ReportWire

Tag: Hunter Biden

  • Hunter Biden’s ex-wife, other family members expected to take the stand in his federal gun trial

    Hunter Biden’s ex-wife, other family members expected to take the stand in his federal gun trial

    [ad_1]

    Federal prosecutors in Hunter Biden’s gun trial have spent hours showing jurors evidence of his drug problem, seeking to reveal through his own words and writing the depth of his addiction in order to show it was still going on when he bought a firearm and, they say, lied on a form to purchase it.

    Testimony was expected to continue Wednesday. Hunter Biden’s ex-wife Kathleen Buhle is expected to be among the witnesses; she was married to President Joe Biden’s son for roughly 20 years. They have three children, divorcing in 2016 after his infidelity and drug abuse became too much to overcome, according to her memoir entitled, “If We Break” about the dissolution of their marriage.

    She’s one of several Biden family and friends expected to testify in a trial that has quickly become a highly personal and detailed tour of Hunter Biden’s mistakes and drug usage as the 2024 presidential election looms and allies worry about the toll it will take on the president, who is deeply concerned about the health and sustained sobriety of his only living son. Prosecutors argue the testimony is necessary to show Hunter Biden’s state of mind when he bought the gun.

    He has been charged with three felonies stemming from the purchase of a gun in October 2018, accused of lying to a federally licensed gun dealer, making a false claim on the application by saying he was not a drug user and illegally having the gun for 11 days.

    “No one is allowed to lie on a federal form like that, even Hunter Biden,” prosecutor Derek Hines told jurors on Tuesday. “He crossed the line when he chose to buy a gun and lied about a federal background check … the defendant’s choice to buy a gun is why we are here.”

    “When the defendant filled out that form, he knew he was a drug addict,” and prosecutors don’t have to prove he was using the day he purchased the firearm, Hines said.

    First lady Jill Biden and her daughter Ashley sat in the courtroom for much of Tuesday. Hunter Biden’s attorney argued that his client did not believe he was in the throes of addiction when he stated in the paperwork that he did not have a drug problem. In the short time that he had the gun, he did nothing with it, and the weapon was never even loaded, attorney Abbe Lowell said in his opening statement.

    “You will see that he is not guilty,” Lowell said.

    Lowell said the form asks whether you “are” a drug user. “It does not say ‘have you ever been,’” and he suggested the president’s son did not think of himself as someone with a drug problem when he purchased the gun.

    His state of mind should be considered at the time of the purchase, not later on, when, after he got sober, he wrote a memoir “Beautiful Things,” about some of his darkest moments. The jury heard lengthy audio excerpts from the book that traces his descent following the death of his brother in 2015 from cancer.

    The trial comes after a plea deal with prosecutors fell apart that would have resolved the gun case and a separate tax case and avoided the spectacle of a trial. Hunter Biden has since pleaded not guilty and has said he’s being unfairly targeted by the Justice Department, after Republicans slammed the now-defunct plea deal as a sweetheart deal for the Democratic president’s son.

    The 12-person panel heard opening statements Tuesday, and testimony from an FBI agent who read aloud some of his personal messages including some that came from a laptop he left at a Delaware repair shop and never retrieved. In 2020, the contents made their way to Republicans and were publicly leaked, revealing some highly personal messages about his work and his life. He has since sued over the leaked information.

    In one exchange with Beau’s widow Hallie on the day after he bought the gun, she wrote: “I called you 500 times in past 24 hours.” Hunter replied less than a minute later, informing her that he was “sleeping on a car smoking crack on 4th street and Rodney.”

    “There’s my truth,” he added in a follow-up text.

    But during cross-examination, the FBI agent testified that Hunter Biden sent fewer messages about seeking drugs in October 2018, around the time when he purchased the gun, than in February 2019, a later period in which Lowell described his client as struggling significantly with addiction.

    Lowell also called into question the receipts for the rehab facility, asking whether the agent knew whether he had been treated for drugs or alcohol. She said she could not.

    His sister Ashley Biden, watching from the courtroom, dabbed at her eyes with a tissue and eventually left.

    Attorneys said jurors would hear testimony from the president’s brother James Biden, who is close with Hunter and helped his nephew through rehab stints in the past. They will also hear how Hallie Biden became addicted to crack during a brief relationship with Hunter.

    Hallie took the gun from Hunter and tossed it into the garbage at a nearby market, afraid of what he might do with it. The weapon was later found by someone collecting cans and eventually turned over to police.

    If convicted, Hunter Biden faces up to 25 years in prison, though first-time offenders do not get anywhere near the maximum, and it’s unclear whether the judge would give him time behind bars.

    The trial is unfolding shortly after Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, was convicted of 34 felonies in New York City. The two criminal cases are unrelated, but their proximity underscores how the courts have taken center stage during the 2024 campaign.

    Hunter Biden also faces a trial in California in September on charges of failing to pay $1.4 million in taxes. Both cases were to have been resolved through the deal with prosecutors last July, the culmination of a yearslong investigation into his business dealings.

    But Judge Maryellen Noreika, who was nominated to the bench by Trump, questioned some unusual aspects of the deal. The lawyers could not come to a resolution on her questions, and the deal fell apart. Attorney General Merrick Garland then appointed a former U.S. attorney for Delaware, David Weiss, as a special counsel in August, and a month later Hunter Biden was indicted.

    ___

    Long reported from Washington.

    [ad_2]

    Claudia Lauer, Randall Chase, Colleen Long and Michael Kunzelman | Associated Press

    Source link

  • 6/4: CBS Evening News

    6/4: CBS Evening News

    [ad_1]

    6/4: CBS Evening News – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Biden announces sweeping changes to asylum system; Ceremony honors school mentors from New York City initiative

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 6/4: The Daily Report with John Dickerson

    6/4: The Daily Report with John Dickerson

    [ad_1]

    6/4: The Daily Report with John Dickerson – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    John Dickerson reports on the new immigration policy affecting asylum seekers at the southern border, NATO military exercises in the Baltic region, and what’s behind the slew of liberal arts schools shutting down.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 6/3: CBS Evening News

    6/3: CBS Evening News

    [ad_1]

    6/3: CBS Evening News – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Jury seated in Hunter Biden’s federal gun trial; Twin brothers graduate high school at top of their class

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 6/3: The Daily Report with John Dickerson

    6/3: The Daily Report with John Dickerson

    [ad_1]

    6/3: The Daily Report with John Dickerson – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    John Dickerson reports on an executive order that could restrict asylum processing at the southern border, the historic election outcome in Mexico, and what’s really behind the dark web.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hunter Biden’s federal gun trial to begin today

    Hunter Biden’s federal gun trial to begin today

    [ad_1]

    Jury selection in Hunter Biden’s federal gun trial begins Monday in Delaware, as he faces three felony charges stemming from his alleged illegal purchase and possession of a firearm in 2018 while he was a drug user.

    Hunter Biden arrived at the courthouse shortly after 8 a.m. ET. First lady Jill Biden arrived shortly after him. 

    The president’s son was indicted by a federal grand jury in September after a diversion agreement for a felony gun offense and a plea deal related to misdemeanor tax charges unraveled when U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika questioned whether the agreement would allow him to avoid potential future charges.

    Hunter Biden’s attorneys decried the charges and argued they were “unconstitutional” and “unprecedented,” as well as in violation of the diversion agreement they maintain was still legally binding and valid.

    A flurry of motions to dismiss filed by Hunter Biden’s attorneys were denied by Judge Noreika, and a federal appeals court rejected his motion to dismiss the gun charges in May.

    US-COURT-BIDEN-POLITICS-WEAPONS-INVESTIGATION-TRIAL
    Hunter Biden, son of President Joe Biden, joined by his wife Melissa Cohen Biden, arrives to the J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building on June 3, 2024 in Wilmington, Delaware. 

    Photo by RYAN COLLERD/AFP via Getty Images


    In the three-count indictment, the president’s son is charged with making false statements on a federal gun form about his drug use, certifying he was not a user of or addicted to any controlled substance during a period when prosecutors allege he was addicted to crack cocaine. Biden purchased a Colt Cobra .38 Special revolver, and it remained in his possession for 11 days before it was discarded in an outdoor receptacle by Hallie Biden, Hunter Biden’s romantic partner at the time. 

    Prosecutors are expected to introduce evidence that details Biden’s use of controlled substances leading up to and during the period he purchased the firearm. In their  trial brief, they reference Biden’s own admission of drug addiction in excerpts from his memoir, Beautiful Things, as well as photos and videos from his laptop and text messages.

    Prosecutors also intend to include testimony from Hunter Biden’s former romantic partners recounting his substance abuse, including his ex-wife, Kathleen Buhle and Hallie Biden, the widow of his late brother, Beau Biden, and expert testimony from FBI and DEA agents.

    Hunter Biden’s attorneys seek to call their own expert witnesses on addiction and forensic psychiatry and forensic toxicology.

    The charges were brought by special counsel David Weiss who was appointed U.S. attorney for Delaware by former President Donald Trump and named special counsel by Attorney General Merrick Garland in 2023. Federal probes into Hunter Biden, led by Weiss, spanned five years over the course of both the Trump and Biden administrations.

    Attorneys for Hunter Biden asserted that Weiss “buckled under political pressure to bring more severe charges” after the plea agreement elicited a “sharp rebuke” from former President Trump and his Republican allies when it was first made public. Weiss’ office slammed claims that the charges were fueled by politics and were pursued to appease Republicans.

    “The charges in this case are not trumped up or because of former President Trump—they are instead a result of the defendant’s own choices and were brought in spite of, not because of, any outside noise made by politicians,” prosecutors said.

    Hunter Biden faces up to 25 years in prison and $750,000 in fines if convicted on all counts.

    Separately, he faces nine federal tax charges in the central district of California in a second indictment brought by Weiss’ office where federal prosecutors allege President Biden’s son engaged in a “four-year scheme” to avoid paying at least $1.4 million in federal taxes. 

    Hunter Biden is charged with three felony and six misdemeanor charges related to his alleged failure to file and pay taxes, evasion of assessment, and filing a false or fraudulent tax return. Biden has pleaded not guilty to those charges. 

    His motions to dismiss the federal tax charges were all denied by U.S. District Judge Mark Scarsi in April. If convicted, Hunter Biden faces up to 17 years in prison. 

    References to the tax charges or questioning related to those charges or the plea hearing are not admissible in his federal gun trial in Delaware.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jury selection begins in Hunter Biden’s federal gun trial

    Jury selection begins in Hunter Biden’s federal gun trial

    [ad_1]

    Jury selection is to begin Monday in a federal gun case against President Joe Biden’s son Hunter after the collapse of a deal with prosecutors that would have avoided the spectacle of a trial so close to the 2024 election.

    Hunter Biden, who spent the weekend with his father, has been charged in Delaware with three felonies stemming from a 2018 firearm purchase when he was, according to his memoir, in the throes of a crack addiction. He has been accused of lying to a federally licensed gun dealer, making a false claim on the application used to screen firearms applicants when he said he was not a drug user, and illegally having the gun for 11 days.

    He has pleaded not guilty and has argued he’s being unfairly targeted by the Justice Department, after Republicans decried the now-defunct deal as special treatment for the Democratic president’s son.

    The trial comes just days after Donald Trump, Republicans’ presumptive 2024 presidential nominee, was convicted of 34 felonies in New York City. A jury found the former president guilty of a scheme to cover up a hush money payment to a porn actor to fend off damage to his 2016 presidential campaign. The two criminal cases are unrelated, but their proximity underscores how the criminal courtroom has taken center stage during the 2024 campaign.

    Hunter Biden is also facing a separate trial in California in September on charges of failing to pay $1.4 million in taxes. Both cases were to have been resolved through a deal with prosecutors last July, the culmination of a yearslong investigation into his business dealings.

    But Judge Maryellen Noreika, who was nominated to the bench by Trump, questioned some unusual aspects of the deal, which included a proposed guilty plea to misdemeanor offenses to resolve the tax crimes and a diversion agreement on the gun charge, which meant as long as he stayed out of trouble for two years the case would be dismissed. The lawyers squabbled over the agreement, could not come to a resolution, and the deal fell apart. Attorney General Merrick Garland then appointed the top investigator as a special counsel in August, and a month later Hunter Biden was indicted.

    This trial isn’t about Hunter Biden’s foreign business affairs — which Republicans have seized on without evidence to try to paint the Biden family as corrupt. But it will excavate some of Hunter Biden’s darkest moments and put them on display.

    The president’s allies are worried about the toll the trial may take on the elder Biden, who’s long been concerned about the well-being and sobriety of his only living son and who must now watch as those painful past mistakes are publicly scrutinized. He’s also protective: Hunter Biden was with his father all weekend before the case began, biking with his dad and attending church together.

    President Biden, in a last-minute switch in plans, shifted from his Rehoboth Beach home back to his Wilmington compound on Sunday evening. Boarding a helicopter on Sunday was the only time the president was seen publicly without his son all weekend.

    Allies are also worried the trial could become a distraction as the president tries to campaign under anemic poll numbers and as he is preparing for an upcoming presidential debate while the proceedings play out.

    Prosecutors are hoping to show Hunter Biden was in the throes of addiction when he bought the gun and therefore lied on the forms. They have said they’re planning to use as evidence his published memoir, and they may also introduce contents from a laptop that he left at a Delaware repair shop and never retrieved. The contents made their way to Republicans in 2020 and were publicly leaked, revealing embarrassing and personal photos in which he’s often nude and doing drugs and messages in which he asks dealers about scores.

    The judge will ask a group of prospective jurors a series of questions to determine whether they can serve impartially on the jury, including whether they have donated to political campaigns or run for political office. She will ask whether their views about the 2024 presidential campaign prevent them from being impartial.

    She’s also going to ask whether prospective jurors believe Hunter Biden is being prosecuted because his father is the president. Also, she’ll ask about firearms purchasing and addiction issues, including: “Do you believe someone who is addicted to drugs should not be charged with a crime?”

    The case against Hunter Biden stems from a period when, by his own public admission, he was addicted to crack. His descent into drugs and alcohol followed the 2015 death of his brother, Beau Biden, from cancer. He bought and owned a gun for 11 days in October 2018 and indicated on the gun purchase form that he was not using drugs.

    Hunter Biden has pleaded not guilty in both cases, and his attorneys have suggested they may argue he didn’t see himself as an addict when prosecutors say he checked “no” to the question on the form. They’ll also attack the credibility of the gun store owner.

    Prosecutors, meanwhile, are also planning to call as witnesses Hunter Biden’s ex-wife and his brother’s widow, Hallie, with whom he became romantically involved.

    If he were to be convicted, he could face up to 25 years in prison, though first-time offenders do not get anywhere near the maximum and it’s unclear whether the judge would give him time behind bars.

    [ad_2]

    Randall Chase, Claudia Lauer, Michael Kunzelman and Colleen Long | The Associated Press

    Source link

  • Judge refuses to dismiss federal gun case against Hunter Biden

    Judge refuses to dismiss federal gun case against Hunter Biden

    [ad_1]

    A federal judge in Delaware refused Friday to throw out a federal gun case against Hunter Biden, rejecting the president’s son’s claim that he is being prosecuted for political purposes as well as other arguments.

    U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika denied defense efforts to scuttle the prosecution charging Hunter Biden with lying about his drug use in October 2018 on a form to buy a gun that he kept for about 11 days.

    Hunter Biden’s lawyers had argued the case was politically motivated and asserted that an immunity provision from an original plea deal that fell apart still holds. They had also challenged the appointment of special counsel David Weiss, the U.S. attorney in Delaware, to lead the prosecution.

    The case is tentatively scheduled to begin in early June. 

    Noreika, who was appointed to the bench by former President Donald Trump, has not yet ruled on a challenge to the constitutionality of the gun charges.

    Hunter Biden faces separate tax counts in Los Angeles alleging he failed to pay at least $1.4 million in taxes over three years while living an “extravagant lifestyle,” during his days of using drugs. The judge overseeing that case refused to dismiss the charges earlier this month.

    Biden has pleaded not guilty in both cases. A representative for his legal team didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Friday.

    The president’s son has acknowledged struggling with an addiction to crack cocaine during that period in 2018, but his lawyers have said he didn’t break the law and another nonviolent, first-time offender would not have been charged.

    Defense attorney Abbe Lowell had argued Hunter Biden was “selectively charged” for improper political purposes. They argued that Weiss “buckled under political pressure” to indict the president’s son amid criticism of the plea deal from Trump and other Republicans.

    Norieka said in her ruling that Biden’s team provided “nothing concrete” to support a conclusion that anyone actually influenced the special counsel’s team.

    “The pressure campaign from Congressional Republicans may have occurred around the time that Special Counsel decided to move forward with indictment instead of pretrial diversion, but the Court has been given nothing credible to suggest that the conduct of those lawmakers (or anyone else) had any impact on Special Counsel,” the judge wrote. “It is all speculation.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hunter Biden’s motions to dismiss tax charges all denied by judge

    Hunter Biden’s motions to dismiss tax charges all denied by judge

    [ad_1]

    FBI’s Biden informant accused of lying before


    FBI’s Biden informant accused of lying as far back as 2016

    03:56

    U.S. District Judge Mark Scarsi on Monday denied all eight of Hunter Biden’s motions to dismiss the nine federal tax charges he faces in California. 

    At a hearing last week, Hunter Biden’s attorney primarily argued that the charges against him were part of a politically fueled prosecution. Special counsel David Weiss’ office rebutted those claims, arguing politics had no bearing on the facts of the case.

    Judge Scarsi also appeared skeptical of Biden’s arguments. In his order Monday, Scarsi said Biden failed to provide “clear evidence” of discriminatory purpose and provided only “conjecture” about prosecutorial decisions made in the case.

    “We strongly disagree with the Court’s decision and will continue to vigorously pursue Mr. Biden’s challenges to the abnormal way the Special Counsel handled this investigation and charged this case,” Biden’s attorney, Abbe Lowell, told CBS News in a statement.

    Biden has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

    Federal prosecutors allege President Biden’s son engaged in a “four-year scheme” to avoid paying at least $1.4 million in federal taxes. In December, they charged him with felonies and misdemeanors related to his alleged failure to file and pay taxes, evasion of assessment and filing a false or fraudulent tax return. 

    Prosecutors say Hunter Biden had earned more than $7 million in gross income when he failed to pay taxes and said he funded an “extravagant lifestyle” and evaded taxes by classifying some personal expenditures — such as luxury hotel stays, luxury vehicle rentals and escort services — as business deductions.  

    If convicted, he faces up to 17 years in prison.

    Another key argument made by Hunter Biden’s counsel was that the tax charges violated a legally binding diversion agreement made last year. But prosecutors argued the proposed agreement had not been approved by the U.S. Office of Probation and had not yet gone into effect. Scarsi found that Hunter Biden was not granted immunity from the charges.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • “The Real White House Crime Family”: Dem Rep. Tells the GOP to Stop Wasting Time With Hunter Biden and Subpoena Jared Kushner

    “The Real White House Crime Family”: Dem Rep. Tells the GOP to Stop Wasting Time With Hunter Biden and Subpoena Jared Kushner

    [ad_1]

    While testifying during a closed-door deposition about his business dealings on Wednesday, Hunter Biden had a question for Republicans, given their apparent concern with conflicts of interest and corruption: Why are they not probing former first son-in-law Jared Kushner’s arrangement with Saudi Arabia, wherein Kushner’s investment firm received $2 billion from the country’s sovereign wealth fund shortly after leaving the White House? “He drew the distinction between what he has done in a business world with independent businessmen versus foreign governments, which he did not do any business with—unlike Jared Kushner,” Representative Dan Goldman told reporters. “He may be a little bit frustrated by some of the double standards relating to Jared Kushner and money that’s just been openly pocketed by Donald Trump in office,” added Representative Jamie Raskin. “And Jared Kushner, of course, brought back $2 billion from Saudi Arabia. And all of that has been a part of the conversation, and he was assertive about that.” And as it turns out, Biden is not the only one curious to know why he is being hauled before Congress while Kushner is counting his Saudi cash.

    In a speech on the House floor on Thursday, Representative Robert Garcia demanded Republicans stop wasting their time on Hunter Biden and investigate Kushner’s business dealings. Standing beside a huge photo of Kushner and Ivanka Trump, Garcia said: “Yesterday I sat in on the Hunter Biden deposition for hours. Republicans once again…provided zero evidence, failing to show any sort of link between Hunter Biden and the president. No links between those business dealings. This entire case is a political stunt and a joke. Donald Trump ordered House Republicans to smear President Biden; they tried and tried and tried and failed.”

    He added: “But I want to remind everyone about the real White House crime family. Why did Saudi Arabia give Jared Kushner $2 billion—billion with a *b—*just months after he left the Trump White House? And why did the Saudis spend hundreds of thousands of dollars at Trump properties while he was still the president? We also know that Jared Kushner used his cushy White House job to secure a $100 billion arms deal for Saudi Arabia and did other favors as well. Now, some members of the majority actually agree that this was unethical. And in fact, a few weeks ago, Jared Kushner was asked by a reporter about his grift. He responded, ‘Are we still really doing this?’ Yes, Jared, we are still really doing this. The American people deserve answers. I rise yet again to urge my colleagues across the aisle to answer our calls and subpoena Jared Kushner’s companies once and for all. We are not stopping, and we demand answers.”

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    As The New York Times reported in 2022, shortly after he left the White House—where he went to bat for Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman following the murder of Jamal Khashoggi—Kushner’s investment firm received a whopping $2 billion from the Saudi Public Investment Fund. That may have struck some people as eye-brow-raising on its own, but making things even more comically corrupt-looking was the fact that the panel that performs due diligence for the Saudi fund concluded Kushner’s firm was “unsatisfactory in all aspects,” and that the country shouldn’t give the former first son-in-law a dime. And then those unequivocal warnings were overridden by the fund’s board, which just so happens to be led by MBS. Kushner, The Times reported, “played a leading role inside the Trump administration defending Crown Prince Mohammed” after Khashoggi’s murder, and urged Donald Trump to support the crown prince, arguing that the whole situation would blow over.

    For his part, Kushner has said his business dealings have been entirely above board. Last month, he called the crown prince “a visionary leader.”

    Not surprisingly, Republicans are beside themselves over the notion that Hunter Biden had the audacity to bring up Kushner during his deposition, and that the former first son-in-law has done anything that demands scrutiny. Speaking to Newsmax on Thursday, House Judiciary Committee chair Jim Jordan insisted, “The idea that Jared Kushner did something wrong is ridiculous.”

    Mike Johnson won’t say if he supports legislation protecting access to IVF

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • GOP lays out next steps in impeachment probe after Hunter Biden testifies

    GOP lays out next steps in impeachment probe after Hunter Biden testifies

    [ad_1]

    GOP lays out next steps in impeachment probe after Hunter Biden testifies – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Hunter Biden testified Wednesday before two House committees leading the impeachment inquiry into his father. CBS News investigative reporter Erica Brown has the latest on where things stand.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Former FBI informant who feds say lied to investigators about the Bidens due back in court

    Former FBI informant who feds say lied to investigators about the Bidens due back in court

    [ad_1]

    Washington — Federal prosecutors in a court hearing on Monday in Los Angeles will once again try to make the case that an ex-FBI informant who is accused of lying to investigators about President Biden and his son Hunter’s business dealings should be detained pending trial. 

    Alexander Smirnov was charged with two counts that amounted to allegedly making up fake stories about the Bidens — namely that they were each paid $5 million by a Ukrainian energy company — and passing that false information along to his FBI handlers for further investigation in 2020.  Special counsel David Weiss — the Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney for Delaware named special counsel by Attorney General Merrick Garland to continue his investigation into Hunter Biden — sought the indictment against him earlier this month. 

    Last week, Smirnov, 43, was briefly released from federal custody after a magistrate judge in Las Vegas said that certain conditions would permit his secure pretrial freedom despite his alleged ties to foreign intelligence services that made him a flight risk. But on Thursday, Smirnov was taken back into federal custody and ordered to appear before the federal judge in Los Angeles who will oversee his case following a request from prosecutors to reconsider the release order.

    President Biden Arrives Back At The White House From Delaware
    Hunter Biden, son of U.S. President Joe Biden, arrives at the White House December 19, 2023 in Washington, DC. 

    Drew Angerer / Getty Images


    “The government..sought reconsideration or re-examination by this Court of the Nevada release order,” wrote federal Judge Otis Wright on Thursday. “That motion for reconsideration has been granted and this Court issued an arrest warrant.” 

    Smirnov’s lawyers have opposed his detention and wrote last week that his personal relationships in the U.S. mitigated his risk of fleeing the country and his lack of criminal history supported his release. 

    “When he was arrested for a second time, Mr. Smirnov was already free and working on his defense in his lawyers’ office,” his legal team wrote, “This is hardly what would be expected of a person preparing to jump bail and flee the country; to the contrary, had he not been rearrested, Mr. Smirnov would have voluntarily traveled to Los Angeles with his lawyers to attend the upcoming hearing.” 

    In seeking Smirnov’s detention, the special counsel’s team revealed that after his arrest,  the defendant claimed that individuals “associated with Russian intelligence” were tied to efforts to peddle a story about Hunter Biden. 

    “He is actively peddling new lies that could impact U.S. elections after meeting with Russian intelligence officials in November,” prosecutors wrote last week, without revealing which claim about Hunter Biden apparently stemmed from Russia. 

    “Law enforcement knows about Smirnov’s contact with officials affiliated with Russian intelligence because Smirnov himself reported on a number of those contacts to his FBI Handler,” the special counsel’s team alleged. “These contacts are extensive and extremely recent, and Smirnov had the intention of meeting with one of these officials on his upcoming planned overseas travel.”

    But it was not just Russia. Investigators alleged that the man charged with lying to them also claimed to have had contacts with other foreign intelligence services that all posed a risk if he had been granted pretrial release. 

    Prosecutors did not say whether Smirnov’s claims about the alleged ties to Russian intelligence have ever been substantiated and wrote that while he was used as an informant for many years, Smirnov was ultimately deemed unreliable and indicted.  

    The alleged fake stories that Smirnov has been charged with providing to his FBI handlers were memorialized in a federal document that became a flashpoint for Republican Congressional leaders as they pushed ahead in their investigation of the first family’s business dealings. They pointed to the document’s allegations of bribery as evidence of misdeeds, but the charges against Smirnov blunted those claims as the ex-informant is accused of “transform[ing] his routine and unextraordinary business contacts with Burisma in 2017 and later into bribery allegations against” Hunter and Mr. Biden. 

    On Monday, federal prosecutors are set to urge Wright to keep Smirov behind bars based on the risks posed by the foreign intelligence contacts he once claimed he maintained. Wright wrote in his order detaining Smirnov that defense attorneys were working to “arrange the release of Defendant Smirnov, likely to facilitate his absconding from the United States. “

    Smirnov’s legal team pushed back, writing that the judge’s assertions were “wrong.” 

    The defendant has yet to enter a plea in the case. 

    His claims are not cited in either of Weiss’ two indictments against the president’s son, charging him with gun crimes and failure to pay taxes in federal courts in Delaware and California. Hunter Biden’s legal team nevertheless referenced Smirnov’s relationship with the FBI in a court filing last week in an effort to bolster their case. 

    Hunter Biden has pleaded not guilty to all counts against him and has filed numerous motions to dismiss both indictments.  

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • GOP Rep. Gaetz Clashes With CNN’s Phillip Over Hunter Biden: ‘Do You Think They Were Paying Him To Figure Out Where To Go Buy Crack?’

    GOP Rep. Gaetz Clashes With CNN’s Phillip Over Hunter Biden: ‘Do You Think They Were Paying Him To Figure Out Where To Go Buy Crack?’

    [ad_1]

    Politics

    Screenshot/CNN

    House Republicans are attempting to impeach Joe Biden.

    Why? They believe there is enough evidence to suggest the president and his son Hunter Biden were accepting bribes or at least engaged in pay-to-play schemes with various countries, and in particular Ukrainian energy company Burisma.

    An impeachment inquiry source, Alexander Smirnov, was recently charged with making false statements to the FBI on the matter. Republicans had previously called Smirnov “highly credible” and said that his claims were “direct evidence of naked corruption and bribery.”

    This caused CNN host Abby Phillip to grill Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz over Smirnov and his credibility.

    And things got interesting.

    RELATED: Donald Trump Teases Tim Scott As Running Mate

    ‘If you want to bribe a 75-year-old man, you pay their kids’

    It was an exchange where Phillips appeared to think she had gotten Gaetz, but the congressman had some good – and undeniable – retorts.

    Mediate reports, “After grilling Gaetz about the arrest of impeachment inquiry source Alexander Smirnov, who was charged with making false statements to the FBI after claiming that the Ukrainian energy company Burisma had paid President Biden and his son Hunter Biden $5 million each, Phillip then played a compilation of Gaetz’s colleagues calling Smirnov ‘highly credible’ and his claims ‘direct evidence of naked corruption and bribery.’”

    “Asked whether the remarks from his colleagues had been ‘irresponsible,’ Gaetz replied, ‘A few of those characterizations might have been a little, a little over sauced, but I do think that the bribery can also go to a family member,” Mediaite noted.

    The story continued:

    He argued, “If you want to bribe a 75-year-old man, you pay their kids…”

    The CNN host then asked, “Given that, according to Jim Jordan, this was the most corroborating piece of evidence that they had, should they drop this impeachment?”

    Gaetz replied:

    I disagree with Jordan that this is what’s most corroborating. I think what’s most corroborating are the payments to Hunter Biden and Frank Biden and James Biden. I was deposing James Biden and the way that they took money from the Chinese government would make your skin crawl. Now, that’s admittedly James Biden, not Joe Biden, but I do believe when these foreign governments are loading up the entire Biden family apparatus with cash, they’re not doing so to extract some sort of skill or service from these ne’er-do-well Bidens, they doing it to influence Joe Biden.

    But it wasn’t this smackdown that got the attention of the ever-watching internet.

    RELATED: CBS Seizes Materials Of Fired Journalist Who Was Investigating Hunter Biden

    Why Was Burisma Paying Hunter Biden Such a Large Amount of Money?

    “Everything that you’ve described is an inference,” said Phillip. “You actually haven’t given any proof of what you’re alleging.”

    Gaetz replied, “But Abby, why do you think Burisma was paying Hunter Biden? Do you think they were paying him to figure out where to go buy crack in LA? I mean, they were paying him because he had access to Joe.”

    It was a testy discussion but Gaetz point was still hard to get around – why exactly would Burisma be paying Hunter Biden such a large amount of money.

    It was certainly not to buy crack.

    7.2 Million Illegal Aliens Entered the U.S. Under Biden. That’s A Larger Population Than 36 States

    Now is the time to support and share the sources you trust.
    The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites.”

    is a professional writer and editor with over 15 years of experience in conservative media and Republican politics. He… More about John Hanson

    [ad_2]

    John Hanson

    Source link

  • Ex-FBI informant charged with lying about Bidens had Russian intelligence contacts, prosecutors say

    Ex-FBI informant charged with lying about Bidens had Russian intelligence contacts, prosecutors say

    [ad_1]

    A former FBI informant charged with making up a multimillion-dollar bribery scheme involving President Joe Biden, his son Hunter and a Ukrainian energy company had contacts with Russian intelligence-affiliated officials, prosecutors said in a court paper Tuesday.

    Prosecutors revealed the alleged contact as they urged a judge to keep Alexander Smirnov behind bars while he awaits trial. He’s accused of falsely telling his handler that executives with the Ukrainian energy company Burisma paid Hunter and Joe Biden $5 million each around 2015. The claim became central to the Republican impeachment inquiry in Congress.

    U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel Albregts allowed Smirnov to be released from custody on electronic GPS monitoring while he awaits trial. He must stay in Clark County, Nevada, and is prohibited from applying for a new passport.

    Prosecutors said Smirnov, 43, admitted during an interview after his arrest last week that “officials associated with Russian intelligence were involved in passing a story” about Hunter Biden. They said Smirnov’s contacts with Russian officials were recent and extensive, and said Smirnov had planned to meet with one official during an upcoming overseas trip.

    Hunter Biden made a surprise appearance on Capitol Hill on Wednesday, briefly sitting in on a House committee hearing over a resolution to hold him in contempt of Congress.

    Smirnov has been in custody at a facility in rural Pahrump, about an hour’s drive west of Las Vegas, since his arrest last week at the airport while returning from overseas.

    Defense attorneys David Chesnoff and Richard Schonfeld said in a statement they asked for Smirnov’s release while he awaits trial “so he can effectively fight the power of the government.”

    The White House didn’t immediately comment on the claims in Tuesday’s court filing.

    Prosecutors say Smirnov, who holds dual U.S.-Israeli citizenship, falsely reported to the FBI in June 2020 that executives associated with the Ukrainian energy company Burisma paid Hunter and Joe Biden $5 million each in 2015 or 2016.

    Smirnov in fact had only routine business dealings with the company starting in 2017 and made the bribery allegations after he “expressed bias” against Joe Biden while he was a presidential candidate, prosecutors said in court documents. He is charged with making a false statement and creating a false and fictitious record. The charges were filed in Los Angeles, where he lived for 16 years before relocating to Las Vegas two years ago.

    Smirnov’s claims have been central to the Republican effort in Congress to investigate the president and his family, and helped spark what is now a House impeachment inquiry into Biden. Democrats called for an end to the probe after the indictment came down last week, while Republicans distanced the inquiry from Smirnov’s claims and said they would continue to “follow the facts.”

    Hunter Biden is expected to give a deposition next week.

    The Burisma allegations became a flashpoint in Congress as Republicans pursuing investigations of President Biden and his family demanded the FBI release the unredacted form documenting the allegations. They acknowledged they couldn’t confirm if the allegations were true.

    __

    Whitehurst reported from Washington. Associated Press writer Alanna Durkin Richer in Boston contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Lindsay Whitehurst and Rio Yamat | Associated Press

    Source link

  • Arizona Republicans want to save horny kids from the internet

    Arizona Republicans want to save horny kids from the internet

    [ad_1]

    A controversial internet age-verification bill passed out of an Arizona House committee on Jan. 29, despite warnings from critics that the legislation is unconstitutional and will not prevent minors from accessing online porn.

    Sponsored by Rep. Tim Dunn, a Republican from Yuma, House Bill 2586 requires websites with material deemed “harmful to minors” to verify that their visitors are 18 or older. Any website failing to comply could be sued for damages “that result from a minor accessing the material.”

    The vote on the bill from the Republican-dominated House Judiciary Committee was hardly a ringing endorsement. Four Republicans voted for it. The three Democrats on the committee voted against it. Two Republicans voted “present.”

    On Feb. 5, the House Rules Committee approved the bill, 9-0. It has yet to be scheduled for a floor vote.

    A similar bill, SB 1503, was considered by the House last year. It failed to pass, 31-26.

    Reading HB 2586, it’s easy to see why even some Republican legislators have qualms about it.

    The proposed law would apply if one-third or more of a website’s total content is “harmful to minors,” a category that covers a broad swath of written, spoken and visual communication. The bill defines “harmful to minors” as “descriptions of actual, simulated or animated” displays or depictions of a variety of sex acts and body parts.

    The sex acts and body parts include sexual intercourse, masturbation, sodomy, flagellation, oral copulation, “excretory functions,” pubic hair, anuses, vulvas, genitals or a “female breast’s nipple.”

    Male nips are apparently A-OK.

    Nor can the website describe or depict “exhibitions or any other sexual act.” The word “exhibitions” is undefined.

    Also verboten is the description of “touching, caressing or fondling of nipples, breasts, buttocks or genitals.” Which means no images or written descriptions of women breastfeeding their children.

    The bill dictates that the forbidden content should lack “serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value for minors.” All of which is wide open to interpretation.

    Newspapers, radio, TV and journalists in general are exempt from the bill’s dictates. So, interestingly, are internet service providers like Google or GoDaddy and social media platforms such as Facebook, Reddit and Twitter.

    click to enlarge

    Marilyn Rodriguez, a lobbyist for the ACLU of Arizona, criticized the legislation as an affront to the First Amendment rights of adults.

    ACTV

    ‘This bill does very little to protect children’

    Before the vote, Mike Stabile, communications director for the California-based Free Speech Coalition, which represents the adult entertainment industry, told the committee the social media exemption was one reason the legislation would fail to have its desired effect.

    “The vast majority of adult content on the web is not affected by this bill,” Stabile said.

    In addition to exempting social media platforms, where most children encounter adult content, he said, the bill would not affect overseas sites, which “is never going to reply to a civil suit in Arizona.”

    “You’re creating low, very ineffective guardrails, and at the same time raising the issue of federal challenges,” he said.

    Stabile said FSC opposes the legislation and has filed federal complaints in other states challenging similar laws. At least eight states have passed statutes mandating age verification for adult sites, according to FSC.

    Stabile also gave the committee members a lesson in how Virtual Private Networks allow kids to do an end run around age verification. It’s as easy as downloading a VPN app.

    “VPNs allow you to appear that you are in another state or another country,” he said. “These are free devices that are allowed online. Forty percent of minors already use VPNs.”

    Which is why FSC supports parents using internet filters that they can download online and control themselves, he said.

    Rep. Analise Ortiz, a Democrat who represents Maryvale and Glendale, said that when she was 12, her school library blocked MySpace, but even at that age, she knew how to use a VPN to navigate around it. She asked Stabile if the bill did anything to protect children.

    “This bill does very little to protect children, and it has really significant downsides for adults trying to access First Amendment-protected content,” Stable said.

    Marilyn Rodriguez, a lobbyist for the ACLU of Arizona, said the organization opposed the bill for the same reasons it opposed SB 1503 in 2023.

    “Multiple Supreme Court cases have held that attempts to block minors’ access to sensitive material on the internet that infringes on adults’ First Amendment rights violate the Constitution,” she said.

    Proponents of the bill at the hearing on Jan. 31 largely framed the legislation as an attempt to shield children from online pornography.

    “The bottom line is we should be actively protecting our children from harmful content in this growing age of technology,” Dunn said when he introduced the bill to the committee.

    Other pro-HB 2586 speakers claimed porn was more addicting than even the hardest illegal drugs, statements that are demonstrably wrong.

    click to enlarge Arizona state Rep. Alex Kolodin

    State Rep. Alex Kolodin expressed concerns about whether age-verification data would be harvested by websites.

    ACTV

    Bill could result in blanket ban on adult websites

    Rep. Alex Kolodin, a Republican from Scottsdale best known for representing the CyberNinjas, struck a libertarian note when he objected to a part of the bill that allows websites to verify age and identity through a service “regularly used by the government.”

    The bill forbids age-verification companies from retaining identifying information after access is granted to a particular website in question, but Kolodin expressed concern that the government would keep that data.

    Peter Gentala, an attorney representing the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, an anti-porn group formerly known as Morality in Media, responded to Kolodin’s concerns by comparing the requirements of the bill to purchasing a bottle of wine online.

    Interestingly, Gentala admitted that in states that have passed age-verification laws, the result is a blanket ban, with sites like PornHub blocking all IP addresses from states where the legislation is in effect.

    All the same, Kolodin wasn’t buying it.

    “I know that the government is not good, and so any bill that asks for me to authorize the government to keep lists that it can use against its political enemies . . . I have a special problem with it,” he said.

    Kolodin voted “present” and said if that section of the bill was not changed, he’d be a no-vote on the House floor. Rep. David Marshal, a Republican from Snowflake, also voted “present.”

    Sen. Wendy Rogers, a Flagstaff Republican, is sponsoring a similar bill in the state Senate. SB 1125 passed out of the Senate Transportation, Technology and Missing Children Committee on Jan. 29 with a similarly unenthusiastic do-pass recommendation — three ayes, two nays and two not voting.

    On Feb. 5, the bill passed out of the Senate Rules Committee on a 4-3 vote. As with HB 2586, the Senate bill has not been scheduled for a floor vote.

    Rogers also sponsored 2023’s failed age verification bill, SB 1503. At the time, she called pornography “a scourge that’s affecting impressionable minds.”

    But later that same year, Rogers got into hot water when she reportedly shared X-rated pics of Hunter Biden on X, which allows minors 13 to 18 to sign up. She later deleted the post, which a fellow Republican legislator called “a mistake.”

    [ad_2]

    Stephen Lemons

    Source link

  • Biden skips visit to South Carolina for presidential primary, stops in L.A. instead

    Biden skips visit to South Carolina for presidential primary, stops in L.A. instead

    [ad_1]

    South Carolina held the first official Democratic presidential primary Saturday. But as the polls closed, President Biden was 2,400 miles away, in Los Angeles, stepping off Air Force One.

    Biden’s victory in the Palmetto State was a foregone conclusion, and his campaign invested significant time there leading up to the primary.

    So Biden headed west. He and First Lady Jill Biden landed at LAX around 3:30 p.m. on Saturday and were greeted by Sen. Alex Padilla and Rep. Maxine Waters before the president choppered to the Santa Monica Airport and his wife left separately for an event.

    It’s unclear what they did while in Los Angeles. They had no public events, and there were no fundraisers known to be taking place.

    Biden had an afternoon campaign meeting at a historic Bel Air estate owned by director George Lucas.

    Biden’s son Hunter lives in Malibu, and Sunday is his 54th birthday. Hunter Biden is a favorite target of the president’s Republican critics and faces federal tax charges.

    The Biden campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

    Republicans predictably grumbled about Biden’s decision not to visit South Carolina on Saturday, which they claimed was a slight by the incumbent.

    “It just goes to show you how much he cares about actually coming and how serious he’s taking it,” said Abby Zilch, spokeswoman for the South Carolina Republican Party. “He and Kamala have spent the last three months coming down to South Carolina, telling South Carolina Democratic voters how much they’re grateful for their party here and how much South Carolina means to them. Yet he was all the way across the country on the day of the Democrats’ first primary.”

    Shortly after Air Force One landed at the Los Angeles International Airport, news broke that Biden had easily won the South Carolina primary.

    The state saved his 2020 presidential campaign after he was trounced in Iowa and New Hampshire and finished a distant second in Nevada. An endorsement from Rep. James E. Clyburn (D-S.C.) and the enthusiastic support of Black voters in the state gave Biden an overwhelming victory and provided momentum heading into the Super Tuesday primaries, which were critical to him becoming the Democratic nominee.

    In return, the Democratic National Committee, at Biden’s behest, overhauled the 2024 nominating calendar, officially making South Carolina the first state to hold a primary. The move was ostensibly meant to give a greater voice to diverse voters in the early stages of the race, compared with caucuses and a primary in overwhelmingly white Iowa and New Hampshire; it was largely viewed as a gift to South Carolina for saving Biden’s 2020 campaign.

    The president, Vice President Kamala Harris and other Democrats, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, have spent considerable time in South Carolina promoting the Biden campaign.

    On Friday, Harris spoke to supporters at South Carolina State University, a historically Black college. After a drumline performed, Harris was introduced by the reigning Miss South Carolina State and touted the administration’s efforts to cancel student loan debt, cap insulin costs and boost the economy.

    “President Biden and I are guided by a fundamental belief: We work for you, the American people. And every day, we fight for you,” she said. “Sadly, however, that is not true for everyone. Case in point: Donald Trump. Former President Trump has made clear time and time again: His fight is not for the people. He fights for himself.”

    Scott Huffmon, a political science professor at Winthrop University in Rock Hill, S.C., noted the frequency of visits by Democrats and their surrogates, including Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff, who visited his home county on Friday.

    “This is repayment for what South Carolina did for Joe Biden, but on a larger scale, South Carolina is so stunningly important to the national Democratic presidential process that keeping this relationship tight and warm is incredibly important,” Huffmon said.

    He added that he doesn’t think most Palmetto State Democrats would have a problem with Biden spending primary night in Los Angeles, given South Carolina’s rightward tilt in the general election. Trump easily carried the state in the 2020 presidential election. The last time a Democrat won there in the general election was 1976, and the candidate was a fellow Southerner, Jimmy Carter.

    “He’s paid his fealty. He’s done his bows and curtsies, and now realism sets in. He’s not going to win South Carolina in November,” Huffmon said. “So the repayment of the debt has happened. Now reality sets in.”

    Indeed, on Sunday, Biden heads to campaign events in Nevada, which is holding its Democratic primary Tuesday and is pivotal to his reelection bid.

    [ad_2]

    Seema Mehta

    Source link

  • Hunter Biden’s lawyers seek dismissal of gun charges by arguing they are politically motivated

    Hunter Biden’s lawyers seek dismissal of gun charges by arguing they are politically motivated

    [ad_1]

    Hunter Biden again asked a judge to dismiss the federal gun case against him on Tuesday, arguing it is politically motivated and key evidence was tested after charges were filed.

    Cocaine residue found on the pouch the president’s son used to hold his gun was only identified last year, after a scuttled plea deal and subsequent indictment, Hunter Biden’s defense attorney said in court documents.

    The pouch was originally found in a trash can and not tested for fingerprints or to determine how long the residue had been there, defense attorney Abbe Lowell wrote. It had been in police evidence storage since 2018, and testing it last year to bolster the case is “’clear evidence’ of selective prosecution,” Lowell argued.

    Prosecutors had been ready to strike a plea deal in the case, but Lowell argued they bowed to “political pressure” after the agreement hit the skids in court and was publicly pilloried by Republicans, including former President Donald Trump, as a “sweetheart deal.”

    Hunter Biden has been charged on nine tax-related charges, including three felony counts, according to court documents filed Thursday

    Prosecutors, meanwhile, have said there’s no evidence the case is politically motivated, while “the strength of the evidence against him is overwhelming.” The charges were “brought in spite of, not because of, any outside noise made by politicians,” they said in court documents this month.

    Hunter Biden has pleaded not guilty to lying about his drug use in October 2018 on a form to buy a gun that he kept for about 11 days. He has acknowledged struggling with an addiction to crack cocaine during that period, but his lawyers have said he didn’t break the law and another non-violent, first-time offender would not have been charged.

    The yearslong investigation had looked ready to wrap up with a plea deal last year, but the agreement fell apart and now the president’s son is facing a possible trial this year while his father, President Joe Biden, is campaigning for another term.

    Hunter was indicted in Delaware after the plea deal broke down following a hearing where a judge who was supposed to approve it instead raised a series of questions. He is also facing tax charges in Los Angeles.

    [ad_2]

    Lindsat Whitehurst | Associated Press

    Source link

  • Former Trump Advisor Peter Navarro Sentenced To 4 Months In Prison By Obama-Appointed Judge For Defying J6 Subpoena

    Former Trump Advisor Peter Navarro Sentenced To 4 Months In Prison By Obama-Appointed Judge For Defying J6 Subpoena

    [ad_1]

    Opinion

    Screenshot: CBS News YouTube Video

    Former senior Trump advisor Peter Navarro was sentenced to four months in prison for defying a subpoena from the House select committee investigating the January 6th protest at the Capitol.

    A federal grand jury indicted Navarro this past summer on two criminal contempt of Congress charges, one for failing to appear at a deposition, and another for refusing to produce documents despite a subpoena by the Committee.

    He was convicted in September 2023 on both counts.

    Prosecutors in the case were seeking a six-month prison sentence claiming that Navarro showed “utter disregard” for the House committee’s probe and “utter contempt for the rule of law.”

    Steve Bannon, another former White House advisor under President Donald Trump, was also convicted on two counts of contempt of Congress last year. 

    On top of his prison sentence, Navarro was ordered to pay a $9,500 fine.

    RELATED: Former Trump Advisor Peter Navarro Indicted For Not Complying With Jan. 6 Committee

    Navarro Heading To Prison – Reaction

    Navarro’s defense centered on his belief that he was protected by executive privilege, which he claimed was invoked by former President Trump. However, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that there was no evidence of Trump formally invoking executive privilege to shield Navarro from the committee.

    And prosecutors fed the judge what some would characterize as a gross inflation of the committee’s worth.

    “The committee was investigating an attack on the very foundation of our democracy,” Assistant U.S. Attorney John Crabb said. “There could be no more serious investigation undertaken by Congress.”

    There was very little of serious value that came from the January 6th committee which has now been found to have destroyed files after disbanding when Republicans took control of the House.

    U.S. District Judge Mehta, who was nominated to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia by former President Barack Obama, claimed that the Justice Department’s pursuit of Navarro was not motivated by politics.

    “It’s unfortunate that the statements mislead. They mislead,” Mehta said. “Nancy Pelosi is not responsible for this prosecution; Joe Biden isn’t responsible for the prosecution. It’s those kinds of statements from someone who knows better … that contributes to why our politics are so divisive.”

    RELATED: Hillary Clinton Taunts Steve Bannon With Message Reminding She’s ‘Never Been Indicted’

    Police State?

    There were some who took exception to Mehta’s contention that the pursuit of Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon over defiance of a politically biased committee of questionable authority was not a political prosecution.

    Especially as the public watches President Biden’s own son openly flaunting his defiance of congressional subpoenas.

    Former White House Advisor Sebastian Gorka slammed the sentencing as evidence of a deep state pursuit of the previous administration.

    “Peter Navarro has been sentenced to 4 months in prison for refusing to testify before Pelosi’s illegal J6 committee,” he wrote. “Hunter Biden is walking around a free man.”

    “The police state has arrived,” he added.

    Trending Politics co-owner Collin Rugg also took aim at Mehta’s specious claims that the Justice Department wasn’t heavily engrossed in political persecution.

    “Selective ‘justice’ strikes again,” he wrote on X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter.

    Navarro indicated that he would continue the appeals process.

    “It is a case that really asks the important question of whether a senior White House aide and alter ego for the president can be compelled to testify by Congress,” he said amidst protesters.

    What do you think about this? Let us know in the comments section.

    Follow Rusty on X

    Governor Greg Abbott Vows To Use ‘Right Of Self-Defense’ To Protect Texas From ‘Lawless’ Biden

    Now is the time to support and share the sources you trust.
    The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites.”

    Rusty Weiss has been covering politics for over 15 years. His writings have appeared in the Daily Caller, Fox… More about Rusty Weiss

    FREE NEWS ALERTS

    Subscribe to receive the most important stories delivered straight to your inbox. Your subscription helps protect independent media.



    By subscribing, you agree to receive emails from ThePoliticalInsider.com and that you’ve read and agree to our Privacy policy and to our terms and conditions.

    FREE NEWS ALERTS

    [ad_2]

    Rusty Weiss

    Source link

  • Hunter Biden to appear for deposition on Feb. 28, House Republicans say

    Hunter Biden to appear for deposition on Feb. 28, House Republicans say

    [ad_1]

    Washington — Hunter Biden will testify behind closed doors on Feb. 28 before the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees, Republicans said Thursday, apparently resolving a dispute over demands for his testimony that had escalated in recent weeks. 

    “His deposition will come after several interviews with Biden family members and associates. We look forward to Hunter Biden’s testimony,” said Reps. James Comer of Kentucky and Jim Jordan of Ohio, the committees’ respective chairmen. 

    Both of the committees had approved contempt of Congress resolutions against President Biden’s son for previously refusing to comply with congressional subpoenas for closed-door testimony amid the GOP’s impeachment inquiry into the president. 

    The full House had been set to vote to hold him in contempt of Congress this week until Hunter Biden’s attorney signaled his willingness to testify.

    Republicans have argued that Hunter Biden’s testimony is a “critical component” of their impeachment investigation as they look into whether the president profited off of his family members’ foreign business dealings while he was vice president. 

    “With the possible exception of President Biden, [Hunter] Biden is the most important witness possessing information about President Biden’s involvement in his son’s business dealings,” Republicans said in a report released last week. 

    Republicans have spent months investigating the president and his son’s business dealings but have yet to uncover any evidence of wrongdoing.

    Hunter Biden has denied that his father was financially involved in his business dealings. 

    He has said that he is willing to answer questions from lawmakers but would only do so in a public hearing. 

    The president’s son made a brief surprise appearance at the Oversight Committee’s hearing last week, where lawmakers debated the contempt resolution. 

    “Hunter Biden’s willful refusal to comply with the committee’s subpoenas is a criminal act,” Comer said at the hearing. “It constitutes contempt of Congress and warrants referral to the appropriate United States Attorney’s Office for prosecution as prescribed by the law.” 

    After leaving the meeting, Abbe Lowell, Hunter Biden’s attorney, said, “Republicans have sought to use him as a surrogate to attack his father.” 

    “And, despite their improper partisan motives, on six occasions — from February to today — we have offered to work with the House committees to see what and how relevant information to any legitimate inquiry could be provided,” Lowell told reporters. 

    Kevin Morris, a Hollywood entertainment attorney, gave closed-door testimony Thursday to the House Oversight and Judiciary committees about his friendship with Hunter Biden, which began after the two met at a political fundraiser in 2019. Morris has said he loaned money to Hunter Biden over the years, which Republicans have alleged, without proof, that Morris has leveraged to gain access and influence in the Biden White House.

    In a statement to CBS News following Thursday’s testimony, Morris defended his actions.

    “In addition to legal advice and friendship, over the course of the last four years, I have loaned Hunter money to help him through his difficulties. When needed, we each have had attorneys separately advise us on these transactions. I am confident Hunter will repay these loans. I did not and do not have any expectations of receiving anything from Hunter’s father or the Biden administration in exchange for helping Hunter, nor have I asked for anything from President Biden or his administration. My only goal was and is to help my friend and client.”

    Melissa Quinn contributed reporting. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jill Biden Whines About How Republicans Are Treating Hunter – ‘What They Are Doing… Is Cruel’

    Jill Biden Whines About How Republicans Are Treating Hunter – ‘What They Are Doing… Is Cruel’

    [ad_1]

    Opinion

    Source YouTube: MSNBC, ABC News

    The First Lady Jill Biden is speaking out in a new interview to whine about how Republicans are treating her son Hunter Biden, accusing them of being “cruel.”

    Jill Defends Hunter – Attacks Republicans

    While being interviewed by MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski, Jill was quick to defend Hunter amidst the onslaught of attacks on him from Republicans.

    “I think what they are doing to Hunter is cruel,” she said, according to The Hill. “And I’m really proud of how Hunter has rebuilt his life after addiction.”

    “You know, I love my son and it’s had — it’s hurt my grandchildren,” she added. “And that’s what I’m so concerned about, that it’s affecting their lives as well.”

    Jill’s interview aired the day after House Republicans voted to advance a contempt of Congress resolution against Hunter, teeing up a full House vote and the potential for criminal charges against the son of the president.

    Related: Hunter Biden Flees Committee Hearing After Nancy Mace Tells Him To His Face ‘You Have No Balls’ and Should Be ‘Arrested Right Here And Right Now’

    Jill Slams Republican Attacks On Her Family

    Jill went on to address the frequent Republican attacks on the Biden family, specifically the rhetoric that is used.

    “I mean, to look at it, what we used to have, and what the other side, the extremists have turned this country into,” Jill said. “I mean, we would never see things like that, say 10 years ago.”

    Of course, Jill made no mention of the way that Democrats have spoken about and treated the former President Donald Trump and his family over the years. When it came to the Trumps, no attack was too below the belt for leftists, and no attempt to destroy their lives went too far. Now that it’s Hunter Biden in the hot seat, however, liberals like Jill are suddenly losing their minds over rhetoric and politically motivated “witch hunts.”

    Related: Viewers Think Jill Biden Had To Race To Lead Confused President Away from Podium

    Jill Defends Joe’s Age

    Elsewhere in the interview, Jill defended her husband Joe Biden from frequent claims that he is too old to be president. He is currently 81 years-old, and he would be 86 by the end of his second term if he is reelected, according to Politico. Despite mass fears over this, Jill claims that Joe’s age is an “asset.”

    “I see his vigor, I see his energy, I see his passion every single day,” said Jill, 72. “He has wisdom, he has experience.”

    “He can do it. And I see Joe every day. I see him out, traveling around this country. I see his vigor, I see his energy, I see his passion every, single day,” she added. “I say his age is an asset. He is experienced. He knows every leader on the world stage. He’s lived history. He knows history. He’s thoughtful in his decisions. He’s is the right man, the right person for the job at this moment in history.”

    Unfortunately for Jill, however, the bulk of the country disagrees with her. Last August, a Wall Street Journal poll found that 73 percent of registered voters considered Joe to be “too old to run for president.” Joe also ended 2023 with an extremely low 39% approval rating.

    Ignoring her husband’s unpopularity, Jill stuck to her guns, claiming it is crucial that he wins this year’s election.

    “We have to win. We must win. We cannot let go of our democracy,” Jill said, to which Brzezinski asked, “And if you don’t?”

    “I don’t know,” Jill replied. “I can’t think about it.”

    Sorry, Jill, but the rest of us can think about it, and there are millions of Americans out there who would love to live in a world where your husband is no longer president!

    Now is the time to support and share the sources you trust.
    The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites.”

    An Ivy leaguer, proud conservative millennial, history lover, writer, and lifelong New Englander, James specializes in the intersection of culture and politics.

    FREE NEWS ALERTS

    Subscribe to receive the most important stories delivered straight to your inbox. Your subscription helps protect independent media.



    By subscribing, you agree to receive emails from ThePoliticalInsider.com and that you’ve read and agree to our Privacy policy and to our terms and conditions.

    FREE NEWS ALERTS

    [ad_2]

    James Conrad

    Source link