ReportWire

Tag: Incumbent bank

  • Challenger banks: profitability and cost efficiency in uncertain times – Banking blog

    Challenger banks: profitability and cost efficiency in uncertain times – Banking blog

    [ad_1]

    This blog is the second publication in our blog series. In our previous blog entitled ‘Challenger banks: Disrupting the Swiss market’, we outlined the history of banks, the different categories of Challenger banks and how they can mitigate the risks they are facing. In this blog, we further explore the various obstacles that Challenger banks are facing today, such as economic and political difficulties, and provide recommendations on how to navigate these hurdles and grow in the years to come.

    Challenger banks are facing significant threats to their survival due to economic obstacles. Their growth has slowed, and most have not yet achieved profitability or are currently operating at a loss. Overall business development strategy, regulatory & compliance, and data security have developed into important focus areas if they are to become sustainably profitable and compliant. To withstand the current economic and geopolitical uncertainties, Challenger banks should act promptly by revaluating their strategic course.

    The financial sector is grappling with challenges posed by major players such as FTX, BlockFi, and Celsius, resulting in a “crypto winter” that wiped out over $2 trillion in market value. This not only impacted the digital asset market but also affected the broader financial industry, including challenger banks . In addition, two California-based financial institutions, SVB and First Republic, experienced a sudden exodus of customer deposits, thereby indirectly threatening the banking sector’s stability. Finally, UBS acquired Credit Suisse amidst the financial turmoil caused by the collapse of the two US banks.

    Furthermore, macroeconomic setbacks such as high inflation and increasing interest rates, coupled with microeconomic factors like rising energy costs, have arisen from global geopolitical tensions. This resulted in a slowdown in investments and increased risk aversion, impacting Challenger banks. This stands in stark contrast to the high valuations seen in Fintech firms at the end of 2021. With decreased investor participation and public scepticism, Challenger banks must now address profitability issues, improve customer retention, ensure compliance, and enhance data security.

    Challenger Banks and Profitability Issues

    In recent years, Challenger banks have been confronted with the reality that once abundant investor funding is now dwindling, down by 45% in 2022 as compared to 2021. In addition, the number of global Challenger banks launched has dropped to an all-time low (a 46% decline between 2020 and 2022), as the market matures and becomes more consolidated and less attractive for new entrants.

    The decline in funding can be attributed to decreased investor appetite and major players reaching maturity, hence not needing further investments. Early pioneers, like Revolut, have secured enough backing to focus on profitability rather than raising new funds.

    Challenger bank blog 1

    Profits of Challenger banks are linked to scale: generating revenue from an expanding global customer base across diverse products and services while minimizing prospect acquisition costs.

    In recent years, there has been a rise in M&A deals, which has led to market consolidation, indicating that some Challenger banks depend on financial acquisitions to achieve the necessary scale and profitability. Prominent examples include Starling Bank’s purchase of buy-to-let mortgage provider Fleet Mortgages Ltd. in 2021. From 2021-2022, the number of annual Challenger banks launches has steadily declined and so have the number of M&A deals completed (a drop of 43%). Regulators have also played a role by implementing regulations (e.g., PSD2) that aim to level the playing field, challenging the dominance of established players.

    Uncertain Times and Pressurized Margins

    It can be argued that the core issue lies in revenue generation. According to industry experts, the estimated revenue per active customer is around $30 per year. Challenger banks, such as Monzo, Revolut, and N26, offer limited product portfolios with lower fees, including subscription fees, foreign exchange fees, and card fees. They lack more lucrative products like mortgages, business loans, or investment products, which traditional banks typically offer. This limited range may constrain their revenue potential. Recent economic situations have also strained consumer spending, further affecting digital bank revenues.

    Despite Challenger banks’ popularity, many retail customers are still hesitant to use them as their primary account. According to industry surveys, 25% of respondents cited data security as their main concern, followed by fraud (22%) and “not being perceived as a bank” (20%).

    Players are addressing higher cost base due to…

    Increased business development and client attraction expenditures

    Revolut’s 25 million client milestone is an exception, as many Challenger banks face difficulties acquiring new clients. Traditional banks now offer similar services and products after significant investment in digital user experience. For example, UBS’s commission-free “key4” credit card appeals to frequent travellers, while Zak by Bank Cler and CSX by Credit Suisse provide more options for clients in Switzerland. Additionally, unified mobile wallet solutions like TWINT, offered by most major Swiss banks and used by 5 million users, cover various financial needs, leaving few unfulfilled niches.

    Challenger banks face fierce competition, constantly introducing new features. However, recent scandals involving digital asset firms such as FTX, including some Challenger banks, have eroded public trust. Industry experts don’t consider them “proper banks” and express concerns over fraud, resulting in low penetration rates in certain regions (e.g., US) and some banks exiting markets (e.g., N26 exited UK and US).

    Tighter Compliance, New Regulations – and Costs

    One major cost driver for Challenger banks is increased spending on regulatory compliance. As these banks attract more users, their responsibilities towards regulators and clients expand. They have made progress in financial crime control measures, but regulators expect further improvements in areas like customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, and Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR). The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) states that financial crime control resources, processes, and technology should match a bank’s expansion. To address this, Challenger banks are creating new positions in their Compliance department.

    Challenger banks must also manage requirements related to their banking license, such as renewing a license from FINMA (the Swiss regulator). This can be challenging due to capital requirements, which depend on the bank’s category and risk profile. A minimum of 8% of total Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA) and suitable financing sources are required. Management must find a balance between the significant regulatory costs of maintaining their banking license and managing costs for scalability purposes.

    Intensified Data Security and Fraud Risks

    Challenger banks have long operated with a “scale first” approach, often overlooking other critical aspects of their business, such as fraud prevention and cybersecurity. Traditional banks allocate around 20% of their annual budgets to IT-related expenses, including data protection, according to a J.P. Morgan study. In contrast, some rapidly growing Challenger banks struggle to maintain a strong technological and security infrastructure for customer data protection.

    These banks also face a shortage of skilled back-office employees, like fraud and cybersecurity specialists. Consequently, many rely on third-party vendors, increasing their vulnerability and dependency due to insufficient internal cybersecurity capabilities. As a result, numerous Challenger banks have encountered security challenges, including fraud attempts, scams, phishing, and client data breaches. For example, in September 2022, Revolut suffered a cyber-attack that affected around 50,000 clients, representing 0.2% of its 25 million customers. Although the percentage is small, such attacks have significant privacy and reputational consequences.

    Challenger bank blog 2

    Challenger Banks and Future Outlook

    Challenger banks, particularly in the Swiss market, must implement a strategic approach to sustain growth and maintain competitiveness.

    Firstly, they can boost revenues by revising pricing models, such as Spain’s Bnext, which created a marketplace offering for not only financial products but also travel and energy services. They can also target more premium clients, akin to Revolut’s “Ultra” subscription plan aimed at higher income client segments.

    Secondly, cost control is critical, encompassing measures such as reviewing cost structures, automating processes, and exiting non-strategic markets, as seen with N26’s decision to leave the US and UK markets.

    Thirdly, Challenger banks need to differentiate themselves to attract customers. This can be done through strategies such as offering competitive and profitable products, exceptional support, and implementing client retention initiatives. The introduction of Apple’s high-yield savings account, which offers an impressive 4.15% annual return, is a notable advancement in the financial industry that can significantly disrupt the landscape. This innovative product, initially launched for US customers in April 2023 and accessible via the Apple Card in the Apple Wallet mobile app, not only signifies a transformative step in the financial industry, but also holds the potential for expansion into other global markets, bringing its potential for disruption to a worldwide scale.

    Lastly, enhancing data security is paramount to reduce data breach risks, as highlighted by Deloitte’s Global Future of Cyber Survey 2023. A combination of these strategies, including the introduction of new products, cost control, customer attraction, and enhanced data security, will be key to surviving and thriving in the ever-evolving Swiss banking landscape.

    Conclusion

    As Challenger banks face key operational hurdles on their road to success, they should carefully evaluate the root cause of their profitability challenges and fraud and cyber risks to reframe their company strategy. By adopting strategic options such as revising pricing models, reviewing cost structures, offering new products and services and partnering with other companies, Challenger banks can navigate the challenges they face. In a highly competitive and rapidly evolving challenger banks landscape, they must keep agile and innovative to stay ahead of the curve.

    Sergio Cruz

    Sergio Cruz, Partner, Consulting

    Sergio is the lead Partner of Deloitte’s Business Operations practice in Zurich and has more than 25 year of experience in Consulting. He focuses on large scale front-to-back digitalisation programs in financial services and has worked on several large assignments both in Switzerland and abroad, covering the implementation of regulatory requirements and the definition as well as implementation of target operating models and process optimisations.

    Email | LinkedIn

    David Klidjian_3 (002)

    David Klidjian, Partner, Consulting

    David is a Partner in Consulting and leads Deloitte’s Business Operations Banking Industry for Switzerland. He has significant experience of Investment Banking and Wealth Management working in the UK, US, Asia and Switzerland. His focus area is on large Front-to-back operations transformations and setup and expansion of new banking operating models.

    Email  | LinkedIn

    [ad_2]

    Lena Woodward

    Source link

  • Challenger banks: Disrupting the Swiss market  – Banking blog

    Challenger banks: Disrupting the Swiss market – Banking blog

    [ad_1]

    This blog is the first in a series on the impact of challenger banks on the Swiss market. It provides insights into how challenger banks threaten to disrupt traditional banks, the different types of banks that are entering the market, and the need to adapt the challenger banks’ operating models to grow successfully.

    Today, banks are changing rapidly to keep up with their customers, who are demanding better experiences and more sophisticated products and services from their providers. For most people, visiting a bank branch used to be the main way of interacting with their bank. However, more and more people are choosing to interact with their banks digitally rather than through a traditional bank set-up.

    This has led to the rise of challenger banks, allowing new entrants to gain momentum and increase their market share in the Swiss banking sector. They have achieved this by offering a superior digital user experience compared to traditional players, by leveraging strong capabilities in technology and focusing on customer centricity. Naturally this raises the questions:
    • To what extent are challenger banks a threat to the market share of traditional banks?
    • Are traditional banks able to keep up with the rapid pace of innovations and customer-centric offerings?

    A problem for traditional banks today is that they are bound by legacy systems and have rigid operating models and governance structures. Even so, many market players have been innovative in adopting new systems and technologies, and in customising client journeys. Upgrading to highly customised systems is costly and does not always justify the cost, ultimately leading many banks to hold back their system upgrade plans. Additionally, the systems of traditional banks have been pieced together over years by internal developers and external outsourcers. This has made them sluggish in keeping up with innovative challenger banks which are changing the banking market status quo.

    Brief history of Swiss banking

    Brief history of Swiss Banking_blog
    Swiss bank development – Source: Deloitte internal research

    The legal and regulatory framework of the Swiss banking sector played an important role in allowing Switzerland to become the banking powerhouse it is today. Since the foundation of the first public bank in Switzerland in the 16th century and up until today, five centuries later, their dominant position was not challenged. Historically, banks owned the entirety of their value chain and differentiated their offerings by creating product and service packages for customers at slightly different rates than their competitors. However, the core operating model has remained the same and has always consisted of building customer relationships and distributing services through brick-and-mortar branches.

    Business models in the banking industry evolved slowly until the creation of the first challenger bank in 2009 which accelerated the business model transformation to keep up with changing customer demands. Backed by private funding, challenger banks have since filled a gap in the market by addressing the increasing demands from customers for innovative features as well as “real-time” transaction speeds. With their new operating models, challenger banks are building large customer bases and are intent on dominating the market. However, they need to obtain a banking licence and address a multitude of regulatory requirements − just like traditional players, which are more experienced and still hold a majority share of the Swiss market.

    Gaining market share whilst addressing regulatory and operational challenges

    Although challenger banks aim to compete with traditional banks by using mobile-centric technology and targeting specific customer segments, they face some challenges to successful growth. We identify four distinct types of banks in the market, each with their unique challenges.

    Challenger banks_Categorization of challenger banks – Source: Deloitte internal research

    Main regulatory and operational challenges for challenger banks in the Swiss market include but are not limited to:
    Licence vs. no licence: Without a banking licence, organisations can still offer prepaid cards, permitting customers to cap the foreign currency fee. However, to generate revenue and make profits, expansion is needed into other financial products and services, such as personal loans, mortgages, credit cards and digital assets. A question is whether it would be more profitable to partner with existing traditional players or to undertake a rigorous and time-consuming banking licence application process.

    Client due diligence and ongoing monitoring: To provide adequate evidence of compliance with Swiss banking regulations and banking secrecy laws it is necessary to establish a client risk assessment framework, relevant policies/procedures and appropriate transaction monitoring alerts. A lack of regulatory and compliance expertise and poorly defined processes might result in failure to gather sufficient information to identify high risk customers, such as politically exposed persons (PEPs), sanctioned individuals and money laundering organisations.

    Governance and internal controls: The governance of Swiss banks is characterised by a strict separation of activities between the board of directors, which is responsible for oversight, and the executive management. There may be a lack of clearly defined roles and responsibilities for each core product offerings and internal functions, and insufficient monitoring of compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. This leads to increased FINMA scrutiny, exposure to financial fines, and reputational risk.

    Compliance risk management: This is a major concern for challenger banks of all sizes. The complexity of region-specific banking rules and regulatory risks means that even major banks with large compliance teams struggle to stay compliant.

    Combatting risks in line with the evolution of the business model

    There are only limited differences between the regulatory and financial crime risks faced by challenger banks and those facing traditional retail banks. Unlike traditional banks, which have large legal and compliance teams, challenger banks are thinly resourced and face increasing pressure from regulators. It is therefore vital for challenger banks to evaluate and mitigate their risks continually, in line with their evolving business model. The most critical and urgent areas for both new and existing challenger banks to focus on are summarised below:

    Banking licence: Before engaging in business operations to offer a wider range of financial products and services, challenger banks should obtain authorisation from the Swiss Financial Market and Supervisory Authority (FINMA). Applications for a licence must be submitted to FINMA in an official Swiss language, containing general information with supporting documentation about their intended operations. The lead time for obtaining a licence is between 6 to 12 months, depending on the quality, completeness and complexity of the application.

    Operating model: Banks should build a robust target operating model with clearly defined roles and responsibilities, to ensure that their various business functions are lean and compliant. They should enhance the customer journey with innovative and risk-based measures to meet their ambitions for growth and profitability.

    Client risk assessment: They should define a robust and flexible risk assessment framework to determine standard and enhanced client due diligence checks,
    with the ability to identify the ultimate beneficial ownership in complex structures, manage financial crime risks and trigger adequate transaction monitoring alerts.

    Control framework: They should avoid regulatory risks relating to anti-money laundering, KYC, banking secrecy, PEP, and sanctions, through risk-based customer screening and appropriate systems. They should enhance their reporting and operational resilience with quality assurance controls.

    Conclusion

    As challenger banks continue to attract more customers and expand their operations in Switzerland, they must pay close attention to the requirements of FINMA and the Swiss Bankers Association (SBA). Balancing regulatory compliance with achieving internal operational growth can be a challenge for many newcomers. It is therefore crucial that challenger banks should manage regulatory and compliance risks effectively by establishing a robust operating model, to position themselves for growth and operational resilience in the Swiss market.

    If you would like to know more about the landscape for challenger banks and how Deloitte can help, please reach out to our contacts below.

    Sources:
    [1] https://www2.deloitte.com/ch/en/pages/financial-services/articles/digitalisation-banking-online-covid-19-pandemic.html

    [2] https://www.fca.org.uk/publications/multi-firm-reviews/financial-crime-controls-at-challenger-banks

    [3] https://www.globallegalinsights.com/practice-areas/banking-and-finance-laws-and regulations/switzerland?msclkid=53079fa6c72711ec8fd3352e9249c895

    [4] https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-007-8999?contextData=(sc.Default)&msclkid=b9229eccc72411ec8b01e08fcdff0f31&transitionType=Default&firstPage=true

     

    Sergio Cruz

    Sergio Cruz, Partner, Consulting

    Sergio is the lead Partner of Deloitte’s Business Operations practice in Zurich and has more than 25 year of experience in Consulting. He focuses on large scale front-to-back digitalisation programs in financial services and has worked on several large assignments both in Switzerland and abroad, covering the implementation of regulatory requirements and the definition as well as implementation of target operating models and process optimisations.

    Email | LinkedIn

    David Klidjian_3 (002)

    David Klidjian, Director, Consulting

    David is a Director in Consulting and leads Deloitte’s Business Operations Banking Industry for Switzerland. He has significant experience of Investment Banking and Wealth Management working in the UK, US, Asia and Switzerland. His focus area is on large Front-to-back operations transformations and setup and expansion of new banking operating models.

    Email  | LinkedIn

    [ad_2]

    Lena Woodward

    Source link