ReportWire

Tag: industrial news

  • Stocks are on a seemingly unstoppable hot streak, but this bond-market ‘tipping point’ could see it end in a hurry

    Stocks are on a seemingly unstoppable hot streak, but this bond-market ‘tipping point’ could see it end in a hurry

    [ad_1]

    The S&P 500 index is on the verge of a fifth straight monthly gain in July. It’s a reality that few on Wall Street expected just eight months ago.

    As a result, it seems that one by one, equity analysts at the big banks are issuing mea culpas or tweaking their S&P 500 targets.

    With so many reconsidering their assumptions about markets and the economy, one analyst who has been bullish for months sees an opportunity to reflect on what Wall Street got wrong in 2023 — and by doing so, pinpoint potential existential threats to the rally that may lie ahead.

    Jawad Mian, a longtime financial markets professional and the founder of Stray Reflections, said professional investors and economists generally underestimated just how resilient U.S. corporations, and U.S. consumers, and the broader U.S. economy would be to higher interest rates. At the same time, they failed to fully appreciate inflation’s ability to boost corporate profits over the long term.

    So far, stocks have proved resilient to higher bond yields in 2023, but that doesn’t mean they always will be. Mian believes that rising real yields could eventually push past a “tipping point” that would send U.S. equity valuations sharply lower.

    “I think what’s happening is we are collectively discovering how high interest rates can go before the economy breaks,” he said.

    “I think the 10-year yield is heading toward 5%. But the nuanced take here is the path higher is not troublesome…however, at some point, we’ll reach a level that’s too much,” Mian added during a phone interview with MarketWatch.

    The yield on the 10-year Treasury note
    TMUBMUSD10Y,
    3.962%

    stood at 3.955% on Friday.

    Past the point of no return

    The Federal Reserve pushed its policy interest-rate to its highest level in 22 years earlier this week, and further hikes certainly could push long-dated bond yields higher, Mian said. But the blow that drives markets over the cliff could easily come from somewhere else as well.

    For example: Foreign investors, particularly those in Japan, could choose to dump U.S. Treasurys now that they’re being enticed by more attractive yields back home.

    Investors received a small taste of what this might look like on Thursday afternoon when a headline about the Bank of Japan’s plans to loosen its grip on its government bond market sent the yield on the 30-year Treasury bond
    TMUBMUSD30Y,
    4.021%

    north of 4%, sparking a selloff in stocks that led to the Dow Jones Industrial Average snapping a 13-day winning streak.

    Yields on the 10-year Japanese government bond hit their highest levels since 2014 on Friday after the BOJ confirmed those reports during its July policy meeting.

    See: Why U.S. stocks and bonds stumbled on talk of a Bank of Japan policy tweak

    Corporate earnings are another puzzle

    While it’s important for investors to monitor bond-market threats like this, yields don’t exist in a vacuum. Corporate earnings are another important piece of the puzzle.

    Higher yields make bonds more attractive to investors, helping to dim the appeal of stocks, but they also increase borrowing costs for corporations, potentially cutting into profits and pushing companies to lay off employees or enact other belt-tightening measures.

    The more pressure companies face from rising borrowing costs, they more likely they’ll need to take more cost-cutting measures like laying off employees.

    “Generally speaking, if yields move higher that should put downward pressure on multiples. That’s a risk to the stock market for sure,” said James St. Aubin, chief investment officer for Sierra Investment Management, during a phone interview with MarketWatch.

    For now at least, it looks like stocks could continue to ride this wave of momentum higher, even if valuations are looking somewhat stretched relative to recent history already, St. Aubin said. For this to continue though, corporate earnings will need to keep pace with increasingly optimistic expectations.

    Already, stock valuations are looking lofty based on the price-to-earnings ratio, one of Wall Street’s favorite metrics for determining how expensive or cheap the market looks.

    The forward 12-month price-to-earnings ratio for the S&P 500 index currently stands at 19.4. That’s already higher than the five-year average of 18.6, and the 10-year average of 17.4, according to FactSet data.

    Right now, investors are willing to tolerate this because they expect corporate profits to grow substantially in the years ahead, even though profits are expected to contract by 7% in the quarter ended in June, bringing the stretch of negative earnings growth to a third straight quarter.

    But in 2024, year-over-year earnings growth is expected to swell to 12.6%. If companies meet, or surpass, these expectations, stocks will likely hold on to their gains, if not continue to climb, St. Aubin said.

    However, should earnings growth disappoint, a painful market reckoning might follow.

    Since the start of 2023, U.S. stocks have nearly erased all of their losses from 2022, which was the worst year for stock-market performance since 2008, while bonds saw their biggest declines in decades as yields soared driven by inflation and the Federal Reserve’s aggressive interest-rate hikes. Since Jan. 1, the S&P 500
    SPX,
    +0.99%

    has risen 19.3% to 4,582.23, according to FactSet.

    The Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    +1.90%

    has risen 36.8% to 14,316, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    +0.50%

    is up 7%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Debt-ridden trucking giant Yellow reportedly shuts down

    Debt-ridden trucking giant Yellow reportedly shuts down

    [ad_1]

    Yellow Corp., one of the largest trucking companies in the country, shut down Sunday as it prepares to file for bankruptcy, the Wall Street Journal reported.

    According to the Journal, Yellow
    YELL,
    +24.02%

    alerted employees and customers Sunday that it would cease all operations by midday. The move does not come as a big surprise — Yellow has seen customers flee in recent years and a bankruptcy filing has been widely expected, with liquidation likely to follow.

    Yellow did not reply to a request for confirmation or comment.

    Yellow’s collapse imperils the jobs of about 30,000 people, including about 20,000 Teamsters, according to the Journal. Many of the company’s non-union workers were reportedly laid off Friday.

    Yellow and the Teamsters last week were able to avert a strike. In June, management sued the union, claiming it was unnecessarily blocking restructuring plans, a charge the union denied while blaming poor management.

    In 2020, Yellow received a $700 million loan from the government to stay afloat during the pandemic, but has repaid only about $230 million, government documents show. Overall, the company reportedly has about $1.5 billion in debt.

    According to the Journal, Yellow’s closure should not cause many disruptions for customers, as most shifted their cargo shipment to rival companies in recent weeks.

    Yellow shares have sunk 72% year to date, and have collapsed 85% over the past 12 months.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • China-Founded Rivals Ramp Up War for American Shoppers

    China-Founded Rivals Ramp Up War for American Shoppers

    [ad_1]

    China-Founded Rivals Ramp Up War for American Shoppers

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • August used to be the best month for the stock market. Then it became the worst.

    August used to be the best month for the stock market. Then it became the worst.

    [ad_1]

    August the best month for average stock market performance? Or is it the worst?

    The answer depends on the period of stock-market history you examine. Over the 90 years from the Dow Jones Industrial Average’s
    DJIA,
    +0.50%

    inception in 1896 until 1986, August on average was far ahead of the other months — more than four times larger, as you can see from the table below. August outperformed the other months’ average by 1.4 percentage points. This difference is significant at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine.

    In the years since then, in contrast, August has been the worst month for the stock market, on average, lagging the other months’ average by 1.7 percentage points. Since 1986, in fact, August has been a worse month for the stock market than even September, whose reputation for stock market losses is widely known.

    August’s average DJIA return

    Average return of all other months

    August’s rank among all 12 months

    1896 to 1986

    +1.8%

    +0.4%

    1st

    After 1986

    -0.8%

    +0.9%

    12th

    If the 36 years since 1986 were all that statisticians had to go on, they would conclude that August’s underperformance was significant at the 95% confidence level — just the opposite of the conclusion that emerges from the 90 years prior. But when analyzing the Dow’s entire history since 1896, August’s performance is no better or worse than average.

    This August, in order to use history as a basis for investing, you’d first need to come up with a plausible explanation of what changed in the 1980s that caused August to swing from best to worst.

    Though I’m not aware of any such explanation, it’s always possible that one exists. To search for it, I analyzed monthly values back to 1900 for the Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) index that was created by Scott Baker of Northwestern University, Nicholas Bloom of Stanford University, and Steven Davis of the University of Chicago. We know from Finance 101 that the stock market responds to changes in economic uncertainty, so we’d be onto a possible explanation of August’s seasonal tendencies if the EPU underwent some fundamental change in 1986.

    But no such change shows up in the data. August’s average EPU level is no different than for any of the other months of the calendar, either before or after 1986.

    Another possible explanation might trace to investor sentiment. To investigate that possibility, I analyzed stock market timers’ average recommended equity exposure levels, as measured by the Hulbert Stock Newsletter Sentiment Index (HSNSI). I was looking to see if, after 1986, the HSNSI was significantly different at the beginning of August than in other months, on average. The answer is “no.”

    A plausible explanation might still exist for August’s change of fortune beginning in the mid-1980s, notwithstanding my inability to find one. But absent such an explanation, the most likely explanation is that it’s a random fluke.

    It would hardly be a surprise if randomness is the culprit. Most of the patterns that capture Wall Street’s attention are in fact nothing more than statistical noise. The reason we nevertheless insist that significant patterns exist is because — as numerous psychological studies have shown — we’re hardwired to find patterns even in randomness.

    That’s why your default reaction to all alleged patterns, not just those involving August, should be skepticism. The odds are overwhelming that they aren’t genuine. Only if those patterns can survive the scrutiny of a skeptical statistician should you even begin to be interested.

    Mark Hulbert is a regular contributor to MarketWatch. His Hulbert Ratings tracks investment newsletters that pay a flat fee to be audited. He can be reached at mark@hulbertratings.com

    More: Puzzled by the stock-market surge? Overshoots are the new normal, Bank of America strategist says

    Plus: Here’s how long the stock market rally may last

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Palantir Stock Spikes After Analyst Says to Buy ‘The Messi of AI’

    Palantir Stock Spikes After Analyst Says to Buy ‘The Messi of AI’

    [ad_1]



    Palantir Technologies


    shares were getting a major boost Friday after Wedbush technology analyst Dan Ives launched coverage of the AI software company with an Outperform rating, setting a target price of $25. Ives contends Palantir is well-positioned to take market share in both the commercial and government analytics software markets.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Puzzled by the stock-market surge? Overshoots are the new normal, Bank of America strategist says

    Puzzled by the stock-market surge? Overshoots are the new normal, Bank of America strategist says

    [ad_1]

    Stocks have surged this year without really anything going right, besides the rolling out of error-prone artificial intellligence chatbots. Interest rates have surged to a 22-year high, earnings are down from last year, and pandemic-era savings are being drawn down if not entirely exhausted.

    Read more: Those extra pandemic savings are now wiped out, Fed study finds.

    Strategists at Bank of America led by Michael Hartnett have an interesting theory.

    “Asset price overshoots [are] the new normal,” they say.

    Consider:

    • Oil
      CL00,
      -0.37%

      went from -$37 in April 2020 to $123 in March 2022, then down to $67 the following 12 months.

    • Bitcoin
      BTCUSD,
      +0.32%

      went from $5,000 in January 2020 to $68,000 in November 2021, down to $16,000 a year later, and up to $29,000 now.

    • The S&P 500 went from 3300 to 2200 to 4800 to 3500 to 4600 thus far in 2020s.

    “AI is simply the new overshoot,” they say.

    The S&P 500
    SPX,
    +0.67%

    has gained 18% this year as the Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    +1.53%

    has rallied by 34%.

    Hartnett and team noted that real retail sales — that is, adjusted for inflation — fell at a 1.6% year-over-year clip, which has coincided with recessions since 1967. Real retail sales falls in excess of 3% are associated with hard recessions.

    Historically, a 2-3 point rise in the savings rate also is recessionary, and already it’s risen from 3% to 4.6%. The unemployment rate so far hasn’t risen, though a 0.5 point to 1 point rise in the jobless rate also is typically recessionary.

    “It would be so ‘2020s’ for the economy to hit a brick wall just as everyone punts ‘soft landing’ into 2024,” they say.

    They like emerging market/commodities as summer upside plays and credit and tech as autumn downside plays.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Digital advertising is Meta and Google’s world, and everyone else is coping with it

    Digital advertising is Meta and Google’s world, and everyone else is coping with it

    [ad_1]

    There are two certainties in the tech world when it comes to digital advertising: Google and Meta. And then there’s everyone else.

    Through economic thick and thin, Google and Meta are the gold standards by virtue of broad reach (billions of people globally), product dominance (in search and social media, respectively) and in their positions in the lightning-fast AI race. This week’s earnings results for Alphabet Inc.
    GOOGL,
    +2.46%

    GOOG,
    +2.42%

    and Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    +4.42%

    proved that emphatically once again.

    Both companies rebounded from recent wobbly digital ads sales of their own through gigantic consumer reach and aggressive plans to parlay AI into ad sales. Google has developed (or dabbled) in some form of AI for at least seven years, and in a conference call with analysts Wednesday, Meta Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg said his company will focus in the near term on AI to develop agents, ad features in existing products like Instagram and Reels, and internal productivity and efficiency. “We want to scale them, but they are hard to forecast,” he admitted.

    Read more: Meta’s stock jumps after AI, ad momentum drive earnings and revenue higher

    And: Alphabet earnings push stock up 6%, fueled by strong ad sales and strides in AI

    Conversely, for companies consigned to the also-ran category, such as Snap Inc.
    SNAP,
    +3.39%

    and X — the former Twitter — the news was bleak. Snap forecast disappointing third-quarter sales amid a spending push to draw advertisers.

    “We continue to believe it will take multiple quarters of improved execution for many investors to get more comfortable with the story longer term,” JP Morgan analysts said in a note on Snap earlier this month.

    Digital-advertising leader Google sought to remind everyone it has been doing AI a long time while Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    +2.31%
    ,
    a major investor in ChatGPT pioneer OpenAI, tempered its approach, Josh Wetzel, chief revenue officer at OneSignal, said in an interview. “AI’s greatest immediate value may be for Facebook advertising,” he said, pointing to it as an efficient and effective tool after Facebook encountered issues with data-privacy changes Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    +1.35%

    made to mobile devices.

    Read more: Alphabet earnings remind Wall Street of Google’s AI prowess

    “Meta’s solid quarter adds further evidence to the view that advertisers are choosing to spend their budget on the so-called market leaders, such as Facebook and Instagram, at the expense of the smaller social-media networks, like Snap,” said Jesse Cohen, senior analyst at Investing.com.

    Jon Oberlander, executive vice president of social at digital-marketing agency Tinuiti, added: “It is, to some extent, still Meta/Google’s game, especially for performance advertisers, as the ROI and scale advertisers can find in the mid-lower funnel gap above other platforms.”

    At the same time, Forrester analyst Kelsey Chickering said linear television ad revenue will slow between now and 2027 to about $65 billion from $70 billion as traditional TV continues to lose the under-25 crowd that has fled to streaming services and creator-heavy platforms like Snapchat and TikTok.

    Digital advertising is on track to grow in the high single digits, or more, in 2023, slightly ahead of June’s forecast estimates from GroupM and Magna of around 8% each, according to Brian Wieser, head of Madison and Wall, a media and advertising consultancy for investors.

    Most of that growth will benefit Google, Meta, and Microsoft’s LinkedIn, according to data from Emburse. Conversely, Emburse found ad spending on Twitter/X has plunged 54% from a year ago in May, before Elon Musk bought the company.

    “Google, Meta and LinkedIn are platforms where people go to consume information, search for ideas, or give context to what they experiencing in their personal or work lives,” Emburse Chief Experience Officer Johann Wrede said.

    While Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai boasted Wednesday of “continued leadership in AI and our excellence in engineering and innovation are driving the next evolution of Search” and other services, as well as improved YouTube ad sales, Meta’s addition of potential X-killer Threads could dramatically inflate its ad sales going forward.

    Zuckerberg sees potential in Threads long term despite a plunge in its user sign-ups because X is hemorrhaging advertising clients, and this week reportedly slashed ad costs to lure business customers.

    “The launch of Threads holds great promise for Meta. While there are currently no ads on the app, it’s inevitable that they will come and the ability to use data from other Meta properties for targeting is a highly lucrative proposition for brands,” Aaron Goldman, chief marketing officer at Mediaocean, said in an email.

    That translates to more near-term pain for smaller platforms such as Snap and X, which are posting negative growth, Michael Nathanson of SVB MoffettNathanson warned in a note Wednesday.

    “The truth is that Alphabet started integrating machine learning and artificial intelligence into their products and ad solutions close to a decade ago,” he said. Snap and others are scrambling to catch up.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why U.S. stocks and bonds stumbled on talk of a Bank of Japan policy tweak

    Why U.S. stocks and bonds stumbled on talk of a Bank of Japan policy tweak

    [ad_1]

    Worries about a possible policy tweak by the Bank of Japan threw a wet blanket on a stretched U.S. stock-market rally Thursday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average snapping its longest winning streak since 1987 after the 10-year Treasury yield surged back above the 4% level.

    The Japanese yen also strengthened after a news report said policy makers on Friday would discuss a possible tweak to the Bank of Japan’s so-called yield-curve control policy that would loosen the cap on long-dated government bond yields.

    Nikkei, without citing sources, reported that BOJ officials would talk about the matter at Friday’s policy meeting and that the potential change would allow the yield on the 10-year Japanese government bond
    TMBMKJP-10Y,
    0.440%

    to trade above its cap of 0.5% “to some degree.”

    ‘Ultimate fear’

    Why is that a negative for U.S. Treasurys and, in turn, U.S. stocks?

    The “ultimate fear” is that Japanese investors, who have vast holdings of U.S. fixed income, including Treasury notes and other securities, “begin to see a higher level of yields in their own backyard,” Torsten Slok, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, told MarketWatch in a phone interview. That could prompt heavy liquidation of those U.S. positions as investors repatriate holdings to reinvest the proceeds at home.

    That dynamic explains the knee-jerk reaction that saw the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield
    TMUBMUSD10Y,
    4.004%

    surge more than 16 basis points to end above 4%, he said. Yields rise as debt prices fall.

    The surge in yields, in turn, saw stocks give up early gains, with U.S. indexes ending lower across the board.

    What is yield curve control?

    The Bank of Japan began implementing yield curve control, or YCC, in 2016, a policy that aims to keep government bond yields low while ensuring an upward-sloping yield curve. Under YCC, the BOJ buys whatever amount of JGBs is necessary to ensure the 10-year yield remains below 0.5%.

    Nikkei said a possible tweak would allow gradual increases in the yield above 0.5%, but would clamp down on any sudden spikes, allowing the BOJ to rein in fluctuations driven by speculators.

    Global market participants are sensitive to changes in YCC. The BOJ sent shock waves through markets in December when it lifted the cap from 0.25% to 0.5%. Investors were rattled by the prospect of the Bank of Japan giving up its role as the remaining low-rate anchor among major central banks.

    BOJ Gov. Kazuo Ueda in May said the bank would start shrinking its balance sheet and end its yield-curve control policy if a 2% inflation looks achievable and sustainable after many years of undershooting.

    Yen rallies

    The yield on the 10-year JGB has traded above 0.4%, but remained below the 0.5% cap. Continued interest rate rises by the Federal Reserve and other major central banks in the past year have raised worries that the 10-year JGB yield could test the limit, Nikkei reported. Those rate hikes, meanwhile, have added pressure to the yen, whose weakness is seen contributing to inflation pressures.

    The yen
    USDJPY,
    -0.02%

    strengthened following the report. The U.S. dollar was off 0.5% versus the currency, fetching 139.48 yen.

    The Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    -0.67%

    ended the day down nearly 240 points, or 0.7%, snapping a 13-day winning streak, while the S&P 500
    SPX,
    -0.64%

    declined 0.6% and the Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    -0.55%

    lost 0.5%.

    Japanese stocks have solidly outpaced strong gains for U.S. equities in 2023, with the Nikkei 225
    NIK,
    +0.68%

    up 26% so far this year versus an 18.7% rise for the S&P 500.

    See: Japan’s stock market is roaring 25% higher. These 4 things could keep the rally going.

    What’s next

    Investors are waiting to see what the Bank of Japan actually has to say.

    While the Nikkei report helped “exaggerate” a selloff in Treasurys, the market may be inoculated against bigger swings after the BOJ’s December adjustment to the rate band, said Ian Lyngen and Benjamin Jeffery, rates strategists at BMO Capital Markets, in a note.

    The analysts said they expect that “the magnitude of the follow through repricing in U.S. rates will be comparatively more contained than would otherwise be expected.”

    More recently, the weak yen has raised the cost of hedging long Treasury positions for Japanese investors. So a stronger yen resulting from a shift toward tighter policy would help make hedging costs for owning Treasurys less onerous for Japanese investors as well, Lyngen and Jeffery wrote, “which over the longer term may begin to make Treasurys more attractive to Japanese buyers and add to the list of sources for duration demand.”

    That could make U.S. debt more attractive to new Japanese buyers, Slok agreed.

    But that’s oveshadowed by the near-term worry, Slok said, that existing Japanese investors will be inclined to sell Treasurys. Flow data will be very much in focus if the Bank of Japan follows through on the apparent trial balloon floated in the Nikkei report.

    Investors will be watching, he said, to see “if the train is leaving the station.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ford revenue jumps 12%, but stock dips as Wall Street spooked by shifting EV production goal

    Ford revenue jumps 12%, but stock dips as Wall Street spooked by shifting EV production goal

    [ad_1]

    Ford Motor Co. late Thursday reported quarterly profit that was about three times higher than last year’s and a 12% increase in its revenue, moving it to raise its outlook for 2023, but the beat-and-raise was overshadowed by a delay in EV production goals.

    Ford stock
    F,
    +0.44%

    initially rose about 3% after the positive results, with Chief Executive Jim Farley telling investors that the company’s goal is to match an “exciting, long-term vision” of itself with “boringly predictable execution quarter after quarter, year after year.”

    Share gains started to fade, however, as investors zeroed in on the shifted production goal, and ended the extended session down 1.2%. Ford said it expects to reach a production rate of 600,000 EVs in 2024; when it reported first-quarter earnings in May it said it would reach that milestone by the end of this year.

    The company’s EV production growth has been “disappointing,” CFRA analyst Garrett Nelson said Thursday.

    Nelson said he was “cautious” on Ford in light of the stock’s run so far this year and the possibility that “higher-for-longer” interest rates would weigh on sales after a strong first half of the year. Looming labor negotiations with the United Auto Workers are another reason for caution, he said.

    Ford earned $1.9 billion, or 47 cents a share, in the second quarter, nearly three times higher than in the year-ago period and a 4% margin, the company said. Adjusted for one-time items, the automaker earned 72 cents a share.

    Revenue rose 12% to $45 billion, Ford said, and its cash and liquidity are “persistently strong.” The revenue increase included a 39% rise for Ford’s EV business.

    Analysts polled by FactSet expected Ford to report adjusted earnings of 54 cents a share on sales of $43.17 billion.

    Supply-chain “disruptions” have persisted but are now easing, and Ford has “more work to do” to streamline its systems, reduce costs and improve quality, Farley said in the call.

    EV adoption is still in the upswing, Farley said, but the number of companies entering the market is growing even at the higher end of the market. With its varied offers, though, Ford is building EV “loyalists” to its brand, Farley said.

    Ford lifted its EBIT guidance range for the full year to between $11 billion and $12 billion. It also adjusted upward its expectations for 2023 adjusted free cash flow to between $6.5 billion and $7 billion. Capital expenditures would be between $8 billion and $9 billion, the automaker said.

    The guidance presumes “headwinds” including “global economic uncertainty and inflationary pressures, higher industrywide customer incentives and continued EV pricing pressure,” Ford said, as well as increased warranty costs and costs associated with union contract negotiations.

    On the positive side, “tailwinds” accounted for in the guidance included “improved” supply chain, higher industry volumes, upside from the its all-new Ford Super Duty truck and lower commodity costs, Ford said.

    Ford earlier this month surprised Wall Street by cutting the price of its sought-after electric pickup truck, the F-150 Lightning.

    Ford earnings close the cycle for major U.S. automakers, as Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    -3.27%

    reported second-quarter earnings last week and General Motors Co.
    GM,
    +1.78%

    earlier this week.

    Shares of Ford have gained 19% so far this year, matching the advance for the S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    -0.64%
    .
    The stock holds an outperformance, however, in the past three months, up 19% to the S&P’s 11%.

    See also: GM, Hyundai and other car manufacturers to build 30,000 fast EV chargers in challenge to Tesla

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Intel stock rallies after earnings show AI data-center beat, strong PC sales

    Intel stock rallies after earnings show AI data-center beat, strong PC sales

    [ad_1]

    Intel Corp. shares surged in the extended session Thursday after the chip maker posted a surprise profit, but while data-center sales came in better than expected, a larger beat in PC product sales drove margin improvement.

    Intel
    INTC,
    +0.55%

    shares surged around 8% after hours, following a 0.6% rise to close the regular session at $34.55.

    The company reported second-quarter net income of $1.48 billion, or 35 cents a share, versus a loss of $454 million, or 11 cents a share, in the year-ago period. After adjusting for restructuring charges and other items, Intel reported 13 cents a share, versus net income of 28 cents a share a year ago.

    Revenue fell to $12.95 billion from $15.32 billion in the year-ago period, and adjusted gross margins came in at 39.8%, the company said.

    Intel had forecast an adjusted second-quarter loss of 4 cents a share on revenue of about $11.5 billion to $12.5 billion for the current period, and adjusted gross margins of about 33.2% for the quarter.

    Analysts surveyed by FactSet, on average, expected a loss of 4 cents a share on revenue of $12.12 billion.

    The margin beat was “largely a function of revenue,” Intel Chief Financial Officer David Zinsner told analysts on a conference call, and that revenue beat was much more pronounced in Intel client, or PC, business than it was data center.

    “We had obviously beat revenue significantly, and we’ve got a good follow-through in the fixed-cost nature of our business, and so that really was what helped us outperform significantly on the gross-margin side in the second quarter,” Zinsner told analysts.

    Intel posted PC-group sales of $6.8 billion and data-center sales of $4 billion, while analysts surveyed by FactSet had forecast $6.08 billion and $3.8 billion, respectively.

    Before the conference call, Edward Jones analyst Logan Purk told MarketWatch in an interview following the report that most of the improvement in Intel’s gross margin came from the unexpected amount of growth in the PC business.

    “The magnitude of client computing growth, and how the PC market is recovering faster than anticipated,” came as a surprise, Purk told MarketWatch. The analyst, who has a hold rating on Intel, said he expects sequential single-digit improvement in data center going forward.

    Still, on the call, Intel Chief Executive Pat Gelsinger hammered home the point that Intel was wholeheartedly going after the AI market, which is expected to be dominated by Nvidia Corp.
    NVDA,
    +0.99%
    ,
    and to a lesser extent, by Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
    AMD,
    +0.92%
    ,
    which reports earnings on Tuesday.

    “We see AI being infused in everything and there’s going to be AI chips for the edge, AI chips for the communications infrastructure, AI chips for sensing devices, for automotive devices, and we see opportunities for us both as a product provider and as a foundry and technology provider across that spectrum,” Gelsinger said.

    Meanwhile, network and edge sales came in at $1.4 billion, while analysts called for $1.48 billion, and foundry services revenue rose to $232 million for the quarter, while Wall Street looked for $149.2 million.

    “In the third quarter, we do obviously at the midpoint see revenue growth sequentially and so that will be helpful in terms of gross margin,” Zinsner told analysts on the call. “We expect, again, pretty good follow-through as we get that incremental revenue.”

    Intel forecast third-quarter earnings of about 20 cents a share on revenue of about $12.9 billion to $13.9 billion and adjusted gross margins of about 43% for the current quarter. Analysts surveyed by FactSet had forecast third-quarter adjusted earnings of 16 cents a share on revenue of $13.22 billion.

    Read: Intel may have bottomed, but earnings will show if chip maker can hope to catch up to Nvidia and AMD in AI

    Year to date, Intel shares have gained nearly 31%, while the PHLX Semiconductor Index 
    SOX,
    +1.86%

    has surged 49%, the S&P 500
    SPX,
    -0.64%

    has grown 18%, the Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    -0.55%

    has gained 34% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    -0.67%

    is up more than 6%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘The housing recession is over,’ real-estate group says, as pending home sales tick up for the first time in 4 months

    ‘The housing recession is over,’ real-estate group says, as pending home sales tick up for the first time in 4 months

    [ad_1]

    The numbers: Home sales inched up for the first time in four months, even as the U.S. housing market continues to deal with a dearth of listings. 

    Pending home sales rose by 0.3% in June from the previous month, according to the monthly index released Thursday by the National Association of Realtors.

    The figure exceeded expectations on Wall Street. Economists were expecting pending home sales to fall 0.5% in June.

    Transactions were still down 15.6% from last year.

    Pending home sales reflect transactions where a contract has been signed for the sale of an existing home but the sale has not yet closed. Economists view it as an indicator of the direction of existing-home sales in subsequent months.

    Big picture: Home sales rose as the housing market contends with excess buyer demand and a shortfall in the supply of homes for sale. 

    Real-estate agents are looking to home builders to fill the gap as rate-locked homeowners hold out on selling. New-home sales surged in May, and while they lost some momentum in June, the broader trend is still upward.

    The prices of new homes, which are generally seen as more expensive, are also coming down. The gulf between the median price of a new home and of an existing home narrowed in June, based on data from the NAR and the federal government. 

    What the real-estate experts said: “The recovery has not taken place, but the housing recession is over,” NAR chief economist Lawrence Yun said. “The presence of multiple offers implies that housing demand is not being satisfied due to lack of supply.” 

    The NAR also said it expects rates for 30-year mortgages to average 6.4% this year and to fall to 6% in 2024. 

    The NAR also expects existing-home sales to fall 12.9% in 2023 from the previous year, to 4.38 million, before recovering in 2024 to a rate of 5.06 million.

    The group also expects home prices to hold steady this year, falling only slightly by 0.4% to $384,900, before rising 2.6% next year to $395,000.

    “The West — the country’s most expensive region — will see reduced prices, while the more affordable Midwest region is likely to see a small positive increase,” Yun added.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Weaker Energy Prices Temper Shell’s Profit, but Not Cash Payouts for Investors

    Weaker Energy Prices Temper Shell’s Profit, but Not Cash Payouts for Investors

    [ad_1]

    Weaker Energy Prices Temper Shell’s Profit, but Not Cash Payouts for Investors

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Anheuser Busch InBev to cut jobs after Bud Light boycott

    Anheuser Busch InBev to cut jobs after Bud Light boycott

    [ad_1]

    Anheuser-Busch InBev is planning to cut jobs in the U.S. after a sharp deterioration in sales following a boycott that’s still impacting Bud Light.

    The industry publication Brewbound said the company was going to cut 2% of its U.S. workforce, where it employs 19,000. The company told the publication that front-line workers, including warehouse staff and field reps, will not be impacted. The company did not specifically identify slumping Bud Light sales as the cause of the layoffs.

    Bud Light sales have tumbled after the company’s ill-fated social media promotion with Dylan Mulvaney.

    Citing Nielsen U.S. beer data, analysts at Bank of America said volumes at the brewer tumbled by 15.3% year-over-year in the four weeks ending July 15, compared to the 2.7% decline for the broader U.S. beer category.

    Bud Light sales over that same time period skidded 29.8%, and Budweiser volumes skidded 14%. In contrast, Coors Light sales rose 17% in the last four weeks, Miller Lite volumes rose by 12.5% and Yuengling sales surged 38%.

    Anheuser-Busch InBev’s U.S.-listed shares
    BUD,
    +0.22%

    have dropped 2% this year. In its home market of Belgium, shares
    ABI,
    +0.97%

    rose 0.6% on Thursday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • WSJ News Exclusive | Trucker Yellow Prepares to File for Bankruptcy as Customers Flee

    WSJ News Exclusive | Trucker Yellow Prepares to File for Bankruptcy as Customers Flee

    [ad_1]

    Trucker Yellow Prepares to File for Bankruptcy as Customers Flee

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Banc of California is expected to keep leading regional banks higher as PacWest deal ignites sector

    Banc of California is expected to keep leading regional banks higher as PacWest deal ignites sector

    [ad_1]

    Banc of California Inc.’s proposed agreement to acquire PacWest Bancorp. helped send regional-bank stocks considerably higher on Wednesday. But even after a two-day increase of 12% for its shares, the acquiring bank remains the favorite name among analysts covering regional players in the U.S.

    The merger agreement was announced after the market close on Tuesday, but the rumor mill had already sent Banc of California’s
    BANC,
    +0.62%

    stock up by 11% that day. Then on Wednesday, shares of PacWest Bancorp
    PACW,
    +26.92%

    shot up 27% to $9.76, which was above the estimated takeout value of $9.60 a share when the deal was announced. The merger deal, if approved by both banks’ shareholders, will also include a $400 million investment from Warburg Pincus LLC and Centerbridge Partners L.P.

    A screen of regional banks by rating and stock-price target is below.

    Deal coverage:

    With PacWest closing above the initial per-share deal valuation, it is fair to wonder whether or not its shareholders will vote to approve the agreement. In a note to clients on Wednesday, Wedbush analyst David Chiaverini called Banc of California’s offer “fair, but not overwhelmingly attractive,” and wrote that PacWest was “a likely seller before the mini banking crisis occurred in March.”

    While Chiaverini went on to predict the deal’s approval by PacWest’s shareholders, he added that he “wouldn’t be surprised if there were some dissent among a minority of shareholders [which could] possibly open the door to the potential emergence of a third-party bid.”

    More broadly, Odeon Capital analyst Dick Bove wrote to clients on Wednesday that the merger deal, along with increasing involvement of private-equity firms in lending businesses, the expected enhancement of regulatory capital requirements for banks and other factors could lead to more consolidation among smaller banks.

    He went on to write that we might be entering a period for the banking industry similar to the 1990s, “when rules were being changed and acquisitions were rampant,” which “created new investment opportunities.”

    The SPDR S&P Regional Banking exchange-traded fund
    KRE,
    +4.74%

    rose 5% on Wednesday but was still down 17% for 2023, while the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY,
    +0.02%

    was up 19%, both excluding dividends.

    KRE holds 139 stocks, with 98 covered by at least five analysts working for brokerage firms polled by FactSet. Out of those 98 banks, 45 have majority “buy” ratings among the analysts. Among those 45, here are the 10 with the most upside potential over the next 12 months, implied by consensus price targets:

    Bank

    Ticker

    City

    Total assets ($mil)

    July 26 price change

    Share buy ratings

    July 26 closing price

    Consensus price target

    Implied 12-month upside potential

    Banc of California Inc.

    BANC,
    +0.62%
    Santa Ana, Calif.

    $9,370

    1%

    71%

    $14.71

    $18.58

    26%

    Enterprise Financial Services Corp.

    EFSC,
    +1.83%
    Clayton, Mo.

    $13,871

    2%

    80%

    $41.75

    $49.25

    18%

    First Merchants Corp.

    FRME,
    +3.52%
    Muncie, Ind.

    $17,968

    4%

    100%

    $32.38

    $37.33

    15%

    Amerant Bancorp Inc. Class A

    AMTB,
    +3.47%
    Coral Gables, Fla.

    $9,520

    3%

    60%

    $20.26

    $23.30

    15%

    Old Second Bancorp Inc.

    OSBC,
    +3.39%
    Aurora, Ill.

    $5,884

    3%

    100%

    $16.15

    $18.50

    15%

    F.N.B. Corp.

    FNB,
    +2.87%
    Pittsburgh

    $44,778

    3%

    75%

    $12.91

    $14.50

    12%

    Columbia Banking System Inc.

    COLB,
    +3.95%
    Tacoma, Wash.

    $53,592

    4%

    55%

    $22.63

    $25.32

    12%

    Wintrust Financial Corp.

    WTFC,
    +3.43%
    Rosemont, Ill.

    $54,286

    3%

    92%

    $86.05

    $95.33

    11%

    Synovus Financial Corp.

    SNV,
    +6.01%
    Columbus, Ga.

    $60,656

    6%

    75%

    $34.06

    $37.73

    11%

    Home BancShares Inc.

    HOMB,
    +4.56%
    Conway, Ark.

    $22,126

    5%

    57%

    $24.09

    $26.67

    11%

    Source: FactSet

    Click on the tickers for more about each bank.

    Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information available for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

    Any stock screen can only be a starting point when considering whether or not to invest. If you see any stocks of interest here, you should do your own research to form your own opinion.

    Don’t miss: How you can profit in the stock market from an incredible financial-services trend over the next 20 years

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ServiceNow Posts Strong Earnings and Adds New AI Tools. But the Stock Is Lower.

    ServiceNow Posts Strong Earnings and Adds New AI Tools. But the Stock Is Lower.

    [ad_1]


    • Order Reprints

    • Print Article



    ServiceNow


    posted better-than-expected results for its latest quarter and lifted its full-year outlook.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Meta’s stock jumps after AI, ad momentum drive earnings, revenue jump

    Meta’s stock jumps after AI, ad momentum drive earnings, revenue jump

    [ad_1]

    Facebook parent Meta Platforms Inc. is raking in digital ads, as its earnings attest, and Wall Street is rewarding it. The company’s stock rose about 7% in after-hours trading Wednesday.

    Meta
    META,
    +1.39%

    reported fiscal second-quarter net income of $7.79 billion, or $2.98 a share, compared with net income of $6.7 billion, or $2.46 a share, in the year-ago quarter.

    Revenue climbed 11% to $32 billion from $28.8 billion in the year-ago quarter.

    Analysts surveyed by FactSet had expected on average net income of $2.91 a share on revenue of $31.1billion.

    Also see: Zuck beats Musk at his own game with Meta’s year of efficiency

    A rebound in advertising, the monetization of Instagram and Reels, and AI-fueled ad targeting and measurement contributed to the quarter’s performance. Meta’s better-than-expected performance comes on the heels of a similarly strong quarter from Google parent
    GOOGL,
    +5.78%

    GOOG,
    +5.59%

    Alphabet Inc. and poor results from Snap Inc.
    SNAP,
    -14.23%
    .

    “We had a good quarter. We continue to see strong engagement across our apps and we have the most exciting roadmap I’ve seen in a while with Llama 2, Threads, Reels, new AI products in the pipeline, and the launch of Quest 3 this fall,” Meta Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg said in a statement announcing the results. AI has been an increasingly dominant story line for Meta, which has quickly shifted its focus from the metaverse. Zuckerberg said AI remains the company’s near-term focus, with metaverse poised to have a long-term impact.

    “In many ways, the two are interrelated,” Zuckerberg said of AI and metaverse in a conference call with analysts. He also spotlighted the potential of Threads, a Twitter-like service that launched earlier this month with much fanfare. “When it gets to hundreds of millions of users, we’ll see how it monetizes,” he said. “It is a long road ahead.”

    Meta executives forecast third-quarter revenue of $32 billion to $34.5 billion, while analysts on average were expecting $31.2 billion, according to FactSet.

    Facebook had 2.06 billion daily active users, up 5% from a year ago, and the “family” of Meta apps — which includes Instagram — reported daily active users of 3.07 billion, up 7%.

    There were blips amid the hoopla, however. Meta says it expects 2023 total expenses will be in the range of $88 billion to $91 billion, compared to the prior range of $86 billion to $90 billion because of legal-related expenses in the second quarter. And Meta’s headcount dropped 14% from a year ago to 71,469 as of June 30. Zuckerberg said Meta’s austerity program will continue into 2024.

    Meta’s stock improved 1.4% to $298.57 in the regular session. The stock has sky-rocketed 148% so far this year, while the broader S&P 500 index 
    SPX,
    -0.02%

     has increased 19%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • British billionaire owner of Tottenham football club charged with ‘brazen’ insider trading

    British billionaire owner of Tottenham football club charged with ‘brazen’ insider trading

    [ad_1]

    U.S. prosecutors have called an offsides on the British billionaire owner of Tottenham Hotspur soccer team, charging him with a “brazen insider-trading scheme,” in which he passed secret stock tips worth millions to his girlfriends, private pilots and assistants for years.

    Joe Lewis, 86, who is one of the richest people in the United Kingdom, is accused of taking inside information about companies in which he was a large investor and handing it out to people around him for them to use to get rich.  

    “Notwithstanding his vast personal wealth, Lewis provided the inside information to his employees, romantic partners, and friends as a way to give them compensation and gifts,” federal prosecutors wrote in an indictment filed in New York.

    Prosecutors say Lewis, who Forbes has estimated to be worth $6.1 billion, carried on with the scheme from 2013 through 2021, helping his employees and friends make millions of dollars in illicit gains. 

    Some people who benefited from Lewis’ loose lips included staff on his private, $250 million super yacht, the Aviva.

    In some cases, prosecutors allege Lewis gave his pilots short-term, $500,000 loans to buy stock and then pay him back after they scored big based on his tips.

    “Thanks to Lewis, those bets were a sure thing,” said Damian Williams, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York. “That’s classic corporate corruption. It’s cheating and it is against the law.”

    Lewis’ private equity company, Tavistock Group, has investments in hundreds of companies ranging from agriculture, sports, resort properties and life-sciences businesses. The firm owns works of art by painters like Pablo Picasso, Henri Matisse and Gustav Klimt.

    Investigators say Lewis shared information about publicly-traded life-science groups Solid Biosciences
    SLDB,
    +0.88%

    and Mirati Therapeutics
    MRTX,
    -2.43%
    ,
    as well as beef producer Australian Agricultural Co.
    AAC,
    -2.79%

    and a special purpose acquisition company, BCTG. 

    Prosecutors also allege that he hid how much of a stake he owned in cancer therapeutics company Mirati “through a pattern of false filings and misleading statements” in order to manipulate markets.  

    A message sent to representatives of Tavistock wasn’t immediately returned.

    Making his fortune as a currency trader, Lewis became more widely known when he acquired the Tottenham football club in 2001 for $35.5 million. 

    He has lived as a tax exile in the Bahamas for years. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • PacWest stock rockets nearly 40% after Banc of California confirms plan to buy troubled bank

    PacWest stock rockets nearly 40% after Banc of California confirms plan to buy troubled bank

    [ad_1]

    PacWest Bancorp’s stock jumped more than 38% in after-hours trading Tuesday after the company said it had agreed to be acquired by Banc of California Inc. in an all-stock merger backed by two private-equity firms. The merger comes as PacWest looks to put a rocky period behind it.

    Under the terms of the merger agreement, PacWest
    PACW,
    -27.04%

    stockholders will receive 0.6569 of a share of Banc of California common stock for each share of PacWest common stock. Based on closing prices on Tuesday, the deal values PacWest at $9.60 a share, a premium over its closing price of $7.67 a share on Tuesday.

    Warburg Pincus and Centerbridge will provide $400 million in equity.

    PacWest stockholders will own 47% of the outstanding shares of the combined company, while the private-equity investors will own 19% and Banc of California shareholders will have 34%.

    PacWest said that it is the company being acquired and that it will change its name to Banc of California. PacWest said it will be the “accounting acquirer,” with fair-value accounting applied to Banc of California’s balance sheet at closing.

    Banc of California CEO Jared Wolff will retain the same role at the combined company.

    The combined company will repay about $13 billion in wholesale borrowings to be funded by the sale of assets, “which are fully marked as a result of the transaction, and excess cash,” the companies said.

    The merged company is currently projecting about $36.1 billion in assets, $25.3 billion in total loans, $30.5 billion in total deposits and more than 70 branches in California.

    John Eggemeyer, the independent lead director at PacWest, will be chair of the board of the combined company following the merger.

    The board of directors of the combined company will consist of 12 directors: eight from the existing Banc of California board, three from the existing PacWest board and one from the pair of private-equity firms led by Warburg Pincus.

    Citing sources close to the deal, the Wall Street Journal had reported earlier that a tie-up was imminent.

    In regular trading Tuesday, PacWest’s stock ended 27% down; trading was halted for volatility following the report of the deal.

    Banc of California’s stock rose 11% but was later halted for news pending as well. The stock rose more than 9% in after-hours trading on Tuesday.

    At last check, PacWest’s market capitalization was about $1.2 billion, while Banc of California’s was about $764 million. Combined, the business would be worth about $2 billion.

    PacWest’s big share-price move on Tuesday marks the latest in a volatile few months for the Beverly Hills, Calif., bank, which was founded in 1999.

    Investors had speculated that the bank could be the next to fail after Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank failed in March and First Republic Bank was taken over by JPMorgan.

    Also on Tuesday, PacWest said it lost $207.4 million, or $1.75 a share, in its second quarter, as it got a hit from items related to loan sales and restructuring of its lending unit Civic. The loss contrasts with earnings of $122 million, or $1.02 a share, in the year-ago period.

    Analysts polled by FactSet expected the bank to report a loss of 58 cents a share in the quarter.

    PacWest disclosed in recent months that it was exploring strategic alternatives while it sold off parts of its business to raise cash to strengthen its balance sheet. It sold a loan portfolio to Ares Management Corp.
    ARES,
    +0.92%

    in a move to generate $2 billion.

    Also read: PacWest sells loan portfolio to Ares Management in deal that generates $2 billion ‘to improve liquidity’

    It also sold a portfolio of loans to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings Inc.
    KW,
    -1.70%
    ,
    which then sold part of the portfolio to Canada’s Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd.
    FFH,
    +1.07%
    .

    Also read: PacWest sparks regional-bank rally after unveiling plan to sell loans worth $2.6 billion

    In May, PacWest sold its real-estate lending portfolio to Roc360.

    Also in May, PacWest’s stock dropped more than 20% after it said it had lost 9.5% of its deposits amid market volatility.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sales forecast sinks Snap stock, and execs say more investments are likely ahead to improve platform

    Sales forecast sinks Snap stock, and execs say more investments are likely ahead to improve platform

    [ad_1]

    Like other social-media platforms, Snap has struggled with a slowdown in the digital ad market.


    AFP/Getty Images

    Shares of Snap Inc. slid in after-hours trade Tuesday after the social-media platform forecast third-quarter sales that were below expectations, amid concerns about a wobbly digital advertising backdrop and the company’s spending push to improve the way people interact and advertise when they log on.

    Snap
    SNAP,
    -1.34%

    said it expects third-quarter revenue of $1.07 billion to $1.13 billion. The midpoint of that range was below FactSet estimates for $1.13 billion.

    Shares tumbled 18.4% after hours on Tuesday.

    “From a revenue perspective, our business remains in a period of rapid transition as we work to improve our advertising platform, while forward visibility of advertising demand remains limited,” executives said in Snap’s earnings release.

    Like other social-media platforms, Snap has struggled with a slowdown in the digital ad market, amid advertiser wariness of a recession. Snap has also faced competition from the likes of Tiktok and Instagram and Facebook parent Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    +0.98%
    .

    Snap has invested heavily strengthening its advertising platform, to serve users with more relevant ads and bring more impact to the businesses trying to advertise. It has also been spending to boost user engagement. Management, during Snap’s earnings call on Tuesday, said it would likely make “a further step up in investment here in Q3” to accelerate the progress being made on those efforts.

    Executives said during the earnings call that engagement with Snapchat friend stories in the U.S. had started to fall more slowly, with viewership trending better than they had forecast. And they said time spent watching Spotlight — a part of the site that helps users explore and discover content — more than tripled year over year.

    JPMorgan analysts, in a note earlier this month, said they continued to monitor Snap’s “heightened infrastructure costs.” But they said that the digital ad market had “stabilized” in the second quarter and that advertisers weren’t feeling as cautious, despite worries over the state of the economy.

    “That said, we continue to believe it will take multiple quarters of improved execution for many investors to get more comfortable with the story longer-term,” the analysts said.

    For the second quarter, Snap reported a net loss of $377 million, or 24 cents a share, compared with $422 million, or 26 cents a share, in the same quarter last year. Revenue fell to $1.07 billion, compared with $1.11 billion in the prior-year quarter.

    Analysts polled by FactSet expected Snap to report a per-share loss of 25 cents a share, on revenue of $1.05 billion.

    Daily active users rose 14% year over year to 397 million.

    Evan Spiegel, Snap’s chief executive, said during Tuesday’s call that despite the competition from larger social platforms, it still had some advantages — namely, communication with friends and family.

    “We actually think providing this place for friends and family to communicate has only become more important as more and more platforms focus on public social-media-style features where people feel like they have to compete for popularity, compete for likes and comments,” Spiegel said.

    “It’s never been more important to actually build deeper relationships with your friends and family,” he added.

    [ad_2]

    Source link