ReportWire

Tag: Intelligence

  • State to use AI to improve government

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Artificial intelligence is being used for everything from guiding self-powered cars and developing life-saving medicines to powering online search engines that help you find a plumber or pick holiday gifts for your family.

    And the machine learning platform could soon be employed by the state government to speed up the processes of getting a state permit, renewing a vehicle registration or detecting fraud in public benefits programs.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 w62=6J 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 2??@F?465 uC:52J E92E :E A=2?D E@ 56A=@J r92Ev!%’D 2CE:7:4:2= :?E6==:86?46 2DD:DE2?E A=2E7@C> 😕 6I64FE:G6 3C2?49 286?4:6D H:E9 E96 8@2= @7 >2<:?8 DE2E6 8@G6C?>6?E H@C< “36EE6C 2?5 72DE6C” 7@C C6D:56?ED]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D 😀 23@FE >2<:?8 8@G6C?>6?E 72DE6C[ >@C6 677:4:6?E[ 2?5 >@C6 67764E:G6 7@C E96 A6@A=6 H6 D6CG6[” v@G] |2FC2 w62=6J D2:5 😕 2 AC6A2C65 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am

    kAmw6C 25>:?:DEC2E:@? D2:5 E96 px C@==@FE H:== 36 :>A=6>6?E65 2D 2 A92D65 2AAC@249 24C@DD E96 6I64FE:G6 3C2?49 “2?5 H:== AC@G:56 2 D276 2?5 D64FC6 6?G:C@?>6?E E92E AC@E64ED DE2E6 52E2]” %96 4@?EC24E H:E9 r92Ev!% H2D ?68@E:2E65 E9C@F89 2 4@>A6E:E:G6 AC@4FC6>6?E AC@46DD[ @77:4:2=D D2:5]k^Am

    kAm~?46 56A=@J65[ |2DD249FD6EED H:== 36 E96 7:CDE DE2E6 E@ 25@AE E96 E649?@=@8J 7@C E96 6?E:C6 c_[___6>A=@J66 6I64FE:G6 3C2?49[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 w62=6J 25>:?:DEC2E:@?]k^Am

    kAm%96 C@==@FE @7 E96 ?6H A@=:4J 4@>6D 2D DE2E6 =2H>2<6CD 2C6 4@?D:56C:?8 2 >JC:25 @7 AC@A@D2=D 2:>65 2E 255:?8 8F2C5C2:=D 2C@F?5 FD6 @7 E96 ?6H E649?@=@8J]k^Am

    kAm~?6 AC@A@D2= H@F=5 C6BF:C6 =2C86 2CE:7:4:2= :?E6==:86?46 E649?@=@8J 4@>A2?:6D DF49 2D E96 @?=:?6 492E3@E r92Ev!% E@ C68:DE6C H:E9 E96 DE2E6 pEE@C?6J v6?6C2=’D ~77:46 2?5 5:D4=@D6 :?7@C>2E:@? 23@FE E96:C 2=8@C:E9>D]k^Am

    kAmp?@E96C 3:== 42==D 7@C 32??:?8 “566A72<6D” @C 4@>AFE6C86?6C2E65 >2?:AF=2E:@?D @7 2 A6CD@?’D G@:46 @C =:<6?6DD FD:?8 >249:?6 =62C?:?8 E@ 4C62E6 G:DF2= 2?5 2F5:@ 4@?E6?E E92E 2AA62CD E@ 36 C62=] %96 E649?@=@8J 😀 36:?8 FD65 E@ 86?6C2E6 72<6 :>286CJ 7@C 2?JE9:?8 7C@> “C6G6?86 A@C?” E@ A@=:E:42= >F5D=:?8:?8]k^Am

    kAmx? a_ac[ pEE@C?6J v6?6C2= p?5C62 r2>A36== D@F89E E@ E:89E6? E96 C6:?D @? 2CE:7:4:2= :?E6==:86?46 56G6=@A6CD[ DFAA=:6CD 2?5 FD6CD[ :DDF:?8 ?6H 8F:52?46 E92E H2C?65 E96> ?@E E@ CF? 27@F= @7 E96 DE2E6’D =2HD @? 4@?DF>6C AC@E64E:@?[ 2?E:5:D4C:>:?2E:@? 2?5 52E2 D64FC:EJ]k^Am

    kAm{2DE H66<[ E96 DE2E6 w@FD6 @7 #6AC6D6?E2E:G6D 2AAC@G65 2 A2:C @7 3:A2CE:D2? 3:==D D6EE:?8 ?6H C6DEC:4E:@?D @? E96 FD6 @7 2CE:7:4:2= :?E6==:86?46 😕 A@=:E:42= 42>A2:8?:?8] %96 AC@A@D2=D H@F=5 C6BF:C6 42>A2:8?D E@ 5:D4=@D6 E96 FD6 @7 px 😕 A@=:E:42= 25D 2?5 32? “5646AE:G6” 4@>>F?:42E:@?D 😕 42>A2:8? 25D h_ 52JD 367@C6 2? 6=64E:@?]k^Am

    kAmr92Ev!%[ H9:49 H2D 4C62E65 3J $2? uC2?4:D4@32D65 ~A6?px[ 2? 2CE:7:4:2= :?E6==:86?46 C6D62C49 7:C> 4@7@F?565 3J t=@? |FD<[ 2==@HD FD6CD E@ 6?E6C E96>6D[ AC@>AED 2?5 8F:56=:?6D :?E@ E96 px DJDE6> E92E 4@>6D FA H:E9 2 C6DA@?D6 2D :7 2 9F>2? HC@E6 :E]k^Am

    kAm~? :ED H63D:E6[ E96 4@>A2?J D2JD E96 r92Ev!% 3@E 😀 2 “D276 2?5 FD67F=” px DJDE6> E92E :?E6C24ED 😕 2 “4@?G6CD2E:@?2= H2J” H:E9 FD6CD[ >2<:?8 :E A@DD:3=6 E@ “2?DH6C 7@==@HFA BF6DE:@?D[ 25>:E :ED >:DE2<6D[ 492==6?86 :?4@CC64E AC6>:D6D[ 2?5 C6;64E :?2AAC@AC:2E6 C6BF6DED]”k^Am

    kAmqFE E96 6>6C86?46 @7 px E649?@=@8J 92D 366? DE66A65 😕 4@?EC@G6CDJ[ H:E9 4C:E:4D H2C?:?8 E92E r@?8C6DD 2?5 DE2E6 8@G6C?>6?ED ?665 E@ >@G6 BF:4<=J E@ D6E C68F=2E:@?D 8@G6C?:?8 :ED FD6]k^Am

    kAmw62=6J 25>:?:DEC2E:@? @77:4:2=D D2J E96 C@==@FE @7 r92Ev!% H:== 36 5@?6 H:E9:? 2 “H2==65@77[ D64FC6 6?G:C@?>6?E E92E AC@E64ED DE2E6 52E2 2?5 6?DFC6D E92E 6>A=@J66 492E :?AFED 5@ ?@E EC2:? AF3=:4 px >@56=D]” %96J D2:5 FD6 @7 E96 E649?@=@8J H:== 36 8@G6C?65 3J 4FCC6?E DE2E6 C68F=2E:@?D 2?5 A@=:4:6D[ H9:49 H:== 36 “C68F=2C=J” FA52E65[ @77:4:2=D D2J]k^Am

    kAm“qJ >2<:?8 r92Ev!% 2G2:=23=6 E@ E96 DE2E6 H@C<7@C46[ H6 2C6 6>A@H6C:?8 @FC 6>A=@J66D H:E9 2 D64FC6[ 8@G6C?65 E@@= E92E 42? 6?92?46 D6CG:46 56=:G6CJ H9:=6 >2:?E2:?:?8 E96 9:896DE DE2?52C5D 7@C 52E2 AC:G24J[ D64FC:EJ[ 2?5 E9@F89E7F=[ EC2?DA2C6?E FD286 @7 px[” y2D@? $?J56C[ D64C6E2CJ @7 E96 tI64FE:G6 ~77:46 @7 %649?@=@8J $6CG:46D 2?5 $64FC:EJ[ D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am

    kAm“~FC 7@4FD 😀 ?@E ;FDE 25@AE:?8 px[ 3FE 5@:?8 D@ 😕 2 H2J E92E C67=64ED @FC G2=F6D[ 2?5 DEC6?8E96?D ECFDE H:E9 E96 C6D:56?ED H6 D6CG6]”k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Mossad was part of Iran’s mosaic pre-ayatollahs, what might it be there after them?

    [ad_1]

    Iran’s Interim Prime Minister Shapour Bakhtiar summoned Tsafrir to make a dramatic request: assassinate Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini at his exile residence near Paris.

    Between the 1950s and the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iran represented one of the most permissive and valuable intelligence environments for Israel’s Mossad.

    While rumors that the Mossad helped the CIA establish Iran’s SAVAK (secret police) security apparatus appear to be exaggerated, the relations between the intelligence agencies were at phenomenal levels.

    While CIA, Mossad, and SAVAK relations were strong, the agencies still had separate identities, did not share everything, and the US was still the major player compared to Jerusalem.

    Their separate identities are expressed in a story that former Mossad director Shabtai Shavit told The Jerusalem Post before he died.

    Back when Shavit was stationed by the Mossad in Iran in 1966, US intelligence noted the presence of a new young couple – Shavit and his wife.

    Illustrative Mossad agent. (credit: SHUTTERSTOCK)

    But US intelligence never tied him to the Mossad or figured out that he was anything unusual – a fact he learned when a US intelligence document was leaked to him around 1980.

    Mossad agents had access to Iranian officials

    Top Mossad agents had easy access to top Iranian officials.

    For example, after the shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, fled Iran in 1979, Mossad station chief Eliezer Tsafrir was inside SAVAK headquarters.

    A distraught general clung to Tsafrir, begging him to, “Take me with you!”

    Iran’s interim prime minister, Shapour Bakhtiar, summoned Tsafrir to make a dramatic request: assassinate Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini at his exile residence near Paris.

    On January 28, Mossad director Yitzhak Hofi gathered senior officers, including Iran chief analyst Yossi Alpher, to debate the request.

    Ultimately, they decided against the assassination, but the fact that Tsafrir had such easy access to SAVAK headquarters, was asked by a general to be brought to Israel, and was asked by the interim prime minister to assassinate an opposition figure speaks to the intimate level of intelligence relations with the Mossad at the time.

    The relations between the Mossad and SAVAK included intelligence sharing, training, and regional security operations, including support for Kurdish forces in Iraq against the Ba’athist regime in Baghdad.

    ISRAEL’S SPY AGENCY was especially helpful in training new SAVAK recruits when Iran established the agency in 1957.

    Their partnership also involved joint technological efforts, intelligence sharing, and coordination against a variety of Sunni Arab regional adversaries.

    Regarding Sunni Arab adversaries, Iran was a lynchpin in the Jewish state’s intelligence and diplomatic strategy to find as many allies as possible in the region where it was generally surrounded by hostile neighbors.

    Iran provided the Mossad a significant reservoir of useful intelligence about many of these adversaries and a physical space to operate in much closer to them.

    While there was a huge population of Israelis and Jews in Iran until 1979, there was no formal diplomatic recognition, so there was also a variety of messages passing between top political leaders through the Mossad.

    There were extensive weapons deals, including for Uzi guns, mortars, radio equipment, and renovations of Iranian aircraft. Much of which was handled by IDF or the relevant business officials, but the Mossad was often an initiator or in the background to make sure new projects ran smoothly.

    Just as Israeli and Iranian generals were frequently visiting each other’s countries, a high volume of senior intelligence officials were also.

    All of this was against the backdrop of Israel relying on Iran for around 40% of its oil imports, while Jerusalem helped Iran with the above weapons and technology issues, but also with advanced agricultural techniques.

    With the US having helped Iran found aspects of its nuclear program, some have also speculated that Israel and the Mossad may have assisted in some of this as well, though this has never been formally confirmed.

    So if the ayatollahs fall and the next regime is not run by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) but a regime that is not hostile to Israel or even eventually friendly, what would be the role of the Mossad?

    The Mossad might not need to work as hard on the Iran issue if the regime no longer pursued nuclear weapons and no longer threatened Israel with ballistic missile attacks or terror.

    It could be that the Mossad would work with the CIA and others to discover any sites they had not already explored and to defang those threats.

    This would not require close relations, but just an absence of investing in hostility, given that the two countries are 1,500 kilometers apart and have no inherent reason to fight, such as over some kind of an adjacent land dispute.

    In a more expansive scenario, the Mossad having access again to Iranian territory as intelligence allies would be a game-changer.

    Having access to Iranian territory would make it infinitely easier to have access to Iraqi, Turkish, and Pakistani territory – all countries it borders on and which are of interest to Israel in the wider region.

    It is unclear what implications a post-Islamic Revolution Iran would have for Hezbollah, Yemen’s Houthis, and other terror groups, which the Islamic Republic propped up.

    But if the Mossad had access to Iranian cooperation, this could be a sea change in being able to better understand and combat these groups long-term.

    The fall of the ayatollahs and the IRGC would not in any way guarantee they would not return.

    After all, they came to power because of the shah’s authoritarian, corrupt, and incompetent rule.

    While the Mossad was as utterly clueless as the CIA about the power of the ayatollahs to overthrow the shah in 1979, maybe this time that knowledge might also empower Israel’s spy agency to help hold down such a future potential returned threat.

    In any case, all of this would be adding to, not starting, the Mossad’s presence in Iran.

    As Mossad Director David Barnea said in June 2025, the agency was deeply involved in the Israel-Iran war that month and continues to have agents there.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hiding in plain sight is the focus of a new exhibit coming to DC’s Spy Museum – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    Whether it is the traditional green, black and brown patterns seen on military uniforms or the more flamboyant “Dazzle Ships” of World War I, a new exhibit coming to the District’s International Spy Museum will cover it.

    This page contains a video which is being blocked by your ad blocker.
    In order to view the video you must disable your ad blocker.

    New exhibit on camouflage coming to DC’s Spy Museum

    Whether it is the traditional green, black and brown patterns seen on military uniforms or the more flamboyant “Dazzle Ships” of World War I, a new exhibit coming to D.C.’s International Spy Museum will cover it.

    The history and dedicated science will be on display beginning in March in “Camouflage: Designed to Deceive.”

    “This is a phenomenon that has its origins in nature,” said Kathryn Keane, vice president of exhibitions at the Spy Museum. “Anybody that studied evolution or adaptation has studied camouflage, and it’s been adapted by humans in all these super interesting ways.”

    Opening March 1, the exhibit will explore the history of camouflage as both the noun, which is the designs of camouflage often seen in military uniforms and the global industry that has developed around it, and the verb, the ability to camouflage and disguise yourself in the real world, and how they’ve been adapted by various military and spy organizations.

    The exhibit will also give visitors an overview of the scientific principles of camouflage, to disappear, to distort, to disguise and to deceive.

    Keane said the real history of modern camouflage can be traced back over a century ago to World War I and later World War II. Entire “camouflage corps” were created that were made up of largely artists working on deception campaigns.

    “Camouflage really was not a thing until World War I,” Keane said. “A group of artists who were really interested in camouflage and the effect of camouflage in nature were able to influence some of the military strategists in the lead up to World War I. They said we should be applying some of these principles that we study in nature to evasion techniques in warfare and on the battlefield.”

    The greatest example of art-inspired World War I camouflage, Keane said, were highly colorful “Dazzle Ships.”

    German U-boats had been regularly destroying U.S. and British supply and transport ships in the Atlantic. Artists tried to find a way to help these ships with very distinct and flamboyant patterns.

    “You can’t hide a ship, but maybe if you paint it in these bright, distorting colors that were inspired by the study of disruptive camouflage that you find in nature, we could distract the captains of these U-boats long enough that they might miss and all it takes is a split second,” Keane said.

    The dazzle ships will be heavily featured in the exhibit as one of the most audacious attempts at camouflage. While it may not have worked quite as effectively as intended, the dazzle ships improved morale and even entered the design zeitgeist of the 1920s.

    “People started wearing these black and white bathing suits and outfits. They had a dazzle ball at the Chelsea Arts Club in New York. And just really interestingly, sort of coincided with a period in art history where you saw the avant garde art style start to come about as well,” Keane said.

    In World War II, Gen. George Patton created a camouflage Ghost Army, with inflatable tanks, jeeps made of cloth and wood, and faux barracks and mess halls in order to deceive Nazi Germany on troop locations in the U.K., and disguise at which point would they invade Northern Europe.

    The exhibit will also include information on literally thousands of camo patterns from over 160 countries that the Spy Museum was able to discover in its research.

    “A lot of them really don’t have anything to do with actually camouflaging yourself. Camouflage has become such a fashion statement,” Keane said.

    The exhibit will also have interactive displays where you can design your own camouflage.

    The Spy Museum will also explore more modern takes on camouflage developed by intelligence agencies. Spies have to blend into their environment, and rarely does that mean putting on fatigues with camo print.

    “We have some masters of disguise that we profile in the exhibit, including a couple who are involved here at the museum that have worked for the intelligence agencies on how to make somebody look different or adapt to a culture that they don’t belong in,” Keane said.

    Going beyond disguising yourself, the exhibit will examine the psychological and behavioral aspects of deception and camouflage, such as how to disappear in a crowd while still surveilling targets.

    “It’s all part of the same theme, right? This idea that deception is at the core of effective intelligence, and camouflage is just the best example of that,” Keane said.

    With the rise of infrared and heat signature cameras, there are even camouflages that have been designed to deceive beyond the visible spectrum of light.

    “For every tool that is developed to try to detect someone, there’s an equally interesting technology that’s developed to evade that detection,” Keane said.

    Like many of the exhibits at the Spy Museum, there will be plenty of interaction for kids and adults, including giant LED screens of landscapes where you try to spot camouflaged people. They will even have a display that shows how facial recognition software works.

    “It will map your face and show you, in real time, how the how the camera does that, and then it will compare your face to a database of 200 random images of sort of famous, important people that we’ve chosen,” Keane said. “We also talk a little bit about how people are going to extraordinary lengths to avoid facial recognition technology and things that you can do to protect yourself from it.”

    The exhibit will open March 1, and will be open through 2029. Tickets for the exhibit are on sale now.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Luke Lukert

    Source link

  • Acquisition.com CEO says leaders ‘have it backwards’ when it comes to hiring: She says she hires for emotional intelligence over technical skills. | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    Now more than ever, it’s difficult to know what makes candidates in a competitive labor market. While layoffs and unemployment remain low at the start of this year, jobseekers face an uphill battle as AI eliminates entry-level roles and employers added just 50,000 jobs in December. One founder says more than technical skills, being a good person is the quality that makes job candidates more appealing to hire.  

    Leila Hormozi, founder and CEO of Acquistion.com, said she learned her guiding principle for hiring from the Ritz-Carlton. Their philosophy is: “We don’t hire people who know how to make beds. We hire people that are good people,” she said in a video on Instagram to her 1.2 million followers.

    “Our process was to hire the right people. Not just hire people but select people and then orient them, not just put them to work but orient them to our thinking,” said Ritz Carlton Hotel Company cofounder Horst Schulze, reflecting on how the global chain developed their high standard, in a 2019 interview with Chief Executive.

    Hormozi says she echoes this philosophy: “I want to hire people who have the natural traits that I just need to give them the technical skills.” Hormozi cofounded Acquisition.com with her husband, Alex, in 2021. Before starting the private investment and advisory firm, Hormozi worked as personal trainer and launched fitness companies Gym Launch and Prestige Labs, and a software company ALAN. By 28, her net worth passed $100 million, she says. Acquisition.com now has a $200M+ portfolio and partners with companies to scale and grow business.  

    “Your business is only as strong as the people you pick to lead it. The fastest way to destroy your business is to hire the wrong people.” Hormozi wrote in a caption on Instagram.

    Some leaders “have it backwards,” she added. “People overvalue technical skills and undervalue social and emotional skills.” 

    As AI masters technical skills used in administrative, human resources, finance, and logistics jobs, soft skills such as adaptability and creative and analytical thinking are growing in demand, according to research from LinkedIn. People with strong foundational skills, such as collaboration, adaptability, and basic math skills typically learn faster and acquire more complex skills over time, one 2025 Harvard study about about long-term performance and advancement shows. 

    Other business leaders share Hormozi’s philosophy.

    “My advice to people would be critical thinking, learn skills, learn your EQ [emotional quotient], learn how to be good in a meeting, how to communicate, how to write,” JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said last month. “You’ll have plenty of jobs.”  

    Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has also long advocated for empathy and emotional intelligence as foundational skills in the workplace. 

    “IQ has a place, but it’s not the only thing that is needed in the world,” Nadella said in an interview with Axel Springer CEO Mathias Döpfner in November. “And I’ve always felt at least as leaders, if you just have IQ without EQ, it’s just a waste of IQ.”

    [ad_2]

    Jacqueline Munis

    Source link

  • Science Says Fit People’s Brains Are Built Differently (and They’re Smarter)

    [ad_1]

    You probably know that exercise helps you perform better under stress. You probably know that exercising at moderate intensity for 20 minutes elevates your mood for up to 12 hours. You might know exercise is one of the five daily habits a 30-year Harvard study shows can not only increase your lifespan by 12 to 14 years, but also cut your risk of Alzheimer’s in half.

    You might even know that exercise increases the production of a protein that supports the function, growth, and survival of brain cells.

    But what you probably don’t know is that a study published in Nature found a definite link between physical fitness and improved cognitive function, one that results in improved memory, reasoning, sharpness, and judgment. 

    Want to find out where you stand? All you have to do is take a quick walk.

    During the study, the researchers asked participants to walk as quickly as they could and measured how far they got in two minutes. The mean distances achieved were 660 feet for men and 640 feet for women. (That extrapolates to a 16-minute mile, or a pace of slightly under four miles an hour.)

    Then they asked them to take a variety of cognitive tests, and compared the results:

    It surprised us to see that even in a young population, cognitive performance decreases as fitness levels drop. We knew how this might be important in an elderly population, which does not necessarily have good health, but to see this happening in 30 year-olds is surprising.

    This leads us to believe that a basic level of fitness seems to be a preventable risk factor for brain health.

    Just as importantly, when the researchers took MRIs of participants, they found that “higher (levels of personal fitness) is associated with preserved white matter microstructure and better performance in a wide range of cognitive domains.”

    Somewhat simply put, fitter people have greater white matter integrity. White matter is made up of bundles of myelinated axons that affect learning and brain functions and coordinate communication between different brain regions.

    More simply put, fit people’s brains are built a little better, which helps them remember, reason, and decide better. White matter integrity improves episodic memory, or personal experiences. White matter integrity improves cognitive flexibility, processing speed, and fluid intelligence.

    White matter integrity helps you better draw on what you’ve learned in the past to make quicker, smarter decisions in the present.

    All from being able to walk a little farther in two minutes.

    So let’s work on that. Walk as fast as you can for two minutes and see how far you get. Where you fall on the scale — under or over 660 or 640 feet — doesn’t really matter. The goal is to work to improve on that result, because doing so should improve your white matter integrity.

    If you’re don’t exercise, start walking for 15 minutes every day. (As an added bonus, other research shows a 15-minute walk can significantly increase your lifespan.)

    But don’t do a circuit; walk away from your home for 7.5 minutes, then walk back. Over time, try to walk farther on the “out” 7.5 minutes and still make it back in 7.5 minutes.

    That will increase your speed and with it, your level of fitness. (And force you to do the whole 15 minutes; when I go for long bike rides, I always ride away from my house for half the intended distance because then I have no choice but to complete the second half if I want to make it home.) 

    Then consider exercising more. Exercising regularly also checks off an item on the Harvard list of five daily healthy habits.)

    If you’re under the study’s mean distance, shoot for 660 and 640 feet for men and women, respectively. And consider adding other forms of cardio, and maybe even a little strength training.

    Do that, and your results on the two-minute walking test will improve a lot faster, and with less effort, than you think.

    As a result you’ll feel better — both physically and mentally — and you could improve your memory, reasoning, decision-making, and ability to make connections and draw on past experiences.

    Can’t beat that.

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    The early-rate deadline for the 2026 Inc. Regionals Awards is Friday, November 14, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply now.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Haden

    Source link

  • You Have More Influence Over Your IQ Than You Think, New Study Suggests

    [ad_1]

    As someone who writes for the internet, I can tell you any story about how to be more intelligent is pretty much guaranteed to attract interest. Through the privacy of our screens, our clicks reveal that a whole lot of us are quietly anxious about our IQ scores. 

    It’s natural enough to worry about whether you have the intellectual horsepower to achieve your dreams. But a new study suggests the premise behind all our anxious googling is flawed. It concluded you have a lot more influence over your IQ than you might imagine. 

    How much is your IQ inborn? 

    Check out the Wikipedia page for ‘IQ’ and you’ll learn that, “Psychometricians generally regard IQ tests as having high statistical reliability. Reliability represents the measurement consistency of a test. A reliable test produces similar scores upon repetition.” 

    Sure, you could be hungry, tired, feeling unmotivated on a particular occasion. Or you could suffer some injury or other health setback. You can even learn hacks and habits that can tune up your effective IQ. But in general, if you take an IQ test one day and then another a month or even several years later, the scores are likely to be about the same. Intelligence, as most of us understand it, is largely fixed from birth. 

    Based on this, if you look to identical twins — who by definition have the same DNA — you would expect them to have very similar IQs. And that’s historically what scientists have found. 

    “Studies of identical twins, such as the landmark Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart, led by Thomas Bouchard, showed correlations of around 0.75 in IQ between twins separated at birth. That’s roughly the same heritability as height, which often ranges in the 0.80s,” reports Harvard researcher T. Alexander Puutio in Psychology Today

    But a new study conducted by Jared Horvath of the English Schools Foundation Center for Research and Katie Fabricant of the University of Wisconsin that was recently published in Acta Psychologica puts a fascinating new twist on this long established finding. 

    A study of twins complicates our picture of intelligence

    Like many researchers before them interested in the nature vs. nurture debate, Horvath and Fabricant focused on identical twins. Their ‘nature’ is identical, which allows scientists to isolate out the effects of ‘nurture.’ Horvath and Fabricant examined one aspect of nature in particular — education. 

    Looking through past studies they identified 87 pairs of identical twins that were raised separately and for whom researchers had good quality data on the type of education they received. When a pair of twins followed a similar educational path, going to schools of similar type and quality, as expected their IQs ended up very similar. But when they pursued different educational paths, the picture looked much different. 

    “The results were startling, with twins that had the largest gap in years of education differing by as much as 15 IQ points,” writes Puutio. “That’s a full standard deviation’s worth of a difference, enough to shift someone from the average range into the gifted category. For the first time, we have twin-based evidence suggesting that education does more than polish existing ability; it adds new horsepower.” 

    Why this matters for entrepreneurs 

    This is only one relatively small study, of course. But according to University of Virginia psychologist Eric Turkheimer, it’s one in a growing body of research indicating IQ is less fixed by genes than scientists once thought. 

    “In fact, the more researchers have learned about associations between DNA and IQ, the more complex and less deterministic this relationship looks,” he wrote recently in The Atlantic

    Genes still matter for smarts but they seem to matter a lot less than we once thought they did. That’s good news for educators. But it’s also good news for any entrepreneur hoping to boost their intelligence through lifelong learning and clever cognitive strategies. (Experts have suggested trying many varieties.) 

    As Puutio puts it, “If schooling can boost IQ even when genes are identical, then intelligence may be more dynamic, and more democratic, than previously thought… The line between ‘raw’ and ‘effective’ intelligence is blurring, and perhaps what we’ve called ‘innate ability’ is better understood as potential, one that education can still unlock well into adulthood.”

    Bottom line: you’re less stuck with the brain you were born with then you probably imagine. It is looking more and more possible to improve your IQ through education and effort. 

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    [ad_2]

    Jessica Stillman

    Source link

  • Science Says You Can Tell in 5 Minutes if Someone Isn’t Nearly as Smart as They Think: the ‘Cynical Genius Illusion’

    [ad_1]

    A guy I know is the ultimate devil’s advocate. Have an idea? He instantly has reasons it won’t work. Have a belief? He instantly has reasons it’s unfounded. Enjoy something? He instantly critiques it to within an inch of its life. He’s quick. He’s sharp. He’s insightful.

    He’s extremely intelligent.

    Or not.

    According to a study of over 200,000 people published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (aptly titled “The Cynical Genius Illusion”), while conventional wisdom holds that cynical people — people who tend to be doubtful that something is worthwhile or will happen — are smarter, wiser, and “cognitively superior,” they actually tend to do worse on cognitive ability tests and academic competency tests.

    Turns out the opposite is true: The more cynical you are, the less intellectually competent you’re likely to be. People who have poor reasoning skills are more likely to assume the worst in human nature. More likely to assume that people are selfish and untrustworthy. Are more likely to see conspiracies where there are none, to reflexively assume belief is unfounded, to believe that almost nothing could actually be what it appears to be.

    As the researchers write:

    Our results revealed that laypeople tend to endorse the “cynical genius” belief — that is, believed that cynical individuals would do better on a variety of cognitive tasks and cognitive ability tests than their less cynical counterparts.
    (In fact), cynical individuals are likely to do worse rather than better on cognitive tasks, cognitive abilities and competencies tests, and tend to be less educated than less cynical individuals.

    Why? For one thing, as Adam Grant points out in this podcast episode with Matthew McConaughey, assuming the worst in others is a form of protection. Guarding yourself against the worst in others — whether people, or organizations, or beliefs, or anything — keeps you safe.

    For another, taking a cynical position is easy. It’s a lot simpler, and a lot less risky, to say why something won’t work. It’s a lot easier to judge than understand, much less embrace.

    Plus, statements like, “Trust me, the risk outweighs the rewards,” appear to carry the weight of experience. Saying, “You know, that might be worth trying”? Since experience — or implied knowledge — can’t play a part, a statement like that sounds more like a guess.

    And then there’s this: A Journal of Personality and Social Psychology study shows we tend to pay more attention and give much greater weight to negative experiences. As brain scans reveal, negative events are quickly stored in your long-term memory, but research shows you need to actively think about positive events for 12 seconds or more in order for them to be transferred to long-term memory.

    In short, it’s easy to be cynical, to latch on to the negatives instead of considering potential positives, both because it’s safer and because we’re built that way.

    All of which is a problem.

    Take deciding whether to invest in new businesses or initiatives; a study published in Management Science shows that people are more swayed by negative views than positive ones. While evaluators lower their scores by more points after seeing scores more critical than their own, they don’t raise them after seeing more favorable scores. 

    Negative clearly seemed smarter than positive, which leads to protecting against failure — instead of seeking to maximize success.

    The next time someone immediately shoots down an idea, don’t assume they’re smart.

    More important, the next time an idea sounds interesting to you, don’t immediately assume you’re wrong.

    Or less intelligent.

    As Jeff Bezos says, “The smartest people are constantly revising their understanding, reconsidering a problem they thought they’d already solved. They’re open to new points of view, new information, new ideas, contradictions, and challenges to their own way of thinking.”

    And are smart enough to realize that never trying something new means never experiencing, enjoying, or achieving anything new. 

    Which is a pretty sucky way to live.

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Haden

    Source link

  • Flight Centre Survey: Few Clients Plan to Cut Travel Budgets

    [ad_1]

    More than eight in 10 companies expect their business travel spending to increase or remain steady from now until next summer, according to a Flight Centre Travel Group survey of more than 1,200 of its corporate clients.

    The State of the Market survey, conducted among FCM Travel and Corporate Traveler clients in June and July, showed 45 percent planned to increase their travel budgets year over year for the 2026 fiscal year, which runs from July 2025 through June 2026. For 9 percent of total respondents, those increases are expected to be more than 20 percent, according to Flight Centre.

    Thirty-seven percent of respondents said their travel spending would remain steady year over year in the fiscal year, and 8 percent said they planned to reduce spending year over year for the fiscal year. The remaining 9 percent were not certain of their spending trends for the fiscal year.

    The results were slightly more bullish than Flight Centre’s client survey this time last year, when 42 percent of surveyed clients expected a year-over-year increase in travel spending for the fiscal year.

    The trend for respondents in the Americas was similar to the overall trendlines in the survey. Among clients in the region, 47 percent expect travel spending in the fiscal year to be up year over year—9 percent of total respondents saying the increase would be more than 20 percent—and 38 percent expect it to stay the same, while 10 percent expect a spending reduction. Only 5 percent of the Americas respondents were not certain of their spending for the fiscal year.

    “With macroeconomic challenges beginning to ease globally, the survey shows that customers have a more optimistic outlook for the year ahead,” Flight Centre Travel Group Americas president Charlene Leiss said in a statement. “Corporate travel is increasingly seen as a non-discretionary spend—a critical component of business success.”

    About a third of total respondents said more than half of their travel spend in the 2026 fiscal year will go toward meetings, events and conferences, an increase from 28 percent who said the same last year. In the Americas, a slightly higher 36 percent of respondents said meetings, events and conferences will make up more than half of their travel budget for the fiscal year.

    [ad_2]

    mbaker@thebtngroup.com (Michael B. Baker)

    Source link

  • Globespan Acquires U.S. Division of Key Travel

    [ad_1]

    Globespan Travel Management has acquired the U.S. division of U.K.-based Key Travel Group, the travel management companies announced.

    With the transaction, the financial terms of which were not disclosed, Los Angeles-based Globespan said it will provide “uninterrupted service” for Key Travel’s U.S. clients as it moves them into its ecosystem. Key Travel focuses on the non-profit, academic and humanitarian travel sectors, while Globespan also serves clients in the non-profit sector as well as the finance, media, legal and professional services sectors.

    The acquisition “is a natural progression for our U.S. business,” Key Travel U.S. managing director Mike Schields said in a statement. “Their leadership, technology and service philosophy align closely with our own.”

    China-based Trip.com Group has acquired Key Travel’s U.K. and Europe, the Middle East and Africa operations and is integrating those operations into Trip.Biz, the full-service TMC powered by Trip.com.

    [ad_2]

    mbaker@thebtngroup.com (Michael B. Baker)

    Source link

  • Michael Tracey: Cutting through the Jeffrey Epstein fog

    [ad_1]

    What is the Jeffrey Epstein story, and what does it mean? Just asking questions.

    Today’s conversation is with journalist Michael Tracey, who has been picking apart what he calls the “Epstein mythology” for the past several weeks over at his Substack. In short, he thinks 90 percent of what most people believe about this case is false, and that this is mostly the fault of credulous establishment journalists who chose to uncritically publish alleged victims’ narratives and ignore inconvenient facts, as well as opportunistic alternative media figures who spun the story into a sprawling conspiracy for political and personal gain. 

    Tracey has been attacked and on the attack, and you’ll hear him air his many grievances with other journalists, lawyers, and politicians in this conversation, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R–Ga.), whom he calls out as his “enemy” because she instructed police to remove him from an Epstein-related press conference after he asked a question about an accusers’ credibility in Washington D.C. this week.  

    The goal of this episode was to move beyond the personality clashes and egos and wild speculation and drill down into what it is we actually know and don’t know about Jeffrey Epstein. But as we talked, it became clear that this kind of detached analysis just wasn’t going to be possible, that the egos and the clashes and the agendas remain intricately tied up with how this story has unfolded. The incentives faced by establishment journalists, podcasters, accusers, and politicians have shaped this story and our understanding of it, mostly for the worse. 

    But in the marketplace of ideas, there is also a countervailing incentive to move against the herd and correct the record. And maybe a turbulent and confrontational personality like Michael Tracey–who admits in this interview that he’s “wired differently”–was exactly what was needed to break taboos, ask uncomfortable questions, and push for real disclosure about the nature of the story that has loomed over American politics for at least a decade.

    Regardless of how one feels about Tracey’s tone or the soundness of his analysis, anyone who purports to care about this story should at least engage with the questions he’s asking and start asking their own questions about what the Epstein story really means.

    This conversation has been edited for time and clarity.

    Mentioned in the podcast:

    1. U.S. v. Jeffrey Epstein
    2. Epstein “provided information” to the FBI: FBI Records: The Vault — Jeffrey Epstein Part 06
    3. Jeffrey Epstein’s Sick Story Played Out for Years in Plain Sight,” by Vicky Ward
    4. 2020 Justice Department Office of Professional Responsibility Report on Epstein
    5. Justice Department interview of Ghislaine Maxwell 
    6. A Look Inside Jeffrey Epstein’s Manhattan Lair,” by David Enrich, Matthew Goldstein, Jessica Silver-Greenberg, and Steve Eder
    7. Jeffrey Epstein Appeared to Threaten Bill Gates Over Microsoft Co-Founder’s Affair With Russian Bridge Player,” by Khadeeja Safdar and Emily Glazer
    8. THE MEDIA BUSINESS; Maxwell Is Buried In Jerusalem,” by Clyde Haberman
    9. Inside Jeffrey Epstein’s Spy Industry Connections,” by Matthew Petti
    10. Donald Trump retweets #ClintonBodyCount conspiracy
    11. Trump on Truth Social: “Nobody cares about” Jeffrey Epstein
    12. Justice Department/FBI Memo on “Epstein Files,” July 2025
    13. Virginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell
    14. The Billionaire’s Play Club,” by Virginia Roberts
    15. July 24, 2025, proffer by Ghislaine Maxwell
    16. Labor Secretary Alex Acosta’s July 2019 press conference
    17. Prince Andrew & the Epstein Scandal: The Newsnight Interview,” by BBC News
    18. Security camera footage from Jeffrey Epstein’s prison block
    19. Michael Tracey booted from Epstein presser, September 3, 2025.

    [ad_2]

    Zach Weissmueller

    Source link

  • Amex GBT: Q2 Business Travel Price Hikes Accelerate

    [ad_1]

    Overall business travel cost increases accelerated in the second quarter, with hotel rates in major cities for business travel expected to rise further in 2026, according to American Express Global Business Travel’s Business Travel Pulse report, published on Tuesday.

    The Pulse’s business travel price index—based on data from Amex GBT’s data lake combined with analysis by its consulting team—shows that business travel prices were up 2.6 percent year over year in the second quarter, up from a 0.6 percent year-over-year increase in the first quarter. The index score gives airfares a weight of 65 percent, hotel rates a weight of 25 percent and the remaining 10 percent split evenly between rail and car rental prices.

    The report also highlighted the cities that are projected to see the largest increases in hotel prices in 2026, using its data along with inflation and GDP forecasts from the International Monetary Fund and modeled with open-source software Prophet. In North America, Amex GBT projects the largest increases will be in Toronto (5.8 percent) and New York (4 percent). In Europe, Amex GBT projects hotel prices will increase 4.8 percent year over year in Madrid, 4.2 percent year over year in London, 3.7 percent year over year in Berlin and 2.4 percent year over year in Paris.

    Other global cities in the report projected to have hotel cost increases above 4 percent year over year include Buenos Aires (5.6 percent), Rio de Janeiro (5 percent), Cape Town (4.7 percent) and Bengaluru (6.4 percent).

    [ad_2]

    mbaker@thebtngroup.com (Michael B. Baker)

    Source link

  • Turkish Airlines €300M Investment Offer Accepted by Air Europa

    [ad_1]

    Air Europa has accepted a €300 million (US$352 million)
    offer from Turkish Airlines for a minority stake in the Spain-based carrier,
    Turkish Airlines announced this week, adding that the exact percentage of the
    stake will be determined following the closing. The process is expected to be
    complete within six to 12 months, subject to obtaining the necessary permits
    and approvals from regulatory authorities, according to Turkish Airlines.

    [ad_2]

    dairoldi@thebtngroup.com (Donna M. Airoldi)

    Source link

  • Gabbard Slashing Intelligence Office Workforce, Cutting Budget By More Than $700 Million – KXL

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Office of the Director of National Intelligence will dramatically reduce its workforce and cut its budget by more than $700 million annually, the Trump administration announced Wednesday.

    Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said in a statement, “Over the last 20 years, ODNI has become bloated and inefficient, and the intelligence community is rife with abuse of power, unauthorized leaks of classified intelligence, and politicized weaponization of intelligence.”

    She said the intelligence community “must make serious changes to fulfill its responsibility to the American people and the U.S. Constitution by focusing on our core mission: find the truth and provide objective, unbiased, timely intelligence to the President and policymakers.”

    The reorganization is part of a broader administration effort to rethink its evaluation of foreign threats to American elections, a topic that has become politically loaded given President Donald Trump’s long-running resistance to the intelligence community’s assessment that Russia interfered on his behalf in the 2016 election.

    In February, for instance, Attorney General Pam Bondi disbanded an FBI task force focused on investigating foreign influence operations, including those that target U.S. elections. The Trump administration also has made sweeping cuts at the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, which oversees the nation’s critical infrastructure, including election systems.

    Gabbard’s efforts to downsize the agency she leads is in keeping with the cost-cutting mandate the administration has employed since its earliest days, when Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency oversaw mass layoffs of the federal workforce.

    It’s the latest headline-making move by a key official who just a few months ago had seemed out of favor with Trump over her analysis of Iran’s nuclear capabilities but who in recent weeks has emerged as a key loyalist.

    She’s released a series of documents meant to call into question the legitimacy of the intelligence community’s findings on Russian election interference in 2016, and this week, at Trump’s direction, revoked the security clearances of 37 current and former government officials.

    The ODNI in the past has joined forces with other federal agencies to debunk and alert the public to foreign disinformation intended to influence U.S. voters.

    For example, it was involved in an effort to raise awareness about a Russian video that falsely depicted mail-in ballots being destroyed in Pennsylvania that circulated widely on social media in the weeks before the 2024 presidential election.

    Notably, Gabbard said she would be refocusing the priorities of the Foreign Malign Influence Center, which her office says on its website is “focused on mitigating threats to democracy and U.S. national interests from foreign malign influence.”

    It wasn’t clear from Gabbard’s release or fact sheet exactly what the changes would entail, but Gabbard noted its “hyper-focus” on work tied to elections and said the center was “used by the previous administration to justify the suppression of free speech and to censor political opposition.”

    The Biden administration created the Foreign Malign Influence Center in 2022, responding to what the U.S. intelligence community had assessed as attempts by Russia and other adversaries to interfere with American elections.

    Its role, ODNI said when it announced the center’s creation, was to coordinate and integrate intelligence pertaining to malign influence.

    In a briefing given to reporters in 2024, ODNI officials said they only notified candidates, political organizations and local election offices of disinformation operations when they could be attributed to foreign sources. They said they worked to avoid any appearance of policing Americans’ speech.

    Sen. Tom Cotton, the Republican chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, hailed the decision to broadly revamp ODNI, saying it would make it a “stronger and more effective national security tool for President Trump.”

    More about:

    [ad_2]

    Jordan Vawter

    Source link

  • Good Will Hunting: A Masterclass in Therapy and Emotional Growth

    [ad_1]

    Take a deep dive into the therapeutic relationship as illustrated in the classic film Good Will Hunting, where a defiant genius and a compassionate therapist confront pain, grief, and regret in an emotional journey that changes them both.


    Good Will Hunting (1997) is a widely acclaimed cinematic masterpiece, offering one of the most compelling depictions of therapy ever portrayed on screen — and it remains one of my personal favorite movies of all time.

    The main protagonist is Will Hunting (played by Matt Damon) who is portrayed as an underachieving genius who works a modest life as a janitor at the prestigious MIT. Despite his intelligence, he’s emotionally guarded and frequently gets into brawls and run-ins with the law. One day he solves a difficult math equation on a chalkboard and is then approached by professors and faculty to pursue his talents in mathematics, but first he has to see a therapist and work out his personal problems.

    Will’s journey into therapy begins reluctantly with a typical “I don’t need to see a shrink” attitude. But after a series of arrests and getting bailed out, he’s court-ordered to start seeing someone. He cycles through five therapists, including a hypnotist, antagonizing each one to the point that they refuse to work with him. Will’s sharp intellect and deep emotional defenses make it nearly impossible for anyone to break through and connect with him.

    Finally he meets Sean Maguire (played by Robin Williams), a compassionate but no-nonsense therapist with a rich life of experiences, including deep wounds from his past, and accumulated wisdom. This article breaks down their relationship, session by session, to explore how it evolved throughout the film and potential lessons we can takeaway from it.

    First Meeting: Tensions and Boundary Testing

    Will’s first meeting with Sean begins with his usual strategy of intellectual dominance and boundary testing.

    He scans Sean’s office, searching for things to criticize, and immediately targets his book collection. “You people baffle me. You spend all this money on beautiful, fancy books, and they’re the wrong f***ing books.” Sean, unfazed, spars back, standing his ground while playfully naming books he assumes Will has read.

    Things reach a climax in the scene when Will begins to mock a painting hanging on the wall, which hits a personal nerve for Sean regarding the grief and loss of his wife. Sean’s reaction is striking and unconventional. After listening patiently, he suddenly grabs Will by the throat and threatens him: “If you ever disrespect my wife again, I will end you.”

    While it’s an unethical move for a therapist, this unorthodoxy shows Will that he is not dealing with an ordinary therapy. Both Will and Sean share working class Irish backgrounds in the hard streets of Boston. Sean knows this language and he is willing to speak it if it’s the only way to get through to Will. Sean thus establishes himself as someone who understands Will’s world, where strength and confrontation often dominate.

    This moment lays the foundation for their relationship. Sean shows he’s human, not just a clinical professional, but also that he won’t be intimidated or dismissed by Will’s antics. It’s the first step in breaking down Will’s defenses.

    The Bench Scene: A Turning Point

    After their intense first meeting, Sean invites Will to a park, where he delivers one of the most memorable monologues in the film. Sean begins by admitting his vulnerability, sharing that Will’s comments about the painting kept him up all night and genuinely bothered him.

    By admitting Will’s comments hurt him, Sean shows he’s willing to show weakness, but then he sharply pivots to challenge Will directly, “But then you know what occurred to me? You’re just a kid. You don’t have the faintest idea what you’re talking about.”

    Sean goes on to explain that despite Will’s intellectual brilliance, he lacks lived experience. Sean shares personal moments that defined him — seeing the Sistine Chapel in person, being truly in love with someone, the scars of losing friends in war, and watching a loved one die of cancer. These deep experiences illustrate the limitations of knowledge without life. Sean’s speech is a blend of tough love and empathy, forcing Will to confront the gap between his intellectual defenses and his emotional reality.

    good will hunting bench

    The bench scene sets the tone for the remainder of their therapy. Sean acknowledges Will’s brilliance but challenges him to live beyond books and theories. Sean leaves the door open for Will to continue having sessions with him only if he is ready to truly open up.

    Second Therapy Session: Silence

    The next therapy session begins with complete silence as Sean and Will sit across from each other. After two emotionally charged meetings and still lingering tensions, neither is willing to be the first to reach out or break the quiet.

    The entire hour goes by and neither says a word. While this may feel like an unproductive session, this is another important moment in their relationship. The power of silence acts as a reset button in their relationship.

    Sometimes, simply sitting in the same room without confrontation (“sharing space”) can be a meaningful step toward healing. It allows both Sean and Will to recalibrate, setting the stage for a more productive dynamic moving forward.

    Third Therapy Session: Humor and Opening Up

    The silence stand-off continues into their third session, with each still not willing to budge or say the first word.

    Finally Will breaks the silence with a dirty joke, immediately breaking the tensions in the room and reinitiating conversation in a fun and light-hearted way. After they share a laugh, Will begins to open up about a girl he’s been dating recently. Will mentions how he worries the girl is “too perfect,” and that getting to know her more would just shatter that illusion. Sean wisely responds back, “That’s a super philosophy, that way you can go through your entire life without ever really getting to know anybody.”

    Sean opens up about his wife and the quirks behind their love, like her farting in her sleep and waking up the dog. After all these years, these are the little moments he remembers and cherishes about her. No one is “perfect,” and it’s often the imperfections that make someone special to us.

    good will hunting laugh

    Robin Williams improvised the story about his wife causing Matt Damon to genuinely burst out into laughter during this scene.


    After more light-hearted banter, Will turns the tables and ask why Sean never got remarried. Will firmly replies, “My wife is dead.” Then Will, always testing and challenging, uses one of Sean’s lines against him: “That’s a super philosophy, that way you can go through your entire life without ever really getting to know anybody.”

    Fourth Therapy Session: Love, Opportunities, and Regrets

    Now on much more amicable terms, Will opens up with an honest question, “Do you ever wonder what your life would be like if you never met your wife?”

    Sean accepts that there’s been a lot of pain and suffering in his relationship, but he doesn’t regret any of it, because the good moments were worth it and he wouldn’t trade a single day with her through good or bad times. Will presses to learn more, “When did you know she was the one?”

    “October 21, 1975.”

    It was game six of the World Series, the biggest game in Red Sox history – and Sean slept on the sidewalk all night with friends to get tickets. He recalls the momentous occasion when the Red Sox hit a game-winning home run and everyone rushed the field.

    “Did you rush the field?”

    “Hell no, I wasn’t there. I was in a bar having a drink with my future wife.”

    The story illustrates how Sean knew his wife was the one when he was willing to miss the opportunity of a life-changing moment (being at a historical sporting event) for an even bigger life-changing moment (finding love and his future wife).

    Will is incredulous and yells at Sean for missing the game. He asks, “How did your friends let you get away with that?” And Will simply replies, “I just slid my ticket across the table and said, ‘Sorry guys, I gotta see about a girl.’”

    Fifth Therapy Session: Facing Potential and Values

    In this session, Will begins to ask deep questions about what he wants to do with the rest of his life and what are the best uses of his intelligence and talents.

    After a job interview with the NSA, Will goes into a diatribe about how his talents could be hypothetically used for catastrophic consequences, like overthrowing foreign governments, destabilizing entire countries, or getting his friends sent to fight some war overseas.

    Sean asks him directly, “What are you passionate about? What do you want?”

    They discuss the honor of work, including construction work and Will’s job as a janitor and the pride he takes in it, even though society may not view it as the most rewarding job in the world. Sean prods further asking why he chose to be a janitor at the most prestigious technical university in the world, and why he secretly finished math problems, highlighting that there may be something else driving Will.

    Sean asks again what Will wants to do with his life, and he deflects by joking that he wants to be a shepherd on his own plot of land away from the world. Sean isn’t willing to waste his time and decides to end the session early. Will has a final outburst before leaving, “You’re lecturing me on life? Look at you, you burnout!”

    This session reveals how Will is afraid of his potential and talents, including the responsibility that comes with them. “I didn’t ask to be born like this.” He feels safe continuing to live in his hometown, work his everyday job, and hangout with his childhood friends. He’s afraid to dream bigger. There may be something deeper driving Will’s thirst for knowledge, but he doesn’t know his core values and motivations, and doesn’t truly know himself or what he wants out of life.

    Sixth Therapy Session: “It’s Not Your Fault”

    The next therapy session begins with Sean uncovering more about Will’s painful past, particularly his life as an orphan and the physical abuse he endured with his foster parents. Sean reveals that he, too, grew up with an abusive, alcoholic father, forging another shared bond between them.

    As their conversation unfolds, Will correctly guesses that his final psychological report likely diagnoses him with “attachment issues” and a “fear of abandonment.” He acknowledges that these issues may have driven him to push his girlfriend away, leading to their recent breakup. When Sean gently asks if he wants to talk about it, Will declines.

    Sean then shifts the focus, holding onto the reports as he says, “I don’t know a lot. But you see this? All this shit? It’s not your fault.”

    At first, Will politely agrees, brushing off the comment, but Sean repeats the line: “It’s not your fault.” With each repetition, Will’s emotional defenses begin to crumble, and he cycles through a range of emotions—politeness, confusion, anger, and aggression—until the weight of Sean’s words fully sinks in. Overwhelmed, Will finally breaks down and cries, releasing years of suppressed pain and guilt.

    good will hunting

    In this profoundly cathartic moment, Sean embraces Will, offering the safe and empathetic connection that has been absent from Will’s life. It’s a turning point where Will confronts his past without blame or self-judgment, finally opening the door to acceptance and healing.

    Last Goodbye

    In their last meeting, Will thanks Sean for all of his help and shares the good news that he has accepted an exciting new job. Sean, in turn, reveals his plans to travel and explore life on his own terms. They exchange numbers to keep in touch, symbolizing the respect and connection they’ve built.

    This moment underscores that therapy is often a chapter in life that prepares individuals to continue their journeys independently. Both Will and Sean needed to say their goodbyes and go their separate ways to continue following their paths in life. Will has learned to face his fears and embrace his potential. Sean has rediscovered purpose and fulfillment through helping Will. Their goodbye is bittersweet but profound, a reminder that growth often requires letting go and moving forward.

    In the final scene, Will leaves a letter at Sean’s place that reads, “If the professor calls about that job, just tell him sorry—I had to go see about a girl.” This moment beautifully exemplifies Will’s newfound courage to follow his heart and take meaningful risks.

    Conclusion

    The therapeutic relationship between Sean and Will in Good Will Hunting is a masterclass in storytelling and psychology. Through humor, vulnerability, and mutual respect, Sean helps Will break through years of pain and fear, while Will reignites Sean’s passion for life. Their journey is a powerful testament to the transformative potential of therapy — and how creating a space of acceptance, healing, and growth can change lives.


    Enter your email to stay updated on new articles in self improvement:

    [ad_2]

    Steven Handel

    Source link

  • Unbelievable facts

    Unbelievable facts

    [ad_1]

    While great apes can learn hundreds of sign language words, they have never been observed asking…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Unbelievable facts

    Unbelievable facts

    [ad_1]

    The Flynn Effect shows that average IQ scores are steadily rising with each generation. IQ tests are…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Court rules that the government can hide its own report on CIA torture

    Court rules that the government can hide its own report on CIA torture

    [ad_1]

    The government investigated itself—and you’re not allowed to see the results. On Monday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled that the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) doesn’t apply to the Senate’s 2012 report on CIA torture programs. The decision blocks off an avenue to find out what’s in the 6,700-page paper, which the CIA has fought to keep under wraps for more than a decade.

    The ruling comes after a small victory for transparency. On Friday, defense lawyers at the Guantanamo Bay military tribunal were allowed to release a photo of their defendant handcuffed and nude at a CIA black site in 2004. Defense lawyers have mentioned the existence of disturbing photos from black sites, but because almost all evidence at the Guantanamo trials is classified, they have never been able to release these photos to the public.

    Over the weekend, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin canceled military prosecutors’ controversial plea deal for three accused Al Qaeda members. Their cases may go to trial—which would allow lawyers to uncover more evidence related to the CIA torture program.

    The Senate investigation had been prompted by past CIA attempts to cover its tracks. After learning that the CIA had destroyed tapes of prisoners being tortured, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence began an investigation into the CIA’s entire interrogation program. (CIA officer Gina Haspel, who helped destroy the tapes and had personally watched torture sessions, later became CIA director during the Trump administration.)

    By 2012, staffers had dug up reams of evidence on CIA malfeasance. They reported not only the specific torture methods, but also that the CIA had tortured innocent people (including a mentally challenged man and two of the agency’s own informants), that CIA leaders had lied to the public and Congress about the program, and that much of the intelligence gained under torture was useless or worse.

    For example, the false reports linking Iraq to Al Qaeda, ultimately used to justify the Iraq War, may have come from a tortured prisoner, according to the Senate report. Another prisoner, Mohamedou Ould Slahi, was tortured into making a false terrorism confession. The military held Slahi at Guantanamo Bay for 14 years before unceremoniously releasing him. FBI agent Ali Soufan—whose memoir the CIA also fought to keep secret—alleges that the CIA refused to believe a real confession warning about a real plot in 2002 because it wasn’t extracted under torture.

    After the Senate committee finished its investigation, the CIA pushed hard to stop the results from seeing the light of day, arguing that the details must stay classified for national security reasons. When a Senate staffer locked up one incriminating document in a committee safe, fearing that the CIA would destroy it, the CIA proved his fears right by hacking into the Senate’s computer network.

    The Senate was finally allowed to publish a 525-page summary of its findings in 2014, but the details remain classified to this day. Even some pseudonyms of CIA officers and code names for countries were censored in the declassified summary, making it impossible to piece together a coherent timeline of many events.

    City University of New York law professor Douglas Cox tried a different route: a FOIA request. Although FOIA doesn’t apply to the Senate, it does apply to the executive branch. Luckily for Cox, the Senate committee had provided copies of the reports to different executive agencies, including the FBI, Department of Justice, Department of Defense, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and Department of State.

    Cox asked all of those agencies for their copy in December 2016. The Department of Justice argued that, even if it possessed a copy of the report, the document still belonged to the Senate, so FOIA didn’t apply. In June 2017, the Trump administration asked several of the agencies to return their copies to the Senate committee, hoping to prevent this kind of disclosure. Cox decided to sue, alleging that the administration was violating FOIA.

    The case dragged on through years of appeals, and the Biden administration continued to fight Cox in court to keep details of CIA torture hidden. This week, a panel of three judges for the 2nd Circuit upheld the administration’s argument. The Senate “manifested a clear intent to control the report at the time of its creation, and because the Committee’s subsequent acts did not vitiate that intent, the report constitutes a congressional record not subject to FOIA,” the judges wrote.

    The Senate committee had disagreed on what to do with the report. Late committee chair Dianne Feinstein (D–Calif.) wrote that the report “should be made available within the CIA and other components of the Executive Branch for use as broadly as appropriate to help make sure that this experience is never repeated.” But then-ranking member Richard Burr (R–N.C.) called the report a “highly classified and committee sensitive document” that “should not be entered into any executive branch system of records.”

    Feinstein’s statement was “ambiguous over who retains full power over the ultimate disposition of the report,” and “does not clearly address whether the report may be disseminated outside of the Executive Branch to, for example, the public,” Judge William Nardini stated in the Monday ruling. So the torture report is still legally a Senate document, outside of FOIA.

    Of course, nothing is stopping the Senate itself from releasing more of the torture report. But ordinary citizens apparently don’t have a right to sue for its disclosure. For now, that decision will have to be a political one.

    [ad_2]

    Matthew Petti

    Source link

  • Unbelievable facts

    Unbelievable facts

    [ad_1]

    Elephants can recognize themselves in mirrors and have passed body awareness tests, rare…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Cubic to Demonstrate Advanced Intelligence Technologies at GEOINT 2024 Symposium

    Cubic to Demonstrate Advanced Intelligence Technologies at GEOINT 2024 Symposium

    [ad_1]

    Press Release


    Apr 30, 2024 06:00 PDT

    Accelerating Decision Dominance from Space to the Edge

    Cubic Defense, a recognized industry leader in providing digital intelligence, will showcase its all-domain geospatial intelligence solutions May 5-8 during the GEOINT 2024 Symposium at the Gaylord Palms Resort & Convention Center in Orlando, Florida. 

    “Cubic Digital Intelligence delivers actionable and seamless data integration from space to edge,” said Paul Sartorius, VP & GM, Cubic Digital Intelligence. “Our proven technologies provide advanced geospatial intelligence solutions to address requirements for the Defense and Intelligence communities.” 

    Visit Cubic at booth #2031 and speak with experts who will demonstrate solutions that include:

    • Geospatial Intelligence: Revolutionizes battlespace data dissemination with seamless integration into existing workflows even in DDIL environments. The Tactical Awareness Kit (TAK) ecosystem integrated with Cubic’s TAKTICS plugin pushes rapid geospatial data updates from enterprise to forward-deployed GEOINT systems. 
    • Advanced Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR): Cutting-edge solutions for ISR processing with Unified Video and ANUBIS, which seamlessly integrates PED (Processing, Exploitation and Dissemination) capabilities for collaborative mission execution.
    • Edge GEOINT: Solutions for tactical units, including HiPER DRIVE, a portable, self-powered, ultra-high-performance map server that fits in a pocket, providing geospatial data anywhere, anytime. 
    • Space Data Delivered to the Edge: Tactical downlink terminal, GATR TRAC, communicates with multi-orbit (HEO, MEO, LEO) constellations and aerial sensors ensuring timely receipt of ISR data, enabling deep sensing from both space and aerial layers.

    To learn more about this event visit: GEOINT Symposium 2024 | Cubic.

    About Cubic
    Cubic creates and delivers technology solutions in transportation that make people’s lives easier by simplifying their daily journeys and defense capabilities that help promote mission success and safety for those who serve their nation. Led by our talented teams around the world, Cubic is driven to solve global challenges through innovation and service to our customers and partners.

    Part of Cubic’s portfolio of businesses, Cubic Defense provides networked Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C5ISR) solutions and is a leading provider of live, virtual, constructive, and game-based training solutions for both U.S. and Allied Forces. These mission-inspired capabilities enable assured multi-domain access; converged digital intelligence; and superior readiness for defense, intelligence, security and commercial missions. For more information, Cubic Digital Intelligence | Cubic.  

    Source: Cubic Defense

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Pendulum Launches ElectionIQ: Intelligence Into the 2024 U.S. Elections

    Pendulum Launches ElectionIQ: Intelligence Into the 2024 U.S. Elections

    [ad_1]

    ElectionIQ helps organizations navigate the 2024 US elections by providing proactive insights to identify risks, trends, and narratives that directly impact their brands, enabling informed decision-making

    Pendulum, the intelligence platform for automated discovery, tracking and analysis of risks and opportunities within online narratives, is excited to announce the launch of ElectionIQ, offering organizations an in-depth understanding of how the narratives surrounding the 2024 U.S. election intersect with and impact their interests. ElectionIQ empowers teams to stay ahead of the curve by identifying and addressing issues early that are pivotal to voter behavior and legislative outcomes. 

    With the 2024 U.S. election poised to be one of the most contested and volatile elections in recent history, organizations are facing unprecedented challenges in navigating a highly polarized political landscape. Fast-flowing information across a proliferating number of social media platforms makes it crucial for organizations to stay ahead of the curve. Organizations need new tools and strategies to effectively uncover, track, and respond to evolving narratives and trends that could negatively impact their reputation and policy interests. 

    Built on Pendulum’s award-winning narrative ML technology, ElectionIQ offers automated discovery and analysis capabilities, enabling organizations to proactively understand how candidates, stakeholders, policy influencers, and major election-cycle stories affect their brands and interests. Videos and podcasts are the new town square for key communities and voter groups, and ElectionIQ is the platform that provides the most comprehensive coverage across video, audio, and text platforms, including YouTube, TikTok, BitChute, podcasts, Twitter, Telegram, and many others.  

    “We are thrilled to launch ElectionIQ, a unique offering that redefines how organizations engage with and understand the complexities of the 2024 US elections,” said Mark Listes, CEO at Pendulum. “ElectionIQ empowers companies to ensure they are prepared and best positioned to navigate this unprecedented election year with insight and confidence.”

    Key features of ElectionIQ include:

    • Track and analyze prebuilt, regularly-updated election-related topics and narratives, along with their impact on brand and policy interests
    • Leverage AI-driven automated reporting across multiple platforms and mediums
    • Understand how the direct voices of key candidates, influencers, and officials shape the conversation, public opinion, and likely post-election effects
    • Discover potential risks and opportunities in narratives associated with federal Presidential, House, and Senate races with automated horizon-scanning capabilities 

    Pendulum’s partnership with Hill & Knowlton, the global strategic communications leader for transformation, combines the valuable insights generated by ElectionIQ with the strategic expertise of H&K advisors at scale.

    “ElectionIQ represents a significant advancement in our ability to help clients navigate the speed, complexity and risks of the 2024 US election cycle,” said Grant Toups, Global Chief Technology Officer at Hill & Knowlton. “Our partnership with Pendulum integrates ElectionIQ into H&K’s innovation portfolio, enabling our intelligence teams and communications advisors to provide clients with the solutions they need to protect and enhance reputation during this pivotal political moment.”

    Customers are taking advantage of ElectionIQ to identify intersections between their brands, assets, and executives and key election narratives, ensuring a clear understanding of their exposure within the election information landscape. Learn how your organization can benefit from ElectionIQ by visiting www.pendulumintel.com/electioniq.

    About Pendulum

    Pendulum empowers organizations to convert risks into opportunities by transforming insights into actionable decisions. Pendulum’s horizon scanning capabilities track online communications, allowing organizations to anticipate threats in critical areas such as brand recognition, social issues, and global unrest to make better-informed decisions. Leveraging proprietary AI and machine learning technology, Pendulum provides the most comprehensive coverage across video, audio and text content to enable organizations to respond effectively. Pendulum is designed for ease of use, offering flexibility right from the start.

    Source: Pendulum Intelligence

    [ad_2]

    Source link