ReportWire

Tag: INC.

  • Jim Cramer Says Meta (META) CEO Zuckerberg Wants To “Win No Matter What”

    [ad_1]

    We recently published 10 Stocks on Jim Cramer’s Radar. Meta Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ:META) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed.

    After social media giant Meta Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ:META)’s shares fell following its latest earnings report, Cramer took the contrarian view and defended the firm’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg. The CNBC TV host did not hold back when discussing the firm:

    Photo by austin-distel on Unsplash

    “[After David Faber commented that Cramer was frustrated with the conference call despite Meta’s sizable user base] I thought that the revenues were terrific. The reaction to the conference call is that, finally we’re at the point where people are spending too much. And he is spending too much. People did not like Mark Zuckerberg’s assurance that you have to spend.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Disney content has gone dark on YouTube TV. Here’s what customers should know

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — Disney content has gone dark on YouTube TV, leaving subscribers of the Google-owned live streaming platform without access to major networks like ESPN and ABC.

    That’s because the companies have failed to reach a new licensing deal to keep Disney channels on YouTube TV. Depending on how long it lasts, the dispute could particularly impact coverage of U.S. college football matchups over the weekend — as well as NBA and NFL games — on top of other news and entertainment disruptions that have already arrived.

    In the meantime, YouTube TV subscribers who want to watch Disney channels could have little choice other than turning to traditional broadcasting or the company’s own platforms — which come with their own price tags.

    Here’s what we know.

    Why is Disney content not on YouTube TV today?

    Disney content was pulled from YouTube TV after a carriage agreement expired on Thursday. The two sides have been unable to reach a new deal to continue licensing Disney channels on the platform — resulting in the current blackout.

    YouTube TV says that Disney is proposing terms that would be too costly, resulting in higher prices and fewer choices for its subscribers. Google’s streamer has accused Disney of following through on “the threat of a blackout on YouTube TV as a negotiating tactic” — and claims that the move also benefits Disney’s own streaming products like Hulu + Live TV and Fubo.

    Meanwhile, Disney says that YouTube TV has refused to pay fair rates of its channels — and is therefore choosing “to deny their subscribers the content they value most.” The California entertainment giant also accused Google of “using its market dominance to eliminate competition and undercut the industry-standard terms we’ve successfully negotiated with every other distributor.”

    In a Friday note to employees, Disney Entertainment Co-Chairs Dana Walden and Alan Bergman and ESPN Chairman Jimmy Pitaro added that YouTube TV pulled Disney content Thursday night “prior to the midnight expiration of our deal” — and noted the platform also deleted subscribers’ previously-recorded programming. The Associated Press reached out to Google for further comment.

    What channels are impacted?

    ESPN and ABC are among the biggest networks that YouTube TV subscribers can no longer access amid the dispute.

    And beyond those top sports and news offerings, other Disney-owned content that is now dark on the platform include channels specific to U.S. college athletic regions, like the Atlantic Coast Conference and the Southeastern Conference. NatGeo and FX are also impacted.

    Here’s a recap of the full list outlined by YouTube TV:

      1. ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, ESPNews and ESPN Deportes (Spanish Plan)

      2. ABC and ABC News Live

      3. Nat Geo, Nat Geo Wild and Nat Geo Mundo (Spanish Plan)

      4. Disney Channel, Disney Junior and Disney XD

      5. FX, FXX and FXM

      6. SEC Network and ACC Network

      7. Freeform

      8. Localish

      9. Baby TV Español (Spanish Plan)

    Google says that streamer adds-ons like 4K Plus and Spanish Plus are also affected.

    Where else can I watch ESPN and ABC?

    Consumers can continue to watch Disney’s sports programming on the company’s own ESPN offerings — but it will come with an additional cost. For streaming, the network launched its own platform earlier this year under the same ESPN name, starting at $29.99 a month.

    Other Disney content can be found on platforms like Hulu, Disney+ and Fubo. Again, those come with their own price tags. Disney also allows people to bundle ESPN along with Hulu and Disney+ for $35.99 a month — or $29.99 a month for the first year.

    Disney also directed customers to a website called KeepMyNetworks.com to explore other options, which includes more traditional broadcast services.

    But if you’re a YouTube TV subscriber and don’t have these streaming subscriptions or broadcast offerings, you might be left without access to this Disney content as long as the impasse lasts. YouTube TV said it would give subscribers a $20 credit if Disney content unavailable “for an extended period of time.”

    YouTube TV’s base subscription plan costs $82.99 per month. Beyond Disney content, the platform currently offers live TV from networks like NBC, CBS, Fox, BBC, PBS, Hallmark, Food Network and more.

    How long could the dispute last?

    YouTube TV and Disney have acknowledged that the disruption is frustrating — and both maintain that they’re still committed to finding a resolution. But only time will tell.

    The current blackout marks the latest in growing list of licensing disputes that impact consumers’ access to content.

    From sports events to awards shows, live programming that was once reserved for broadcast has increasingly made its way into the streaming world over the years — as more and more consumers ditch traditional cable or satellite TV subscriptions for content they can get online. But renewing carriage agreements can also mean tense contract negotiations, particularly amid growing competition in the space.

    YouTube TV and Disney have been down this road before. In 2021, YouTube TV subscribers also briefly lost access to all Disney content on the platform after a similar contract breakdown between the two companies. That outage lasted less than two days, with the companies eventually reaching an agreement.

    Some past impasses have been shorter and limited to a matter of hours — or found a way to temporarily ward of disruptions at the last minute. In August, for example, YouTube TV reached a “short-term extension” in its contract dispute with Fox, and the two later reached a new licensing deal.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • China’s economy slows to 4.8% annual growth in July-September, hit by tariffs and slack demand

    [ad_1]

    HONG KONG (AP) — China’s economy expanded at the slowest annual pace in a year in July-September, growing 4.8%, weighed down by trade tensions with the United States and slack domestic demand.

    The July-September data was the weakest pace of growth since the third quarter of 2024, and compares with a 5.2% pace of growth in the previous quarter, the government said in a report Monday.

    In January-September, the world’s second largest economy grew at a 5.2% annual pace. Despite U.S. President Donald Trump’s higher tariffs on imports from China, its exports have remained relatively strong as companies expanded sales to other world markets.

    China’s exports to the United States fell 27% in September from the year before, even though growth in its global exports hit a six-month high, climbing 8.3%.

    Exports of electric vehicles doubled in September from a year earlier, while domestic passenger car sales climbed 11.2% year-on-year in last month, down from a 15% rise in August, according to data released last week.

    Tensions between Beijing and Washington remain elevated, and it’s unclear if Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping will go ahead with a proposed meeting during a regional summit at the end of this month.

    Xi and other ruling Communist Party members are convening one of China’s most important political meetings for the year on Monday, where they will map out economic and social policy goals for the country for the next five years.

    The economy slowed in the last quarter as the authorities moved to curb fierce price wars in sectors such as the auto industry due to excess capacity.

    China is also facing challenges including a prolonged property sector downturn which has been affecting consumption and demand.

    Data released Monday showed China’s residential property sales fell 7.6% by value in the January-September period from a year earlier. Industrial output rose 6.5% year-on-year last month, the fastest pace since June, but retail sales growth slowed to 3% from the year before.

    Ratings agency S&P estimates nationwide new home sales will fall by 8% in 2025 from the year before and by 6% to 7% in 2026.

    The World Bank expects China’s economy to grow at a 4.8% annual rate this year. The government’s official growth target is around 5%.

    Chinese shares rose Monday, with the Hang Seng in Hong Kong climbing 2.3% and the Shanghai Composite index up 0.5%.

    A National Bureau of Statistics spokesman said China has a “solid foundation” to achieve its full-year growth target, but cited external complications — including trade friction with the U.S. and other trading partners and protectionist policies in many countries — as reasons for the slowdown.

    China’s stronger economic growth in the first half of this year gives it “some buffer” to achieve the growth target, said Lynn Song, chief economist for Greater China at ING Bank.

    However, spending during China’s eight-day Golden Week national holiday in October was “mildly disappointing,” reflecting sluggish consumer confidence and demand, Morningstar analysts said in a note this month.

    Investments in factories, equipment and other “fixed assets” fell 0.5% in the last quarter, underscoring weakness in domestic demand. It also was reflected in prices, which have continued to fall both at the consumer and the wholesale level.

    There’s room for the government to do more, Song said.

    “(We) are looking to see if there will be further measures to support consumption and the property market, as the impact from previous policies begins to weaken,” Song said.

    Economists are also expecting a rate cut by China’s central bank by the end of the year, which could encourage more spending and investment.

    China’s economy is also likely to further slow in 2026, said Jacqueline Rong, chief China economist at BNP Paribas, as property investment in the country “looks (to) continue falling” and the AI boom, which helped lift China’s economy and fueled a stock market rally, is expected to moderate.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Disney pulls ABC, ESPN and more from YouTube TV as talks break down

    [ad_1]

    YouTube TV viewers can no longer see Disney channels including ABC and ESPN after the two sides failed to agree on a new content distribution deal.

    Other channels that vanished from Google’s pay TV platform include the Disney Channel, FX and Nat Geo.

    Google’s pay TV platform said in a blog post late Thursday that Disney had followed through on a threat to suspend its content amid the negotiations.

    The breakdown could impact coverage of some college football games on Saturday, as well as NBA, NFL and NHL games.

    YouTube is the largest internet TV provider in the U.S. with more than 9 million subscribers. Hulu, owned by Disney, is next, with about half that many subscribers.

    Viewers have become aware of the dispute in recent weeks because of warnings being scrolled across their screens.

    YouTube said Disney used the threat of a blackout as a negotiating tactic that would have resulted in higher prices for its subscribers. Disney’s move to take down its content also benefits its own streaming products Hulu + Live TV and Fubo, YouTube said.

    “We know this is a frustrating and disappointing outcome for our subscribers and we continue to urge Disney to work with us constructively to reach a fair agreement that restores their networks to YouTube TV,” it said.

    YouTube said it would give subscribers a $20 credit if Disney content unavailable “for an extended period of time.” YouTube TV’s base subscription plan costs $82.99 per month.

    Disney said that YouTube TV is refusing to pay fair rates for its channels and has chosen to “deny their subscribers the content they value most,” pointing out the number of Top 25 teams playing this weekend.

    “With a $3 trillion market cap, Google is using its market dominance to eliminate competition and undercut the industry-standard terms we’ve successfully negotiated with every other distributor,” Disney said. The company said that it was committed to reaching a resolution as quickly as possible.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • China says it will work with US to resolve issues related to TikTok

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump’s meeting Thursday with China’s top leader Xi Jinping produced a raft of decisions to help dial back trade tensions, but no agreement on TikTok’s ownership.

    “China will work with the U.S. to properly resolve issues related to TikTok,” China’s Commerce Ministry said after the meeting.

    It gave no details on any progress toward ending uncertainty about the fate of the popular video-sharing platform in the U.S.

    The Trump administration had been signaling that it may have finally reached a deal with Beijing to keep TikTok running in the U.S.

    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had said on CBS’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday that the two leaders will “consummate that transaction on Thursday in Korea.”

    Wide bipartisan majorities in Congress passed — and President Joe Biden signed — a law that would ban TikTok in the U.S. if it did not find a new owner to replace China’s ByteDance. The platform went dark briefly on a January deadline but on his first day in office, Trump signed an executive order to keep it running while his administration tries to reach an agreement for the sale of the company.

    Three more executive orders followed, as Trump, without a clear legal basis, extended deadlines for a TikTok deal. The second was in April, when White House officials believed they were nearing a deal to spin off TikTok into a new company with U.S. ownership. That fell apart when China backed out after Trump announced sharply higher tariffs on Chinese products. Deadlines in June and September passed, with Trump saying he would allow TikTok to continue operating in the United States in a way that meets national security concerns.

    Trump’s order was meant to enable an American-led group of investors to buy the app from China’s ByteDance, though the deal also requires China’s approval.

    However, TikTok deal is “not really a big thing for Xi Jinping,” said Bonnie Glaser, managing director of the German Marshall Fund’s Indo-Pacific program, during a media briefing Tuesday. “(China is) happy to let (Trump) declare that they have finally kept a deal. Whether or not that deal will protect the data of Americans is a big question going forward.”

    “A big question mark for the United States, of course, is whether this is consistent with U.S. law since there was a law passed by Congress,” Glaser said.

    About 43% of U.S. adults under the age of 30 say they regularly get news from TikTok, higher than any other social media app, including YouTube, Facebook and Instagram, according to a Pew Research Center report published in September.

    A recent Pew Research Center survey found that about one-third of Americans said they supported a TikTok ban, down from 50% in March 2023. Roughly one-third said they would oppose a ban, and a similar percentage said they weren’t sure.

    Among those who said they supported banning the social media platform, about 8 in 10 cited concerns over users’ data security being at risk as a major factor in their decision, according to the report.

    The security debate centers on the TikTok recommendation algorithm — which has steered millions of users into an endless stream of video shorts. China has said the algorithm must remain under Chinese control by law. But a U.S. regulation that Congress passed with bipartisan support said any divestment of TikTok would require the platform to cut ties with ByteDance.

    American officials have warned the algorithm — a complex system of rules and calculations that platforms use to deliver personalized content — is vulnerable to manipulation by Chinese authorities, but no evidence has been presented by U.S. officials proving that China has attempted to do so.

    ___

    Associated Press Writer Fu Ting contributed to this story from Washington.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Apple delivers strong quarter despite trade war challenges and ongoing artificial technology issues

    [ad_1]

    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Apple delivered financial results during its summertime quarter that exceeded analyst projections, despite being caught in the crosshairs of a global trade war at the same time the trendsetting company is scrambling to catch up to its Big Tech peers in the artificial intelligence race.

    The performance announced Thursday was driven largely by strong initial demand for its iPhone 17 lineup that went on sale last month.

    Although the iPhone 17 lacks the AI wizardry featured in rival devices recently introduced by Samsung and Google, Apple spruced up its latest models with a redesign highlighted by a sleek “liquid glass” appearance on the display screens.

    Apple also largely maintained its pricing on its latest iPhones, despite being squeezed by the tariffs that President Donald Trump has imposed on the U.S. devices that the company mostly makes in India and China. The tariffs cost Apple $1.1 billion during the past quarter and are expected to cost another $1.4 billion during the final three months of the year.

    The formula apparently was enough to win over consumers, particularly in the United States and Europe, helping to produce iPhone sales totaling $49 billion during the July-September period, a 6% increase from the same time last year. That was slightly below the 8% jump in iPhone sales that had been anticipated by analysts, and less than the 13% bump in sales during the April-June period.

    IDC estimates that 58.6 million iPhones were sold worldwide in the July-September quarter, putting Apple second behind Samsung at 61.4 million of their Android-powered phones sold worldwide in the quarter.

    Buoyed by the iPhone results, Apple earned $27.5 billion, or $1.85 per share, nearly doubling its profit from a year ago. Revenue climbed 8% from a year ago to $102.5 billion. Both the earnings and revenue eclipsed the analyst forecasts that steer the stock market.

    Apple shares surged 3% in extended trading after the numbers came out.

    In a conference call with analysts, Apple CEO Tim Cook indicated his belief that the iPhone 17 lineup will continue to do well, predicting even more of the devices will be sold during the final three months of the year. “As we head into the holiday season with our most powerful lineup ever, I couldn’t be more excited for what’s to come,” Cook said. He cited the iPhone 17’s popularity in most parts of the world except China, where sales of the device dipped by 4% from a year ago.

    The Cupertino, California, company expects its iPhone sales to increase at least 10% from last year’s holiday season, according to projections provided by Apple’s chief financial officer, Kevan Parekh. Total revenue is expected to rise at a similar rate.

    Apple’s stock has been on a tear since a report earlier this month from the research firm International Data Corp. telegraphed the quarterly results with a preliminary analysis that concluded the company had set a new July-September record for iPhone sales. The rally catapulted Apple’s market value above $4 trillion for the first time earlier this week and now the stage is set for the shares to hit another new high during Friday’s regular trading session.

    But Apple has been widely seen as a laggard in the AI craze, one of the reasons that Nvidia — a chipmaker whose processors power the technology — became the first company to be valued at $5 trillion earlier this week.

    Apple had promised a wide array of AI features would be rolling out on last year’s iPhone models, but was only able to deliver a few of them. The missing upgrades included a smarter and more versatile version of its frequently flummoxed Siri virtual assistant – a makeover that Apple now doesn’t expect to complete until next year.

    But Apple has a long history of late starts when technology starts to head in another direction before it finally catches up and emerges as a front-runner.

    If Apple can pull it off again by eventually implanting more AI features on the iPhone, Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives believes those breakthroughs could boost the company’s market share by another $1 trillion to $1.5 trillion, translating into $75 to $100 per share.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Federal Reserve cuts key rate yet Powell says future reductions are not locked in

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Federal Reserve cut its key interest rate Wednesday for a second time this year as it seeks to shore up economic growth and hiring, even as inflation stays elevated.

    But Fed Chair Jerome Powell also cautioned that further rate cuts weren’t guaranteed, citing the government shutdown’s interruption of economic reports and sharp divisions among 19 Fed officials who participate in the central bank’s interest-rate deliberations.

    Speaking to reporters after the Fed announced its rate decision, Powell said there were “strongly differing views about how to proceed in December” at its next meeting and a further reduction in the benchmark rate is not “a foregone conclusion — far from it.”

    The rate cut — a quarter of a point — brings the Fed’s key rate down to about 3.9%, from about 4.1%. The central bank had cranked its rate to roughly 5.3% in 2023 and 2024 to combat the biggest inflation spike in four decades before implementing three cuts last year. Lower rates could, over time, reduce borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans, and credit cards, as well as for business loans.

    The move comes amid a fraught time for the central bank, with hiring sluggish and yet inflation stuck above the Fed’s 2% target. Compounding its challenges, the central bank is navigating without the economic signposts it typically relies on from the government, including monthly reports on jobs, inflation, and consumer spending, which have been suspended because of the government shutdown.

    Financial markets largely expected another rate reduction in December, and stock prices dropped after Powell’s comments, with the S&P 500 nearly unchanged and the Dow Jones Industrial Average closing slightly lower.

    “Powell poured cold water on the idea that the Fed was on autopilot for a December cut,” said Gennadiy Goldberg, head of U.S. rates strategy at TD Securities. “Instead, they’ll have to wait for economic data to confirm that a rate cut is actually needed.”

    Powell was asked about the impact of the government shutdown, which began on Oct. 1 and has interrupted the distribution of economic data. Powell said the Fed does have access to some data that give it “a picture of what’s going on.” He added that, “If there were a significant or material change in the economy, one way or another, I think we’d pick that up through this.”

    But the Fed chair did acknowledge that the limited data could cause officials to proceed more cautiously heading into its next meeting in mid-December.

    “There’s a possibility that it would make sense to be more cautious about moving (on rates). I’m not committing to that, I’m just saying it’s certainly a possibility that you would say ‘we really can’t see, so let’s slow down.’”

    The Fed typically raises its short term rate to combat inflation, while it cuts rates to encourage borrowing and spending and shore up hiring. Right now it sees risks of both slowing hiring and rising inflation, so it is reducing borrowing costs to support the job market, while still keeping rates high enough to avoid stimulating the economy so much that it worsens inflation.

    Yet Powell suggested the Fed increasingly sees inflation as less of a threat. He noted that excluding the impact of President Donald Trump’s tariffs, inflation is “not so far from our 2% goal.” Inflation has slowed in apartment rents and for many services, such as car insurance. A report released last week showed that inflation remains elevated but isn’t accelerating.

    The government recalled employees to produce the report, despite the shutdown, because it was used to calculate the cost of living adjustment for Social Security.

    At the same time, the economy could be rebounding from a sluggish first half, which could improve job growth in the coming months, Powell said. That would make rate cuts less necessary.

    “For some part of the committee, it’s time to maybe take a step back and see if whether there really are downside risks to the labor market,” Powell said. “Or see whether in fact that the stronger growth that we’re seeing is real.”

    Two of the 12 officials who vote on the Fed’s rate decisions dissented Wednesday, but in different directions. Jeffrey Schmid, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, voted against the move because he preferred no change to the Fed’s rate. Schmid has previously expressed concern that inflation remains too high.

    Fed governor Stephen Miran dissented for the second straight meeting in favor of a half-point cut. Miran was appointed by President Donald Trump just before the central bank’s last meeting in September.

    Trump has repeatedly attacked Powell for not reducing borrowing costs more quickly. In South Korea early Wednesday he repeated his criticisms of the Fed chair.

    “He’s out of there in another couple of months,” Trump said. Powell’s term ends in May. On Monday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed the administration is considering five people to replace Powell, and will decide by the end of this year.

    The Fed also said Wednesday that it would stop reducing the size of its massive securities holdings, which it accumulated during the pandemic and after the 2008-2009 Great Recession. The change, to take effect Dec. 1, could over time slightly reduce longer-term interest rates on things like mortgages but won’t have much overall impact on consumer borrowing costs.

    Without government data, the economy is harder to track, Powell said. September’s jobs report, scheduled to be released three weeks ago, is still postponed. This month’s hiring figures, to be released Nov. 7, will likely be delayed and may be less comprehensive when finally released. And the White House said last week that October’s inflation report may never be issued at all.

    Before the government shutdown cut off the flow of data, monthly hiring gains had weakened to an average of just 29,000 a month for the previous three months, according to the Labor Department’s data. The unemployment rate ticked up to a still-low 4.3% in August from 4.2% in July.

    More recently, several large corporations have announced sweeping layoffs, including UPS, Amazon, and Target, which threatens to boost the unemployment rate if it continues. Powell said the Fed is watching the layoff announcements “very carefully.”

    ___

    Associated Press Writer Alex Veiga in Los Angeles contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Layoffs are piling up, raising worker anxiety. Here are some companies that have cut jobs recently

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — It’s a tough time for the job market.

    Amid wider economic uncertainty, some analysts have said that businesses are at a “no-hire, no fire” standstill. That’s caused many to limit new work to only a few specific roles, if not pause openings entirely. At the same time, some sizeable layoffs have continued to pile up — raising worker anxieties across sectors.

    Some companies have pointed to rising operational costs spanning from President Donald Trump’s barrage of new tariffs and shifts in consumer spending. Others cite corporate restructuring more broadly — or, as seen with big names like Amazon, are redirecting money to artificial intelligence.

    Federal employees have encountered additional doses of uncertainty, impacting worker sentiment around the job market overall. Shortly after Trump returned to office at the start of the year, federal jobs were cut by the thousands. And many workers are now going without pay as the U.S. government shutdown nears its fourth week.

    “A lot of people are looking around, scanning the job environment, scanning the opportunities that are available to them — whether it’s in the public or private sector,” said Jason Schloetzer, professor business administration at Georgetown University’s McDonough School. “And I think there’s a question mark around the long-term stability everywhere.”

    Government hiring data is on hold during the shutdown, but earlier this month a survey by payroll company ADP showed that the private sector lost 32,000 jobs in September.

    Here are some companies that have moved to cut jobs recently.

    General Motors

    General Motors moved to lay off about 1,700 workers across manufacturing sites in Michigan and Ohio on Wednesday, as the auto giant adjusts to slowing demand for electric vehicles.

    Hundreds of additional employees are reportedly slated for “temporary layoffs.” And GM has recently moved to downsize other parts of its workforce, too — including 200 layoffs mostly impacting engineers in Detroit, and other 300 job cuts at a Georgia IT Innovation Center, which it is also shuttering.

    Paramount

    In long-awaited cuts just months after completing its $8 billion merger with Skydance, Paramount is going to lay off about 2,000 employees — about 10% of its workforce.

    Paramount initiated roughly 1,000 of those layoffs on Wednesday, according to a source familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The rest of the cuts will be made at a later date.

    Amazon

    Amazon will cut about 14,000 corporate jobs as the online retail giant ramps up spending on artificial intelligence.

    Amazon said Tuesday that it will cut about 14,000 corporate jobs, close to 4% of its workforce, as the online retail giant ramps up spending on AI while trimming costs elsewhere. A letter to employees said most workers would be given 90 days to look for a new position internally.

    CEO Andy Jassy previously said he anticipated generative AI would reduce Amazon’s corporate workforce in the coming years. And he has worked to aggressively cut costs overall since 2021.

    UPS

    United Parcel Service has disclosed about 48,000 job cuts this year as part of turnaround efforts, which arrive amid wider shifts in the company’s shipping outputs.

    In a Tuesday regulatory filing, UPS said it’s cut about 34,000 operational positions — and the company announced another 14,000 role reductions, mostly within management. Combined, that’s much higher than the roughly 20,000 cuts UPS forecast earlier this year.

    Target

    Last week, Target that it would eliminate about 1,800 corporate positions, or about 8% of its corporate workforce globally.

    Target said the cuts were part of wider streamlining efforts — with Chief Operating Officer Michael Fiddelke noting that “too many layers and overlapping work have slowed decisions.” The retailer is also looking to rebuild its customer base. Target reported flat or declining comparable sales in nine of the past eleven quarters.

    Nestlé

    In mid-October, Nestlé said it would be cutting 16,000 jobs globally — as part of wider cost cutting aimed at reviving its financial performance.

    The Swiss food giant said the layoffs would take place over the next two years. The cuts arrive as Nestlé and others face headwinds like rising commodity costs and U.S. imposed tariffs. The company announced price hikes over the summer to offset higher coffee and cocoa costs.

    Lufthansa Group

    In September, Lufthansa Group said it would shed 4,000 jobs by 2030 — pointing to the adoption of artificial intelligence, digitalization and consolidating work among member airlines.

    Most of the lost jobs would be in Germany, and the focus would be on administrative rather than operational roles, the company said. The layoff plans arrived even as the company reported strong demand for air travel and predicted stronger profits in years ahead.

    Novo Nordisk

    Also in September, Danish pharmaceutical company Novo Nordisk said it would cut 9,000 jobs, about 11% of its workforce.

    Novo Nordisk — which makes drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy — said the layoffs were part of wider restructuring as the company works to sell more obesity and diabetes medications amid rising competition.

    ConocoPhillips

    Oil giant ConocoPhillips has said it plans to lay off up to a quarter of its workforce, as part of broader efforts from the company to cut costs.

    A spokesperson for ConocoPhillips confirmed the layoffs on Sept. 3, noting that 20% to 25% of the company’s employees and contractors would be impacted worldwide. At the time, ConocoPhillips had a total headcount of about 13,000 — or between 2,600 and 3,250 workers. Most reductions were expected to take place before the end of 2025.

    Intel

    Intel has moved to shed thousands of jobs — with the struggling chipmaker working to revive its business as it lags behind rivals like Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices.

    In a July memo to employees, CEO Lip-Bu Tan said Intel expected to end the year with 75,000 “core” workers, excluding subsidiaries, through layoffs and attrition. That’s down from 99,500 core employees reported the end of last year. The company previously announced a 15% workforce reduction.

    Microsoft

    In May, Microsoft began began laying off about 6,000 workers across its workforce. And just months later, the tech giant said it would be cutting 9,000 positions — marking its biggest round of layoffs seen in more than two years.

    The latest job cuts hit Microsoft’s Xbox video game business and other divisions. The company has cited “organizational changes,” with many executives characterizing the layoffs as part of a push to trim management layers. But the labor reductions also arrive as the company spends heavily on AI.

    Procter & Gamble

    In June, Procter & Gamble said it would cut up to 7,000 jobs over the next two years, 6% of the company’s global workforce.

    The maker of Tide detergent and Pampers diapers said the cuts were part of a wider restructuring — also arriving amid tariff pressures. In July, P&G said it would hike prices on about a quarter of its products due to the newly-imposed import taxes, although it’s since said it expects to take less of a hit than previously anticipated for the 2026 fiscal year.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump administration moves to overrule state laws protecting credit reports from medical debt

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — The Trump administration is moving to overrule any state laws that may protect consumers’ credit reports from medical debt and other debt issues.

    The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has drafted what’s known as an interpretative rule related to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, interpreting the law in a way that says the FCRA should preempt any state laws or regulations when it comes to how debt should be reported to the credit bureaus like Experian, Equifax and Trans Union.

    This repeals previous Biden-era rules and regulations that allowed states to implement their own credit reporting bans. More than a dozen states like New York and Delaware prohibit the reporting of medical debt on a consumers’ credit report.

    Medical debt is often the most disputed part of a consumer’s credit report, because insurance payments can take time, and oftentimes patients do not have the means to fully pay a medical bill if insurance is not covering a procedure that has already taken place.

    The three credit bureaus jointly announced in 2023 they would no longer track any medical debts below $500, which at the time the bureaus said would eliminate 70% of all medical debts reported on consumers’ credit files. But some states have gone further than that. New York, Delaware and others passed laws where medical debts can no longer be reported to the credit bureaus.

    The CFPB, which is largely not operating at the moment with the exception of actively repealing previous rules written under President Biden or earlier, says in its rule that Congress intended to “create national standards for the credit reporting system” under the FCRA and state laws run afoul of that intention.

    The Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that Americans owe roughly $220 billion in medical debt. In Republican-controlled states like South Dakota, Mississippi, West Virginia and Georgia, roughly one in six Americans have outstanding medical debt, according to the KFF.

    Having outstanding, delinquent medical debt can impact the ability for an individual to apply for a mortgage, a credit card or an auto loan.

    A spokesperson for the Bureau did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The stock market is breaking records. Time for a gut check

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — Almost everything in your 401(k) should be coming up a winner now. That makes it time for a gut check.

    Not only is the U.S. stock market setting records, so are foreign stocks. Bond funds, which are supposed to be the boring and safe part of any portfolio, are also doing well this year, along with gold and cryptocurrencies.

    But in the midst of all the fun, it can pay to remember how you felt during April. That’s when financial markets were tumbling because of worldwide tariffs that President Donald Trump announced on his “Liberation Day.”

    Did all that fear push you to sell your stocks, lock in the losses and miss out on the stunning rebound that came afterward? Or did you hold tight, as many financial advisers suggested? Either way, it’s valuable information because another downturn could strike at any time.

    To be sure, many professionals along Wall Street are forecasting that the U.S. stock market will keep rising. But the threat of a sharp drop remains, as it always does. That leaves investors with the luxury now, while prices are high, to reassess. Don’t get lulled into leaving your 401(k) on autopilot, unless you’re intentionally doing so, and make sure your portfolio isn’t stuffed with too much risk.

    Here are some things to keep in mind:

    The stock market is doing well?

    It’s been another fabulous year for stocks. The S&P 500 has soared more than 35% from its low point in April, shortly after “Liberation Day.”

    The market has had a few hiccups recently, as worries have popped up about everything from potentially bad loans at some banks to renewed talk about much higher tariffs on China. But stocks have come back from each stumble, only to push higher.

    “The market continues to (hit) record highs on the back of strong earnings and easing U.S.–China trade tensions,” said Mark Hackett, chief market strategist at Nationwide, who calls the current state of “steady growth without irrational exuberance” a ”Goldilocks environment.”

    If the market’s great, why should I worry?

    You don’t need to worry at the moment, but remember that the stock market will fall eventually. It always does.

    The S&P 500 index, which sits at the heart of many 401(k) accounts, has forced investors to swallow a 10% drop every couple of years or so, on average. That’s what Wall Street calls a “correction,” and professional investors see them as ways to clear out excessive optimism that may have built up and pushed prices too high. More serious drops of at least 20%, which Wall Street calls “bear markets,” are less common but can last for years.

    Back in April, the S&P 500 index plunged nearly 20% from its record at the time. But the market came back, propelled by the big tech companies that have led the way the last few years.

    “Fundamentally superior stocks recover quickly and bounce like fresh tennis balls, while fundamentally inferior stocks bounce like rocks.” said Louis Navellier, founder and chief investment officer of asset manager Navellier & Associates, who also brushed off worries that the stock market is in a bubble.

    What could trip up the market?

    The stock market has charged to records because investors are expecting several important things to happen. If any fail to pan out, it would undercut the market.

    Chief among those expectations is that big U.S. companies will continue to deliver big growth in profits. That’s one of the few ways they can justify the jumps for their stock prices and quiet criticism that they’ve become too expensive.

    Critics point in particular to the frenzy going on in artificial-intelligence technology. There, they hear echoes of the dot-com bonanza that ultimately imploded in 2000 and sent stocks on a yearslong descent. One popular measure of valuing stocks, which looks at corporate profits over the preceding 10 years, showed the S&P 500 recently was near its most expensive level since the 2000 dot-com bubble.

    Consider Nvidia, the chip company that’s become the poster child of the AI trade. If it fails to meet analysts’ high expectations for growth, its stock will look more expensive than it already does. It’s trading at 54 times its earnings per share over the last 12 months, much higher than the overall S&P 500’s price-earnings ratio of nearly 30.

    What’s the next event to be mindful of?

    Wednesday’s meeting of the Federal Reserve could be a key moment for the market.

    Besides companies delivering bigger profits or stock prices falling, another way for the stock market to look less expensive is if interest rates ease.

    The widespread expectation is that the Fed will cut its main interest rate to support the slowing job market and deliver more reductions through next year. But the Fed has also warned it may hold off on cuts if inflation accelerates beyond its still-high level. That’s because lower interest rates can make inflation worse, and Wednesday’s focus will be on whether the Fed gives any hints about the likelihood of more cuts in coming months.

    Several of Wall Street’s most influential stocks will also be reporting their latest earnings results this week, including Microsoft and Apple. And Trump will be meeting with China’s leader, Xi Jinping on Thursday. The market has already run up on hopes that the two will ease rising trade tensions at some point.

    If there’s a bubble, I should sell everything, right?

    A famous saying on Wall Street is that being too early is the same as being wrong.

    Consider prescient investors who knew that stocks were too expensive when former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan famously talked about the possibility of “irrational exuberance” in financial markets. That was in late 1996.

    If they sold then, they would have missed out as the bubble inflated further and the S&P 500 more than doubled through late March 2000 before it popped.

    Instead, the better way to think of it may be: Make sure your investments are set up the right way, so you can stomach the market whether it goes up or down.

    How much of my 401(k) should be in stocks?

    It depends on your age and how much risk you’re willing to take.

    If you did sell stocks this past April, you may have had too much of your portfolio in stocks for your risk tolerance. Or you may need to steel yourself more during the next drop.

    Remember that anyone decades away from retirement has the luxury of waiting out any drops in the market. Bear markets are actually great in that case, because they put stocks on sale for anyone continuing to make regular contributions to their 401(k) account.

    Workers closer to retirement still need stocks, though in smaller proportions, because they have historically provided the highest returns over the long term, and a retirement can last decades.

    “They aren’t the most sexy, but companies with dependable dividends are a good bet, as are simple index funds designed to track the S&P 500 or a subset aimed at value or growth,” said John Kiernan, managing editor of personal finance site WalletHub.

    “Young people need to grow their money over time, and they will have decades to make up for any losses,” Kiernan said. “Older people need to protect the money they have now, which might mean favoring bonds and high-yield savings accounts over risky investments.”

    It’s easy to see how much stock retirement savers are recommended to hold at various ages. Mutual-fund companies have target-date retirement funds, which are built as autopilot products that will automatically move investors from lots of stocks when they’re young to fewer stocks when they’re closer to retirement.

    The average target-date fund for workers just starting their careers had 92% of its portfolio invested in stocks at the end of last year, according to Morningstar. Target-date funds designed for people entering retirement have a bit under 50% invested in stocks, meanwhile.

    I hate all this uncertainty

    Unfortunately, it’s the price you have to pay if you want the strong returns that the U.S. stock market has historically provided over the long term.

    This is what the stock market does. It goes up and down, sometimes by shocking amounts, but it usually helps patient savers build their nest eggs over decades.

    Ben Fulton, CEO of WEBs investments, recommends monitoring volatility by paying attention to the VIX, a volatility index, sometimes called the “fear index, which measures market expectations of future risk. The VIX is currently around 16, which Fulton said signals ”calm by historical standards.”

    “When the VIX begins to hold consistently above 20, it often signals a time to gradually reduce market exposure,” he said. That happened during the tech bubble and more recently during the pandemic in 2020 and when inflation spiked in 2022.

    “Until then, maintaining positions is critical, as markets that rise steadily can continue longer than logic might suggest, and stepping aside too early can mean missing valuable portfolio appreciation,” Fulton said.

    “Markets rarely behave as we want, instead reflecting the collective sentiment of all investors.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • China’s C919 jet faces turbulent skies as US-China trade tensions add to delays

    [ad_1]

    HONG KONG (AP) — China’s ambition to challenge Boeing and Airbus with its own homegrown passenger jet is running into turbulence, with deliveries of finished aircraft likely to fall far short of its target announced for this year.

    The C919 jet — a single-aisle passenger plane aiming to rival Boeing’s 737 and Airbus’ A320 – is made by state-owned aircraft manufacturer COMAC. Beijing is showcasing it as evidence of China’s technological advancement and progress in self-reliance, though it uses many Western sourced components.

    Trade friction with Washington threatens to prevent COMAC from securing core parts for the program that has been supported by huge Chinese government subsidies.

    “COMAC faces significant risk from the volatile policy environment, with its supply chains vulnerable to export restrictions and tit-for-tat measures between the U.S. and China,” said Max J. Zenglein, Asia-Pacific senior economist at The Conference Board think tank.

    The C919 has 48 major suppliers from the U.S. — including GE, Honeywell and Collins — 26 from Europe and 14 from China, according to analysts at the Bank of America. Trump threatened to impose new export controls on “critical” software to China after Beijing imposed stricter export controls on rare earths.

    “Existing choke points are being exploited in the deal making process between governments,” Zenglein said. “This is likely to continue as critical dependencies have become political bargaining chips.”

    Beijing has high hopes for the C919, which made its maiden commercial flight in 2023. The mid-sized jet is meant to help fill vast domestic demand for new aircraft over the next few decades. China hopes to expand sales beyond its borders and fly globally, including in Southeast Asia, Africa and Europe.

    COMAC delivered 13 C919s to Chinese carriers last year and only seven as of October this year, despite plans to ramp up production and deliver 30 jets in 2025, according to the aviation consultancy Cirium.

    China’s biggest state-owned airlines — Air China, China Eastern and China Southern — are the only commercial airlines currently flying a total of around 20 C919s.

    Trade tensions between the U.S. and China have “directly affected” delivery schedules for the C919, said Dan Taylor, head of consulting at aviation consultancy IBA. For one, output plans were disrupted when the U.S. suspended export licenses for the jet’s LEAP-1C engines around May, resuming them in July, he said.

    U.S.-controlled technology that needs export licensing for the LEAP-1C engines — jointly built by the U.S.’s GE Aerospace and France’s Safran -— means the C919’s engines require U.S. export clearance, Taylor said, making it “inherently sensitive to political shifts.”

    “Engine and avionics dependence on Western suppliers continues to expose the program to policy decisions beyond COMAC’s control,” Taylor explained.

    Geopolitical tensions alone are not the only cause for slower than expected production of the C919s. The program has been “marked by caution and prioritizing quality and safety, so there also may be some operational reasons for the slower production ramp up,” said Zenglein from The Conference Board.

    While “it has always been the aim to reduce the reliance on foreign components as quickly as possible” for the C919, Zenglein said, many analysts say it is a challenging process. China’s own engine alternative — the CJ-1000A under development by state-owned Aero Engine Corporation of China (AECC) — is still under testing, according to IBA.

    Several airlines outside of China, including AirAsia, have expressed interest in flying the C919, but a lack of international certification has so far prevented the C919 from flying beyond China. Certifications from the U.S. and the European Union’s aviation regulators could take years.

    For the C919 to succeed, it “needs to have each one of three things: good economics, a prompt global product support network, and certification from safety agencies”, said Richard Aboulafia, managing director of AeroDynamic Advisory. “Any one of these three alone doesn’t mean much,” he said.

    China will need 9,570 new passenger aircraft between 2025 and 2044, according to Airbus’ latest market forecast, more than 80% of them single-aisle jets like the C919.

    COMAC’s faces a growing challenge from Airbus, which is expanding its manufacturing capacity in China. A second assembly line is due to begin operating in 2026, allowing Airbus to increase its production of A320 single-aisle jets in China – an aircraft model similar to the C919.

    Analysts expect that it will take years for COMAC to break the Boeing-Airbus duopoly in global aircraft share. By the late 2020s, COMAC will likely grow within China and possibly establish regional exports, said IBA’s Taylor.

    In the near term, a lack of international certification will be “delaying any meaningful Western-market entry” for the jet and export control volatility will likely continue to undermine its global expansion plans, Taylor added.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Amazon cuts 14,000 corporate jobs as spending on artificial intelligence accelerates

    [ad_1]

    Amazon will cut about 14,000 corporate jobs as the online retail giant ramps up spending on artificial intelligence while cutting costs elsewhere.

    Teams and individuals impacted by the job cuts will be notified on Tuesday. Most workers will be given 90 days to look for a new position internally, Beth Galetti, Senior Vice President of People Experience and Technology at Amazon, wrote in a letter to employees on Tuesday. Those who can’t find a new role at the company or who opt not to look for one will be provided transitional support including severance pay, outplacement services and health insurance benefits.

    Amazon has about 350,000 corporate employees and a total workforce of approximately 1.56 million. The cuts announced Tuesday amount to about a 4% reduction in its corporate workforce.

    In June CEO Andy Jassy, who has aggressively sought to cut costs since becoming CEO in 2021, said that he anticipated generative AI would reduce Amazon’s corporate workforce in the next few years.

    Jassy said at the time that Amazon had more than 1,000 generative AI services and applications in progress or built, but that figure was a “small fraction” of what it plans to build.

    Amazon has announced plans to invest $10 billion building a campus in North Carolina to expand its cloud computing and artificial intelligence infrastructure.

    Since 2024 started, Amazon has committed to about $10 billion apiece to data center projects in Mississippi, Indiana, Ohio and North Carolina as it builds up its infrastructure to try to keep up with other tech giants making leaps in AI. Amazon is competing with OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Meta and others. In a conference call with industry analysts in May, Jassy said that the potential for growth in the company’s AWS business is massive.

    “If you believe your mission is to make customers’ lives easier and better every day, and you believe that every customer experience will be reinvented with AI, you’re going to invest very aggressively in AI, and that’s what we’re doing. You can see that in the 1,000-plus AI applications we’re building across Amazon. You can see that with our next generation of Alexa, named Alexa+,” he said.

    Amazon’s workforce doubled during the pandemic as millions stayed home and boosted online spending. In the following years, big tech and retail companies cut thousands of jobs to bring spending back in line.

    The cuts announced Tuesday suggests Amazon is still trying to get the size of its workforce right and it may not be over. It was the biggest culling at Amazon since 2023, when the company cut 27,000 jobs. Those cuts came in waves, with 9,000 jobs trimmed in March of that year, and another 18,000 employees two months later. Amazon has not said if more job cuts are on the way.

    Yet the jobs market which has for years been a pillar in the U.S. economy, is showing signs of weakening. Layoffs have been limited, but the same can be said for hiring.

    Government hiring data is on hold during the government shut down, but earlier this month a survey by payroll company ADP showed a surprising loss of 32,000 jobs losses in the private sector in September.

    Many retailers are pulling back on seasonal hiring this year due to uncertainty over the U.S. economy and tariffs. Amazon Inc. said this month, however, that it would hire 250,000 seasonal workers, the same as last year’s holiday season.

    Neil Saunders, managing director of GlobalData, said in a statement that the layoffs “represent a deep cleaning of Amazon’s corporate workforce.”

    “Unlike the Target layoffs, Amazon is operating from a position of strength,” he said. “The company has been producing good growth, and it still has a lot of headroom for further expansion in both the U.S. and overseas.”

    But Saunders noted that Amazon is not immune to outside factors, as global markets tighten and underlying costs climb.

    “It needs to act if it wants to continue with a good bottom-line performance. This is especially so given the amount of investment the company is making in areas like logistics and AI. In some ways, this is a tipping point away from human capital to technological infrastructure,” he said.

    Amazon will post quarterly financial results on Thursday. During its most recent quarter, the company reported 17.5% growth for its cloud computing arm Amazon Web Services.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump says a Canadian ad misstated Ronald Reagan’s views on tariffs. Here are the facts and context

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump pulled out of trade talks with Canada Thursday night, furious over what he called a “fake’’ television ad from Ontario’s provincial government that quoted former U.S. President Ronald Reagan from 38 years ago criticizing tariffs — Trump’s favorite economic tool.

    The ad features audio excerpts from an April 25, 1987 radio address in which Reagan said: “Over the long run such trade barriers hurt every American worker and consumer.’’

    Trump attacked the ad on Truth Social Friday posting: “CANADA CHEATED AND GOT CAUGHT!!! They fraudulently took a big buy ad saying that Ronald Reagan did not like Tariffs, when actually he LOVED TARIFFS FOR OUR COUNTRY, AND ITS NATIONAL SECURITY.″

    The Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute criticized the ad on X Thursday night posting that it “misrepresents the ‘Presidential Radio Address to the Nation on Free and Fair Trade’ dated April 25, 1987.”

    While Trump called the ad fake, Reagan’s words were real. But context is missing.

    Here’s a look at the facts:

    Reagan, who held office during a period of growing fear over Japan’s rising economic might, made the address a week after he himself had imposed tariffs on Japanese semiconductors; he was attempting to explain the decision, which seemed at odds with his reputation as a free trader.

    Reagan did not, in fact, love tariffs. He often criticized government policies – including protectionist measures such as tariffs – that interfered with free commerce and he spent much of 1987 radio address spelling out the case against tariffs.

    “High tariffs inevitably lead to retaliation by foreign countries and the triggering of fierce trade wars,’’ he said. “The result is more and more tariffs, higher and higher trade barriers, and less and less competition. So, soon, because of the prices made artificially high by tariffs that subsidize inefficiency and poor management, people stop buying. Then the worst happens: Markets shrink and collapse; businesses and industries shut down; and millions of people lose their jobs.’’

    But Reagan’s policies were more complicated than his rhetoric.

    In addition to taxing Japanese semiconductors, Reagan slapped levies on heavy motorcycles from Japan to protect Harley-Davidson. He also strong-armed Japanese automakers into accepting “voluntary’’ limitations on their exports to the United States, ultimately encouraging them to set up factories in the American Midwest and South.

    And he pressured other countries to push down the value of the currencies to help make American exports more competitive in world markets.

    Robert Lighthizer, a Reagan trade official who served as Trump’s top trade negotiator from 2017 through 2021, wrote in his 2023 memoir that “President Reagan distinguished between free trade in theory and free trade in practice.’’

    In 1988, an analyst at the libertarian Cato Institute even declared Reagan “ the most protectionist president since Herbert Hoover, the heavyweight champion of protectionists.’’

    Reagan, though, was no trade warrior. Discussing his semiconductor tariffs in the April 1987 radio address, he said that he was forced to impose them because the Japanese were not living up to a trade agreement and that “such tariffs or trade barriers and restrictions of any kind are steps that I am loath to take.’’

    Trump, on the other hand, has no such reticence. He argues that tariffs can protect American industry, draw manufacturing back to the United States and raise money for the Treasury. Since returning to the White House in January, he has slapped double-digit tariffs on almost every country on earth and targeted specific products including autos, steel and pharmaceuticals.

    The average effective U.S. tariff rate has risen from around 2.5% at the start of the 2025 to 18%, highest since 1934, according to the Budget Lab at Yale University.

    Trump’s enthusiastic use of import taxes — he has proudly called himself “Tariff Man’’ — has drawn a challenge from businesses and states charging that he overstepped his authority. The Constitution gives Congress the power to levy taxes, including tariffs, though lawmakers have gradually ceded considerable authority over trade policy to the White House. The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in the case early next month.

    Trump claimed Thursday that the Canadian ad was intended “to interfere with the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, and other courts.’’

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Spelhouse Step Show Kicks Off Homecoming 2025

    [ad_1]

    Photo by Tabius McCoy/The Atlanta Voice

    Alumni and students gathered under the night sky, illuminated by the stage lights on the Spelman lawn. Students’ rhythmic stomps and chants of the Divine Nine electrified the crowd as Spelhouse students, alumni, and families gathered for the 2025–2026 Homecoming Step Show.

    Each year, the homecoming step show brings together Spelman and Morehouse students, alumni, and families to celebrate a cultural legacy that extends far beyond the stage. The event, was the kickoff to the tailgate weekend with sororities and fraternities performing routines that blended their unique craftsmanship while honoring the alumni who came before, while remixing it with contemporary music and themes.

    Photo by Tabius McCoy/The Atlanta Voice

    This year, the Eta Kappa chapter of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. brought the heat with a chef-themed performance that had the crowd on its feet. Dressed in crisp chef whites, the Deltas “cooked” to a playlist featuring GloRilla’s “Let Em Cook.” Their creative execution and sharp choreography earned them the top prize among the sororities. The night’s emcee, Jaden Palmer-Waldron, a junior finance major from Philadelphia and vice president of the Campus Alliance for Student Activities (CASA), kept the energy high throughout the show. “Events like this show the dedication our students have day in and day out,” Palmer-Waldron said. “It’s about celebrating their hard work, balancing school, and building something for the future. We need to invest in that.”

    Photo by Tabius McCoy/The Atlanta Voice

    For many in the audience, their victory carried a deeper meaning. Alison Kean Wright, class of 1986 and a proud alumna member of Delta Sigma Theta Incorporated, said the performance transported her back to her own college years. “I used to step, so it brings back memories,” Wright said. “I definitely can’t do what they can do now, but it’s all about tradition and celebrating our sorority and our chapter.”

    Another Delta and advisor to the current chapter, Joni Johnson Williams, class of 1987, said mentoring today’s members of the Eta Kappa chapter keeps her connected to the organization’s legacy. “Their energy and enthusiasm remind me why I wanted to be a member in the first place,” Williams said. “They always bring new ideas, and it keeps the tradition alive.”

    Photo by Tabius McCoy/The Atlanta Voice

    The Zeta Phi Beta Sorority, Inc. followed with a creative Squid Game-themed routine that turned the arena into a neon-lit performance. 

    The fraternity competition was equally fierce. The men of Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc. delivered a cinematic performance inspired by ancient Egypt, complete with mummy-wrapped costumes and a museum-themed storyline that morphed into a high-energy dance sequence. Their set paid homage to Michael Jackson’s “Remember the Time” while mixing in contemporary hip-hop music; ultimately winning them first prize for the fraternities. 

    Zion Horn, a senior software engineering major from Chicago, said the team’s performance was the product of practice and focus. “Hard work and practice lead to preparation,” Horn said. “Even when you don’t see the results, you keep going. The crowd’s reaction made every step worth it.”

    Photo by Tabius McCoy/The Atlanta Voice

    Omega Psi Phi Fraternity, Inc. (the “Q-Dogs”) capped off the night with a funk-filled spectacle straight out of the 1970s. Dressed in open-collar shirts, Afros, and flared pants, the Qs strutted down a Soul Train line to tunes such as “That’s the Way (I Like It)” by KC & The Sunshine Band, aiming to embody the spirit of the disco era with charisma and rhythm.

    For first-year Spelman student Haley Buckner, a health science major from Nashville, the step show represented her first real taste of Spelhouse spirit. “It’s fun, the sisterhood, coming together, and having a break from studying,” Buckner said. “You really feel the energy of Spelhouse.”

    Photo by Tabius McCoy/The Atlanta Voice

    [ad_2]

    Noah Washington

    Source link

  • Smucker sues Trader Joe’s, saying its new PB&J sandwiches are too similar to Uncrustables

    [ad_1]

    The J.M. Smucker Co. is suing Trader Joe’s, alleging the grocery chain’s new frozen peanut butter and jelly sandwiches are too similar to Smucker’s Uncrustables in their design and packaging.

    In the lawsuit, which was filed Monday in federal court in Ohio, Smucker said the round, crustless sandwiches Trader Joe’s sells have the same pie-like crimp markings on their edges that Uncrustables do. Smucker said the design violates its trademarks.

    Smucker also asserted that the boxes Trader Joe’s PB&J sandwiches come in violate the Orrville, Ohio-based company’s trademarks because they are the same blue color it uses for the lettering on “Uncrustables” packages.

    Trader Joe’s boxes also show a sandwich with a bite mark taken out of it, which is similar to the Uncrustables design, Smucker said.

    “Smucker does not take issue with others in the marketplace selling prepackaged, frozen, thaw-and-eat crustless sandwiches. But it cannot allow others to use Smucker’s valuable intellectual property to make such sales,” the company said in its lawsuit.

    Smucker is seeking restitution from Trader Joe’s. It also wants a judge to require Trader Joe’s to deliver all products and packaging to Smucker to be destroyed.

    A message seeking comment was left Wednesday with Trader Joe’s, which is based in Monrovia, California.

    Michael Kelber, chair of the intellectual property group at Neal Gerber Eisenberg, a Chicago law firm, said Smucker’s registered trademarks will help bolster its argument. But Trader Joe’s might argue that the crimping on its sandwiches is simply functional and not something that can be trademarked, Kelber said.

    Trader Joe’s sandwiches also appear to be slightly more square than Uncrustables, so the company could argue that the shape isn’t the same, Kelber said.

    Uncrustables were invented by two friends who began producing them in 1996 in Fergus Falls, Minnesota. Smucker bought their company in 1998 and secured patents for a “sealed, crustless sandwich” in 1999.

    But it wasn’t easy to mass produce them. In the lawsuit, Smucker said it has spent more than $1 billion developing the Uncrustables brand over the last 20 years. Smucker spent years trying to perfect Uncrustables’ stretchy bread and developing new filling flavors like chocolate and hazelnut.

    Kelber said one of the biggest issues companies debate in cases like this one is whether the copycat product deceives consumers.

    Smucker claims that’s already happening with Trader Joe’s sandwiches. In the lawsuit, Smucker showed a social media photo of a person claiming that Trader Joe’s is contracting with Smucker to make the sandwiches under its own private label.

    This isn’t the first time Smucker has taken legal action to protect its Uncrustables brand. In 2022, it sent a cease and desist letter to a Minnesota company called Gallant Tiger, which was making upscale versions of crustless peanut butter and jelly sandwiches with crimped edges. Smucker said Wednesday that it hasn’t taken further action but continues to monitor Gallant Tiger.

    Smucker likely felt it had no choice but to sue this time around, Kelber said.

    “For the brand owner, what is the point of having this brand if I’m not going to enforce it?” Kelber said. “If they ignore Trader Joe’s, they are feeding that, and then the next person who does it they won’t have an argument.”

    Kelber said trademark cases often wind up being settled because neither company wants to go through an expensive trial.

    Smucker’s lawsuit comes a few months after a similar lawsuit filed against the Aldi by Mondelez International, which claimed that Aldi’s store-brand cookies and crackers have packaging that is too similar to Mondelez brands like Chips Ahoy, Wheat Thins and Oreos.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Career experts say asking for a raise isn’t off the table in a tough job market

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — With the U.S. experiencing a significant hiring slowdown, it’s a daunting time to be looking for a job. Many workers are staying put instead of changing jobs to secure better pay. Artificial intelligence tools increasingly screen the resumes of applicants. Now may seem like an inappropriate time to request a raise.

    But sticking around doesn’t mean wages and salaries have to stagnate. Career experts say it’s not wrong, even in a shaky economy, to ask to be paid what you’re worth. Raises aren’t even necessarily off the table at organizations that are downsizing, according to some experts.

    “A lot of people think if their company has done layoffs, the likelihood of getting a raise is pretty low,” said Jamie Kohn, a senior director in the human resources practice at business research and advisory firm Gartner. “And that might be true, but the the other way to think about it is that this company has already decided to reinvest in you by keeping you on.”

    This article is part of AP’s Be Well coverage, focusing on wellness, fitness, diet and mental health. Read more Be Well.

    When should you ask?

    If you’ve taken on greater responsibilities at work and have received strong performance reviews, or if you’ve learned you’re paid substantially less than colleagues or competitors with similar levels of experience, then it may be the right time to ask for a pay adjustment.

    “They know that you’re taking on more work, especially if you’ve had layoffs on your team,” Kohn continued. “At that point, it is very hard for them to lose an employee that you know they now are relying on much more.”

    Another signal that it’s time to ask for an adjustment is if you’re working a second job to make ends meet or your current financial situation is causing angst that impacts job performance, said Rodney Williams, co-founder of SoLo Funds, a community finance platform.

    “There’s nothing wrong with saying, ’Hey, I need to raise my financial position. I’m willing to do more,” Williams said. “I’m willing to show up earlier, I’m willing to leave later, I’m willing to help out, maybe, and do other things here.”

    Some people view asking for more compensation as less risky than switching to a new job. “There is a sense of not wanting to be ‘last in, first out’ in a potential layoff situation,” said Kohn.

    Know your worth

    Before starting the compensation conversation, do some research on current salaries. You can find out what people with comparable experience are making in your industry by searching on websites such as Glassdoor, where people self-report salaries, or ZipRecruiter, which gathers pay data from job postings and other sources.

    Three years ago, a lot of people asked for 20% pay increases because of price inflation and high employee turnover coming out of the coronavirus pandemic, Kohn said. Companies no longer are considering such big bumps.

    “Right now, I think you could say that you are worth 10% more, but you’re unlikely to get a 10% pay increase if you ask for it,” she said.

    Your success also depends on your recent performance reviews. “If you’ve been given additional responsibilities, if you are operating at a level that would be a promotion, those might be situations where asking for a higher amount might be worth it,” Kohn said.

    Compare notes with colleagues

    Many people view the topic as taboo, but telling coworkers what you make and asking if they earn more may prove instructive. Trusted coworkers with similar roles are potential sources. People who were recently hired or promoted may supply a sense of the market rate, Kohn said.

    “You can say, ‘Hey, I’m trying to make sure I’m being paid equitably. Are you making over or under X dollars?’ That’s one of my favorite phrases to use, and it invites people into a healthy discussion,” Sam DeMase, a career expert with ZipRecruiter, said. “People are way more interested in talking about salary than you might think.”

    You can also reach out to people who left the company, who may be more willing to compare paychecks than current colleagues, DeMase said.

    Brag sheet

    Keep track of your accomplishments and positive feedback on your work. Compile it into one document, which human resources professionals call a “brag sheet,” DeMase said. If you’re making your request in writing, list those accomplishments when you ask for a raise. If the request is made in a conversation, you can use the list as talking points.

    Be sure to list any work or responsibilities that typically would not have been part of your job description. “Employers are wanting employees to do more with less, so we need to be documenting all of the ways in which we’re working outside of our job scope,” DeMase said.

    Also take stock of the unique skills or traits you bring to the team.

    “People tend to overestimate our employers’ alternatives,” said Oakbay Consulting CEO Emily Epstein, who teaches negotiation courses at Harvard University and the University of California, Berkeley. “We assume they could just hire a long line of people, but it may be that we bring specialized expertise to our roles, something that would be hard to replace.”

    Timing matters

    Don’t seek a raise when your boss is hungry or at the end of a long day because the answer is more likely to be no, advises Epstein, whose company offers training on communication, conflict resolution and other business skills. If they’re well-rested and feeling great, you’re more likely to succeed, she said.

    Getting a raise is probably easier in booming fields, such as cybersecurity, while it could be a tough time to request one if you work in an industry that is shedding positions, Epstein said.

    By the same token, waiting for the perfect time presents the risk of missing out on a chance to advocate for yourself.

    “You could wait your whole life for your boss to be well-rested or to have a lot of resources,” Epstein said. “So don’t wait forever.”

    Responding to “no”

    If your request is denied, having made it can help set the stage for a future negotiation.

    Ask your manager what makes it difficult to say yes, Epstein suggested. “Is it the precedent you’d be establishing for this position that might be hard to live up to? Is it fairness to the other people in my position? Is it, right now the company’s struggling?” she said.

    Ask when you might revisit the conversation and whether you can get that timeframe in writing, DeMase said.

    Laura Kreller, an executive assistant at a university in Louisiana, recently earned a master’s degree and asked for her job description to change to reflect greater responsibilities and hopefully higher pay. Her boss was kind but turned her down, citing funding constraints. Kreller said she has no regrets.

    “I was proud of myself for doing it,” she said. “It’s better to know where you stand.”

    ___

    Share your stories and questions about workplace wellness at [email protected]. Follow AP’s Be Well coverage, focusing on wellness, fitness, diet and mental health at https://apnews.com/hub/be-well

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Seven years, $13M in tax dollars: What happened to Cambridge Harbor?

    [ad_1]

    Seven years and more than $13 million in taxpayer money later, an Eastern Shore nonprofit tasked with transforming Cambridge’s waterfront has produced little more than a slab of concrete and a brick promenade along the Choptank River.

    “We have been spending a lot of money and we still have an empty field,” said Republican state Del. Tom Hutchinson, who represents Caroline, Dorchester, Talbot, and Wicomico counties. “It is frankly time to get shovels in the ground and make something happen. It’s been a very, very long process.”

    At the same time, group officials say they need more money to get the work done, with a memorandum scheduled to go out to potential investors next January.

    Since Cambridge Waterfront Development, Inc. (CWDI) first formed in 2018, it has received $13.16 million in grants and over 17 acres of free land, and it has paid out more than $5 million to contractors, according to the latest publicly available financial information. The nonprofit was created by the state of Maryland, Dorchester County and the City of Cambridge.

    Yet the only visible progress is a partially built 900 ft. brick promenade that was supposed to be completed this summer and now may be finished by the end of this month.

    The 34-acre development, named “Cambridge Harbor,” is nestled between the Choptank River Bridge on Rt. 50 and Cambridge Creek in the City of Cambridge.

    On paper, plans call for a boutique anchor hotel, a fishing pier, a 1.5-acre park, restaurants, a promenade for bicycling and walking, an expanded public beach, and a blend of commercial and residential development.

    State and local officials said the project appears to be years away from any substantive progress.

    Pier funding has yet to be approved by the state. A hotel developer hasn’t been hired and master plans haven’t been approved by the city.

    “I don’t think CWDI did anything right in terms of facilitating the successful redevelopment of the Cambridge Harbor site,” Former Cambridge City Manager Tom Carroll said.

    He resigned his position in March 2024 in frustration, Carroll said, with the project’s lack of progress.

    CWDI Board President Angie Hengst said she’s heard the concerns and acknowledges the delays. She blames the lack of visible results on the 2021 COVID-19 epidemic and poor working relationships between CWDI, city and county officials.

    Big vision, slow progress

    Part of the problem is how much the project is dependent on unconfirmed plans.

    The state intends to tear down the current 2,500 ft. pier along the Choptank River Bridge, which is old and unusable, then build and manage a new one. However, there’s no money budgeted to do any of that.

    “Funding for both the demolition of the old pier and construction of the new pier is subject to future budget allocations,” said Eric Luedtke, director of Capital Projects for the Maryland Department of Natural Resources.

    Among the reasons it hasn’t been in state budget discussions is that the city, county and CWDI couldn’t agree on a location for the new pier. That was resolved this summer, with the three settling on a preferred site. Even so, Luedtke said construction discussions were only in the early planning stages, as not even the length of the new pier has been decided.

    He also would not give an estimate for how much demolition or construction would cost.

    There are also questions about the hotel. CWDI officials said they’re in “final negotiations” with Pinnacle Hospitality Group to serve as the hotel developer. Hengst said she expects a deal by the end of October — although a nearly identical pledge was made in 2023.

    If a deal gets approved in October, the actual hotel design work wouldn’t be expected to start until January 2026, CWDI officials estimate. Calls to Pinnacle were not returned by The Sun’s deadline.

    Regardless of which company operates the hotel, it is currently scheduled to be placed right next to a yacht maintenance facility. In recent CWDI meetings, Cambridge residents questioned whether the noise from a working yacht facility would drive away tourists and how the hotel would operate in the off-season. CWDI officials, meanwhile, believe the yacht facility and a “working waterfront” could be an attraction.

    Hengst told The Baltimore Sun the group did a hotel feasibility study in June 2021.

    “However, the study is stale and was completed while coming out of the pandemic,” she added.

    The Sun requested a copy of the study, but Hengst said she didn’t know where it was. She added that Pinnacle’s interest in working with CWDI shows the hotel is viable.

    “Since we have a hotelier wanting to develop the site, it does confirm that it’s a desirable location,” she said.

    Money goes for demolition

    Multiple residents have also raised questions at both CWDI meetings and those of the Cambridge council in recent months, about where the nonprofit’s money went.

    The group received $13.158 million in federal, state and local grants over the past six years, according to both the CWDI’s tax filings and Hengst. That includes $8.849 million in state grants; $2.4 million from federal sources; a total of $1.5 million in ARPA (American Rescue Plan Act) funds from Cambridge, Dorchester County and the state; $204,000 directly from Cambridge and $205,000 directly from Dorchester County.

    According to tax filings and other financial records, 27% went to construction, 24% went to design, 24% went to buy property, 18% to demolition and 7% to operating costs.

    How was the money spent?

    • CWDI executive director annual salary – $100,000

    • Demolition costs to tear down Dorchester General Hospital – $2.45 million

    • Cost of purchasing Dorchester General Hospital and 17-acre property from University of Maryland Shore Regional Health – $2 million

    • Project management bill for contractors – $936,004

    • Engineering bill for contractors – $581,514

    • Architect services – $381,096

    • Insurance broker fees – $112,557

    • Cost of purchasing Richardson Maritime Museum and surrounding property – $818,000

    State officials say the money was used as intended.

    “The Department’s awards have been used as intended for demolition and acquisition,” said Allison Foster, the communications director for the Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development. “The dilapidated hospital buildings have been successfully demolished and the site acquired, clearing the way for new development.”

    That new development stands at 34 acres now, thanks to both of these land purchases and additional property given by the city. But there’s nothing to see yet and for that, CWDI officials partly blame a lawsuit.

    A costly legal fight

    In 2024, CWDI looked to sell 2 acres of the city-donated land to Yacht Maintenance Company, which is owned by George Robinson, the brother-in-law of former CWDI board member Jeff Powell. The City of Cambridge argued that the land deal violated the original agreement, which required the nonprofit to advertise for and eventually choose a master developer for the property before agreeing to any land transfers. Instead, the CWDI board had appointed itself as master developer with no public process.

    Both sides agreed to dismiss the case on Aug. 21, 2024, after Del. Hutchinson stepped in as mediator. In the wake of the meditation, founding CWDI board member Rich Zeidman resigned, along with CWDI executive director Matt Leonard. Attempts to reach both men were unsuccessful by presstime. Caroll also resigned his position with the city at that time. Meanwhile, CWDI got permission to sell the land to Yacht Maintenance.

    Hutchinson said change in leadership on both sides was needed, “in order to regain the trust and to rebuild the CWDI board.”

    “We had to get the city to drop the lawsuit,” Hutchinson said. “When you get to a point that you have a lawsuit, the only people that win are the attorneys with the fees. It was important to get people back to the table to talk collectively.”

    Hengst said the fight was a major setback.

    “That certainly stopped things dead in their tracks,” she said.

    Moving forward

    But now, Hengst said, the group is moving forward. She points to infrastructure and design plans, which CWDI is working with the city planning staff to get approved. She also points to the hotel developer, with whom she hopes to have a contract signed by the end of October.

    Accomplishing Phase I comes with a price tag of $9.24 million. That includes $5.24 million for public infrastructure, $800,000 for design and development costs, a $300,000 match for a grant from the U.S. Economic Development Administration, $2.4 million for that brick promenade and $500,000 to repair the wharf.

    Using the land sale proceeds, the new EDA grant and $1.25 million left over in ARPA funds, the nonprofit says it has all but $2.89 million covered.

    Despite repeated delays, Hutchinson said he remains hopeful the project will eventually succeed.

    “It’s been a challenge — there have been disagreements and some legal challenges along the way,” he said. “I think we are past that.”

    Have a news tip? Contact Eastern Shore bureau chief Josh Davis at jdavis@baltsun.com or 443-366-1844. You can also contact reporter Glynis Kazanjian at gkazanjian@baltsun.com or 301-674-7135.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ethereum Price Will Still Climb Above $5,000 As Long As It Holds This Level

    [ad_1]

    The Ethereum price has spent the past weeks stuck in a wide consolidation zone, testing bullish momentum as analysts anticipate its next big breakout. One market expert has highlighted a critical level for ETH, suggesting that as long as the second-largest cryptocurrency can hold above this level, its path to surpassing the $5,000 milestone remains intact. 

    Ethereum Price Faces Critical Level At $4,400

    According to market expert Daan Crypto Trades on X social media, Ethereum’s recent price action has been choppy following two slow weeks of trading. The analyst’s chart shows that ETH has oscillated between $4,100 and $4,800, with several stop hints and liquidity grabs creating false moves on both the bullish and bearish side. 

    Related Reading

    Despite these fluctuations, the $4,400 zone, which sits around the 200-day Moving Average (MA) on the 4-hour chart, continues to act as the key support level that stands between ETH and the $5,000 milestone. Daan Crypto Trades noted that this critical support is not just technical but also aligns with strong accumulation levels

    Source: Chart from Daan Crypto Trades on X

    The analyst highlighted that Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR) has been steadily adding to positions, though at a slightly lower pace as Net Asset Value (NAV) flows ease. This shows that as long as Ethereum can maintain its price above the $4,400 support level, buyers may remain in control. The chart clearly illustrates this battle for support. ETH’s dips below $4,500 have so far been short-lived, with price consistently bouncing back into the consolidation range. 

    This repeated defense strengthens the case for Ethereum to sustain its momentum and build the foundation for a run above $5,000. For now, patient accumulation within the consolidation zone appears to be the market’s strategy as the cryptocurrency gears up for a potential breakout once broader conditions align. 

    $5,000 Is Only A Matter Of Time

    In a follow-up analysis, Daan Crypto Trades reinforced his bullish view, noting that Ethereum is essentially in a “$5,000 waiting room.” The analyst’s chart highlights this view, showing ETH rebounding strongly after retesting the $4,400 region. With both the 200 MA and 200 EMA on the 4-hour chart acting as underlying support, the cryptocurrency’s structure appears intact despite short-term volatility. 

    Related Reading

    Daan Crypto Trades suggested that while a retest of $4,000 – $4,100 is still possible, the market is unlikely to sustain a breakdown below that zone as long as ETH holds $4,400. In other words, maintaining this critical support could pave the way for new all-time highs. 

    The chart also reflected the market’s resilience, with ETH rejecting the lows and quickly climbing back toward $4,600. Such a rebound often signals that bulls may be preparing for the next leg higher. If the momentum continues, Ethereum retesting its former all-time high of $4,868 and breaking above $5,000 may only be a matter of time.

    Ethereum
    ETH trading at $4,516 on the 1D chart | Source: ETHUSDT on Tradingview.com

    Featured image from Getty Images, chart from Tradingview.com

    [ad_2]

    Scott Matherson

    Source link

  • Banh Mi Cookoff 2025 Winners

    [ad_1]

    The sprawling metropolis of Houston has often been touted as one of the most diverse cities in the United States. And the diversity has spread even further in the region to areas south of the city such as Sugar Land and Missouri City. The immigrant population of Houston has not only brought demographic changes and cultural heterogeneity, but also an abundance of delicious cuisines.

    While West African dishes and Filipino food are starting to gain more attention, the large influx of Vietnamese immigrants to Houston over the past 50 years has created a booming culinary industry. No longer do adventurous diners have to travel to Old Chinatown or Alief to find pho or banh mi.

    While those areas and Katy Asiantown are still teeming with Vietnamese restaurants, many family-owned pho shops and banh mi eateries have popped up all over Houston’s suburbs. Though Vietnamese cuisine extends far beyond those two items, pho and banh mi have become popular eats for Houstonians.

    click to enlarge

    Van Academy inspires young people to success.

    Photo by Lorretta Ruggiero

    The first wave of Vietnamese immigrants came after the fall of Saigon in 1975 and there have been subsequent groups since then such as the “boat people” of Vietnam and Cambodia. While some people might consider the term derogatory, many of the immigrants did arrive by boats and ships, though the treacherous journey also meant that a large number of them did not make it. And those that made it safely, often faced racism and anti-immigrant attitudes in their new land.

    Boat People SOS originally began in the 1980s in San Diego as a a non-profit to aid refugees and protect their rights as asylum-seekers. It moved its services to Virginia before expanding to several other states and southeast Asia. In 2000, Boat People SOS-Houston Inc. was founded and its mission not only included helping refugees and immigrants with legal assistance and language services, but it also provided help to victims of human trafficking and domestic violence. Today its outreach includes senior citizen services as well as providing aid during natural disasters.

    click to enlarge

    Banh mi sandwiches are a local favorite.

    Photo by Lorretta Ruggiero

    And that history brings us to banh mi. The BPSOS has an annual Banh Mi Cookoff to raise funds for its various programs. This year’s event, held September 16, was number 9 for the foundation and brought together six talented chefs and their teams for the tasty throwdown.

    The competition was originally planned for the Pinstripes on Kirby, but after the venue unexpectedly closed, the event was moved to Lam Bo Ballroom off Westheimer. Despite the last-minute change, there was still a strong turnout.

    click to enlarge

    The Lam Bo Ballroom was the new venue for 2025.

    Photo by Lorretta Ruggiero

    The Houston Press was asked to help judge the event and this writer was the fortunate appointee. It was my second stint as a judge and the panel that served with me this year was an esteemed one. Lukkaew Srasrisuwan, chef and owner of acclaimed local restaurants Kin Dee, MaKiin and Thai Tail stood out as a culinary expert. She was joined by Danny Nguyen of Danny Nguyen Couture, sporting fabulous boots and a handlebar moustache. The last judge, Mama Mai, arrived a bit late due to a flight delay, and quickly grabbed the attention of the crowd who all seemed to know her. The mother of television host Jeannie Mai, Mama Mai has garnered her own following for her vibrant personality and humor. And everyone wanted a photo with her.

    click to enlarge

    The crackling on this pork belly was indeed special.

    Photo by Lorretta Ruggiero

    This year’s list of competitors was much smaller than 2023, when I had last judged. One team also dropped out at the last minute, but there were several other vendors providing bites to attendees besides the banh mi teams.

    Our first dish came from Lena’s Asian Kitchen and it was a pretty traditional version, except for the use of crispy pork belly, which owner Lena Le explained was usually reserved for special occasions and holidays. I loved the crackle of the pork skin and all of the elements worked well as a sandwich, but it didn’t have the sparkle of a competition dish. The addition of the hoisin ginger sauce was a yummy bonus, though. I was most impressed by Le’s representation of her business, which she said employs victims of domestic violence to help create the healthful meals for the kitchen’s home delivery service.

    click to enlarge

    A little less mushroom would have let the other flavors shine through.

    Photo by Lorretta Ruggiero

    The immigrant community was also well-represented by Van Houston Academy, a Vietnamese private school that hosts a number of international students. Our creator for the dish, Trinh, is the head chef at the school and is from Vietnam. He had a translator to describe the dish which was made with lemon grass chicken and used a mushroom spread instead of the typical pate. I loved the sweet, tender chicken and the vegetables inside. Unfortunately for me, the mushroom flavor was off-putting, almost overpowering the whole sandwich. I did eat the chicken with my fingers while no one was looking.

    The best part of the presentation was the reason that Trinh gave for his love of cooking. Apparently, it was almost out of necessity. His own father’s picky eating and his mother’s lack of prowess in the kitchen stirred in him a desire to get in the kitchen and cook his way.

    click to enlarge

    Darius King’s pepper jelly made a fan out of this writer.

    Photo by Lorretta Ruggiero

    Though we were receiving delicious sandwiches, we had yet to be wowed. That was until Darius King brought out his smoked pork rib version. The smell of the smoky meat wafted across the table as he made his presentation. The taste of the tender pork was a match for the mouth-watering aromas. King owns Candy Paint Preserve Co. and it was his own red pepper jelly that gave a slight heat to the sandwich along with the pork and pickled vegetables. It was a bit of a messy sandwich and I could have done with a little less of the black pepper mayo, but this banh mi was a fusion of the South meets Vietnam and it was my favorite.

    click to enlarge

    The pork was tasty but the presentation need a little extra.

    Photo by Lorretta Ruggiero

    Our next entry, on the other hand, was a bit underwhelming. It was brought to us by the team at Petit Beignets and Tapioca. It was served bruschetta-style, with shredded pork shoulder, super-thin slices of pickled carrot, jalapeno and a sprig of cilantro. The meat was delicious, but the other elements were barely perceptible. It was fine as a festival freebie, but as a competition entry, it seriously fell short. Located up north, off Highway 249, the restaurant gets great reviews for its boba, ramen and beignets, so maybe this was just a one-off.

    click to enlarge

    Judge Danny Nguyen gets a closer look at Drunken Lobster’s entry.

    Photo by Lorretta Ruggiero

    The next presentation, however, was spectacular. The crew at Drunken Lobster arrived at the judges’ table with a circular platter with banh mi bruschetta. There were slices of rolled pork and banh mi ingredients each in their own little jar, or decorating the platter. Though the judges’ servings were already composed, it looked like a BYOBanh mi party. For some judges, the presentation, complete with dry ice, put Drunken Lobster ahead of the rest of the competition. I was still sticking with King’s amazing pork rib version, but chef Cardin Nguyen’s creation delivered all the key components of a traditional banh mi in a creative way. And gave this writer an idea for her next cocktail party.

    click to enlarge

    Drunken Lobster impressed the judge’s with its creativity.

    Photo by Lorretta Ruggiero

    Our last entry was from Huynh’s Restaurant and delivered by Cindy Dang. She skipped the pork route and use prime ground beef instead. There was a lot going on with this sandwich and not all of it worked. She delivered the banh mi in a baguette, but also in a lettuce leaf. I don’t know the rules of the competition, but the bread itself was a distraction because it was soggy from the meat juices and pate butter. As a lettuce wrap, it would have been easier to taste all of the ingredients. Perhaps the baguette could have been added as croutons instead. The addition of the plastic pipette of soy sauce was cute and the choice of ground beef was different, but it wasn’t a solid choice for me. However, it was the People’s Choice, so who am I to question the people?

    One thing I did learn from that dish was not to taste chili garlic sauce by itself. I popped a seed right in my mouth and the numbness was immediate. Thankfully, one of the team members from Central Vietnam Coffee arrived just in time with a sample of its Vietnamese coffee. The sweet and milky beverage helped to quell the heat.

    click to enlarge

    This is one we missed.

    Photo by Lorretta Ruggiero

    Afterwards, we judges headed out to try some of the other dishes. Unfortunately, thanks to the successful turnout, everything was pretty much gone. There was a curry I was eyeing earlier and a pork jerky that I am very sorry I missed. However, I was grateful for all the flavorful food that I had been kindly presented and the interesting people that I met.

    click to enlarge

    Participants “mingle”.

    Photo by Lorretta Ruggiero

    There were a lot of young people at the event, both volunteers and attendees, which was inspiring to see. In a time of uncertainty and fear for so many communities, it is up to the youth to honor the legacies and struggles of their ancestors and families by continuing their mission. 

    I, for one, believe they can do it.

    BPSOS Banh Mi Cookoff Winners:

    Judges’ Choice 1st Place: Drunken Lobster
    Judges’ Choice 2nd Place: Darius King (Candy Paint Preserve Co.)

    People’s Choice 1st Place: Huynh’s Restaurant
    People’s Choice 2nd Place: Drunken Lobster

    [ad_2]

    Lorretta Ruggiero

    Source link

  • Analysts Keep Raising Shopify’s Targets – Make a 3.0% Yield in One-Month SHOP OTM Puts

    [ad_1]

    Analysts continue to raise their revenue and stock price targets for Shopify, Inc. (SHOP). Its new target price is 20% higher. This article will demonstrate how to achieve a 3.0% yield by shorting one-month away SHOP puts at a 4% out-of-the-money strike price.

    SHOP closed at $146.82 on Friday, Sept. 5, with a $191.274 billion market cap. That is well over my prior target price of $137 at a 178 billion market valuation.

    SHOP stock – last 3 months – Barchart – As of Sept. 5, 2025

    This can be seen in my July 13 Barchart article, just after its Q2 earnings release (“Shopify Stock is a Bargain – How to Make a 3.2% One-Month Yield with SHOP).

    Since then, Shopify delivered strong Q2 results on Aug. 6. This article will update our prior target price based on its strong free cash flow (FCF) and FCF margins.

    Shopify, which competes more and more with Amazon (AMZN) in the third-party online seller space, said its Q2 revenue rose 31% to $2.68 billion from $2.045 billion a year ago.

    Moreover, its free cash flow (FCF), which is what is left over after all cash expenses, net working capital changes, and even capex spending, rose by +$26.7% to $422 million.

    That means that, as a percent of revenue, its FCF represented 15.75% of sales (which Shopify rounds up to 16%) compared to 15.38% last quarter and 16.3% last year.

    Shopify Q2 FCF and FCF margins page 6 of Q2 earnings release
    Shopify Q2 FCF and FCF margins page 6 of Q2 earnings release

    That implies that the company is continuing to squeeze out good amounts of cash from its operations, even as sales keep rising.

    Keep in mind that during Q4, Shopify tends to make significantly higher FCF margins during the Christmas season.

    For example, last Q4, its FCF margin was 21.73%, according to Stock Analysis. As a result, its look-back trailing 12 months (TTM) FCF margin as of Q2 was 18.14%, based on Stock Analysis data. In Q1, its TTM FCF margin was slightly higher at 18.42%.

    As a result, assuming the next Q4 margin will rise, we can use an 18.5% FCF margin to forecast its next 12 months (NTM) free cash flow.

    Analysts now project 2025 sales will be $11.26 billion (up from $10.88 billion in my prior Barchart article). Moreover, the 2026 sales forecast is now $13.75 billion, up from $13.11 billion.

    That implies that Shopify’s next 12 months (NTM) revenue will be on a run rate of $12.505 billion (up from $12.0 billion in my prior article).

    So, applying the 18.5% FCF margin:

     $12.505 billion NTM sales x 18.5% FCF margin = $2.3134 billion FCF NTM

    [ad_2]

    Source link