ReportWire

Tag: industrial news

  • Ford is going all in on hybrids. Here’s why.

    Ford is going all in on hybrids. Here’s why.

    [ad_1]

    Ford Motor Co. is betting that hybrid vehicles will be the bridge toward an all-electric-vehicle future for perhaps longer than most people expect. It’s a cautious strategy that has its admirers on Wall Street.

    Ford
    F,
    -4.48%

    is not thinking about “extremes” between hybrids and EVs, company Chief Executive Jim Farley said recently. The automaker decided to keep investing in heavy-duty hybrid vehicles and has been surprised by their popularity, he said.

    That’s a “subtle shift of strategy” for Ford, but one that makes sense in the current reality, said Garrett Nelson, an analyst with CFRA.

    On the call with analysts following Ford’s quarterly results last month, Farley noted that Ford’s hybrid offerings are extremely popular. About 10% of F-150 pickup trucks and 56% of smaller Maverick pickup trucks being sold in the U.S. are hybrids, he said.

    “We are adding hybrid options across our [internal-combustion-engine] lineup,” he said. “And we expect to quadruple our hybrid sales in the next five years, and we were already No. 2 in the market last year.”

    The pure-battery EV market has become saturated, and Ford is indicating that it is willing to be flexible, CFRA’s Nelson said.

    “Bottom line, aside from Tesla
    TSLA,
    +1.30%

    EVs, the vast majority of other EV models have sold very poorly,” Nelson said, adding that although many people are not interested in EVs, hybrids could be an easier sell.

    Related: Electric vehicles vs. gas-powered cars: Which one is cheaper to buy and own?

    “Consumers are becoming much more educated,” he said. “You can in a lot of cases go on pure battery power and not even use any fuel with these hybrids.”

    Japanese carmakers such Toyota Motor Corp.
    7203,
    +1.40%

    TM,
    +0.26%

    and Honda Motor Co.
    7267,
    +5.87%

    HMC,
    -0.09%

    have taken that approach from the start, making much bigger bets on hybrids, and “in hindsight that appears to have paid off,” Nelson said.

    Indeed, “hybrids are a much easier purchase in today’s environment,” said Karl Brauer, an analyst with iSeeCars.com.

    “They cost less than electric vehicles, they don’t involve range anxiety, and Ford has managed to make them quite practical in how it pairs the technology with the F-150,” Brauer said.

    Hybrids are more expensive to buy than internal-combustion-engine vehicles, but they are cheaper than electric vehicles because their batteries are significantly smaller — even those in plug-in hybrids, which are capable of driving several dozen miles solely on an electric charge. About a third of the cost of an EV is the cost of the battery.

    Hybrids have one more critical advantage over EVs, Brauer said — they can be produced and sold for a profit.

    Ford’s strategy contrasts with a more aggressive EV push by General Motors Co.
    GM,
    -5.79%
    ,
    Nelson said.

    GM late Wednesday unveiled its Cadillac Escalade IQ, a luxury EV that starts at around $130,000 and has 450 miles of range. GM expects to begin making the vehicle in the summer of 2024, with sales beginning in late 2024.

    GM’s future lineup includes a number new EV models as well as electric versions of popular vehicles that were previously available only as gas-powered models. That includes an electric Chevy Equinox for next year and a return of the Chevy Bolt, among the cheapest EVs available in the U.S.

    See also: GM is bringing back the Bolt. What do we know so far about the updated EV?

    GM will cease production of the Bolt later this year but has promised to bring it back using the company’s new shared EV platform. Observers expect the new Bolt to be available around 2025.

    GM’s EV strategy is generally viewed as more risky.

    Tesla started a price war earlier this year, cutting prices of its EVs several times. Ford also cut prices, most notably on the F-150 Lightning, the electric version of a pickup truck that’s been the best-selling vehicle in the U.S. since the 1980s.

    Hybrids also do away with so-called charge anxiety, because their gas-powered engines kick in when needed.

    Related: EVs zoomed ahead with a 8.2% slice of auto financing pie in second quarter

    According to a Consumer Reports survey in June, about 6 in 10 respondents said that concerns about charging were holding them back from purchasing an EV, and about 5 in 10 cited range as a reason they wouldn’t buy one just yet.

    Tesla has made its fast-charging ports the de facto standard in the U.S., and several automakers, including Ford and GM, have inked deals to allow their EV owners to power up at Tesla’s Supercharger network, which has charging stations located near major highways.

    An often-cited 2022 study about the reliability of public, open-to-all fast-charging stations in nine counties in the San Francisco Bay Area found a range of issues with the stations, from charging and payment failures to annoyances such as spaces being occupied by gas-powered vehicles or EVs that are not actively charging.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • WHO names Eris a COVID variant of interest. Here’s what you need to know.

    WHO names Eris a COVID variant of interest. Here’s what you need to know.

    [ad_1]

    The World Health Organization has upgraded COVID-19 variant EG.5 to a variant of interest, or VOI, from a variant under monitoring, or VUM, as it continues to become more prevalent around the world.

    The variant — which has been nicknamed Eris by some media, following the Greek-alphabet designation used for other variants — has been found in 51 countries, with most sequences, 30.6%, stemming from China, said the WHO.

    Other countries that have submitted at least 100 sequences to a central database include the U.S., the Republic of Korea, Japan, Canada, Australia, Singapore, the United Kingdom, France, Portugal and Spain, the WHO said in a statement.

    Eris is a descendent lineage of XBB.1.9.2, which is an omicron subvariant. It was first detected on Feb. 17 and designated as a VUM on July 19.

    Its latest designation means it’s more prevalent than it was, has a growth advantage over earlier variants and merits closer monitoring and tracking.

    Here’s what you need to know about Eris.

    Eris is spreading around the world

    The strain is increasing in global prevalence, accounting for 17.4% of cases sequenced in the week through July 23, up from 7.6% four weeks earlier. The WHO has been tracking COVID data on a 28-day basis, largely because countries have cut back on testing and surveillance as they emerge from the pandemic, meaning the agency has far less data than it did during the pandemic.

    It’s already dominant in the U.S.

    Eris has become dominant in the U.S., according to projections made by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, although a shortage of data is hampering the agency’s efforts to surveil the illness.

    The CDC said last week it was unable to publish its “nowcast” projections, which it releases every two weeks, for where EG.5 and other variants are circulating for every region, because it did not have enough sequences to update the estimates.

    “Because nowcast is modeled data, we need a certain number of sequences to accurately predict proportions in the present,” CDC representative Kathleen Conley told MarketWatch.

    “For some regions, we have limited numbers of sequences available and therefore are not displaying nowcast estimates in those regions, though those regions are still being used in the aggregated national nowcast,” she said.

    It is estimated that EG.5, an omicron subvariant, accounted for 17.3% of COVID cases in the U.S. in the two-week period through Aug. 5. That was up from an estimated 11.9% in the previous period and was more than any other variant.

    For more, see: New Eris COVID variant is dominant in the U.S., but a shortage of data is making it hard to track

    It’s no riskier than earlier variants

    The public-health risk is deemed to be low at the global level, lining up with the risk posed by XBB.1.16 and other currently circulating VOIs, according to the WHO statement. But it’s likely more infectious.

    “While EG.5 has shown increased prevalence, growth advantage, and immune escape properties, there have been no reported changes in disease severity to date,” said the WHO.

    That growth advantage and immune-escape properties mean Eris may cause a rise in case incidence over time and become dominant in some countries or even the world, according to the WHO.

    It has the same symptoms as other strains

    The Eris variant causes the same symptoms as seen with other strains of COVID, such as sore throat, runny nose, cough, congestion, fever, fatigue, body aches and a possible loss of taste or smell.

    The best defense against Eris is vaccination

    Like earlier strains of COVID, the best protection is to be vaccinated with any of the vaccines developed by Pfizer Inc.
    PFE,
    -0.03%

    and German partner BioNTech SE
    BNTX,
    -0.32%
    ,
    Moderna Inc.
    MRNA,
    -1.01%

    or Novavax Inc.
    NVAX,
    +9.83%

    The vaccines that will be made available in the fall will be designed to protect against all subvariants of XBB, including Eris.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Nvidia’s stock drops below key uptrend tracker, snapping longest streak above it in 6 years

    Nvidia’s stock drops below key uptrend tracker, snapping longest streak above it in 6 years

    [ad_1]

    Nvidia Corp.’s stock chart now shows that the stunning uptrend investors in the semiconductor maker have enjoyed this year amid all the artificial-intelligence hype may have ended.

    But as history suggests, after a long uptrend, rather than a new downtrend, investors may have to endure some whipsaw action within a relatively static trading range over the next several months before the uptrend resumes.

    The stock
    NVDA,
    -0.72%

    slumped 4.7% on Wednesday to close at $425.54, which was 10.4% below the July 18 record close of $474.94, following a downbeat earnings report from Super Micro Computer Inc.
    SMCI,
    +3.47%
    ,
    which counts Nvidia as a key supplier.

    Many on Wall Street believe a correction is defined by a decline of at least 10% to up to 20% from a significant recent peak. A drop of 20% or more is thought of as a bear market.

    But perhaps more important for chart followers, the stock closed below the widely followed 50-day moving average for the first time since Jan. 6, 2023. The 50-DMA had extended to $429.03 on Wednesday.


    FactSet, MarketWatch

    On Thursday, the stock bounced 0.5% in morning trading but held below the 50-DMA, which extended to $429.68, according to FactSet. Despite the recent correction, the stock was still up 192.6% year to date, while the PHLX Semiconductor Index
    SOX
    has climbed 43.7% and the S&P 500
    SPX
    has advanced 17.2%.

    Read: Nvidia is ‘domination’ and could unlock $300 billion in AI revenue by 2027, analyst says.

    The 50-DMA is used by many chart watchers as a short-term trend tracker. If the stock is above that line, it is viewed as being in an uptrend. The most time spent above that line, the stronger the uptrend.

    Until Wednesday, Nvidia’s stock closed above the 50-DMA for 146 consecutive trading sessions, according to FactSet data, which is the second-longest stretch since it went public in January 1999.

    The record stretch above the 50-DMA was 255 sessions, a streak that ended on Feb. 23, 2017, while the second-longest stretch of 143 sessions ended on Oct. 28, 2020.

    After the stock snapped the super-50-DMA streak in 2020, it waffled around the line and was little changed for the next several months before resuming the uptrend with a big spike.

    As an uptrend takes a several-month pause after the 50-DMA breaks, the 200-DMA becomes strong support.


    FactSet, MarketWatch

    As the chart above shows, after the 50-DMA broke, investors set their sights on the 200-DMA, which many view as a dividing line between longer-term uptrends and downtrends. In this case, despite a one-day dip below the 200-DMA in mid-March 2021, the line acted as strong support.

    And after the record super-50-DMA streak, the stock seesawed around the line, while having a slightly negative bias for the next few months, before the uptrend resumed in force.

    After the 50-DMA break, the 200-DMA was never threatened.


    FactSet, MarketWatch

    This time, the stock never really threatened the 200-DMA.

    In the current technical situation, one of the downside levels to keep an eye on is the bear-market threshold of 20% below the July closing high, which comes in at $379.95. Another level to watch is the 200-DMA, which currently extends to $269.63 and has been rising by $1.65 a day over the past 10 days.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Alibaba Smashes Estimates. Here’s The Bad News.

    Alibaba Smashes Estimates. Here’s The Bad News.

    [ad_1]

    Alibaba Stock Jumps as Earnings Smash Estimates. But There’s a Case for Caution.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Alibaba’s stock advances after earnings beat

    Alibaba’s stock advances after earnings beat

    [ad_1]

    Shares of Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. were rallying more than 2% in Thursday’s premarket trading after the Chinese e-commerce giant topped expectations with its latest revenue and earnings.

    The company notched fiscal first-quarter net income of RMB34.3 billion ($4.6 billion), or RMB13.30 per American depositary share, compared with net income of RMB22.7 billion, or RMB8.51 per ADS, in the year-before period.

    On an adjusted basis, Alibaba
    BABA,
    +0.67%

    earned RMB17.37 per ADS, while the FactSet consensus was RMB14.59 per share. Revenue rose to RMB234.2 billion from RMB205.6 billion, where analysts had been modeling RMB224.7 billion.

    Chief Executive Daniel Zhang said the company’s reorganization was “beginning to unleash new energy across our businesses.” Alibaba recently realigned into six units with their own CEOs and boards of directors, and the ability to pursue independent fundraising.

    “Through this self-driven transformation, we aim to catalyze innovation, promote vitality in our organization and enable businesses to focus on long-term growth,” Zhang continued. “We look forward to positive impacts on our business, including strengthening competitiveness, sustainable growth and shareholder value creation.”

    See also (from June): Alibaba’s Zhang to step down as CEO, chairman amid business shakeup

    Overall revenue for the company’s Taobao and Tmall Group, which represents the company’s core e-commerce marketplaces in China, rose to RMB115.0 billion from RMB102.5 billion.

    Within that group, customer management revenue was up 10% to RMB79.7 billion, “primarily due to the increase in merchant’s willingness to invest in advertising” and an increase in the volume of online physical goods generated on the platforms.

    The company’s cloud group saw revenue increase to RMB25.1 billion from RMB24.1 billion. Alibaba previously announced plans to spin out that business.

    Alibaba bought back $3.1 billion worth of ADRs during the June quarter, “which is supported by our continuous generation of strong free cash flow,” Chief Financial Officer Toby Xu said in the release. Free cash flow was RMB39.1 billion in the quarter, up 76% from a year earlier.

    U.S.-listed shares of Alibaba are up about 8% so far this year.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Disney looking to crack down on password sharing, following Netflix’s lead

    Disney looking to crack down on password sharing, following Netflix’s lead

    [ad_1]

    “We are actively exploring ways to address account sharing and the best options for paying subscribers to share their accounts with friends and family.”


    — Disney CEO Bob Iger

    Pour another one out for streaming freeloaders.

    Netflix Inc.
    NFLX,
    -2.14%

    has been cracking down on account-sharing, and now Walt Disney Co.
    DIS,
    -0.73%

    is likely to follow suit.

    Bob Iger, the media giant’s chief executive, said Wednesday that the company was “actively exploring” how to tackle the fact that many streaming subscribers on Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+ share passwords and accounts with loved ones.

    “Later this year, we will begin to update our subscriber agreements with additional terms on our sharing policies, and we will roll out tactics to drive monetization sometime in 2024,” he said, according to a transcript provided by AlphaSense/Sentieo.

    See also: Disney posts smaller streaming loss, will hike prices for Disney+ and Hulu

    Whereas Netflix suggested that it could be housing 100 million global account borrowers, Iger declined to put a number on Disney’s own base of password sharers, “except to say that it’s significant.”

    “What we don’t know, of course, is as we get to work on this, how much of the password-sharing, as we basically eliminate it, will convert to growth” in subscribers, he said. “Obviously, we believe there will be some, but we’re not speculating.”

    Read: The long-simmering rumor of Apple buying Disney is resurfacing as Bob Iger looks to sell assets

    The company plans to “get at this issue” next calendar year, and the initiative could have some impact on Disney’s business in that period.

    “It’s possible that we won’t be complete or the work will not be completed within the calendar year, but we certainly have established this as a real priority, and we actually think that there’s an opportunity here to help us grow our business,” Iger continued.

    Disney is making a big push to improve the financials of its streaming business, after spending the stay-home pandemic era focused on raw subscriber growth. Now the company is targeting streaming profitability by the end of fiscal 2024, and it just announced a new round of price hikes in pursuit of that goal.

    Don’t miss: Disney is raising prices on Hulu and Disney+ again. Here’s how much you’ll soon pay.

    “We grew this business really fast, really before we even understood what our pricing strategy should be or could be,” Iger commented. In the past six months, the company has started to pursue a pricing strategy “that’s really aimed at enabling us to improve the bottom line, ultimately to turn this into a growth business.”

    Netflix is farther along in its efforts, and it’s won praise from Wall Street for them. Executives at the streaming giant indicated early success with Netflix’s broad password-sharing crackdown, though it will take time for the impact to fully manifest in the company’s financials.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The long-simmering rumor of Apple buying Disney is resurfacing as Bob Iger looks to sell assets

    The long-simmering rumor of Apple buying Disney is resurfacing as Bob Iger looks to sell assets

    [ad_1]

    Analysts got to the point early and often during a conference call late Wednesday: What are Disney Chief Executive Robert Iger’s M&A plans, particularly following reports that former Disney executives Kevin Mayer and Tom Staggs, now co-CEOs of Blackstone-backed Candle Media, have been retained in a “consulting capacity” to decide ESPN’s fate?

    There is even the unthinkable, unsinkable decades-old rumor floating about again: Could Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    -0.90%

    acquire Disney
    DIS,
    -0.73%
    ,
    as one Hollywood executive floated to the Hollywood Reporter?

    The prospect of an Apple-Disney combo seems far-fetched in a heated regulatory climate, where the Federal Trade Commission is attempting to crack down on Big Tech acquisitions, but it could happen should Disney sell off assets and Apple gobbles up Disney’s direct-to-consumer business that includes streaming service Disney+, some media analysts speculate. Apple could conceivably even buy ABC, which reportedly is on the block. But the path is long and circuitous.

    Yet the rumors persist, dating back to Apple co-founder Steve Jobs’ reverence for the Disney brand, and the increasingly overlapping businesses of both companies over the years.

    When pressed by analysts during a conference call late Wednesday, Iger declined to discuss the future of Disney’s structure or possible asset sales. When asked if Disney might “plausibly” be snapped up by one company — read Apple — an exasperated Iger said he would not “speculate” on the sale of Disney to a technology company or anyone else, given the current global stance of regulators. The FTC has aggressively challenged mergers from the likes of Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    -1.17%

    and Facebook parent Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    -2.38%
    ,
    with limited success.

    Since Iger hinted at the potential sale of Disney’s assets in an interview with CNBC last month, rumors have swirled around ESPN.

    ESPN and related properties likely could command at least one-third of Disney’s current depressed market cap of about $150 billion, say some media watchers, though Iger has denied ESPN is for sale. He has acknowledged “the sports leader” is seeking “strategic partners” — possibly with the NFL, MLB, NBA and NHL — to generate revenue. Late Tuesday, ESPN stuck up a deal with Penn Entertainment Inc.
    PENN,
    +9.10%

    to create ESPN Bet, a digital sportsbook to launch in the fall in 16 states.

    Read more: Penn dumps Barstool for ESPN-branded sports-gambling service

    Another possible property being dangled is ABC. But with rights to the NBA Finals and two Super Bowls in the next eight years, it is unclear who would acquire the network and how Disney would replace lucrative sports revenue.

    Other properties on the block include cable channels Freeform and Disney Channel, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal.

    “If an asset sale happens, will the proceeds be deployed into fortifying its balance sheet or beefing up its remaining operations?” Rick Munarriz, senior media analyst at The Motley Fool, said in an email.

    Disney, which is in the midst of a $5.5 billion cost-cutting campaign, is exploring several avenues to prop up sales as linear TV ads shrink, Disney+ subscriptions decline and attendance at Walt Disney World wanes.

    Read more: Disney posts smaller streaming loss amid cost-cutting moves, stock slips

    Shares of Disney are trading at half their highs from a few years ago, in large part because of dwindling sales and profits at ESPN and Disney’s other cable networks.

    Enter Mayer, who previously ran Disney’s strategic planning group for years and engineered a trifecta of mega deals: The acquisition of the aforementioned Pixar Animation Studios from Steve Jobs for $7.4 billion in 2006, the purchase of Marvel Entertainment for $4 billion in 2009, and the acquisition of Lucasfilm for $4.05 billion in 2012. Mayer also led the $71.3 billion acquisition of 20th Century Fox’s entertainment assets in 2019, which has drawn mixed reviews.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Disney to Significantly Raise Prices of Disney+, Hulu Streaming Services

    Disney to Significantly Raise Prices of Disney+, Hulu Streaming Services

    [ad_1]

    Disney to Significantly Raise Prices of Disney+, Hulu Streaming Services

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Disney posts smaller streaming loss, will hike prices for Disney+ and Hulu

    Disney posts smaller streaming loss, will hike prices for Disney+ and Hulu

    [ad_1]

    Walt Disney Co.’s stock dipped in after-hours trading Wednesday after the company posted mixed quarterly results roughly in line with analysts’ expectations amid a cost-cutting frenzy.

    Separately, Disney said it is hiking prices on almost all of its streaming packages in an aggressive push to boost its bottom line. Commercial-free Disney+ will cost $13.99 per month, a 27% increase, beginning Oct. 12. Ad-free Hulu will increase 20% to $17.99 per month. A new Disney+ and Hulu Bundle ad-free plan launches Sept. 6 for $19.99.

    Read more: Disney is raising prices on Hulu and Disney+ again. Here’s how much you’ll soon pay.

    The media giant
    DIS,
    -0.73%

    reported a fiscal third-quarter loss of $460 million, or 25 cents a share, mostly because of restructuring and impairment charges. After adjusting for restructuring costs and other effects, Disney reported earnings of $1.03 a share. Revenue grew 4% to $22.3 billion from $21.5 billion a year ago.

    Analysts surveyed by FactSet had on average expected adjusted earnings of 96 cents a share on revenue of $22.5 billion. Disney shares declined about 3% in after-hours trading immediately following the release of the report, after dropping 0.7% to $87.52 in the regular session.

    “Our results this quarter are reflective of what we’ve accomplished through the unprecedented transformation we’re undertaking at Disney to restructure the company, improve efficiencies and restore creativity to the center of our business,” Disney Chief Executive Robert Iger said in a statement announcing the results. Disney is in the midst of a $5.5 billion cost-cutting plan overseen by Iger, who returned to the CEO position to right the ship in late 2022.

    Direct-to-consumer (DTC) sales, which includes streaming services and some international products, hauled in $5.5 billion, compared with analysts’ forecast of $5.7 billion on average and last year’s total of $5.05 billion. The division did reduce its quarterly losses to $512 million, compared with $1.06 billion a year ago. Analysts were expecting a loss of $758 million.

    Still, the company has lost more than $10 billion in its DTC segment since launching Disney+ in late 2019. Disney had told investors for three years it expects Disney+ to be profitable by September 2024. During a conference call with analysts late Thursday, Iger said Disney is “actively exploring” options to crack down on account sharing when the company updates subscriber agreements later this year and will “roll out tactics to drive monetization” in 2024.

    The company’s iconic theme parks around the world and product-sales business increased to $8.3 billion in revenue from $7.4 billion a year ago. The average analyst estimate was $8.1 billion.

    Disney’s largest business segment, media and entertainment distribution, raked in $14 billion during the quarter, down from $14.1 billion a year ago. Analysts on average predicted $14.3 billion, according to FactSet.

    Disney’s television networks generated sales of $6.7 billion, while analysts’ average estimates called for $6.74 billion. Content sales and licensing, a category that includes Disney’s film business, reported revenue of $2.1 billion, compared with analysts’ expectations of about $2.15 billion.

    In the weeks leading up to Disney’s results, there has been a whirlwind of fear and doubt over the current state of the company’s streaming services — including ESPN — as well as linear-TV ad sales, the actors’ and writers’ strikes that have shut down Hollywood, Disney’s theme parks and its legal and political battle with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

    Front and center is the health of Disney+ as it battles streaming rivals like Apple Inc. 
    AAPL,
    -0.90%
    ,
     Netflix Inc. 
    NFLX,
    -2.14%
    ,
     Amazon.com Inc. 
    AMZN,
    -1.49%
    ,
     Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. 
    WBD,
    -2.15%

    and Comcast Corp.
    CMCSA,
    -0.26%
    .
    Macquarie Equity Research analyst Tim Nollen believes in Disney’s streaming services over the long term but said “we see too many near-term issues to overcome to support a more constructive view.”

    Disney+ had 146.1 million subscribers globally, 7% fewer than the 157.8 million it had in the previous quarter. The decline mostly came from India, where Disney lost the rights to stream a popular cricket league last year.

    Disney and DeSantis, who is running for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, have filed dueling lawsuits that stem from the company’s criticism last year of a Florida law that bans classroom discussion of sexuality and gender identity with younger children. Earlier this week, a group of mostly former Republican high-level government officials called DeSantis’s takeover of Disney World’s governing district “severely damaging to the political, social, and economic fabric” of Florida.

    The somber vibe prompted Deutsche Bank analysts on Tuesday to lower their price target on Disney shares 8% to $120, with “lower advertising revenue, underperformance at the box office, and lighter parks attendance in Orlando” chief among their concerns.

    “This is Iger’s most important earnings call since returning to Disney late last year. He came in with a punch list that was too long to realistically knock off in two years,” Rick Munarriz, an analyst at the Motley Fool, said in an email. “Now the board has given him four years, and every word he uses during Thursday afternoon’s earnings call has to carry some serious heft.”

    Disney’s call was to start at 4:30 p.m. Eastern.

    Shares of Disney have inched up 0.7% this year, while the S&P 500
    SPX
    has climbed 16%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • You can invest in market winners and still lose big. Here’s how to avoid the hit.

    You can invest in market winners and still lose big. Here’s how to avoid the hit.

    [ad_1]

    Investors should think twice before picking an actively managed mutual fund according to its style category. By “style category,” I’m referring to the widely used method of grouping mutual funds according to the market-cap of the stocks they invest in and where those stocks stand on the spectrum of growth-to-value.

    This matrix traces to groundbreaking research in 1992 by University of Chicago professor Eugene Fama and Dartmouth College professor Ken French, and has since been popularized by investment researcher Morningstar in the form of its well-known style box.

    In urging you to think twice before picking a fund based on this matrix, I’m not questioning the existence of important distinctions between the various styles. Fama and French’s research convincingly showed that there are systematic differences between them. My point is that there also are huge differences within each style as well. You can pick a style that outperforms all others on Wall Street and still lose a lot of money, just as you can pick the worst-performing style and turn a huge profit.

    This points to the two types of risk you face when picking an actively managed fund. You have the risk associated with the fund’s style (category risk) and you also have the risk associated with the particular stocks that the fund’s manager selects (so-called idiosyncratic risk). Idiosyncratic risk often overwhelms category risk, especially over shorter periods.

    To illustrate, consider the midcap-growth style. As judged by the Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
    VOT,
    this style produced a 28.8% loss in 2022. Yet, according to Morningstar Direct, the best-performing actively managed midcap-growth fund last year produced a gain of 39.5%, while the worst performer lost 67.0%.

    This best-versus-worst performance spread of over 100 percentage points is illustrated in the accompanying chart. Notice that the comparable spread was almost as wide for many of the other styles as well. Though I haven’t done the research to compare 2022’s spreads with those of other calendar years, I have no reason to expect that they on average were any lower.

    The only way to eliminate idiosyncratic risk when investing in particular styles is to invest in an index fund.

    The only way to eliminate idiosyncratic risk when investing in particular styles is to invest in an index fund benchmarked to the style in question. If you are enamored of a particular fund manager and willing to bet he will significantly outperform the category average, just know that you also incur the not-significant idiosyncratic risk that the fund will lag by a large amount.

    The bottom line? By investing in an actively managed fund in a style category, you will be incurring the risk not only of that category itself but also the not-insignificant idiosyncratic risk of that particular fund. Fasten your seatbelt if that’s the path you take.

    Mark Hulbert is a regular contributor to MarketWatch. His Hulbert Ratings tracks investment newsletters that pay a flat fee to be audited. He can be reached at mark@hulbertratings.com

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • State and local pensions look healthier — even with asset market turbulence

    State and local pensions look healthier — even with asset market turbulence

    [ad_1]

    My colleagues JP Aubry and Yimeng Yin just released an update on state and local pension plans. Their analysis compared 2023 to 2019 – the year before all the craziness began. Think of the unusual events that have occurred in the last few years: 1) the onset of COVID; 2) the subsequent COVID stimulus; 3) declining interest rates; 4) rising inflation; and then 5) rising interest rates. 

    Despite the volatility of asset values over this period, the 2023 funded status of state and local pension plans is about 78%, which is 5 percentage points higher than in 2019 (see Figure 1). Of course, the numbers for 2023 are estimates based on plan-by-plan projections, but these projections have an excellent track record.   

    While the aggregate funded ratio provides a useful measure of the public pension landscape at large, it also can obscure variations in funding at the plan level. Figure 2 separates the plans into thirds based on their current actuarial funded status. The average 2023 funded ratio for each group was 57.6% for the bottom third, 79.5% for the middle third, and 91.1% for the top third.

    The major reason for the improvement in plans’ funded status is that, despite the turbulence in the economy, total annualized returns, which include interest and dividends, have risen noticeably for almost all major asset class indexes over the 2019-2023 period (see Figure 3). The exception over this short and volatile period is fixed-income assets, which have declined in value.

    The effect of fixed income’s decline on overall portfolio performance has been modest because, since 2019, fixed income has averaged only about 20% of pension fund assets (see Figure 4).

    So, things are looking a little better for state and local pensions. Yes, the funded ratios are biased upward because plans use the assumed return on their portfolios – roughly 7% – to discount promised benefits. That said, trends are important, and the trend is good. 

    Moreover, annual state and local benefit payments as a share of the economy are approaching their peak for two reasons. First, most pension plans do not fully index retiree benefits for inflation, which lowers the real value of benefits over time. Second, the benefit reductions for new hires – introduced in the wake of the Great Recession – have started to have an impact.

    With liabilities in check and solid asset performance, maybe we can all relax a bit about the future of the state and local pension system.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Roblox Misses on Earnings. The Videogame Stock Sinks.

    Roblox Misses on Earnings. The Videogame Stock Sinks.

    [ad_1]

    Roblox Stock Falls Sharply. Blame the Wider Loss.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • $1.8 million to retire? Are you kidding?

    $1.8 million to retire? Are you kidding?

    [ad_1]

    This time it’s in the latest Charles Schwab Retirement Survey. Among 1,000 people surveyed, the average respondent figured he or she needed to save $1.8 million to retire. (That figure is up from $1.7 million in the same survey a year earlier.)

    Touchingly, 86% also told Schwab they were either “somewhat” or “very” likely to achieve their goals.

    Er, no.

    If the numbers show anything, it’s that most people don’t understand math, don’t understand finance and are wildly out of touch with reality.

    Some simple calculations will show that these figures are all wrong.

    First, let’s start with the bad news. There is no way 86% of people should be “very” or “somewhat” confident that they are going to hit that $1.8 million target, or anything like it. Let alone that 37% think they are “very” likely to hit it.

    Median retirement-account balance at the moment? Try $27,000 and change, says 401(k) giant Vanguard.

    Even that’s overstating the picture. The Federal Reserve’s most recent triennial Survey of Consumer Finances says the median American household has $26,000 in total financial assets, including savings accounts, life insurance, 401(k) plan and the like. Among those aged 45 to 54, the figure is $37,000, and among those 55 to 64 it’s $47,000. How anyone thinks they are getting from there to $1.8 million by retirement age is a mystery. Magic carpets? Magic beans?

    Granted, the survey is from 2019, but the intervening pandemic period won’t have changed the picture that much — in either direction.

    It’s not clear from the survey whether those polled included the value of the equity in their homes. Throw that in, and the median household’s total net worth rises to $122,000. Among those aged 45 to 54 it rises to $169,000, and among those 55 to 64 to $213,000. COVID policies helped drive up average U.S. home prices by about 30%, so those figures will have risen since 2019.

    But again we are not nearing $1.8 million.

    Not even close.

    The good news, though, is that you don’t actually need this amount or anything like it to retire.

    Naturally if someone hasn’t figured life out by the time they retire, and they still think that buying yet more stuff is the route to happiness, no amount is going to be enough.

    How much we’d like and how much we need are very different things.

    A $1.8 million balance would buy a 65-year-old couple an immediate annuity paying a guaranteed lifetime income of $9,500 a month, or just over $110,000 a year.

    The average Social Security benefit on top of that for a retired couple is just under $3,000 a month, or $36,000 a year. So in total you’d be on about $146,000 a year. What are these people planning to do in retirement?

    Even with a 3% annual rise, to account for inflation risk, that annuity will pay out $83,000 a year, and that’s for a couple, not just for one person. The money continues until both of you have gone.

    How much do we really need? Well, while acknowledging that each person and each person’s situation is going to be different, let’s do some simple math.

    Actual seniors are living on median annual incomes of around $45,000 to $50,000, says the Federal Reserve. And most of them say they are either reasonably satisfied with retirement or actually happy. So, at least, they tell Gallup and the Employee Benefit Research Institute.

    Meanwhile, a new survey from Schroders finds that the average person thinks a comfortable retirement can be had on around $5,000 a month, or $60,000 a year.

    The average Social Security benefit for a retired couple is $36,000 a year. To bring that income up to $50,000 you’d need an annuity paying $14,000 a year.

    Current cost in the annuities market: $225,000.

    To bring that up to $60,000 the annuity would cost $385,000.

    For $350,000 you can get an income of $18,000 with a 3% annual increase to deal with inflation.

    For $800,000 you can double your Social Security income, bringing in another $36,000 a year — with a 3% annual increase to deal with inflation.

    The cost of housing is a major component for retirees. No, someone doesn’t have to move to Iowa to be able to retire in comfort. But they can move the dial by cashing in their home in an expensive neighborhood — especially the kind of location they may have moved to for a high-paying job or the best schools — and moving somewhere cheaper. Away from coastal California or the “Acela” corridor in the Northeast, a lot of U.S. homes are really cheap.

    Retirement savings generally are grossly inadequate, and many people face genuine hardship in their senior years. And, of course, pretty much everyone could use more money. On the other hand, you can retire in comfort with a lot less than $1.8 million.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • WeWork Raises Doubt About Its Survival

    WeWork Raises Doubt About Its Survival

    [ad_1]

    WeWork Raises Doubt About Its Survival

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • WeWork flags ‘substantial doubt’ about its ability to stay in business

    WeWork flags ‘substantial doubt’ about its ability to stay in business

    [ad_1]

    WeWork Inc. disclosed Tuesday that there’s “substantial doubt” about its ability to continue operating, as the company seeks to improve its financial positioning.

    Shares of the company, which provides co-working spaces, were down 33% in Tuesday’s after-hours trading.

    WeWork
    WE,
    -5.50%

    lost $397 million in the second quarter and has $680 million of liquidity. In light of its losses and expected cash needs, “substantial doubt exists about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern,” WeWork said in its second-quarter earnings release.

    Its ability to continue “is contingent upon successful execution of management’s plan to improve liquidity and profitability over the next 12 months.”

    See also: Proterra stock craters as electric-bus maker files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy

    As part of that liquidity planning, WeWork will aim to cut its rent and tenancy costs through restructuring as a renegotiation of lease terms. The company is also looking to boost revenue by lowering member churn, and it will try to rein in expenses and capital expenditures. Finally, WeWork is seeking additional capital through the issuance of debt or equity, or via asset divestitures.

    The company was a hot technology player before the pandemic, enabling businesses to obtain flexible arrangements for workspaces, but it’s struggled to find its footing again now that companies and employees have become more comfortable with remote work.

    WeWork’s losses narrowed in the latest quarter, though they were still sizable, as the company logged a net loss of $397 million, or 21 cents a share, compared with a loss of $635 million, or 76 cents a share, in the year-prior period. The FactSet consensus was for a 12-cent loss per share, based on three estimates.

    The company also managed to grow revenue in its latest quarter, bringing in an $844 million haul on the top line, up from $815 million a year earlier, though analysts had been looking for $850 million.

    “The company’s transformation continues at pace, with a laser focus on member retention and growth, doubling down on our real-estate portfolio optimization efforts, and maintaining a disciplined approach to reducing operating costs,” Interim Chief Executive David Tolley said in a release.

    The company’s prior CEO stepped down in May.

    See more: WeWork bonds sink after top executives resign from cash-burning company

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Penn dumps Barstool for ESPN-branded sports-gambling service

    Penn dumps Barstool for ESPN-branded sports-gambling service

    [ad_1]

    Online sports-betting company Penn Entertainment Inc. sealed a $1.5 billion deal with Walt Disney Co.’s
    DIS,
    +1.50%

    ESPN to launch ESPN Bet, a branded sportsbook for fans in the U.S., and pivoted away from Barstool Sports on Tuesday, selling the platform back to founder Dave Portnoy.

    Penn Entertainment
    PENN,
    -0.68%

    will rebrand its current sportsbook and relaunch as ESPN Bet in the fall in 16 legalized-betting states where Penn is licensed.

    The rebrand — which includes the mobile app, website, and mobile website — sent Penn’s stock soaring 13% in after-hours trading Tuesday. ESPN Bet will benefit from exclusive promotional services across ESPN’s platforms, including access to ESPN talent, the companies said.

    Penn will pay ESPN $1.5 billion over 10 years as part of the strategic partnership, and will grant ESPN $500 million of warrants to purchase about 31.8 million Penn common shares, with additional bonus warrants possible.

     “Together, we can utilize each other’s strengths to create the type of experience that existing and new bettors will expect from both companies, and we can’t wait to get started,” Penn Entertainment Chief Executive Jay Snowden said in a release. 

    Penn also said it has divested 100% of its stake in Barstool Sports to Portnoy, allowing the sports media platform “to return to its roots of providing unique and authentic content to its loyal audience without the restrictions associated with a publicly traded, licensed gaming company.”

    For Penn, the ESPN partnership represents “a clear step up from Barstool in terms of mass appeal…and minimal regulatory risk,” according to Wells Fargo analyst Daniel Politzer, who said it was a “nearly impossible challenge for a publicly traded, licensed gaming company” to own “a media platform that thrived on viral/provocative content.”

    Still, he said in a note to clients that “it’s premature to conclude this is a game change” since past partnerships between online sports-betting companies and media players have come up short of what initial fanfare would’ve suggested.

    The news sent rival DraftKings Inc. shares
    DKNG,
    +0.25%

    sinking about 5% in after-hours trading.

     The decline in DraftKings shares comes as they’ve advanced 178% so far in 2023, through Tuesday’s close. Two analysts upgraded DraftKings’ stock just this week.

    See more: DraftKings’ stock has nearly tripled this year — and it just won a new fan

    Disney shares rose fractionally in after-hours trading.

    Mike Murphy contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rivian’s stock flat after EV maker raises production guidance

    Rivian’s stock flat after EV maker raises production guidance

    [ad_1]

    This update corrects EPS numbers for Rivian.

    Rivian Automotive Inc. shares were flat in the extended session Tuesday after the EV maker reported a narrower-than-expected quarterly loss, revenue that beat Wall Street expectations, and called for higher production numbers this year.

    Rivian
    RIVN,
    +2.14%

    stock had dropped immediately after the results but turned direction as company executives spoke on a call with analysts, and closed the after-hours session at $24.80, even with where they ended the regular trading day.

    They highlighted Rivian’s cost-savings steps and the goal of turning a gross profit next year, reassured investors about continued demand for their pricey EVs, and highlighted the higher production outlook for the year. At last check, the stock was up 1% after hours.

    Rivian “achieved meaningful reductions” in its vehicles, including its last-mile electric delivery van, “across key components, including material costs, manufacturing labor, overhead and logistics,” Rivian’s Chief Executive RJ Scaringe said during the call.

    “Maintaining our cost-reduction efforts through consistent focus and collaboration across all levels of the company is a core part of the culture we’re building,” he said.

    Rivian lost $1.2 billion, or $1.88 a share, in the second quarter, compared with a loss of $1.7 billion, or $1.89 a share, a year ago. Adjusted for one-time items, Rivian lost $1.08 a share.

    Revenue rose to $1.12 billion thanks to quarterly sales that exceeded expectations, the company said.

    FactSet consensus called for a loss of $1.43 a share for Rivian on sales of $1.02 billion.

    Rivian bumped its 2023 production outlook to 52,000 vehicles, from a previous expectations of 50,000 vehicles.

    The results were “all-around strong,” Truist Securities analyst Jordan Levy said in a note Tuesday.

    Rivian saw improvements in gross margins, thanks to its production and cost-saving initiatives and that appears “to be driving margin improvements faster than our prior expectations,” Levy said.

    Rivian surprised Wall Street last month by announcing second-quarter deliveries that nearly tripled, and production data that more than tripled from a year ago.

    See also: Rivian’s stock has been rocketing, and this analyst now urges a pause

    Rivian shares have gained 36% so far this year, compared with an advance of about 17% for the S&P 500 index
    SPX.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Upstart stock sinks as tough lending landscape drives downbeat earnings outlook

    Upstart stock sinks as tough lending landscape drives downbeat earnings outlook

    [ad_1]

    Upstart Holdings Inc. has struggled to contend with a tougher lending environment, and the company indicated Tuesday that its challenges are expected to continue.

    The financial-technology company, which uses artificial intelligence to inform lending decisions, delivered a lower-than-expected forecast for the current quarter, as Chief Executive David Girouard called out high interest rates and “an environment where banks continue to be super cautious about lending.”

    For the third quarter, Upstart
    UPST,
    -0.42%

    expects $140 million in revenue, while analysts had been anticipating $155 million. The company also models $5 million in adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (Ebitda), while analysts were looking for $9.6 million in adjusted Ebitda.

    Upstart shares tumbled more than 19% in Tuesday’s after-hours action.

    See also: Marqeta scores long-awaited Cash App renewal, and its stock is surging

    Chief Financial Officer Sanjay Datta, meanwhile, explained that the “ongoing supply of loans on offer in the secondary markets by sellers anxious for liquidity contributes to a challenging market dynamic, with loan books being sold at bargain prices and creating no shortage of buying opportunities for selected investors.”

    “Our view is that it will take some time for the market to work its way through this surplus of cheap available yield,” he said. “Despite this, we continue to pursue a number of promising discussions with prospective funding partners, aimed at bringing more committed capital to the platform, and believe that we will be well positioned once the loan market returns to a more traditional state of pricing equilibrium.”

    Though Datta said Upstart moved in a “promising direction this past quarter,” he also acknowledged there’s “much work to be done to restore our business to the scale and growth that we aspire to.”

    Read: Toast’s stock heats up after earnings as company hits a milestone

    The company reported a second-quarter net loss of $28.2 million, or 34 cents a share, compared with a loss of $29.9 million, or 36 cents a share, in the year-earlier period. On an adjusted basis, Upstart earned 6 cents a share, whereas analysts tracked by FactSet were modeling a 7-cent loss per share.

    Revenue fell to $136 million from $228.2 million. The FactSet consensus was for $135.2 million. The company generated $144 million in fee revenue, compared with the $131 million that analysts were expecting.

    Upstart’s lending partners originated 109,447 loans across its platform in the second quarter, totaling $1.2 billion. Conversion on rate requests was 9%, down from 13% in the same period a year prior.

    Though Upstart beat on adjusted earnings, it “signaled that macro pressure is not set to abate in Q3, with credit performance and the funding markets still buffeted by a challenging economic environment,” Barclays analyst Ramsey El-Assal wrote in a note to clients Tuesday. “With a new Q3 guide that came in below Street estimates, we expect shares to be down in tomorrow’s tape.”

    Shares of Upstart have rocketed 291% so far in 2023, through Tuesday’s close, as the S&P 500
    SPX
    has risen 17%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • New ‘Eris’ COVID variant is dominant in the U.S., but a shortage of data is making it hard to track

    New ‘Eris’ COVID variant is dominant in the U.S., but a shortage of data is making it hard to track

    [ad_1]

    A new variant of COVID-19 dubbed EG.5 has become dominant in the U.S., according to projections made by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, although a shortage of data is hampering the agency’s efforts to surveil the illness.

    The CDC said on Friday it was unable to publish its “Nowcast” projections for where EG.5 and other variants are circulating for every region, which it releases every two weeks, because it did not have enough sequences to update the estimates.

    “Because Nowcast is modeled data, we need a certain number of sequences to accurately predict proportions in the present,” CDC representative Kathleen Conley said in a statement to CBS News.

    “For some regions, we have limited numbers of sequences available, and therefore are not displaying nowcast estimates in those regions, though those regions are still being used in the aggregated national nowcast.”

    It is estimated that EG.5, an omicron subvariant, accounted for 17.3% of COVID cases in the U.S. in the two-week period through Aug. 5. That was up from an estimated 11.9% in the previous period and more than any other variant.

    But the data are based on sequencing from just three regions; Region 2, comprising New Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands; Region 4, comprising Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee; and Region 9, comprising Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, American Samoa, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, Marshall Islands and Republic of Palau.

    The next most common variants are XBB.1.16, accounting for 15.6% of cases, and XBB.2.3, accounting for 11.2% of cases.

    All are subvariants of XBB, which COVID vaccines in the fall will be designed to protect against.

    The symptoms of EG.5, which Twitter users have nicknamed “Eris,” are similar to early variants, and it’s not deemed to be more virulent than early variants. It may be more infectious, however, as has been the pattern with new strains. Symptoms include a cough, fever, chills, shortness of breath, fatigue and a loss of taste or smell.

    The World Health Organization said last week that EG.5 increased in prevalence globally to 11.6% in the week through July 30 from 62% four weeks earlier.

    The variant is for now a variant under monitoring, or VUM, for the agency, which is a less serious designation than a variant of interest, or VOI, according to its weekly epidemiological update.

    The WHO is monitoring two VOIs, XBB.1.5 and XBB.1.6.

    It is tracking seven VUMs and their descendent lineages, namely BA.2.75, CH.1.1, XBB, XBB.1.9.1, XBB.1.9.2, XBB.2.3 and EG.5.

    CDC data show that hospital admissions with COVID started to rise again in July after being flat or falling for several months. But the number of deaths continues to decline with 81.4% of the overall population in the U.S. having had at least one vaccine dose.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • German exports to Russia’s neighbors have surged

    German exports to Russia’s neighbors have surged

    [ad_1]

    European Union countries are meant to have placed an array of sanctions on Russia, preventing exports of a host of goods and services, ranging from high-end machinery to luxury cars, to the country in the wake of its unprovoked 2022 invasion of neighboring Ukraine.

    And official data do show that EU exports to Russia have slumped, by 31% during the first five months of the year.

    But, curiously, exports from EU countries to Russia’s neighbors have surged.

    Take Germany, for instance, whose exports to Kazakhstan are up 105% on a year-over-year basis. German exports to Central Asia and Belarus are up 75%.


    IIF

    “Not all of this stuff is going to Russia. But a lot of it probably is,” tweeted Robin Brooks, chief economist at the Institute of International Finance, who produced the chart.

    And it’s not just Germany. Sweden also has seen a surge of exports to Kazakhstan.

    Meanwhile, Germany, Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary have boosted exports to Kyrgyzstan.

    Read on:

    Why the exodus of Western companies out of Russia market after Ukraine invasion hasn’t fully materialized

    Yale’s Sonnenfeld locked in heated clash over integrity of Swiss research into companies’ Russia retreat

    How enforcement loopholes are creating an unfair playing field for U.S. companies that exited Russia over Ukraine war

    Far from Putin’s claims of resilience, Russian economy is being hammered by sanctions and exodus of international companies, Yale report finds

    [ad_2]

    Source link