @7 E96 E6CC:E@CJk^2m 2?5 =67E 5@K6?D @7 9@DE286D[ =:G:?8 2?5 5625[ 😕 v2K2]k^Am

    kAm%96 H2C[ H9:49 3682? H:E9 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^:DC26=A2=6DE:?:2?D92>2DH2C?6HD9@DE286DaJ62CD`__fa_ade7`h43a666d6_d_h`4fc7_6e7`34bde2Qmw2>2D’ 5625=J 2EE24^G:56@^F?4@>>:DD:@?@7:?BF:CJ244FD6D:DC26=@786?@4:56:?82K22A6IA=2:?Daegg6_`4bg4`cc4bgca6b5g`_23`cb_hQm2==682E:@?D @7 86?@4:56k^2m E92E xDC26= 56?:6D]k^Am

    kAm$@>6 `[a__ A6@A=6 H6C6 <:==65 😕 E96 w2>2D=65 2DD2F=E[ 2?5 ad` H6C6 E2<6? 9@DE286] x? xDC26=’D 6?DF:?8 @776?D:G6[ >@C6 E92? ef[___ !2=6DE:?:2?D 92G6 366? <:==65 😕 v2K2 2?5 ?62C=J `f_[___ H@F?565[ 244@C5:?8 E@ v2K2’D w62=E9 |:?:DECJ[ H9:49 5@6D?’E 5:776C6?E:2E6 36EH66? 4:G:=:2?D 2?5 4@>32E2?ED 3FE D2JD 23@FE 92=7 @7 E96 562E9D H6C6 H@>6? 2?5 49:=5C6?]k^Am

    kAmtG6? H:E9 E96 28C66>6?E 92?8:?8 😕 E96 32=2?46[ xDC26=: DEC:<6D 4@?E:?F65[ H:E9 6IA=@D:@?D D66? %9FCD52J 😕 ?@CE96C? v2K2] pE =62DE “ 5625 !2=6DE:?:2?D 2?5 ch @E96CD H9@ H6C6 H@F?565 2CC:G65 2E 9@DA:E2=D @G6C E96 A2DE ac 9@FCD[ v2K2’D w62=E9 |:?:DECJ D2:5]k^Am

    kAm{2E6C @? %9FCD52J[ 2 DEC:<6 @? 2 3F:=5:?8 😕 v2K2 r:EJ <:==65 2E =62DE EH@ A6@A=6 2?5 =67E >@C6 E92? c_ EC2AA65 F?56C CF33=6[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 !2=6DE:?:2? r:G:= s676?D6]k^Am

    kAmp? xDC26=: >:=:E2CJ @77:4:2= H9@ DA@<6 @? E96 4@?5:E:@? @7 2?@?J>:EJ 😕 =:?6 H:E9 >:=:E2CJ 8F:56=:?6D D2:5 xDC26= H2D 9:EE:?8 E2C86ED E92E A@D65 2 E9C62E E@ :ED EC@@AD 2D E96J C6A@D:E:@?] w2>2D 3=2DE65 xDC26= @G6C E96 DEC:<6[ D2J:?8 }6E2?J29F H2D ECJ:?8 E@ “D9F77=6 E96 42C5D 2?5 4@?7FD6” 677@CED 3J >65:2E@CD E@ 6?5 E96 H2C 😕 v2K2]k^Am

    kAmp D6?:@C w2>2D @77:4:2= 2?5 =625 ?68@E:2E@C >256 2 DA6649 %9FCD52J =2J:?8 @FE H92E 96 D2JD 2C6 E96 4@C6 6=6>6?ED @7 E96 462D67:C6 562=i xDC26= C6=62D:?8 2C@F?5 a[___ !2=6DE:?:2? AC:D@?6CD[ @A6?:?8 E96 3@C56C 4C@DD:?8 H:E9 t8JAE[ 2==@H:?8 2:5 E@ 7=@H 2?5 H:E95C2H:?8 7C@> v2K2]k^Am

    kAmz92=:= 2=w2JJ2 D2:5 2== H@>6? 2?5 49:=5C6? 96=5 😕 xDC26=: ;2:=D H:== 2=D@ 36 7C665] w6 5:5 ?@E @776C 56E2:=D @? E96 6IE6?E @7 E96 xDC26=: H:E95C2H2= 7C@> v2K2]k^Am

    kAmp=w2JJ2 D2:5 E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 2?5 >65:2E@CD 925 8:G6? 2DDFC2?46D E92E E96 H2C 😀 @G6C[ 2?5 E92E w2>2D 2?5 @E96C !2=6DE:?:2? 724E:@?D H:== ?@H 7@4FD @? 249:6G:?8 D6=756E6C>:?2E:@? 2?5 6DE23=:D9:?8 2 !2=6DE:?:2? DE2E6]k^Am

    kAm“(6 564=2C6 E@52J E92E H6 92G6 C624965 2? 28C66>6?E E@ 6?5 E96 H2C 2?5 E96 288C6DD:@? 282:?DE @FC A6@A=6[” p=w2JJ2 D2:5 😕 2 E6=6G:D65 DA6649 %9FCD52J 6G6?:?8]k^Am

    kAmx? E96 D@FE96C? v2K2 4:EJ @7 z92? *@F?:D[ C624E:@?D E@ E96 2??@F?46>6?E @7 2 462D67:C6 H6C6 C6=2E:G6=J >FE65 2?5 @7E6? 4@=@C65 3J 8C:67]k^Am

    kAm“x 2> 92AAJ 2?5 F?92AAJ] (6 92G6 =@DE 2 =@E @7 A6@A=6 2?5 =@DE =@G65 @?6D[ 7C:6?5D 2?5 72>:=J] (6 =@DE @FC 9@>6D[” D2:5 |@92>>25 p=u2CC2] “s6DA:E6 @FC 92AA:?6DD[ H6 42??@E 96=A 3FE E9:?< @7 H92E 😀 E@ 4@>6] ]]] %96 2C62D H6 2C6 8@:?8 324< E@[ @C :?E6?5:?8 E@ C6EFC? E@[ 2C6 F?:?923:E23=6]”k^Am

    kAmx? %6= pG:G[ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^82K2H2C9@DE286D72>:=:6DECF>Ac3b32g33dd47_6bffbh4h3`2df4`_47fQm72>:=:6D @7 E96 C6>2:?:?8 9@DE286Dk^2m A@AA65 492>A28?6 2?5 4C:65 E62CD @7 ;@J 27E6C %CF>A 2??@F?465 E96 562=]k^Am

    kAmx? y6CFD2=6> @? %9FCD52J[ $92C@? r2?@E 46=63C2E65 H:E9 D@>6 @E96CD]k^Am

    kAm“(6 2C6 D@ 6I4:E65 E9:D >@C?:?8] (6 4C:65 2== >@C?:?8[” D96 D2:5] “xE’D 366? EH@ J62CD E92E H6 2C6 😕 9@CC@C]”k^Am

    kAm&?56C E96 E6C>D[ w2>2D :?E6?5D E@ C6=62D6 2== =:G:?8 9@DE286D 😕 2 >2EE6C @7 52JD[ H9:=6 E96 xDC26=: >:=:E2CJ H:== 368:? 2 H:E95C2H2= 7C@> E96 >2;@C:EJ @7 v2K2[ A6@A=6 72>:=:2C H:E9 E96 >2EE6C E@=5 %96 pDD@4:2E65 !C6DD] %96J DA@<6 @? 4@?5:E:@? @7 2?@?J>:EJ E@ 5:D4FDD 56E2:=D @7 2? 28C66>6?E E92E 92D ?@E 7F==J 366? >256 AF3=:4] $@>6 a_ @7 E96 cg 9@DE286D DE:== 😕 42AE:G:EJ 2C6 36=:6G65 E@ 36 2=:G6]k^Am

    kAmx? 2 D9@CE G:56@ A@DE65 3J &]$] r@>>6C46 $64C6E2CJ w@H2C5 {FE?:4<[ %CF>A H2D D66? DA62<:?8 3J A9@?6 E@ 2 8C@FA @7 6=2E65 9@DE286 72>:=:6D]k^Am

    kAm“%96J 2C6 2== 4@>:?8 324< @? |@?52J[” D2:5 %CF>A[ H9@ 😀 6IA64E65 E@ G:D:E E96 C68:@? 😕 E96 4@>:?8 52JD]k^Am

    kAm{2E6 @? %9FCD52J[ }6E2?J29F 4@?G6?65 9:D 7F== r23:?6E[ H9:49 H2D 6IA64E65 E@ G@E6 @? E96 562=]k^Am

    kAmqFE xDC26=’D 72CC:89E k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^9F3^:E2>2C36?8G:CQm}2E:@?2= $64FC:EJ |:?:DE6C xE2>2C q6?vG:Ck^2m D2:5 E92E 96 2?5 >6>36CD @7 9:D y6H:D9 !@H6C A2CEJ H@F=5 G@E6 282:?DE E96 462D67:C6 A=2?[ 2?5 E92E 96 “C67FD65 E@ 36 A2CE @7 2 8@G6C?>6?E E92E 2==@HD 7@C E96 4@?E:?F2E:@? @7 w2>2D CF=6 😕 v2K2]”k^Am

    kAm$E:==[ q6?vG:C’D C67FD2= H2D F?=:<6=J E@ 6?52?86C E96 A=2?[ H9:49 H2D 6IA64E65 E@ A2DD H:E9 2 H:56 >2C8:?]k^Am

    kAmw2>2D 92D 42==65 @? %CF>A 2?5 E96 >65:2E@CD E@ 6?DFC6 E92E xDC26= 7F==J :>A=6>6?ED E96 EC@@A H:E95C2H2=[ E96 6?ECJ @7 2:5 :?E@ v2K2 2?5 E96 6I492?86 @7 AC:D@?6CD]k^Am

    kAm%@> u=6E496C[ E96 &]}] 9F>2?:E2C:2? 49:67[ E@=5 C6A@CE6CD %9FCD52J E92E @77:4:2=D 92G6 `f_[___ >6EC:4 E@?D @7 >65:4:?6[ 2:5 2?5 @E96C DFAA=:6D 2E C625J 7@C EC2?DA@CE :?E@ v2K2 H96? E96J 2C6 8:G6? 2 8C66? =:89E]k^Am

    By SAMY MAGDY, MELANIE LIDMAN and WAFAA SHURAFA – Associated Press

    Source link