ReportWire

Tag: Hurricane Harvey

  • Houston Lawmaker Al Green Blasts Trump for Pulling FEMA Funding During Hurricane Season

    [ad_1]

    Texas’ six-month hurricane season just hit the halfway point, and elected officials across the state say they’re bracing themselves for delayed responses, reduced funding, and an increased strain on local resources as President Donald Trump threatens to eliminate the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

    U.S. Congressman Al Green, D-Houston, joined the chorus last week of representatives condemning the president’s actions and calling on state officials like Gov. Greg Abbott to do more than approve “Band-Aid bills” while Texas stands to lose $74 million because of Trump’s cuts.

    Trump has said he’ll “phase out” FEMA after the 2025 hurricane season ends in November. “We want to wean off of FEMA and we want to bring it down to the state level,” the president said in June.

    But the cuts have already begun. The U.S. government announced in April it had eliminated FEMA’s $4.6 billion Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities grant program in the middle of a distribution cycle.

    Before adjourning a second special session this month, Texas lawmakers approved, in response to the July 4 Kerr County floods, a $368 million one-time appropriation from the state’s Rainy Day Fund for disaster relief, with $50 million to help local governments purchase flood warning sirens and rain gauges and $28 million for flood monitoring grants. Green said last week that’s not enough.

    “The state of Texas is not known to spend federal dollars wisely, and I’m not sure the state of Texas is prepared to handle the amount of dollars necessary if FEMA is eliminated in its entirety,” the congressman said on a press call last week. “I regret that Texas is not doing more to insist on FEMA being managed as it has been. It’s not a perfect organization but I’ve been in Congress long enough to see how FEMA has benefited my constituents.”

    “Unfortunately, it seems that if Trump can aggressively dismantle an agency, he will,” Green added. “While this is not a good time for the most vulnerable in Texas, it is a great time for us to unite, band together, and fight to protect our communities.”

    In August, Houston Controller Chris Hollins spoke at a virtual press briefing with finance chiefs from New Mexico, Vermont, and Minnesota to discuss the long-term repercussions that FEMA cuts could have on the economic health and safety of the country.

    Harris County’s population is larger than 26 individual states, so the impact of a disaster is widespread, Hollins said.

    “Houstonians deal with and live the consequences of these disasters on a regular basis,” he said. “This is not theoretical for us. There is significant human and economic pain, families who are displaced, small businesses shuttered, city and county budgets that are spread thin, and billions and billions of dollars of damage that we’re still paying for.”

    The federal government is turning disaster relief into a political game, the controller added. “These disasters, when they come, don’t check if you’re rich or poor, Black or white, Republican or Democrat,” he said. “The floodwaters do not stop at the city line because the precinct voted blue or red. When Trump Republicans, when MAGA, go after these programs like FEMA, when they kneecap HUD’s disaster recovery work, they don’t punish a city. They punish human beings.”

    Half of Houstonians can’t afford an unexpected $400 expense, Hollins added, so the impact of a storm and rising insurance premiums can be devastating, forcing people to go into debt or rebuild alone. The homes of some residents in north Houston have still not been repaired after Hurricane Harvey in 2017, he said.

    “They slashed FEMA, hollowed out staffing, they tried to kill proven resilience programs and wrapped it all in red tape that slowed the response down,” Hollins said. “That can be life or death for Houstonians and for Texans. That’s not fiscal discipline. It’s not responsibility. It’s recklessness, it’s partisan sabotage, and it’s a lack of public safety.”

    Harris County commissioners and Houston City Council members have also expressed concern that, while FEMA hasn’t traditionally swept in like a white knight and solved everyone’s problems in the wake of a disaster, the agency is relied upon for much-needed funding that state and local governments don’t have.

    Harris County Commissioner Rodney Ellis said last month that Trump and Abbott have attacked Harris County, not just by ignoring its needs but by “actively working to undermine our ability to serve the people who need us most.”

    “Donald Trump has slashed, and continues to slash, federal safety net programs, even as more families have fallen into poverty,” Ellis said. “Greg Abbott has imposed state revenue caps that choke local budgets — part of a broader war on local governments and working people.”

    At last week’s press briefing, Green was joined by Bexar County Commissioner Tommy Calvert and Houston-based former FEMA Public Affairs Director Rafael Lemaitre to address how federal budget cuts are “sabotaging the safety” of Texans.

    Calvert said that 13 people in his San Antonio-area precinct died during flash flooding in June. The legislature had an opportunity to earmark funds to repair drainage and coordinate emergency systems, but didn’t do it, he said.

    “They only allocated $50 million out of the Rainy Day Fund for a state that is full of rainy days,” Calvert said. “Texas has more money in its Rainy Day Fund than almost every state in the United States combined. Whether it was Winter Storm Uri, the February freeze that we had in 2021, or a number of emergencies that are truly rainy days for communities, we’ve seen the state benefit the bankers holding onto that money a lot more than Main Street getting that money, and that is shameful.”

    Thousands of lives would be saved if state and federal governments would fund “microgrids” so hospitals and assisted living homes would be self-sustaining in a power outage, Calvert said.

    “When you start seeing microgrids funded in local communities, that’s when you’re cooking with grease,” he said. “Right now we’re not cooking with grease for a state that has a lot of emergencies.”

    “It is an emergency right now that the people in Harris County and the Houston area do not have a congressperson should a hurricane or flooding happen in their area,” Calvert said. “The fact that the governor hasn’t moved that election faster after the death of Congressman Turner is a shame, and it’s going to matter if we have an emergency.”

    Rafael Lemaitre worked as a spokesman for FEMA during the Obama administration and said last week that the agency’s importance has increased as climate change has caused natural disasters to become more frequent and more severe.

    Following his tenure with FEMA, Lemaitre moved to Houston and worked as a senior adviser to County Judge Lina Hidalgo. His family received individual FEMA assistance as disaster survivors of the 2024 derecho, he said, noting that he’s dealt with the federal agency on multiple levels.

    Lemaitre said there’s a dangerous narrative being advanced by Trump that FEMA is not prepared to handle disasters; that it’s the role of state governments.

    “That simply isn’t how disaster management operates,” he said. “During Democratic administrations, FEMA has always had a supporting role in helping states and governors in disaster response when their capacity is exceeded, which happens quite often. Even on what we call blue-sky days, FEMA has a vital role in supporting states and local communities.”

    The agency used to operate the Center for Domestic Preparedness and the National Fire Academy, where first responders trained for free, learning to respond to mass casualty incidents and biological attacks, among other things.

    “This was gutted and closed down at the beginning of the Trump administration, forcing 7,000 first responders from across the country to miss out on the vital training that makes our communities more resilient,” Lemaitre said.

    “I fear that we’re on a course to painfully relearn the lessons of Hurricane Katrina,” he added. “Folks on this call who saw that disaster unravel in real time on television probably remember that it was a bad time for emergency management. FEMA was underfunded. It wasn’t a respected agency. And we saw the result of that. We saw a bungled response to a major disaster.”

    Green said the matter of disaster response and recovery ought to be a bipartisan issue.

    “We have a president who seems to believe that Congress is subordinate to him and that he is a superior personality,” he said. “We’re trying to restore funding, but to do that, you have to have it in a bill that my Republican colleagues need to support. All of these things are very difficult when you don’t have control of the House and don’t have control of the Senate.”

    “Democratic members of Congress will work to maintain FEMA, strengthen FEMA, and get more dollars into states when these events arrive,” Green added. “We cannot eliminate the one agency that has the experience and the expertise to manage a disaster.”

    [ad_2]

    April Towery

    Source link

  • Harris County Flood Control District Unveils Bond Project Dashboard

    [ad_1]

    The Harris County Commissioners Court held a public hearing on its controversial budget and tax rate on Thursday, but another agenda item was top of mind for Billy Guevara, Doris Brown, and members of the disaster response advocacy group West Street Recovery: the unveiling of a dashboard to track $2.5 billion worth of flood bond projects that were approved seven years ago.

    Guevara lost six family members who tried to outrun Hurricane Harvey in 2017 and drowned in the floodwaters of Halls Bayou. Brown’s northeast Houston home flooded, the roof caved in, and FEMA rejected her application for assistance. West Street Recovery was formed shortly after Harvey to help Houstonians like Guevara and Brown.

    Hurricane Harvey devastated Houston and southeast Texas, flooding more than 100,000 structures and causing $125 billion in damage. At least 100 people died.

    Harris County responded by putting a multibillion-dollar bond issue before voters in 2018. The measure passed with 86 percent casting ballots in favor, and local leaders got to work submitting projects.

    But until this week, there was no way for a member of the public, or even an elected county commissioner, to get a simple snapshot on the Harris County Flood Control District website of what’s been accomplished and what’s in the pipeline.

    Precinct 1 Commissioner Rodney Ellis, the only current official who was seated at the time of the bond program, has demanded that the county follow an equity framework that prioritizes flood mitigation projects in historically underserved areas that need it most.

    Commissioner Tom Ramsey has argued that Ellis’ definition of equity puts the projects in Precinct 1 at the top of the priority list, neglecting much-needed flood mitigation in other areas of the county.

    During a Commissioners Court meeting in June, Harris County Flood Control District Director Tina Petersen heard from an irate crowd, including Guevara and Brown, who said they were promised that flood mitigation projects would be initiated in their neighborhoods to prevent “another Harvey.” They voted for the bonds and supported the framework that was supposed to address “the worst first.”

    They didn’t know if the projects in their neighborhoods were funded and slated for construction or if they’d been discarded because they were found not to be feasible. Residents and commissioners accused the flood control district of not being transparent.

    “We could land a guy on the moon easier than what we’re trying to do here, in terms of how complicated we’ve made it,” Ramsey said at the June meeting. “It shouldn’t be this hard to figure out whether a project is going to be done in your neighborhood or not. I have to send a registered professional engineer with 20 years of experience to go meet for two hours to try to figure out what projects are being done, just in my precinct.”

    Many suggested a streamlined “one-stop shop” where residents and commissioners could track projects and hold officials accountable to do what they said they’d do when the bond passed.

    Petersen and her team heard the mandate, and the Harris County Flood Control District rolled out a dashboard this week that displays more than 100 projects with detailed information about the scope, benefits, completion status, and funding sources for each. Residents can type in their address for a micro view of projects near their neighborhoods.

    click to enlarge

    A dashboard unveiled this week allows residents to track projects approved in a 2018 bond.

    Screenshot

    Flood Control District Chief External Affairs Officer Emily Woodell met with the media prior to Thursday’s court meeting to review the dashboard. In addition to providing the public display of all things related to the 2018 flood bond package, Woodell said her team has been meeting every Friday morning since July with staffers from each of the four county commission precinct offices.

    “There’s been a massive amount of effort to really, literally, all come to the table with a shared understanding of the program and a shared understanding of benefits to make sure we’re moving this forward in a responsible way,” she said.

    A dashboard doesn’t fix Harris County’s infrastructure but it does provide much-needed transparency, Woodell added. Rumors abounded earlier this year that the bond program faced a massive deficit due to inflation. It’s important for the voters to see not just which projects are getting done, but how they’re being funded, she said.

    Voters approved a $2.5 billion bond but the needs assessment at that time amounted to more than $5 billion. Flood control district officials have leveraged the bond funds into an additional $2.7 billion in partnership funding, representing a 109 percent return on investment, Woodell explained. If a project doesn’t have funding or the necessary cooperation of a government entity, it’s being paused.

    Currently about 26 projects are paused, and “solid engineering estimates” show the amount needed to fund them is $400 million, Woodell said.

    “We think it’s really important and frankly this is something we’ve been wanting to spend time on for a long time,” she said of the dashboard. “What we’re focused on doing is providing the data in a lot of different ways. When you talk about $5.2 billion, you lose the sense of scale and you lose the sense of what’s going on. We’re focused on making sure that when we talk funding, we’re talking spent funds, committed funds, and then total funds so that people know where their tax dollars are going.”

    “We’re also getting into where the projects are in the overall delivery process,” she added. “How is my watershed’s funding stacking up to other people’s funding?”

    Based on any potential directives given at Thursday’s Commissioners Court meeting, which was still underway at press time, the dashboard will be updated early next week to reflect new priorities and funding allocations, Woodell said.

    A lot of work has been done since the program was initiated, but some of it — such as design work and right-of-way acquisition — isn’t immediately visible while driving through Houston neighborhoods.

    The new dashboard shows 181 approved “bond IDs,” categories such as Greens Bayou Watershed, Buffalo Bayou Watershed, and Galveston Bay Watershed. Within those bond IDs are about 400 projects. About half of those projects are finished, Woodell said.

    “One of the things that we’ve gotten away from, just to be totally honest with you, is that this really was in response to Harvey,” she said. “It was seven years ago but it feels like it was yesterday. The damage was countywide. I think one of the things that’s been lost in this is just how much work has been done already and the benefits that are on the ground right now. We know that tens of thousands of people are safer.”

    click to enlarge

    Each of the 2018 bond projects has its own page on the dashboard that details the construction timeline and associated costs.

    Screenshot

    One of the big wins for the bond program, according to Woodell, was the construction of more than 16,000 acre-feet of stormwater detention.

    “That’s like if you took Minute Maid Park and stacked it 1,000 feet with stormwater,” she said. “It’s an amazing amount of capacity we’ve been able to add across the county. We’ve also constructed miles and miles of channel conveyance improvements. What that looks like is making sure our channels can actually move water and they have more capacity.”

    As new commissioners were elected and Petersen was appointed executive director in 2022, the bond program remained “highly conceptual,” Woodell said.

    “There were not a lot of hard projects included in the bond program,” she said. “There was a ton of engineering and analysis that was needed to be able to refine those concepts and actually build projects. The back-of-the-napkin things had to be turned into things that could be built, and there’s a lot of work that goes into that.”

    A prioritization framework was adopted by Commissioners Court in 2019 and later updated by the Harris County Community Flood Resilience Task Force in 2022.

    click to enlarge

    Precinct 1 Commissioner Rodney Ellis surveys damage after Hurricane Harvey.

    Photo by Brandon Dudley

    The flood control district, which reports to Commissioners Court, has followed the framework throughout the process, according to Petersen and Woodell, but Commissioner Ellis said this week he intends to hold them accountable to ensure vulnerable neighborhoods are being prioritized.

    Ellis said he was pleased with the action taken in June to secure $262.5 million for urgent needs, including $118 million for Greens Bayou.

    “I will continue to push for full implementation of the flood equity framework; no cuts to feasible projects in underserved areas; transparent reporting on project status, funding, and timelines; and deployment of all remaining flood bond funds according to equity principles,” Ellis said in an email. “We cannot back off. Equity isn’t a slogan. It’s a promise.”

    Some projects have been paused or eliminated from the to-do list because they were found to be “unfeasible,” Woodell said, meaning there is no engineering solution to move a project forward or a partner hasn’t come to the table. The dollars earmarked to those projects will be shifted to other efforts, Woodell said.

    Partnerships with private funders have proved lucrative, however, although the partners get to pick the projects they want to fund and their priorities may not line up with residents who voted for the bond.

    “The thing that will slow an infrastructure project down the fastest is uncertainty, whether it’s uncertainty about funding or scope,” Woodell said. “As we’ve refined the program over time, we’ve gotten more and more clarity.”

    click to enlarge

    Doris Brown asks for transparency and accountability at a September 18 meeting of Harris County Commissioners Court.

    Screenshot

    Public comment was held prior to the dashboard unveiling at Thursday’s Commissioners Court meeting, and while it was clear that several residents had already viewed the one-stop shop, many weren’t satisfied that it addressed their concerns about prioritizing projects in Harris County’s historically underserved neighborhoods.

    Community activist Shirley Ronquillo said she volunteered on the Flood Resilience Task Force from 2022 to 2024, but project prioritization based on equity wasn’t discussed.

    “I am here on behalf of communities that have been historically neglected and left to flood time and time again,” she said. “I applied for the task force under the illusion that the community could work alongside Harris County Flood Control and serve as an adviser to equitable flood mitigation solutions. However, my free time, after work, time away from my aging parents, was spent listening to county departments rather than serving as an adviser on projects.”

    Doris Brown, the northeast Houston resident whose home flooded during Harvey, also addressed equity.

    “Equity means that we must assist people in communities so that everyone ends up with an equal opportunity to thrive,” she said. “It means that communities that have been neglected, if not outright discriminated against, should get investment. All communities deserve to be protected from flooding.”

    “For too long, flood control decisions were made on basic cost-benefit analysis that valued a million-dollar home as more important than six $150,000 homes,” she added. “The prioritization matrix that flood control was instructed to use in 2019 and 2022 was supposed to address this, but time and time again, we have seen that flood control does not. It is a betrayal of trust that flood control decided that some projects didn’t need to be passed through the matrix.”

    [ad_2]

    April Towery

    Source link

  • The Hidden Cost: How Hurricanes Hit Black Students Harder

    The Hidden Cost: How Hurricanes Hit Black Students Harder

    [ad_1]

    In 2017, Christina Boyd-Patterson was a high school senior when the remnants of Hurricane Irma — a Category 5 storm when it hit Texas — swept through Jacksonville, Florida, where she lived and went to school. The storm inundated her city, forcing schools to shut down for weeks.

    “I know the hurricane affected everyone at my school just as much as me, but it was a lot,” Boyd-Patterson tells Word in Black. Among other things, she fell behind on college applications, but “at least I didn’t have to repeat a year, like some of my classmates did.”

    Data, including a recent government report, highlights the problems Patterson, now 25, faced.  

    From mental health challenges to prolonged school closures, Black students whose lives and education are disrupted by devastating weather events face greater obstacles in the aftermath, issues that widen existing inequities in education. 

    According to the U.S. Government Accountability Office, most school districts that received disaster recovery funds between 2017 and 2019 served high proportions of socially vulnerable students. Districts with large numbers of Black and Brown students, the report states, require significantly more recovery assistance than those with less vulnerable populations.

    But studies also show vulnerable Black communities often receive less financial support for disaster recovery overall than their white counterparts. That means schools in those communities are closed longer, have fewer resources to repair or rebuild and less support for students who may be struggling emotionally, living in temporary housing or homeless. 

    The data take on new significance as the aftermath of back-to-back hurricanes, Helene and Milton, grinds on in Florida, Texas, Georgia and western North Carolina. And it comes as climate change has made intense, destructive storms the new normal.

    Tatiana Samuels, a guidance counselor in Jacksonville, Florida, says the frequency of school closures after disasters has become so routine that “it almost feels like a drill.”

    “During teacher planning days, it’s something we always prepare for,” she says. “I always worry about the students’ mental well-being when they return to school, especially when we as school administrators don’t have many resources to offer them.”

    Federal Aid Disparities and Delayed Recovery

    A significant factor is the disparity in federal aid distribution. A 2022 study in Center of American Progress revealed that Black survivors of natural disasters saw their wealth decrease by an average of $27,000, while white survivors saw their wealth increase by $126,000. This disparity affects the ability of these families to rebuild their homes and stabilize their children’s education, further hindering recovery.

    The aftermath of Hurricane Harvey, which tore through southeastern Texas and Louisiana in 2017, just months after Irma, is a striking example. After the disaster, the number of homeless students soared by 351%, with around 8 in 10 students unhoused by the storm. The sudden displacement disrupted schooling for nearly 24,000 students. 

    Last year, the NAACP reported that counties with higher Black populations receive less FEMA funding than predominantly white counties despite experiencing similar levels of damage. 

    Black Mental Health and Emotional Trauma

    Black students’ mental health challenges after a natural disaster only add to the disparities. Exposure to disasters like hurricanes can lead to post-traumatic stress disorder in survivors, and Black students — who are more likely to experience housing instability and food insecurity post-disaster — are the most at risk.

    RELATED: A Month of Rain, All at Once

    Schools in disaster-affected Black communities often lack the resources needed to adequately support students’ mental health. Following Hurricane Harvey, many schools in low-income areas reported a shortage of qualified mental health providers. That left many students without the emotional support to recover, a factor in long-term academic and behavioral challenges.

    Educational Setbacks and Learning Loss

    Black students whose lives and education are disrupted by a major event are substantially more likely to fall behind academically and are vulnerable to absenteeism and at increased risk of dropping out. Research shows that extended school closures from natural disasters lead to long-term setbacks, particularly for Black students.

    The learning loss typically involves lower test scores and decreased graduation rates. 

    Meanwhile, student displacement — relocations to temporary shelters or different schools due to storm-related damage at their home school — also disrupt students’ education and can limit access to resources critical to academic success, such as internet connectivity or tutoring, 

    A Path Forward: Ensuring Equitable Recovery for Black Students 

    To ensure these students can recover and thrive academically post-disaster, systemic changes in disaster response and recovery funding are necessary.

    Samuels, the Jacksonville teacher, says federal aid “often fails to prioritize those in Black and Brown communities, which means the school districts in those areas are also disproportionately impacted.” School districts, she says, should designate an official “to work directly with federal organizations like FEMA to ensure the proper amount of aid is being provided, especially to communities of color.”

    Along with providing relief for students affected by natural disasters, Samuels says officials must adequately prepare for the new normal — more powerful storms that lead to increased disruptions in education.

    “Educators and community leaders must ensure schools are prepared for future disasters while providing immediate support for affected students. This includes expanding access to mental health services, ensuring equitable federal funding for recovery, and creating disaster preparedness plans.”

    [ad_2]

    Quintessa Williams, Word in Black

    Source link

  • US storm survivors: We need faster money, less red tape

    US storm survivors: We need faster money, less red tape

    [ad_1]

    MIDDLETOWN, N.J. — Survivors of storms that pounded several U.S. states say the nation’s disaster aid system is broken and want reforms to get money into victims’ hands faster, with less red tape.

    On the 10th anniversary of Superstorm Sandy’s landfall at the Jersey Shore, devastating communities throughout the northeast, survivors will gather Saturday with others who went through hurricanes Harvey, Irma, Maria and Ida along with victim advocacy groups from New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Louisiana and Puerto Rico.

    Robert Lukasiewicz said Sandy sounded like “a hundred freight trains” as it roared past his Atlantic City, New Jersey home on Oct. 29, 2012.

    Contractor fraud set his recovery efforts back and work by a second contractor stalled because of a lack of funds, Lukasiewicz said. After waiting two years for a government aid program, he said he finally found out he needed to have flood insurance first — the price of which had by then soared to unaffordable levels.

    “If all these things had been steps instead of missteps, I could have been home years ago,” he said. “You’ve got different systems that are all butting heads and blaming the other side, when the homeowners and families that all of this was designed for are suffering.”

    The survivors and their advocates listed five reforms they say are needed to help future storm victims avoid the type of delays, runarounds and financial desperation they experienced: getting money into people’s hands more quickly; ensuring that disaster recovery systems are applied equitably; making flood insurance work for storm victims instead of against them; including future storm resiliency into disaster recovery efforts; and ensuring that disaster recovery is systematic, not piecemeal.

    Specific recommendations call for a single point of application for the numerous local, state and federal assistance programs; imposing a smaller cap on annual flood insurance premium rate increases; giving storm victims direct payments and health insurance for a period after the storm; restructuring loan repayment or aid overpayment “clawbacks” to take into account a storm survivor’s ability to pay; and paying 100% of mitigation costs upfront for low-income storm victims instead of reimbursing them after they pay for the work.

    Michael Moriarty, director of the mitigation division of the Federal Emergency Management Agency region that includes New Jersey, said the agency is constantly trying to become more responsive to storm victims.

    “That’s been the Holy Grail, to get aid to people while their house was flooded,” he said. “That’s taxpayer money, so we have to be cautious, not just throwing it away, making sure it gets to the right place and is properly used. We’re trying to get to a mechanism that allows for quicker relief.”

    He said the idea for a single application point for storm aid is good, but cautioned that federal privacy laws restrict information sharing with state and local governments without first getting signed releases, which can take weeks.

    And a post-Ida aid program designed to be fast-tracked so applicants could learn within two weeks whether they had been approved took eight months to be reviewed by federal budget monitors, Moritarty said.

    “It was within the first year but not within the goal of the first month,” he said. “I think that will get better and better.”

    ———

    Follow Wayne Parry on Twitter at www.twitter.com/WayneParryAC.

    [ad_2]

    Source link