ReportWire

Tag: Illegal immigration

  • Immigration experts share how to push back against Trump’s actions

    [ad_1]

    MARBLEHEAD — A panel of local immigration experts shared how people can push back against President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown, including donating to legal defense funds for immigrants or volunteering to accompany local immigrants to court hearings.

    During a panel discussion on immigration enforcement Tuesday night, experts said people can also challenge local police departments’ use of security technology from companies such as Flock Security, which allows Immigration and Customs Enforcement to access license plate data collected by local law enforcement.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“*6D[ E9:D 😀 23@FE :>>:8C2?ED 3FE H6 2C6 E96 42?2CJ 😕 E96 >:?6[” D2:5 A2?6=:DE 2?5 $2=6> C6D:56?E p=6I2?5C2 !:ñ6C@D$9:6=5D[ 2? 2DD@4:2E6 AC@76DD@C 2E qC2?56:D &?:G6CD:EJ’D %96 w6==6C $49@@=] “(92E 😀 92AA6?:?8 E@ :>>:8C2?ED 😀 2 H2C?:?8 D:8? 23@FE E96 E@I:4:EJ @7 E96 >:?6] %9:D H@C< 😀 23@FE E96 4@?5:E:@?D @7 @FC 56>@4C24J]”k^Am

    kAm!:ñ6C@D$9:6=5D[ H9@ E62496D 4=2DD6D @? AF3=:4 A@=:4J 2?5 :>>:8C2E:@?[ H2D @?6 @7 D6G6C2= A2?6=:DED 2E |2C3=69625’D ~=5 }@CE9 r9FC49 7@C 2? 6G6?E E:E=65 “qF:=5:?8 r@>>F?:EJ !@H6C 😕 E96 }6H xrt p86]” $96 2?5 @E96CD D92C65 ?@E @?=J 9@H A6@A=6 42? 96=A E96:C :>>:8C2?E ?6:893@CD[ 3FE 2=D@ 9@H %CF>A’D A@=:4J 492?86D 92G6 D6G6C6=J 9:?56C65 @C 6G6? 92=E65 E96 A2E9 E@ 4:E:K6?D9:A 7@C >:==:@?D @7 A6@A=6]k^Am

    kAms6DA:E6 E96 25>:?:DEC2E:@?’D 2DDFC2?46 E92E xrt 286?ED 2C6 E2C86E:?8 :>>:8C2?ED H9@ 2C6 4C:>:?2=D[ EH@E9:C5D @7 :>>:8C2?ED 😕 &]$] 4FDE@5J 5@ ?@E 92G6 4C:>:?2= 4@?G:4E:@?D[ D2:5 A2?6=:DE 2?5 =@42= :>>:8C2E:@? 2EE@C?6J s:2?? $=2G:E]k^Am

    kAm%96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 92D >256 :E >@C6 5:77:4F=E 7@C F?244@>A2?:65 >:?@CD 😕 xrt 4FDE@5J E@ 36 C6=62D65 E@ E96:C C6=2E:G6D’ 4FDE@5J[ 2?5 :>A=6>6?E65 2 >@C6 5:77:4F=E 4:E:K6?D9:A E6DE 😕 ~4E@36C[ D96 ?@E65]k^Am

    kAm~77:4:2=D 2=D@ 92G6 A=2?D E@ C6G6E E96 ?62C=J a__[___ C67F866D 2==@H65 :?E@ E96 4@F?ECJ F?56C E96 q:56? 25>:?:DEC2E:@?[ 244@C5:?8 E@ %96 pDD@4:2E65 !C6DD] %CF>A 92D =:>:E65 E96 2??F2= 42A @7 C67F866D 25>:EE65 :?E@ E96 &]$] E@ f[d__[ H:E9 AC:@C:EJ 8:G6? E@ H9:E6 $@FE9 p7C:42?D]k^Am

    kAmxrt 😀 ?@H 2==@H65 E@ 56E2:? 2?5 56A@CE G:4E:>D @7 9F>2? EC277:4<:?8 H9@ 92G6 A6?5:?8 2AA=:42E:@?D 7@C 2DJ=F> DE2EFD] pD @7 y2?] a`[ E96 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 92D 2=D@ DFDA6?565 :>>:8C2E:@? G:D2D 7@C fd 4@F?EC:6D[ :?4=F5:?8 p7892?D H9@ 2:565 &]$] EC@@AD 5FC:?8 E96 p7892?:DE2? (2C]k^Am

    kAm“|2?J @7 E96> 92G6 2=C625J 8@?6 E9C@F89 E96 2DJ=F> AC@46DD[ 2?5 E96:C 72>:=:6D 2C6 😕 52?86C[” $=2G:E D2:5] “x C6>6>36C @?6 4=:6?E H96C6 E96 %2=:32? G:D:ED E96 72>:=J @?46 2 H66<[ 2?5 ?@H E96J’C6 ?@E 6G6? 2==@H65 E@ 4@>6 @G6C]”k^Am

    kAm“W%CF>AX 😀 24E:G6=J E2<:?8 2H2J =682= DE2EFD[” !:ñ6C@D$9:6=5D D2:5] “w6’D E2=<:?8 23@FE :==682=:EJ[ 3FE 96’D 24EF2==J 4C62E:?8 >@C6 :==682=:EJ[ 3642FD6 E96D6 A6@A=6 925 DE2EFD6D]”k^Am

    kAmp3@FE `c >:==:@? F?5@4F>6?E65 :>>:8C2?ED 92G6 2AA=:42E:@?D 36:?8 AC@46DD65 E@ @3E2:? =682= DE2EFD[ $=2G:E D2:5] $96 25565 E92E :E 😀 96C 5FEJ 2D 2? 2EE@C?6J E@ AC@E64E E96D6 A6@A=6 7C@> “>62? DA:C:E65[ F?72:C[ :==682= :>>:8C2E:@? AC24E:46D]k^Am

    kAm“%9C@F89 6I64FE:G6 @C56C[ :>>:8C2?ED H9@ 92G6 5@?6 6G6CJE9:?8 C:89E[ 7@==@H65 2== E96 CF=6D[ ?@H E96J’C6 36:?8 9F?E65 5@H? =:<6 4@>>@? 4C:>:?2=D 2?5 >2J ?@E 92G6 2 492?46 2E 86EE:?8 32:=[” $=2G:E D2:5]k^Am

    kAmxrt 😀 2=D@ >@G:?8 :>>:8C2?ED :E 92D 😕 4FDE@5J E@ 5:776C6?E DE2E6D[ >2<:?8 :E 92C56C 7@C :>>:8C2E:@? 2EE@C?6JD E@ 5676?5 E96:C 4=:6?ED[ D2:5 A2?6=:DE }2?4J }@C>2?[ 2? :>>:8C2E:@? 2EE@C?6J H9@ DA64:2=:K6D 😕 4@>A=6I 56A@CE2E:@? 42D6D]k^Am

    kAm“(6’C6 ?@E DE2?5:?8 DE:==[” }@C>2? D2:5] “(6 2C6 7:89E:?8 324<[ 3FE F?56CDE2?5:?8 E92E H6 42? @?=J 7:89E H:E9:? E96 4@?7:?6D @7 E96 =2H]”k^Am

    kAm%92E’D H9J :E 😀 D@ :>A@CE2?E E@ 42== =68:D=2E@CD @? r2A:E@= w:== 2?5 q624@? w:== 2?5 25G@42E6 282:?DE C646?E 492?86D @C 3:==D E92E AC@E64E :>>:8C2?ED’ C:89ED[ !:ñ6C@D$9:6=5D D2:5]k^Am

    kAm!6@A=6 42? E2<6 A2CE 😕 DJ>3@=:4 24E:@?D =:<6 AC@E6DED[ D:E:?D 2?5 @E96C 56>@?DEC2E:@?D E@ AFD9 7@C 2 ?2CC2E:G6 492?86 2C@F?5 :>>:8C2E:@?[ 6:E96C @FED:56 xrt 56E6?E:@? 46?E6CD =:<6 E96 @?6 😕 qFC=:?8E@? @C H96C6 =2HD 2C6 A2DD65[ D96 D2:5]k^Am

    kAms@?2E:@?D 42? 36 >256 E@ =682= 5676?D6 7F?5D 2?5 7F?5C2:D6CD 7@C 72>:=:6D 27764E65 3J xrt 2CC6DED E9C@F89 E96 x>>:8C2?E yFDE:46 }6EH@C< @7 |2DD249FD6EED[ @C {&rt[ 2?5 D:>:=2C @C82?:K2E:@?D]k^Am

    kAm%96D6 @C82?:K2E:@?D ?665 G@=F?E66CD E@@[ :?4=F5:?8 E96 $2=6>32D65 (6=4@>6 x>>:8C2?E }6EH@C<[ E96 q@DE@? x>>:8C2?E yFDE:46 p44@>A2?:>6?E }6EH@C< 2?5 !px# !C@;64E[ H9:49 AC@G:56D =682= DFAA@CE]k^Am

    kAm{&rt 2=D@ ?665D G@=F?E66CD E@ G6C:7J :7 xrt 286?ED 2C6 @? E96 }@CE9 $9@C6 2?5 CF? 2 9@E=:?6 7@C =@42= C6A@CED @7 xrt 286?ED]k^Am

    kAm~? E96 >F?:4:A2= =6G6=[ C6D:56?ED 42? 25G@42E6 7@C E96:C 4:EJ @C E@H? 8@G6C?>6?E E@ >2<6 D2?4EF2CJ @C5:?2?46D @C AC@>:D6D ?@E E@ 2DD:DE xrt[ =:<6 H92E q6G6C=J C646?E=J 5:5] {@42= 2?5 DE2E6 A@=:46 56A2CE>6?ED 😕 |2DD249FD6EED 2C6 ?@E =682==J 2==@H65 E@ >2<6 2CC6DED D@=6=J 32D65 @? :>>:8C2E:@? DE2EFD[ 3FE >F?:4:A2=:E:6D 42? A=6586 E@ ?@E 2==@H xrt E@ FD6 >F?:4:A2= AC@A6CE:6D E@ DE286 7@C @A6C2E:@?D]k^Am

    kAm“sFC:?8 %CF>A’D 7:CDE 25>:?:DEC2E:@?[ H6 H@C<65 C62==J 92C5 E@ 4C62E6 2 =:?6 36EH66? @FC =2H 6?7@C46>6?E 2?5 xrt[” !:ñ6C@D$9:6=5D D2:5] “%96 r@?DE:EFE:@? 😀 G6CJ 4=62C E92E E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?E 42??@E 7@C46 DE2E6D E@ 5@ E96 H@C< @7 E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?E[ 2?5 😕 E96 r@?DE:EFE:@?[ W:>>:8C2E:@?X 😀 2 7656C2= 7F?4E:@?[ ?@E 2 DE2E6 7F?4E:@?]k^Am

    kAm“!@=:46 5@?’E 92G6 E@ 5@ :>>:8C2E:@? W6?7@C46>6?EX 3FE D@>6E:>6D A@=:46 56A2CE>6?ED H2?E E@ 5@ :>>:8C2E:@? 6?7@C46>6?E[ 2?5 H6 ?665 E@ AC6G6?E E92E 7C@> 92AA6?:?8 3642FD6 E96J’C6 ?@E DFAA@D65 E@]”k^Am

    kAmr@?E24E r2C@=:?6 t?@D 2E k6>mk2 9C67lQ>2:=E@irt?@Do?@CE9@73@DE@?]4@>Qmrt?@Do?@CE9@73@DE@?]4@>k^2mk^6>m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Caroline Enos | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Immigration experts share how locals can push back against Trump’s actions

    [ad_1]

    MARBLEHEAD — A panel of local immigration experts shared ways people can push back against President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown, including donating to legal defense funds for immigrants or volunteering to accompany local immigrants to court hearings.

    During a panel discussion on immigration enforcement Tuesday night, experts said citizens can also challenge local police departments’ use of security technology from companies like Flock Security, which allows Immigration and Customs Enforcement to access license plate data collected by local law enforcement.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“*6D E9:D 😀 23@FE :>>:8C2?ED[ 3FE H6 2C6 E96 42?2CJ 😕 E96 >:?6[” D2:5 A2?6=:DE 2?5 $2=6> C6D:56?E p=6I2?5C2 !:ñ6C@D$9:6=5D[ 2? 2DD@4:2E6 AC@76DD@C 2E qC2?56:D &?:G6CD:EJ’D %96 w6==6C $49@@=] “(92E 😀 92AA6?:?8 E@ :>>:8C2?ED 😀 2 H2C?:?8 D:8? 23@FE E96 E@I:4:EJ @7 E96 >:?6] %9:D H@C< 😀 23@FE E96 4@?5:E:@?D @7 @FC 56>@4C24J]”k^Am

    kAm!:ñ6C@D$9:6=5D[ H9@ E62496D 4=2DD6D @? AF3=:4 A@=:4J 2?5 :>>:8C2E:@?[ H2D @?6 @7 D6G6C2= A2?6=:DED 2E |2C3=69625’D ~=5 }@CE9 r9FC49 7@C 2? 6G6?E E:E=65 “qF:=5:?8 r@>>F?:EJ !@H6C 😕 E96 }6H xrt p86]” $96 2?5 @E96CD D92C65 ?@E @?=J 9@H A6@A=6 42? 96=A E96:C :>>:8C2?E ?6:893@CD[ 3FE 2=D@ 9@H %CF>A’D A@=:4J 492?86D 92G6 D6G6C6=J 9:?56C65 @C 6G6? 92=E65 E96 A2E9 E@ 4:E:K6?D9:A 7@C >:==:@?D @7 A6@A=6]k^Am

    kAms6DA:E6 E96 25>:?:DEC2E:@?’D 2DDFC2?46 E92E xrt 286?ED 2C6 E2C86E:?8 :>>:8C2?ED H9@ 2C6 4C:>:?2=D[ EH@E9:C5D @7 :>>:8C2?ED 😕 &]$] 4FDE@5J 4FCC6?E=J 5@ ?@E 92G6 4C:>:?2= 4@?G:4E:@?D[ D2:5 A2?6=:DE 2?5 =@42= :>>:8C2E:@? 2EE@C?6J s:2?? $=2G:E]k^Am

    kAm%96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 92D >256 :E >@C6 5:77:4F=E 7@C F?244@>A2?:65 >:?@CD H9@ 2C6 😕 xrt 4FDE@5J E@ 36 C6=62D65 :?E@ E96:C C6=2E:G6D’ 4FDE@5J[ 2?5 :>A=6>6?E65 2 >@C6 5:77:4F=E 4:E:K6?D9:A E6DE 😕 ~4E@36C[ D96 ?@E65]k^Am

    kAm~77:4:2=D 2=D@ 92G6 A=2?D E@ C6G6E E96 ?62C=J a__[___ C67F866D H9@ H6C6 2==@H65 :?E@ E96 4@F?ECJ F?56C E96 q:56? 25>:?:DEC2E:@?[ 244@C5:?8 E@ p! }6HD C6A@CED] %CF>A 92D =:>:E65 E96 2??F2= 42A @7 C67F866D 25>:EE65 :?E@ E96 &]$] E@ f[d__[ H:E9 2 AC:@C:EJ 7@C H9:E6 $@FE9 p7C:42?D]k^Am

    kAmxrt 😀 ?@H 2==@H65 E@ 56E2:? 2?5 56A@CE G:4E:>D @7 9F>2? EC277:4<:?8 H9@ 92G6 A6?5:?8 2AA=:42E:@?D 7@C 2DJ=F> DE2EFD] pD @7 y2?] a`[ E96 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 92D 2=D@ DFDA6?565 :>>:8C2E:@? G:D2D 7@C fd 4@F?EC:6D[ :?4=F5:?8 p7892?D H9@ 2:565 &]$] EC@@AD 5FC:?8 E96 p7892?:DE2? (2C]k^Am

    kAm“|2?J @7 E96> 92G6 2=C625J 8@?6 E9C@F89 E96 2DJ=F> AC@46DD[ 2?5 E96:C 72>:=:6D 2C6 😕 52?86C[” $=2G:E D2:5] “x C6>6>36C @?6 4=:6?E H96C6 E96 %2=:32? G:D:ED E96 72>:=J @?46 2 H66<[ 2?5 ?@H E96J’C6 ?@E 6G6? 2==@H65 E@ 4@>6 @G6C]”k^Am

    kAm“W%CF>AX 😀 24E:G6=J E2<:?8 2H2J =682= DE2EFD[” !:ñ6C@D$9:6=5D D2:5] “w6’D E2=<:?8 23@FE :==682=:EJ[ 3FE 96’D 24EF2==J 4C62E:?8 >@C6 :==682=:EJ[ 3642FD6 E96D6 A6@A=6 925 DE2EFD6D]”k^Am

    kAmp3@FE `c >:==:@? F?5@4F>6?E65 :>>:8C2?ED 92G6 2AA=:42E:@?D 36:?8 AC@46DD65 E@ @3E2:? =682= DE2EFD[ $=2G:E D2:5] $96 25565 E92E :E 😀 96C 5FEJ 2D 2? 2EE@C?6J E@ AC@E64E E96D6 A6@A=6 7C@> “>62? DA:C:E65[ F?72:C[ :==682= :>>:8C2E:@? AC24E:46D]k^Am

    kAm“%9C@F89 6I64FE:G6 @C56C[ :>>:8C2?ED H9@ 92G6 5@?6 6G6CJE9:?8 C:89E[ 7@==@H65 2== E96 CF=6D[ ?@H E96J’C6 36:?8 9F?E65 5@H? =:<6 4@>>@? 4C:>:?2=D 2?5 >2J ?@E 92G6 2 492?46 2E 86EE:?8 32:=[” $=2G:E D2:5]k^Am

    kAmxrt 😀 2=D@ >@G:?8 :>>:8C2?ED :E 92D 😕 4FDE@5J E@ 5:776C6?E DE2E6D[ >2<:?8 :E 92C56C 7@C :>>:8C2E:@? 2EE@C?6JD E@ 5676?5 E96:C 4=:6?ED[ D2:5 A2?6=:DE }2?4J }@C>2?[ 2? :>>:8C2E:@? 2EE@C?6J H9@ DA64:2=:K6D 😕 4@>A=6I 56A@CE2E:@? 42D6D]k^Am

    kAm“(6’C6 ?@E DE2?5:?8 DE:==[” }@C>2? D2:5] “(6 2C6 7:89E:?8 324<[ 3FE F?56CDE2?5:?8 E92E H6 42? @?=J 7:89E H:E9:? E96 4@?7:?6D @7 E96 =2H]”k^Am

    kAm%92E’D H9J :E 😀 D@ :>A@CE2?E E@ 42== =68:D=2E@CD @? r2A:E@= w:== 2?5 q624@? w:== 2?5 25G@42E6 282:?DE C646?E 492?86D @C 3:==D E92E AC@E64E :>>:8C2?ED’ C:89ED[ !:ñ6C@D$9:6=5D D2:5]k^Am

    kAm!6@A=6 42? E2<6 A2CE 😕 DJ>3@=:4 24E:@?D =:<6 AC@E6DED[ D:E:?D 2?5 @E96C 56>@?DEC2E:@?D E@ AFD9 7@C 2 ?2CC2E:G6 492?86 2C@F?5 :>>:8C2E:@?[ 6:E96C @FED:56 xrt 56E6?E:@? 46?E6CD =:<6 E96 @?6 😕 qFC=:?8E@? @C H96C6 =2HD 2C6 A2DD65[ D96 D2:5]k^Am

    kAms@?2E:@?D 42? 36 >256 E@ =682= 5676?D6 7F?5D 2?5 7F?5C2:D6CD 7@C 72>:=:6D 27764E65 3J xrt 2CC6DED E9C@F89 E96 x>>:8C2?E yFDE:46 }6EH@C< @7 |2DD249FD6EED W{&rtX 2?5 D:>:=2C @C82?:K2E:@?D]k^Am

    kAm%96D6 @C82?:K2E:@?D ?665 G@=F?E66CD E@@[ :?4=F5:?8 E96 $2=6>32D65 (6=4@>6 x>>:8C2?E }6EH@C<[ E96 q@DE@? x>>:8C2?E yFDE:46 p44@>A2?:>6?E }6EH@C< 2?5 !px# !C@;64E[ H9:49 AC@G:56D =682= DFAA@CE]k^Am

    kAm{&rt 2=D@ ?665D G@=F?E66CD E@ G6C:7J :7 xrt 286?ED 2C6 @? E96 }@CE9 $9@C6 2?5 CF? 2 9@E=:?6 7@C =@42= C6A@CED @7 xrt 286?ED]k^Am

    kAm~? E96 >F?:4:A2= =6G6=[ C6D:56?ED 42? 25G@42E6 7@C E96:C 4:EJ @C E@H? 8@G6C?>6?E E@ >2<6 D2?4EF2CJ @C5:?2?46D @C AC@>:D6D ?@E E@ 2DD:DE xrt[ =:<6 H92E q6G6C=J C646?E=J 5:5] {@42= 2?5 DE2E6 A@=:46 56A2CE>6?ED 😕 |2DD249FD6EED 2C6 ?@E =682==J 2==@H65 E@ >2<6 2CC6DED D@=6=J 32D65 @? :>>:8C2E:@? DE2EFD[ 3FE >F?:4:A2=:E:6D 42? A=6586 E@ ?@E 2==@H xrt E@ FD6 >F?:4:A2= AC@A6CE:6D E@ DE286 7@C @A6C2E:@?D]k^Am

    kAm“sFC:?8 %CF>A’D 7:CDE 25>:?:DEC2E:@?[ H6 H@C<65 C62==J 92C5 E@ 4C62E6 2 =:?6 36EH66? @FC =2H 6?7@C46>6?E 2?5 xrt[” !:ñ6C@D$9:6=5D D2:5] “%96 r@?DE:EFE:@? 😀 G6CJ 4=62C E92E E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?E 42??@E 7@C46 DE2E6D E@ 5@ E96 H@C< @7 E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?E[ 2?5 😕 E96 r@?DE:EFE:@?[ W:>>:8C2E:@?X 😀 2 7656C2= 7F?4E:@?[ ?@E 2 DE2E6 7F?4E:@?]k^Am

    kAm“!@=:46 5@?’E 92G6 E@ 5@ :>>:8C2E:@? W6?7@C46>6?EX 3FE D@>6E:>6D A@=:46 56A2CE>6?ED H2?E E@ 5@ :>>:8C2E:@? 6?7@C46>6?E[ 2?5 H6 ?665 E@ AC6G6?E E92E 7C@> 92AA6?:?8 3642FD6 E96J’C6 ?@E DFAA@D65 E@]”k^Am

    kAmk6>mr@?E24E r2C@=:?6 t?@D 2Ek^6>m k6>mk2 9C67lQ>2:=E@irt?@Do?@CE9@73@DE@?]4@>Qmrt?@Do?@CE9@73@DE@?]4@>k^2mk^6>m k6>m]k^6>mk^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Caroline Enos | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Is Trump Losing the Plot? There’s Still Time To Fix It | RealClearPolitics

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump did not win the 2024 election because America suddenly became meaningfully more Republican.

    He won because voters, many of them independents and crossover Democrats, many of them young, had lost trust in the system and believed he was willing to confront it. In our (Rasmussen) final 2024 polling, 42% of Trump’s electorate came from independents and Democrats. That is not a MAGA monoculture. It is a fragile coalition built on one thing: accountability.

    Voters did not elect Trump to manage decline. They elected him to fix things that were not working. That is why DOGE mattered. For a brief moment, it validated what Americans, particularly younger voters, already believed: that the federal government is bloated, corrupt, self-dealing, and largely insulated from consequences. Under-40 voters, the most disillusioned cohort by many measures, were the most supportive of DOGE, the most open to arrests for corruption, and the most likely to agree with the statement that “he who saves his country violates no laws” (57%).

    Trump’s approval among voters under 40 briefly hit 60% almost exactly when Google search interest in DOGE peaked. That alignment should have frozen Republican politics in Washington in place. Instead, DOGE was quietly sidelined, and Trump’s approval among younger voters has since fallen sharply into the low 40s. That is not coincidence. It is a signal.

    Rather than doubling down on systemic accountability, the last few months have felt unfocused, with counter-signaling on affordability and jobs, infighting, the Epstein saga, renewed foreign entanglements, and a governing posture that feels reactive rather than intentional. Voters are noticing.

    Despite Trump’s unsurprising personal approval rating today (net -7), the Democratic lead on the generic ballot has steadily widened to D+6. That should set off alarms. The November 2024 election was Trumpy, not Republican, and off-cycle special elections continue to reinforce that reality. Momentum, enthusiasm, and turnout are not automatic for Republicans.

    The Republican Party has not helped. Its legislative output is thin. Its ability to deliver tangible wins is questionable. Even the bare minimum – serious accountability investigations – has largely failed to materialize. There is no clear path to a 2026 victory if this continues, which is why what happened in Minnesota mattered so much.

    The discovery of rampant alleged fraud in Minnesota was a gift. It offered a rare opportunity to shift the national conversation away from Republican dysfunction and toward something Americans overwhelmingly agree on. Three-quarters of voters are angry about the level of waste, fraud, and abuse in the federal government. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has cited figures as high as $300 to $600 billion annually. That is not budget trimming. That is empire-fatal kleptocracy.

    This was the moment for a full-scale, anti-blue-state fraud push. Follow the money. Subpoena everything. Make examples. Send every agency in, even the 80,000 armed IRS agents we should have fired. If fraud is that widespread, maybe austerity is not the answer. Maybe arrests are.

    Instead, the focus shifted.

    ICE was surged into Minneapolis. What could have been a systemic fraud investigation became a performative deportation spectacle. Predictable protests followed. Then escalation: more ICE presence, masks, tear gas, aggressive enforcement. Within days, the headlines were no longer about uncovering fraud. They were about clashes, optics, and ultimately the tragic shooting deaths of two protesters.

    The ICE red meat might be cathartic for some. But politically effective, no.

    Our polling has been consistent for years on this point. Americans want illegal immigration stopped. That is not in dispute. They want criminals deported. They want the border enforced. But they also want fairness, not brutality, and they recoil when enforcement looks indiscriminate, theatrical, or excessive.

    A plurality of Americans now say ICE tactics are too harsh, even while still supporting deportation in principle. That tension is not ideological. It is emotional.

    Trump made matters worse by signaling a narrowing of deportations to only the “worst criminals,” while simultaneously negotiating with Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, who reportedly has an active criminal referral at the Department of Justice. To many in Trump’s coalition, this likely feels like a rug pull, as my barrage of private X messages imply. A betrayal of expectations. Something uncomfortably close to “read my lips.”

    Here is what should worry the White House most: Voters trust big business almost as little as they trust the federal government itself. By a five-to-one margin, voters say businesses have too much influence in the Trump administration, not too little. 

    Americans do not just want illegal immigrants removed. They want the hiring magnet destroyed. They overwhelmingly support punishing companies that employ illegal labor. That policy outperforms Trump’s personal approval by nearly 30 net points. It is not even close.

    So the obvious question follows: What is stopping this administration from going after the employers?  Likewise, a federal E-Verify mandate is ridiculously popular. Why have Republicans been unable to pluck this low-hanging fruit?

    Is it donor pressure? Fear of market volatility? Is Trump, the tribune of the forgotten voter, being restrained by plutocratic interests? From the outside, it increasingly looks that way.

    There was a clean path forward. Keep DOGE front and center. Launch relentless investigations into blue-state fraud hubs. Hammer corporate lawbreaking and worker exploitation. Restore trust through accountability. Instead, the administration chose theatrics over results, and is paying the price politically.

    This can still be fixed, but only if Trump remembers why he was elected. Not to manage the system. Not to appease donors. Not to chase viral moments. Make the System Fear Consequences Again.

    Americans are not asking for chaos.

    They are asking for justice.

    And they are still waiting.

    Mark Mitchell is the head pollster at Rasmussen Reports.

    [ad_2]

    Mark Mitchell, RealClearPolitics

    Source link

  • Woman Shot By Border Patrol Officer In Portland Gets Probation For Illegal Entry – KXL

    [ad_1]

    PORTLAND, OR – The woman shot in the chest by a Border Patrol officer during a traffic stop in Portland earlier this month pleaded guilty Thursday to illegally entering the United States and was sentenced to a year of probation.

    Yorlenys Betzabeth Zambrano-Contreras, 32, appeared by video from an immigration detention center in Tacoma, Washington, for a hearing in federal court in Portland. Under a negotiated agreement, she will remain out of custody in Oregon while on probation.

    Zambrano-Contreras pleaded guilty to improper entry by an alien, a misdemeanor. The case was initially filed in Texas, but she waived her right to appear there for prosecution.

    Her defense attorney, Conor Huseby, said Zambrano-Contreras crossed the border in 2023 while seeking a better life for herself and her child amid long delays at ports of entry. Speaking through a Spanish-language interpreter, Zambrano-Contreras told the judge she had no place to live or work and crossed with a large group of people without inspection.

    Prosecutors said Zambrano-Contreras entered the U.S. from Mexico in September 2023 near the Paso Del Norte port of entry in Texas. She was detained by Border Patrol, then released due to lack of space and ordered to report to immigration authorities in Portland, which she did not do. Her immigration court hearing is scheduled for June 1, 2028.

    U.S. Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman ordered Zambrano-Contreras to undergo location monitoring during probation and comply with an initial nightly curfew. She was also barred from areas where prostitution occurs and warned she could be arrested if she violates probation conditions.

    Zambrano-Contreras was wounded Jan. 8 while sitting in the front passenger seat of a red Toyota Tacoma that was stopped by Border Patrol officers in a Southeast Portland medical office parking lot. Authorities say the driver, Luis David Niño-Moncada, rammed a federal vehicle and struck an officer with the truck. An officer then fired two shots into the vehicle, wounding both the driver and Zambrano-Contreras.

    Niño-Moncada, 33, later drove to an apartment complex and called 911. He has pleaded not guilty to aggravated assault of a federal officer and damaging federal property and remains in custody.

    Federal officials have alleged Zambrano-Contreras was the target of the stop and linked to a prostitution ring tied to the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang, but she has not been charged in connection with any prostitution activity or prior shooting. She is expected to be a witness in the case against Niño-Moncada.

    More about:

    [ad_2]

    Tim Lantz

    Source link

  • Immigration officials allow suspect in $100 million Southern California jewelry heist to self deport, avoiding trial

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES  — Federal immigration authorities allowed a suspect in a $100 million jewelry heist believed to be the largest in U.S. history to deport himself to South America in December, a move that stunned and upset prosecutors who were planning to try the case and send him to prison.

    Jeson Nelon Presilla Flores was one of seven people charged last year with stalking an armored truck to a rural freeway rest stop north of Los Angeles and stealing millions worth of diamonds, emeralds, gold, rubies and designer watches in 2022.

    Flores faced up to 15 years in federal prison if convicted on charges of conspiracy to commit theft from interstate and foreign shipment and theft from interstate and foreign shipment. He pleaded not guilty to the charges.

    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement deported Flores in late December after he requested voluntary departure, prosecutors said in court filings.

    ICE did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.

    Flores’ attorney, John D. Robertson, motioned to dismiss the indictment against his client, asking for the charges to be permanently dropped and the case closed.

    Federal prosecutors oppose the motion and say they still hope to bring Flores to trial, asking for charges to be dropped “without prejudice” to keep the door open for criminal prosecution in the future.

    Despite Flores being a lawful permanent resident and released on bail, he was taken into ICE custody in September, according to court filings from his defense attorneys. Federal prosecutors say they were unaware Flores had an immigration detainer.

    This was a violation of his criminal prosecution rights and warrants his case getting dismissed, Robertson said in his motion.

    Flores opted for deportation to Chile during a Dec. 16 immigration hearing, according to court documents. The judge denied his voluntary departure application but issued a final order of removal, and he was sent to Ecuador.

    “Prosecutors are supposed to allow the civil immigration process to play out independently while criminal charges are pending,” federal prosecutors wrote in their motion opposing the case dismissal. “That is exactly what they did in this case — unwittingly to defendant’s benefit in that he will now avoid trial, and any potential conviction and sentence, unless and until he returns to the United States.”

    What happened to Flores is extremely unusual, especially in a case of this significance, former federal prosecutor Laurie Levenson said.

    Ordinarily, if a criminal defendant had immigration proceedings against them — which is common — immigration officials would inform prosecutors what was happening. In minor cases, a defendant can sometimes choose to self-deport in lieu of prosecution.

    “It’s just beyond me how they would deport him without the prosecutors … being in on the conversation,” Levenson said. “This really was the left hand not knowing what the right hand was doing.”

    The infamous jewelry heist unfolded in July 2022 after the suspects scouted the Brink’s tractor-trailer leaving an international jewelry show near San Francisco with dozens of bags of jewels, according to the indictment. While the victims reported more than $100 million in losses, Brink’s said the stolen items were worth less than $10 million.

    A lawsuit filed by the Brink’s security company said one of the drivers was asleep inside the big rig and the other was getting food inside the rest stop when the thieves broke in.

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • U.K. Follows Europe and U.S. in Crackdown on Asylum Seekers

    [ad_1]

    LONDON—The U.K. government on Monday announced an overhaul of its immigration policy to deter asylum seekers from arriving on British shores, the latest European nation to tighten rules in response to growing dissatisfaction from voters at levels of illegal immigration.

    The Labour government of Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced a suite of policies including changing laws to make it easier to expel migrants, quadrupling the length of time they have to wait to become permanent residents to 20 years and regularly reviewing whether their home countries have become safer and can take them back.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    Max Colchester

    Source link

  • The Liberal Scholars Who Influenced Trump’s Attack on Birthright Citizenship

    [ad_1]

    The amendment was debated in the Senate in 1866, as the Reconstruction Congress attempted to suture the nation together after the Civil War and secure rights for freed slaves. At that time, discussion of the Citizenship Clause mostly focussed on the question of Native Americans on tribal lands within U.S. territory. The words “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” Lyman Trumbull, a senator from Illinois, explained, prevented members of those tribes from receiving birthright citizenship, since they were beyond the nation’s “complete jurisdiction.” (Two other groups were similarly excluded: children born to foreign diplomats and those born to a hostile occupying force.)

    To Schuck and Smith, that conclusion was revelatory. The phrase “subject to the jurisdiction” must mean more than the mere accident of birth. It seemed to denote a mutual compact—people whose sole allegiance was to the U.S., and who were intentionally accepted by the government. Given that the phenomenon of illegal immigration didn’t exist when the Fourteenth Amendment was drafted, they reasoned, the clause simply didn’t apply to children born on U.S. soil whose parents had come here “without consent.” Nor did the prevailing Supreme Court precedent, U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), seem to address them, since it concerned a man whose parents were legal immigrants. Schuck and Smith concluded that Congress could limit future birthright citizenship to the offspring of citizens and permanent residents—a notion that “has to our knowledge never been seriously considered.” Smith told me he didn’t believe Congress should do this, only that it could. “We thought it was provocative,” he said.

    Various academic peers deemed their novel reading “seriously flawed,” “simply puzzling,” and “morally incoherent.” “People were shocked,” recalled the Harvard immigration scholar Gerald Neuman. “The settled understanding had been settled for so long.” Undocumented immigrants, critics pointed out in a flurry of law-review essays, were obviously bound by the U.S. legal system. Trumbull had been speaking of Native Americans on the frontier or on reservations that largely operated as quasi-foreign states under treaties with Washington. Like foreign diplomats and their families, they couldn’t be sued or prosecuted in federal court. (Native Americans wouldn’t be granted citizenship until 1924.)

    Some of the book’s arguments, Neuman said, “are just made in ignorance of history.” Immigration was not entirely unregulated, he pointed out, before the Fourteenth Amendment was written. States barred the entry of “paupers” and the “infirm”; Southern legislatures prohibited the entry of free Black people. In 1803, Congress made it a federal offense to bring any “people of color” into the country, to prevent an influx of free Black immigrants fleeing the Haitian revolution.

    The amendment’s opponents were also acutely aware that it would extend citizenship to the children of immigrants they did not want to let in. Edgar Cowan, a Republican senator from Pennsylvania, warned of an invasion of “gypsies” who “pay no taxes; who never perform military service; who do nothing, in fact, which becomes the citizen, and perform none of the duties which devolve upon him, but, on the other hand, have no homes, pretend to own no land, live nowhere, settle as trespassers wherever they go.” He also feared “a flood of immigration of the Mongol race,” demanding, “Is the child of the Chinese immigrant in California a citizen?” Although Chinese immigrants were then barred from naturalizing, the response from the California senator John Conness, another Republican, was unequivocal: U.S.-born children “of all parentage whatever” would be citizens. With these possibilities in plain view, the amendment was ratified in 1868.

    Above all, legal experts concluded, Schuck and Smith had misconstrued the Fourteenth Amendment’s purpose. The Constitution barely mentioned citizenship, in part because disagreements over slavery made it impossible to agree on a definition. In the Dred Scott case, of 1857, the Supreme Court supplied one, ruling that no person of African descent, free or enslaved, could be an American citizen. The Fourteenth Amendment’s authors sought to establish an expansive, titanium-clad definition of citizenship that couldn’t be dismantled by the courts, Congress, or the President. In a blistering review of “Citizenship Without Consent” titled “Back to Dred Scott?” Neuman concluded that Schuck and Smith had, at best, “identified a strategy by which a court, determined to deny citizenship to American-born children of undocumented aliens, could justify such a holding.”

    [ad_2]

    Rachel Morris

    Source link

  • The U.S. was a leader in cultural heritage investigations. Now those agents are working immigration enforcement.

    [ad_1]

    The Trump administration has disbanded its federal cultural property investigations team and reassigned the agents to immigration enforcement, delivering a blow to one of the world’s leaders in heritage protection and calling into question the future of America’s role in repatriating looted relics, according to multiple people familiar with the changes.

    The U.S. Department of Homeland Security established the Cultural Property, Art and Antiquities program in 2017 to “conduct training on the preservation, protection and investigation of cultural heritage and property; to coordinate and support investigations involving the illicit trafficking of cultural property around the world; and to facilitate the repatriation of illicit cultural items seized as a result of (federal) investigations to the objects and artifacts’ lawful and rightful owners.”

    Looted: Stolen relics, laundered art and a Colorado scholar’s role in the illicit antiquities trade

    Homeland Security Investigations, the department’s investigative arm, once had as many as eight agents in its New York office investigating cultural property cases. A select number of additional agents around the country also worked these cases, including a nationwide investigation into looted Thai objects.

    The Denver Art Museum has previously acknowledged that two relics from Thailand in its collection are part of that federal investigation.

    Since 2007, HSI says it has repatriated over 20,000 items to more than 40 countries.

    But the Trump administration, as part of its unprecedented mass-deportation agenda, earlier this year dissolved the cultural property program and moved the agents to immigration enforcement, multiple people with knowledge of the change told The Denver Post.

    Homeland Security officials did not respond to requests for comment.

    A few months after Trump took office, a Homeland Security staffer with knowledge of the antiquities field told The Post that they received an email from their bosses. The message, according to their recollection: “The way of the world is immigration. Bring your cases to a reasonable conclusion and understand that the priority is immigration operations.”

    This individual, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly, said they were given no time frame for the new assignment. Leadership, though, was clear that there would be no new cultural property cases.

    Instead of conducting these investigations, this individual said they have been driving detainees between detention facilities and the airport for their deportation.

    “I just spent almost a month cuffing guys up, throwing them in a van from one jail to another,” this person said, adding that the work doesn’t take advantage of their specialized training.

    It’s frustrating, the individual said, because cultural property cases don’t require a lot of agents or resources. They don’t need all types of fancy electronic equipment.

    “The juice from the squeeze on these cases is a lot more than people wanna give it credit,” this person said.

    Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post

    The Bunker Gallery section of the Denver Art Museum’s Southeast Asian art galleries at the Martin Building is pictured on Tuesday, Oct. 25, 2022. Emma C. Bunker’s name was removed from the gallery in the wake of an investigation by The Denver Post. (Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post)

    Thai objects in Denver under investigation

    For years, HSI has been investigating two Thai relics in the Denver Art Museum’s collection after officials in Thailand raised issues with their provenance, or ownership history.

    The pieces — part of the so-called “Prakhon Chai hoard” — were looted in the 1960s from a secret vault at a temple near the Cambodian border, The Post found in a three-part investigation in 2022. Villagers told the newspaper that they recall dredging the vault for these prized objects and selling them to a British collector named Douglas Latchford.

    A federal grand jury decades later indicted Latchford for conspiring to sell plundered Southeast Asian antiquities around the world. He died before he could stand trial.

    Latchford funneled some of his stolen antiquities through the Denver Art Museum due to his close personal relationship with one of the museum’s trustees and volunteers, Emma C. Bunker, The Post found.

    The museum told The Post last week it hasn’t received any communication from the federal government since December, before Trump took office.

    High-profile cases in New York and Denver are proceeding despite the reallocation of resources, one agent said.

    With the federal government mostly out of the game, cultural heritage investigations will be largely left to the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office in New York City, which has an Antiquities Trafficking Unit.

    But the DA’s office relies heavily on its partnership with HSI, which has federal jurisdiction and can serve warrants and issue summonses across the country. The Manhattan DA’s office only has authority over New York.

    “The future for the DA’s office and the (antiquities trafficking) unit is in jeopardy,” said an individual familiar with the Manhattan unit’s dealings, who also spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. “It’s unclear who’s going to be swearing out warrants going forward.”

    A spokesperson for the Manhattan DA declined to comment for this story.

    Department of Homeland Security Investigations agents join Washington Metropolitan Police Department officers as they conduct traffic checks at a checkpoint along 14th Street in northwest Washington, Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
    Department of Homeland Security Investigations agents join Washington Metropolitan Police Department officers as they conduct traffic checks at a checkpoint along 14th Street in northwest Washington, Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

    ‘Doing the right thing still has power’

    These changes in enforcement priorities mean countries seeking the repatriation of their cultural items have fewer partners in the U.S. who can help them deal with museums and private collectors.

    “A few years ago, the United States led the world in restoring stolen history — and it mattered,” said Bradley Gordon, an American attorney who for years has represented the Cambodian government in its quest to reclaim its pillaged history from art museums, including Denver’s.

    It’s a shame, he said, that federal agencies have stepped back, even as the Manhattan DA continues its work.

    “This work isn’t just about art; it’s about security, diplomacy and restoring dignity,” Gordon said. “These looted objects were never meant to be hidden in mansions or displayed in museum glass cases far from their origins. When they are returned, entire communities celebrate with sincere happiness. It’s a reminder that doing the right thing still has power in the world.”

    Representatives from Thailand’s government, meanwhile, said they haven’t gotten an update on the Prakhon Chai investigation since Trump returned to office this year.

    Cultural heritage experts say these investigations can serve as an important diplomatic tool and use of soft power — a way for the U.S. to strengthen connections to allies or thaw fraught relations with longtime adversaries.

    In 2013, for example, President Barack Obama’s administration returned a ceremonial drinking vessel from the seventh century B.C. to Iran. For years, American officials said they couldn’t return the million-dollar relic until relations between the two countries normalized. The move — which NBC News titled “archaeo-diplomacy” — represented a small but important gesture as the U.S. sought a nuclear deal with the Middle Eastern power.

    “The return of the artifact reflects the strong respect the United States has for cultural heritage property — in this case, cultural heritage property that was likely looted from Iran and is important to the patrimony of the Iranian people,” the U.S. State Department said at the time. “It also reflects the strong respect the United States has for the Iranian people.”

    A lack of law enforcement activity in this space could also mean that museums and private collectors will be less inclined to return stolen pieces, said Erin Thompson, an art crime professor at New York’s John Jay College of Criminal Justice. Museums, instead, will maintain the status quo.

    [ad_2]

    Sam Tabachnik

    Source link

  • President Trump deploys the National Guard to Memphis

    [ad_1]

    President Trump said this task force will replicate what is happening on the streets of Washington DC. The president said the goal is to essentially put an end to crime in Memphis and mirror the actions taking place in the nation’s capital. The memorandum President Trump signed on Monday did not include details on when troops would be deployed or exactly what his promised surge in law enforcement efforts would actually look like. Tennessee’s governor embraced the deployment while the mayor of Memphis is not thrilled with the plan. Crime that’s going on not only in Memphis in many cities and we’re gonna take care of all of them step by step just like we did in DC. We’ll have folks without training interacting with our citizenry, and there’s *** chance that that will compromise our due process rights. The president also mentioned he’s still looking to send National Guard troops to more Democratic-led cities like Baltimore, New Orleans, and Saint Louis. In Washington, I’m Rachel Herzheimer.

    President Trump deploys the National Guard to Memphis

    President Donald Trump plans to send National Guard troops to Memphis, Tennessee, as part of a federal initiative to combat crime, drawing varied responses from local leaders.

    Updated: 4:56 AM PDT Sep 16, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    President Donald Trump is sending National Guard troops to Memphis, Tennessee, as part of his efforts to combat crime and illegal immigration.Trump said the task force will replicate what is happening on the streets in Washington, D.C., with the goal of reducing crime in Memphis. “It’s very important because of the crime that’s going on, not only in Memphis, and many cities that we’re going to take care of all of them, Trump said during an Oval Office event with members of his administration, and Tennessee’s governor and two Republican senators. “Step by step, just like we did in DC.” The memorandum President Trump signed on Monday did not specify when the troops would be deployed or detail the nature of the increased law enforcement efforts. Tennessee Governor Bill Lee has embraced the deployment, but Shelby County Mayor Lee Harris expressed concerns. “We’ll have folks without training interacting with our citizenry, and there’s a chance that will compromise our due process rights,” Harris said.”I think that the National Guard is a short-term solution, and let’s be honest, these guys, these men and women, have jobs and families just like we do, and they would probably rather not be here as well,” Memphis city council member J. Ford Canale said.The president mentioned that he is still looking to send National Guard troops to more Democratic-led cities, such as New Orleans, Baltimore, and St. Louis.It looked like Chicago was going to be the next city to see troops hit the streets. The administration faced resistance from the Governor of Illinois and other local authorities. On Monday, President Trump insisted Chicago would probably be next to see National Guard troops.Keep watching for the latest from the Washington News Bureau:

    President Donald Trump is sending National Guard troops to Memphis, Tennessee, as part of his efforts to combat crime and illegal immigration.

    Trump said the task force will replicate what is happening on the streets in Washington, D.C., with the goal of reducing crime in Memphis.

    “It’s very important because of the crime that’s going on, not only in Memphis, and many cities that we’re going to take care of all of them, Trump said during an Oval Office event with members of his administration, and Tennessee’s governor and two Republican senators. “Step by step, just like we did in DC.”

    The memorandum President Trump signed on Monday did not specify when the troops would be deployed or detail the nature of the increased law enforcement efforts.

    Tennessee Governor Bill Lee has embraced the deployment, but Shelby County Mayor Lee Harris expressed concerns. “We’ll have folks without training interacting with our citizenry, and there’s a chance that will compromise our due process rights,” Harris said.

    “I think that the National Guard is a short-term solution, and let’s be honest, these guys, these men and women, have jobs and families just like we do, and they would probably rather not be here as well,” Memphis city council member J. Ford Canale said.

    The president mentioned that he is still looking to send National Guard troops to more Democratic-led cities, such as New Orleans, Baltimore, and St. Louis.

    It looked like Chicago was going to be the next city to see troops hit the streets. The administration faced resistance from the Governor of Illinois and other local authorities.

    On Monday, President Trump insisted Chicago would probably be next to see National Guard troops.

    Keep watching for the latest from the Washington News Bureau:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • No bond for man charged with murdering Da’Cara Thompson in Prince George’s County – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    The suspect accused of murdering 19-year-old Da’Cara Thompson last month was ordered held without bond after his first court appearance on Monday in Prince George’s County, Maryland.

    The man accused of killing 19-year-old Da’Cara Thompson last month was ordered held without bond after his first court appearance on Monday in Prince George’s County, Maryland.

    Hugo Hernandez-Mendez, 35, was charged in Thompson’s murder on Friday after prosecutors accused him of driving Thompson to his home in Bowie, killing her in the bedroom and then leaving her body in a grassy area near Route 50 in Anne Arundel County.

    Investigators are still trying to put together the last hours of Thompson’s life. According to court documents, surveillance video shows her park her SUV and walk into a parking lot near a Family Dollar store in Langley Park. She spoke to the driver of another vehicle and then got into the vehicle’s front passenger seat around 3 a.m.

    Court records allege that Hernandez-Mendez threw Thompson’s body off the South River Bridge on Route 50, a drop of more than 30 feet, and that her body had numerous fractures. The motive for the murder is still under investigation and Acting Prince George’s County State’s Attorney Tara Jackson said an autopsy is pending.

    Investigators arrested Hernandez-Mendez in the 12000 Block of Kembridge Drive, where he was a renter, and authorities believe Thompson was killed there and her body was moved.

    ‘She was a soft-spoken, kind young lady’

    The bond hearing was routine. But the courtroom was packed with family and friends of the victim.

    After the hearing, Da’Cara Thompson’s mother, Carmen, spoke about her daughter.

    “She had just completed a yearlong internship in which she was very successful. She did a great job. She was a soft-spoken, kind young lady,” Carmen said, wearing a wearing a shirt printed with her daughter’s photo and #JusticeForDaCara. “I just want justice served for my daughter.”

    Thompson had graduated from St. Charles High School in Waldorf and worked for a nonprofit as part of a service program for recent graduates.

    In an official statement from the Department of Homeland Security, it said Hernandez-Mendez was in the United States illegally from Guatemala. The agency also said he had been arrested and charged previously with driving under the influence in May of 2022.

    At a news conference Friday, Prince George’s County Executive Aisha Braveboy said Hernandez-Mendez had also been arrested this past April by U.S. Park Police on another DUI charge while driving on the Baltimore Parkway. She noted that despite the federal agency’s understanding that he was living in the country illegally, they released him.

    “It’s very disappointing, finding that out now. We may not be here today if they did what they were supposed to do,” she said Monday.

    According to court records, Hernandez-Mendez worked for a Baltimore landscaping company.

    Getting justice

    For more than a week, Thompson’s relatives searched for her after she disappeared after saying she was going out to get gasoline for her car on the night of Aug. 22.

    It wasn’t until nine days later that they got the terrible news.

    State’s Attorney Jackson said regardless of the suspect’s immigration status, she will press ahead with his first- and second-degree murder charges.

    “My concern is to hold accountable people who commit crimes against the residents of Prince George’s County,” she said. “This office’s primary concern is not the legal status of the defendant, or frankly any defendant.”

    Thompson’s mother said she has confidence in the work of the investigators and the State’s Attorney’s Office to find out what happened, and she urged caution to those who are judging her daughter.

    “There’s been a lot of people disparaging her character on social media and things and such. Please don’t believe everything you see. Please don’t believe everything you hear. Out of respect for the family and us grieving, please approach everything with grace. We would appreciate that,” Carmen said.

    Hernandez-Mendez is due back in court on Oct. 8 for a preliminary hearing.

    WTOP’s John Domen and Jose Umana contributed to this report.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Dan Ronan

    Source link

  • Citing immigration raids, councilmember opposes proposed Home Depot in Eagle Rock

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES — City Councilwoman Ysabel Jurado expressed opposition on Friday, Aug. 29, to a proposed Home Depot opening in Eagle Rock Plaza, citing concerns with federal immigration raids targeting day laborers at the company’s locations across the L.A. region.

    On Thursday, federal agents conducted a raid at The Home Depot in Westlake, the fourth at the location since immigration enforcement operations began in June. Similar operations have been reported at several stores across Los Angeles, including one that apparently resulted in four arrests Friday morning outside a Home Depot in Pomona.

    The Thursday operation in Westlake resulted in eight individuals being detained by federal agents.

    “When your name becomes associated with terror and you refuse to speak, you are complicit,” Jurado said in a statement. “Home Depot has chosen power and profit over the working people who sustain it.”

    Last week, Home Depot submitted plans with the City Planning Department to demolish a former Macy’s department store in the Eagle Rock Plaza to build a superstore.

    “That’s why I unequivocally oppose Home Depot coming to Eagle Rock Plaza, a mall that has long been a gathering place for the Filipino community in Los Angeles,” Jurado said. “I won’t allow violence to take root in our neighborhoods. Our communities deserve safety, dignity and businesses that fight for the people, not against them.”

    Representatives for the company did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the Eagle Rock proposal. Earlier this month, immigrants rights advocates and labor groups organized a community stoppage, which called for a boycott of Home Depot and other businesses.

    In response, a spokesman for The Home Depot issued a statement: “Immigration enforcement agencies are the best sources if you have questions. We aren’t notified that these activities are going to happen, and we aren’t involved in the operations. We’re required to follow all federal and local rules and regulations in every market where we operate.”

    [ad_2]

    City News Service

    Source link

  • Former ICE field director seizes on immigration in race against Rep. Jason Crow to represent Aurora

    Former ICE field director seizes on immigration in race against Rep. Jason Crow to represent Aurora

    [ad_1]

    John Fabbricatore enforced federal immigration laws in his position as an ICE field office director until two years ago, and now he hopes to help secure America’s borders as a congressman.

    The Republican candidate in Colorado’s 6th Congressional District is drawing on his career with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement as he runs against U.S. Rep. Jason Crow in the Nov. 5 election. Crow, a Democrat, just finished his third term in Congress as the representative of the district, which includes Aurora, Littleton, Englewood, Greenwood Village and Centennial.

    The odds weigh heavily in Crow’s favor. The nonpartisan Cook Political Report doesn’t consider the fight for the 6th District to be competitive. It’s ranked as solidly Democratic, in part because Crow, 45, won all three of his elections by double-digit percentages and redistricting in 2020 resulted in boundaries more favorable to Democrats.

    That’s a change from 2018 when the district was seen as a battleground and Crow won his first race by unseating then-U.S. Rep. Mike Coffman, now Aurora’s mayor.

    But this time, Fabbricatore, 52, says voters are looking for a candidate who will prioritize the economy and lower taxes — and he contends that he’s the person for the job.

    “They want someone that wants to fight,” Fabbricatore said.

    He and Crow share certain traits. They’re both veterans: Fabbricatore served in the U.S. Air Force, and Crow was an Army Ranger. They’re hunters, each having longstanding experience with firearms. Neither hails from Colorado originally, with Fabbricatore raised in New York City and Crow in Madison, Wisconsin.

    And the candidates, both fathers of two children, reside in Aurora.

    Beyond that, their stances on major issues diverge — including on immigration, which Fabbricatore refers to as his “subject matter expertise.”

    He argues jobs are going to immigrants compensated with lower wages, taking positions that could be filled by Americans for higher pay. Fabbricatore says he supports “legal, vetted” immigration and more stringent enforcement of existing laws.

    “If we actually just enforce those laws, we will be doing much better than we are doing today with immigration,” he said.

    In recent weeks, Fabbricatore has raised the alarm alongside former President Donald Trump and other conservatives about the presence of Venezuelan gangs in Aurora — while Crow has called out exaggerations and criticized Trump for distorting the problems in certain apartment complexes.

    Crow notes that he represents “one of the most diverse districts in the nation,” with nearly 20% of his constituents born outside of the U.S. He wants to use federal grants and other programs to help immigrants and defend them against racist rhetoric.

    He said he backed a bipartisan immigration deal that ran aground earlier this year after failing to earn enough Republican support. It would have boosted the number of border patrol agents, immigration judges and officers that oversee asylum cases, as well as established more legal pathways for migrants and others without documentation.

    Fabbricatore said in a Denver Post candidate questionnaire that he would not have supported the bipartisan bill, instead preferring another bill with a greater focus on border security.

    Gun violence is what motivated Crow to run for office. He backs a ban on assault weapons and supports universal background checks. He’s also working to pass a bill that would apply the same restrictions to out-of-state residents when they purchase long guns and shotguns as they face when buying handguns — requiring that the gun be shipped to a federally licensed seller in their home state, with a background check performed there.

    Gun violence is “just an unacceptable, avoidable, ongoing national tragedy,” Crow said. “We don’t have to live with mass shootings.”

    Fabbricatore says he believes in gun rights and is instead pushing for investments in mental health.

    The candidates differ on abortion. Crow favors abortion rights, saying he aligns with the majority of Coloradans who back legal access to abortion — and he would support a federal law establishing that as a right. Fabbricatore says Congress should leave abortion’s legal status to the states. He opposes abortion, but he says he recognizes a need for exceptions, including in cases of rape.

    “Having been someone who worked in sex trafficking and saw what many women went through, I could never tell a woman that she couldn’t have a medical procedure to end what happened to her,” he said.

    Fabbricatore points to the economy as his No. 1 issue, saying it’s impacted by energy policy and immigration. He sees Colorado’s potential to participate in the energy sector through solar, wind, fracking and coal.

    [ad_2]

    Megan Ulu-Lani Boyanton

    Source link

  • Retired Border Chief Ordered to Not Report Border Crossers With Ties to Terrorism

    Retired Border Chief Ordered to Not Report Border Crossers With Ties to Terrorism

    [ad_1]

    Credit: David Lienemann, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

    By Bethany Blankley (The Center Square)

    Retired San Diego Border Patrol Chief Patrol Agent Aaron Heitke said he was instructed by the Biden administration to not publicize arrests of illegal border crossers identified as “Significant Interest Aliens” with ties to terrorism.

    RELATED: Border Patrol Officials: Violent Criminals Being Released Into U.S. Aren’t Being Vetted

    Heitke testified before a U.S. House Committee on Homeland Security hearing on Wednesday about how Biden-Harris “open border policies have undermined our safety and security.”

    “We had an exponential increase in Significant Interest Aliens … with significant ties to terrorism,” illegally entering in the U.S. Customs and Border Protection San Diego Sector, he said.

    Prior to the Biden-Harris administration, the sector averaged 10 to 15 SIAs per year. “Once word was out that the border was far easier to cross, San Diego went to over 100 SIAs in 2022, way over 100 SIAs in 2023 and more than that this year,” he said.

    “These are only the ones we caught,” meaning the number likely is higher because of the volume of gotaways, those who illegally cross the border and are not apprehended.

    “At the time, I was told I could not release any information on this increase in SIA’s or mention any of the arrests,” Heitke testified. “The administration was trying to convince the public that there was no threat at the border.”

    His testimony came as the greatest number of individuals on the U.S. federal terrorist watch list have been apprehended under the Biden-Harris administration of 1,856 since fiscal 2021 through August, The Center Square reported.

    None of this would have happened if current federal laws enacted by Congress were enforced, he said.

    RELATED: Border Patrol Faces Subpoena Threat for Allegedly Hiding Harris’ Role as Border Czar

    “The only true consequence we have to slow down and discourage people from coming to the United States illegally is sending them back to their country of origin,” required under current law, he said.

    Under the Biden-Harris administration, Border Patrol agents were instructed to do the opposite, he said. In three and half years, “I saw a steady decrease in countries we could send people back to.

    “For the first time in my 25 years and under five different administrations, whether through neglect or on purpose, I saw a large-scale lapse in our ability to return people to their country of origin. The inability to send people home meant that most people being arrested for illegal entry would either have to be detained or released.”

    Since January 2021, “on day one,” the Biden-Harris administration “made a point of decreasing the amount of detention space available nationwide,” noting that Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s funding for detention space has steadily been cut and private detention eliminated.

    The “open border policies” and “the fact that so many illegal aliens were being released into the United States spread worldwide very quickly,” he said, resulting in an unprecedented influx of illegal entry into the country.

    “The impacts to me and my agents were significant. Sectors were ordered to take in and process all the illegal aliens encountered on the border. The Border Patrol saw groups of hundreds and thousands coming into the United States and turning themselves in.”

    RELATED: Media Push Misleading Crime Stats To Protect Democrat Narrative

    The result was  “80% to 90%, sometimes 100% of the agents on duty [were taken] away from” the southwest border. There were miles of the border unmanned in Texas, Arizona and California, he said, where there was “no agent presence for weeks and months at a time.”

    Foreign nationals “who did not want to be caught could simply walk in,” he said, referring to gotaways. They total at least more than 2 million since fiscal 2021, The Center Square first reported.

    “We have no idea who and what entered our country over this time. Throughout 2022 and 2023, I sent agents to Texas and Arizona to count gotaways. Those sectors could not even put enough agents in the field to see what they had missed.”

    U.S. Rep. Anthony D’Esposito, R-NY, then asked him, “What information do we have on the millions of known gotaways that have entered this country?”

    “None,” Heitke replied.

    RELATED: Biden-Harris Price Controls Causing Senior Drug Prices to Skyrocket

    “Zero information of millions of people – some of which have been found to be on the terror watchlist – we have zero information?” D’Esposito asked.

    “Correct.”

    Heitke was previously interviewed by the committee last year and described the level of national security threats that existed because they were forced to close checkpoints after an influx of illegal border crossers shifted to California. Agents were then required to shift manpower from the field to process and release into the country illegal border crossers, The Center Square reported. With their agents being pulled from the field, Heitke and others said Americans were unsafe and transnational criminal organizations were exploiting the open border to smuggle people and an unprecedented amount of fentanyl.

    “Each time we asked for help in dealing with a new issue, it fell on deaf ears,” he said.

    Syndicated with permission from The Center Square.

    [ad_2]

    The Center Square

    Source link

  • Border Patrol Officials: Violent Criminals Being Released Into U.S. Aren’t Being Vetted

    Border Patrol Officials: Violent Criminals Being Released Into U.S. Aren’t Being Vetted

    [ad_1]

    Screenshot: Bill Melugin X

    By Bethany Blankley (The Center Square)

    Border Patrol officials say foreign nationals who illegally cross the border aren’t being vetted prior to being released into the country.

    At a press conference in Houston Monday, Gov. Greg Abbott announced Texas’ plan to target and arrest members of a violent Venezuelan prison gang, Tren De Aragua, who illegally entered the country. “I will not allow them to use Texas as a base of operations to terrorize our citizens,” he said.

    RELATED: Now What? Secret Service Looks Ahead After Second Assassination Attempt

    Joining Abbott was National Border Patrol Council Vice President Chris Cabrera, who said, “As a federal agent, we have no way of vetting these people other than the honor system. If they tell us they’re from so and so and this is their name and we can’t check against Venezuela’s database, that they’re not going to give us access to it, so we have to let them go,” he said, referring to releasing them into the U.S. “Unfortunately, we do let them go.”

    Border Patrol officials say foreign nationals who illegally cross the border aren’t being vetted prior to being released into the country.

    At a press conference in Houston Monday, Gov. Greg Abbott announced Texas’ plan to target and arrest members of a violent Venezuelan prison gang, Tren De Aragua, who illegally entered the country. “I will not allow them to use Texas as a base of operations to terrorize our citizens,” he said.

    Joining Abbott was National Border Patrol Council Vice President Chris Cabrera, who said, “As a federal agent, we have no way of vetting these people other than the honor system. If they tell us they’re from so and so and this is their name and we can’t check against Venezuela’s database, that they’re not going to give us access to it, so we have to let them go,” he said, referring to releasing them into the U.S. “Unfortunately, we do let them go.”

    “It is a known fact that the Venezuelan government has released prisoners” with the condition that they don’t come back. “When they show up here, there’s no surprise that we have a criminal illegal gang problem in the United States,” he said.

    The Biden administration maintains all illegal border crossers are being vetted. “That is an absolute lie,” Banks said, “because they cannot vet them against their criminal history in Venezuela because Venezuela refuses to share that information with us.”

    RELATED: FACT CHECK: In Presidential Debate, Harris Deflects on Border Record

    No criminal database exists to capture TDA gang member data and arrests. Texas Department of Public Safety is creating one, Abbott said.

    Texas Public Policy Foundation fellow and former Border Patrol agent Ammon Blair told The Center Square that because of the volume of illegal border crossers, there isn’t enough time for an individual agent to properly vet anyone.

    Not all agents are trained to identify false identification and some just “want to get them out of the field as fast as possible,” he said. “That’s priority number one is getting them into the intake system, putting them on the bus and moving them out.

    “There really is no vetting. The only vetting is asking them, ‘What country are you from? What is your name? How old are you? Are you a family member?’”

    If they have a criminal history, it may pop up if it’s connected to their ID, or fake ID, he said. But many have no ID so they have to take them at their word for who they say they are. “They just tell us, and we have to accept that as truth,” he said.

    Agents also no longer ask if they are seeking asylum or making a claim of credible fear, he said. After a foreign national illegally crosses the border, agents “immediately just get their biographical information however best we can.” They input their information and scan passports if they have them, he said. For those with no IDs, they input biometric data, including fingerprints. “That’s the only vetting we do.”

    Under the Trump administration, he said, “we heavily scrutinized. The process was completely different. We adhered more towards the immigration law than we do now.”

    RELATED: U.S. Borrowing Tops $1.9 Trillion So Far This Year

    Since fiscal 2021 through July, illegal border crossers from Venezuela total nearly 856,000, the greatest number in U.S. history, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection data.

    Another 115,000 Venezuelans were granted parole through a program that’s been directly linked to perpetrators committing violent crimes against Americans, including TDA gang members, who are being arrested nationwide, The Center Square reported.

    In Texas, law enforcement officials have arrested more than 3,000 Venezuelan illegal border crossers; more than 200 are wanted, Abbott said.

    Syndicated with permission from The Center Square.

    [ad_2]

    The Center Square

    Source link

  • Florida Sues Over Violent Foreign Nationals Being Released from Prison into U.S.

    Florida Sues Over Violent Foreign Nationals Being Released from Prison into U.S.

    [ad_1]

    Office of Governor Ron DeSantis, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

    By Bethany Blankley (The Center Square)

    The state of Florida is suing the Biden-Harris administration to obtain information on how many illegal foreign nationals convicted of violent crimes who served time in prison were released into the U.S. instead of being deported.

    “Historically, when illegal aliens were brought to the U.S. to be prosecuted for their crimes, it was well understood that the aliens would be deported once they have served their sentence,” Florida’s lawsuit, filed by Attorney General Ashley Moody, states. “That was until the Biden-Harris Administration implemented their shockingly irresponsible immigration policy, pushing unknown numbers of dangerous criminals straight from federal prison into our communities and causing chaos, anarchy, and crime.”

    RELATED: Illegal Immigrants Keep Trying to Ride San Diego School Buses With Students on Board

    The lawsuit was filed after Florida received no response to a Freedom of Information Act request it submitted in March seeking information about criminal illegal foreign nationals allegedly being released into the U.S. instead of being deported.

    It was filed in the U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida Fort Myers Division and names U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and the Federal Bureau of Prisons as defendants.

    “In addition to flat out refusing to secure the border, reports indicate that President Biden and failed Border Czar Kamala Harris refuse to deport dangerous illegal immigrant prisoners into our communities once they are released from prison,” Moody said. “This administration has made it clear they will not turn over documents showing this dangerous and unlawful scheme in a timely manner. Now, American cities are suffering in a very public way. I will not stand idly by and allow this dereliction of duty.”

    When filing the FOIA request in March, she said, “The Biden administration has full knowledge that prisoners from other countries are making their way into the United States through our wide-open border. Now, we are demanding to know reasons why the Biden administration is releasing criminal illegal aliens in U.S. prisons directly into the interior, rather than deporting them back to their country of origin,” saying, “the American people deserve to know.”

    The complaint states the administration is “unlawfully withholding records” and by doing so, harming Florida by “continuously denying Florida access to documents that it has a legal right to.” It also states the harm is irreparable until ICE is compelled to follow the law. The lawsuit asks the court to order the defendants to respond to Florida’s request and cover attorney fees.

    RELATED: California Legislature Allows ‘Undocumented’ Immigrants to Get Free $150K Home Down Payments

    In the complaint, Moody also alludes to the different processes followed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection Air & Marine Operations, Border Patrol, and U.S. Coast Guard officials when apprehending an illegal border crosser at a land border versus at sea.

    Unlike those illegally entering at the southwest or northern borders by land, who are largely processed into the U.S. instead of for removal, when apprehended at sea, most illegal foreign nationals are repatriated to their country of origin, The Center Square has reported.

    U.S. Coast Guard 7th District in South Florida crews continue to interdict and repatriate foreign nationals attempting to illegally enter the U.S. off the coast of Florida, including a record number under the Biden-Harris administration, The Center Square has reported.

    According to Coast Guard records, in six months from Oct. 1, 2022, to May 17, 2023, for example, crews interdicted or encountered 6,679 Cubans and 4,473 Haitians, The Center Square previously reported.

    By comparison, crews apprehended 838 Cubans in fiscal 2021, 49 in fiscal 2020, 313 in fiscal 2019 and 259 in fiscal 2018, The Center Square reported.

    These numbers exclude interdiction efforts of Miami Sector Border Patrol agents, also exclusively reported on by The Center Square.

    RELATED: American Dream Out of Reach? Only 10% Polled Said They Can Afford to Buy a Home

    Critics argue if the policies implemented at sea, off the coast of Florida, or on Florida shores were implemented at U.S. northern and southwest land borders, potentially millions of illegal foreign nationals would have been processed for removal instead of being released into the country with a notice to appear before an immigration judge several years into the future.

    Those apprehended by federal and local officials on the Florida coast after they illegally arrived by sea, who didn’t legally arrive at ports of entry with any immigration claim, are primarily processed for removal and “are generally not eligible to claim asylum or to appear before an immigration judge,” Moody notes.

    Under the Biden-Harris administration, “criminal aliens [are brought] to the United States [by the federal government] so the aliens can be prosecuted consistent with federal law and serve time in prison. But everyone has always assumed – in both Democrat and Republican Administrations – that such aliens would be deported the moment they finished their criminal sentence,” she said. “Otherwise, the decision to bring a criminal to the United States for prosecution results in a benefit to that alien in the form of the right to permanently remain in the United States.

    “For the first time in history, however, the Biden-Harris Administration has abandoned that practice … In other words, as things stand, asylum seekers caught on the high seas have been returned to their home country without even seeing an immigration judge, while drug traffickers and other serious criminals brought to the United States only for the purpose of serving prison time are being released straight into our communities to wreak havoc on our citizenry.”

    Syndicated with permission from The Center Square.

    [ad_2]

    The Center Square

    Source link

  • California Legislature Allows Illegal Immigrants to Get Free $150K Home Down Payments

    California Legislature Allows Illegal Immigrants to Get Free $150K Home Down Payments

    [ad_1]

    Office of the Governor of California, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

    By Kenneth Schrupp (The Center Square)

    The California legislature passed a bill allowing undocumented immigrants to make use of the state’s $150,000, 0 down, 0 interest home “loans.” The bill now goes to the governor’s desk, where he must either veto or approve the bill by the end of September.

    California has one of the worst home shortages in the nation, with an estimated 4.5 million home shortage, and a nearly $1 million median home price.

    RELATED: Migrants Keep Trying to Ride San Diego School Buses With Students on Board

    “Many generational Californians can’t afford to buy a house in their home state thanks to Democrats’ unsustainable economic policies,” said State Senate Minority Leader Brian W. Jones, R-San Diego, in a statement urging California Gov. Gavin Newsom to veto the bill. “This policy is not only unfair but also sends a dangerous message: ‘Come to California, whether legally or illegally, and claim your $150,000 home loan.’”

    The California legislature passed a bill allowing undocumented immigrants to make use of the state’s $150,000, 0 down, 0 interest home “loans.” The bill now goes to the governor’s desk, where he must either veto or approve the bill by the end of September.

    California has one of the worst home shortages in the nation, with an estimated 4.5 million home shortage, and a nearly $1 million median home price.

    RELATED: 16 State Coalition Sues Biden Administration to Block Amnesty Plan

    “Many generational Californians can’t afford to buy a house in their home state thanks to Democrats’ unsustainable economic policies,” said State Senate Minority Leader Brian W. Jones, R-San Diego, in a statement urging California Gov. Gavin Newsom to veto the bill. “This policy is not only unfair but also sends a dangerous message: ‘Come to California, whether legally or illegally, and claim your $150,000 home loan.’”

    Syndicated with permission from The Center Square.

    [ad_2]

    The Center Square

    Source link

  • Illegal Immigrants Keep Trying to Ride San Diego School Buses With Students on Board

    Illegal Immigrants Keep Trying to Ride San Diego School Buses With Students on Board

    [ad_1]

    Screenshot: CBS News Youtube

    By Kenneth Schrupp (The Center Square)

    Migrants attempted to board San Diego area school buses with children still inside for two days in a row, in one case requiring parents and the bus driver to keep the migrants away. In response, the school district says buses will no longer stop when migrants are present.

    Jamul-Dulzura Union School District told Fox 5 that on Tuesday afternoon, a group of three men walked in the middle of the highway tried to stop a school bus, requiring the vehicle to take evasive action. On Wednesday morning, a group of 20 migrants tried to board a school bus at a bus stop where elementary students were waiting with their parents for pickup. Parents and drivers “stepped in, keeping the migrants at bay.” 

    “He was really confused. He said these adults, they weren’t kids, they had backpacks on and they tried to get on our bus. And there were a lot of them,” said Nicole Cardinale, whose eight year old son was already on the bus, told the TV station. 

    RELATED: 16 State Coalition Sues Biden Administration to Block Amnesty Plan

    The presence of backpacks suggests the individuals had recently crossed the border; Jamul is just inland from San Diego and just north of the California-Mexico border.

    “Earlier today I notified transportation families about two recent incidents involving our school buses on Highway 94. Both incidents involved people either trying to stop or board a bus at a bus stop,” wrote school district superintendent Liz Bystedt in a letter to parents. “I want to say thank you to our bus drivers for keeping our students safe and to the parents who helped to ensure the bus was not boarded.”

    Bystedt wrote that the district had already contacted law enforcement, including border patrol, about the incident. In an email to parents, Bystedt also said that buses would not be stopping at any stops where migrants are present, and that parents should follow the bus to the next migrant-free stop to pick up or drop off their children.

    Syndicated with permission from The Center Square.

    [ad_2]

    The Center Square

    Source link

  • No, Biden and Harris’ Border Crisis Is Not Over

    No, Biden and Harris’ Border Crisis Is Not Over

    [ad_1]

    Screenshot: Steve Loves Ammo X

    By Mark Green for RealClearPolitics

    Ever since early 2021, Americans have watched as illegal aliens have flooded across the Southwest border unimpeded. They have read with horror the accounts of innocent Americans victimized by those here unlawfully. They have seen family and friends die after being poisoned by fentanyl coming across the border. And the Biden-Harris administration has largely done nothing.

    Yet now, following a few months of somewhat-reduced numbers of apprehensions between ports of entry along the Southwest border, the Biden-Harris administration is taking a victory lap. Such premature celebration, however, ignores the reality of the continuing nature of this crisis.

    RELATED: Washington Spends About $3 Billion Per Year on Food Stamps for Noncitizens

    Before explaining why, Americans must understand that even if not one more inadmissible alien crossed our borders for the remainder of Biden and Harris’ term, the millions they have already allowed into our country have done damage that will take decades to remedy. For many families, like those of Laken Riley, Rachel Morin, and Jocelyn Nungaray, the damage can never be undone.

    But if Biden and Harris want to talk about numbers, the president and his “border czar” will find no exoneration. On their watch, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has recorded more than 10 million encounters nationwide, plus another two million known “gotaways” who have crossed our borders uncaught.

    Many on the left like to appeal to the history of Ellis Island as an excuse for mass immigration – despite the fact that these individuals arrived in accordance with then-existing law. However, the number of people who came through Ellis Island was also roughly 12 million – in the 62 years between 1892 and 1954.

    The number of inadmissible aliens who have been encountered at our borders or crossed uncaught since the start of Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 is unprecedented. Claiming victory now due to temporarily reduced border crossings displays a willful ignorance of the nature of this ongoing crisis, because these numbers alone do not tell the full story of what Americans are experiencing.

    RELATED: Illegal Border Crossings Surpass 12.5 Million Since Biden-Harris Took Office

    First, there are the continuing financial impacts. As of mid-June 2024, more than 205,000 illegal aliens had arrived in New York City since the spring of 2022. Mayor Eric Adams has declared that these arrivals and the resultant costs “will destroy New York City.” Small towns will also be struggling for years with the consequences of unchecked crossings. Springfield, Ohio, home to 60,000 people, has seen roughly 20,000 Haitians arrive since the crisis began, putting major strain on housing and other services. Whitewater, Wisconsin, a town of just 15,000 people, has been overwhelmed by the arrival of 1,000 illegal aliens “often lacking basic English skills.” According to one official in Sanford, Maine last year, “We’re tapped. … We’ve been overrun,” after costs to care for illegal aliens tripled.

    DHS has reported that more than 80% of illegal aliens who are “neither expelled or repatriated directly by CBP nor continuously detained by ICE” remain in the United States years later. These communities, and thousands more like them, are going to be dealing with these costs for years.

    Second, consider the ongoing public safety implications of what’s happening at the Southwest border. Border Patrol arrests of illegal aliens with criminal histories since FY2021 have more than doubled from FY2017-2020. Worse, criminals and individuals with possible ties to terrorism have been, and continue to be, released into the interior. In fact, news recently broke that the Biden-Harris administration actually released into the interior 99 individuals whom they knew were on the terrorist watchlistAccording to one DHS source, ICE officials have been “discouraged from deporting even illegal immigrants who had final deportation orders and were linked to gangs.” Former ICE Field Director John Fabbricatore has said, “I was being forced to release people that should not have been allowed on the street.”

    How many other threats to our safety and security have likewise been unwittingly released or entered as gotaways? How many more, who either did not commit crimes in their home country or were never caught, will do so for the first time against American victims?

    RELATED: ‘We do not support her:’ California Sheriff Pushes Back on Harris Border Claims

    Finally, despite a recent decrease in illegal crossings between ports of entry, encounters of inadmissible aliens at ports of entry are at record highs, in large part because the administration has devised numerous, unlawful mass-parole programs encouraging them to enter this way. Consider that in February 2021, Biden and Harris’ first full month in office, CBP recorded just 17,744 encounters at ports nationwide. By July 2024, that number was 110,615. Encouraging would-be border crossers to cross at ports of entry certainly cuts down on the embarrassing optics of overwhelmed Border Patrol agents and facilities, but ultimately leads to the same result – inadmissible aliens being released into the interior. And now, one of these mass-parole programs has been temporarily shut down due to massive fraud.

    This border crisis is not over – not by a long shot. It is time for Congress, and the American people, to say enough is enough.

    Rep. Mark E. Green, chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, represents Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District.

    Syndicated with permission from RealClearWire.

    [ad_2]

    RealClearWire

    Source link

  • Sheriff Warns That Illegal Immigrants Are Coming In Through South Florida: ‘Undocumented And Unvetted’

    Sheriff Warns That Illegal Immigrants Are Coming In Through South Florida: ‘Undocumented And Unvetted’

    [ad_1]

    Chuck Callesto X

    America’s southern border is completely out of control. Illegal immigrants pour in every day. But not just in states like Texas and Arizona, apparently.

    Florida is also part of this.

    RELATED: Former Obama Fundraiser Blasts Letitia James For Trying To Seize Trump’s Assets: ‘Trying To Inflict Pain Before Trump Wins Appeal’

    Illegal Immigrants Crossing Over in Florida

    From Florida’s Voice, “St. Lucie County Sheriff Keith Pearson warned of illegal immigrants entering southern Florida, including in the community that he oversees.”

    “Pearson specifically highlighted how Haitian migrants were traveling to St. Lucie County and how the sheriff’s office was apprehending them and turning them into the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol.”

    The story continued:

    “Illegal aliens aren’t just flooding across our southern borders, they’re arriving all across south Florida beaches, including right here in St. Lucie County,” he said during a video where his team was actively encountering a migrant vessel.

    “They are undocumented and unvetted individuals whom we have no idea what kind of positive or negative impact they could have on the public safety of our community or nation,” Pearson said.

    The sheriff explained that his agency works with the Florida Highway Patrol to find illegal immigrants attempting to enter Florida and provide them fresh water and address any medical concerns while they wait for the U.S. Coast Guard to process the individuals.

    RELATED: AOC Claims ‘RICO Is Not A Crime’ During Wild Exchange Where She Demands Witness Name Specific Crimes Committed By President Biden

    RELATED: Joe Rogan Goes After Media For ‘Deceptive’ Coverage Of Trump ‘Bloodbath’ Remark

    When Will it End?

    “The men and women of the St. Lucie County sheriff’s office will continue to monitor and assist our federal partners to ensure we protect our borders,” Pearson added.

    “The sheriff’s office was not able to provide a number of the total estimated apprehensions that law enforcement has made since it is up to the federal government to record the number of processed individuals,” the story noted.

    It shouldn’t be surprising that illegal migrants are coming in through Florida since the entire southern U.S. border has been easy to cross for so many.

    Will this ever end? That might be a question best answered after November.

    Ex-NBC Exec Says Barron Trump Is ‘Fair Game’ Now That He’s 18 – Immediately Gets Shut Down

    [ad_2]

    John Hanson

    Source link

  • Migrants ‘poisoning the blood:’ half of all voters in poll agree with Trump

    Migrants ‘poisoning the blood:’ half of all voters in poll agree with Trump

    [ad_1]

    A new CBS News Poll released on Sunday shows nearly half of U.S. voters surveyed agree with former President Donald Trump‘s controversial comment that illegal immigrants are “poisoning the blood” of the country.

    Trump, the frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination according to numerous polls, sparked criticism and was accused of echoing Adolf Hitler last month after his remarks about immigrants.

    While speaking at an event in New Hampshire on December 16, 2023, the MAGA leader claimed that immigrants are “poisoning the blood” of the United States during an event in Durham, New Hampshire.

    “They’re poisoning the blood of our country,” Trump said. “They poison mental institutions and prisons all over the world. Not just in South America, not just in three or four countries that we think about, but all over the world. They’re coming into our country from Africa, from Asia, all over the world.”

    President Joe Biden‘s campaign was among those to quickly denounce Trump’s comments, saying he had “parroted Hitler.”

    Former President Donald Trump speaks to supporters during a rally at Simpson College on January 14, 2024 in Indianola, Iowa, where Republicans will be the first to select their party’s nomination for the 2024 presidential race when they go to caucus on January 15, 2023. A CBS News Poll, conducted from January 10 to 12, shows roughly 47 percent of U.S. voters surveyed agreed with Trump’s controversial statement that illegal immigrants are “poisoning the blood” of the country.
    Scott Olson/Getty

    Newsweek reached out via email on Sunday night to several pollsters and Trump’s representatives for comment.

    Despite the backlash over his remarks at the December rally, the CBS News/YouGov found that not only his avid MAGA supporters agree with Trump on immigration.

    The CBS survey, which was conducted between January 10 and 12, probed a nationally representative sample of 2,870 American voters, including 786 likely Republicans, according to the national news outlet. The poll surveyed respondents on where they stood on various issues, asking whether they agreed with disagreed with candidates’ comments or stances.

    One of the topics in the poll included gauging how people felt about Trump’s use of the phrase “poisoning the blood of the country” when referring to migrants who enter the U.S. illegally.

    Of all voters surveyed, not just Republicans, roughly 47 percent said they “agree with Trump” on his comment about illegal immigrants and 53 percent of all voters said they “disagree” with the remark.

    While most voters overall disagreed with this language, roughly eight in 10 GOP primary voters said they agreed with it.

    Of the Republicans polled, 81 percent said they “agree with Trump” while 19 percent said they “disagree” with the former president’s language.

    When Trump made the comment in December, it ignited a firestorm of criticism on social media.

    Robert Reich, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and former Labor Secretary, wrote that “claiming that immigrants are ‘poisoning the blood of the country’ is the literal language of Hitler’s Mein Kampf.”

    Reich said Trump and his allies “are openly embracing fascism.”

    Newsweek reached out via Reich’s website on Sunday for comment.

    Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung told Newsweek previously that the former president “gave a great speech and knocked it out of the park” during the December event.

    “Contrast that with mainstream media and academia-at-large who have given safe haven for dangerous antisemitic and pro-Hamas rhetoric that is both dangerous and alarming considering what is going on in the world.”

    The December speech wasn’t the first time Trump had said that phrase, saying that immigrants were “poisoning the blood of our country” in an interview with The National Pulse website in September.

    Hitler’s Mein Kampf has several passages in which the genocidal dictator uses words such as “blood” and “poison” to attack Jews and others he viewed as a threat to the Aryan race’s purity.