ReportWire

Tag: Industrial Electrical Equipment

  • Dividend stocks are dirt cheap. It may be time to back up the truck.

    Dividend stocks are dirt cheap. It may be time to back up the truck.

    The stock market always overreacts, and this year it seems as if investors believe dividend stocks have become toxic. But a look at yields on quality dividend stocks relative to the market underlines what may be an excellent opportunity for long-term investors to pursue growth with an income stream that builds up over the years.

    The current environment, in which you can get a yield of more than 5% yield on your cash at a bank or lock in a yield of 4.57% on a10-year U.S. Treasury note
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
    or close to 5% on a 20-year Treasury bond
    BX:TMUBMUSD20Y
    seems to have made some investors forget two things: A stock’s dividend payout can rise over the long term, and so can it is price.

    It is never fun to see your portfolio underperform during a broad market swing. And people have a tendency to prefer jumping on a trend hoping to keep riding it, rather than taking advantage of opportunities brought about by price declines. We may be at such a moment for quality dividend stocks, based on their yields relative to that of the benchmark S&P 500
    SPX.

    Drew Justman of Madison Funds explained during an interview with MarketWatch how he and John Brown, who co-manage the Madison Dividend Income Fund, BHBFX MDMIX and the new Madison Dividend Value ETF
    DIVL,
    use relative dividend yields as part of their screening process for stocks. He said he has never seen such yields, when compared with that of the broad market, during 20 years of work as a securities analyst and portfolio manager.

    Dividend stocks are down

    Before diving in, we can illustrate the market’s current loathing of dividend stocks by comparing the performance of the Schwab U.S. Equity ETF
    SCHD,
    which tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, with that of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY.
    Let’s look at a total return chart (with dividends reinvested) starting at the end of 2021, since the Federal Reserve started its cycle of interest rate increases in March 2022:


    FactSet

    The Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index is made up of “high-dividend-yielding stocks in the U.S. with a record of consistently paying dividends, selected for fundamental strength relative to their peers, based on financial ratios,” according to S&P Dow Jones Indices.

    The end results for the two ETFs from the end of 2021 through Tuesday are similar. But you can see how the performance pattern has been different, with the dividend stocks holding up well during the stock market’s reaction to the Fed’s move last year, but trailing the market’s recovery as yields on CDs and bonds have become so much more attractive this year. Let’s break down the performance since the end of 2021, this time bringing in the Madison Dividend Income Fund’s Class Y and Class I shares:

    Fund

    2023 return

    2022 return

    Return since the end of 2021

    SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

    14.9%

    -18.2%

    -6.0%

    Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

    -3.8%

    -3.2%

    -6.9%

    Madison Dividend Income Fund – Class Y

    -4.7%

    -5.4%

    -9.9%

    Madison Dividend Income Fund – Class I

    -4.7%

    -5.3%

    -9.7%

    Source: FactSet

    Dividend stocks held up well during 2022, as the S&P 500 fell more than 18%. But they have been left behind during this year’s rally.

    The Madison Dividend Income Fund was established in 1986. The Class Y shares have annual expenses of 0.91% of assets under management and are rated three stars (out of five) within Morningstar’s “Large Value” fund category. The Class I shares have only been available since 2020. They have a lower expense ratio of 0.81% and are distributed through investment advisers or through platforms such as Schwab, which charges a $50 fee to buy Class I shares.

    The opportunity — high relative yields

    The Madison Dividend Income Fund holds 40 stocks. Justman explained that when he and Brown select stocks for the fund their investible universe begins with the components of the Russell 1000 Index
    RUT,
    which is made up of the largest 1,000 companies by market capitalization listed on U.S. exchanges. Their first cut narrows the list to about 225 stocks with dividend yields of at least 1.1 times that of the index.

    The Madison team calculates a stock’s relative dividend yield by dividing its yield by that of the S&P 500. Let’s do that for the Schwab U.S. Equity ETF
    SCHD
    (because it tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index) to illustrate the opportunity that Justman highlighted:

    Index or ETF

    Dividend yield

    5-year Avg. yield 

    10-year Avg. yield 

    15-year Avg. yield 

    Relative yield

    5-year Avg. relative yield 

    10-year Avg. relative yield 

    15-year Avg. relative yield 

    Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

    3.99%

    3.41%

    3.20%

    3.16%

    2.6

    2.1

    1.8

    1.6

    S&P 500

    1.55%

    1.62%

    1.79%

    1.92%

    Source: FactSet

    The Schwab U.S. Equity ETF’s relative yield is 2.6 — that is, its dividend yield is 2.6 times that of the S&P 500, which is much higher than the long-term averages going back 15 years. If we went back 20 years, the average relative yield would be 1.7.

    Examples of high-quality stocks with high relative dividend yields

    After narrowing down the Russell 1000 to about 225 stocks with relative dividend yields of at least 1.1, Justman and Brown cut further to about 80 companies with a long history of raising dividends and with strong balance sheets, before moving further through a deeper analysis to arrive at a portfolio of about 40 stocks.

    When asked about oil companies and others that pay fixed quarterly dividends plus variable dividends, he said, “We try to reach out to the company and get an estimate of special dividends and try to factor that in.” Two examples of companies held by the fund that pay variable dividends are ConocoPhillips
    COP,
    -0.29%

    and EOG Resources Inc.
    EOG,
    +0.52%
    .

    Since the balance-sheet requirement is subjective “almost all fund holdings are investment-grade rated,” Justman said. That refers to credit ratings by Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service or Fitch Ratings. He went further, saying about 80% of the fund’s holdings were rated “A-minus or better.” BBB- is the lowest investment-grade rating from S&P. Fidelity breaks down the credit agencies’ ratings hierarchy.

    Justman named nine stocks held by the fund as good examples of quality companies with high relative yields to the S&P 500:

    Company

    Ticker

    Dividend yield

    Relative yield

    2023 return

    2022 return

    Return since the end of 2021

    CME Group Inc. Class A

    CME,
    +0.47%
    2.04%

    1.3

    31%

    -23%

    1%

    Home Depot, Inc.

    HD,
    -0.39%
    2.79%

    1.8

    -3%

    -22%

    -25%

    Lowe’s Cos., Inc.

    LOW,
    +0.27%
    2.17%

    1.4

    3%

    -21%

    -19%

    Morgan Stanley

    MS,
    -1.54%
    4.24%

    2.7

    -3%

    -10%

    -13%

    U.S. Bancorp

    USB,
    -0.25%
    5.89%

    3.8

    -22%

    -19%

    -37%

    Medtronic PLC

    MDT,
    -4.32%
    3.62%

    2.3

    1%

    -23%

    -22%

    Texas Instruments Inc.

    TXN,
    -0.21%
    3.30%

    2.1

    -3%

    -10%

    -12%

    United Parcel Service Inc. Class B

    UPS,
    -0.16%
    4.17%

    2.7

    -8%

    -16%

    -23%

    Union Pacific Corp.

    UNP,
    +1.52%
    2.52%

    1.6

    2%

    -16%

    -15%

    Source: FactSet

    Click on the tickers for more about each company, fund or index.

    Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information available for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

    Now let’s see how these companies have grown their dividend payouts over the past five years. Leaving the companies in the same order, here are compound annual growth rates (CAGR) for dividends.

    Before showing this next set of data, let’s work through one example among the nine stocks:

    • If you had purchased shares of Home Depot Inc.
      HD,
      -0.39%

      five years ago, you would have paid $193.70 a share if you went in at the close on Oct. 10, 2018. At that time, the company’s quarterly dividend was $1.03 cents a share, for an annual dividend rate of $4.12, which made for a then-current yield of 2.13%.

    • If you had held your shares of Home Depot for five years through Tuesday, your quarterly dividend would have increased to $2.09 a share, for a current annual payout of $8.36. The company’s dividend has increased at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15.2% over the past five years. In comparison, the S&P 500’s weighted dividend rate has increased at a CAGR of 6.24% over the past five years, according to FactSet.

    • That annual payout rate of $8.36 would make for a current dividend yield of 2.79% for a new investor who went in at Tuesday’s closing price of $299.22. But if you had not reinvested, the dividend yield on your five-year-old shares (based on what you would have paid for them) would be 4.32%. And your share price would have risen 54%. And if you had reinvested your dividends, your total return for the five years would have been 75%, slightly ahead of the 74% return for the S&P 500 SPX during that period.

    Home Depot hasn’t been the best dividend grower among the nine stocks named by Justman, but it is a good example of how an investor can build income over the long term, while also enjoying capital appreciation.

    Here’s the dividend CAGR comparison for the nine stocks:

    Company

    Ticker

    Five-year dividend CAGR

    Dividend yield on shares purchased five years ago

    Dividend yield five years ago

    Current dividend yield

    Five-year price change

    Five-year total return

    CME Group Inc. Class A

    CME,
    +0.47%
    9.46%

    2.44%

    1.55%

    2.04%

    20%

    42%

    Home Depot Inc.

    HD,
    -0.39%
    15.20%

    4.32%

    2.13%

    2.79%

    54%

    75%

    Lowe’s Cos, Inc.

    LOW,
    +0.27%
    18.04%

    4.14%

    1.81%

    2.17%

    91%

    109%

    Morgan Stanley

    MS,
    -1.54%
    23.16%

    7.62%

    2.69%

    4.24%

    80%

    108%

    U.S. Bancorp

    USB,
    -0.25%
    5.34%

    3.60%

    2.78%

    5.89%

    -39%

    -26%

    Medtronic PLC

    MDT,
    -4.32%
    6.65%

    2.90%

    2.10%

    3.62%

    -20%

    -9%

    Texas Instruments Inc.

    TXN,
    -0.21%
    11.04%

    5.24%

    3.10%

    3.30%

    59%

    82%

    United Parcel Service Inc. Class B

    UPS,
    -0.16%
    12.23%

    5.56%

    3.12%

    4.17%

    33%

    56%

    Union Pacific Corp.

    UNP,
    +1.52%
    10.20%

    3.37%

    2.07%

    2.52%

    34%

    49%

    Source: FactSet

    This isn’t to say that Justman and Brown have held all of these stocks over the past five years. In fact, Lowe’s Cos.
    LOW,
    +0.27%

    was added to the portfolio this year, as was United Parcel Service Inc.
    UPS,
    -0.16%
    .
    But for most of these companies, dividends have compounded at relatively high rates.

    When asked to name an example of a stock the fund had sold, Justman said he and Brown decided to part ways with Verizon Communications Inc.
    VZ,
    -0.94%

    last year, “as we became concerned about its fundamental competitive position in its industry.”

    Summing up the scene for dividend stocks, Justman said, “It seems this year the market is treating dividend stocks as fixed-income instruments. We think that is a short-term issue and that this is a great opportunity.”

    Don’t miss: How to tell if it is worth avoiding taxes with a municipal-bond ETF

    Source link

  • These 20 stocks in the S&P 500 are expected to soar after rising interest rates have pushed down valuations

    These 20 stocks in the S&P 500 are expected to soar after rising interest rates have pushed down valuations

    Two things investors can be sure about: Nothing lasts forever and the stock market always overreacts. The spiking of yields on long-term U.S. Treasury securities has been breathtaking, and it has led to remarkable declines for some sectors and possible bargains for contrarian investors who can commit for the long term.

    First we will show how the sectors of the S&P 500

    have performed. Then we will look at price-to-earnings valuations for the sectors and compare them to long-term averages. Then we will screen the entire index for companies trading below their long-term forward P/E valuation averages and narrow the list to companies most favored by analysts.

    Here are total returns, with dividends reinvested, for the 11 sectors of the S&P 500, with broad indexes below. The sectors are sorted by ascending total returns this year through Monday.

    Sector or index

    2023 return

    2022 return

    Return since end of 2021

    1 week return

    1 month return

    Utilities

    -18.4%

    1.6%

    -17.2%

    -11.1%

    -9.6%

    Real Estate

    -7.1%

    -26.1%

    -31.4%

    -3.0%

    -8.8%

    Consumer Staples

    -5.4%

    -0.6%

    -6.0%

    -2.2%

    -4.4%

    Healthcare

    -4.2%

    -2.0%

    -6.1%

    -1.7%

    -3.3%

    Financials

    -2.5%

    -10.5%

    -12.7%

    -2.5%

    -4.7%

    Materials

    1.3%

    -12.3%

    -11.2%

    -1.9%

    -7.0%

    Industrials

    3.5%

    -5.5%

    -2.1%

    -1.8%

    -7.3%

    Energy

    4.0%

    65.7%

    72.4%

    -1.9%

    -1.4%

    Consumer Discretionary

    27.0%

    -37.0%

    -20.0%

    -0.6%

    -5.2%

    Information Technology

    36.5%

    -28.2%

    -2.0%

    0.8%

    -5.9%

    Communication Services

    42.5%

    -39.9%

    -14.3%

    1.1%

    -1.3%

    S&P 500
    13.1%

    -18.1%

    -7.4%

    -1.1%

    -4.9%

    DJ Industrial Average
    2.5%

    -6.9%

    -4.5%

    -1.7%

    -4.0%

    Nasdaq Composite Index
    COMP
    28.0%

    -32.5%

    -13.7%

    0.3%

    -5.1%

    Nasdaq-100 Index
    36.5%

    -32.4%

    -7.7%

    0.5%

    -4.2%

    Source: FactSet

    Returns for 2022 are also included, along with those since the end of 2021. Last year’s weakest sector, communications services, has been this year’s strongest performer. This sector includes Alphabet Inc.
    GOOGL
    and Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    which have returned 52% and 155% this year, respectively, but are still down since the end of 2021. To the right are returns for the past week and month through Monday.

    On Monday, the S&P 500 Utilities sector had its worst one-day performance since 2020, with a 4.7% decline. Investors were reacting to the jump in long-term interest rates.

    Here is a link to the U.S. Treasury Department’s summary of the daily yield curve across maturities for Treasury securities.

    The yield on 10-year U.S. Treasury notes

    jumped 10 basis points in only one day to 4.69% on Monday. A month earlier the 10-year yield was only 4.27%. Also on Monday, the yield on 20-year Treasury bonds

    rose to 5.00% from 4.92% on Friday. It was up from 4.56% a month earlier.

    Market Extra: Bond investors feel the heat as popular fixed-income ETF suffers lowest close since 2007

    The Treasury yield curve is still inverted, with 3-month T-bills

    yielding 5.62% on Monday, but that was up only slightly from a month earlier. An inverted yield curve has traditionally signaled that bond investors expect a recession within a year and a lowering of interest rates by the Federal Reserve. Demand for bonds pushes their prices down. But the reverse has happened over recent days, with the selling of longer-term Treasury securities pushing yields up rapidly.

    Another way to illustrate the phenomenon is to look at how the Federal Reserve has shifted the U.S. money supply. Odeon Capital analyst Dick Bove wrote in a note to clients on Friday that “the Federal Reserve has not deviated from its policy to defeat inflation by tightening monetary policy,” as it has shrunk its balance sheet (mostly Treasury securities) to $8.1 trillion from $9 trillion in March 2022. He added: “The M2 money supply was $21.8 trillion in March 2022; today it is $20.8 trillion. You cannot get tighter than these numbers indicate.”

    Then on Tuesday, Bove illustrated the Fed’s tightening and the movement of the 10-year yield with two charts:


    Odeon Capital Group, Bloomberg

    Bove said he believes the bond market has gotten it wrong, with the inverted yield curve reflecting expectations of rate cuts next year. If he is correct, investors can expect longer-term yields to keep shooting up and a normalization of the yield curve.

    This has set up a brutal environment for utility stocks, which are typically desired by investors who are seeking dividend income. In a market in which you can receive a yield of 5.5% with little risk over the short term, and in which you can lock in a long-term yield of about 5%, why take a risk in the stock market? And if you believe that the core inflation rate of 3.7% makes a 5% yield seem paltry, keep in mind that not all investors think the same way. Many worry less about the inflation rate because large components of official inflation calculations, such as home prices and car prices, don’t affect everyone every year.

    We cannot know when this current selloff of longer-term bonds will end, or how much of an effect it will have on the stock market. But sharp declines in the stock market can set up attractive price points for investors looking to go in for the long haul.

    Screening for lower valuations and high ratings

    A combination of rising earnings estimates and price declines could shed light on potential buying opportunities, based on forward price-to-earnings ratios.

    Let’s look at the sectors again, in the same order, this time to show their forward P/E ratios, based on weighted rolling 12-month consensus estimates for earnings per share among analysts polled by FactSet:

    Sector or index

    Current P/E to 5-year average

    Current P/E to 10-year average

    Current P/E to 15-year average

    Forward P/E

    5-year average P/E

    10-year average P/E

    15-year average P/E

    Utilities

    82%

    86%

    95%

    14.99

    18.30

    17.40

    15.82

    Real Estate

    76%

    80%

    81%

    15.19

    19.86

    18.89

    18.72

    Consumer Staples

    93%

    96%

    105%

    18.61

    19.92

    19.30

    17.64

    Healthcare

    103%

    104%

    115%

    16.99

    16.46

    16.34

    14.72

    Financials

    88%

    92%

    97%

    12.90

    14.65

    14.08

    13.26

    Materials

    100%

    103%

    111%

    16.91

    16.98

    16.42

    15.27

    Industrials

    88%

    96%

    105%

    17.38

    19.84

    18.16

    16.56

    Energy

    106%

    63%

    73%

    11.78

    11.17

    18.80

    16.23

    Consumer Discretionary

    79%

    95%

    109%

    24.09

    30.41

    25.39

    22.10

    Information Technology

    109%

    130%

    146%

    24.20

    22.17

    18.55

    16.54

    Communication Services

    86%

    86%

    94%

    16.41

    19.09

    19.00

    17.43

    S&P 500
    94%

    101%

    112%

    17.94

    19.01

    17.76

    16.04

    DJ Industrial Average
    93%

    98%

    107%

    16.25

    17.49

    16.54

    15.17

    Nasdaq Composite Index
    92%

    102%

    102%

    24.62

    26.71

    24.18

    24.18

    Nasdaq-100 Index
    97%

    110%

    126%

    24.40

    25.23

    22.14

    19.43

    There is a limit to how many columns we can show in the table. The S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio is now 17.94, compared with 16.79 at the end of 2022 and 21.53 at the end of 2021. The benchmark index’s P/E is above its 10- and 15-year average levels but below the five-year average.

    If we compare the current sector P/E numbers to 5-, 10- and 15-year averages, we can see that the current levels are below all three averages for four sectors: utilities, real estate, financials and communications services. The first three face obvious difficulties as they adjust to the rising-rate environment, while the real-estate sector reels from continuing low usage rates for office buildings, from the change in behavior brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Your own opinions, along with the pricing for some sectors, might drive some investment choices.

    A broader screen of the S&P 500 might point to companies for you to research further.

    We narrowed the S&P 500 as follows:

    • Current forward P/E below 5-, 10- and 15-year average valuations. For stocks with negative earnings-per-share estimates for the next 12 months, there is no forward P/E ratio so they were excluded. For stocks listed for less than 15 years, we required at least a 5-year average P/E for comparison. This brought the list down to 138 companies.

    • “Buy” or equivalent ratings from at least two-thirds of analysts: 41 companies.

    Here are the 20 companies that passed the screen, for which analysts’ price targets imply the highest upside potential over the next 12 months.

    There is too much data for one table, so first we will show the P/E information:

    Company

    Ticker

    Current P/E to 5-year average

    Current P/E to 10-year average

    Current P/E to 15-year average

    SolarEdge Technologies Inc.

    SEDG 89%

    N/A

    N/A

    AES Corp.

    AES 66%

    75%

    90%

    Insulet Corp.

    PODD 18%

    N/A

    N/A

    United Airlines Holdings Inc.

    UAL 42%

    50%

    N/A

    Alaska Air Group Inc.

    ALK 51%

    57%

    N/A

    Tapestry Inc.

    TPR 39%

    49%

    70%

    Albemarle Corp.

    ALB 39%

    50%

    73%

    Delta Air Lines Inc.

    DAL 60%

    63%

    21%

    Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.

    ARE 59%

    68%

    N/A

    Las Vegas Sands Corp.

    LVS 96%

    78%

    53%

    Paycom Software Inc.

    PAYC 61%

    N/A

    N/A

    PayPal Holdings Inc.

    PYPL 33%

    N/A

    N/A

    SBA Communications Corp. Class A

    SBAC 27%

    N/A

    N/A

    Advanced Micro Devices Inc.

    AMD 58%

    39%

    N/A

    LKQ Corp.

    LKQ 92%

    44%

    78%

    Charles Schwab Corp.

    SCHW 75%

    54%

    73%

    PulteGroup Inc.

    PHM 94%

    47%

    N/A

    Lamb Weston Holdings Inc.

    LW 71%

    N/A

    N/A

    News Corp Class A

    NWSA 93%

    73%

    N/A

    CVS Health Corp.

    CVS 75%

    61%

    67%

    Source: FactSet

    Click on the tickers for more about each company or index.

    Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information available for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

    News Corp
    NWSA
    is on the list. The company owns Dow Jones, which in turn owns MarketWatch.

    Here’s the list again, with ratings and consensus price-target information:

    Company

    Ticker

    Share “buy” ratings

    Oct. 2 price

    Consensus price target

    Implied 12-month upside potential

    SolarEdge Technologies Inc.

    SEDG 74%

    $122.56

    $268.77

    119%

    AES Corp.

    AES 79%

    $14.16

    $25.60

    81%

    Insulet Corp.

    PODD 68%

    $165.04

    $279.00

    69%

    United Airlines Holdings Inc.

    UAL 71%

    $41.62

    $69.52

    67%

    Alaska Air Group Inc.

    ALK 87%

    $36.83

    $61.31

    66%

    Tapestry Inc.

    TPR 75%

    $28.58

    $46.21

    62%

    Albemarle Corp.

    ALB 81%

    $162.41

    $259.95

    60%

    Delta Air Lines Inc.

    DAL 95%

    $36.45

    $58.11

    59%

    Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.

    ARE 100%

    $98.18

    $149.45

    52%

    Las Vegas Sands Corp.

    LVS 72%

    $45.70

    $68.15

    49%

    Paycom Software Inc.

    PAYC 77%

    $260.04

    $384.89

    48%

    PayPal Holdings Inc.

    PYPL 69%

    $58.56

    $86.38

    48%

    SBA Communications Corp. Class A

    SBAC 68%

    $198.24

    $276.69

    40%

    Advanced Micro Devices Inc.

    AMD 74%

    $103.27

    $143.07

    39%

    LKQ Corp.

    LKQ 82%

    $49.13

    $67.13

    37%

    Charles Schwab Corp.

    SCHW 77%

    $53.55

    $72.67

    36%

    PulteGroup Inc.

    PHM 81%

    $73.22

    $98.60

    35%

    Lamb Weston Holdings Inc.

    LW 100%

    $92.23

    $123.50

    34%

    News Corp Class A

    NWSA 78%

    $20.00

    $26.42

    32%

    CVS Health Corp.

    CVS 77%

    $69.69

    $90.88

    30%

    Source: FactSet

    A year may actually be a short period for a long-term investor, but 12-month price targets are the norm for analysts working for brokerage companies.

    Don’t miss: This fund shows that industry expertise can help you make a lot of money in the stock market

    Source link

  • Here’s an easy way to make a more concentrated play on the ‘Magnificent Seven’ stocks

    Here’s an easy way to make a more concentrated play on the ‘Magnificent Seven’ stocks

    Investors in index funds have been well rewarded by a high concentration in the largest technology companies over the past decade. But there are also continuing warnings about the risk of such heavy concentrations, even in index funds that track the S&P 500. Solutions are offered to limit this risk, but if you expect Big Tech to continue to drive the broad market returns over the coming years, why not make an even more focused bet?

    Comparisons of three index-fund approaches highlight how successful concentration in the “Magnificent Seven” has been.

    The Magnificent Seven are Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    +0.16%
    ,
    Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    +0.72%
    ,
    Nvidia Corp.
    NVDA,
    -2.03%
    ,
    Amazon.com Inc.
    AMZN,
    +2.17%
    ,
    Alphabet Inc.
    GOOGL,
    -0.27%

    GOOG,
    -0.32%
    ,
    Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    +9.37%

    and Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    +1.67%
    .
    We have listed them in the order of their concentration within the Invesco S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY,
    which tracks the S&P 500
    SPX.
    The U.S. benchmark index is weighted by market capitalization, as is the Nasdaq Composite Index
    COMP
    and the Russell indexes.

    SPY is 27.6% concentrated in the Magnificent Seven. One way to play the same group of 500 stocks but eliminate concentration risk is to take an equal-weighted approach to the index, which has worked well for certain long periods. But here, we’re focusing on how well the concentrated strategy has worked.

    Let’s take a look at the group’s concentration in three popular index approaches, then look at long-term performance and consider what happened in 2022 as rising interest rates helped crush the tech sector.

    Here are the portfolio weightings for the Magnificent Seven in SPY, along with those of the Invesco QQQ Trust
    QQQ,
    which tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
    NDX
    and the Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
    XLG
    :

    Company

    Ticker

    % of SPY

    % of QQQ

    % of XLG

    Apple Inc.

    AAPL,
    +0.16%
    7.05%

    10.85%

    12.46%

    Microsoft Cor.

    MSFT,
    +0.72%
    6.65%

    9.53%

    11.76%

    Amazon.com Inc.

    AMZN,
    +2.17%
    3.30%

    5.50%

    5.84%

    Nvidia Corp.

    NVDA,
    -2.03%
    3.02%

    4.44%

    5.33%

    Alphabet Inc. Class A

    GOOGL,
    -0.27%
    2.17%

    3.12%

    3.83%

    Alphabet Inc. Class C

    GOOG,
    -0.32%
    1.88%

    3.11%

    3.32%

    Tesla Inc.

    TSLA,
    +9.37%
    1.79%

    3.10%

    3.17%

    Meta Platforms Inc. Class A

    META,
    +1.67%
    1.77%

    3.60%

    3.12%

    Totals

     

    27.63%

    43.25%

    48.83%

    Sources: Invesco Ltd., State Street Corp.

    The same group of seven companies (eight stocks with two common share classes for Alphabet) is at the top of each exchange-traded fund’s portfolio, although the top seven for QQQ aren’t in the same order as those for SPY and XLG. QQQ’s weighting was changed recently as the underlying Nasdaq-100 underwent a “special rebalancing” last month.

    Here’s a five-year chart comparing the performance of the three approaches. All returns in this article include reinvested dividends.


    FactSet

    QQQ has been the clear winner for five years, but it is also worth noting how well XLG has performed when compared with SPY. This “top 50” approach to the S&P 500 incorporates many stocks that aren’t listed on the Nasdaq and therefore cannot be included in QQQ, which itself is made up of the largest 100 nonfinancial companies in the full Nasdaq Composite Index
    COMP,
    +0.45%
    .

    Examples of stocks held by XLG that aren’t held by QQQ include such non-tech stalwarts as Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
    BRK.B,
    +0.77%
    ,
    Johnson & Johnson
    JNJ,
    +0.79%
    ,
    Procter & Gamble Co.
    PG,
    +0.94%
    ,
    Home Depot Inc.
    HD,
    -0.12%

    and Nike Inc.
    NKE,
    -0.42%
    .

    Now let’s go deeper into long-term performance. First, here are the total returns for various time periods:

    ETF

    3 Years

    5 Years

    10 Years

    15 Years

    20 Years

    SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY
    40%

    69%

    223%

    370%

    531%

    Invesco QQQ Trust
    QQQ
    41%

    113%

    430%

    882%

    1,158%

    Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
    XLG
    41%

    85%

    262%

    404%

    N/A

    Source: FactSet

    Click on the tickers for more about each ETF, company or index.

    Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information available for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

    There is no 20-year return for XLG because this ETF was established in 2005.

    For five years and longer, QQQ has been the runaway leader, but for 5, 10 and 15 years, XLG has also beaten SPY handily, with broader industry exposure.

    Something else to consider is that during 2022, when SPY was down 18.2%, XLG fell 24.3% and QQQ dropped 32.6%.

    For disciplined long-term investors, the tech pain of 2022 may not seem to have been a small price to pay for outperformance. And it may have been easier to take the pounding when holding SPY or even XLG that year.

    Here’s a look at the average annual returns for the three ETFs:

    ETF

    3 years

    5 years

    10 years

    15 years

    20 years

    SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY
    11.8%

    11.0%

    12.4%

    10.9%

    9.6%

    Invesco QQQ Trust
    QQQ
    12.0%

    16.3%

    18.2%

    16.4%

    13.5%

    Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
    XLG
    12.2%

    13.1%

    13.7%

    11.4%

    N/A

    Source: FactSet

    So the question remains — do you believe that the largest technology companies will continue to lead the stock market for the next decade at least? If so, a more concentrated index approach may be for you, provided you can withstand the urge to sell into a declining market, such as the one we experienced last year.

    Here is something else to keep in mind. In a note to clients on Monday, Doug Peta, the chief U.S. investment strategist at BCA, made a fascinating point: “The only novel development is that all the heaviest hitters now hail from Tech and Tech-adjacent sectors and are therefore more prone to move together than they were at the end of 2004, when the seven largest stocks came from six different sectors. “

    Nothing lasts forever. Peta continued by suggesting that investors who are tired of big tech taking all the glory “need only wait.”

    “[I]f history is any guide, their time at the top of the capitalization scale will be short,” he wrote.

    Don’t miss: These four Dow stocks take top prizes for dividend growth

    Source link

  • Charter vs. Disney: Is this the end of the bundle as we know it?

    Charter vs. Disney: Is this the end of the bundle as we know it?

    It was the night cable TV went out across most of America.

    Late Thursday, all Disney channels, including ESPN and ABC, went dark on Charter Communications Inc.’s
    CHTR,
    -3.16%

    Spectrum cable service as discussions over affiliate renewals hit an impasse — in the middle of the U.S. Open and college football season, and with the NFL regular season kicking off this Thursday night on NBC.

    The carriage dispute between Charter and Walt Disney Co.
    DIS,
    -0.55%

    threatens to upend business for both companies and dramatically reshape both the pay-TV and streaming ecosystems, and it could also spill over to affect content distributors and millions of consumers. The result will likely be far less spending on content from media and entertainment companies, including on sports and original programming.

    If Charter exits the TV business altogether, millions of homes are likely to abandon the pay-TV bundle, potentially speeding its decline as other, smaller TV providers follow suit, analysts said.

    “If Charter can drop ESPN, then any network (broadcast station or cable network) can be dropped,” analysts at LightShed Partners said in a note Tuesday. “Nobody is safe and the leverage will have permanently shifted to the distributor not because content is no longer king, but because too much content no longer requires the big video bundle and because the video bundle no longer is economically viable for distributors.”

    Indeed, the pandemic-era boom that streaming services enjoyed is unlikely to return. Netflix Inc.
    NFLX,
    +2.00%

    recently introduced an ad-supported tier while cracking down on password sharing. Disney also announced higher prices last month.

    “The collateral damage could be wide-ranging from sports leagues with rights coming up for renewal, local TV station affiliates seeking material step-ups and creative talent tied to the programming investments made by linear networks,” MoffettNathanson analysts Michael Nathanson and Craig Moffett said in a report Friday.

    Cable TV system needed a reset

    Billions of dollars and hours of must-see-TV time are at stake. The conflict boils down to two issues: How much the carrier will pay per channel, and what percentage of a distributor’s footprint will be required to have the channel in their package.

    The showdown was inevitable, with murmurings the cable TV model was fundamentally broken and with programmers like Disney continuing to pursue direct-to-consumer options. For example, Disney has indicated it plans to take ESPN, its most valuable property in the pay-TV bundle, direct to consumers in the coming years.

    The conflict “marks the beginning of the end of the media-carriage bundle extortion on [multichannel video programming distributor services], and does not bode well for other networks that are perceived to have far less clout than Disney,” Raymond James analyst Frank G. Louthan IV said in a note on Friday.

    Oppenheimer analysts went so far as to deem the dispute a “tipping point” for legacy TV and a defining moment for Charter, the country’s second-largest cable TV provider with 14.7 million subscribers. Media providers like Disney are transitioning to over-the-top (OTT) TV — streaming content via the internet — but are still expecting cable providers such as Charter to keep paying the same amount for legacy TV, the analysts said.

    “The linear TV business model is broken. The only thing that can save it somewhat longer term is by combining and bundling with OTT services,” the Oppenheimer analysts said.

    The impasse has Disney executives urging Charter subscribers to ditch the cable giant for Hulu with Live TV, which offers EPSN, ABC, Disney+ and other channels. Disney owns two-thirds of Hulu.

    “Disney deeply values its relationship with its viewers and is hopeful Charter is ready to have more conversations that will restore access to its content to Spectrum customers as quickly as possible,” Disney executives wrote in a blog post late Monday. “However, if you are one of these frustrated customers, it can be infuriating to not be able to access the content you want. Luckily, consumers have more choices today than ever before to immediately access the programming they want without a cable subscription.”

    Charter has remained firm that it is prepared to abandon its video business.

    “We’re on the edge of a precipice. We’re either moving forward with a new collaborative video model, or we’re moving on,” Charter CEO Chris Winfrey said on a conference call with Wall Street analysts Friday morning. “This is not a typical carriage dispute. It’s significant for Charter, and we think it’s even more significant for programmers and the broader video ecosystem.”

    Source link

  • Ocado to Receive GBP200 Mln in Settlement from AutoStore

    Ocado to Receive GBP200 Mln in Settlement from AutoStore

    By Christian Moess Laursen

    Ocado Group said Monday that it has reached an agreement to settle all litigation with Norwegian peer AutoStore over e-commerce patent claims.

    The online grocer and retail-technology specialist said AutoStore will pay Ocado 200 million pounds ($257.1 million) in 24 monthly installments starting this month.

    The settlement includes a cross-licence of certain patents between the two companies, whereby they both have freedom to access and use technology covered by each other’s pre-2020 patents.

    The agreement gives access to part of each company’s patent portfolio for both of them to use or develop their own products, Ocado said.

    The settlement ends a three-year row that started in 2020, when AutoStore filed a claim for patent infringement against Ocado regarding e-commerce tech.

    Write to Christian Moess Laursen at christian.moess@wsj.com

    Source link

  • Worried that stocks are too expensive? This value approach can highlight bargains.

    Worried that stocks are too expensive? This value approach can highlight bargains.

    At a time when many investors seem euphoric, others are warning that stock valuations have once again turned frothy. It may pay to take a look back at valuation and performance and consider your own risk tolerance.

    A value-based approach that offers lower volatility and good long-term returns can be expected to be less flashy than one focused on the hottest technology stocks. But depending on how much it bothers you when the stock market gyrates, it may be a better way for you to invest. Lower volatility might help you to avoid the type of emotional reaction that can lead to selling into a declining market or attempting to time the market, both of which tend to be losing strategies.

    Aaron Dunn is a co-head of the value equity team at Eaton Vance, which is based in Boston and is a unit of Morgan Stanley. During an interview, he explained how he and Brad Galko, who co-heads the team, select stocks for the Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund. The fund’s performance benchmark is the Russell 1000 Value Index
    RLV,
    +1.08%
    .

    First, let’s take a broad look at how aggregate forward price-to-earnings ratios have moved for exchange-traded funds tracking several broad indexes over the past 10 years:


    FactSet

    The valuations are lower than their 2020 peaks. But for all but one, the valuations still appear to be high when compared with their 10-year averages:

    ETF

    Ticker

    Current forward P/E

    10-year average forward P/E

    Current valuation to 10-year average

    SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

    SPY,
    +0.64%
    19.06

    15.93

    120%

    iShares Russell 1000 ETF

    IWB,
    +0.80%
    18.94

    16.02

    118%

    iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF

    IWD,
    +1.07%
    14.33

    13.94

    103%

    iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF

    IWF,
    +0.50%
    26.63

    19.00

    140%

    Source: FactSet

    All of the listed ETFs listed here are trading well above their 10-year average P/E valuations except the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF, which is only slightly higher. These numbers back the notion that the broad market is expensive and that a value approach may be more reasonable. It is also worth keeping in mind that during 2022, when the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY,
    +0.64%

    declined 18.2% and the iShares Russell 1000 ETF
    IWB,
    +0.80%

    fell 19.2%, the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
    IWD,
    +1.07%

    pulled back 7.7% and the Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunity Fund’s Class I shares were down only 3.3%, all with dividends reinvested.

    If we look at 10-year total returns, the nonvalue indexes, so heavily weighted to the largest technology-oriented companies, have been excellent performers for investors who could remain committed through thick and thin:


    FactSet

    Fund

    Ticker

    3-year average annual return

    5-year average annual return

    10-year average annual return

    SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

    SPY,
    +0.64%
    13.2%

    11.4%

    12.3%

    iShares Russell 1000 ETF

    IWB,
    +0.80%
    12.5%

    11.0%

    12.1%

    iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF

    IWF,
    +0.50%
    11.2%

    14.0%

    15.0%

    iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF

    IWD,
    +1.07%
    13.7%

    7.3%

    8.7%

    Eaton Vance Value Opportunities Fund – Class I

    EIFVX,
    +0.92%
    14.8%

    8.7%

    9.7%

    Source: FactSet

    For five and 10 years, the growth-oriented approaches have shined. But for three years, which includes the 2022 disruption, the Eaton Vance Value Opportunities Fund has fared best, even outperforming its benchmark.

    A selective approach to value

    The Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunity Fund’s Class I
    EIFVX,
    +0.92%

    shares are rated four stars (out of five) within Morningstar’s Large Value fund category. The fund’s Class A
    EAFVX,
    +0.93%

    shares are rated three stars. The difference is that the Class I shares, which are typically distributed through investment advisers, have annual expenses of 0.74% of assets under management, while the Class A shares have an expense ratio of 0.99%. You can purchase Class I shares directly through brokerage platforms for a $50 fee.

    Dunn said that when selecting stocks for the fund, he and Galko take a bottom-up approach to identify quality companies. The want to see high returns on invested capital (ROIC) over the long term, as well as a “good competitive position” for a company and a strong management team.

    They also prefer companies with low debt. “We do not want to buy overlevered companies and be in a situation where we are diluting through equity raises and putting capital at risk,” he said.

    Dunn added that he and Galko look closely at free cash flow generation. A company’s free cash flow is its remaining cash flow after capital expenditures. This is money that can be used to fund expansion, acquisitions, dividend increases or share buybacks, or for other corporate purposes.

    “Philosophically, what this results in is that we hold up well in markets such as last year’s. And we find upside in stocks trading below intrinsic value,” he said.

    “We focus on finding ideas where there is a good skew for upside relative to downside,” he added.

    According to Morningstar, the fund’s active share when compared with IWD is high, at 91.45%. Active share is a measure of how much an actively managed fund differs in investment exposure from its benchmark index. If you are paying more for active management than you would to invest in an index fund, active share is something to consider. If it is low, you might be overpaying for a “closet indexer.” You can read about how Morningstar assesses active shares here.

    The fund is concentrated, typically holding between 25 and 45 companies.

    According to Morningstar’s most recent data, these were the fund’s top 10 holdings (out of 28 stocks) as of May 31:

    Company

    Ticker

    % of Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunity Fund

    Forward P/E

    2023 total return

    Alphabet Inc. Class A

    GOOGL,
    +0.59%
    5.0%

    19.6

    32%

    Micron Technology Inc.

    MU,
    +1.79%
    4.8%

    N/A

    25%

    American International Group Inc.

    AIG,
    +1.15%
    4.3%

    8.1

    -7%

    Reinsurance Group of America Inc.

    RGA,
    -0.34%
    4.2%

    8.0

    1%

    Bristol Myers Squibb Co.

    BMY,
    +0.50%
    4.1%

    7.7

    -11%

    Wells Fargo & Co.

    WFC,
    +0.99%
    4.0%

    8.9

    4%

    ConocoPhillips

    COP,
    +2.96%
    4.0%

    10.5

    -10%

    Constellation Brands Inc. Class A

    STZ,
    +0.30%
    3.9%

    20.4

    9%

    NextEra Energy Inc.

    NEE,
    +0.67%
    3.8%

    21.9

    -13%

    Charles Schwab Corp.

    SCHW,
    -0.43%
    3.8%

    16.0

    -30%

    Source: FactSet

    Click the tickers for more about each company, fund or index.

    Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information available for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

    There is no forward price-to-earnings ratio for Micron Technology Inc.
    MU,
    +1.79%
    ,
    because the company’s combined EPS for the next 12 months are expected to be negative.

    Micron is a company in transition, caught up in diplomatic conflict between the U.S. and China, whose government directed some manufacturers in May to stop purchasing memory chips made by the company. Then again, in June, Micron highlighted its “commitment to China” when announcing a new investment in its plant in Xi’an.

    Read: Micron recovery debated by analysts as bottom is called in memory-chip market

    Dunn said downside for Micron’s stock was “mitigated” because of the company’s relatively low debt. He also said that as companies continue to adopt more cloud services and deploy artificial-intelligence technology, demand for memory chips will increase.

    While there is no current forward P/E for Micron, the stock always trades at low valuations relative to most other large tech companies. Dunn touted Micron’s strong cash flow and said the stock was “underappreciated” and remained “an interesting play on cloud and AI.”

    While it is not among the top 10 holdings listed above, Dunn highlighted Dollar Tree Inc.
    DLTR,
    +1.80%

    as an example of the type of value stock he favors. The company “was not well run” following its acquisition of Family Dollar in 2015. But he has been impressed with its more recent turnaround efforts, including improvements in how products are shipped to stores, better efficiency and “a lot of work going on with culture, how they operate, how they treat employees [and] adding some shelf space to move more product.”

    It is interesting to see NextEra Energy Inc.
    NEE,
    +0.67%

    among the fund’s largest holdings. This has been quite a strong grower over the past 10 years, with a total return of 346% as the owner of Florida Power & Light has grown along with its customer base and has become a leader in the build-out of solar-power generation.

    Dunn said the company is “still growing in the mid-single digits. For a utility company, that is a strong profile.”

    When discussing Alphabet Inc.
    GOOGL,
    +0.59%
    ,
    the fund’s largest holding as of May 31, Dunn said that “it is really an advertising business with other businesses around it” and that its P/E valuation was “not extremely taxing.” He said Alphabet had been “less aggressive with cost cutting” than other technology giants and added that the company’s “targeted search” through Google and other properties, such as YouTube, “probably provides a better return on investment than broadcast advertising, and that really is the key.”

    Don’t miss: This stock investing strategy has blown away the S&P 500. Here’s a way to refine it for quality.

    Source link

  • How to enjoy retirement without busting your budget

    How to enjoy retirement without busting your budget

    The goal of many (or most) savers and long-term investors is to achieve financial independence. The combination of building up a nest egg, paying down debt and eventually receiving Social Security payments or another source of retirement income might put you in a comfortable position, but even people who have worked together to achieve financial independence may disagree on what to do after their careers end.

    Quentin Fottrell — the Moneyist — heard from one couple who are facing a quandary. They have been financially responsible, but as they near retirement, the wife wishes to be very careful with their combined investment portfolio, while the husband wants to begin spending a significant portion of it. They both make reasonable arguments. Here’s what they should do.

    From the Help Me Retire column: My 57-year-old husband works three shifts and is burned out. Can he retire?

    You have to get there first

    A behavioral study finds a correlation between having one specific type of conversation and taking action to build wealth.


    Getty Images

    Doing this even once might help encourage you or someone you know to begin saving and investing for the long term.

    The ‘Magnificent Seven’ stocks may not remain at the top

    Salesforce is among the companies passing a Goldman Sachs screen for growth of sales and earnings.


    Getty Images

    Even an index that includes hundreds of stocks can be heavily concentrated. Large technology-oriented companies have led this year’s 16% rebound for the S&P 500
    SPX,
    -0.29%
    ,
    following last year’s 18% decline (both with dividends reinvested). But the index is weighted by market capitalization, which means the “Magnificent Seven” — Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    -0.59%
    ,
    Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    -1.19%
    ,
    two common share classes of Alphabet Inc.
    GOOGL,
    -0.52%

    GOOG,
    -0.65%
    ,
    Amazon.com Inc.
    AMZN,
    +1.11%
    ,
    Nvidia Corp.
    NVDA,
    +0.95%
    ,
    Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    -0.76%

    and Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    -0.50%

    — make up 27.9% of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY,
    -0.25%
    .

    In the Need to Know column, Barbara Kollmeyer lists companies that might turn out to be among the next Magnificent Seven, based on a Goldman Sachs screen.

    Getting back to the current Magnificent Seven, you may be surprised to see which of the stocks is cheapest — by far — per one commonly used valuation metric.

    Related: Top investment newsletters aren’t bullish on tech, Tesla or Meta Platforms. Here’s what they do like.

    A thrill ride for EV makers

    An electric Rivian R1S.


    Rivian

    There has been a lot of news in the electric-vehicle space this week. Here are lists of coverage organized by topic.

    Rising unit sales among EV makers:

    Legacy automakers report sales increases, including a tremendous increase in EV unit sales for Ford
    F,

    :

    Reaction from analysts and investors:

    In other news, Mullen Automotive Inc.
    MULN,
    -12.97%

    has started to deliver electric vehicles. Further developments for the company this week included the announcement of a stock-buyback plan and possible action against naked short sellers.

    A changing job market

    The employment numbers for June from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics showed the lowest level of job creation since late 2020. Then again, the demand for labor in the U.S. remains high, despite the Federal Reserve’s efforts to slow economic growth.

    If you are looking to make a career change, what does all this mean to you? Andrew Keshner points to a development in the employment market that may have you thinking twice about jumping ship.

    Threads and Twitter

    Meta’s Threads app has signed up as many as 50 million users in its first two days of operation, some reports say.


    AFP via Getty Images

    Meta rolled out its new Threads service on Wednesday to compete directly with Twitter and has already signed up 50 million users, according to some reports.

    Twitter CEO Linda Yaccarino was quick to respond.

    More reaction:

    Consumer spending may spike

    U.S. shoppers have been taking it slow during a period of high inflation, but the overall economy has been stronger than expected even as the Federal Reserve continues tightening its monetary policy.

    The coming flurry of July sales events at Amazon, Walmart Inc.
    WMT,
    -2.30%

    and Target Corp.
    TGT,
    -0.60%

    could signal a turnaround for consumers, as James Rogers reports.

    Financial crime

    Lukas I. Alpert writes the Financial Crime column. Have you ever wondered how you might steal a lot of cash from a company that is likely to have rather tight accounting controls in place? This week Alpert explains how the manager of an Amazon warehouse managed to scale the heights of criminal achievement to collect $10 million — and a 16-year jail sentence.

    Also read: Silver dealer ordered to pay $146 million in case of 500,000 missing coins

    Want more from MarketWatch? Sign up for this and other newsletters to get the latest news and advice on personal finance and investing.

    Source link

  • 20 AI stocks expected to post the highest compound annual sales growth through 2025

    20 AI stocks expected to post the highest compound annual sales growth through 2025

    Things move quickly in the world of artificial intelligence. It is easy to sit back and complain about developments that could be disruptive, but sometimes investors are best served by putting emotions aside and observing new developments and how they affect markets. Could AI developments and related trends make you a lot of money?

    Below is a new screen showing a group of AI-oriented companies expected to increase their sales most rapidly through 2025, based on consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet. Then we show expected revenue growth rates for the largest AI-oriented companies in the screen.

    Over the long haul, many businesses might perform more efficiently by employing AI. Maybe this technology can create an economic revolution similar to the one that moved the majority of the working population away from agricultural labor during the 19th and 20th centuries.

    Back in February, we screened 96 stocks held by five exchange-traded funds focused on AI and related industries and listed the 20 that analysts thought would rise the most over the following 12 months.

    Three months is a long time for AI, and the shakeout hasn’t even started.

    Read: Congress and tech seem open to regulating AI efforts, but that doesn’t mean it will happen

    There is no way to predict how politicians will react to perceived or real threats of AI and machine learning. And the largest U.S. tech players are doing everything they can to employ the new technology and remain dominant. But that doesn’t mean they will grow more quickly than smaller AI-focused players.

    A new AI stock screen

    Once again we will begin a screen with these five ETFs:

    • The Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
      BOTZ,
      +0.97%

      BOTZ was established 2016 and has $1.8 billion in assets under management. The fund tracks an index of companies listed in developed markets that are expected to benefit from the increased utilization of robotics and AI. There are 44 stocks in the BOTZ portfolio, which is weighted by market capitalization and rebalanced once a year. Its largest holding is Intuitive Surgical Inc.
      ISRG,
      +0.53%
      ,
      which makes up 10% of the portfolio, followed by Nvidia Corp.
      NVDA,
      +3.30%

      at 9.4%.

    • The iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF
      IRBO,
      +1.64%

      holds 116 stocks that are equal-weighted, as it tracks a global index of companies that derive at east 50% of revenue from robotics or AI, or have significant exposure to related industries. This ETF was launched in 2018 and has $304 million in assets.

    • The $246 million First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
      ROBT,
      +1.83%

      has 107 stocks in its portfolio, with a modified weighting based on how directly companies are involved in AI or robotics. It was established in 2018.

    • The Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
      THNQ,
      +1.81%

      has $26 million in assets and was established in 2020. I holds 69 stocks and isn’t concentrated. It uses a scoring system to weight its holdings by percentage of revenue derived from AI, with holdings also subject to minimum market capitalization and liquidity requirements.

    • The newest ETF on this list is the WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund
      WTAI,
      +2.42%
      ,
      which was established in December and has $13 million in assets and holds 73 stocks in an equal-weighted portfolio. According to FactSet, stocks are handpicked and selected companies “generate at least 50% of their revenue from AI and innovation activities, including those related to software, semiconductors, hardware technology, machine learning and innovative products.”

    Altogether and removing duplicates, the five ETFs hold 270 stocks of companies in 23 countries. We first narrowed the list to 197 covered by at least nine analysts and for which consensus sales estimates are available through calendar 2025. We used calendar-year estimates because some companies have fiscal years that don’t match the calendar.

    Here are the 20 screened AI-related companies expected by analysts to have the highest compound annual growth rates (CAGR) for sales from 2023 through 2025. Sales estimates are in millions of U.S. dollars. The list also shows which of the above five ETFs holds each stocks.

    Company

    Ticker

    Estimated sales – 2023 ($mil)

    Estimated sales – 2024 ($mil)

    Estimated sales – 2025 ($mil)

    Two-year estimated sales CAGR through 2025

    Held by

    BioXcel Therapeutics Inc.

    BTAI,
    -2.47%
    $5

    $39

    $121

    411.5%

    WTAI

    Luminar Technologies Inc. Class A

    LAZR,
    +8.82%
    $86

    $266

    $588

    161.0%

    ROBT, WTAI

    BlackBerry Ltd.

    BB,
    +6.01%
    $685

    $769

    $1,925

    67.6%

    ROBT

    Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd.

    CRDO,
    +10.29%
    $183

    $259

    $363

    40.9%

    IRBO

    SentinelOne Inc. Class A

    S,
    +1.05%
    $619

    $881

    $1,176

    37.9%

    WTAI

    Wolfspeed Inc.

    WOLF,
    +5.02%
    $982

    $1,323

    $1,860

    37.6%

    WTAI

    SK hynix Inc.

    000660,
    +1.66%
    $18,319

    $27,899

    $34,542

    37.3%

    WTAI

    Mobileye Global Inc. Class A

    MBLY,
    +1.67%
    $2,109

    $2,782

    $3,920

    36.3%

    ROBT, WTAI

    Snowflake Inc. Class A

    SNOW,
    +1.42%
    $2,811

    $3,863

    $5,139

    35.2%

    IRBO, THNQ, WTAI

    Lemonade Inc.

    LMND,
    +8.08%
    $395

    $471

    $712

    34.2%

    THNQ, WTAI

    Nio Inc. ADR Class A

    NIO,
    +1.39%
    $11,874

    $16,733

    $21,304

    33.9%

    ROBT

    Stem Inc.

    STEM,
    +4.88%
    $607

    $833

    $1,055

    31.8%

    WTAI

    Upstart Holdings Inc.

    UPST,
    +10.37%
    $547

    $768

    $938

    31.0%

    BOTZ, WTAI

    Cloudflare Inc. Class A

    NET,
    +5.84%
    $1,284

    $1,669

    $2,194

    30.7%

    THNQ

    Samsara Inc. Class A

    IOT,
    +1.42%
    $830

    $1,062

    $1,364

    28.2%

    THNQ

    Ambarella Inc.

    AMBA,
    +3.45%
    $287

    $355

    $472

    28.2%

    IRBO, ROBT, THNQ, WTAI

    iflytek Co. Ltd. Class A

    002230,
    -1.34%
    $3,561

    $4,582

    $5,851

    28.2%

    THNQ

    Tesla Inc.

    TSLA,
    +4.41%
    $99,558

    $128,412

    $161,061

    27.2%

    ROBT, THNQ, WTAI

    CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. Class A

    CRWD,
    +2.40%
    $2,935

    $3,793

    $4,739

    27.1%

    THNQ, WTAI

    PB Fintech Ltd.

    543390,
    +1.39%
    $358

    $462

    $573

    26.5%

    IRBO

    Source: FactSet

    Click the tickers for more about each company or ETF.

    Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information for free on the MarketWatch quote pages.

    We have screened for expected revenue growth, rather than for earnings or cash flow, because in a newer tech-oriented business area, investors are most likely to consider the top line as companies sacrifice profits to build market share.

    It is important to do your own research if you consider purchasing any individual stock, to form your own opinion about a company’s ability to remain competitive over the long term. Starting from the top of the list, BioXcel Therapeutics Inc.
    BTAI,
    -2.47%

    is expected to show exponential sales growth, but that is from a low expected baseline this year.

    What about the largest AI-related companies held by these ETFs?

    Here are the largest 20 companies in the screen by market capitalization, ranked by expected sales CAGR from 2022 through 2025. Once again the sales estimates are in millions of U.S. dollars, but the market caps are in billions.

    Company

    Ticker

    Estimated sales – 2023 ($mil)

    Estimated sales – 2024 ($mil)

    Estimated sales – 2025 $mil)

    Two-year estimated sales CAGR through 2025

    Market Cap ($bil)

    Held by

    Tesla Inc.

    TSLA,
    +4.41%
    $99,558

    $128,412

    $161,061

    27.2%

    $528

    ROBT, THNQ, WTAI

    Nvidia Corp.

    NVDA,
    +3.30%
    $29,839

    $36,877

    $46,154

    24.4%

    $722

    BOTZ, IRBO, ROBT, THNQ, WTAI

    Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. ADR

    TSM,
    +5.83%
    $71,434

    $86,284

    $101,112

    19.0%

    $445

    ROBT, WTAI

    Advanced Micro Devices Inc.

    AMD,
    +2.23%
    $22,976

    $26,823

    $30,359

    15.0%

    $163

    IRBO, ROBT, THNQ, WTAI

    ASML Holding NV ADR

    ASML,
    +2.83%
    $28,974

    $32,374

    $37,796

    14.2%

    $263

    THNQ, WTAI

    Microsoft Corp.

    MSFT,
    +0.95%
    $223,438

    $251,028

    $282,397

    12.4%

    $2,318

    IRBO, ROBT, THNQ, WTAI

    Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.

    005930,
    -0.61%
    $200,595

    $227,286

    $252,129

    12.1%

    $292

    IRBO, WTAI

    Amazon.com Inc.

    AMZN,
    +1.85%
    $559,438

    $626,549

    $702,395

    12.1%

    $1,164

    IRBO, ROBT, THNQ, WTAI

    Adobe Inc.

    ADBE,
    +3.34%
    $19,470

    $21,784

    $24,276

    11.7%

    $158

    IRBO, THNQ

    Netflix Inc.

    NFLX,
    +1.86%
    $33,915

    $38,067

    $42,275

    11.6%

    $148

    IRBO, THNQ

    Tencent Holdings Ltd.

    700,
    -0.58%
    $88,727

    $99,212

    $110,556

    11.6%

    $422

    IRBO, ROBT

    Salesforce Inc.

    CRM,
    +2.37%
    $34,392

    $38,273

    $42,786

    11.5%

    $205

    IRBO, THNQ

    Alphabet Inc. Class A

    GOOGL,
    +1.11%
    $299,810

    $333,077

    $369,195

    11.0%

    $710

    IRBO, ROBT, THNQ, WTAI

    Intel Corp.

    INTC,
    -1.20%
    $51,060

    $57,799

    $62,675

    10.8%

    $122

    IRBO, ROBT

    Meta Platforms Inc. Class A

    META,
    +1.53%
    $125,901

    $139,545

    $154,259

    10.7%

    $528

    IRBO, WTAI

    Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. ADR

    BABA,
    +2.17%
    $134,140

    $148,206

    $162,199

    10.0%

    $235

    ROBT, THNQ

    Texas Instruments Inc.

    TXN,
    +1.20%
    $17,941

    $19,433

    $20,799

    7.7%

    $148

    IRBO

    Apple Inc.

    AAPL,
    +0.36%
    $390,845

    $416,761

    $445,956

    6.8%

    $2,706

    IRBO, WTAI

    Siemens Aktiengesellschaft

    SIE,
    +2.55%
    $84,681

    $89,145

    $93,925

    5.3%

    $130

    ROBT

    Johnson & Johnson

    JNJ,
    -0.20%
    $98,761

    $100,990

    $103,870

    2.6%

    $414

    ROBT

    Source: FactSet

    Tech-stock picks that are small and focused: This fund invests in unsung innovators. Here are 2 top choices.

    Source link

  • Tech-stock picks that are small and focused: This fund invests in unsung innovators. Here are 2 top choices.

    Tech-stock picks that are small and focused: This fund invests in unsung innovators. Here are 2 top choices.

    When investors think of technology stocks, they might automatically gravitate toward “the next big thing,” or to the giant companies that dominate the S&P 500
    SPX,
    -0.40%
    .
    But Robert Stimson, chief investment officer of Oak Associates Funds, makes a case for diversification through exposure to smaller innovators which he believes are “overlooked in this environment.”

    The River Oak Discovery Fund
    RIVSX,
    +0.98%

    invests in tech-oriented companies with market capitalizations of $5 billion or less, with an average of about $2 billion. It has a five-star rating, the highest, from Morningstar, despite having what the investment information firm considers “above average” annual expenses of 1.19% of assets under management. The fund is ranked in the 6th percentile among 546 funds in Morningstar’s “Small Blend” category for five-year performance and in the 13th percentile among 374 funds for 10-year performance. The performance comparisons are net of expenses.

    The Black Oak Emerging Technologies Fund
    BOGSX,
    +1.54%

    has more of a midcap focus, with some small-cap stocks and follows a similar strategy to that of RIVSX. But with no restriction on the size of companies this fund invests in, “we don’t have to sell stocks,” Stimpson said. So long-term holdings of this fund include Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    -0.05%

    and Salesforce.com Inc.
    CRM,
    +0.69%
    .
    This fund is rated three stars within Morningstar’s “Technology” category and has a lower expense ratio of 1.03%.

    Both funds are concentrated. The River Oak Discovery Fund held 34 stocks and the Black Oak Emerging Technologies Fund held 35 stocks as of March 31. Lists of both funds’ largest holdings are below.

    During an Interview, Stimpson, who co-manages both funds, said that when investing in the small-cap technology space, he and colleagues identify companies that are “focused on niches.

    “I want a company that knows who they are, what they do and do it well, rather than a small company trying to growing into the next Microsoft, Google or Salesforce,” he said.

    More about giant companies dominating stock indexes: This twist on a traditional S&P 500 stock fund can lower your risk and still beat the market overall

    Stimpson said Oak Associates pays close attention to what corporate management teams say during earnings calls and in presentations, preferring comments related to improving sales and operations with a market niche, rather than expressions of grand visions for exponential growth.

    That type of narrow focus can support higher valuations over time, Stimpson said. “They have better execution, a better ability to fend-off competition and they are quality acquisition candidates.”

    “I caution everyone that until there is revenue, earnings and a product, the hype can be more dangerous than an opportunity.”


    — Robert Stimpson, chief investment officer at Oak Funds, when discussing AI and ChatGPT.

    All of those factors can be important to investors, considering how easily tech giants such as Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    +1.00%

    or Google holding company Alphabet Inc.
    GOOGL,
    +2.89%

    GOOG,
    +2.88%

    can begin to compete with smaller innovative companies because they can afford to make such large investments, he said.

    Simpson went further, saying that when running screens for “quality” metrics, such as improving free cash flow yields, the Oak Associates team also looks for “shareholder friendly practices.” For example, a company may be repurchasing shares. But are the buybacks lowering the share count significantly (which boosts earnings per share) or are they merely mitigating the dilution caused by the shoveling of new shares to executives as part of their compensation?

    Finally, Simpson cautioned investors not to get caught up in tech-focused hype.

    “When I talk to our clients, I get questions about AI and ChatGPT and how to play it. People get focused on a new great tech innovation,” he said. “You can replace ChatGPT with bitcoin, metaverse or 3-D printing.”

    “I caution everyone that until there is revenue, earnings and a product, the hype can be more dangerous than an opportunity.”

    Two examples

    These companies are held by theRiver Oak Discovery Fund and the Black Oak Emerging Technologies Fund.

    Cirrus Logic Inc.
    CRUS,
    -2.37%

    is the largest holding of the River Oak Discovery Fund. Stimpson calls the company “a derivative play on the success of Apple.”

    “They are focused on the chips that go into mobile and [vehicles],” as well as the needs of their customers, including Apple, “rather than problem areas of the chip sector, such as memory or PCs. They are not talking about chips for AI, for example,” Stimpson said.

    Cirrus focuses on systems and related software used in audio systems..

    Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc.
    KLIC,
    +1.92%

    makes equipment, tools and related software used by a variety of manufacturers of computer chips and integrated electronic devices.

    Stimpson likes the company as a long-term play on the worldwide disruption in semiconductor manufacturing and supply, in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. “All chip companies learned that any supply disruption in Southeast Asia is a problem. Over time, the opportunities for semiconductor equipment makers are very good. There will be more plants in more locations, so more equipment,” he said.

    He said KLICK was in a “protected” position, with returns on equity of about 20% and free cash flow yields of about 10%.

    Top holdings of the funds

    Here are the largest 10 holdings of the River Oak Discovery Fund as of March 31:

    Company

    Ticker

    % of portfolio

    Cirrus Logic Inc.

    CRUS,
    -2.37%
    4.9%

    Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc.

    KLIC,
    +1.92%
    4.6%

    Advanced Energy Industries Inc.

    AEIS,
    +0.30%
    4.5%

    Cohu Inc.

    COHU,
    +1.45%
    3.7%

    Asbury Automotive Group Inc.

    ABG,
    -1.75%
    3.7%

    Korn Ferry

    KFY,
    -0.96%
    3.6%

    Kforce Inc.

    KFRC,
    -2.40%
    3.4%

    Ambarella Inc.

    AMBA,
    -0.50%
    3.3%

    Applied Industrial Technologies Inc.

    AIT,
    -1.71%
    3.3%

    Perficient Inc.

    PRFT,
    +0.72%
    3.2%

    Click on the tickers for more about each company.

    Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information available for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

    Here are the largest 10 holdings of the Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund as of March 31:

    Company

    Ticker

    % of portfolio

    Apple Inc.

    AAPL,
    -0.05%
    5.7%

    KLA Corp.

    KLAC,
    +1.69%
    4.6%

    Advanced Energy Industries Inc.

    AEIS,
    +0.30%
    4.5%

    Cohu Inc.

    COHU,
    +1.45%
    4.1%

    SolarEdge Technologies Inc.

    SEDG,
    -3.76%
    3.9%

    Cirrus Logic Inc.

    CRUS,
    -2.37%
    3.9%

    Cohu Inc.

    COHU,
    +1.45%
    3.9%

    Ambarella Inc.

    AMBA,
    -0.50%
    3.4%

    Applied Industrial Technologies Inc.

    AIT,
    -1.71%
    3.4%

    Salesforce Inc.

    CRM,
    +0.69%
    3.3%

    Source link

  • Here’s how to play oil-industry stocks for long-term growth of 20% or more

    Here’s how to play oil-industry stocks for long-term growth of 20% or more

    Oil demand is likely to hold up longer than many people expect during the anticipated transition to electric vehicles. And changes in the industry point to oilfield services companies as good long-term growth investments as offshore production ramps up.

    Below is a list of oil producers and related companies favored by two analysts who have followed the industry for decades.

    U.S….

    Source link

  • These 20 stocks in the S&P 500 tumbled between 20% and 30% in September

    These 20 stocks in the S&P 500 tumbled between 20% and 30% in September

    Stocks declined again on Friday, closing out September with large losses across the board as the rally from the June lows partway through August faded into memory.

    The S&P 500
    SPX,
    -1.51%

    fell 1.5% on Friday. The benchmark index slumped 9.3% for September, leading to a 2022 loss of 24.8%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    -1.71%

    gave up 1.7% on Friday, for a September decline of 8.8%. The Dow has now fallen 20.9% for 2022. The Nasdaq Composite Index
    COMP,
    -1.51%

    pulled back 1.5% on Friday for a September drop of 10.5% and a year-to-date plunge of 32.4%. (All price changes in this article exclude dividends.)

    Below is a list of stocks in the S&P 500 that fell the most during September.

    It was the worst September performance for U.S. stocks since 2008, according to Dow Jones Market Data. William Watts looked back to see what poor performance during September may portend for October.

    Real estate leads the sector bloodbath

    All sectors of the S&P 500 were down during September, including five that fell by double digits:

    S&P 500 sector

    Sept. 30 price change

    September price change

    2022 price change

    Real Estate

    1.0%

    -13.6%

    -30.4%

    Communication Services

    -1.7%

    -12.2%

    -39.4%

    Information Technology

    -1.9%

    -12.0%

    -31.9%

    Utilities

    -2.0%

    -11.5%

    -8.6%

    Industrials

    -1.3%

    -10.6%

    -21.7%

    Energy

    -0.9%

    -9.7%

    30.7%

    Materials

    -0.3%

    -9.6%

    -24.9%

    Consumer Staples

    -1.8%

    -8.3%

    -13.5%

    Consumer Discretionary

    -1.8%

    -8.1%

    -30.3%

    Financials

    -1.1%

    -7.9%

    -22.4%

    Health Care

    -1.4%

    -2.7%

    -14.1%

    S&P 500

    -1.5%

    -9.3%

    -24.8%

    Source: FactSet

    Worst performers in the S&P 500 in September
    Company

    Ticker

    Sept. 30 price change

    September price change

    2022 price change

    Decline from 52-week intraday high

    Date of 52-week intraday high

    FedEx Corp.

    FDX,
    -2.52%
    -2.5%

    -29.6%

    -42.6%

    -44.4%

    01/05/2022

    V.F. Corp.

    VFC,
    -2.73%
    -2.7%

    -27.8%

    -59.2%

    -62.1%

    11/16/2021

    Lumen Technologies Inc.

    LUMN,
    -1.36%
    -1.4%

    -26.9%

    -42.0%

    -49.8%

    11/05/2021

    Ford Motor Co.

    F,
    -2.35%
    -2.4%

    -26.5%

    -46.1%

    -56.7%

    01/13/2022

    Charter Communications Inc. Class A

    CHTR,
    -2.96%
    -3.0%

    -26.5%

    -53.5%

    -59.8%

    10/07/2021

    Adobe Inc.

    ADBE,
    -1.10%
    -1.1%

    -26.3%

    -51.5%

    -60.7%

    11/22/2021

    Carnival Corp.

    CCL,
    -23.25%
    -23.3%

    -25.7%

    -65.1%

    -73.5%

    10/01/2021

    CarMax Inc.

    KMX,
    +1.32%
    1.3%

    -25.4%

    -49.3%

    -57.7%

    11/08/2021

    Advanced Micro Devices Inc.

    AMD,
    -1.22%
    -1.2%

    -25.3%

    -56.0%

    -61.5%

    11/30/2021

    Caesars Entertainment Inc.

    CZR,
    -0.49%
    -0.5%

    -25.2%

    -65.5%

    -73.1%

    10/01/2021

    Boeing Co.

    BA,
    -3.39%
    -3.4%

    -24.4%

    -39.9%

    -48.2%

    11/15/2021

    WestRock Co.

    WRK,
    -1.56%
    -1.6%

    -23.9%

    -30.4%

    -43.6%

    05/05/2022

    International Paper Co.

    IP,
    -1.22%
    -1.2%

    -23.8%

    -32.5%

    -44.0%

    10/13/2021

    Western Digital Corp.

    WDC,
    +1.15%
    1.1%

    -23.0%

    -50.1%

    -53.1%

    01/05/2022

    Newell Brands Inc.

    NWL,
    -0.57%
    -0.6%

    -22.2%

    -36.4%

    -47.5%

    02/16/2022

    Eastman Chemical Co.

    EMN,
    +0.34%
    0.3%

    -21.9%

    -41.2%

    -45.1%

    01/19/2022

    Nike Inc. Class B

    NKE,
    -12.81%
    -12.8%

    -21.9%

    -50.1%

    -53.6%

    11/05/2021

    Seagate Technology Holdings PLC

    STX,
    -2.11%
    -2.1%

    -20.5%

    -52.9%

    -54.8%

    01/05/2022

    PVH Corp.

    PVH,
    -3.55%
    -3.6%

    -20.4%

    -58.0%

    -64.3%

    11/05/2021

    Dish Network Corp. Class A

    DISH,
    -2.19%
    -2.2%

    -20.3%

    -57.4%

    -70.1%

    10/04/2021

    Source: FactSet

    Click on the tickers for more about each company, including developments that led to their share-price declines.

    Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

    FedEx Corp.
    FDX,
    -2.52%

    tops the list because of investors’ harsh reaction to the company’s sales and profit warning on Sept. 16. Claudia Assis and Greg Robb explained the implications of FedEx’s warning for the broad economy.

    Shares of Carnival Corp.
    CCL,
    -23.25%

    fell 23% on Friday (for a September decline of 26%) after the cruise giant again reported sales and earnings below what analysts had expected, even though it reported increasing its capacity usage to 92%.

    Nike Inc.
    NKE,
    -12.81%

    was down 13% on Friday for a September decline of 22%, after the company warned that discounting to clear inventory would continue to affect its earnings performance. Here’s how analysts reacted.

    Adobe Inc.
    ADBE,
    -1.10%

    made the list because of investors’ doubt about its dilutive $20 billion deal to acquire Figma.

    The bulk of CarMax’s
    KMX,
    +1.32%

    drop for the month came on Sept. 29, after the used-car dealer missed sales and earnings estimates and indicated that consumers were beginning to resist high prices.

    Don’t miss: Dividend yields on preferred stocks have soared. This is how to pick the best ones for your portfolio.

    Source link